1
|
Aljohani DM, Almalki N, Dixon D, Adam R, Forget P. Experiences and perspectives of adults on using opioids for pain management in the postoperative period: A scoping review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:500-512. [PMID: 38757159 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids play an important role in peri-operative pain management. However, opioid use is challenging for healthcare practitioners and patients because of concerns related to opioid crises, addiction and side effects. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to identify and synthesise the existing evidence related to adults' experiences of opioid use in postoperative pain management. DESIGN Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. Inductive content analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were applied to analyse and report the findings and to identify unexplored gaps in the literature. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All qualitative and mixed-method studies, in English, that not only used a qualitative approach that explored adults' opinions or concerns about opioids and/or opioid reduction, and adults' experience related to opioid use for postoperative pain control, including satisfaction, but also aspects of overall quality of a person's life (physical, mental and social well being). RESULTS Ten studies were included; nine were qualitative ( n = 9) and one used mixed methods. The studies were primarily conducted in Europe and North America. Concerns about opioid dependence, adverse effects, stigmatisation, gender roles, trust and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients appeared repeatedly throughout the studies. The TDF analysis showed that many peri-operative factors formed people's perceptions and experiences of opioids, driven by the following eight domains: Knowledge, Emotion, Beliefs about consequences, Beliefs about capabilities, Self-confidence, Environmental Context and Resources, Social influences and Decision Processes/Goals. Adults have diverse pain management goals, which can be categorised as proactive and positive goals, such as individualised pain management care, as well as avoidance goals, aimed at sidestepping issues such as addiction and opioid-related side effects. CONCLUSION It is desirable to understand the complexity of adults' experiences of pain management especially with opioid use and to support adults in achieving their pain management goals by implementing an individualised approach, effective communication and patient-clinician relationships. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine patients' experiences of postoperative opioid use and their involvement in opioid usage decision-making. A summary is provided regarding adults' experiences of peri-operative opioid use, which may inform future researchers, healthcare providers and guideline development by considering these factors when improving patient care and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia M Aljohani
- From the Pain and opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Department of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK (DD), School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland (DD), Health Psychology Group (DD), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (DMA, RA) and Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, UK (PF)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kerry R, Young KJ, Evans DW, Lee E, Georgopoulos V, Meakins A, McCarthy C, Cook C, Ridehalgh C, Vogel S, Banton A, Bergström C, Mazzieri AM, Mourad F, Hutting N. A modern way to teach and practice manual therapy. Chiropr Man Therap 2024; 32:17. [PMID: 38773515 PMCID: PMC11110311 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00537-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions are the leading contributor to global disability and health burden. Manual therapy (MT) interventions are commonly recommended in clinical guidelines and used in the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Traditional systems of manual therapy (TMT), including physiotherapy, osteopathy, chiropractic, and soft tissue therapy have been built on principles such as clinician-centred assessment, patho-anatomical reasoning, and technique specificity. These historical principles are not supported by current evidence. However, data from clinical trials support the clinical and cost effectiveness of manual therapy as an intervention for musculoskeletal conditions, when used as part of a package of care. PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to propose a modern evidence-guided framework for the teaching and practice of MT which avoids reference to and reliance on the outdated principles of TMT. This framework is based on three fundamental humanistic dimensions common in all aspects of healthcare: safety, comfort, and efficiency. These practical elements are contextualised by positive communication, a collaborative context, and person-centred care. The framework facilitates best-practice, reasoning, and communication and is exemplified here with two case studies. METHODS A literature review stimulated by a new method of teaching manual therapy, reflecting contemporary evidence, being trialled at a United Kingdom education institute. A group of experienced, internationally-based academics, clinicians, and researchers from across the spectrum of manual therapy was convened. Perspectives were elicited through reviews of contemporary literature and discussions in an iterative process. Public presentations were made to multidisciplinary groups and feedback was incorporated. Consensus was achieved through repeated discussion of relevant elements. CONCLUSIONS Manual therapy interventions should include both passive and active, person-empowering interventions such as exercise, education, and lifestyle adaptations. These should be delivered in a contextualised healing environment with a well-developed person-practitioner therapeutic alliance. Teaching manual therapy should follow this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Kerry
- School of Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Kenneth J Young
- Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
| | - David W Evans
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Edward Lee
- School of Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
- Nottingham CityCare Partnership, Bennerley Rd, Nottingham, NG6 8WR, UK
| | - Vasileios Georgopoulos
- School of Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Adam Meakins
- Department of Orthopaedics, West Herts Hospitals Trust, Watford, WD18 0HB, UK
| | - Chris McCarthy
- School of Physiotherapy, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK
| | - Chad Cook
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Colette Ridehalgh
- School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Darley Rd, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR, UK
- Clinical Neuroscience, Trafford Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK
| | - Steven Vogel
- University College of Osteopathy, 275 Borough High St, London, SE1 1JE, UK
| | - Amanda Banton
- University College of Osteopathy, 275 Borough High St, London, SE1 1JE, UK
| | - Cecilia Bergström
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, S-90187, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Firas Mourad
- Department of health, LUNEX, Differdange, 4671, Luxembourg
- Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute A.s.b.l., 50, Avenue du Parc des Sports, Differdange, 4671, Luxembourg
| | - Nathan Hutting
- Department of Occupation and Health, School of Organization and Development, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duarte ST, Moniz A, Costa D, Donato H, Heleno B, Aguiar P, Cruz EB. Low back pain management in primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review on models of care. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079276. [PMID: 38754873 PMCID: PMC11097853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Models of care (MoCs) describe evidence-informed healthcare that should be delivered to patients. Several MoCs have been implemented for low back pain (LBP) to reduce evidence-to-practice gaps and increase the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare services. OBJECTIVE To synthesise research evidence regarding core characteristics and key common elements of MoCs implemented in primary healthcare for the management of LBP. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES Searches on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases were conducted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible records included MoCs implemented for adult LBP patients in primary healthcare settings. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was carried out independently by two researchers and included a summary of the studies, the identification of the MoCs and respective key elements, concerning levels of care, settings, health professionals involved, type of care delivered and core components of the interventions. Findings were investigated through a descriptive qualitative content analysis using a deductive approach. RESULTS 29 studies reporting 11 MoCs were included. All MoCs were implemented in high-income countries and had clear objectives. Ten MoCs included a stratified care approach. The assessment of LBP patients typically occurred in primary healthcare while care delivery usually took place in community-based settings or outpatient clinics. Care provided by general practitioners and physiotherapists was reported in all MoCs. Education (n=10) and exercise (n=9) were the most common health interventions. However, intervention content, follow-ups and discharge criteria were not fully reported. CONCLUSIONS This study examines the features of MoCs for LBP, highlighting that research is in its early stages and stressing the need for better reporting to fill gaps in care delivery and implementation. This knowledge is crucial for researchers, clinicians and decision-makers in assessing the applicability and transferability of MoCs to primary healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Tinoco Duarte
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Alexandre Moniz
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniela Costa
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Escola Superior de Saúde do Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal
| | - Helena Donato
- Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- University of Coimbra Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Bruno Heleno
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Pedro Aguiar
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valentine MJ, Hayat F, Kayastha A, Newsome-Cuby TR, Nguyen ATN, AlDallal U, Ismail M. An Unidentified Infiltrative Etiology of Spinal Cord Compression: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e60141. [PMID: 38864071 PMCID: PMC11166180 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord compression is a neurosurgical emergency. Symptoms of this disorder are highlighted as back pain, ambulatory difficulties, and bladder/bowel incontinence. Diagnostic imaging is not indicated in many circumstances of nonspecific back pain; however, the addition of neurologic deficits in the setting of back pain justifies radiologic imaging. Various pathologies can cause constriction of the spinal cord due to the delicate nature of spinal cord anatomy. Etiologies may include trauma, neoplasms, and infections. In this report, we present an unusual case of a 31-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with a history of chronic back pain accompanied by neurological deficits, ataxia, and bladder dysfunction. Contrast-enhanced MRI imaging heightened the suspicion of a neoplastic etiology; however, neuropathology revealed a non-neoplastic nature with abnormal lymphohistiocytic infiltrate suspicious for Langerhans cell histiocytosis or infectious etiology. A second opinion was provided by Mayo Clinic Laboratories, resulting in the definitive conclusion that the mass was non-neoplastic and tested negative for SD1a and Langerhin, biomarkers used to diagnose Langerhans cell histiocytosis. This unusual non-neoplastic lesion exemplifies one of many diverse and multifaceted pathologies that can precipitate spinal cord compression. Additionally, these findings underscore the importance of considering both neoplastic and non-neoplastic causes in the differential diagnosis of spinal cord compression, thereby enhancing clinical vigilance and improving patient outcomes for underlying spinal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fakhar Hayat
- Neurosurgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Al Sayh, BHR
| | - Ankur Kayastha
- Medical School, Kansas City University, Kansas City, USA
| | | | | | - Usama AlDallal
- School of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons In Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain, Manama, BHR
| | - Mohamed Ismail
- Neurosurgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Al Sayh, BHR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greenwood H, Davidson AR, Thomas R, Albarqouni L. Common barriers and enablers to the use of non-drug interventions for managing common chronic conditions in primary care: an overview of reviews. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:108. [PMID: 38582829 PMCID: PMC10998330 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02321-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-drug interventions are recommended for chronic condition prevention and management yet are underused in clinical practice. Understanding barriers and enablers to using non-drug interventions may help implement non-drug interventions in primary care. We aimed to conduct an overview of reviews to identify and summarise common barriers and enablers for using non-drug interventions for common chronic conditions in primary care. METHODS We included qualitative and quantitative reviews that used systematic process or methods to examine barriers and enablers to using non-drug interventions for chronic condition prevention and management in primary care settings. We searched 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, PsycInfo and CINAHL) from inception to September 2022. Two authors independently screened reviews. One author extracted and deductively coded data to Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) (and where relevant, Theoretical Domains Framework [TDF]). A second author validated 10% of extracted data and coding. Data was synthesised thematically using CFIR and TDF. One author assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using a modified AMSTAR 2 tool, with 10% validated by a second author. We assessed overlap between primary studies in included reviews. RESULTS From 5324 records, we included 25 reviews, with data predominately from patients. Overall, 130 subthemes (71 barrier and 59 enabler) were identified across 4 CFIR domains (Innovation, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, and Individuals), and all TDF domains. Common barrier and enabler subthemes were identified for CFIR constructs of Innovation Adaptability, Innovation Cost, Innovation Relative Advantage, Local Attitudes, External Pressure, Local Conditions, Relational Connections, Available Resources, and Access to Knowledge and Information. For TDF domains, important barrier and enabler subthemes were identified for Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context and Resources, Beliefs about Consequences, Reinforcement, and Emotion. CONCLUSIONS We synthesised reviews to provide new insight into common barriers and enablers for using non-drug interventions to prevent and manage chronic conditions in primary care. The factors identified can inform the development of generalisable implementation interventions to enhance uptake of multiple non-drug interventions simultaneously. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022357583).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Greenwood
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Alexandra R Davidson
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Rae Thomas
- Tropical Australian Academic Health Centre, Townsville, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burton W, Salsbury SA, Goertz CM. Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating a comprehensive spine care model in an academic health system: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:125. [PMID: 38263013 PMCID: PMC10804504 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10578-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems (HCS) are challenged in adopting and sustaining comprehensive approaches to spine care that require coordination and collaboration among multiple service units. The integration of clinicians who provide first line, evidence-based, non-pharmacological therapies further complicates adoption of these care pathways. This cross-sectional study explored clinician perceptions about the integration of guideline-concordant care and optimal spine care workforce requirements within an academic HCS. METHODS Spine care clinicians from Duke University Health System (DUHS) completed a 26-item online survey via Qualtrics on barriers and facilitators to delivering guideline concordant care for low back pain patients. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS A total of 27 clinicians (57% response) responded to one or more items on the questionnaire, with 23 completing the majority of questions. Respondents reported that guidelines were implementable within DUHS, but no spine care guideline was used consistently across provider types. Guideline access and integration with electronic records were barriers to use. Respondents (81%) agreed most patients would benefit from non-pharmacological therapies such as physical therapy or chiropractic before receiving specialty referrals. Providers perceived spine patients expected diagnostic imaging (81%) and medication (70%) over non-pharmacological therapies. Providers agreed that receiving imaging (63%) and opioids (59%) benchmarks could be helpful but might not change their ordering practice, even if nudged by best practice advisories. Participants felt that an optimal spine care workforce would require more chiropractors and primary care providers and fewer neurosurgeons and orthopedists. In qualitative responses, respondents emphasized the following barriers to guideline-concordant care implementation: patient expectations, provider confidence with referral pathways, timely access, and the appropriate role of spine surgery. CONCLUSIONS Spine care clinicians had positive support for current tenets of guideline-concordant spine care for low back pain patients. However, significant barriers to implementation were identified, including mixed opinions about integration of non-pharmacological therapies, referral pathways, and best practices for imaging and opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wren Burton
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Christine M Goertz
- Implementation of Spine Health Innovations, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Musculoskeletal Research, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Parvar SY, Mojgani P, Lankarani KB, Poursaeed F, Mohamadi Jahromi LS, Mishra V, Abbasi A, Shahabi S. Barriers and facilitators to reducing low-value care for the management of low back pain in Iran: a qualitative multi-professional study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:204. [PMID: 38233835 PMCID: PMC10792884 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder with a wide range of etiologies, ranging from self-limiting conditions to life-threatening diseases. Various modalities are available for the diagnosis and management of patients with LBP. However, many of these health services, known as low-value care (LVC), are unnecessary and impose undue financial costs on patients and health systems. The present study aimed to explore the perceptions of service providers regarding the facilitators and barriers to reducing LVC in the management of LBP in Iran. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study interviewed a total of 20 participants, including neurosurgeons, physiatrists, orthopedists, and physiotherapists, who were selected through purposive and snowball sampling strategies. The collected data were analyzed using the thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Thirty-nine sub-themes, with 183 citations, were identified as barriers, and 31 sub-themes, with 120 citations, were defined as facilitators. Facilitators and barriers to reducing LVC for LBP, according to the interviewees, were categorized into five themes, including: (1) individual provider characteristics; (2) individual patient characteristics; (3) social context; (4) organizational context; and (5) economic and political context. The ten most commonly cited barriers included unrealistic tariffs, provider-induced demand, patient distrust, insufficient time allocation, a lack of insurance coverage, a lack of a comprehensive referral system, a lack of teamwork, cultural challenges, a lack of awareness, and defensive medicine. Barriers such as adherence to clinical guidelines, improving the referral system, improving the cultural status of patients, and facilitators such as strengthening teamwork, developing an appropriate provider-patient relationship, improving the cultural status of the public, motivating the patients, considering an individualized approach, establishing a desirable payment mechanism, and raising the medical tariffs were most repeatedly stated by participants. CONCLUSION This study has pointed out a great number of barriers and facilitators that shape the provision of LVC in the management of LBP in Iran. Therefore, it is essential for relevant stakeholders to consider these findings in order to de-implement LVC interventions in the process of LBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyedeh Yasamin Parvar
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Parviz Mojgani
- Iran-Helal Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
- Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of The Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fereshteh Poursaeed
- Transitional Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
| | - Leila Sadat Mohamadi Jahromi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Vinaytosh Mishra
- College of Healthcare Management and Economics, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE
| | - Alireza Abbasi
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Saeed Shahabi
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferreira GE, Zadro JR, Traeger AC, Jones CP, West CA, O'Keeffe M, Jenkins H, McAuley J, Maher CG. Adding Brief Pain Science or Ergonomics Messages to Guideline Advice Did Not Increase Feelings of Reassurance in People With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Experiment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023; 53:1-11. [PMID: 37751303 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice on feelings of reassurance and management intentions among people with acute low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Three-arm parallel-group randomized experiment. METHODS: We recruited people with acute LBP (pain for ≤6 weeks) to participate in an online experiment. Participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: guideline advice alone or guideline advice with the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages. The intervention was delivered via prerecorded videos in all 3 groups. Coprimary outcomes were reassurance that (1) no serious condition is causing LBP and (2) continuing with daily activities is safe. Secondary outcomes were perceived risk of developing chronic pain, management intentions (bed rest, see a health professional, see a specialist, and imaging), credibility, and relevance of the advice in addressing the participant's concerns. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety-seven responses (99.3% of 2,313 randomized) were analyzed. Adding brief pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not change reassurance that LBP was not caused by serious disease. The addition of ergonomics advice provided worse reassurance that it is safe to continue with daily activities compared to guideline advice (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.53). There was no difference between groups on management intentions. CONCLUSION: Adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not increase reassurance or change management intentions in people with acute LBP. Ergonomics messages may lead to reduced feelings of reassurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12)1-11. Epub 26 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12090.
Collapse
|
9
|
Orlando JF, Beard M, Guerin M, Kumar S. Systematic review of predictors of hospitalisation for non-specific low back pain with or without referred leg pain. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292648. [PMID: 37816006 PMCID: PMC10564130 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Significant costs and utilisation of healthcare resources are associated with hospitalisations for non-specific low back pain despite clinical guidelines recommending community-based care. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the predictors of hospitalisation for low back pain. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (#CRD42021281827) and conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Database search of Ovid Medline, Emcare, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, PEDro and OTSeeker was conducted. Studies were included if they examined a predictor of hospitalisation for non-specific low back pain with or without referred leg pain. Data was extracted and descriptively synthesised. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists. There were 23 studies published over 29 articles which identified 52 predictor variables of hospitalisation for low back pain. The risk of hospitalisation was grouped into themes: personal, health and lifestyle, psychology, socioeconomic, occupational, clinical, and health systems and processes. There was moderate level evidence that arrival to an emergency department via ambulance with low back pain, and older age increase the risk of hospitalisations for low back pain. There was low level evidence that high pain intensity, past history of low back pain, opioid use, and occupation type increase the risk of hospitalisation for low back pain. Further research into psychological and social factors is warranted given the paucity of available studies. Hospital avoidance strategies, improved patient screening and resource utilisation in emergency departments are considerations for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F. Orlando
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Matthew Beard
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michelle Guerin
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Saravana Kumar
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lowry V, Desmeules F, Zidarov D, Lavigne P, Roy JS, Cormier AA, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Perreault K, Lefèbvre MC, Décary S, Hudon A. "I wanted to know what was hurting so much": a qualitative study exploring patients' expectations and experiences with primary care management. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:755. [PMID: 37749557 PMCID: PMC10521438 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06885-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of shoulder pain is challenging for primary care clinicians considering that 40% of affected individuals remain symptomatic one year after initial consultation. Developing tailored knowledge mobilization interventions founded on evidence-based recommendations while also considering patients' expectations could improve primary care for shoulder pain. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore patients' expectations and experiences of their primary care consultation for shoulder pain. METHODS In this qualitative study, participants with shoulder pain and having consulted a primary care clinician in the past year were interviewed. All the semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify themes related to the participants' expectations and experiences of primary care consultations for shoulder pain. RESULTS Thirteen participants with shoulder pain were interviewed (8 women, 5 men; mean age 50 ± 12 years). Eleven of them initially consulted a family physician or an emergency physician, and two participants initially consulted a physiotherapist. Four overarching themes related to patients' expectations and experiences were identified from our thematic analysis: 1) I can't sleep because of my shoulder; 2) I need to know what is happening with my shoulder; 3) But… we need to really see what is going on to help me!; and 4) Please take some time with me so I can understand what to do!. Several participants waited until they experienced a high level of shoulder pain before making an appointment since they were not confident about what their family physician could do to manage their condition. Although some participants felt that their physician took the time to listen to their concerns, many were dissatisfied with the limited assessment and education provided by the clinician. CONCLUSIONS Implementing evidence-based recommendations while considering patients' expectations is important as it may improve patients' satisfaction with healthcare. Several participants reported that their expectations were not met, especially when it came to the explanations provided. One unexpected finding that emerged from this study was the waiting period between the onset of shoulder pain and when patients decided to consult their primary care clinician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Lowry
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, 5415 L' Assomption Boulevard, Pav. Rachel Tourigny, Montreal, Canada, H1T 2M4.
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS), de l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
| | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, 5415 L' Assomption Boulevard, Pav. Rachel Tourigny, Montreal, Canada, H1T 2M4
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS), de l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Diana Zidarov
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, 5415 L' Assomption Boulevard, Pav. Rachel Tourigny, Montreal, Canada, H1T 2M4
- Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Institut Universitaire Sur La Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Patrick Lavigne
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS), de l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation Et Intégration Sociale (Cirris), Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Audrey-Anne Cormier
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS), de l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Kadija Perreault
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation Et Intégration Sociale (Cirris), Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Lefèbvre
- Groupe de Médecine Familiale Universitaire (GMF-U) Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Anne Hudon
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, 5415 L' Assomption Boulevard, Pav. Rachel Tourigny, Montreal, Canada, H1T 2M4
- Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche en Éthique (CRÉ), Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barnett R, Gaffney K, Sengupta R. Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis: A lost battle? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101870. [PMID: 37658016 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) remains an unacceptable worldwide problem; with evidence suggesting significant detrimental impact both clinically on the individual, and economically on society. There is therefore, a need for global action across various healthcare professions that come into contact with patients living, and suffering, with undiagnosed axSpA. Recent estimates of the median diagnostic delay suggest that globally, individuals with axSpA wait between 2 and 6 years for a diagnosis - revealing a clear benchmark for improvement. This timespan presents a window of opportunity for earlier diagnosis and intervention, which will likely improve patient outcomes. This review describes the current diagnostic delay as estimated across countries and over time, before presenting evidence from published strategies that may be implemented to improve this delay across primary and secondary care, including for specialties treating extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA (ophthalmology, gastroenterology, dermatology). Ongoing campaigns tackling delayed diagnosis in axSpA are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie Barnett
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK; Rheumatology Department, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases & Brownsword Therapies Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.
| | - Karl Gaffney
- Rheumatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk & Norwich, University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
| | - Raj Sengupta
- Rheumatology Department, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases & Brownsword Therapies Centre, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oliveira CB, Coombs D, Machado GC, McCaffery K, Richards B, Pinto RZ, O'Keeffe M, Maher CG, Christofaro DGD. Process evaluation of the implementation of an evidence-based model of care for low back pain in Australian emergency departments. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 66:102814. [PMID: 37421758 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Sydney Health Partners Emergency Department (SHaPED) trial targeted ED clinicians and evaluated a multifaceted strategy to implement a new model of care. The objective of this study was to investigate attitudes and experiences of ED clinicians as well as barriers and facilitators for implementation of the model of care. DESIGN A qualitative study. METHODS The EDs of three urban and one rural hospital in New South Wales, Australia participated in the trial between August and November 2018. A sample of clinicians was invited to participate in qualitative interviews via telephone and face-to-face. The data collected from the interviews were coded and grouped in themes using thematic analysis methods. RESULTS Non-opioid pain management strategies (i.e., patient education, simple analgesics, and heat wraps) were perceived to be the most helpful strategy for reducing opioid use by ED clinicians. However, time constraints and rotation of junior medical staff were seen as the main barriers for uptake of the model of care. Fear of missing a serious pathology and the clinicians' conviction of a need to provide something for the patient were seen as barriers to reducing lumbar imaging referrals. Other barriers to guideline endorsed care included patient's expectations and characteristics (e.g., older age and symptoms severity). CONCLUSIONS Improving knowledge of non-opioid pain management strategies was seen as a helpful strategy for reducing opioid use. However, clinicians also raised barriers related to the ED environment, clinicians' behaviour, and cultural aspects, which should be addressed in future implementation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystian B Oliveira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Western São Paulo (Unoeste), Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Departamento de Fisioterapia, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, Brazil; Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Danielle Coombs
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gustavo C Machado
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bethan Richards
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia; Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rafael Z Pinto
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chris G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Diego G D Christofaro
- Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mayhew M, Balderson BH, Cook AJ, Dickerson JF, Elder CR, Firemark AJ, Haller IV, Justice M, Keefe FJ, McMullen CK, O'Keeffe-Rosetti MC, Owen-Smith AA, Rini C, Schneider JL, Von Korff M, Wandner LD, DeBar LL. Comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of remote (telehealth and online) cognitive behavioral therapy-based treatments for high-impact chronic pain relative to usual care: study protocol for the RESOLVE multisite randomized control trial. Trials 2023; 24:196. [PMID: 36927459 PMCID: PMC10018633 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07165-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) is an effective but underused treatment for high-impact chronic pain. Increased access to CBT-CP services for pain is of critical public health importance, particularly for rural and medically underserved populations who have limited access due to these services being concentrated in urban and high income areas. Making CBT-CP widely available and more affordable could reduce barriers to CBT-CP use. METHODS As part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term® (NIH HEAL) initiative, we designed and implemented a comparative effectiveness, 3-arm randomized control trial comparing remotely delivered telephonic/video and online CBT-CP-based services to usual care for patients with high-impact chronic pain. The RESOLVE trial is being conducted in 4 large integrated healthcare systems located in Minnesota, Georgia, Oregon, and Washington state and includes demographically diverse populations residing in urban and rural areas. The trial compares (1) an 8-session, one-on-one, professionally delivered telephonic/video CBT-CP program; and (2) a previously developed and tested 8-session online CBT-CP-based program (painTRAINER) to (3) usual care augmented by a written guide for chronic pain management. Participants are followed for 1 year post-allocation and are assessed at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-allocation. The primary outcome is minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥ 30% reduction) in pain severity (composite of pain intensity and pain-related interference) assessed by a modified 11-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include pain severity, pain intensity, and pain-related interference scores, quality of life measures, and patient global impression of change at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cost-effectiveness is assessed by incremental cost per additional patient with MCID in primary outcome and by cost per quality-adjusted life year achieved. Outcome assessment is blinded to group assignment. DISCUSSION This large-scale trial provides a unique opportunity to rigorously evaluate and compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of 2 relatively low-cost and scalable modalities for providing CBT-CP-based treatments to persons with high-impact chronic pain, including those residing in rural and other medically underserved areas with limited access to these services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04523714. This trial was registered on 24 August 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Mayhew
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA.
| | | | - Andrea J Cook
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Morgan Justice
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | | | | | - Ashli A Owen-Smith
- Georgia State University and Center for Health Research and Evaluation Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Michael Von Korff
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Laura D Wandner
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA
| | - Lynn L DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fritsch CG, Abdel-Shaheed C, Mohammed R, Ferreira PH, McLachlan AJ, Ferreira ML. A qualitative assessment of a text message intervention for people with low back pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 64:102739. [PMID: 36924579 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Text messages represent a simple and scalable strategy to provide self-management to people with low back pain (LBP), yet their usefulness is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the usefulness, delivery format, behaviour-change ability and potential for the TEXT4myBACK intervention to be scaled-up. DESIGN Qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. METHODS 64 participants of the TEXT4myBACK trial randomised to the intervention arm were invited to participate in online sessions. Participants provided feedback about the text messages received. Online sessions were conducted by two researchers until thematic saturation was achieved. Information was analysed based on framework analysis and thematic data-driven coding. RESULTS Of the 64 invited, 10 people participated in the sessions and thematic saturation was reached. The following themes were identified: intervention's format, barriers and facilitators for behaviour-change, effectiveness, and implementation into healthcare. The messages were considered useful and their format was well-accepted, whilst some suggested a longer duration. The messages were considered simple to read and understand yet further information about LBP and exercise would be appreciated. Some believed the intervention improved their LBP and others believed its effectiveness would depend on receiver's characteristics. Participants felt the messages helped them to increase physical activity. Provision of information, reminders, and self-awareness were some behaviour-change facilitators. Participants said the intervention could be provided by healthcare professionals either for free or through a small fee. CONCLUSIONS The TEXT4myBACK intervention was useful and well-accepted. It provided reminders and supported increases in physical activity. Participants provided suggestions for the intervention to be scaled-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina G Fritsch
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Christina Abdel-Shaheed
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Riyaas Mohammed
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paulo H Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Manuela L Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manansala C, Ferbers S, Johnson M, Passmore S. Factors associated with non-pharmacological, non-operative treatment utilization prior to thoracolumbar spine surgery in Manitoba: A Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 63:102695. [PMID: 36473826 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for managing chronic low back pain suggests beginning with non-invasive treatments and having surgery as a last resort. Currently, no studies examine treatment engagement for back pain in the six-months preceding elective spine surgery assessment. OBJECTIVES This study aims to: 1) determine the engagement in non-pharmacological, non-operative treatment before elective thoracolumbar spine surgery (ETSS) assessment in XXXXXXXX; and 2) investigate potential factors associated with engagement in this population. DESIGN Retrospective cohort design. METHODS Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) registry data were analyzed to compare groups who reported minimal engagement in non-pharmacological, non-operative treatment before ETSS assessment to those who engaged. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with engagement. RESULTS A total of 144 patients qualified, 41.7% reported minimal engagement with non-pharmacological, non-operative treatment in the six-months preceding ETSS assessment. Four statistically significant factors associated with minimal engagement were identified: 1) 61-90 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-10.7, p < .001); 2) Oswestry disability index (ODI) score >60% (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-9.2, p = .010; 3) body mass index (BMI) score 25-29.9 (OR 6.7, 95% CI 2.2-20.9, p < .001) and BMI ≥ 30 (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.2, p = .009); and 4) female biological sex (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-5.6, p = .039. CONCLUSIONS In total, 41.7% of CSORN patients had minimal engagement with non-pharmacological, non-operative treatment in the six-months prior to ETSS assessment in XXXXXXXX. Factors associated with minimal engagement included: older age, high disability, increased BMI, and female biological sex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Manansala
- Department of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, 179G Frank Kennedy Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada.
| | - Spencer Ferbers
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 260 Brodie Centre - 727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P5, Canada
| | - Michael Johnson
- Departments of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, AD401 - 820 Sherbrook Street, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Department of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, 179G Frank Kennedy Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kahere M, Hlongwana K, Ginindza T. Exploring patients' lived experience on the barriers to accessing low back pain health services. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2022; 14:e1-e10. [PMID: 36546491 PMCID: PMC9772776 DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major concern to public health. However, the treatment of CLBP in primary care has shown to be ineffective in South Africa. Understanding the barriers encountered by patients in accessing CLBP healthcare services is paramount in the development of context-specific intervention strategies. AIM To explore the patients' lived experiences on the barriers to accessing diagnostic, referral and treatment services for CLBP. SETTING A health facility-based study conducted at five primary public hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS A phenomenological study by means of in-depth interviews using the general interview guide approach. Interviews were conducted by a research assistant with relevant experience and qualifications in qualitative methods. A total of 15 participants were recruited to participate in this study. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed iteratively until saturation was reached, where no new themes were emerging. All the transcripts were exported to NVivo 12 Pro for analysis. RESULTS The results of this study identified the following barriers: travel, long waiting periods, shortage of personnel, poor infrastructural development, inadequate healthcare personnel, communication barrier, social influence, beliefs around cause and effect, misdiagnosis and inappropriate and/or ineffective treatment approaches. CONCLUSION This study concluded that barriers to patients' accessing diagnostic, referral and treatment services exist. Efforts should be made towards developing health systems in underserved communities.Contribution: This is the first study to be conducted in South Africa that explored the barriers associated with accessing healthcare services for chronic low back pain. Based on the results of this study, in order to improve health outcomes for low back pain there need to be a change of emphasis in primary health care by ensuring sufficient allocation of resources towards musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morris Kahere
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Khumbulani Hlongwana
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa,Cancer and Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Unit (CIDERU), School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Themba Ginindza
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa,Cancer and Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Unit (CIDERU), School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ayre J, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. Physiotherapists have some hesitations and unmet needs regarding delivery of exercise programs for low back pain prevention in adults: A qualitative interview study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102630. [PMID: 35932753 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there is some qualitative research on physiotherapists' experiences of delivering low back pain treatment, we do not know the extent that these findings apply to low back pain prevention. OBJECTIVE To explore physiotherapists' understanding, attitudes and experiences related to delivering low back pain prevention programs. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. METHOD Interviews from 25 Australian physiotherapists (56% female; 44% male) were analysed using framework thematic analysis. RESULTS Theme 1 explored physiotherapists' hesitancy about 'low back pain prevention,' raising concerns this term might inadvertently entrench unhelpful beliefs. They preferred language about minimising the risk and impact of recurrences, and promoting an active lifestyle. Theme 2 emphasised that as pain receded, engaging patients could be challenging. Some discussed that person-centred care and individualised programs helped overcome this challenge. Several wanted more training in counselling skills, and more consistent external messaging about low back pain prevention. Theme 3 highlighted uncertainty about delivering high-value prevention care. Some perceived the programs as potentially placing unnecessary financial burden on some patients. Many physiotherapists were uncertain about how to support patients when they weren't in pain (i.e., remission) and wanted training in tailored exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS Many of the physiotherapists had some hesitations and unmet needs regarding delivery of exercise programs for secondary prevention of low back pain. Clinicians may find it useful to ask patients directly about their interest in prevention programs and work with interested patients to develop tailored, progressive programs that continue to be motivating, even during periods when there is no pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bursey K, Hall A, Pike A, Etchegary H, Aubrey-Bassler K, Patey AM, Romme K. Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066681. [PMID: 36319054 PMCID: PMC9628688 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Overprescription of antibiotics poses a significant threat to healthcare globally as it contributes to the issue of antibiotic resistance. While antibiotics should be predominately prescribed for bacterial infections, they are often inappropriately given for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and related conditions, such as the common cold. This study will involve a qualitative systematic review of physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care settings and synthesise the findings using a theoretical basis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies that assess physicians' reported barriers to following evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care settings for URTIs. We plan to search the following databases with no date or language restrictions: MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PsycInfo. Qualitative studies that explore the barriers and enablers to following antibiotic prescription guidelines for URTIs for primary care physicians will be included. We will analyse our findings using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is a theoretically designed resource based on numerous behaviour change theories grouped into 14 domains. Using the TDF approach, we will be able to identify the determinants of our behaviour of interest (ie, following antibiotic prescription guidelines for URTIs) and categorise them into the 14 TDF domains. This will provide the necessary information to develop future evidence-based interventions that will target the identified issues and apply the most effective behaviour change techniques to affect change. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystal Bursey
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Andrea Pike
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Holly Etchegary
- Clinical Epidemiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Andrea M Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristen Romme
- Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hochheim M, Ramm P, Wunderlich M, Amelung V. A cross-sectional study to validate an administrative back pain severity classification tool based on the graded chronic pain scale. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16927. [PMID: 36209228 PMCID: PMC9547910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21422-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of chronic lower back pain (CLBP) should be stratified for best medical and economic outcome. To improve the targeting of potential participants for exclusive therapy offers from payers, Freytag et al. developed a tool to classify back pain chronicity classes (CC) based on claim data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the model. Administrative claim data and self-reported patient information from 3,506 participants (2014-2021) in a private health insurance health management programme in Germany were used to validate the tool. Sensitivity, specificity, and Matthews' correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated comparing the prediction with actual grades based on von Korff's graded chronic pain scale (GCPS). The secondary outcome was an updated view on direct health care costs (€) of patients with back pain (BP) grouped by GCPS. Results showed a fair correlation between predicted CC and actual GCPS grades. A total of 69.7% of all cases were correctly classified. Sensitivity and specificity rates of 54.6 and 76.4% underlined precision. Correlation between CC and GCPS with an MCC of 0.304 also indicated a fair relationship between prediction and observation. Cost data could be clearly grouped by GCPS: the higher the grade, the higher the costs and the use of health care. This was the first study to compare the predicted severity of BP using claim data with the actual severity of BP by GCPS. Based on the results, the usage of CC as a single tool to determine who receives CLBP treatment cannot be recommended. CC is a good tool to segment candidates for specific types of intervention in BP. However, it cannot replace a medical screening at the beginning of an intervention, as the rate of false negatives is too high. Trial registration The study was conducted using routinely collected data from an intervention, which was previously evaluated and registered retrospectively in the German Registry of Clinical Trials under DRKS00015463 (04/09/2018). Informed consent and the self-reported questionnaire have remained unchanged since the study and, therefore, are still valid according to the ethics proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hochheim
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine, and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany.
| | - P Ramm
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - M Wunderlich
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - V Amelung
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Alrushud AS, Alamam DM, Almurdi MM, Almutairi SK, Alzahrani RO, Alanazi MS, Dhahi WM, Alshaiqy DM. Primary Investigation of Low Back Pain among Saudi Arabians: A Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12854. [PMID: 36232153 PMCID: PMC9565200 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disease that affects all ages and is a symptom that induces immobility. Patients' beliefs may influence LBP management, and adjusting detrimental beliefs is required to improve treatment outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of LBP within the Saudi population and beliefs regarding LBP, physical activity, rest, imaging, and medication. People with LBP were targeted with a questionnaire containing sections on demographic information and the validated Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ), in addition to questions regarding imaging, physical activity, rest and medication. A total of 651 responses were received, 559 of them (86%) experienced LBP. The most common age group was those aged 18-21 (n = 221), 80% from females. The average BBQ score was 27.8 (SD = 5.58). The majority of the respondents held the following beliefs, which are contrary to the best available evidence: back pain must be rested (77.1%) and X-rays or scans are required to gain the best medical care for LBP (73.2%). The Saudi population holds unhelpful beliefs that may affect their quality of life. Healthcare professionals working with patients with LBP have an important role in changing detrimental beliefs and behaviors about the condition.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hartvigsen J, Kamper SJ, French SD. Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward? Pain Pract 2022; 22 Suppl 2:65-70. [PMID: 36109843 PMCID: PMC9545107 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-value care that wastes resources and harms patients is prevalent in health systems everywhere. METHODS As part of an invited keynote presentation at the Pain in Motion IV conference held in Maastricht, Holland, in May 2022, we reviewed evidence for low-value care in musculoskeletal conditions and discussed possible solutions. RESULTS Drivers of low-value care are diverse and affect patients, clinicians, and health systems everywhere. We show that low-value care for back pian, neck pain, and osteoarthritis is prevalent in all professional groups involved in caring for people who seek care for these conditions. Implementation efforts that aim to reverse low-value care seem to work better if designed using established conceptual and theoretical frameworks. CONCLUSION Low-value care is prevalent in the care of people with musculoskeletal conditions. Reducing low-value care requires behaviour change among patients and clinicians as well as in health systems. There is evidence that behaviour change can be facilitated through good conceptual and theoretical frameworks but not convincing evidence that it changes patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bondaronek P, Dicken SJ, Singh Jennings S, Mallion V, Stefanidou C. Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Digital Tools in Primary Care to Deliver Physical Activity Advice: Semistructured Interviews and Thematic Analysis. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9:e35070. [PMID: 36040764 PMCID: PMC9472053 DOI: 10.2196/35070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Physical inactivity is a leading risk factor for many health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer; therefore, increasing physical activity (PA) is a public health priority. Health care professionals (HCPs) in primary care are pivotal in addressing physical inactivity; however, few HCPs provide PA advice to patients. There can be obstacles to delivering PA advice, including lack of time, confidence, or knowledge. Digital technology has the potential to overcome obstacles and facilitate delivering PA advice. However, it is unknown if and how digital tools are used to deliver PA advice in primary care consultations and what factors influence their use. Objective We aimed to understand the use of digital tools to support primary care consultations and to identify the barriers to and facilitators of using these systems. Methods Overall, 25 semistructured interviews were conducted with primary care HCPs. Professionals were sampled based on profession (general practitioners, practice nurses, and health care assistants), prevalence of long-term conditions within their practice area, and rural-urban classification. The data were analyzed thematically to identify the influences on the use of digital tools. Themes were categorized using the COM-B (capability, opportunity, and motivation—behavior) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify the barriers to and facilitators of using digital tools to support the delivery of PA advice in primary care consultations. Results The identified themes fell within 8 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. The most prominent influence (barrier or facilitator) within psychological capability was having the skills to use digital tools. Training in the use of digital tools was also mentioned several times. The most notable influences within physical opportunity were limited digital tools to prompt/support the provision of PA advice, time constraints, efficiency of digital tools, simplicity and ease of use of digital tools, and integration with existing systems. Other physical opportunity influences included lack of access to digital tools and technical support in the use of digital tools. Within social opportunity, a notable barrier was that digital tools reduce interpersonal communication with patients. Patient preference was also identified. Several important influences were within reflective motivation, including confidence to use digital tools, beliefs about the usefulness of digital tools, the belief that digital tools “are the way forward,” beliefs related to data privacy and security concerns, and perceptions about patient capabilities. About automatic motivation, influences included familiarity and availability regarding digital tools and the fact that digital tools prompt behavior. Conclusions A variety of influences were identified on the use of digital tools to support primary care consultations. These findings provide a foundation for designing a digital tool addressing barriers and leverages the facilitators to support PA advice provision within primary care to elicit patient behavior change and increase PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Bondaronek
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, United Kingdom.,Research, Translation & Innovation, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.,Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel J Dicken
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, United Kingdom.,Research, Translation & Innovation, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seth Singh Jennings
- Research, Translation & Innovation, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Verity Mallion
- Research, Translation & Innovation, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chryssa Stefanidou
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, United Kingdom.,Research, Translation & Innovation, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
O'Hagan ET, Di Pietro F, Traeger AC, Cashin AG, Hodges PW, Wand BM, O'Neill S, Schabrun SM, Harris IA, McAuley JH. What messages predict intention to self-manage low back pain? A study of attitudes towards patient education. Pain 2022; 163:1489-1496. [PMID: 34784310 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This observational study evaluated people's attitudes towards educational statements and tested whether this predicted intention to self-manage low back pain (LBP). People with or without LBP who were older than 18 years and fluent in written English were recruited. Participants completed an online survey asking demographic questions and questions on the presence or absence of LBP, its duration, and intensity. We assessed attitude toward educational statements and conducted linear regression analyses to investigate the relationship between attitude toward each statement and intention to self-manage. We recruited 656 participants, n = 345 (53.6%), with LBP of varying duration. On average, participants had a positive attitude toward all statements except one; participants with chronic LBP had a negative attitude toward a statement relating to the cause of LBP. The effect of attitude on intention to self-manage was dependent on whether someone had LBP and for how long. For example, increased intention to self-manage was predicted by a positive attitude toward educational statements related to staying active (β = 0.22 [CI 0.11-0.33]) in participants without pain, statements about reassurance (β = 0.33 [CI 0.16-0.49]) for participants with acute or subacute LBP, and statements about the severity of back pain (β = 0.25 [CI 0.18-0.33]) for participants with chronic LBP. We noted differences in attitude toward educational messages and individuals' intention to self-manage LBP depending on pain duration. Self-management could be encouraged with specific reassurance in people with acute or subacute LBP and education about severity in people with chronic LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Flavia Di Pietro
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul W Hodges
- NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury & Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sean O'Neill
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Morgan S, Kongsted A, Nørgaard B. User perspectives on systematic data collection regarding back pain managed in general practice - a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:684. [PMID: 35854291 PMCID: PMC9294778 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05613-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Back pain is a main driver of disability and the most prevalent reason why people in Demark visit a general practitioner (GP). However, little is known about back pain management in primary care. For new strategies to be sustainable and to accommodate the recommendations for evidence-based practice, patients’ perspectives are paramount to complement clinical expertise and research evidence. This study aimed to identify recommendations for systematic data collection in a nationwide cohort regarding the management of back pain in general practice from the perspectives of GPs and patients. Method We applied an adapted exploratory sequential design using focus groups and individual interviews. Seven GPs and ten patients with back pain participated, and four focus groups and seventeen individual interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using abductive reasoning. Results Both GPs and patients with back pain found that 1) recruitment to a cohort should take place through the GPs, 2) the heterogeneity of patients with back pain and their need for individualized treatment and care should be considered, and 3) data from the cohort should feed into a flowchart or guideline to illustrate a generic patient pathway and visually assist both the patient and GP to obtain an overview and, thus, structure the patient pathway. Conclusion GPs and patients with back pain both considered the nationwide cohort with the overall aim to investigate back pain management as being extremely relevant in relation to improve t the patient pathway. User perspectives should be explored and integrated into health care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Morgan
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Nørgaard
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gervais-Hupé J, Filleul A, Perreault K, Hudon A. Implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice: a review of systematic reviews to map barriers and facilitators and identify specific behavior change techniques. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-10. [PMID: 35790490 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2094479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our first objective was to map the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Our second objective was to identify the specific behavior change techniques (BCT) that could facilitate this implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a review of systematic reviews to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of a biopsychosocial approach by physiotherapists and we mapped them within the TDF domains. We then analyzed these domains using the Theory and Techniques tool (TaTT) to identify the most appropriate BCTs for the implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice. RESULTS The barriers and facilitators to the use of a biopsychosocial approach by physiotherapists were mapped to 10 domains of the TDF (Knowledge; skills; professional role; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; intentions; memory, attention and decision processes; environmental context; social influences; emotion). The inclusion of these domains within the TaTT resulted in the identification of 33 BCTs that could foster the use of this approach by physiotherapists. CONCLUSIONS Investigating the implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice from a behavior change perspective provides new strategies that can contribute to successfully implement this approach.Implications for RehabilitationThe implementation of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice is a complex process which involves behavior changes influenced by several barriers and facilitators.Barriers and facilitators reported by physiotherapists when implementing a biopsychosocial approach can be mapped within 10 domains of the Theoretical Domain Framework.Thirty-three behavior change techniques (e.g., verbal persuasion about capability, problem solving, restructuring the physical environment, etc.) were identified to foster the implementation of a biopsychosocial approach and specifically target barriers and facilitators.By using a behavior change perspective, this study highlights new strategies and avenues that can support current efforts to successfully implement the use of a biopsychosocial approach into physiotherapists' practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Gervais-Hupé
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré de services sociaux et de santé du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ), Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Kadija Perreault
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Centre intégré universitaire en santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada
| | - Anne Hudon
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Centre intégré de services sociaux et de santé du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khazen M. Power dynamics in doctor-patient relationships: A qualitative study examining how cultural and personal relationships facilitate medication requests in a minority with collectivist attributes. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2038-2044. [PMID: 34865890 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examines personal patient-doctor relationships in a minority with collectivist attributes that facilitate medically inappropriate requests of patients. METHODS Personal interviews were conducted with 56 (27 family doctors/ 29 patients) members of the Arab minority in Israel. The interviews were transcribed, and thematically analyzed by two coders. FINDINGS Collectivist attributes and long-term patient-doctor relationships, patients' close and mostly familial affiliation to the doctor, and informal policies of recruiting members to sick funds by doctors could result in shifting power dynamics in patients' favor and enhance their confidence to request treatments from their doctor. CONCLUSIONS The present study highlights examining closely-knit patient-doctor relationships in a society with collectivist attributes that foster and reinforce patients' requests. These personal relationships challenge patient-doctor partnerships and the patient-centeredness approach. Instead of collaborating and discussing whether a treatment is needed, patients might pressure for inappropriate treatments and doctors accede. These relationships can be channelled to promote patient centeredness and patient-doctor collaboration. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Programs promoting prudent provision of treatments can emphasize that collectivist attributes and personal relationships challenge professional boundaries in patient-doctor relationships. Also, doctors' experiences dealing with patients' pressures to prescribe medications, could serve as a base for these programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maram Khazen
- Dan Department of Communication, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Zoete A, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R. Diagnostic Imaging in Chiropractic Practice: A Survey of Opinions and Self-Reported Guideline Adherence of Dutch and Belgian Chiropractors. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 45:57-72. [PMID: 35753875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was (1) to describe diagnostic imaging in Dutch and Belgian chiropractic practice in general, (2) to estimate adherence to the diagnostic imaging guidelines for patients with low back pain (LBP) via vignettes, and (3) to evaluate factors associated with diagnostic imaging and adherence to the guidelines. METHODS We used a web-based survey to collect sociodemographic data, practice characteristics, amount of imaging, opinions, and indications for requesting imaging from registered Dutch and Belgian chiropractors in 2013. Additionally, adherence to imaging guidelines for LBP was assessed by 6 vignettes in patients with LBP. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to explore associations between characteristics of chiropractors and the use of imaging. Generalized mixed models were used to explore guidelines adherence and their relationship with chiropractor's characteristics. RESULTS The overall response rate was 60% (n = 203 out of 340). In total, 83% of chiropractors viewed diagnostic imaging in general as an important part of their practice. It is important to note that Dutch and Belgian chiropractors are not allowed to refer directly for imaging. Chiropractors reported that they would like to have imaging in 42% of their patients. Imaging had already been performed in 37% of patients before the first visit and was ordered by another health care provider (ie, general practitioner or medical specialist). The most common indication for ordering imaging was exclusion of contraindications (73%). The most common reason against imaging was the perceived limited value (45%). Many chiropractors (71%) were familiar with imaging guidelines. Adherence to the imaging guidelines for LBP based upon the vignettes was 66%. Dutch chiropractors and chiropractors with less than 10 years in practice demonstrated better adherence to guidelines and imaging use as compared with Belgian and those with more than 10 years of experience. CONCLUSIONS Most Dutch and Belgian chiropractors reported that imaging in general was important in chiropractic practice. Self-reported indications for ordering diagnostic imaging were in line with the imaging guidelines in the majority of cases. We found some variances between Belgian and Dutch chiropractors and years of experience related to guideline adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie de Zoete
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Michiel R de Boer
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sidney M Rubinstein
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pike A, Patey A, Lawrence R, Aubrey-Bassler K, Grimshaw J, Mortazhejri S, Dowling S, Jasaui Y, Hall A. Barriers to following imaging guidelines for the treatment and management of patients with low-back pain in primary care: a qualitative assessment guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:143. [PMID: 35659251 PMCID: PMC9164352 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01751-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability and is among the top five reasons that patients visit their family doctors. Over-imaging for non-specific low back pain remains a problem in primary care. To inform a larger study to develop and evaluate a theory-based intervention to reduce inappropriate imaging, we completed an assessment of the barriers and facilitators to reducing unnecessary imaging for NSLBP among family doctors in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). Methods This was an exploratory, qualitative study describing family doctors’ experiences and practices related to diagnostic imaging for non-specific LBP in NL, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Data were collected using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed deductively (assigning text to one or more domains) and inductively (generating themes at each of the domains) before the results were examined to determine which domains should be targeted to reduce imaging. Results Nine family doctors (four males; five females) working in community (n = 4) and academic (n = 5) clinics in both rural (n = 6) and urban (n = 3) settings participated in this study. We found five barriers to reducing imaging for patients with NSLBP: 1) negative consequences, 2) patient demand 3) health system organization, 4) time, and 5) access to resources. These were related to the following domains: 1) beliefs about consequences, 2) beliefs about capabilities, 3) emotion, 4) reinforcement, 5) environmental context and resources, 6) social influences, and 7) behavioural regulation. Conclusions Family physicians a) fear that if they do not image they may miss something serious, b) face significant patient demand for imaging, c) are working in a system that encourages unnecessary imaging, d) don’t have enough time to counsel patients about why they don’t need imaging, and e) lack access to appropriate practitioners, community programs, and treatment modalities to prescribe to their patients. These barriers were related to seven TDF domains. Successfully reducing inappropriate imaging requires a comprehensive intervention that addresses these barriers using established behaviour change techniques. These techniques should be matched directly to relevant TDF domains. The results of our study represent the important first step of this process – identifying the contextual barriers and the domains to which they are related. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01751-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pike
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
| | - Andrea Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Lawrence
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sameh Mortazhejri
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patients' Perceptions and Outcome Measures after Undergoing the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Mixed-Method Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19106106. [PMID: 35627641 PMCID: PMC9140490 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the outcome measures and perceptions of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) after being treated with the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI). In this process evaluation mixed-methods study, 30 patients with CLBP electronically completed self-reported measures (function, pain, and fear-avoidance beliefs) before and after ETMI treatment. Subsequently, each patient participated in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvements in function (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001), and fear-avoidance beliefs (p < 0.001) after receiving ETMI treatment, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.234). Moreover, the average number of physiotherapy sessions was 2.6 ± 0.6 for the ETMI intervention, while the annual average number in Maccabi is estimated at 4.1 ± 1.5. Three main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) communication between the patient and the practitioner; (2) psychosocial treatment elements, and (3) ETMI as a long-term solution for CLBP. The findings of the current study highlight patients’ perceived need for an open and sincere dialogue and for receiving reassurance and encouragement about their LBP. Notably, they had no problem with the fact that they did not receive passive treatment. Accordingly, together with the significant improvement in post-treatment outcome measures, patients perceived the ETMI method as a practical tool for self-managing their back problems in the long term.
Collapse
|
30
|
To D, Hall A, Bussières A, French SD, Lawrence R, Pike A, Patey AM, Brake-Patten D, O'Keefe L, Elliott B, De Carvalho D. Exploring factors influencing chiropractors' adherence to radiographic guidelines for low back pain using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:23. [PMID: 35534902 PMCID: PMC9082849 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00433-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The inappropriate use of lumbar spine imaging remains common in primary care despite recommendations from evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to avoid imaging in the absence of red flags. This study aimed to explore factors influencing ordering behaviours and adherence to radiographic guidelines for low back pain (LBP) in chiropractors in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada. Methods We conducted two focus groups in December 2018 with chiropractors in different regions of NL (eastern, n = 8; western, n = 4). An interview guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) served to identify perceived barriers to, and enablers of, target behaviours of guideline adherence and managing LBP without X-rays. We conducted thematic analysis of chiropractors’ statements into relevant theoretical domains, followed by grouping of similar statements into specific beliefs. Domains key to changing radiographic guideline adherence, LBP imaging behaviours, and/or informing intervention design were identified by noting conflicting beliefs and their reported influence on the target behaviours. Results Six of the 14 TDF domains were perceived to be important for adherence to radiographic guidelines and managing non-specific LBP without imaging. Participating chiropractors reported varying levels of knowledge and awareness of guidelines for LBP imaging (Knowledge). Many chiropractors based their decision for imaging on clinical presentation, but some relied on “gut feeling” (Memory, attention, and decision processes). While chiropractors thought it was their role to manage LBP without imaging, others believed ordering imaging was the responsibility of other healthcare providers (Social/professional role and identity). Contrasting views were found regarding the negative consequences of imaging or not imaging LBP patients (Beliefs about consequences). Communication was identified as a skill required to manage LBP without imaging (Skills) and a strategy to enable appropriate imaging ordering behaviours (Behavioural regulation). Chiropractors suggested that access to patients’ previous imaging and a system that facilitated better interprofessional communication would likely improve their LBP imaging behaviours (Behavioural regulation). Conclusion We identified potential influences, in six theoretical domains, on participating chiropractors’ LBP imaging behaviours and adherence to radiographic guidelines. These beliefs may be targets for theory-informed behaviour change interventions aimed at improving these target behaviours for chiropractors in NL. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00433-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne To
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lawrence
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Andrea Pike
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Andrea M Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Barbara Elliott
- Patient Engagement Partner, North Bay, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Education and Professional Studies - School of Nursing, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Diana De Carvalho
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Why hospital-based healthcare professionals do not report adverse drug reactions: a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:1165-1175. [PMID: 35476123 PMCID: PMC9043508 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03326-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Adverse drug reaction (ADR) underreporting is highly prevalent across the world. This study aimed to identify factors associated with ADR reporting and map these to a behavioural change framework to help inform future interventions designed to improve ADR underreporting. Methods A mixed methods survey was distributed to healthcare professionals at a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. Quantitative data was analysed using logistic regression to identify factors that predict ADR reporting. Qualitative data was evaluated using content analysis. These were then integrated and mapped to the 14 domains within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify target areas relevant for improving ADR reporting. Results One hundred thirty-three healthcare professionals completed the survey. Knowing how to report ADRs (OR 4.56, 95%CI 1.95–10.7), having been trained on ADR reporting (OR 2.72, 95%CI 1.29–5.77), and encountering ADRs as part of clinical practice (OR 10.3, 95%CI 3.59–29.4) were significant predictors of reporting an ADR. Content analysis identified three categories: modifying the ADR reporting process, enabling clinicians to report ADRs, and creating a positive ADR reporting culture. After data integration, the three target TDF domains were knowledge, environmental context/resources, and beliefs about consequences. Conclusion Future interventions designed to improve ADR reporting should address these target domains to instigate behaviour change in healthcare professionals’ reporting of ADRs. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03326-x.
Collapse
|
32
|
Duarte ST, Nunes C, Costa D, Donato H, Cruz EB. Models of care for low back pain patients in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053848. [PMID: 35379620 PMCID: PMC8981342 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition worldwide and it is responsible for high healthcare costs and resources consumption. It represents a challenge for primary care services that struggle to implement evidence-based practice. Models of care (MoCs) are arising as effective solutions to overcome this problem, leading to better health outcomes. Although there is growing evidence regarding MoCs for the management of LBP patients, an analysis of the existing body of evidence has not yet been carried out. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and map the current evidence about the implementation of MoCs for LBP in primary healthcare. Findings from this study will inform policy makers, health professionals and researchers about their characteristics and outcomes, guiding future research and best practice models. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies that implemented an MoC for LBP patients in primary healthcare will be included. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, grey literature databases and relevant organisations websites. This review will consider records from 2000, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Two researchers will independently screen all citations and full-text articles and abstract data. Data extracted will include the identification of the MoC, key elements of the intervention, organisational components, context-specific factors and patient-related, system-related and implementation-related outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As a secondary analysis, this study does not require ethical approval. It will provide a comprehensive understanding on existing MoCs for LBP, outcomes and context-related challenges that may influence implementation in primary healthcare, which is meaningful knowledge to inform future research in this field. Findings will be disseminated through research papers in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at relevant conferences and documentation for professional organisations and stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Tinoco Duarte
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Carla Nunes
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniela Costa
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Helena Donato
- Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Eduardo B Cruz
- Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Physical Therapy Department, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setubal, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kolb WH, Bade MJ, Bradberry C. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for low back pain: A case control cohort study of knowledge translation in a multi-site healthcare organization. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:288-302. [PMID: 34761482 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The benefits of clinical practice guideline (CPG) adoption for the management of patients with back pain are well documented. However, the gap between knowledge creation and implementation remains wide with few studies documenting the iterative process of comprehensive implementation in clinical settings. The objective of this study was to improve adherent physical therapy care according to CPG's for low back pain and describe the knowledge to action (K2A) process used in a rural healthcare organization. METHODS A prospective case control cohort design was used to evaluate physical therapy provider practice changes during an 18 month intervention. Four clinical sites were selected, two of which received multifaceted educational and process interventions tailored to feedback from ongoing K2A cycle outcomes. Overall program assessment included monthly charge code reports for adherence and a pre-post survey of confidence for guideline use. Pragmatic Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) criteria were used to complete the process evaluation. RESULTS A significant difference (p < 0.001, mean difference 13.5, CI [8.5,18.5]) for charge code adherence favoured education site-1 over control site-2 after implementation. Adherence scores remained above target at both education sites 18 months after implementation. Survey differences were significant for confidence scores at education sites in use of the cognitive behavioural category, overall treatment category use and guideline communication. Process evaluation supported multifaceted interventions tailored to education sites with average cost measured by staff education time of 15.5 h per therapist trained. CONCLUSION This study extends the literature of guideline implementation by describing the unique cycles required for promoting provider behaviour change within a rural healthcare system. Adherence and confidence results suggest increased provider CPG use which was supported by the process evaluation. This study demonstrates the importance of multiple site comparisons, long-term reporting and standardized frameworks for assessment of real-world CPG implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Kolb
- Department of Physical Therapy, Radford University Waldron College of Health Professions, Radford University Carilion Campus, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael J Bade
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Caleb Bradberry
- School of Computing and Information Sciences, Radford University Artis College of Science and Technology, Radford, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mankelow J, Ryan CG, Green PW, Taylor PC, Martin D. An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals' understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:211. [PMID: 35351106 PMCID: PMC8962069 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE). METHODS An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention. RESULTS Clinicians' relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients' passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians' lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov ( NCT04587596 ) in October 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagjit Mankelow
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Centuria Building, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley TS1 3BX England
| | - Cormac G. Ryan
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Centuria Building, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley TS1 3BX England
| | - Paul W. Green
- Linthorpe Surgery, 378 Linthorpe Road, Middlesbrough, TS5 6HA England
| | - Paul C. Taylor
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law Education and Social Work, Teesside University Middlesbrough, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley TS1 3BX England
| | - Denis Martin
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration for the North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Horppu R, Väänänen A, Kausto J. Evaluation of a guidelines implementation intervention to reduce work disability and sick leaves related to chronic musculoskeletal pain: a theory-informed qualitative study in occupational health care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:272. [PMID: 35317760 PMCID: PMC8938719 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05234-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines for pain management and sick leave prescription were formulated and implemented in an occupational health services (OHS) in Finland to reduce work disability and sick leaves related to musculoskeletal pain. We investigated how the guidelines implementation intervention may have produced its effects, how the number of prescribed sick leave days varied before and after the launch of the guidelines, and which factors beyond physician behaviour were seen to influence sick leaves. Methods Seventeen physicians, two occupational physiotherapists and one occupational health care nurse were interviewed. Qualitative content analysis using both inductive and deductive approaches was performed, informed by Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework. Employees’ sick leave days related to musculoskeletal disorders in 2015–2019 were drawn from the employer’s register. Results Physicians’ guidelines adherence was facilitated by psychological capability (e.g., having relevant knowledge, remembering to engage in recommended behaviours), reflective motivation (e.g., guidelines-related behaviours regarded as central part of one’s professional role; beliefs in the positive consequences of recommended behaviours to employees and employers), and physical and social opportunities (e.g., adequate physical resources, culture of social support). Some physicians also described barriers to recommended behaviours (e.g., lack of knowledge or non-pharmacological pain treatment tools). The guidelines had served as sources of new knowledge, reminders of recommended practices and means of self-assessment. Considerable declining trend of prescribed sick leave days was detected, especially during the first years after the intervention, levelling off somewhat thereafter. OHS policies and structures were seen to enable professionals’ focusing on preventing pain-related disability and prolonged sick leaves. The decline of sickness absences was also attributed to the municipal client organization’s commitment and the employees’ positive attitudes towards the alternatives to full-time sick leave. Conclusions The guidelines implementation intervention was found successful. The study showed the importance of social and organizational environment supporting physicians’ engagement in recommended practices. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05234-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritva Horppu
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ari Väänänen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Kausto
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leach MJ. Implementation science in New Zealand naturopathic practice: a cross-sectional study. JOURNAL OF COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 19:781-790. [PMID: 35092655 DOI: 10.1515/jcim-2021-0508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Understanding and addressing the barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP) falls within the realm of implementation science. To date, disciplines such as naturopathy have paid little attention to implementation science, meaning the obstacles to delivering best practice care have largely been ignored. This study addresses this knowledge gap by examining the determinants of evidence implementation in New Zealand naturopathic practice. METHODS This cross-sectional study was open to all New Zealand naturopaths who had Internet access, and were fluent in the English language. Participants were invited to complete the 84-item Evidence-Based practice Attitude and utilization Survey (EBASE) online between February and July 2020. RESULTS The survey was completed in full by 104 naturopaths (86% female; 55% aged 40-59 years). While attitudes toward EBP were generally favourable, engagement in EBP activities was reported at a moderate-low level. Factors potentially contributing to the modest uptake of EBP were the moderate level of self-reported EBP-related skill, lack of clinical evidence in naturopathy and lack of time. Enablers of EBP uptake that were supported by the majority of participants were access to the Internet, online databases, EBP education materials, and full-text journal articles. CONCLUSIONS This study has provided much-needed insight into the level of EBP engagement among New Zealand naturopaths, as well as the various factors impacting evidence implementation. Attitude did not pose a major barrier to evidence implementation; rather, the barriers were largely structural, cognitive and cultural. This suggests that the barriers to EBP uptake in naturopathy are not unsurmountable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Leach
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Military Road, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
García-Martínez E, Soler-González J, Blanco-Blanco J, Rubí-Carnacea F, Masbernat-Almenara M, Valenzuela-Pascual F. Misbeliefs about non-specific low back pain and attitudes towards treatment by primary care providers in Spain: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:9. [PMID: 35172719 PMCID: PMC8759168 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01617-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
AIM To identify misbeliefs about the origin and meaning of non-specific chronic low back pain and to examine attitudes towards treatment by primary health care providers. DESIGN Generic qualitative study. METHODS Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted between October and November 2016 with physicians and nurses from primary health care centres in Lleida. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis via Atlas.ti-8 software. RESULTS Five themes were identified: i. beliefs about the origin and meaning of chronic low back pain, ii. psychosocial aspects of pain modulators, iii. Therapeutic exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain, iv. biomedical attitudes of primary health care providers, and v. difficulties in the clinical approach to chronic low back pain. CONCLUSION Primary health care providers have a unifactorial view of chronic low back pain and base their approach on the biomedical model. Professionals attribute chronic low back pain to structural alterations in the lumbar spine while psychosocial factors are only recognized as pain modulators. For professionals, therapeutic exercise represents a possible solution to chronic low back pain; however, they still do not prescribe it and continue to educate on postural hygiene and recommend limiting physical and/or occupational activities, as opposed to clinical practice guidelines. These findings suggest that to improve the adherence of primary health care providers to the biopsychosocial model, it may be necessary first to modify their misbeliefs about non-specific chronic low back pain by increasing their knowledge on pain neurophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02962817 . Date of registration: 11/11/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester García-Martínez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Jorge Soler-González
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Institut Català de la Salut and Department of Medicine - University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Joan Blanco-Blanco
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Francesc Rubí-Carnacea
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - María Masbernat-Almenara
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Fran Valenzuela-Pascual
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hochheim M, Ramm P, Wunderlich M, Amelung V. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a chronic back pain multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) compared to standard care for privately insured in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1362. [PMID: 34952585 PMCID: PMC8705190 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07337-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) is highly recommended for chronic lower back pain (CLBP) treatment, but its economic benefit remains to be clearly demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of a 12-month MBR programme of behavioural change coaching and device-supported exercise on direct medical costs, sick leave and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 24 months. Methods An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in Germany from a private health insurance perspective using data from a multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with parallel-group Zelen's randomisation and 24-month follow-up. After removing dissimilarities in characteristics between MBR and usual care (control) via propensity score matching, treatment effects were calculated using a difference-in-difference approach. Results Base-case analysis of the MBR (n=112) and usual care group (n=111) showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €8,296 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, indicating that the intervention was cost-effective. Compared to the controls, MBR reduced economically unaccounted sick leave due to back pain in the last six months by 17.5 days (p = 0.001) and had a positive effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (0.046, p=0.026). Subgroup analysis of participants with major impairment demonstrated that a dominant intervention was possible, as reflected by an ICER of - €7,302 per QALY. Savings were driven by a - €1,824 reduction in back pain-specific costs. Moreover, sick leave was 27 days (p = 0.006) less in the MBR group. Conclusions This first cost-effectiveness study with combined data from a private health insurer and a controlled trial in Germany demonstrated that long term MBR for the treatment of CLBP is cost-effective. Subgroups with major impairment from back pain benefitted more from the intervention than those with minor impairment. MBR significantly reduced sick leave in all participants. Hence, it is a profitable intervention from a societal point of view. Trial registration The trial of the evaluation study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under trial number DRKS00015463 retrospectively (dated 4 Sept 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hochheim
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. .,Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany.
| | - P Ramm
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - M Wunderlich
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - V Amelung
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Knudsen RH, Thomsen JL, Andersen CA, Afzali T, Riis A. Involving practice nurse and other assistant clinical staff members in the management of low back pain: A qualitative interview study from Danish general practice. SAGE Open Med 2021; 9:20503121211039660. [PMID: 34777804 PMCID: PMC8580501 DOI: 10.1177/20503121211039660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Involving practice nurse and other assistant clinical staff members in providing information and education to patients with low back pain at follow-up appointments may release more time and improve care in general practice. However, this requires a shift in the division of tasks, and general practitioners' barriers and facilitators for this are currently unknown. The objectives were to explore general practitioners' experiences and perceptions of including assistant clinical staff members in the management of low back pain. Methods This is a semi-structured interview study in Danish general practice. General practitioners with a variation in demographics and experience with task-delegation to clinical staff were recruited for in-depth interviews. We used a phenomenological approach to guide the data collection and the analysis in order to gain insight into the subjective experiences of the general practitioners and to understand the phenomenon of 'delegating tasks to practice staff' from the perspective of the general practitioners' lifeworld. Analysis was conducted using an inductive descriptive method. The sample size was guided by information power. Results We conducted five interviews with general practitioners. All general practitioners had experience with task delegation, but there was a variation in which tasks the general practitioners delegated and to which types of clinical staff members. The following themes were derived from the analysis: general practice organisation, delegating to clinical staff members, doctor-patient relationship, exercise instruction, clinical pathway for patients and external support. Conclusion General practitioners consider patients with low back pain to be a heterogeneous group with a variety of treatment needs and a patient group without any predetermined content or frequency of consultations; this can be a barrier for delegating these patients to clinical staff members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi H Knudsen
- Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Janus L Thomsen
- Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Tamana Afzali
- Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Allan Riis
- Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy, University College Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bonner C, Tuckerman J, Kaufman J, Costa D, Durrheim DN, Trevena L, Thomas S, Danchin M. Comparing inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand health service implementation problems: a case study of childhood vaccination barriers. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:100. [PMID: 34526141 PMCID: PMC8442360 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00202-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective implementation requires a comprehensive understanding of individual, organisational and system determinants. This study aimed to compare inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand a complex implementation issue. We used childhood vaccination as a case study, an issue with wide-ranging barriers contributing to low-vaccine uptake internationally. METHODS The study is based on the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, which was derived from several levels of theory: the 3 components of the COM-B framework (capability, opportunity and motivation) can be mapped to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is based on 84 underlying constructs. We first conducted a review of systematic reviews of parent-level barriers to childhood vaccination. Subsequently we (1) inductively coded these barriers into a data-driven framework, using thematic analysis, and (2) deductively mapped the barriers to COM-B and TDF domains and constructs. These processes were undertaken by two authors independently, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Inductive and deductive results were compared. RESULTS The inductive process coded 583 descriptions of barriers identified from the literature into a framework of 74 barriers in 7 categories. The initial definitions used to map the barriers to deductive domains/constructs led to 89% agreement at the domain level. Resolving discrepancies required further definitions at the construct level. Of the 14 TDF domains, 10 were clearly identified in the data from the barrier reviews. Some domains were not specific enough to differentiate between types of barriers (e.g. Environmental Context and Resources), while other domains were not represented in the review data (e.g. Behavioural Regulation). CONCLUSIONS Using both inductive and deductive analysis techniques can help achieve a more comprehensive understanding of barriers to health service implementation. The inductive categories represented the review data in a clearer way than the theoretical domains, with better differentiation; but the missing deductive domains were useful as a way to identify additional issues to investigate further. Both analysis techniques resulted in a comprehensive list of barriers to vaccination that would not have been achieved using either approach alone. We recommend a hybrid approach combining TDF with broader frameworks, for future researchers conducting evidence syntheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Bonner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jane Tuckerman
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica Kaufman
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel Costa
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - David N Durrheim
- School of Medicine and Public Heatlh, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Susan Thomas
- School of Medicine and Public Heatlh, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of General Medicine, Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Simula AS, Jenkins HJ, Hancock MJ, Malmivaara A, Booth N, Karppinen J. Patient education booklet to support evidence-based low back pain care in primary care - a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:178. [PMID: 34493219 PMCID: PMC8422671 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate imaging and low-value care for low back pain (LBP) are common. A new patient-education booklet was created to overcome identified barriers to the delivery of recommended care, including the use of inappropriate imaging. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of this booklet as part of primary care for LBP patients in comparison to usual care. METHODS A cluster-randomized trial was performed. The intervention involved providing practitioners with the new patient-education booklet and a 30-min training session on its use. The booklet was provided during the clinical consult to all consenting LBP patients in the intervention group. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients presenting with LBP who underwent imaging examinations during the first three months of follow-up and PROMIS PF-20 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, 20-item physical functioning short form) change between baseline and three-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes, including sick leave and imaging examinations at 12 months, were investigated. Logistic regression using GEE-estimation was used for dichotomous outcomes, Poisson regression using GEE-estimation for count outcomes, and linear mixed models for continuous outcomes. RESULTS Using the patient education booklet appeared to substantially reduce the proportion of LBP patients who underwent an imaging examination at three months, but the result was not statistically significant (OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.27 to 1.22). At 12 months, the effect was slightly larger and statistically significant (OR 0.50, 95%Cl 0.30 to 0.83, p = 0.008). No difference was observed in the PROMIS PF-20 T-score change between baseline and 3 months or 12 months (p = 0.365 and p = 0.923, respectively). The number of sick leave days in the intervention group was less than that in the control group at 3 months (RR 0.47, 95%Cl 0.26 to 0.83, p = 0.010) and at 12 months (RR 0.36, 95%Cl 0.18 to 0.72, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The booklet appeared to be effective in reducing the proportion of LBP patients who underwent imaging examinations over 12 months. The intervention had no discernible effect on the PROMIS PF20 T-score change. The number of sick leave days was substantially lower in the intervention group. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN14389368 , Registered 4 April 2019-Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Simula
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland. .,Department of General Medicine, the South Savo Social and Health Care Authority, Porrassalmenkatu 35-37, 50100, Mikkeli, Finland.
| | - Hazel J Jenkins
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.,Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Antti Malmivaara
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Neill Booth
- Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33014, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jaro Karppinen
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.,Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Aapistie 1, 90220, Oulu, Finland.,Rehabilitation Services of South Karelia Social and Health Care District, Lappeenranta, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bussières A, Cancelliere C, Ammendolia C, Comer CM, Zoubi FA, Châtillon CE, Chernish G, Cox JM, Gliedt JA, Haskett D, Jensen RK, Marchand AA, Tomkins-Lane C, O'Shaughnessy J, Passmore S, Schneider MJ, Shipka P, Stewart G, Stuber K, Yee A, Ornelas J. Non-Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Leading To Neurogenic Claudication: A Clinical Practice Guideline. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 22:1015-1039. [PMID: 33857615 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causing neurogenic claudication (NC) is increasingly common with an aging population and can be associated with significant symptoms and functional limitations. We developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on nonsurgical management of patients with LSS causing NC. Using the GRADE approach, a multidisciplinary guidelines panel based recommendations on evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published through June 2019, or expert consensus. The literature monitored up to October 2020. Clinical outcomes evaluated included pain, disability, quality of life, and walking capacity. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population includes adults with LSS (congenital and/or acquired, lateral recess or central canal, with or without low back pain, with or without spondylolisthesis) causing NC. The guidelines panel developed 6 recommendations based on randomized controlled trials and 5 others based on professional consensus, summarized in 3 overarching recommendations: (Grade: statements are all conditional/weak recommendations) Recommendation 1. For patients with LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may initially select multimodal care nonpharmacological therapies with education, advice and lifestyle changes, behavioral change techniques in conjunction with home exercise, manual therapy, and/or rehabilitation (moderate-quality evidence), traditional acupuncture on a trial basis (very low-quality evidence), and postoperative rehabilitation (supervised program of exercises and/or educational materials encouraging activity) with cognitive-behavioral therapy 12 weeks postsurgery (low-quality evidence). Recommendation 2. In patients LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may consider a trial of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants. (very low-quality evidence). Recommendation 3. For patients LSS causing NC, we recommend against the use of the following pharmacological therapies: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, methylcobalamin, calcitonin, paracetamol, opioids, muscle relaxants, pregabalin (consensus-based), gabapentin (very low-quality), and epidural steroidal injections (high-quality evidence). PERSPECTIVE: This guideline, on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence on the nonsurgical management of lumbar spine stenosis, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe and effective non-surgical management of lumbar spine stenosis should be on the basis of a plan of care tailored to the individual and the type of treatment involved, and multimodal care is recommended in most situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Bussières
- School of Physical Medicine & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Carolina Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine M Comer
- Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom/ Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Fadi Al Zoubi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | | | - Greg Chernish
- Family Medicine at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Rikke Krüger Jensen
- NIKKB and Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christy Tomkins-Lane
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada
| | - Julie O'Shaughnessy
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Kent Stuber
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Albert Yee
- Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joseph Ornelas
- American Hip Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ng W, Slater H, Starcevich C, Wright A, Mitchell T, Beales D. Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Pain 2021; 162:2154-2185. [PMID: 33534357 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A substantial evidence-practice gap exists between healthcare professionals learning about the biopsychosocial model of pain and adopting this model in clinical practice. This review aimed to explore the barriers and enablers that influence the application of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain in practice, from the clinicians' perspective. Qualitative evidence synthesis was used. Four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) were searched. Primary qualitative studies were included if they investigated the experiences of primary healthcare professionals using a biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain care in outpatient settings or their perceptions towards biopsychosocial-oriented clinical practice guidelines. After screening 6571 abstracts, 77 full-text articles were retrieved. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting the experiences of 413 healthcare professionals (including general practitioners, physiotherapists, and others) spanning 11 countries. Three metathemes were identified that impact the adoption of the biopsychosocial model across the whole of health: (1) at the microlevel, healthcare professionals' personal factors, knowledge and skills, and their misconceptions of clinical practice guidelines, perception of patients' factors, and time; (2) at the mesolevel, clinical practice guideline formulation, community factors, funding models, health service provision, resourcing issues, and workforce training issues; and (3) at the macrolevel, health policy, organizational, and social factors. Synthesized data revealed multilevel (whole-of-health) barriers and enablers to health professionals adopting a biopsychosocial model of pain into practice. Awareness of these multilevel factors may help inform preimplementation preparedness and support more effective implementation of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Ng
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cobie Starcevich
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony Wright
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tim Mitchell
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Darren Beales
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hall A, Richmond H, Pike A, Lawrence R, Etchegary H, Swab M, Thompson JY, Albury C, Hayden J, Patey AM, Matthews J. What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging? Implement Sci 2021; 16:68. [PMID: 34215284 PMCID: PMC8254222 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite international guideline recommendations, low back pain (LBP) imaging rates have been increasing over the last 20 years. Previous systematic reviews report limited effectiveness of implementation interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary LBP imaging. No previous reviews have analysed these implementation interventions to ascertain what behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used in this field. Understanding what techniques have been implemented in this field is an essential first step before exploring intervention effectiveness. Methods We searched EMBASE, Ovid (Medline), CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to February 1, 2021, as well as and hand-searched 6 relevant systematic reviews and conducted citation tracking of included studies. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and extracted data on study and intervention characteristics. Study interventions were qualitatively analysed by three coders to identify BCTs, which were mapped to mechanisms of action from the theoretical domains framework (TDF) using the Theory and Techniques Tool. Results We identified 36 eligible studies from 1984 citations in our electronic search and a further 2 studies from hand-searching resulting in 38 studies that targeted physician behaviour to reduce unnecessary LBP imaging. The studies were conducted in 6 countries in primary (n = 31) or emergency care (n = 7) settings. Thirty-four studies were included in our BCT synthesis which found the most frequently used BCTs were ‘4.1 instruction on how to perform the behaviour’ (e.g. Active/passive guideline dissemination and/or educational seminars/workshops), followed by ‘9.1 credible source’, ‘2.2 feedback on behaviour’ (e.g. electronic feedback reports on physicians’ image ordering) and 7.1 prompts and cues (electronic decision support or hard-copy posters/booklets for the office). This review highlighted that the majority of studies used education and/or feedback on behaviour to target the domains of knowledge and in some cases also skills and beliefs about capabilities to bring about a change in LBP imaging behaviour. Additionally, we found there to be a growing use of electronic or hard copy reminders to target the domains of memory and environmental context and resources. Conclusions This is the first study to identify what BCTs have been used to target a reduction in physician image ordering behaviour. The majority of included studies lacked the use of theory to inform their intervention design and failed to target known physician-reported barriers to following LBP imaging guidelines. Protocol Registation PROSPERO CRD42017072518 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01136-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada.
| | - Helen Richmond
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Andrea Pike
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Rebecca Lawrence
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Holly Etchegary
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Michelle Swab
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Y Thompson
- Public Health, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Charlotte Albury
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Jill Hayden
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Andrea M Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - James Matthews
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sajid IM, Parkunan A, Frost K. Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:e001287. [PMID: 34215659 PMCID: PMC8256731 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The largest proportion of general practitioner (GP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is musculoskeletal (MSK), with consistent annual growth. With limited supporting evidence and potential harms from early imaging overuse, we evaluated practice to improve pathways and patient safety. METHODS Cohort evaluation of routinely collected diagnostic and general practice data across a UK metropolitan primary care population. We reviewed patient characteristics, results and healthcare utilisation. RESULTS Of 306 MSK-MRIs requested by 107 clinicians across 29 practices, only 4.9% (95% CI ±2.4%) appeared clearly indicated and only 16.0% (95% CI ±4.1%) received appropriate prior therapy. 37.0% (95% CI ±5.5%) documented patient imaging request. Most had chronic symptoms and half had psychosocial flags. Mental health was addressed in only 11.8% (95% CI ±6.3%) of chronic sufferers with psychiatric illness, suggesting a solely pathoanatomical approach to MSK care. Only 7.8% (95% CI ±3.0%) of all patients were appropriately managed without additional referral. 1.3% (95% CI ±1.3%) of scans revealed diagnoses leading to change in treatment (therapeutic yield). Most imaged patients received pathoanatomical explanations to their symptoms, often based on expected age or activity-related changes. Only 16.7% (95% CI ±4.2%) of results appeared correctly interpreted by GPs, with spurious overperception of surgical targets in 65.4% (95% CI ±5.3%) who suffered 'low-value' (ineffective, harmful or wasteful) post-MRI referral cascades due to misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis. Typically, 20%-30% of GP specialist referrals convert to a procedure, whereas MRI-triggered referrals showed near-zero conversion rate. Imaged patients experienced considerable delay to appropriate care. Cascade costs exceeded direct-MRI costs and GP-MSK-MRI potentially more than doubles expenditure compared with physiotherapist-led assessment services, for little-to-no added therapeutic yield, unjustifiable by cost-consequence or cost-utility analysis. CONCLUSION Unfettered GP-MSK-MRI use has reached unaccceptable indication creep and disutility. Considerable avoidable harm occurs through ubiquitous misinterpretation and salient low-value referral cascades for two-thirds of imaged patients, for almost no change in treatment. Any marginally earlier procedural intervention for a tiny fraction of patients is eclipsed by negative consequences for the vast majority. Only 1-2 patients need to be scanned for one to suffer mismanagement. Direct-access imaging is neither clinically, nor cost-effective and deimplementation could be considered in this setting. GP-MSK-MRI fuels unnecessary healthcare utilisation, generating nocebic patient beliefs and expectations, whilst appropriate care is delayed and a high burden of psychosocial barriers to recovery appear neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Mohammed Sajid
- NHS West London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Anand Parkunan
- Healthshare Community NHS Musculoskeletal Services, London, UK
| | - Kathleen Frost
- NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
O'Mahony B, Kerins C, Murrin C, Kelly C. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nutrition standards for school food: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2021; 3:20. [PMID: 32743340 PMCID: PMC7372527 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13041.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The importance of nutrition during childhood and the high prevalence of child and adolescent obesity has resulted in several countries implementing nutritional standards for school food as a way of providing healthy school food environments. Yet, there has been less focus on the barriers and facilitators influencing the process of implementing school food standards. This mixed-methods systematic review aims to address this evidence gap by synthesising the empirical evidence on the factors that may influence the implementation of school food standards. Methods: This mixed-methods systematic review will use qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods evidence from peer-reviewed publications retrieved from the following databases; PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Grey literature will be accessed through Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, OpenGrey, RIAN, EThOS, ProQuest, WorldCat, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and public health organisation websites will also be accessed. Screening reference lists and citation chaining of all included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on publication date or language will be applied, however, only primary research studies relevant to supply-side stakeholders will be eligible for inclusion. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Study titles and abstracts will be screened to decide whether the full-text manuscript should be retrieved. For screening reliability, a second review author will assess a random sample of 20%. Kappa statistics will be used to assess inter-rater reliability, with values of 0.75 and higher representing high agreement. Two authors will independently extract data and factors reported to influence implementation. This will be synthesized using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Discussion: A comprehensive understanding of these factors can provide guidance to relevant stakeholders to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of nutrition standards for school meals. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO
CRD42019117904
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breda O'Mahony
- Home Economics Department, St. Angela's College, Sligo, Ireland.,Discipline of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Claire Kerins
- Discipline of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Celine Murrin
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colette Kelly
- Health Promotion Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Maxwell C, Robinson K, McCreesh K. Managing shoulder pain: a meta-ethnography exploring healthcare providers' experiences. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:3772-3784. [PMID: 33847548 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1897886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review and synthesize qualitative research studies exploring the experiences of Healthcare Providers (HCPs) of managing shoulder pain. METHODS A meta-ethnographic approach was adopted to review and synthesize eligible studies. The findings from each included study were translated into one another using Noblit and Hares' seven-stage process. A systematic search of eleven electronic databases was conducted in February 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Ten studies were included in the meta-synthesis, all deemed of high methodological quality. Three themes were identified; (1) Lack of consensus: "we all have different approaches." (2) Challenges to Changing Practice: It's "really hard to change and switch to a different approach," (3) Getting "Buy in" to Treatment: "…so you have to really sell it early". CONCLUSION Healthcare providers working with people with shoulder pain struggle to reconcile, often conflicting, research recommendations with their own clinical experience, beliefs and patient expectations. These findings help explain the continued lack of consensus on how best to manage shoulder pain in clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare providers (HCPs) working with people with shoulder pain struggle to resolve conflicts between evidence-based recommendations, clinical experience, their own shoulder pain beliefs and patient expectations and preferences.Stronger collaboration across professional disciplines is needed to address the current lack of consensus on the management of shoulder pain.Many HCP's find it difficult to engage patients with shoulder pain in exercise and they work hard to "sell" this approach to patients using strategies such as education, shared decision making and therapeutic alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Maxwell
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Katie Robinson
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Karen McCreesh
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
What do the general public believe about the causes, prognosis and best management strategies for low back pain? A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:682. [PMID: 33832463 PMCID: PMC8028215 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10664-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking health care and is costly to the health care system. Recent evidence has shown that LBP care provided by many providers is divergent from guidelines and one reason may be patient’s beliefs and expectations about treatment. Thus, examining the nature of patient beliefs and expectations regarding low back pain treatment will help coordinate efforts to improve consistency and quality of care. Methods This study was a cross-sectional population-based survey of adults living in Newfoundland, Canada. The survey included demographic information (e.g. age, gender, back pain status and care seeking behaviors) and assessed outcomes related to beliefs about the inevitable consequences of back pain with the validated back beliefs questionnaire as well as six additional questions relating beliefs about imaging, physical activity and medication. Surveys were mailed to 3000 households in July–August 2018 and responses collected until September 30th, 2018. Results Fout hundred twenty-eight surveys were returned (mean age 55 years (SD 14.6), 66% female, 90% had experienced an episode of LBP). The mean Back Beliefs Questionnaire score was 27.3 (SD 7.2), suggesting that people perceive back pain to have inevitable negative consequences. Large proportions of respondents held the following beliefs that are contrary to best available evidence: (i) having back pain means you will always have weakness in your back (49.3%), (ii) it will get progressively worse (48.0%), (iii) resting is good (41.4%) and (iv) x-rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for LBP (54.2%). Conclusions A high proportion of the public believe LBP to have inevitable negative consequences and hold incorrect beliefs about diagnosis and management options, which is similar to findings from other countries. This presents challenges for clinicians and suggests that considering how to influence beliefs about LBP in the broader community could have value. Given the high prevalence of LBP and that many will consult a range of healthcare professionals, future efforts could consider using broad reaching public health campaigns that target patients, policy makers and all relevant health providers with specific content to change commonly held unhelpful beliefs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10664-5.
Collapse
|
50
|
Kisembo HN, Nassanga R, Ameda FA, Ocan M, Kinengyere AA, Abdirahaman SO, Malumba R, Salama DH, Kawooya MG. Barriers and facilitators to implementing clinical imaging guidelines by healthcare professionals using theoretical domains framework: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol. BJR Open 2021; 3:20210004. [PMID: 35855474 PMCID: PMC9264334 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify, categorize, and develop an aggregated synthesis of evidence using the theoretical domains framework (TDF) on barriers and facilitators that influence implementation of clinical imaging guidelines (CIGs) by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in diagnostic imaging. Methods The protocol will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2014. Methodology for JBI Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews and will adhere to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA-P). Information source will include databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library), internet search (https://www.google.com/scholar), experts' opinion, professional societies/organizations websites and government bodies strategies/recommendations, and reference lists of included studies. Articles of any study design published in English from 1990 to date, having investigated factors operating as barriers and/or facilitators to the implementation CIGs by HCPs will be eligible. Selecting, appraising, and extracting data from the included studies will be independently performed by at least two reviewers using validated tools and Rayyan - Systematic Review web application. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus and a third reviewer as a tie breaker. The aggregated studies will be synthesized using thematic analysis guided by TDF. Results: Identified barriers will be defined a priori and mapped into 7 TDF domains including knowledge, awareness, effectiveness, time, litigationand financial incentives. Conclusion The results will provide an insight into a theory-based approach to predict behavior-related determinants for implementing CIGs and develop strategies/interventions to target the elicited behaviors. Recommendations will be made if the level of evidence is sufficient. Advances in knowledge Resource-constrained settings that are in the process of adopting CIGs may opt for this strategy to predict in advance likely impediments to achieving the goal of CIG implementation and develop tailored interventions during the planning phase.Systematic review Registration: PROSPERO ID = CRD42020136372 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ritah Nassanga
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Faith Ameda Ameda
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Sahal Omal Abdirahaman
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Richard Malumba
- Ernest cook Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Mengo Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Michael Grace Kawooya
- Ernest cook Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Mengo Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|