Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration

A careful reassessment of anthracycline use in curable breast cancer

It has been over three decades since anthracyclines took their place as the standard chemotherapy backbone for breast cancer in the curative setting. Though the efficacy of anthracycline chemotherapy is not debatable, potentially life-threatening and long-term risks accompany this class of agents, leading some to question their widespread use, especially when newer agents with improved therapeutic indices have become available. Critically assessing when to incorporate an anthracycline is made more relevant in an era where molecular classification is enabling not only the development of biologically targeted therapeutics but also is improving the ability to better select those who would benefit from cytotoxic agents. This comprehensive analysis will present the problem of overtreatment in early-stage breast cancer, review evidence supporting the use of anthracyclines in the pre-taxane era, analyze comparative trials evaluating taxanes with or without anthracyclines in biologically unselected and selected patient populations, and explore published work aimed at defining anthracycline-sensitive tumor types.

Predictive Significance of an Optimized Panel for Basal-like Breast Cancer: Results from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.5 and MA.12 Phase III Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

Accurate IHC biomarkers incorporating nestin positivity or inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphate (INPP4B) loss have recently been optimized to identify the basal-like intrinsic breast cancer subtype regardless of estrogen, progesterone, or Her2 status. We examined the predictive capacity of these basal biomarkers in the CCTG MA.5 chemotherapy and MA.12 endocrine therapy trials.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks of primary tumors from patients randomized in the two trials were used to build tissue microarrays. IHC staining for nestin and INPP4B followed published methods and REMARK criteria. A prespecified statistical plan tested the hypothesis that patients with basal breast cancer (nestin⁺ or INPP4B^-) would not benefit from anthracycline substitution in MA.5 or from tamoxifen in MA.12.

RESULTS

Nestin positivity or INPP4B loss was observed in 110/453 (24%) interpretable samples from MA.5 and 47/366 (13%) from MA.12, and was associated with high grade, younger age, estrogen receptor negativity, triple-negative, core basal, and PAM50 basal-like subtypes. In the MA.5 trial, patients assigned as basal experienced lower benefit from anthracycline versus nonanthracycline adjuvant chemotherapy [HR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-3.10] when compared with non-basal (nestin^- and INPP4B⁺) cases where there was a higher benefit from anthracyclines (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54-1.04; P _interaction = 0.01). In the MA.12 trial, patients assigned as basal did not demonstrate a benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen versus placebo (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.12-1.86; P = 0.29), whereas nonbasal cases displayed significant benefit (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = 0.04), although the interaction test was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The nestin/INPP4B IHC panel identifies women with basal breast cancers who benefit from nonanthracycline chemotherapy but not endocrine adjuvant treatments.

CMF revisited in the 21st century

Over the last 35 years, classical CMF (combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) has been a milestone in the adjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer. However, after an early burst of success lasted just over 10 years, classical CMF has been supplanted by 'third-generation' regimens containing taxanes and anthracyclines. Questions have been raised in the past years concerning the true effectiveness of adjuvant CMF for specific subgroups of patients and particularly, recent retrospective data support the fact that the CMF might have a role in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. One possible justification for supporting this role of CMF may be sought in the mechanism of action of drugs used in the regimen, as triple-negative cells may be sensitive to alkylating agents that cause double-strand breaks in DNA. The lesson learned from the CMF could lead us to identify new combinations of drugs that could include the optimal chemotherapy backbone for triple-negative breast cancer such as platinum compounds or alkylating agents or Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. In conclusion, although we have learned a lot from the use of CMF, many questions are still open and hopefully stimulate our thinking, as clinicians, leading us to find new and more effective ways to treat breast cancer.

Assessment of setup accuracy in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the setup accuracy for patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients undergoing radiotherapy via tangent (TG), supraclavicular-axillary (SA), and internal mammary (IM) fields were included. To explore the setup accuracy, distances between chosen landmarks were taken as reference parameters (RPs). The difference between measured RPs on simulation films and electronic portal images (EPIs) was calculated as the setup error.

RESULTS

A total of 30 simulation films and 120 EPIs were evaluated. In the SA field, calculated RPs were lung length (LL), clavicle-field center perpendicular distance, and clavicle-field center transverse distance. The mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the random errors (sigma) for these parameters were 4.7, 7.3, and 7.6; and the SDs of the systematic errors (Sigma) were 6.8, 4.4, and 13.5, respectively. In the TG fields, the calculated RPs were the central lung distance (CLD), maximum lung distance (MLD), and central soft-tissue distance (CSTD). In the medial TG field, the sigma values for these parameters were 3.4, 3.6, and 4.1, respectively; and the sigma values were 6.6, 2.6, and 3.4, respectively. In the lateral TG field, Sigma values for the calculated RPs were 2.4, 3.2, and 3.3l, respectively; and the Sigma values were 5.6, 3.6, and 4.8, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CLD, MLD, and CSTD in TG fields and LL in SA fields are easily identifiable and are helpful for detecting setup errors using EPIs in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Complete hormonal blockade versus epirubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal, one to three node-positive, and hormone-receptor positive, early breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 06 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine optimal adjuvant therapy between complete hormonal blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer and one to three positive nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomised 333 patients to receive either LHRH agonist (triptorelin 3.75 mg i.m., monthly) plus tamoxifen 30 mg/day for 3 years (TAM-LHRHa, n=164), or fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 21 days for six cycles, without any hormonal treatment (FEC50, n=169).

RESULTS

The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% with TAM-LHRHa, and 72% with FEC50 (P=0.13). The 7-year overall survival (OS) was 91% and 88%, respectively (P=0.20). The multivariate analysis confirmed that both treatments were not different for DFS and OS (P=0.83 and P=0.41, respectively). Amenorrhoea occurred in 64% of patients treated with FEC50; it was temporary in 58% of cases after hormonotherapy and in 31% after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In intermediate-risk breast cancer, complete hormonal blockade and chemotherapy provided similar outcomes. Hormonal treatment is an alternative to chemotherapy in hormone-sensitive patients, considering the preference of patients in terms of quality of life.

Sequential Addition of an Anthracycline-Based Regimen to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this phase II study was to attempt to maximize response and survival in patients with bulky, operable breast cancer by combining sequential neoadjuvant docetaxel to a semi-intensive anthracycline-based regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients (N = 53) were included to receive 4 cycles of docetaxel, followed by a maximum of 4 cycles of TNCF (THP [theprubican]-doxorubicin/vinorelbine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil) every 21 days before definitive surgery and radiation therapy.

RESULTS

After a median number of 4 cycles of docetaxel and 2 cycles of TNCF, the overall clinical response rate was 81.1%, including a 13.2% complete remission rate and only 2 incidences of progressive disease. Breast conservation was achieved in 87% of patients. According to Chevallier classification, a pathologic complete response in breast and axilla was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) and in 9 patients (17%) using the Sataloff's classification. The important myelosuppression observed in this trial was expected but limited by the prophylactic use of growth factors. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, only 5 recurrences were documented, with a median time to first recurrence of 12.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite disappointing results of this trial for pathologic complete response rate, possibly because of the order of drug administration, clinical response, breast conservation, and survival were optimized.

The role of taxanes in the treatment of breast cancer

Among the novel chemotherapeutic agents introduced in the last decade, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful group of compounds, and results available so far confirm that they will be remembered in the future as the breast cancer chemotherapy of the 1990s. Two taxanes are available (paclitaxel and docetaxel) and they share some characteristics, although they do have some significant differences both in terms of their preclinical profile and, most importantly, their clinical characteristics. There are three main clinical differences: different efficacy-toxicity ratio in relation to dose and schedule; different integrability in anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens, secondary to differences in pharmacokinetic interactions with anthracyclines; and different level of synergism between each taxane and trastuzumab. In clinical practice, the taxanes are now standard therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Their role as monochemotherapy or in combination with anthracyclines in advanced breast cancer has suggested their potential therapeutic impact in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. Recent results in the adjuvant setting show that taxanes, used either in combination or in sequential therapy, possess the capability to induce significant improvements, in particular in terms of survival; thus confirming the positive impact of taxanes on the natural history of breast cancer. However, further results of all completed or ongoing Phase III trials in the early setting will help define the optimal use of taxanes and maximise the induced benefits for breast cancer patients.

A phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in operable node-positive breast cancer: final results

PURPOSE

To compare concomitant and sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in node-positive, operable breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a randomized, French, multicenter, phase III trial enrolling 638 eligible women with prior breast surgery and positive axillary dissection. Patients in Arm A received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 12 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with concomitant radiotherapy (50 Gy +/- 10-20-Gy boost). Patients in Arm B received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 60 mg/m2 epirubicin, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with subsequent radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

Median treatment durations were 64 and 126 days (Arms A and B, respectively), with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival favored patients with conservative surgery (two thirds of the population), with less local and/or regional recurrence in Arm A than in Arm B (3% vs. 9%; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis in this subgroup showed a 2.8-fold increased risk of locoregional recurrence with sequential chemoradiotherapy, independent of other prognostic factors (p = 0.027). Febrile neutropenia and Grade 3-4 leukopenia were significantly more frequent in Arm A. Subclinical left ventricular ejection fraction events at 1 year were more frequent with concomitant radiotherapy (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant radiotherapy with adjuvant fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide has significantly better locoregional control in node-positive breast cancer after conservative surgery and 50% shorter treatment, albeit with slightly more acute toxicity. With mitoxantrone no longer available for adjuvant breast cancer treatment, alternative concomitant chemoradiotherapy studies are needed.

Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) in node-negative breast cancer patients with and without tamoxifen (TAM), overall and by hormone receptor (HR) status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Node-negative patients identified by tumor size (> 2 cm), negative HR, or high S-phase fraction (n = 2,690) were randomly assigned to CMF, CAF, CMF + TAM (CMFT), or CAF + TAM (CAFT). Cox regression evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for CAF versus CMF and TAM versus no TAM separately. Two-sided CIs and one-sided P values for planned comparisons were calculated.

RESULTS

Ten-year estimates indicated that CAF was not significantly better than CMF (P = .13) for the primary outcome of DFS (77% v 75%; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.27). CAF had slightly better OS than CMF (85% v 82%, HR = 1.19 for CMF v CAF; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.43); values were statistically significant in the planned one-sided test (P = .03). Toxicity was greater with CAF and did not increase with TAM. Overall, TAM had no benefit (DFS, P = .16; OS, P = .37), but the TAM effect differed by HR groups. For HR-positive patients, TAM was beneficial (DFS, HR = 1.32 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.61; P = .003; OS, HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.61; P = .03), but not for HR-negative patients (DFS, HR = 0.81 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03; OS, HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.05).

CONCLUSION

CAF did not improve DFS compared with CMF; there was a slight effect on OS. Given greater toxicity, we cannot conclude CAF to be superior to CMF. TAM is effective in HR-positive disease, but not in HR-negative disease.

Selection of adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of node-positive breast cancer

Over the past two decades, several studies have suggested that regimens that contain anthracyclines are more effective than those that do not. A meta-analysis by the 2005 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group confirmed that about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy in the adjuvant setting reduced the yearly death rate from breast cancer by about 38% for women younger than 50 years and by 20% for women aged 50-69 years. Although this meta-analysis found that survival was better with regimens that contain anthracycline than with regimens based on cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, the best use of anthracycline-based regimens remains unclear. Adjuvant regimens in use can be categorised into three groups: standard-dose anthracycline; escalated-dose epirubicin; and anthracyclines and taxanes. The duration of treatment and combination of dose and drugs varies between these three categories. We reviewed the three types of regimen to establish which provide a better outcome in terms of safety, efficacy, cost, and convenience to patients. We found that both escalated-dose epirubicin and anthracycline-taxane regimens were most effective in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. Of the specific anthracycline-based regimens, the docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide regimen (TAC); the fluorouracil, 100 mg epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide regimen (FEC100); and the cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil regimen (CEF) produced the greatest proportional decreases in 5-year death rate.

Primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma comparing CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) with an anthracycline-containing regimen: short-term responses translated into long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

The role of anthracyclines has been extensively studied in adjuvant chemotherapy, but much less in the primary chemotherapy of early breast carcinoma. This study, comparing CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) with the rotational anthracycline-containing regimen CMFEV (CMF plus epirubicin and vincristine) administered as primary chemotherapy, demonstrated a significant increase in clinical complete response in premenopausal women. We report the long-term results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and eleven patients with stage I or II palpable breast carcinoma and a tumour diameter of >2.5 cm were randomised to receive CMF or CMFEV for four cycles before surgery. After surgery, the patients in both arms received adjuvant CMF for three cycles.

RESULTS

In the study population as a whole, there was a non-significant 20% reduction in mortality and relapse rates in the CMFEV arm. However, the effect of the experimental regimen was only found in premenopausal patients, especially in terms of relapse-free survival (P=0.07) and locoregional relapse-free survival (P=0.0009), thus mirroring the effect on response rates. After 10 years, the proportions of premenopausal patients free from locoregional relapse as a first event in the CMF and CMFEV groups were 68% and 97%, respectively. No relevant differences were found in postmenopausal patients.

CONCLUSION

The overall results of this study showed that the greater activity of the experimental anthracycline-containing combination over CMF as primary chemotherapy in premenopausal patients translated into long-term effects in the same subgroup.

Have we made progress in pharmacogenomics? The implementation of molecular markers in colon cancer

For the last 40 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the treatment of choice in both the adjuvant and advanced treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, 5-FU monotherapy produces response rates of only 10–20% in the advanced setting. 5-FU has been combined with newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and this has significantly increased response rates to 40–50% in the advanced setting. More recently, novel biological agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies targeting either the epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor, have shown to provide additional clinical benefit for patients with metastatic CRC. A number of predictive markers have been identified for CRC to date. However, their usefulness as individual markers of response has led to somewhat inconclusive results. Therefore, there is a need to identify panels of predictive markers of response to therapy for advanced CRC, in order to improve these disappointing response rates. The advent of high-throughput methodologies, such as microarrays, enables tumor samples to be profiled on a global scale. This technology has been utilized to develop predictive markers for a wide range of tumor types to date, and hopefully this technology can be translated into the CRC setting with the hope of predicting the response of each individual tumor to chemotherapy.

Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among eight French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 3653 patients were assessable: 2603 received epirubicin; 682 received hormonotherapy; and 368 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 85% of cases (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50, 75 or 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, three or six cycles). Epirubicin cumulative dose was <300 mg/m2 in 1045 patients; 300-600 mg/m2 in 1187; and > or =600 mg/m2 in 286, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. The median follow-up was 104 months.

RESULTS

Eight cases of leukemia occurred in epirubicin-exposed patients and one in non-exposed patients. After 9 years, the risk of developing a leukemia was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.57) in epirubicin-exposed patients. In patients receiving chemotherapy, leukemia subtypes were: AML2 (two), AML3 (one), AML4 (three) and ALL (two). None of the classically recognized risk factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence of a leukemia.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of the dose, the incidence of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy was low. After a long follow-up, the benefit/risk ratio for early breast cancer patients remained in favor of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: eight cases (0.31%) occurred, and in some of them, treatment causality could be debatable.

Role of Genomic Markers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment

For the last four decades, fluorouracil (FU) has been the main treatment of choice in colorectal cancer (CRC) in both the advanced and adjuvant settings. In the advanced setting, FU monotherapy produces response rates of only 10% to 20%. Furthermore, in resected stage III CRC, FU monotherapy has increased overall survival by only 20%. The combination of FU with newer therapies such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan has significantly improved response rates to 40% to 50%. Despite these improvements, more than half of advanced CRC patients derive no benefit from treatment; this is due to either acquired or inherent drug resistance. This review aims to highlight the current prognostic and predictive markers that have been identified for CRC to date. The limited use of these predictive markers underscores the importance of and need for multiple marker testing in order to improve response rates and decrease toxicity. This review will also focus on high throughput methods to identify panels of predictive markers for CRC, which ultimately aim to tailor treatment according to an individual patient and tumor profile.

Introducing taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: expectations and reality

Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer significantly improves disease-free and overall survival. However, a recent update of the world-wide overview indicated that improvements, though statistically significant, are of modest magnitude. Considering the results of individual clinical trials, further improvements in disease-free survival through introduction of new drugs as part of adjuvant treatment for breast cancer are expected to be small. Phase III studies in advanced, measurable disease, each involving several hundreds of patients, have been conducted with both paclitaxel and docetaxel and these results are now available. The high level of efficacy observed, especially with docetaxel, has led to their prompt introduction into adjuvant trials, and the results of one trial with paclitaxel are already available. In this trial, which included 3170 patients, paclitaxel was given every three weeks for four courses following an adjuvant treatment with four courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination. The sequential use of the AC following by the taxane showed an early significant improvement of disease-free survival as compared to AC alone, but the difference observed was exclusively in the 40% of patients who had oestrogen receptor (OR)-negative disease. These patients, and a few of those with OR-positive primaries, did not receive tamoxifen following chemotherapy. Differences in duration of the entire adjuvant treatment programme might have influenced results leading to potentially the wrong conclusion being drawn that the taxane made the difference and other treatment variables had a negligible influence on outcome. Taxanes deserve a 'fair trial' in the adjuvant setting. Moreover, potential cardiotoxicity and long-term impact of high-dose steroids suggest that caution and longer follow-up are required before the definitive introduction of taxanes into the routine care of patients with early breast cancer.

Optimizing the Use of Anthracyclines in the Adjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Anthracyclines have been incorporated into adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer since the 1980s. A metaanalysis confirmed that regimens containing anthracyclines result in better disease-free and overall survival than standard CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil), with a proportional reduction of 11% in risk of death at 10 years with the addition of these agents. Dose escalation of doxorubicin results in outcome improvement up to a threshold dose beyond which no further improvement is seen. Epirubicin, with its better toxicity profile, can be escalated to higher doses than doxorubicin, with better outcomes associated with higher dose levels. Tumors expressing HER2/neu may respond better to anthracycline-containing regimens than to standard CMF, but this remains controversial. Newer regimens combining anthracyclines with taxanes may offer a slight additional advantage in terms of disease-free and overall survival in some patient populations. The scheduling of treatment is important, with recent results of dose-dense scheduling showing a greater survival benefit than conventional scheduling. Ongoing clinical trials should further define the best choice of anthracycline and the optimal dose and schedule of treatment.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Optimal and Suboptimal Anthracycline-Containing Regimens

We hypothesized that the advantage of adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimens over the conventional CMF combination found by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group overview may depend on the 'additive' or 'substitutive' nature of the administration of anthracycline in the experimental arm. The aim of this study was to explore this hypothesis. By means of computerized and hand searches, we identified 21 published randomized trials comparing early breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapies with and without anthracycline, and divided them into those in which the use of anthracycline was substantially 'additive' or substantially 'substitutive'. The trial results were then judged 'positive' or 'negative' depending on whether they showed statistically significant differences in disease-free or overall survival in favor of the anthracycline-containing regimen. Anthracycline was substantially 'additive' in 14 trials, eight of which were 'positive', and substantially 'substitutive' in seven, all of which were 'negative': this difference is statistically significant (P = 0.018). In conclusion this trial classification, an attempt to test a very simple unifying concept with the aim of explaining the different results of trials involving the administration of anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer, significantly correlated with patient outcome. It therefore seems that anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimens can be considered optimal or suboptimal depending on whether or not they reflect the potential benefit offered by anthracycline administration.

Quantitation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) mRNA expression levels in normal colon and colorectal cancer tumor paraffin-embedded tissue specimens

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used for more than 40 years in the treatment of neoplastic disease, and remains the standard first-line treatment for colorectal cancer in combination with irinotecan and leucovorin. Previous studies indicated that measurement of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene expression before treatment was valuable in determining the potential benefit of and toxicity to 5-FU treatment. In this study, we investigated the association between intratumoral DPD gene expression and the adjacent normal tissue DPD gene expression and DPD mRNA expression level in non-paired colon tumor and normal colon tissue specimens. In addition, we have compared the difference of DPD gene expression at three different RNA concentrations from the same specimen (180, 100 and 5 ng/reaction, respectively). DPD expression was measured by quantitative RT-PCR using a LightCycler instrument in a total of 31 specimens. Gene expression values were expressed as a ratio of target gene (DPD) to the internal reference gene (G6PDH). Our study revealed no statistically significant difference (p=0.23) between tumor tissues and matched normal tissue in DPD expression. In contrast, the data on DPD mRNA expression in non-paired colon tumor and normal tissue specimens revealed a significant difference (p=0.0004) between the tumor group and the normal group. In the three RNA concentration groups, there was no significant difference (p=0.55) in gene expression at the different RNA concentrations from the same donor. These results demonstrate that intratumoral gene expression levels of DPD do not correlate with tumor cell percentage or with RNA concentration. Thus, DPD mRNA expression appears to be a valid sensitivity test for 5-FU in spite of a varying density of tumor cells and RNA yield in specimens submitted for analysis.

Second malignancies following adjuvant chemotherapy: 6-year results from a Belgian randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with an anthracycline-based regimen in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Alkylating agents and topoisomerase-II inhibitors have been associated with the occurrence of secondary leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conversely, data on the occurrence of second solid malignancies in this setting are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluates the occurrence of second hematological and solid malignancies in the context of a prospective multicenter phase III trial comparing epirubicin-cyclophosphamide at intermediate doses (EC), or at full doses (HEC), with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in 777 patients with early breast cancer.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 73 months, the following 8-year actuarial rates of second solid primaries were observed: CMF 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 9.5%], EC 4.1% (95% CI 0.1% to 8.1%), and HEC 7.2% (95% CI 3.2% to 11.2%) (P = 0.79 by log rank test). Three secondary acute myeloid leukemias (AML) were reported, all in the HEC arm (incidence = 1.2%, 95% CI 0.0% to 2.5%), which by a three arm comparison allows us to conclude that HEC is statistically different (borderline significance) from CMF and EC (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HEC, as delivered in this trial, cannot be recommended in clinical practice because of the lack of superiority over classic CMF and because of the increased risk of AML observed in this arm. Prolongation of conventional anthracycline-based treatment beyond the current standard of four to six cycles is not recommended in clinical practice.

Randomized trial comparing six versus three cycles of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 01 trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the duration and dose intensity of epirubicin-based regimens in premenopausal patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 1990, 621 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil (Roche SA, Basel, Switzerland) 500 mg/m2, epirubicin (Pharmacia SA, Milan, Italy) 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (Asta Medica AG, Frankfurt, Germany) 500 mg/m2 every 21 days (FEC 50) for six cycles (6 FEC 50); FEC 50 for three cycles (3 FEC 50); or the same regimen with epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (FEC 75) for three cycles (3 FEC 75). All patients in the three arms received chest wall irradiation at the end of the third cycle.

RESULTS

After a 131-month median follow-up, the 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 53.4%, 42.5%, and 43.6% (P =.05) in the three arms, respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was superior both to 3 FEC 50 (P =.02) and to 3 FEC 75 (P =.05). The 10-year overall survival (OS) for the 6 FEC 50 arm was 64.3%, for the 3 FEC 50 arm it was 56.6%, and for the 3 FEC 75 arm, it was 59.7% (P =.25), respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was more effective than 3 FEC 50 (P =.10). Cox regression analysis demonstrates that OS was significantly better in the 6 FEC 50 than in the 3 FEC 50 arm (P =.046). No severe infections (grade 3 to 4), acute cardiac toxicity, or deaths from toxicity have been observed. Only five patients developed delayed cardiac dysfunctions, and three patients developed acute myeloblastic leukemia.

CONCLUSION

After a long-term follow-up in an adjuvant setting, the benefit of six cycles of FEC 50 compared with three cycles, whatever the dose, is highly significant in terms of DFS. As regards OS, the group receiving six cycles of FEC 50 has significantly better results than the group receiving three cycles of FEC 50.

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer-report of a European expert panel

The anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin, and the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, are effective chemotherapeutic agents for the first-line and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and their clinical use is widespread. However, for women whose disease has progressed despite receiving these drugs, treatment options are limited. These women often have a good performance status, and may survive for many months or even years, so they should be given the opportunity to benefit from further chemotherapy. The goals of chemotherapy in these patients are to obtain maximum control of symptoms, prevent serious complications, and increase survival without diminishing quality of life. Several agents are used for this purpose, including fluorouracil, docetaxel (in patients who have already received paclitaxel), vinorelbine, and mitomycin c, but because data from controlled trials are limited, a standard regimen has not yet been established. Moreover, these agents may be inconvenient to administer and can be associated with adverse events requiring hospitalisation. Therefore, there is a clear need for additional therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ideally, agents should have a convenient method of administration, eg, oral, and should be suitable for home-based rather than hospital-based therapy. Treatment should control disease in at least 20-30% of patients with an acceptable side-effect profile. Novel oral therapies have now been developed and are being used increasingly in patients whose disease has progressed following taxane therapy.

Epirubicin versus CMF as adjuvant therapy for stage I and II breast cancer: a prospective randomised study

We compared a relatively short regimen of monochemotherapy with epirubicin versus polychemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant treatment for stage I and II breast cancer patients. 348 patients with oestrogen receptor negative (ER-) node negative and ER- or ER+ node-positive with <10 nodes were accrued. CMF was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks, for six courses; epirubicin was given weekly for 4 months. Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen for 3 years. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Outcome evaluation was performed both in eligible patients and in all randomised patients according to the intention-to-treat principle. 8 randomised patients were considered ineligible. At a median follow-up of 8 years, there was no difference in OS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77-1.61, P=0.58), EFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, P=0.48), and RFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.8-1.64, P=0.48) between the two arms for all of the patients. At 8 years, the RFS percentages (+/-Standard Error (S.E.)) were 65.4% (+/-4%) in the CMF arm and 62.7% (+/-4%) in the epirubicin arm; for EFS these were 64.2% (+/-4%) for CMF and 60.8% (+/-4%) for epirubicin, respectively. A significant difference in RFS (P=0.015) was observed in patients with 4-9 positive nodes in favour of the CMF arm. Toxicity in the two arms was superimposable except for more frequent grade 3 alopecia in the epirubicin-treated patients (P=0.001). Overall, at a median follow-up of 8 years, there were no differences between the two arms in terms of OS, EFS and RFS.

High sensitivity of radiolabelled antimyosin scintigraphy in assessing anthracycline related early myocyte damage preceding cardiac dysfunction

In antimyosin scintigraphy was evaluated at various cumulative anthracycline dose levels in order to early identify patients with severe cardiac injury and increased long-term risk of cardiac dysfunction. Twenty-four patients receiving standard doses of 60-75 mg.m(-2) doxorubicin or 90-112.5 mg.m(-2) epirubicin were followed at baseline, low (two cycles), middle (four cycles), and high (six cycles) cumulative dose using (111)In antimyosin 48 h heart-to-lung ratio (HLR), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and peak filling rate (PFR). At a low cumulative dose only HLR was significantly increased (P=0.0001); at middle dose HLR (P<0.0001) and LVEF (P=0.0054), but not PFR, were significantly changed, and at high dose HLR (P<0.0001), LVEF (P=0.0001) and PFR (P=0.033) all changed significantly. Concerning individual results, HLR became abnormal in 18 patients (75%) at low, 22 (92%) at middle, and 24 (100%) at high cumulative dose whereas LVEF and PFR remained within normal limits in all patients. It is concluded that myocyte damage appears to precede left ventricle systolic and diastolic dysfunction in anthracycline treatment. (111)In antimyosin scintigraphy is very sensitive in detecting myocardial damage after cumulative dose levels even as low as 120-150 mg.m(-2) doxorubicin or 180-225 mg.m(-2) epirubicin.

Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with rotational CMF, epirubicin and vincristine as primary chemotherapy in operable breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

According to the overview of Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, anthracycline containing regimens are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma, but no comparative information is available in terms of primary chemotherapy. In the current randomized controlled trial, the authors compared CMF with a chemotherapy regimen including CMF, epirubicin, and vincristine (CMFEV).

METHODS

Two hundred eleven patients with Stages I and II palpable breast carcinoma and tumor diameter > 2.5 cm or < or = 2.5 cm with cytologically proven axillary lymph node involvement were randomized to receive CMF (arm A) or CMFEV regimen (arm B) for four cycles before surgery. After surgery, patients in both arms received adjuvant CMF for three cycles; the postmenopausal patients also received tamoxifen for two years.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the complete response (CR) and in the CR plus partial response (PR) rates between the two arms. In the subset analysis, among premenopausal patients, significantly higher rates of CR (26% vs 4%, P = 0.004) and of CR + PR rates (80% vs 54%, P = 0.007) were observed in the CMFEV, as compared to the CMF arm. Multivariate analysis confirmed the presence of a significant interaction between menopausal status and type of treatment on the probability of achieving CR (P = 0.02) or CR + PR (P = 0.01). There were no major differences in the side effects of the two treatments, with the exception of more frequent alopecia in the experimental arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study are in line with those of previous published randomized clinical trials comparing regimens without and with anthracycline as adjuvant treatment, indicating an agreement between the short term response to primary chemotherapy and the long term results observed in the adjuvant setting.

Treatment guidelines and techniques in delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy in management of operable breast cancer

Radiation therapy has been shown to statistically significantly reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence in high-risk patients with operable breast cancer following mastectomy and systemic therapy. Recent trials have also demonstrated a significant survival benefit following radiotherapy in high-risk patients. Therefore, it is important to identify the patients who could potentially derive that survival benefit and to not offer treatment to those patients who are not at increased risk for failure. Established risk factors that predict for increased rates of locoregional recurrence include axillary lymph node involvement and T3 (or T4) disease. While treatment-related factors, such as the extent of the axillary dissection and extent of lymph nodal positivity, also undoubtedly affect locoregional recurrence, additional studies are needed to define the magnitude of their risk. Locoregional patterns of failure have identified the chest wall and supraclavicular/infraclavicular regions to be the most common sites of locoregional failure following mastectomy, which justifies treatment to these regions. While long-term complications are uncommon following locoregional radiotherapy, careful treatment planning is critical to minimize cardiac (and pulmonary) toxicity.

Progress in systemic chemotherapy of primary breast cancer: an overview

Substantial progress has been made in the multidisciplinary management of primary breast cancer during the last 30 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to significantly reduce the annual risk of cancer recurrence and mortality, and these effects persist even 15 years after diagnosis. Combination chemotherapy is superior to single-agent therapy and anthracycline-containing regimens. Those that combine an anthracycline with 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide are more effective than regimens without an anthracycline. Six cycles of a single regimen appear to provide optimal benefit. Dose reductions below the standard range are associated with inferior results. Dose increases that require growth factor or hematopoietic stem cell support are under investigation; at this time, the existing results provide no compelling reason to use this strategy outside a clinical trial. Regimens using fixed crossover designs with two non-cross-resistant regimens are being evaluated. The addition of a taxane to anthracycline-containing regimens is currently under intense scrutiny, and preliminary analysis of the first three clinical trials has shown encouraging, albeit not compelling, results. For patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, the sequential administration of chemotherapy and 5 years of tamoxifen therapy provides additive benefits. No compelling evidence exists to combine ovarian ablation with chemotherapy. Most side effects and toxic effects are self-limited, although premature menopause requires monitoring and preventive interventions to preserve bone mineral density. The small risk of acute leukemia is of concern, and additional research to develop safer regimens is clearly indicated. The overall effect of optimal local/regional treatment combined with an anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and a taxane (and, for patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, 5 years of tamoxifen therapy) is a greater than 50% reduction in annual risks of recurrence of and death from breast cancer. For most patients at intermediate or high risk of cancer recurrence, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy exceed by far its unwanted effects.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil in taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of combined oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (5-FU) in taxane-pretreated advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated (within 6 months of study entry) women were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous [IV] infusion), day 1, and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2)/d (continuous IV infusion) days 1 to 4, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 51 years (range, 34 to 71 years), with a median of two involved organs (range, one to six organs), and metastases in the liver (70%), bone (47%), and lung (34%). Patients had a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens (range, one to six regimens), and 78% had previous hormonal therapy, with clinical taxane and anthracycline resistance in 53% and 34%, respectively. A total of 367 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles/patient (range, one to 15 cycles). Sixty patients were assessable for response (World Health Organization criteria): 17 partial response, 26 stable disease, and 17 disease progression, giving an overall response rate of 27% (95% confidence interval, 16.3% to 39.1%), and 26% and 36% in taxane- and anthracycline-resistant populations, respectively, all responders having metastatic liver disease. Median time to progression was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 11.9 months. Four treatment-related serious adverse events occurred, seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Hematotoxicity was prevalent but rarely severe, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in 34%, 19%, and 16% of patients, respectively, and a single episode of febrile neutropenia. One third of patients developed grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy (oxaliplatin-specific scale), with grade 3 in only 8%.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU combination is effective with an excellent safety profile in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated ABC patients, showing encouraging activity in patients with anthracycline/taxane-resistance or visceral disease.

Population pharmacokinetics of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)

Despite the success of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluouracil (5-FU) (CMF) treatment for early stage breast cancer, more than 35% of patients die within 5 years of diagnosis. Optimisation of the dose of each component drug may improve survival and reduce toxicity. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)), MTX (40 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) were determined in 46 women, with data on two consecutive courses available for 41 patients. A population analysis using NONMEM was performed to investigate the effect of patient covariates on pharmacokinetics (PK), and to estimate the relative magnitude of interindividual and interoccasion variability. Patient weight had a significant influence on the clearance of cyclophosphamide and on the volume of central compartment for MTX, whose clearance was dependent on renal function. For all three drugs, interoccasion variability was of the same order (20-40%) as that between individuals, suggesting a limited potential for dose-optimisation of this regimen.

The expanding role of epirubicin in the treatment of breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer has experienced major changes in the last 25 years. Since the mid 1970s, when cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has become common practice worldwide. Anthracyclines are considered to be among the most active available agents to treat breast cancer and have become core components of adjuvant regimens. Anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy regimens provide a significant benefit over CMF. Regimens containing epirubicin are generally associated with prolongation in relapse-free and overall survival rates compared with standard therapies including CMF. Epirubicin-taxane combinations are active in treating metastatic breast cancer and do not appear to be associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions. Ongoing research is focusing on combining anthracyclines with taxanes in an effort to continue to improve outcomes following adjuvant therapy.

The worldwide perspective in the adjuvant treatment of primary lymph node positive breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer has experienced major changes in the last 25 years. Since the mid 1970s when cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has become common practice worldwide. Anthracyclines have long been considered to be among the most active available agents to treat breast cancer and they have become a core component of adjuvant regimens. Anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy regimens provide a significant benefit over CMF. Regimens containing epirubicin are associated with a significant prolongation in relapse-free and overall survival rates compared with standard therapies including CMF. Epirubicin-taxane combinations are highly active in treating metastatic breast cancer and do not appear to be associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions. Epirubicin is a unique anthracycline whose introduction to the US market represents a significant advance in breast cancer treatment. Ongoing research efforts are focusing on combining anthracyclines with taxanes in an effort to continue to improve outcomes following adjuvant therapy.

Optimal Management of Primary Breast Cancer

The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have changed in response to not only new technologies but also cultural and social aspects of the disease. While breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant therapy are the preferred treatments for many breast cancers, neoadjuvant therapy is often used in advanced disease. In this review we examine the treatment options that are influenced by pathologic and clinical factors. Invasive breast cancer is a potentially curable disease if it is regarded and managed by a multidisciplinary approach from the outset.

What is the ideal duration of adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer: are four cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin enough?

For 25 years we have known that adjuvant chemotherapy improves both disease-free and overall survival for many of our patients with primary breast cancer. We also know that these therapies have significant toxicities and are not always effective. We have therefore focused a great deal of effort into maximizing the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy and defining just how much chemotherapy, with respect to both dose and duration, is necessary to achieve this maximum benefit. In our attempt to define these parameters through clinical trials, we have been faced with many options, and we may not yet have defined an optimal regimen of chemotherapy, or an optimal duration. Although many physicians in the United States consider four cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin as "standard of care" for patients with primary breast cancer, many feel that both choice of regimen and duration of treatment remain controversial. The reasons for this uncertainty and lack of clarity are complex, and they are addressed in this review.

Optimum anthracycline-based chemotherapy for early breast cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the overall survival of women treated after surgery for early breast cancer. Several trials have suggested that anthracycline-containing regimens are more effective than those that do not contain anthracyclines. A modest overall benefit has also been confirmed by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group overview. Newer agents, such as the taxanes, are now being tested in the adjuvant setting in randomised trials. The control group of such studies should receive the optimum standard treatment. There are several anthracycline-based regimens in common use, varying in terms of the type of anthracycline used, the dose, and drug scheduling. We review the available evidence and consider whether the optimum anthracycline-containing chemotherapy schedule has now been identified.

Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare a full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) regimen with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy and with a moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen (EC) in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Node-positive breast cancer patients who were aged 70 years or younger were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: CMF for six cycles (oral cyclophosphamide); EC for eight cycles (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks); and HEC for eight cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks).

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced among the three arms. One and three cases of congestive heart failure were reported in the EC and HEC arms, respectively. Three cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported in the HEC arm. After 4 years of median follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between HEC and CMF (event-free survival [EFS]: hazards ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.31, P =.80; distant-EFS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.34, P =.87; overall survival [OS]: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.44, P =.87). HEC is more effective than EC (EFS: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P =.04; distant-EFS: HR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02, P =.06; OS HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.00, P =.05).

CONCLUSION

This three-arm study does not show an advantage in favor of an adequately dosed epirubicin-based regimen over classical CMF in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Moreover, this study confirms that there is a dose-response curve for epirubicin in breast cancer adjuvant therapy.

Prospective Evaluation of Early Cardiac Damage Induced by Epirubicin-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Locoregional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the cardiotoxic effects of epirubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (median age, 46 years; range, 28 to 55 years) were treated with five cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin (90 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (FEC) (group I, n = 21) or with four cycles of FEC followed by high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (group II, n = 19). Locoregional radiotherapy was applied subsequently. Cardiac evaluation was performed before chemotherapy (T0), 1 month after chemotherapy, 1 month after radiotherapy (T2), and 1 year after start of chemotherapy (T3). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined by radionuclide ventriculography and diastolic function by echocardiography. Autonomic function was assessed by 24-hour ECG registration for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Time-corrected QT (QTc) was assessed and N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured as biochemical markers of cardiac dysfunction.

RESULTS: No patient developed overt congestive heart failure (CHF) and the mean LVEF declined from 0.61 at T0 to 0.54 at T3 (P = .001), resulting in an LVEF below 0.50 (range, 0.42 to 0.49) in 17% of the patients, whereas 28% had a decline of more than 0.10. Plasma NT-ANP levels increased gradually from 237 pmol/L at T0 to 347 pmol/L at T3 (P < .01), whereas plasma BNP levels increased from 2.9 pmol/L to 5.1 pmol/L (P = .04). Mean QTc increased from 406 msec at T0 to 423 msec at T3 (P < .01). No persistent alterations were found in diastolic function and HRV.

CONCLUSION: Relatively low doses of epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer results in mild subclinical myocardial damage demonstrated by a decline in LVEF, an increase in natriuretic peptide levels, and an increase in QTc, which may indicate a long-term risk of CHF.

Activity of pemetrexed (ALIMTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514) in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane: an interim analysis

As many breast cancer patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy using anthracyclines or anthracenediones and taxanes, more therapeutic options are needed for subsequent lines of therapy. Pemetrexed (ALIMTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514) is a novel antifolate that inhibits several enzymes in the de novo pathways of pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis. This paper reports on a subset analysis of a phase II clinical trial of pemetrexed in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Patients were required to have received prior first-line anthracycline therapy for metastatic disease. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy and prior taxanes were allowed. A substantial subset of the study population (31 of 72 patients, 43%) had also received a taxane in the metastatic setting. All patients were treated with pemetrexed, 600 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion, once every 21 days. In the study subset, 23 of 31 (74%) patients were anthracyclines failures (progression > 30 days following treatment), and eight (26%) patients were anthracyclines refractory (progression during or < or = 30 days of treatment). The median age was 55 years (range, 30-75 years) and the median World Health Organization performance status was 0. Metastases were present in the liver (61%), lung (29%), bone (6%), and soft tissue (19%). The overall response rate for this subset was 26%, with one complete response, seven partial responses, and 13 (42%) patients with stable disease. The median duration of response was 5.4 months and median survival was 12.8 months. Pemetrexed was well tolerated by patients in the study. This post hoc analysis suggests promising activity in MBC patients previously treated with both anthracyclines and taxanes. An ongoing trial is prospectively evaluating activity in this same population.

Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study

PURPOSE

To determine the relative efficacy of a cyclophosphamide epirubicin and fluorouracil (CEF) regimen compared with an intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) combination in metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either CEF (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2) IV, epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) IV, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8), or CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) IV, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) IV, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8). Treatment was given in 3- to 4-week cycles for a total of six to nine cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients (223 CEF and 237 CMF) were randomized. Overall response rate was superior for CEF than CMF in all randomized patients (57% v 46%, respectively; P =.01) and in the assessable subset (66% v 52%, respectively; P =.005). With a median follow-up of more than 20 months, time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer with CEF than CMF (median 8.9 v 6.3 months, respectively; P =.0064), as was time to treatment failure (TTF) (median 6.2 v 5.0 months, respectively; P =.01). Significant survival differences were not observed between CEF and CMF (median 20.1 v 18.2 months, respectively; P =.23). Granulocytopenia and infections were similar in both arms. Grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting and alopecia were more frequent with CEF, whereas diarrhea was more frequent with CMF. Cardiac toxicity, primarily asymptomatic, required withdrawal from study of 15 patients on CEF (7%) and one patient on CMF.

CONCLUSION

This CEF regimen safely provides significantly better tumor control than CMF, manifest as a higher response rate, and longer TTP and TTF, but not survival, when used as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of the epirubicin dose in operable node-positive breast cancer patients with factors of poor prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1990 and July 1993, 565 operable breast cancer patients with either more than three positive nodes or between one and three positive nodes with Scarff Bloom Richardson grade > or = 2 and hormone receptor negativity were randomized after surgery to receive either fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days for six cycles (FEC 50) or the same regimen except with epirubicin dose of 100 mg/m(2) (FEC 100). Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen 30 mg/d for 3 years at the beginning of chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered at the end of chemotherapy in both groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 67 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 54.8% with FEC 50 and 66.3% with FEC 100 (P =.03). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 65.3% and 77.4%, respectively (P =.007). The mean relative dose-intensity was similar in the two groups (90.3% and 86.1%, respectively). Neutropenia and anemia were significantly more frequent in FEC 100 (P < 10(-3)), as were nausea-vomiting (P =.008) and stomatitis and alopecia (P < 10(-3)). Nine cases of grade 3 infection occurred only with FEC 100, and no toxic deaths occurred. Three cases of acute cardiac toxicity were observed (FEC50 = 1, FEC100 = 2) and 10 patients (FEC50 = 6, FEC100 = 4) presented delayed cardiac dysfunctions. Two cases of secondary leukemia were observed (acute lymphatic leukemia with FEC 50 and acute myelogenous leukemia with FEC 100).

CONCLUSION

After 5 years of follow-up, the increased epirubicin dose led to a significant benefit in terms of DFS and OS, with a high survival rate among patients with poor-prognosis breast cancer.

Adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This randomized controlled trial was to determine whether a combination chemotherapy regimen that contains anthracycline (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide [AC]) is superior to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF] combination in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive Stage II breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Premenopausal women with lymph node positive breast carcinoma were stratified according to age (younger than 35 or 35 years or older) and the number of positive axillary lymph nodes (1-3, 4-9, or >/= 10) and then randomly assigned to receive either doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks or cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally on Days 1 through 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Both arms were scheduled for six cycles.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 57 months. Eighteen of the 55 AC patients developed recurrence compared with 16 of the 69 CMF patients. The corresponding 5-year recurrence free survival rates were 64% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.12). The site of the first recurrence for AC patients was locoregional in 7%, distant in 22%, and combined in 4%. The corresponding data for the CMF arm were 4%, 16%, and 3%, respectively. Six AC patients died compared with 9 CMF patients. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 90% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.96). More leukopenia (52%, mostly Grade 1-2) occurred in the CMF arm than in the AC arm (33%, P = 0.001), but no febrile episode was accompanied with leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no difference between AC and CMF with respect to both disease free and overall survival rates in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma.

Long-term chemotherapy-related cardiovascular morbidity

As a consequence of the successful use of chemotherapy in the treatment of curable neoplasms such as germ cell tumours and malignant lymphomas, and the increasing application of primary and adjuvant chemotherapy for various tumour types, the number of patients with a prolonged life expectancy after treatment is rising. Attention to long-term side-effects, including cardiovascular toxicity, is therefore of growing importance. In this review we evaluate the literature on long-term cardiovascular toxicity related to chemotherapy in adult patients. Two categories of patient with favourable life expectancy have been reviewed, namely patients cured of metastatic disease by chemotherapy and patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In the first category, the literature on long-term cardiovascular morbidity in survivors of metastatic testicular cancer and lymphomas is discussed, while in the second category this is done for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast and colon cancer. As well as the direct toxic effects of chemotherapy on the cardiovascular system, the indirect toxic effects such as chemotherapy-related metabolic changes that may cause cardiovascular morbidity are also discussed.

Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson experience, with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients and to compare results in elderly patients with those in younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients aged 50 years or older treated in trials of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy between 1974 and 1988. Old age was not an exclusion criterion for these trials. Patient characteristics, hematologic and nonhematologic side effects, patterns of recurrence, and causes of death were determined for patients aged 50-64 years and for patients aged 65 years or older, and results were compared between these two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and tested by the generalized Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

A total of 390 patients aged 50 years or older were treated with doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy during the study period. Of these, 325 were aged 50-64 years (group 1), and 65 were aged 65 years or older (group 2). The median follow-up period for group 1 was 185 months (range 29-272+ months), and the median follow-up period for group 2 was 169 months (range 128-240+ months). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to performance status, hormone receptor profile, tumor size, nodal status, or type of locoregional therapy. There also were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in recurrence patterns, disease-free survival, or overall survival. The granulocyte and platelet nadirs of cycles 1, 3, and 6 were similar between the two groups. No cumulative hematologic side effects were seen in either group. The occurrence of second malignancies was extremely low in both groups. In both groups, the majority of deaths were due to progression of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy is well tolerated in elderly breast cancer patients who have good performance status and normal cardiac ejection fraction. Adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in these patients results in disease-free and overall survival rates similar to those seen in younger patients.