Nutritional management of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy with L-methylfolate-methylcobalamin-pyridoxal-5-phosphate: results of a real-world patient experience trial

Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy: An Overview on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Diabetic distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a common complication of diabetes with devastating consequences. Hyperglycaemia is the major aetiological factor, while emerging data demonstrate that cardiometabolic risk factors also contribute to its development. Diagnosis of DSPN involves interview of medical and neurological history, foot inspection, and sensory and motor function examination with specific tests such as temperature and pinprick perception for small nerve fibers, and vibration and light touch assessments for large nerve fibers. Management includes optimised glycaemic control, treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, and symptomatic treatment aiming at improving life quality. This article provides an overview on epidemiology, risk factors, classification, diagnosis and current treatment of DSPN.

The Role of Vitamin B6 in Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin B6 is a water-soluble vitamin that is naturally present in many foods and is accessible in many dietary supplements. The three natural forms are pyridoxine, pyridoxal, and pyridoxamine. Both vitamin B6 deficiency and high B6 intake have been described as risk factors for developing peripheral neuropathy (PN). The aim of this systematic review is to characterize and comprehensively describe B6-related PN.

METHOD

A systematic, computer-based search was conducted using the PubMed database. Twenty articles were included in this review.

RESULTS

Higher vitamin B6 levels, which usually occur following the taking of nutritional supplements, may lead to the development of a predominantly, if not exclusively, sensory neuropathy of the axonal type. After pyridoxine discontinuation, such patients subjectively report improved symptoms. However, although low vitamin B6 levels can be seen in patients suffering from peripheral neuropathy of various etiologies, there is no firm evidence that low B6 levels have a direct causal relationship with PN. Many studies suggest subjective improvement of neuropathy symptoms in patients suffering from PN of various etiologies after receiving B6 supplementation; however, no data about B6 administration as a monotherapy exist, only as part of a combination treatment, usually with other vitamins. Therefore, the potential therapeutic role of B6 cannot be confirmed to date. Supplementation with vitamin B6, even as part of a nutritional multivitamin supplement, has not been proven harmful at permitted daily doses in patients who already suffer from PN.

CONCLUSION

Current scientific evidence supports a neurotoxic role of B6 at high levels. Although some studies suggest that low B6 is also a potential risk factor, further studies in this area are needed.

l-Methylfolate in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

One of the most frequently occurring complications of diabetes mellitus is peripheral neuropathy. Despite the painful symptoms associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), the current treatment landscape focuses on managing symptoms without addressing the underlying causes of DPN. This narrative review describes the mechanistic effects and clinical trial data supporting the use of l-methylfolate calcium (LMF), the bioactive form of folate, which is available in the United States as a prescription medical food that also contains other B vitamins for the dietary management of DPN.

METHODS

Preclinical and clinical trial data evaluating the impact of LMF on DPN was identified using PubMed searches for articles published between 2010 and 2023. Search terms included: folate, l-methylfolate, diabetes, neuropathy, and neuropathic pain. Additionally, a literature search was conducted to identify studies related to LMF, genetic polymorphisms, and DPN pathophysiology.

RESULTS

Several studies show that the C677T variant of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene is linked to greater risk of DPN than other MTHFR variants due to its inhibitory effects on several folic acid metabolic pathways. One double-blind, randomized controlled trial, five open-label studies, and one retrospective study found that LMF has a significant beneficial effect on DPN that extends beyond symptomatic relief to include modulating the underlying pathophysiology that leads to the progression and symptoms of DPN. LMF also significantly improves patient quality of life, with minimal adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Preclinical and clinical studies have found that LMF can be used to treat the underlying causes of DPN and provide long-lasting symptomatic relief.

A randomized comparative study of methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin plus pregabalin and methylcobalamin plus duloxetine in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy

CONTEXT:

Diabetic neuropathy affects 10.5%–32.2% of diabetic population posing clinical burden onto society.

AIMS:

We aimed to study the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin plus pregabalin, and methylcobalamin plus duloxetine in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN:

It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional, and parallel-group study done in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A total of 100 patients were recruited and randomized to three study groups A, B, and C on methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin and pregabalin, and methylcobalamin and duloxetine, respectively. Patients were assessed at day 0 and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The tuning fork test, monofilament test, Thermal Sensitivity testing, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used to analyze vibration, pressure, thermal sensitivity, and pain.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED:

The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Appropriate statistical methods were used to calculate P value (<0.05 – significant).

RESULTS:

The increase in number of patients with vibration perception is 11.6%, 37.9%, and 41.4%; pressure sensation is 7.6%, 37.9%, and 37.9%; and thermal sensitivity is 15.4%, 31.1%, and 37.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The decrease in VAS scores is 0.58 ± 0.14, 3.82 ± 0.05, and 4.17 ± 0.48 in Groups A, B, and C correspondingly. The adverse effects reported in Groups A, B, and C are 0%, 6.9%, and 10.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Group C is more efficacious when compared to Groups A and B while Group B is safer.

[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the neuroprotective complex Neurouridin in patients with back pain]

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of the neurouridin dietary supplement in patients with back pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 3179 patients with low back pain. Patients were randomized into the main group and the comparison group who did not receive neurouridin. The Visual Analogue scale (VAS), the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) and The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale were used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

A positive effect of treatment on VAS scores and a greater degree of decrease in the intensity of pain was observed in the main group compared with the comparison group. Signs of improved functional status according to RMQ and CGI are shown.

B vitamins as a treatment for diabetic pain and neuropathy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

B vitamin therapy is a common treatment for diabetic pain and neuropathy, yet its use remains controversial in patients lacking B vitamin deficiencies. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence for the efficacy of B vitamin therapy in diabetic patients with neuropathy.

COMMENT

We screened the English literature for clinical studies evaluating B vitamins as a therapy for pain and neuropathy in diabetic patients. We selected 43 relevant studies for qualitative analysis based on our selection criteria. Our survey of the literature revealed substantive heterogeneity with respect to efficacies of reported outcomes, as well as study design. Most beneficial outcomes were reported against baseline measures, with few positive comparisons against placebo. This highlights the need for larger, placebo-controlled studies.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

B vitamins should be considered a plausible therapy for diabetic neuropathy, but its overall efficacy remains uncertain and requires further study.

Microvascular Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiometabolic Disease

This review takes an inclusive approach to microvascular dysfunction in diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic disease. In virtually every organ, dynamic interactions between the microvasculature and resident tissue elements normally modulate vascular and tissue function in a homeostatic fashion. This regulation is disordered by diabetes mellitus, by hypertension, by obesity, and by dyslipidemia individually (or combined in cardiometabolic disease), with dysfunction serving as an early marker of change. In particular, we suggest that the familiar retinal, renal, and neural complications of diabetes mellitus are late-stage manifestations of microvascular injury that begins years earlier and is often abetted by other cardiometabolic disease elements (eg, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia). We focus on evidence that microvascular dysfunction precedes anatomic microvascular disease in these organs as well as in heart, muscle, and brain. We suggest that early on, diabetes mellitus and/or cardiometabolic disease can each cause reversible microvascular injury with accompanying dysfunction, which in time may or may not become irreversible and anatomically identifiable disease (eg, vascular basement membrane thickening, capillary rarefaction, pericyte loss, etc.). Consequences can include the familiar vision loss, renal insufficiency, and neuropathy, but also heart failure, sarcopenia, cognitive impairment, and escalating metabolic dysfunction. Our understanding of normal microvascular function and early dysfunction is rapidly evolving, aided by innovative genetic and imaging tools. This is leading, in tissues like the retina, to testing novel preventive interventions at early, reversible stages of microvascular injury. Great hope lies in the possibility that some of these interventions may develop into effective therapies.

Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Diabetic Neuropathy: A 1-Year, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

AIM

To investigate the effect of normalizing vitamin B12 (B12) levels with oral B12 (methylcobalamin) 1000 μg/day for one year in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 90 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin for at least four years and both peripheral and autonomic DN were randomized to an active treatment group (n = 44) receiving B12 and a control group (n = 46) receiving a placebo. All patients had B12 levels less than 400 pmol/L. Subjects underwent measurements of sural nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), sural nerve action potential (amplitude) (SNAP), and vibration perception threshold (VPT), and they performed cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs: mean circular resultant (MCR), Valsalva test, postural index, and orthostatic hypotension). Sudomotor function was assessed with the SUDOSCAN that measures electrochemical skin conductance in hands and feet (ESCH and ESCF, respectively). We also used the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Examination (MNSIQ and MNSIE, respectively) and questionnaires to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and level of pain (pain score).

RESULTS

B12 levels increased from 232.0 ± 71.8 at baseline to 776.7 ± 242.3 pmol/L at follow-up, p < 0.0001, in the active group but not in the control group. VPT, MNSIQ, QoL, pain score, SNCV, SNAP, and ESCF significantly improved in the active group (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, p < 0.000, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.014, respectively), whereas CARTS and MNSIE improved but not significantly. MCR, MNSIQ, SNCV, SNAP, and pain score significantly deteriorated in the control group (p = 0.025, p = 0.017, p = 0.045, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of patients with DN with 1 mg of oral methylcobalamin for twelve months increased plasma B12 levels and improved all neurophysiological parameters, sudomotor function, pain score, and QoL, but it did not improve CARTS and MNSIE.

B12 as a Treatment for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review

Neuropathic pain describes a range of unpleasant sensations caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The sensations caused by neuropathic pain are debilitating and improved treatment regimens are sought in order to improve the quality of life of patients. One proposed treatment for neuropathic pain is vitamin B12, which is thought to alleviate pain by a number of mechanisms including promoting myelination, increasing nerve regeneration and decreasing ectopic nerve firing. In this paper, the evidence for B12 as a drug treatment for neuropathic pain is reviewed. Twenty four published articles were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review in which a range of treatment regimens were evaluated including both B12 monotherapy and B12 in combination with other vitamins or conventional treatments, such as gabapentinoids. Overall, this systematic review demonstrates that there is currently some evidence for the therapeutic effect of B12 in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia (level II evidence) and the treatment of painful peripheral neuropathy (level III evidence).

[Adjuvant therapy of pain syndromes: possibilities of using nucleotides]

Despite the variety of treatment options, pain syndromes are widespread in the population. Adjuvant methods, in particular vitamins and vitamin combinations, are widely used, along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, myorelaxants and anticonvulsants, by physicians of different specialties. In recent years, new drugs containing pyrimidine nucleotides (uridine monophosphate) were brought to market. The paper describes analgesic effects of uridine monophosphate and choline, possibilities of their simultaneous use in combination with vitamins to promote the recovery of damaged structured of the peripheral nervous system, including remyelination and neuroplasticity. It has been concluded that nucleotide complexes can be effectively used as adjuvant therapy of pain.

Quality of Life in Painful Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review

Objective

Neuropathic pain is a common presenting complaint of patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN) and is considered one of the most disabling neuropathic symptoms, with detrimental effects on patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of this review was to overview the current literature that focuses on QoL in painful PN of various aetiologies. We sought to clarify the direct effect of pain and its treatment on patients' QoL.

Methodology

A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to search for papers on QoL in painful PN. Information was extracted regarding prevalence, demographics, and response to treatment where relevant.

Results

We identified 66 articles eligible for inclusion. The vast majority of studies (n=47) focused on patients with diabetic PN. Other aetiologies of painful PN where QoL has been studied to date include gluten, immune-mediated, HIV, chemotherapy-induced, and chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. Pharmacological treatment is the mainstay in managing pain and has a direct positive and independent effect on the overall QoL. Other nonpharmacological approaches can also be of benefit, either alone or as adjuvant treatments, and are discussed.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate that QoL is impaired in painful PN and should not be neglected in clinical practice. Patients' pain management and subsequent impact on QoL should routinely be assessed and monitored.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions for chronic noncancer pain

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of nutrition interventions on participant reported pain severity and intensity in populations with chronic pain.

METHODS

Eight databases were systematically searched for studies that included adult populations with a chronic pain condition, a nutrition intervention and a measure of pain. Where possible, data were pooled using meta-analysis. Seventy-one studies were included, with 23 being eligible for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Studies were categorised into four groups: (i) altered overall diet with 12 of 16 studies finding a significant reduction in participant reported pain; (ii) altered specific nutrients with two of five studies reporting a significant reduction in participant reported pain; (iii) supplement-based interventions with 11 of 46 studies showing a significant reduction in pain; and (iv) fasting therapy with one of four studies reporting a significant reduction in pain. The meta-analysis found that, overall, nutrition interventions had a significant effect on pain reduction with studies testing an altered overall diet or just one nutrient having the greatest effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the importance and effectiveness of nutrition interventions for people who experience chronic pain.

Wherefore Art Thou, O Treatment for Diabetic Neuropathy?

As of March 2016, we continue to advocate the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using a simple foot examination or monofilament, which identifies only those with severe neuropathy and hence risk of foot ulceration. Given the fact that the 5-year mortality rate of diabetic patients with foot ulceration is worse than that of most common cancers, surely we should be identifying patients at an earlier stage of neuropathy to prevent its progression to a stage with such a high mortality? Of course, we lament that there is no licensed treatment for diabetic neuropathy. Who is to blame? As researchers and carers, we have a duty of care to our patients with diabetic neuropathy. So, we have to look forward not backwards, and move away from our firmly entrenched views on the design and conduct of clinical trials for diabetic neuropathy. Relevant organizations such as Neurodiab, the American Diabetes Association and the Peripheral Nerve Society have to acknowledge that they cannot continue to endorse a bankrupt strategy. The FDA needs an open and self-critical dialogue with these organizations, to give pharmaceutical companies at least a fighting chance to deliver effective new therapies for diabetic neuropathy.