Syncope and Risk of Sudden Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Comparative prognostic importance of measures of left atrial structure and function in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the association between measures of left atrial (LA) structure and function, derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), with cardiovascular death or non-fatal heart failure events in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

CMR studies of 580 prospectively recruited patients with DCM in sinus rhythm [median age 54 (interquartile range 44-64) years, 61% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction 42% (30-51%)] were analysed for measures of LA structure [LA maximum volume index (LAVImax) and LA minimum volume index (LAVImin)] and function (LA emptying fraction, LA reservoir strain, LA conduit strain (LACS), and LA booster strain]. Over a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 103 patients (18%) met the primary endpoint. Apart from LACS, each measure of LA structure and function was associated with the primary endpoint after adjusting for other important prognostic variables. The addition of each LA metric to a baseline model containing the same important prognostic covariates improved model discrimination, with LAVImin providing the greatest improvement [C-statistic improvement: 0.702-0.738; χ2 test comparing likelihood ratio P < 0.0001; categorical net reclassification index: 0.210 (95% CI 0.023-0.392)]. Patients in the highest tercile of LAVImin had similar event rates to those with persistent atrial fibrillation. Measures of LA strain did not enhance model discrimination above LA volumetric measures.

CONCLUSION

Measures of LA structure and function offer important prognostic information in patients with DCM and enhance the prediction of adverse outcomes. LA strain was not incremental to volumetric analysis for risk prediction.

Austrian consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited heart disease that is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy unexplained by secondary causes. Based on international epidemiological data, around 20,000-40,000 patients are expected to be affected in Austria. Due to the wide variety of clinical and morphological manifestations the diagnosis can be difficult and the disease therefore often goes unrecognized. HCM is associated with a substantial reduction in quality of life and can lead to sudden cardiac death, especially in younger patients. Early and correct diagnosis, including genetic testing, is essential for comprehensive counselling of patients and their families and for effective treatment. The latter is especially true as an effective treatment of outflow tract obstruction has recently become available in the form of a first in class cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitor, as a noninvasive alternative to established septal reduction therapies. The aim of this Austrian consensus statement is to summarize the recommendations of international guidelines with respect to the genetic background, pathophysiology, diagnostics and management in the context of the Austrian healthcare system and resources, and to present them in easy to understand algorithms.

Cardiomyopathy and Sudden Cardiac Death: Bridging Clinical Practice with Cutting-Edge Research

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in cardiomyopathies such as hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), non-dilated left ventricular (NDLCM), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) remains a crucial but complex clinical challenge, especially among younger populations. Accurate risk stratification is hampered by the variability in phenotypic expression and genetic heterogeneity inherent in these conditions. This article explores the multifaceted strategies for preventing SCD across a spectrum of cardiomyopathies and emphasizes the integration of clinical evaluations, genetic insights, and advanced imaging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in assessing SCD risks. Advanced imaging, particularly CMR, not only enhances our understanding of myocardial architecture but also serves as a cornerstone for identifying at-risk patients. The integration of new research findings with current practices is essential for advancing patient care and improving survival rates among those at the highest risk of SCD. This review calls for ongoing research to refine risk stratification models and enhance the predictive accuracy of both clinical and imaging techniques in the management of cardiomyopathies.

Percutaneous endocardial septal radiofrequency ablation on syncope in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a short-term safety and efficacy study

Background

Syncope is a serious consequence in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Percutaneous endocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PESA) has emerged as a promising intervention to alleviate symptoms and enhance the quality of life for HOCM patients. However, little is known about the effects of PESA on syncope in HOCM. The authors aimed to study the effects of PESA on syncope in patients with HOCM.

Materials and methods

Nineteen patients with HOCM and syncope were enrolled. The left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) of the patients was more than 50 mmHg despite medication. The participants underwent PESA under the guidance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) combined with a three-dimensional electrophysiological mapping system. The patients were followed for 3 (3-5.5) months.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 54.8±13.7 years. Out of the 19 participants, 7 (37%) were females. During the follow-up, the syncope was completely alleviated in 14 patients (73.7%) or the syncope episodes were reduced greater than or equal to 80% in 16 patients (84.2%). The mean NYHA functional class significantly improved from 2.2±0.7 at baseline to 1.7±0.6 during follow-up (P=0.002). The LVOTG and septal thickness showed a decreasing trend from baseline to follow-up (LVOTG: P=0.083, septal thickness: P=0.086).

Conclusion

The authors' investigation provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of PESA in reducing syncope episodes in patients with HOCM.

Vigorous Exercise in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

ABSTRACT

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a genetic heart condition occurring in up to 1 in 200 patients in the United States, many of whom are young and otherwise healthy. This condition puts those affected at increased risk for adverse cardiac outcomes, including sudden cardiac arrest and death, with particular concern for this to occur during exercise and other forms of exertion. Recent studies aimed at evaluating the risk of exercise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients have suggested that moderate and even vigorous exercise may be safe for certain patients. Clinical guidelines are changing to reflect this recent information and to encourage a shared decision-making approach, which can allow more hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients to participate in health-promoting exercise activities.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an important cause of heart failure and arrhythmias, including sudden death, with a major impact on the healthcare system. Genetic causes and different phenotypes are now increasingly being identified for this condition. In addition, specific medications, such as myosin inhibitors, have been recently shown as potentially able to modify its symptoms, hemodynamic abnormalities and clinical course. Our article aims to provide a comprehensive outline of the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the current era.

Role of arrhythmic phenotype in prognostic stratification and management of dilated cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with arrhythmic phenotype combines phenotypical aspects of DCM and predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias, typical of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The definition of DCM with arrhythmic phenotype is not universally accepted, leading to uncertainty in the identification of high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of arrhythmic phenotype in risk stratification and the correlation of arrhythmic markers with high-risk arrhythmogenic gene variants in DCM patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre study, DCM patients with available genetic testing were analysed. The following arrhythmic markers, present at baseline or within 1 year of enrolment, were tested: unexplained syncope, rapid non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ≥1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h or ≥50 ventricular couplets/24 h. LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, and desmosomal pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were considered high-risk arrhythmogenic genes. The study endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). We studied 742 DCM patients (45 ± 14 years, 34% female, 410 [55%] with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35%). During a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range 1.6-12.1), unexplained syncope and NSVT were the only arrhythmic markers associated with SCD/MVA, and the combination of the two markers carried a significant additive risk of SCD/MVA, incremental to LVEF and New York Heart Association class. The probability of identifying an arrhythmogenic genotype rose from 8% to 30% if both early syncope and NSVT were present.

CONCLUSION

In DCM patients, the combination of early detected NSVT and unexplained syncope increases the risk of life-threatening arrhythmic outcomes and can aid the identification of carriers of malignant arrhythmogenic genotypes.

Predictive value of a comprehensive atrial assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: keep it simple

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide a multi-parametric evaluation of left atrial (LA) size and function. A complete CMR-based LA assessment might improve the risk stratification of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We performed a comprehensive CMR-based evaluation of LA size and function, in order to assess the prognostic impact of specific LA parameters in DCM. Secondary analysis of a prospective registry (UHSM-CMR study, NCT02326324) including 648 consecutive patients with DCM and CMR evaluation of LA area and LA length. Of these, 456 had complete LA assessment covering reservoir, conduit and booster pump function and including LA reservoir strain evaluated with feature tracking. The heart failure (HF) endpoint included HF hospitalizations, HF death and heart transplant. The arrhythmic endpoint included ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (sustained or treated by implantable defibrillator) and sudden death (SD). At median follow-up of 23 months, 34 patients reached the HF endpoint; in a multivariable model including NYHA class and LVEF, LA length had incremental predictive value. LA length ≥ 69 mm was the best cut-off to predict HF events (adjusted HR 2.3, p = 0.03). Among the 456 patients with comprehensive LA assessment, only LA length was independently associated with the HF endpoint after adjusting for LVEF and NYHA class. By contrast, no LA parameter independently predicted the arrhythmic risk. In DCM patients, LA length is an independent predictor of HF events, showing stronger association than other more complex parameters of LA function. No atrial parameter predicts the risk of VA and SD.

The Paradigm of Sudden Death Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common and, often, inherited cardiac disease, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and, perhaps, most visibly as a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young. However, HCM is now more accurately considered a treatable disease with management options that significantly alter its clinical course. This is particularly true for SCD because the penetration of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators into HCM practice enables primary prevention device therapy that reliably terminates potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3% to 4%/year). This therapeutic advance is largely responsible for >10-fold decrease in the overall disease-related mortality to 0.5%/year, independent of patient age. A guideline-based clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, which included variables identifiable with cardiac magnetic resonance: ≥1 risk markers judged major within the clinical profile of an individual patient, associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making, can be sufficient to consider the recommendation of a prophylactic defibrillator implant. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decisions using the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association traditional major risk marker strategy are associated with a 95% sensitivity for identifying those patients who subsequently experience appropriate therapy, albeit often 5 to 10+ years after implant but without heart failure deterioration or death after a device intervention. A mathematical SCD risk score proposed by European Society of Cardiology is associated with a relatively low sensitivity (33%) for predicting and preventing SCD events but with potential for less device overtreatment.

Performance of 2020 AHA/ACC HCM Guidelines and Incremental Value of Myocardial Strain for Predicting SCD

Background

The 2020 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines for sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) need further international validation.

Objectives

Performance of the guidelines and the incremental value of myocardial strain for predicting SCD in HCM were investigated.

Methods

In 1,416 HCM patients, SCD risk was stratified according to the 2020 AHA/ACC and 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) were measured. The main outcome consisted of SCD events.

Results

Overall, 29.1% had major risk factors (RFs), and 14.7% had nonmajor RFs in the absence of major RFs; estimated 5-year SCD event rates were 6.8% and 2.3%, respectively. SCD risk was significantly increased in the former group but not in the latter. When stratified by the number of RFs, 5-year SCD event rates were 1.9%, 3.0%, 4.9%, and 18.4% for patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more RFs, respectively. SCD risk was elevated in patients with multiple RFs but not in those with a single RF. Performance of the AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines did not differ significantly over 10 years (5-year time-dependent area under the curve: 0.677 vs 0.724; P = 0.235). Decreased LV GLS and LARS were independently associated with SCD events with optimal cutoffs of LV GLS <13% and LARS <21%. Adding LV GLS and LARS to the guidelines had incremental predictive value.

Conclusions

The 2020 AHA/ACC guidelines were predictive of SCD events with modest power in a large Asian HCM cohort. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are reasonable in patients with multiple RFs, and consideration of myocardial strain can improve SCD prediction.

Prolonged mHealth-Based Arrhythmia Monitoring in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM-PATCH): Protocol for a Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular arrhythmias and other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmias is mandatory to assess the individual SCD risk, but long-term electrocardiography (ECG) is rarely performed in routine clinical practice. Intensified monitoring may increase the detection rate of ventricular arrhythmias and identify more patients with an increased SCD risk who are potential candidates for the primary prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. To date, reliable data on the clinical benefit of prolonged arrhythmia monitoring in patients with HCM are rare.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study aims to measure the prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HCM observed by mobile health (mHealth)-based continuous rhythm monitoring over 14 days compared to standard practice (a 24- and 48-h long-term ECG). The frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in this 14-day period is compared with the frequency in the first 24 or 48 hours for the same patient (intraindividual comparison).

METHODS

Following the sample size calculation, 34 patients with a low or intermediate risk for SCD, assessed by the HCM Risk-SCD calculator, will need to be recruited in this single-center cohort study between June 2023 and February 2024. All patients will receive an ECG patch that records their heart activity over 14 days. In addition, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing data will be integrated into risk stratification. All patients will be asked to complete questionnaires about their symptoms; previous therapy; family history; and, at the end of the study, their experience with the ECG patch-based monitoring.

RESULTS

The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Impact of a Prolonged mHealth-Based Arrhythmia Monitoring by Single-Channel ECG (HCM-PATCH) study investigates the prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (ie, ≥3 consecutive ventricular beats at a rate of 120 beats per minute, lasting for <30 seconds) in low- to intermediate-risk patients with HCM (according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator) with additional mHealth-based prolonged rhythm monitoring. The study was funded by third-party funding from the Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe of Bielefeld University in June 2023 and approved by the institutional review board in May 2023. Data collection began in June 2023, and we plan to end the study in February 2024. Of the 34 patients, 26 have been recruited. Data analysis has not yet taken place. Publication of the results is planned for the fall of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged mHealth-based rhythm monitoring could lead to differences in the prevalence of arrhythmias compared to 24- and 48-hour long-term ECGs. This may lead to improved identification of patients at high risk and trigger therapeutic interventions that may provide better protection from SCD or atrial fibrillation-related complications such as embolic stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00032144; https://tinyurl.com/498bkrx8.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/52035.

Sudden cardiac death in childhood RASopathy-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Validation of the HCM risk-kids model and predictors of events

BACKGROUND

RASopathies account for nearly 20% of cases of childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Sudden cardiac death (SCD) occurs in patients with RASopathy-associated HCM, but the risk factors for SCD have not been systematically evaluated.

AIM

To validate the HCM Risk-Kids SCD risk prediction model in children with RASopathy-associated HCM and investigate potential specific SCD predictors in this population.

METHODS

Validation of HCM Risk-Kids was performed in a retrospective cohort of 169 patients with a RASopathy-associated HCM from 15 international paediatric cardiology centres. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used for missing values related to the HCM Risk-Kids parameters.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (6.5%) experienced a SCD or equivalent event at a median age of 12.5 months (IQR 7.7-28.64). The calculated SCD/equivalent event incidence was 0.78 (95% CI 0.43-1.41) per 100 patient years. Six patients (54.54%) with an event were in the low-risk category according to the HCM Risk-Kids model. Harrell's C index was 0.60, with a sensitivity of 9.09%, specificity of 63.92%, positive predictive value of 1.72%, and negative predictive value of 91%; with a poor distinction between the different risk groups. Unexplained syncope (HR 42.17, 95% CI 10.49-169.56, p < 0.001) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (HR 5.48, 95% CI 1.58-19.03, p < 0.007) were predictors of SCD on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Unexplained syncope and the presence of NSVT emerge as predictors for SCD in children with RASopathy-associated HCM. The HCM Risk-Kids model may not be appropriate to use in this population, but larger multicentre collaborative studies are required to investigate this further.

Incidence, risk assessment and prevention of sudden cardiac death in cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, mainly due to the development of heart failure and increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Despite improvement in survival with contemporary treatment, SCD remains an important cause of mortality in cardiomyopathies. It occurs at a rate ranging between 0.15% and 0.7% per year (depending on the cardiomyopathy), which significantly surpasses SCD incidence in the age- and sex-matched general population. The risk of SCD is affected by multiple factors including the aetiology, genetic basis, age, sex, physical exertion, the extent of myocardial disease severity, conduction system abnormalities, and electrical instability, as measured by various metrics. Over the past decades, the knowledge on the mechanisms and risk factors for SCD has substantially improved, allowing for a better-informed risk stratification. However, unresolved issues still challenge the guidance of SCD prevention in patients with cardiomyopathies. In this review, we aim to provide an in-depth discussion of the contemporary concepts pertinent to understanding the burden, risk assessment and prevention of SCD in cardiomyopathies (dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, hypertrophic, arrhythmogenic right ventricular, and restrictive). The review first focuses on SCD incidence in cardiomyopathies and then summarizes established and emerging risk factors for life-threatening arrhythmias/SCD. Finally, it discusses validated approaches to the risk assessment and evidence-based measures for SCD prevention in cardiomyopathies, pointing to the gaps in evidence and areas of uncertainties that merit future clarification.

Mavacamten: a first-in-class myosin inhibitor for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Mavacamten is a first-in-class, targeted, cardiac-specific myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with symptomatic New York Heart Association Classes II and III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Mavacamten was developed to target the hyper-contractile phenotype, which plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of the disease. In Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, mavacamten was well tolerated, reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradients, improved exercise capacity and symptoms, and was associated with improvements in other clinically relevant parameters, such as patient-reported outcomes and circulating biomarkers. In addition, treatment with mavacamten was associated with evidence of favourable cardiac remodelling in multi-modality imaging studies. Mavacamten substantially reduced guideline eligibility for septal reduction therapy candidates with oHCM and drug-refractory symptoms. In this article, the available efficacy and safety data from completed and ongoing clinical studies of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic oHCM are reviewed. Longer term extension studies may help address questions related to the positioning of mavacamten in current oHCM management algorithms, interactions with background therapy, as well as the potential for disease modification beyond symptomatic relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Validation of the Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death in Chinese Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Accurate identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) event is challenging. The objective of this study was to validate the three SCD risk stratifications recommended by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline, the 2020 American Heart Association /American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guideline, and the 2022 ESC guideline in Chinese patients with HCM. Our study population are made up of a cohort of 856 HCM patients without prior SCD events. The endpoint was defined as SCD or equivalent events (successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest or appropriate ICD shock for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation). During a median follow-up of 43 months, SCD endpoints occurred in 44 (5.1%) patients. A total of 34 (77.3%) patients suffering from SCD events were classified correctly into high-risk groups by the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline, 27(61.4%) by the 2022 ESC guideline, and 13 (29.6%) by the 2014 ESC guideline. The C-statistic of the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60-0.76), which performed better than the 2022 ESC guideline (0.65: 95% CI, 0.56-0.73), and the 2014 ESC guideline (0.58: 95% CI, 0.48-0.67). The 2020 AHA/ACC guideline displayed better discrimination for SCD risk stratification in Chinese HCM patients than the other two guidelines, with a higher sensitivity but lower specificity.

Prognostic Value of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Primary Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background and Objectives: Mitral valve pathology and mitral regurgitation (MR) are very common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and the evaluation of mitral valve anatomy and degree of MR is important in patients with HCM. The aim of our study was to examine the potential influence of moderate or moderately severe MR on the prognosis, clinical presentation, and structural characteristics of HCM patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective study examined 176 patients diagnosed with primary asymmetric HCM. According to the severity of the MR, the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 116) with no/trace or mild MR and Group 2 (n = 60) with moderate or moderately severe MR. All patients had clinical and echocardiographic examinations, as well as a 24 h Holter ECG. Results: Group 2 had significantly more often the presence of the obstructive type of HCM (p < 0.001), syncope (p = 0.030), NYHA II class (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.023). Also, Group 2 had an enlarged left atrial dimension (p < 0.001), left atrial volume index (p < 0.001), and indirectly measured systolic pressure in the right ventricle (p < 0.001). Patients with a higher grade of MR had a significantly higher E/e' (p < 0.001) and, as a result, higher values of Nt pro BNP values (p < 0.001) compared to Group 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the event-free survival rate during a median follow-up of 88 (IQR 40-112) months was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (84% vs. 45% at 8 years; log-rank 20.4, p < 0.001). After adjustment for relevant confounders, the presence of moderate or moderately severe MR remained as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (HR 2.788; 95% CI 1.221-6.364, p = 0.015). Conclusions: The presence of moderate or moderately severe MR was associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes in HCM patients.

Sudden Death Risk Assessment in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Across the Lifespan: Reconciling the American and European Approaches

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent inherited cardiac disease. Since the modern description of HCM more than seven decades ago, great focus has been placed on preventing its most catastrophic complication: sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have been recognized to provide effective prophylactic therapy. Over the years, two leading societies, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC), have proposed risk stratification models to assess SCD in adults. European guidelines rely on a risk calculator, the HCM Risk-SCD, while American guidelines propose a stand-alone risk factor approach. Recently, risk prediction models were also developed in the pediatric population. This article reviews the latest recommendations on the risk stratification of SCD in HCM and summarises current indications for ICD use.

Art and science of risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Current state, unknowns, and future directions

The progress in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) over the last several decades has resulted in great improvements in quality of life and overall survival for HCM patients. Yet, sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is among the common causes of HCM-related mortality. SCD risk stratification is a central and often challenging domain in the care of the HCM patient. Distinguishing the individuals most likely to benefit from a primary prevention implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) from those truly at a low risk of SCD in whom an ICD is not necessary is a nuanced process. Clinicians need to carefully balance the potential benefit and risks of ICDs, particularly in young patients. Because of intense investigations in diverse HCM cohorts globally, two main approaches to SCD risk stratification in HCM have emerged, one based on major SCD risk factors and one based on a mathematically derived risk score. In this overview, we discuss the current state, latest advances and remaining unknowns about established and novel markers of risk of SCD in HCM. We also review how the risk factor- and risk score-based assessments can and should be used in conjunction to enhance rather than contradict each other in facilitating informed ICD decision-making in contemporary clinical practice.

Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Objectives

To determine whether ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) changes maximal wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and if it improves correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Patients and Methods

A total of 107 patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary referral center between July 10, 2014, and August 31, 2017, and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with and without UEA and MRI. Maximal WT measurements were compared, and variability among the 3 modalities was evaluated using a simple linear regression analysis and paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots. Interobserver variability for each technique was assessed.

Results

Most (63%) of cardiac imagers found UEA helpful in determining maximal WT by TTE, with 49% reporting change in WT. Of 52 patients where UEA changed WT measurement, 32 (62%) reported an increase and 20 (38%) reported a decrease in WT. The UEA did not alter the median discrepancy in WT between MRI and TTE. However, where UEA increased reported WT, the difference between MRI and TTE improved in 79% of cases (P=.001) from 2.0-0.5mm. In those with scar on MRI, UEA improved agreement of WT between TTE and MRI compared with that of TTE without UEA (79% vs 39%; P=.011). Interclass correlation coefficient for WT for TTE without UEA, with UEA, and MRI was 0.84; (95% CI, 0.61-0.92), 0.88; (95%CI, 0.82-0.92), and 0.97; (95%CI, 0.96-0.98), respectively.

Conclusion

Although use of UEA did not eliminate differences in WT discrepancy between modalities, the addition of UEA to TTE aided in WT determination and improved correlation with MRI in those with greater WT and in all patients with myocardial scars.

Vigorous Exercise in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Importance

Whether vigorous intensity exercise is associated with an increase in risk of ventricular arrhythmias in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown.

Objective

To determine whether engagement in vigorous exercise is associated with increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias and/or mortality in individuals with HCM. The a priori hypothesis was that participants engaging in vigorous activity were not more likely to have an arrhythmic event or die than those who reported nonvigorous activity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was an investigator-initiated, prospective cohort study. Participants were enrolled from May 18, 2015, to April 25, 2019, with completion in February 28, 2022. Participants were categorized according to self-reported levels of physical activity: sedentary, moderate, or vigorous-intensity exercise. This was a multicenter, observational registry with recruitment at 42 high-volume HCM centers in the US and internationally; patients could also self-enroll through the central site. Individuals aged 8 to 60 years diagnosed with HCM or genotype positive without left ventricular hypertrophy (phenotype negative) without conditions precluding exercise were enrolled.

Exposures

Amount and intensity of physical activity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary prespecified composite end point included death, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest, arrhythmic syncope, and appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. All outcome events were adjudicated by an events committee blinded to the patient's exercise category.

Results

Among the 1660 total participants (mean [SD] age, 39 [15] years; 996 male [60%]), 252 (15%) were classified as sedentary, and 709 (43%) participated in moderate exercise. Among the 699 individuals (42%) who participated in vigorous-intensity exercise, 259 (37%) participated competitively. A total of 77 individuals (4.6%) reached the composite end point. These individuals included 44 (4.6%) of those classified as nonvigorous and 33 (4.7%) of those classified as vigorous, with corresponding rates of 15.3 and 15.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis of the primary composite end point, individuals engaging in vigorous exercise did not experience a higher rate of events compared with the nonvigorous group with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01. The upper 95% 1-sided confidence level was 1.48, which was below the prespecified boundary of 1.5 for noninferiority.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that among individuals with HCM or those who are genotype positive/phenotype negative and are treated in experienced centers, those exercising vigorously did not experience a higher rate of death or life-threatening arrhythmias than those exercising moderately or those who were sedentary. These data may inform discussion between the patient and their expert clinician around exercise participation.

Arrhythmic Risk Stratification among Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a cardiac muscle disorder characterized by generally asymmetric abnormal hypertrophy of the left ventricle without abnormal loading conditions (such as hypertension or valvular heart disease) accounting for the left ventricular wall thickness or mass. The incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM patients is about 1% yearly in adults, but it is far higher in adolescence. HCM is the most frequent cause of death in athletes in the Unites States of America. HCM is an autosomal-dominant genetic cardiomyopathy, and mutations in the genes encoding sarcomeric proteins are identified in 30-60% of cases. The presence of this genetic mutation carries more than 2-fold increased risk for all outcomes, including ventricular arrhythmias. Genetic and myocardial substrate, including fibrosis and intraventricular dispersion of conduction, ventricular hypertrophy and microvascular ischemia, increased myofilament calcium sensitivity and abnormal calcium handling, all play a role as arrhythmogenic determinants. Cardiac imaging studies provide important information for risk stratification. Transthoracic echocardiography can be helpful to evaluate left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, LV outflow-tract gradient and left atrial size. Additionally, cardiac magnetic resonance can evaluate the prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement, which when higher than 15% of LV mass is a prognostic maker of SCD. Age, family history of SCD, syncope and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia at Holter ECG have also been validated as independent prognostic markers of SCD. Arrhythmic risk stratification in HCM requires careful evaluation of several clinical aspects. Symptoms combined with electrocardiogram, cardiac imaging tools and genetic counselling are the modern cornerstone for proper risk stratification.

Indications and management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sudden cardiac death is the most common mode of death during childhood and adolescence in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and identifying those individuals at highest risk is a major aspect of clinical care. The mainstay of preventative therapy is the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, which has been shown to be effective at terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but can be associated with substantial morbidity. Accurate identification of those children at highest risk who would benefit most from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation while minimising the risk of complications is, therefore, essential. This position statement, on behalf of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), reviews the currently available data on established and proposed risk factors for sudden cardiac death in childhood-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and current approaches for risk stratification in this population. It also provides guidance on identification of individuals at risk of sudden cardiac death and optimal management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and adolescents with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

From the phenotype to precision medicine: an update on the cardiomyopathies diagnostic workflow

Cardiomyopathies are disease of the cardiac muscle largely due to genetic alterations of proteins with 'structural' or 'functional' roles within the cardiomyocyte, going from the regulation of contraction-relaxation, metabolic and energetic processes to ionic fluxes. Modifications occurring to these proteins are responsible, in the vast majority of cases, for the phenotypic manifestations of the disease, including hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic and restrictive cardiomyopathies. Secondary nonhereditary causes to be excluded include infections, toxicity from drugs or alcohol or medications, hormonal imbalance and so on. Obtaining a phenotypic definition and an etiological diagnosis is becoming increasingly relevant and feasible, thanks to the availability of new tailored treatments and the diagnostic advancements made particularly in the field of genetics. This is, for example, the case for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, Fabry disease or dilated cardiomyopathies due to laminopathies. For these diseases, specific medications have been developed, and a more tailored arrhythmic risk stratification guides the implantation of a defibrillator. In addition, new medications directly targeting the altered protein responsible for the phenotype are becoming available (including the myosin inhibitors mavacantem and aficamten, monoclonal antibodies against Ras-MAPK, genetic therapies for sarcoglycanopathies), thus making a precision medicine approach less unrealistic even in the field of cardiomyopathies. For these reasons, a contemporary approach to cardiomyopathies must consider diagnostic algorithms founded on the clinical suspicion of the disease and developed towards a more precise phenotypic definition and etiological diagnosis, based on a multidisciplinary methodology putting together specialists from different disciplines, facilities for advanced imaging testing and genetic and anatomopathological competencies.

Differing strategies for sudden death prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sudden death (SD) has traditionally been the most visible and feared complication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Substantial progress in reducing the occurrence of these catastrophic events represents a new paradigm in disease management. Prevention of SD in HCM has resulted from introduction of primary prevention ICDs that reliably terminate life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, as well as a matured risk stratification algorithm capable of reliably identifying those patients at highest risk. This initiative has been a major determinant of reducing HCM-related mortality to a low rate of 0.5%/year. In such a heterogeneous heart disease as HCM, no perfect risk stratification strategy is possible, and available approaches differ in terms of sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with SD risk. Major cardiovascular societies, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology in the USA and European Society of Cardiology in Europe have promoted different risk stratification guidelines creating the potential for judging SD risk in a given HCM patient differently based on commitment to a particular societal guideline or country of residence. In this review, we provide a critical but balanced assessment of these two divergent SD prevention strategies with regard to their respective strengths and weaknesses, as a guide to clinicians directly engaged in this important management issue.

Registered prodromal symptoms of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among patients calling the medical helpline services

Background Early identification of warning symptoms among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients remains challenging. Thus, we examined the registered prodromal symptoms of patients who called medical helpline services within 30-days before OHCA. Methods Patients unwitnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) aged ≥18 years during their OHCA were identified from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry (2014-2018) and linked to phone records from the 24-h emergency helpline (1-1-2) and out-of-hours medical helpline (1813-Medical Helpline) in Copenhagen before the arrest. The registered symptoms were categorized into chest pain; breathing problems; central nervous system (CNS)-related/unconsciousness; abdominal/back/urinary; psychiatric/addiction; infection/fever; trauma/exposure; and unspecified (diverse from the beforementioned categories). Analyses were divided by the time-period of calls (0-7 days/8-30 days preceding OHCA) and call type (1-1-2/1813-Medical Helpline). Results Of all OHCA patients, 18% (974/5442) called helpline services (males 56%, median age 76 years[Q1-Q3:65-84]). Among these, 816 had 1145 calls with registered symptoms. The most common symptom categories (except for unspecified, 33%) were breathing problems (17%), trauma/exposure (17%), CNS/unconsciousness (15%), abdominal/back/urinary (12%), and chest pain (9%). Most patients (61%) called 1813-Medical Helpline, especially for abdominal/back/urinary (17%). Patients calling 1-1-2 had breathing problems (24%) and CNS/unconsciousness (23%). Nearly half of the patients called within 7 days before their OHCA, and CNS/unconsciousness (19%) was the most registered. The unspecified category remained the most common during both time periods (32%;33%) and call type (24%;39%). Conclusions Among patients who called medical helplines services up to 30-days before their OHCA, besides symptoms being highly varied (unspecified (33%)), breathing problems (17%) were the most registered symptom-specific category.

Updated risk assessments for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disease associated with a risk of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Assessment of the SCD risk is crucial for its clinical management, and there has been considerable interest in developing risk stratification strategies. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving treatment for patients with HCM who are at a high-risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD. However, a substantial number of ICD recipients experience adverse effects arising from inappropriate device therapy and implant-related complications. This has led to numerous investigations of the risk of SCD and the indications for ICD implantation. American guidelines were recently updated to include new risk markers, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction, apical aneurysm, and extensive late gadolinium enhancement, while European guidelines recommend individualized estimated 5-year SCD risk assessment models. Studies evaluating other risk factors for SCD in patients with HCM have also been published. Drawing on recent guidelines and publications on clinical risk factors, we focus this review on updated risk assessments for SCD with ICD therapy in patients with HCM.

Cardiovascular outcomes by time-varying New York Heart Association class among patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Assess the relationship between New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Optum Market Clarity database with linked claims and electronic health records. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with obstructive HCM and ≥1 NYHA class assessment after first HCM diagnosis were eligible (selection period: 2007-2021). Thirteen outcomes were assessed following the index date (first documented NYHA class assessment after first HCM diagnosis in the study period): all-cause mortality; first occurrences of all-cause hospitalization; CV-related hospitalization; primary ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); myocardial infarction (MI); deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE); and major adverse CV event (MACE); as well as first incident events of atrial fibrillation or flutter; primary ischemic stroke or TIA; heart failure; acute MI; DVT/PE; and a composite endpoint of pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Their associations with the index NYHA class were described using the Kaplan-Meier method (mortality) or cumulative incidence functions (other outcomes). Hazard ratios between NYHA class over time and outcomes were evaluated using time-varying Cox models, adjusting for age at first observed HCM diagnosis, sex, and race.

RESULTS

Among 4,631 eligible patients, the mean age was 59 years at the first observed HCM diagnosis (female, 47%; White, 77%). The risks of all outcomes increased with worse (higher) index NYHA class and worsening NYHA class over time. Deterioration in the NYHA class from the index date was associated with increased risks of outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

The study population may not be representative of all patients with obstructive HCM in the real world. Documented NYHA classes may not fully reflect the longitudinal variation of NYHA class for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Worsening NYHA class was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality and CV outcomes in obstructive HCM.

Implantable defibrillators in primary prevention of genetic arrhythmias. A shocking choice?

Many previously unexplained life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in young individuals are now recognized to be genetic in nature and are ascribed to a growing number of distinct inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. These include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), and short QT syndrome. Because of their lower frequency compared to coronary disease, risk factors for SCD are not very precise in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. As randomized studies are generally non-feasible and may even be ethically unjustifiable, especially in the presence of effective therapies, the risk assessment of malignant arrhythmic events such as SCD, cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions, or ICD therapy on fast VT/VF to guide ICD implantation is based on observational data and expert consensus. In this document, we review risk factors for SCD and indications for ICD implantation and additional therapies. What emerges is that, allowing for some important differences between cardiomyopathies and channelopathies, there is a growing and disquieting trend to create, and then use, semi-automated systems (risk scores, risk calculators, and, to some extent, even guidelines) which then dictate therapeutic choices. Their common denominator is a tendency to favour ICD implantation, sometime with reason, sometime without it. This contrasts with the time-honoured approach of selecting, among the available therapies, the best option (ICDs included) based on the clinical judgement for the specific patient and after having assessed the protection provided by optimal medical treatment.

Syncope in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (part I): An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To describe the proportion of patients with syncope among those affected by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the relevance of syncope as risk factor for sudden cardiac death and life-threatening arrhythmic events.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Systematic review of original articles that assessed syncope in HCM patients. Literature search of PubMed including all English publications from 1973 to 2021.We found 57 articles for a total of 21.791 patients; of these, 14 studies reported on arrhythmic events in the follow-up. Syncope was reported in 15.8% (3.452 of 21.791) patients. It was considered unexplained in 91% of cases. Life-threatening arrhythmic events occurred in 3.6% of non-syncopal patients and in 7.7% of syncopal patients during a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. A relative risk of 1.99 (95%CI 1.39 to 2.86) was estimated for syncope patients by the random effect model using Haldane continuity correction for 0 events.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current practice, the cause of syncope remained unexplained in most patients affected by HCM. The management of patients seems mainly driven by risk stratification rather than identification of the aetiology of syncope. There is a need of precise instructions how to apply the recommendations of current guidelines to this disease, which tests are indicated and how to interpret their findings. The protocol was registered in Prospero (ID: 275963).

Recommendations for Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy in the absence of other potentially causative cardiac, systemic, syndromic, or metabolic diseases. Symptoms can be related to a range of pathophysiologic mechanisms including left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with or without significant mitral regurgitation, diastolic dysfunction with heart failure with preserved and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, autonomic dysfunction, ischemia, and arrhythmias. Appropriate understanding and utilization of multimodality imaging is fundamental to accurate diagnosis as well as longitudinal care of patients with HCM. Resting and stress imaging provide comprehensive and complementary information to help clarify mechanism(s) responsible for symptoms such that appropriate and timely treatment strategies may be implemented. Advanced imaging is relied upon to guide certain treatment options including septal reduction therapy and mitral valve repair. Using both clinical and imaging parameters, enhanced algorithms for sudden cardiac death risk stratification facilitate selection of HCM patients most likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

The Relationship between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Assessed Replacement and Interstitial Fibrosis and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) creates the electrical basis for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between interstitial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and nsVT in HCM. A total of 50 HCM patients underwent CMR with a 3 T scanner to determine the presence of replacement fibrosis expressed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and interstitial fibrosis expressed by native T₁, post-contrast T₁, and extracellular volume (ECV). The incidence of nsVT was assessed by Holter monitoring. We detected nsVT in 14 (28%) out of 50 HCM patients. Replacement fibrosis expressed by LGE was present in 37 (74%) patients and only showed a trend towards a differentiation between the groups with and without nsVT (p = 0.07). However, the extent of LGE was clearly higher in the nsVT group (3.8 ± 4.9% vs. 7.94 ± 4.5%, p = 0.002) and was an independent predictor of nsVT in a multivariable regression analysis (OR 1.2; 95%CI 1.02-1.4; p = 0.02). No relationship was observed between interstitial fibrosis and nsVT. To conclude, it was found that it is not the mere presence but the actual extent of LGE that determines the occurrence of nsVT in HCM patients; the role of interstitial fibrosis remains unclear.

Sudden cardiac death in cardiomyopathies: acting upon "acceptable" risk in the personalized medicine era

Patients with cardiomyopathies are confronted with the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) throughout their lifetime. Despite the fact that SCD is relatively rare, prognostic stratification is an integral part of physician-patient discussion, with the goal of risk modification and prevention. The current approach is based on a concept of "acceptable risk." However, there are intrinsic problems with an algorithm-based approach to risk management, magnified by the absence of robust evidence underlying clinical decision support tools, which can make high- versus low-risk classifications arbitrary. Strategies aimed at risk reduction range from selecting patients for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to disqualification from competitive sports. These clinical options, especially when implying the use of finite financial resources, are often delivered from the physician's perspective citing decision-making algorithms. When the burden of intervention-related risks or financial costs is deemed higher than an "acceptable risk" of SCD, the patient's perspective may not be appropriately considered. Designating a numeric threshold of "acceptable risk" has ethical implications. One could reasonably ask "acceptable to whom?" In an era when individual choice and autonomy are pillars of the physician-patient relationship, the subjective aspects of perceived risk should be acknowledged and be part of shared decision-making. This is particularly true when the lack of a strong scientific evidence base makes a dichotomous algorithm-driven approach suboptimal for unmitigated translation to clinical practice.

Risk factors of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in younger people and athletes. It is crucial to identify the risk factors for SCD in individuals with HCM. This review, based on recent systematic literature studies, will focus on the risk factors for SCD in patients with HCM.

RECENT FINDINGS

An increasing number of studies have further explored the risk factors for SCD in patients with HCM, and new risk markers have emerged accordingly. In addition, more accurate SCD risk estimation and stratification methods have been proposed and continuously improved.

SUMMARY

The identification of independent risk factors for HCM-related SCD would likely contribute to risk stratification. However, it is difficult to predict SCD with absolute certainty, as the annual incidence of SCD in adult patients with HCM is approximately 1%. The review discusses the established risk factors, such as a family history of SCD, unexplained syncope and some new risk factors. Taken together, the findings of this review demonstrate that there is a need for further research on individual risk factors and that SCD risk stratification in HCM patients remains a clinical challenge.

Projecting the Long-term Clinical Value of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the United States: An Assessment of Net Health Benefit

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to project the long-term net health benefits of mavacamten for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in the United States.

METHODS

A Markov model with 4 mutually exclusive health states (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional classes I, II, and III/IV and death) was developed to project the life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon for patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM receiving mavacamten with or without β-blocker (BB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy or placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy. The model simulated a patient cohort with a starting age of 59 years and 41% women. Transition probabilities across NYHA functional classes were estimated using data from the Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM) and the EXPLORER long-term extension (EXPLORER-LTE) cohort from the Long-term Safety Extension Study of Mavacamten in Adults who Have Completed MAVERICK-HCM or EXPLORER-HCM (MAVA-LTE) trial and were extrapolated after week 30. The mortality risks of NYHA functional class I were assumed to be the age- and sex-specific mortality risks of the US general population. The mortality risks for NYHA class II and III/IV were estimated using those for class I in conjunction with the relative mortality risks derived using patients with obstructive HCM from a large real-world registry. Health state utilities for each treatment were estimated from EXPLORER-HCM. Both LYs and QALYs were aggregated over a lifetime for each treatment arm, discounted at 3% annually, and compared between the 2 arms. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model findings.

FINDINGS

Over a lifetime, treatment with mavacamten with or without BB or CCB monotherapy was associated with 3.67 incremental LYs compared with placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy (13.00 vs 9.33 LYs). Compared with individuals in the placebo group, patients in the mavacamten group were projected to spend 6.17 additional LYs in NYHA functional class I and 0.04 and 2.46 fewer LYs in NYHA functional classes II and III/IV, respectively. With utilities incorporated, mavacamten with or without BB or CCB monotherapy was associated with 4.17 additional QALYs compared with placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy (11.74 vs 7.57 QALYs). In the sensitivity analyses, incremental benefits ranged from 1.55 to 6.21 LYs and from 2.48 to 6.19 QALYs across the scenarios.

IMPLICATIONS

This model projected substantial net health benefits associated with mavacamten for symptomatic obstructive HCM owing to improved patient survival and quality of life. The projected QALY gain underscored the likely long-term clinical value of mavacamten in symptomatic obstructive HCM.

The Risk of Sudden Death in Children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common cause of death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and occurs more frequently than in adult patients. Risk stratification strategies have traditionally been extrapolated from adult practice, but newer evidence has highlighted important differences between childhood and adult cohorts, with the implication that pediatric-specific risk stratification strategies are required. Current guidelines use cumulative risk factor thresholds to recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation but have been shown to have limited discriminatory ability. Newer pediatric models that allow clinicians to calculate individualized estimates of 5-year risk allowing, for the first time, personalization of ICD implantation decision-making have been developed. This article describes the pathophysiology, risk factors, and approach to risk stratification for SCD in childhood HCM and highlights unanswered questions.

Prognostic implications of different clinical profiles in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a myocardial genetic disease relatively common in the general population with heterogenous clinical presentation, natural history and prognosis. About 60% of HCM patients have a stable clinical course, while others may experience a variety of HCMrelated complications which follows relatively independent pathways, and that can be distinguished in different subgroups. These subgroups are represented by patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; patients with end-stage disease and reduced or preserved systolic function; patients with apical hypertrophy; patients with apical aneurysm; patients with atrial fibrillation, patients at high risk of sudden death and patients with pre-clinical HCM. The purpose of this review is to describe each of these clinical profiles with its prognostic implications.

Prognostic Value of Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Patients With Asymmetric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background

Microvascular dysfunction might be a major determinant of clinical deterioration and outcome in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, long‐term prognostic value of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE) coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on clinical outcome is uncertain in HCM patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess long‐term prognostic value of CFVR on clinical outcome in HCM population.

Methods and Results

We prospectively included 150 HCM patients (82 women; mean age 48±15 years). Patients’ clinical characteristics, echocardiographic and CFVR findings (both for left anterior descending [LAD] and posterior descending artery [PD]), were assessed in all patients. The primary outcome was a composite of: HCM related death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, sustained ventricular tachycardia and ischemic stroke. Patients were stratified into 2 subgroups depending on CFVR LAD value: Group 1 (CFVR LAD>2, [n=87]) and Group 2 (CFVR LAD≤2, [n=63]). During a median follow‐up of 88 months, 41/150 (27.3%) patients had adverse cardiac events. In Group 1, there were 8/87 (9.2%), whereas in Group 2 there were 33/63 (52.4%, P<0.001 vs. Group 1) adverse cardiac events. By Kaplan‐Meier analysis, patients with preserved CFVR LAD had significantly higher cumulative event‐free survival rate compared to patients with impaired CFVR LAD (96.4% and 90.9% versus 66.9% and 40.0%, at 5 and 8 years, respectively: log‐rank 37.2, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified only CFVR LAD≤2 as an independent predictor for adverse cardiac outcome (HR 6.54; 95% CI 2.83–16.30, P<0.001), while CFVR PD was not significantly associated with outcome.

Conclusions

In patients with HCM, impaired CFVR LAD (≤2) is a strong, independent predictor of adverse cardiac outcome. When the aim of testing is HCM risk stratification and CFVR LAD data are available, the evaluation of CFVR PD is redundant.

Implantable loop recorders in patients with heart disease: comparison between patients with and without syncope

OBJECTIVE

Patients with heart disease are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Guidelines recommend an implantable loop recorder (ILR) for symptomatic patients when symptoms are sporadic and possibly arrhythmia-related. In clinical practice, an ILR is mainly used in patients with unexplained syncope. We aimed to compare the clinical value of an ILR in patients with heart disease and a history of syncope versus those with non-syncopal symptoms.

METHODS

In this observational single-centre study, we included symptomatic patients with heart disease who received an ILR. The primary endpoint was an actionable event which was defined as an arrhythmic event leading to a change in clinical management. The secondary endpoint was an event leading to device implantation.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients (mean age 47±17 years, 49% men) were included. The underlying disease substrate was inherited cardiomyopathy (31%), congenital heart disease (28%), channelopathy (23%) and other (18%). Group A consisted of 43 patients with prior syncope and group B consisted of 77 patients with palpitations and/or near-syncope. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (IQR 8-36). The 3-year cumulative event rate was similar between groups with regard to the primary endpoint (38% vs 39% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.54). There was also no difference in the 3-year cumulative rate of device implantation (21% vs 13% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.65).

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients with heart disease, there is no difference in the yield of an ILR in patients presenting with or without syncope.

Risk Prediction Models and Scores in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has historically been linked with sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, it is well established that only a subset of patients is at the highest risk stratum for such a catastrophic event. Detection of patients belonging to this high-risk category can allow for timely defibrillator implantation, changing the natural history of HCM. Inversely, device implantation in patients deemed at low risk leads to an unnecessary burden of device complications with no apparent protective benefit. Previous studies have identified a series of markers, now considered established risk factors, with genetic testing and newer imaging allowing for the detection of novel, highly promising indices of increased risk for SCD. Despite the identification of a number of risk factors, there is noticeable discrepancy in the utility of such factors for risk stratification between the current American and European guidelines. We sought to systematically review the data available on these two approaches, presenting their rationale and respective predictive capacity, also discussing the potential of novel markers to augment the precision of currently used risk stratification models for SCD in HCM.

Validation of the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in a large Mediterranean cohort with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the new American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines, with respect to sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, in comparison with the established risk score of the European Society of Cardiology (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [HCM] Risk-SCD), in a large Mediterranean cohort of HCM patients.

METHODS

The clinical and imaging characteristics of 784 HCM patients (mean age at first evaluation 52 ± 16 years, 67.2% males) were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for SCD events of the presence of ≥1 risk factor for SCD according to the ACC/AHA Guidelines 2020 and of the HCM Risk-SCD≥6% and HCM Risk-SCD≥4% were estimated during follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 47 (6%) patients suffered an SCD event. The presence of ≥1 major risk factor for SCD according to the new ACC/AHA Guidelines had 96% sensitivity (95% CI 85.5-99.5%) with modest specificity of 59% (95% CI 55-62.2%) and negative predictive value of 99.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.9%). On the contrary, HCM- Risk-SCD≥6% had a relatively low sensitivity (32%, 95% CI 19.1-47.1%) and high specificity of 95% (95% CI 93.1-96.4%), whereas, HCM-Risk-SCD≥4% had sensitivity of 60% (95% CI 44-74%) and specificity of 83.9% (95% CI 80-85.6%). Both the HCM Risk-SCD cut-off values demonstrated lower negative predictive value but higher accuracy than the ACC/AHA algorithm for SCD prediction.

CONCLUSION

The novel ACC/AHA proposed algorithm identifies most of the patients with an SCD event with the cost of numerous defibrillator implantations. HCM-Risk-SCD demonstrated higher specificity, whereas its sensitivity and negative predictive value are modest.

[Adult advanced life support]

These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.