1
|
Waitzberg R, Pfundstein I, Maresso A, Rechel B, van Ginneken E, Quentin W. Health system description and assessment: a scoping review of templates for systematic analyses. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:82. [PMID: 38992666 PMCID: PMC11238392 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01166-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding and comparing health systems is key for cross-country learning and health system strengthening. Templates help to develop standardised and coherent descriptions and assessments of health systems, which then allow meaningful analyses and comparisons. Our scoping review aims to provide an overview of existing templates, their content and the way data is presented. MAIN BODY Based on the WHO building blocks framework, we defined templates as having (1) an overall framework, (2) a list of indicators or topics, and (3) instructions for authors, while covering (4) the design of the health system, (5) an assessment of health system performance, and (6) should cover the entire health system. We conducted a scoping review of grey literature published between 2000 and 2023 to identify templates. The content of the identified templates was screened, analyzed and compared. We found 12 documents that met our inclusion criteria. The building block `health financing´ is covered in all 12 templates; and many templates cover ´service delivery´ and ´health workforce'. Health system performance is frequently assessed with regard to 'access and coverage', 'quality and safety', and 'financial protection'. Most templates do not cover 'responsiveness' and 'efficiency'. Seven templates combine quantitative and qualitative data, three are mostly quantitative, and two are primarily qualitative. Templates cover data and information that is mostly relevant for specific groups of countries, e.g. a particular geographical region, or for high or for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Templates for LMICs rely more on survey-based indicators than administrative data. CONCLUSIONS This is the first scoping review of templates for standardized descriptions of health systems and assessments of their performance. The implications are that (1) templates can help analyze health systems across countries while accounting for context; (2) template-guided analyses of health systems could underpin national health policies, strategies, and plans; (3) organizations developing templates could learn from approaches of other templates; and (4) more research is needed on how to improve templates to better achieve their goals. Our findings provide an overview and help identify the most important aspects and topics to look at when comparing and analyzing health systems, and how data are commonly presented. The templates were created by organizations with different agendas and target audiences, and with different end products in mind. Comprehensive health systems analyses and comparisons require production of quantitative indicators and complementing them with qualitative information to build a holistic picture. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Waitzberg
- Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße Des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Isabel Pfundstein
- Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Maresso
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Rechel
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ewout van Ginneken
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse Des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilm Quentin
- Planetary & Public Health, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
- German West-African Centre for Global Health and Pandemic Prevention, Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waitzberg R, Pfundstein ID, Maresso A, Rechel B, van Ginneken E, Quentin W. Analysis of health system characteristics needed before performance assessment. Bull World Health Organ 2024; 102:547-549. [PMID: 38933477 PMCID: PMC11197642 DOI: 10.2471/blt.24.291760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Waitzberg
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anna Maresso
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Rechel
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England
| | - Ewout van Ginneken
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilm Quentin
- German West-African Centre for Global Health and Pandemic Prevention, Chair of Planetary & Public Health, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iroz CB, Ramaswamy R, Bhutta ZA, Barach P. Quality improvement in public-private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:332. [PMID: 38481226 PMCID: PMC10935959 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10802-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public-private partnerships (PPP) are often how health improvement programs are implemented in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We therefore aimed to systematically review the literature about the aim and impacts of quality improvement (QI) approaches in PPP in LMICs. METHODS We searched SCOPUS and grey literature for studies published before March 2022. One reviewer screened abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. The study characteristics, setting, design, outcomes, and lessons learned were abstracted using a standard tool and reviewed in detail by a second author. RESULTS We identified 9,457 citations, of which 144 met the inclusion criteria and underwent full-text abstraction. We identified five key themes for successful QI projects in LMICs: 1) leadership support and alignment with overarching priorities, 2) local ownership and engagement of frontline teams, 3) shared authentic learning across teams, 4) resilience in managing external challenges, and 5) robust data and data visualization to track progress. We found great heterogeneity in QI tools, study designs, participants, and outcome measures. Most studies had diffuse aims and poor descriptions of the intervention components and their follow-up. Few papers formally reported on actual deployment of private-sector capital, and either provided insufficient information or did not follow the formal PPP model, which involves capital investment for a explicit return on investment. Few studies discussed the response to their findings and the organizational willingness to change. CONCLUSIONS Many of the same factors that impact the success of QI in healthcare in high-income countries are relevant for PPP in LMICs. Vague descriptions of the structure and financial arrangements of the PPPs, and the roles of public and private entities made it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about the impacts of the organizational governance on the outcomes of QI programs in LMICs. While we found many articles in the published literature on PPP-funded QI partnerships in LMICs, there is a dire need for research that more clearly describes the intervention details, implementation challenges, contextual factors, leadership and organizational structures. These details are needed to better align incentives to support the kinds of collaboration needed for guiding accountability in advancing global health. More ownership and power needs to be shifted to local leaders and researchers to improve research equity and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra B Iroz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Rohit Ramaswamy
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Global Health & Development, The Aga Khan University, South Central Asia, East Africa, UK
| | - Paul Barach
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang Y, Xiao X, Wan Y, Ye Q, Yang Z, Xu L, Chen S, Li H, Wang F, Chen Y, Zhao D, Zhang Q, Zheng J, Guo G, Li Y. Tracking progress towards equitable maternal and child health in Yunnan: a systematic assessment for the Health Programme for Poverty Alleviation in China during 2015-2020. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070809. [PMID: 37821133 PMCID: PMC10583063 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform the impacts of health programmes which aimed at preventing women and children from being trapped in or returning to poverty because of illness in Yunnan, the main battlefield against poverty in China. DESIGN The longitudinal comparative evaluation design. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS National and Yunnan policy documents related to maternal and child health programmes for poverty alleviation during 2015-2020 were analysed. The changes in disparities in maternal and child health system inputs, service coverage, and health outcomes between poor and non-poor areas, as well as out-of-pocket payments between poor and non-poor populations were assessed before and after 2017. RESULTS In total 12 policies and 15 programmes related to poverty alleviation for poor women and children in Yunnan were summarised. As a result of health system strengthening in Yunnan, the densities of licensed doctors, nurses, obstetricians, midwives, township health workers and female village doctors had been increased substantially in poor areas, with the annual rates of 14.3%, 22.5%, 21.8%, 23.9%, 14.1% and 7.1% separately. Although disparities existed in some of service coverage between poor and non-poor areas, the health programmes had narrowed the gaps in utilisation of facility birth, caesarean section, prenatal screening and newborn screening across Yunnan (p<0.01). The out-of-pocket payments for inpatient care for serious illnesses among women and children with poverty registration had been considerably decreased to 10.0%. Paralleling the universal coverage, maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths and child deaths per 1000 livebirths had further declined in both poor and non-poor areas, and the impacts of health programmes on closing the gaps in child survivals across Yunnan were significant (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Remarkable progress in equitable maternal and child survival has been achieved in Yunnan. The practices in Yunnan have shown the Chinese model in ending poverty by strengthening health system and implementing universal coverage with firm commitment, determined leadership, detailed blueprint and social participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Huang
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Xia Xiao
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Ying Wan
- Information Centre, Yunnan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Qingyun Ye
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Zhongting Yang
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Lingling Xu
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Shuqi Chen
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Huifang Li
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Fangfang Wang
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Yurong Chen
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Dandan Zhao
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Information Centre, Yunnan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Jiarui Zheng
- Health Care Centre, Yunnan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Guangping Guo
- Health Care Centre, Yunnan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Yan Li
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghaffar A, Zennaro LD, Tran N. The African Health Initiative's Role in Advancing the Use of Embedded Implementation Research for Health Systems Strengthening. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022; 10:e2200318. [PMID: 36109064 PMCID: PMC9476485 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The African Health Initiative has demonstrated the feasibility of changing the traditional knowledge generation paradigm by using an embedded implementation research approach to improve health systems’ performance and strengthen capacity for knowledge generation and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Livia Dal Zennaro
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nhan Tran
- Department of the Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Embedding Research on Implementation of Primary Health Care Systems Strengthening: A Commentary on Collaborative Experiences in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Mozambique. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022; 10:e2200061. [PMID: 36109054 PMCID: PMC9476480 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Achieving universal health care coverage requires the adoption of primary health care policies and delivery strategies that are evidence based. Although this has been confronted by manifold challenges, particularly in the health systems of sub-Saharan Africa, there are promising approaches for accomplishing this objective. Salient among these is embedding implementation research (i.e., the study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) into routine practice) into policy making and implementation processes. Since 2007, the African Health Initiative of the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation supported partnerships that strengthened primary health systems and policy implementation in 7 countries in sub-Saharan Africa using the embedded implementation research as a core strategy. This programmatic review and analysis aims to identify the core features and processes that characterized how the partnerships operationalized the embedded implementation research approach and understand the factors that helped and constrained partnerships' effective use of this approach. For this, we drew upon findings from a desk review that consisted of 30 examples of embedded implementation research conducted by 3 African Health Initiative partnerships between 2016 and 2021 in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Mozambique. In addition, we conducted and analyzed 13 in-depth interviews with embedded implementation research stakeholders of the 3 projects. Core features and processes of embedded implementation research were: (1) the leadership role of policy decision makers and implementation leaders; (2) positioning research with program implementation at multiple levels of health systems; (3) multidisciplinary and multisectoral partnerships; (4) focus on research capacity building; and (5) real-time feedback loops and knowledge translation. Factors influencing the effectiveness of the embedded implementation research experiences involved: (1) the implementation climate and leadership; (2) opportunities and capacities to circulate and absorb new information; and (3) stakeholders' baseline knowledge and embedded scientists' identification within their organizations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Baynes C, Adedokun L, Awoonor-Williams JK, Hirschhorn LR. Learning Health Systems to Bridge the Evidence-Policy-Practice Gap in Primary Health Care: Lessons From the African Health Initiative. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022; 10:e2200390. [PMID: 36109063 PMCID: PMC9476491 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The compilation of lessons in this supplement on the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation’s African Health Initiative’s work in the application of implementation research in primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa reflects the evolution of the discipline that is now increasingly recognized as integral to health systems strengthening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Baynes
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Lola Adedokun
- Formerly of the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Koku Awoonor-Williams
- Formerly of the Department of Policy, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, Ghana Health Service Accra, Ghana
| | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Ryan Family Center for Global Primary Care, Havey Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amouzou A, Bryce J, Walker N. Strengthening effectiveness evaluations to improve programs for women, children and adolescents. Glob Health Action 2022; 15:2006423. [PMID: 36098952 PMCID: PMC9481099 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A full understanding of the pathways from efficacious interventions to population impact requires rigorous effectiveness evaluations conducted under realistic scale-up conditions at country level. In this paper, we introduce a deductive framework that underpins effectiveness evaluations. This framework forms the theoretical and conceptual basis for the 'Real Accountability: Data Analysis for Results' (RADAR) project, intended to address gaps in guidance and tools for the evaluation of projects being implemented at scale to reduce mortality among women and children. These gaps include needs for a framework to guide decisions about evaluations and practical measurement tools, as well as increased capacity in evaluation practice among donors and program planners at global, national and project levels. RADAR aimed to improve the evidence base for program and policy decisions in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition (RMNCH&N). We focus on five linked methodological steps - presented as core evaluation questions - for designing and implementing effectiveness evaluation of large-scale programs that support both the needs of program managers to improve their programs and the needs of donors to meet their accountability responsibilities. RADAR has operationalized each step with a tool to facilitate its application. We also describe cross-cutting methodological issues and broader contextual factors that affect the planning and implementation of such evaluations. We conclude with proposals for how the global RMNCH&N community can support rigorous program evaluations and make better use of the resulting evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agbessi Amouzou
- Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Bryce
- Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Neff Walker
- Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee S, Ishizuka A, Tachimori H, Uechi M, Akashi H, Hinoshita E, Miyata H, Shibuya K. Japan's development cooperation for health in Vietnam: a first holistic assessment on Japan's ODA and non-ODA public resources cooperation. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2175. [PMID: 34837970 PMCID: PMC8626744 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12170-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Japan strives to strengthen its development cooperation by mobilizing various resources to assist partner countries advance on Universal Health Coverage by 2030. However, the involvement and roles of various actors for health are not clear. This study is the first to map Japan’s publicly funded projects by both Official Development Assistance (ODA) and other non-ODA public funds, and to describe the intervention areas. Further, the policy implications for country-specific cooperation strategies are discussed. The development cooperation for health in Vietnam is used as a case in this study. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of the Japanese publicly funded health projects that were being implemented in Vietnam during December 2016 was conducted. A framework of analysis based on the World Health Organization six health systems building blocks was adopted. The projects’ qualitative information was also assessed. Results Overall, 68 projects implemented through Japanese public funding were analyzed. These 68 projects under 15 types of schemes were managed by seven different scheme-operating organizations and funded by five ministries. Of these 44 (64.7%) were ODA and 24 (35.3%) were non-ODA projects. Among the recategorized six building blocks of the health system, the largest proportion of projects was health service delivery (44%), followed by health workforces (25%), and health information systems (15%). Almost half the projects were implemented together with the central hospitals as Vietnamese counterparts, which suggests that this is one area in which the specificities of Japanese cooperation are demonstrated. No synergetic effects of potential collaboration or harmonization among Japanese funded projects were captured. Conclusions Several Japanese-funded projects addressed a wide range of health issues across all six building blocks of the health system in Vietnam. However, there is room for improvement in developing coordination and harmonization among the diversified Japanese projects. Establishing a country-specific mechanism for strategic coordination across Japanese ministries’ schemes can yield efficient and effective development cooperation for health. While Vietnam’s dependence on external funding is low, the importance of coordination across domestic actors of the donor countries can serve as an important lesson, especially in beneficiary countries with high external funding dependency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12170-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangnim Lee
- Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. .,Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, the Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Aya Ishizuka
- Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.,Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisateru Tachimori
- Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.,Endowed Course for Health System Innovation, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manami Uechi
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Hidechika Akashi
- Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Hinoshita
- Health and Medical Division, Bureau of Personnel and Education, Ministry of Defense, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Shibuya
- Soma COVID Vaccination Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carter A, Akseer N, Ho K, Rothschild O, Bose N, Binagwaho A, Hirschhorn LR, Price M, Muther K, Panjabi R, Freeman MC, Bednarczyk RA, Bhutta ZA. A framework for identifying and learning from countries that demonstrated exemplary performance in improving health outcomes and systems. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 5:bmjgh-2020-002938. [PMID: 33272938 PMCID: PMC7716663 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper introduces a framework for conducting and disseminating mixed methods research on positive outlier countries that successfully improved their health outcomes and systems. We provide guidance on identifying exemplar countries, assembling multidisciplinary teams, collecting and synthesising pre-existing evidence, undertaking qualitative and quantitative analyses, and preparing dissemination products for various target audiences. Through a range of ongoing research studies, we illustrate application of each step of the framework while highlighting key considerations and lessons learnt. We hope uptake of this comprehensive framework by diverse stakeholders will increase the availability and utilisation of rigorous and comparable insights from global health success stories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Carter
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nadia Akseer
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Ho
- Gates Ventures, Kirkland, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Kyle Muther
- Last Mile Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raj Panjabi
- Last Mile Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew C Freeman
- Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Erondu NA, Rahman-Shepherd A, Khan MS, Abate E, Agogo E, Belfroid E, Dar O, Fehr A, Hollmann L, Ihekweazu C, Ikram A, Iversen BG, Mirkuzie AH, Rathore TR, Squires N, Okereke E. Improving National Intelligence for Public Health Preparedness: a methodological approach to finding local multi-sector indicators for health security. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004227. [PMID: 33495285 PMCID: PMC7839902 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 epidemic is the latest evidence of critical gaps in our collective ability to monitor country-level preparedness for health emergencies. The global frameworks that exist to strengthen core public health capacities lack coverage of several preparedness domains and do not provide mechanisms to interface with local intelligence. We designed and piloted a process, in collaboration with three National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) in Ethiopia, Nigeria and Pakistan, to identify potential preparedness indicators that exist in a myriad of frameworks and tools in varying local institutions. Following a desk-based systematic search and expert consultations, indicators were extracted from existing national and subnational health security-relevant frameworks and prioritised in a multi-stakeholder two-round Delphi process. Eighty-six indicators in Ethiopia, 87 indicators in Nigeria and 51 indicators in Pakistan were assessed to be valid, relevant and feasible. From these, 14–16 indicators were prioritised in each of the three countries for consideration in monitoring and evaluation tools. Priority indicators consistently included private sector metrics, subnational capacities, availability and capacity for electronic surveillance, measures of timeliness for routine reporting, data quality scores and data related to internally displaced persons and returnees. NPHIs play an increasingly central role in health security and must have access to data needed to identify and respond rapidly to public health threats. Collecting and collating local sources of information may prove essential to addressing gaps; it is a necessary step towards improving preparedness and strengthening international health regulations compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mishal S Khan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Ebba Abate
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Evelien Belfroid
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Aamer Ikram
- Pakistan National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | - Neil Squires
- Global Public Health, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Ebere Okereke
- International Health Regulations Strengthening Project, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brault MA, Mwinga K, Kipp AM, Kennedy SB, Maimbolwa M, Moyo P, Ngure K, Haley CA, Vermund SH. Measuring child survival for the Millennium Development Goals in Africa: what have we learned and what more is needed to evaluate the Sustainable Development Goals? Glob Health Action 2020; 13:1732668. [PMID: 32114967 PMCID: PMC7067162 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1732668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Reducing child mortality is a key global health challenge. We examined reasons for greater or lesser success in meeting under-five mortality rate reductions, i.e. Millennium Development Goal #4, between 1990 and 2015 in Sub-Saharan Africa where child mortality remains high. We first examined factors associated with child mortality from all World Health Organization African Region nations during the Millennium Development Goal period. This analysis was followed by case studies of the facilitators and barriers to Millennium Development Goal #4 in four countries – Kenya, Liberia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Quantitative indicators, policy documents, and qualitative interviews and focus groups were collected from each country to examine factors within and across countries related to child mortality. We found familiar themes that highlighted the need for both specific services (e.g. primary care access, emergency obstetric and neonatal care) and general management (e.g. strong health governance and leadership, increasing community health workers, quality of care). We also identified methodological opportunities and challenges to assessing progress in child health, which can provide insights to similar efforts during the Sustainable Development Goal period. Specifically, it is important for countries to adapt general international goals and measurements to their national context, considering baseline mortality rates and health information systems, to develop country-specific goals. It will also be critical to develop more rigorous measurement tools and indicators to accurately characterize maternal, neonatal, and child health systems, particularly in the area of governance and leadership. Valuable lessons can be learned from Millennium Development Goal successes and failures, as well as how they are evaluated. As countries seek to lower child mortality further during the Sustainable Development Goal period, it will be necessary to prioritize and support countries in quantitative and qualitative data collection to assess and contextualize progress, identifying areas needing improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie A Brault
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kasonde Mwinga
- Rwanda Country Office, World Health Organization, Kigali, Rwanda (Formerly, WHO African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo)
| | - Aaron M Kipp
- Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephen B Kennedy
- University of Liberia-Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation (UL-PIRE) Africa Center, University of Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia
| | - Margaret Maimbolwa
- Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Precious Moyo
- Collaborative Research Program, University of Zimbabwe-University of California, San Francisco, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Kenneth Ngure
- Department of Community Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Connie A Haley
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sten H Vermund
- Office of the Dean, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vaz LME, Franco L, Guenther T, Simmons K, Herrera S, Wall SN. Operationalising health systems thinking: a pathway to high effective coverage. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:132. [PMID: 33143734 PMCID: PMC7641804 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00615-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The global health community has recognised the importance of defining and measuring the effective coverage of health interventions and their implementation strength to monitor progress towards global mortality and morbidity targets. Existing health system models and frameworks guide thinking around these measurement areas; however, they fall short of adequately capturing the dynamic and multi-level relationships between different components of the health system. These relationships must be articulated for measurement and managed to effectively deliver health interventions of sufficient quality to achieve health impacts. Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives programme and EnCompass LLC, its evaluation partner, developed and applied the Pathway to High Effective Coverage as a health systems thinking framework (hereafter referred to as the Pathway) in its strategic planning, monitoring and evaluation. Methods We used an iterative approach to develop, test and refine thinking around the Pathway. The initial framework was developed based on existing literature, then shared and vetted during consultations with global health thought leaders in maternal and newborn health. Results The Pathway is a robust health systems thinking framework that unpacks system, policy and point of intervention delivery factors, thus encouraging specific actions to address gaps in implementation and facilitate the achievement of high effective coverage. The Pathway includes six main components – (1) national readiness; (2) system structures; (3) management capacity; (4) implementation strength; (5) effective coverage; and (6) impact. Each component is comprised of specific elements reflecting the range of facility-, community- and home-based interventions. We describe applications of the Pathway and results for in-country strategic planning, monitoring of progress and implementation strength, and evaluation. Conclusions The Pathway provides a cohesive health systems thinking framework that facilitates assessment and coordinated action to achieve high coverage and impact. Experiences of its application show its utility in guiding strategic planning and in more comprehensive and effective monitoring and evaluation as well as its potential adaptability for use in other health areas and sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara M E Vaz
- Population Reference Bureau, 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 520, Washington, DC, 20009, United States of America.
| | - Lynne Franco
- EnCompass LLC, 1451 Rockville Pike Suite 600, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Tanya Guenther
- Formerly with Save the Children US, 899 North Capitol St NE Suite 900, Washington DC, 20001, USA
| | - Kelsey Simmons
- Ford Foundation, 320 E 43rd St, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Samantha Herrera
- Save the Children US, 899 North Capitol St NE Suite 900, Washington DC, 20001, USA
| | - Stephen N Wall
- Save the Children US, 899 North Capitol St NE Suite 900, Washington DC, 20001, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Inguane C, Sawadogo-Lewis T, Chaquisse E, Roberton T, Ngale K, Fernandes Q, Dinis A, Augusto O, Covele A, Hicks L, Gremu A, Sherr K. Challenges and facilitators to evidence-based decision-making for maternal and child health in Mozambique: district, municipal and national case studies. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:598. [PMID: 32605564 PMCID: PMC7329398 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05408-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for evidence-based decision-making in the health sector is well understood in the global health community. Yet, gaps persist between the availability of evidence and the use of that evidence. Most research on evidence-based decision-making has been carried out in higher-income countries, and most studies look at policy-making rather than decision-making more broadly. We conducted this study to address these gaps and to identify challenges and facilitators to evidence-based decision-making in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Nutrition (MNCH&N) at the municipality, district, and national levels in Mozambique. METHODS We used a case study design to capture the experiences of decision-makers and analysts (n = 24) who participated in evidence-based decision-making processes related to health policies and interventions to improve MNCH&N in diverse decision-making contexts (district, municipality, and national levels) in 2014-2017, in Mozambique. We examined six case studies, at the national level, in Maputo City and in two districts of Sofala Province and two of Zambézia Province, using individual in-depth interviews with key informants and a document review, for three weeks, in July 2018. RESULTS Our analysis highlighted various challenges for evidence-based decision-making for MNCH&N, at national, district, and municipality levels in Mozambique, including limited demand for evidence, limited capacity to use evidence, and lack of trust in the available evidence. By contrast, access to evidence, and availability of evidence were viewed positively and seen as potential facilitators. Organizational capacity for the demand and use of evidence appears to be the greatest challenge; while individual capacity is also a barrier. CONCLUSION Evidence-based decision-making requires that actors have access to evidence and are empowered to act on that evidence. This, in turn, requires alignment between those who collect data, those who analyze and interpret data, and those who make and implement decisions. Investments in individual, organizational, and systems capacity to use evidence are needed to foster practices of evidence-based decision-making for improved maternal and child health in Mozambique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celso Inguane
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1107 45th Street. NE, Suite 350, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
| | | | - Eusébio Chaquisse
- National Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | - Timothy Roberton
- Institute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University,, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kátia Ngale
- Institute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | - Quinhas Fernandes
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1107 45th Street. NE, Suite 350, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.,National Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | - Aneth Dinis
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1107 45th Street. NE, Suite 350, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.,National Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | - Orvalho Augusto
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1107 45th Street. NE, Suite 350, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.,Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | | | | | - Artur Gremu
- Health Alliance International, Maputo City, Mozambique
| | - Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1107 45th Street. NE, Suite 350, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.,Health Alliance International, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hodgins S, Khanal L, Joshi N, Penfold S, Tuladhar S, Shrestha PR, Lamichhane B, Dawson P, Guenther T, Singh S, Sharma G, Oyloe P. Achieving and sustaining impact at scale for a newborn intervention in Nepal: a mixed-methods study. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.29392/joghr.3.e2019046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
16
|
Moresky RT, Razzak J, Reynolds T, Wallis LA, Wachira BW, Nyirenda M, Carlo WA, Lin J, Patel S, Bhoi S, Risko N, Wendle LA, Calvello Hynes EJ. Advancing research on emergency care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: ensuring high-quality care delivery systems. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001265. [PMID: 31406599 PMCID: PMC6666806 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Emergency care systems (ECS) address a wide range of acute conditions, including emergent conditions from communicable diseases, non-communicable diseases, pregnancy and injury. Together, ECS represent an area of great potential for reducing morbidity and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is estimated that up to 54% of annual deaths in LMICs could be addressed by improved prehospital and facility-based emergency care. Research is needed to identify strategies for enhancing ECS to optimise prevention and treatment of conditions presenting in this context, yet significant gaps persist in defining critical research questions for ECS studies in LMICs. The Collaborative on Enhancing Emergency Care Research in LMICs seeks to promote research that improves immediate and long-term outcomes for clients and populations with emergent conditions. The objective of this paper is to describe systems approaches and research strategies for ECS in LMICs, elucidate priority research questions and methodology, and present a selection of studies addressing the operational, implementation, policy and health systems domains of health systems research as an approach to studying ECS. Finally, we briefly discuss limitations and the next steps in developing ECS-oriented interventions and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel T Moresky
- sidHARTe-Strengthening Emergency Systems Program, Columbia University Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Junaid Razzak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Teri Reynolds
- Department for Management of Noncommunicable Diseases, Disability, Violence and Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lee A Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Mulinda Nyirenda
- Adult Emergency and Trauma Centre, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Blantyre, Malawi.,Emergency Medicine Section, Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Waldemar A Carlo
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Janet Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Global Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shama Patel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sanjeev Bhoi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Nicholas Risko
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lily A Wendle
- sidHARTe-Strengthening Emergency Systems Program, Columbia University Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emilie J Calvello Hynes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miller AC, Garchitorena A, Rabeza V, Randriamanambintsoa M, Rahaniraka Razanadrakato HT, Cordier L, Ouenzar MA, Murray MB, Thomson DR, Bonds MH. Cohort Profile: Ifanadiana Health Outcomes and Prosperity longitudinal Evaluation (IHOPE). Int J Epidemiol 2019; 47:1394-1395e. [PMID: 29939260 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C Miller
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andres Garchitorena
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,PIVOT, Boston, MA, USA.,UMR 224 MIVEGEC, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France
| | - Victor Rabeza
- Institut National de la Statistique, Direction de la Demographie et des Statistiques Sociales, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Marius Randriamanambintsoa
- Institut National de la Statistique, Direction de la Demographie et des Statistiques Sociales, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | | | | | | | - Megan B Murray
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dana R Thomson
- Social Statistics Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Matthew H Bonds
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,PIVOT, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hazel E, Wilson E, Anifalaje A, Sawadogo-Lewis T, Heidkamp R. Building integrated data systems for health and nutrition program evaluations: lessons learned from a multi-country implementation of a DHIS 2-based system. J Glob Health 2019; 8:020307. [PMID: 30356499 PMCID: PMC6188163 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Hazel
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily Wilson
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Talata Sawadogo-Lewis
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca Heidkamp
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Báscolo E, Houghton N, Del Riego A. [Construction of a monitoring framework for universal healthConstrução de um quadro de monitoramento para saúde universal]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2019; 42:e81. [PMID: 31093109 PMCID: PMC6385791 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2018.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
El objetivo del trabajo es construir un marco conceptual de monitoreo sobre los avances de políticas y acciones orientadas a alcanzar la salud universal. Se revisaron modelos conceptuales y propuestas metodológicas relacionados con el monitoreo del acceso y la cobertura universal de salud. Se realizó también una revisión de la literatura para seleccionar indicadores relevantes. Esta revisión fue complementada con un proceso de consulta con expertos en sistemas de salud de la Región de las Américas. Se desarrolló un marco integral para el monitoreo de políticas y acciones para el acceso y la cobertura universal de salud. El marco de monitoreo contiene cuatro componentes (acciones estratégicas, resultados inmediatos, resultados intermedios y resultados de impacto) e identifica un conjunto de opciones políticas para guiar la transformación de los sistemas de salud hacia el acceso y la cobertura universal de salud. Se eligieron 64 indicadores entre un total de 500 indicadores para la evaluación de los componentes del marco de monitoreo. El abordaje propuesto para la utilización del marco se basa en la medición de inequidades en las condiciones de acceso y cobertura, así como en la recolección de evidencia cualitativa sobre el grado de ejecución de políticas y acciones. El marco propuesto podría contribuir a fortalecer los procesos de transformación de los sistemas de salud para avanzar hacia el acceso y la cobertura universal de salud.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Báscolo
- Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, DC, Estados Unidos de América
| | - Natalia Houghton
- Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, DC, Estados Unidos de América
| | - Amalia Del Riego
- Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, DC, Estados Unidos de América
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Labasangzhu, Bjertness E, McNeil EB, Deji, Guo Y, Songwathana P, Chongsuvivatwong V. Progress and challenges in improving maternal health in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2018; 11:221-231. [PMID: 30532605 PMCID: PMC6241686 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s170445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of the Tibet Autonomous Region (hereinafter “Tibet”) is still five times higher than the national average. This study aims to identify the successes and pitfalls of the health system that might be related to the high mortality rate based on the WHO health system building blocks, focusing on human resources for health and health infrastructure and the impact on maternal health and outcomes. Methods Sources of information include China’s central government and Tibet’s local government policies and regulations, health statistical yearbooks, maternal and child health routine reporting system, and English and Chinese online research articles. Joinpoint analysis was applied for MMR and maternal health service trends, and correlation test was used to test the relationship between maternal health services and outcomes. Results Between 2000 and 2015, public health spending in Tibet increased 67-fold, the hospital delivery rate increased 70.1%, and the MMR dropped from 466.9 to 100.1 per 100,000 live births. However, the total number of health workers, qualified medical doctors, and registered nurses per 1,000 people were 4.4, 1.4, and 1.0, respectively, much lower than the national average (5.8, 1.8, and 2.4). In Tibet, there were 80 basic and 16 comprehensive emergency obstetric care (EOC) centers. On average, there were 12 basic and 2.5 comprehensive EOC centers per 500,000 of the population. Though it met the WHO’s recommendation, it might remain inadequate in the low population density of the area like Tibet. Conclusion The shortage of health professionals and EOC centers and health information in predominantly remote rural areas with a scattered population still needs to be rectified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Labasangzhu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Tibet University Medical College, Lhasa, Tibet, China.,Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand,
| | - E Bjertness
- Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E B McNeil
- Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand,
| | - Deji
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Tibet University Medical College, Lhasa, Tibet, China
| | - Y Guo
- Department of Health Policies and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health and Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - P Songwathana
- Department of Adult and Elderly Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - V Chongsuvivatwong
- Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Miller AC, Ramananjato RH, Garchitorena A, Rabeza VR, Gikic D, Cripps A, Cordier L, Rahaniraka Razanadrakato HT, Randriamanambintsoa M, Hall L, Murray M, Safara Razanavololo F, Rich ML, Bonds MH. Baseline population health conditions ahead of a health system strengthening program in rural Madagascar. Glob Health Action 2018. [PMID: 28621206 PMCID: PMC5496087 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1329961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A model health district was initiated through a program of health system strengthening (HSS) in Ifanadiana District of southeastern Madagascar in 2014. We report population health indicators prior to initiation of the program. Methods: A representative household survey based on the Demographic Health Survey was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling design in two strata – the initial program catchment area and the future catchment area. Chi-squared and t-tests were used to compare data by stratum, using appropriate sampling weights. Madagascar data for comparison were taken from a 2013 national study. Results: 1522 households were surveyed, representing 8310 individuals including 1635 women ages 15–49, 1685 men ages 15–59 and 1251 children under age 5. Maternal mortality rates in the district are 1044/100,000. 81% of women’s last childbirth deliveries were in the home; only 20% of deliveries were attended by a doctor or nurse/midwife (not different by stratum). 9.3% of women had their first birth by age 15, and 29.5% by age 18. Under-5 mortality rate is high: 145/1000 live births vs. 62/1000 nationally. 34.6% of children received all recommended vaccines by age 12 months (compared to 51.5% in Madagascar overall). In the 2 weeks prior to interview, approximately 28% of children under age 5 had acute respiratory infections of whom 34.7% were taken for care, and 14% of children had diarrhea of whom 56.6% were taken for care. Under-5 mortality, illness, care-seeking and vaccination rates were not significantly different between strata. Conclusions: Indicators of population health and health care-seeking reveal low use of the formal health system, which could benefit from HSS. Data from this survey and from a longitudinal follow-up study will be used to target needed interventions, to assess change in the district and the impact of HSS on individual households and the population of the district.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C Miller
- a Department of Global Health and Social Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.,b PIVOT , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Ranto H Ramananjato
- c Institut National de la Statistique, Direction de la Demographie et de les Statistiques Sociales , Antananarivo , Madagascar
| | - Andres Garchitorena
- a Department of Global Health and Social Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.,b PIVOT , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Victor R Rabeza
- c Institut National de la Statistique, Direction de la Demographie et de les Statistiques Sociales , Antananarivo , Madagascar
| | | | | | | | | | - Marius Randriamanambintsoa
- c Institut National de la Statistique, Direction de la Demographie et de les Statistiques Sociales , Antananarivo , Madagascar
| | | | - Megan Murray
- a Department of Global Health and Social Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | | | - Michael L Rich
- a Department of Global Health and Social Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Matthew H Bonds
- a Department of Global Health and Social Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.,b PIVOT , Boston , MA , USA.,e Department of Medicine , Stanford School of Medicine , Stanford , CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garchitorena A, Miller AC, Cordier LF, Rabeza VR, Randriamanambintsoa M, Razanadrakato HTR, Hall L, Gikic D, Haruna J, McCarty M, Randrianambinina A, Thomson DR, Atwood S, Rich ML, Murray MB, Ratsirarson J, Ouenzar MA, Bonds MH. Early changes in intervention coverage and mortality rates following the implementation of an integrated health system intervention in Madagascar. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3:e000762. [PMID: 29915670 PMCID: PMC6001915 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Sustainable Development Goals framed an unprecedented commitment to achieve global convergence in child and maternal mortality rates through 2030. To meet those targets, essential health services must be scaled via integration with strengthened health systems. This is especially urgent in Madagascar, the country with the lowest level of financing for health in the world. Here, we present an interim evaluation of the first 2 years of a district-level health system strengthening (HSS) initiative in rural Madagascar, using estimates of intervention coverage and mortality rates from a district-wide longitudinal cohort. METHODS We carried out a district representative household survey at baseline of the HSS intervention in over 1500 households in Ifanadiana district. The first follow-up was after the first 2 years of the initiative. For each survey, we estimated maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) coverage, healthcare inequalities and child mortality rates both in the initial intervention catchment area and in the rest of the district. We evaluated changes between the two areas through difference-in-differences analyses. We estimated annual changes in health centre per capita utilisation from 2013 to 2016. RESULTS The intervention was associated with 19.1% and 36.4% decreases in under-five and neonatal mortality, respectively, although these were not statistically significant. The composite coverage index (a summary measure of MNCH coverage) increased by 30.1%, with a notable 63% increase in deliveries in health facilities. Improvements in coverage were substantially larger in the HSS catchment area and led to an overall reduction in healthcare inequalities. Health centre utilisation rates in the catchment tripled for most types of care during the study period. CONCLUSION At the earliest stages of an HSS intervention, the rapid improvements observed for Ifanadiana add to preliminary evidence supporting the untapped and poorly understood potential of integrated HSS interventions on population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Garchitorena
- UMR 224 MIVEGEC, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Montpellier, France
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- PIVOT, Ranomafana, Madagascar
| | - Ann C Miller
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Victor R Rabeza
- Direction de la Démographie et des Statistiques Sociales, Institut National de la Statistique, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Marius Randriamanambintsoa
- Direction de la Démographie et des Statistiques Sociales, Institut National de la Statistique, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Hery-Tiana R Razanadrakato
- Direction de la Démographie et des Statistiques Sociales, Institut National de la Statistique, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dana R Thomson
- Social Statistics Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sidney Atwood
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael L Rich
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan B Murray
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Josea Ratsirarson
- Ministère de la Sante Publique de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | | | - Matthew H Bonds
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- PIVOT, Ranomafana, Madagascar
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nemser B, Aung K, Mushamba M, Chirwa S, Sera D, Chikhwaza O, Kachale F. Data-informed decision-making for life-saving commodities investments in Malawi: A qualitative case study. Malawi Med J 2018; 30:111-119. [PMID: 30627339 PMCID: PMC6307067 DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v30i2.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During the last 15 years, Malawi has made remarkable progress in reducing child mortality. However, maternal and newborn mortality remains persistently high. To help address these entrenched challenges, the Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH) Trust Fund provided short-term catalytic financing of $11.5 million (2013-2016) to support country plans to advance the RMNCH and commodity agenda. Objectives (1) To document how Malawi (ministries, partners, working groups) used evidence to inform decision-making and RMNCH investments, (2) To identify barriers to utilizing information and evidence in the planning and prioritization process at national and sub-national levels, and (3) To assess the utility of the RMNCH Landscape Synthesis, which uses existing information to review life-saving RMNCH commodities and services. Methods This was a qualitative case study utilizing a Rapid Appraisal (RA) approach, where semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff members from UN agencies, development partners and the Ministry of Health (MoH) at national and district level. The analysis enlists a framework approach for manual qualitative content analysis. Results Led by the MoH, the RMNCH Trust Fund grant proposal utilized an evidence-based and equity-focused process for prioritization of investments. Data-informed decision-making permeates similar commodity-focused working groups. However, common health information system (HIS) weaknesses, such as data quality and collection burden, persist and are more prevalent at district-level. The collation of evidence in the RMNCH Landscape Synthesis was a useful and sustainable tool to support planning. Conclusions The evidence-based, equity-focused decision-making process for the RMNCH Trust Fund proposal provides an effective model for inter-agency investment prioritization. Strengthening data-informed decision-making will require financial and political commitments to HIS and capacity building for data use, particularly at the district-level. New initiatives (e.g. Health Data Collaborative and QED Network to Improve Quality of Care) provide opportunities to further improve evidence-informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Nemser
- UNICEF Headquarters, New York
- University of the Western Cape, South Africa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thomson DR, Amoroso C, Atwood S, Bonds MH, Rwabukwisi FC, Drobac P, Finnegan KE, Farmer DB, Farmer PE, Habinshuti A, Hirschhorn LR, Manzi A, Niyigena P, Rich ML, Stulac S, Murray MB, Binagwaho A. Impact of a health system strengthening intervention on maternal and child health outputs and outcomes in rural Rwanda 2005-2010. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3:e000674. [PMID: 29662695 PMCID: PMC5898359 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although Rwanda’s health system underwent major reforms and improvements after the 1994 Genocide, the health system and population health in the southeast lagged behind other areas. In 2005, Partners In Health and the Rwandan Ministry of Health began a health system strengthening intervention in this region. We evaluate potential impacts of the intervention on maternal and child health indicators. Methods Combining results from the 2005 and 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys with those from a supplemental 2010 survey, we compared changes in health system output indicators and population health outcomes between 2005 and 2010 as reported by women living in the intervention area with those reported by the pooled population of women from all other rural areas of the country, controlling for potential confounding by economic and demographic variables. Results Overall health system coverage improved similarly in the comparison groups between 2005 and 2010, with an indicator of composite coverage of child health interventions increasing from 57.9% to 75.0% in the intervention area and from 58.7% to 73.8% in the other rural areas. Under-five mortality declined by an annual rate of 12.8% in the intervention area, from 229.8 to 83.2 deaths per 1000 live births, and by 8.9% in other rural areas, from 157.7 to 75.8 deaths per 1000 live births. Improvements were most marked among the poorest households. Conclusion We observed dramatic improvements in population health outcomes including under-five mortality between 2005 and 2010 in rural Rwanda generally and in the intervention area specifically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana R Thomson
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | - Sidney Atwood
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew H Bonds
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Woods Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Peter Drobac
- Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Karen E Finnegan
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Paul E Farmer
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anatole Manzi
- Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda
| | | | - Michael L Rich
- Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara Stulac
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan B Murray
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Agnes Binagwaho
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sabot K, Marchant T, Spicer N, Berhanu D, Gautham M, Umar N, Schellenberg J. Contextual factors in maternal and newborn health evaluation: a protocol applied in Nigeria, India and Ethiopia. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2018; 15:2. [PMID: 29441117 PMCID: PMC5800046 DOI: 10.1186/s12982-018-0071-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the context of a health programme is important in interpreting evaluation findings and in considering the external validity for other settings. Public health researchers can be imprecise and inconsistent in their usage of the word “context” and its application to their work. This paper presents an approach to defining context, to capturing relevant contextual information and to using such information to help interpret findings from the perspective of a research group evaluating the effect of diverse innovations on coverage of evidence-based, life-saving interventions for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and India. Methods We define “context” as the background environment or setting of any program, and “contextual factors” as those elements of context that could affect implementation of a programme. Through a structured, consultative process, contextual factors were identified while trying to strike a balance between comprehensiveness and feasibility. Thematic areas included demographics and socio-economics, epidemiological profile, health systems and service uptake, infrastructure, education, environment, politics, policy and governance. We outline an approach for capturing and using contextual factors while maximizing use of existing data. Methods include desk reviews, secondary data extraction and key informant interviews. Outputs include databases of contextual factors and summaries of existing maternal and newborn health policies and their implementation. Use of contextual data will be qualitative in nature and may assist in interpreting findings in both quantitative and qualitative aspects of programme evaluation. Discussion Applying this approach was more resource intensive than expected, in part because routinely available information was not consistently available across settings and more primary data collection was required than anticipated. Data was used only minimally, partly due to a lack of evaluation results that needed further explanation, but also because contextual data was not available for the precise units of analysis or time periods of interest. We would advise others to consider integrating contextual factors within other data collection activities, and to conduct regular reviews of maternal and newborn health policies. This approach and the learnings from its application could help inform the development of guidelines for the collection and use of contextual factors in public health evaluation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12982-018-0071-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Sabot
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Tanya Marchant
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Neil Spicer
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,3Department of Global Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Della Berhanu
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Meenakshi Gautham
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Nasir Umar
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Joanna Schellenberg
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hedt-Gauthier BL, Chilengi R, Jackson E, Michel C, Napua M, Odhiambo J, Bawah A. Research capacity building integrated into PHIT projects: leveraging research and research funding to build national capacity. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:825. [PMID: 29297405 PMCID: PMC5763288 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2657-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inadequate research capacity impedes the development of evidence-based health programming in sub-Saharan Africa. However, funding for research capacity building (RCB) is often insufficient and restricted, limiting institutions’ ability to address current RCB needs. The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation’s African Health Initiative (AHI) funded Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) partnership projects in five African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania and Zambia) to implement health systems strengthening initiatives inclusive of RCB. Methods Using Cooke’s framework for RCB, RCB activity leaders from each country reported on RCB priorities, activities, program metrics, ongoing challenges and solutions. These were synthesized by the authorship team, identifying common challenges and lessons learned. Results For most countries, each of the RCB domains from Cooke’s framework was a high priority. In about half of the countries, domain specific activities happened prior to PHIT. During PHIT, specific RCB activities varied across countries. However, all five countries used AHI funding to improve research administrative support and infrastructure, implement research trainings and support mentorship activities and research dissemination. While outcomes data were not systematically collected, countries reported holding 54 research trainings, forming 56 mentor-mentee relationships, training 201 individuals and awarding 22 PhD and Masters-level scholarships. Over the 5 years, 116 manuscripts were developed. Of the 59 manuscripts published in peer-reviewed journals, 29 had national first authors and 18 had national senior authors. Trainees participated in 99 conferences and projects held 37 forums with policy makers to facilitate research translation into policy. Conclusion All five PHIT projects strongly reported an increase in RCB activities and commended the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation for prioritizing RCB, funding RCB at adequate levels and time frames and for allowing flexibility in funding so that each project could implement activities according to their trainees’ needs. As a result, many common challenges for RCB, such as adequate resources and local and international institutional support, were not identified as major challenges for these projects. Overall recommendations are for funders to provide adequate and flexible funding for RCB activities and for institutions to offer a spectrum of RCB activities to enable continued growth, provide adequate mentorship for trainees and systematically monitor RCB activities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier
- Partners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda. .,Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Roma Chilengi
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jackson
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, USA
| | - Cathy Michel
- Health Alliance International, Beira, Mozambique
| | - Manuel Napua
- Beira Operational Research Center, National Institute of Health, Beira, Mozambique
| | | | - Ayaga Bawah
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, USA.,Regional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Magge H, Chilengi R, Jackson EF, Wagenaar BH, Kante AM. Tackling the hard problems: implementation experience and lessons learned in newborn health from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:829. [PMID: 29297352 PMCID: PMC5763287 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2659-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation’s African Health Initiative supported the implementation of Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) Partnership health system strengthening interventions in designated areas of five countries: Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia. All PHIT programs included health system strengthening interventions with child health outcomes from the outset, but all increasingly recognized the need to increase focus to improve health and outcomes in the first month of life. This paper uses a case study approach to describe interventions implemented in newborn health, compare approaches, and identify lessons learned across the programs’ collective implementation experience. Methods Case studies were built using quantitative and qualitative methods, applying the World Health Organization Health Systems Strengthening Framework, and maternal, newborn and child health continuum of care framework. We identified the following five primary themes in health systems strengthening intervention strategies used to target improvement in newborn health, which were incorporated by all PHIT projects with varying results: health service delivery at the community level (Tanzania), combining community and health facility level interventions (Zambia), participatory information feedback and clinical training (Ghana), performance review and enhancement (Mozambique), and integrated clinical and system-level improvement (Rwanda), and used individual case studies to illustrate each of these themes. Results Tanzania and Zambia included significant community-based components, including mobilization and sensitization for increased uptake of essential services, while Ghana, Mozambique, and Rwanda focused more efforts on improving the quality of services delivered once a patient enters a health facility. All countries included aspects that improved communication across levels of the health system, whether through district-wide data sharing and peer learning networks in Mozambique and Rwanda, or improved referral processes and systems in Tanzania, Zambia, and Ghana. Conclusion Key lessons learned include the importance of focusing intervention components on addressing drivers of neonatal mortality across the maternal and newborn care continuum at all levels of the health system, matching efforts to improve service utilization with provision of high quality facility-based services, and the critical role of leadership to catalyze improvements in newborn health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Magge
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Partners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda. .,Partners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Roma Chilengi
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Elizabeth F Jackson
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bradley H Wagenaar
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Health Alliance International, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almamy Malick Kante
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hirschhorn LR, Adedokun L, Ghaffar A. Implementing, improving and learning: cross-country lessons learned from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:773. [PMID: 29297339 PMCID: PMC5763471 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave, 14-013, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. .,Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
| | | | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rwabukwisi FC, Bawah AA, Gimbel S, Phillips JF, Mutale W, Drobac P. Health system strengthening: a qualitative evaluation of implementation experience and lessons learned across five African countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:826. [PMID: 29297333 PMCID: PMC5763488 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2662-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in sub-Saharan Africa will require substantial improvements in the coverage and performance of primary health care delivery systems. Projects supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's (DDCF) African Health Initiative (AHI) created public-private-academic and community partnerships in five African countries to implement and evaluate district-level health system strengthening interventions. In this study, we captured common implementation experiences and lessons learned to understand core elements of successful health systems interventions. METHODS We used qualitative data from key informant interviews and annual progress reports from the five Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) partnership projects funded through AHI in Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia. RESULTS Four major overarching lessons were highlighted. First, variety and inclusiveness of concerned key players (public, academic and private) are necessary to address complex health system issues at all levels. Second, a learning culture that promotes evidence creation and ability to efficiently adapt were key in order to meet changing contextual needs. Third, inclusion of strong implementation science tools and strategies allowed informed and measured learning processes and efficient dissemination of best practices. Fourth, five to seven years was the minimum time frame necessary to effectively implement complex health system strengthening interventions and generate the evidence base needed to advocate for sustainable change for the PHIT partnership projects. CONCLUSION The AHI experience has raised remaining, if not overlooked, challenges and potential solutions to address complex health systems strengthening intervention designs and implementation issues, while aiming to measurably accomplish sustainable positive change in dynamic, learning, and varied contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ayaga A. Bawah
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, NY USA
| | - Sarah Gimbel
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - James F. Phillips
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, NY USA
| | | | - Peter Drobac
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sherr K, Fernandes Q, Kanté AM, Bawah A, Condo J, Mutale W. Measuring health systems strength and its impact: experiences from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:827. [PMID: 29297341 PMCID: PMC5763472 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2658-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health systems are essential platforms for accessible, quality health services, and population health improvements. Global health initiatives have dramatically increased health resources; however, funding to strengthen health systems has not increased commensurately, partially due to concerns about health system complexity and evidence gaps demonstrating health outcome improvements. In 2009, the African Health Initiative of the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation began supporting Population Health Implementation and Training Partnership projects in five sub-Saharan African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) to catalyze significant advances in strengthening health systems. This manuscript reflects on the experience of establishing an evaluation framework to measure health systems strength, and associate measures with health outcomes, as part of this Initiative. Methods Using the World Health Organization’s health systems building block framework, the Partnerships present novel approaches to measure health systems building blocks and summarize data across and within building blocks to facilitate analytic procedures. Three Partnerships developed summary measures spanning the building blocks using principal component analysis (Ghana and Tanzania) or the balanced scorecard (Zambia). Other Partnerships developed summary measures to simplify multiple indicators within individual building blocks, including health information systems (Mozambique), and service delivery (Rwanda). At the end of the project intervention period, one to two key informants from each Partnership’s leadership team were asked to list – in rank order – the importance of the six building blocks in relation to their intervention. Results Though there were differences across Partnerships, service delivery and information systems were reported to be the most common focus of interventions, followed by health workforce and leadership and governance. Medical products, vaccines and technologies, and health financing, were the building blocks reported to be of lower focus. Conclusion The African Health Initiative experience furthers the science of evaluation for health systems strengthening, highlighting areas for further methodological development – including the development of valid, feasible measures sensitive to interventions in multiple contexts (particularly in leadership and governance) and describing interactions across building blocks; in developing summary statistics to facilitate testing intervention effects on health systems and associations with health status; and designing appropriate analytic models for complex, multi-level open health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, USA. .,Health Alliance International, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Almamy M Kanté
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ayaga Bawah
- Regional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Jeanine Condo
- School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Wilbroad Mutale
- Department of Public Health, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Manzi A, Hirschhorn LR, Sherr K, Chirwa C, Baynes C, Awoonor-Williams JK. Mentorship and coaching to support strengthening healthcare systems: lessons learned across the five Population Health Implementation and Training partnership projects in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:831. [PMID: 29297323 PMCID: PMC5763487 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2656-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite global efforts to increase health workforce capacity through training and guidelines, challenges remain in bridging the gap between knowledge and quality clinical practice and addressing health system deficiencies preventing health workers from providing high quality care. In many developing countries, supervision activities focus on data collection, auditing and report completion rather than catalyzing learning and supporting system quality improvement. To address this gap, mentorship and coaching interventions were implemented in projects in five African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) as components of health systems strengthening (HSS) strategies funded through the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation’s African Health Initiative. We report on lessons learned from a cross-country evaluation. Methods The evaluation was designed based on a conceptual model derived from the project-specific interventions. Semi-structured interviews were administered to key informants to capture data in six categories: 1) mentorship and coaching goals, 2) selection and training of mentors and coaches, 3) integration with the existing systems, 4) monitoring and evaluation, 5) reported outcomes, and 6) challenges and successes. A review of project-published articles and technical reports from the individual projects supplemented interview information. Results Although there was heterogeneity in the approaches to mentorship and coaching and targeted areas of the country projects, all led to improvements in core health system areas, including quality of clinical care, data-driven decision making, leadership and accountability, and staff satisfaction. Adaptation of approaches to reflect local context encouraged their adoption and improved their effectiveness and sustainability. Conclusion We found that incorporating mentorship and coaching activities into HSS strategies was associated with improvements in quality of care and health systems, and mentorship and coaching represents an important component of HSS activities designed to improve not just coverage, but even further effective coverage, in achieving Universal Health Care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anatole Manzi
- Partners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda. .,Partners In Health, 800 Boylston Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA, 02199, USA. .,College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
| | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Partners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.,Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Health Alliance International, Beira, Mozambique
| | - Cindy Chirwa
- Primary Care and Health Systems Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Colin Baynes
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gao Y, Zhou H, Singh NS, Powell-Jackson T, Nash S, Yang M, Guo S, Fang H, Alvarez MM, Liu X, Pan J, Wang Y, Ronsmans C. Progress and challenges in maternal health in western China: a Countdown to 2015 national case study. THE LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2017; 5:e523-e536. [PMID: 28341117 PMCID: PMC5387688 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30100-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 01/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND China is one of the few Countdown countries to have achieved Millennium Development Goal 5 (75% reduction in maternal mortality ratio between 1990 and 2015). We aimed to examine the health systems and contextual factors that might have contributed to the substantial decline in maternal mortality between 1997 and 2014. We chose to focus on western China because poverty, ethnic diversity, and geographical access represent particular challenges to ensuring universal access to maternal care in the region. METHODS In this systematic assessment, we used data from national census reports, National Statistical Yearbooks, the National Maternal and Child Health Routine Reporting System, the China National Health Accounts report, and National Health Statistical Yearbooks to describe changes in policies, health financing, health workforce, health infrastructure, coverage of maternal care, and maternal mortality by region between 1997 and 2014. We used a multivariate linear regression model to examine which contextual and health systems factors contributed to the regional variation in maternal mortality ratio in the same period. Using data from a cross-sectional survey in 2011, we also examined equity in access to maternity care in 42 poor counties in western China. FINDINGS Maternal mortality declined by 8·9% per year between 1997 and 2014 (geometric mean ratio for each year 0·91, 95% CI 0·91-0·92). After adjusting for GDP per capita, length of highways, female illiteracy, the number of licensed doctors per 1000 population, and the proportion of ethnic minorities, the maternal mortality ratio was 118% higher in the western region (2·18, 1·44-3·28) and 41% higher in the central region (1·41, 0·99-2·01) than in the eastern region. In the rural western region, the proportion of births in health facilities rose from 41·9% in 1997 to 98·4% in 2014. Underpinning such progress was the Government's strong commitment to long-term strategies to ensure access to delivery care in health facilities-eg, professionalisation of maternity care in large hospitals, effective referral systems for women medically or socially at high risk, and financial subsidies for antenatal and delivery care. However, in the poor western counties, substantial disparity by education level of the mother existed in access to health facility births (44% of illiterate women vs 100% of those with college or higher education), antenatal care (17% vs 69%) had at least four visits), and caesarean section (8% vs 44%). INTERPRETATION Despite remarkable progress in maternal survival in China, substantial disparities remain, especially for the poor, less educated, and ethnic minority groups in remote areas in western China. Whether China's highly medicalised model of maternity care will be an answer for these populations is uncertain. A strategy modelled after China's immunisation programme, whereby care is provided close to the women's homes, might need to be explored, with township hospitals taking a more prominent role. FUNDING Government of Canada, UNICEF, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanqiu Gao
- Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China,Office for National Maternal & Child Health Statistics of China, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zhou
- Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China
| | - Neha S Singh
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK,MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Timothy Powell-Jackson
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Stephen Nash
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Min Yang
- West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Chengdu, China,School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sufang Guo
- UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Hai Fang
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Melisa Martinez Alvarez
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Xiaoyun Liu
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jay Pan
- West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China,Correspondence to: Prof Yan Wang, Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Carine Ronsmans
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK,MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK,West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Chengdu, China,Prof Carine Ronsmans, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Armstrong CE, Martínez-Álvarez M, Singh NS, John T, Afnan-Holmes H, Grundy C, Ruktanochai CW, Borghi J, Magoma M, Msemo G, Matthews Z, Mtei G, Lawn JE. Subnational variation for care at birth in Tanzania: is this explained by place, people, money or drugs? BMC Public Health 2016; 16 Suppl 2:795. [PMID: 27634353 PMCID: PMC5025821 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3404-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tanzania achieved the Millennium Development Goal for child survival, yet made insufficient progress for maternal and neonatal survival and stillbirths, due to low coverage and quality of services for care at birth, with rural women left behind. Our study aimed to evaluate Tanzania's subnational (regional-level) variations for rural care at birth outcomes, i.e., rural women giving birth in a facility and by Caesarean section (C-section), and associations with health systems inputs (financing, health workforce, facilities, and commodities), outputs (readiness and quality of care) and context (education and GDP). METHODS We undertook correlation analyses of subnational-level associations between health system inputs, outputs, context, and rural care at birth outcomes; and constructed implementation readiness barometers using benchmarks for each health system input indicator. We used geographical information system (GIS) mapping to visualise subnational variations in care at birth for rural women, with a focus on service availability and readiness, and collected qualitative data to investigate financial flows from national to council level to understand variation in financing inputs. RESULTS We found wide subnational variation for rural care at birth outcomes, health systems inputs, and contextual indicators. There was a positive association between rural women giving birth in a facility and by C-section; maternal education; workforce and facility density; and quality of care. There was a negative association between these outcomes and proportion of all births to rural women, total fertility rate, and availability of essential commodities at facilities. Per capita recurrent expenditure was positively associated with facility births (correlation coefficient = 0.43; p = 0.05) but not with C-section. Qualitative results showed that the health financing system is complex and insufficient for providing care at birth services. Bottlenecks for care at birth included low density of health workers, poor availability of essential commodities, and low health financing in Lake and Western Zones. CONCLUSIONS No region meets the benchmarks for the four health systems building blocks including health finance, health workforce, health facilities, and commodities. Strategies for addressing health system inequities, including overall increases in health expenditure, are needed in rural populations and areas of highest unmet need for family planning to improve coverage of care at birth for rural women in Tanzania.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne E. Armstrong
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
- Evidence for Action, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Melisa Martínez-Álvarez
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Neha S. Singh
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Theopista John
- World Health Organization, 1 Luthuli Street, PO Box 9292, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Hoviyeh Afnan-Holmes
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
- Independent consultant, London, UK
| | - Chris Grundy
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Corrine W. Ruktanochai
- Department of Geography & Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Moke Magoma
- Evidence for Action, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Georgina Msemo
- Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Zoe Matthews
- Division of Social Statistics and Demography & Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty and Policy, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK
| | - Gemini Mtei
- Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Joy E. Lawn
- Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tanzania's countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2016; 3:e396-409. [PMID: 26087986 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00059-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Revised: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tanzania is on track to meet Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 for child survival, but is making insufficient progress for newborn survival and maternal health (MDG 5) and family planning. To understand this mixed progress and to identify priorities for the post-2015 era, Tanzania was selected as a Countdown to 2015 case study. METHODS We analysed progress made in Tanzania between 1990 and 2014 in maternal, newborn, and child mortality, and unmet need for family planning, in which we used a health systems evaluation framework to assess coverage and equity of interventions along the continuum of care, health systems, policies and investments, while also considering contextual change (eg, economic and educational). We had five objectives, which assessed each level of the health systems evaluation framework. We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) and did multiple linear regression analyses to explain the reduction in child mortality in Tanzania. We analysed the reasons for the slower changes in maternal and newborn survival and family planning, to inform priorities to end preventable maternal, newborn, and child deaths by 2030. FINDINGS In the past two decades, Tanzania's population has doubled in size, necessitating a doubling of health and social services to maintain coverage. Total health-care financing also doubled, with donor funding for child health and HIV/AIDS more than tripling. Trends along the continuum of care varied, with preventive child health services reaching high coverage (≥85%) and equity (socioeconomic status difference 13-14%), but lower coverage and wider inequities for child curative services (71% coverage, socioeconomic status difference 36%), facility delivery (52% coverage, socioeconomic status difference 56%), and family planning (46% coverage, socioeconomic status difference 22%). The LiST analysis suggested that around 39% of child mortality reduction was linked to increases in coverage of interventions, especially of immunisation and insecticide-treated bednets. Economic growth was also associated with reductions in child mortality. Child health programmes focused on selected high-impact interventions at lower levels of the health system (eg, the community and dispensary levels). Despite its high priority, implementation of maternal health care has been intermittent. Newborn survival has gained attention only since 2005, but high-impact interventions are already being implemented. Family planning had consistent policies but only recent reinvestment in implementation. INTERPRETATION Mixed progress in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Tanzania indicates a complex interplay of political prioritisation, health financing, and consistent implementation. Post-2015 priorities for Tanzania should focus on the unmet need for family planning, especially in the Western and Lake regions; addressing gaps for coverage and quality of care at birth, especially in rural areas; and continuation of progress for child health. FUNDING Government of Canada, Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development; US Fund for UNICEF; and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hargreaves JRM, Goodman C, Davey C, Willey BA, Avan BI, Schellenberg JRA. Measuring implementation strength: lessons from the evaluation of public health strategies in low- and middle-income settings. Health Policy Plan 2016; 31:860-7. [PMID: 26965038 PMCID: PMC4977426 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of strategies to ensure evidence-based, low-cost interventions reach those in need is critical. One approach is to measure the strength, or intensity, with which packages of interventions are delivered, in order to explore the association between implementation strength and public health gains. A recent systematic review suggested methodological guidance was needed. We described the approaches used in three examples of measures of implementation strength in evaluation. These addressed important public health topics with a substantial disease burden in low-and middle-income countries; they involved large-scale implementation; and featured evaluation designs without comparison areas. Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches were discussed. In the evaluation of Ethiopia’s Health Extension Programme, implementation strength scoring for each kebele (ward) was based on aggregated data from interviews with mothers of children aged 12–23 months, reflecting their reports of contact with four elements of the programme. An evaluation of the Avahan HIV prevention programme in India used the cumulative amount of Avahan funding per HIV-infected person spent each year in each district. In these cases, a single measure was developed and the association with hypothesised programme outcomes presented. In the evaluation of the Affordable Medicines Facility—malaria, several implementation strength measures were developed based on the duration of activity of the programme and the level of implementation of supporting interventions. Measuring the strength of programme implementation and assessing its association with outcomes is a promising approach to strengthen pragmatic impact evaluation. Five key aspects of developing an implementation strength measure are to: (a) develop a logic model; (b) identify aspects of implementation to be assessed; (c) design and implement data collection from a range of data sources; (d) decide whether and how to combine data into a single measure; and, (e) plan whether and how to use the measure(s) in outcome analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Bilal Iqbal Avan
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ako-Arrey DE, Brouwers MC, Lavis JN, Giacomini MK. Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis. Implement Sci 2016; 11:9. [PMID: 26800684 PMCID: PMC4724139 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0373-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems guidance (HSG) are systematically developed statements that assist with decisions about options for addressing health systems challenges, including related changes in health systems arrangements. However, the development, appraisal, and reporting of HSG poses unique conceptual and methodological challenges related to the varied types of evidence that are relevant, the complexity of health systems, and the pre-eminence of contextual factors. To address this gap, we are conducting a program of research that aims to create a tool to support the appraisal of HSG and further enhance HSG development and reporting. The focus of this paper was to conduct a knowledge synthesis of the published and grey literatures to determine quality criteria (concepts) relevant for this process. METHODS We applied a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach to knowledge synthesis that enabled an iterative, flexible, and dynamic analysis of diverse bodies of literature in order to generate a candidate list of concepts that will constitute the foundational components of the HSG tool. Using our review questions as compasses, we were able to guide the search strategy to look for papers based on their potential relevance to HSG appraisal, development, and reporting. The search strategy included various electronic databases and sources, subject-specific journals, conference abstracts, research reports, book chapters, unpublished data, dissertations, and policy documents. Screening the papers and data extraction was completed independently and in duplicate, and a narrative approach to data synthesis was executed. RESULTS We identified 43 papers that met eligibility criteria. No existing review was found on this topic, and no HSG appraisal tool was identified. Over one third of the authors implicitly or explicitly identified the need for a high-quality tool aimed to systematically evaluate HSG and contribute to its development/reporting. We identified 30 concepts that may be relevant to the appraisal of HSG and were able to cluster them into three meaningful domains: process principles, content, and context principles. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed the role that the quality criteria play in the development, appraisal, and reporting of HSG and demonstrated the link and resonance within and between the various concepts in the three domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis E Ako-Arrey
- McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital Site, G Wing, 2nd Floor, Room 207, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Melissa C Brouwers
- McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital Site, G Wing, 2nd Floor, Room 207, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - John N Lavis
- McMaster University, MML-417, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.
| | - Mita K Giacomini
- McMaster University, CRL-218, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Diaz T, Guenther T, Oliphant NP, Muñiz M. A proposed model to conduct process and outcome evaluations and implementation research of child health programs in Africa using integrated community case management as an example. J Glob Health 2014; 4:020409. [PMID: 25520799 PMCID: PMC4267085 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.04.020409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To use a newly devised set of criteria to review the study design and scope of
collection of process, outcomes and contextual data for evaluations and
implementation research of integrated community case management (iCCM) in
Sub–Saharan African. Methods We examined 24 program evaluations and implementation research studies of iCCM in
sub–Saharan Africa conducted in the last 5 years (2008–2013), assessed
the design used and categorized them according to whether or not they collected
sufficient information to conduct process and outcome evaluations. Results Five of the 24 studies used a stepped wedge design and two were randomized control
trials. The remaining 17 were quasi–experimental of which 10 had comparison
areas; however, not all comparison areas had a pre and post household survey.
With regard to process data, 22 of the studies collected sufficient information to
report on implementation strength, and all, except one, could report on program
implementation. Most common missing data elements were health facility treatments,
service costs, and qualitative data to assess demand. For the measurement of
program outcomes, 7 of the 24 studies had a year or less of implementation at
scale before the endline survey, 6 of the household surveys did not collect point
of service, 10 did not collect timeliness (care seeking within 24 hours of
symptoms) and 12 did not have socioeconomic (SES) information. Among the 16
studies with comparison areas, only 5 randomly selected comparison areas, while 10
had appropriate comparison areas. Conclusions Several evaluations were done too soon after implementation, lacked information on
health facility treatments, costs, demand, timeliness or SES and/or did not have a
counterfactual. We propose several study designs and minimal data elements to be
collected to provide sufficient information to assess whether iCCM increased
timely coverage of treatment for the neediest children in a cost–efficient
manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Diaz
- UNICEF, Programme Division, Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Maria Muñiz
- UNICEF, Programme Division, Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fischer Walker CL, Walker N. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) as a model for diarrhea mortality reduction. BMC Med 2014; 12:70. [PMID: 24779400 PMCID: PMC4234397 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diarrhea is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children under five years of age. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) is a model used to calculate deaths averted or lives saved by past interventions and for the purposes of program planning when costly and time consuming impact studies are not possible. DISCUSSION LiST models the relationship between coverage of interventions and outputs, such as stunting, diarrhea incidence and diarrhea mortality. Each intervention directly prevents a proportion of diarrhea deaths such that the effect size of the intervention is multiplied by coverage to calculate lives saved. That is, the maximum effect size could be achieved at 100% coverage, but at 50% coverage only 50% of possible deaths are prevented. Diarrhea mortality is one of the most complex causes of death to be modeled. The complexity is driven by the combination of direct prevention and treatment interventions as well as interventions that operate indirectly via the reduction in risk factors, such as stunting and wasting. Published evidence is used to quantify the effect sizes for each direct and indirect relationship. Several studies have compared measured changes in mortality to LiST estimates of mortality change looking at different sets of interventions in different countries. While comparison work has generally found good agreement between the LiST estimates and measured mortality reduction, where data availability is weak, the model is less likely to produce accurate results. LiST can be used as a component of program evaluation, but should be coupled with more complete information on inputs, processes and outputs, not just outcomes and impact. SUMMARY LiST is an effective tool for modeling diarrhea mortality and can be a useful alternative to large and expensive mortality impact studies. Predicting the impact of interventions or comparing the impact of more than one intervention without having to wait for the results of large and expensive mortality studies is critical to keep programs focused and results oriented for continued reductions in diarrhea and all-cause mortality among children under five years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa L Fischer Walker
- Department of International Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Institute for International Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neff Walker
- Department of International Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Institute for International Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wagenaar BH, Gimbel S, Hoek R, Pfeiffer J, Michel C, Manuel JL, Cuembelo F, Quembo T, Afonso P, Gloyd S, Sherr K. Stock-outs of essential health products in Mozambique - longitudinal analyses from 2011 to 2013. Trop Med Int Health 2014; 19:791-801. [PMID: 24724617 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the relationship between health system factors and facility-level EHP stock-outs in Mozambique. METHODS Service provisions were assessed in 26 health facilities and 13 district warehouses in Sofala Province, Mozambique, from July to August in 2011-2013. Generalised estimating equations were used to model factors associated with facility-level availability of essential drugs, supplies and equipment. RESULTS Stock-out rates for drugs ranged from 1.3% for oral rehydration solution to 20.5% for Depo-Provera and condoms, with a mean stock-out rate of 9.1%; mean stock-out rates were 15.4% for supplies and 4.1% for equipment. Stock-outs at the district level accounted for 27.1% (29/107) of facility-level drug stock-outs and 44.0% (37/84) of supply stock-outs. Each 10-km increase in the distance from district distribution warehouses was associated with a 31% (CI: 22-42%), 28% (CI: 17-40%) or 27% (CI: 7-50%) increase in rates of drug, supply or equipment stock-outs, respectively. The number of heath facility staff was consistently negatively associated with the occurrence of stock-outs. CONCLUSIONS Facility-level stock-outs of EHPs in Mozambique are common and appear to disproportionately affect those living far from district capitals and near facilities with few health staff. The majority of facility-level EHP stock-outs in Mozambique occur when stock exists at the district distribution centre. Innovative methods are urgently needed to improve EHP supply chains, requesting and ordering of drugs, facility and district communication, and forecasting of future EHP needs in Mozambique. Increased investments in public-sector human resources for health could potentially decrease the occurrence of EHP stock-outs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley H Wagenaar
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA; Health Alliance International, Beira, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bassett MT, Gallin EK, Adedokun L, Toner C. From the ground up: strengthening health systems at district level. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2. [PMID: 23819479 PMCID: PMC3668220 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mary T Bassett
- The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, New York, NY, 10019, USA
| | - Elaine K Gallin
- The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, New York, NY, 10019, USA
- Dr. Gallin was the program director for the Medical Research Program at the time the African Health Initiative was launched. She currently works as an independent consultant
| | - Lola Adedokun
- The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, New York, NY, 10019, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hirschhorn LR, Baynes C, Sherr K, Chintu N, Awoonor-Williams JK, Finnegan K, Philips JF, Anatole M, Bawah AA, Basinga P. Approaches to ensuring and improving quality in the context of health system strengthening: a cross-site analysis of the five African Health Initiative Partnership programs. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S8. [PMID: 23819662 PMCID: PMC3668288 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated into the work in health systems strengthening (HSS) is a growing focus on the importance of ensuring quality of the services delivered and systems which support them. Understanding how to define and measure quality in the different key World Health Organization building blocks is critical to providing the information needed to address gaps and identify models for replication. DESCRIPTION OF APPROACHES We describe the approaches to defining and improving quality across the five country programs funded through the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation African Health Initiative. While each program has independently developed and implemented country-specific approaches to strengthening health systems, they all included quality of services and systems as a core principle. We describe the differences and similarities across the programs in defining and improving quality as an embedded process essential for HSS to achieve the goal of improved population health. The programs measured quality across most or all of the six WHO building blocks, with specific areas of overlap in improving quality falling into four main categories: 1) defining and measuring quality; 2) ensuring data quality, and building capacity for data use for decision making and response to quality measurements; 3) strengthened supportive supervision and/or mentoring; and 4) operational research to understand the factors associated with observed variation in quality. CONCLUSIONS Learning the value and challenges of these approaches to measuring and improving quality across the key components of HSS as the projects continue their work will help inform similar efforts both now and in the future to ensure quality across the critical components of a health system and the impact on population health.
Collapse
|
42
|
Sherr K, Requejo JH, Basinga P. Implementation research to catalyze advances in health systems strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa: the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S1. [PMID: 23819761 PMCID: PMC3668282 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mutale W, Chintu N, Amoroso C, Awoonor-Williams K, Phillips J, Baynes C, Michel C, Taylor A, Sherr K. Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S9. [PMID: 23819699 PMCID: PMC3668230 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s9;13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weak health information systems (HIS) are a critical challenge to reaching the health-related Millennium Development Goals because health systems performance cannot be adequately assessed or monitored where HIS data are incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely. The Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) Partnerships were established in five sub-Saharan African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) to catalyze advances in strengthening district health systems. Interventions were tailored to the setting in which activities were planned. COMPARISONS ACROSS STRATEGIES All five PHIT Partnerships share a common feature in their goal of enhancing HIS and linking data with improved decision-making, specific strategies varied. Mozambique, Ghana, and Tanzania all focus on improving the quality and use of the existing Ministry of Health HIS, while the Zambia and Rwanda partnerships have introduced new information and communication technology systems or tools. All partnerships have adopted a flexible, iterative approach in designing and refining the development of new tools and approaches for HIS enhancement (such as routine data quality audits and automated troubleshooting), as well as improving decision making through timely feedback on health system performance (such as through summary data dashboards or routine data review meetings). The most striking differences between partnership approaches can be found in the level of emphasis of data collection (patient versus health facility), and consequently the level of decision making enhancement (community, facility, district, or provincial leadership). DISCUSSION Design differences across PHIT Partnerships reflect differing theories of change, particularly regarding what information is needed, who will use the information to affect change, and how this change is expected to manifest. The iterative process of data use to monitor and assess the health system has been heavily communication dependent, with challenges due to poor feedback loops. Implementation to date has highlighted the importance of engaging frontline staff and managers in improving data collection and its use for informing system improvement. Through rigorous process and impact evaluation, the experience of the PHIT teams hope to contribute to the evidence base in the areas of HIS strengthening, linking HIS with decision making, and its impact on measures of health system outputs and impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilbroad Mutale
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Zambia
- School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Zambia
| | | | | | | | - James Phillips
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, USA
| | - Colin Baynes
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, USA
- Ifakara Health Institute , Mikocheni, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Cathy Michel
- Health Alliance International, Direcçao Provincial de Saúde, Beira, Sofala, Mozambique
| | - Angela Taylor
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Zambia
| | - Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sherr K, Cuembelo F, Michel C, Gimbel S, Micek M, Kariaganis M, Pio A, Manuel JL, Pfeiffer J, Gloyd S. Strengthening integrated primary health care in Sofala, Mozambique. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S4. [PMID: 23819552 PMCID: PMC3668215 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Large increases in health sector investment and policies favoring upgrading and expanding the public sector health network have prioritized maternal and child health in Mozambique and, over the past decade, Mozambique has achieved substantial improvements in maternal and child health indicators. Over this same period, the government of Mozambique has continued to decentralize the management of public sector resources to the district level, including in the health sector, with the aim of bringing decision-making and resources closer to service beneficiaries. Weak district level management capacity has hindered the decentralization process, and building this capacity is an important link to ensure that resources translate to improved service delivery and further improvements in population health. A consortium of the Ministry of Health, Health Alliance International, Eduardo Mondlane University, and the University of Washington are implementing a health systems strengthening model in Sofala Province, central Mozambique. Description of implementation The Mozambique Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) Partnership focuses on improving the quality of routine data and its use through appropriate tools to facilitate decision making by health system managers; strengthening management and planning capacity and funding district health plans; and building capacity for operations research to guide system-strengthening efforts. This seven-year effort covers all 13 districts and 146 health facilities in Sofala Province. Evaluation design A quasi-experimental controlled time-series design will be used to assess the overall impact of the partnership strategy on under-5 mortality by examining changes in mortality pre- and post-implementation in Sofala Province compared with neighboring Manica Province. The evaluation will compare a broad range of input, process, output, and outcome variables to strengthen the plausibility that the partnership strategy led to health system improvements and subsequent population health impact. Discussion The Mozambique PHIT Partnership expects to provide evidence on the effect of efforts to improve data quality coupled with the introduction of tools, training, and supervision to improve evidence-based decision making. This contribution to the knowledge base on what works to enhance health systems is highly replicable for rapid scale-up to other provinces in Mozambique, as well as other sub-Saharan African countries with limited resources and a commitment to comprehensive primary health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mutale W, Chintu N, Amoroso C, Awoonor-Williams K, Phillips J, Baynes C, Michel C, Taylor A, Sherr K. Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S9. [PMID: 23819699 PMCID: PMC3668230 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-s2-s9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weak health information systems (HIS) are a critical challenge to reaching the health-related Millennium Development Goals because health systems performance cannot be adequately assessed or monitored where HIS data are incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely. The Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) Partnerships were established in five sub-Saharan African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) to catalyze advances in strengthening district health systems. Interventions were tailored to the setting in which activities were planned. COMPARISONS ACROSS STRATEGIES All five PHIT Partnerships share a common feature in their goal of enhancing HIS and linking data with improved decision-making, specific strategies varied. Mozambique, Ghana, and Tanzania all focus on improving the quality and use of the existing Ministry of Health HIS, while the Zambia and Rwanda partnerships have introduced new information and communication technology systems or tools. All partnerships have adopted a flexible, iterative approach in designing and refining the development of new tools and approaches for HIS enhancement (such as routine data quality audits and automated troubleshooting), as well as improving decision making through timely feedback on health system performance (such as through summary data dashboards or routine data review meetings). The most striking differences between partnership approaches can be found in the level of emphasis of data collection (patient versus health facility), and consequently the level of decision making enhancement (community, facility, district, or provincial leadership). DISCUSSION Design differences across PHIT Partnerships reflect differing theories of change, particularly regarding what information is needed, who will use the information to affect change, and how this change is expected to manifest. The iterative process of data use to monitor and assess the health system has been heavily communication dependent, with challenges due to poor feedback loops. Implementation to date has highlighted the importance of engaging frontline staff and managers in improving data collection and its use for informing system improvement. Through rigorous process and impact evaluation, the experience of the PHIT teams hope to contribute to the evidence base in the areas of HIS strengthening, linking HIS with decision making, and its impact on measures of health system outputs and impact.
Collapse
|