1
|
Kennedy DS, Vu VK, Ritchie H, Bartlein R, Rothschild O, Bausch DG, Roser M, Seale AC. COVID-19: Identifying countries with indicators of success in responding to the outbreak. Gates Open Res 2021; 4:62. [PMID: 34703986 PMCID: PMC8515014 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13140.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In designing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to understand what has already worked well. We aimed to identify countries with emerging success stories from whom policymakers might draw important lessons. Methods: We developed a process to first include countries with large enough populations that results were unlikely to be due to chance, that had sufficient cases for response mechanisms to be tested, and that shared the necessary publicly available data. Within these countries, we looked at indicators suggesting success in terms of detecting disease, containing the outbreak, and treating those who were unwell. To support comparability, we measured indicators per capita (per million) and across time. We then used the indicators to identify three countries with emerging success stories to include some diversity in global region, population demographics and form of government. Results: We identified 66 countries that met our inclusion criteria on 18 th May 2020. Several of these countries had indicators of success against the set indicators at different times in the outbreak. Vietnam had high levels of testing and successful containment with no deaths reported. South Korea had high levels of testing early in the outbreak, supporting containment. Germany had high levels of sustained testing and slower increases in cases and deaths than seen in other comparable settings. Conclusions: At the time of our assessment, Vietnam and South Korea were able to contain the outbreak of COVID-19 and avoid the exponential growth in cases seen elsewhere. Germany had more cases and deaths, but was nevertheless able to contain and mitigate the outbreak. Despite the many limitations to the data currently available, looking at comparative data can help identify countries from whom we can draw lessons, so that countries can inform and adapt their strategies for success in response to COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Kennedy
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - VK Vu
- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA
| | - Hannah Ritchie
- Our World in Data, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel G. Bausch
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Max Roser
- Our World in Data, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna C. Seale
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carter A, Akseer N, Ho K, Rothschild O, Bose N, Binagwaho A, Hirschhorn LR, Price M, Muther K, Panjabi R, Freeman MC, Bednarczyk RA, Bhutta ZA. A framework for identifying and learning from countries that demonstrated exemplary performance in improving health outcomes and systems. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 5:bmjgh-2020-002938. [PMID: 33272938 PMCID: PMC7716663 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper introduces a framework for conducting and disseminating mixed methods research on positive outlier countries that successfully improved their health outcomes and systems. We provide guidance on identifying exemplar countries, assembling multidisciplinary teams, collecting and synthesising pre-existing evidence, undertaking qualitative and quantitative analyses, and preparing dissemination products for various target audiences. Through a range of ongoing research studies, we illustrate application of each step of the framework while highlighting key considerations and lessons learnt. We hope uptake of this comprehensive framework by diverse stakeholders will increase the availability and utilisation of rigorous and comparable insights from global health success stories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Carter
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nadia Akseer
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Ho
- Gates Ventures, Kirkland, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lisa R Hirschhorn
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Kyle Muther
- Last Mile Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raj Panjabi
- Last Mile Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew C Freeman
- Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akseer N, Vaivada T, Rothschild O, Ho K, Bhutta ZA. Understanding multifactorial drivers of child stunting reduction in Exemplar countries: a mixed-methods approach. Am J Clin Nutr 2020; 112:792S-805S. [PMID: 32649742 PMCID: PMC7487431 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several countries have notably reduced childhood stunting relative to economic growth over the past 15-20 y. The Exemplars in Stunting Reduction project, or "Exemplars," studies success factors among these countries with a lens toward replicability. OBJECTIVES This paper details the standardized mixed-methods framework for studying determinants of childhood stunting reduction applied in Exemplars studies. METHODS An expert technical advisory group (TAG), criteria for identifying Exemplar countries, evidence-based frameworks, mixed methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, policy, literature review), effective research partnerships, case study process and timeline, and data triangulation and corroboration are presented. RESULTS Experts in health, nutrition, and evaluation methods were selected at the study outset to provide technical support to all phases of research (TAG). Exemplar countries were selected by the TAG, who considered quantitative data (e.g., annual rates of stunting change compared with economic growth, country population size) and qualitative insights (e.g., logistics of country work, political stability). Experienced country research partners were selected and an inception meeting with stakeholder consultations was held to launch research and garner support. Evidence-based conceptual frameworks underpinned all Exemplars research activities. A systematic review of published peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken, along with in-depth policy and program analysis of nutrition-specific and -sensitive investments. Both descriptive and advanced quantitative analysis was undertaken (e.g., equity analyses, difference-in-difference regression, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition). Qualitative data collection using in-depth interviews and focus groups was conducted with national and community stakeholders (i.e., child care workers and mothers) to understand country experiences. The case study process was iterative, and all research outputs were triangulated to develop the stunting reduction narrative for each country. Findings were shared with country experts for weigh-in and corroboration through dissemination events. CONCLUSIONS Exemplars research uses a mixed-methods framework for studying positive outliers that can be applied across diverse health and development outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Akseer
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tyler Vaivada
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Kevin Ho
- Gates Ventures, Kirkland, Washington, USA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, the Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirschhorn LR, Gerthe N, Phillips DE, Rothschild O, Singh M, Binagwaho A. Lessons for responding to COVID-19, from Exemplars in Under-five Mortality Reduction. Gates Open Res 2020. [DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13165.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 may not have the same direct effects on children as it does on older adults, but its indirect effects still pose a threat to child health, by disrupting delivery of routine health services like immunizations. This has happened during previous crises, and early indications point towards similar disruptions due to the coronavirus pandemic. To mitigate this, countries need to build resilient health systems capable of maintaining essential maternal and child health interventions, while also responding to COVID. How can this be accomplished? To find some answers, we can learn from countries in the past who improved health outcomes in the face of challenging circumstances. Specific to child health, countries with positive-outlier performance in reducing under-five mortality provide helpful strategies. These lessons include a clear national plan that drives rapid response, leveraging existing data systems to inform decision-making, engaging communities via community health workers, and focusing on equity. Today, countries around the world are facing the challenge of responding to the pandemic while building resilient health systems that continue to deliver invaluable maternal and child health services. Studying lessons from previous success stories can help inform the road ahead.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kennedy DS, Vu VK, Ritchie H, Bartlein R, Rothschild O, Bausch DG, Roser M, Seale AC. COVID-19: Identifying countries with indicators of success in responding to the outbreak. Gates Open Res 2020; 4:62. [PMID: 34703986 PMCID: PMC8515014 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13140.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In designing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to understand what has already worked well. We aimed to identify countries with emerging success stories from whom policymakers might draw important lessons. Methods: We developed a process to first include countries with large enough populations that results were unlikely to be due to chance, that had sufficient cases for response mechanisms to be tested, and that shared the necessary publicly available data. Within these countries, we looked at indicators suggesting success in terms of detecting disease, containing the outbreak, and treating those who were unwell. To support comparability, we measured indicators per capita (per million) and across time. We then used the indicators to identify three countries with emerging success stories to include some diversity in global region, population demographics and form of government. Results: We identified 66 countries that met our inclusion criteria on 18 th May 2020. Several of these countries had indicators of success against the set indicators at different times in the outbreak. Vietnam had high levels of testing and successful containment with no deaths reported. South Korea had high levels of testing early in the outbreak, supporting containment. Germany had high levels of sustained testing and slower increases in cases and deaths than seen in other comparable settings. Conclusions: At the time of our assessment, Vietnam and South Korea were able to contain the outbreak of COVID-19 and avoid the exponential growth in cases seen elsewhere. Germany had more cases and deaths, but was nevertheless able to contain and mitigate the outbreak. Despite the many limitations to the data currently available, looking at comparative data can help identify countries from whom we can draw lessons, so that countries can inform and adapt their strategies for success in response to COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Kennedy
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - VK Vu
- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA
| | - Hannah Ritchie
- Our World in Data, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel G. Bausch
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Max Roser
- Our World in Data, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna C. Seale
- UK-Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/ Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kopec D, Kabir MH, Reinharth D, Rothschild O, Castiglione JA. Human errors in medical practice: systematic classification and reduction with automated information systems. J Med Syst 2003; 27:297-313. [PMID: 12846462 DOI: 10.1023/a:1023796918654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We review the general nature of human error(s) in complex systems and then focus on issues raised by Institute of Medicine report in 1999. From this background we classify and categorize error(s) in medical practice, including medication, procedures, diagnosis, and clerical error(s). We also review the potential role of software and technology applications in reducing the rate and nature of error(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kopec
- Department of Computer and Information Science, Brooklyn College, 2109 Ingersoll Hall, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, New York 11210, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|