Relapse risk following truncation of pegylated asparaginase in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

A Refined Population Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Guideline for Individualized PEGasparaginase Dosing in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

In the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL11 protocol, PEGasparaginase dosing was individualized for standard-risk and medium-risk patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. After using our pragmatic old guideline, we aimed to improve individualized PEGasparaginase dosing by developing a population pharmacokinetic model-based dosing guideline.

METHOD

After the 3 doses of 1500 IU/m2 administered in induction, standard-risk patients received 1 individualized dose and medium-risk patients 14, targeting trough activity levels between 100 and 250 IU/L. The effectiveness, adherence, and toxicity of our new dosing guideline was assessed and compared with the old guideline.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients (714 samples) were included in the new dosing group and 509 patients (4539 samples) were included in the old dosing group. Comparing the effectiveness, we found that 32% (22/67) of patients in the new and 13% (47/354) of patients in the old dosing group were within the target range after the first individualized dose (P < 0.001). Among medium-risk patients, a median of 3 dose reductions was needed to reach and maintain levels within the target range in the new dosing group compared with 5 in the old dosing group (P < 0.001). With a continuous PEGasparaginase dosing schedule, target trough activity levels were reached after 2 dose reductions in the new group versus 4 in the old dosing group. The adherence to the new guideline was >99%, with 6/714 recommended doses deviating from the guideline. With exception of a lower proportion of patients with increased (≥grade 3) serum alanine transaminase (34% new vs 64% old, P < 0.05) in the new dosing group, toxicity was comparable between guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

With the new dosing guideline, fewer dose-reduction steps are necessary to reach and remain within the target. The high adherence rate emphasized its simplicity and practicality, confirming that it can be easily integrated into clinical practice.

The correlation of asparaginase enzyme activity levels after PEG-asparaginase administration with clinical characteristics and adverse effects in Chinese paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Studies on asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) monitoring in Chinese patients receiving PEG-asparaginase remain limited. We monitored AEA in paediatric patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and treated according to the Chinese Children's Cancer Group study protocols, CCCG-ALL-2015/CCCG-ALL-2020 protocols. We measured the AEA at days 7 ± 1 and 14 ± 1 and analysed their association with patient characteristics and PEG-asparaginase-related adverse effects (AEs). We measured 2147 samples from 329 patients. Mean AEA levels (interquartile range) were 931 iu/L (654-1174 iu/L) at day 7 ± 1 and 664 iu/L (463-860 iu/L) at day 14 ± 1. The AEA levels were higher in younger children and increased with the cumulative dose numbers. PEG-asparaginase inactivation rate was 19.1%, and the silent inactivation (SI) rate was 12.5%. Nine patients were identified with allergic-like reactions. Hypofibrinogenaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, pancreatitis and thrombosis were associated with older age, whereas hypoglycaemia was associated with younger age. The risk of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypoglycaemia increased with cumulative dose numbers of PEG-asparaginase. Except for hypofibrinogenaemia, elevated AEA levels did not increase the risk of PEG-asparaginase-related AEs. Drug monitoring can be utilized as guidance for treatment decision-making. Individualizing asparaginase doses do not reduce toxicities. The treatment target of PEG-asparaginase remains to achieve sustained and adequate activity.

ETV6::RUNX1 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: how much therapy is needed for cure?

Recent trials show 5-year survival rates >95% for ETV6::RUNX1 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Since treatment has many side effects, an overview of cumulative drug doses and intensities between eight international trials is presented to characterize therapy needed for cure. A meta-analysis was performed as a comprehensive summary of survival outcomes at 5 and 10 years. For drug dose comparison in non-high risk trial arms, risk group distribution was applied to split the trials into two groups: trial group A with ~70% (range: 63.5-75%) of patients in low risk (LR) (CCLSG ALL2004, CoALL 07-03, NOPHO ALL2008, UKALL2003) and trial group B with ~45% (range: 38.7-52.7%) in LR (AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000, ALL-IC BFM ALL 2002, DCOG ALL10, JACLS ALL-02). Meta-analysis did not show evidence of heterogeneity between studies in trial group A LR and medium risk (MR) despite differences in treatment intensity. Statistical heterogeneity was present in trial group B LR and MR. Trials using higher cumulative dose and intensity of asparaginase and pulses of glucocorticoids and vincristine showed better 5-year event-free survival but similar overall survival. Based on similar outcomes between trials despite differences in therapy intensity, future trials should investigate, to what extent de-escalation is feasible for ETV6::RUNX1 ALL.

Differential impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcomes of children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Asparaginase is essential for treating T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Despite the ongoing debate on whether T-ALL and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are the same disease entity or two distinct diseases, patients with T-LBL often receive the same or similar treatment protocols as those with T-ALL.

METHODS

The outcomes of patients with or without L-asparaginase discontinuation were retrospectively analyzed among four national protocols: Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study (JACLS) ALL-02 and ALL-97 for T-ALL and Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group ALB-NHL03 and JACLS NHL-98 for T-LBL. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with the Cox regression model by considering L-asparaginase discontinuation as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

In total, 199 patients with T-ALL, and 133 patients with T-LBL were included. L-asparaginase discontinuation compromised event-free survival (EFS) of T-ALL patients (ALL-02: HR 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-7.90; ALL-97: HR 3.39, 95%CI 1.19-9.67). Conversely, EFS compromise was not detected among T-LBL patients (ALB-NHL03: HR 1.39, 95%CI 0.41-4.68; NHL-98: HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.11-7.60).

CONCLUSION

The effects of L-asparaginase discontinuation differed between T-ALL and T-LBL. We assume that the differential impact results from (1) the inherent differential response to L-asparaginase between them and/or (2) a less stringent assessment of early treatment response in T-LBL than in T-ALL. Given the poor salvage rate of refractory or relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL, optimization of the frontline therapy is critical, and the current study provides a new suggestion for further treatment modifications. However, larger studies in contemporary intensified treatment protocols are required.

Continuous PEGasparaginase Dosing Reduces Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric ALL: A Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL11 Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this randomized study was to determine whether a continuous dosing schedule (without the asparaginase-free interval) would result in less hypersensitivity reactions to PEGasparaginase (PEGasp) compared with the standard noncontinuous dosing schedule.

METHODS

Eight hundred eighteen patients (age 1-18 years) with ALL were enrolled in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group-ALL11 protocol and received PEGasp. Three hundred twelve patients stratified in the medium-risk arm were randomly assigned to receive 14 individualized PEGasp doses once every two weeks in either a noncontinuous or continuous schedule after the first three doses in induction (EudraCT: 2012-000067-25). Hypersensitivity reactions were defined as allergies, allergic-like reactions, and silent inactivation. Secondary end points were other asparaginase-related toxicities, asparaginase activity and antibody levels, and outcome.

RESULTS

During induction, 27 of 818 patients (3.3%) experienced hypersensitivity reactions. After random assignment, 4 of 155 (2.6%) in the continuous treatment arm versus 17 of 157 (10.8%) patients in the noncontinuous treatment arm had hypersensitivity reactions (P < .01), of which two (1.3%) versus 13 (8.3%) were inactivating reactions (P < .01). The occurrence of inactivating hypersensitivity reactions was seven times lower in the continuous arm (odds ratio, 0.15 [0.032-0.653]). In addition, antibody levels were significantly lower in the continuous arm (P < .01). With exception of a lower incidence of increased amylase in the continuous arm, there were no significant differences in total number of asparaginase-associated toxicities between arms. However, the timing of the toxicities was associated with the timing of the asparaginase administrations. No difference in 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, death, or disease-free survival was found between both treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

A continuous dosing schedule of PEGasp is an effective approach to prevent antibody formation and inactivating hypersensitivity reactions. The continuous PEGasp schedule did not increase toxicity and did not affect the efficacy of the therapy.

Increase in peg-asparaginase clearance as a predictor for inactivation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Asparaginase is an essential component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, yet its associated toxicities often lead to treatment discontinuation, increasing the risk of relapse. Hypersensitivity reactions include clinical allergies, silent inactivation, or allergy-like responses. We hypothesized that even moderate increases in asparaginase clearance are related to later inactivation. We therefore explored mandatory monitoring of asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) in patients with ALL aged 1-45 years treated according to the ALLTogether pilot protocol in the Nordic and Baltic countries to relate mean AEA to inactivation, to build a pharmacokinetic model to better characterize the pharmacokinetics of peg-asparaginase and assess whether an increased clearance relates to subsequent inactivation. The study analyzed 1631 real-time AEA samples from 253 patients, identifying inactivation in 18.2% of the patients. This inactivation presented as mild allergy (28.3%), severe allergy (50.0%), or silent inactivation (21.7%). A pharmacokinetic transit compartment model was used to describe AEA-time profiles, revealing that 93% of patients with inactivation exhibited prior increased clearance, whereas 86% of patients without hypersensitivity maintained stable clearance throughout asparaginase treatment. These findings enable prediction of inactivation and options for either dose increments or a shift to alternative asparaginase formulations to optimize ALL treatment strategies.

Pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in Infants with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

PEGasparaginase is known to be a critical drug for treating pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), however, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal dose for infants who are less than one year of age at diagnosis. This international study was conducted to identify the pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in infants with newly diagnosed ALL and gather insight into the clearance and dosing of this population.

METHODS

Infants with ALL who received treatment with PEGasparaginase were included in our population pharmacokinetic assessment employing non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM).

RESULTS

68 infants with ALL, with a total of 388 asparaginase activity samples, were included. PEGasparaginase doses ranging from 400 to 3,663 IU/m2 were administered either intravenously or intramuscularly. A one-compartment model with time-dependent clearance, modeled using a transit model, provided the best fit to the data. Body weight was significantly correlated with clearance and volume of distribution. The final model estimated a half-life of 11.7 days just after administration, which decreased to 1.8 days 14 days after administration. Clearance was 19.5% lower during the post-induction treatment phase compared to induction.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of PEGasparaginase in infants diagnosed under one year of age with ALL is comparable to that of older children (1-18 years). We recommend a PEGasparaginase dosing at 1,500 IU/m2 for infants without dose adaptations according to age, and implementing therapeutic drug monitoring as standard practice.

Desensitization using pegaspargase in the era of commercially available Erwinia: A single-institution report on efficacy, cost, and resource utilization

BACKGROUND

Pegaspargase is a therapeutic enzyme that is utilized in treatment regimens targeting pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, many patients experience hypersensitivity reactions, requiring discontinuation of the therapy. Historically, this necessitated switching to an alternative form of the drug, most commonly asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi; however, in recent years this was difficult due to drug shortages and eventually commercial discontinuation. We report here our experience performing pegaspargase desensitizations in patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions.

PROCEDURE

Patients with a clinical hypersensitivity reaction to pegaspargase were identified. When due for their next dose, patients were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, bone marrow transplant unit, or oncology unit, and underwent desensitization utilizing a rigorous premedication and multistep dilution-based protocol. Serum asparaginase activity levels were drawn after desensitization to assess for therapeutic levels of enzyme activity.

RESULTS

We identified 11 patients who underwent a total of 33 desensitizations to pegaspargase and calaspargase pegol-mknl. No patients experienced clinically significant hypersensitivity reactions necessitating stopping the infusion, nor administration of rescue medications. All serum asparaginase activity levels collected demonstrated enzyme activity levels above predefined therapeutic thresholds. Cost analysis revealed substantial savings when patients received asparaginase desensitization over the now commercially available asparaginase E. chrysanthemi (recombinant) rywn.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing desensitization to pegaspargase in the pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia population is feasible, safe, and effective. It is financially advantageous over available alternative approaches, and requires fewer injections and presentations to care.

Treatment completion, asparaginase completion, and oncologic outcomes among children, adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with DFCI Consortium Protocols

Adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) face worse outcomes than children. While pediatric-inspired protocols have improved outcomes, the ability of patients to complete these intensive regimens and the reasons for discontinuation are unknown. We analyzed a cohort of 332 AYA patients (aged 15-49 years) and 1159 children (aged 1-14 years) with Ph-negative ALL treated on DFCI consortium protocols. We found that AYA patients completed treatment at lower rates than children (60.8% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001), primarily due to higher rates of early treatment failure (14.5% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001). Withdrawal from treatment for toxicity, social/personal, or unknown reasons was uncommon, but higher among AYA patients (9.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.001). Patients who remained on assigned therapy for one year had favorable overall survival (AYA 5-year OS 88.9%; children 5-year OS 96.4%; p < 0.001). Among patients who continued treatment for 1 year, AYA patients completed asparaginase (defined as receiving 26+ weeks) at lower rates than children (79.1% vs. 89.6%, p < 0.001). Patients who received more weeks of consolidation asparaginase had higher overall and event-free survival. Efforts should focus on identifying patients at risk for early treatment failure and optimizing asparaginase delivery.

Advancing Diagnostics and Therapy to Reach Universal Cure in Childhood ALL

Systemic combination chemotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy markedly increased the survival rate of children with ALL. In the past two decades, the use of minimal (measurable) residual disease (MRD) measurements early in therapy improved risk group stratification with subsequent treatment intensifications for patients at high risk of relapse, and enabled a reduction of treatment for low-risk patients. The recent development of more sensitive MRD technologies may further affect risk stratification. Molecular genetic profiling has led to the discovery of many new subtypes and their driver genetic alterations. This increased our understanding of the biological basis of ALL, improved risk classification, and enabled implementation of precision medicine. In the past decade, immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and cellular therapies directed against surface proteins, led to more effective and less toxic therapies, replacing intensive chemotherapy courses and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed and refractory ALL, and are now being tested in newly diagnosed patients. It has taken 50-60 years to increase the cure rate in childhood ALL from 0% to 90% by stepwise improvements in chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of how the developments over the past 10-15 years mentioned above have significantly changed the diagnostic and treatment approach in ALL, and discusses how the integrated use of molecular and immunotherapeutic insights will very likely direct efforts to cure those children with ALL who are not cured today, and improve the quality of life for survivors who should have decades of life ahead. Future efforts must focus on making effective, yet very expensive, new technologies and therapies available to children with ALL worldwide.

Polymorphisms of inflammation-related genes and susceptibility to childhood leukemia: evidence from a meta-analysis of 16 published studies

OBJECTIVE

This study was to comprehensively clarify the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in inflammatory genes and the susceptibility to childhood leukemia.

METHODS

Eligible articles were collected from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wan Fang. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to estimate the association strength by using the STATA 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were enrolled. These studies mainly evaluated SNPs in 13 genes, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), toll-like receptor (TLR)-4, TLR6, TLR9, CD14, interleukin (IL)-1β, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3, IL-4, interleukin 4 receptor, IL-10, IL-13, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and tumor necrosis factor-α. The meta-analysis indicated that CXCL12 rs1801157 (AG vs GG: OR = 1.99; 95%CI = 1.20-3.30; p = 0.008; AA + AG vs GG: OR = 1.92; 95%CI = 1.18-3.12; p = 0.009), TLR6 rs5743810 (TC vs TT: OR = 0.58; 95%CI = 0.39-0.85; p = 0.005), IL-10 rs1800871 (TC vs CC: OR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.01-1.41; p = 0.044), rs1800872 (AC vs AA: OR = 1.53; 95%CI = 1.22-1.92; p < 0.001) and MIF rs755622 (CG versus GG: OR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.07-1.67; p = 0.012) polymorphisms were associated with the risk of childhood leukemia. No significant correlations were found between SNPs in other genes and the childhood leukemia risk. Subgroup analyses of rs1800871 and rs1800872 confirmed the conclusions obtained in their overall meta-analytical processes.

CONCLUSION

CXCL12 rs1801157, TLR6 rs5743810, IL-10 rs1800871, rs1800872 and MIF rs755622 polymorphisms may represent candidate biomarkers for the risk prediction of childhood leukemia.

Clinical summary of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients complicated with asparaginase-associated pancreatitis in SCCLG-ALL-2016 protocol

Asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP) is a common and fatal complication after ASNase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL). Here, a total of 1063 pediatric ALL patients treated with SCCLG-ALL-2016 regimen were collected since October 2016 to June 2020, including 35 patients with AAP. The clinical characteristics of AAP and non-AAP patients were compared. In AAP patients, the possible factors that affected the recurrence of AAP were analyzed, and the possible risk factors related to ALL-relapse were discussed. The results showed that age was a risk factor (P = .017) that affect the occurrence of AAP. In AAP patients, AAP tended to develop after the second use of PEG-ASNase (25.71%). In the follow-up chemotherapy, 17 patients re-exposed to ASNase and 7 cases developed AAP again with a percentage was 41.2%. There were no special factors that related with the recurrence of AAP. This study also found no association between the occurrence of AAP and prognosis of ALL, with the 4-year incidence of ALL relapse in AAP and non-AAP patients were 15.9% v.s.11.7% (HR: 1.009, 95% CI:0.370-2.752, P = .986), and there were no special factors that related with the ALL relapse among AAP patients. Based on the above results, the occurrence of AAP is related to age and should be vigilant after the second use of PEG-ASNase after use in pediatric ALL patients. Moreover, AAP is not associated with ALL relapse, but there is a high AAP recurrence rate when re-exposure to ASNase.

Impact of body mass index on outcome and treatment-related toxicity in young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Data on outcome for patients in different body mass index (BMI) categories in young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are scarce. We explored survival and toxicities in different BMI categories in young adults with ALL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients aged 18-45 years, diagnosed with ALL between July 2008 and June 2022 in the Nordic countries, Estonia, or Lithuania, and treated according to the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol, were retrospectively enrolled and classified into different BMI categories. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse as well as incidence rate ratio (IRR) of severe predefined toxic events, and treatment delays.

RESULTS

The group comprised 416 patients, of whom 234 (56%) were stratified to non-high-risk (non-HR) treatment. In the non-HR group, patients with severe obesity, BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had worse EFS due to relapses but there was no effect on toxicity or treatment delays compared with the healthy-weight patients. There was no association between BMI category and OS, overall toxicity, or treatment delays in the patients with high-risk treatment.

CONCLUSION

Severe obesity is associated with worse EFS in young adults treated according to the non-HR arms of the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol. Poorer outcome is explained with a higher risk of relapse, possibly due to under treatment, and not caused by excess therapy-related mortality.

Evaluating the Frequencies of CNOT3, GRIA1, NFATC2, and PNPLA3 Variant Alleles and Their Association with L-Asparaginase Hypersensitivity in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Introduction

L-asparaginase is a vital component for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); however, hypersensitivity reactions and hepatotoxicity hinder its anti-neoplastic efficacy. Previous reports indicated that genetic variants in CNOT3, GRIA1, and NFATC2 genes might be associated with hypersensitivity reactions and PNPLA3 with liver function.

Objective

In this study, it was investigated whether this association also exists in a pediatric ALL cohort from Ethiopia.

Methods

Three variants GRIA1 rs4958351, CNOT3 rs73062673, and NFATC2 rs6021191 were genotyped in a cohort of 160 patients. Association analysis to investigate the association with hypersensitivity reactions was performed using logistic regression analyses. Besides these variants, a variant in PNPLA3 (rs738409) was genotyped to assess the association with liver function.

Results

Genotype frequencies of GRIA1 rs4958351, CNOT3 rs73062673, and NFATC2 rs6021191 were higher/lower than previously reported. One hundred and forty-four patients were included in the association analysis of which, 18 (12.5%) developed L-ASP hypersensitivity. Though the frequency of hypersensitivity was higher in patients that carried the risk alleles of the three investigated genes, no statistically significant differences were observed. Association analysis between PNPLA3 rs738409 and liver function could not be investigated due to a lack of clinical information.

Conclusion

In conclusion, none of the tested genes did predict L-asparaginase hypersensitivity in an Ethiopian pediatric ALL patients.

Our Experiences with Asparaginase Activity Measurements in Children with Lymphoblastic Diseases

BACKGROUND

Asparaginase is a key component of chemotherapy protocols for the treatment of lymphoblastic malignancies among children. Adequate asparagine depletion is an important factor to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.

METHODS

Over a 3.5 year period, 106 patients were monitored for asparaginase activity (329 samples) in a single center of the Hungarian Pediatric Oncology-Hematology Group. In Hungary, three asparaginase products are available: native E. coli ASNase (Kidrolase), a pegylated form of this enzyme (Pegaspargase) and another native product from Erwinia chrysanthemi (Erwinase). A retrospective data analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In 81% (268/329) of our patients, AEA levels were in the optimal therapeutic range of over 100 IU/L. Of 106 patients, 13 (12%) were diagnosed with 'silent inactivation'.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of AEA can help to identify patients with 'silent inactivation' and their asparaginase therapy can thus be optimized.

Long-term effects of asparaginase-associated pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is a common and severe toxicity that occurs during asparaginase treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and has received increasing attention during the last decades. However, no consensus regarding follow-up exists. In this commentary, we highlight potential long-term health-related effects following asparaginase-associated pancreatitis, thereby providing clinicians with a framework when following these patients during and after cessation of therapy.

Incidence and Characteristics of Hypersensitivity Reactions to PEG-asparaginase Observed in 6136 Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Enrolled in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 Study Protocol

The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to PEG-asparaginase (PEG-ASNase) was evaluated in 6136 children with ALL enrolled in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 study. Patients with B-cell precursor-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) were stratified as standard-risk/medium-risk (MR)/high-risk (HR) and those with T-ALL as non-High/HR. PEG-ASNase was administered intravenously at 2500 IU/sqm/dose. All patients received 2 PEG-ASNase doses in induction; thereafter non-HR versus HR patients received 1 versus 6 PEG-ASNase doses, respectively. After the single regular dose of PEG-ASNase at the beginning of delayed intensification, BCP-ALL-MR patients were randomized to receive 9 additional PEG-ASNase doses every 2 weeks (experimental arm [EA]) versus none (standard arm [SA]); HR patients were randomized to receive, in consolidation, 4 weekly PEG-ASNase doses (EA) versus none (SA). The HSR cumulative incidence (CI) was estimated adjusting for competing risks. An HSR occurred in 472 of 6136 (7.7%) patients. T-non- HR/BCP-Standard-Risk, BCP-MR-SA, BCP-MR-EA, HR-SA and HR-EA patients had 1-year-CI-HSR (±SE) rates of 5.2% (0.5), 5.2% (0.5), 4.0% (0.8), 20.2% (1.2), and 6.4% (1.3), respectively. The randomized intensification of PEG-ASNase did not significantly impact on HSR incidence in BCP-MR patients (1-y-CI-HSR 3.8% [0.8] versus 3.2% [0.6] in MR-EA versus MR-SA; P = 0.55), while impacted significantly in HR patients (1-y-CI-HSR 6.4% [1.3] versus 17.9% [1.8] in HR-EA and HR-SA, respectively; P < 0.001). The CI-HSR was comparable among non-HR groups and was not increased by a substantial intensification of PEG-ASNase in the BCP-MR-EA group whilst it was markedly higher in HR-SA than in HR-EA patients, suggesting that, in such a chemotherapy context, a continuous exposure to PEG-ASNase reduces the risk of developing an HSR.

PEG-asparaginase treatment regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Asparaginase has played a crucial role in the improvement of survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), which is the commonest cancer among children. Survival rates have steadily increased over decades since the introduction of asparaginase to ALL therapy, and overall survival rates reach 90% with the best contemporary protocols. Currently, polyethylene glycolated native Escherichia coli-derived L-asparaginase (PEG-asparaginase) is the preferred first-line asparaginase preparation. Besides its clinical benefits, PEG-asparaginase is well known for severe toxicities. Agreement on the optimal dose, treatment duration, and frequency of administration has never been reached among clinicians.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To assess the effect of the number of PEG-asparaginase doses on survival and relapse in children and adolescents with ALL. Secondary objectives To assess the association between the number of doses of PEG-asparaginase and asparaginase-associated toxicities (e.g. hypersensitivity, thromboembolism, pancreatitis and osteonecrosis). To undertake a network meta-analysis at dose-level in order to generate rankings of the number of doses of PEG-asparaginase used in the treatment for ALL, according to their benefits (survival and relapse) and harms (toxicity).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases and three trials registers in November 2021, together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different PEG-asparaginase treatment regimens in children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first-line ALL treated with multiagent chemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardised data collection form, two review authors independently screened and selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias for each outcome using a standardised tool (RoB 2.0) and assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. Primary outcomes included overall survival, event-free survival and leukaemic relapse. Secondary outcomes included asparaginase-associated toxicities (hypersensitivity, thromboembolism, pancreatitis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and osteonecrosis as well as overall asparaginase-associated toxicity). We conducted the review and performed the analyses in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs in the review, and identified an additional four ongoing studies. We judged outcomes of two RCTs to be at low risk of bias in all the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2) domains. We rated the remaining study as having some concerns regarding bias. Due to concerns about imprecision, we rated all outcomes as having low- to moderate-certainty evidence.  One study compared intermittent PEG-asparaginase treatment (eight doses of PEG-asparaginase, 1000 IU/m2, intramuscular (IM) administration) versus continuous PEG-asparaginase treatment (15 doses of PEG-asparaginase, 1000 IU/m2, IM) in 625 participants with non-high risk ALL aged 1.0 to 17.9 years. We found that treatment with eight doses probably results in little to no difference in event-free survival compared to treatment with 15 doses (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.06; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared to treatment with 15 doses, treatment with eight doses may result in either no difference or a slight reduction in hypersensitivity (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.93; low-certainty evidence), thromboembolism (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.36; low-certainty evidence) or osteonecrosis (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.32; low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, we found that treatment with eight doses probably reduces pancreatitis (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.75; moderate-certainty evidence) and asparaginase-associated toxicity (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to treatment with 15 doses. One study compared low-risk standard treatment with additional PEG-asparaginase (six doses, 2500 IU/m2, IM) versus low-risk standard treatment (two doses, 2500 IU/m2, IM) in 1857 participants aged one to nine years old with standard low-risk ALL. We found that, compared to treatment with two doses, treatment with six doses probably results in little to no difference in overall survival (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; moderate-certainty evidence) and event-free survival (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.04; moderate-certainty evidence), and may result in either no difference or a slight increase in osteonecrosis (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.00; low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, we found that treatment with six doses probably increases hypersensitivity (RR 12.05, 95% CI 5.27 to 27.58; moderate-certainty evidence), pancreatitis (RR 4.84, 95% CI 2.15 to 10.85; moderate-certainty evidence) and asparaginase-associated toxicity (RR 4.49, 95% CI 3.05 to 6.59; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to treatment with two doses. One trial compared calaspargase (11 doses, 2500 IU/m2, intravenous (IV)) versus PEG-asparaginase (16 doses, 2500 IU/m2, IV) in 239 participants aged one to 21 years with standard- and high-risk ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma. We found that treatment with 11 doses of calaspargase probably results in little to no difference in event-free survival compared to treatment with 16 doses of PEG-asparaginase (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.16; moderate-certainty evidence). However, treatment with 11 doses of calaspargase probably reduces leukaemic relapse compared to treatment with 16 doses of PEG-asparaginase (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.83; moderate-certainty evidence). Furthermore, we found that treatment with 11 doses of calaspargase results in either no difference or a slight reduction in hypersensitivity (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.13; low-certainty evidence), pancreatitis (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.52; low-certainty evidence), thromboembolism (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.42; low-certainty evidence), osteonecrosis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.56; low-certainty evidence) and asparaginase-associated toxicity (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.40; low-certainty evidence) compared to treatment with 16 doses of PEG-asparaginase.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were not able to conduct a network meta-analysis, and could not draw clear conclusions because it was not possible to rank the interventions. Overall, we found that different numbers of doses of PEG-asparaginase probably result in little to no difference in event-free survival across all studies. In two studies, we found that a higher number of PEG-asparaginase doses probably increases pancreatitis and asparaginase-associated toxicities.

Impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia receiving the Japan Association of Childhood Leukaemia Study ALL-02 protocol

Asparaginase is an essential drug for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment, but has several side effects, and its discontinuation often compromises patient outcomes. In the prospective Japan Association of Childhood Leukaemia Study ALL-02 protocol, two major changes were made: (1) additional chemotherapies to compensate for the reduction of treatment intensity when asparaginase was discontinued and (2) more intensive concomitant corticosteroid administration, relative to our previous ALL-97 protocol. In ALL-02 study, 1192 patients were included and L-asparaginase was discontinued for 88 (7.4%). Discontinuation due to allergy was markedly decreased relative to the ALL-97 protocol (2.3% vs 15.4%). Event-free survival (EFS) among patients with T-ALL was compromised when L-asparaginase was discontinued, as well as among patients with high-risk B-cell ALL, especially when discontinued before maintenance therapy. Moreover, multivariate analysis identified discontinuation of L-asparaginase as an independent poor prognostic factor for EFS. In the current study, additional chemotherapies failed to fully compensate for L-asparaginase discontinuation, illustrating the difficulty of replacing asparaginase with other classes of drugs, although this study was not designed to evaluate the effect of these modifications. Concomitant intensive corticosteroid treatment may help to reduce allergy to asparaginase. These results will assist in further optimization of asparaginase use.

Population pharmacokinetics of intramuscular recombinant Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase (JZP458) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

JZP458 is a recombinant Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) who have developed hypersensitivity to Escherichia coli-derived asparaginases. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed for intramuscular (i.m.) JZP458 using serum asparaginase activity (SAA) data from 166 patients with ALL/LBL enrolled in a phase II/III study conducted in collaboration with the Children's Oncology Group (AALL1931; NCT04145531). The pharmacokinetics of i.m. JZP458 is best characterized by a one-compartment model with mixed-order absorption and linear elimination, with body surface area included as an allometric covariate on JZP458 SAA clearance and volume, and race (i.e., Black/African American) and disease subtype (i.e., T-cell ALL) as covariates on JZP458 SAA clearance. The PopPK model was used to simulate SAA profiles to estimate the likelihood of achieving nadir SAA (NSAA) levels greater than or equal to 0.1 IU/mL with different dosing regimens. Model-based simulations suggest when JZP458 is administered i.m. at 25/25/50 mg/m² Monday/Wednesday/Friday (MWF), 92.1% of subjects (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.9%, 93.3%) are expected to achieve the last 72-h (after 50 mg/m² dose) NSAA level greater than or equal to 0.1 IU/mL, and 93.8% (95% CI: 92.7%, 94.9%) are expected to achieve the last 48-h (after 25 mg/m² dose) NSAA level greater than or equal to 0.1 IU/mL. When JZP458 is administered 25 mg/m² i.m. every 48 h, 93.8% (95% CI: 92.7%, 94.8%) are expected to achieve the last 48-h NSAA level greater than or equal to 0.1 IU/mL. These data supported the i.m. dose of 25 mg/m² every 48 h or 25/25/50 mg/m² on a MWF dosing schedule in patients with ALL/LBL.

Asparaginase therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: expert opinion on use and toxicity management

The addition of asparaginase to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treatment regimens provides significant patient benefits. Asparaginase therapies vary in origin (Escherichia coli- or Erwinia-derived) and preparation (native or pegylated), conferring distinct pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles. Clinical hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are commonly reported in patients and range from localized erythema to systemic anaphylaxis. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and reduced immunogenicity compared to native E. coli preparations, pegaspargase is the first-line asparaginase therapeutic option. Switching to an Erwinia-derived asparaginase is recommended for patients who experience HSRs or antibody-mediated inactivation to achieve the significant clinical benefit observed in patients who complete asparaginase treatment. Previous global shortages of asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi necessitated conversion mitigation strategies such as premedication protocols, desensitization, and asparaginase activity level monitoring. Here, we discuss the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, current use, and administration of asparaginase therapies for pediatric and adolescent patients with ALL/LBL.

The impact of early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation in young adults with ALL: a post hoc analysis of the CALGB 10403 study

Asparaginase is a key component of pediatric-inspired regimens in young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Truncation of asparaginase therapy is linked to inferior outcomes in children with ALL. However, a similar correlation in adults is lacking. Here, we studied the prevalence and risk factors associated with pegylated (PEG)-asparaginase discontinuation in young adults with ALL treated on the US intergroup Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 10403 study and examined the prognostic impact of early discontinuation (ED) (defined as <4 of 5 or 6 planned doses) on survival outcomes. The analysis included 176 patients who achieved complete remission and initiated the delayed intensification (DI) cycle. The median number of PEG-asparaginase doses administered before DI was 5 (range, 1-6), with 57 (32%) patients with ED. The ED patients were older (median, 26 vs 23 years; P = .023). Survival was apparently lower for ED patients compared with those receiving ≥4 doses, but this finding was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.43; P = .06), with corresponding 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 66% and 80%, respectively. In patients with standard-risk ALL, the ED of PEG-asparaginase adversely influenced OS (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02-5.22; P = .04) with a trend toward inferior event-free survival (EFS) (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.92-3.67; P = .08). In contrast, there was no impact of early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation on OS (P = .64) or EFS (P = .32) in patients with high-risk disease based on the presence of high-risk cytogenetics, Ph-like genotype, and/or high white blood cell count at presentation. In conclusion, early PEG-asparaginase discontinuation is common in young adults with ALL and may adversely impact survival of patients with standard-risk ALL.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Asparaginase-Understanding and Overcoming Toxicities in Adults with ALL

The adoption of pediatric-inspired regimens in young adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved their survival outcomes. Pediatric-inspired regimens in ALL rely profoundly on delivering adequate dosing of non-myelosuppressive drugs of which asparaginase, a bacterial derived agent, is a key component. Asparaginase therapy is associated with a spectrum of unique toxicities that are observed more frequently in adult patients compared to children with ALL, and this observation has contributed to the reluctance of adult oncologists to administer the drug to their patients. Understanding the breadth of asparaginase toxicity and the associated risk factors may help in preventing severe manifestations and allow safer treatment for adults with ALL. In this review, we will discuss the different formulations of asparaginase and the appropriate dosing in adults with ALL. We will further discuss the frequency and risk factors for individual toxicities of asparaginase along with strategies for their prevention and management.

Depletion of d- and l-asparagine in cerebrospinal fluid in acute lymphoblastic leukemia during PEGasparaginase therapy

BACKGROUND

l-Asparaginase hydrolyzes l-asparagine and not its enantiomer d-asparagine. Unlike l-asparagine, d-asparagine is nonessential for the survival of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells. Studies showed that serum asparagine is depleted below 0.5 μM in ≥96% of the patients during pegylated Escherichia coli l-asparaginase (PEGasparaginase) treatment; however, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) asparagine levels are depleted in only 20%-30% of the patients. Thus far, studies only reported the total CSF asparagine (sum of d- and l-asparagine) concentrations. Data on the pharmacological goal, which is l-asparagine depletion, are lacking.

METHOD

Therefore, we studied this in 30 patients (95 samples) with newly diagnosed ALL. They received two doses of PEGasparaginase on day 4 and 18 in induction.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 5.7 years (range 1.5-17.1 years). d-Asparagine and l-asparagine concentrations (median (range)) before PEGasparaginase treatment were 0.038 (0.0-0.103) μM and 6.1 (1.82-11.5) μM, respectively. CSF l-asparagine concentrations were reduced by 85% (76%-100%) and approximately one-third of the patients (32%) had CSF l-asparagine depletion below 0.5 μM 11 days after the second PEGasparaginase dose administration. CSF d-asparagine and l-glutamine levels remained stable before and after administration of PEGasparaginase. The percentage of d-asparagine as a fraction of total asparagine (sum of d- and l-asparagine) was 0.62% before and 4.5% after PEGasparaginase treatment. No correlation was found between higher serum PEGasparaginase activity and CSF l-asparagine concentration.

CONCLUSION

l-Asparagine is not a better parameter than total asparagine in CSF due to the negligible amount of d-asparagine in the CSF before and after PEGasparaginase treatment.

Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis and asparaginase re‐exposure in patients aged 1–45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: A NOPHO ALL2008 study

Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) is a serious complication during asparaginase therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). We identified 46 patients with CSVT among 2651 patients (1‒45 years) treated according to the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 protocol between 2008 and 2018. CSVT cases were prospectively registered in the NOPHO database with retrospective updates. We examined the frequency of asparaginase re‐exposure after CSVT, potential factors associated with asparaginase truncation, and sequelae after CSVT. This work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation. The 2.5‐year cumulative incidence of CSVT was 1.9% (95% confidence interval 1.4%–2.5%). The majority of patients (74%, n = 31) were re‐exposed to asparaginase (with low‐molecular‐weight heparin coverage), one of whom had a second CSVT, without neurological sequelae. Patients re‐exposed to asparaginase were earlier in ALL treatment and lacked more asparaginase doses than non‐re‐exposed patients at CSVT diagnosis (median 50 vs. 81 days, p = 0.03; mean 11.2 vs. 8.4 asparaginase doses, p = 0.04). No other examined factors had an impact on asparaginase re‐exposure. At the last follow‐up (median 4.5 years after CSVT), 61% of patients had normal neurological status, and 57% had complete recanalisation of CSVT, with no significant difference between patients re‐exposed and non‐re‐exposed to asparaginase. Our results indicate that re‐exposure to asparaginase is safe after CSVT during anticoagulation.

Dietary regulation in health and disease

Nutriments have been deemed to impact all physiopathologic processes. Recent evidences in molecular medicine and clinical trials have demonstrated that adequate nutrition treatments are the golden criterion for extending healthspan and delaying ageing in various species such as yeast, drosophila, rodent, primate and human. It emerges to develop the precision-nutrition therapeutics to slow age-related biological processes and treat diverse diseases. However, the nutritive advantages frequently diversify among individuals as well as organs and tissues, which brings challenges in this field. In this review, we summarize the different forms of dietary interventions extensively prescribed for healthspan improvement and disease treatment in pre-clinical or clinical. We discuss the nutrient-mediated mechanisms including metabolic regulators, nutritive metabolism pathways, epigenetic mechanisms and circadian clocks. Comparably, we describe diet-responsive effectors by which dietary interventions influence the endocrinic, immunological, microbial and neural states responsible for improving health and preventing multiple diseases in humans. Furthermore, we expatiate diverse patterns of dietotheroapies, including different fasting, calorie-restricted diet, ketogenic diet, high-fibre diet, plants-based diet, protein restriction diet or diet with specific reduction in amino acids or microelements, potentially affecting the health and morbid states. Altogether, we emphasize the profound nutritional therapy, and highlight the crosstalk among explored mechanisms and critical factors to develop individualized therapeutic approaches and predictors.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults in Malawi

There are limited data on treatment and outcomes for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) among adolescents and young adults in sub-Saharan Africa. We describe a prospective observational cohort in Malawi.

Can Machine Learning Models Predict Asparaginase-associated Pancreatitis in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP) frequently affects children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) causing severe acute and persisting complications. Known risk factors such as asparaginase dosing, older age and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have insufficient odds ratios to allow personalized asparaginase therapy. In this study, we explored machine learning strategies for prediction of individual AAP risk. We integrated information on age, sex, and SNPs based on Illumina Omni2.5exome-8 arrays of patients with childhood ALL (N=1564, 244 with AAP 1.0 to 17.9 yo) from 10 international ALL consortia into machine learning models including regression, random forest, AdaBoost and artificial neural networks. A model with only age and sex had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.62. Inclusion of 6 pancreatitis candidate gene SNPs or 4 validated pancreatitis SNPs boosted ROC-AUC somewhat (0.67) while 30 SNPs, identified through our AAP genome-wide association study cohort, boosted performance (0.80). Most predictive features included rs10273639 (PRSS1-PRSS2), rs10436957 (CTRC), rs13228878 (PRSS1/PRSS2), rs1505495 (GALNTL6), rs4655107 (EPHB2) and age (1 to 7 y). Second AAP following asparaginase re-exposure was predicted with ROC-AUC: 0.65. The machine learning models assist individual-level risk assessment of AAP for future prevention trials, and may legitimize asparaginase re-exposure when AAP risk is predicted to be low.

Activity and toxicity of intramuscular 1000 iu/m2 polyethylene glycol-E. coli L-asparaginase in the UKALL 2003 and UKALL 2011 clinical trials

In successive UK clinical trials (UKALL 2003, UKALL 2011) for paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), polyethylene glycol‐conjugated E. coli L‐asparaginase (PEG‐EcASNase) 1000 iu/m² was administered intramuscularly with risk‐stratified treatment. In induction, patients received two PEG‐EcASNase doses, 14 days apart. Post‐induction, non‐high‐risk patients (Regimens A, B) received 1–2 doses in delayed intensification (DI) while high‐risk Regimen C patients received 6–10 PEG‐EcASNase doses, including two in DI. Trial substudies monitored asparaginase (ASNase) activity, ASNase‐related toxicity and ASNase‐associated antibodies (total, 1112 patients). Median (interquartile range) trough plasma ASNase activity (14 ± 2 days post dose) following first and second induction doses and first DI dose was respectively 217 iu/l (144–307 iu/l), 265 iu/l (165–401 iu/l) and 292 iu/l (194–386 iu/l); 15% (138/910) samples showed subthreshold ASNase activity (<100 iu/l) at any trough time point. Older age was associated with lower (regression coefficient −9.5; p < 0.0001) and DI time point with higher ASNase activity (regression coefficient 29.9; p < 0.0001). Clinical hypersensitivity was observed in 3.8% (UKALL 2003) and 6% (UKALL 2011) of patients, and in 90% or more in Regimen C. A 7% (10/149) silent inactivation rate was observed in UKALL 2003. PEG‐EcASNase schedule in UKALL paediatric trials is associated with low toxicity but wide interpatient variability. Therapeutic drug monitoring potentially permits optimisation through individualised asparaginase dosing.

Asparaginase encapsulated in erythrocytes as second-line treatment in hypersensitive patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Asparaginase is essential in treating acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Asparaginase-related hypersensitivity causes treatment discontinuation, which is associated with decreased event-free survival. To continue asparaginase treatment after hypersensitivity, a formulation of asparaginase encapsulated in erythrocytes (eryaspase) was developed. In NOR-GRASPALL 2016 (NCT03267030) the safety and efficacy of eryaspase was evaluated in 55 patients (aged 1-45 years; median: 6.1 years) with non-high-risk ALL and hypersensitivity to asparaginase conjugated with polyethylene glycol (PEG-asparaginase). Eryaspase (150 u/kg) was scheduled to complete the intended course of asparaginase (1-7 doses) in two Nordic/Baltic treatment protocols. Forty-nine (96.1%) patients had asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) ≥100 iu/l 14 ± 2 days after the first eryaspase infusion [median AEA 511 iu/l; interquartile range (IQR), 291-780], whereas six of nine (66.7%) patients had AEA ≥100 iu/l 14 ± 2 days after the fourth infusion (median AEA 932 iu/l; IQR, 496-163). The mean terminal half-life of eryaspase following the first infusion was 15.3 ± 15.5 days. Few asparaginase-related adverse events were reported; five patients (9.1%) developed clinical allergy associated with enzyme inactivation. Replacement therapy was successfully completed in 50 patients (90.9%). Eryaspase was well tolerated, and most patients had AEA levels above the therapeutic target after the first infusion. The half-life of eryaspase confirmed that a 2-week schedule is appropriate.

Novel Insights on the Use of L-Asparaginase as an Efficient and Safe Anti-Cancer Therapy

Simple Summary

L-asparaginase (L-ASNase) therapy is key for achieving the very high cure rate of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet its use is mostly confined to this indication. One main reason preventing the expansion of today’s FDA-approved L-ASNases to solid cancers is their high toxicity and side effects, which become especially challenging in adult patients. The design of optimized L-ASNase molecules provides opportunities to overcome these unwanted toxicities. An additional challenge to broader application of L-ASNases is how cells can counter the pharmacological effect of this drug and the identification of L-ASNases resistance mechanisms. In this review, we discuss recent insights into L-ASNase adverse effects, resistance mechanisms, and how novel L-ASNase variants and drug combinations can expand its clinical applicability, with a focus on both hematological and solid tumors.

Abstract

L-Asparaginase (L-ASNase) is an enzyme that hydrolyses the amino acid asparagine into aspartic acid and ammonia. Systemic administration of bacterial L-ASNase is successfully used to lower the bioavailability of this non-essential amino acid and to eradicate rapidly proliferating cancer cells with a high demand for exogenous asparagine. Currently, it is a cornerstone drug in the treatment of the most common pediatric cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Since these lymphoblasts lack the expression of asparagine synthetase (ASNS), these cells depend on the uptake of extracellular asparagine for survival. Interestingly, recent reports have illustrated that L-ASNase may also have clinical potential for the treatment of other aggressive subtypes of hematological or solid cancers. However, immunogenic and other severe adverse side effects limit optimal clinical use and often lead to treatment discontinuation. The design of optimized and novel L-ASNase formulations provides opportunities to overcome these limitations. In addition, identification of multiple L-ASNase resistance mechanisms, including ASNS promoter reactivation and desensitization, has fueled research into promising novel drug combinations to overcome chemoresistance. In this review, we discuss recent insights into L-ASNase adverse effects, resistance both in hematological and solid tumors, and how novel L-ASNase variants and drug combinations can expand its clinical applicability.

L-asparaginase mediated therapy in L-asparagine auxotrophic cancers: A review

Microbial L-asparaginase is the most effective first-line therapeutic used in the treatment protocols of paediatric and adult leukemia. Leukemic cell's auxotrophy for L-asparagine is exploited as a therapeutic strategy to mediate cell death through metabolic blockade of L-asparagine using L-asparaginase. Escherichia coli and Erwinia chrysanthemi serve as the major enzyme deriving sources accepted in clinical practise and the enzyme has bestowed improvements in patient outcomes over the last 40 years. However, an array of side effects generated by the native enzymes due to glutamine co-catalysis and short serum stays augmenting frequent dosages, intended a therapeutic switch towards the development of biobetter alternatives for the enzyme including the formulations resulting in sustained local depletion of L-asparagine. In addition, the treatment with L-asparaginase in few cancer types has proven to elicit drug-induced cytoprotective autophagy mechanisms and therefore warrants concern. Although the off-target glutamine hydrolysis has been viewed in contributing the drug-induced secondary responses in cells deficient with asparagine synthetase machinery, the beneficial role of glutaminase-asparaginase in proliferative regulation of asparagine prototrophic cells has been looked forward. The current review provides an overview on the enzyme's clinical applications in leukemia and possible therapeutic implications in other solid tumours, recent advancements in drug formulations, and discusses the aspects of two-sided roles of glutaminase-asparaginases and drug-induced cytoprotective autophagy mechanisms.

Impact of Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol on the Pharmacokinetics of PEGylated Asparaginase in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: A Population Pharmacokinetic Approach

Background and Objectives

Besides allergic reactions, antibodies against polyethylene glycol (PEG) have been associated with reduced PEG-asparaginase (PEG-ASNase) activity. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) allow for an in-depth investigation of the influence of anti-PEG antibodies on PEG-ASNase pharmacokinetics.

Methods

PEG-ASNase activity (6261 samples) and anti-PEG antibodies (2082/6412 samples prior to/post administration) in 1444 children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 trial were evaluated. Patients received two doses of PEG-ASNase during induction (2500 U/m², intravenous, biweekly) and a third dose during reinduction treatment. Anti-PEG IgG and IgM measured prior to and post administration were explored for their influence on the initial clearance of PEG-ASNase using a previously established popPK model. Categorical and continuous antibody data, including each isotype individually as well as in combination, were assessed.

Results

High pre-existing levels of anti-PEG antibodies increase the initial drug clearance. Analysed separately, both anti-PEG IgG_prior and IgM_prior were significant covariates; the stronger effect was observed for anti-PEG IgM_prior. Hockey stick models best described the data. For anti-PEG IgM_prior, each additional log unit above the estimated cut point was related to a 41.4% increase in initial clearance after the first dose in induction. Antibody levels below the cut point were not associated with an effect on clearance. The combination of both isotypes did not provide additional information compared to anti-PEG IgM_prior alone. Antibody levels post administration were not associated with an effect on clearance.

Conclusion

Pre-existing antibodies against PEG-ASNase significantly increased the initial clearance in a subgroup of patients showing high antibody levels. (Trial registration: EU clinical trials register; EudraCT No: 2007-004270-43; first registered 23 October 2009.)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13318-021-00741-w.

Obesity as a predictor of treatment-related toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Obesity is associated with poor outcomes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). We explored whether severe treatment-related toxicity and treatment delays could explain this observation. This study included 1 443 children aged 2·0-17·9 years with ALL treated with the Nordic Society of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 non-high-risk protocol. Prospective treatment-related toxicities registered every three-month interval were used. Patients were classified according to sex- and age-adjusted international childhood cut-off values, corresponding to adult body mass index: underweight, <17 kg/m² ; healthy weight, 17 to <25 kg/m² ; overweight, 25 to <30 kg/m² ; and obese, ≥30 kg/m² . Obese children had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for severe toxic events {IRR: 1·55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·07-2·50]}, liver and kidney failures, bleeding, abdominal complication, suspected unexpected severe adverse reactions and hyperlipidaemia compared with healthy-weight children. Obese children aged ≥10 years had increased IRRs for asparaginase-related toxicities compared with healthy-weight older children: thromboses [IRR 2·87 (95% CI 1·00-8·21)] and anaphylactic reactions [IRR 7·95 (95% CI 2·15-29·37)] as well as higher risk for truncation of asparaginase [IRR 3·54 (95% CI 1·67-7·50)]. The high prevalence of toxicity and a higher risk of truncation of asparaginase may play a role in the poor prognosis of obese children aged ≥10 years with ALL.

Asparaginase Enzyme Activity Levels and Toxicity in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: a NOPHO ALL2008 study

Overall asparaginase-associated toxicity and relapse were not significantly associated with increased asparaginase enzyme activity levels.

The risk of pancreatitis and osteonecrosis were significantly associated with increasing asparaginase enzyme activity.

Asparaginase treatment is a mainstay in contemporary treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but substantial asparaginase-related toxicity may lead to jeopardized protocol compliance and compromises survival. We investigated the association between risk of asparaginase-associated toxicities (AspTox) and asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) levels in 1155 children aged 1.0 to 17.9 years, diagnosed with ALL between July 2008 and March 2016, and treated according to the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 protocol. Patients with ≥2 blood samples for AEA measurement drawn 14 ± 2 days after asparaginase administration were included (6944 trough values). AEA was measurable (or >0 IU/L) in 955 patients, whereas 200 patients (17.3%) had asparaginase inactivation and few AspTox recorded. A time-dependent multiple Cox model of time to any first asparaginase-associated toxicity adjusted for sex and age was used. For patients with measurable AEA, we found a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17 per 100 IU/L increase in median AEA (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.41; P = .09). For pancreatitis, thromboembolism, and osteonecrosis, the HRs were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.12-1.75; P = .002), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.70-1.40; P = .96), and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.04-1.77; P = .02) per 100 IU/L increase in median AEA, respectively. No significant decrease in the risk of leukemic relapse was found: HR 0.88 per 100 IU/L increase in AEA (95% CI, 0.66-1.16; P = .35). In conclusion, these results emphasize that overall AspTox and relapse are not associated with AEA levels, yet the risk of pancreatitis and osteonecrosis increases with increasing AEA levels.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Management of Asparaginase Toxicity in Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A wider use of L-asparaginase in the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia has improved cure rates during recent decades and hence led to introduction of pediatric-inspired treatment protocols for adolescents and young adults. In parallel, a range of burdensome, often severe and occasionally life-threatening toxicities have become frequent, including hypersensitivity, hepatotoxicity, hypertriglyceridemia, thromboembolism, pancreatitis, and osteonecrosis. This often leads to truncation of asparaginase therapy, which at least in the pediatric population has been clearly associated with a higher risk of leukemic relapse. Many of the asparaginase induced toxicities are far more common in older patients, but since their relapse rate is still unsatisfactory, the decision to discontinue asparaginase therapy should balance the risk of toxicity with continued asparaginase therapy against the risk of relapse in the individual patient. The underlying mechanisms of most of the asparaginase induced side effects are still unclear. In this review we address the individual toxicities, known risk factors, and their clinical management.