Minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative RT-PCR in core binding factor AML allows risk stratification and predicts relapse: results of the United Kingdom MRC AML-15 trial

Molecular relapse after first-line intensive therapy in patients with CBF or NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia - a FILO study

Patients with Core-Binding Factor (CBF) and NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be monitored by quantitative PCR after having achieved first complete remission (CR) to detect morphologic relapse and drive preemptive therapy. How to best manage these patients is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 303 patients with CBF and NPM1-mutated AML, aged 18-60 years, without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first CR, with molecular monitoring after first-line intensive therapy. Among these patients, 153 (51%) never relapsed, 95 (31%) had molecular relapse (53 received preemptive therapy and 42 progressed to morphologic relapse at salvage therapy), and 55 (18%) had upfront morphologic relapse. Patients who received preemptive therapy had higher OS than those who received salvage therapy after having progressed from molecular to morphologic relapse and those with upfront morphologic relapse (three-year OS: 78% vs. 51% vs. 51%, respectively, P = 0.01). Preemptive therapy included upfront allogeneic HCT (n = 19), intensive chemotherapy (n = 21), and non-intensive therapy (n = 13; three-year OS: 92% vs. 79% vs. 58%, respectively, P = 0.09). Although not definitive due to the non-randomized allocation of patients to different treatment strategies at relapse, our study suggests that molecular monitoring should be considered during follow-up to start preemptive therapy before overt morphologic relapse.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in de novo core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: data from the EBMT

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) represents 12-15% of all AML cases. Although CBF positivity infers a survival advantage, overall survival (OS) remains dismal. Treatment is with cytarabine/anthracycline-based chemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is reserved for relapse or for patients having not achieved MRD-negativity at high risk for relapse. The role of SCT in first complete remission (CR1) remains controversial and is considered in high risk conditions. In this retrospective, multi-national, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-based study, we identified 1901 patients with de novo CBF-AML who received an allo-SCT or autologous transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. 65.5% harbored t(8;21) and 34.4% inv(16). In this group, the majority (77%) were treated with allo-SCT in CR1. In multivariate analysis, treatment with allo-SCT was an independent and significant, negative predictor of NRM and OS (HR 4.26, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.67, p = 0.003) and among patients treated with allo-SCT, those treated with MSD had the best outcomes, comparable to those treated with ASCT. There was no interaction between the type of transplant and MRD status at time of SCT. In both, MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, NRM was worse in the allo-SCT group (MRD-: 12.9% vs 5.2%, p = 0.007; MRD+: 10.6% vs 0%, p = 0.004). We therefore demonstrated that consolidation in CR1 with allo-SCT results in worse outcomes than ASCT. Whether consolidation with ASCT yields better outcomes than chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy in combination with Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin is yet to be investigated.

Real-world outcomes of intensive induction approaches in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF-AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF-AML. We included 200 patients with CBF-AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3-year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3-year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3-year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF-AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.

The Effects of Resveratrol, Gallic Acid, and Piperine on the Expression of miR-17, miR-92b, miR-181a, miR-222, BAX, BCL-2, MCL-1, WT1, c-Kit, and CEBPA in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells and Their Roles in Apoptosis

MicroRNAs (miRs) play a crucial role in the leukemogenesis and the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study investigated the therapeutic effects of resveratrol, gallic acid, and piperine as natural anticancer agents on the HL-60 cell line and their roles in apoptosis. In this experimental study, quantitative analysis of miRs, including miR-17, miR-92b, miR-181a, and miR-222, were performed in 150 newly diagnosed patients with AML by real-time PCR assay. HL-60 cell viability as well as the expression of miRs, BAX, BCL-2, MCL-1, WT1, c-Kit, and CEBPA, were also assessed after transfection with the LNA-miRs and treatment with resveratrol, gallic acid, and piperine. The expression of miR-17 and miR-181a decreased significantly in LNA-anti-miRs. Although HL-60 cell viability decreased in LNA-anti-miR-222, miR-17, and miR-92b, blockade of miR-181a increased the cell viability. Besides, the cell viability increased merely in the piperine-treated group. Compared to untreated cells, miR-17 and miR-92b expression significantly increased in gallic acid- and resveratrol-treated cells. In HL-60 cells treated with resveratrol, gallic acid, and piperine, the expression of miR-181a was also increased significantly. The expression of BAX was also increased in resveratrol and piperine-treated groups. Compared to untreated cells, the expression of c-Kit increased significantly in the piperine-treated group; however, it decreased in the resveratrol-treated group. LNA-anti-miRs may be a promising agent for the treatment of AML. All three compounds used in this study showed anticancer effects, which can exert the desired outcome in patients with AML.

Neratinib impairs function of m6A recognition on AML1-ETO pre-mRNA and induces differentiation of t (8;21) AML cells by targeting HNRNPA3

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is frequently linked to genetic abnormalities, with the t (8; 21) translocation, resulting in the production of a fusion oncoprotein AML1-ETO (AE), being a prevalent occurrence. This protein plays a pivotal role in t (8; 21) AML's onset, advancement, and recurrence, making it a therapeutic target. However, the development of drug molecules targeting AML1-ETO are markedly insufficient, especially used in clinical treatment. In this study, it was uncovered that Neratinib could significantly downregulate AML1-ETO protein level, subsequently promoting differentiation of t (8; 21) AML cells. Based on "differentiated active" probes, Neratinib was identified as a functional inhibitor against HNRNPA3 through covalent binding. The further studies demonstrated that HNRNPA3 function as a putative m6A reader responsible for recognizing and regulating the alternative splicing of AML-ETO pre-mRNA. These findings not only contribute to a novel insight to the mechanism governing post-transcriptional modification of AML1-ETO transcript, but also suggest that Neratinib would be promising therapeutic potential for t (8; 21) AML treatment.

Lower relapse incidence with haploidentical versus matched sibling or unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for core-binding factor AML patients in CR2: A study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended for core-binding factor mutated (CBF) AML patients achieving second complete remission (CR2). However, approximately 20% of patients may relapse after transplant and donor preference remains unclear. We compared in this EBMT global multicenter registry-based analysis the allo-HCT outcomes using either haploidentical (Haplo), matched siblings donors (MSD), or 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD). Data from 865 de novo adult CBF AML patients in CR2 receiving allo-HCT in 227 EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed, in which 329 MSD, 374 MUD, and 162 Haplo-HCTs were included. For the entire cohort, 503 (58%) patients were inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 and 362 patients (42%) were t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML. On multivariate analysis, Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower Relapse Incidence (RI) compared to either MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p < .05) or MUD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p < .05). No significant difference was observed among the 3 types of donors on LFS, OS and GRFS. CBF-AML with t(8;21) was associated with both higher RI (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.47; p < .01) and higher NRM (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.1-2.27; p < .01) than CBF-AML with inv(16), which led to worse LFS, OS and GRFS. To conclude, for CBF-AML patients in CR2, Haplo-HCTs were associated with a lower RI compared to MSD and MUD allo-HCTs. There was no difference on LFS, OS or GRFS. CBF AML patients with inv(16) had a better progonosis than those with t(8;21) after allo-HCT in CR2.

Impact of monocytic differentiation on acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents

INTRODUCTION

Although the combination of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) results in impressive efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there is still a subset of patients who are refractory. We investigated the outcomes of AML patients with monocytic differentiation who were treated with frontline VEN/HMA.

METHODS

A total of 155 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with frontline VEN/HMA were enrolled in the study. Monocyte-like AML was identified by flow cytometry with typical expression of monocytic markers, and M5 was identified according to French, American, and British category. We compared the outcomes of patients with different characteristics.

RESULTS

The rate of complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in monocyte-like AML were inferior to those in nonmonocyte-like AML (CR/CRi rates, 26.7% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001; median PFS, 2.1 vs. 8.8 months, p < 0.001; median OS, 9.2 vs. 19 months, p = 0.013). CR/CRi rate in M5 was lower than that in non-M5 (60.7% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.049). Multivariate analyses showed that monocyte-like AML was associated with lower odds of CR/CRi and higher risk of progression.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that newly diagnosed AML with a monocytic immunophenotype had a poor prognosis with VEN/HMA treatment.

Targeting Molecular Measurable Residual Disease and Low-Blast Relapse in AML With Venetoclax and Low-Dose Cytarabine: A Prospective Phase II Study (VALDAC)

PURPOSE

A prospective phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in AML at first measurable residual disease (MRD) or oligoblastic relapse.

METHODS

Patients with either MRD (≥1 log10 rise) or oligoblastic relapse (blasts 5%-15%) received venetoclax 600 mg once daily D1-28 plus LDAC once daily D1-10 in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was MRD response in the MRD relapse cohort or complete remission (CR/CRh/CRi) in the oligoblastic relapse cohort.

RESULTS

Forty-eight adults with either MRD (n = 26) or oligoblastic (n = 22) relapse were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (range, 18-80) and 94% had received previous intensive chemotherapy. Patients received a median of four cycles of therapy; 17% completed ≥12 cycles. Patients with oligoblastic relapse had more grade ≥3 anemia (32% v 4%; P = .02) and infections (36% v 8%; P = .03), whereas grade 4 neutropenia (32 v 23%) or thrombocytopenia (27 v 15%) were comparable with the MRD relapse cohort. Markers of molecular MRD relapse included mutant NPM1 (77%), CBFB::MYH11 (4%), RUNX1::RUNX1T1 (4%), or KMT2A::MLLT3 (4%). Three patients with a log10 rise in IDH1/2 (12%) were included. By cycle 2 in the MRD relapse cohort, a log10 reduction in MRD was observed in 69%; 46% achieved MRD negative remission. In the oligoblastic relapse cohort, 73% achieved CR/CRh/CRi. Overall, 21 (44%) underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either cohort. Estimated 2-year OS rate was 67% (95% CI, 50 to 89) in the MRD and 53% (95% CI, 34 to 84) in the oligoblastic relapse cohorts.

CONCLUSION

For AML in first remission and either MRD or oligoblastic relapse, venetoclax plus LDAC is well tolerated and highly effective.

Multi-target measurable residual disease assessed by error-corrected sequencing in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: An ALFA study

The evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using comprehensive mutation analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been investigated in several studies. However controversial results exist regarding the detection of persisting mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 (DTA). Benchmarking of NGS-MRD taking into account other molecular MRD strategies has to be done. Here, we performed error-corrected-NGS-MRD in 189 patients homogeneously treated in the ALFA-0702 study (NCT00932412). Persistence of non-DTA mutations (HR = 2.23 for RFS and 2.26 for OS), and DTA mutations (HR = 2.16 for OS) were associated with poorer prognosis in multivariate analysis. Persistence of at least two mutations in complete remission (CR) was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (HR = 3.71, p < 0.0001), lower RFS (HR = 3.36, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 3.81, p = 0.00023) whereas persistence of only one mutation was not. In 100 analyzable patients, WT1-MRD, but not NGS-MRD, was an independent factor for RFS and OS. In the subset of 67 NPM1 mutated patients, both NPM1 mutation detection (p = 0.0059) and NGS-MRD (p = 0.035) status were associated with CIR. We conclude that detectable NGS-MRD including DTA mutations correlates with unfavorable prognosis in AML. Its integration with alternative MRD strategies in AML management warrants further investigations.

Integration of measurable residual disease by WT1 gene expression and flow cytometry identifies pediatric patients with high risk of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Molecular testing plays a pivotal role in monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), aiding in the refinement of risk stratification and treatment guidance. Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) is frequently upregulated in pediatric AML and serves as a potential molecular marker for MRD. This study aimed to evaluate WT1 predictive value as an MRD marker and its impact on disease prognosis.

Methods

Quantification of WT1 expression levels was analyzed using the standardized European Leukemia Network real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay (qRT-PCR) among a cohort of 146 pediatric AML patients. Post-induction I and intensification I, MRD response by WT1 was assessed. Patients achieving a ≥2 log reduction in WT1MRD were categorized as good responders, while those failing to reach this threshold were classified as poor responders.

Results

At diagnosis, WT1 overexpression was observed in 112 out of 146 (76.7%) patients. Significantly high levels were found in patients with M4- FAB subtype (p=0.018) and core binding fusion transcript (CBF) (RUNX1::RUNX1T1, p=0.018, CBFB::MYH11, p=0.016). Following induction treatment, good responders exhibited a reduced risk of relapse (2-year cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR] 7.9% vs 33.2%, p=0.008). Conversely, poor responders' post-intensification I showed significantly lower overall survival (OS) (51% vs 93.2%, p<0.001), event-free survival (EFS) (33.3% vs 82.6%, p<0.001), and higher CIR (66.6% vs 10.6%, p<0.001) at 24 months compared to good responders. Even after adjusting for potential confounders, it remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (p=0.04) and EFS (p=0.008). High concordance rates between WT1-based MRD response and molecular MRD were observed in CBF patients. Furthermore, failure to achieve either a 3-log reduction by RT-PCR or a 2-log reduction by WT1 indicated a high risk of relapse. Combining MFC-based and WT1-based MRD results among the intermediate-risk group identified patients with unfavorable prognosis (positive predictive value [PPV] 100%, negative predictive value [NPV] 85%, and accuracy 87.5%).

Conclusion

WT1MRD response post-intensification I serves as an independent prognostic factor for survival in pediatric AML. Integration of WT1 and MFC-based MRD results enhances the reliability of MRD-based prognostic stratification, particularly in patients lacking specific leukemic markers, thereby influencing treatment strategies.

Addition of single dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin to intensive induction chemotherapy in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

In a meta-analysis of 5 trials, the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to intensive induction chemotherapy led to a survival benefit in patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the heterogeneous incorporation of GO in clinical trials, the ideal dose and schedule remains unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare outcomes of patients with CBF-AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy, with or without a single dose of GO 3 mg/m2, during induction only. We included 87 patients (GO=32, control=55). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate was higher in the control group (93%) compared to the GO group (82%) (p<0.001). The rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative cCR, by flow cytometry, was similar between both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of toxicity. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for both groups was similar (71% vs 68%, p=0.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the GO group was 68%, compared to 66% for the control group (p=0.9).In multivariable analysis, age and MRD positive status were risk factors for inferior outcomes. We find that survival of patients with CBF-AML is favorable in the real-world setting. The addition of single-dose GO, during induction, did not lead to a higher remission rate or survival benefit, when compared to intensive chemotherapy without GO. Further investigation into the incorporation of GO in the treatment algorithm for CBF-AML is needed.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Pre-emptive Therapy at Molecular Measurable Residual Disease Failure in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Molecular measurable residual disease (MRD, eg, by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RT-qPCR), is an integral part of response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with established prognostic and evolving therapeutic significance. MRD failure can occur through several pathways (namely MRD persistence at the end of treatment at a high level, MRD progression from a low level or MRD re-emergence during follow up; the latter two constitute MRD relapse as defined by the European Leukemia Net) and is clinically actionable, with survival benefit reported in AML subgroups. Selection of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure relies upon an integrated clinico-molecular assessment and is subset-specific. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic trioxide-based regimen for MRD failure following frontline treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid plus chemotherapy represents standard of care, while hypomethylating agents (eg, azacitidine), salvage chemotherapy (eg, FLAG-IDA) and venetoclax-based regimens are effective in NPM1-mutated AML. Specific inhibitors of FLT3 have emerging use in FLT3-mutated AML and are associated with minimal toxicity. Furthermore, immunotherapeutic approaches such as donor lymphocyte infusions and interferon-⍺ are efficacious options in the post-allogeneic-HSCT settings. Enrollment into clinical trials with genomic-guided assignment of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure should be prioritized. Finally, with the emergence of novel agents (eg, menin inhibitors) and approaches (eg, adoptive cellular and immunological therapy), an exciting future lies ahead where a broad array of highly active pre-emptive therapeutic options will likely be clinically applicable to a wide range of AML subsets.

Targeting PRAME for acute myeloid leukemia therapy

Despite significant progress in targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), clinical outcomes are disappointing for elderly patients, patients with less fit disease characteristics, and patients with adverse disease risk characteristics. Over the past 10 years, adaptive T-cell immunotherapy has been recognized as a strategy for treating various malignant tumors. However, it has faced significant challenges in AML, primarily because myeloid blasts do not contain unique surface antigens. The preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer-testis antigen, is abnormally expressed in AML and does not exist in normal hematopoietic cells. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that PRAME is a useful target for treating AML. This paper reviews the structure and function of PRAME, its effects on normal cells and AML blasts, its implications in prognosis and follow-up, and its use in antigen-specific immunotherapy for AML.

Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study

Very few data are available about hypomethylating agent (HMA) efficiency in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemias (CBF-AML). Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HMA in the specific subset of CBF-AML. Here, we report the results of a multicenter retrospective French study about efficacy of HMA monotherapy, used frontline or for R/R CBF-AML. Forty-nine patients were included, and received a median of 5 courses of azacitidine (n = 46) or decitabine (n = 3). ORR was 49% for the whole cohort with a median time to response of 112 days. After a median follow-up of 72.3 months, median OS for the total cohort was 10.6 months. In multivariate analysis, hematological relapse of CBF-AML at HMA initiation was significantly associated with a poorer OS (HR: 2.13; 95%CI: 1.04-4.36; p = 0.038). Responders had a significantly improved OS (1-year OS: 75%) compared to non-responders (1-year OS: 15.3%; p < 0.0001). Hematological improvement occurred for respectively 28%, 33% and 48% for patients who were red blood cell or platelet transfusion-dependent, or who experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia at HMA initiation. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of HMA. Our study highlights that HMA is a well-tolerated therapeutic option with moderate clinical activity for R/R CBF-AML and for patients who cannot handle intensive chemotherapy.

Impact of measurable residual disease in combination with CD19 on postremission therapy choices for adult t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

BACKGROUND

The post-remission therapy (PRT) choices for adult t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) need to be further explored.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the impact of measurable residual disease (MRD) combined with CD19 on PRT choices for adult t(8;21) AML in CR1.

METHODS

A total of 150 t(8;21) AML patients were enrolled, including 67 underwent chemotherapy (CMT) and 83 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as PRT in CR1. Subgroup analyses were performed according to MRD level after three cycles of chemotherapy combined with CD19 expression.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis indicated MRDhigh after three courses of treatment (HR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.03-0.66]; p = 0.013) and CD19 negativity (HR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.96]; p = 0.045) were risk factors for relapse, while allo-SCT was protective factor for relapse (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15-0.75]; p = 0.008). Grouped by MRD after three courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had lower CIR (p < 0.001) and better OS (p = 0.003) than CMT for MRDhigh patients, CMT showed a higher CIR (35.99% vs. 15.34%, p = 0.100) but comparable OS (p = 0.588) than allo-SCT for MRDlow patients. Grouped by CD19 expression, allo-SCT demonstrated lower CIR (p < 0.001) and better OS (p = 0.002) than CMT for CD19- patients. CMT had a higher CIR (41.37% vs. 10.48%, p = 0.007) but comparable OS (p = 0.147) than allo-SCT for CD19+ patients. Grouped by MRD combined with CD19, MRDhigh /CD19+ subsets were identified out of CD19+ patients benefiting from allo-SCT with lower CIR (p = 0.002) and superior OS (p = 0.020) than CMT. CMT preserved comparable CIR (p = 0.939) and OS (p = 0.658) with allo-SCT for MRDlow /CD19+ patients. MRDlow /CD19- subsets were also identified from MRDlow patients requiring allo-SCT with lower CIR (p < 0.001) and superior OS (p = 0.008) than CMT. Allo-SCT maintained lower CIR (p < 0.001) and superior OS (p = 0.008) than CMT for MRDhigh /CD19- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MRD combined with CD19 might optimize PRT choices for adult t(8;21) AML patients in CR1.

Venetoclax Combined with Intensive Chemotherapy: A New Hope for Refractory and/or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

Background. Primary resistance of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to the conventional 3 + 7 intensive chemotherapy and relapses after first-line chemotherapy are two highly challenging clinical scenarios. In these cases, when allogeneic stem cell transplantation is feasible, patients are usually retreated with other chemotherapeutic regimens, as transplantation is still considered, nowadays, the only curative option. Methods. We discuss the mechanisms behind resistance to chemotherapy and offer a comprehensive review on current treatments of refractory/relapsed AML with a focus on novel approaches incorporating the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Results. Alas, complete remission rates after salvage chemotherapy remain relatively low, between 30 and 60% at best. More recently, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax was combined either with hypomethylating agents or chemotherapy in refractory/relapsed patients. In particular, its combination with chemotherapy offered promising results by achieving higher rates of remission and bridging a substantial number of patients to transplantation. Conclusions. Venetoclax-based approaches might become, in the near future, the new standard of care for refractory/relapsed AML.

Genomic DNA-based measurable residual disease monitoring in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: unselected consecutive cohort study

Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is used to assess response to treatment and for early detection of imminent relapse. In childhood AML, MRD is typically evaluated using flow cytometry, or by quantitative detection of leukemia-specific aberrations at the mRNA level. Both methods, however, have significant limitations. Recently, we demonstrated the feasibility of MRD monitoring in selected subgroups of AML at the genomic DNA (gDNA) level. To evaluate the potential of gDNA-based MRD monitoring across all AML subtypes, we conducted a comprehensive analysis involving 133 consecutively diagnosed children. Integrating next-generation sequencing into the diagnostic process, we identified (presumed) primary genetic aberrations suitable as MRD targets in 97% of patients. We developed patient-specific quantification assays and monitored MRD in 122 children. The gDNA-based MRD monitoring via quantification of primary aberrations with a sensitivity of at least 10-4 was possible in 86% of patients; via quantification with sensitivity of 5 × 10-4, of secondary aberrations, or at the mRNA level in an additional 8%. Importantly, gDNA-based MRD exhibited independent prognostic value at early time-points in patients stratified to intermediate-/high-risk treatment arms. Our study demonstrates the broad applicability, feasibility, and clinical significance of gDNA-based MRD monitoring in childhood AML.

Test Then Erase? Current Status and Future Opportunities for Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Measurable residual disease (MRD) test positivity during and after treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been associated with higher rates of relapse and worse overall survival. Current approaches for MRD testing are not standardized leading to inconsistent results and poor prognostication of disease. Pertinent studies evaluating AML MRD testing at specific times points, with various therapeutics and testing methods are presented.

SUMMARY

AML is a set of diseases with different molecular and cytogenetic characteristics and is often polyclonal with evolution over time. This genetic diversity poses a great challenge for a single AML MRD testing approach. The current ELN 2021 MRD guidelines recommend MRD testing by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in those with a validated molecular target or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in all other cases. The benefit of MFC is the ability to use this method across disease subsets, at the relative expense of suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. AML MRD detection may be improved with molecular methods. Genetic characterization at AML diagnosis and relapse is now standard of care for appropriate therapeutic assignment, and future initiatives will provide the evidence to support testing in remission to direct clinical interventions.

KEY MESSAGES

The treatment options for patients with AML have expanded for specific molecular subsets such as FLT3 and IDH1/2 mutated AML, with development of novel agents for NPM1 mutated or KMT2A rearranged AML ongoing, but also due to effective venetoclax-combinations. Evidence regarding highly sensitive molecular MRD detection methods for specific molecular subgroups, in the context of these new treatment approaches, will likely shape the future of AML care.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

Dual intron-targeted CRISPR-Cas9-mediated disruption of the AML RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion gene effectively inhibits proliferation and decreases tumor volume in vitro and in vivo

Oncogenic fusion drivers are common in hematological cancers and are thus relevant targets of future CRISPR-Cas9-based treatment strategies. However, breakpoint-location variation in patients pose a challenge to traditional breakpoint-targeting CRISPR-Cas9-mediated disruption strategies. Here we present a new dual intron-targeting CRISPR-Cas9 treatment strategy, for targeting t(8;21) found in 5-10% of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which efficiently disrupts fusion genes without prior identification of breakpoint location. We show in vitro growth rate and proliferation reduction by 69 and 94% in AML t(8;21) Kasumi-1 cells, following dual intron-targeted disruption of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 compared to a non t(8;21) AML control. Furthermore, mice injected with RUNX1-RUNX1T1-disrupted Kasumi-1 cells had in vivo tumor growth reduction by 69 and 91% compared to controls. Demonstrating the feasibility of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 disruption, these findings were substantiated in isolated primary cells from a patient diagnosed with AML t(8;21). In conclusion, we demonstrate proof-of-principle of a dual intron-targeting CRISPR-Cas9 treatment strategy in AML t(8;21) without need for precise knowledge of the breakpoint location.

Assessment of acute myeloid leukemia molecular measurable residual disease testing in an interlaboratory study

The European LeukaemiaNet (ELN) measurable residual disease (MRD) working group has published consensus guidelines to standardize molecular genetic MRD testing of the t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) RUNX1::RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) CBFB::MYH11, t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.2) PML::RARA, and NPM1 type A markers. A study featuring 29 international laboratories was performed to assess interlaboratory variation in testing and the subsequent interpretation of results, both crucial to patient safety. Most participants in this study were able to detect, accurately quantify, and correctly interpret MRD testing results, with a level of proficiency expected from a clinical trial or standard-of-care setting. However, a few testing and interpretive errors were identified that, in a patient setting, would have led to misclassification of patient outcomes and inappropriate treatment pathways being followed. Of note, a high proportion of participants reported false-positive results in the NPM1 marker-negative sample. False-positive results may have clinical consequences, committing patients to unneeded additional chemotherapy and/or transplant with the attendant risk of morbidity and mortality, which therefore highlights the need for ongoing external quality assessment/proficiency testing in this area. Most errors identified in the study were related to the interpretation of results. It was noted that the ELN guidance lacks clarity for certain clinical scenarios and highlights the requirement for urgent revision of the guidelines to elucidate these issues and related educational efforts around the revisions to ensure effective dissemination.

Avapritinib is effective for treatment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with t (8;21) and kit mutation failing to immunotherapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), pre-emptive interferon-α therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion are noneffective in 30%-50% of patients. Avapritinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting KIT mutations. We retrospectively report about 20 patients with t(8;21) AML and KIT mutations treated with avapritinib after allo-HSCT with MRD and most failing to respond to immunotherapy. Reduction of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 after 1 month of treatment was ≥1 log in 12 patients (60%), which became negative in 4 patients (20%). In 13 patients who received avapritinib for ≥3 months, the reduction was ≥1 log in all patients, which became negative in 7 patients (53.8%). The median follow-up time was 5.5 (2.0-10.0) months from avapritinib initiation to the last follow-up. Three patients underwent hematologic relapse and survived. Among all 20 patients, RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts turned negative in 9 patients (45%). The efficacy did not differ significantly between D816 and non-D816 KIT mutation groups. The main adverse effect was hematological toxicity, which could generally be tolerated. In summary, avapritinib was effective for MRD treatment in patients with t(8;21) AML with KIT mutations failing to respond to immunotherapy after allo-HSCT.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells in Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by an abundance of incompletely matured or immature clonally derived hematopoietic precursors called leukemic blasts. Rare leukemia stem cells (LSCs) that can self-renew as well as give rise to leukemic progenitors comprising the bulk of leukemic blasts are considered the cellular reservoir of disease initiation and maintenance. LSCs are widely thought to be relatively resistant as well as adaptive to chemotherapy and can cause disease relapse. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the molecular bases of LSC forms and functions during different stages of disease progression, so we can more accurately identify these cells and design therapies to target them. Irrespective of the morphological, cytogenetic, and cellular heterogeneity of AML, the uniform, singularly important and independently significant prognosticator of disease response to therapy and patient outcome is measurable or minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, defined by residual disease detection below the morphology-based 5% blast threshold. The importance of LSC identification and frequency estimation during MRD detection, in order to make MRD more effective in predicting disease relapse and modifying therapeutic regimen is becoming increasingly apparent. This review focuses on summarizing functional and cellular composition-based LSC identification and linking those studies to current techniques of MRD detection to suggest LSC-inclusive MRD detection as well as outline outstanding questions that need to be addressed to improve the future of AML clinical management and treatment outcomes.

Challenges of detecting measurable/minimal disease in acute leukemia

Measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) tracking has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing treatment response and predicting outcomes in acute leukemia. However, the clinical and technological challenges associated with MRD tracking must be addressed to improve its utility in routine patient care. This review article aims to provide a summary of the different MRD methodologies used in acute leukemia. It highlights the strengths, diagnostic pitfalls, and clinical utility associated with MRD tracking in this rapidly evolving field.

Targeting Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Moving beyond Prognostication

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an established role in disease prognostication, particularly in guiding decisions for hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission. Serial MRD assessment is now routinely recommended in the evaluation of treatment response and monitoring in AML by the European LeukemiaNet. The key question remains, however, if MRD in AML is clinically actionable or "does MRD merely portend fate"? With a series of new drug approvals since 2017, we now have more targeted and less toxic therapeutic options for the potential application of MRD-directed therapy. Recent approval of NPM1 MRD as a regulatory endpoint is also foreseen to drastically transform the clinical trial landscape such as biomarker-driven adaptive design. In this article, we will review (1) the emerging molecular MRD markers (such as non-DTA mutations, IDH1/2, and FLT3-ITD); (2) the impact of novel therapeutics on MRD endpoints; and (3) how MRD might be used as a predictive biomarker to guide therapy in AML beyond its prognostic role, which is the focus of two large collaborative trials: AMLM26 INTERCEPT (ACTRN12621000439842) and MyeloMATCH (NCT05564390).

Risk factors for post-transplant relapse and survival in younger adult patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter retrospective study

Background

Outcomes of patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain heterogeneous.

Methods

To identify the risk factors for relapse and survival after allo-HSCT in t(8;21) AML patients, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical and prognostic information of 142 patients with t(8;21) AML undergoing allo-HSCT between January 2002 and September 2018 at 15 hematology research centers in China.

Results

Twenty-nine patients (20%) relapsed after undergoing allo-HSCT. A > 1-log reduction in RUNX1/RUNX1T1-based minimal residual disease (MRD) directly before allo-HSCT and a > 3-log reduction within the first 3 months after allo-HSCT were associated with a significantly lower post-transplant 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, 9% vs. 62% and 10% vs. 47%,all P < 0.001), whereas transplantation during the second complete remission (CR2, 39% vs. 17% during CR1, P = 0.022), during relapse (62% vs. 17% during CR1, P < 0.001) and KIT D816 mutations at diagnosis (49% vs. 18%, P = 0.039) were related to a significantly higher 3-year CIR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a > 1-log reduction in MRD directly before transplantation (CIR: hazard ratio(HR), 0.21 [0.03-0.71], P = 0.029; overall survival (OS): HR = 0.27 [0.08-0.93], P = 0.038) and a > 3-log reduction in post-transplant MRD within the first 3 months (CIR: HR = 0.25 [0.07-0.89], P = 0.019; OS: HR = 0.38 [0.15-0.96], P = 0.040) were independent favorable prognostic factors, and transplantation during relapse (CIR: HR = 5.55 [1.23-11.56], P = 0.041; OS: HR = 4.07 [1.82-20.12], P = 0.045) were independent adverse prognostic factors for post-transplant relapse and survival in patients with t(8;21) AML.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that for patients with t(8;21) AML undergoing allo-HSCT, it would be better to receive transplantation during CR1 with a MRD directly before transplantation achieving at least 1-log reduction. MRD monitoring in the first 3 months after allo-HSCT might be robust in predicting relapse and adverse survival after allo-HSCT.

Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) usually stems from exposure of the bone marrow to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. t-AML is usually associated with poor overall survival, but occasionally t-AML can involve favorable-risk cytogenetics, including core binding factor AML (CBF-AML), which shows a recurrent chromosomal rearrangement with t(8;21) (q22;22) and 'inv(16) (p13.1;q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)', leading to 'RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFB::MYH11' fusion genes, respectively. Therapy-related CBF-AML (t-CBF-AML) accounts for 5-15% of CBF-AML cases and tends to have better outcomes than t-AML with unfavorable cytogenetics. Although CBF-AML is sensitive to high-dose cytarabine, t-CBF-AML has worse overall survival than de novo CBF- AML. The objective of this review is to discuss the available data on the pathogenesis, mutations, and therapeutic options in patients with t-CBF-AML.

Applying molecular measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia

Molecular testing in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has continued to dramatically advance in recent years, facilitating the ability to detect residual disease at exponentially lower levels. With the advent of the recently updated ELN consensus recommendations, there is increasing complexity to ordering and interpreting measurable residual disease (MRD) assays in AML. We outline the technology itself in conjunction with the relevant testing timepoints, clinically significant thresholds and potential prognostic and therapeutic significance of MRD testing for the major molecular targets in AML. This practical overview should assist haematologists in incorporating molecular MRD assays routinely into their personalised AML clinical management.

New drugs before, during, and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved over the past few years with the advent of next-generation sequencing. Targeted therapies alone or in combination with low-dose or high-intensity chemotherapy have improved the outcome of patients with AML treated in the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. Despite these advances, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains essential as consolidation therapy following frontline treatment in intermediate-and adverse-risk and relapsed/refractory disease. However, many patients relapse, with limited treatment options, hence the need for post-transplant strategies to mitigate relapse risk. Maintenance therapy following allo-HCT was developed for this specific purpose and can exploit either a direct anti-leukemia effect and/or enhance the bona fide graft-versus-leukemia effect without increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In this paper, we summarize novel therapies for AML before, during, and after allo-HCT and review ongoing studies.

The basics of commonly used molecular techniques for diagnosis, and application of molecular testing in cytology

Molecular diagnostics has expanded to become the standard of care for a variety of solid tumor types. With limited diagnostic material, it is often desirable to use cytological preparations to provide rapid and accurate molecular results. This review covers important pre-analytic considerations and limitations, and a description of common techniques that the modern cytopathologist should understand when ordering and interpreting molecular tests in practice.

The mythological chimera and new era of relapse prediction post-transplant

Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for high-risk or relapsed acute leukemia. However, unfortunately, relapse post-transplant continues to be the most common cause of treatment failure with 20-80% of patients relapsing based on disease risk and status at transplant. Advances in molecular profiling of different hematological malignancies have enabled us to monitor low level disease before and after transplant and develop a more personalized approach to the management of these disease including early detection post-transplant. While, in general, detectable disease by morphology remains the gold standard to diagnosing relapse, multiple approaches have allowed detection of cancer cells earlier, using peripheral blood-based methods with sensitivities as high as 1:10⁶, together called minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection. However, a in significant number of patients with acute leukemia where no such molecular markers exist it remains challenging to detect early relapse. In such patients who receive transplantation, chimerism monitoring remains the only option. An increase in mixed chimerism in post allogeneic HCT patients has been correlated with relapse in multiple studies. However, chimerism monitoring, while commonly accepted as a tool for assessing engraftment, has not been routinely used for relapse detection, at least in part because of the lack of standardized, high sensitivity, reliable methods for chimerism detection. In this paper, we review the various methods employed for MRD and chimerism detection post-transplant and discuss future trends in MRD and chimerism monitoring from the viewpoint of the practicing transplant physician.

Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring by Locked Nucleic Acid Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for IDH1/2 Mutation in Adult AML

Locked nucleic acid quantitative Real-Time PCR (LNA-qPCR) for IDH1/2 mutations in AML measurable residual disease (MRD) detection is rarely reported. LNA-qPCR was applied to quantify IDH1/2 mutants MRD kinetics in bone marrow from 88 IDH1/2-mutated AML patients, and correlated with NPM1-MRD, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The median normalized copy number (NCN) of IDH1/2 mutants decreased significantly from 53,228 (range 87−980,686)/ALB × 106 at diagnosis to 773 (range 1.5−103,600)/ALB × 106 at first complete remission (CR). IDH1/2 LNA-qPCR MRD was concordant with remission status or NPM1-MRD in 79.5% (70/88) of patients. Younger patients and patients with FLT3 mutations had higher concordance. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) and concordance rate between the log reduction of IDH1/2 LNA-qPCR and NPM1-MRD were 0.68 and 81% (K = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50−0.74), respectively. IDH1/2-MRD > 2 log reduction at first CR predicted significantly better relapse-free survival (3-year RFS rates 52.9% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.007) and cumulative incidence of relapse (3-year CIR rates 44.5% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.012) compared to IDH1/2-MRD ≤ 2 log reduction. IDH1/2-MRD > 2 log reduction during consolidation is also associated with a significantly lower CIR rate than IDH1/2-MRD ≤ 2 log reduction (3-year CIR rates 42.3% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.019). LNA-qPCR for IDH1/2 mutation is a potential MRD technique to predict relapse in IDH1/2-mutated AML patients, especially for those with IDH1/2 MRD > 2 log reduction at first CR or a concurrent FLT3 mutation.

Fusion transcript analysis reveals slower response kinetics than multiparameter flow cytometry in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia

INTRODUCTION

Analysis of measurable residual disease (MRD) is increasingly being implemented in the clinical care of children and adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, MRD methodologies differ and discordances in results lead to difficulties in interpretation and clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to compare results from reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in childhood AML and describe the kinetics of residual leukaemic burden during induction treatment.

METHODS

In 15 children who were treated in the NOPHO-AML 2004 trial and had fusion transcripts quantified by RT-qPCR, we compared MFC with RT-qPCR for analysis of MRD during (day 15) and after induction therapy. Eight children had RUNX1::RUNX1T1, one CBFB::MYH11 and six KMT2A::MLLT3.

RESULTS

When ≥0.1% was used as cut-off for positivity, 10 of 22 samples were discordant. The majority (9/10) were MRD positive with RT-qPCR but MRD negative with MFC, and several such cases showed the presence of mature myeloid cells. Fusion transcript expression was verified in mature cells as well as in CD34 expressing cells sorted from diagnostic samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement with RT-qPCR suggests slower response kinetics than indicated from MFC, presumably due to the presence of mature cells expressing fusion transcript. The prognostic impact of early measurements with RT-qPCR remains to be determined.

The present and future of measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia

Considerable progress has been made in the past several years in the scientific understanding of, and available treatments for, acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Achievement of a conventional remission, evaluated cytomorphologically via small bone marrow samples, is a necessary but not sufficient step toward cure. It is increasingly appreciated that molecular or immunophenotypic methods to identify and quantify measurable residual disease (MRD) - populations of leukemia cells below the cytomorphological detection limit - provide refined information on the quality of response to treatment and prediction of the risk of AML recurrence and leukemia-related deaths. The principles and practices surrounding MRD remain incompletely determined however and the genetic and immunophenotypic heterogeneity of AML may prevent a one-sizefits- all approach. Here, we review the current approaches to MRD testing in AML, discuss strengths and limitations, highlight recent technological advances that may improve such testing, and summarize ongoing initiatives to generate the clinical evidence needed to advance the use of MRD testing in patients with AML.

Retrospective comparison of survival and responses to Fludarabine, Cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG) in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) or Idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia: MD Anderson experience in 174 patients

Fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation results in high remission rates in core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia. We treated 174 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML in a prospective clinical trial of FLAG-based induction/consolidation in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (FLAG-GO; N = 65) or in combination with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA; N = 109). The 5 year RFS in the FLAG-GO cohort was significantly better than the FLAG-IDA cohort, 78% versus 59%, respectively (p-value = .02). In multivariate analysis for RFS, age (p = .0001), FLAG-GO regimen (p = .04), 4 log reduction in CBF-related fusion transcript by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in bone marrow samples at end of consolidation therapy (p = .03), and additional cytogenetic abnormalities (p = .03) were significant variables. Lower age (p = .0001) and 3 log or more transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .04) were significant variables predicting for better overall survival (OS), while there was strong trend for better OS with FLAG-GO (p = .06) regimen. FLAG-GO regimen was superior in optimal disease specific fusion transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .002), mid-consolidation (p < .01), and end of consolidation (p < .001) therapy. Induction/consolidation with FLAG-GO regimen results in better clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with CBF-AML compared to FLAG-IDA and achieves deeper molecular clearance by qPCR assessment of the fusion transcripts.

Reproducible measurable residual disease detection by multiparametric flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with AML. A simple, broadly applicable eight-color panel was implemented and analyzed utilizing a hierarchical gating strategy with fixed gates to develop a clear-cut LAIP-based DfN approach. In total, 32 subpopulations with aberrant phenotypes with/without expression of markers of immaturity were monitored in 246 AML patients after completion of induction chemotherapy. Reference values were established utilizing 90 leukemia-free controls. Overall, 73% of patients achieved a response by cytomorphology. In responders, the overall survival was shorter for MRDpos patients (HR 3.8, p = 0.006). Overall survival of MRDneg non-responders was comparable to MRDneg responders. The inter-rater-reliability for MRD detection was high with a Krippendorffs α of 0.860. The mean time requirement for MRD analyses at follow-up was very short with 04:31 minutes. The proposed one-tube MFC approach for detection of MRD allows a high level of standardization leading to a promising inter-observer-reliability with a fast turnover. MRD defined by this strategy provides relevant prognostic information and establishes aberrancies outside of cell populations with markers of immaturity as an independent risk feature. Our results imply that this strategy may provide the base for multicentric immunophenotypic MRD assessment.

Relative impact of residual cytogenetic abnormalities and flow cytometric measurable residual disease on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an independent established prognostic factor in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Several methods exist to evaluate the presence of residual leukemia cells, but how these are used best in combination is unclear. In order to examine how residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MRD testing by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) may refine risk assessment before HCT, we analyzed 506 adults with cytogenetically abnormal AML who underwent both routine karyotyping and MFC MRD testing before receiving a first allograft while in morphologic remission. Testing for residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MFC MRD identified four groups of patients with differential relapse-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=1.63 for Cytoabnormal/MFCnegative [P=0.01, n=63], HR=3.24 for Cytonormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001, n=60], and HR=5.50 for Cytoabnormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001, n=56] with Cytonormal/MFCnegative as reference [n=327]) and overall survival (OS) (HR=1.55 for Cytoabnormal/MFCnegative [P=0.03], HR=2.69 for Cytonormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001], and HR=4.15 for Cytoabnormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001] with Cytonormal/MFCnegative as reference). Results were similar for patients who received myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning. C-statistic values were higher, indicating higher accuracy, when using pre-HCT cytogenetic and MFC MRD information together for prediction of relapse, RFS, and OS, rather than using either test result alone. This study indicates that residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MFC MRD testing provide complementary prognostic information for post- HCT outcomes in patients with cytogenetically abnormal AML undergoing allogeneic HCT.

Clinical Impact of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Simple Summary

Advances in immunophenotyping and molecular techniques have allowed for the development of more sensitive diagnostic tests in acute leukemia. These techniques can identify low levels of leukemic cells (quantified as 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁶ ratio to white blood cells) in patient samples. The presence of such low levels of leukemic cells, termed “measurable/minimal residual disease” (MRD), has been shown to be a marker of disease burden and patient outcomes. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, new agents are highly effective at eliminating MRD for patients whose leukemia progressed despite first line therapies. By comparison, the role of MRD in acute myeloid leukemia is less clear. This commentary reviews select data and remaining questions about the clinical application of MRD to the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a primary marker of risk severity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is, however, ongoing debate about MRD-based surveillance and treatment. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database with the keywords MRD or residual disease in recently published journals. Identified articles describe the prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD and suggest optimal timing and techniques to quantify MRD. Several studies address the implications of MRD on treatment selection and hematopoietic stem cell transplant, including patient candidacy, conditioning regimen, and transplant type. More prospective, randomized studies are needed to guide the application of MRD in the treatment of AML, particularly in transplant.

Low IL7R Expression at Diagnosis Predicted Relapse in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With t(8;21)

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) needs to be further stratified. In addition to leukemia cells, immune cells in tumor microenvironment participate in tumor initiation, growth and progression. Interleukins (ILs)/interleukin receptors (ILRs) interaction plays important roles in the antitumor immune response. IL7R is reported to be relevant to prognosis in solid tumor and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the prognostic significance of IL7R in t(8;21) AML remains to be clarified.

Methods

Bone marrows collected from 156 newly diagnosed t(8;21) AML patients were used for testing IL7R transcript level by TaqMan-based real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR), and RNAseq were performed in 15 of them. Moreover, IL7R expression at diagnosis were measured by RQ-PCR and flow cytometry (FCM) simultaneously in other 13 t(8;21) AML patients.

Results

t(8;21) AML patients had varied IL7R transcript levels and were categorized into low-expression (IL7R-L) and high-expression (IL7R-H) groups; IL7R-L was significantly associated with a lower relapse-free survival (RFS) rate (P=0.0027) and KITD816/D820 mutation (P=0.0010). Furthermore, IL7R-L was associated with a lower RFS rate in KITD816/D820 group (P=0.013) and IL7R-H/KITD816/D820 patients had similar RFS to KITN822/e8/WT patients (P=0.35). GO analysis enrichment showed that down-regulated genes were predominantly involved in the regulation of T cell and leukocyte activation, proliferation and differentiation in IL7R-L group. IL7R-L had significantly lower levels of Granzymes A/B, CCR7, CD28 and CD27 than IL7R-H group (all P&lt;0.05). FCM analysis showed IL7R protein was primarily expressed in CD4+ T and CD8+ T cell subset. A significant association was found between the transcript level of IL7R and the percentage of CD8+ T cells in nucleated cells (P=0.015) but not CD4+ T cells (P=0.47).

Conclusion

Low IL7R transcript level of bone marrow at diagnosis predicted relapse in t(8;21) AML, which might be caused by the difference in the amount, status and function of T cells.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia: single-center experience and current challenges

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has gained growing consideration as a treatment option for favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (FR-AML) in first complete remission (CR1), compared with chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report the long-term outcomes of 117 consecutive patients with FR-AML fit for intensive chemotherapy diagnosed in our center between 1999 and 2020, who underwent ASCT.

RESULTS

Sixty-five of the 117 were eligible for intensive post-remission treatment, and 42 of those 65 received ASCT. Median follow up was 132 months. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 75% and 76%. Higher doses of CD34 + stem cell infusions negatively impacted DFS in multivariate analysis. Core-binding factor (CBF) leukemia was an independent prognostic factor for improved DFS. No differences based on pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) were observed. In CBF leukemia, 10-year DFS is 72% for MRD-positive patients versus 100% for MRD negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ASCT is effective and safe in FR-AML patients. In CBF leukemia, ASCT provides excellent results regardless of achievement of bone marrow MRD negativity. In NPM1-mutated/FLT3-wild type (mNPM1) AML, early molecular response seems to have more impact on prognosis. Prospective investigation of the role of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in this setting is ongoing.

Combination of KIT and FLT3-ITD mutation status with minimal residual disease levels guides treatment strategy for adult patients with inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

Although several studies have investigated the benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with inv (16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) individually stratified by KIT or FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation status or minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, evaluation based on the combination of mutation status and MRD levels remains absent. This study included 157 adult patients with inv (16) AML who were consecutively diagnosed and receiving treatment at our center. A total of 50 (31.6%) patients had KIT mutations (KIT^MU ), and the risk of relapse was significantly higher in patients with KIT^MU than in patients with KIT^WT (p < 0.001). A total of 12 patients (7.6%) had FLT3-ITD, and FLT3-ITD⁺ tended to be related to a higher risk of relapse (p = 0.14). KIT^MU , FLT3-ITD and MRD3-H (beta subunit of core binding factor-myosin heavy chain 11 levels >0.2% after course 2 of consolidation therapy) were independent adverse prognostic factors for relapse with patients who received allo-HSCT at CR1 were censored at the time of transplantation. After combination, patients were categorized into molecularly defined high-risk (M-HR; KIT^MU or FLT3-ITD⁺ with MRD3-H; n = 30), low-risk (M-LR; KIT^WT and FLT3-ITD^- with MRD3-L; n = 45) and intermediate-risk (M-IR; others; n = 70) groups. For the M-HR group, allo-HSCT significantly improved both cumulative incidence of relapse cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and overall survival (OS) (11.1% vs. 92.6%, p < 0.001; 90.0% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.019). For the M-IR group, allo-HSCT significantly improved CIR but did not affect OS (14.1% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.0004; 73.3% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.43). For the M-LR group, allo-HSCT had no significant effect on both CIR and OS (0% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.31; 100% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.22). Therefore, the combination of KIT and FLT3-ITD mutation status with MRD levels may identify inv (16) AML patients with high-risk who can benefit from allo-HSCT in CR1.

Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Posttherapy measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF‐AML) is associated with shorter relapse‐free survival (RFS). Elimination of MRD measured via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) for disease specific transcripts can potentially lead to better outcomes in CBF‐AML.

Methods

We prospectively monitored the MRD using qRTPCR and flow cytometry on bone marrow samples in patients with newly diagnosed CBF‐AML who received decitabine (DAC) maintenance therapy after fludarabine/cytarabine/G‐CSF (FLAG)‐based induction/consolidation regimen. Negative qRTPCR (CMR) was defined as fusion transcript <0.01%.

Results

Thirty‐one patients with CBF‐AML including 14 with t(8;21) and 17 with inv(16) received parenteral DAC as maintenance therapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) had completed FLAG‐based induction/consolidation but with positive MRD (0.35%, range = 0.01%–0.91%) (Group 1). Sixteen patients (51.7%) could not complete recommended consolidations with FLAG‐based regimen (due to older age or complications) and were switched to DAC maintenance (Group 2). In Group 2, eight patients (50%) had undetectable MRD (Group 2A) (all had qRTPCR ≤ 0.01%) and the other eight patients (50%) had residual fusion product by qRTPCR (0.1%, range = 0.02%–0.36%) (Group 2B) prior to starting DAC. Amongst the 23 patients who had a PCR ≥ 0.01% before maintenance therapy (Groups 1 and 2B), 12 patients (52%) attained a CMR as their best response (responders). The median pre‐DAC qRTPCR amongst responders were 0.03% compared to 0.14% in nonresponders (p = .002). The median estimated molecular RFS amongst responders were 93.9 months. At a median follow‐up of 59.3 months (13.2–106 months) from DAC initiation, 16 patients (51.6%) had to be initiated on a second line of therapy (40%, 25%, and 100% patients, respectively, in Groups1, 2A, and 2B). The median estimated time to new treatment between responders was 112.4 versus 5.8 months in nonresponders (hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.04–0.54); however, there were no difference in overall survival between these groups (p = .37).

Conclusion

DAC is an effective maintenance therapy for CBF‐AML patients with persistent fusion transcript at a low level after FLAG‐based regimen. Attainment of CMR with DAC maintenance can lead to long‐term remission in patients who have persistent MRD positive after FLAG‐based regimen or are unable to receive the full course of consolidation therapy.

Deep sequencing in CD34+ cells from peripheral blood allows sensitive detection of measurable residual disease in AML

The combination of FACS for enrichment of CD34⁺ PB cells and deep sequencing enables detection of MRD at levels down to 1:10⁶.

NGS in CD34⁺ PB cells improved early prediction of molecular relapse compared with NGS of unsorted PB or CD34⁺ donor chimerism.

Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is predictive of disease recurrence and may identify patients who benefit from treatment intensification. Current MRD techniques rely on multicolor flow cytometry or molecular methods, but are limited in applicability or sensitivity. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel approach for MRD detection in peripheral blood (PB), which combines immunomagnetic preenrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for isolation of CD34⁺ cells with error-reduced targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). For clinical validation, we retrospectively analyzed 429 PB and 55 bone marrow (BM) samples of 40 patients with AML or high-risk MDS, with/without molecular relapse based on CD34⁺ donor chimerism (DC), in complete remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Enrichment of CD34⁺ cells for NGS increased the detection of mutant alleles in PB ∼1000-fold (median variant allele frequency, 1.27% vs 0.0046% in unsorted PB; P < .0001). Although a strong correlation was observed for the parallel analysis of CD34⁺ PB cells with NGS and DC (r = 0.8601), the combination of FACS and NGS improved sensitivity for MRD detection in dilution experiments ∼10-fold to levels of 10⁻⁶. In both assays, MRD detection was superior using PB vs BM for CD34⁺ enrichment. Importantly, NGS on CD34⁺ PB cells enabled prediction of molecular relapse with high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%), and significantly earlier (median, 48 days; range, 0-281; P = .0011) than by CD34⁺ DC or NGS of unsorted PB, providing additional time for therapeutic intervention. Moreover, panel sequencing in CD34⁺ cells allowed for the early assessment of clonal trajectories in hematological complete remission.

Machine learning methods to predict presence of residual cancer following hysterectomy

Surgical management for gynecologic malignancies often involves hysterectomy, often constituting the most common gynecologic surgery worldwide. Despite maximal surgical and medical care, gynecologic malignancies have a high rate of recurrence following surgery. Current machine learning models use advanced pathology data that is often inaccessible within low-resource settings and are specific to singular cancer types. There is currently a need for machine learning models to predict non-clinically evident residual disease using only clinically available health data. Here we developed and tested multiple machine learning models to assess the risk of residual disease post-hysterectomy based on clinical and operative parameters. Data from 3656 hysterectomy patients from the NSQIP dataset over 14 years were used to develop models with a training set of 2925 patients and a validation set of 731 patients. Our models revealed the top postoperative predictors of residual disease were the initial presence of gross abdominal disease on the diaphragm, disease located on the bowel mesentery, located on the bowel serosa, and disease located within the adjacent pelvis prior to resection. There were no statistically significant differences in performances of the top three models. Extreme gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression models had comparable AUC ROC (0.90) and accuracy metrics (87–88%). Using these models, physicians can identify gynecologic cancer patients post-hysterectomy that may benefit from additional treatment. For patients at high risk for disease recurrence despite adequate surgical intervention, machine learning models may lay the basis for potential prospective trials with prophylactic/adjuvant therapy for non-clinically evident residual disease, particularly in under-resourced settings.

Acute myeloid leukemia displaying clonal instability during treatment: implications for measurable residual disease assessments

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an excellent methodology for measuring residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia and survey several sub-clones simultaneously. Little experience exists regarding interpretation of differential clonal responses to therapy. We hypothesize that differential clonal response could best be studied in patients with residual disease at the time of response evaluation. We performed targeted panel sequencing of paired diagnostic and first treatment evaluation samples in 69 patients with residual disease by morphology or measurable residual disease (MRD) level >0.02. Five patients displayed a rising clone at the time of evaluation. A representative case showed the rising clone present only in the putative healthy stem cells (CD45^lowCD34⁺CD38^-CD123^-CD7^-) and not in the putative leukemic stem cells (CD34⁺CD38^-CD123⁺CD7⁺) cells, thus representing non-malignant clonal hematopoiesis. In contrast, 17/43 evaluable patients displayed a differential response in genes related to the leukemic clone. 26/43 patients displayed a clonal response that followed the overall treatment response. Patients with a differential response had a better event-free survival (EFS) as well as overall survival (OS) than those where the clonal response followed the overall response (log-rank test, EFS P=0.045, OS, P=0.050). This indicates that when following multiple leukemia-related clones the less chemotherapy-responsive clone could, in some cases, have lesser relapse potential, contrary to what is known when using standard mutation or fusion transcript-based disease surveillance. In conclusion, our results confirm the potential of refining MRD assessments by following multiple clones and warrants further studies into the precise interpretations of multi-clone NGS-MRD assays.