Checkpoint inhibitor therapy in preclinical sepsis models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

VISTA nonredundantly regulates proliferation and CD69low γδ T cell accumulation in the intestine in murine sepsis

Sepsis is a dysregulated systemic immune response to infection i.e. responsible for ∼35% of in-hospital deaths at a significant fiscal healthcare cost. Our laboratory, among others, has demonstrated the efficacy of targeting negative checkpoint regulators (NCRs) to improve survival in a murine model of sepsis, cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). B7-CD28 superfamily member, V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), is an ideal candidate for strategic targeting in sepsis. VISTA is a 35 to 45 kDa type 1 transmembrane protein with unique biology that sets it apart from all other NCRs. We recently reported that VISTA-/- mice had a significant survival deficit post-CLP, which was rescued upon adoptive transfer of a VISTA-expressing pMSCV-mouse Foxp3-EF1α-GFP-T2A-puro stable Jurkat cell line (Jurkatfoxp3 T cells). Based on our prior study, we investigated the effector cell target of Jurkatfoxp3 T cells in VISTA-/- mice. γδ T cells are a powerful lymphoid subpopulation that require regulatory fine-tuning by regulatory T cells to prevent overt inflammation/pathology. In this study, we hypothesized that Jurkatfoxp3 T cells nonredundantly modulate the γδ T cell population post-CLP. We found that VISTA-/- mice have an increased accumulation of intestinal CD69low γδ T cells, which are not protective in murine sepsis. Adoptive transfer of Jurkatfoxp3 T cells decreased the intestinal γδ T cell population, suppressed proliferation, skewed remaining γδ T cells toward a CD69high phenotype, and increased soluble CD40L in VISTA-/- mice post-CLP. These results support a potential regulatory mechanism by which VISTA skews intestinal γδ T cell lineage representation in murine sepsis.

Drug Repurposing of ACT001 to Discover Novel Promising Sulfide Prodrugs with Improved Safety and Potent Activity for Neutrophil-Mediated Antifungal Immunotherapy

Neutrophil-mediated immunotherapy is a promising strategy for treating Candida albicans infection due to its potential in dealing with drug-resistant events. Our previous study found that ACT001 exhibited good antifungal immunotherapeutic activity by inhibiting PD-L1 expression in neutrophils, but its strong cytotoxicity and high BBB permeability hindered its antifungal application. To address these deficiencies, a series of novel sulfide derivatives were designed and synthesized based on a slow-release prodrug strategy. Among these derivatives, compound 16 exhibited stronger inhibition of PD-L1 expression, less cytotoxicity to neutrophils, and lower BBB permeability than ACT001. Compound 16 also significantly enhanced neutrophil-mediated antifungal immunity in C. albicans infected mice, with acceptable pharmacokinetic properties and good oral safety. Moreover, pharmacological mechanism studies demonstrated that ACT001 and compound 16 reduced PD-L1 expression in neutrophils by directly targeting STAT3. Briefly, this study provided a novel prototype compound 16 which exhibited great potential in neutrophil-mediated antifungal immunotherapy.

Anti-PD-L1 therapy altered inflammation but not survival in a lethal murine hepatitis virus-1 pneumonia model

Introduction

Because prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in cancer patients presenting with COVID-19 may affect outcomes, we investigated the beta-coronavirus, murine hepatitis virus (MHV)-1, in a lethal pneumonia model in the absence (Study 1) or presence of prior programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody (PD-L1mAb) treatment (Study 2).

Methods

In Study 1, animals were inoculated intratracheally with MHV-1 or vehicle and evaluated at day 2, 5, and 10 after infection. In Study 2, uninfected or MHV-1-infected animals were pretreated intraperitoneally with control or PD-L1-blocking antibodies (PD-L1mAb) and evaluated at day 2 and 5 after infection. Each study examined survival, physiologic and histologic parameters, viral titers, lung immunophenotypes, and mediator production.

Results

Study 1 results recapitulated the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and revealed increased cell surface expression of checkpoint molecules (PD-L1, PD-1), higher expression of the immune activation marker angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), but reduced detection of the MHV-1 receptor CD66a on immune cells in the lung, liver, and spleen. In addition to reduced detection of PD-L1 on all immune cells assayed, PD-L1 blockade was associated with increased cell surface expression of PD-1 and ACE, decreased cell surface detection of CD66a, and improved oxygen saturation despite reduced blood glucose levels and increased signs of tissue hypoxia. In the lung, PD-L1mAb promoted S100A9 but inhibited ACE2 production concomitantly with pAKT activation and reduced FOXO1 levels. PD-L1mAb promoted interferon-γ but inhibited IL-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production, contributing to reduced bronchoalveolar lavage levels of eosinophils and neutrophils. In the liver, PD-L1mAb increased viral clearance in association with increased macrophage and lymphocyte recruitment and liver injury. PD-L1mAb increased the production of virally induced mediators of injury, angiogenesis, and neuronal activity that may play role in COVID-19 and ICI-related neurotoxicity. PD-L1mAb did not affect survival in this murine model.

Discussion

In Study 1 and Study 2, ACE was upregulated and CD66a and ACE2 were downregulated by either MHV-1 or PD-L1mAb. CD66a is not only the MHV-1 receptor but also an identified immune checkpoint and a negative regulator of ACE. Crosstalk between CD66a and PD-L1 or ACE/ACE2 may provide insight into ICI therapies. These networks may also play role in the increased production of S100A9 and neurological mediators in response to MHV-1 and/or PD-L1mAb, which warrant further study. Overall, these findings support observational data suggesting that prior ICI treatment does not alter survival in patients presenting with COVID-19.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Infection: What Is the Interplay?

Immune checkpoint molecules are receptors expressed on immune cells, especially T-cells, which activate immunosuppressive pathways and lead them to a state known as T-cell exhaustion. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) constitute a group of specific antibodies that target these molecules, restoring T-cell effector function. Several ICIs have already been approved by the FDA as therapeutic options for certain malignancies. However, evidence in the literature remains unclear regarding the possible risk of infection in patients receiving this treatment. A thorough examination of existing literature was carried out to investigate whether the use of ICIs increases the likelihood of specific infections and to explore the potential beneficial effects of ICIs on the treatment of infections. Our review found most infectious complications are related to immunosuppressive therapy for immune-related adverse events caused by checkpoint blockade. Current evidence shows that ICIs per se do not seem to generally increase the risk of infection, yet they might increase susceptibility to certain infections, such as tuberculosis. On the other hand, reinvigoration of immune responses triggered by ICIs might play a significant role in pathogen clearance, establishing a possible positive impact of ICIs, especially on chronic infectious diseases, such as HIV infection. Data from preclinical models are limited and larger clinical trials are warranted to shed more light on the effect of immune checkpoint blockade on specific pathogens.

Role of regulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in sepsis

Long term immunosuppression is problematic during sepsis. The PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint proteins have potent immunosuppressive functions. Recent studies have revealed several features of PD-1 and PD-L1 and their roles in sepsis. Here, we summarize the overall findings of PD-1 and PD-L1 by first reviewing the biological features of PD-1 and PD-L1 and then discussing the mechanisms that control the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. We then review the functions of PD-1 and PD-L1 in physiological settings and further discuss PD-1 and PD-L1 in sepsis, including their involvement in several sepsis-related processes and their potential therapeutic relevance in sepsis. In general, PD-1 and PD-L1 have critical roles in sepsis, indicating that their regulation may be a potential therapeutic target for sepsis.

Severe infections in recipients of cancer immunotherapy: what intensivists need to know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the increased number of cancer patients admitted in the ICU and the growing importance of immunotherapy in their therapeutic arsenal, intensivists will be increasingly confronted to patients treated with immunotherapies who will present with complications, infectious and immunologic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Apart from their specific immunologic toxicities, cancer immunotherapy recipients also have specific immune dysfunction and face increased infectious risks that may lead to intensive care unit admission.

SUMMARY

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is associated with profound immunosuppression and the risks of bacterial, fungal and viral infections vary according to the time since infusion.Immune checkpoint blockers are associated with an overall favorable safety profile but associations of checkpoint blockers and corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs prescribed to treat immune-related adverse events are associated with increased risks of bacterial and fungal infections.The T-cell engaging bispecific therapy blinatumomab causes profound B-cell aplasia, hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia, but seems to be associated with fewer infectious adverse events compared with standard intensive chemotherapy.Lastly, intravesical administration of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) can lead to disseminated BCGitis and severe sepsis requiring a specific antibiotherapy, often associated with corticosteroid treatment.

Immune hyporeactivity to bacteria and multiple TLR-ligands, yet no response to checkpoint inhibition in patients just after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria

Rationale

The immune profile of sepsis patients is incompletely understood and hyperinflammation and hypoinflammation may occur concurrently or sequentially. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) may counter hypoinflammation but effects are uncertain. We tested the reactivity of septic whole blood to bacteria, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and to ICI.

Methods

Whole blood assays of 61 patients’ samples within 24h of meeting sepsis-3 criteria and 12 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Measurements included pattern/danger-associated molecular pattern (P/DAMP), cytokine concentrations at baseline and in response to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli, E.coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), concentration of soluble and cellular immune checkpoint molecules, and cytokine concentrations in response to ICI directed against programmed-death receptor 1 (PD1), PD1-ligand 1, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, both in the absence and presence of LPS.

Main results

In sepsis, concentrations of P/DAMPs and inflammatory cytokines were increased and the latter increased further upon incubation ex vivo. However, cytokine responses to TLR 2, 4, and 7/8 ligands, heat-inactivated S. aureus or E. coli, and E. coli LPS were all depressed. Depression of the response to LPS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Despite increased PD-1 expression on monocytes and T-cells, and monocyte CTLA-4 expression, however, addition of corresponding checkpoint inhibitors to assays failed to increase inflammatory cytokine concentrations in the absence and presence of LPS.

Conclusion

Patients first meeting Sepsis-3 criteria reveal 1) depressed responses to multiple TLR-ligands, bacteria, and bacterial LPS, despite concomitant inflammation, but 2) no response to immune checkpoint inhibition.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of sepsis:insights from preclinical and clinical development

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis represents one-fifth of all deaths worldwide and is associated with huge costs. Regarding disease progression, it is now well established that sepsis induces a state of acquired immunosuppression, with an increased risk of secondary infections that contributes to patients' worsening. Thus, tackling sepsis-induced immunosuppression represents a promising perspective.

AREAS COVERED

Of mechanisms responsible for sepsis-induced immunosuppression, the increased expression of co-inhibitory receptors (aka immune checkpoint) such as PD-1, CTLA4, TIM-3, LAG-3 or BTLA and their ligands recently received considerable interest since their inhibition, thanks to the so-called checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), provided astonishing results in cancer by rebooting immune functions. This review reports on the first landmarks of these molecules in sepsis. We introduce them in terms of basic immunology in line with sepsis pathophysiology both in experimental models and observational works and assess the first human clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical results are positive and the first human clinical trials, although currently limited to the early phase, showed a beneficial effect on immunological functions and/or markers and suggested that tolerance of CPIs side effects, mainly auto-immune disorders, is acceptable in sepsis. Elsewhere, in some specific infections leading to ICU admission (or occurring during ICU stay), such as fungal infections, preliminary convincing case reports have been published. Overall, the first results regarding CPIs in sepsis appear encouraging. However, further efforts are warranted, especially in defining the right patients to be treated (i.e., in an individualized approach) and establishing the optimal time to start an immune restoration. Larger trials are now mandatory to confirm CPIs' potential in sepsis.

Oncology Drug Repurposing for Sepsis Treatment

Sepsis involves life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite three decades of efforts and multiple clinical trials, no treatment, except antibiotics and supportive care, has been approved for this devastating syndrome. Simultaneously, numerous preclinical studies have shown the effectiveness of oncology-indicated drugs in ameliorating sepsis. Here we focus on cataloging these efforts with both oncology-approved and under-development drugs that have been repositioned to treat bacterial-induced sepsis models. In this context, we also envision the exciting prospect for further standard and oncology drug combination testing that could ultimately improve clinical outcomes in sepsis.

PD-L1 Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Targeting in Mouse Models for Infectious Diseases

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regulates immune homeostasis by promoting T-cell exhaustion. It is involved in chronic infections and tumor progression. Nuclear imaging using radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies can monitor PD-L1 tissue expression and antibody distribution. However, physiological PD-L1 can cause rapid antibody clearance from blood at imaging doses. Therefore, we hypothesized that inflammatory responses, which can induce PD-L1 expression, affect anti-PD-L1 antibody distribution. Here, we investigated the effects of three different infectious stimuli on the pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting of radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies in tumor-bearing mice.

Materials/Methods

Anti-mouse-PD-L1 and isotype control antibodies were labelled with indium-111 ([¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 and [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-IgG2a, respectively). We evaluated the effect of inflammatory responses on the pharmacokinetics of [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 in RenCa tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in three conditions: lipopolysaccharide (LPS), local Staphylococcus aureus, and heat-killed Candida albicans. After intravenous injection of 30 or 100 µg of [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 or [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-IgG2a, blood samples were collected 1, 4, and 24 h p.i. followed by microSPECT/CT and ex vivo biodistribution analyses. PD-L1 expression, neutrophil, and macrophage infiltration in relevant tissues were evaluated immunohistochemically.

Results

In 30 µg of [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 injected tumor-bearing mice the LPS-challenge significantly increased lymphoid organ uptake compared with vehicle controls (spleen: 49.9 ± 4.4%ID/g versus 21.2 ± 6.9%ID/g, p < 0.001), resulting in lower blood levels (3.6 ± 1.6%ID/g versus 11.5 ± 7.2%ID/g; p < 0.01) and reduced tumor targeting (8.1 ± 4.5%ID/g versus 25.2 ± 5.2%ID/g, p < 0.001). Local S. aureus infections showed high PD-L1⁺ neutrophil influx resulting in significantly increased [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 uptake in affected muscles (8.6 ± 2.6%ID/g versus 1.7 ± 0.8%ID/g, p < 0.001). Heat-killed Candida albicans (Hk-C. albicans) challenge did not affect pharmacokinetics. Increasing [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 dose to 100 µg normalized blood clearance and tumor uptake in LPS-challenged mice, although lymphoid organ uptake remained higher. Infectious stimuli did not affect [¹¹¹In]In-DTPA-IgG2a pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions

This study shows that anti-PD-L1 antibody pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting can be significantly altered by severe inflammatory responses, which can be compensated for by increasing the tracer dose. This has implications for developing clinical PD-L1 imaging protocols in onco-immunology. We further demonstrate that radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies can be used to evaluate PD-L1 expression changes in a range of infectious diseases. This supports the exploration of using these techniques to assess hosts' responses to infectious stimuli.

Citrus Extract as a Perspective for the Control of Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis From Animal Models to Human Studies

This study aims to obtain scientific evidence on the use of Citrus to control dyslipidemia. The surveys were carried out in 2020 and updated in March 2021, in the PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO databases, using the following descriptors: Citrus, dyslipidemias, hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemias, lipoproteins, and cholesterol. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane methodology for clinical trials and ARRIVE for preclinical trials. A meta-analysis was performed using the application of R software. A total of 958 articles were identified and 26 studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the Citrus genus in controlling dyslipidemia were selected, of which 25 were included in the meta-analysis. The effects of Citrus products on dyslipidemia appear consistently robust, acting to reduce total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides, in addition to increasing HDL. These effects are associated with the composition of the extracts, extremely rich in antioxidant, as flavonoids, and that act on biochemical targets involved in lipogenesis and beta-oxidation. The risk of bias over all of the included studies was considered critically low to moderate. The meta-analysis demonstrated results favorable to control dyslipidemia by Citrus products. On the other hand, high heterogeneity values were identified, weakening the evidence presented. From this study, one can suggest that Citrus species extracts are potential candidates for dyslipidemia control, but more studies are needed to increase the strength of this occurrence.

Mechanisms and modulation of sepsis-induced immune dysfunction in children

Immunologic responses during sepsis vary significantly among patients and evolve over the course of illness. Sepsis has a direct impact on the immune system due to adverse alteration of the production, maturation, function, and apoptosis of immune cells. Dysregulation in both the innate and adaptive immune responses during sepsis leads to a range of phenotypes consisting of both hyperinflammation and immunosuppression that can result in immunoparalysis. In this review, we discuss components of immune dysregulation in sepsis, biomarkers and functional immune assays to aid in immunophenotyping patients, and evolving immunomodulatory therapies. Important research gaps for the future include: (1) Defining how age, host factors including prior exposures, and genetics impact the trajectory of sepsis in children, (2) Developing tools for rapid assessment of immune function in sepsis, and (3) Assessing how evolving pediatric sepsis endotypes respond differently to immunomodulation. Although multiple promising immunomodulatory agents exist or are in development, access to rapid immunophenotyping will be needed to identify which children are most likely to benefit from which therapy. Advancements in the ability to perform multidimensional endotyping will be key to developing a personalized approach to children with sepsis. IMPACT: Immunologic responses during sepsis vary significantly among patients and evolve over the course of illness. The resulting spectrum of immunoparalysis that can occur due to sepsis can increase morbidity and mortality in children and adults. This narrative review summarizes the current literature surrounding biomarkers and functional immunologic assays for immune dysregulation in sepsis, with a focus on immunomodulatory therapies that have been evaluated in sepsis. A precision approach toward diagnostic endotyping and therapeutics, including gene expression, will allow for optimal clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of individualized and targeted treatments for pediatric sepsis.

Anti-PD-L1 therapy does not improve survival in a murine model of lethal Staphyloccocus aureus pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Staphyloccocus aureus (SA) bacterial pneumonia is a common cause of sepsis in intensive care units. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) that target programmed death (PD)-1 protein and its ligand (PD-L1) have been proposed for the treatment of sepsis. However, in our systematic review of sepsis pre-clinical models, none of the models examined CPIs in pneumonia.

METHODS

Mice were inoculated intratracheally with vehicle control, low (LD)- or high dose (H D)-SA. Immune cell recruitment and checkpoint molecule expression were examined at 4h, 24h and 48h after infection. Infected animals, treated with control or anti-PDL1 antibodies, were assessed for survival, bacterial burden, lung immunophenotypes and mediator production.

RESULTS

LD-SA and HD-SA produced lethality of 15% and 70% respectively by 168h. At 24h, LD-infected animals exhibited increased lung monocyte PD-L1 expression (p=0.0002) but lower bacterial counts (p=0.0002) compared to HD-animals. By 48h, either infection induced lung neutrophil and macrophage PD-L1 expression (p<0.0001). Anti-PD-L1 treatment at the time of infection and at 24h infection with low to high doses of SA reduced PD-L1 detection but did not affect survival or bacterial clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PD-L1 therapy did not alter survival in this pneumonia model. Pre-clinical studies of additional common pathogens and septic foci are needed.

PD-1 signaling pathway in sepsis: Does it have a future?

Sepsis is characterized by high mortality and poor prognosis and is one of the leading causes of death among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the past, drugs that block early inflammatory responses have done little to reverse the progression of sepsis. Programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its two ligands, programmed cell death receptor ligand 1(PD-L1) and programmed cell death receptor ligand 2 (PD-L2), are negative regulatory factors of the immune response of the body. Recently, the role of the PD-1 signaling pathway in sepsis has been widely studied. Studies showed that the PD-1 signaling pathways are closely related to the mortality and prognosis of sepsis patients. In the immunotherapy of sepsis, whether in animal experiments or clinical trials, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have shown good promise. In this review, firstly, we focus on the immunosuppressive mechanism of sepsis and the structure and function of the PD-1 signaling pathway. The variety of the PD-1 signaling pathways in sepsis is introduced. Then, the relationship between the PD-1 signaling pathway and immune cells and organ dysfunction and the regulatory factors of the PD-1 signaling pathway in sepsis is discussed. Finally, the application of the PD-1 signaling pathway in sepsis is specifically emphasized.

Identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune alterations in acutely ill patients

Dysregulated immune profiles have been described in symptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Whether the reported immune alterations are specific to SARS-CoV-2 infection or also triggered by other acute illnesses remains unclear. We performed flow cytometry analysis on fresh peripheral blood from a consecutive cohort of (a) patients hospitalized with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, (b) patients of comparable age and sex hospitalized for another acute disease (SARS-CoV-2 negative), and (c) healthy controls. Using both data-driven and hypothesis-driven analyses, we found several dysregulations in immune cell subsets (e.g., decreased proportion of T cells) that were similarly associated with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and non-COVID-19-related acute illnesses. In contrast, we identified specific differences in myeloid and lymphocyte subsets that were associated with SARS-CoV-2 status (e.g., elevated proportion of ICAM-1+ mature/activated neutrophils, ALCAM+ monocytes, and CD38+CD8+ T cells). A subset of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune alterations correlated with disease severity, disease outcome at 30 days, and mortality. Our data provide an understanding of the immune dysregulation specifically associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among acute care hospitalized patients. Our study lays the foundation for the development of specific biomarkers to stratify SARS-CoV-2-positive patients at risk of unfavorable outcomes and to uncover candidate molecules to investigate from a therapeutic perspective.

Immune checkpoints in sepsis: New hopes and challenges

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome with a high incidence and a weighty economic burden. The cytokines storm in the early stage and the state of immunosuppression in the late stage contribute to the mortality of sepsis. Immune checkpoints expressed on lymphocytes and APCs, including CD28, CTLA-4, CD80, CD86, PD-1 and PD-L1, CD40 and CD40L, OX40 and OX40L, 4-1BB and 4-1BBL, BTLA, TIM family, play significant roles in the pathogenesis of sepsis through regulating the immune disorder. The specific therapies targeting immune checkpoints exhibit great potentials in the animal and preclinical studies, and further clinical trials are planning to implement. Here, we review the current literature on the roles played by immune checkpoints in the pathogenesis and treatment of sepsis. We hope to provide further insights into this novel immunomodulatory strategy.

Inhibitory Immune Checkpoint Molecule Expression in Clinical Sepsis Studies: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Checkpoint inhibitors have been proposed for sepsis following reports of increased checkpoint molecule expression in septic patients. To determine whether clinical studies investigating checkpoint molecule expression provide strong evidence supporting trials of checkpoint inhibitors for sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, inception through October 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies comparing checkpoint molecule expression in septic patients versus healthy controls or critically ill nonseptic patients or in sepsis nonsurvivors versus survivors.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators extracted data and evaluated study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-six studies were retrieved. Across 26 studies, compared with healthy controls, septic patients had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased CD4+ lymphocyte programmed death-1 and monocyte programmed death-ligand-1 expression in most studies. Other checkpoint molecule expressions were variable and studied less frequently. Across 11 studies, compared with critically ill nonseptic, septic patients had significantly increased checkpoint molecule expression in three or fewer studies. Septic patients had higher severity of illness scores, comorbidities, and mortality in three studies providing analysis. Across 12 studies, compared with septic survivors, nonsurvivors had significantly increased expression of any checkpoint molecule on any cell type in five or fewer studies. Of all 36 studies, none adjusted for nonseptic covariates reported to increase checkpoint molecule expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although sepsis may increase some checkpoint molecule expression compared with healthy controls, the data are limited and inconsistent. Further, data from the more informative patient comparisons are potentially confounded by severity of illness. These clinical checkpoint molecule expression studies do not yet provide a strong rationale for trials of checkpoint inhibitor therapy for sepsis.

Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: The Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) is the pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of 25 May 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 has caused 347,192 deaths around the world. The current evidence showed that severely ill patients tend to have a high concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, compared to those who are moderately ill. The high level of cytokines also indicates a poor prognosis in COVID-19. Besides, excessive infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells, mainly involving macrophages and T-helper 17 cells, has been found in lung tissues of patients with COVID-19 by postmortem examination. Recently, increasing studies indicate that the "cytokine storm" may contribute to the mortality of COVID-19. Here, we summarize the clinical and pathologic features of the cytokine storm in COVID-19. Our review shows that SARS-Cov-2 selectively induces a high level of IL-6 and results in the exhaustion of lymphocytes. The current evidence indicates that tocilizumab, an IL-6 inhibitor, is relatively effective and safe. Besides, corticosteroids, programmed cell death protein (PD)-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition, cytokine-adsorption devices, intravenous immunoglobulin, and antimalarial agents could be potentially useful and reliable approaches to counteract cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients.

The unleashing of the immune system in COVID-19 and sepsis: the calm before the storm?

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is sorely testing health care systems and economies around the world and is rightly considered as the major health emergency in a century. Despite the course of the disease appearing to be mild in many cases, a significant proportion of symptomatic patients develop pneumonia requiring hospitalisation or progress to manifest respiratory complications leading to intensive care treatment. Potential interventions for SARS-CoV2-associated pneumonia are being tested, some of which holding promise, but as of today none of these has yet demonstrated outstanding efficacy in treating COVID-19. In this article, we discuss fresh perspectives and insights into the potential role of immune dysregulation in COVID-19 as well as similarities with systemic inflammatory response in sepsis and the rationale for exploring novel treatment options affecting host immune response.