Preventive or Deferred Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Defibrillator (BERLIN VT)

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with or without Previous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Interventions Undergoing Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment in patients with ventricular tachycardia and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Methods: We enrolled 57 consecutive carriers of ICD undergoing CA for electrical storm (ES). Our aim was to investigate differences in clinical, device-related, and electroanatomic features among patients who had history of appropriate ICD interventions before the ES compared to those who had not. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause and recurrences of sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate ICD therapy, or ES. Results: During a median follow up of 39 months, 28 patients (49%) met the primary endpoint. Those with previous ICD interventions had a higher prevalence of late potentials and a greater unipolar low-voltage area at electroanatomic mapping. Patients who met the primary endpoint had a higher prevalence of ATP/shock episodes preceding the ES event. At Cox regression analysis, non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), QRS duration, and previous ATP and/or shock before the ES were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. At multivariate analysis, NIDCM and previous shock were associated with arrhythmic recurrences and/or death. Conclusions: A history of recurrent ICD therapies predicts worse outcomes when CA is needed because of ES. Although more studies are needed to definitively address this question, our data speak in support of an early referral for CA of ES.

Catheter ablation as first-line treatment for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with SHD are particularly susceptible to VT, a condition that increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can terminate VT and prevent SCD but do not prevent VT recurrence. The efficacy and safety of CA as a first-line treatment in SHD patients with preserved LVEF remain unclear. We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies reporting the outcomes of CA therapy in patients with VT and preserved LVEF, published up to January 19, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of SCD following catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of VT in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, VT recurrence, procedural complications, CA success rate, and ICD implantation after catheter ablation. We included seven studies in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 920 patients. The pooled success rate of catheter ablation was 84.6% (95% CI 67.2-93.6). Complications occurred in 6.4% (95% CI 4.0-9.9) of patients, and 13.9% (95% CI 10.1-18.8) required ICD implantation after ablation. VT recurrence was observed in 23.2% (95% CI 14.8-34.6) of patients, while the rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was 3.1% (95% CI 1.7-5.6). The overall prevalence of all-cause mortality in this population was 5% (95% CI 1.8-13). CA appears promising as a first-line VT treatment in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF, especially for monomorphic hemodynamically tolerated VT. However, due to the lack of direct comparisons with ICDs and anti-arrhythmic drugs, further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Catheter ablation compared to medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in sarcoidosis: nationwide outcomes and hospital readmissions

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be a useful treatment strategy, however, few studies have compared CA to medical therapy (MT) in the sarcoidosis population.

Objective

To assess in-hospital outcomes and unplanned readmissions following CA for VT compared to MT in patients with sarcoidosis.

Methods

Data was obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2019 to identify patients with sarcoidosis admitted for VT either undergoing CA or MT during elective and non-elective admission. Primary endpoints were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and 30-day hospital readmissions. Procedural complications at index admission and causes of readmission were also identified.

Results

Among 1581 patients, 1217 with sarcoidosis and VT underwent MT compared to 168 with CA during non-elective admission. 63 patients admitted electively underwent CA compared with 129 managed medically. There was no difference in the composite outcome for patients undergoing catheter ablation or medical therapy during both non-elective (9.0 % vs 12.0 %, p = 0.312) and elective admission (3.2 % vs. 7.8 %, p = 0.343). The most common cause of readmission were ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in both groups, however, those undergoing elective CA were less likely to be readmitted for VA compared to non-elective CA. The most common complication in the CA group was cardiac tamponade (4.8 %).

Conclusion

VT ablation is associated with similar rates of 30-day readmission compared to MT and does not confer increased risk of harm with respect to inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Further research is warranted to determine if a subgroup of sarcoidosis patients admitted with VT are better served with an initial conservative management strategy followed by VT ablation.

A randomized clinical trial of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for suppression of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.

METHODS

The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized. All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques RESULTS: The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov registration NCT02830360.

The Current Landscape of Ventricular Tachycardia Trials: A Systematic Review of Registered Studies

BACKGROUND

Although there are evolving techniques and technologies for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT), the current landscape of clinical trials for managing VT remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide a systematic characterisation of the interventional management of VT through an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, anzctr.org.au and chictr.org.cn databases.

METHODS

We queried all phase II to IV interventional trials registered up to November 2023 that enrolled patients with VT. Published, completed but unpublished, terminated, or ongoing trials were included for final analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 698 registered studies, 135 were related to VT, with 123 trials included in the final analysis. Among these trials, 25 (20%) have been published, enrolling a median of 35 patients (interquartile range [IQR] 20-132) over a median of 43 months (IQR 19-62). Out of the published trials, 14 (56%) were randomised, and 12 (48%) focused on catheter ablation. Twenty-two (18%) have been completed but remain unpublished, even after a median of 36 months (IQR 15-60). Furthermore, 27 (22%) trials were terminated or withdrawn, with the most common cause being poor enrolment. Currently, 49 (40%) trials are ongoing and novel non-ablative technologies, such as radioablation and autonomic modulation, account for 35% and 8% of ongoing trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed that many registered trials remain unpublished or incomplete, and randomised controlled trial evidence is limited to only a few studies. Furthermore, many ongoing trials are focused on non-catheter ablation-based strategies. Therefore, larger pragmatic trials are needed to create stronger evidence in the future.

A screening for cerebral deoxygenation during VT ablations in patients with structural heart disease

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation often present with structural heart disease (SHD) and reduced ejection fraction. Inducing VT by programmed electrical stimulation (PES) puts these patients at risk for hemodynamic instability and cerebral hypoperfusion.

OBJECTIVE

The present study screens for cerebral oxygen desaturation phases (ODPs) in patients undergoing VT ablation.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 72% males) underwent ablation of sustained VT with simultaneous neuromonitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

RESULTS

Analysis of NIRS signal identified ODPs in 29 patients (62%). ODPs were associated with a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (45% vs. 11%, p = 0.024), previous VT episodes (n = 16 vs. 4, p = 0.018), and VTs inducible by PES (n = 2.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.004). Patients with ODPs were more likely to be admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (78% vs. 33%, p = 0.005) and had more in-hospital VT recurrences (24% vs. 0%, p = 0.034). No differences were observed in VT recurrence rates after hospital discharge (41.4% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.60) and left ventricular ejection fraction (34% vs. 38%, p = 0.567). IHD (OR: 32.837, p = 0.006), ICU admission (OR: 14.112, p = 0.013), and the number of VTs inducible at PES (OR: 2.705, p = 0.015) were independently associated with ODPs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study registers episodes of cerebral hypoperfusion in 62% of patients undergoing VT ablation and identifies IHD and the number of VTs inducible at PES as possible risk factors for these episodes.

Acute post-procedural inducibility is a poor predictor of clinical outcomes in high-risk patients (PAINESD > 17) undergoing scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation

AIMS

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) non-inducibility in response to programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a widely used procedural endpoint for VT ablation despite inconclusive evidence with respect to clinical outcomes in high-risk patients. The aim is to determine the utility of acute post-ablation VT inducibility as a predictor of VT recurrence, mortality, or mortality equivalent in high-risk patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of high-risk patients (defined as PAINESD > 17) who underwent scar-related VT ablation at our institution between July 2010 and July 2022. Patients' response to PVS (post-procedure) was categorized into three groups: Group A, no clinical VT or VT with cycle length > 240 ms inducible; Group B, only non-clinical VT with cycle length > 240 ms induced; and Group C, all other outcomes (including cases where no PVS was performed). The combined primary endpoint included death, durable left ventricular assist device placement, and cardiac transplant (Cox analysis). Ventricular tachycardia recurrence was considered a secondary endpoint (competing risk analysis). Of the 1677 VT ablation cases, 123 cases met the inclusion criteria for analysis. During a 19-month median follow-up time (interquartile range 4-43 months), 82 (66.7%) patients experienced the composite primary endpoint. There was no difference between Groups A and C with respect to the primary [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21 (0.94-1.57), P = 0.145] or secondary [HR = 1.18 (0.91-1.54), P = 0.210] outcomes. These findings persisted after multivariate adjustments. The size of Group B (n = 13) did not permit meaningful statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of post-ablation PVS do not significantly correlate with long-term outcomes in high-risk (PAINESD > 17) VT ablation patients.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Fluoroless Ablation of VT in Patients With Structural Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically requires radiation exposure with its potential adverse health effects. A completely fluoroless ablation approach is achievable using a combination of electroanatomical mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Nonetheless, data in patients undergoing VT ablation are limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease using a zero-fluoroscopy approach.

METHODS

This multicenter study included consecutive patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing fluoroless VT ablation. Patients requiring epicardial access or coronary angiography were excluded.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2023 a total of 198 patients (aged 66.4 ± 13.4 years, 76% male, 48% ischemic) were included. Most patients (95.4%) underwent left ventricular (LV) mapping and/or ablation, which was conducted via transseptal route in 54.5% (n = 103), via retrograde aortic route in 43.4% (n = 82), and using a combined approach in 2.1% (n = 4). Two-thirds of patients had a cardiac device, including a biventricular device in 15%; 2 patients had a LV assist device, and 1 patient had a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The mean total procedural time was 211 ± 70 minutes, and the total radiofrequency time was 30 ± 22 minutes. During a follow-up period of 22 ± 18 months, the freedom from VT recurrence was 80%, and 7.6% of patients underwent a repeated ablation. Procedural-related complications occurred in 6 patients (3.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroless ablation of VT in structural heart disease is feasible, effective, and safe when epicardial mapping/ablation is not required.

RIPPLE-VT study: Multicenter prospective evaluation of ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation by targeting scar channels to eliminate latest scar potentials without direct ablation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be treated by substrate modification of the myocardial scar by catheter ablation during sinus rhythm without VT induction. Better defining this arrhythmic substrate could help improve outcome and reduce ablation burden.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to limit ablation within postinfarction scar to conduction channels within the scar to reduce VT recurrence.

METHODS

Patients undergoing catheter ablation for recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for postinfarction VT were recruited at 5 centers. Left ventricular maps were collected on CARTO using a Pentaray catheter. Ripple mapping was used to categorize infarct scar potentials (SPs) by timing. Earliest SPs were ablated sequentially until there was loss of the terminal SPs without their direct ablation. The primary outcome measure was sustained VT episodes as documented by device interrogations at 1 year, which was compared with VT episodes in the year before ablation.

RESULTS

The study recruited 50 patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 33% ± 9%), and 37 patients (74%) met the channel ablation end point with successful loss of latest SPs without direct ablation. There were 16 recurrences during 1-year follow-up. There was a 90% reduction in VT burden from 30.2 ± 53.9 to 3.1 ± 7.5 (P < .01) per patient, with a concomitant 88% reduction in appropriate shocks from 2.1 ± 2.7 to 0.2 ± 0.9 (P < .01). There were 8 deaths during follow-up. Those who met the channel ablation end point had no significant difference in mortality, recurrence, or VT burden but had a significantly lower ablation burden of 25.7 ± 4.2 minutes vs 39.9 ± 6.1 minutes (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Scar channel ablation is feasible by ripple mapping and can be an alternative to more extensive substrate modification techniques.

Competing risks of monomorphic vs. non-monomorphic ventricular arrhythmias in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) study

AIMS

Ablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) has been shown to reduce shock frequency and improve survival. We aimed to compare cause-specific risk factors for MMVT and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and to develop predictive models.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The multicentre retrospective cohort study included 2668 patients (age 63.1 ± 13.0 years; 23% female; 78% white; 43% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 28.2 ± 11.1%). Cox models were adjusted for demographic characteristics, heart failure severity and treatment, device programming, and electrocardiogram metrics. Global electrical heterogeneity was measured by spatial QRS-T angle (QRSTa), spatial ventricular gradient elevation (SVGel), azimuth, magnitude (SVGmag), and sum absolute QRST integral (SAIQRST). We compared the out-of-sample performance of the lasso and elastic net for Cox proportional hazards and the Fine-Gray competing risk model. During a median follow-up of 4 years, 359 patients experienced their first sustained MMVT with appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and 129 patients had their first PVT/VF with appropriate ICD shock. The risk of MMVT was associated with wider QRSTa [hazard ratio (HR) 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.34], larger SVGel (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05-1.30), and smaller SVGmag (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and SAIQRST (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99). The best-performing 3-year competing risk Fine-Gray model for MMVT [time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC(t)AUC) 0.728; 95% CI 0.668-0.788] identified high-risk (> 50%) patients with 75% sensitivity and 65% specificity, and PVT/VF prediction model had ROC(t)AUC 0.915 (95% CI 0.868-0.962), both satisfactory calibration.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated models to predict the competing risks of MMVT or PVT/VF that could inform procedural planning and future randomized controlled trials of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL:www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier:NCT03210883.

Active Arrhythmia Pattern: A Novel Predictor of ICD Shocks-A Subanalysis From the PARTITA Study

BACKGROUND

In the PARTITA trial (Does Timing of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Affect Prognosis in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?), antitachycardia pacing (ATP) predicted the occurrence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after the first shock reduced the risk of death or worsening heart failure. A threshold of ATPs that might warrant an ablation procedure before ICD shocks is unknown. Our aim was to identify a threshold of ATPs and clinical features that predict the occurrence of shocks and cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 517 patients in phase A of the PARTITA study. We used classification and regression tree analysis to develop and test a risk stratification model based on arrhythmia patterns and clinical data to predict ICD shocks. Secondary end points were worsening heart failure and cardiovascular hospitalization.

RESULTS

Classification and regression tree classified patients into 6 leaves by increasing shock probability. Patients treated with ≥5 ATPs in 6 months (active arrhythmia pattern) had the highest risk of ICD shocks (93% and 86%, training and testing samples, respectively). Patients without ATPs had the lowest (1% and 2%). Other predictors included left ventricle ejection fraction<35%, age of <60 years, and obesity. Survival analysis revealed a higher risk of worsening heart failure (hazard ratio, 5.45 [95% CI, 1.62-18.4]; P=0.006) and cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 7.29 [95% CI, 3.66-14.5]; P<0.001) for patients with an active arrhythmia pattern compared with those without ATPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an active arrhythmia pattern (≥5 ATPs in 6 months) are associated with an increased risk of ICD shocks, as well as heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. These data suggest that additional treatments may be helpful to this high-risk group as a preventive strategy to reduce the incidence of major events. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefits of early ventricular tachycardia ablation in this setting.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease: What Is Known and New Perspectives

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease and explore novel approaches currently developing to improve procedural and long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently published trials (PARTITA, PAUSE-SCD, and SURVIVE-VT) have demonstrated the prognostic benefit of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to current clinical practice. Advanced cardiac imaging provides a valuable pre-procedural evaluation of the arrhythmogenic substrate, identifying ablation targets non-invasively. Advanced cardiac mapping techniques allow to better characterize arrhythmogenic substrate during ablation procedure. Emerging technologies like pulsed field ablation and ultra-low temperature cryoablation show promise in ventricular tachycardia ablation. Advancements in mapping techniques, ablation technologies, and pre-procedural cardiac imaging offer promise for improving ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes in ischemic heart disease.

Efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients without an ICD implantation

BACKGROUND

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Catheter ablation has been shown to effectively reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence, yet its efficacy in patients without an ICD implantation remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the outcomes of ablation for VT in patients with ICM without a backup ICD.

METHODS

Patients with ICM who received ablation for VT without an ICD implantation were included in this study. Ablation was guided by either activation mapping or substrate mapping. Endocardial ablation was the primary strategy; epicardial access was considered when endocardial ablation failed. The primary end point was VT recurrence during follow-up; secondary end points included cardiovascular rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and a composite of these events.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included, with the mean age of 58.2 ± 11.1 years, 102 of whom (89.5%) were male. Twelve patients (10.5%) underwent endo-epicardial ablation, whereas the rest received endocardial ablation. With a median follow-up of 53.8 months (24.8-84.2 months), VT recurred in 45 patients (39.5%), and 6 patients (5.3%) died, including 2 sudden cardiac deaths. The recurrence rate of VT was significantly lower in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation than in those with endocardial ablation only (8.3% vs 43.1%; log-rank P = .032). After multivariate adjustment, epicardial ablation remained associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidential interval, 0.02-0.98; P = .048).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ICM undergoing VT ablation without a backup ICD experienced a notably low rate of arrhythmic death. Most recurrences proved nonlethal.

Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion

AIMS

Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151).

CONCLUSION

Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.

Intramural needle ablation or repeated standard ablation in patients referred for repeat ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

When ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs after standard RF ablation (sRFA) some patients benefit from repeat sRFA, whereas others warrant advanced methods such as intramural needle ablation (INA). Our objectives are to assess the utility of repeat sRFA and to clarify the benefit of INA when repeat sRFA fails in patients with VT due to structural heart disease.

METHODS

In consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in a study for INA for recurrent sustained monomorphic VT despite sRFA, repeat sRFA was considered first. INA was performed during the same procedure if repeat sRFA failed or no targets for sRFA were identified.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients enrolled, acute success with repeat sRFA was achieved in 30 patients (35%), and during the 6-month follow-up, 87% (20/23) were free of VT hospitalization, 78% were free of any VT, and 7 were lost to follow-up. INA was performed in 55 patients (65%) after sRFA failed, or no endocardial targets were found abolished or modified inducible VT in 35/55 patients (64%). During follow-up, 72% (39/54) were free of VT hospitalization, 41% were free of any VT, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Overall, 59 out of 77 (77%) patients were free of hospitalization and 52% were free of any VT. Septal-origin VTs were more likely to need INA, whereas RV and papillary muscle VTs were less likely to require INA.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat sRFA was beneficial in 23% (18/77) of patients with recurrent sustained VT who were referred for INA. The availability of INA increased favorable outcomes to 52%.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Endpoints: Moving Beyond Noninducibility

In patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) undergoing catheter ablation, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at the end of the procedure has been traditionally used to evaluate the acute success and predict long-term outcomes. Although noninducibility at PES has been extensively investigated and validated in clinical trials and large multicenter registries, its performance in predicting long-term freedom from VT is suboptimal. In addition, PES has inherent limitations related to the influence of background antiarrhythmic drug therapy, periprocedural use of anesthesia, and the heterogeneity in PES protocols. The increased utilization of substrate-based ablation approaches that focus on ablation of abnormal electrograms identified with mapping in sinus or paced rhythm has been paralleled by a need for additional procedural endpoints beyond VT noninducibility at PES. This article critically appraises the relative merits and limitations of different procedural endpoints according to different ablation techniques for catheter ablation of scar-related VT.

Thirty-day readmission after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia: associated factors and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) who require VT ablation are at high risk for readmission. This study aimed to identify the causes and outcomes of 30-day readmission after VT ablation and to analyze the predictors of recurrent VT that required rehospitalization.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, our study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. Based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), we identified the causes of 30-day readmission by organ systems and analyzed their outcomes. Additional analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT.

RESULTS

Of the 4228 patients who underwent VT ablation, 14.2% were readmitted within 30 days of the procedure. The most common cause of readmission was cardiac events (73.6%). Among the cardiac-related readmissions, recurrent VT (47.7%) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (12.9%) were the most common etiologies. Among the readmissions, patients readmitted for CHF had the highest rate of readmission mortality (9.2%). Of the patients readmitted within 30 days of the procedure, 278 patients (6.8%) were readmitted for recurrent VT. Via multivariable analysis, CHF (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.12-3.47; P = 0.02) and non-elective index admissions (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.04-2.55; P = 0.03) were identified as the independent predictors predictive of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent VT was the most common cause of readmission after the VT ablation procedure, and CHF and non-elective index admissions were the significant predictors of these early readmissions. Readmission due to CHF had the highest mortality rate during readmission.

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

Cryocure-VT: the safety and effectiveness of ultra-low-temperature cryoablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies

AIMS

The ultra-low-temperature cryoablation (ULTC) ablation system using -196°C N2 cryogen has been reported to create lesions with freeze duration-dependent depth titratable to over 10 mm with minimum attenuation by scar. Cryocure-VT (NCT04893317) was a first-in-human clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel, purpose-built ULTC catheter in endocardial ablation of scar-dependent ventricular tachycardias (VTs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multi-centre study enrolled patients referred for de novo or second ablations of recurrent monomorphic VT of both ischaemic and non-ischaemic aetiologies. Primary safety and efficacy endpoints of the study were freedom from device- or procedure-related major adverse events (MAEs) up to 30 days post-ablation, acute non-inducibility of clinical VTs at the end of the procedure, and freedom from sustained VT or implantable defibrillator intervention at 6 months. Ultra-low-temperature cryoablation was performed in 64 patients (age 67 ± 11 years, 78% ischaemic, ejection fraction = 35 ± 10%) at 9 centres. The primary acute effectiveness endpoint was achieved in 94% (51/54) of patients in whom post-ablation induction was attempted. There were no protocol-defined MAEs; four procedure-related serious adverse events resolved without clinical sequelae. At 6-month follow-up, 38 patients (60.3%) remained VT-free, and freedom from defibrillator shock was 81.0%, with no significant difference between ischaemic and non-ischaemic cohorts. In 47 patients with defibrillator for at least 6 months prior to the ablation, the VT burden was reduced from median of 4, inter-quartile range (IQR, 1-9) to 0, IQR (0-2).

CONCLUSION

In this first-in-human multi-centre experience, endocardial ULTC ablation of monomorphic VT appears safe and effective in patients with both ischaemic-cardiomyopathy and non-ischaemic-cardiomyopathy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04893317.

Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project

AIMS

Catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has become an important tool to improve clinical outcomes in patients with appropriate transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The aim of our analysis was to test whether VT ablation (VTA) impacts long-term clinical outcomes even in subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) carriers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

International Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (iSUSI) registry patients who experienced either an ICD shock or a hospitalization for monomorphic VT were included in this analysis. Based on an eventual VTA after the index event, patients were divided into VTA+ vs. VTA- cohorts. Primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of a combination of device-related appropriate shocks, monomorphic VTs, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were addressed individually. Among n = 1661 iSUSI patients, n = 211 were included: n = 177 experiencing ICD shocks and n = 34 hospitalized for VT. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed. Both the crude and the yearly event rate of the primary outcome (5/59 and 3.8% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 41/152 and 16.4% yearly event rate in the VTA-; log-rank: P value = 0.0013) and the cardiovascular mortality (1/59 and 0.7% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 13/152 and 4.7% yearly event rate VTA-; log-rank P = 0.043) were significantly lower in the VTA + cohort. At multivariate analysis, VTA was the only variable remaining associated with a lower incidence of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio 0.262 (0.100-0.681), P = 0.006].

CONCLUSION

In a real-world registry of S-ICD carriers, the combined study endpoint of arrhythmic events and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the patient cohort undergoing VTA at long-term follow-up.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT0473876.

[History of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in Germany]

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was a breakthrough in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. After years of technical development in the USA, Michel Mirowski succeeded in proving reliable automatic defibrillation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias through initial human implantations in 1980, despite many obstacles. Nearly 4 years later, the first patients received ICDs at multiple centers in Germany. Subsequently, outside the USA, Germany became the country with highest implantation rates. The absolute number of implantations remained small as long as implantations required epicardial defibrillation electrodes and therefore thoracotomy by cardiac surgeons. Pacemaker-like implantation using a transvenous defibrillation electrode with a pectoral ICD became feasible in the early 1990s pushing implantation rates to the next level. Technical advancements were accompanied by clinical research in Germany, and often, the first-in-human studies were conducted in Germany. In 1991, the first guidelines for indications were established in the USA and Germany. Several randomized studies on indications were published between 1996 and 2009, mostly led by American teams with German participation, but also under German leadership (CASH, CAT, DINAMIT, IRIS). The DANISH study in 2016 questioned the results of these long-standing studies. Instead of providing ICDs to patients using a broad indication, future efforts aim to identify patients who, despite optimal medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and/or catheter ablation, need protection against sudden cardiac death. Risk scores incorporating myocardial scars in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic information are expected to contribute to more individualized and effective indications.

Area-weighted unipolar voltage to predict heart failure outcomes in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia

AIMS

Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) are at risk for end-stage heart failure (HF) due to adverse remodelling. Local unipolar voltages (UV) decrease with loss of viable myocardium. A UV parameter reflecting global viable myocardium may predict prognosis. We evaluate if a newly proposed parameter, area-weighted unipolar voltage (awUV), can predict HF-related outcomes [HFO; HF death/left ventricular (LV) assist device/heart transplant] in ICM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From endocardial voltage maps of consecutive patients with ICM referred for VT ablation, awUV was calculated by weighted interpolation of local UV. Associations between clinical and mapping parameters and HFO were evaluated and validated in a second cohort. The derivation cohort consisted of 90 patients [age 68 ±8 years; LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% interquartile range (IQR) (24-40)] and validation cohort of 60 patients [age 67 ± 9, LVEF 39% IQR (29-45)]. In the derivation cohort, during a median follow-up of 45 months [IQR (34-83)], 36 (43%) patients died and 23 (26%) had HFO. Patients with HFO had lower awUV [4.51 IQR (3.69-5.31) vs. 7.03 IQR (6.08-9.2), P < 0.001]. A reduction in awUV [optimal awUV (5.58) cut-off determined by receiver operating characteristics analysis] was a strong predictor of HFO (3-year HFO survival 97% vs. 57%). The cut-off value was confirmed in the validation cohort (2-year HFO-free survival 96% vs. 60%).

CONCLUSION

The newly proposed parameter awUV, easily available from routine voltage mapping, may be useful at identifying ICM patients at high risk for HFO.

Antiarrhythmic Treatment in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and are associated with a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Optimal antiarrhythmic treatment is therefore essential. Here, we review current approaches to antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

In atrial fibrillation, rhythm control and ventricular rate control are accepted therapeutic strategies. In recent years, clinical trials have demonstrated a prognostic benefit of early rhythm control strategies and AF catheter ablation, especially in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Prevention of sudden cardiac death with ICD therapy is essential, but optimal risk stratification is challenging. For ventricular tachycardias, recent data support early consideration of catheter ablation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is an adjunctive therapy in symptomatic patients but has no prognostic benefit and well-recognized (proarrhythmic) adverse effects. Antiarrhythmic therapy in HF requires a systematic, multimodal approach, starting with guideline-directed medical therapy for HF and integrating pharmacological, device, and interventional therapy.

Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), and its occurrence, is still one of the main reasons for sudden cardiac death and, therefore, for increased mortality and morbidity foremost in patients with structural heart [Kahle A-K, Jungen C, Alken F-A, Scherschel K, Willems S, Pürerfellner H et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium. Europace 2022;24:538-51]. Catheter ablation has become a safe and effective treatment option in patients with recurrent VT [Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:e2-154]. Previous and current guidelines provide guidance on indication for VT ablation and risk assessment and evaluation of underlying disease. However, no uniform recommendation is provided regarding procedural strategies, timing of ablation, and centre setting. Therefore, these specifics seem to differ largely, and recent data are sparse. This physician-based European Heart Rhythm Association survey aims to deliver insights on not only infrastructural settings but also procedural specifics, applied technologies, ablation strategies, and procedural endpoints. Therefore, these findings might deliver a real-world scenario of VT management and potentially are of guidance for other centres.

Major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: individual case analysis of 43 031 procedures

AIMS

In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%.

CONCLUSION

Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005-20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data.

[Long-term results of catheter ablation of idiopathic and structural ventricular tachycardia]

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VTs) has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Ablation procedures for idiopathic VTs depends on the anatomical origin of the arrhythmias, is highly effective in certain cases, and has been implemented as a first-line therapy in recent European guidelines. In contrast, catheter ablation of VTs in patients with structural heart disease has a significant risk of arrhythmia recurrence. Interventional treatment for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy was studied in multiple randomized multicenter trials and it was shown that catheter ablation was more effective in arrhythmia suppression compared to conservative treatment modalities. Catheter ablation of nonischemic cardiomyopathy suffers from far higher rates of arrhythmia recurrences as documented in several long-term studies and often needs complex procedures with or without epicardial mapping and ablation. There is still no clear proof of a mortality benefit from catheter ablation of VTs in patients with or without structural heart disease. Nevertheless, recent guidelines recommend catheter ablation as an alternative to implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in selected cases.

Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of 1-Year Arrhythmia Recurrence after Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Structural Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after catheter ablation remains a concern, emphasizing the need for precise risk assessment. We aimed to use machine learning (ML) to predict 1-month and 1-year VT recurrence following VT ablation.

METHODS

For 337 patients undergoing VT ablation, we collected 31 parameters including medical history, echocardiography, and procedural data. 17 relevant features were included in the ML-based feature selection, which yielded six and five optimal features for 1-month and 1-year recurrence, respectively. We trained several supervised machine learning models using 10-fold cross-validation for each endpoint.

RESULTS

We observed 1-month VT recurrence was observed in 60 (18%) cases and accurately predicted using our model with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.73. Input features used were hemodynamic instability, incessant VT, ICD shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE, and non-inducibility of the clinical VT at the end of the procedure. A separate model was trained for 1-year VT recurrence (observed in 117 (35%) cases) with a mean AUC of 0.71. Selected features were hemodynamic instability, the number of inducible VT morphologies, left ventricular systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, and ICD shock. For both endpoints, a random forest model displayed the highest performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our ML models effectively predict VT recurrence post-ablation, aiding in identifying high-risk patients and tailoring follow-up strategies.

Systematic use of half normal saline during ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease

BACKGROUND

Efficiency and safety of ablation using half normal saline (HNS) has been shown in refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), but no evaluation in unselected larger populations has been made.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficiency and safety of systematic HNS ablation in VT ablation.

METHODS

All successive VT ablations in patients with structural heart disease from 2018 to 2021 used HNS in our center and were retrospectively included.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven successive VT ablation procedures using HNS have been performed in 148 patients (91% males, mean 64 ± 12 years, ischemic cardiomyopathy 64%, left ventricular ejection fraction 38 ± 13%). A mean of 19 ± 7.5 min of RF was delivered, with a mean power of 44 ± 7 W. Relevant complications happened in 9% (strokes 2%, tamponades 3%, atrioventricular block during septal ablations 5%). Over a mean follow-up of 15 ± 9 months, VT recurred in 46%. Final recurrence rate after one or several procedures was 36% (18 months follow-up). Number of VT episodes decreased from 14 ± 35 before to 2.5 ± 10 after ablation (p < .0001) and number of ICD shocks decreased from 4.8 ± 6.8 to 1.5 ± 0.8 (p = .027).

CONCLUSION

Systematic use of HNS during VT ablations in patients with structural heart disease leads to long-term recurrences rates and complications in the range of what is reported using normal saline. Although controlled studies are needed for demonstrating the superiority of such attitude, the use of HNS in every scar-related VT ablation seems safe for standard cases and may be furthermore useful in case of refractory arrhythmias due to difficult-to-ablate substrates.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia After MI: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Background

The prognostic impact of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation is an important outstanding research question. We undertook a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing ablation to medical therapy in patients developing VT after MI.

Methods

We systematically identified all trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. The prespecified primary endpoint was reconstructed individual patient assessment of all-cause mortality. Prespecified secondary endpoints included trial-level assessment of all-cause mortality, VT recurrence or defibrillator shocks and all-cause hospitalisations. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed for ablation approaches involving only substrate modification without VT activation mapping. Sensitivity analyses were performed depending on the proportion of patients with prior MI included.

Results

Eight trials, recruiting a total of 874 patients, were included. Of these 874 patients, 430 were randomised to catheter ablation and 444 were randomised to medical therapy. Catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy when synthesising individual patient data (HR 0.63; 95% CI [0.41-0.96]; p=0.03), but not in trial-level analysis (RR 0.91; 95% CI [0.67-1.23]; p=0.53; I2=0%). Catheter ablation significantly reduced VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and hospitalisations compared with medical therapy. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses.

Conclusion

In patients with postinfarct VT, catheter ablation reduces mortality.

Recurrences of ventricular tachycardia after stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation arise outside the treated volume: analysis of the Swiss cohort

AIMS

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has been recently introduced for the management of therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). VT recurrences have been reported after STAR but the mechanisms remain largely unknown. We analysed recurrences in our patients after STAR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 09.2017 to 01.2020, 20 patients (68 ± 8 y, LVEF 37 ± 15%) suffering from refractory VT were enrolled, 16/20 with a history of at least one electrical storm. Before STAR, an invasive electroanatomical mapping (Carto3) of the VT substrate was performed. A mean dose of 23 ± 2 Gy was delivered to the planning target volume (PTV). The median ablation volume was 26 mL (range 14-115) and involved the interventricular septum in 75% of patients. During the first 6 months after STAR, VT burden decreased by 92% (median value, from 108 to 10 VT/semester). After a median follow-up of 25 months, 12/20 (60%) developed a recurrence and underwent a redo ablation. VT recurrence was located in the proximity of the treated substrate in nine cases, remote from the PTV in three cases and involved a larger substrate over ≥3 LV segments in two cases. No recurrences occurred inside the PTV. Voltage measurements showed a significant decrease in both bipolar and unipolar signal amplitude after STAR.

CONCLUSION

STAR is a new tool available for the treatment of VT, allowing for a significant reduction of VT burden. VT recurrences are common during follow-up, but no recurrences were observed inside the PTV. Local efficacy was supported by a significant decrease in both bipolar and unipolar signal amplitude.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as first-line therapy for the management of ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) in line with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in VT management; however, it is unknown if CA should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this study is to verify the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy for the first VT presentation (as adjunctive to ICD insertion), compared to initial ICD insertion and anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy.

METHODS

Data from patients with the first presentation for VT from January 2017 to January 2021 was reviewed. Patients were classified as "ablation first" vs "ICD first" groups and compared the clinical outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients presented with VT; 34 underwent CA as first-line therapy prior to ICD insertion, and 150 had ICD insertion/AAD therapy as first-line. During the median follow-up of 625 days, patients who underwent CA as first-line therapy had significantly higher ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (91% vs 59%, log-rank P = 0.002) and composite of VA recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, transplant, and death (84% vs 54%, log-rank P = 0.01) compared to those who did not undergo CA. Multivariate analysis revealed that first-line CA was the only protective predictor of VA recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.20, P = 0.003). There were 3 (9%) peri-procedural complications with no peri-procedural deaths.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data supports the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy at the time of the first VT hospitalization, compared to the initial ICD implant and AAD therapy.

A Comparison of Statistical Analysis Between "Real" Patients Reported in Kaplan-Meier Curves and "Reconstructed" Patients Estimated Through the IPDfromKM Method: Analysis of Eight Trials Evaluating Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

Time-to-event endpoints are most widely used in oncology and, to a lesser extent, in cardiology. Typical statistical parameters employed in this context include overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. The graphical presentation of the results is based on the Kaplan-Meier plot. When Kaplan-Meier curves are included in a meta-analysis, the typical methodological approach is a simplified one because the results of each trial (as well as those of the meta-analysis itself) are expressed through a 2x2 contingency; the methodological simplification is that the follow-up is left out from the analysis and, consequently, the Kaplan-Meier curves are omitted as well. The IPDfromKM method, developed in 2021, is an artificial intelligence algorithm designed to be used in these situations. According to this method, to keep the Kaplan-Meier curves in the meta-analysis, each curve is converted into a database of individual patients (which are denoted as "reconstructed" individual patients). In this way, for the purposes of the meta-analysis, the statistical methods are based on individual patients (like those of clinical trials) so that the Kaplan-Meier curves must not be excluded, and the effect of the follow-up can, therefore, be investigated. This technical report describes the IPDfromKM method in all of its operational details. To present the method, a meta-analysis investigating the effects of catheter ablation to prevent ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) has been taken as an example. The original meta-analysis, which included nine controlled trials, was published in February 2023 and adopted the simplified approach based on 2x2 contingency tables. We have reanalyzed these trials by using the IPDfromKM method. Overall, both the standard binary meta-analysis and the IPDfromKM method showed that ablation significantly reduces VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.820 for binary meta-analysis vs 0.728 for the IPDfromKM method). By contrast, while no heterogeneity was found by the binary method, the IPDfromKM found significant heterogeneity, which was confirmed by visual inspection of the Kaplan-Meier curves. This suggests that the results of the IPDfromKM method are more accurate because they include the effect of the follow-up on patients' outcomes. In conclusion, our reanalysis confirms the significant benefit determined by ablation, but a more pronounced degree of between-trial heterogeneity has been found. Finally, it should be stressed that, outside the field of meta-analysis, the IPDfromKM method is also applicable to carry out an indirect comparison between treatments that have never been compared in real clinical trials. In this case, reconstructed patients are analyzed by conducting a simulated comparative trial.

The Lancet Commission to reduce the global burden of sudden cardiac death: a call for multidisciplinary action

Despite major advancements in cardiovascular medicine, sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be an enormous medical and societal challenge, claiming millions of lives every year. Efforts to prevent SCD are hampered by imperfect risk prediction and inadequate solutions to specifically address arrhythmogenesis. Although resuscitation strategies have witnessed substantial evolution, there is a need to strengthen the organisation of community interventions and emergency medical systems across varied locations and health-care structures. With all the technological and medical advances of the 21st century, the fact that survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains lower than 10% in most parts of the world is unacceptable. Recognising this urgent need, the Lancet Commission on SCD was constituted, bringing together 30 international experts in varied disciplines. Consistent progress in tackling SCD will require a completely revamped approach to SCD prevention, with wide-sweeping policy changes that will empower the development of both governmental and community-based programmes to maximise survival from SCA, and to comprehensively attend to survivors and decedents' families after the event. International collaborative efforts that maximally leverage and connect the expertise of various research organisations will need to be prioritised to properly address identified gaps. The Commission places substantial emphasis on the need to develop a multidisciplinary strategy that encompasses all aspects of SCD prevention and treatment. The Commission provides a critical assessment of the current scientific efforts in the field, and puts forth key recommendations to challenge, activate, and intensify efforts by both the scientific and global community with new directions, research, and innovation to reduce the burden of SCD worldwide.

Innovations in ventricular tachycardia ablation

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) has evolved significantly over the past decade and is currently a well-established therapeutic option. Technological advances and improved understanding of VA mechanisms have led to tremendous innovations in VA ablation. The purpose of this review article is to provide an overview of current innovations in VA ablation. Mapping techniques, such as ultra-high density mapping, isochronal late activation mapping, and ripple mapping, have provided improved arrhythmogenic substrate delineation and potential procedural success while limiting duration of ablation procedure and potential hemodynamic compromise. Besides, more advanced mapping and ablation techniques such as epicardial and intramyocardial ablation approaches have allowed operators to more precisely target arrhythmogenic substrate. Moreover, advances in alternate energy sources, such as electroporation, as well as stereotactic radiation therapy have been proposed to be effective and safe. New catheters, such as the lattice and the saline-enhanced radiofrequency catheters, have been designed to provide deeper and more durable tissue ablation lesions compared to conventional catheters. Contact force optimization and baseline impedance modulation are important tools to optimize VT radiofrequency ablation and improve procedural success. Furthermore, advances in cardiac imaging, specifically cardiac MRI, have great potential in identifying arrhythmogenic substrate and evaluating ablation success. Overall, VA ablation has undergone significant advances over the past years. Innovations in VA mapping techniques, alternate energy source, new catheters, and utilization of cardiac imaging have great potential to improve overall procedural safety, hemodynamic stability, and procedural success.

Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward

This article will discuss the past, present, and future of ventricular tachycardia ablation and the continuing contribution of the Europace journal as the platform for publication of milestone research papers in this field of ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite substantial progress in medical and device-based heart failure (HF) therapy, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain a major challenge. Here we review contemporary management of VA in the context of HF with one particular focus on recent advances in imaging and catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Besides limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), their potentially life-threatening side effects are increasingly acknowledged. On the other hand, with tremendous advances in catheter technology, electroanatomical mapping, imaging, and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, catheter ablation has evolved into a safe, efficacious therapy. In fact, recent randomized trials support early catheter ablation, demonstrating superiority over AAD. Importantly, CMR imaging with gadolinium contrast has emerged as a central tool for the management of VA complicating HF: CMR is not only essential for an accurate diagnosis of the underlying entity and subsequent treatment decisions, but also improves risk stratification for SCD prevention and patient selection for ICD therapy. Finally, 3-dimensional characterization of arrhythmogenic substrate by CMR and imaging-guided ablation approaches substantially enhance procedural safety and efficacy. VA management in HF patients is highly complex and should be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach, preferably at specialized centers. While recent evidence supports early catheter ablation of VA, an impact on mortality remains to be demonstrated. Moreover, risk stratification for ICD therapy may have to be reconsidered, taking into account imaging, genetic testing, and other parameters beyond left ventricular function.

Worldwide Experience With an Irrigated Needle Catheter for Ablation of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: Final Report

BACKGROUND

We previously reported feasibility of irrigated needle ablation (INA) with a retractable 27-G end-hole needle catheter to treat nonendocardial ventricular arrhythmia substrate, an important cause of ablation failure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report outcomes and complications in our entire INA-treated population.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or high-density premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) despite radiofrequency ablation were prospectively enrolled at 4 centers. Endpoints included a 70% decrease in VT frequency or PVC burden decrease to <5,000/24 h at 6 months.

RESULTS

INA was performed in 111 patients (median: 2 failed prior ablations, 71% nonischemic heart disease, and left ventricular ejection fraction 36% ± 14%). INA acutely abolished targeted PVCs in 33 of 37 patients (89%), and PVCs were reduced to <5,000/day in 29 patients (78%). During 6-month follow-up, freedom from hospitalization was observed in 50 of 72 patients with VT (69%), and improvement or abolition of VT occurred in 47%. All patients received multiple INA applications, with more in the VT group than in the PVC group (median: 12 [IQR: 7-19] vs 7 [5-15]; P < 0.01). After INA, additional endocardial standard radiofrequency ablation was required in 23% of patients. Adverse events included 4 pericardial effusions (3.5%), 3 cases of (anticipated) atrioventricular block (2.6%), and 3 heart failure exacerbations (2.6%). During 6-month follow-up, 5 deaths occurred; none were procedure-related.

CONCLUSIONS

INA achieves improved arrhythmia control in 78% of patients with PVCs and avoids hospitalization in 69% of patients with VT refractory to standard ablation at 6-month follow-up. Procedural risks are acceptable. (Intramural Needle Ablation for Ablation of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia, NCT01791543; Intramural Needle Ablation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias, NCT03204981).

Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation improves ventricular tachycardia (VT) event-free (time to event) survival in patients with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT and previous myocardial infarction (MI). The effects of ablation on recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (burden) have yet to be investigated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the VT and ICD therapy burden following treatment with either ablation or escalated AAD therapy among patients with VT and previous MI in the VANISH (Ventricular tachycardia AblatioN versus escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ISchemic Heart disease) trial.

METHODS

The VANISH trial randomized patients with previous MI and VT despite initial AAD therapy to either escalated AAD treatment or catheter ablation. VT burden was defined as the total number of VT events treated with ≥1 appropriate ICD therapy. Appropriate ICD therapy burden was defined as the total number of appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATPs) delivered. The Anderson-Gill recurrent event model was used to compare burden between the treatment arms.

RESULTS

Of the 259 enrolled patients (median age, 69.8 years; 7.0% women), 132 patients were randomized to ablation and 129 patients were randomized to escalated AAD therapy. Over 23.4 months of follow-up, ablation-treated patients had a 40% lower shock-treated VT event burden and a 39% lower appropriate shock burden compared with patients who received escalated AAD therapy (P <0.05 for all). A reduction in VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation patients was only demonstrated in the stratum of patients with amiodarone-refractory VT (P <0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AAD-refractory VT and a previous MI, catheter ablation reduced shock-treated VT event burden and appropriate shock burden compared with escalated AAD therapy. There was also lower VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation-treated patients; however, the effect was limited to patients with amiodarone-refractory VT.

Contemporary updates on ventricular arrhythmias: from mechanisms to management

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a group of heart rhythm disorders that can be life-threatening and cause significant morbidity. VA in the presence of structural heart disease (SHD) has distinct prognostic implications and requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach for investigation and management. Early specialist referral should be considered for all patients with VA. Particular urgency is recommended in patients with syncope, nonsustained/sustained VA on Holter monitor and SHD on cardiac imaging because of the heightened risk of sudden cardiac death. Comprehensive phenotyping is recommended for most patients with VA, encompassing noninvasive cardiac functional testing, multimodality imaging and genetic testing in select circumstances. Management of idiopathic VA is guided heavily by symptom burden and the presence of ventricular systolic impairment. In SHD, guideline-directed heart failure therapy and device implantation are critical considerations. Whilst commonly used and well-established, antiarrhythmic drugs can be hampered by toxicity and failure of adequate arrhythmia control. Catheter ablation is increasingly being considered a feasible first-line alternative to medical therapy, where outcomes are influenced by disease aetiology and scar burden in SHD. Catheter ablation is associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence and burden and improved quality of life at follow-up.

Spotlight on the 2022 ESC guideline management of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death: 10 novel key aspects

Sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias are a global health issue. Recently, a new guideline for the management of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death has been published by the European Society of Cardiology that serves as an update to the 2015 guideline on this topic. This review focuses on 10 novel key aspects of the current guideline: As new aspects, public basic life support and access to defibrillators are guideline topics. Recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ventricular arrhythmias are structured according to frequently encountered clinical scenarios. Management of electrical storm has become a new focus. In addition, genetic testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging significantly gained relevance for both diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification. New algorithms for antiarrhythmic drug therapy aim at improving safe drug use. The new recommendations reflect increasing relevance of catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, especially in patients without structural heart disease or stable coronary artery disease with only mildly impaired ejection fraction and haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardias. Regarding sudden cardiac death risk stratification, risk calculators for laminopathies, and long QT syndrome are now considered besides the already established risk calculator for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Generally, 'new' risk markers beyond left ventricular ejection fraction are increasingly considered for recommendations on primary preventive implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Furthermore, new recommendations for diagnosis of Brugada syndrome and management of primary electrical disease have been included. With many comprehensive flowcharts and practical algorithms, the new guideline takes a step towards a user-oriented reference book.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with higher rates of mortality and reduced quality of life. In this study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an ICD.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CA vs control. The primary outcomes were recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves for these outcomes were digitized to obtain individual patient data, which were pooled in a 1-stage meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, syncope, appropriate ICD therapies, appropriate ICD shocks, and inappropriate shocks. For these, study-level HRs or risk ratios were obtained and pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed for trials that investigated prophylactic CA (before or during ICD implantation).

RESULTS

Data on 9 studies and 1103 patients were retrieved. CA significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation recurrence compared with control (shared frailty HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P < 0.001) but not mortality (shared frailty HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23; P = 0.361). CA was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, appropriate ICD therapies and shocks, but not syncope or inappropriate shocks. Subgroup analysis showed similar results for prophylactic CA except that no significant difference was observed for cardiac hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

CA is associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, appropriate ICD therapies/shocks, electrical storm, and cardiac hospitalization, and might be effective in preventing future morbidity. Future trials are needed to support the continued benefit of these promising results, and to investigate the optimal timing of ablation.

[Arrhythmias : Update on ablations and devices]

The field of invasive electrophysiology is technically evolving and especially the catheter ablation treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The technically innovative method of so-called electroporation (pulsed field ablation, PFA) is characterized by a rapid and effective treatment of AF. The current study data confirm a high success rate for ablation and a good safety profile in the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF. In the field of radiofrequency ablation (RF) of AF the modified form of energy transfer, the very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) protocols, show good results and can reduce the procedural time. There are also technical innovations in other single-shot devices. There is a device based on the RF technique that could show good clinical results in an initial study and can combine the targeted delivery of RF energy with the advantages of a single-shot device. For ventricular tachycardia (VT) there are innovations in the diagnostics and clarification in the new European guidelines that were presented in August 2022. These make individual recommendations for different types of cardiomyopathy. There are also technical developments in the field of active rhythm implants. In cardiac pacemaker treatment and specifically for conduction system pacing (CSP) there is evidence for a targeted stimulation of the bundle of His or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). This form of stimulation is particularly advantageous for patients with heart failure and a broad QRS complex. For leadless pacemakers (leadless pacing) there are now good long-term results and also a two-chamber approach.

First-in-Human Experience With Ultra-Low Temperature Cryoablation for Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Ultra-low temperature cryoablation (ULTC) using near-critical nitrogen (^-196ºC) has been shown to produce durable, contiguous, transmural lesions in ventricles of animal models. This report summarizes acute experience with ULTC in the first-ever 13 patients with recurrent monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) of both ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonischemic etiologies enrolled in the CryoCure-VT (Cryoablation for Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia; NCT04893317) clinical trial. After an average of 9.6 ± 4.6 endocardial ULTC lesions per patient, no clinical ventricular tachycardias were inducible in 91% of patients. Two procedure-related serious adverse events recorded in 2 patients resolved post-procedurally without clinical sequelae. Further investigation of both acute and chronic outcomes is warranted and ongoing.

Preventive substrate ablation in chronic post-myocardial infarction patients with high-risk scar characteristics for ventricular arrhythmias: rationale and design of PREVENT-VT study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies showed that an early strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation resulted in reduction of VT episodes or mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived border zone channel (BZC) mass has proved to be a strong non-invasive predictor of VT in post-myocardial infarction (MI). CMR-guided VT substrate ablation proved to be safe and effective for reducing sudden cardiac death (SCD) and VA occurrence.

METHODS

PREVENT-VT is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, and controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic CMR-guided VT substrate ablation in chronic post-MI patients with CMR-derived arrhythmogenic scar characteristics. Chronic post-MI patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR will be evaluated. CMR images will be post-processed and the BZC mass measured: patients with a BZC mass > 5.15 g will be eligible. Consecutive patients will be enrolled at 3 centers and randomized on a 1:1 basis to undergo a VT substrate ablation (ABLATE arm) or optimal medical treatment (OMT arm). Primary prevention ICD will be implanted following guideline recommendations, while non-ICD candidates will be implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sustained monomorphic VT, either treated by an ICD or documented with ICM. Secondary endpoints are procedural safety and efficiency outcomes of CMR-guided ablation.

DISCUSSION

In some patients, the first VA episode causes SCD or severe neurological damage. The aim of the PREVENT-VT is to evaluate whether primary preventive substrate ablation may be a safe and effective prophylactic therapy for reducing SCD and VA occurrence in patients with previous MI and high-risk scar characteristics based on CMR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675073, registered on January 1, 2021.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies

BACKGROUND

In patients with cardiomyopathy, radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an adjunctive and alternative treatment option to long-term anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. We sought to compare CA with medical therapy for the management of VT in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were evaluated for relevant studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with 2126 adult patients were included (711 in CA, 1415 in medical therapy). In the randomized controlled trial (RCT) analysis, CA reduced risk of recurrent VT (risk ratio (RR) 0.79 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.93], p = 0.005), ICD shocks (RR 0.64 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.89] p = 0.008), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.92] p = 0.005). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, p = 0.71). In combined RCT and observational study analysis, there was a trend for reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.75 [95% CI 0.55 to 1.02] p = 0.07). In subgroup analysis of studies with mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%, CA demonstrated reduction in mortality (RR 0.71, p = 0.004), ICD shocks (RR 0.63, p = 0.03), VT recurrence (RR 0.76, p = 0.004), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.75, p = 0.02). The subgroup of early CA prior to ICD shocks demonstrated reduction in ICD shocks (RR 0.57, p < 0.001) and VT recurrence (RR 0.74, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CA for VT demonstrated a lower risk of VT recurrence, ICD shocks, and hospitalization in comparison to medical therapy. The subgroups of early CA and LVEF < 35% demonstrated better outcomes.

Complications of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia

With the increasing literature demonstrating benefits of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), the number of patients undergoing VT ablation has increased dramatically. As VT ablation is being performed more routinely, operators must be aware of potential complications of VT ablation. This review delves deeper into the practice of VT ablation with a focus on periprocedural complications.