Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework

Community intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease in Chicago (CIRCL-Chicago): protocol for a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study using a parallel cluster-randomized trial design

BACKGROUND

Hypertension affects nearly half of adults in the U.S., with African American and Black (AA/B) adults experiencing some of the highest rates domestically and globally. Despite improvements in blood pressure control in the general population, rates of control among AA/B adults have stagnated, contributing to significant health disparities in the prevalence of hypertension and its long-term health impacts. Systemic barriers, including poverty and historically earned distrust in healthcare, hinder patient and clinician adherence to best practices for hypertension management. Community-based interventions, particularly those involving faith-based organizations, show promise in improving blood pressure control among AA/B adults.

METHODS

The CIRCL-Chicago Implementation Research Center will test the effectiveness of a community-adapted hypertension control program, a "bundled" intervention developed by and tested in the Kaiser Permanente system, in South Side Chicago community health centers. A key partner for this trial, the Total Resource Community Development Organization, isa faith-based community outreach hub networked with faith-based organizations throughout Chicago's South Side community. The study employs a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach with a parallel cluster-randomized trial. Sixteen clinics will be randomized to implement a community-adapted Kaiser bundle with or without practice facilitation. We will recruit adults who live, work, or practice their faith in Chicago's South Side community to populate a community-based hypertension registry (target n = 5,760 participants). The primary implementation outcome is the reach of the intervention, measured by the proportion of eligible patients in the registry who receive the adapted Kaiser bundle. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure control rates, assessed at 12 months post-enrollment. The study will use community-engaged adaptation, practice facilitation, and education and training strategies to support implementation.

DISCUSSION

The CIRCL-Chicago study aims to address cardiovascular health disparities by integrating clinical and community-based approaches to hypertension management. By leveraging trusted community settings and engaging local partners, the study seeks to enhance the reach and effectiveness of evidence-based hypertension interventions. The findings could inform scalable models for hypertension control in diverse urban communities, potentially reducing health disparities for AA/B adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04755153 on 24 August 2023, https://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/listings/NCT04755153/community-intervention-to-reduce-cardiovascular-disease-in-chicago.

Adapting an early autism caregiver coaching intervention for telehealth delivery in low-resource settings: A South African study of the 'what' and the 'why'

The COVID-19 pandemic required in-person interventions to be adapted for remote delivery all over the globe. In South Africa, an in-person cascaded task-sharing naturalistic developmental behavioural intervention was adapted for telehealth delivery in a low-resource context. Here we describe the adaptations made (the 'what') and reasons for adaptations (the 'why'). The Framework for Modification and Adaptations (FRAME) was used to document the 'what', and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to describe the 'why'. Systematic member-checking ensured robustness of results. The 'what' included 10 adaptations: selecting WhatsApp as delivery platform, developing images with simple text to communicate intervention concepts, modifying session structure for hybrid delivery, including a caregiver self-reflection checklist, utilizing online practitioner training, supervision, assessment and consent procedures, developing session recording procedures, distributing session materials electronically, and developing caregiver-child interaction recording and uploading protocols. The 'why' included three outer contextual factors (the digital divide, WhatsApp security/privacy policy, and COVID-19 restrictions), three inner contextual factors (characteristics of caregivers and practitioners, ethics board guidance, and school leadership and organizational characteristics) and one innovation factor (support from intervention co-developers). Adaptations were made in response to unchangeable outer contextual factors and through identification of malleable inner contextual factors.Lay abstractWe were busy with an early autism caregiver-coaching programme in South Africa, when COVID-19 stopped all in-person work. We changed the programme so it could be done using computers and/or phones. Here, we describe programme changes (which we call the 'what') and the reasons for those changes (which we call the 'why'). We used a tool called the Framework for Modification and Adaptations (FRAME) to describe the 'what', and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to describe the 'why' of our programme changes. The team members who helped make these changes checked that the changes described were correct. We made 10 changes in total: we used WhatsApp to deliver the programme, made simple pictures with words as visual tools for the programme, changed some session activities, changed a self-reflection checklist, provided all activities online, changed the way assessment and consent was done, made a session recording guide, sent things needed for sessions by email and WhatsApp, and made a caregiver-child play recording guide. The reasons for changes (the 'why') were about factors outside schools (the types of phones and data people had, WhatsApp security rules, COVID-19 rules), things inside schools/workplace (about the caregivers and nonspecialists themselves, ethics boards, things about the school itself), and support from people who developed the programme. Changes were made by working with things inside schools/workplace that could change. Identifying what could change helped focus and guide which changes were made to a programme.

Medicaid reimbursement for community violence intervention and prevention (CVI): a multi-state policy implementation case study

BACKGROUND

Violence has fluctuated in the United States in recent years. Additionally, policing practices have been challenged, especially in neighborhoods of color. Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs have emerged as an effective policy to address violence through neighborhood-centered resources, trauma-informed care, and credible messengers, without full reliance on law enforcement officials. However, inconsistent funding challenges the feasibility and sustainability of these programs. In 2021 several states introduced policies to allocate Medicaid reimbursement for CVI services offering a promising solution to a more sustainable stream of funding.

METHODS

This study uses rigorous qualitative analysis to evaluate the implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies in California, Illinois, and Connecticut, applying the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment (EPIS) model. An analysis of secondary documentation and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the first three states to implement the policy. Stakeholders were recruited from a variety of policy, medical, and non-profit sectors to provide their perspectives and expertise on implementation.

RESULTS

Interviews with stakeholders from policy, medical, and non-profit sectors and a deep analysis of secondary documentation identifies key successes and barriers to effective implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies across the United States. Acknowledging the barriers of implementation highlights where policy planning and development fails to be properly implemented on the ground. Findings emphasize the need for state-specific policy adaptation, collaboration amongst policymakers and practitioners, and sufficient training for on-the-ground CVI staff members.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a Medicaid reimbursement policy for CVI programs could improve the efficacy and sustainability of such programs. However, states need to be aware of the challenges that may arise during the planning and implementation phases. The findings from this study reveal that policy makers, service providers and medical professionals need to be involved and collaborative throughout the planning and implementation process of the policy. States that are planning to implement these policies should assess whether they are ready to implement the policy to ensure that it is successful in the long term.

Workforce and systems change to treat adolescent substance use disorder within integrated pediatric primary care: A cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial

BACKGROUND

While the overdose crisis has impacted all ages, overdose-related deaths among adolescents have been increasing more rapidly than any other age group, doubling between 2019 and 2020. Identifying and treating substance use disorders (SUDs) among adolescents is critical to preventing adolescent overdose deaths. While evidence-based interventions for adolescents with SUDs exist, they remain underutilized. Implementing SUD interventions in primary care settings through integrated behavioral health (IBH) is one approach for increasing access to evidence-based SUD services for adolescents.

METHODS

This is a Hybrid Type 2, cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge trial comparing SUD IBH to standard primary care treatment. In our open cohort stepped-wedge design, primary care clinics will be randomly designated to one of three cohorts. We will use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate both implementation and effectiveness outcomes, with a focus on assessing the impact of IBH on primary care provider behaviors around SUD interventions. All cohorts will complete baseline surveys during the control condition and then every 6 months. At each time point, we will also collect and analyze patient administrative data to assess patient engagement and outcomes. In addition, we will conduct qualitative interviews at pre-, mid-, and post-implementation during sustainment of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Addressing the overdose crisis is a national priority. IBH has the potential to reduce overdose rates by enhancing primary care provider willingness to deliver SUD services for adolescents.

Sustainability of fall prevention exercise programmes for community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Falls have financial, emotional and physical implications for ageing individuals and the healthcare system. Evidence-based exercise programmes have been one of the most effective ways of preventing falls in community dwellings for older adults. However, more research is needed to understand how to sustain these programmes. This scoping review protocol describes our plan to investigate the factors influencing the sustainability of community-based fall prevention exercise programmes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews framework. The studies will have no restrictions, including publication date, language or geographic location. Key search terms concerning programme sustainability and exercise falls prevention will be conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Academic Search Premier, APA PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus in consultation with an experienced librarian. Once duplicates have been removed, two independent reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction. Data from eligible articles will be collated and charted to summarise data into three categories: (1) study description, including publication date, author(s), study location, paper's aim/purpose, study participants, study design and conclusion; (2) data regarding the type of exercise programme will be used using the 16-point checklist Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template; and (3) data regarding sustainability will be organised using domains from the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool. Our results will be charted through the use of Covidence to identify patterns across the studies. Additionally, narrative synthesis will be employed to articulate the study findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this is a scoping review, we do not require ethics approval. We intend to share our report findings with scientists, healthcare professionals and decision-makers. We will publish our results in reputable scientific journals and present them at relevant conferences.

From glitter to gold: recommendations for effective dashboards from design through sustainment

BACKGROUND

Dashboards-tools that compile and summarize key performance data-have become increasingly utilized for supporting data organization and decision-making processes across various fields, such as business, economics, healthcare, and policy. The dashboard's impact is dependent on its use by the individuals for whom it was designed. Yet, few studies measure dashboard use, and of those that do, their utility is limited. When dashboards go unused, they provide little value and impact. We argue that successful and long-term use of dashboards can be achieved using human-centered design and implementation science methods.

MAIN BODY

In this article, we describe the characteristics of dashboards and provide examples of existing dashboards. We discuss the common pitfalls of dashboards that result in their limited use. Next, we proffer how human-centered design and implementation science can improve dashboard relevance. We provide eight recommendations from across the design to the sustainment phase. To guide dashboard developers and implementers, we organize our recommendations using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework. Lastly, we raise several cautions when using human-centered design and implementation science methods in dashboard development and implementation.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for more effective, sustainable, and impactful dashboards. We suggest that incorporating human-centered design and implementation science methods can facilitate achieving this goal.

Preliminary Outcomes from PrEP Well: A Community-led, Multicomponent HIV Prevention Strategy Implemented in a Transgender Community Health Center

Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals are disproportionately impacted by HIV, particularly those who identify as racial/ethnic minorities and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective medication to prevent HIV infection, but many TGNB individuals encounter barriers to PrEP uptake and adherence that limit fully realized preventive benefits. We developed PrEP Well, a multicomponent community-led program, to scale and sustain comprehensive PrEP services from a TGNB-led community organization that provides gender-affirming healthcare and social services. We used implementation science frameworks to evaluate initial program outcomes and contextual influences on program implementation. Preliminary data from August 2022 through January 2024 showed promising implementation and effectiveness outcomes. During that time, 113 primarily low-resourced TGNB clients were educated about PrEP and received an HIV test, of whom 60 (53%) attended a visit with a provider and received a PrEP prescription. At 30-day follow-up, urinalysis confirmed uptake of PrEP among 50 (83%) of the clients prescribed PrEP. At 90-day follow-up, 43 (72%) demonstrated continued use of PrEP and 40 (67%) showed protective levels of PrEP adherence. Qualitative interviews and surveys indicated that clients, staff, and leadership viewed the PrEP Well program as highly acceptable, feasible, and sustainable (including willingness to address persistent implementation barriers). Referral patterns and rates of PrEP uptake suggested increasing integration of PrEP Well into the TGNB community center over time. The PrEP Well program demonstrates the potential for TGNB communities to address HIV inequities by integrating community-led HIV prevention services with gender-affirming healthcare in TGNB-specific health centers.

Peer Perspectives on Challenges Encountered During a Multi-Site Digital Mental Health Intervention Project

Peers are individuals with lived experience of mental health challenges trained to provide support to others with similar challenges. Help@Hand was a multi-site project that integrated peers into digital mental health intervention (DMHI) implementation. This study uses the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to frame challenges reported by peers when implementing DMHIs. Individuals leading the local peer workforce completed quarterly online surveys about perceived challenges to DMHI implementation. Biannual interviews probed for details on survey-reported challenges. 103 quarterly surveys and 39 bi-annual interviews were collected from key informants at 11 Help@Hand sites between Summer 2020 and Fall 2022. One challenge was tied directly to DMHIs; namely, device distribution. Several related to the Implementation Process, including challenges with recruiting qualified peers and integrating peers into DMHI implementations; communication and collaboration; and translation. Challenges in the Individual domain included unclear peer roles and multi-tasking across various projects. Inner Setting challenges included structural barriers to hiring peers, issues with communication and project management, and workforce turnover. Outer Setting challenges related to environmental technology readiness, COVID-19, unclear decision-making processes across the collaborative, and uneven communication between sites' peers. Funding uncertainty bridged the Inner and Outer Settings. Using the CFIR model to frame challenges to DMHI implementation yielded useful lessons, especially when peers are engaged as partners in planning and implementation process. Successful implementation will be enhanced by ensuring adequate environmental readiness for tech-based interventions, clear role definition, streamlined peer hiring processes, and well-delineated lines of communication locally and across sites.

The implementation of guidelines in palliative care - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Guidelines are essential tools for ensuring high-quality healthcare. However, discrepancies exist between their availability and practical implementation. In the context of palliative care, the extent to which guidelines are implemented and the barriers and facilitators that influence this process remain unknown.

AIM

The present study aimed at systematically reviewing the international literature on the implementation of palliative care guidelines to evaluate factors that support or hinder implementation of palliative care guidelines globally.

METHOD

A scoping review was conducted following the methodological approach of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). After the formulation of research questions and development of a search string, relevant studies investigating the implementation of guidelines were identified and retrieved from the databases CINAHL, LIVIO, PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection on 4 January 2024. Two researchers independently selected articles for inclusion, employing a blinded process with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results were subsequently categorised deductively by the same researchers using Petermann's (2014) taxonomy of implementation outcomes. The results were summarised and presented in tabular form.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,086 records, of which 1,252 were included in the title and abstract screening. Subsequently, 113 full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility, resulting in 29 articles deemed suitable for the final analysis. Six implementation outcomes were identified in the included literature: (1) acceptability (n = 15 articles), (2) adoption (n = 6 articles), (3) appropriateness (n = 9 articles), (4) feasibility (n = 9 articles), (5) fidelity/adherence (n = 14 articles) and (6) penetration (n = 14 articles). The majority of studies employed quantitative approaches (n = 22) and considered the perspective of healthcare professionals and their opinions regarding guideline implementation in palliative care. Only 4 articles considered patient related outcomes or the perspectives of the family caregivers. Ten articles reported on facilitators and barriers. Facilitators included healthcare professionals' motivation and managerial support, while barriers primarily referred to time constraints and limited knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline implementation in palliative care is highly variable. Future research should aim at comprehensively analysing facilitators of and barriers to this process, considering diverse implementation outcomes. For these evaluations, mixed-method approaches are recommended.

Providers' Perspectives on Implementation of Low-threshold HCV Treatment in New York State: A Qualitative Study

Background

Global study data show injection drug use is driving upwards of 79% of all new hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases in high-income countries. Low-threshold models can engage vulnerable populations in treatment to achieve HCV elimination targets. We examined the implementation of low-threshold models for HCV care in New York State, which has a robust HCV elimination program.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 healthcare providers in 2022. Included providers either self-described as "low-threshold," had a clinical focus on marginalized populations, or practiced in non-traditional settings. Interviews focused on the implementation of low-threshold HCV care. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and were categorized into themes guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.

Results

Providers implemented low-threshold HCV care by facilitating access (e.g., having walk-in or telemedicine HCV services). Point-of-care testing and peer support were other important features. The inner context was driven by provider and organization values and involved providing low-threshold HCV care within health systems that were not themselves "low-threshold." Adequate staffing was crucial for the extensive care coordination and outreach activities needed to engage persons who inject drugs (PWID). The outer context was characterized by a limited funding environment, restrictive insurance policies, and the high impact of patients' unmet social needs. Providers relied on care coordination and integrated care models to overcome these barriers.

Conclusions

Low-threshold HCV care incorporates operational flexibility and patient navigation but is challenged by patients' unmet social needs. Jurisdictions can support implementation by providing adequate funding for substantial outreach activities needed to engage vulnerable populations.

Annual Research Review: Exposure to environmental chemicals and psychosocial stress and the development of children's learning difficulties

Although awareness of the role of environmental exposures in children's cognitive development is increasing, learning difficulties have not yet been a major focus of environmental health science. Learning difficulties disproportionately affect children living in economic disadvantage, yielding an 'achievement gap.' Studies examining the neurobiology of reading and math have mostly included economically advantaged youth, leaving a great deal unknown about the neural underpinnings of reading and math difficulties in youth living in disadvantaged contexts. Critically, due to environmental injustice, these youth are disproportionately exposed to environmental neurotoxicants. Herein, we review literature supporting a theoretical framework of environmentally associated phenotypes of learning difficulties. We propose that prenatal exposure to neurotoxicants and early-life exposure to psychosocial stressors increases risk for learning difficulties via effects on neural circuits that support cognitive processes which, in addition to literacy and numeracy, are integral to acquiring and performing academic skills. We describe models in which (1) prenatal exposure to air pollution has a main effect on learning via brain structure and function or associated domain-general cognitive processes and (2) a joint 'two-hit' pathway in which prenatal air pollution exposure followed by early life stress-when combined and sequential-increases risk for learning difficulties also via effects on brain structure, function, and/or associated cognitive processes. We review a select literature documenting effects of exposure to pollutants and early life stress on relevant neural circuits and associated cognitive processes in animal models and parallel findings in human epidemiologic studies. We advocate for team science in which researchers, practitioners, and policymakers collaborate to increase health literacy about environmentally associated phenotypes of learning difficulties and support the development of precision-oriented instructional and environmental intervention methods for youth living in economic disadvantage.

Content validation of drug problem-oriented clinical record

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, hospitals are responsible for restoring health. However, poorly executed processes in these institutions can lead to risks and harm to patients, especially in identifying drug related problems. This fact justifies the proposal of tools to support the diagnosis, management and resolution of these problems.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and content validate a clinical record that is oriented towards drug-related problems.

METHOD

A drug-oriented clinical record was first developed, after which it underwent content validation. The study was carried out between September and December 2017.7 The first version of the drug-related clinical record was prepared by two experienced researchers, using studies and problem-oriented medical tools described in the literature. Thereafter, content validation was performed using the nominal group technique. The expert panel consisted of a physician, two nurses, and three pharmacists with clinical experience in a hospital setting or pharmaceutical care. After that, the respective instrument was assessed according to the criteria objectivity, simplicity, clarity, relevance. These criteria are intended to ensure the rigor and reliability of instrument content.

RESULTS

Experts' suggestions included modification of the order of some items, insertion of new items, modification of item-writing procedures, expansion of specific fields, and better specification of data that is to be filled in as an item. The final version of the instrument was titled "DAM Clinical Record" (Diagnostics - Adverse Clinical Findings - Medicines) and comprised 45 items categorized into six sections: Patient Identification, Anamnesis, Clinical Diagnosis, Adverse Clinical Findings, Medicines and Pharmaceutical Evaluation.

CONCLUSION

A clinical record oriented towards drug-related problems, named DAM, was developed to guide healthcare professionals in identifying and solving drug-related problems. All relevant information generated in the hospital setting was consecutively stored as drug problem-oriented clinical records after undergoing thorough content validation.

Optimising Scopes of Practice and Team-Based Collaborative Care Through Task-Shifting and Task-Sharing in Mental Health-A Collaborative Patient Care (CPC) Initiative

Team-based collaborative models utilise a broad range of healthcare clinicians that practise at the top of their licence, while proactively redistributing shared work through task-shifting, offering meaningful ways to contribute to patient care while ensuring high-quality outcomes. A mental health hospital in Canada embarked on a Collaborative Patient Care (CPC) initiative to optimise skill and skill mix of interdisciplinary inpatient teams. Implementation science, specifically the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, was utilised to guide the project. Following qualitative and quantitative syntheses, analyses and stakeholder engagement, CPC re-imagined team-based care by restructuring one clinical team of recreational therapy and introduced 26 new positions to infuse across the organisation, including new disciplines of rehabilitation assistant, geriatric physiotherapist, occupational therapists and bachelor of social work roles, while recruiting for more child and youth workers, recreational therapists, secretaries, psychologists, behavioural therapists and personal support workers. Scopes of work were defined to support differences (i.e., between Registered Nurses (RN) and Registered Practical Nurses (RPN)) while team responsibilities were designed to support shared practices. An educational upskilling plan was implemented to support unregulated and regulated clinicians to perform at the level of the new model. At the time of this paper, CPC is immersed in its Sustainment stage. CPC represents a comprehensive plan aimed at enhancing patient care through service efficiencies and optimising resource allocation. It is anticipated that the implementation of CPC will contribute to a shared vision for a better future where patients (and families) receive the right care at the right time by the right clinician.

Using human-centered design to advance health literacy in local health department programming: a case study

BACKGROUND

Human-centered design (HCD) and behavioral science are structured, evidence-based methodologies used to develop and evaluate community-driven interventions. While HCD focuses on deeply understanding user needs and co-designing solutions, behavioral science applies empirically tested principles to drive behavior change. Together, these methodologies enable the development of interventions that are both user-centered and behaviorally informed. The Pima County Health Department and project partners leveraged these collaborative methodologies to assemble a Community of Practice to improve health literacy and adherence to COVID-19 public health practices among Hispanic/Latine individuals of childbearing age and ability in Pima County.

METHODS

Human-centered design processes identified and evaluated barriers facing the target population. On the basis of these findings, two pilot interventions were implemented between July 2023 and November 2023: one in a clinical setting with 92 participants and another in a community setting with 207 participants. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the impact of these pilots. Quantitatively, a pre-post evaluation and survey design estimated the effect of an intervention by comparing outcomes before and after implementation using paired t-test and chi-square tests. Qualitatively, structured post intervention interviews were conducted with participants who were randomly selected based upon their initial consent and willingness to participate.

RESULTS

Participants in the clinical and community pilots perceived fewer barriers to health-seeking behaviors after the intervention. Both pilots increased participants' confidence in health-seeking behaviors (p < 0.01). Only the clinical pilot resulted in an increase in health literacy. In the clinical pilot, the number of unvaccinated participants decreased, and the number of participants who reported needing a booster increased. The community pilot did not find a statistically significant difference in COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating human-centered design and behavioral science into public health interventions can improve health literacy and confidence in health-seeking behaviors among historically and contemporarily excluded populations. Local health departments can use these methods to develop multicomponent interventions that foster mutual co-invention with communities and improve population health outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term impacts and explore broader applications of these approaches in different contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This project received University of Arizona IRB review and approval. This study was not considered a randomized controlled trial and did not require registration.

Leveraging the science of implementation: the case for specialized mental health community supervision

People with mental illnesses are overrepresented in criminal legal systems internationally, making addressing mental health among this population a global public health concern. Across the world, community supervision agencies (i.e., probation and parole) have implemented a variety of innovative and evidence-informed approaches to improve outcomes for people with mental illness. However, the demonstrated success of these approaches in one region or country does not guarantee effectiveness in another due to significant variations in the implementation context, including differences in governance and administration, society and culture, and resource constraints. Applying implementation science methods throughout the phases of intervention (design and development, implementation, and evaluation) provides tools that can help translate innovations within and across different agencies, countries, and contexts. To highlight how implementation science methods can be used to adapt and implement health interventions within criminal legal system settings, this perspective uses the example of specialized mental health community supervision in the USA. Drawing on general implementation science principles and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we articulate key questions and steps agencies can take to translate health interventions from theory into practice.

A randomized controlled trial of a family-based HIV/STI prevention program for Black girls and male caregivers in Chicago: IMAGE study protocol paper

Black girls are disproportionately impacted by HIV and STIs in the United States. Black male caregivers are underutilized in family-based HIV/STI prevention programming and offer a novel opportunity to protect Black girls. This study will evaluate the efficacy and implementation of an HIV/STI prevention program delivered to Black girls and male caregivers in community settings. IMAGE: IMARA for the Male Caregivers and Girls Empowerment was adapted from IMARA, an evidence-based mother-daughter intervention to decrease HIV/STI infection and increase communication and healthy relationships among girls and their male caregivers. Using an efficacy implementation design, we will test the effectiveness of IMAGE compared to a time-matched general health promotion program across six community-based organizations. Aim one will evaluate IMAGE in a 2-arm randomized controlled trial with 300 14-18-year-old Black girls and their male caregiver dyads in Chicago, IL. We hypothesize that girls who receive IMAGE will have lower STI incidence (primary outcome), fewer sexual partners, and more consistent condom use (secondary outcomes) at 6- and 12-months compared to girls in the health promotion program. Guided by the 3-Step Implementation Model, our second aim is to identify and describe factors (barriers, facilitators) and processes affecting implementation in community settings. HIV and STI disparities go beyond individual-level factors, and male caregivers may protect girls by being a sexual health resource. This study will facilitate rapid CBO uptake and ownership of IMAGE if effective. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06266416.

Navigating Health Insurance Selection for in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Benefits: A Study Protocol

Introduction

A large public university added health insurance coverage of 50% co-insurance for up to two cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) to eligible faculty and staff.

Methods

We describe the design and conduct of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a health insurance educational intervention on health insurance literacy and IVF benefit utilization. The intervention materials included 1) Key insurance terms; 2) Examples of premiums and deductibles across the insurance plan options; 3) Examples of how premiums and deductibles affect out-of-pocket costs; and 4) A guide to find in-network providers/facilities. The primary outcome is health insurance literacy. Secondary outcomes are IVF services and insurance benefit utilization, out-of-pocket costs, and financial hardship related to fertility care. We collected validated patient-reported outcomes at three timepoints over 1 year. We will integrate mixed methods data to explore whether the intervention was effective, feasible, acceptable, and appropriate.

Results

Among 394 faculty and staff screened, 217 (55%) reproductive-aged (18 to 50 years) employees consented, completed the baseline survey and were randomized in a 2:1 fashion. Participants were female (81%), married (63%), and worked as a staff employee (72%). Approximately 39% reported an infertility diagnosis, and 28% had undergone prior IVF treatment. Participants reported feeling slightly confident when using their health insurance plans and moderately confident being proactive when using their health insurance plans.

Discussion

Our goal is to improve health insurance literacy and utilization of health insurance benefits for IVF care, thereby expanding family-building options for reproductive-aged individuals.

How State Administrative Structures Influence Implementation Outcomes for Wraparound Care Coordination

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine how inner-context (organizational) and outer-context (system) variables affect implementation outcomes for wraparound care coordination, an evidence-based strategy for youths with complex behavioral health needs.

METHODS

This study focused on data from 1,178 providers in 10 states that used one of two state-level administrative structures to implement wraparound care coordination; four states used care management entities (CMEs), and six used community mental health centers (CMHCs). Implementation completeness and duration were assessed with the Stages of Implementation Completion tool, and practice fidelity was assessed with the Coaching Observation Measure for Effective Teams. Multilevel models were used to compare CMEs with CMHCs at the state level in terms of implementation completeness, duration, and fidelity.

RESULTS

Compared with CMHC states, CME states had higher mean fidelity scores among practitioners (0.37 vs. 0.24; t=8.02, df=1,136, p<0.001), completed more implementation activities, and completed most implementation activities faster. Multilevel models found that the duration of the preimplementation phase was positively associated with fidelity (b<0.001, t=3.62, df=10.85, p=0.004) and that the duration of the implementation phase was negatively associated with fidelity (b<-0.001, t=-6.64, df=7.04, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results reinforce that systems-level strategies such as wraparound care coordination require considerable time to plan and implement and that state-level administrative structures meaningfully influence implementation outcomes and service quality. Taking the time to design hospitable inner and outer contexts is crucial to implementation efficiency, completeness, and quality.

Continuous quality improvement across a South Australian health service and the role it plays in a learning health system: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives are commonly used to enhance patient safety and quality of care. A novel South Australian Local Health Network (SALHN) Continuous Improvement Program (CIP009) has integrated a top-down model of executive-directed change initiatives, with a bottom-up approach of clinician designed interventions to address an organisational-wide goal of improved patient flow. This study evaluated the strengths and challenges of CIP009 implementation from the perspective of participants and deliverers.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted in 2023/2024 to evaluate the implementation of CIP009 and 12 associated quality improvement projects. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with key stakeholders (executives, coaches and CIP009 fellows) and guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A document review and observations of CIP009 team meetings were also conducted. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis, then deductively mapped against the five CFIR domains.

RESULTS

Thirty-one participants were interviewed individually or in focus groups, two presentation days and six team meetings were observed, and 78 documents were reviewed. Seven key themes were identified highlighting key challenges and strengths of CIP009 implementation within the SALHN setting. These included four key strengths: the CIP framework and culture (the flexible framework, common language, training, and a culture of flattened hierarchy); the benefits of support from a dedicated, internal improvement Faculty (wrap around support from coaches); the advantages of an enthusiastic team member disposition and incentives (vested interests to enhance workflow and patient outcomes); and effective teams and team composition (teams comprised of senior clinician change agents). Three key challenges included: workforce and organisation-level challenges (individual workloads, workforce capacity, and data access); team cohesion, logistics and stakeholder engagement challenges (issues in the way teams worked together); and training and support shortcomings (the training course, and the top-down nature of CIP009).

CONCLUSION

This evaluation identified that CIP009 was considered an effective multifaceted CQI program. The strengths of CIP009 support a learning health system (a data driven model, utilising systematic frameworks, with commitment from leadership, and a culture of continuous learning). Further integration of implementation science principles may support the program to overcome the key challenges identified. These findings will inform and guide improvement efforts within future iterations of CIP.

Practical considerations for engaging staff in resource-constrained healthcare settings in implementation research: A qualitative focus group and consensus building study

Background

The primary purpose of this study was to assess perceived burdens and benefits of participating in implementation research among staff employed in resource-constrained healthcare settings. Another objective was to use findings to generate considerations for engaging staff in research across different phases of implementation research.

Methods

This qualitative focus group and consensus building study involved researchers affiliated with the National Cancer Institute Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control program and nine Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Massachusetts. Six focus groups (n = 3 with CHC staff; n = 3 with researchers) assessed barriers and facilitators to staff participation in implementation research. During consensus discussions, we used findings to develop considerations for engaging staff as participants and partners throughout phases of implementation research.

Results

Sixteen researchers and 14 staff participated in separate focus groups; nine researchers and seven staff participated in separate consensus discussions. Themes emerged across participant groups in three domains: (1) influences on research participation; (2) research burdens and benefits; and (3) ways to facilitate staff participation in research. Practical considerations included: (a) aligning research with organizational and staff values and priorities; (b) applying user-centered design to research methods; (c) building organizational and individual research capacity; and (d) offering equitable incentives for staff participation.

Conclusions

Engaging staff as participants and partners across different phases of implementation research requires knowledge about what contributes to research burden and benefits and addressing context-specific burdens and benefits.

IM4Equity: an implementation science meta-framework for community-engaged partnerships to advance health equity

BACKGROUND

Implementation determinant frameworks identify factors that may impede or facilitate implementation of evidence-based innovations (EBI) in new contexts, including diverse community settings. For health equity initiatives, variations in which frameworks are used make synthesis and identification of shared determinants difficult, including equity constructs. Further, such frameworks are rarely informed by community partner input. We describe the development of an equity-centered meta-framework that centers community-engagement called IM4Equity (Crosswalk of 4 IMplementation Frameworks to advance health Equity) as part of the Disparities Elimination through Coordinated Interventions to Prevent and Control Heart and Lung Disease Risk (DECIPHeR) Alliance, comprised of seven research-community partnerships across the U.S.

METHODS

We conducted a crosswalk of determinants (domains and constructs within domains) from the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework; Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model; updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; and Health Equity Implementation Framework. We reviewed original source publications and resources to identify determinants from each framework, which informed a prototype figure. We obtained feedback on the figure with a user-centered design approach with DECIPHeR research teams and community partners, plus framework developers. We used thematic analysis to summarize the feedback and inform iterative development of supporting materials to guide community partner engagement in informing and applying IM4Equity (e.g., blank framework template, guidance for completing the template).

RESULTS

IM4Equity identifies shared and unique domains: intra- and extra-organizational contexts, characteristics of individuals involved in implementation, innovation characteristics, bridging factors, implementation process, and implementation phases. We identified examples of shared constructs for each domain and example factors that may improve health equity or maintain systems of oppression (e.g., structural racism). Feedback sessions identified two areas for improving the usability of IM4Equity, which we addressed in the final figure and supporting materials: 1) design and appropriateness (e.g., language) and 2) approach for integrating community partner perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

IM4Equity highlights key overlapping determinants across existing frameworks, which can promote shared learning across health equity initiatives. IM4Equity is one of the first meta-frameworks to promote co-creation and application of an implementation framework with community partners, which may help inform more equitable implementation measures and strategies to advance health equity.

Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of smoking opioids and other unregulated drugs has increased across the United States (U.S.) since 2000. Improved access to safer smoking supplies may reduce the health consequences of inhalation while helping to engage more people who use drugs in syringe services programs (SSPs); however, the landscape of safer smoking supply implementation is understudied.

METHODS

From November 2023-January 2024, we surveyed representatives of U.S. SSPs to assess safer smoking supply implementation across contextual domains of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Descriptive statistics were used to describe determinants across the phases of safer smoking supply implementation. Poisson regression identified factors associated with implementation.

RESULTS

Among 118 organizations responding to the survey, most received state funding (83%), were community-based organizations (CBOs; 74%), and served urban jurisdictions (62%). The majority (67%) were already providing safer smoking supplies; 16% were exploring implementation and 11% were not. On average, safer smoking supply implementation occurred more recently than the provision of syringes (1-2 years ago vs. > 5 years ago), with participant request being the most common motivation for implementation (84%). Additional facilitators of safer smoking supply implementation were organizational prioritization (65%) and internal leadership support (57%). Factors significantly associated with safer smoking supply implementation included being from the Northeastern or Western regions (vs. the U.S. South), serving exurban communities, being a CBO, receiving foundation funding, receiving private donations from fundraising, and offering syringes and other injection alternatives (e.g., safer snorting supplies). Receiving federal funding, fear of external community opposition, internal leadership opposition, and respondent uncertainty about changing demand for safer smoking supplies (vs. perceiving that demand has not changed) were negatively associated with implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Determinants in the inner context, like organizational prioritization of safer smoking supplies and internal leadership support, may facilitate safer smoking supply implementation, while specific outer context factors (e.g., funding, regional policies) may inhibit implementation. Flexible policies and funding structures and further research to build and disseminate evidence on the benefits of safer smoking supplies are needed to expand the implementation and scale-up of this prevention service within U.S. SSPs.

The wide-angle lens of implementation science to improve health outcomes in criminal legal settings

BACKGROUND

Implementation science (IS) is an emerging discipline that offers frameworks, theories, measures, and interventions to understand both the effective organizational change processes and the contextual factors that affect how well an innovation operates in real-world settings.

RESULTS

In this article, we present an overview of the basic concepts and methods of IS. We then present six studies where IS was used as a means to understand implementation of a new innovations designed to improve the health and well-being of individuals under criminal legal system supervision.

CONCLUSION

We discuss how IS has developed new knowledge on how to implement efficacious innovations and suggesting future research needed to further our understanding of implementation and sustainability of innovations in the legal context.

A clinician implementation protocol for BetterBrains: An online, person-centred risk factor management program to prevent cognitive decline

OBJECTIVE

Modifiable risk factors, particularly those in midlife, can contribute to cognitive decline and dementia. Despite this, the 'how' of dementia risk reduction, including the application of interventional and care frameworks to deliver such a program is lacking. Our aim was to describe the 'how' in clinical delivery of a dementia risk reduction program called BetterBrains.

METHODS

BetterBrains is an online, person-centred risk factor management program designed to prevent or delay cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired community-dwelling, middle-aged adults with a family history of dementia. This protocol describes the delivery and implementation of BetterBrains using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.

RESULTS

Procedures for risk factor assessment and tailored management pathways using motivational interviewing, nationwide community linkage mapping and community referral pathways using digital delivery are outlined. Coach training and competency checks for program fidelity measures are also described.

CONCLUSION

Complex, multi-component programs require detailed implementation processes. Clinicians delivering BetterBrains may be better supported through standardised operating procedures, training and monitoring of competencies and implementation fidelity.

Implementation science in higher education: Identifying key determinants in the selection of evidence-based alcohol and substance prevention and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Although there are evidence-based strategies (EBSs) for alcohol and other drug (AOD) prevention and treatment for college students, there has been little focus on evaluating AOD EBS implementation in higher education. The use of implementation strategies in higher education may help bridge the gap between research and practice and improve students' access to EBSs. However, it is important to first understand determinants of AOD EBS program implementation to support AOD EBS selection and implementation strategy selection.

METHODS

We used mixed-methods to examine determinants occurring in the EBS selection and adoption process for AOD prevention and treatment using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework (Aarons et al., 2011), with a focus on the inner organizational context and early EPIS phases. Participants (N = 142) were student affairs professionals across 23 campuses engaged in a statewide prevention coalition. Participants completed a survey assessing constructs relevant to EBS selection. A subset of participants (n = 16) completed semi-structured interviews designed to generate an in-depth understanding of the EBS implementation process on their respective campuses. Content analysis was employed to identify determinants present in the EBS selection process.

RESULTS

Provider perspectives of Inner Context aligning with the exploration phase suggested higher education contexts were generally supportive of EBS implementation via ratings of absorptive capacity (e.g., mechanisms supporting knowledge acquisition) and implementation climate. Leadership support was rated as present "to a moderate extent". Qualitative data highlighted the importance of attending to six key determinants of the implementation process for substance EBSs: collaboration, evidence for initiative, leadership, institution priorities, resources, and student needs and perspectives. Collectively, the integration of qualitative and quantitative data suggests there are important facilitators to address with implementation strategies, and support is needed across campuses to prepare for implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Student affairs professionals within a statewide coalition identified features of EPIS Inner Context (climate, readiness, leadership support) that align with EBS selection and implementation processes and identified key determinants to selecting and adopting AOD prevention EBSs in higher education. Addressing these areas may help build capacity and scale up EBS selection.

Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

This study uses the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) model to retrospectively describe the mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) program developed in collaboration with the Kentucky Department of Corrections (DOC) for use in the HEALing Communities Study in Kentucky (HCS-KY) and details the reach of this innovative delivery model.

METHODS

HCS-KY is a community-engaged cluster-randomized trial assessing the effects of implementing evidence-based practices, including OEND, on overdose death reduction across 16 communities highly impacted by the opioid epidemic in Kentucky.6 The study launch coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. All coalitions in the 16 HCS-KY counties selected OEND implementation in community supervision offices; however, pandemic limitations on in-person reporting made face-to-face OEND unfeasible. This study uses the EPIS phases to understand how the unique inner and outer contextual factors of the pandemic drove innovation, including five implementation strategies to promote the mail-based OEND program. Internal study management trackers data measured implementation reach.

RESULTS

Implementation occurred in all 16 counties. All promotional strategies used in the first 8 counties (Wave 1) were carried over to the second 8 counties (Wave 2), except letters were not sent to community supervision clients in Wave 2 counties. Across both waves, 1759 people accessed the Typeform™ website to receive overdose education, complete a brief demographic survey, and 1696 had naloxone shipped to their homes. Greater reach occurred in Wave 1 and in rural counties. Of the participants, 81.13 % were white, 61.17 % were female, 51.79 % were between the ages of 35-54, 18.82 % had previously experienced an overdose, and 69.07 % had witnessed an overdose. Sites sustained three of the five implementation strategies for publicizing the OEND website at the study's end but not letters and texting.

CONCLUSIONS

Mail-based OEND programs are an appropriate delivery method for ensuring access to life-saving medication for people on community supervision and may encourage treatment. Strategies to promote the OEND program that were high-effort for agency and study staff, such as letters, or high-cost, such as texting, were not sustainable. Implications for OEND best practices, including innovative technology use within community supervision settings are addressed.

The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review

The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) framework (2017) was established as an evidence-based, theory-informed tool to predict and evaluate the success of implementing health and care technologies. While the NASSS is gaining popularity, its use has not been systematically described. Literature reviews on the applications of popular implementation frameworks, such as the RE-AIM and the CFIR, have enabled their advancement in implementation science. Similarly, we sought to advance the science of implementation and application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in research by exploring the application of the NASSS in the five years since its inception. We aim to understand the characteristics of studies that used the NASSS, how it was used, and the lessons learned from its application. We conducted a scoping review following the JBI methodology. On December 20, 2022, we searched the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and LISTA. We used typologies and frameworks to characterize evidence to address our aim. This review included 57 studies that were qualitative (n=28), mixed/multi-methods (n=13), case studies (n=6), observational (n=3), experimental (n=3), and other designs (e.g., quality improvement) (n=4). The four most common types of digital applications being implemented were telemedicine/virtual care (n=24), personal health devices (n=10), digital interventions such as internet Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (n=10), and knowledge generation applications (n=9). Studies used the NASSS to inform study design (n=9), data collection (n=35), analysis (n=41), data presentation (n=33), and interpretation (n=39). Most studies applied the NASSS retrospectively to implementation (n=33). The remainder applied the NASSS prospectively (n=15) or concurrently (n=8) with implementation. We also collated reported barriers and enablers to implementation. We found the most reported barriers fell within the Organization and Adopter System domains, and the most frequently reported enablers fell within the Value Proposition domain. Eighteen studies highlighted the NASSS as a valuable and practical resource, particularly for unravelling complexities, comprehending implementation context, understanding contextual relevance in implementing health technology, and recognizing its adaptable nature to cater to researchers' requirements. Most studies used the NASSS retrospectively, which may be attributed to the framework's novelty. However, this finding highlights the need for prospective and concurrent application of the NASSS within the implementation process. In addition, almost all included studies reported multiple domains as barriers and enablers to implementation, indicating that implementation is a highly complex process that requires careful preparation to ensure implementation success. Finally, we identified a need for better reporting when using the NASSS in implementation research to contribute to the collective knowledge in the field.

Improving cancer prevention and control through implementing academic-local public health department partnerships - protocol for a cluster-randomized implementation trial using a positive deviance approach

BACKGROUND

Local public health departments in the United States are responsible for implementing cancer-related programs and policies in their communities; however, many staff have not been trained to use evidence-based processes, and the organizational climate may be unsupportive of evidence-based processes. A promising approach to address these gaps is through academic-public health department (AHD) partnerships, in which practitioners and academics collaborate to improve public health practice and education through joint research projects and educational opportunities. Prior research has demonstrated the benefits of AHD partnerships to public health practice and education. However, knowledge about how AHD partnerships should be structured to support implementation of programs and policies is sparse.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods, two-phase study, guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, in which AHD partnerships are a relational type of bridging factor. A positive deviance approach will be used to understand how AHD partnerships are best structured and supported. In the formative phase, we will survey academics and local health department staff (n = 500) to characterize AHD partnerships and understand contextual influences. We will conduct in-depth interviews with eight AHD partnerships (four high and four low engagement), to identify differences between high and low engagement partnerships. The second, experimental phase will be a paired group randomized trial with 28 AHD partnerships (n = 14 randomized to implementation arm and n = 14 to the control arm). A menu of strategies will be refined through survey and interview findings, literature, and our team's previous work. The trial will assess whether these strategies can be used to strengthen partnerships and improve adoption of cancer prevention and control programs and policies. We will evaluate changes in AHD partnership engagement and implementation of evidence-based programs and policies.

DISCUSSION

This first-of-its-kind study will focus on collaborations that leverage complementary expertise of health department staff and academics to improve public health practice. Our results can impact the field by identifying new, sustainable models for how public health practitioners and academics can work together to meet common goals, increase the use of evidence-based programs and policies, and expand our understanding of bridging factors within the EPIS framework.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective registered on 9/17/2024 at clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT06605196 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06605196 ).

Caregiver determinants and capacity for participation in constraint-induced movement therapy

Aim

Hemiplegic cerebral palsy affects 1 in every 1,100 children, making it the most common pediatric motor disability. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is an evidence-based intervention that significantly improves upper extremity function when implemented with high fidelity. Despite its effectiveness, CIMT's intensive nature-requiring daily therapy for up to twenty days-limits its availability. This study examined caregivers' perspectives on implementing and adapting home-based CIMT to identify practical solutions for improving intervention accessibility.

Method

Caregivers of a child who has a diagnosis associated with upper extremity motor impairment consistent with cerebral palsy were recruited from the Cerebral Palsy Center at the St. Louis Children's Hospital. Caregivers completed a semi-structured interview to share their CIMT experiences, as well as their ideas and opinions related to modified versions of CIMT. All interviews were coded and analyzed for themes using descriptive analysis.

Results

Twelve interviews were conducted and revealed that caregivers would be interested in CIMT with an at-home model. Those who had experience with CIMT stated they found meaningful results from their participation in CIMT. Caregivers communicated potential challenges such as their child remaining engaged in at-home therapy, caregiver confidence in implementing the therapy, and the time required for implementing caregiver-led, home-based CIMT.

Interpretation

Study findings identified that caregivers see value in a modified, at-home CIMT program. Developing a modified version of CIMT is needed to increase access to this beneficial intervention.

Social risk factors screening preferences among breast and prostate cancer survivors: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

This project aimed to understand the experiences and preferences for social risk factor screening among racially, ethnically, and linguistically diverse cancer survivors in the Washington, DC, region.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with English, Spanish, and Amharic-speaking breast and prostate cancer survivors. Data were inductively coded to identify themes, and differences by race and preferred language were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Twenty-two interviews in English (n = 14), Spanish (n = 7), and Amharic (n = 1) among participants who identified as Black (n = 8), White (n = 5), Asian (n = 1), Other (n = 6), and multiracial (n = 2) were completed. Participants reported unresolved needs during treatment including transportation, healthful food, mental health care, financial help, and employment assistance. COVID-19 exacerbated many needs. Most participants did not recall discussing needs with oncology teams, but all participants were open to having these conversations.

CONCLUSION(S)

This research reveals that cancer survivors might benefit from culturally appropriate strategies that address social needs.

Attitudes Toward and Usage of Evidence-Based Mental Health Practices for Autistic Youth in Bangladesh and Germany: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

The implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autistic youth is a critical concern worldwide. Research examining factors facilitating the implementation of EBPs found that providers' attitudes are an important factor. In this study, we evaluated cross-cultural differences in attitudes toward and use of EBPs. We tested socio-demographic factors as predictors of attitudes, and attitudes as predictors of EBPs use among mental health professionals working with autistic youth in Bangladesh and Germany. We used purposeful sampling. Two-hundred-ninety-two professionals who worked in a clinical setting responded to the survey and fulfilled the inclusion criteria (101 in Bangladesh, 191 in Germany). Participants were asked to respond to nine subscales of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36), to indicate which of nine types of treatments they used, and to provide sociodemographic data. Measurement invariance across countries could be established for four subscales of the EBPAS-36. Comparative analyses of attitudes showed that professionals in both countries were open to using EBPs, but German practitioners were more likely to use EBPs when they appealed to them. By contrast, Bangladeshi professionals claimed to be more likely to adopt an EBP when required and to be more willing to learn EBPs to enhance job security. The relationship between caseload and attitudes varied between countries. A broader variety of EBPs was used in Germany. The findings highlight the importance of considering country-specific factors when implementing EBPs. Directions for conducting comparative studies on mental health professionals' attitudes towards EBP including methodological considerations are discussed.

HEAL-D Online: Exploring the potential for the spread and adoption of a virtual culturally tailored diabetes self-management programme for adults of African and Caribbean heritage

BACKGROUND

People of African and Caribbean heritage in the UK have a higher prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and poorer health outcomes than white Europeans. Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles for Diabetes Online (HEAL-D Online) is a co-designed, culturally tailored T2D self-management programme for black African and Caribbean adults, which, due to online delivery, is well positioned for spread. This qualitative evaluation uses the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment (EPIS) framework to explore factors affecting scale-up from delivery and commissioning perspectives.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine commissioners and providers of T2D services from three English areas with varying population characteristics to explore scale-up. Focus groups were held with 15 people of African and Caribbean heritage with T2D lived experience to explore the impact of a digital model of participation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, with themes mapped onto the EPIS framework exploration phase constructs to consider the outer and inner contextual factors for planning implementation.

RESULTS

Six EPIS constructs were identified by commissioners and providers as key in scaling HEAL-D Online. People with T2D lived experience explored the online mode of delivery, using the patient advocacy construct as the analytical lens. In delivering an online T2D programme, two themes were identified: (1) aligning course content with people's preferences; (2) practicalities to ensure online delivery was acceptable and accessible to the community.

CONCLUSIONS

HEAL-D Online was acceptable with the potential to help address health inequalities. The EPIS framework provided a structure to understand factors in planning scale-up for an intervention targeting underserved communities.

Using the EPIS Framework to Implement a Physical Activity Promotion Intervention at a Large Academic Healthcare System

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the implementation of a workplace health promotion to address low levels of physical activity (PA).

METHODS

Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we implemented and evaluated a 10-week workplace step-count challenge to promote PA. All health system employees invited to participate. Data were collected on the exploration, preparation, and implementation phases.

RESULTS

During exploration, we recognized inadequate PA among employees. Meetings with key personnel were held to determine details of the health promotion and obtain support. We pursued a step-count PA intervention, capitalizing on employee ownership of smartphones with accelerometers. Vendors to host the intervention were evaluated. All employees were invited to participate. Participants received weekly messages about improving PA and notifications of weekly challenges. Exit interviews provided feedback and suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS

A workplace health promotion focused on employee PA is feasible using EPIS.

Examining the Efficacy of Culturally Responsive Interventions for Autistic Children and Their Families: A Meta-Analysis

Culturally responsive interventions for autistic children and their families have been developed and implemented to address issues related to limited representation, inequities, and disparities in access to care of minoritized families in research. Currently available reviews are relatively limited in scope or do not synthesize interventions specifically. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize autism intervention literature that specifically targeted autistic individuals and their family members from minoritized backgrounds, such as immigrant families. We used four databases to identify studies that used culturally responsive interventions with minoritized autistic children and their families. An article was included if it included empirical intervention data using an experimental design. A total of 354 studies were initially screened, and 24 studies were included. Effect sizes of these studies were extracted across two levels (i.e., child and family levels). Data from group design studies were extracted manually, and data from single-case design studies were extracted using a web-based tool. We used design-comparable standardized effect sizes to compare across both designs. The analysis revealed a large, positive, and significant overall effect size across culturally responsive interventions. Specifically, social-communication and mental health outcomes yielded significant effects at the child level. Additionally, parents' mental health and fidelity of strategy implementation also yielded significant results. Our results suggest that culturally responsive interventions yield comparable outcomes to unadapted, original interventions. Future research should examine the distinction between the effect of cultural adaptation and the efficacy of the intervention itself.

Supporting the Advancement of a National Agenda for Pediatric Healthcare Reform: A multi-year Evaluation of a Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities Program

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation and sustainability of the effect of a 1-year Leadership in Education for Neurodevelopmental and related Disabilities (LEND) program in a southeastern state, and to examine its impact on advancing the Maternal Child Health Bureau's (MCHB) Blueprint for Change-a national agenda for pediatric healthcare reform.

METHODS

This study applies the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework to rigorously evaluate LEND implementation and impact between 2018 and 2022. In-depth interviews (N = 24) were conducted among long-term (1-year) LEND trainees, via Zoom, in a southeastern state. A hybrid approach of deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify emergent patterns and themes from trainees' experiences, related to the EPIS constructs and national priorities.

RESULTS

Exploration and Preparation. Trainees identified insights from multidisciplinary discussions and family panels as key facilitators to their development.

IMPLEMENTATION

Trainees reported growth in confidence and communication and improving their service delivery, including implementation of a collaborative approach to patient care, family-centered care, and occasionally facilitating their obtainment of leadership positions. Trainees also reported systemic barriers to implementation, including time and financial constraints. Sustainability. Trainees identify their experienced shift in mindset and statewide connections as drivers for sustained change, with suggestions for follow-up events and networking opportunities to enhance the effect of LEND training.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

These results may inform LEND objectives to enhance the statewide network and to advance a national framework for prioritizing family well-being and quality of life and access to services.

Implementing weight management during and after pregnancy to reduce diabetes and CVD risk in maternal and child populations

Maintaining a healthy weight during pregnancy is critical for both women's and children's health. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can lead to complications such as gestational diabetes, hypertension and caesarean delivery. Insufficient GWG can cause fetal growth restriction and increase infant mortality risk. Additionally, postpartum weight retention raises risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases for both mother and child. This review seeks to identify current obstacles in weight management research during and after pregnancy and explore evidence-based strategies to overcome them. Pregnancy offers a window of opportunity for health behaviour changes as women are more receptive to education and have regular contact with health services. Staying within Institute of Medicine's recommended GWG ranges is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes. Systematic review evidence supports structured diet and physical activity pregnancy interventions, leading to reduced GWG and fewer complications. Health economic evaluation indicates significant returns from implementation, surpassing investment costs due to decreased perinatal morbidity and adverse events. However, the most effective way to implement interventions within routine antenatal care remains unclear. Challenges increase in the postpartum period due to competing demands on women physically, mentally and socially, hindering intervention reach and retention. Flexible, technology-supported interventions are needed, requiring frameworks such as penetration-implementation-participation-effectiveness and template-for-intervention-description-and-replication for successful implementation. Greater research efforts are necessary to inform practice and investigate fidelity aspects through pragmatic implementation trials during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Understanding the best ways to deliver interventions will empower women to maintain a healthy weight during their reproductive years.

The Multilevel Limb-loss and Preservation Rehabilitation Continuum model (MLPRC): An evidence-based implementation model integrating multiple perspectives to improve outcomes for people facing limb loss

BACKGROUND

The patient journey from threatened to actual limb loss, subsequent rehabilitation, and limb preservation through the health system is complicated and prone to delays, attrition, and inequities. A shared multi(socioecological)-level conceptualization of this journey among the multiple stakeholders is the first step for systematically improving limb care through identification of bottlenecks and gaps, contributory factors, and responsive interventions and implementation strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To meet this knowledge gap by presenting a novel implementation model, the Multilevel Limb-loss and Preservation Rehabilitation Continuum (MLPRC), that can be used to develop multilevel applications.

METHODS

MLPRC was developed in three overlapping steps: (1) design of the patient journey through the health system (horizontal element), (2) addition of multilevel perspectives along the journey (vertical element), and (3) implementation facilitation by incorporating implementation model constructs (concentric cells element).

RESULTS

MLPRC is an implementation model for limb loss and preservation with three concentric cells: inner context cell (horizontal time-ordered patient journey at patient level, based on phases of amputation rehabilitation and patient journey concepts, and corresponding care delivery at provider/organization-level, based on the continuum of care and lower limb loss rehabilitation continuum concepts, on the journey timeline), less influenceable outer context cell (community, system and policy level perspectives), and outermost implementation cell, based on Proctor Model of Implementation Research, that utilizes inner and outer context cells (concept derived from Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework) information to define responsive metrics, interventions and implementation strategies.

DISCUSSION

Examples of MLPRC use as a blueprint for multilevel applications include patient level (education and navigation instruments), provider level (integrated practice clinic, referral streams), organization level (limb care continuum programs), and community, system, and policy level (interdisciplinary organizational partnerships, data repositories).

CONCLUSION

MLPRC is among the first implementation model to present both a unified picture of the field of limb loss and preservation and a blueprint for multilevel applications.

Using capacity assessments and tailored technical assistance to advance trauma informed care integration at the organizational level

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of trauma among individuals with HIV has prompted efforts to integrate trauma-informed care (TIC) into HIV care and treatment to improve health outcomes. A TIC Implementation Model, developed by a US capacity-building organization focuses on organizational changes, aligning cultural and physical environments, emphasizing values like safety and trustworthiness, engaging leadership, and training staff in skills-based TIC services. Despite growing research, gaps remain in understanding the relationship between organizational capacity, provider knowledge, and the dosage of technical assistance (TA) required to sustain TIC integration. Researchers investigated how the project team adapted the type and amount of TA based on initial Cultural Assessment scores (measuring core TIC values) and its impact on Implementation Status scores.

METHODS

This study focuses on eight of 20 HIV care agencies in New Jersey that had largely met their TIC implementation goals by Spring 2022. As part of the TIC Implementation Model to measure agency capacity and implementation progress over time, agency staff and clients completed a Cultural Assessment (n = 72) and Physical Assessment (n = 43); staff completed a Pre/Post Training Survey (n = 296); and implementation teams at 8 agencies completed an Implementation Status Assessment Tool. Additionally, TA Logs capturing the details of TA meetings with the eight agencies were recorded by project staff. Data from these tools were analyzed in aggregate by agency using descriptive and correlational analyses.

RESULTS

Results demonstrated responsive TA correlated with agencies' baseline capacity. Agencies with lower capacity received significantly more frequent and extended TA encounters, which were associated with higher implementation scores and improvements in cultural environments for staff and clients (e.g., new protocols for staff response plans).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of tailored TA in fostering diverse organizational cultures conducive to TIC implementation. For HIV care agencies, successful TIC implementation can impact health behaviors and outcomes for clients impacted by trauma. The TIC Implementation Model significantly advanced organizations' ability to transform their culture and systems, increasing their capacity to implement and sustain TIC integration. These results align with existing research that emphasizes when time is invested to shift organizational culture and develop leadership, new practices can effectively be implemented and scaled-up.

Self-Management Strategies for Low Back Pain Among Horticulture Workers: Protocol for a Type II Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and disabling, especially in agriculture sectors. However, there is a gap in LBP prevention and intervention studies in these physically demanding occupations, and to date, no studies have focused on horticulture workers. Given the challenges of implementing interventions for those working in small businesses, self-management offers an attractive and feasible option to address work-related risk factors and manage LBP.

OBJECTIVE

This study will (1) investigate the effectiveness of self-management strategies for nursery and landscape workers by comparing within-subject control and intervention periods and (2) determine if adoption and effectiveness differs between participants randomly assigned to review self-management videos only and those who also receive multimodal implementation support. We will also identify contextual factors impacting effectiveness and implementation.

METHODS

A pragmatic, mixed methods, hybrid effectiveness and implementation design will be used to compare back pain with work tasks, disability, medication and substance use, and psychological factors between a baseline control and intervention periods. We aim to recruit 122 English- and Spanish-speaking horticulture workers with back pain, 30 supervisors, and 12 focus group participants. Participants will review short video modules designed to increase awareness of opioid risk and introduce self-management and ergonomic choices and use 1 self-management and 1 ergonomic strategy for 10 weeks. They will be randomly assigned to 2 implementation groups: video modules only or video + multimodal personalized support (checklist guidance, review of video feedback for ergonomic problem-solving, and text message reminders). Questionnaires will be administered at 3-month time points: baseline, pre- and postintervention, and at 3 and 6 months. Qualitative analysis of field notes, open-ended comments, and focus groups will expand understanding of results with comprehensive documentation of the context, barriers and facilitators, and reasons for adoption.

RESULTS

The project was funded on September 29, 2023 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety, CDC NIOSH; U54OH011230-07S1), as a core research grant for the Southeast Coastal Center for Agricultural Health and Safety. The design, creation, and editing of English and Spanish videos was completed in June 2024 after comprehensive formative evaluation. Enrollment began in June 2024 with anticipated completion in 2027.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesize that both self-management interventions will result in reductions in work task pain and disability and that the video enhanced with multimodal personalized support will result in greater reductions than the video alone. If self-management is effective, mitigating pain positively impacts quality of life, productivity, and retention, while increasing the use of nonpharmacological alternatives to opioids addresses an important public health issue. Implementation aims will help inform reasons for results, barriers and facilitators, and potential for similar interventions in these and similar industries with physically challenging outdoor work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06153199; http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06153199.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/64817.

Study protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Uganda

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer (CC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among Uganda women, yet rates of CC screening are very low. Training women who have recently screened to engage in advocacy for screening among women in their social network is a network-based strategy for promoting information dissemination and CC screening uptake.

METHODS

Drawing on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework for implementation science, this hybrid type 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a peer-led, group advocacy training intervention, Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP), will examine efficacy for increasing CC screening uptake as well as how it can be implemented and sustained in diverse clinic settings. In the Preparation phase we will prepare the four study clinics for implementation of GC-CCP and the expected increase in demand for CC screening, by using qualitative methods (stakeholder interviews and client focus groups) to identify and address structural barriers to easy access to CC screening. In the Implementation phase, GC-CCP will be implemented over 36 months at each clinic, with screened women (index participants) enrolled as research participants receiving the intervention in the first 6 months as part of a parallel group RCT overseen by the research study team to evaluate efficacy for CC screening uptake among their enrolled social network members. All research participants will be assessed at baseline and months 6 and 12. Intervention implementation and supervision will then be transitioned to clinic staff and offered as part of usual care in the subsequent 30 months as part of the Sustainability phase. Using the RE-AIM framework, we will evaluate engagement in GC-CCP and CC advocacy (reach), alter CC screening (effectiveness), adoption into clinic operations, implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, cost-effectiveness) and maintenance.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first studies to use a network-driven approach and empowerment of CC screened peers as change agents to increase CC screening. If shown to be an effective and sustainable implementation strategy for promoting CC screening, this peer advocacy model could be applied to other preventative health behaviors and disease contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT06010160 (clinicaltrials.gov; date: 8/17/2023).

Application of an implementation premortem: A novel qualitative approach leveraging prospective hindsight to enhance barbershop health interventions for Black men

Barbershop-based efforts to promote health among Black men have been uniquely successful. Despite the success of these efforts, the emphasis on outcomes as opposed to how these outcomes can be achieved has created a gap in the literature. The present study addresses this gap by describing implementation-related program priorities that Black men identify for barbershop-based interventions. Twenty-three Black men participated in implementation premortem activities. Participants were: (i) given details about a barbershop-based health promotion effort, (ii) told that the effort had failed, and (iii) were asked to identify potential sources of program failure and strategies to overcome those challenges. The frequency of program priorities was calculated based on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, and focus group data were analyzed using an inductive thematic qualitative data analytic approach. Data analyses occurred in three phases: (i) excerpts were grouped by Phase, Domain, and Construct of the EPIS Framework; (ii) themes within each excerpt were then identified using an inductive approach; and (iii) themes were organized into conceptually similar and parsimonious categories. Participants suggested that the biggest source of program failure was that more attention needed to be paid to Program Fit during the Implementation Phase. Participants reported concerns with the accessibility and convenience of the effort. Additional participant concerns included economic issues, community ownership, climate, staffing processes, cultural sensitivity, engagement, and trust. The implementation of health promotion programs for Black men should pay particular attention to how the intervention fits the needs, lives, and contexts of potential participants.

Preparing to implement Floreciendo with Latina teens and their female caregivers: Integrating implementation science and the multiphase optimization strategy framework

BACKGROUND

Practical examples of studies integrating implementation science and the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework are lacking. Floreciendo is a sexual and reproductive health program for Latina teens and their female caregivers, adapted from the IMARA evidence-based program.

PURPOSE

We prepared for delivering Floreciendo by developing an implementation plan to support the program's adoption and sustainment.

METHODS

Drawing on a community-based participatory research approach, we used qualitative methods to explore program logistics, implementation determinants and strategies, adoption, and sustainability. We positioned our study activities within the preparation phases of both the MOST and the EPIS frameworks. We conducted and rapidly analyzed seven focus group discussions-one with Latina teens (n = 9), one with female caregivers (n = 6), four with organizational staff (n = 32), and one with IMARA staff (n = 6)-and seven key informant interviews.

RESULTS

Participants described community organizations as the preferred location for workshops in offering a "safe space." They recommended workshop delivery on two days over separate weekends. Teens and caregivers requested relatable, bilingual Latina facilitators. Implementation barriers were raised (e.g. work conflicts) with strategies to address them (e.g. provide stipends). Organizational adoption was perceived as likely since the workshop addresses clients' needs and fits with organizational values. Recommendations for sustainment included identifying funding opportunities specific to each organization.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings directly informed our immediate plans to optimize Floreciendo using the MOST framework and principles and our long-term goals for adoption and sustainability. Implementation science can strengthen studies using the MOST framework.

Effectiveness of Multilevel Implementation Strategies for Autism Interventions: Outcomes of Two Linked Implementation Trials

OBJECTIVE

This study tests the effectiveness of leader- and provider-level implementation strategies to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in 2 of the service systems caring for autistic children. The TEAMS Leadership Institute (TLI) targets implementation leadership and climate, and TEAMS Individualized Provider Strategy (TIPS) targets provider motivation and engagement.

METHOD

A cluster randomized hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial tested the effects of the implementations strategies when paired with AIM HI (An Individualized Mental Health Intervention for Autism) in mental health programs (study 1) and CPRT (Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching) in classrooms (study 2). The combined sample included 65 programs/districts across 4 training cohorts (2018-2019 to 2020-2021). Organizations were randomized to receive a leader-level strategy, provider strategy, both strategies, or neither strategy (EBI provider training only). Leader and provider participants were recruited from enrolled programs/districts, and child participants were recruited from providers' caseloads or classrooms. Data from a total of 387 providers (mean age = 36.39 years; 91% female participants; 30% Latino/a/x participants) and 385 children (mean age = 8 years; 80% male participants; 45% Latino/a/x participants) were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed over 6 months. Provider outcome measures included provider EBI certification and observed EBI fidelity. Clinical outcome measures included the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) (study 1) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDD-BI) (study 2). Outcomes were analyzed using intent-to-treat models.

RESULTS

There was no significant effect of TLI on EBI Certification. TLI was associated with significantly higher EBI fidelity compared to non-TLI (B = 0.37, p = .04). Moreover, a statistically significant TLIxTime interaction was found for child outcome T scores (B = -10.47, p = .03), with a significant reduction in T scores across time only for those in the TLI condition. There were no significant effects of TIPS on any outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Findings support the effectiveness of leader-focused strategies to promote implementation and clinical outcomes of autism EBIs in multiple public service systems and for multiple EBIs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Translating Evidence-based Interventions for ASD: Multi-Level Implementation Strategy (TEAMS); https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03380078.

An implementation trial to mAnage siCkle CELl disEase through incReased AdopTion of hydroxyurEa in Nigeria (ACCELERATE): Study protocol

BACKGROUND

Despite the proven efficacy of evidence-based healthcare interventions in reducing adverse outcomes and mortality associated with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), a vast majority of affected individuals in Africa remain deprived of such care. Hydroxyurea (HU) utilization among SCD patients in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) stands at less than 1%, while in Nigeria, approximately 13% of patients benefit from HU therapy. To enhance HU utilization, targeted implementation strategies addressing provider-level barriers are imperative. Existing evidence underscores the significance of addressing barriers such as inadequate healthcare worker training to improve HU adoption. The ACCELERATE study aims to evaluate the adoption of HU among providers through the Screen, Initiate, and Maintain (SIM) intervention, facilitated by healthcare worker training, clinical reminders, and task-sharing strategies, thereby enhancing patient-level SCD management in Nigeria.

METHODS

This study will implement the SIM intervention, encompassing patient screening, initiation of HU treatment, and maintenance of dosage, which will be implemented via the TAsk-Strengthening Strategy for Hemoglobinopathies (TASSH TCP), derived from our team's TAsk-Strengthening Strategy for Hypertension control (TASSH) trials. Employing a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach within the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, this study will assess SIM adoption by providers in Nigeria. The primary outcome is the rate of SIM adoption at clinical sites at 12 months, with secondary outcomes including sustainability/maintenance of SIM intervention and implementation fidelity.

DISCUSSION

This study's findings will offer crucial insights into effective SCD management strategies, leveraging existing SCD clinical networks and resources in Nigeria to enhance HU adoption among providers in a scalable and sustainable manner. Additionally, the study will inform best practices for implementing HU therapy in resource-constrained settings, benefiting healthcare providers, policymakers, and stakeholders invested in improving SCD care delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06318143.

A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing

INTRODUCTION

The overdose crisis in the U.S. disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) - permanent, affordable housing with voluntary support services - is an effective, evidence-based intervention to address homelessness. However, overdose risk remains high even after entering PSH for individual and structural reasons. In this study, we aimed to refine a set of evidence-based overdose prevention practices (EBPs) and an associated implementation support package for PSH settings using focus groups with PSH tenants, frontline staff, and leaders.

METHODS

Our community-academic team identified an initial set of overdose EBPs applicable for PSH through research, public health guidance, and a needs assessment. We adapted these practices based on feedback from focus groups with PSH leaders, staff, and tenants. Focus groups followed semi-structured interview guides developed using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework constructs of inner context, outer context, and bridging factors related to overdose prevention and response.

RESULTS

We conducted 16 focus groups with 40 unique participants (14 PSH tenants, 15 PSH staff, 11 PSH leaders); focus groups were held in two iterative rounds and individuals could participate in one or both rounds. Participants were diverse in gender, race, and ethnicity. Focus group participants were enthusiastic about the proposed EBPs and implementation strategies, while contributing unique insights and concrete suggestions to improve upon them. The implementation support package contains an iteratively refined PSH Overdose Prevention (POP) Toolkit with 20 EBPs surrounding overdose prevention and response, harm reduction, and support for substance use treatment and additional core implementation strategies including practice facilitation, tenant-staff champion teams, and learning collaboratives.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript describes how robust community-academic partnerships and input from people with lived experience as tenants and staff in PSH informed adaptation of evidence-based overdose prevention approaches and implementation strategies to improve their fit for PSH settings. This effort can inform similar efforts nationally in other settings serving highly marginalized populations. We are currently conducting a randomized trial of the refined overdose prevention implementation support package in PSH.

Intersectional stigma among Latino MSM and HIV prevention: barriers to HIV prevention and strategies to overcome the barriers

Latino men, especially Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM), experience disparities in HIV prevention. Lack of attention to key barriers to care, such as stigma, result in inequitable access to HIV prevention and care for LMSM. This paper describes how intersectional stigma and related factors act as barriers to HIV prevention among Latino men and proposes strategies to overcome these barriers. Qualitative data were collected via in-depth interviews (n = 15) with Latino men about HIV prevention services, mobile outreach, peer navigation and care coordination, and analyzed using rapid qualitative methods. Three key themes emerged: (1) HIV stigma as a barrier to HIV testing, (2) sexual minority stigma as a barrier to accessing HIV prevention services and (3) strategies for stigma reduction, such as confidentiality, comprehensive education about HIV and prevention, and empathy and warmth from staff/care providers. Identified stigmas were intersectional. Addressing and reducing stigma is critical to engaging Latino men in HIV prevention and care, and requires strategies sensitive to the Latino cultural context and community.

THE WHO, WHAT, AND HOW OF INTERAGENCY CRIMINAL JUSTICE-BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TEAMS: Developing and Sustaining Collaborations

Interagency teams are considered an evidence-based change practice, but there is a paucity of research examining them in criminal justice (CJ) and behavioral health (BH) reform contexts. This study draws on qualitative interviews (n = 52) and survey data (n = 791) from BH and CJ leaders across the United States to examine who is on them, what they do, and effective strategies for building and sustaining them. Findings indicated that CJ-BH interagency teams often incorporate agencies from a range of CJ, BH, social service, and health agencies. Teamwork focused on connecting clients to resources or contributing to CJ-BH coalitions and resource centers. Although the team-building strategies learning about/from other agencies and system integration were significantly associated with developing more collaborations, consensus-building activities were not. These findings suggest that interagency teams need not necessarily reach consensus on goals and vision prior to working together, as this can be built through collaboration.

Medication disposal within reach: Assessing implementation of permanent disposal receptacles in community pharmacies

BACKGROUND

Availability of medication disposal receptacles is critical to curbing nonmedical opioid use and diversion; however, availability in community pharmacies is sparse. The objective of this study was to describe implementation of the community pharmacy medication disposal program offered by the HEALing Communities Study in Kentucky (HCS-KY) using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment) framework.

METHODS

Sixteen counties participated in the HCS-KY from 1/1/2020-12/31/2023. Exploration and Preparation included gathering and review of evidence-based literature, state/community data, and key opinion leader input to develop a detailed implementation plan. Implementation and Sustainment were assessed using implementation outcome data collected (e.g., number of receptacles placed, amount of drug returned) and semi-structured qualitative interviews to evaluate common themes, including barriers and facilitators related to implementation and sustainment.

RESULTS

Disposal receptacles were placed in 59 pharmacies within the 16 HCS-KY counties. Following implementation, the median number of receptacles per participating county increased significantly from 2.5 to 4.5 (p<0.001). A total of 8019.9 pounds of drug were returned during the study period, with a median per-county return rate of 230.5 pounds per year. Twenty-one pharmacy representatives participated in qualitative interviews. Most (70.0 %) reported weekly receptacle usage; however, few (35.0 %) reported routinely discussing disposal with patients. While 42.9 % reported no barriers, the most frequently reported barrier (33.3 %) was receptacle limitations (e.g., only available during business hours, dosage form restrictions).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the HCS-KY community pharmacy medication disposal program led to notable increases in disposal locations that were highly utilized by communities.