Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis

Timing and cortical region matter: theta power differences between teenagers affected by Major Depression and healthy controls

In adults affected by Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), most findings point to higher electroencephalographic (EEG) theta power during wake compared to healthy controls (HC) as a potential biomarker aiding the diagnostic process or subgrouping for stratified treatment. Besides these group differences, theta power is modulated by time of day, sleep/wake history, and age. Thus, we aimed at assessing if the time of recording alters theta power in teenagers affected by MDD or HC. Standardized wake EEG power was assessed with high-density EEG in 15 children and adolescents with MDD and in 15 age- and sex-matched HC in the evening and morning. Using a two-way ANOVA, group, time, and their interaction were tested. In patients, the current severity of depression was rated using the Children's Depression Rating Scale. Broadband EEG power was lower in the morning after sleep, with a significant interaction (group x time) in central regions in the 4-6 Hz range. In MDD relative to HC, theta power was decreased over occipital areas in the evening and increased over frontal areas in the morning. A higher frontal theta power was correlated with more severe depressive mood in the morning but not in the evening. This was a cross-sectional study design, including patients on antidepressant medication. In conclusion, depending on time of recording, region-specific opposite differences of theta power were found between teenagers with MDD and HC. These findings stress the importance of the time of the recording when investigating theta power's relationship to psychopathology.

Emotion-Induced Frontal Alpha Asymmetry as a Candidate Predictor of Relapse After Discontinuation of Antidepressant Medication

BACKGROUND

One in 3 patients relapse after antidepressant discontinuation. Thus, the prevention of relapse after achieving remission is an important component in the long-term management of major depressive disorder. However, no clinical or other predictors are established. Frontal reactivity to sad mood as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging has been reported to relate to relapse independently of antidepressant discontinuation and is an interesting candidate predictor.

METHODS

Patients (n = 56) who had remitted from a depressive episode while taking antidepressants underwent electroencephalography (EEG) recording during a sad mood induction procedure prior to gradually discontinuing their medication. Relapse was assessed over a 6-month follow-up period. Thirty five healthy control participants were also tested. Current source density of the EEG power in the alpha band (8-13 Hz) was extracted and alpha asymmetry was computed by comparing the power across 2 hemispheres at frontal electrodes (F5 and F6).

RESULTS

Sad mood induction was robust across all groups. Reactivity of alpha asymmetry to sad mood did not distinguish healthy control participants from patients with remitted major depressive disorder on medication. However, the 14 (25%) patients who relapsed during the follow-up period after discontinuing medication showed significantly reduced reactivity in alpha asymmetry compared with patients who remained well. This EEG signal provided predictive power (69% out-of-sample balanced accuracy and a positive predictive value of 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple EEG-based measure of emotional reactivity may have potential to contribute to clinical prediction models of antidepressant discontinuation. Given the very small sample size, this finding must be interpreted with caution and requires replication in a larger study.

Overcoming treatment-resistant depression with machine-learning based tools: a study protocol combining EEG and clinical data to personalize glutamatergic and brain stimulation interventions (SelecTool Project)

Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) poses a substantial health and economic challenge, persisting as a major concern despite decades of extensive research into novel treatment modalities. The considerable heterogeneity in TRD's clinical manifestations and neurobiological bases has complicated efforts toward effective interventions. Recognizing the need for precise biomarkers to guide treatment choices in TRD, herein we introduce the SelecTool Project. This initiative focuses on developing (WorkPlane 1/WP1) and conducting preliminary validation (WorkPlane 2/WP2) of a computational tool (SelecTool) that integrates clinical data, neurophysiological (EEG) and peripheral (blood sample) biomarkers through a machine-learning framework designed to optimize TRD treatment protocols. The SelecTool project aims to enhance clinical decision-making by enabling the selection of personalized interventions. It leverages multi-modal data analysis to navigate treatment choices towards two validated therapeutic options for TRD: esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) and accelerated repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (arTMS). In WP1, 100 subjects with TRD will be randomized to receive either ESK-NS or arTMS, with comprehensive evaluations encompassing neurophysiological (EEG), clinical (psychometric scales), and peripheral (blood samples) assessments both at baseline (T0) and one month post-treatment initiation (T1). WP2 will utilize the data collected in WP1 to train the SelecTool algorithm, followed by its application in a second, out-of-sample cohort of 20 TRD subjects, assigning treatments based on the tool's recommendations. Ultimately, this research seeks to revolutionize the treatment of TRD by employing advanced machine learning strategies and thorough data analysis, aimed at unraveling the complex neurobiological landscape of depression. This effort is expected to provide pivotal insights that will promote the development of more effective and individually tailored treatment strategies, thus addressing a significant void in current TRD management and potentially reducing its profound societal and economic burdens.

Electrophysiological Markers Predicting Antipsychotic Treatment Response in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

This study aimed to provide an objective means of predicting treatment responses in patients with schizophrenia using quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as an electrophysiological indicator. We obtained qEEG recordings from patients with schizophrenia and explored them for patterns indicative of treatment responsiveness.

Patients and Methods

The study included 68 patients had been diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. After retrospectively gathering demographic information, clinical data such as qEEG, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), a multiple regression analysis was performed. This analysis employed baseline qEEG findings as independent variables and PANSS score changes as dependent variables to discern causal relationships.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 38.4 years(SD =13.73). The mean PANSS score on admission was 92.97, decreasing to 67.41 at discharge. Multiple regression analysis revealed that delta waves in T4 (β=0.346, t=3.165, p=0.002), and high-beta waves in Fp2 (β=0.231, t=2.361, p=0.021) were associated with PANSS changes in absolute power. In addition, the delta waves of O2 (β=0.250, t=3.288, p=0.002); beta waves of T3 (β=-1.463, t=-5.423, p<0.001) and O2 (β=0.551, t=3.366, p=0.001); high beta waves of Fp1 (β=0.307, t=4.026, p<0.001), T3 (β=0.855, t=4.414, p<0.001) and T6 (β=-0.838, t=-4.559, p<0.001) of absolute power using the Z-score were also related to PANSS changes. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that only delta waves at Cz (r= 0.246, p=0.043) in absolute power correlated with changes in the PANSS.

Conclusion

We found that certain qEEG wave patterns in patients with schizophrenia prior to antipsychotic treatment were linked to PANSS changes before and after treatment. Delta waves and beta waves, primarily in the frontal and temporal regions, were found to be significantly associated with changes in PANSS scores. In the future, the qEEG indicators identified in this study could serve as electrophysiological markers for predicting antipsychotic treatment responses in patients with schizophrenia.

Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression

Treatment outcomes widely vary for individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder, implicating a need for deeper understanding of the biological mechanisms conferring a greater likelihood of response to a particular treatment. Our improved understanding of intrinsic brain networks underlying depression psychopathology via magnetic resonance imaging and other neuroimaging modalities has helped reveal novel and potentially clinically meaningful biological markers of response. And while we have made considerable progress in identifying such biomarkers over the last decade, particularly with larger, multisite trials, there are significant methodological and practical obstacles that need to be overcome to translate these markers into the clinic. The aim of this review is to review current literature on brain network structural and functional biomarkers of treatment response or selection in depression, with a specific focus on recent large, multisite trials reporting predictive accuracy of candidate biomarkers. Regarding pharmaco- and psychotherapy, we discuss candidate biomarkers, reporting that while we have identified candidate biomarkers of response to a single intervention, we need more trials that distinguish biomarkers between first-line treatments. Further, we discuss the ways prognostic neuroimaging may help to improve treatment outcomes to neuromodulation-based therapies, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation. Lastly, we highlight obstacles and technical developments that may help to address the knowledge gaps in this area of research. Ultimately, integrating neuroimaging-derived biomarkers into clinical practice holds promise for enhancing treatment outcomes and advancing precision psychiatry strategies for depression management. By elucidating the neural predictors of treatment response and selection, we can move towards more individualized and effective depression interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment response in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies

Predicting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) could reduce the financial and psychological risks of treatment failure. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed studies that leveraged neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers to predict rTMS response in MDD. Five databases were searched from inception to May 25, 2023. The primary meta-analytic outcome was predictive accuracy pooled from classification models. Regression models were summarized qualitatively. A promising marker was identified if it showed a sensitivity and specificity of 80% or higher in at least two independent studies. Searching yielded 36 studies. Twenty-two classification modeling studies produced an estimated area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.83-0.92), with 86.8% sensitivity (95% CI = 80.6-91.2%) and 81.9% specificity (95% CI = 76.1-86.4%). Frontal theta cordance measured by electroencephalography is closest to proof of concept. Predicting rTMS response using neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers is promising for clinical decision-making. However, replications by different research groups are needed to establish rigorous markers.

Prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder using a hybrid of convolutional recurrent deep neural networks and effective connectivity based on EEG signal

In this study, we have developed a novel method based on deep learning and brain effective connectivity to classify responders and non-responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients prior to the treatment using EEG signal. The effective connectivity of 30 MDD patients was determined by analyzing their pretreatment EEG signals, which were then concatenated into delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands and transformed into images. Using these images, we then fine tuned a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network that is enhanced with bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory cells based on transfer learning. The Inception-v3, ResNet18, DenseNet121, and EfficientNet-B0 models are implemented as base models. Finally, the models are followed by BiLSTM and dense layers in order to classify responders and non-responders to SSRI treatment. Results showed that the EfficiencyNet-B0 has the highest accuracy of 98.33, followed by DensNet121, ResNet18 and Inception-v3. Therefore, a new method was proposed in this study that uses deep learning models to extract both spatial and temporal features automatically, which will improve classification results. The proposed method provides accurate identification of MDD patients who are responding, thereby reducing the cost of medical facilities and patient care.

Trajectory Modeling and Response Prediction in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy could be improved by better and earlier prediction of response. Latent class mixture (LCMM) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modelling have been applied to model the trajectories of antidepressant response (or non-response) to TMS, but it is not known whether such models can predict clinical outcomes. We compared LCMM and NLME approaches to model the antidepressant response to TMS in a naturalistic sample of 238 patients receiving rTMS for treatment resistant depression (TRD), across multiple coils and protocols. We then compared the predictive power of those models. LCMM trajectories were influenced largely by baseline symptom severity, but baseline symptoms provided little predictive power for later antidepressant response. Rather, the optimal LCMM model was a nonlinear two-class model that accounted for baseline symptoms. This model accurately predicted patient response at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.52-0.87]), but not before. NLME offered slightly improved predictive performance at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI = [0.58 - 0.94], but likewise, not before. In showing the predictive validity of these approaches to model response trajectories to rTMS, we provided preliminary evidence that trajectory modeling could be used to guide future treatment decisions.

Optimizing Antidepressant Efficacy: Multimodal Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Prediction of Treatment Response

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and often severe condition that profoundly diminishes quality of life for individuals across ages and demographic groups. Unfortunately, current antidepressant and psychotherapeutic treatments exhibit limited efficacy and unsatisfactory response rates in a substantial number of patients. The development of effective therapies for MDD is hindered by the insufficiently understood heterogeneity within the disorder and its elusive underlying mechanisms. To address these challenges, we present a target-oriented multimodal fusion framework that robustly predicts antidepressant response by integrating structural and functional connectivity data (sertraline: R2 = 0.31; placebo: R2 = 0.22). Through the model, we identify multimodal neuroimaging biomarkers of antidepressant response and observe that sertraline and placebo show distinct predictive patterns. We further decompose the overall predictive patterns into constitutive network constellations with generalizable structural-functional co-variation, which exhibit treatment-specific association with personality traits and behavioral/cognitive task performance. Our innovative and interpretable multimodal framework provides novel insights into the intricate neuropsychopharmacology of antidepressant treatment and paves the way for advances in precision medicine and development of more targeted antidepressant therapeutics.

Evaluating Robustness of Brain Stimulation Biomarkers for Depression: A Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography Studies

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) treatments have gained considerable attention as potential therapeutic intervention for psychiatric disorders. The identification of reliable biomarkers for predicting clinical response to NIBS has been a major focus of research in recent years. Neuroimaging techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been used to identify potential biomarkers that could predict response to NIBS. However, identifying clinically actionable brain biomarkers requires robustness. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the current state of brain biomarker research for NIBS in depression, focusing only on well-powered studies (N ≥ 88) and/or studies that aimed at independently replicating previous findings, either successfully or unsuccessfully. A total of 220 studies were initially identified, of which 18 MRI studies and 18 EEG studies met the inclusion criteria. All focused on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression. After reviewing the included studies, we found the following MRI and EEG biomarkers to be most robust: 1) functional MRI-based functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, 2) functional MRI-based network connectivity, 3) task-induced EEG frontal-midline theta, and 4) EEG individual alpha frequency. Future prospective studies should further investigate the clinical actionability of these specific EEG and MRI biomarkers to bring biomarkers closer to clinical reality.

Resting-state EEG connectivity recorded before and after rTMS treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy and tolerability in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, the underlying mechanisms of its antidepressant effects remain unclear. This open-label study investigated electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity markers associated with response and the antidepressant effects of rTMS. Resting-state EEG data were collected from 28 participants with MDD before and after a four-week rTMS course. Source-space functional connectivity between 38 cortical regions was compared using an orthogonalised amplitude approach. Depressive symptoms significantly improved following rTMS, with 43 % of participants classified as responders. While the study's functional connectivity findings did not withstand multiple comparison corrections, exploratory analyses suggest an association between theta band connectivity and rTMS treatment mechanisms. Fronto-parietal theta connectivity increased after treatment but did not correlate with antidepressant response. Notably, low baseline theta connectivity was associated with greater response. However, due to the exploratory nature and small sample size, further replication is needed. The findings provide preliminary evidence that EEG functional connectivity, particularly within the theta band, may reflect the mechanisms by which rTMS exerts its therapeutic effects.

EEG abnormalities are not associated with poor antidepressant treatment outcome - A NeuroPharm study

EEG brain abnormalities, such as slowing and isolated epileptiform discharges (IEDs), has previously been associated with non-response to antidepressant treatment with escitalopram and venlafaxine, suggesting a potential need for treatment with anticonvulsant property in some patients. The current study aims to replicate the reported association of EEG abnormality and treatment outcomes in an open-label trial of escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) and explore its relationship to mood and cognition. Pretreatment, 6 min eyes-closed resting-state 256-channel EEG was recorded in 91 patients with MDD (age 18-57) who were treated with 10-20 mg escitalopram for 12 weeks; patients could switch to duloxetine after four weeks. A certified clinical neurophysiologist rated the EEGs. IED and EEG slowing was seen in 13.2%, and in 6.6% there were findings with unclear significance (i.e., Wicket spikes and theta activity). We saw no group-difference in remission or response rates after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment or switching to duloxetine. Patients with EEG abnormalities had higher pretreatment mood disturbances driven by greater anger (p=.039) and poorer verbal memory (p=.012). However, EEG abnormality was not associated with improved mood or verbal memory after treatment. Our findings should be interpreted in light of the rarity of EEG abnormalities and the sample size. While we cannot confirm that EEG abnormalities are associated with non-response to treatment, including escitalopram, abnormal EEG activity is associated with poor mood and verbal memory. The clinical utility of EEG abnormality in antidepressant treatment selection needs careful evaluation before deciding if useful for clinical implementation.

Closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders

Despite increasing prevalence and huge personal and societal burden, psychiatric diseases still lack treatments which can control symptoms for a large fraction of patients. Increasing insight into the neurobiology underlying these diseases has demonstrated wide-ranging aberrant activity and functioning in multiple brain circuits and networks. Together with varied presentation and symptoms, this makes one-size-fits-all treatment a challenge. There has been a resurgence of interest in the use of neurostimulation as a treatment for psychiatric diseases. Initial studies using continuous open-loop stimulation, in which clinicians adjusted stimulation parameters during patient visits, showed promise but also mixed results. Given the periodic nature and fluctuations of symptoms often observed in psychiatric illnesses, the use of device-driven closed-loop stimulation may provide more effective therapy. The use of a biomarker, which is correlated with specific symptoms, to deliver stimulation only during symptomatic periods allows for the personalized therapy needed for such heterogeneous disorders. Here, we provide the reader with background motivating the use of closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We review foundational studies of open- and closed-loop neurostimulation for neuropsychiatric indications, focusing on deep brain stimulation, and discuss key considerations when designing and implementing closed-loop neurostimulation.

Closing the loop in psychiatric deep brain stimulation: physiology, psychometrics, and plasticity

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive approach to precise modulation of psychiatrically relevant circuits. Although it has impressive results in open-label psychiatric trials, DBS has also struggled to scale to and pass through multi-center randomized trials. This contrasts with Parkinson disease, where DBS is an established therapy treating thousands of patients annually. The core difference between these clinical applications is the difficulty of proving target engagement, and of leveraging the wide range of possible settings (parameters) that can be programmed in a given patient's DBS. In Parkinson's, patients' symptoms change rapidly and visibly when the stimulator is tuned to the correct parameters. In psychiatry, those same changes take days to weeks, limiting a clinician's ability to explore parameter space and identify patient-specific optimal settings. I review new approaches to psychiatric target engagement, with an emphasis on major depressive disorder (MDD). Specifically, I argue that better engagement may come by focusing on the root causes of psychiatric illness: dysfunction in specific, measurable cognitive functions and in the connectivity and synchrony of distributed brain circuits. I overview recent progress in both those domains, and how it may relate to other technologies discussed in companion articles in this issue.

Predicting acupuncture efficacy for major depressive disorder using baseline clinical variables: A machine learning study

Acupuncture is a viable treatment option for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, its effectiveness varies among patients. This study aimed to develop a model to predict the efficacy of acupuncture therapy for MDD using machine learning and baseline clinical variables. A total of 124 patients with MDD from five research centers were included in our machine learning study. All patients underwent acupuncture treatment for 6 weeks and the efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Scale-17 (HAMD-17). The max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR) algorithm and Pearson correlation analysis were used for selecting 11 significant features from 26 baseline clinical variables for model training. We compared the performance of five machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, and XgBoost, in predicting the effect of acupuncture in relieving major depression. Among the five models, XgBoost performed the best with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.835, an accuracy of 0.730, a sensitivity of 0.670, a specificity of 0.774, and an F1 score of 0.751. The key predictive variables identified were anxiety score in the self-rating depression scale (SDS), the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome of deficiency in both heart and spleen, and body mass index (BMI). The study demonstrates that the developed model can help physicians predict the patients who will benefit from acupuncture treatment, which is of positive significance for improving the clinical efficacy of acupuncture on MDD.

Predictive Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent, debilitating disorder with a high rate of treatment resistance. One strategy to improve treatment outcomes is to identify patient-specific, pre-intervention factors that can predict treatment success. Neurophysiological measures such as electroencephalography (EEG), which measures the brain's electrical activity from sensors on the scalp, offer one promising approach for predicting treatment response for psychiatric illnesses, including MDD. In this study, a secondary data analysis was conducted on the publicly available Two Decades Brainclinics Research Archive for Insights in Neurophysiology (TDBRAIN) database. Logistic regression modeling was used to predict treatment response, defined as at least a 50% improvement on the Beck's Depression Inventory, in 119 MDD patients receiving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The results show that both age and baseline symptom severity were significant predictors of rTMS treatment response, with older individuals and more severe depression scores associated with decreased odds of a positive treatment response. EEG measures contributed predictive power to these models; however, these improvements in outcome predictability only trended towards statistical significance. These findings provide confirmation of previous demographic and clinical predictors, while pointing to EEG metrics that may provide predictive information in future studies.

Aperiodic neural activity is a biomarker for depression severity

A reliable physiological biomarker for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is necessary to improve treatment success rates by shoring up variability in outcome measures. In this study, we establish a passive biomarker that tracks with changes in mood on the order of minutes to hours. We record from intracranial electrodes implanted deep in the brain - a surgical setting providing exquisite temporal and spatial sensitivity to detect this relationship in a difficult-to-measure brain area, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC). The aperiodic slope of the power spectral density captures the balance of activity across all frequency bands and is construed as a putative proxy for excitatory/inhibitory balance in the brain. This study demonstrates how shifts in aperiodic slope correlate with depression severity in a clinical trial of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The correlation between depression severity scores and aperiodic slope is significant in N=5 subjects, indicating that flatter (less negative) slopes correspond to reduced depression severity, especially in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. This biomarker offers a new way to track patient response to MDD treatment, facilitating individualized therapies in both intracranial and non-invasive monitoring scenarios.

Associations between psychotropic drugs and rsEEG connectivity and network characteristics: a cross-sectional study in hospital-admitted psychiatric patients

Introduction

Resting-state EEG (rsEEG) characteristics, such as functional connectivity and network topology, are studied as potential biomarkers in psychiatric research. However, the presence of psychopharmacological treatment in study participants poses a potential confounding factor in biomarker research. To address this concern, our study aims to explore the impact of both single and multi-class psychotropic treatments on aforementioned rsEEG characteristics in a psychiatric population.

Methods

RsEEG was analyzed in a real-world cross-sectional sample of 900 hospital-admitted psychiatric patients. Patients were clustered into eight psychopharmacological groups: unmedicated, single-class treatment with antipsychotics (AP), antidepressants (AD) or benzodiazepines (BDZ), and multi-class combinations of these treatments. To assess the associations between psychotropic treatments and the macroscale rsEEG characteristics mentioned above, we employed a general linear model with post-hoc tests. Additionally, Spearman's rank correlation analyses were performed to explore potential dosage effects.

Results

Compared to unmedicated patients, single-class use of AD was associated with lower functional connectivity in the delta band, while AP was associated with lower functional connectivity in both the delta and alpha bands. Single-class use of BDZ was associated with widespread rsEEG differences, including lower functional connectivity across frequency bands and a different network topology within the beta band relative to unmedicated patients. All of the multi-class groups showed associations with functional connectivity or topology measures, but effects were most pronounced for concomitant use of all three classes of psychotropics. Differences were not only observed in comparison with unmedicated patients, but were also evident in comparisons between single-class, multi-class, and single/multi-class groups. Importantly, multi-class associations with rsEEG characteristics were found even in the absence of single-class associations, suggesting potential cumulative or interaction effects of different classes of psychotropics. Dosage correlations were only found for antipsychotics.

Conclusion

Our exploratory, cross-sectional study suggests small but significant associations between single and multi-class use of antidepressants, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines and macroscale rsEEG functional connectivity and network topology characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of considering the effects of specific psychotropics, as well as their interactions, when investigating rsEEG biomarkers in a medicated psychiatric population.

Developing an Electroencephalography-Based Model for Predicting Response to Antidepressant Medication

Importance

Untreated depression is a growing public health concern, with patients often facing a prolonged trial-and-error process in search of effective treatment. Developing a predictive model for treatment response in clinical practice remains challenging.

Objective

To establish a model based on electroencephalography (EEG) to predict response to 2 distinct selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prognostic study developed a predictive model using EEG data collected between 2011 and 2017 from 2 independent cohorts of participants with depression: 1 from the first Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) group and the other from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) consortium. Eligible participants included those aged 18 to 65 years who had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Data were analyzed from January to December 2022.

Exposures

In an open-label trial, CAN-BIND participants received an 8-week treatment regimen of escitalopram treatment (10-20 mg), and EMBARC participants were randomized in a double-blind trial to receive an 8-week sertraline (50-200 mg) treatment or placebo treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The model's performance was estimated using balanced accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity metrics. The model used data from the CAN-BIND cohort for internal validation, and data from the treatment group of the EMBARC cohort for external validation. At week 8, response to treatment was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the primary, clinician-rated scale of depression severity.

Results

The CAN-BIND cohort included 125 participants (mean [SD] age, 36.4 [13.0] years; 78 [62.4%] women), and the EMBARC sertraline treatment group included 105 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [13.8] years; 72 [68.6%] women). The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 64.2% (95% CI, 55.8%-72.6%), sensitivity of 66.1% (95% CI, 53.7%-78.5%), and specificity of 62.3% (95% CI, 50.1%-73.8%) during internal validation with CAN-BIND. During external validation with EMBARC, the model achieved a balanced accuracy of 63.7% (95% CI, 54.5%-72.8%), sensitivity of 58.8% (95% CI, 45.3%-72.3%), and specificity of 68.5% (95% CI, 56.1%-80.9%). Additionally, the balanced accuracy for the EMBARC placebo group (118 participants) was 48.7% (95% CI, 39.3%-58.0%), the sensitivity was 50.0% (95% CI, 35.2%-64.8%), and the specificity was 47.3% (95% CI, 35.9%-58.7%), suggesting the model's specificity in predicting SSRIs treatment response.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prognostic study, an EEG-based model was developed and validated in 2 independent cohorts. The model showed promising accuracy in predicting treatment response to 2 distinct SSRIs, suggesting potential applications for personalized depression treatment.

Evidence for Altered Electroencephalography Coherence in Depressed Adolescents with Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a primary risk factor for suicide, which is one of the leading causes of death among adolescents worldwide. Understanding the heterogeneity of suicidality in adolescents with MDD is critical for suicide prevention and intervention discovery. Quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising tool to address the knowledge gaps related to the neurophysiological characteristics of depression and suicidality. This study sought to examine resting-state EEG coherence differences in adolescents with MDD and suicidal ideation (SI)/behaviors (SB) and healthy controls (HC) to assess the utility of coherence as a biomarker of suicide. Methods: Twenty-six adolescents with MDD who were hospitalized for suicidality and 30 HC were recruited. The clinical sample was divided into SI (n = 9) and SB (n = 19) subgroups. Eyes closed resting-state EEG were recorded, and coherence was calculated. Depression severity and suicidality were assessed with the Children's Depression Rating Scale Revised and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, respectively. Results: There were intrahemispheric differences in the right hemisphere across multiple electrode pairs. Delta, alpha, and beta coherence were higher in the SB group over the right prefrontofrontal and left parietooccipital electrode pairs, while alpha coherence was higher in the HC group over the right centroparietal electrode pair. There were no significant differences between HC and SI groups in any electrode pair. Conclusions: Patients with recent SB showed increased coherence in right frontal regions compared with patients with SI, suggesting altered cognitive states between those with SB and SI. These findings may have implications for suicide prevention in adolescents and could serve as useful biomarkers in clinical settings, but larger studies are needed to confirm the results.

Functional connectivity analysis on electroencephalography signals reveals potential biomarkers for treatment response in major depression

BACKGROUND

The treatment efficacy varies across individual patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). It lacks robust electroencephalography (EEG) markers for an antidepressant-responsive phenotype.

METHOD

This is an observational study enrolling 28 patients with MDD and 33 healthy controls (mean age of 40.7 years, and 71.4% were women). Patients underwent EEG exams at baseline (week0) and week1, while controls' EEG recordings were acquired only at week0. A resting eye-closing EEG segment was analyzed for functional connectivity (FC). Four parameters were used in FC analysis: (1) node strength (NS), (2) global efficiency (GE), (3) clustering coefficient (CC), and (4) betweenness centrality (BC).

RESULTS

We found that controls had higher values in delta wave in the indices of NS, GE, BC, and CC than MDD patients at baseline. After treatment with antidepressants, patients' FC indices improved significantly, including GE, mean CC, and mean NS in the delta wave. The FC in the alpha and beta bands of the responders were higher than those of the non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

The FC of the MDD patients at baseline without treatment was worse than that of controls. After treatment, the FC improved and was close to the values of controls. Responders showed better FC in the high-frequency bands than non-responders, and this feature exists in both pre-treatment and post-treatment EEG.

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation alters resting-state neurophysiological traits in major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent and debilitating health conditions worldwide; unfortunately, many patients do not respond to traditional antidepressant medication or talk therapy approaches. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) has emerged as an effective treatment option for such "treatmentresistant" cases; however, the mechanisms by which Deep TMS attenuates depressive symptoms are still ambiguous.

METHODS

In the current study, resting-state quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) measures were assessed pre-and-post treatment to illustrate neurophysiological changes resulting from Deep TMS.

RESULTS

The results showed reduced slow-frequency brain activity (delta and theta waves) in the prefrontal cortex following 36 treatments. Additionally, baseline QEEG measures predicted treatment response with approximately 90 % accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide preliminary evidence that TMS improves depressive symptoms by mitigating slow-wave brain activity in the prefrontal cortex.

SIGNIFICANCE

Deep TMS paired with QEEG should continue to be utilized for treatment of MDD in clinical practice and future studies should explore its potential for other neuropsychiatric conditions.

In silicodevelopment and validation of Bayesian methods for optimizing deep brain stimulation to enhance cognitive control

Objective.deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral internal capsule/striatum (VCVS) is a potentially effective treatment for several mental health disorders when conventional therapeutics fail. Its effectiveness, however, depends on correct programming to engage VCVS sub-circuits. VCVS programming is currently an iterative, time-consuming process, with weeks between setting changes and reliance on noisy, subjective self-reports. An objective measure of circuit engagement might allow individual settings to be tested in seconds to minutes, reducing the time to response and increasing patient and clinician confidence in the chosen settings. Here, we present an approach to measuring and optimizing that circuit engagement.Approach.we leverage prior results showing that effective VCVS DBS engages cognitive control circuitry and improves performance on the multi-source interference task, that this engagement depends primarily on which contact(s) are activated, and that circuit engagement can be tracked through a state space modeling framework. We develop a simulation framework based on those empirical results, then combine this framework with an adaptive optimizer to simulate a principled exploration of electrode contacts and identify the contacts that maximally improve cognitive control. We explore multiple optimization options (algorithms, number of inputs, speed of stimulation parameter changes) and compare them on problems of varying difficulty.Main results.we show that an upper confidence bound algorithm outperforms other optimizers, with roughly 80% probability of convergence to a global optimum when used in a majority-vote ensemble.Significance.we show that the optimization can converge even with lag between stimulation and effect, and that a complete optimization can be done in a clinically feasible timespan (a few hours). Further, the approach requires no specialized recording or imaging hardware, and thus could be a scalable path to expand the use of DBS in psychiatric and other non-motor applications.

A review of critical brain oscillations in depression and the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) have been proven effective non-invasive treatments for patients with drug-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). However, some depressed patients do not respond to these treatments. Therefore, the investigation of reliable and valid brain oscillations as potential indices for facilitating the precision of diagnosis and treatment protocols has become a critical issue. The current review focuses on brain oscillations that, mostly based on EEG power analysis and connectivity, distinguish between MDD and controls, responders and non-responders, and potential depression severity indices, prognostic indicators, and potential biomarkers for rTMS or iTBS treatment. The possible roles of each biomarker and the potential reasons for heterogeneous results are discussed, and the directions of future studies are proposed.

Future directions in psychiatric neurosurgery: Proceedings of the 2022 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery meeting on surgical neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in the treatment of psychiatric diseases, currently available therapies do not provide sufficient and durable relief for as many as 30-40% of patients. Neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation (DBS), has emerged as a potential therapy for persistent disabling disease, however it has not yet gained widespread adoption. In 2016, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ASSFN) convened a meeting with leaders in the field to discuss a roadmap for the path forward. A follow-up meeting in 2022 aimed to review the current state of the field and to identify critical barriers and milestones for progress.

DESIGN

The ASSFN convened a meeting on June 3, 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia and included leaders from the fields of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry along with colleagues from industry, government, ethics, and law. The goal was to review the current state of the field, assess for advances or setbacks in the interim six years, and suggest a future path forward. The participants focused on five areas of interest: interdisciplinary engagement, regulatory pathways and trial design, disease biomarkers, ethics of psychiatric surgery, and resource allocation/prioritization. The proceedings are summarized here.

CONCLUSION

The field of surgical psychiatry has made significant progress since our last expert meeting. Although weakness and threats to the development of novel surgical therapies exist, the identified strengths and opportunities promise to move the field through methodically rigorous and biologically-based approaches. The experts agree that ethics, law, patient engagement, and multidisciplinary teams will be critical to any potential growth in this area.

Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established approach to treating medication-refractory neurological disorders and holds promise for treating psychiatric disorders. Despite strong open-label results in extremely refractory patients, DBS has struggled to meet endpoints in randomized controlled trials. A major challenge is stimulation "dosing"-DBS systems have many adjustable parameters, and clinicians receive little feedback on whether they have chosen the correct parameters for an individual patient. Multiple groups have proposed closed loop technologies as a solution. These systems sense electrical activity, identify markers of an (un)desired state, then automatically deliver or adjust stimulation to alter that electrical state. Closed loop DBS has been successfully deployed in movement disorders and epilepsy. The availability of that technology, as well as advances in opportunities for invasive research with neurosurgical patients, has yielded multiple pilot demonstrations in psychiatric illness. Those demonstrations split into two schools of thought, one rooted in well-established diagnoses and symptom scales, the other in the more experimental Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Both are promising, and both are limited by the boundaries of current stimulation technology. They are in turn driving advances in implantable recording hardware, signal processing, and stimulation paradigms. The combination of these advances is likely to change both our understanding of psychiatric neurobiology and our treatment toolbox, though the timeframe may be limited by the realities of implantable device development.

Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment

Informatics paradigms for brain and mental health research have seen significant advances in recent years. These developments can largely be attributed to the emergence of new technologies such as machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence. Data-driven methods have the potential to support mental health care by providing more precise and personalised approaches to detection, diagnosis, and treatment of depression. In particular, precision psychiatry is an emerging field that utilises advanced computational techniques to achieve a more individualised approach to mental health care. This survey provides an overview of the ways in which artificial intelligence is currently being used to support precision psychiatry. Advanced algorithms are being used to support all phases of the treatment cycle. These systems have the potential to identify individuals suffering from mental health conditions, allowing them to receive the care they need and tailor treatments to individual patients who are mostly to benefit. Additionally, unsupervised learning techniques are breaking down existing discrete diagnostic categories and highlighting the vast disease heterogeneity observed within depression diagnoses. Artificial intelligence also provides the opportunity to shift towards evidence-based treatment prescription, moving away from existing methods based on group averages. However, our analysis suggests there are several limitations currently inhibiting the progress of data-driven paradigms in care. Significantly, none of the surveyed articles demonstrate empirically improved patient outcomes over existing methods. Furthermore, greater consideration needs to be given to uncertainty quantification, model validation, constructing interdisciplinary teams of researchers, improved access to diverse data and standardised definitions within the field. Empirical validation of computer algorithms via randomised control trials which demonstrate measurable improvement to patient outcomes are the next step in progressing models to clinical implementation.

Fronto-central resting-state 15-29 Hz transient beta events change with therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and shows promise for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet effectiveness varies. Electroencephalography (EEG) can identify rTMS-associated brain changes. EEG oscillations are often examined using averaging approaches that mask finer time-scale dynamics. Recent advances show some brain oscillations emerge as transient increases in power, a phenomenon termed "Spectral Events," and that event characteristics correspond with cognitive functions. We applied Spectral Event analyses to identify potential EEG biomarkers of effective rTMS treatment. Resting 8-electrode EEG was collected from 23 patients with MDD and PTSD before and after 5 Hz rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Using an open-source toolbox ( https://github.com/jonescompneurolab/SpectralEvents ), we quantified event features and tested for treatment associated changes. Spectral Events in delta/theta (1-6 Hz), alpha (7-14 Hz), and beta (15-29 Hz) bands occurred in all patients. rTMS-induced improvement in comorbid MDD PTSD were associated with pre- to post-treatment changes in fronto-central electrode beta event features, including frontal beta event frequency spans and durations, and central beta event maxima power. Furthermore, frontal pre-treatment beta event duration correlated negatively with MDD symptom improvement. Beta events may provide new biomarkers of clinical response and advance the understanding of rTMS.

Fronto-central resting-state 15-29Hz transient beta events change with therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and shows promise for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet effectiveness varies. Electroencephalography (EEG) can identify rTMS-associated brain changes. EEG oscillations are often examined using averaging approaches that mask finer time-scale dynamics. Recent advances show some brain oscillations emerge as transient increases in power, a phenomenon termed "Spectral Events," and that event characteristics correspond with cognitive functions. We applied Spectral Event analyses to identify potential EEG biomarkers of effective rTMS treatment. Resting 8-electrode EEG was collected from 23 patients with MDD and PTSD before and after 5Hz rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Using an open-source toolbox ( https://github.com/jonescompneurolab/SpectralEvents ), we quantified event features and tested for treatment associated changes. Spectral Events in delta/theta (1-6 Hz), alpha (7-14 Hz), and beta (15-29 Hz) bands occurred in all patients. rTMS-induced improvement in comorbid MDD PTSD were associated with pre-to post-treatment changes in fronto-central electrode beta event features, including frontal beta event frequency spans and durations, and central beta event maxima power. Furthermore, frontal pre-treatment beta event duration correlated negatively with MDD symptom improvement. Beta events may provide new biomarkers of clinical response and advance the understanding of rTMS.

Right-side frontal-central cortical hyperactivation before the treatment predicts outcomes of antidepressant and electroconvulsive therapy responsivity in major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder places a great burden on healthcare resources worldwide. Antidepressants are the first-line treatment for major depressive disorder, but if patients don't respond adequately, brain stimulation therapy may be needed as second-line treatment. Digital phenotyping in patients with major depressive disorder will aid in the timely prediction of treatment effectiveness. This study explored electroencephalographic (EEG) signatures that diversify depression treatment responsivity, including antidepressant administration or brain stimulation therapy. Resting-state, pre-treatment EEG sequences from depressive patients who received fluoxetine treatment (n = 55; 26 remitters and 29 poor responders) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT, n = 58; 36 remitters and 22 nonremitters) were recorded on 19 channels. Twenty-nine EEG segments were obtained from each patient per recording electrode. Power spectral analysis was conducted for feature extraction and showed the highest predictive accuracy for fluoxetine or ECT outcomes. Both occurred with beta-band oscillations within right-side frontal-central (F1-score = 0.9437) or prefrontal areas of the brain (F1-score = 0.9416), respectively. Significantly higher beta-band power was observed among patients who lacked adequate treatment response than the remitters, specifically at 19.2 Hz or 24.5 Hz for fluoxetine administration or ECT outcome, respectively. Our findings indicated that pre-treatment, right-side cortical hyperactivation is associated with poor outcomes of antidepressant-based or ECT-based treatment in major depression. Whether depression treatment response rates can be improved by reducing the high-frequency EEG power in corresponding areas of the brain to provide a protective effect against depression recurrence warrants further study.

Deep phenotyping towards precision psychiatry of first-episode depression - the Brain Drugs-Depression cohort

BACKGROUND

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a heterogenous brain disorder, with potentially multiple psychosocial and biological disease mechanisms. This is also a plausible explanation for why patients do not respond equally well to treatment with first- or second-line antidepressants, i.e., one-third to one-half of patients do not remit in response to first- or second-line treatment. To map MDD heterogeneity and markers of treatment response to enable a precision medicine approach, we will acquire several possible predictive markers across several domains, e.g., psychosocial, biochemical, and neuroimaging.

METHODS

All patients are examined before receiving a standardised treatment package for adults aged 18-65 with first-episode depression in six public outpatient clinics in the Capital Region of Denmark. From this population, we will recruit a cohort of 800 patients for whom we will acquire clinical, cognitive, psychometric, and biological data. A subgroup (subcohort I, n = 600) will additionally provide neuroimaging data, i.e., Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Electroencephalogram, and a subgroup of patients from subcohort I unmedicated at inclusion (subcohort II, n = 60) will also undergo a brain Positron Emission Tomography with the [¹¹C]-UCB-J tracer binding to the presynaptic glycoprotein-SV2A. Subcohort allocation is based on eligibility and willingness to participate. The treatment package typically lasts six months. Depression severity is assessed with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at baseline, and 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment initiation. The primary outcome is remission (QIDS ≤ 5) and clinical improvement (≥ 50% reduction in QIDS) after 6 months. Secondary endpoints include remission at 12 and 18 months and %-change in QIDS, 10-item Symptom Checklist, 5-item WHO Well-Being Index, and modified Disability Scale from baseline through follow-up. We also assess psychotherapy and medication side-effects. We will use machine learning to determine a combination of characteristics that best predict treatment outcomes and statistical models to investigate the association between individual measures and clinical outcomes. We will assess associations between patient characteristics, treatment choices, and clinical outcomes using path analysis, enabling us to estimate the effect of treatment choices and timing on the clinical outcome.

DISCUSSION

The BrainDrugs-Depression study is a real-world deep-phenotyping clinical cohort study of first-episode MDD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at clinicaltrials.gov November 15th, 2022 (NCT05616559).

Resting-state frontal, frontlateral, and parietal alpha asymmetry:A pilot study examining relations with depressive disorder type and severity

Introduction

The search for biomarkers has been central to efforts of improving clinical diagnosis and prognosis in psychopathology in the last decades. The main approach has been to validate biomarkers that could accurately discriminate between clinical diagnoses of very prevalent forms of psychopathology. One of the most popular electrophysiological markers proposed for discrimination in depressive disorders is the electroencephalography (EEG)-derived frontal alpha asymmetry. However, the validity, reliability and predictive value of this biomarker have been questioned in recent years, mainly due to conceptual and methodological heterogeneity.

Methods

In the current non-experimental, correlational study we investigated relationship of resting-state EEG alpha asymmetry from multiple sites (frontal, frontolateral, and parietal) with different forms of depressive disorders (varying in type or severity), in a clinical sample.

Results

Results showed that alpha asymmetry in the parietal (P3-P4) was significantly higher than in the frontal (F3-F4) and frontolateral sites (F7-F8). However, we did not find significant relations between alpha asymmetry indices and our depressive disorder measures, except for a moderate positive association between frontolateral alpha asymmetry (eyes-closed only) and depressive disorder severity (determined through clinical structured interview). We also found no significant differences in alpha asymmetry between participants, depending on their depression type.

Discussion

Based on results, we propose the parietal and frontolateral asymmetry indices to form hypotheses that should not be abandoned in the depression markers research, but worth for further experimental research. Methodological and clinical implications of the current findings are discussed.

A Narrative Review on REM Sleep Deprivation: A Promising Non-Pharmaceutical Alternative for Treating Endogenous Depression

Endogenous depression represents a severe mental health condition projected to become one of the worldwide leading causes of years lived with disability. The currently available clinical and non-clinical interventions designed to alleviate endogenous depression-associated symptoms encounter a series of inconveniences, from the lack of intervention effectiveness and medication adherence to unpleasant side effects. In addition, depressive individuals tend to be more frequent users of primary care units, which markedly affects the overall treatment costs. In parallel with the growing incidence of endogenous depression, researchers in sleep science have discovered multiple links between rapid eye movement (REM) sleep patterns and endogenous depression. Recent findings suggest that prolonged periods of REM sleep are associated with different psychiatric disorders, including endogenous depression. In addition, a growing body of experimental work confidently describes REM sleep deprivation (REM-D) as the underlying mechanism of most pharmaceutical antidepressants, proving its utility as either an independent or adjuvant approach to alleviating the symptoms of endogenous depression. In this regard, REM-D is currently being explored for its potential value as a sleep intervention-based method for improving the clinical management of endogenous depression. Therefore, this narrative review represents a comprehensive inventory of the currently available evidence supporting the potential use of REM-D as a reliable, non-pharmaceutical approach for treating endogenous depression, or as an adjuvant practice that could improve the effectiveness of currently used medication.

Electroencephalography for predicting antidepressant treatment success: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) regularly experience non-response to treatment for their depressive episode. Personalized clinical decision making could shorten depressive episodes and reduce patient suffering. Although no clinical tools are currently available, machine learning analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) shows promise in treatment response prediction.

METHODS

With a systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the accuracy of EEG for individual patient response prediction. Importantly, we included only prediction studies that used cross-validation. We used a bivariate model to calculate prediction success, as expressed by area-under the curve, sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we analyzed prediction success for separate antidepressant interventions.

RESULTS

15 studies with 12 individual patient samples and a total of 479 patients were included. Research methods varied considerably between studies. Meta-analysis of results from this heterogeneous set of studies resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91, a sensitivity of 83 % (95 % CI 74-89 %), and a specificity of 86 % (95 % CI 81-90 %). Classification performance did not significantly differ between treatments. Although studies were all internally validated, no externally validated studies have been reported. We found substantial risk of bias caused by methodological shortcomings such as non-independent feature selection, though performance of non-biased studies was comparable.

LIMITATIONS

Sample sizes were relatively small and no study used external validation, increasing the risk of overestimation of accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroencephalography can predict the response to antidepressant treatment with high accuracy. However, future studies with more rigorous validation are needed to produce a clinical tool to guide interventions in MDD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021268169.

Electroencephalogram pattern association with drug-related cues in a long-duration virtual reality environment in patients with methamphetamine use disorder

The cognitive processing of drug-related cues and the subsequent dysregulation of behaviour play a central role in the pathophysiology of substance use disorders. Prior studies are limited by small sample sizes and a lack of immersion in stimulus presentation. In the present study, we recruited patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD; N = 1099) from four compulsory isolated detoxification centres and healthy control participants (N = 305). With a 12-min-long virtual reality (VR) protocol stimulus, we discovered that patients showed a decrease in electroencephalogram (EEG) power across alpha to gamma bands in anterior scalp regions under methamphetamine-related VR stimuli (e.g. a glass pipe and medical tubing) compared with the control stimuli (e.g. balls and cubes). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the interaction effects of stimuli type and group were significant in five EEG bands. Using generalised linear models, we classified the stimuli type (i.e. drug-related vs. drug-unrelated cues) in MUD patients with an f1 score of 90% on an out-of-sample testing set. The decreases of EEG between drug-related cues and drug-unrelated cues in delta, theta and alpha frequency bands are more frequently seen in patients than in healthy controls, perhaps reflecting general arousal and attenuated impulsive control. Our results suggest that EEG responses elicited by long-duration methamphetamine-related VR cues showed a specific signature, which may have future clinical implications.

Non-sedative cortical EEG signatures of allopregnanolone and functional comparators

Neurosteroids that positively modulate GABA_A receptors are among a growing list of rapidly acting antidepressants, including ketamine and psychedelics. To develop increasingly specific treatments with fewer side effects, we explored the possibility of EEG signatures in mice, which could serve as a cross-species screening tool. There are few studies of the impact of non-sedative doses of rapid antidepressants on EEG in either rodents or humans. Here we hypothesize that EEG features may separate a rapid antidepressant neurosteroid, allopregnanolone, from other GABA_A positive modulators, pentobarbital and diazepam. Further, we compared the actions GABA modulators with those of ketamine, an NMDA antagonist and prototype rapid antidepressant. We examined EEG spectra during active exploration at two cortical locations and examined cross-regional and cross-frequency interactions. We found that at comparable doses, the effects of allopregnanolone, despite purported selectivity for certain GABA_AR subtypes, was indistinguishable from pentobarbital during active waking exploration. The actions of diazepam had recognizable common features with allopregnanolone and pentobarbital but was also distinct, consistent with subunit selectivity of benzodiazepines. Finally, ketamine exhibited no distinguishing overlap with allopregnanolone in the parameters examined. Our results suggest that rapid antidepressants with different molecular substrates may remain separated at the level of large-scale ensemble activity, but the studies leave open the possibility of commonalities in more discrete circuits and/or in the context of a dysfunctional brain.

Predicting treatment outcome in depression: an introduction into current concepts and challenges

Improving response and remission rates in major depressive disorder (MDD) remains an important challenge. Matching patients to the treatment they will most likely respond to should be the ultimate goal. Even though numerous studies have investigated patient-specific indicators of treatment efficacy, no (bio)markers or empirical tests for use in clinical practice have resulted as of now. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding the treatment of MDD still have to be made on the basis of questionnaire- or interview-based assessments and general guidelines without the support of a (laboratory) test. We conducted a narrative review of current approaches to characterize and predict outcome to pharmacological treatments in MDD. We particularly focused on findings from newer computational studies using machine learning and on the resulting implementation into clinical decision support systems. The main issues seem to rest upon the unavailability of robust predictive variables and the lacking application of empirical findings and predictive models in clinical practice. We outline several challenges that need to be tackled on different stages of the translational process, from current concepts and definitions to generalizable prediction models and their successful implementation into digital support systems. By bridging the addressed gaps in translational psychiatric research, advances in data quantity and new technologies may enable the next steps toward precision psychiatry.

Individualized Functional Connectome Identified Replicable Biomarkers for Dysphoric Symptoms in First-Episode Medication-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous syndrome and can be conceptualized as a mixture of dimensional abnormalities across several specific brain circuits. The neural underpinnings of different symptom dimensions in MDD are not well understood. We aimed to identify robust, generalizable, functional connectivity (FC)-based biomarkers for different symptom dimensions in MDD using individualized functional connectomes.

METHODS

Patterns of FC associated with symptom severity were identified using a novel, individualized, functional network parcellation analysis in conjunction with hierarchical clustering. Dimension-specific prediction models were trained to estimate symptom severity in first-episode medication-naïve patients (discovery dataset, n = 95) and replicated in an independent validation dataset (n = 94). The correlation between FC changes and symptom changes was further explored in a treatment dataset (n = 55).

RESULTS

Two distinct symptom clusters previously identified in patients with MDD, namely dysphoric and anxiosomatic clusters, were robustly replicated in our data. A connectivity biomarker associated with dysphoric symptoms was identified, which mainly involved the default, dorsal attention, and limbic networks. Critically, this brain-symptom association was confirmed in the validation dataset. Moreover, the marker also tracked dysphoric symptom improvement following a 2-week antidepressant treatment. For comparison, we repeated our analyses using a nonindividualized approach and failed to identify replicable brain-symptom biomarkers. Further quantitative analysis indicated that the generalizability of the connectivity-symptom association was hampered when functional regions were not localized in individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This work reveals robust, replicable FC biomarkers for dysphoric symptoms in MDD, demonstrates the advantage of individual-oriented approach, and emphasizes the importance of independent validation in psychiatric neuroimaging analysis.

Toward biophysical markers of depression vulnerability

A major difficulty with treating psychiatric disorders is their heterogeneity: different neural causes can lead to the same phenotype. To address this, we propose describing the underlying pathophysiology in terms of interpretable, biophysical parameters of a neural model derived from the electroencephalogram. We analyzed data from a small patient cohort of patients with depression and controls. Using DCM, we constructed biophysical models that describe neural dynamics in a cortical network activated during a task that is used to assess depression state. We show that biophysical model parameters are biomarkers, that is, variables that allow subtyping of depression at a biological level. They yield a low dimensional, interpretable feature space that allowed description of differences between individual patients with depressive symptoms. They could capture internal heterogeneity/variance of depression state and achieve significantly better classification than commonly used EEG features. Our work is a proof of concept that a combination of biophysical models and machine learning may outperform earlier approaches based on classical statistics and raw brain data.

A polygenic-informed approach to a predictive EEG signature empowers antidepressant treatment prediction: A proof-of-concept study

The treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is hampered by low chances of treatment response in each treatment step, which is partly due to a lack of firmly established outcome-predictive biomarkers. Here, we hypothesize that polygenic-informed EEG signatures may help predict antidepressant treatment response. Using a polygenic-informed electroencephalography (EEG) data-driven, data-reduction approach, we identify a brain network in a large cohort (N=1,123), and discover it is sex-specifically (male patients, N=617) associated with polygenic risk score (PRS) of antidepressant response. Subsequently, we demonstrate in three independent datasets the utility of the network in predicting response to antidepressant medication (male, N=232) as well as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and concurrent psychotherapy (male, N=95). This network significantly improves a treatment response prediction model with age and baseline severity data (area under the curve, AUC=0.623 for medicaton; AUC=0.719 for rTMS). A predictive model for MDD patients, aimed at increasing the likelihood of being a responder to antidepressants or rTMS and concurrent psychotherapy based on only this network, yields a positive predictive value (PPV) of 69% for medication and 77% for rTMS. Finally, blinded out-of-sample validation of the network as predictor for psychotherapy response in another independent dataset (male, N=50) results in a within-subsample response rate of 50% (improvement of 56%). Overall, the findings provide a first proof-of-concept of a combined genetic and neurophysiological approach in the search for clinically-relevant biomarkers in psychiatric disorders, and should encourage researchers to incorporate genetic information, such as PRS, in their search for clinically relevant neuroimaging biomarkers.

Predicting treatment response using EEG in major depressive disorder: A machine-learning meta-analysis

Selecting a course of treatment in psychiatry remains a trial-and-error process, and this long-standing clinical challenge has prompted an increased focus on predictive models of treatment response using machine learning techniques. Electroencephalography (EEG) represents a cost-effective and scalable potential measure to predict treatment response to major depressive disorder. We performed separate meta-analyses to determine the ability of models to distinguish between responders and non-responders using EEG across treatments, as well as a performed subgroup analysis of response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and antidepressants (Registration Number: CRD42021257477) in Major Depressive Disorder by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between January 1960 and February 2022. We included 15 studies that predicted treatment responses among patients with major depressive disorder using machine-learning techniques. Within a random-effects model with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator comprising 758 patients, the pooled accuracy across studies was 83.93% (95% CI: 78.90-89.29), with an Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of 0.850 (95% CI: 0.747-0.890), and partial AUC of 0.779. The average sensitivity and specificity across models were 77.96% (95% CI: 60.05-88.70), and 84.60% (95% CI: 67.89-92.39), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, greater performance was observed in predicting response to rTMS (Pooled accuracy: 85.70% (95% CI: 77.45-94.83), Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC): 0.928, partial AUC: 0.844), relative to antidepressants (Pooled accuracy: 81.41% (95% CI: 77.45-94.83, AUC: 0.895, pAUC: 0.821). Furthermore, across all meta-analyses, the specificity (true negatives) of EEG models was greater than the sensitivity (true positives), suggesting that EEG models thus far better identify non-responders than responders to treatment in MDD. Studies varied widely in important features across models, although relevant features included absolute and relative power in frontal and temporal electrodes, measures of connectivity, and asymmetry across hemispheres. Predictive models of treatment response using EEG hold promise in major depressive disorder, although there is a need for prospective model validation in independent datasets, and a greater emphasis on replicating physiological markers. Crucially, standardization in cut-off values and clinical scales for defining clinical response and non-response will aid in the reproducibility of findings and the clinical utility of predictive models. Furthermore, several models thus far have used data from open-label trials with small sample sizes and evaluated performance in the absence of training and testing sets, which increases the risk of statistical overfitting. Large consortium studies are required to establish predictive signatures of treatment response using EEG, and better elucidate the replicability of specific markers. Additionally, it is speculated that greater performance was observed in rTMS models, since EEG is assessing neural networks more likely to be directly targeted by rTMS, comprising electrical activity primarily near the surface of the cortex. Prospectively, there is a need for models that examine the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatments across the same patients. However, this will require a thoughtful consideration towards cumulative treatment effects, and whether washout periods between treatments should be utilised. Regardless, longitudinal cross-over trials comparing multiple treatments across the same group of patients will be an important prerequisite step to both facilitate precision psychiatry and identify generalizable physiological predictors of response between and across treatment options.

Resting and TMS-EEG markers of treatment response in major depressive disorder: A systematic review

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive method to identify markers of treatment response in major depressive disorder (MDD). In this review, existing literature was assessed to determine how EEG markers change with different modalities of MDD treatments, and to synthesize the breadth of EEG markers used in conjunction with MDD treatments. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 2000 to 2021 for studies reporting resting EEG (rEEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG) measures in patients undergoing MDD treatments. The search yielded 966 articles, 204 underwent full-text screening, and 51 studies were included for a narrative synthesis of findings along with confidence in the evidence. In rEEG studies, non-linear quantitative algorithms such as theta cordance and theta current density show higher predictive value than traditional linear metrics. Although less abundant, TMS-EEG measures show promise for predictive markers of brain stimulation treatment response. Future focus on TMS-EEG measures may prove fruitful, given its ability to target cortical regions of interest related to MDD.

The two decades brainclinics research archive for insights in neurophysiology (TDBRAIN) database

In neuroscience, electroencephalography (EEG) data is often used to extract features (biomarkers) to identify neurological or psychiatric dysfunction or to predict treatment response. At the same time neuroscience is becoming more data-driven, made possible by computational advances. In support of biomarker development and methodologies such as training Artificial Intelligent (AI) networks we present the extensive Two Decades-Brainclinics Research Archive for Insights in Neurophysiology (TDBRAIN) EEG database. This clinical lifespan database (5–89 years) contains resting-state, raw EEG-data complemented with relevant clinical and demographic data of a heterogenous collection of 1274 psychiatric patients collected between 2001 to 2021. Main indications included are Major Depressive Disorder (MDD; N = 426), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; N = 271), Subjective Memory Complaints (SMC: N = 119) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; N = 75). Demographic-, personality- and day of measurement data are included in the database. Thirty percent of clinical and treatment outcome data will remain blinded for prospective validation and replication purposes. The TDBRAIN database and code are available on the Brainclinics Foundation website at www.brainclinics.com/resources and on Synapse at www.synapse.org/TDBRAIN.

Measurement(s)	psychiatric and healthy resting state EEG
Technology Type(s)	electro-encephalography (EEG)
Sample Characteristic - Organism	human
Sample Characteristic - Environment	laboratory environment
Sample Characteristic - Location	Province (The Netherlands)

A benchmark for prediction of psychiatric multimorbidity from resting EEG data in a large pediatric sample

Psychiatric disorders are among the most common and debilitating illnesses across the lifespan and begin usually during childhood and adolescence, which emphasizes the importance of studying the developing brain. Most of the previous pediatric neuroimaging studies employed traditional univariate statistics on relatively small samples. Multivariate machine learning approaches have a great potential to overcome the limitations of these approaches. On the other hand, the vast majority of existing multivariate machine learning studies have focused on differentiating between children with an isolated psychiatric disorder and typically developing children. However, this line of research does not reflect the real-life situation as the majority of children with a clinical diagnosis have multiple psychiatric disorders (multimorbidity), and consequently, a clinician has the task to choose between different diagnoses and/or the combination of multiple diagnoses. Thus, the goal of the present benchmark is to predict psychiatric multimorbidity in children and adolescents. For this purpose, we implemented two kinds of machine learning benchmark challenges: The first challenge targets the prediction of the seven most prevalent DSM-V psychiatric diagnoses for the available data set, of which each individual can exhibit multiple ones concurrently (i.e. multi-task multi-label classification). Based on behavioral and cognitive measures, a second challenge focuses on predicting psychiatric symptom severity on a dimensional level (i.e. multiple regression task). For the present benchmark challenges, we will leverage existing and future data from the biobank of the Healthy Brain Network (HBN) initiative, which offers a unique large-sample dataset (N = 2042) that provides a wide array of different psychiatric developmental disorders and true hidden data sets. Due to limited real-world practicability and economic viability of MRI measurements, the present challenge will permit only resting state EEG data and demographic information to derive predictive models. We believe that a community driven effort to derive predictive markers from these data using advanced machine learning algorithms can help to improve the diagnosis of psychiatric developmental disorders.

Electrophysiological correlates and predictors of the antidepressant response to repeated ketamine infusions in treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Sub-anesthetic ketamine doses rapidly reduce depressive symptoms, although additional investigations of the underlying neural mechanisms and the prediction of response outcomes are needed. Electroencephalographic (EEG)-derived measures have shown promise in predicting antidepressant response to a variety of treatments, and are sensitive to ketamine administration. This study examined their utility in characterizing changes in depressive symptoms following single and repeated ketamine infusions.

METHODS

Recordings were obtained from patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (N = 24) enrolled in a multi-phase clinical ketamine trial. During the randomized, double-blind, crossover phase (Phase 1), patients received intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and midazolam (30 μg/kg), at least 1 week apart. For each medication, three resting, eyes-closed recordings were obtained per session (pre-infusion, immediately post-infusion, 2 h post-infusion), and changes in power (delta, theta1/2/total, alpha1/2/total, beta, gamma), alpha asymmetry, theta cordance, and theta source-localized anterior cingulate cortex activity were quantified. The relationships between ketamine-induced changes with early (Phase 1) and sustained (Phases 2,3: open-label repeated infusions) decreases in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Score, MADRS) and suicidal ideation (MADRS item 10) were examined.

RESULTS

Both medications decreased alpha and theta immediately post-infusion, however, only midazolam increased delta (post-infusion), and only ketamine increased gamma (immediately post- and 2 h post-infusion). Regional- and frequency-specific ketamine-induced EEG changes were related to and predictive of decreases in depressive symptoms (theta, gamma) and suicidal ideation (alpha). Early and sustained treatment responders differed at baseline in surface-level and source-localized theta.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine exerts frequency-specific changes on EEG-derived measures, which are related to depressive symptom decreases in treatment-resistant MDD and provide information regarding early and sustained individual response to ketamine.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: Action of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression, NCT01945047.

Isolated epileptiform activity in children and adolescents: prevalence, relevance, and implications for treatment

In the field of psychiatry diagnoses are primarily based on the report of symptoms from either the patient, parents, or both, and a psychiatrist's observations. A psychiatric diagnosis is currently the most widely used basis for medication selection and the brain is seldom investigated directly as a source of those symptoms. This study addresses the request from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC) for scientific research into neurological abnormalities that can be linked to psychiatric symptoms for the purpose of predicting medication response. One such neurological abnormality that has been the focus of many studies over the last three decades is isolated epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in children and adolescents without seizures. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine prevalence rates of IEDs within diagnostic categories. We then compared the prevalence of IEDs in the selected literature to our IRB-approved data archive. Our study found a consistent high prevalence of IEDs specifically for ADHD (majority > 25%) and ASD (majority > 59%), and consistent low prevalence rates were found for Depression (3%). If children and adolescents have failed multiple medication attempts, and more than one-third of them have IEDs, then an EEG would be justified within the RDoC paradigm.

Patient-specific connectomic models correlate with, but do not reliably predict, outcomes in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum (VCVS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Recently, multiple studies using normative connectomes have correlated DBS outcomes to stimulation of specific white matter tracts. Those studies did not test whether these correlations are clinically predictive, and did not apply cross-validation approaches that are necessary for biomarker development. Further, they did not account for the possibility of systematic differences between DBS patients and the non-diagnosed controls used in normative connectomes. To address these gaps, we performed patient-specific diffusion imaging in 8 patients who underwent VCVS DBS for OCD. We delineated tracts connecting thalamus and subthalamic nucleus (STN) to prefrontal cortex via VCVS. We then calculated which tracts were likely activated by individual patients' DBS settings. We fit multiple statistical models to predict both OCD and depression outcomes from tract activation. We further attempted to predict hypomania, a VCVS DBS complication. We assessed all models' performance on held-out test sets. With this best-practices approach, no model predicted OCD response, depression response, or hypomania above chance. Coefficient inspection partly supported prior reports, in that capture of tracts projecting to cingulate cortex was associated with both YBOCS and MADRS response. In contrast to prior reports, however, tracts connected to STN were not reliably correlated with response. Thus, patient-specific imaging and a guideline-adherent analysis were unable to identify a tractographic target with sufficient effect size to drive clinical decision-making or predict individual outcomes. These findings suggest caution in interpreting the results of normative connectome studies.

Changes in Electric Brain Response to Affective Stimuli in the First Week of Antidepressant Treatment: An Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION

Asymmetrical alpha and frontal theta activity have been discussed as neurobiological markers for antidepressant treatment response. While most studies focus on resting-state EEG, there is evidence that task-related activity assessed at multiple time points might be superior in detecting subtle early differences.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic study design assessing participants in a psychiatric in- and outpatient hospital setting. We investigated stimulus-related EEG asymmetry (frontal and occipital alpha-1 and alpha-2) and power (frontal midline theta) assessed at baseline and 1 week after initiation of pharmacological depression treatment while presenting affective stimuli. We then compared week 4 responders and nonresponders to antidepressant treatment.

RESULTS

Follow-up analyses of a significant group × emotion × time interaction (p < 0.04) for alpha-1 asymmetry showed that responders differed significantly at baseline in their asymmetry scores in response to sad compared to happy faces with a change in this pattern 1 week later. Nonresponders did not show this pattern. No significant results were found for alpha-2, occipital alpha-1, and occipital alpha-2 asymmetry or frontal midline theta power.

DISCUSSION

Our study addresses the gap in comparisons of task-related EEG activity changes measured at two time points and supports the potential value of this approach in detecting early differences in responders versus nonresponders to pharmacological treatment. Important limitations include the small sample size and the noncontrolled study design.