Sex-specific differences in endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 modulation influence blood pressure and renin-angiotensin system responses

Striatin Gene Variants Are Associated With Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure by Mechanisms That Differ in Women and Men

BACKGROUND

Salt sensitivity of blood pressure (SSBP) is a substantial risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Striatin (STRN) is critical for estrogen and aldosterone nongenomic signaling. However, the role of biological sex on the SSBP phenotype associated with STRN gene variants remains unexplored.

METHOD

Data from 1306 subjects participating in the Hypertensive Pathotype (HyperPATH) Consortium were used to identify STRN gene single-nucleotide variants associated with SSBP. Haploblock analysis revealed a novel diplotype in the upstream regulatory region of STRN (rs888083 and rs6744560), with 31% of subjects being homozygous for the risk diplotype.

RESULTS

Individuals homozygous for the risk diplotype had significantly greater SSBP than nonrisk diplotypes (P<0.009). While a significant genotype/SSBP association was present in both sexes, their potential mechanisms differed. Women, but not men homozygous risk diplotypes, had significantly greater aldosterone levels than nonrisk diplotypes (5.8±0.4 versus 3.2±0.7 ng/dl; P=0.01; liberal Na+ diet, adjusted). Men, but not women, homozygous risk diplotypes, had significantly reduced renal plasma flow response to Angiotensin II than nonrisk diplotypes (delta 95.2±5.2 versus 122.9±10.2 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P=0.01; liberal Na+ diet, adjusted). The single-nucleotide variants composing the risk diplotype were associated with lower STRN mRNA expression in human tissues (in silico).

CONCLUSION

In women, the primary driver of SSBP is increased aldosterone, while in men, it is reduced renal plasma flow responses. Thus, despite a common hypertensive phenotype (SSBP) in both sexes, the specific treatment approaches might differ to increase therapeutic gain and mitigate adverse effects. These genetic- and sex-based observational results require confirmation in a prospective clinical study.

Understanding painful versus non-painful dental pain in female and male patients: A transcriptomic analysis of human biopsies

Dental pain from apical periodontitis is an infection induced-orofacial pain condition that presents with diversity in pain phenotypes among patients. While 60% of patients with a full-blown disease present with the hallmark symptom of mechanical allodynia, nearly 40% of patients experience no pain. Furthermore, a sexual dichotomy exists, with females exhibiting lower mechanical thresholds under basal and diseased states. Finally, the prevalence of post-treatment pain refractory to commonly used analgesics ranges from 7-19% (∼2 million patients), which warrants a thorough investigation of the cellular changes occurring in different patient cohorts. We, therefore, conducted a transcriptomic assessment of periapical biopsies (peripheral diseased tissue) from patients with persistent apical periodontitis. Surgical biopsies from symptomatic male (SM), asymptomatic male (AM), symptomatic female (SF), and asymptomatic female (AF) patients were collected and processed for bulk RNA sequencing. Using strict selection criteria, our study found several unique differentially regulated genes (DEGs) between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, as well as novel candidate genes between sexes within the same pain group. Specifically, we found the role of cells of the innate and adaptive immune system in mediating nociception in symptomatic patients and the role of genes involved in tissue homeostasis in potentially inhibiting nociception in asymptomatic patients. Furthermore, sex-related differences appear to be tightly regulated by macrophage activity, its secretome, and/or migration. Collectively, we present, for the first time, a comprehensive assessment of peripherally diseased human tissue after a microbial insult and shed important insights into the regulation of the trigeminal system in female and male patients.

ERAP1 Shows Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms on Blood Pressure Modulation Between Males and Females

The authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to editing error. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

M1-aminopeptidase family - beyond antigen-trimming activities

Antigen (Ag)-trimming aminopeptidases belong to the oxytocinase subfamily of M1 metallopeptidases. In humans, this subfamily contains the endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases 1 and 2 (ERAP1 and 2) and the insulin-responsive aminopeptidase (IRAP, synonym oxytocinase), an endosomal enzyme. The ability of these enzymes to trim antigenic precursors and to generate major histocompatibility class-I ligands has been demonstrated extensively for ERAP1, less for ERAP2, which is absent in rodents, and exclusively in the context of cross-presentation for IRAP. During 20 years of research on these aminopeptidases, their enzymatic function has been very well characterized and their genetic association with autoimmune diseases, cancers, and infections is well established. The mechanisms by which these proteins are associated to human diseases are not always clear. This review discusses the Ag-trimming-independent functions of the oxytocinase subfamily of M1 aminopeptidases and the new questions raised by recent publications on IRAP and ERAP2.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 deficiency modifies aldosterone synthesis in a sex-specific manner

Biologic sex influences the development of cardiovascular disease and modifies aldosterone (ALDO) and blood pressure (BP) phenotypes: females secrete more ALDO, and their adrenal glomerulosa cell is more sensitive to stimulation. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) variants in Africans and LSD1 deficiency in mice are associated with BP and/or ALDO phenotypes. This study, in 18- and 40-week-old wild type (WT) and LSD1+/- mice, was designed to determine whether (1) sex modifies ALDO biosynthetic enzymes; (2) LSD1 deficiency disrupts the effect of sex on these enzymes; (3) within each genotype, there is a positive relationship between ALDO biosynthesis (proximate phenotype), plasma ALDO (intermediate phenotype) and BP levels (distant phenotype); and (4) sex and LSD1 genotype interact on these phenotypes. In WT mice, female sex increases the expression of early enzymes in ALDO biosynthesis but not ALDO levels or systolic blood pressure (SBP). However, enzyme expressions are shifted downward in LSD1+/- females vs males, so that early enzyme levels are similar but the late enzymes are substantially lower. In both age groups, LSD1 deficiency modifies the adrenal enzyme expressions, circulating ALDO levels, and SBP in a sex-specific manner. Finally, significant sex/LSD1 genotype interactions modulate the three phenotypes in mice. In conclusion, biologic sex in mice interacts with LSD1 deficiency to modify several phenotypes: (1) proximal (ALDO biosynthetic enzymes); (2) intermediate (circulating ALDO); and (3) distant (SBP). These results provide entry to better understand the roles of biological sex and LSD1 in (1) hypertension heterogeneity and (2) providing more personalized treatment.

Antigen presentation in SARS-CoV-2 infection: the role of class I HLA and ERAP polymorphisms

Given the highly polymorphic nature of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules, it is not surprising that they function as key regulators of the host immune response to almost all invading pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent responsible for the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Several correlations have already been established between the expression of a specific HLA allele/haplotype and susceptibility/progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection and new ones are continuously emerging. Protective and harmful HLA variants have been described in both mild and severe forms of the disease, but considering the huge amount of existing variants, the data gathered in such a brief span of time are to some extent confusing and contradictory. The aim of this mini-review is to provide a snap-shot of the main findings so far collected on the HLA-SARS-CoV-2 interaction, so as to partially untangle this intricate yarn. As key factors in the generation of antigenic peptides to be presented by HLA molecules, ERAP1 and ERAP2 role in SARS-CoV-2 infection will be revised as well.

ERAP1 and ERAP2 Enzymes: A Protective Shield for RAS against COVID-19?

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a wide variety of clinical outcomes ranging from asymptomatic to severe respiratory syndrome that can progress to life-threatening lung lesions. The identification of prognostic factors can help to improve the risk stratification of patients by promptly defining for each the most effective therapy to resolve the disease. The etiological agent causing COVID-19 is a new coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that enters cells via the ACE2 receptor. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes a reduction in ACE2 levels, leading to an imbalance in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and consequently, in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance. ERAP1 and ERAP2 are two RAS regulators and key components of MHC class I antigen processing. Their polymorphisms have been associated with autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, hypertension, and cancer. Based on their involvement in the RAS, we believe that the dysfunctional status of ERAP1 and ERAP2 enzymes may exacerbate the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection, aggravating the symptomatology and clinical outcome of the disease. In this review, we discuss this hypothesis.

A New ERAP2/Iso3 Isoform Expression Is Triggered by Different Microbial Stimuli in Human Cells. Could It Play a Role in the Modulation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection?

Following influenza infection, rs2248374-G ERAP2 expressing cells may transcribe an alternative spliced isoform: ERAP2/Iso3. This variant, unlike ERAP2-wt, is unable to trim peptides to be loaded on MHC class I molecules, but it can still dimerize with both ERAP2-wt and ERAP1-wt, thus contributing to profiling an alternative cellular immune-peptidome. In order to verify if the expression of ERAP2/Iso3 may be induced by other pathogens, PBMCs and MDMs isolated from 20 healthy subjects were stimulated with flu, LPS, CMV, HIV-AT-2, SARS-CoV-2 antigens to analyze its mRNA and protein expression. In parallel, Calu3 cell lines and PBMCs were in vitro infected with growing doses of SARS-CoV-2 (0.5, 5, 1000 MOI) and HIV-1BAL (0.1, 1, and 10 ng p24 HIV-1Bal/1 × 106 PBMCs) viruses, respectively. Results showed that: (1) ERAP2/Iso3 mRNA expression can be prompted by many pathogens and it is coupled with the modulation of several determinants (cytokines, interferon-stimulated genes, activation/inhibition markers, antigen-presentation elements) orchestrating the anti-microbial immune response (Quantigene); (2) ERAP2/Iso3 mRNA is translated into a protein (western blot); (3) ERAP2/Iso3 mRNA expression is sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1 concentration. Considering the key role played by ERAPs in antigen processing and presentation, it is conceivable that these enzymes may be potential targets and modulators of the pathogenicity of infectious diseases and further analyses are needed to define the role played by the different isoforms.

The Multifaceted Nature of Aminopeptidases ERAP1, ERAP2, and LNPEP: From Evolution to Disease

In the human genome, the aminopeptidases ERAP1, ERAP2 and LNPEP lie contiguously on chromosome 5. They share sequence homology, functions and associations with immune-mediated diseases. By analyzing their multifaceted activities as well as their expression in the zoological scale, we suggest here that the progenitor of the three aminopeptidases might be LNPEP from which the other two aminopeptidases could have derived by gene duplications. We also propose that their functions are partially redundant. More precisely, the evolutionary story of the three aminopeptidases might have been dictated by their role in regulating the renin–angiotensin system, which requires their controlled and coordinated expression. This hypothesis is supported by the many species that lack one or the other gene as well as by the lack of ERAP2 in rodents and a null expression in 25% of humans. Finally, we speculate that their role in antigen presentation has been acquired later on during evolution. They have therefore been diversified between those residing in the ER, ERAP1 and ERAP2, whose role is to refine the MHC-I peptidomes, and LNPEP, mostly present in the endosomal vesicles where it can contribute to antigen cross-presentation or move to the cell membrane as receptor for angiotensin IV. Their association with autoinflammatory/autoimmune diseases can therefore be two-fold: as “contributors” to the shaping of the immune-peptidomes as well as to the regulation of the vascular response.

The roles of ERAP1 and ERAP2 in autoimmunity and cancer immunity: New insights and perspective

Autoimmunity and cancer affect millions worldwide and both, in principal, result from dysregulated immune responses. There are many well-known molecules involved in immunological process playing as a double-edged sword, by which associating autoimmune diseases and cancer. In this regard, Endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases (ERAP) 1, which belongs to the M1 family of aminopeptidases, plays a central role as a "molecular ruler", proteolyzing of N-terminal of the antigenic peptides before their loading onto HLA-I molecules for antigen presentation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER). Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) highlighted the significance of ERAP1 and ERAP2 in autoimmune diseases, including Ankylosing spondylitis, Psoriasis, Bechet's disease, and Birdshot chorioretinopathy, as well as in cancers. The expression of ERAP1/2 is mostly altered in different cancers compared to normal cells, but how this affects anti-cancer immune responses and cancer growth has been little explored. Recent studies on the immunological outcomes and the catalytic functions of ERAP1 and ERAP2 have provided a better understanding of their potential pathogenetic role in autoimmunity and cancer. In this review, we summarize the role of ERAP1 and ERAP2 in the autoimmune diseases and cancer immunity based on the recent advances in GWAS studies.