First independent evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Plus performance

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube assays for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in Thai healthcare workers

Detecting latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is important, especially in high-risk populations including healthcare workers (HCWs). QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new version of the interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) to replace the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT). However, data on the use of QFT-Plus for LTBI detection in high TB-burden countries are limited. This study was conducted in a TB-endemic setting in Thailand. HCWs were enrolled in the study and underwent both tests during the annual health screening. The testing results were compared and the concordance was determined. Of 102 HCWs, 11 (10.78%) were positive according to both tests, and 15 (14.71%) were positive according to QFT-Plus. The overall agreement between assays was 96.08%, with Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) at 0.82. All four discordant results occurred with QFT-GIT negative and QFT-Plus positive. The comparison between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus based on each antigen tube (TB1 or TB2) exhibited similar concordance with 99.02% and 95.10% agreement, respectively. The intra-comparison between TB1 and TB2 of QFT-Plus also showed good concordance at 96.08%. Among this group of HCWs, the LTBI prevalence of any positive results in both tests was low. Overall, the study showed good agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (k = 0.82) with a minimal difference, suggesting similar assay performance to that mainly carried out in TB-low incidence countries. The results support the use of QFT-Plus for detecting LTBI in a format similar to QFT-GIT.

Host blood-based biosignatures for subclinical TB and incipient TB: A prospective study of adult TB household contacts in Southern India

A large proportion of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden is asymptomatic and not detectable by symptom-based screening, driving the TB epidemic through continued M. tuberculosis transmission. Currently, no validated tools exist to diagnose incipient and subclinical TB. Nested within a large prospective study in household contacts of pulmonary TB cases in Southern India, we assessed 35 incipient TB and 12 subclinical TB cases, along with corresponding household active TB cases (n=11), and household controls (n=39) using high throughput methods for transcriptional and protein profiling. We split the data into training and test sets and applied a support vector machine classifier followed by a Lasso regression model to identify signatures. The Lasso regression model identified an 11-gene signature (ABLIM2, C20orf197, CTC-543D15.3, CTD-2503O16.3, HLADRB3, METRNL, RAB11B-AS1, RP4-614C10.2, RNA5SP345, RSU1P1, and UACA) that distinguished subclinical TB from incipient TB with a very good discriminatory power by AUCs in both training and test sets. Further, we identified an 8-protein signature comprising b-FGF, IFNγ, IL1RA, IL7, IL12p70, IL13, PDGF-BB, and VEGF that differentiated subclinical TB from incipient TB with good and moderate discriminatory power by AUCs in the training and test sets, respectively. The identified 11-gene signature discriminated well between the distinct stages of the TB disease spectrum, with very good discriminatory power, suggesting it could be useful for predicting TB progression in household contacts. However, the high discriminatory power could partly be due to over-fitting, and validation in other studies is warranted to confirm the potential of the immune biosignatures for identifying subclinical TB.

Determinants of QuantiFERON Plus-diagnosed tuberculosis infection in adult Ugandan TB contacts: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The tuberculin skin test is commonly used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in resource-limited settings, but its specificity is limited by factors including cross-reactivity with BCG vaccine and environmental mycobacteria. Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) overcome this problem by detecting M. tuberculosis complex-specific responses, but studies to determine risk factors for IGRA-positivity in high TB burden settings are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine factors associated with a positive IGRA by employing the QuantiFERON-TB® Gold-plus (QFT Plus) assay in a cohort of asymptomatic adult TB contacts in Kampala, Uganda. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise logit function was employed to identify independent correlates of QFT Plus-positivity.

RESULTS

Of the 202 participants enrolled, 129/202 (64%) were female, 173/202 (86%) had a BCG scar, and 67/202 (33%) were HIV-infected. Overall, 105/192 (54%, 95% CI 0.48-0.62) participants had a positive QFT Plus result. Increased risk of QFT-Plus positivity was independently associated with casual employment/unemployment vs. non-casual employment (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.18, 95% CI 1.01-4.72), a family vs. non-family relation to the index patient (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.33-6.18), living in the same vs. a different house as the index (aOR 3.05, 95% CI 1.28-7.29), a higher body mass index (BMI) (aOR per additional kg/m2 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.18) and tobacco smoking vs. not (aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.00-8.60). HIV infection was not associated with QFT-Plus positivity (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42-1.96).

CONCLUSION

Interferon Gamma Release Assay positivity in this study population was lower than previously estimated. Tobacco smoking and BMI were determinants of IGRA positivity that were previously unappreciated.

Comparing QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection among highly TB exposed gold miners in South Africa

Background: QuantiFERON-TB-Gold-in-tube (QFT-GIT) is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection. Limited data exists on performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus (QFT-Plus), a next generation of IGRA that includes an additional antigen tube 2 (TB2) while excluding TB7.7 from antigen tube 1 (TB1), to measure TB specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes responses. We compared agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT among highly TB exposed goldminers in South Africa. Methods: We enrolled HIV-negative goldminers in South Africa, aged ≥33 years with no prior history of TB disease or evidence of silicosis. Blood samples were collected for QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. QFT-GIT was considered positive if TB1 tested positive; while QFT-Plus was positive if both or either TB1 or TB2 tested positive, as per manufacturer's recommendations. We compared the agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT using Cohen's Kappa. To assess the specific contribution of CD8+ T-cells, we used TB2-TB1 differential values as an indirect estimate. A cut-off value was set at 0.6. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having TB2-TB1>0.6 difference on QFT-Plus. Results: Of 349 enrolled participants, 304 had QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT results: 205 (68%) were positive on both assays; 83 (27%) were negative on both assays while 16 (5%) had discordant results. Overall, there was 94.7% (288/304) agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (Kappa = 0.87). 214 had positive QFT-Plus result, of whom 202 [94.4%, median interquartile range (IQR): 3.06 (1.31, 7.00)] were positive on TB1 and 205 [95.8%, median (IQR): 3.25 (1.53, 8.02)] were positive on TB2. A TB2-TB1>0.6 difference was observed in 16.4% (35/214), with some evidence of a difference by BMI; 14.9% (7/47), 9.8% (9/92) and 25.3% (19/75) for BMI of 18.5-24.9, 18.5-25 and >30 kg/m 2, respectively (P=0.03). Conclusion: In a population of HIV-negative goldminers, QFT-Plus showed high agreement with QFT-GIT, suggesting similar performance.

Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostic biomarkers in immunocompromised hosts based on cytokine levels in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious health concern globally. QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) is a diagnostic tool for TB detection, and its sensitivity is reduced in immunocompromised hosts with low T lymphocyte counts or abnormal T cell function. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between T cell and cytokine levels in patients with active TB using QFT-Plus. Forty-five patients with active TB were enrolled, and the cytokines in QFT-Plus tube supernatants were quantified using the MAGPIX System. CD4⁺ T cell count negatively correlated with patient age (p < 0.001, r = -0.51). The levels of TB1-responsive interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and IL-2 correlated with CD4⁺ T cell count, whereas the levels of TB2-responsive IL-1Ra and IFN-γ-induced protein 10 correlated with both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell counts. Cytokines that correlated with CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell counts might not be suitable TB diagnostic biomarkers in immunocompromised hosts. Notably, cytokines that did not correlate with the T cell counts, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, might be candidate biomarkers for TB in immunocompromised hosts. Our findings might help improve TB diagnosis, which could enable prompt treatment and minimize poor disease outcomes.

Comparing the performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube among highly TB exposed gold miners in South Africa

Background: QuantiFERON-TB-Gold-in-tube (QFT-GIT) is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection. Limited data exists on performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus (QFT-Plus), a next generation of IGRA that includes an additional antigen tube 2 (TB2) while excluding TB7.7 from antigen tube 1 (TB1), to measure TB specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes responses. We compared the performance of QFT-Plus with QFT-GIT among highly TB exposed goldminers in South Africa. Methods: We enrolled HIV-negative goldminers in South Africa, aged ≥33 years with no prior history of TB disease or evidence of silicosis. Blood samples were collected for QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. QFT-GIT was considered positive if TB1 tested positive; while QFT-Plus was positive if both or either TB1 or TB2 tested positive, as per manufacturer's recommendations. We compared the performance of QFT-Plus with QFT-GIT using Cohen’s Kappa. To assess the specific contribution of CD8+ T-cells, we used TB2−TB1 differential values as an indirect estimate. A cut-off value was set at 0.6. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having TB2-TB1>0.6 difference on QFT-Plus. Results: Of 349 enrolled participants, 304 had QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT results: 205 (68%) were positive on both assays; 83 (27%) were negative on both assays while 16 (5%) had discordant results. Overall, there was 94.7% (288/304) agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (Kappa = 0.87). 214 had positive QFT-Plus result, of whom 202 [94.4%, median interquartile range (IQR): 3.06 (1.31, 7.00)] were positive on TB1 and 205 [95.8%, median (IQR): 3.25 (1.53, 8.02)] were positive on TB2. A TB2-TB1>0.6 difference was observed in 16.4% (35/214), with some evidence of a difference by BMI; 14.9% (7/47), 9.8% (9/92) and 25.3% (19/75) for BMI of 18.5-24.9, 18.5-25 and >30 kg/m2, respectively (P=0.03). Conclusion: In a population of HIV-negative goldminers, QFT-Plus showed high agreement with QFT-GIT, suggesting similar performance.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Assay in Patients With Latent vs. Active Tuberculosis in a Low Incidence Setting: Level of IFN-γ, CD4/CD8 Responses, and Release of IL-2, IP-10, and MIG

Objectives

We analyzed the results of the QuantiFERON Glod Plus assay (QFT) and cytokine patterns associated with active tuberculosis (ATB) among patients with positive QFT.

Methods

A total of 195 patients are QFT-positive, among which 24 had an ATB and 171 had a latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secretion was analyzed relative to interleukin-2 (IL-2), IFN-γ inducible protein or CXCL-10 (IP-10), and monokine induced by IFN-γ or CXCL-9 (MIG) secretion, and then compared between two sets of peptide antigens [tube 1 - cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cell stimulation; tube 2 - CD4+/CD8+ T cell response].

Results

Higher IFN-γ responses were measured in the ATB group (p = 0.0089). The results showed that there was a lower ratio of tube 1/tube 2 IFN-γ concentrations in the ATB group (p = 0.0009), and a median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] difference between the two sets at −0.82 IU/ml (−1.67 to 0.18) vs. −0.07 IU/ml (−0.035 to 0.11, p &lt; 0.0001) in the ATB group compared to the LTBI group, respectively. In addition, patients with low ratios of IL-2/IFN-γ, IP-10/IFN-γ, and MIG/IFN-γ were much more likely to have ATB.

Conclusion

High levels of IFN-γ secretion, preferential IFN-γ response in tube 2, and lower secretion of IL-2, IP-10, and MIG release relative to IFN-γ secretion were more likely observed in subjects with ATB. These features of T cell response may be helpful in low prevalence settings to suspect ATB in patients tested positive for IFN-γ release assays (IGRA).

In-hospital blood collection increases the rate of indeterminate results in interferon-gamma release assays

Background:

The interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (IGRA) has recently been established as a method to evaluate the infection status of tuberculosis instead of the tuberculin skin test. However, indeterminate results can create challenges to interpretation. The IGRA has been available in Japan since 2005, including the recently launched QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-plus) assay.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and predictors of indeterminate results by the QFT-plus test in routine practice.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional study of 1258 patients. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to investigate the clinical factors related to indeterminate results by the QFT-plus.

Results:

Overall, 91.8% of results were found to be conclusive and 8.2% were indeterminate. The QFT-plus indeterminate results were predominantly due to a low level of IFN-γ production by mitogens. Multivariate analysis indicated that an indeterminate result was significantly associated with age, sex, corticosteroid use, autoimmune disease, and inpatient setting.

Conclusion:

Certain types of individuals are at higher risk of an indeterminate IGRA result. The QFT-plus test for hospitalized patients should be avoided as much as possible, and it is better to perform the test for those patients in outpatient settings.

Discordance between TST and QFT-TBGold Plus for Latent Tuberculosis Screening among Under-Five Children: An Interim Analysis

AIM

To analyze the agreement between tuberculin skin test (TST) and fourth-generation QuantiFERON (QFT)-TB Gold Plus [interferon gamma (INF-γ) release assays (IGRA)] for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis among under-five children who are undernourished and/or who have history of contact with active tuberculosis (TB) patients.

METHODS

Children from the age group of 6 months to 5 years (undernourished or tuberculosis household contacts) were screened through anganwadis (government playschools) and TB Health posts from Mumbai, India during September 2019 to January 2021. Both TST and QFT-TB Gold Plus test were carried out to diagnose LTBI.

RESULTS

Out of the total 299, 35 (11.7%) (95% CI 8.1-15.3%) children tested positive by IGRA (QFT-TB Gold Plus) and 68 (22.7%) (95% CI 18.0-27.4%) by TST, suggestive of moderate concordance (κ = 0.483) between both tests. IGRA and TST showed moderate concordance in children <24 months (κ = 0.478). Moreover, 26 (21.1%) children with TB contact had both TST and IGRA positive with moderate concordance (κ = 0.550). A fair concordance (κ = 0.396) was observed between IGRA and TST in undernourished children. Also, 45 (15.0%) children showed discordance of which 39 (13.0%) had positive TST but negative IGRA and 6 (2.0%) had negative TST but positive IGRA.

CONCLUSIONS

The study strongly recommends both TST and QFT-TB Gold Plus test for the diagnosis of LTBI in under-five children. A moderate concordance in children <24 months endorses the reliability of QFT-TB Gold Plus in diagnosing LTBI in this age group. This study highlights the need for screening undernourished children for LTBI to consider repeating IGRA testing for TST positives as per the window period and risk of ongoing exposure.

Frequency and Factors of Indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON-TB Gold PLUS Test Results in Rheumatic Diseases

We compared the results and differences of indeterminate rates between the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold PLUS (QFT-PLUS) tests in patients with rheumatic diseases and analyzed the associated factors. Data of patients with rheumatic diseases who had undergone the QFT-GIT or QFT-PLUS test were used, and information regarding patient demographics, primary diagnosis, laboratory results, and medications was collected. Furthermore, indeterminate result rates of the patient cohort and healthy controls were also compared. A total of 177 (43.4%) and 231 (56.6%) patients had undergone QFT-GIT and QFT-PLUS tests, respectively. Among them, four (2.3%) and seven (3.0%) patients had indeterminate results, which did not differ between the QFT-GIT and QFT-PLUS groups. Indeterminate results were significantly higher among patients with rheumatic diseases than in healthy controls (2.7% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the lymphocyte count (hazard ratio (HR) 0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.997, 1.000; p = 0.012) and albumin level (HR 0.366, 95% CI 0.150, 0.890; p = 0.027) were predictive of indeterminate results. A lymphocyte count of ≤810/mm³ and an albumin level of ≤3.7 mg/dL were capable of discriminating between indeterminate and determinate results. The QFT-GIT and QFT-PLUS tests have comparable diagnostic performances in patients with rheumatic diseases. Decreased lymphocyte and albumin levels contribute to indeterminate results.

Retrospective Performance Analyses of over Two Million U.S. QuantiFERON Blood Sample Results

Both the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests are interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) intended to detect in vitro cell-mediated immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed performance data for both the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus test systems from over 2 million samples. QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT testing was performed as specified in the respective package inserts at 23 Quest Diagnostics sites. Blood specimens were collected from individuals in all 50 states from November 2018 through December 2019. Retrospective analyses compared the proportion of positive, indeterminate, and conversion/reversion results. The overall proportion of QFT-positive results was 7% for both the QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT. The proportion of positive results was highest for QFT-GIT (7.5%) followed by the heparin 1-tube QFT-Plus (7.2%); a lower proportion of positives was observed with the 4-tube (all four QFT tubes were used in blood collection) QFT-Plus (6.0%). The proportions of indeterminate results for the 1-tube (heparin-only tube collection) and 4-tube QFT-Plus methods were less than 1% and 4%, respectively. This study indicates a higher proportion of positive results for M. tuberculosis than data from other studies. Additionally, the proportion of indeterminate QFT results were markedly lower when the sample was transported in one lithium-heparin tube instead of direct inoculation into 4 QFT-Plus tubes at the site of blood collection. IMPORTANCE In this study, we retrospectively analyzed results from both the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus test systems from over 2 million blood specimens. The variables analyzed were (i) QFT positivity rates among various U.S. populations, (ii) indeterminate rates among various types of blood draws and how often an indeterminate result was resolved within 30 days after the initial draw, and (iii) the association of TB1 and TB2 antigen tubes with IGRA reversion and conversion events from serial QFT testing. This is, to our knowledge, the largest QFT study representing patients from an extensive geographic coverage across the United States and U.S. territories.

Evaluation of the Fully Automated Chemiluminescence Analyzer Liaison XL for the Performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Assay in an Area with a Low Incidence of Tuberculosis

Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is considered key in the control of tuberculosis. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test (QFT-Plus), are now widely implemented for the in vitro diagnosis of LTBI. To date, the detection and quantification of IFN-γ has been mostly performed with semiautomated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), but several limitations currently exist. The study aims to evaluate the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzer Liaison XL compared to ELISA for the performance of the QFT-Plus test. Between February and April 2020, 333 heparin blood samples from 323 adult patients were collected at a tertiary teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Overall, the CLIA analyzer Liaison XL performed well for the detection of IFN-γ compared to the ELISA method, demonstrating substantial agreement (κ, 0.872) and great correlation between assays (r, >0.950). CLIA produced significantly higher values of IFN-γ IU per milliliter than the ELISA (P = 0.004 for the TB1 tube and P = 0.010 for the TB2 tube). Many discrepant cases (8/15, 53.3%) corresponded to indeterminate results with ELISA (NIL-corrected mitogen value of <0.5 IU/ml), which, when analyzed with the CLIA analyzer Liaison XL, reverted to interpretable results. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that CLIA presents a greater sensitivity for the identification of LTBI, especially among immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, the analytical variability reported between both ELISA and CLIA methods, especially around the standardized 0.35-IU/ml positivity threshold, suggests the need to refine the interpretative algorithm.

Evaluation of CD8+ response in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus as a marker of recent infection

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is essential for the elimination of TB. Preventive therapy could be limited to those with recent TB contact. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), a new Interferon-γ release assay, includes a new antigen tube (TB2), which elicits CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate CD8⁺ T-cell response as a marker of recent TB infection.

DESIGN

We retrospectively studied 1165 patients who were screened for LTBI. Patients were divided according to history of recent exposure to TB (contact with a confirmed index case in the previous year). CD8⁺ T-cell activity was measured as the difference between QFT-Plus tubes (TB2-TB1) using two cut-offs (>0.35 IU/mL and >0.60 IU/mL).

RESULTS

CD8⁺ T-cell activity was significantly higher in the exposed group for both cut-offs (96 - 13% vs 36 - 5% patients - OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.52 for >0.35 IU/mL and 77 vs 28 patients - OR 1.72 95% CI 1.10-2.70 for >0.60 IU/mL). CD8⁺ T-cell activity also showed an association with positive sputum smear of the index case and higher exposure time.

CONCLUSION

CD8⁺ T-cell activity as measured with TB2-TB1 shows a significant association with recent exposure to TB, especially in patients with higher exposure and may prove to be a useful tool in identifying patients with recent LTBI.

Comparing the performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube among highly TB exposed gold miners in South Africa

Background: QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT) is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection. Limited data exists on performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus (QFT-Plus), a next generation of IGRA that includes an additional antigen tube 2 (TB2) while excluding TB7.7 from antigen tube 1 (TB1), to measure TB specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes responses. We compared the performance of QFT-Plus with QFT-GIT among highly TB exposed goldminers in South Africa. Methods: We enrolled HIV-negative goldminers in South Africa, ≥33 years with no prior history of TB disease or evidence of silicosis. Blood samples were collected for QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. QFT-GIT was considered positive if TB1 tested positive; while QFT-Plus was positive if both or either TB1 or TB2 tested positive, as per manufacturer's recommendations. We compared the performance of QFT-Plus with QFT-GIT using Cohen’s Kappa. To assess the specific contribution of CD8+ T-cells, we used TB2−TB1 differential values as an indirect estimate. A cut-off value was set at 0.6. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having TB2-TB1>0.6 difference on QFT-Plus. Results: Of 349 enrolled participants, 304 had QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT results: 205 (68%) were positive on both assays; 83 (27%) were negative on both assays while 16 (5%) had discordant results. Overall, there was 94.7% (288/304) agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (Kappa = 0.87). 214 had positive QFT-Plus result, of whom 202 [94.4%, median interquartile range (IQR): 3.06 (1.31, 7.00)] were positive on TB1 and 205 [95.8%, median (IQR): 3.25 (1.53, 8.02)] were positive on TB2. A TB2-TB1>0.6 difference was observed in 16.4% (35/214), with some evidence of a difference by BMI; 14.9% (7/47), 9.8% (9/92) and 25.3% (19/75) for BMI of 18.5-24.9, 18.5-25 and >30 kg/m2, respectively (P=0.03). Conclusion: In a population of HIV-negative goldminers, QFT-Plus showed a similar performance to QFT-GIT.

Evaluation of the performance of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold plus test in active tuberculosis patients

The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and the possible factors affecting the sensitivity of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay in culture-positive active TB (Tuberculosis) patients, to investigate the possible causes of negative and indeterminate results in active TB patients, and to compare the QFT-Plus results of active TB patients and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases. The QFT-Plus assay was performed in 46 active TB patients and 64 LTBI. The sensitivity of the test was found as 79.5% in all culture-positive patients, 72.7% in the immunocompromised patients, and 86.4% in the non-immunocompromised patients. Compared to active TB, individuals with LTBI had a lower T-cell response and lower IFN-ɣ concentrations. It was determined that the immunocompromisation reduced the sensitivity of the test and the secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations and increased the indeterminate results in patients with active TB. There was no difference in secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations between M. tuberculosis clones, but higher IFN-ɣ concentrations in patients infected with M. tuberculosis strains compared to patients infected with zoonotic strains. Compared with active TB, response to “only to TB2” was significantly higher in LTBI. In conclusion, it was concluded that TB2 tube increased sensitivity in LTBI but may not contribute to sensitivity in active TB.

CD4 response of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for positive consistency of latent tuberculosis infection in patients on dialysis

A significantly negative reversion in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) test is reported in patients on dialysis, which makes the results unreliable. The CD4 and CD8 responses of the QFT-Gold plus (QFT-Plus) may have better positive consistency, but this needs to be investigated. We enrolled dialysis patients with baseline positive QFT-GIT₀ results and conducted two rounds of follow-up paired QFT-GIT_1&2 and QFT-Plus_1&2 tests at an interval of 6 months. The positive consistency, concordance, and discordance of the QFT results were analyzed. A total of 236 patients on dialysis were screened, and 73 participants with positive QFT-GIT₀ results were enrolled. The baseline QFT-GIT₀ response was higher in the 1st QFT-Plus₁(+) group than in the QFT-Plus₁(-) group, but insignificantly different between the 1st QFT-GIT₁(+) and QFT-GIT₁(-) groups. The two assays had good correlation when concurrently tested. Fifty-three subjects completed a second round of the QFT-GIT₂ and QFT-Plus₂. Persistent positivity was higher with the QFT-Plus₂ (81.8%) than with the QFT-GIT₂ (58.8%, p = 0.040). The QFT-GIT₁ and QFT-Plus₁ CD4 responses were higher in patients with persistent positivity than in those with negative reversion, whereas the difference of the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 data, representative of the CD8 response, were similar between positive persistence and negative reversion. In conclusion, the QFT-Plus provides more reliable positive consistency than does the QFT-GIT. The CD4 interferon-γ response might play a role in maintaining positivity of LTBI.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with Chemiluminescence Immunoassay: Do We Need a Higher Cutoff?

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the most widely used interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The aim of this study was to compare QFT-Plus results by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the SkyLab system with those obtained with chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) on the Liaison XL analyzer. Agreement between the two assays was evaluated on 419 QFT-Plus blood samples and was found to be substantial (75.4%); higher agreement was found for positive (95.4%) and negative (80.4%) results, while most discordances were due to ELISA-indeterminate/CLIA-determinate results. According to Italian Clinical Microbiologist Association recommendations, in samples (n = 79) with a borderline result in ELISA (0.20 to 0.70 IU/ml), CLIA median values statistically increased (from 0.29 to 0.59 IU/ml for TB1 and from 0.32 to 0.60 IU/ml for TB2) but remained in the borderline range. Linear regression analysis indicated a substantial correlation between ELISA and CLIA for antigen tubes TB1 (Pearson's r = 0.8666) and TB2 (Pearson's r = 0.8728), but CLIA produced higher values than ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value in CLIA was 0.45 IU/ml for TB1 and 0.46 IU/ml for TB2. In conclusion, automated QFT-Plus with CLIA is comparable to QFT-Plus performed by ELISA. Within the linearity range of the test, CLIA detects higher quantitative values than ELISA, resulting in a higher number of determinate results and the conversion of samples that were close to the cutoff into positive borderline results. A higher cutoff for QFT-CLIA needs to be defined based on clinical diagnostic criteria.

Interferon gamma release assays for Diagnostic Evaluation of Active tuberculosis (IDEA): test accuracy study and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) are blood tests recommended for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) infection. There is currently uncertainty about the role and clinical utility of IGRAs in the diagnostic workup of suspected active TB in routine NHS clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of T-SPOT.TB ^® (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) and QuantiFERON^® TB GOLD In-Tube (Cellestis, Carnegie, VIC, Australia) for diagnosis of suspected active TB and to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of second-generation IGRAs.

DESIGN

Prospective within-patient comparative diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

Secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (aged ≥ 16 years) presenting as inpatients or outpatients at 12 NHS hospital trusts in London, Slough, Oxford, Leicester and Birmingham with suspected active TB.

INTERVENTIONS

The index tests [T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON GOLD In-Tube (QFT-GIT)] and new enzyme-linked immunospot assays utilising novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens (Rv3615c, Rv2654, Rv3879c and Rv3873) were verified against a composite reference standard applied by a panel of clinical experts blinded to IGRA results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy. A decision tree model was developed to calculate the incremental costs and incremental health utilities [quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] of changing from current practice to using an IGRA as an initial rule-out test.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients had active TB (culture-confirmed and highly probable TB cases), 439 had no active TB and 43 had an indeterminate final diagnosis. Comparing T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT, the sensitivities [95% confidence interval (CI)] were 82.3% (95% CI 77.7% to 85.9%) and 67.3% (95% CI 62.1% to 72.2%), respectively, whereas specificities were 82.6% (95% CI 78.6% to 86.1%) and 80.4% (95% CI 76.1% to 84.1%), respectively. T-SPOT.TB was more sensitive than QFT-GIT (relative sensitivity 1.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.31; p < 0.001), but the specificities were similar (relative specificity 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.08; p = 0.3). For both IGRAs the sensitivity was lower and the specificity was higher for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive than for HIV-negative patients. The most promising novel antigen was Rv3615c. The added value of Rv3615c to T-SPOT.TB was a 9% (95% CI 5% to 12%) relative increase in sensitivity at the expense of specificity, which had a relative decrease of 7% (95% CI 4% to 10%). The use of current IGRA tests for ruling out active TB is unlikely to be considered cost-effective if a QALY was valued at £20,000 or £30,000. For T-SPOT.TB, the probability of being cost-effective for a willingness to pay of £20,000/QALY was 26% and 21%, when patients with indeterminate test results were excluded or included, respectively. In comparison, the QFT-GIT probabilities were 8% and 6%. Although the use of IGRAs is cost saving, the health detriment is large owing to delay in diagnosing active TB, leading to prolonged illness. There was substantial between-patient variation in the tests used in the diagnostic pathway.

LIMITATIONS

The recruitment target for the HIV co-infected population was not achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Although T-SPOT.TB was more sensitive than QFT-GIT for the diagnosis of active TB, the tests are insufficiently sensitive for ruling out active TB in routine clinical practice in the UK. Novel assays offer some promise.

FUTURE WORK

The novel assays require evaluation in distinct clinical settings and in immunosuppressed patient groups.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Fourth-Generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: What Is the Evidence?

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the latest generation of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) to receive approval from the U.S. FDA, replacing its predecessor, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). The novelty of QFT-Plus is that it elicits a response from CD8 T cells, in addition to CD4 T cells, thus collecting a broader response from T-cell subsets than QFT-GIT. It was developed with the aim to improve the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), especially among recently exposed contacts, immunocompromised hosts, and young children. In this minireview, we summarize the performance of QFT-Plus compared with that of QFT-GIT among active tuberculosis (TB) patients (a surrogate for LTBI patients), high-risk populations, and low-risk individuals based on recent publications. Studies comparing QFT-Plus to QFT-GIT currently do not support the superior performance of QFT-Plus in individuals with active TB and LTBI. The difference in sensitivity between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT in active TB patients was not significant in nearly all studies and ranged from -4.0 to 2.0%. Among high-risk groups, the agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was 89.9 to 96.0% (kappa coefficient range, 0.80 to 0.91). The specificity in the low-risk population was slightly lower for QFT-Plus than for QFT-GIT, with the difference ranging from -7.4 to 0%. Further studies are needed to accurately evaluate the sensitivity of QFT-Plus in immunocompromised hosts and children. In addition, further evidence is required to validate a modified interpretation of QFT-Plus for the identification of false-positive results in low-risk health care workers.

Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, and T-SPOT.TB among patients with tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy of the following interferon (IFN)-γ release assays (IGRAs): QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), QFT-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), and T-SPOT. TB (T-SPOT) with the quantitative values of IFN-γ response.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from patients with active tuberculosis (TB), latent TB infection (LTBI), individuals with previous TB infection, and healthy volunteers enrolled between May 2017 and June 2018.

RESULTS

IGRAs results were analyzed in 175 subjects (76 had active TB, 14 had LTBI, 35 had prior TB infection, and 50 were healthy). QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT revealed equal efficacy for IFN-γ values, and the IFN-γ response in QFTs tended to increase with the spot counts in T-SPOT, with similar high sensitivities (approximately 90%) in the active TB group. The test concordance of two of three IGRAs was optimal among all subjects (κ coefficients: 0.82-0.96). Additionally, the median quantitative values of IFN-γ with QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT were higher in the active TB group than in the LTBI and previous TB groups.

CONCLUSION

Three IGRAs showed equivalent efficacy with high sensitivities and higher IFN-γ response in active TB group than that in non-active TB group.

Quantitative IFN-γ Release Assay and Tuberculin Skin Test Results to Predict Incident Tuberculosis. A Prospective Cohort Study

Rationale: Development of diagnostic tools with improved predictive value for tuberculosis (TB) is a global research priority.Objectives: We evaluated whether implementing higher diagnostic thresholds than currently recommended for QuantiFERON Gold-in-Tube (QFT-GIT), T-SPOT.TB, and the tuberculin skin test (TST) might improve prediction of incident TB.Methods: Follow-up of a UK cohort of 9,610 adult TB contacts and recent migrants was extended by relinkage to national TB surveillance records (median follow-up 4.7 yr). Incidence rates and rate ratios, sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values for incident TB were calculated according to ordinal strata for quantitative results of QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, and TST (with adjustment for prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin [BCG] vaccination).Measurements and Main Results: For all tests, incidence rates and rate ratios increased with the magnitude of the test result (P < 0.0001). Over 3 years' follow-up, there was a modest increase in positive predictive value with the higher thresholds (3.0% for QFT-GIT ≥0.35 IU/ml vs. 3.6% for ≥4.00 IU/ml; 3.4% for T-SPOT.TB ≥5 spots vs. 5.0% for ≥50 spots; and 3.1% for BCG-adjusted TST ≥5 mm vs. 4.3% for ≥15 mm). As thresholds increased, sensitivity to detect incident TB waned for all tests (61.0% for QFT-GIT ≥0.35 IU/ml vs. 23.2% for ≥4.00 IU/ml; 65.4% for T-SPOT.TB ≥5 spots vs. 27.2% for ≥50 spots; 69.7% for BCG-adjusted TST ≥5 mm vs. 28.1% for ≥15 mm).Conclusions: Implementation of higher thresholds for QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, and TST modestly increases positive predictive value for incident TB, but markedly reduces sensitivity. Novel biomarkers or validated multivariable risk algorithms are required to improve prediction of incident TB.

Effect of HIV-infection on QuantiFERON-plus accuracy in patients with active tuberculosis and latent infection

OBJECTIVE

HIV-infection increases the risk to progress to active-tuberculosis (TB). Detection of latent TB infection (LTBI) is needed to eventually propose preventive-therapy and reduce TB reservoir. QuantiFERON-TB Plus (QFT-Plus)-test identifies LTBI. Currently, only two studies on QFT-Plus accuracy in HIV-infected-population are available in high TB-endemic-countries. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the effect of HIV-infection on QFT-Plus accuracy to detect LTBI in a low TB-endemic-country.

METHODS

We enrolled 465 participants, among the 167 HIV-infected-persons: 32 with active-TB (HIV-TB), 45 remote-LTBI (HIV-LTBI) and 90 at low M. tuberculosis (Mtb)-infection risk. Among the 298 HIV-uninfected-persons: 170 with active-TB, 76 recent-LTBI, 34 remote-LTBI and 18 with low Mtb-infection risk.

RESULTS

QFT-Plus sensitivity was similar in TB regardless of HIV-status. CD4-count did not influence the distribution of IFN-γ values in HIV-TB and HIV-LTBI. Moreover HIV-LTBI and HIV-uninfected remote LTBI had a similar proportion of results in the uncertain range (IFNγ ≥0.2 ≤ 0.7 IU/ml) differently from those LTBI-persons reporting recent-exposure (p = 0.016). Cytometry results demonstrated that CD8-response was similar in HIV-infected- and -uninfected-persons whereas CD4-response was impaired in HIV-infected-persons (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infection does not affect QFT-Plus response in active-TB, whereas the time of exposure influences the proportion of uncertain-results in LTBI.

Comparison of QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT tests for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in immunocompetent Korean subjects

Background

QFT-Plus is a recently developed next-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test. Unlike the QFT-GIT test, it includes a TB2 antigen tube with peptides that may stimulate CD8+ T cells. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of QFT-Plus and compared it with that of QFT-GIT.

Methods

QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT tests were performed in 33 patients with active tuberculosis (TB) and 57 healthy controls including subjects with latent TB infection (LTBI). Positivity and negativity of IFN-γ responses were compared between tests, and total concordance of the outcome was analyzed.

Results

Positive and negative outcomes of QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT tests showed substantial agreement (91.1%, kappa=0.8). The sensitivity and the specificity of QFT-Plus (93.9% sensitivity, 92.6% specificity) were similar with those of QFT-GIT (93.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Of eight discordant results, five (5.56%) and three (3.3%) were positive in QFT-GIT alone and QFT-plus alone, respectively. Reactivity in the TB2 tube contributes to the difference between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. Median IFN-γ production in TB2 (10.0 IU/mL in TB, 3.850 IU/mL in LTBI, P=0.001) is significantly higher in the TB group than the LTBI group. The QFT-Plus did not clearly discriminate between active TB and latent TB, although it showed significantly lower IFN-γ concentrations compared with the QFT-GIT in individuals with LTBI (3.850 vs. 7.205 IU/mL).

Conclusions

Similar accuracy of detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection was observed for QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT tests in immunocompetent patients and healthy controls, including those with LTBI. Improved efficacy for identifying M. tuberculosis infection was not found with the QFT-Plus, but further studies in a larger population may confirm the clinical significance of positive response in the TB2 tube of QFT-Plus.

Identifying molecularly defined antigens for a Histoplasma capsulatum-specific interferon gamma release assay

BACKGROUND

In a previous work we showed the feasibility of an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) for detecting latent infection by Histoplasma capsulatum. While in that proof-of-concept study we used crude fungal extracts as antigens, the newest IGRAs developed for other infections are based on molecularly defined antigens, mostly on mixtures of immunogenic peptides.

AIMS

To identify proteins in H. capsulatum that might serve as molecularly defined antigens for an IGRA test.

METHODS

We surveyed the literature looking for known H. capsulatum-immunogenic proteins and assayed two of them as antigens in an IGRA test, in a study that involved 80 volunteers. Furthermore, we used several bioinformatics tools to identify specific H. capsulatum proteins and to analyze possible strategies for the design of H. capsulatum-specific immunogenic peptides.

RESULTS

Seven H. capsulatum-immunogenic proteins were retrieved from the literature. IGRA tests using either the heat shock protein 60 or the M antigen showed high sensitivities but low specificities, most likely due to the high sequence similarity with the corresponding orthologs in other pathogenic microorganisms. We identified around 2000 H. capsulatum-specific proteins, most of which remain unannotated. Class II T-cell epitope predictions for a small number of these proteins showed a great variability among different alleles, prompting for a "brute force" approach for peptide design.

CONCLUSIONS

The H. capsulatum genome encodes a large number of distinctive proteins, which represent a valuable source of potential specific antigens for an IGRA test. Among them, the Cfp4 protein stands out as a very attractive candidate.

Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB and tuberculin skin test for detection of latent tuberculosis infection in cancer patients in a developing country

Cancer patients have an increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection. It is unknown which strategy on screening should be used in this population in developing countries. We aimed to determine the concordance between the tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON^®-TB (QFT) assay in order to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection in cancer patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study of the agreement of diagnostic tests. Prevalence and agreement between tests were calculated. A logistic regression to assess predictors of discordance was performed. The accuracy of the TST to predict QFT results by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was evaluated. We included 149 adults with cancer without active tuberculosis. Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection was 21.5% (n=32), defined as positive results on either test. Test agreement was moderate for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (κ=0.43, 90% CI 0.26-0.6). No predictor was associated with the chance of discordant results. Agreement improved slightly using a cut-off point ≥8 mm (κ=0.5, 90% CI 0.35-0.66). In a moderate-incidence setting, a moderate agreement was found between tests in cancer patients. Modification of the cut-off points of test results achieved marginally better agreement between the TST and QFT.

QuantiFERON-TB Performs Better in Children, Including Infants, than in Adults with Active Tuberculosis: a Multicenter Study

Immunological tests, including the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) assay, represent an important aid for diagnosing active tuberculosis (TB) and latent TB infections in children, but concerns about their use in children <5 years of age persist. This is a multicenter retrospective study comparing a population of 226 children to 521 adults with pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB. The aim was to evaluate the QFT-IT performance, analyzing both qualitative and quantitative results, according to age, birthplace, and disease localization. Compared to culture, QFT-IT sensitivity was 93.9%, 100%, and 94.4% in children ≤2, 2 to 5, and 5 to 16 years of age, respectively, and was significantly higher than that in adults (81.0%) (P < 0.0001). The rate of indeterminate test results for children (2.2%) was significantly lower than that for adults (5.2%) (P < 0.0001). In children, QFT-IT sensitivity was not affected by disease localization or birthplace (Italy born versus foreign born). Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) values in response to TB antigen and mitogen were significantly higher in children than in adults (TB antigen, median of 10 versus 1.66 IU IFN-γ/ml; mitogen, median of 10 versus 6.70 IU IFN-γ/ml; P < 0.0001). In summary, this study supports the use of QFT-IT as a complementary test for the diagnosis of pediatric TB even under 2 years of age. Our observations could be applicable to the new version of the test, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, which has recently been shown to have similar sensitivity in active TB, although data in children are still lacking.

QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Estimated 2017 tuberculosis (TB) incidence is 10 million and mainly depends on the reservoir of individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI). Quantiferon^Ⓡ-TB Gold in-Tube (QFT-GIT) is one of the tests used for LTBI detection. Since 2015 a new version, Quantiferon^Ⓡ-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is available.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy for TB of QFT-Plus compared to QFT-GIT.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were used to detect records related to predefined strings from 2015 to 2018. Full text articles dealing with the sensitivity and/or specificity of the QFT-Plus vs. QFT-GIT for active-TB and LTBI detection were analyzed. Scientific quality and risk of bias were assessed using QADAS-2.

RESULTS

We selected 15 articles. Studies were mainly observational and cross-sectional, performed in 8 countries. Sample size differed in the TB group (27 to 164) compared to LTBI group (29 to 1031). Pooled sensitivity of QFT-Plus for active-TB was 0.94 (0.91 and 0.95 for TB1 and TB2, respectively), whereas pooled specificity for healthy status was 0.96. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for LTBI was 0.91 and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that QFT-Plus is more sensitive compared to QFT-GIT for detecting M. tuberculosis infection, mainly due to TB2 responses.

A Model Based on the Combination of IFN-γ, IP-10, Ferritin and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D for Discriminating Latent From Active Tuberculosis in Children

In recent years, pediatric research on tuberculosis (TB) has focused on addressing new biomarkers with the potential to be used as immunological non-sputum-based methods for the diagnosis of TB in children. The aim of this study was to characterize a set of cytokines and a series of individual factors (ferritin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], parasite infections, and nutritional status) to assess different patterns for discriminating between active TB and latent TB infection (LTBI) in children. The levels of 13 cytokines in QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) supernatants were analyzed in 166 children: 74 with active TB, 37 with LTBI, and 55 uninfected controls. All cytokines were quantified using Luminex or ELISA. Ferritin and 25(OH)D were also evaluated using CLIA, and Toxocara canis Ig-G antibodies were detected with a commercial ELISA kit. The combination of IP-10, IFN-γ, ferritin, and 25(OH)D achieved the best diagnostic performance to discriminate between active TB and LTBI cases in children in relation to the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.955 (confidence interval 95%: 0.91–1.00), achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity for the development of a new test (93.2 and 90.0%, respectively). Children with TB showed higher ferritin levels and an inverse correlation between 25(OH)D and IFN-γ levels. The model proposed includes a combination of biomarkers for discriminating between active TB and LTBI in children to improve the accuracy of TB diagnosis in children. This combination of biomarkers might have potential for identifying the onset of primary TB in children.

Discordance between the QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON Gold Plus assays associated with country of birth TB incidence

BACKGROUND

The new QuantiFERON Gold Plus (QFT+) assay is used for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) infection and has 2 phlebotomy methods: direct (QFT + D) and single tube transfer (QFT + T). Little data is available on how the TB incidence in the country of birth (COB) of healthcare workers (HCWs) can impact the assay results.

METHODS

QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QFT-G), QFT + D and QFT + T assays were obtained from a single blood draw and compared for HCWs annually tested for TB infection. HCWs COB was ranked as: high (≥150 per 100,000), medium (20-149), and low TB incidence (<20 TB cases).

RESULTS

In 265 HCWs, QFT-G/+D/+T results from medium TB incidence COB (15.6%, 16.9% and 22.1%) were more likely to be positive than high (9.7%, 11.8% and 16.1%) or low incidence COB (6.3%, 8.4% and 10.5%). Agreement between assay results for high, medium and low TB incidence COB were: 95.7%, 83.1%, and 95.8% between QFT-G/QFT + D (p = 0.003), 91.4%, 88.3% and 95.8% between QFT-G/QFT + T (p = 0.187), and 91.4%, 76.6%, and 91.6% between QFT + D/QFT + T (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Lower agreement and a higher proportion of positivity were found in QFT-G/+D/+T results in individuals from medium TB incidence COB. QFT + may be more sensitive than QFT-G in HCWs from medium TB incidence COB.

Curving Tuberculosis: Current Trends and Future Needs

Tuberculosis (TB) presents new challenges as a global public health problem, especially at a time of increasing threats to some particular patients due to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection and multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The World Health Assembly strives to reduce TB deaths by 95% and to decrease TB incidence by 95% by 2035. However, new approaches are necessary in order to attain these objectives. Such approaches include active ascertainment of cases in high risk populations, increasing the availability of accurate point-of-care testing, rapid detection of drug resistance, novel vaccines, and new prophylaxis and treatment regimens (particularly for MDR and XDR TB). The ultimate objective of those programs is to develop highly effective drug regimens that can achieve high cure rates regardless of strains’ resistance patterns.

Clinical utility of existing and second-generation interferon-γ release assays for diagnostic evaluation of tuberculosis: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear, although they are commonly used in countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by determining the accuracy and utility of commercially available and second-generation IGRAs in the diagnostic assessment of suspected tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting.

METHODS

We did a prospective cohort study of adults with suspected tuberculosis in routine secondary care in England. Patients were tested for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection at baseline with commercially available (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [QFT-GIT]) and second-generation (incorporating novel M tuberculosis antigens) IGRAs and followed up for 6-12 months to establish definitive diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and predictive values of the tests were determined.

FINDINGS

Of the 1060 adults enrolled in the study, 845 were included in the analyses and 363 were diagnosed with tuberculosis. Sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB for all tuberculosis diagnosis, including culture-confirmed and highly probable cases, was 81·4% (95% CI 76·6-85·3), which was higher than QFT-GIT (67·3% [62·0-72·1]). Second-generation IGRAs had a sensitivity of 94·0% (90·0-96·4) for culture-confirmed tuberculosis and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) when including highly probable tuberculosis, giving a negative likelihood ratio for all tuberculosis cases of 0·13 (95% CI 0·10-0·19). Specificity ranged from 86·2% (95% CI 82·3-89·4) for T-SPOT.TB to 80·0% (75·6-83·8) for second-generation IGRAs.

INTERPRETATION

Commercially available IGRAs do not have sufficient accuracy for diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Second-generation tests, however, might have sufficiently high sensitivity, low negative likelihood ratio, and correspondingly high negative predictive value in low-incidence settings to facilitate prompt rule-out of tuberculosis.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research.

Specificity of QuantiFERON-TB Plus, a New-Generation Interferon Gamma Release Assay

Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) are important tools in identifying prior tuberculosis exposure. The new-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay, recently approved for use in the United States, differs from the current-generation QFT Gold-In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay with the addition of a second antigen tube that also contains novel CD8⁺ T-cell-stimulating peptides. The QFT-Plus assay has increased sensitivity in immunocompromised populations, and we sought to assess the specificity of QFT-Plus compared to that of QFT-GIT in low-risk individuals. We enrolled adults without tuberculosis risk factors, including a subgroup with pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) or Mycobacterium abscessus. The primary outcome measures included specificity, interassay concordance, and agreement between the QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT assays. Of 262 participants enrolled, 51 had pulmonary NTM. The median age was 39 years (age range, 18 to 78 years); 73% were female. Among the 262 individuals who were enrolled, 5 (1.9%) individuals had positive QFT-Plus results, and 3 of these individuals also had positive QFT-GIT results. The two individuals with discordant results (QFT-Plus positive/QFT-GIT negative) had only one tube positive in the QFT-Plus assay. The overall specificity of QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.6, 99.4%) and 98.9% (95% CI, 96.7, 99.8%), respectively. The QFT-Plus specificity was similar in both the NTM (98.0% [95% CI, 89.4, 99.9%]) and non-NTM (98.1% [95% CI, 95.2, 99.5%]) groups. QFT-Plus has a high specificity, similar to that of the QFT-GIT assay, including in patients with pulmonary MAC or M. abscessus disease.

Performance and variability of QuantiFERON Gold Plus assay associated with phlebotomy type

Background

QuantiFERON Gold Plus (Plus) assay has two approved methods for blood collection: direct in-tube (Plus direct) or the transfer of blood from a lithium heparin tube (Plus transfer). Currently, there is little data comparing the results of Plus and the QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (Gold) based on blood collection.

Methods

In 2017, high risk healthcare workers undergoing annual tuberculosis infection screening at Houston Methodist Hospital, a private hospital in the Texas Medical Center (Houston, TX, U.S.A.) were consented and enrolled in a study comparing the Gold-in-tube (Gold), Plus direct in-tube, and Plus transfer assays. Blood was drawn concurrently for all 3 assays.

Results

Phlebotomy occurred on 300 consecutive, consented and enrolled participants in the study. The proportion of positive test results for the Gold, Plus direct and Plus transfer assays were 10% (29/300), 12% (35/299) and 17% (51/299), respectively. The agreement in the results of Gold versus Plus direct, Gold versus Plus transfer, and Plus direct versus Plus transfer was 91%, kappa (κ) = 0.56; 91%, κ = 0.59; and 85%, κ = 0.37, respectively.

Conclusions

Among high risk healthcare workers in a low prevalence tuberculosis setting, the Gold Plus assay had a higher proportion of positive results than the Gold in-tube assay. The agreement between the Gold, Plus direct and Plus transfer assays was unexpectedly low for simultaneously obtained samples. Blood transfer using lithium heparin offers individual clinics and public health programs greater ability to customize protocols, but variability of results still exists.

Can we predict tuberculosis cure? What tools are available?

Antibiotic treatment of tuberculosis takes ≥6 months, putting a major burden on patients and health systems in large parts of the world. Treatment beyond 2 months is needed to prevent tuberculosis relapse by clearing remaining, drug-tolerant Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli. However, the majority of patients treated for only 2-3 months will cure without relapse and do not need prolonged treatment. Assays that can identify these patients at an early stage of treatment may significantly help reduce the treatment burden, while a test to identify those patients who will fail treatment may help target host-directed therapies.In this review we summarise the state of the art with regard to discovery of biomarkers that predict relapse-free cure for pulmonary tuberculosis. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanning to measure pulmonary inflammation enhances our understanding of "cure". Several microbiological and immunological markers seem promising; however, they still need a formal validation. In parallel, new research strategies are needed to generate reliable tests.

Effect of therapy on Quantiferon-Plus response in patients with active and latent tuberculosis infection

Lack of biomarkers for treatment monitoring is listed among the main requirements for next generation assays, as identified globally among tuberculosis (TB) researchers. In this study, we evaluated in a low TB endemic country such as Italy, the effect of preventive therapy on the results obtained in the QuantiFERON TB Plus (QFT-Plus), in a cohort of subjects with latent TB infection (LTBI) and active TB. We found that TB therapy significantly decreased IFN-γ values and number of responders to TB1- and TB2- peptides stimulation in both LTBI and active TB patients. Stratifying LTBI subjects according to the type of preventive TB therapy used, we found that INH treatment but not INH and RIF significantly decreased IFN-γ production. Stratifying the active TB patients according the microbiological status, we found that TB therapy significantly decreased IFN-γ response to antigen present in QFT-Plus test in patients with clinical diagnosis compared to those with a microbiological diagnosis. In conclusions, we demonstrated that TB therapy decreases IFN-γ level in response to antigen present in QFT-Plus test in LTBI and active TB patients. Future studies are needed to better characterize Mtb-specifc response as a potential marker for monitoring TB therapy and preventive treatment effects.

Prognostic value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin test in predicting the development of active tuberculosis (UK PREDICT TB): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tackling tuberculosis requires testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis in high-risk groups. The aim of this study was to estimate the predictive values of the tuberculin skin test (TST) and two interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for the development of active tuberculosis in high-risk groups-ie, people in recent contact with active tuberculosis cases and from high-burden countries.

METHOD

In this prospective cohort study, we recruited participants from 54 centres (eg, clinics, community settings) in London, Birmingham, and Leicester in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older and at high risk for latent tuberculosis infection (ie, recent contact with someone with active tuberculosis [contacts] or a migrant who had arrived in the UK in the past 5 years from-or who frequently travelled to-a country with a high burden of tuberculosis [migrants]). Exclusion criteria included prevalent cases of tuberculosis, and participants who were treated for latent tuberculosis after a positive test result in this study. Each participant received three tests (QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In Tube, T-SPOT.TB, and a Mantoux TST). A positive TST result was reported using three thresholds: 5 mm (TST-5), 10 mm (TST-10), and greater than 5 mm in BCG-naive or 15 mm in BCG-vaccinated (TST-15) participants. Participants were followed up from recruitment to development of tuberculosis or censoring. Incident tuberculosis cases were identified by national tuberculosis databases, telephone interview, and review of medical notes. Our primary objective was to estimate the prognostic value of IGRAs compared with TST, assessed by the ratio of incidence rate ratios and predictive values for tuberculosis development. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01162265, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between May 4, 2010, and June 1, 2015, 10 045 people were recruited, of whom 9610 were eligible for inclusion. Of this cohort, 4861 (50·6%) were contacts and 4749 (49·4%) were migrants. Participants were followed up for a median of 2·9 years (range 21 days to 5·9 years). 97 (1·0%) of 9610 participants developed active tuberculosis (77 [1·2%] of 6380 with results for all three tests). In all tests, annual incidence of tuberculosis was very low in those who tested negatively (ranging from 1·2 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 0·6-2·0 for TST-5 to 1·9 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 1·3-2·7, for QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube). Annual incidence in participants who tested positively were highest for T-SPOT.TB (13·2 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 9·9-17·4), TST-15 (11·1 per 1000 person-years, 8·3-14·6), and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (10·1 per 1000 person-years, 7·4-13·4). Positive results for these tests were significantly better predictors of progression than TST-10 and TST-5 (eg, ratio of test positivity rates in those progressing to tuberculosis compared with those not progressing T-SPOT.TB vs TST-5: 1·99, 95% CI 1·68-2·34; p<0·0001). However, TST-5 identified a higher proportion of participants who progressed to active tuberculosis (64 [83%] of 77 tested) than all other tests and TST thresholds (≤75%).

INTERPRETATION

IGRA-based or BCG-stratified TST strategies appear most suited to screening for potential disease progression among high-risk groups. Further work will be needed to assess country-specific cost-effectiveness of each screening test, and in the absence of highly specific diagnostic tests, cheap non-toxic treatments need to be developed that could be given to larger groups of people at potential risk.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme 08-68-01.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Is a More Sensitive Screening Tool than QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube for Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities

We investigated the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among the residents in seven long-term care facilities (LTCFs) located in different regions of Taiwan and compared the performance of two interferon gamma release assays, i.e., QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) for screening LTBI. We also assessed the diagnostic performance against a composite reference standard (subjects with persistent-positive, transient-positive, and negative results from QFTs during reproducibility analysis were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively). Two hundred forty-four residents were enrolled, and 229 subjects were included in the analysis. The median age was 80 years (range, 60 to 102 years old), and 117 (51.1%) were male. Among them, 66 (28.8%) and 74 (32.3%) subjects had positive results from QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively, and the results for 215 (93.9%) subjects showed agreement. Using the composite reference standard, 66 (28.8%), 11 (4.8%), and 152 (66.4%) were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively. For definite LTBI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of QFT-GIT were 89.4%, 95.7%, 89.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, and those for QFT-Plus were 100.0%, 95.1%, 89.2%, and 100.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of QFT-GIT decreased gradually with patient age. Compared to QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus displayed significantly higher sensitivity (100.0% versus 89.4%, P = 0.013) and similar specificity (95.1% versus 95.7%). In conclusion, a high prevalence of LTBI was found among elders in LTCFs in Taiwan. The new QFT-Plus test demonstrated a higher sensitivity than QFT-GIT in the older adults in LTCFs.

Incipient and Subclinical Tuberculosis: a Clinical Review of Early Stages and Progression of Infection

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious cause of mortality worldwide, due in part to a limited understanding of its clinical pathogenic spectrum of infection and disease. Historically, scientific research, diagnostic testing, and drug treatment have focused on addressing one of two disease states: latent TB infection or active TB disease. Recent research has clearly demonstrated that human TB infection, from latent infection to active disease, exists within a continuous spectrum of metabolic bacterial activity and antagonistic immunological responses. This revised understanding leads us to propose two additional clinical states: incipient and subclinical TB. The recognition of incipient and subclinical TB, which helps divide latent and active TB along the clinical disease spectrum, provides opportunities for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to prevent progression to active TB disease and transmission of TB bacilli. In this report, we review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, immunology, clinical epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of both incipient and subclinical TB, two emerging clinical states of an ancient bacterium.

Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Interferon Gamma Release Assays in Patients at Risk for Tuberculosis and in Health Care Workers

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) received FDA clearance in 2017 and will replace the prior version of the assay, the QFT-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). Here, we compared performances of the QFT-Plus assay and the QFT-GIT version in a diverse patient population, including patients undergoing evaluation for or follow-up of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI; n = 39) or active TB infection (n = 3), and in health care workers (HCWs; n = 119) at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Compared to the QFT-GIT, the QFT-Plus assay showed 91.2% (31/34) positive, 98.4% (124/126) negative, and 96.6% (156/161) overall qualitative agreement among the 161 enrolled subjects, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.91 (excellent interrater agreement). Among the 28 patients diagnosed with LTBI at the time of enrollment, the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays agreed in 24 (85.7%) patients; in all four discordant patients, the positivity of the QFT-GIT or QFT-Plus IGRA was associated with low-level interferon gamma (IFN-γ) reactivity, ranging from 0.36 IU/ml to 0.66 IU/ml. Additionally, we document a high degree of correlation between IFN-γ levels in the QFT-GIT TB antigen tube and each of the two QFT-Plus TB antigen tubes, as well as between the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 tubes (Pearson's correlation coefficients [R] > 0.95). Overall, we show comparable results between the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays in our study population composed of subjects presenting with a diverse spectrum of TB infections. Our findings suggest that the necessary transition to the QFT-Plus assay will be associated with a minimal difference in assay performance characteristics.

Latent tuberculosis infection: Opportunities and challenges

Diagnosing and treating latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is recognized by the World Health Organization as an important strategy to accelerate the decline in global TB and achieve TB elimination. Even among low-TB burden countries that have achieved high rates of detection and successful treatment for active TB, a number of barriers have prevented implementing or expanding LTBI treatment programmes. Of those infected with TB, relatively few will develop active disease and the current diagnostic tests have a low predictive value. LTBI treatment using isoniazid (INH) has low completion rates due to the long duration of therapy and poor tolerability. Both patients and physicians often perceive the risk of toxicity to be greater than the risk of reactivation TB. As a result, LTBI treatment has had a limited or negligible role outside of countries with high resources and low burden of disease. New tools have emerged including the interferon-gamma release assays that more accurately diagnose LTBI, particularly in people vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Shorter, better tolerated treatment using rifamycins are proving safe and effective alternatives to INH. While still imperfect, TB prevention using these new diagnostic and treatment tools appear cost effective in modelling studies in the United States and have the potential to improve TB prevention efforts globally. Continued research to understand the host-organism interactions within the spectrum of LTBI is needed to develop better tools. Until then, overcoming the barriers and optimizing our current tools is essential for progressing toward TB elimination.

Evaluation of IP-10 in Quantiferon-Plus as biomarker for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new test for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis, in which has been added a new tube containing shorter peptides stimulating CD8 T-cells and CD4-stimulating-peptides. Measurement of alternative biomarkers to Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in QFT-Plus may improve its sensitivity. Interferon-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10), has been proposed as a tuberculosis (TB) biomarker. We aimed to evaluate the IP-10 accuracy in QFT-Plus for LTBI diagnosis. QFT-Plus was performed in 36 active TB, 31 LTBI and 16 healthy donors (HD). IP-10 was detected by ELISA. IP-10 is increased in TB1 and TB2 tubes in subjects with active TB and LTBI compared to HD. A ROC analysis comparing active TB and HD was performed and a cut-off of 1174 pg/mL for TB1 and 928.8 pg/mL for TB2 identified active TB with 86% sensitivity (Se) and 94% specificity (Sp). Moreover, increased IP-10 in response to TB1 was found in subjects with LTBI compared to those with active TB. A cut-off point of ≥16,108 pg/mL was chosen to maximize the test performance. However, the test predicted LTBI only with 58% Se and 61% Sp. These results suggest that IP-10 is an alternative biomarker to IFN-γ in the QFT-Plus format.

Stratification by interferon-γ release assay level predicts risk of incident TB

INTRODUCTION

Targeted testing and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) are priorities on the global health agenda, but LTBI management remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the QuantiFERON TB-Gold (QFT) test for incident TB, focusing on the interferon (IFN)-γ level, when applied in routine practice in a low TB incidence setting.

METHODS

In this large population-based prospective cohort, we linked QFT results in Norway (1 January 2009-30 June 2014) with national registry data (Norwegian Surveillance System for Infectious Diseases, Norwegian Prescription Database, Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway) to assess the prognostic value of QFT for incident TB. Participants were followed until 30 June 2016. We used restricted cubic splines to model non-linear relationships between IFN-γ levels and TB, and applied these findings to a competing risk model.

RESULTS

The prospective analyses included 50 389 QFT results from 44 875 individuals, of whom 257 developed TB. Overall, 22% (n=9878) of QFT results were positive. TB risk increased with the IFN-γ level until a plateau level, above which further increase was not associated with additional prognostic information. The HRs for TB were 8.8 (95% CI 4.7 to 16.5), 19.2 (95% CI 11.6 to 31.6) and 31.3 (95% CI 19.8 to 49.5) times higher with IFN-γ levels of 0.35 to <1.00, 1.00 to <4.00 and >4.00 IU/mL, respectively, compared with negative tests (<0.35 IU/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistently, QFT demonstrates increased risk of incident TB with rising IFN-γ concentrations, indicating that IFN-γ levels may be used to guide targeted treatment of LTBI.

Managing latent tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis in children

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. The aim of this review is to describe the management of the child with TB and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). To develop this article, a working group reviewed relevant epidemiological and other scientific studies and established practices in conducting LBTI and TB in children. The article describes how to manage the child with LTBI, considering transmission and infectiousness of tuberculosis, contact screening and prioritization of contacts and recommendations on treatment of children with LTBI and how to manage the child with TB considering the susceptibility of children to developing tuberculosis, epidemiology and classification of tuberculosis in children, diagnosis and treatment.

Quantitative Analysis of Gamma Interferon Release Assay Response in Children with Latent and Active Tuberculosis

The use of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) infection in children is still under debate because of concerns about the immature immune response in children. The aim of this study was to investigate quantitative values of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) test, a commercially available IGRA, in a large cohort of children screened for TB infection. A retrospective analysis was conducted on samples from 517 children aged 0 to 14 years old at the Pediatric Unit of S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna (Italy); quantitative responses to QFT-IT stimuli were analyzed according to diagnosis and age. Elevated IFN-γ values in the QFT-IT nil (background) tube were statistically associated with diagnosis of active TB. Quantitative IFN-γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens (TB Ag) was not significantly different in children with active TB compared to those with latent TB infection (LTBI), even though the median values were higher in the first group. When children were grouped by age, those less than 5 years old produced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ in response to TB Ag if they had active TB (median 10 IU/ml) than those with LTBI (median 1.96 IU/ml). IFN-γ response to mitogen increased with age. The overall rate of indeterminate results was low (3.9%), and no indeterminate QFT-IT values were observed in active or latent TB patients. In conclusion, quantitative QFT-IT values could provide further information to clinicians to manage TB in children, and these observations could be transferred to the new version of the test, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, which to date lacks data from the pediatric population.