Novel anti-B-cell maturation antigen antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) selectively induces killing of multiple myeloma

Advancements in the design and function of bispecific CAR-T cells targeting B Cell-Associated tumor antigens

Single-targeted CAR-T has exhibited notable success in treating B-cell tumors, effectively improving patient outcomes. However, the recurrence rate among patients remains above fifty percent, primarily attributed to antigen escape and the diminished immune persistence of CAR-T cells. Over recent years, there has been a surge of interest in bispecific CAR-T cell therapies, marked by an increasing number of research articles and clinical applications annually. This paper undertakes a comprehensive review of influential studies on the design of bispecific CAR-T in recent years, examining their impact on bispecific CAR-T efficacy concerning disease classification, targeted antigens, and CAR design. Notable distinctions in antigen targeting within B-ALL, NHL, and MM are explored, along with an analysis of how CAR scFv, transmembrane region, hinge region, and co-stimulatory region design influence Bi-CAR-T efficacy across different tumors. The summary provided aims to serve as a reference for designing novel and improved CAR-Ts, facilitating more efficient treatment for B-cell malignant tumors.

Soluble B-cell maturation antigen in lacrimal fluid as a potential biomarker and mediator of keratopathy in multiple myeloma

Belantamab mafodotin (belantamab) is a first-in-class anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. It provides a unique therapeutic option for patients ineligible for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T and bispecific antibody therapy, and/or patients progressing on anti-CD38 treatment where CAR T and bispecifics might be kept in reserve. Wider use of the drug can be challenged by its distinct ocular side effect profile, including corneal microcysts and keratopathy. While dose reduction has been the most effective way to reduce these toxicities, the underlying mechanism of this BCMA off-target effect remains to be characterized. In this study, we provide the first evidence for soluble BCMA (sBCMA) in lacrimal fluid and report on its correlation with tumor burden in myeloma patients. We confirm that corneal cells do not express BCMA, and show that sBCMA-belantamab complexes may rather be internalized by corneal epithelial cells through receptor-ligand independent pinocytosis. Using an hTcEpi corneal cell-line model, we show that the pinocytosis inhibitor EIPA significantly reduces belantamab-specific cell killing. As a proof of concept, we provide detailed patient profiles demonstrating that, after belantamab-induced cell killing, sBCMA is released into circulation, followed by a delayed increase of sBCMA in the tear fluid and subsequent onset of keratopathy. Based on the proposed mechanism, pinocytosis-induced keratopathy can be prevented by lowering the entry of sBCMA into the lacrimal fluid. Future therapeutic concepts may therefore consist of belantamab-free debulking therapy prior to belantamab consolidation and/or concomitant use of γ-secretase inhibition as currently evaluated for belantamab and nirogacestat in ongoing studies.

Emerging trends and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are being used to prevent, detect, and treat a broad spectrum of malignancies and infectious and autoimmune diseases. Over the past few years, the market for mAbs has grown exponentially. They have become a significant part of many pharmaceutical product lines, and more than 250 therapeutic mAbs are undergoing clinical trials. Ever since the advent of hybridoma technology, antibody-based therapeutics were realized using murine antibodies which further progressed into humanized and fully human antibodies, reducing the risk of immunogenicity. Some of the benefits of using mAbs over conventional drugs include a drastic reduction in the chances of adverse reactions, interactions between drugs, and targeting specific proteins. While antibodies are very efficient, their higher production costs impede the process of commercialization. However, their cost factor has been improved by developing biosimilar antibodies, which are affordable versions of therapeutic antibodies. Along with biosimilars, innovations in antibody engineering have helped to design bio-better antibodies with improved efficacy than the conventional ones. These novel mAb-based therapeutics are set to revolutionize existing drug therapies targeting a wide spectrum of diseases, thereby meeting several unmet medical needs. In the future, mAbs generated by applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) are expected to become a powerful tool in clinical therapeutics. This article describes the methods of mAb production, pre-clinical and clinical development of mAbs, approved indications targeted by mAbs, and novel developments in the field of mAb research.

Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for multiple myeloma

Despite significant therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a challenging, incurable, hematological malignancy. The efficacy of traditional chemotherapy and currently available anti-MM agents is in part limited by their adverse effects, which restrict their therapeutic potential. Nanotherapeutics is an emerging field of cancer therapy that can overcome the biological and chemical barriers of existing anticancer drugs. This review presents an overview of recent advancements in nanoparticle- and immunotherapy-based drug delivery systems for MM treatment. It further delves into the targeting strategies, mechanism of controlled drug release, and challenges associated with the development of drug delivery systems for the treatment of MM.

Double agents in immunotherapy: Unmasking the role of antibody drug conjugates in immune checkpoint targeting

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have high specificity with lesser off-target effects, thus providing improved efficacy over traditional chemotherapies. A total of 14 ADCs have been approved for use against cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with more than 100 ADCs currently in clinical trials. Of particular interest ADCs targeting immune antigens PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and integrins. Specifically, we describe ADCs in development along with the gene and protein expression of these immune checkpoints across a wide range of cancer types let url = window.clickTag || window.clickTag1 || window.clickTag2 || window.clickTag3 || window.clickTag4 || window.bsClickTAG || window.bsClickTAG1 || window.bsClickTAG2 || window.url || ''; if(typeof url == 'string'){ document.body.dataset['perxceptAdRedirectUrl'] = url;}.

Preclinical Evaluation of STI-8811, a Novel Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting BCMA for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Treatment for patients with multiple myeloma has experienced rapid development and improvement in recent years; however, patients continue to experience relapse, and multiple myeloma remains largely incurable. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has been widely recognized as a promising target for treatment of multiple myeloma due to its exclusive expression in B-cell linage cells and its critical role in the growth and survival of malignant plasma cells. Here, we introduce STI-8811, a BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) linked to an auristatin-derived duostatin payload via an enzymatically cleavable peptide linker, using our proprietary C-lock technology. STI-8811 exhibits target-specific binding activity and rapid internalization, leading to G2/M cell-cycle arrest, caspase 3/7 activation, and apoptosis in BCMA-expressing tumor cells in vitro. Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) is shed by multiple myeloma cells into the blood and increases with disease progression, competing for ADC binding and reducing its efficacy. We report enhanced cytotoxic activity in the presence of high levels of sBCMA compared with a belantamab mafodotin biosimilar (J6M0-mcMMAF). STI-8811 demonstrated greater in vivo activity than J6M0-mcMMAF in solid and disseminated multiple myeloma models, including tumor models with low BCMA expression and/or in large solid tumors representing soft-tissue plasmacytomas. In cynomolgus monkeys, STI-8811 was well tolerated, with toxicities consistent with other BCMA-targeting ADCs with auristatin payloads in clinical studies. STI-8811 has the potential to outperform current clinical candidates with lower toxicity and higher activity under conditions found in patients with advanced disease. Significance: STI-8811 is a BCMA-targeting ADC carrying a potent auristatin derivative. We report unique binding properties which maintain potent cytotoxic activity under sBCMA-high conditions that hinder the clinical efficacy of current BCMA-targeting ADC candidates. Beyond disseminated models of multiple myeloma, we observed efficacy in solid tumor models of plasmacytomas with low and heterogenous BCMA expressions at a magnitude and duration of response exceeding that of clinical comparators.

Belantamab mafodotin concentration-QTc relationships in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma from the DREAMM-1 and -2 studies

AIMS

To evaluate relationships between plasma concentrations of belantamab mafodotin, total monoclonal antibody, and its payload and changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma from the DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 studies.

METHODS

Hysteresis plots and linear regression analyses of pharmacokinetic (PK) analyte (belantamab mafodotin, total monoclonal antibody, and cytotoxic cysteine-maleimidocaproyl monomethyl auristatin F payload) concentrations vs. time-matched ECG parameters (absolute/change from baseline in QT interval corrected for RR interval [QTc/ΔQTc] and QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula [QTcF/ΔQTcF]) were performed. Concentrations of PK analyte required for a 10-ms increase in QTc in DREAMM-2 were calculated via simulation, as was the probability of ΔQTc/ΔQTcF exceeding 10 ms for the expected Cmax of PK analyte concentrations associated with the doses (2.5 and 3.4 mg/kg) administered in DREAMM-2.

RESULTS

Time-matched PK and ECG data from 290 patients (DREAMM-1, n = 73; DREAMM-2, n = 217) were analysed. Hysteresis plots did not clearly indicate any concentration-related prolongation in QTc or QTcF; regression analyses indicated a very small rate of increase in ΔQTc and ΔQTcF with increasing concentrations of PK analytes. Calculated concentrations of PK analyte required for a 10-ms prolongation in QTc were higher than the maximum analyte concentrations observed following treatment with belantamab mafodotin in DREAMM-2; the probability that each dose would prolong ΔQTc and ΔQTcF by >10 ms was 0 and <0.25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study of belantamab mafodotin and its payload did not provide evidence of QT prolongation in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at clinically relevant doses.

Application of Pharmacometrics in Advancing the Clinical Research of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Principles and Modeling Strategies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a pivotal area in the research and development of antitumor drugs. They provide innovative possibilities for tumor therapy by integrating the tumor-targeting capabilities of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxic effect of small molecule drugs. Pharmacometrics, an important discipline, facilitates comprehensive understanding of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ADCs by integrating clinical trial data through modeling and simulation. However, due to the complex structure of ADCs, their modeling approaches are still unclear. In this review, we analyzed published population pharmacokinetic models for ADCs and classified them into single-analyte, two-analyte, and three-analyte models. We also described the benefits, limitations, and recommendations for each model. Furthermore, we suggested that the development of population pharmacokinetic models for ADCs should be rigorously considered and established based on four key aspects: (1) research objectives; (2) available in vitro and animal data; (3) accessible clinical information; and (4) the capability of bioanalytical methods. This review offered insights to guide the application of pharmacometrics in the clinical research of ADCs, thereby contributing to more effective therapeutic development.

Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for triple class exposed/refractory relapsed multiple myeloma: a subgroup analysis of the ALGONQUIN trial

Given the early use of triplet and quadruplet regimens, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will be exposed and/or refractory to PIs, IMiDs, and anti-CD38 mAbs after first- or second-line treatment. Effective treatment for this group of triple class exposed/refractory (TCE/R) patients is crucial. Here we present a post-hoc subgroup analysis of TCE/R patients treated on the ALGONQUIN study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone (belamaf-Pd) for relapsed MM. Of the 99 patients treated on the ALGONQUIN study, 69 were TCE and 56 were TCR and were included in this analysis. Patients had a median of three prior lines of therapy. The ORR was 86.4% in TCE patients and 84.9% in TCR patients, with ≥ very good partial response rates of 64% and 68% respectively. The median progression free survival was 18.3 months in TCE patients and 19.6 months in TCR patients, with overall survival not yet reached and 34.4 months, respectively for TCE and TCR patients. No new safety signals were identified. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were keratopathy (48%), decreased visual acuity (42%), neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (27%), and infection (25%). In this subgroup analysis of the ALGONQUIN study, patients with TCE/TCR disease treated with belamaf-Pd achieved high clinical response rates with durable remissions, comparable to other novel therapeutics in this space.

Cardiac Complications of Multiple Myeloma Treatments

Multiple myeloma (MM) arises in plasma cells, a type of white blood cell. The cancerous plasma cells produce monoclonal immunoglobulins in the bone marrow. The extent of proliferation in the malignant state can manifest in many complications including osteopenia, osteolytic lesions, pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, anemia, and kidney dysfunction. As is the case with the treatment of other malignancies, the research relating to the management of MM is dynamic and evolving. In this review, we aim to succinctly summarize and categorize the major treatment options of MM, including both new treatments and also older treatments that are now less frequently utilized, with a specific focus on the cardiotoxicity of these agents.

The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Myeloma Kidney Disease

Renal failure is one of the most important manifestations of multiple myeloma. It is caused by renal lesions such as cast nephropathy, immunoglobulin deposition disease, AL amyloidosis or other glomerular and/or tubular diseases, mostly due to the toxic effect of free light chains in serum. Renal failure can represent a clinical emergency and is associated with poor outcome in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Although progression-free survival and overall survival have improved with the introduction of novel agents, renal failure remains a challenge for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Monoclonal antibodies are a component of therapy for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients and, based on clinical trials and real-world experience, are also safe and effective for subjects with renal failure, even if they are on dialysis. Most of the data are on anti-CD38 and anti-SLAM7 antibodies, but new antibody-drug conjugates such as belantamab mafodotin and bispecific antibodies also appear to be effective in myeloma kidney disease. In the future, we will have to face some challenges, such as defining new criteria for renal response to treatment, defining specific trials for these difficult-to-treat patients and integrating different therapeutic options.

Pharmaceutical innovation and advanced biotechnology in the biotech-pharmaceutical industry for antibody-drug conjugate development

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), from prototypes in the 1980s to first- and second-generation products in the 2000s, and now in their multiformats, have progressed tremendously to meet oncological challenges. Currently, 13 ADCs have been approved for medical practice, with over 200 candidates in clinical trials. Moreover, ADCs have evolved into different formats, including bispecific ADCs, probody-drug conjugates, pH-responsive ADCs, target-degrading ADCs, and immunostimulating ADCs. Technologies from biopharmaceutical industries have a crucial role in the clinical transition of these novel biotherapeutics. In this review, we highlight several features contributing to the prosperity of bioindustrial ADC development. Various proprietary technologies from biopharmaceutical companies are discussed. Such advances in biopharmaceutical industries are the backbone for the success of ADCs in development and clinical application.

Just scratching the surface: novel treatment approaches for multiple myeloma targeting cell membrane proteins

A better understanding of the roles of the adaptive and innate immune systems in the oncogenesis of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM) has led to the development of novel immune-based therapies. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) and Fc receptor-like protein 5 (FcRL5, also known as FcRH5) are cell-surface transmembrane proteins expressed by plasma cells, and have been identified as prominent immunotherapeutic targets in MM, with promising activity demonstrated in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory disease. Indeed, since 2020, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers and autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting BCMA or GPRC5D have been approved for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory MM. However, responses to these therapies are not universal, and acquired resistance invariably occurs. In this Review, we discuss the various immunotherapeutic approaches targeting BCMA, GPRC5D and FcRL5 that are currently either available or in clinical development for patients with MM. We also review the mechanisms underlying resistance to such therapies, and discuss potential strategies to overcome these mechanisms and improve patient outcomes.

Emerging conjugation strategies and protein engineering technologies aim to improve ADCs in the fight against cancer

Antibody drug conjugates are an exciting therapeutic modality that combines the targeting specificity of antibodies with potent cytotoxins to selectively kill cancer cells. The targeting component improves efficacy and protects non-target cells from the harmful effects of the payload. To date 15 ADCs have been approved by regulatory agencies for commercial use and shown to be valuable tools in the treatment of cancer.The assembly of an ADC requires the chemical ligation of a linker-payload to an antibody. Conventional conjugation methods targeting accessible lysines and cysteines have produced all the ADCs currently on the market. While successful, technologies aiming to improve the homogeneity and stability of ADCs are being developed and tested.Here we provide a review of developing methods for ADC construction. These include enzymatic methods, oligosaccharide remodelling, and technologies using genetic code expansion techniques. The virtues and limitations of each technology are discussed.Emerging conjugation technologies are being applied to produce new formats of ADCs with enhanced functionality including bispecific ADCs, dual-payload ADCs, and nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. The benefits of these novel formats are highlighted.

Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Belantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies.

METHODS

In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status.

RESULTS

In total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.).

Targeting CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia with GLK-33, a Lintuzumab-Auristatin Conjugate with a Wide Therapeutic Window

CD33 (Siglec-3) is a cell surface receptor expressed in approximately 90% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts, making it an attractive target for therapy of AML. Although previous CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) like gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg) have shown efficacy in AML treatment, they have suffered from toxicity and narrow therapeutic window. This study aimed to develop a novelADCwith improved tolerability and a wider therapeutic window. GLK-33 consists of the anti-CD33 antibody lintuzumab and eight mavg-MMAU auristatin linkerpayloads per antibody. The experimental methods included testing in cell cultures, patient-derived samples, mouse xenograft models, and rat toxicology studies. GLK-33 exhibited remarkable efficacy in reducing cell viability within CD33-positive leukemia cell lines and primary AML samples. Notably, GLK-33 demonstrated antitumor activity at single dose as low as 300 mg/kg in mice, while maintaining tolerability at single dose of 20 to 30 mg/kg in rats. In contrast with both GO and lintuzumab vedotin, GLK-33 exhibited a wide therapeutic window and activity against multidrug-resistant cells. The development of GLK-33 addresses the limitations of previous ADCs, offering a wider therapeutic window, improved tolerability, and activity against drug-resistant leukemia cells. These findings encourage further exploration of GLK-33 in AML through clinical trials.

Belantamab mafodotin, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: part 1 results of a phase I/II study

Preclinical and clinical data demonstrate synergy between belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) and immunomodulatory drugs with limited overlapping toxicities. We investigated the safety and efficacy of belamaf with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly (belamaf-Rd) in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Thirty-six patients (median age, 72.5 years) were randomized to receive belamaf at three different doses (2.5, 1.9, or 1.4 mg/kg) every 8 weeks. The dosing schedule was extended to every 12 weeks to mitigate ocular toxicity. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were fatigue (n=21, 58.3%), rash (n=6, 16.7%), diarrhea (n=8, 22.2%) and COVID-19 (n=5, 13.9%). Grade 3-4 ocular adverse events, comprising visual acuity decline from baseline and/or keratopathy, were reported in 39/216 (18.1%), 33/244 (13.5%), and 26/207 (12.6%) ophthalmological assessments in the 2.5, 1.9, and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Importantly, grade 3-4 keratopathy was identified in 9/216 (4.2%), 1/244 (0.4%) and 1/207(0.5%) assessments. Most patients (32/36, 88.9%) were treated with the extended, every-12-week schedule, during which 40, 33 and 16 doses were withheld due to ocular adverse events in the 2.5, 1.9, and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Overall, the rates of very good partial response and better and complete response and better were 83.3% and 52.8%, respectively, without significant differences among cohorts. Over a median follow-up of 20.3 months no disease progression was reported; six patients discontinued treatment due to infection-related death (4 cases of COVID-19, 2 cases of pneumonia) and one patient withdrew consent. Based on the toxicity/efficacy balance, the recommended phase II dose was 1.9 mg/kg every 8 weeks, extended to every 12 weeks because of toxicity. In conclusion, Belamaf-Rd, with the extended schedule for belamaf, showed important clinical activity and a significant improvement of ocular adverse events with minimal impact on vision-related functioning in an elderly, non-transplant eligible population.

Beyond cytotoxic potency: disposition features required to design ADC payload

1. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated impressive clinical usefulness in treating several types of cancer, with the notion of widening of the therapeutic index of the cytotoxic payload through the minimisation of the systemic toxicity. Therefore, choosing the most appropriate payload molecule is a particularly important part of the early design phase of ADC development, especially given the highly competitive environment ADCs find themselves in today.2. The focus of the current review is to describe critical attributes/considerations needed in the discovery and ultimately development of cytotoxic payloads in support of ADC design. In addition to potency, several key dispositional characteristics including solubility, permeability and bystander effect, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and drug-drug interactions, are described as being an integral part of the integrated activities required in the design of clinically safe and useful ADC therapeutic agents.

Belantamab mafodotin: an important treatment option for vulnerable patients with triple class exposed relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Not available.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Novel Therapeutic Agents for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with or without Alterations in Oncogenic Drivers

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics for lung cancer, and several are currently in development for this malignancy. The structure of these molecules is based on an antibody that targets a protein on the lung cancer cell surface and a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker. Many protein targets, including TROP2, c-MET, CEACAM5, HER2, and HER3 have been identified. In metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) without alterations in oncogenic drivers, platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) interaction are the standard first-line treatments. In patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended. However, although the prognosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC differs between such with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers, most patients eventually experience disease progression. A novel therapeutic class is needed in routine practice to overcome the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and EGFR/ALK TKIs. Several ADCs have already been approved for other cancers, such as breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma. This review summarizes the knowledge about the efficacy and tolerance profiles of ADCs targeting TROP2, HER2, HER3, CEACAM5 and c-MET in metastatic NSCLC with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers.

Antibody-drug conjugates combinations in cancer treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a promising class of anticancer agents. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to 12 compounds, with 2 later undergoing withdrawal. Moreover, several other compounds are currently under clinical development at different stages. Despite substantial antitumoral activity observed among different tumor types, adverse events and the development of resistance represent significant challenges in their use. Over the last years, an increasing number of clinical trials have been testing these drugs in different combinations with other anticancer agents, such as traditional chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and small targeted agents, reporting promising results based on possible synergistic effects and a potential for improved treatment outcomes among different tumor types. Here we will review combinations of ADCs with other antitumor agents aiming at describing the current state of the art and future directions.

Targeted Delivery Strategies for Multiple Myeloma and Their Adverse Drug Reactions

Currently, multiple myeloma (MM) is a prevalent hematopoietic system malignancy, known for its insidious onset and unfavorable prognosis. Recently developed chemotherapy drugs for MM have exhibited promising therapeutic outcomes. Nevertheless, to overcome the shortcomings of traditional clinical drug treatment, such as off-target effects, multiple drug resistance, and systemic toxicity, targeted drug delivery systems are optimizing the conventional pharmaceuticals for precise delivery to designated sites at controlled rates, striving for maximal efficacy and safety, presenting a promising approach for MM treatment. This review will delve into the outstanding performance of antibody-drug conjugates, peptide-drug conjugates, aptamer-drug conjugates, and nanocarrier drug delivery systems in preclinical studies or clinical trials for MM and monitor their adverse reactions during treatment.

Visualization of Keratopathy Associated With the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Belantamab Mafodotin Using Infrared Imaging in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin is affected by ocular adverse effects, most frequently keratopathy with corneal microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs). To assess ocular side effects, the "Keratopathy and Visual Acuity (KVA) scale," based on the extent of keratopathy subjectively graded on slit-lamp examination and the change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline, was created. Advanced corneal imaging techniques have been explored to further characterize MECs and identify objective imaging biomarkers. We examined whether infrared reflectance imaging of the anterior segment (AS-IR) could contribute to the assessment, monitoring, and documentation of corneal toxicity in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin.

METHODS

In addition to the KVA examination, AS-IR imaging was performed. AS-IR images were evaluated for presence of visible hyporeflective lesions and their spatial and temporal distribution between visits and compared with keratopathy identified on slit-lamp examination. To standardize the assessment, a scoring system for lesions on AS-IR was implemented for additional analysis.

RESULTS

Nine patients undergoing treatment with belantamab mafodotin for up to 9 months were examined. All patients exhibited hyporeflective lesions on AS-IR imaging, indicative of corneal toxicity corresponding to MECs observed on slit-lamp examination. AS-IR lesions showed early occurrence, variable quantity and size, and distinct distribution patterns, correlating with clinical findings during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

As shown for belantamab mafodotin, AS-IR imaging represents a fast, noninvasive, supplemental method for documentation, monitoring, and assessment of corneal adverse effects during treatment with antibody-drug conjugates, which may enable more standardized analyses.

Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells therapy in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Modern immunotherapy approaches are revolutionizing the treatment scenario of relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients, providing an opportunity to reach deep level of responses and extend survival outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and T-cell redirecting treatments, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells therapy, have been recently introduced in the treatment of RRMM. Some agents have already received regulatory approval, while newer constructs, novel combinations, and applications in earlier lines of therapy are currently being explored. This review discusses the current landscape and possible development of ADCs, BsAbs and CAR-T cells immunotherapies.

EXPERT OPINION

ADCs, BsAbs, and CAR-T therapy have demonstrated substantial activity in heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed (TCE) MM patients, and T-cell redirecting treatments represent new standards of care after third (European Medicines Agency, EMA), or fourth (Food and Drug Administration, FDA), line of therapy. All these three immunotherapies carry advantages and disadvantages, with different accessibility and new toxicities that require appropriate management and guidelines. Multiple on-going programs include combinations therapies and applications in earlier lines of treatment, as well as the development of novel agents or construct to enhance potency, reduce toxicity and facilitate administration. Sequencing is a challenge, with few data available and mechanisms of resistance still to be unraveled.

Implementation of antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-positive solid cancers: Recent advances and future directions

In recent decades, there has been a surge in the approval of monoclonal antibodies for treating a wide range of hematological and solid malignancies. These antibodies exhibit exceptional precision in targeting the surface antigens of tumors, heralding a groundbreaking approach to cancer therapy. Nevertheless, monoclonal antibodies alone do not show sufficient lethality against cancerous cells compared to chemotherapy. Consequently, a new class of anti-tumor medications, known as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), has been developed to bridge the divide between monoclonal antibodies and cytotoxic drugs, enhancing their therapeutic potential. ADCs are chemically synthesized by binding tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic payloads through linkers that are susceptible to cleavage by intracellular proteases. They combined the accurate targeting of monoclonal antibodies with the potent efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs while circumventing systemic toxicity and boasting superior lethality over standalone targeted drugs. The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family, which encompasses HER1 (also known as EGFR), HER2, HER3, and HER4, plays a key role in regulating cellular proliferation, survival, differentiation, and migration. HER2 overexpression in various tumors is one of the most frequently targeted antigens for ADC therapy in HER2-positive cancers. HER2-directed ADCs have emerged as highly promising treatment modalities for patients with HER2-positive cancers. This review focuses on three approved anti-HER2 ADCs (T-DM1, DS-8201a, and RC48) and reviews ongoing clinical trials and failed trials based on anti-HER2 ADCs. Finally, we address the notable challenges linked to ADC development and underscore potential future avenues for tackling these hurdles.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers: An Updated Review of Data

The treatment landscape of genitourinary cancers has significantly evolved over the past few years. Renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer are the most common genitourinary malignancies. Recent advancements have produced new targeted therapies, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), due to a better understanding of the underlying oncogenic factors and molecular mechanisms involved. ADCs function as a 'drug delivery into the tumor' system. They are composed of an antigen-directed antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug that releases cytotoxic components after binding to the tumor cell's surface antigen. ADCs have been proven to be extremely promising in the treatment of several cancer types. For GU cancers, this novel treatment has only benefited patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). The rest of the GU cancer paradigm does not have any FDA-approved ADC treatment options available yet. In this study, we have thoroughly completed a narrative review of the current literature and summarized preclinical studies and clinical trials that evaluated the utility, activity, and toxicity of ADCs in GU cancers, the prospects of ADC development, and the ongoing clinical trials. Prospective clinical trials, retrospective studies, case reports, and scoping reviews were included.

Innate immune cells: Key players of orchestra in modulating tumor microenvironment (TME)

The tumor microenvironment (TME) with vital role in cancer progression is composed of various cells such as endothelial cells, immune cells, and mesenchymal stem cells. In particular, innate immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, neutrophils, innate lymphoid cells, γδT lymphocytes, and natural killer cells can either promote or suppress tumor progression when present in the TME. An increase in research on the cross-talk between the TME and innate immune cells will lead to new approaches for anti-tumoral therapeutic interventions. This review primarily focuses on the biology of innate immune cells and their main functions in the TME. In addition, it summarizes several innate immune-based immunotherapies that are currently tested in clinical trials.

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

HDAC Inhibition Induces CD26 Expression on Multiple Myeloma Cells via the c-Myc/Sp1-mediated Promoter Activation

CD26 is ubiquitously and intensely expressed in osteoclasts in patients with multiple myeloma, whereas its expression in plasma cells of patients with multiple myeloma is heterogeneous because of its cellular diversity, immune escape, and disease progression. Decreased expression levels of CD26 in myeloma cells constitute one of the mechanisms underlying resistance to humanized anti-CD26 mAb therapy in multiple myeloma. In the current study, we show that histone deacetylase inhibition (HDACi) with broad or class-specific inhibitors involves the induction of CD26 expression on CD26neg myeloma cells both transcriptionally and translationally. Furthermore, dipeptidyl peptidase Ⅳ (DPPⅣ) enzymatic activity was concomitantly enhanced in myeloma cells. Combined treatment with HDACi plus CD26mAb synergistically facilitated lysis of CD26neg myeloma cells not only by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity but also by the direct effects of mAb. Of note, its combination readily augmented lysis of CD26neg cell populations, refractory to CD26mAb or HDACi alone. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that HDACi increased acetylation of histone 3 lysine 27 at the CD26 promoter of myeloma cells. Moreover, in the absence of HDACi, c-Myc was attached to the CD26 promoter via Sp1 on the proximal G-C box of myeloma cells, whereas, in the presence of HDACi, c-Myc was detached from Sp1 with increased acetylation of c-Myc on the promoter, leading to activation of the CD26 promoter and initiation of transcription in myeloma cells. Collectively, these results confirm that HDACi plays crucial roles not only through its anti-myeloma activity but by sensitizing CD26neg myeloma cells to CD26mAb via c-Myc/Sp1-mediated CD26 induction, thereby augmenting its cytotoxicity.

SIGNIFICANCE

There is a desire to induce and sustain CD26 expression on multiple myeloma cells to elicit superior anti-myeloma response by humanized anti-CD26 mAb therapy. HDACi upregulates the expression levels of CD26 on myeloma cells via the increased acetylation of c-MycK323 on the CD26 promoter, leading to initiation of CD26 transcription, thereby synergistically augments the efficacy of CD26mAb against CD26neg myeloma cells.

Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide and dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1/2 trial

Due to evolving treatment standards for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, many patients will be triple-class exposed after initial relapses and have poor survival. Novel therapies and combinations are therefore required to improve outcomes. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted biologics have emerged as an important new area of therapeutics for relapsed multiple myeloma. The two-part ALGONQUIN trial evaluated various doses and schedules of the anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients who are lenalidomide refractory and proteosome inhibitor exposed. The primary endpoints, including evaluating dose-limiting toxicities, establishing the recommended Part 2 dose (RP2D) and overall response rate for patients treated at the RP2D, were met. Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Patients treated on study (N = 87) had a median of three previous regimens and 55.2% were triple-class refractory. At the RP2D the most common adverse events were decrease in best-corrected visual acuity (71.1%), keratopathy (65.8%), fatigue (57.9%), infection (47.4%; 7.9% grade ≥3), neutropenia (39.5%) and thrombocytopenia (39.5%). For RP2D patients (n = 38), the overall response rate was 85.3%, ≥very good partial response 75.7% and estimated two-year progression-free survival 52.8% (95% confidence interval, 33.9% to 82.4%), at a median follow-up of 13.9 months. The RP2D schedule was associated with manageable antibody-drug conjugate-associated corneal adverse events and improved tolerability without compromising efficacy. Belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone induced durable responses with promising overall survival in relapsed multiple myeloma, the results of which are yet to be confirmed in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03715478 .

Targeted immunotherapy: harnessing the immune system to battle multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematological malignancy disease characterized by the progressive dysfunction of the patient's immune system. In this context, immunotherapy for MM has emerged as a prominent area of research in recent years. Various targeted immunotherapy strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells/natural killer (NK) cells, and checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for MM. This review aims to discuss promising experimental and clinical evidence as well as the mechanisms of action underlying these immunotherapies. Specifically, we will explore the design of exosome-based bispecific monoclonal antibodies that offer cell-free immunotherapy options. The treatment landscape for myeloma continues to evolve with the development of numerous emerging immunotherapies. Given their significant advantages in modulating the MM immune environment through immune-targeted therapy, these approaches provide novel perspectives in selecting cutting-edge treatments for MM.

The promise and challenges of combination therapies with antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an important class of cancer therapies that have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of solid tumors. To date, many ongoing studies of ADC combinations with a variety of anticancer drugs, encompassing chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and immunotherapy, are being rigorously conducted in both preclinical studies and clinical trial settings. Nevertheless, combination therapy does not always guarantee a synergistic or additive effect and may entail overlapping toxicity risks. Therefore, understanding the current status and underlying mechanisms of ADC combination therapy is urgently required. This comprehensive review analyzes existing evidence concerning the additive or synergistic effect of ADCs with other classes of oncology medicines. Here, we discuss the biological mechanisms of different ADC combination therapy strategies, provide prominent examples, and assess their benefits and challenges. Finally, we discuss future opportunities for ADC combination therapy in clinical practice.

A Review of the Current FDA-Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Landmark Clinical Trials and Indications

Despite considerable treatment progress, cancer remains among the leading causes of death worldwide. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), a rapidly growing class of systemic therapy, show promise by combining the properties of conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates have been shown to be more efficacious than traditional chemotherapy. To date, there are 13 ADCs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating various hematological and solid organ cancers. There are several new promising ADCs that are being developed and are in clinical trials. This review provides an overview of the current FDA-approved ADCs, the landmark clinical trials that led to their approval, the common toxicities seen in the landmark trials, the challenges associated with ADCs, and the potential future directions.

Adavosertib and beyond: Biomarkers, drug combination and toxicity of WEE1 inhibitors

WEE1 kinase is renowned as an S-G2 checkpoint inhibitor activated by ATR-CHK1 in response to replication stress. WEE1 inhibition enhances replication stress and effectively circumvents checkpoints into mitosis, which triggers significant genetic impairs and culminates in cell death. This approach has been validated clinically for its promising anti-tumor efficacy across various cancer types, notably in cases of ovarian cancers. Nonetheless, the initial stage of clinical trials has shown that the first-in-human WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib is limited by dose-limiting adverse events. As a result, recent efforts have been made to explore predictive biomarkers and smart combination schedules to alleviate adverse effects. In this review, we focused on the exploration of therapeutic biomarkers, as well as schedules of combination utilizing WEE1 inhibitors and canonical anticancer drugs, according to the latest preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that the optimal application of WEE1 inhibitors will likely be as part of dose-reducing combination and be tailored to specific patient populations.

Patient-reported experiences during and following treatment with belantamab mafodotin for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the DREAMM-2 study

Introduction

Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are likely to be living with persistent symptoms, especially bone pain and fatigue, and experiencing restrictions in their physical and social functioning, which reduce health-related quality of life.

Methods

This qualitative interview study evaluated patients' perspectives about living with RRMM and their treatment with belantamab mafodotin, using interviews embedded in the Phase II DREAMM-2 trial (NCT03525678) with belantamab mafodotin. Patients consented to participate in up to 2 recorded telephone interviews (at treatment cycle 4 [C4] and at end of treatment [EOT]) comprising open-ended questions.

Results

A total of 142 interviews were conducted with 111 unique patients. At C4, common symptoms included neuropathy, fatigue, and bone or joint pain. Improvements in symptom severity were reported by patients who responded to belantamab mafodotin. Symptoms associated with visual impairment, eye irritation, and eye pain reported during the trial were reported to be at- or near-resolution by the EOT interview. Regarding impacts of underlying MM, patients most commonly expressed concerns about changes in daily performance and lifestyle for both responders (67.5% of all impact expressions) and non-responders (63.2%). Overall, interview participants reported being satisfied with belantamab mafodotin treatment.

Discussion

This qualitative patient interview study provides valuable insight into patients' symptomatic experience with belantamab mafodotin for their RRMM treatment and may help healthcare providers better anticipate their patients' real-world experience and needs when prescribing this novel agent in the clinic.

Plasma levels of BCMA-positive extracellular vesicles correlate to response and side effects in myeloma patients treated with belantamab-mafodotin

In myeloma patients, high levels of soluble BCMA (sBCMA) can limit the efficacy of BCMA-directed therapies. Belantamab-mafodotin is a BCMA antibody-drug conjugate and shows good overall response rates in heavily pretreated patients but progression-free survival data are poor. As the drug induces apoptosis, we hypothesized that sBCMA includes extracellular vesicles (EV) and thus evaluated numbers of BCMA-EV before and during belantamab therapy in 10 myeloma patients. BCMA-EV were significantly higher in patients prior to Belantamab (median: 3227/μl; p = .013) than in other myeloma patients before therapy (n = 10; 1082/μl) or healthy volunteers (n = 10; 980/μl). During therapy, BCMA-EV showed a significant increase to a maximum of 8292/μl (p = .028). Maximal changes in BCMA-EV (Δmax = BCMA-EV at C1/maximal BCMA-EV) showed a strong inverse, logarithmic correlation (r = -.950; p < .001) with FLC ratio changes (Δmax = FLC ratio at C1/minimal FLC ratio) and BCMA-EV peaks often preceded FLC progression. Correlating increase of LDH and BCMA-EV levels, together with clinical symptoms, point to a mafodotin-induced eryptosis. In summary, BCMA-EV are a part of sBCMA, peak levels precede progression, and their measurement might be helpful in identifying resistance mechanisms and side effects of BCMA targeted therapies.

Novel Immunotherapies and Combinations: The Future Landscape of Multiple Myeloma Treatment

In multiple myeloma impressive outcomes have improved with the introduction of new therapeutic approaches, mainly those including naked monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab. However, moving to earlier lines of therapy with effective anti-myeloma drugs led to an increase in the number of patients who developed multi-refractoriness to them early on. Currently, triple- or multi-refractory MM represents an unmet medical need, and their management remains a complicated challenge. The recent approval of new immunotherapeutic approaches such as conjugated monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR T cells could be a turning point for these heavily pretreated patients. Nevertheless, several issues regarding their use are unsolved, such as how to select patients for each strategy or how to sequence these therapies within the MM therapeutic landscape. Here we provide an overview of the most recent data about approved conjugated monoclonal antibody belantamab, mafodotin, bispecific antibody teclistamab, and other promising compounds under development, mainly focusing on the ongoing clinical trials with monoclonal antibody combination approaches in advanced and earlier phases of MM treatment.

Cancer chemotherapy resistance: Mechanisms and recent breakthrough in targeted drug delivery

Conventional chemotherapy, one of the most widely used cancer treatment methods, has serious side effects, and usually results in cancer treatment failure. Drug resistance is one of the primary reasons for this failure. The most significant drawbacks of systemic chemotherapy are rapid clearance from the circulation, the drug's low concentration in the tumor site, and considerable adverse effects outside the tumor. Several ways have been developed to boost neoplasm treatment efficacy and overcome medication resistance. In recent years, targeted drug delivery has become an essential therapeutic application. As more mechanisms of tumor treatment resistance are discovered, nanoparticles (NPs) are designed to target these pathways. Therefore, understanding the limitations and challenges of this technology is critical for nanocarrier evaluation. Nano-drugs have been increasingly employed in medicine, incorporating therapeutic applications for more precise and effective tumor diagnosis, therapy, and targeting. Many benefits of NP-based drug delivery systems in cancer treatment have been proven, including good pharmacokinetics, tumor cell-specific targeting, decreased side effects, and lessened drug resistance. As more mechanisms of tumor treatment resistance are discovered, NPs are designed to target these pathways. At the moment, this innovative technology has the potential to bring fresh insights into cancer therapy. Therefore, understanding the limitations and challenges of this technology is critical for nanocarrier evaluation.

Trends in the Development of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy

In cancer treatment, the first-generation, cytotoxic drugs, though effective against cancer cells, also harmed healthy ones. The second-generation targeted cancer cells precisely to inhibit their growth. Enter the third-generation, consisting of immuno-oncology drugs, designed to combat drug resistance and bolster the immune system's defenses. These advanced therapies operate by obstructing the uncontrolled growth and spread of cancer cells through the body, ultimately eliminating them effectively. Within the arsenal of cancer treatment, monoclonal antibodies offer several advantages, including inducing cancer cell apoptosis, precise targeting, prolonged presence in the body, and minimal side effects. A recent development in cancer therapy is Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs), initially developed in the mid-20th century. The second generation of ADCs addressed this issue through innovative antibody modification techniques, such as DAR regulation, amino acid substitutions, incorporation of non-natural amino acids, and enzymatic drug attachment. Currently, a third generation of ADCs is in development. This study presents an overview of 12 available ADCs, reviews 71 recent research papers, and analyzes 128 clinical trial reports. The overarching objective is to gain insights into the prevailing trends in ADC research and development, with a particular focus on emerging frontiers like potential targets, linkers, and drug payloads within the realm of cancer treatment.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin monotherapy in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: DREAMM-11

Belantamab mafodotin, a B-cell maturation antigen-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was investigated in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Part 1 of the phase I DREAMM-11 study. Patients who had received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent were eligible. Eight patients received belantamab mafodotin monotherapy at 2.5 mg/kg (n = 4) or 3.4 mg/kg (n = 4) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were tolerability and safety, and secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. The most common Grade ≥ 3 adverse event was thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased (2.5 mg/kg cohort, 100% [4/4]; 3.4 mg/kg cohort, 75% [3/4]), and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Ocular events, including keratopathy findings, were observed in most patients (2.5 mg/kg cohort, 100% [4/4]; 3.4 mg/kg cohort, 75% [3/4]) and were managed with dose modifications. All resolved within the study period. Overall response rates were 50% (2/4) in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort and 25% (1/4) in the 3.4 mg/kg cohort. Although PK profiles in Japanese patients varied, individual exposures overlapped with previous results in Western populations. Belantamab mafodotin monotherapy was generally well-tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity at both doses.

Towards a platform quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for preclinical to clinical translation of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs)

A next generation multiscale quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) is presented, for preclinical to clinical translation of ADC efficacy. Two HER2 ADCs (trastuzumab-DM1 and trastuzumab-DXd) were used for model development, calibration, and validation. The model integrates drug specific experimental data including in vitro cellular disposition data, pharmacokinetic (PK) and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data for T-DM1 and T-DXd, as well as system specific data such as properties of HER2, tumor growth rates, and volumes. The model incorporates mechanistic detail at the intracellular level, to account for different mechanisms of ADC processing and payload release. It describes the disposition of the ADC, antibody, and payload inside and outside of the tumor, including binding to off-tumor, on-target sinks. The resulting multiscale PK model predicts plasma and tumor concentrations of ADC and payload. Tumor payload concentrations predicted by the model were linked to a TGI model and used to describe responses following ADC administration to xenograft mice. The model was translated to humans and virtual clinical trial simulations were performed that successfully predicted progression free survival response for T-DM1 and T-DXd for the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, including differential efficacy based upon HER2 expression status. In conclusion, the presented model is a step toward a platform QSP model and strategy for ADCs, integrating multiple types of data and knowledge to predict ADC efficacy. The model has potential application to facilitate ADC design, lead candidate selection, and clinical dosing schedule optimization.

Efficacy and safety of single-agent belantamab mafodotin versus pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised study

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma remains incurable, and heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory disease have few good treatment options. Belantamab mafodotin showed promising results in a phase 2 study of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at second or later relapse and a manageable adverse event profile. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin in a phase 3 setting.

METHODS

In the DREAMM-3 open-label phase 3 study, conducted at 108 sites across 18 countries, adult patients were enrolled who had confirmed multiple myeloma (International Myeloma Working Group criteria), ECOG performance status of 0-2, had received two or more previous lines of therapy, including two or more consecutive cycles of both lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, and progressed on, or within, 60 days of completion of the previous treatment. Participants were randomly allocated using a central interactive response technology system (2:1) to receive belantamab mafodotin 2·5 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days, or oral pomalidomide 4·0 mg daily (days 1-21) and dexamethasone 40·0 mg (20·0 mg if >75 years) weekly in a 28-day cycle. Randomisation was stratified by previous anti-CD38 therapy, International Staging System stage, and number of previous therapies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in all patients who were randomly allocated. The safety population included all randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04162210, and is ongoing. Data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 12, 2022.

FINDINGS

Patients were recruited between April 2, 2020, and April 18, 2022. As of September, 2022, 325 patients were randomly allocated (218 to the belantamab mafodotin group and 107 to the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group); 184 (57%) of 325 were male and 141 (43%) of 325 were female, 246 (78%) of 316 were White. Median age was 68 years (IQR 60-74). Median follow-up was 11·5 months (5·5-17·6) for belantamab mafodotin and 10·8 months (5·6-17·1) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Median progression-free survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 6·4-14·5) for belantamab mafodotin and 7·0 months (4·6-10·6) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 1·03 [0·72-1·47]; p=0·56). Most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (49 [23%] of 217) and anaemia (35 [16%]) for belantamab mafodotin, and neutropenia (34 [33%] of 102) and anaemia (18[18%]) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Serious adverse events occurred in 94 (43%) of 217 and 40 (39%) of 102 patients, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths in the belantamab mafodotin group and one (1%) in the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group due to sepsis.

INTERPRETATION

Belantamab mafodotin was not associated with statistically improved progression-free survival compared with standard-of-care, but there were no new safety signals associated with its use. Belantamab mafodotin is being tested in combination regimens for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

FUNDING

GSK (study number 207495).

Glycosylation shapes the efficacy and safety of diverse protein, gene and cell therapies

Over recent decades, therapeutic proteins have had widespread success in treating a myriad of diseases. Glycosylation, a near universal feature of this class of drugs, is a critical quality attribute that significantly influences the physical properties, safety profile and biological activity of therapeutic proteins. Optimizing protein glycosylation, therefore, offers an important avenue to developing more efficacious therapies. In this review, we discuss specific examples of how variations in glycan structure and glycoengineering impacts the stability, safety, and clinical efficacy of protein-based drugs that are already in the market as well as those that are still in preclinical development. We also highlight the impact of glycosylation on next generation biologics such as T cell-based cancer therapy and gene therapy.

Longitudinal efficacy and safety modeling and simulation framework to aid dose selection of belantamab mafodotin for patients with multiple myeloma

Belantamab mafodotin, a monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF)-containing monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DRiving Excellence in Approaches to Multiple Myeloma (DREAMM)-1 and pivotal DREAMM-2 studies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. As with other MMAF-containing ADCs, ocular adverse events were observed. To predict the effects of belantamab mafodotin dosing regimens and dose-modification strategies on efficacy and ocular safety end points, DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 data across a range of doses were used to develop an integrated simulation framework incorporating two separate longitudinal models and the published population pharmacokinetic model. A concentration-driven tumor growth inhibition model described the time course of serum M-protein concentration, a measure of treatment response, whereas a discrete time Markov model described the time course of ocular events graded with the GSK Keratopathy and Visual Acuity scale. Significant covariates included baseline β2 -microglobulin on growth rate, baseline M-protein on kill rate, extramedullary disease on the effect compartment rate constant, and baseline soluble B cell maturation antigen on maximal effect. Efficacy and safety end points were simulated for various doses with dosing intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 9 weeks and various event-driven dose-modification strategies. Simulations predicted that lower doses and longer dosing intervals were associated with lower probability and lower overall time with Grade 3+ and Grade 2+ ocular events compared with the reference regimen (2.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks), with a less-than-proportional reduction in efficacy. The predicted improved benefit-risk profiles of certain dosing schedules and dose modifications from this integrated framework has informed trial designs for belantamab mafodotin, supporting dose-optimization strategies.

A Terphenyllin Derivative CHNQD-00824 from the Marine Compound Library Induced DNA Damage as a Potential Anticancer Agent

With the emergence of drug resistance and the consequential high morbidity and mortality rates, there is an urgent need to screen and identify new agents for the effective treatment of cancer. Terphenyls-a group of aromatic hydrocarbons consisting of a linear 1,4-diaryl-substituted benzene core-has exhibited a wide range of biological activities. In this study, we discovered a terphenyllin derivative-CHNQD-00824-derived from the marine compound library as a potential anticancer agent. The cytotoxic activities of the CHNQD-00824 compound were evaluated against 13 different cell lines with IC50 values from 0.16 to 7.64 μM. Further study showed that CHNQD-00824 inhibited the proliferation and migration of cancer cells, possibly by inducing DNA damage. Acridine orange staining demonstrated that CHNQD-00824 promoted apoptosis in zebrafish embryos. Notably, the anti-cancer effectiveness was verified in a doxycin hydrochloride (DOX)-induced liver-specific enlargement model in zebrafish. With Solafinib as a positive control, CHNQD-00824 markedly suppressed tumor growth at concentrations of 2.5 and 5 μM, further highlighting its potential as an effective anticancer agent.

A comprehensive overview on antibody-drug conjugates: from the conceptualization to cancer therapy

Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) represent an innovative class of potent anti-cancer compounds that are widely used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Unlike conventional chemotherapeutic drug-based therapies, that are mainly associated with modest specificity and therapeutic benefit, the three key components that form an ADC (a monoclonal antibody bound to a cytotoxic drug via a chemical linker moiety) achieve remarkable improvement in terms of targeted killing of cancer cells and, while sparing healthy tissues, a reduction in systemic side effects caused by off-tumor toxicity. Based on their beneficial mechanism of action, 15 ADCs have been approved to date by the market approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and/or other international governmental agencies for use in clinical oncology, and hundreds are undergoing evaluation in the preclinical and clinical phases. Here, our aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the key features revolving around ADC therapeutic strategy including their structural and targeting properties, mechanism of action, the role of the tumor microenvironment and review the approved ADCs in clinical oncology, providing discussion regarding their toxicity profile, clinical manifestations and use in novel combination therapies. Finally, we briefly review ADCs in other pathological contexts and provide key information regarding ADC manufacturing and analytical characterization.