A clinical repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service in Australia: 6 years on

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders in Singapore

Introduction

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there are few studies on patient outcomes in Southeast Asia. In this study, we describe the clinical profile and outcome of patients with MDD and OCD treated with rTMS in Singapore.

Method

A naturalistic retrospective study of 71 patients (inpatient and outpatient) who received rTMS treatment between June 2018 and April 2023 was conducted. The depressive and obsessive outcome rating scales used were clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and self-rated Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).

Results

Clinician-rated and self-rated mood and general condition improved significantly. MADRS mean score improved from 28.1 (standard deviation [SD] 7.3) to 20.7 (SD 10.1) (P<0.0001) (20.8% response rate/17% remission rate). CGI-S mean 4.6 (SD 0.8) improved to 3.3 (SD 1.2) (P<0.0001). DASS-21 total mean improved from 67.3 (SD 24.6) to 49.6 (SD 28.0) (P<0.0001). Y-BOCS mean score displayed a trend towards improvement from 30.1 (SD 7.5) to 27.2 (SD 6.9) (P=0.799). However, 44.4% of patients with OCD responded with a minimal 20% reduction in baseline Y-BOCS. Moreover, the subgroup of 35.8% of patients with less than 30 rTMS sessions had contributed disproportionately to nonresponse (85.7%). Patients who received rTMS treatment (>30 sessions) had a trend of larger improvement of MADRS score when compared to patients with (≤30 sessions) (9.4 [SD 9.7] versus 3.8 [SD 12.3] [P=0.078]).

Conclusion

Response and remission rates for MDD and OCD suggest patients have a good response to rTMS treatment. Dosing longer rTMS sessions after an acute course helps to maximise effectiveness. Further research to determine predictors of outcome and characterise clinical features of late responders to target treatment more effectively is recommended.

Response to Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Comparison of Patients With and Without History of Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Current Depressive Episode

INTRODUCTION

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) conducted in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In this retrospective naturalistic study, we investigated the outcome of iTBS in treatment-resistant depression patients with (ECT+) and without (ECT-) history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in their current depressive episode, as well as among previous ECT responders and nonresponders.

METHODS

We included 66 inpatients (57.6% women; mean age, 52.7 years) at a German University Department of Psychiatry. A binary logistic regression model was utilized to investigate the impact of ECT treatment history on response to iTBS.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 51.5%. History of ECT in the current episode was present in 47% of patients. In the regression model, history of ECT in the current episode was associated with significantly worse response to iTBS (odds ratio, 0.252; 95% confidence interval, 0.085-0.743; P = 0.013), whereas other disease- and treatment-related covariates had no significant impact on treatment outcome. In the ECT+ group, ECT nonresponders showed a significantly worse outcome of iTBS than ECT responders. Overall rate of treatment discontinuations was 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, iTBS was most effective in patients without history of ECT in the current episode. Previous ECT responders had better outcome following iTBS than ECT nonresponders. Hence, patients with ECT response, who had to discontinue ECT due to side effects or complications, may be considered suitable candidates to be switched to iTBS.

Investigation of physical activity, sleep, and mental health recovery in treatment resistant depression (TRD) patients receiving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in treating depression; however, the effect on physical activity, sleep and recovery is unclear. This study investigated rTMS effect on physical activity and sleep through providing patients with a Fitbit and software apps; and reports the impact of rTMS on depression, anxiety and mental health recovery.

Methods

Study design was a pre and post data collection without a control, with twenty-four participants with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Measures used were Fitbit activity and sleep data, and patient-rated Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7).

Results

Response and remission rates were, respectively: 34.8% and 39% for PHQ-9; 34.8% and 47.8% for GAD-7. ReQoL-20 response and reliable improvement were 29.4% and 53%. PHQ-9, GAD-7 and ReQol-20 scores significantly improved, with large effect sizes. Analysis of Fitbit activity and sleep data yielded non-significant results. The Fitbit data machine learning model classified two levels of depression to 82% accuracy.

Limitations

rTMS treatment was open-label and adjunct to existing antidepressant medication. No control group. Female patients were overrepresented.

Conclusions

Improvements on the ReQoL-20 and aspects of sleep and activity indicate the positive impact of rTMS on the individual's real world functioning and quality of life. A wearable activity tracker can provide feedback to patients and clinicians on sleep, physical activity and depression levels. Further research could be undertaken through a sufficiently powered RCT comparing rTMS versus rTMS with use of a Fitbit, its software applications, and sleep and physical activity advice.

Ten years' data of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): A naturalistic, observational study outcome in clinical practice

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is used reliably as an alternative method in the treatment of a number of treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. However, information about the daily practice is limited. In this article, we aim to report and discuss the 10-years results of a clinic that applies TMS to treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. This naturalistic study is a retrospective review of data routinely collected from patients undergoing TMS between 2010 and 2020. A total of 284 patients with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 40.49±12.64 years. In general, when the responses of all patients were examined, 26.1% were evaluated as response, 29.2% as partial response, and 44.7% as inadequate response. It has been determined that MDD responds to treatment better than other disorders. Regardless of the diagnosis, a significant relationship was found between response and age. The multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that patients with improvement from TMS were less likely to have advanced age and not to have been diagnosed with PTSD. The idea that TMS may be useful for some patients, but not every patient, is supported.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a debilitating mood disorder marked by manic, hypomanic and/or mixed or depressive episodes. It affects approximately 1-2% of the population and is linked to high rates of suicide, functional impairment and poorer quality of life. Presently, treatment options for BD are limited. There is a strong evidence base for pharmacological (e.g., lithium) and psychological (e.g., psychoeducation) treatments; however, both of these pose challenges for treatment outcomes (e.g., non-response, side-effects, limited access). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, is a recommended treatment for unipolar depression, but it is unclear whether rTMS is an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment in people with BD. This article reviews the extant literature on the use of rTMS to treat BD across different mood states. We found 34 studies in total (N = 611 patients), with most assessing bipolar depression (n = 26), versus bipolar mania (n = 5), mixed state bipolar (n = 2) or those not in a current affective episode (n = 1). Across all studies, there appears to be a detectable signal of efficacy for rTMS treatment, as most studies report that rTMS treatment reduced bipolar symptoms. Importantly, within the randomised controlled trial (RCT) study designs, most reported that rTMS was not superior to sham in the treatment of bipolar depression. However, these RCTs are based on small samples (NBD ⩽ 52). Reported side effects of rTMS in BD include headache, dizziness and sleep problems. Ten studies (N = 14 patients) reported cases of affective switching; however, no clear pattern of potential risk factors for affective switching emerged. Future adequately powered, sham-controlled trials are needed to establish the ideal rTMS treatment parameters to help better determine the efficacy of rTMS for the treatment of BD.

Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has broadly disrupted biomedical treatment and research including non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). Moreover, the rapid onset of societal disruption and evolving regulatory restrictions may not have allowed for systematic planning of how clinical and research work may continue throughout the pandemic or be restarted as restrictions are abated. The urgency to provide and develop NIBS as an intervention for diverse neurological and mental health indications, and as a catalyst of fundamental brain research, is not dampened by the parallel efforts to address the most life-threatening aspects of COVID-19; rather in many cases the need for NIBS is heightened including the potential to mitigate mental health consequences related to COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To facilitate the re-establishment of access to NIBS clinical services and research operations during the current COVID-19 pandemic and possible future outbreaks, we develop and discuss a framework for balancing the importance of NIBS operations with safety considerations, while addressing the needs of all stakeholders. We focus on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and low intensity transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) - including transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS).

METHODS

The present consensus paper provides guidelines and good practices for managing and reopening NIBS clinics and laboratories through the immediate and ongoing stages of COVID-19. The document reflects the analysis of experts with domain-relevant expertise spanning NIBS technology, clinical services, and basic and clinical research - with an international perspective. We outline regulatory aspects, human resources, NIBS optimization, as well as accommodations for specific demographics.

RESULTS

A model based on three phases (early COVID-19 impact, current practices, and future preparation) with an 11-step checklist (spanning removing or streamlining in-person protocols, incorporating telemedicine, and addressing COVID-19-associated adverse events) is proposed. Recommendations on implementing social distancing and sterilization of NIBS related equipment, specific considerations of COVID-19 positive populations including mental health comorbidities, as well as considerations regarding regulatory and human resource in the era of COVID-19 are outlined. We discuss COVID-19 considerations specifically for clinical (sub-)populations including pediatric, stroke, addiction, and the elderly. Numerous case-examples across the world are described.

CONCLUSION

There is an evident, and in cases urgent, need to maintain NIBS operations through the COVID-19 pandemic, including anticipating future pandemic waves and addressing effects of COVID-19 on brain and mind. The proposed robust and structured strategy aims to address the current and anticipated future challenges while maintaining scientific rigor and managing risk.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alleviates Neurological Deficits After Cerebral Ischemia Through Interaction Between RACK1 and BDNF exon IV by the Phosphorylation-Dependent Factor MeCP2

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is acknowledged as a form of neurostimulation, especially for functional recovery. The foundational knowledge of molecular mechanism is limited regarding its role in cerebral ischemia, for which the present study was designed. Primary neurons were treated with oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS), in which brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and transcription of BDNF exons were examined. Then, adenovirus vectors carrying siRACK1 sequence were delivered to primary neurons, followed by detection of the transcription of BDNF exons and the extent of methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) phosphorylation. Results showed that BDNF and the transcription of BDNF exons were upregulated by rMS and OGD treatment, but decreased by extra treatment of RACK1 siRNA. Then, the mechanism investigations demonstrated that rMS increased the extent of MeCP2 phosphorylation to promote the interaction between RACK1 and BDNF exon IV. The aforementioned findings were further confirmed in vivo in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO)-induced rat models, as indicated by improved neurological functions and reduced area of cerebral infarction. The study offers potential evidence for improvement of neurological deficits, highlighting the important role of rTMS for treatment of cerebral ischemia.

Effect of Previous Electroconvulsive Therapy on Subsequent Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVES

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) often seek transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy as a less invasive treatment option. How prior history of ECT and its responsiveness may affect TMS treatment outcomes for MDD is unclear. We aim to contribute evidence to this important clinical question.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective naturalistic TMS treatment data from n = 257 MDD patients. Three sets of analyses were conducted: History of past exposure to ECT (n = 71, "+ECT" vs. n = 186 ECT-naïve, "-ECT") was examined as a potential predictor of TMS outcomes (measured by two self-report scales); A subset of n = 38 +ECT patients with adequate ECT trials in current depression episode were compared with -ECT patients blindly matched on clinical variables associated with TMS outcomes; for a subset with available data, TMS outcomes were explored in relation to positive/negative response to prior ECT.

RESULTS

Compared to -ECT, +ECT patients more likely had past psychiatric hospitalizations (p < 0.01) and were more severely depressed at baseline (p = 0.07). Response (p = 0.07) and remission (p = 0.02) rates were higher in -ECT than +ECT groups on one scale. However, comparison between the subsets (n = 38 each) matched on confounding factors did not find history of ECT to be a significant independent predictor of TMS outcomes. Differential responsiveness to ECT and ECT treatment characteristics did not significantly impact TMS outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by the retrospective nature of this analysis, the results suggest that history of the past ECT, regardless of responsiveness to ECT, may not independently portend differential TMS treatment outcomes.

Does rTMS reduce depressive symptoms in young people who have not responded to antidepressants?

AIM

Depression is common in young people, and there is a need for safe, effective treatments. This study examined the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in a sample of young people aged 17 to 25 years.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 15 people aged 17 to 25 years referred by their private psychiatrists affiliated with Ramsay Health Care, South Australia Mental Health Services. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder. Eleven patients received right unilateral treatment and four patients received bilateral treatment. Patients were assessed at baseline and after treatment.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (t(14) = 4.71, P < 0.0001); Montgomery-Åsperg Depression Rating Scale (t(14) = 3.96, P < 0.01) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (t(14) = 4.13, P < 0.01). There was no difference in response by gender or age. The response rates in these young people did not differ significantly from those of adults aged 25 to 82 years.

CONCLUSION

This open label, naturalistic study suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is an effective treatment in young adults who have treatment-resistant depression. Randomized sham-controlled studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy of this treatment in this age group.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression: outcomes in a United Kingdom (UK) clinical practice

Objective: The aim of this paper is to present the outcomes data from the largest United Kingdom's (UK) National Health Service (NHS) clinical rTMS service treating treatment resistant depression (TRD). Methods: The study was a retrospective investigation of routinely collected data on patients receiving rTMS between 2015 and 2017. Measures used were the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and patient rated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The outcome data of 73 patients with TRD were analysed. The sample included patients with co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis. Results: Response and remission rates, respectively, were 40.4% and 25.5% for the HAM-D; 35.6% and 20.8% for the BDI; and 51.1% and 52.1% for the CGI. Effect sizes were medium (0.54, 0.52 and 0.56, respectively). Conclusions: The results show that a UK-based clinical service achieves similar results to those published internationally and that clinical rTMS can have significant impact on symptoms of depression in many patients with TRD. Health services are under pressure to make financial savings, investment in rTMS could reduce the long-term treatment costs associated with TRD.

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression with comorbid anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND

The presence of comorbid anxiety is generally associated with poorer treatment outcomes in people with depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be effective for treatment resistant depression, but there has been little research examining rTMS in depressed patients with comorbid anxiety disorders. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of rTMS in patients with treatment resistant Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and comorbid anxiety disorders.

METHODS

This study included 248 patients with treatment resistant MDD who were treated with rTMS. Of these, 172 patients had one or more comorbid anxiety disorders, so their outcomes were compared with patients who did not have comorbid anxiety.

RESULTS

Patients both with and without comorbid anxiety disorders showed improvement in depression ratings after rTMS treatment, with no significant difference in remission rates between groups. In those with comorbid anxiety disorders, 23.3% met criteria for remission and 39.5% met response criteria. For each anxiety disorder diagnosis, there was a significant reduction in HAM-A, HAM-D21, MADRS and ZUNG scores (p = <0.001 for all).

LIMITATIONS

This was not a sham-controlled study, so placebo response rates are not known. Patients were referred by private psychiatrists so are not representative of all patients with depression.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that rTMS is an effective treatment for Major Depressive Disorder in people who have comorbid anxiety disorders.