Evidence for a Prognostic Role of Orthostatic Hypertension on Survival in a Very Old Institutionalized Population

Hypertension in an ageing population: Diagnosis, mechanisms, collateral health risks, treatments, and clinical challenges

Ageing population is considerably increasing worldwide, which is considered to reflect an improved quality of life. However, longevity in the human lifespan has increased the burden of late-life illnesses including cancer, neurodegeneration, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Of these, hypertension is the most common condition with huge health risks, with an increased prevalence among the elderly. In this review, we outline the current guidelines for defining hypertension and examine the detailed mechanisms underlying the relationship between hypertension and ageing-related outcomes, including sodium sensitivity, arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, isolated systolic hypertension, white coat effect, and orthostatic hypertension. As hypertension-related collateral health risk increases among the elderly, the available management strategies are necessary to overcome the clinical treatment challenges faced among elderly population. To improve longevity and reduce adverse health effects, potential approaches producing crucial information into new era of medicine should be considered in the prevention and treatment of hypertension among elderly population. This review provides an overview of mechanisms underlying hypertension and its related collateral health risk in elderly population, along with multiple approaches and management strategies to improve the clinical challenges among elderly population.

Orthostatic hypotension and cognitive impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

The association between cognitive disorders and orthostatic hypotension (OH) has been empirically explored, but the results have been divergent, casting doubt on the presence and direction of the association. The objective of this meta-analysis was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the association of OH and cognitive function, specifically mean score on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), cognitive impairment and incident dementia. A Medline search was conducted in May 2022 with no date limit, using the MeSH terms "orthostatic hypotension" OR "orthostatic intolerance" OR "hypotension" combined with the Mesh terms "cognitive dysfunction" OR "Alzheimer disease" OR "dementia" OR "cognition disorder" OR "neurocognitive disorder" OR "cognition" OR "neuropsychological test". Of the 746 selected studies, 15 longitudinal studies met the selection criteria, of which i) 5 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of mean MMSE score comparison, ii) 5 studies for the association of OH and cognitive impairment, and iii) 6 studies for the association between OH and incident dementia. The pooled effect size in fixed-effects meta-analysis was: i) -0.25 (-0.42; -0.07) for the mean MMSE score, which indicates that the MMSE score was lower for those with OH; ii) OR (95 % CI) = 1.278 (1.162; 1.405), P < 0.0001, indicating a 28 % greater risk of cognitive impairment for those with OH at baseline; and iii) HR (95 % CI) = 1.267 (1.156; 1.388), P < 0.0001, indicating a 27 % greater risk of incident dementia for those with OH at baseline. Patients with OH had a lower MMSE score and higher risk of cognitive impairment and incident dementia in this meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. This study confirmed the presence of an association between OH and cognitive disorders in older adults.

Assessment and management of exaggerated blood pressure response to standing and orthostatic hypertension: consensus statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability

Recent evidence suggests that an exaggerated blood pressure (BP) response to standing (ERTS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, both in young and old individuals. In addition, ERTS has been shown to be an independent predictor of masked hypertension. In the vast majority of studies reporting on the prognostic value of orthostatic hypertension (OHT), the definition was based only on systolic office BP measurements. This consensus statement provides recommendations on the assessment and management of individuals with ERTS and/or OHT. ERTS is defined as an orthostatic increase in SBP at least 20 mmHg and OHT as an ERTS with standing SBP at least 140 mmHg. This statement recommends a standardized methodology to assess ERTS, by considering body and arm position, and the number and timing of BP measurements. ERTS/OHT should be confirmed in a second visit, to account for its limited reproducibility. The second assessment should evaluate BP changes from the supine to the standing posture. Ambulatory BP monitoring is recommended in most individuals with ERTS/OHT, especially if they have high-normal seated office BP. Implementation of lifestyle changes and close follow-up are recommended in individuals with ERTS/OHT and normotensive seated office BP. Whether antihypertensive treatment should be administered in the latter is unknown. Hypertensive patients with ERTS/OHT should be managed as any other hypertensive patient. Standardized standing BP measurement should be implemented in future epidemiological and interventional studies.

Orthostatic Hypertension: A Newcomer Among the Hypertension Phenotypes

The prognostic role and the clinical significance of orthostatic hypertension (OHT) remained undefined for long because data were sparse and often inconsistent. In recent years, evidence has been accumulating that OHT is associated with an increased risk of masked and sustained hypertension, hypertension-mediated organ damage, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Most evidence came from studies in which OHT was defined using systolic blood pressure (BP) whereas the clinical relevance of diastolic OHT is still unclear. Recently, the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension defined OHT as an orthostatic systolic BP increase ≥20 mm Hg associated with a systolic BP of at least 140 mm Hg while standing. However, also smaller orthostatic BP increases have shown clinical relevance especially in people ≤45 years of age. A possible limitation of the BP response to standing is poor reproducibility. OHT concordance is better when the between-assessment interval is shorter, when OHT is evaluated using a larger number of BP readings, and if home BP measurement is used. The pathogenetic mechanisms leading to OHT are still controversial and may vary according to age. Excessive neurohumoral activation seems to be the main determinant in younger adults whereas vascular stiffness plays a more important role in older individuals. Conditions associated with higher activity of the sympathetic nervous system and/or baroreflex dysregulation, such as diabetes, essential hypertension, and aging have been found to be often associated with OHT. Measurement of orthostatic BP should be included in routine clinical practice especially in people with high-normal BP.

Utility of standing office blood pressure in detecting hypertension in healthy adults

Current guidelines recommend office blood pressures (BP) be taken in a seated position when screening for hypertension (HTN). Seated BP is known to have limited accuracy in detecting high BP, while the utility of standing BP in diagnosing HTN is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the incremental value of standing BP in diagnosing HTN. Seated, standing, and 24-h ambulatory BPs (ABPM) were obtained in adults without known cardiovascular disease, HTN, or BP medication use. Presence of HTN was defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA and the 2023 ESH HTN guidelines based on ABPM. Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of seated and standing BP. Sensitivity and specificity of standing BP was determined using cut-offs derived from Youden's Index, while sensitivity and specificity of seated BP was determined using the cut-off of 130/80 mmHg and by 140/90 mmHg. Among 125 participants (mean age 49 ± 17 years; 62% female; 24% Black), 33.6% of them had HTN. Sensitivity and specificity of seated systolic BP (SBP) was 43% and 92%, respectively. Cut-offs selected by Youden's index for standing SBP/diastolic BP (DBP) were 124/81 mmHg according to the 2017 ACC/AHA HTN guidelines, and 123.5/83.5 mmHg according to the 2023 ESH HTN guidelines. Sensitivity and specificity of standing SBP was 71% and 67%, respectively. The AUROC of standing SBP (0.81 [0.71-0.92]) was significantly higher than seated SBP (0.70 [0.49-0.91]), when HTN was defined as average 24-h SBP ≥ 125 mmHg. Moreover, the addition of standing to seated SBP (0.80 [0.68-0.92]) improved HTN detection when compared to seated SBP. These patterns were consistent for both the 2017 ACC/AHA and the 2023 ESH definitions for HTN. In summary, standing BP, alone or in combination with seated BP, outperformed seated BP alone in diagnosing HTN in adults.

Exaggerated blood pressure response to standing in young-to-middle-age subjects: prevalence and factors involved

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of orthostatic hypertension and the association of the blood pressure (BP) level, supine BP decline, and white-coat effect with the orthostatic pressor response.

METHODS

We studied 1275 young-to-middle-age individuals with stage-1 hypertension. Orthostatic response was assessed three times over a 3 month period. The white-coat effect was assessed at baseline and after 3 months, and was calculated as the difference between office and average 24 h BP. In 660 participants, urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine were also measured.

RESULTS

An orthostatic systolic BP increase ≥ 20 mmHg was observed in 0.6-1.2% of the subjects during the three visits. Using the 20 mmHg cut-off, the prevalence of orthostatic hypertension was 0.6%. An orthostatic BP increase of ≥ 5 mmHg was found in 14.4% of participants. At baseline, the orthostatic response to standing showed an independent negative association with the supine BP level (p < 0.001), the supine BP change from the first to third measurement (p < 0.001), and the white-coat effect (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the 1080 participants assessed at the third visit. Urinary epinephrine showed higher values in the top BP response decile (systolic BP increase ≥ 6 mmHg, p = 0.002 versus rest of the group).

CONCLUSION

An orthostatic systolic BP reaction ≥ 20 mmHg is rare in young adults. However, even lower BP increases may be clinically relevant. The BP level, the supine BP decline over repeated measurement, and the white-coat effect can influence the estimate of the BP response to standing and should be considered in clinical and pathogenetic studies.

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥ 20 mmHg when going from supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" for when this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and identification of patients who are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥20 mmHg when going from the supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" if this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and the identification of patients that are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Relationship between orthostatic blood pressure changes and intensive blood pressure management in patients with hypertension

INTRODUCTION

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated that closely controlling blood pressure (BP) could decrease cardiovascular outcome risk without increasing the orthostatic hypotension rate. We aimed to evaluate the association between baseline orthostatic BP change and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis using SPRINT data including 9329 patients with hypertension. The SPRINT trial was a two-arm, multicentre, randomised clinical trial designed to test whether an intensive treatment aimed at reducing systolic BP (SBP) to <120 mm Hg would reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Orthostatic BP change was defined as baseline standing systolic BP (SBP)-baseline mean seated SBP, or diastolic BP (DBP)-baseline mean seated DBP.

RESULTS

We found a U-shaped relationship between orthostatic BP changes and MACE occurrence. All lowest risk points were around 0 mm Hg. On the left side of the inflection point, MACE risk decreased with orthostatic BP change decrease (HR=0.99, 95% CI (0.98 to 1.00), p=0.04, SBP change) (HR=0.97, 95% CI (0.95 to 0.99), p<0.01, DBP change); on the right side, MACE risk increased with orthostatic BP change increase (HR=1.02, 95% CI (1.01 to 1.06), p<0.01, SBP change) (HR=1.01, 95% CI (1.00 to 1.03), p=0.16, DBP change). There was no significant interaction effect between orthostatic SBP (p for interaction=0.37) or DBP changes (p for interaction=0.33) and intensive BP management.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic DBP increase and SBP decrease were associated with an increased MACE risk. The benefits of intensive BP management were also consistent across different orthostatic BP change ranges.

Relations of postural change in blood pressure with hypertension-mediated organ damage in middle-aged adults of the Framingham heart study: A cross-sectional study

Background

Dysregulation of compensatory mechanisms to regulate blood pressure (BP) upon postural change is a phenotype of BP variability and an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes.

Materials and methods

We assessed postural change in BP (starting 2 min after standing from a supine position), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and markers of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in the heart, kidney, and brain in Framingham Third Generation, Omni-2, and New Offspring Spouse Cohort participants. We related vascular measures (postural change in BP measures and cfPWV) with HMOD in 3,495 participants (mean age 47 years, 53% women) using multivariable logistic and linear regression models.

Results

In multivariable-adjusted models, we did not observe significant associations of vascular measures with presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, albuminuria, covert brain infarcts, or white matter hyperintensities (Bonferroni-adjusted P-values > 0.05/20 > 0.0025). In multivariable models, greater cfPWV (est. β = 0.11 ± 0.03; P < 0.001), but not postural change in BP measures (Bonferroni-adjusted P-values > 0.05/20 > 0.0025), was associated with higher white matter free water using brain magnetic resonance imaging. In multivariable models, greater postural change in pulse pressure was associated with higher urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (est. β = 0.07 ± 0.02; P < 0.001). No other postural change in BP measure was associated with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (Bonferroni-adjusted P-values > 0.05/20 > 0.0025). In sex-specific analyses, higher cfPWV was associated with higher urinary albumin-creatinine ratio in men (est. β: 0.11 ± 0.04; P = 0.002) but not in women (est. β: 0.03 ± 0.03; P = 0.44). We also observed marginal to strong effect modification by above vs. at/below median postural change in BP for the association of cfPWV with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (Bonferroni-adjusted interaction P < 0.001-0.01). Vascular measures were not related to left ventricular mass index or fractional anisotropy (Bonferroni-adjusted P-values > 0.05/20 > 0.0025).

Conclusion

Baroreflex dysfunction is associated with greater subclinical kidney damage. Additionally, relations of higher aortic stiffness with greater kidney damage may be modified by associated baroreflex dysregulation.

Management of Hypertension in the Elderly and Frail Patient

Hypertension is a frequent finding in elderly patients. Hypertension in older age can be both associated with frailty and represent a risk factor for frailty. Hypertension is recognized as a main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke and the occurrence of these diseases may provoke a decline in health status and/or worsen the degree of frailty. Blood pressure targets in hypertensive older and frail patients are not completely defined. However, specific evaluations of individual patients and their co-morbidities and assessment of domains and components of frailty, together with weighted consideration of drug use, may help in finding the appropriate therapy.

Orthostatic blood pressure changes and diabetes duration

To determine the prevalence and the associated clinical characteristics of orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic hypertension in patients with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 DSP patients who had 3-minute orthostatic measures as part of the standard clinic evaluation. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) supine and again after 3 min of standing.

RESULTS

The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension was 19.5% and that of orthostatic hypertension was 23%. Subjects with orthostatic hypotension had significantly longer diabetes duration than subjects who were normotensive and those with orthostatic hypertension. Quantitatively, BP changes from supine to standing correlated with diabetes duration (R = 0.306; P = 0.0582) and age (R = 0.434; P = 0.006) in subjects with orthostatic hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic hypertension and orthostatic hypotension are frequent in patients with DSP. Orthostatic hypertension is associated with shorter diabetes duration than orthostatic hypotension.

Prevalence of orthostatic hypertension and its association with cerebrovascular diagnoses in patients with suspected TIA and minor stroke

Purpose

We aimed to compare the rate of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular disease diagnoses across groups of patients based on their orthostatic blood pressure response in a transients ischemic attack clinic setting.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 3201 patients referred to a transient ischemic attack (TIA)/minor stroke outpatients clinic. Trained nurses measured supine and standing blood pressure using an automated blood pressure device and the patients were categorized based on their orthostatic blood pressure change into four groups: no orthostatic blood pressure rise, systolic orthostatic hypertension, diastolic orthostatic hypertension, and combined orthostatic hypertension. Then, four stroke physicians, who were unaware of patients' orthostatic BP response, assessed the patients and made diagnoses based on clinical and imaging data. We compared the rate of stroke, TIA, and cerebrovascular disease (either stroke or TIA) diagnoses across the study groups using Pearson's χ² test. The effect of confounders was adjusted using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Cerebrovascular disease was significantly less common in patients with combined systolic and diastolic orthostatic hypertension compared to the "no rise" group [OR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.35–0.89]. The odds were even lower among the subgroups of patients with obesity [OR = 0.31 (0.12–0.80)], without history of smoking [OR 0.34 (0.15–0.80)], and without hypertension [OR = 0.42 (95% CI 0.19–0.92)]. We found no significant relationship between orthostatic blood pressure rise with the diagnosis of stroke. However, the odds of TIA were significantly lower in patients with diastolic [OR 0.82 (0.68–0.98)] and combined types of orthostatic hypertension [OR = 0.54 (0.32–0.93)]; especially in patients younger than 65 years [OR = 0.17 (0.04–0.73)] without a history of hypertension [OR = 0.34 (0.13–0.91)], and patients who did not take antihypertensive therapy [OR = 0.35 (0.14–0.86)].

Conclusion

Our data suggest that orthostatic hypertension may be a protective factor for TIA among younger and normotensive patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02600-1.

Blood Pressure Hyperreactivity to Standing: a Predictor of Adverse Outcome in Young Hypertensive Patients

The prognostic significance and the mechanisms of blood pressure (BP) hyperreactivity to standing remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate the association of orthostatic hyperreactivity with major adverse cardiovascular and renal events in a cohort of young hypertensive subjects. We studied 1207 untreated subjects screened for stage I hypertension with a mean age of 33.1±8.6 years. The orthostatic BP change was calculated as the difference between 6 standing and 6 supine BP readings obtained during 2 separate visits. Hyperreactivity to standing was defined as the standing-supine systolic BP difference in the top decile. The mean difference in the whole group was -2.5±7.3/4.6±5.4 mm Hg. Ambulatory hypertension evaluated with 24-hour recordings was more common in Hyperreactors than Normoreactors (90.8% versus 76.4%, P=0.001). In 630 participants in whom 24-hour urinary catecholamines were measured, epinephrine/creatinine ratio was higher in hyperreactors (118.4±185.6 versus 77.0±90.1 nmol/mol, P=0.005). During a 17.2-year follow-up, 105 major adverse cardiovascular and renal events were accrued. In a multivariate Cox model, hyperreactivity to standing was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular and renal events with a hazard ratio of 1.97 (95% CI, 1.10-3.52). Hyperreactivity remained an independent predictor of adverse events even when ambulatory BP data and incident hypertension during follow-up were included in the Cox model (hazard ratio, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.10-3.44]). Our data indicate that in young-to-middle-age hypertensive subjects an exaggerated systolic BP response to standing is associated with sympatho-adrenergic hyperreactivity and is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular and renal events. Orthostatic BP assessment gives the advantage of simple acquisition and provides prognostic information on top of ambulatory BP.

Arterial hypertension and antihypertensive therapy in older patients. The agreed opinion of experts from the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians, the Antihypertensive League, the National Society for Preventive Cardiology

High blood pressure is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as cognitive decline and loss of autonomy in the elderly and old age. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in populations of older patients living at home with low comorbidity and preserved autonomy indicate the benefit of lowering elevated blood pressure in patients over 80 years of age. Older patients with senile asthenia, loss of autonomy and other geriatric problems were excluded from RCTs, and observational studies in these groups of patients indicate an increase in morbidity and mortality with lower blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy. Obviously, in very elderly patients, a universal strategy for the treatment of arterial hypertension cannot be applied due to the significant heterogeneity of their functional status. The geriatric approach to the management of arterial hypertension in older patients involves an assessment of the functional status, the presence of senile asthenia, and the degree of autonomy for the choice of antihypertensive therapy tactics.

Increased pulse wave velocity in patients with an orthostatic blood pressure rise independent of other cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND

Positional changes in blood pressure (BP) have been shown to have effects on long-term outcomes. Although a BP drop with upright posture is frequently observed, an orthostatic rise in BP can also occur. Here, we aimed to investigate whether the phenotype of orthostatic hypertension is associated with more pronounced vascular hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) and whether this is associated with other cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

In a cohort of 200 patients referred to our tertiary hypertension clinic, we prospectively assessed unattended seated automated office BP and the response to 1 min of upright posture. The difference in BP after standing up was calculated and pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed as a marker of vascular HMOD. Routine clinical cardiovascular risk markers were also assessed. Regression models were used to assess the association between orthostatic BP changes and pulse wave velocity.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and clinic cardiovascular risk factors were similar between orthostatic BP response groups. A U-shaped association was evident between PWV and orthostatic BP changes with elevated PWV in patients with either a fall or a rise in BP in response to upright posture. The regression models remained significant after adjusting for other cardiovascular risk factors, including 24 h ambulatory BP.

CONCLUSION

Both an orthostatic BP drop and rise were associated with elevated PWV. Although standing BP is commonly measured in elderly hypertensive patients to exclude significant orthostatic hypotension, this simple measurement may provide an additional independent risk factor for vascular HMOD at any age.

Orthostatic Hypertension and Hypotension and Outcomes in CKD: The CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) Study

Rationale & Objective

There are limited data about the prevalence and prognostic significance of orthostatic hypo- and hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of orthostatic hypo- and hypertension in a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease and examine their association with clinical outcomes.

Study Design

Prospective cohort study: Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

Setting & Population

7 clinical centers, participants with chronic kidney disease.

Exposures

Orthostatic hypotension (decline in systolic blood pressure [BP] > 20 mm Hg) and orthostatic hypertension (increase in systolic BP > 20 mm Hg) from seated to standing position.

Outcomes

Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and mortality.

Analytical Approach

Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with orthostatic hypo- and hypertension; Cox regression was used to examine associations with clinical outcomes.

Results

Mean age of study population (n = 3,873) was 58.1 ± 11.0 years. There was a wide distribution of change in systolic BP from seated to standing (from −73.3 to +60.0 mm Hg); 180 participants (4.6%) had orthostatic hypotension and 81 (2.1%) had orthostatic hypertension. Diabetes, reduced body mass index, and β-blocker use were independently associated with orthostatic hypotension. Black race and higher body mass index were independently associated with orthostatic hypertension. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, orthostatic hypotension was independently associated with high risk for cardiovascular (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) but not kidney outcomes or mortality. Orthostatic hypertension was independently associated with high risk for kidney (HR, 1.51; 96% CI, 1.14-1.97) but not cardiovascular outcomes or mortality.

Limitations

Orthostatic change in BP was ascertained at a single visit.

Conclusions

Orthostatic hypotension was independently associated with higher risk for cardiovascular outcomes, whereas orthostatic hypertension was associated with higher risk for kidney outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of orthostatic BP measurement in practice and the need for future investigation to understand the mechanisms and potential interventions to minimize the risk associated with orthostatic changes in BP.

Orthostatic Hypertension and Intensive Blood Pressure Control; Post-Hoc Analyses of SPRINT

We evaluated the association between orthostatic hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes and the effect of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with orthostatic hypertension. Post hoc analyses of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) data were conducted; orthostatic hypertension was defined as increase in systolic BP≥20 mm Hg or increase in diastolic BP≥10 mm Hg with standing. Of 9329 participants, 1986 (21.2%) had orthostatic hypertension at baseline. Within the intensive treatment group, participants with orthostatic hypertension were at higher risk of developing the composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.1-1.87], P=0.007) compared with participants without orthostatic hypertension. Within the standard treatment group, there were no significant differences in cardiovascular outcome between participants with and without orthostatic hypertension. In participants with orthostatic hypertension, there was no statistically significant difference in risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome between the intensive and the standard BP treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.78-1.47], P=0.68). In participants without orthostatic hypertension at baseline, the intensive treatment group was associated with a lower risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.79], P<0.0001). Orthostatic hypertension was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular outcomes in the intensive and not in the standard treatment group; intensive treatment of BP did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared with standard treatment in patients with orthostatic hypertension. These post hoc analyses are hypothesis generating and will need to be confirmed in future studies.

Morbidity and mortality in orthostatic hypotension

This review summarizes the current literature on the epidemiology of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in the elderly and in patients with autonomic impairment also known as neurogenic OH (nOH); these two conditions have distinct pathophysiologies and affect different patient populations. The prevalence of OH in the elderly varies depending on the study population. In community dwellers, OH prevalence is estimated at 16%, whereas in institutionalized patients, it may be as high as 60%. The prevalence of OH increases exponentially with age, particularly in those 75 years and older. Multiple epidemiological studies have identified OH as a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease including heart failure and stroke. Real-world data from administrative databases found polypharmacy, multiple co-morbid conditions, and high health-care utilization as common characteristics in OH patients. A comprehensive evaluation of medications associated with OH is discussed with particular emphasis on the use of anti-hypertensive therapy from two large clinical trials on high-intensive versus standard blood pressure management. Finally, we also review the epidemiology of nOH based on the underlying neurodegenerative disorder (either Parkinson's disease or multiple system atrophy), and the presence of co-morbid conditions such as hypertension and cognitive impairment.

Orthostatic Hypertension in Children: An Update

The concept of orthostatic hypertension in children was first proposed in 2012. The pathogenesis is not clear by now. Orthostatic hypertension is one of the important causes of orthostatic intolerance in children and is related to the development of essential hypertension in the future. It is commonly seen in older children, with dizziness and syncope as their main clinical manifestations. Non-drug therapy is the commonly used treatment strategy, which is effective to improve the orthostatic intolerance symptoms. In this paper, we reviewed the clinical studies on the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of orthostatic hypertension in children, aiming to provide new insights for the future studies on pediatric orthostatic hypertension.

Antihypertensive Treatment in Elderly Frail Patients: Evidence From a Large Italian Database

Aim of our study was to assess the relationship between adherence with antihypertensive drugs and the risk of death in frail versus nonfrail old individuals. Using the database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), we identified 1 283 602 residents aged ≥65 years (mean age 76) who had ≥3 prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs between 2011 and 2012. A nested case-control design was applied, with cases being the cohort members who died during the observation period (7 years). Logistic regression was used to model the association of interest, with adjustment for potential confounders. Adherence was measured by the proportion of the follow-up covered by prescriptions, and the analysis was separately performed in patients with a good, medium, poor, and very poor clinical status, as assessed by a score that has been shown to be a sensitive predictor of death in the Italian population. The 7-year death probability increased from 16% (good) to 64% (very poor) clinical status. Compared with patients with very low adherence with antihypertensive treatment (<25% of follow-up time covered by prescriptions), those with high adherence (>75% of time covered by prescriptions) exhibited a lower risk of all-cause mortality in each group, the difference decreasing progressively (-44%, -43%, -40%, and -33%) from the good to the very poor clinical status. Adherence with antihypertensive drug treatment was also associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality. Adherence with antihypertensive appears to be protective in frail old patients, but the benefit is less marked than in patients with a good clinical status.

Impact of orthostatic hypotension and antihypertensive drug treatment on total and cardiovascular mortality in a very elderly community-dwelling population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between orthostatic hypotension, cardiovascular drug intake and mortality in a very elderly community-dwelling population (>80 years of age).

METHODS

In 2013-2014, 224 (71 M, 31.7%) 80-year-old individuals from one primary care practice were invited to participate. Basic clinical information was gathered and blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed while sitting and after 1 and 3 min in the standing position on 209 patients. The individuals were followed till December 2016.

RESULTS

Orthostatic hypotension was present, depending on applied definition, in 34.5% of the individuals at 1 min, 38.3% at 3 min; 44.9% on either 1 or 3 min, and 27.8% individuals in both measurements. Sixty-nine (30.8%) individuals died during the follow-up. Presence of orthostatic hypotension, irrespective of definition, did not have any significant association with the mortality risk in all groups. Intensive hypertension treatment (more than two drugs versus none) was associated with longer survival. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only age and presence of coronary heart disease/congestive heart failure had a negative predictive value on mortality. In both treated and untreated individuals, presence of orthostatic hypotension was not linked to mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although orthostatic hypotension is very common among the very elderly, its presence is not related to increased risk of death (all-cause/cardiovascular). Intensively treated elderly patients had significantly longer survival time than untreated individuals.

Orthostatic Hypertension: Critical Appraisal of an Overlooked Condition

Orthostatic hypertension, which appears to be mediated through excess neurohumoral activation while standing, is a common blood pressure trait among patients with and without arterial hypertension. However, lack of consensus regarding the definition of orthostatic hypertension makes it difficult to assess the true prevalence of this condition. Orthostatic hypertension appears to predict the risk for progression to arterial hypertension in younger and risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in older persons. Yet, the risk may differ between populations. Whether orthostatic hypertension indicates a generally increased risk of death, constitutes an intermediate variable in the causal pathway of cardiovascular risk factors, a simple measure of disease severity, or an independently acting mechanism is not known. Since both orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic hypertension herald increased risk of cardiovascular disease, it appears reasonable to screen the patients for abnormal orthostatic blood pressure responses using simple orthostatic testing. However, how presence of orthostatic hypertension may affect clinical management decisions such as the choice of antihypertensive drugs is currently difficult to ascertain. Clearly, this issue deserves more attention.

Sympathetic Overactivation From Supine to Upright Is Associated With Orthostatic Hypertension in Children and Adolescents

There are no prior publications or submissions with any overlapping information, including studies and patients. The study data have not been presented as an abstract or poster before the submission. Objectives: The study was conducted to analyze the changes of baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability from supine to upright standing in children and adolescents with orthostatic hypertension to explore whether and how the autonomic nerve regulation was involved in the development of pediatric orthostatic hypertension. Methods: This case-control study included twenty-five children with orthostatic hypertension (the patient group) and twenty-six healthy controls (the control group). All subjects underwent a standing test, during which their hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored by a Finapres Medical System, and baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability were calculated. Results: The demographic characteristics, supine baroreflex sensitivity, and supine heart rate variability including time domain and frequency domain indices did not differ between the patients with orthostatic hypertension and healthy subjects (P > 0.05). However, a more obvious drop of baroreflex sensitivity and a greater increase of low frequency/high frequency ratio from supine to upright were observed in subjects with orthostatic hypertension compared with those in the healthy children (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Changes of baroreflex sensitivity were negatively related to mean arterial pressure changes from supine to upright in all subjects (P < 0.01), and the increases in low frequency/high frequency ratio from supine to standing were positively correlated with those in mean arterial pressure in the study subjects (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Upright sympathetic overactivation is associated with pediatric orthostatic hypertension.

Hypertension prevalence alteration in 92 815 nurses based on the new standard by 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline: observational cross-sectional study from China

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to elucidate the status of hypertension and to analyse the hypertension changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rate among the portion of Chinese nursing staff based on the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) High Blood Pressure Guideline and the 2010 Chinese Guideline for the Management of Hypertension.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

512 medical institutions in 13 cities in Hebei Province.

PARTICIPANTS

The candidates of registered nurses from 512 medical institutions in 13 cities in Hebei Province (N=143 772) were invited to participate in the survey, and few of them who refused to participate were excluded from the research group based on the reasons that 93 603 incumbent nurses at the age of 18-65 accepted to the survey and submitted questionnaires online. Undoubtedly, a response rate of 65.11% was achieved. After excluding 788 individuals with incomplete information in the questionnaires, 92 815 participants were included in the final analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates of hypertension.

RESULTS

92 815 participants were included in the final analysis, among which consisted of 3677 men (3.96%) and 89 138 women (96.04%). The mean age of the participants was 31.65 (SD=7.47) years.We demonstrated that 26 875 nursing staff were diagnosed as having hypertension according to the new standard by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, more than 20 551 cases compared with the previous threshold on the 2010 Chinese guideline. The prevalence of hypertension among nursing staff was 28.96% in the context of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, 3.25 times higher than that (6.81%) evaluated by the criteria of the 2010 Chinese guideline. However, the awareness, treatment and control rate (13.50%, 10.73% and 0.81%) were 3.25, 3.22 and 17.48 times lower than those (57.37%, 45.30% and 14.97%) based on the 2010 Chinese guideline, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This research illustrated that it was crucial to improve the awareness rate, drug treatment rate and control rate of hypertension for nurses. Meanwhile, according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, the prevalence of hypertension in China will increase significantly, which poses a more severe challenge to the management of hypertension in China.

The association between orthostatic blood pressure changes and subclinical target organ damage in subjects over 60 years old

Background

Although recent studies have indicated that both orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic hypertension independently predict cardiovascular events, the underlying mechanisms are still controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationships between orthostatic changes and organ damage in subjects over 60 years old.

Methods

This is a prospective observational cohort study. One thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven subjects over 60 years old were enrolled. Participants were grouped according to whether they had a drop ≥ 20 mmHg in systolic or ≥ 10 mmHg in diastolic BP (orthostatic hypotension), an increase in mean orthostatic systolic blood pressure ≥ 20 mm Hg (orthostatic hypertension), or normal changes within 3 min of orthostatism. Multiple regression modeling was used to investigate the relationship between orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic hypertension and subclinical organ damage with adjustment for confounders.

Results

Orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic hypertension were found in 461 (23.1%) and 189 (9.5%) participants, respectively. Measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), clearance of creatinine, and microalbuminuria were associated with orthostatic hypotension; measurement of IMT and baPWV were associated with orthostatic hypertension in a cruse model. After adjustment, IMT [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) per one-SD increment: 1.385, 1.052–1.823; P = 0.02], baPWV (OR = 1.627, 95% CI: 1.041–2.544; P = 0.033) and microalbuminuria (OR = 1.401, 95% CI: 1.002–1.958; P = 0.049) were still associated with orthostatic hypotension, while orthostatic hypertension was only associated with IMT (OR = 1.730, 95% CI: 1.143–2.618; P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Orthostatic hypotension seems to be independently correlated with increased carotid atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness and renal damage in subjects over 60 years old. Orthostatic hypertension correlates with carotid atherosclerosis only.

Orthostatic blood pressure rise is associated with frailty in older patients

AIM

Orthostatic blood pressure (BP) can fall with reduced stroke volume and arterial elasticity. However, as the reason for orthostatic BP rise is unclear, we investigated the relationship of orthostatic BP rise with frailty in older patients.

METHODS

In 169 consecutive outpatients who visited the frailty clinic, we evaluated orthostatic BP and heart rate changes (i.e. in the sitting position, just after standing up, 1 min after standing and after sitting down). Frailty was evaluated using the Kihon Checklist (KCL) established by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare.

RESULTS

The mean age was 77.4 ± 6.9 years, and 29% of patients had frailty with a KCL score ≥8. The systolic BP declined in both groups, but patients with frailty experienced a smaller decrease just after standing (-0.2 ± 10.3 vs -6.2 ± 11.5, P = 0.001). During standing for 1 min, elevation of systolic BP was greater in patients with frailty than in those without (8.4 ± 11.6 mmHg vs 3.2 ± 11.2 mmHg, P = 0.009). The difference in elevation of systolic BP remained significant, even after adjusting for confounding factors including systolic BP before standing (P = 0.013). In particular, the KCL score for motor function was significantly correlated with an elevation of orthostatic systolic BP after standing for 1 min, even after controlling for systolic BP before standing and confounding factors (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

The elevation of systolic BP after standing for 1 min was greater in patients with frailty as diagnosed by the KCL score, especially in relation to reduced motor function. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 525-529.

Orthostatic hypertension: From pathophysiology to clinical applications and therapeutic considerations

Orthostatic hypertension (OHT), that is, sustained increase in blood pressure after standing, is an increasingly recognized cardiovascular disorder having been examined in much fewer studies compared with orthostatic hypotension (OH). However, in both OHT and OH, dysfunction of the autonomous nervous system is considered to be the primary pathophysiological disturbance, while significant associations with essential hypertension have been observed. Although in many studies OHT has been related to subclinical or clinical target organ damage, there is also evidence denying such an association. Because OHT is defined variably across different studies, the comparison of relevant outcomes is at least problematic. Since evidence about OHT treatment is exclusively based on limited non-randomized studies, no specific recommendations have been developed. Therefore, both the prognostic role and the clinical significance of OHT remain largely undefined. The aim of the present review is to summarize the available evidence regarding the definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, prognostic role and treatment of OHT and highlight potential clinical implications of this underestimated condition.

Labile hypertension: a new disease or a variability phenomenon?

Blood pressure (BP) is a physiological parameter with short- and long-term variability caused by complex interactions between intrinsic cardiovascular (CV) mechanisms and extrinsic environmental and behavioral factors. Available evidence suggests that not only mean BP values are important, but also BP variability (BPV) might contribute to CV events. Labile hypertension (HTN) is referred to sudden rises in BP and it seems to be linked with unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this article was to review and summarize recent evidence on BPV phenomenon, unraveling the labile HTN concept along with the prognostic value of these conditions.

Hypertension Management at Older Age: An Update

Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with increasing prevalence with age, whose treatment is associated with benefits over fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events even later in life. However, there are persistent concerns on the short- and long-term weighted benefits of treating hypertension in the very old, particularly in those with specific clinical features. In fact, a broad range of clinical scenarios can be observed at older ages, spanning from the healthy to the frailest patient, and hypertension clinical trials have traditionally excluded the latter, thus preventing the unconditioned application to these patients of the same recommendations as in younger ages. Persistent issues regarding high blood pressure management in the very old adult are mainly related to treatment threshold and targets, which have been differently addressed by American and European guidelines. Herein, we will examine the challenges related to high blood pressure treatment in healthy and frail older and very old adults. We will discuss the evidence behind current recommendations. Finally, we will recapitulate the recommended treatment options for high blood pressure in these patients in the light of the most recent guidelines.

Impact of variations in blood pressure with orthostatism on mortality: the HOMO study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of orthostatic hypotension (OH) and orthostatic hypertension (OHT) on all-cause mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of, 1176 adults from the community over 18 years of age were included in this ambispective study. The mean follow-up was 9.4 years. OH and OHT were defined as a decrease or an increase, respectively, in systolic blood pressure (BP) of at least 20 mmHg and/or diastolic BP of at least 10 mmHg from sitting to standing position at 1 and/or 3 min after standing. The impact of systolic or diastolic OH and systolic or diastolic OHT at 1 and 3 min after standing was also analyzed separately.

RESULTS

In total, 135 individuals died during the follow-up. Neither OH [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-2.10] nor OHT (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.59-1.38) was associated with all-cause mortality in the adjusted models. In contrast, systolic OHT at 3 min (HR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.68) was independently associated with global mortality.

CONCLUSION

Systolic OHT at 3 min is associated with all-cause mortality. The determination of this parameter could add valuable prognostic information during the routine examination of patients.

Aortic atherosclerosis is a key modulator of the prognostic value of postural blood pressure changes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Orthostatic blood pressure decrease or increase has been related to cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Large blood pressure changes after orthostatic stress are associated with autonomic and neurohormonal abnormalities; aortic atherosclerosis (ATS) may also play a role.

METHODS

We investigated the interaction of ATS on the prognostic value of postural blood pressure changes. In a cohort of 958 hypertensive patients with an aortography (mean ± standard deviation age 44 ± 11 years, 61% men, mean blood pressure 182/110 mmHg), blood pressure was measured after 10 min of rest in the supine position. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was also measured in standing position, 1 min after the supine position. Blood pressure changes were calculated as supine SBP minus standing SBP and analyzed as absolute or arithmetic means. ATS was assessed using an aortography score.

RESULTS

After 15 years of follow-up, 280 all-cause and 167 cardiovascular deaths occurred. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for major cardiovascular risk factors and stratified according to ATS status, SBP changes were statistically associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality only in the presence of ATS: tertile 3 versus 1, 2.99 (1.37-6.49) and 4.08 (1.55-10.72) respectively, tertile 3 versus 2, 2.89 (1.29-6.46) and 4.82 (1.79-12.98), respectively (p for interaction: 0.003 for all-cause and 0.003 for cardiovascular mortality) for absolute changes. The hazard associated with the magnitude of SBP changes was more important than that associated with its direction.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic significance of postural SBP changes is markedly influenced by ATS in hypertensive patients.

Clinical Update on Nursing Home Medicine: 2016

This is the tenth clinical update. It covers chronic kidney disease, dementia, hypotension, polypharmacy, rapid geriatric assessment, and transitional care.

Hemodynamic characterization of hypertensive patients with an exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation

Exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation (EOV) is a poorly understood phenomenon related to high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to determine whether hypertensive patients with EOV have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, assessed through impedance cardiography.

METHODS

In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between -20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between -10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV.

RESULTS

We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01-1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.

Orthostatic hypertension in normotensive type 2 diabetics: What characteristics?

AIM OF THE STUDY

We aimed to determine the prevalence of orthostatic hypertension (OHT) in normotensive, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics, to assess clinical, biological characteristics of those patients and evaluate the evolution of their blood pressure, after one year of follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is an observational, prospective, cohort study, on 108 normotensive, newly diagnosed diabetics, 40 men and 68 women aged from 40 to 70 ans. OHT was defined as an increase of systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥20mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥10mmHg, after 1 and 2min of standing from supine position. Arterial hypertension and metabolic syndrome were respectively defined according to WHO and AHA 2009 guidelines. Clinical and biological data were collected for all patients. They had a screening for diabetic complications and a follow-up during one year. Statistical analysis was performed with Epi-Info 6.04.

RESULTS

We found OHT in 22 patients (20.4%). Patients with OHT had a higher SBP at lying position (P=0.029), a higher waist circumference (P=0.022) and LDL (P=0.041). They had more frequently obesity (P=0.036) left ventricular hypertrophy (P=0.024), metabolic syndrome (P=0.042) and cerebrovascular events (P=0.050) when compared with those with normal blood pressure response to orthostasis. One year after follow-up, the prevalence of permanent hypertension was significantly higher in the OHT group (P=0.0008).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that OHT is associated with insulin resistance syndrome and onset of sustained arterial hypertension in normotensive, newly diagnosed diabetics.

Locomotive syndrome is associated with large blood pressure variability in elderly hypertensives: the Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Prospective (JAMP) substudy

Chronic pain, represented by locomotive syndrome (LS), and psychosocial factors are possible factors of blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV). The authors tested the hypothesis that there are links among LS, depression, and BPV. In 85 Japanese elderly hypertensive patients with normal daily activities, the authors performed ambulatory BP monitoring, determined the LS scale (LSS), and administered the Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQD). The LSS score but not the SRQD score was associated with the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of daytime systolic BP (SBP) and SD of nighttime SBP (all P<.05). Higher LSS score (in quartiles) was associated with a higher SD of daytime SBP (P=.041), even after adjusting for covariates. Regarding the components of the LSS score, movement-related difficulty and usual care difficulty were associated with the SD and CV of daytime SBP. In elderly hypertensive patients, the LSS score was associated with exaggerated systolic BPV. The LS state could be an important determinant of systolic BPV.

[Usefulness of different techniques of blood pressure measurements in 2016]

The management of hypertensive patients is greatly influenced by blood pressure levels and accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial in this context. Mercury sphygmomanometer has been progressively replaced by more precise oscillometric devices that can be widely used in the clinic and ambulatory setting. The purpose of this review was to detail the different methods for evaluating blood pressure, and to refine their indications and clinical benefit. Office blood pressure measurement has a great variability and should follow a strict protocol to give consistent results. National and international guidelines focus on blood pressure measurement in the ambulatory setting. When used by trained patients, home blood pressure monitoring is reproducible and can provide substantial prognostic information, even if ambulatory blood pressure monitoring remains the gold standard. The role of central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity monitoring in the therapeutic strategy of hypertension needs further assessment.

Hypertension in the frail elderly

Extant data indicate that treating to lower systolic pressure confers significant advantage to younger people in general good health and to relatively healthy octogenarians. Few data exist to guide practitioners on the treatment of frail elderly hypertensives. Chronological age alone does not suffice to make useful judgments regarding therapy. The definition of frailty remains controversial. One method, use of a simple questionnaire or a test of walking speed is practical but not universally accepted. Frail subjects, while at higher risk for cardiovascular complications, seem to benefit less or not at all from antihypertensive drug treatment. Clinicians should treat robust older patients as they would younger patients because the benefits far outweigh the low risk of adverse effects. Successful antihypertensive therapy in those younger than 80 years should not be discontinued simply because that age milestone has been crossed. Treatment of frail older patients must be individualized. Some frail survivors age 80 years or older may actually fare better with elevated systolic pressures. Pending the cognitive function substudy of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, there is little evidence that antihypertensive treatment benefits established cognitive dysfunction. Because hypertension in middle age is a good predictor of later cognitive dysfunction, the clinical approach should be one of early prevention.