How Do Resuscitation Teams at Top-Performing Hospitals for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Succeed? A Qualitative Study

Leadership Lingo: Developing a Shared Language of Leadership Behaviors to Enrich Debriefing Conversations

INTRODUCTION

Leadership in medical emergencies is variable and frequently suboptimal, contributing to poor patient care and outcomes. Simulation training can improve leadership in both simulated practice and real clinical emergencies. Thoughtful debriefing is essential. However, unclear language around leadership limits facilitators' capacity for transformative reflective discussion.

METHODS

Internal medicine trainees participated in simulated medical emergency scenarios. Video recordings of consenting participants were analyzed using template analysis. A priori codes from existing literature formed an initial coding template. This was modified with inductive codes from the observed behaviors to develop a taxonomy of leadership behaviors in simulated medical emergencies. The taxonomy was then transformed into an infographic, to be used as a leadership debriefing tool.

RESULTS

The taxonomy of leadership behaviors consisted of the following 4 themes: Structuring, Decision making, Supporting, and Communicating. Structuring behaviors shaped the team, ensuring that the right people were in the right place at the right time. Decision-making behaviors steered the team, setting a direction and course of action. Communicating behaviors connected the team, sharing valuable information. Supporting behaviors nurtured the team, guiding team members to perform at their optimum level.

CONCLUSIONS

Debriefing-as-imagined is not always debriefing-as-done. A shared language of leadership can connect educators and learners, advancing critical debriefing conversations and enabling facilitators to drive meaningful reflective discussion. The use of infographics in simulation offers an opportunity to support educators in facilitating complex debriefing conversations.

Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in-hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

AIM

To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DESIGN

Systematic review with synthesis without meta-analysis.

METHODS

The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and CINAHL (years of 2013-2023) and a manual reference list search of all included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 60 papers were identified with three major themes of useful resuscitation leadership; 'social skills', 'cognitive skills and behaviour' and 'leadership development skills' were identified. Main factors included delegating effectively, while being situationally aware of team members' ability and progress during resuscitation, and being empathetic and supportive, yet 'controlling the room' using a hands-off style. Shared decision-making to reduce cognitive load for one leader was shown to improve effective teamwork. Findings were limited by heterogeneity of studies and inconsistently applied tools to measure leadership.

CONCLUSION

Traditional authoritarian leadership styles are not wanted by team members with preference for shared leadership and collaboration. Balancing this with the need for team members to see leaders in 'control of the room' brings new challenges for leaders and trainers of resuscitation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PROFESSION

All clinicians need effective leadership skills for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in-hospital. Nurses provide first response and ongoing leadership for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurses typically display suitable skills that align with useful resuscitation leader factors.

IMPACT

What were the main findings? Collaboration rather than an authoritarian approach to leadership is preferred by team members. Nurses are suitable to 'control the room'. Restricting resuscitation team size will manage disruptive behaviour of team members.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022385630.

PATIENT OF PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient of public contribution.

Nurses' experience with patient deterioration and rapid response teams

BACKGROUND

While timely activation and collaborative teamwork of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) are crucial to promote a culture of safety and reduce preventable adverse events, these do not always occur. Understanding nurses' perceptions of and experiences with RRTs is important to inform education and policy that improve nurse performance, RRT effectiveness, and patient outcomes.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore nurse perceptions of detecting patient deterioration, deciding to initiate RRTs, and experience during and at conclusion of RRTs.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured focus group interviews was conducted with 24 nurses in a Chicago area hospital. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded independently by investigators. Thematic analysis identified and organized patterns of meaning across participants. Several strategies supported trustworthiness.

RESULTS

Data revealed five main themes: identification of deterioration, deciding to escalate care, responsiveness of peers/team, communication during rapid responses, and perception of effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide insight into developing a work environment supportive of nurse performance and interprofessional collaboration to improve RRT effectiveness. Nurses described challenges in identification of subtle changes in patient deterioration. Delayed RRT activation was primarily related to negative attitudes of responders and stigma. RRT interventions were often considered a temporary fix leading to subsequent RRTs, especially when patients needing a higher level of care were not transferred. Implications include the need for ongoing RRT monitoring and education on several areas such as patient hand-off, RRT activation, nurse empowerment, interprofessional communication, role delineation, and code status discussions.

Multidisciplinary Care Teams in Acute Cardiovascular Care: A Review of Composition, Logistics, Outcomes, Training, and Future Directions

As cardiovascular care continues to advance and with an aging population with higher comorbidities, the epidemiology of the cardiac intensive care unit has undergone a paradigm shift. There has been increasing emphasis on the development of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for providing holistic care to complex critically ill patients, analogous to heart teams for chronic cardiovascular care. Outside of cardiovascular medicine, MDTs in critical care medicine focus on implementation of guideline-directed care, prevention of iatrogenic harm, communication with patients and families, point-of-care decision-making, and the development of care plans. MDTs in acute cardiovascular care include physicians from cardiovascular medicine, critical care medicine, interventional cardiology, cardiac surgery, and advanced heart failure, in addition to nonphysician team members. In this document, we seek to describe the changes in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit, health care delivery, composition, logistics, outcomes, training, and future directions for MDTs involved in acute cardiovascular care. As a part of the comprehensive review, we performed a scoping of concepts of MDTs, acute hospital care, and cardiovascular conditions and procedures.

Understanding attendance patterns and determinants in cardiac, pulmonary, and ICU Rehabilitation/Recovery programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac, pulmonary, and intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation/recovery programs are health promotion interventions designed to improve physical recovery, psychological well-being, and quality of life after acute illness while reducing the risk of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

Identify the difference in attendance rates for patients invited to a cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, or ICU recovery program and factors influencing attendance.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual reference lists from inception to June 3, 2024. We included studies reporting patient attendance rates in eligible programs following acute illness hospitalization. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third member reviewing and achieving consensus when necessary. Our main outcomes focused on the proportion of attendance in eligible programs among patients referred.

RESULTS

Of 3,446 studies screened, 179 studies (N = 4,779,012 patients) were included across cardiac rehabilitation (n = 153 studies), pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 11 studies), and ICU recovery (n = 15 studies) programs. Pooled attendance rates were 53 % (95 % CI: 48-57 %) for cardiac rehabilitation, 56 % (95 % CI: 42-70 %) for pulmonary rehabilitation, and 61 % (95 % CI: 51-70 %) for ICU recovery programs. Significant attendance heterogeneity was present (cardiac I2=100 %, p < 0.001; pulmonary I2=100 %, p < 0.001; ICU I2=94 %, p < 0.01). Barriers to attendance included transportation, distance, work conflicts, and patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, older age). Facilitators included male gender, younger age, higher education, income, provider recommendations, and flexible scheduling. Individual factors represented the primary domain affecting attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate comparable attendance rates and factors shaping attendance across acute illness rehabilitation/recovery programs, with ICU recovery programs being the most well-attended on average.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022357261.

A mixed-methods approach to assessing implementers' readiness to adopt digital health interventions (RADHI)

BACKGROUND

Despite being the primary setting for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men (MSM) since the start of the epidemic, community-based organizations (CBOs) struggle to reach this historically stigmatized and largely hidden population with face-to-face interventions. HIV researchers have readily turned to the internet to deliver critical HIV education to this group, with evidence of high effectiveness and acceptability across studies. However, implementation outside of research contexts has been limited and not well studied. We aimed to assess HIV CBOs' readiness to adopt digital health interventions and identify contextual factors that may contribute to differing levels of readiness.

METHODS

We recruited 22 CBOs across the US through a pragmatic request-for-proposals process to deliver Keep It Up! (KIU!), an evidence-based eHealth HIV prevention program. We used mixed methods to examine CBO readiness to adopt digital health interventions (RADHI). Before implementation, CBO staff completed a 5-item RADHI scale (scored 0-4) that demonstrated concurrent and predictive validity. We interviewed CBO staff using semi-structured questions guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and compared RADHI score groups on determinants identified from the interviews.

RESULTS

Eighty-five staff (range = 1-10 per CBO) completed the RADHI. On average, CBOs reported moderate-to-great readiness (2.74) to adopt KIU!. High RADHI CBOs thought KIU! was a top priority and an innovative program complementary to their existing approaches for their clients. Low RADHI CBOs expressed concerns that KIU! could be a cultural mismatch for their clients, was lower priority than existing programs and services, relied on clients' own motivation, and might not be suitable for clients with disabilities. Value, appeal, and limitations did not differ by RADHI group.

CONCLUSIONS

While HIV CBOs are excited for the opportunities and advantages of digital interventions, additional pre-implementation and implementation support may be needed to increase perceived value and usability for different client populations. Addressing these limitations is critical to effective digital prevention interventions for HIV and other domains such as mental health, chronic disease management, and transitions in care. Future research can utilize our novel, validated measure of CBOs' readiness to adopt digital health interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03896776, clinicaltrials.gov, 1 April 2019.

Comparing Leadership Skills of Senior Emergency Medicine Residents in 3-Year Versus 4-Year Programs During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

The majority of pediatric patients in the United States (US) are evaluated and treated at general emergency departments. It is possible that discrepancies in length of emergency medicine (EM) residency training may allow for variable exposure to pediatric patients, critical resuscitations, and didactic events. The goal of this pilot study was to compare leadership skills of graduating EM residents from 3- to 4-year programs during simulated pediatric resuscitations using a previously validated leadership assessment tool, the Concise Assessment of Leader Management (CALM).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, simulation-based cohort pilot study that included graduating 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM resident physicians from 6 EM residency programs. We measured leadership performance across 3 simulated pediatric resuscitations (sepsis, seizure, cardiac arrest) using the CALM tool and compared leadership scores between the 3 rd - and 4 th -year resident cohorts. We also correlated leadership to self-efficacy scores.

RESULTS

Data was analyzed for 47 participating residents (24 3 rd -year residents and 23 4 th -year residents). Out of a total possible CALM score of 66, residents from 3-year programs scored 45.2 [SD ± 5.2], 46.8 [SD ± 5.0], and 46.6 [SD ± 4.7], whereas residents from 4-year programs scored 45.5 [SD ± 5.2], 46.4 [SD ± 5.0], and 48.2 [SD ± 4.3] during the sepsis, seizure, and cardiac arrest cases, respectively. The mean leadership score across all 3 cases for the 3-year cohort was 46.2 [SD ± 4.8] versus 46.7 [SD ± 4.5] ( P = 0.715) for the 4-year cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show feasibility for a larger cohort project and, while not statistically significant, suggest no difference in leadership skills between 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM residents in our study cohort. This pilot study provides the basis of future work that will assess a larger multicenter cohort with the hope to obtain a more generalizable dataset.

Grand rounds in methodology: designing for integration in mixed methods research

Mixed methods research is a popular approach used to understand persistent and complex problems related to quality and safety, such as reasons why interventions are not implemented as intended or explaining differential outcomes. However, the quality and rigour of mixed methods research proposals and publications often miss opportunities for integration, which is the core of mixed methods. Achieving integration remains challenging, and failing to integrate reduces the benefits of a mixed methods approach. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to guide quality and safety researchers in planning and designing a mixed methods study that facilitates integration. We highlight how meaningful integration in mixed methods research can be achieved by centring integration at the following levels: research question, design, methods, results and reporting and interpretation levels. A holistic view of integration through all these levels will enable researchers to provide better answers to complex problems and thereby contribute to improvement of safety and quality of care.

Effectiveness of team-focused CPR on in-hospital CPR quality and outcomes

Objective

We sought to identify changes in neurological outcome over time following initial training and subsequent implementation of team-focused CPR in an inpatient setting where responders practice specific roles with emphasis on minimally interrupted chest compressions and early defibrillation.

Methods

This retrospective pre- vs post-intervention study was conducted at an urban 900-bed teaching hospital and Level I Cardiac Resuscitation Center. We included adult patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest occurring in non-emergency department and non-intensive care unit areas who received CPR and/or defibrillation. We compared survival with good neurological outcome at time of hospital discharge in the one-year periods before and after implementation of team-focused CPR. To investigate skill degradation, we compared cumulative survival with good neurological outcome in 3-month intervals against the before team-focused CPR baseline. Trained research associates abstracted explicitly defined variables from electronic health records using a standardized form and data dictionary to achieve consistency between collaborators.

Results

Of 296 IHCAs, 207 patients met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. In 104 patients before team-focused CPR initiation, survival with good neurological outcome was 21%. In the 12-month period following team-focused CPR initiation, survival with good neurological outcome was 31% in 101 patients, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI -2 to 22%; p = 0.14). By quarterly time intervals, following team-focused CPR implementation, the cumulative survival with good neurological outcome at 3 months was 42%; at 6 months 37%; at 9 months 31%; and at 12 months 31%.

Conclusion

In our single-institution implementation of team-focused CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest, outcomes significantly improved at 6 months before declining towards baseline.

Nurse and Physician Perceptions and Decision Making During Interdisciplinary Communication: Factors That Influence Communication Channel Selection

Errors in decision making and communication play a key role in poor patient outcomes. Safe patient care requires effective decision making during interdisciplinary communication through communication channels. Research on factors that influence nurse and physician decision making during interdisciplinary communication is limited. Understanding influences on nurse and physician decision making during communication channel selection is needed to support effective communication and improved patient outcomes. The purpose of the study was to explore nurse and physician perceptions of and decision-making processes for selecting interruptive or noninterruptive interdisciplinary communication channels in medical-surgical and intermediate acute care settings. Twenty-six participants (10 RNs, 10 resident physicians, and six attending physicians) participated in semistructured interviews in two acute care metropolitan hospitals for this qualitative descriptive study. The Practice Primed Decision Model guided interview question development and early data analysis. Findings include a core category, Development of Trust in the Communication Process, supported by three main themes: (1) Understanding of Patient Status Drives Communication Decision Making; (2) Previous Interdisciplinary Communication Experience Guides Channel Selection; and (3) Perceived Usefulness Influences Communication Channel Selection. Findings from this study provide support for future design and research of communication channels within the EHR and clinical decision support systems.

Perceptions on Specialist Palliative Care Involvement During and After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Qualitative Study

IMPORTANCE

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an exceptional physical situation and may lead to significant psychological, spiritual, and social distress in patients and their next of kin. Furthermore, clinicians might experience distress related to a CPR event. Specialist palliative care (sPC) integration could address these aspects but is not part of routine care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore perspectives on sPC integration during and after CPR. A needs assessment for sPC, possible triggers indicating need, and implementation strategies were addressed.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A multiprofessional qualitative semistructured focus group study was conducted in a German urban academic teaching hospital. Participants were clinicians (nursing staff, residents, and consultants) working in the emergency department and ICUs (internal medicine and surgical).

ANALYSIS

The focus groups were recorded and subsequently transcribed. Data material was analyzed using the content-structuring content analysis according to Kuckartz.

RESULTS

Seven focus groups with 18 participants in total were conducted online from July to November 2022. Six main categories (two to five subcategories) were identified: understanding (of palliative care and death), general CPR conditions (e.g., team, debriefing, and strains), prognosis (e.g., preexisting situation, use of extracorporeal support), next of kin (e.g., communication, presence during CPR), treatment plan (patient will and decision-making), and implementation of sPC (e.g., timing, trigger factors).

CONCLUSIONS

Perceptions about the need for sPC to support during and after CPR depend on roles, areas of practice, and individual understanding of sPC. Although some participants perceive CPR itself as a trigger for sPC, others define, for example, pre-CPR-existing multimorbidity or complex family dynamics as possible triggers. Suggestions for implementation are multifaceted, especially communication by sPC is emphasized. Specific challenges of extracorporeal CPR need to be explored further. Overall, the focus groups show that the topic is considered relevant, and studies on outcomes are warranted.

Improving response time and survival in ward based in-hospital cardiac arrest: A quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Survival in cardiac arrest is associated with rapid initiation of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and advanced life support. To improve ROSC rates and survival, we identified the need to reduce response times and implement coordinated resuscitation by dedicated cardiac arrest teams (CATs). We aimed to improve ROSC rates by 10% within 6 months, and subsequent survival to hospital discharge.

METHODS

We used the Model for Improvement to implement a ward-based cardiac arrest quality improvement (QI) initiative across 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. QI interventions focused on instituting dedicated CATs and resuscitation equipment, staff training, communications, audit framework, performance feedback, as well as a cardiac arrest documentation form. The primary outcome was the rate of ROSC, and the secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Process measures were call center processing times, CAT response times and CAT nurses' knowledge and confidence regarding CPR. Balancing measures were the number of non-cardiac arrest activations and the number of cardiac arrest activations in patients with existing do-not-resuscitate orders.

RESULTS

After adjustments for possible confounders in the multivariate analysis, there was a significant improvement in ROSC rate post-intervention as compared to the pre-intervention period (OR 2.05 [1.04-4.05], p = 0.04). Median (IQR) call center processing times decreased from 1.8 (1.6-2.0) pre-intervention to 1.4 (1.4-1.6) minutes post-intervention (p = 0.03). Median (IQR) CAT response times decreased from 5.1 (4.5-7.0) pre-intervention to 3.6 (3.4-4.3) minutes post-intervention (p < 0.001). After adjustments for possible confounders in the multivariate analysis, there was no significant improvement in survival to hospital discharge post-intervention as compared to the pre-intervention period (OR 0.71 [0.25-2.06], p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a ward-based cardiac arrest QI initiative resulted in an improvement in ROSC rates, median call center and CAT response times.

Optimizing infection control and antimicrobial stewardship bedside discussion: a scoping review of existing evidence on effective healthcare communication in hospitals

BACKGROUND

The link between healthcare worker (HCW) communication, teamwork and patient safety is well-established. Infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) require multidisciplinary teamwork and communication.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a scoping review of published evidence on effective mechanisms of HCW team communication in hospitals with the intention of transferring and tailoring learning to IPC and AMS team communication.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for studies that investigated HCW team communication across in-hospital patient pathways. Studies published between 2000 and 2021 that provided evidence on/or described the effect of communication on team and patient outcomes in hospital were included. Through a process of inductive qualitative content analysis, key themes in the included studies were identified.

RESULTS

Of 537 studies identified, 53 (from high-income countries) were included in the data extraction. Fifty one percent (27/53) of studies were conducted in high acuity settings e.g., intensive care units. Standardizing or structuring the content and/or process of team communication was the most common goal of interventions (34/53, 64%). The key outcome measures were either team communication focused (25/34,74%) or patient and process outcome focused (8/34, 24%), such as reduced length of mechanical ventilation days, length of hospital stay, and shorter empiric antibiotic duration. Four studies (4/53, 8%) associated improved communication with positive IPC and AMS outcome measures. Mixed method intervention studies primarily facilitated collaborative input from HCWs and applied structures to standardize the content of patient care discussions, whereas observational studies describe component of team communication.

CONCLUSIONS

A communication strategy that formalizes input from multidisciplinary team members can lead to optimized and consistent clinical discussion including in IPC and AMS-related care. Although we were unable to assess the effectiveness of interventions, the existing evidence suggests that optimizing team communication can have a positive effect on infection-related patient outcomes.

Examining the roles of rural nurses in resuscitation care: An ethnographic study

INTRODUCTION

Rural nurses play a vital role in the provision of resuscitation care, as first responders and often the sole healthcare professionals delivering timely interventions with greater role autonomy and extended scope of practice. Whilst there is a developing body of literature describing the 'generalist' roles of rural nurses when providing care in acute care settings, little is known about the roles rural nurses assume during a resuscitation.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the role/s that rural nurses enact when delivering resuscitative care to their rural community.

DESIGN/METHODS

An ethnographic methodology was used across two rural hospital sites in Australia, involving non-participant observation and interviews.

RESULTS

Reflexive thematic analysis led to three themes that described the resuscitative roles of rural nurses: Senior and junior nurse, formal and informal leadership roles, multiple roles.

CONCLUSION

This study has placed a spotlight on rural nurse's capacity to be adaptive in a dynamic and highly variable resuscitative environment. Building leadership capacity should be a rural nursing workforce strategy, aimed at supporting the unique roles that rural nurses undertake when working with various external teams during resuscitations.

Organization and training for pediatric cardiac arrest in Danish hospitals: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Background

Improving survival from pediatric cardiac arrest requires a well-functioning system of care with appropriately trained healthcare providers and designated cardiac arrest teams. This study aimed to describe the current organization and training for pediatric cardiac arrest in Denmark.

Methods

 We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study. A questionnaire was distributed to all hospitals in Denmark with a pediatric department. The survey included questions about receiving patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, protocols for extracorporeal life support, cardiac arrest team compositions, and training.

Results

We obtained responses from 17 of 19 hospitals with a pediatric department. In total, 76% of hospitals received patients with pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 35% of hospitals had a protocol for extracorporeal life support. None of the hospitals had identical cardiac arrest team member compositions. The total number of team members ranged from 4-10, with a median of 8 members (IQR 7;9). In 84% of hospitals a specialized course in pediatric resuscitation was implemented and in 5% of hospitals, the specialized course was for the entire cardiac arrest team. Only few hospitals had training in laryngeal mask (6%) and intubation (29%) for pediatric cardiac arrest and none of them were trained in extracorporeal life support.

Conclusion

We found high variability in the composition of the pediatric cardiac arrest teams and training across the surveyed Danish hospitals. Many hospitals lack training in important pediatric resuscitation skills. Although many hospitals receive pediatric patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, only few have protocols for transfer for extracorporeal life support.

Effects of communication team training on clinical competence in Korean Advanced Life Support: A randomized controlled trial

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the effects of interprofessional communication team training on clinical competence in the Korean Advanced Life Support provider course using a team communication framework. Our study involved 73 residents and 42 nurses from a tertiary hospital in Seoul. The participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, forming 10 teams per group. The intervention group underwent interprofessional communication team training with a cardiac arrest simulation and standardized communication tools. The control group completed the Korean Advanced Life Support provider course. All participants completed a communication clarity self-reporting questionnaire. Clinical competence was assessed using a clinical competency scale comprising technical and nontechnical tools. Blinding was not possible due to the educational intervention. Data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and a multivariate Kruskal-Wallis H test. While no significant differences were observed in communication clarity between the two groups, there were significant differences in clinical competence. Therefore, the study confirmed that the intervention can enhance the clinical competence of patient care teams in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The initiative for medical equity and global health (IMEGH) resuscitation training program: A model for resuscitation training courses in Africa

In high-income countries, outcomes following in hospital cardiac arrest have improved over the last two decades due to the introduction of rapid response teams, cardiac arrest teams, and advanced resuscitation training. However, in low-income countries, such as Rwanda, outcomes are still poor. This is due to multiple factors including lack of adequate resuscitation training, few trainers, and lack of equipment. To address this issue, the Initiative for Medical Equity and Global Health Equity (IMEGH), a training organization founded in 2018 by 5 local anesthesiologists has regularly taught resuscitation courses such as Basic Life Support, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, and Pediatric Advanced Life Support in hospitals throughout Rwanda. The aims of the organization include developing a sustainable model to offer context relevant resuscitation training courses, building a cadre of local instructors to teach on the courses, as well as engaging funding partners to help support the effort. From October 2018 until September 2022, 31 courses were run in 11 hospitals across Rwanda training 1,060 healthcare providers (mainly of non-physician anesthetists, nurses, midwives, and general practitioners). Ongoing challenges include lack of local protocols, inability to tracking resuscitation outcomes, and continued inaccessibility by many healthcare providers. Despite these challenges, the IMEGH program is an example of a successful context-relevant model and has potential to inform the design of resuscitation programs in other similar settings. This article describes the development of the IMEGH program, accomplishments as well as lessons learned, challenges, and next steps for expansion.

When routine becomes stressful: A qualitative study into resuscitation team members' perception of stress and performance

Interprofessional teamwork is of high importance during stressful situations such as CPR. Stress can potentially influence team performance. This study explores the perception of stress and its stressors during performance under pressure, to be able to further adjust or develop training. Healthcare professionals, who are part of the resuscitation team in a large Dutch university medical center, discussed their experiences in homogeneous focus groups. Nine focus groups and one individual interview were conducted and analyzed thematically, in order to deepen our understanding of their experiences. Thematic analysis resulted in two scenarios, routine and stress and an analysis of accompanying team processes. Routine refers to a setting perceived as straightforward. Stress develops in the presence of a combination of stressors such as a lack of clarity in roles and a lack of knowledge on fellow team members. Participants reported that stress affects the team, specifically through an altering of communication, a decrease in situational awareness, and formation of subgroups. This may lead to a further increase in stress, and potentially result in a vicious cycle. Team processes in a stressful situation like CPR can be disrupted by different stressors, and might affect the team and their performance. Improved knowledge about the stressors and their effects might be used to design a training environment representative for the performance setting healthcare professionals work in. Further research on the impact of representative training with team-level stressors and the development of a "team brain" might be worthwhile.

Sudden cardiac arrest during endovascular embolization of carotid artery aneurysm: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Endovascular embolization has been widely applied in carotid artery aneurysm due to less trauma and simpler procedures than open surgery. Sudden cardiac arrest is a rare event that may cause severe consequences during endovascular embolization. Risk factors of perioperative cardiac arrest include cardiac surgery, younger age, comorbid conditions, and emergency surgery.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 62-year-old male patient had hypertension for 15 years and experienced sudden cardiac arrest of pulseless electrical activity during endovascular embolization.

DIAGNOSES

He was diagnosed with a 3.5 × 2.5 mm aneurysm.

INTERVENTIONS

Chest compression and effective interventions were given.

OUTCOMES

He was resuscitated by cardiopulmonary resuscitation and systematic therapy.

LESSONS

This case may provide experience in the management of sudden cardiac arrest during endovascular embolization of a carotid artery aneurysm.

Using rapid response system trigger clusters to characterize patterns of clinical deterioration among hospitalized adult patients

BACKGROUND

Many rapid response system (RRS) events are activated using multiple triggers. However, the patterns in which multiple RRS triggers occur together to activate RRS events are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify these patterns (RRS trigger clusters) and determine their association with outcomes among hospitalized adult patients.

METHODS

RRS events among adult patients from January 2015 to December 2019 in the Get With The Guidelines- Resuscitation registry's MET module were examined (n = 134,406). Cluster analysis methods were performed to identify RRS trigger clusters. Pearson's chi-squared and ANOVA tests were used to examine differences in patient characteristics across RRS trigger clusters. Multilevel logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between RRS trigger clusters and outcomes.

RESULTS

Six RRS trigger clusters were identified. Predominant RRS triggers for each cluster were: tachypnea, new onset difficulty in breathing, decreased oxygen saturation (Cluster 1); tachypnea, decreased oxygen saturation, staff concern (Cluster 2); respiratory depression, decreased oxygen saturation, mental status changes (Cluster 3); tachycardia, staff concern (Cluster 4); mental status changes (Cluster 5); hypotension, staff concern (Cluster 6). Significant differences in patient characteristics were observed across clusters. Patients in Clusters 3 and 6 had an increased likelihood of in-hospital cardiac arrest (p < 0.01). All clusters had an increased risk of mortality (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We discovered six novel RRS trigger clusters with differing relationships to adverse patient outcomes. RRS trigger clusters may prove crucial in clarifying the associations between RRS events and adverse outcomes and aiding in clinician decision-making during RRS events.

Survey of resuscitation practices at emergency medical service agencies in the U.S

Background

Survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies across emergency medical service (EMS) agencies. Yet, little is known about resuscitation response and quality improvement activities at EMS agencies. We describe herein a novel survey to EMS agencies in a U.S. registry for OHCA.

Methods

Using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), we identified 577 EMS agencies with ≥10 OHCA cases annually between 2015 and 2019 that remained active in CARES. We administered a survey to EMS directors regarding agency characteristics, cardiac arrest response, relationships with first responders and dispatchers, quality improvement activities and perceived barriers in the community.

Results

Of eligible EMS agencies, 470 (81.5%) completed the survey. The high completion rate was likely due to frequent personalized emails and phone calls, liaising with CARES state coordinators to encourage survey response, and multiple periodic drawings of an automated external defibrillator during the survey period for participating EMS agencies. The survey examined rates of resuscitation training modalities; use of resuscitation equipment and devices in the field; frequency of simulation; non-EMS stakeholder response to OHCA (dispatchers, fire, police); quality improvement; and community factors affecting bystander response to OHCA.

Conclusions

In this study design paper on the RED-CASO survey, we provide summary data on EMS agency characteristics in the U.S. Upon linkage to CARES patient-level data, this survey will provide critical insights into 'best practices' at EMS agencies with the highest OHCA survival rates as well as provide insights into current disparities in outcomes.

The associations between rapid response systems and their components with patient outcomes: A scoping review

Background

While rapid response systems have been widely implemented, their impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. Further understanding of their components-including medical emergency team triggers, medical emergency team member composition, additional roles in patient care beyond responding to medical emergency team events, and their involvement in "Do-Not-Resuscitate" order placement-may elucidate the relationship between rapid response systems and outcomes.

Objective

To explore how recent studies have examined rapid response system components in the context of relevant adverse patient outcomes, such as in-hospital cardiac arrests and hospital mortality.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for articles published between November 2014 and June 2022. Studies mainly focused on rapid response systems and associations with in-hospital cardiac arrests were considered. The following were extracted for analysis: study design, location, sample size, participant characteristics, system characteristics (including medical emergency team member composition, additional system roles outside of medical emergency team events), medical emergency team triggers, in-hospital cardiac arrests, and hospital mortality.

Results

Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. While most studies described triggers used, few analyzed medical emergency team trigger associations with outcomes. Of those, medical emergency team triggers relating to respiratory abnormalities and use of multiple triggers to activate the medical emergency team were associated with adverse patient outcomes. Many studies described medical emergency team member composition, but the way composition was reported varied across studies. Of the seven studies with dedicated medical emergency team members, six found their systems were associated with decreased incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrests. Six of seven studies that described additional medical emergency team roles in educating staff in rapid response system use found their systems were associated with significant decreases in adverse patient outcomes. Four of five studies that described proactive rounding responsibilities reported found their systems were associated with significant decreases in adverse patient outcomes. Reporting of rapid response system involvement in "Do-Not-Resuscitate" order placement was variable across studies.

Conclusions

Inconsistencies in describing rapid response system components and related data and outcomes highlights how these systems are complex to a degree not fully captured in existing literature. Further large-scale examination of these components across institutions is warranted. Development and use of robust and standardized metrics to track data related to rapid response system components and related outcomes are needed to optimize these systems and improve patient outcomes.

A cross-stakeholder approach to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects over 300,000 individuals per year in the United States with poor survival rates overall. A remarkable 5-fold difference in survival-to-hospital discharge rates exist across United States communities.

METHODS

We conducted a study using qualitative research methods comparing the system of care across sites in Michigan communities with varying OHCA survival outcomes, as measured by return to spontaneous circulation with pulse upon emergency department arrival.

RESULTS

Major themes distinguishing higher performing sites were (1) working as a team, (2) devoting resources to coordination across agencies, and (3) developing a continuous quality improvement culture. These themes spanned the chain of survival framework for OHCA. By examining the unique processes, procedures, and characteristics of higher- relative to lower-performing sites, we gleaned lessons learned that appear to distinguish higher performers. The higher performing sites reported being the most collaborative, due in part to facilitation of system integration by progressive leadership that is willing to build bridges among stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the distinguishing features of higher performing sites, we provide recommendations for toolkit development to improve survival in prehospital systems of care for OHCA.

Nurses' Perceptions Towards Resuscitated Patients: A Qualitative Study

Nurses' perceptions of resuscitated patients may affect their care, and this has not been investigated in previous literature. The aim of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions towards resuscitated patients. In this descriptive-qualitative study seventeen clinical nurses participated using purposive sampling. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted and data were analyzed by conventional content analysis. Four main categories emerged: Injured, undervalued, problematic, and destroyer of resources. Participants considered resuscitated patients to have multiple physical injuries, which are an important source of legal problems and workplace violence, and they believed that these patients will eventually die. Resuscitated patients are considered forgotten and educational cases. Iranian nurses have a strong negative perception towards resuscitated patients. Improving the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, improving the knowledge and skills of personnel in performing resuscitation, and supporting managers and doctors to nurses in the post-resuscitation period can change the attitude of nurses and improve post-resuscitation care.

Cardiac Arrest Survival at Emergency Medical Service Agencies in Catchment Areas With Primarily Black and Hispanic Populations

Importance

Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to survive an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) than White patients. Given the central importance of emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in prehospital care, a better understanding of OHCA survival at EMS agencies that work in Black and Hispanic communities and White communities is needed to address OHCA disparities.

Objective

To examine whether EMS agencies serving catchment areas with primarily Black and Hispanic populations (Black and Hispanic catchment areas) have different rates of OHCA survival than agencies serving catchment areas with primarily White populations (White catchment areas).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cohort study including adults with nontraumatic OHCA from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival was conducted. Data analysis was conducted from August 17, 2022, to July 7, 2023.

Exposure

Emergency medical service agencies, categorized as working in catchment areas where the combination of Black and Hispanic residents made up more than 50% of the population or where White residents made up more than 50% of the population.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The unit of analysis was the EMS agency. The primary outcome was agency-level risk-standardized survival rates (RSSRs) to hospital admission for OHCA at each EMS agency, which were calculated using hierarchical logistic regression and compared between agencies serving Black and Hispanic and White catchment areas. Whether differences in OHCA survival were explained by EMS and first responder measures was evaluated with additional adjustment for these factors.

Results

Among 764 EMS agencies representing 258 342 OHCAs, 82 EMS agencies (10.7%) had a Black and Hispanic catchment area. Overall median age of the patients was 63.0 (IQR, 52.0-75.0) years, 36.1% were women, and 63.9% were men. Overall, the mean (SD) RSSR was 27.5% (3.6%), with lower survival at EMS agencies with Black and Hispanic catchment areas (25.8% [3.6%]) compared with agencies with White catchment areas (27.7% [3.5%]; P < .001). Among the 82 EMS agencies with Black and Hispanic catchment areas, a disproportionately higher number (32 [39.0%]) was in the lowest survival quartile, whereas a lower number (12 [14.6%]) was in the highest survival quartile. Additional adjustment for EMS response times, EMS termination of resuscitation rates, and first responder rates of initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation or applying an automated external defibrillator before EMS arrival did not meaningfully attenuate differences in RSSRs between agencies with Black and Hispanic compared with White catchment areas (mean [SD] RSSRs after adjustment, 25.9% [3.3%] vs 27.7% [3.1%]; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Risk-standardized survival rates for OHCA were 1.9% lower at EMS agencies working in Black and Hispanic catchment areas than in White catchment areas. This difference was not explained by EMS response times, rates of EMS termination of resuscitation, or first responder rates of initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation or applying an automated external defibrillator. These findings suggest there is a need for further assessment of these discrepancies.

Resuscitation team training in Rwanda: A mixed method study exploring the combination of the VAST course with Advanced Cardiac Life Support training

Introduction

The influence of non-technical skills training on resuscitation performance in low-resource settings is unknown. This study investigates combining the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course with Advanced Cardiac Life Support training on resuscitation performance in Rwanda.

Methods

Participants in this mixed method study are members of resuscitation teams in three district hospitals in Rwanda. The intervention was participation in a 2-day Advanced Cardiac Life Support course followed by the 3-day Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course. Quantitative primary endpoints were time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, time to epinephrine administration, and time to defibrillation. Qualitative data on workplace implementation were gathered during focus groups held 3-months post-intervention.

Results

Forty-seven participants were recruited. Quantitative data showed a statistically significant decrease in time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, epinephrine administration, and defibrillation from pre- to post-Advanced Cardiac Life Support, with times of [43.3 (49.7) seconds] versus [16.5 (20) sec], p = <0.001; [137.3 (108.9) sec] versus [51.3 (37.9)], p = <0.001; and [218.5 (105.8) sec] versus [110.8 (87.1) sec], p = <0.001; respectively. These improvements were maintained following the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course, and at 3-month retention testing. Qualitative analysis highlighted five key themes: ability to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation; team coordination for task allocation; empowerment; desire for training and mentorship; and advocacy for system improvement.

Conclusion

A modified 2-day Advanced Cardiac Life Support course improved resuscitation time indicators with retention 3-months later. Combining the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course and Advanced Cardiac Life Support led to better team coordination, empowerment to act, and advocacy for system improvement. This pairing of courses has promise for improving Advanced Cardiac Life Support skills amongst healthcare workers in low-resource settings.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05278884.

Team Strategies and Dynamics During Resuscitation

Resuscitations are complex events that require teamwork to succeed. In addition to the technical skills involved, a host of nontechnical skills are critical for optimal medical care delivery. These skills include mental preparation; planning for tasks and roles; leadership to guide resuscitation progress; and clear, closed-loop communication. Concerns and error detection should be escalated in an established format. Debriefing after the event helps identify learning points to carry forward for the next resuscitation. Support of the team providing this intense form of care is crucial to protect the mental health and function of providers.

The impact of a smartphone-based cognitive aid on clinical performance during cardiac arrest simulations: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives

In-hospital cardiac arrests are common and associated with high mortality. Smartphone applications offer quick access to algorithms and timers but often lack real-time guidance. This study assesses the impact of the Code Blue Leader application on the performance of providers leading cardiac arrest simulations.

Methods

This open-label randomized controlled trial included Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)-trained medical doctors (MD) and registered nurses (RN). Participants were randomized to lead the same ACLS simulation with or without the app. The primary outcome, "performance score," was assessed by a trained rater using a validated ACLS scoring system. Secondary outcomes included percentage of critical actions performed, number of incorrect actions, and chest compression fraction (percentage of time spent performing chest compressions). A sample size of 30 participants was calculated to detect a difference of 20% at the 0.05 alpha level with 90% power.

Results

Fifteen MDs and 15 RNs underwent stratified randomization. The median (interquartile range) performance score in the app group was 95.3% (93.0%-100.0%) compared to 81.4% (60.5%-88.4%) in the control group, demonstrating an effect size of r = 0.69 (Z = -3.78, r = 0.69, p = 0.0002). The percentage of critical actions performed in the app group was 100% (96.2%-100.0%) compared to 85.0% (74.1%-92.4%) in the control group. The number of incorrect actions performed in the app group was 1 (1) compared to 4 (3-5) in the control group. Chest compression fraction in the app group was 75.5% (73.0%-84.0%) compared to 75.0% (72.0%-85.0%) in the control group.

Conclusions

The Code Blue Leader smartphone app significantly improved the performance of ACLS-trained providers in cardiac arrest simulations.

Stress Testing the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Novel Use of In Situ Simulation to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats During Acute Airway Management

INTRODUCTION

Although uncommon, cardiac arrests in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) are often catastrophic and likely to increase with rising case complexity. In situ simulation (ISS) has been used to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) in inpatient units but has not yet been studied in the CCL.

METHODS

Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles leveraging ISS were conducted focused on acute airway management. Data collected through debriefs focused on (1) airway management, (2) equipment availability, and (3) interdepartmental communication. The LSTs were subcategorized and plotted on the Survey Analysis for Evaluating Risk (SAFER)-Matrix. A SAFER score was calculated based on quantifying the likelihood of harm, scope, and the number of times a threat was identified during simulation. Time to definitive airway was collected as a secondary measure. Interventions were developed using cause and effect and driver diagrams between PDSA cycles.

RESULTS

Eleven total simulations through 3 PDSA cycles were conducted between January and December 2021 (5 in PDSA 1, 4 in PDSA 2, and 2 in PDSA 3). One hundred one LSTs were identified with 14 total subcategories. The mean SAFER score decreased from 5.37 in PDSA 1, to 2.96 in PDSA 2, and to 1.00 in PDSA 3. Bivariate regression analysis showed a decrease in SAFER score of 2.19 for every PDSA cycle (P = 0.011). Ordinary least squares regression had a decrease of 1.65 in airway-related threats every PDSA cycle (P < 0.01) as well as an increase in intubation time of 35.0 seconds for every 1-unit increase in communication threat identified (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

This study successfully leveraged ISS and existing quality improvement initiatives in the CCL, resulting in a decrease in airway-related threats as measured through simulation.

Feasibility of accelerated code team activation with code button triggered smartphone notification

INTRODUCTION

Studies support rapid interventions to improve outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to decrease the time to code team activation and improve dissemination of patient-specific data to facilitate targeted treatments.

METHODS

We mapped code blue buttons behind each bed to patients through the electronic medical record. Pushing the button sent patient-specific data (admitting diagnosis, presence of difficult airway, and recent laboratory values) through a secure messaging system to the responding teams' smartphones. The code button also activated a hospital-wide alert through the operator. We piloted the system on seven medicine inpatient units from November 2019 through May 2022. We compared the time from code blue button press to smartphone message receipt vs traditional operator-sent overhead page.

RESULTS

The code button was the primary mode of code team activation for 12/35 (34.3%) cardiac arrest events. The code team received smartphone notifications a median of 78 s (IQR = 47-127 s) before overhead page. The median time to adrenaline administration for codes activated with the code button was not significantly different (240 s (IQR 142-300 s for code button) vs 148 s (IQR = 34-367 s) for overhead page, p = 0.89). Survival to discharge was 3/12 (25.0%) for codes activated with the code button vs 4/23 (17.4%) when activated by calling the operator (p = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a smartphone-based code button notification system reduced time to code team activation by 78 s. Larger cohorts are necessary to assess effects on patient outcomes.

Using rapid response system trigger clusters to characterize patterns of clinical deterioration among hospitalized adult patients

Background

Many rapid response system (RRS) events are activated using multiple triggers. However, the patterns in which RRS triggers co-occur to activate the medical emergency team (MET) to respond to RRS events is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the patterns (RRS trigger clusters) in which RRS triggers co-occur when used to activate the MET and determine the association of these clusters with outcomes using a sample of hospitalized adult patients.

Methods

RRS events among adult patients from January 2015 to December 2019 in the Get With The Guidelines- Resuscitation registry's MET module were examined (n=134,406). A combination of cluster analyses methods was performed to group patients into RRS trigger clusters based on the triggers used to activate their RRS events. Pearson's chi-squared and ANOVA tests were used to examine differences in patient characteristics across RRS trigger clusters. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the associations between RRS trigger clusters and outcomes following RRS events.

Results

Six RRS trigger clusters were identified in the study sample. The RRS triggers that predominantly identified each cluster were as follows: tachypnea, new onset difficulty in breathing, and decreased oxygen saturation (Cluster 1); tachypnea, decreased oxygen saturation, and staff concern (Cluster 2); respiratory depression, decreased oxygen saturation, and mental status changes (Cluster 3); tachycardia and staff concern (Cluster 4); mental status changes (Cluster 5); hypotension and staff concern (Cluster 6). Significant differences in patient characteristics were observed across RRS trigger clusters. Patients in Clusters 3 and 6 were associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA [p<0.01]), while Cluster 4 was associated with a decreased likelihood of IHCA (p<0.01). All clusters were associated with an increased risk of mortality (p<0.01).

Conclusions

We discovered six novel RRS trigger clusters with differing relationships to adverse patient outcomes following RRS events. RRS trigger clusters may prove crucial in clarifying the associations between RRS events and adverse outcomes and may aid in clinician decision-making during RRS events.

Updating the model for Risk-Standardizing survival for In-Hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons

BACKGROUND

Risk-standardized survival rates (RSSR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been widely used for hospital benchmarking and research. The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a substantial decline in IHCA survival as COVID-19 infection is associated with markedly lower survival. Therefore, there is a need to update the model for computing RSSRs for IHCA given the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Within Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we identified 53,922 adult patients with IHCA from March, 2020 to December, 2021 (the COVID-19 era). Using hierarchical logistic regression, we derived and validated an updated model for survival to hospital discharge and compared the performance of this updated RSSR model with the previous model.

RESULTS

The survival rate was 21.0% and 20.8% for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The model had good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72) and excellent calibration. The updated parsimonious model comprised 13 variables-all 9 predictors in the original model as well as 4 additional predictors, including COVID-19 infection status. When applied to data from the pre-pandemic period of 2018-2019, there was a strong correlation (r = 0.993) between RSSRs obtained from the updated and the previous models.

CONCLUSION

We have derived and validated an updated model to risk-standardize hospital rates of survival for IHCA. The updated model yielded RSSRs that were similar to the initial model for IHCAs in the pre-pandemic period and can be used for supporting ongoing efforts to benchmark hospitals and facilitate research that uses data from either before or after the emergence of COVID-19.

The Concise Assessment of Leader Management Tool: Evaluation of Healthcare Provider Leadership During Real-Life Pediatric Emergencies

INTRODUCTION

Resuscitation events in pediatric critical and emergency care are high risk, and strong leadership is an important component of an effective response. The Concise Assessment of Leadership Management (CALM) tool, designed to assess the strength of leadership skills during pediatric crises, has shown promising validity and reliability in simulated settings. The objective of this study was to generate further validity and reliability evidence for the CALM by applying it to real-life emergency events.

METHODS

A prospective, video-based study was conducted in an academic pediatric emergency department. Three reviewers independently applied the CALM tool to the assessment of pediatric emergency department physicians as they led both a cardiac arrest and a sepsis event. Time to critical event (epinephrine, fluid, and antibiotic administration) was collected via video review. Based on Kane's framework, we conducted fully crossed, person × event × rater generalizability (G) and decision (D) studies. Interrater reliability was calculated using Gwet AC 2 and intraclass correlation coefficients. Time to critical events was correlated with CALM scores using Spearman coefficient.

RESULTS

Nine team leaders were assessed in their leadership of 2 resuscitations each. The G coefficient was 0.68, with 26% subject variance, 20% rater variance, and no case variance. Thirty-three percent of the variance (33%) was attributed to third-order interactions and unknown factors. Gwet AC 2 was 0.3 and intraclass correlation was 0.58. The CALM score and time to epinephrine correlated at -0.79 ( P = 0.01). The CALM score and time to fluid administration correlated at -0.181 ( P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides additional validity evidence for the CALM tool's use in this context if used with multiple raters, aligning with data from the previous simulation-based CALM validity study. Further development may improve reliability. It also serves as an exemplar of the rigors of conducting validity work within medical simulation.

Experiences of primary health care practitioners dealing with emergencies - 'We are on our own'

BACKGROUND

Primary health care (PHC) focuses on health promotion and disease prevention; however, acute episodes and emergencies still occur at this level of care. The World Health Organization (WHO) proposes strengthening emergency care at a PHC level as a way of lessening the burden of disease on the overall health system. It is not known how health care practitioners at the PHC level experience management of emergencies.

AIM

To explore and describe the experiences of PHC practitioners dealing with emergencies at PHC facilities in Gauteng, South Africa.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the District Health Services of Gauteng province in South Africa, including clinics, community health care centres and district hospitals.

METHODS

Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample of professional nurses and doctors from various levels of the district health care system. Data were transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Various themes were identified related to the individual confidence and competence of the PHC practitioner, the team approach, the process of role and task allocation and the need for training.

CONCLUSION

The study provided a voice for the needs of health care practitioners dealing with emergencies at the PHC level. The designing of a targeted and contextually appropriate approach to emergency care training of health care practitioners in the PHC setting that improves team dynamics and team performance, is recommended.Contribution: The insights of PHC practitioners dealing with emergencies contribute contextual relevance to any strategic improvement of care at this level.

Dedicated chest compressor team: A quality improvement initiative to improve chest compression performance at in-hospital cardiac arrest events through quarterly training

Background

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is foundational to all resuscitative efforts. Spaced practice improves learners' skill retention. We evaluated the implementation of a quarterly CPR curriculum and skills training program for a dedicated chest compressor team to improve the quality of CPR performed during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) events and its impact on patient survival of event.

Methods

Baseline observations on CPR performance within the hospital were collected in October 2018. The CPR quarterly training program was implemented in November 2018. Training included use of high-fidelity simulation manikins and team members received real-time feedback scores related to compression rate, depth and recoil. High-quality CPR scores were set at ≥ 70%. Yearly IHCA event survival data was examined in relation to the implementation of training.

Results

Quarterly CPR training of the team led to retention of CPR skills (chest compression rate, depth, and recoil). The team's initial CPR training performance average score was 49.1%, increasing to 80.3%, with 95% (n = 37) of participants achieving a higher score after feedback during their initial training. A two-sample t-test was used for numerical data and chi-square was used for proportional data analysis. The survival of event prior to this training was 61.0% January-October 2018. Post -training, event survival rose to 73.5% (p-value 0.03) in 2019.

Conclusion

Implementation of a team that attends quarterly CPR training with a high-fidelity simulation manikin is attainable. This training resulted in improved CPR quality and benefited IHCA event survival.

Impact of Hospital Safety-Net Burden on Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

High safety-net burden hospitals (HBHs) treating large numbers of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients have generally been linked to worse clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist on the impact of the hospitals' safety-net burden on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the differences in survival to discharge, routine discharge home, and healthcare resource utilization between patients at HBH with those treated at low safety-net burden hospital (LBH).

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study across hospitals in the United States: Hospitalized patients greater than or equal to 18 years that underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between 2008 and 2018 identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Database. Data analysis was conducted in January 2022.

EXPOSURE

IHCA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Other outcomes are routine discharge home among survivors, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization cost.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 patients were hospitalized with IHCA, of which 19.2% occurred at LBH and 55.2% at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH were younger (62 ± 20 yr vs 67 ± 17 yr) and predominantly in the lowest median household income (< 25th percentile). In multivariate analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), compared with LBH. In addition, IHCA patients at publicly owned hospitals and those with medium and large hospital bed size were less likely to survive to hospital discharge, while patients with median household income greater than 25th percentile had better odds of hospital survival.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH may have lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and are less likely to be routinely discharged home after CPR. Median household income and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.

The Five-4-Life Quality Improvement Program: Improving Frontline Nurses' Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Leadership and Team Management Skills

BACKGROUND

Poor leadership and teamwork in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are associated with poor patient outcomes.

PROBLEM

Frontline nursing staff frequently identify patients in cardiac arrest but may not have the initial leadership and teamwork skills to organize their initial rescue response.

APPROACH

The Five-4-Life Quality Improvement (QI) program was pilot tested in a pediatric unit within a 510-bed acute care hospital in 2 phases: first, an educational program focused on leadership, team dynamics, and CPR skills, followed by sustaining interventions in the unit. Video recordings of 12 mock codes (4 pre-, 4 post-, 4 follow-up) were analyzed by trained observers.

OUTCOMES

Descriptive statistical tests indicated a significant improvement in leadership, teamwork, and task management scores pre- and post-program, and sustained after the program.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the Five-4-Life QI program is feasible in improving leadership, teamwork, and task management of first responding frontline nurses.

In-hospital cardiac arrest: the state of the art

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with a high risk of death, but mortality rates are decreasing. The latest epidemiological and outcome data from several cardiac arrest registries are helping to shape our understanding of IHCA. The introduction of rapid response teams has been associated with a downward trend in hospital mortality. Technology and access to defibrillators continues to progress. The optimal method of airway management during IHCA remains uncertain, but there is a trend for decreasing use of tracheal intubation and increased use of supraglottic airway devices. The first randomised clinical trial of airway management during IHCA is ongoing in the UK. Retrospective and observational studies have shown that several pre-arrest factors are strongly associated with outcome after IHCA, but the risk of bias in such studies makes prognostication of individual cases potentially unreliable. Shared decision making and advanced care planning will increase application of appropriate DNACPR decisions and decrease rates of resuscitation attempts following IHCA.

Intraoperative Code Blue: Improving Teamwork and Code Response Through Interprofessional, In Situ Simulation

INTRODUCTION

An intraoperative cardiac arrest requires perioperative teams to be equipped with the technical skills, nontechnical skills, and confidence to provide the best resuscitative measures for the patient. In situ simulation (simulation conducted in health professionals' work environment, such as a patient care unit, and not in an off-site location) has the potential to improve team performance. The research team assessed the effects of in situ simulation on code response, teamwork, communication, and comfort in intraoperative resuscitations.

METHODS

This study included seven interprofessional teams consisting of RNs, anesthesiologists, surgical technologists, and patient care technicians working in the operating room of a community hospital in New Jersey. The hour-long interdisciplinary simulation training sessions consisted of a code blue scenario run twice; both times video recorded, retrospectively reviewed, and compared to each other. Technical skills were measured by "time-to-tasks"; nontechnical skills were assessed using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) instrument. Self-reported comfort in skills was collected before the simulation program and after completion of the training.

RESULTS

A total of 21 perioperative nurses, 7 anesthesiologists, 7 surgical technologists, and 4 patient care technicians participated from January to April 2021. There was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in time to compressions (by 14 seconds, 53.5% improvement) and in time to defibrillation (by 49 seconds) between the two simulations. Significant improvements were noted in confidence levels of certain CPR-related technical skills. There were statistically significant improvements in TEAM scores in the two teams that performed lowest in the pre-debrief simulation (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the operative setting, where time and space for training are limited, in situ simulation training was associated with improvement in technical skills of individuals and teams, with significantly improved teamwork in teams that required the most training. The long-term effects of such training and its effects on patient outcomes require additional research.

Early changes in hospital resuscitation practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in many disruptions in care for patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We sought to identify changes made in hospital resuscitation practices during progression of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study using in-depth interviews of clinical staff leadership involved with resuscitation care at a select group of U.S. acute care hospitals in the national American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry for IHCA. We focused interviews on resuscitation practice changes for IHCA since the initiation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used rapid analysis techniques for qualitative data summarization and analysis.

Results

A total of 6 hospitals were included with interviews conducted with both physicians and nurses between November 2020 and April 2021. Three topical themes related to shifts in resuscitation practice through the COVID-19 pandemic were identified: 1) ensuring patient and provider safety and wellness (e.g., use of personal protective equipment); 2) changing protocols and training for routine educational practices (e.g., alterations in mock codes and team member roles); and 3) goals of care and end of life discussions (e.g., challenges with visitor and family policies). We found advances in leveraging technology use as an important topic that helped institutions address challenges across all 3 themes.

Conclusions

Early on, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many changes to resuscitation practices at hospitals placing an emphasis on enhanced safety, training, and end of life planning. These lessons have implications for understanding how systems may be better designed for resuscitation efforts.

Impact of trained intensivist coverage on survival outcomes after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea

AIM

We aimed to investigate whether trained intensivist coverage affects survival outcomes following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ICPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).

METHODS

All adult patients who received ICPR for IHCA between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 in South Korea were included. Patients who received ICPR in hospitals with trained intensivist coverage for ICU staffing were defined as the intensivist group, whereas other patients were considered the non-intensivist group.

RESULTS

In total 68,286 adult patients (36,025 [52.8%] in the intensivist group and 32,261 [47.2%] in the non-intensivist group) were included in the analysis. After propensity score (PS) matching 40,988 patients (20,494 in each group) were included. In logistic regression after PS matching, the intensivist group showed a 17% (odds ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.22; P < 0.001) higher live discharge rate after ICPR than the non-intensivist group. In Cox regression after PS matching, the 6-month and the 1-year mortality rates in the intensivist group after ICPR were 11% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.87-0.91; P < 0.001) and 10% (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88-0.92; P < 0.001) lower than those in the non-intensivist group, respectively. In Kaplan-Meir estimation the median survival time after ICPR in the intensivist group was 12.0 days (95% CI: 11.6-12.4) while that in the non-intensivist group was 8.0 days (95% CI: 7.7-8.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Trained intensivist coverage in the ICU was associated with improvements in both short and long-term survival outcomes after ICPR for IHCA.

Telemedical Intensivist Consultation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

High-quality leadership improves resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but experienced resuscitation leaders are unavailable in many settings.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does real-time telemedical intensivist consultation improve resuscitation quality for IHCA?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, standardized high-fidelity simulations of IHCA conducted between February 2017 and September 2018 on inpatient medicine and surgery units at seven hospitals were assigned randomly to consultation (intervention) or simulated observation (control) by a critical care physician via telemedicine. The primary outcome was the fraction of time without chest compressions (ie, no-flow fraction) during an approximately 4- to 6-min analysis window beginning with telemedicine activation. Secondary outcomes included other measures of chest compression quality, defibrillation and medication timing, resuscitation protocol adherence, nontechnical team performance, and participants' experience during resuscitation participation.

RESULTS

No-flow fraction did not differ between the 36 intervention group (0.22 ± 0.13) and the 35 control group (0.19 ± 0.10) resuscitation simulations included in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = .41). The etiology of the simulated cardiac arrest was identified more often during evaluable resuscitations supported by a telemedical intensivist consultant (22/32 [69%]) compared with control resuscitations (10/34 [29%]; P = .001), but other measures of resuscitation quality, resuscitation team performance, and participant experience did not differ between intervention groups. Problems with audio quality or the telemedicine connection affected 14 intervention group resuscitations (39%).

INTERPRETATION

Consultation by a telemedical intensivist physician did not improve resuscitation quality during simulated ward-based IHCA.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03000829; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.