Correlation between uracil and dihydrouracil plasma ratio, fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetic parameters, and tolerance in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A potential interest for predicting 5-FU toxicity and determining optimal 5-FU dosage

Closed-loop automated drug infusion regulator: A clinically translatable, closed-loop drug delivery system for personalized drug dosing

BACKGROUND

Dosing of chemotherapies is often calculated according to the weight and/or height of the patient or equations derived from these, such as body surface area (BSA). Such calculations fail to capture intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variation, which can lead to order of magnitude variations in systemic chemotherapy levels and thus under- or overdosing of patients.

METHODS

We designed and developed a closed-loop drug delivery system that can dynamically adjust its infusion rate to the patient to reach and maintain the drug's target concentration, regardless of a patient's pharmacokinetics (PK).

FINDINGS

We demonstrate that closed-loop automated drug infusion regulator (CLAUDIA) can control the concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in rabbits according to a range of concentration-time profiles (which could be useful in chronomodulated chemotherapy) and over a range of PK conditions that mimic the PK variability observed clinically. In one set of experiments, BSA-based dosing resulted in a concentration 7 times above the target range, while CLAUDIA keeps the concentration of 5-FU in or near the targeted range. Further, we demonstrate that CLAUDIA is cost effective compared to BSA-based dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that CLAUDIA could be rapidly translated to the clinic to enable physicians to control the plasma concentration of chemotherapy in their patients.

FUNDING

This work was supported by MIT's Karl van Tassel (1925) Career Development Professorship and Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Bridge Project, a partnership between the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center.

Therapeutic Potential of Chlorogenic Acid in Chemoresistance and Chemoprotection in Cancer Treatment

Chemotherapeutic drugs are indispensable in cancer treatment, but their effectiveness is often lessened because of non-selective toxicity to healthy tissues, which triggers inflammatory pathways that are harmful to vital organs. In addition, tumors' resistance to drugs causes failures in treatment. Chlorogenic acid (5-caffeoylquinic acid, CGA), found in plants and vegetables, is promising in anticancer mechanisms. In vitro and animal studies have indicated that CGA can overcome resistance to conventional chemotherapeutics and alleviate chemotherapy-induced toxicity by scavenging free radicals effectively. This review is a summary of current information about CGA, including its natural sources, biosynthesis, metabolism, toxicology, role in combatting chemoresistance, and protective effects against chemotherapy-induced toxicity. It also emphasizes the potential of CGA as a pharmacological adjuvant in cancer treatment with drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, regorafenib, and radiotherapy. By analyzing more than 140 papers from PubMed, Google Scholar, and SciFinder, we hope to find the therapeutic potential of CGA in improving cancer therapy.

Integrating rare genetic variants into DPYD pharmacogenetic testing may help preventing fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity

Variability in genes involved in drug pharmacokinetics or drug response can be responsible for suboptimal treatment efficacy or predispose to adverse drug reactions. In addition to common genetic variations, large-scale sequencing studies have uncovered multiple rare genetic variants predicted to cause functional alterations in genes encoding proteins implicated in drug metabolism, transport and response. To understand the functional importance of rare genetic variants in DPYD, a pharmacogene whose alterations can cause severe toxicity in patients exposed to fluoropyrimidine-based regimens, massively parallel sequencing of the exonic regions and flanking splice junctions of the DPYD gene was performed in a series of nearly 3000 patients categorized according to pre-emptive DPD enzyme activity using the dihydrouracil/uracil ([UH2]/[U]) plasma ratio as a surrogate marker of DPD activity. Our results underscore the importance of integrating next-generation sequencing-based pharmacogenomic interpretation into clinical decision making to minimize fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy toxicity without altering treatment efficacy.

Short-term biological variation of plasma uracil in a Caucasian healthy population

OBJECTIVES

Plasma uracil is a new biomarker to assess the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase before cancer treatment with fluoropyrimidine drugs. Knowledge on the biological variation of plasma uracil is important to assess the applicability of plasma uracil as a biomarker of drug tolerance and efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 33 apparently healthy individuals were submitted to sequential blood draws for three days. On the second day, blood draws were performed every third hour for 12 h. Plasma uracil was quantified by LC-MS/MS. The within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) biological variation estimates were calculated using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

The overall median value of plasma uracil was 10.6 ng/mL (range 5.6-23.1 ng/mL). The CVI and CVG were 13.5 and 22.1%, respectively. Plasma uracil remained stable during the day, and there was no day-to-day variation observed. No differences in biological variation components were found between sex and no correlation to age was found. Four samples were calculated to be required to estimate the homeostatic set-point ±15% with 95% confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma uracil is subject to tight homeostatic regulation without semidiurnal and day-to-day variation, however between-subject variation exists. This emphasizes plasma uracil as a well-suited biomarker for evaluation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, but four samples are required to establish the homeostatic set-point in a patient.

The effects of Ankaferd hemostat on preventing oral mucositis in colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

New agents are introduced each day to be used in the prevention and treatment of mucositis in cancer treatment. One of those agents is the Ankaferd hemostat. Ankaferd hemostat has pleiotropic effects and anti-infective characteristics in tissue healing.

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized controlled experimental study. The sample of the study comprised a total of 66 patients (33 patients in the Ankaferd hemostat group and 33 patients in the sodium bicarbonate group) with colorectal cancer who received FOLFOX combination chemotherapy treatment in the first cycle of chemotherapy to prevent mucositis. Participants who met the criteria were randomly assigned to the groups. Before the patient received chemotherapy, ECOG performance score and Oral Mucositis Grading Scale were applied on the 7th day and 15th day. The Ankaferd hemostat group brushed teeth at least twice a day for 2 min and gargled with Ankaferd hemostat twice for 2 min for 2 weeks. The sodium bicarbonate group brushed teeth at least 2 min a day and gargled with sodium bicarbonate 4 times for 2 min for 2 weeks. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram was used to illustrate the randomization of patients.

RESULTS

When the Ankaferd hemostat group is compared with the sodium bicarbonate group, there is a significant difference in favor of the Ankaferd hemostat group in the mucositis grade on the 7th day and 15th day after chemotherapy (p < 0.05). In the binary logistic regression analysis, among the factors affecting the formation of mucositis on the 7th day, only neutrophil and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were included in the model, while only the TSH variable is statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

It was determined that Ankaferd hemostat is effective in preventing oral mucositis due to chemotherapy in adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. In addition, it has been suggested to conduct new studies on the effectiveness of Ankaferd hemostat in the prevention of mucositis in different groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05438771, Date: 25.06.2022).

Screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency by measuring uracilemia in chronic kidney disease patients is associated with a high rate of false positives

BACKGROUND

Pretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency based on the measurement of plasma uracil ([U]) is recommended prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Cancer patients frequently have impaired kidney function, but the extent to which kidney function decline impacts [U] levels has not been comprehensively investigated.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between DPD phenotypes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 1751 patients who benefited on the same day from a screening for DPD deficiency by measuring [U] and [UH₂]:[U], and an evaluation of eGFR. The impact of a kidney function decline on [U] levels and [UH₂]:[U] ratio was evaluated.

RESULTS

We observed that [U] was negatively correlated with eGFR, indicating that [U] levels increase as eGFR declines. For each ml/min of eGFR decrease, [U] value increased in average by 0.035 ng/ml. Using the KDIGO classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD), we observed that [U] values >16 ng/ml (DPD deficiency) were measured in 3.6 % and 4.4 % of stage 1 and 2 CKD (normal-high eGFR, >60 ml/min/1.73m²) patients, but in 6.7 % of stage 3A CKD patients (45 to 59 ml/min/1.73m²), 25% of stage 3B CKD patients (30 to 44 ml/min/1.73m²), 22.7% of stage 4 CKD patients (15 to 29 ml/min/1.73m² and 26.7% of stage 5 CKD patients (<15 ml/min/1.73m²). [UH2]:[U] ratios were not impacted by kidney function.

CONCLUSION

DPD phenotyping based on the measurement of plasma [U] in patients with decreased eGFR is associated with an exceedingly high rate of false positives when kidney function decline reaches 45 ml/minute/1.73m² of eGFR or lower. In this population, an alternative strategy that remain to be evaluated would be to measure the [UH₂]:[U] ratio in addition to [U].

The past, present, and future of chemotherapy with a focus on individualization of drug dosing

While there have been rapid advances in developing new and more targeted drugs to treat cancer, much less progress has been made in individualizing dosing. Even though the introduction of immunotherapies such as CAR T-cells and checkpoint inhibitors, as well as personalized therapies that target specific mutations, have transformed clinical treatment of cancers, chemotherapy remains a mainstay in oncology. Chemotherapies are typically dosed on either a body surface area (BSA) or weight basis, which fails to account for pharmacokinetic differences between patients. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion rates can vary between patients, resulting in considerable differences in exposure to the active drugs. These differences result in suboptimal dosing, which can reduce efficacy and increase side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), genotype guided dosing, and chronomodulation have been developed to address this challenge; however, despite improving clinical outcomes, they are rarely implemented in clinical practice for chemotherapies. Thus, there is a need to develop interventions that allow for individualized drug dosing of chemotherapies, which can help maximize the number of patients that reach the most efficacious level of drug in the blood while mitigating the risks of underdosing or overdosing. In this review, we discuss the history of the development of chemotherapies, their mechanisms of action and how they are dosed. We discuss substantial intraindividual and interindividual variability in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics. We then propose potential engineering solutions that could enable individualized dosing of chemotherapies, such as closed-loop drug delivery systems and bioresponsive biomaterials.

Identification of DPYD variants and estimation of uracil and dihydrouracil in a healthy Indian population

Aim: This study aimed to identify DPYD variants and the related but previously unexplored phenotype (plasma uracil, dihydrouracil [DHU], and the DHU-to-uracil ratio) in a healthy adult Indian population. Methods: Healthy adult volunteers (n = 100) had their uracil and DHU levels measured and were genotyped for selected variants. Results: Among the nine variants studied, c.1906-14763G>A and c.85T>C were the most prevalent. Participants with any of the variants except for c.85T>C and c.1627A>G had a significantly lower DHU-to-uracil ratio and those with c.1905+1G>A variant had significantly increased uracil concentration compared with wild type. Conclusion: Participants with five variants were identified as having altered phenotypic measures, and 40% of the intermediate metabolizers had their phenotype in the terminal population percentiles.

Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Pretreatment DPYD Testing for Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Patients who carry pathogenic variants in DPYD have higher systemic fluoropyrimidine (FP) concentrations and greater risk of severe and fatal FP toxicity. Pretreatment DPYD testing and DPYD-guided FP dosing to reduce toxicity and health care costs is recommended by European clinical oncology guidelines and has been adopted across Europe, but has not been recommended or adopted in the United States. The cochairs of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for colon cancer treatment explained their concerns with recommending pretreatment DPYD testing, particularly the risk that reduced FP doses in DPYD carriers may reduce treatment efficacy.

METHODS

This special article uses previously published frameworks for assessing the clinical utility of cancer biomarker tests, including for germline indicators of toxicity risk, to assess the clinical utility of pretreatment DPYD testing, with a particular focus on the risk of reducing treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

There is no direct evidence of efficacy reduction, and the available indirect evidence demonstrates that DPYD-guided FP dosing results in similar systemic FP exposure and toxicity compared with standard dosing in noncarriers, and is well calibrated to the maximum tolerated dose, strongly suggesting there is minimal risk of efficacy reduction.

CONCLUSION

This article should serve as a call to action for clinicians and clinical guidelines committees in the United States to re-evaluate the clinical utility of pretreatment DPYD testing. If clinical utility has not been demonstrated, further dialogue is needed to clarify what additional evidence is needed and which of the available study designs, also described within this article, would be appropriate. Clinical guideline recommendations for pretreatment DPYD testing would increase clinical adoption and ensure that all patients receive maximally safe and effective FP treatment.

Impact of Guidelines Regarding Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Deficiency Screening Using Uracil-Based Phenotyping on the Reduction of Severe Side Effect of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: A Propension Score Analysis

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is associated with severe fluoropyrimidines-induced toxicity. As of September 2018, French recommendations call for screening for DPD deficiency by plasma uracil quantification prior to all fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. A dose reduction of fluoropyrimidine is recommended when uracil concentration is equal to or greater than 16 ng/mL. This matched retrospective study assessed the impact of DPD screening on the reduction of severe side effects and on the management of DPD-deficient patients. Using a propensity score, we balanced the factors influencing 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity. Then, the severity scores (G3 and G4 severity as well as their frequency) of patients who did not benefit from DPD screening were compared with those of patients who benefited from DPD screening for each treatment cycle (from 1 to 4). Among 349 screened patients, 198 treated patients were included. Among them, 31 (15.7%) had DPD deficiency (median uracilemia 19.8 ng/mL (range: 16.1−172.3)). The median toxicity severity score was higher in the unscreened group for each treatment cycle (0 vs. 1, p < 0.001 at each cycle from 1 to 4) as well as the cumulative score during all courses of treatment (p = 0.028). DPD-deficient patients received a significantly lower dose of 5-FU (p < 0.001). This study suggests that pretherapeutic plasmatic uracil assessment, along with 5-FU dosage adjustment, may be beneficial in reducing 5-FU toxicity in real-life patients.

Rare genetic variant burden in DPYD predicts severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity risk

Preemptive targeted pharmacogenetic testing of candidate variations in DPYD is currently being used to limit toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidines. The use of innovative next generation sequencing (NGS) approaches could unveil additional rare (minor allele frequency <1%) genetic risk variants. However, their predictive value and management in clinical practice are still controversial, at least partly due to the challenges associated with functional analyses of rare variants. The aim of this study was to define the predictive power of rare DPYD variants burden on the risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity.

The DPYD coding sequence and untranslated regions were analyzed by NGS in 120 patients developing grade 3–5 (NCI-CTC vs3.0) fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity and 104 matched controls (no-toxicity). The functional impact of rare variants was assessed using two different in silico predictive tools (i.e., Predict2SNP and ADME Prediction Framework) and structural modeling. Plasma concentrations of uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) were quantified in carriers of the novel variants.

Here, we demonstrate that the burden of rare variants was significantly higher in patients with toxicity compared to controls (p = 0.007, Mann-Whitney test). Carriers of at least one rare missense DPYD variant had a 16-fold increased risk in the first cycle and an 11-fold increased risk during the entire course of chemotherapy of developing a severe adverse event compared to controls (p = 0.013 and p = 0.0250, respectively by multinomial regression model). Quantification of plasmatic U/UH2 metabolites and in silico visualization of the encoded protein were consistent with the predicted functional effect for the novel variations.

Analysis and consideration of rare variants by DPYD-sequencing could improve prevention of severe toxicity of fluoropyrimidines and improve patients’ quality of life.

•

DPYD genotype-guided dosing reduces fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity risk.

•

Rare DPYD variants associate with severe FP toxicities.

•

Carriers of rare DPYD variants have 11-fold increased risk of toxicity.

•

DPYD sequencing and in silico functional prediction could prevent FP toxicity events.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Implementation of Upfront DPYD Genotyping

Fluoropyrimidines (FP; 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, and tegafur) are a commonly prescribed class of antimetabolite chemotherapies, used for various solid organ malignancies in over 2 million patients globally per annum. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene, is the critical enzyme implicated in FP metabolism. DPYD variant genotypes can result in decreased DPD production, leading to the development of severe toxicities resulting in hospitalization, intensive care admission, and even death. Management of toxicity incurs financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems alike. Upfront DPYD genotyping to identify variant carriers allows an opportunity to identify patients who are at high risk to suffer from serious toxicities and allow prospective dose adjustment of FP treatment. This approach has been shown to reduce patient morbidity, as well as improve the cost-effectiveness of managing FP treatment. Upfront DPYD genotyping has been recently endorsed by several countries in Europe and the United Kingdom. This review summarizes current knowledge about DPD deficiency and upfront DPYD genotyping, including clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes, with the intent of supporting implementation of an upfront DPYD genotyping service with individualized dose-personalization.

A semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model incorporating autoinduction for the dose justification of TAS-114

TAS-114 is a dual deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor expected to widen the therapeutic index of capecitabine. Its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined from a safety perspective in a combination study with capecitabine; however, its inhibitory effects on DPD activity were not assessed in the study. The dose justification to select its MTD as the recommended dose in terms of DPD inhibition has been required, but the autoinduction profile of TAS-114 made it difficult. To this end, an approach using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model incorporating autoinduction was planned; however, the utility of this approach in the dose justification has not been reported. Thus, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification via a case study of TAS-114. Plasma concentrations of TAS-114 from 185 subjects and those of the endogenous DPD substrate uracil from 24 subjects were used. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time and an enzyme turnover model were selected for the pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Moreover, an indirect response model was selected for the PD model to capture the changes in plasma uracil concentrations. Model-based simulations provided the dose justification that DPD inhibition by TAS-114 reached a plateau level at the MTD, whereas exposures of TAS-114 increased dose dependently. Thus, the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification was demonstrated via this case study of TAS-114.

(Neo)Adjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Special Focus on Sex Differences

Simple Summary

Multimodal therapy is standard in locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Although substantial differences in incidence and outcome between women and men have been observed, no clear sex-specific treatment guide has been developed. In this summary, we described known sex differences focusing on locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is a common disease. This disease is significantly more prevalent in men, although the main underlying risk factor has an equal sex distribution. In locally advanced disease, multimodal therapy has been developed as the standard in the western world. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy using the FLOT regimen was established as the standard. Most recently, adjuvant immunotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery has been introduced into the multimodal therapy. Substantial sex-specific differences in outcome in multimodal therapy have been described in retrospective subgroup analysis. Further studies are warranted to dissect the sex-specific differences in these treatment regimens.

Current status and future outlooks on therapeutic drug monitoring of fluorouracil

INTRODUCTION

: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the anticancer drug fluorouracil (5FU) as a method to support dose adjustments has been researched and discussed extensively. Despite manifold evidence of the advantages of 5FU-TDM, traditional body surface area (BSA)-guided dosing is still widely applied.

AREAS COVERED

: This review covers the latest evidence on 5FU-TDM based on a literature search in PubMed between June and September 2021. It particularly highlights new approaches of implementing 5FU-TDM into precision medicine by combining TDM with pharmacogenetic testing and/or pharmacometric models. This review further discusses remaining obstacles in order to incorporate 5FU-TDM into clinical routine.

EXPERT OPINION

: New data on 5FU-TDM further strengthen the advantages compared to BSA-guided dosing as it is able to reduce pharmacokinetic variability and thereby improve treatment efficacy and safety. Interprofessional collaboration has the potential to overcome the remaining barriers for its implementation. Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing followed by 5FU-TDM can further improve 5FU exposure in a substantial proportion of patients. Developing a model framework integrating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 5FU will be crucial to fully advance into the precision medicine era. Model applications can potentially support clinicians in dose finding before starting chemotherapy. Additionally, TDM provides further assistance in continuously improving model predictions.

Endogenous metabolic markers for predicting the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

Five‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent that is mainly metabolized by the rate‐limiting enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The DPD enzyme activity deficiency involves a wide range of severities. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of a DPYD single nucleotide polymorphism on 5‐FU efficacy and highlighted the importance of studying such genes for cancer treatment. Common polymorphisms of DPYD in European ancestry populations are less frequently present in Koreans. DPD is also responsible for the conversion of endogenous uracil (U) into dihydrouracil (DHU). We quantified U and DHU in plasma samples of healthy male Korean subjects, and samples were classified into two groups based on DHU/U ratio. The calculated DHU/U ratios ranged from 0.52 to 7.12, and the two groups were classified into the 10th percentile and 90th percentile for untargeted metabolomics analysis using liquid chromatography‐quantitative time‐of‐flight‐mass spectrometry. A total of 4440 compounds were detected and filtered out based on a coefficient of variation below 30%. Our results revealed that six metabolites differed significantly between the high activity group and low activity group (false discovery rate q‐value < 0.05). Uridine was significantly higher in the low DPD activity group and is a precursor of U involved in pyrimidine metabolism; therefore, we speculated that DPD deficiency can influence uridine levels in plasma. Furthermore, the cutoff values for detecting DPD deficient patients from previous studies were unsuitable for Koreans. Our metabolomics approach is the first study that reported the DHU/U ratio distribution in healthy Korean subjects and identified a new biomarker of DPD deficiency.

A narrative review of genetic factors affecting fluoropyrimidine toxicity

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to document progress in developing personalized therapy with fluoropyrimidine drugs (FPs) to improve outcomes for cancer patients and to identify areas requiring further investigation.

BACKGROUND

FPs including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), are among the most widely used drugs for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. While FPs confer a survival benefit for CRC patients, serious systemic toxicities, including neutropenia, occur in ~30% of patients with lethality in 0.5-1% of patients. While serious systemic toxicities may occur in any patient, patients with polymorphisms in DPYD, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme for pyrimidine degradation are at very high risk. Other genetic factors affecting risk for 5-FU toxicity, including miR-27a, are under investigation.

METHODS

Literature used to inform the text of this article was selected from PubMed.gov from the National Library of Medicine while regulatory documents were identified via Google search.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical studies to date have validated four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, HapB3) associated with serious toxicities in patients treated with 5-FU. Genetic screening for these is being implemented in the Netherlands and the UK and has been shown to be a cost-effective way to improve outcomes. Factors other than DPYD polymorphisms (e.g., miR-27a, TYMS, ENOSF1, p53) also affect 5-FU toxicity. Functional testing for deficient pyrimidine catabolism {defined as [U] >16 ng/mL or [UH2]:[U] <10} is being implemented in France and has demonstrated utility in identifying patients with elevated risk for 5-FU toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from plasma levels of 5-FU during first cycle treatment also is being used to improve outcomes and pharmacokinetic-based dosing is being used to increase the percent of patients within optimal area under the curve (AUC) (18-28 mg*h/L) values. Patients maintained in the optimal AUC range experienced significantly reduced systemic toxicities. As understanding the genetic basis for increased risk of 5-FU toxicity becomes more refined, the development of functional-based methods to optimize treatment is likely to become more widespread.

Issues and limitations of available biomarkers for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy toxicity, a narrative review of the literature

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies are widely used to treat gastrointestinal tract, head and neck, and breast carcinomas. Severe toxicities mostly impact rapidly dividing cell lines and can occur due to the partial or complete deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catabolism. Since April 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends DPD testing before any fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. Currently, different assays are used to predict DPD deficiency; the two main approaches consist of either phenotyping the enzyme activity (directly or indirectly) or genotyping the four main deficiency-related polymorphisms associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity. In this review, we focused on the advantages and limitations of these diagnostic methods: direct phenotyping by evaluation of peripheral mononuclear cell DPD activity (PBMC-DPD activity), indirect phenotyping assessed by uracil levels or UH2/U ratio, and genotyping DPD of four variants directly associated with 5-FU toxicity. The risk of 5-FU toxicity increases with uracil concentration. Having a pyrimidine-related structure, 5-FU is catabolised by the same physiological pathway. By assessing uracil concentration in plasma, indirect phenotyping of DPD is then measured. With this approach, in France, a decreased 5-FU dose is systematically recommended at a uracil concentration of 16 ng/ml, which may lead to chemotherapy under-exposure as uracil concentration is a continuous variable and the association between uracil levels and DPD activity is not clear. We aim herein to describe the different available strategies developed to improve fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy safety, how they are implemented in routine clinical practice, and the possible relationship with inefficacy mechanisms.

Individualized Dosing of Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy to Prevent Severe Fluoropyrimidine-Related Toxicity: What Are the Options?

Fluoropyrimidines are widely used in the treatment of several types of solid tumors. Although most often well tolerated, severe toxicity is encountered in ~ 20-30% of the patients. Individualized dosing for these patients can reduce the incidence of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. However, no consensus has been achieved on which dosing strategy is preferred. The most established strategy for individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidines is upfront genotyping of the DPYD gene. Prospective research has shown that DPYD-guided dose-individualization significantly reduces the incidence of severe toxicity and can be easily applied in routine daily practice. Furthermore, the measurement of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity has shown to accurately detect patients with a DPD deficiency. Yet, because this assay is time-consuming and expensive, it is not widely implemented in routine clinical care. Other methods include the measurement of pretreatment endogenous serum uracil concentrations, the uracil/dihydrouracil-ratio, and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) degradation rate. These methods have shown mixed results. Next to these methods to detect DPD deficiency, pharmacokinetically guided follow-up of 5-FU could potentially be used as an addition to dosing strategies to further improve the safety of fluoropyrimidines. Furthermore, baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, body composition, and renal function have shown to have a relationship with the development of severe toxicity. Therefore, these baseline characteristics should be considered as a dose-individualization strategy. We present an overview of the current dose-individualization strategies and provide perspectives for a future multiparametric approach.

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of capecitabine and its metabolites in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The present study was performed to examine relationships between systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites (5-FU, 5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) and toxicity or clinical response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model for capecitabine and its three metabolites was built. Typical parameter values, characteristics of random distributions, associated with parameters, and covariates impact were estimated. Area under the curve (AUC) were computed for 5-FU and compared with grades of toxicity. Pharmacokinetic modeling was based on data collected on the first treatment cycle. Toxicity was assessed on the two first treatment cycles.

RESULTS

The study was conducted in 43 patients. The population pharmacokinetic model (a one-compartment model per compound) was able to capture the very complex absorption process of capecitabine. Statistically significant covariates were cytidine deaminase, alkaline phosphatase and dihydrouracilemia (UH2)/uracilemia (U) ratio. UH2/U ratio was the most significant covariate on 5-FU elimination and CDA on the transformation of 5'-DFCR in 5'-DFUR. A trend was observed between 5-FU AUC and thrombopenia toxicity grades, but not with other toxicities. Best clinical response was not linked to systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we propose a model able to describe, meanwhile, and its main metabolites, with a complex absorption process and inclusion of enzyme activity covariates such as CDA and UH2/U ratio. Trial registration Eudract 2008-004136-20, 2008/11/26.

Overcoming barriers to implementing precision dosing with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine

Despite advances in targeted cancer therapy, the fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine continue to play an important role in oncology. Historically, dosing of these drugs has been based on body surface area. This approach has been demonstrated to be an imprecise way to determine the optimal dose for a patient. Evidence in the literature has demonstrated that precision dosing approaches, such as DPD enzyme activity testing and, in the case of intravenous 5FU, pharmacokinetic-guided dosing, can reduce toxicity and yield better patient outcomes. However, despite the evidence, there has not been uniform adoption of these approaches in the clinical setting. When a drug such as 5FU has been used clinically for many decades, it may be difficult to change clinical practice. With the aim of facilitating change of practice, issues and barriers to implementing precision dosing approaches for 5FU and capecitabine are identified and discussed with possible solutions proposed.

Prospective evaluation and refinement of an S-1 dosage formula based on renal function for clinical application

In patients with impaired renal function, S-1-related toxicities increase due to higher exposure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Our previous pharmacokinetic study in 16 cancer patients with various renal functions developed an S-1 dosage formula based on individual creatinine clearance (CLcr) and body surface area (BSA). To evaluate and refine the formula, this prospective study was conducted. Thirty-three patients with various renal functions received S-1 for 4 weeks at doses determined by the nomogram derived from the previously developed formula. A series of blood samples were collected after the first dose to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5-FU. Thirty patients with BSA of 1.14-1.84 m² and CLcr of 23.8-96.4 mL/min were assessable for pharmacokinetics. The observed daily AUC ranged from 712.6 to 2868.7 ng·h/mL, and 18 patients achieved the target AUC (1447.8 ± 545.4 ng·h/mL). Three patients experienced S-1-related grade 3 adverse events during the first course. In the population pharmacokinetic analysis from the combined data of 46 patients in this study and the previous study, sex was identified as a statistically significant covariate for 5-FU clearance. Hence, the refined formula includes sex as an additional factor: Recommended daily dose = target AUC × (14.5 + 8.23 × SEX [0 for female and 1 for male] + 0.301 × CLcr) × BSA. Revised nomograms for recommended daily doses derived from the refined formula can be used in clinical practice to achieve the target AUC ensuring efficacy and safety of S-1.

Comparison of 4 Screening Methods for Detecting Fluoropyrimidine Toxicity Risk: Identification of the Most Effective, Cost-Efficient Method to Save Lives

Background

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) carry around 20% risk of G3-5 toxicity and 0.2-1% risk of death, due to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. Several screening approaches exist for predicting toxicity, however there is ongoing debate over which method is best. This study compares 4 screening approaches.

Method

472 patients treated for colorectal, head-and-neck, breast, or pancreatic cancers, who had not been tested pre-treatment for FP toxicity risk, were screened using: DPYD genotyping (G); phenotyping via plasma Uracil (U); phenotyping via plasma-dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (UH₂/U); and a Multi-Parametric Method (MPM) using genotype, phenotype, and epigenetic data. Performance was compared, particularly the inability to detect at-risk patients (false negatives).

Results

False negative rates for detecting G5 toxicity risk were 51.2%, 19.5%, 9.8% and 2.4%, for G, U, UH₂/U and MPM, respectively. False negative rates for detecting G4-5 toxicity risk were 59.8%, 36.1%, 21.3% and 4.7%, respectively. MPM demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) better prediction performance.

Conclusion

MPM is the most effective method for limiting G4-5 toxicity. Its systematic implementation is cost-effective and significantly improves the risk-benefit ratio of FP-treatment. The use of MPM, rather than G or U testing, would avoid nearly 8,000 FP-related deaths per year globally (500 in France), and spare hundreds of thousands from G4 toxicity.

A Genotyping/Phenotyping Approach with Careful Clinical Monitoring to Manage the Fluoropyrimidines-Based Therapy: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature

Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are mainly metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene. FP pharmacogenetics, including four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD-PGx), is recommended to tailor the FP-based chemotherapy. These polymorphisms increase the risk of severe toxicity; thus, the DPYD-PGx should be performed prior to starting FP. Other factors influence FP safety, therefore phenotyping methods, such as the measurement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) clearance and DPD activity, could complement the DPYD-PGx. We describe a case series of patients in whom we performed DPYD-PGx (by real-time PCR), 5-FU clearance and a dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (as the phenotyping analysis) and a continuous clinical monitoring. Patients who had already experienced severe toxicity were then identified as carriers of DPYD variants. The plasmatic dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) ranged between 1.77 and 7.38. 5-FU clearance (by ultra-HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry) was measured in 3/11 patients. In one of them, it reduced after the 5-FU dosage was halved; in the other case, it remained high despite a drastic dosage reduction. Moreover, we performed a systematic review on genotyping/phenotyping combinations used as predictive factors of FP safety. Measuring the plasmatic 5-FU clearance and/or dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) ratio could improve the predictive potential of DPYD-PGx. The upfront DPYD-PGx combined with clinical monitoring and feasible phenotyping method is essential to optimising FP-based chemotherapy.

5-Fluorouracil Response Prediction and Blood Level-Guided Therapy in Oncology: Existing Evidence Fundamentally Supports Instigation

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) response prediction and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are required to minimize toxicity while preserving efficacy. Conventional 5-FU dose normalization uses body surface area. It is characterized by up to 100-fold interindividual variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and typically >50% of patients have plasma 5-FU concentrations outside the optimal range. This underscores the need for a different dose rationalization paradigm, hence there is a case for 5-FU TDM. An association between 5-FU PK parameters and efficacy/toxicity has been established. It is believed that 5-FU response is enhanced and toxicity is reduced by PK management of its dosing. The area under the concentration-time curve is the most relevant PK parameter associated with 5-FU efficacy/toxicity, and optimal therapeutic windows have been proposed. Currently, there is no universally applied a priori test for predicting 5-FU response and identifying individuals with an elevated risk of toxicity. The following two-step strategy: prediction of response/toxicity and TDM for subsequent doses seems plausible. Approximately 80% of 5-FU is degraded in a three-step sequential metabolic pathway. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme. Its deficiency can cause toxicity with standard 5-FU doses. DPD also metabolizes uracil (U) into 5,6-dihydrouracil (UH2). The UH2/U ratio is an index of DPD activity and a credible biomarker of response and toxicity. This article outlines the UH2/U ratio as a parameter for 5-FU response/toxicity prediction and highlights key studies emphasizing the value of 5-FU TDM. Broad application of 5-FU response/toxicity prediction and blood level-guided therapy remains unmet, despite ever-increasing clinical interest. Considered collectively, existing evidence is compelling and fundamentally supports universal instigation of response/toxicity prediction and TDM.

A comprehensive population-based study comparing the phenotype and genotype in a pretherapeutic screen of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency

Background

Pretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is recommended or required prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, the best strategy to identify DPD-deficient patients remains elusive.

Methods

Among a nationwide cohort of 5886 phenotyped patients with cancer who were screened for DPD deficiency over a 3 years period, we assessed the characteristics of both DPD phenotypes and DPYD genotypes in a subgroup of 3680 patients who had completed the two tests. The extent to which defective allelic variants of DPYD predict DPD activity as estimated by the plasma concentrations of uracil [U] and its product dihydrouracil [UH₂] was evaluated.

Results

When [U] was used to monitor DPD activity, 6.8% of the patients were classified as having DPD deficiency ([U] > 16 ng/ml), while the [UH₂]:[U] ratio identified 11.5% of the patients as having DPD deficiency (UH₂]:[U] < 10). [U] classified two patients (0.05%) with complete DPD deficiency (> 150 ng/ml), and [UH₂]:[U] < 1 identified three patients (0.08%) with a complete DPD deficiency. A defective DPYD variant was present in 4.5% of the patients, and two patients (0.05%) carrying 2 defective variants of DPYD were predicted to have low metabolism. The mutation status of DPYD displayed a very low positive predictive value in identifying individuals with DPD deficiency, although a higher predictive value was observed when [UH₂]:[U] was used to measure DPD activity. Whole exon sequencing of the DPYD gene in 111 patients with DPD deficiency and a “wild-type” genotype (based on the four most common variants) identified seven heterozygous carriers of a defective allelic variant.

Conclusions

Frequent genetic DPYD variants have low performances in predicting partial DPD deficiency when evaluated by [U] alone, and [UH₂]:[U] might better reflect the impact of genetic variants on DPD activity. A clinical trial comparing toxicity rates after dose adjustment according to the results of genotyping or phenotyping testing to detect DPD deficiency will provide critical information on the best strategy to identify DPD deficiency.

New DPYD variants causing DPD deficiency in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine

PURPOSE

Several clinical guidelines recommend genetic screening of DPYD, including coverage of the variants c.1905 + 1G>A(DPYD*2A), c.1679T>G(DPYD*13), c.2846A>T, and c.1129-5923C>G, before initiating treatment with fluoropyrimidines. However, this screening is often inadequate at predicting the occurrence of severe fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in patients.

METHODS

Using a complementary approach combining whole DPYD exome sequencing and in silico and structural analysis, as well as phenotyping of DPD by measuring uracilemia (U), dihydrouracilemia (UH₂), and the UH₂/U ratio in plasma, we were able to characterize and interpret DPYD variants in 28 patients with severe fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity after negative screening.

RESULTS

Twenty-five out of 28 patients (90%) had at least 1 variant in the DPYD coding sequence, and 42% of the variants (6/14) were classified as potentially deleterious by at least 2 of the following algorithms: SIFT, Poly-Phen-2, and DPYD varifier. We identified two very rare deleterious mutations, namely, c.2087G>A (p.R696H) and c.2324T>G (p.L775W). We were able to demonstrate partial DPD deficiency, as measured by the UH₂/U ratio in a patient carrying the variant p.L775W for the first time.

CONCLUSION

Whole exon sequencing of DPYD in patients with suspicion of partial DPD deficiency can help to identify rare or new variants that lead to enzyme inactivation. Combining different techniques can yield abundant information without increasing workload and cost burden, thus making it a useful approach for implementation in patient care.

Automatic quantification of uracil and dihydrouracil in plasma

Fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapies are the backbone in the treatment of many cancers. However, the use of 5-fluorouracil and its oral pre-prodrug, capecitabine, is associated with an important risk of toxicity. This toxicity is mainly due to a deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This deficiency may be detected by using a phenotypic approach that consists in the measurement of uracilemia or the calculation of dihydrouracil (UH₂)/uracil (U) ratio. For uracilemia, a threshold value of 16 ng/ml has been proposed for partial deficiency, while a value of 150 ng/ml has been proposed for complete deficiency. We have developed a rapid, accurate and fully-automated procedure for the quantification of U and UH₂ in plasma. Sample extraction was carried out by a programmable liquid handler directly coupled to a liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system. The method was validated according to the EMA guidelines and ISO 15189 requirements and was applied to real patient samples (n = 64). The limit of quantification was 5 and 10 ng/ml for U and UH₂ respectively. Imprecision and inaccuracy were less than 15% for inter and intra-assay tests. Comparison with dedicated routine method showed excellent correlation. An automated procedure perfectly fulfills the need of low inaccuracy and CVs at the threshold values (less than 5% at 16 ng/ml) and is highly suitable for the characterization of DPD deficiency. Automatization should guaranty reliable and robust performances by minimizing the sources of variation such as volume inaccuracies, filtration or manual extraction related errors.

Pharmacokinetics-based Dose Management of 5-Fluorouracil Clinical Research in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Objective:

The study aimed to explore the efficacy of pharmacokinetic-based 5-fluorouracil dose management by plasma concentration test in advanced colorectal cancer treatment.

Methods:

153 samples of advanced colorectal cancer patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a control group and an experimental group. All patients received double-week chemotherapy with 5- fluorouracil (four weeks were used as one period), and chemotherapy duration ranged from 2 to 6 periods. In the first period, all patients were administered with the classic strategy of body surface area (BSA).

Results:

In the subsequent periods, the control group (77 samples) continued with BSA guided chemotherapy, while the experimental group (76 samples) received pharmacokinetic AUC-based chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxic side effects were assessed during chemotherapy, and survival was recorded in a follow-up. In the AUC experimental group, the rate of diarrhea significantly decreased (37.50% vs. 70.00%, P=0.010), and incidence of oral mucositis reduced (54.17% vs. 82.50%, P=0.014). Compared with the control group, the clinical benefit rate of experimental group was much higher (90.79% vs. 79.22%, P=0.046).

Conclusion:

There was no significant difference in other 5-fluorouracil related toxic side effect events (nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome) and progression-free survival between the two groups. Pharmacokinetic- based dose management of 5-Fluorouracil reduces the toxicity of chemotherapy and improves long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU): new preanalytic aspects

Background 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. The pharmacological effect of 5-FU is influenced by genetic polymorphisms as well as differently dosed regimens. Currently, 5-FU is generally administered as a continuous infusion via an implanted port system using a body surface area (BSA)-based dose calculation. In order to optimize treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) can be estimated to allow for individual dose adjustment. A 5-FU AUC range between 20 and 30 [mg×h×L] is recommended. The aim of the current study was to assess if blood for AUC analysis could also be drawn at the side where the port system had been placed. Methods We collected EDTA blood samples of patients receiving infusional 5-FU simultaneously from different sampling points (right/left cubital vein). 5-FU concentrations were measured in a steady-state equilibrium based on nanoparticle immunoassay (My5-FU; Saladax). Results A total of 39 patients took part in this study. About half of the patients did not reach the target 5-FU concentration window (37% were under- and 16% of the patients were overdosed). Calculated median AUC was 23.3 for the right arm (range 5.8-59.4) and a median of 23.4 for the left arm (range 5.3-61.0). AUC values showed no difference between right compared to left arms (p=0.99). Conclusions In all, these results confirm that a high percentage of patients are not treated with 5-FU doses reaching suggested AUC levels of 20-30. The location of venepuncture, however, had no impact on the results of plasma 5-FU concentration.

DPYD and Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Mini Review and Case Report

5-Fluorouracil remains a foundational component of chemotherapy for solid tumour malignancies. While considered a generally safe and effective chemotherapeutic, 5-fluorouracil has demonstrated severe adverse event rates of up to 30%. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil can improve the precision medicine approaches to this therapy. A single enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mediates 80% of 5-fluorouracil elimination, through hepatic metabolism. Importantly, it has been known for over 30-years that adverse events during 5-fluorouracil therapy are linked to high systemic exposure, and to those patients who exhibit DPD deficiency. To date, pre-treatment screening for DPD deficiency in patients with planned 5-fluorouracil-based therapy is not a standard of care. Here we provide a focused review of 5-fluorouracil metabolism, and the efforts to improve predictive dosing through screening for DPD deficiency. We also outline the history of key discoveries relating to DPD deficiency and include relevant information on the potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-fluorouracil. Finally, we present a brief case report that highlights a limitation of pharmacogenetics, where we carried out therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-fluorouracil in an orthotopic liver transplant recipient. This case supports the development of robust multimodality precision medicine services, capable of accommodating complex clinical dilemmas.

Therapeutic drug monitoring as a tool to optimize 5-FU-based chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer patients older than 75 years

AIMS

Most clinical trials exclude elderly people, leading to a limited understanding of the benefit-to-risk ratio in this population. Despite existing data regarding the oncological management of elderly receiving fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen, our objective was to investigate 5-FU exposure/toxicity relationship in patients ≥75 years and compare the effectiveness of 5-FU therapeutic drug monitoring between elderly and younger patients.

METHODS

Hundred fifty-four patients (31 of whom are older than 75 years) with gastrointestinal cancers, who were to receive 5-FU-based regimens, were included in our study. At cycle 1 (C1), the 5-FU dose was calculated using patient's body surface area, then a blood sample was drawn to measure 5-FU concentration and 5-FU dose was adjusted at the subsequent cycles based on C1 concentration. Assessments of toxicity were performed at the beginning of every cycle.

RESULTS

Seventy-one percent of elderly patients required dose adjustments after C1, compared with 50% for younger patients. Percentages of patients within 5-FU area under the curve range at cycle 2 were 64% and 68%, respectively, for elderly and younger patients. The proportion of elderly patients experiencing severe toxicities fell from 15% at C1 to only 5% at cycle 3.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic-guided 5-FU-dosing algorithm, leading to an improved tolerability while remaining within therapeutic concentration range, is even more valuable for patients older than 75 years than in younger patients.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Recommendations for 5-Fluorouracil Therapy

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is dosed by body surface area, a practice unable to reduce the interindividual variability in exposure. Endorsed by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT), we evaluated clinical evidence and strongly recommend TDM for the management of 5-FU therapy in patients with colorectal or head-and-neck cancer receiving common 5-FU regimens. Our systematic methodology provides a framework to evaluate published evidence in support of TDM recommendations in oncology.

Food-effect study on uracil and dihydrouracil plasma levels as marker for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human volunteers

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the effect of food intake on uracil and dihydrouracil plasma levels. These levels are a promising marker for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and for individualizing fluoropyrimidine anticancer therapy.

METHODS

A randomized, cross-over study in 16 healthy volunteers was performed, in which subjects were examined in fasted and fed state on two separate days. In fed condition, a high-fat, high-caloric breakfast was consumed between 8:00 h and 8:30 h. Whole blood for determination of uracil, dihydrouracil and uridine plasma levels was drawn on both test days at predefined time points between 8:00 h and 13:00 h.

RESULTS

Uracil levels were statistically significantly different between fasting and fed state. At 13:00 h, the mean uracil level in fasting state was 12.6 ± 3.7 ng ml-1 and after a test meal 9.4 ± 2.6 ng ml-1 (P < 0.001). Dihydrouracil levels were influenced by food intake as well (mean dihydrouracil level at 13:00 h in fasting state 147.0 ± 36.4 ng ml-1 and in fed state 85.7 ± 22.1 ng ml-1 , P < 0.001). Uridine plasma levels showed curves with similar patterns as for uracil.

CONCLUSIONS

It was shown that both uracil and dihydrouracil levels were higher in fasting state than in fed state. This is hypothesized to be an direct effect of uridine plasma levels, which were previously shown to be elevated in fasting state and reduced after intake of food. These findings show that, when assessing plasma uracil and dihydrouracil levels for adaptive fluoropyrimidine dosing in clinical practice, sampling should be done between 8:00 h and 9:00 h after overnight fasting to avoid bias caused by circadian rhythm and food effects.

How can we best monitor 5-FU administration to maximize benefit to risk ratio?

INTRODUCTION

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently used as a chemotherapy in several cancers such as head-and-neck (H&N) and colorectal cancers. 5-FU dosing is traditionally based on body surface area (BSA), but this strategy is usually associated with severe toxicities. 5-FU is mainly catabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and 5-FU dosage adaptation according to DPD status at the first cycle of treatment is now recommended. To further optimize 5-FU-based chemotherapy, a body of evidences justifies therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Areas covered: 5-FU pharmacokinetics, relationships between pharmacokinetics and efficacy or toxicity of 5-FU, proofs of interest of 5-FU TDM and its practical considerations are discussed. Expert opinion: BSA-adjusted 5-FU administration is associated with a large inter-individual variability, and according to this strategy, many patients experience under- or overexposure. Moreover, relationships between 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) and its toxicity or efficacy have been demonstrated, at least in patients with colorectal or H&N cancers. 5-FU therapeutic index has been validated and algorithms of 5-FU dosage adaptation according to its AUC are now available. Advances in pre-analytical and analytical steps of 5-FU TDM make its use feasible in clinical practice. Thus, there are consistent evidences to recommend 5-FU TDM in patients with advanced colorectal or H&N cancers.

Circadian variations in the pharmacokinetics of the oral anticancer agent tegafur-uracil (UFT) and its metabolites in rats

Uracil-tegafur (UFT) is an oral anticancer drug containing uracil and 5‑fluorouracil prodrug tegafur and is widely used for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Although clinical data show circadian variations in plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentrations during its long-term infusion, and feasibility studies of chronomodulated administration have been previously reported, the circadian pattern in plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration after UFT administrations remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify factors causing circadian variations in UFT pharmacokinetics and estimate circadian patterns of plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration corresponding to UFT dosing time in rats. Rats were orally administered UFT (15 mg/kg as tegafur) at three different times of the day: 07:00 (23 h after light onset, HALO), 13:00 (5 HALO), or 19:00 (11 HALO), and then plasma concentrations of tegafur, 5‑fluorouracil, and uracil were measured after UFT administration. We found that the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC_0-∞) of 5‑fluorouracil depended on the UFT dosing time of day with a 2.4-fold difference between the peak (at 19:00: 13.7 ± 1.4 μmol·h/L) and trough (at 13:00: 5.6 ± 1.3 μmol·h/L). The simulated population mean clearance of 5‑fluorouracil followed a 24-h cosine circadian curve, with the highest value in the early light phase being 2.2-fold higher than the lowest value in the early dark phase, which was an inverse circadian pattern compared to the plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration. The plasma tegafur levels suggested that circadian variation in tegafur absorption and conversion to 5‑fluorouracil are factors causing variations in plasma 5‑fluorouracil levels following UFT administration. In conclusion, the circadian pattern of 5‑fluorouracil clearance and circadian variations in tegafur pharmacokinetics are important determinants of plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentrations following UFT administration. This knowledge could help in developing a chronomodulated administration strategy of UFT for improving clinical outcomes.

[5-fluorouracil therapeutic drug monitoring: Update and recommendations of the STP-PT group of the SFPT and the GPCO-Unicancer]

Despite being 60-years old now, 5-FU remains the backbone of numerous regimen to treat a variety of solid tumors such as breast, head-and-neck and digestive cancers either in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings. Standard 5-FU usually claims 15-40% of severe toxicities and up to 1% of toxic-death. Numerous studies show a stiff relationship between 5-FU exposure and toxicity or efficacy. In addition, 5-FU pharmacokinetics is highly variable between patients. Indeed, 80% of the 5-FU dose is catabolized in the liver by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) into inactive compounds. It is now well established that DPD deficiency could lead to severe toxicities and, thus, require dose reduction in deficient patients. However, despite dosage adaptation based on DPD status, some patients may still experience under- or over-exposure, leading to inefficacy or major toxicity. The "Suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique et personnalisation des traitements" (STP-PT) group of the "Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique" (SFPT) and the "Groupe de pharmacologie clinique oncologique" (GPCO)-Unicancer, based on the latest and most up-to-date literature data, recommend the implementation of 5-FU Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in order to ensure an adequate 5-FU exposure.

Pharmacokinetics of continuous transarterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Numerous studies concerning hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have been conducted by adopting regimens containing 5-fluorouracil (FU), with a favourable efficacy compared with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) treatment; however, the detailed mechanism of HAIC remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate peripheral concentration time curves of 5-FU administered through the hepatic artery, which may additionally explain the mechanism of action of HAIC. A total of 10 eligible patients underwent transcatheter arterial embolization and a 2-day HAIC treatment regimen using a folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin regimen. Peripheral venous blood sampling was performed in each patient prior to infusion, and at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 5, 10, 15, 22 and 23 h following the start of infusion. The blood sample at 0 h was analysed for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) levels by high performance liquid chromatography, and the rest of the samples were analysed for 5-FU by optimised liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The lower limit of quantification of optimised LC-MS for 5-FU was 5 ng/ml. The steady-state plasma concentration of 5-FU administered through the hepatic artery was achieved after 15 h. This concentration largely varied, ranging from 8.64-152.00 ng/ml. Optimised LC-MS may detect low concentrations of 5-FU. The steady-state concentration of 5-FU administered through the hepatic artery was achieved after 15 h. DPD levels were analysed through determining the ratio of plasma uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) by HPLC, and the results indicated a mild DPD deficiency in the patients with HCC. These results may provide a basis for the explanation of the clinical efficacy of HAIC, and to additionally optimise its efficacy.

The impact of liver resection on the dihydrouracil:uracil plasma ratio in patients with colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

The dihydrouracil (DHU):uracil (U) plasma ratio is a promising marker for identification of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-deficient patients. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of liver resection on the DHU:U plasma ratio in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

An observational study was performed in which DHU:U plasma ratios in patients with CRLM were analyzed prior to and 1 day after liver resection. In addition, the DHU:U plasma ratio was quantified in six additional patients 4-8 weeks after liver resection to explore long-term effects on the DHU:U plasma ratio. Quantification of U and DHU plasma levels was performed using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay.

RESULTS

The median (range) DHU:U plasma ratio in 15 patients prior to liver resection was 10.7 (2.6-14.4) and was significantly reduced to 5.5 (< quantification limit (LLOQ-10.5) 1 day after resection (p = 0.0026). This reduction was caused by a decrease in DHU plasma levels from 112.0 (79.8-153) ng/mL to 41.2 (< LLOQ-160) ng/mL 1 day after resection (p = 0.0004). Recovery of the DHU:U plasma ratio occurred 4-8 weeks after liver resection, which was shown by a median (range) DHU:U plasma ratio in six patients of 9.1 (6.9-14.5).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection leads to very low DHU:U plasma ratios 1 day after liver resection, which is possibly caused by a reduction in DPD activity. Quantification of the DHU:U plasma ratios directly after liver resection could lead to false-positive identification of DPD deficiency and is therefore not advised.

Acute reversible toxic encephalopathy during capecitabine and oxaliplatin treatment

Introduction

Capecitabine is a fluoropyrimidine commonly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer which may cause central nervous system toxicity, namely cerebellar dysfunction.

Case report

We describe a 77-year-old man undergoing adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin who presented with acute cerebellar ataxia and encephalopathy that progressed to coma. Diagnosis of toxic encephalopathy was made after the exclusion of alternative causes of neurological dysfunction and complete resolution of clinical findings with permanent discontinuation of chemotherapy.

Discussion

When patients with cancer develop symptoms and signs of central nervous dysfunction, metabolic and infectious causes plus tumor involvement of central nervous system must be sought. However, chemotherapy may also cause toxicity to the central nervous system. Capecitabine is no exception, although cerebellar dysfunction is rarely reported.

Conclusion

Although rare, capecitabine-induced encephalopathy may be severe and physicians should be aware of this possible side effect.

A new sample preparation and separation combination for the precise, accurate, and simultaneous determination of uracil and dihydrouracil in human plasma by reversed-phase HPLC

We have developed an efficient procedure and detection method using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography for the simultaneous measurement of uracil and dihydrouracil in human plasma. The procedure, including chromatographic conditions and sample preparation, was optimized and validated. Optimization of the sample preparation included deproteinization, extraction, and cleanup. A new sample preparation method which resulted in an improved extraction yield of analytes and significantly reduced interference at low-wavelength UV detection was developed. The developed method was validated for specificity, linearity, limits of detection and quantitation, precision, and accuracy. All calibration curves showed excellent linear regression (R²  > 0.9990) within the testing range. The limit of detection for uracil and dihydrouracil was 2.5 and 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. The extraction yields were >94% for uracil and 91% for dihydrouracil. Intra- and interassay precision and accuracy for uracil and dihydrouracil were lower than 8% at all tested concentrations. The proposed method was successfully applied to measure plasma concentrations of uracil and dihydrouracil in colorectal cancer patients scheduled to receive fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Pretreatment serum uracil concentration as a predictor of severe and fatal fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity

Background:

We investigated the predictive value of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotype, measured as pretreatment serum uracil and dihydrouracil concentrations, for severe as well as fatal fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity in 550 patients treated previously with fluoropyrimidines during a prospective multicenter study.

Methods:

Pretreatment serum concentrations of uracil and dihydrouracil were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The primary endpoint of this analysis was global (any) severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity, that is, grade ⩾3 toxicity according to the NCI CTC-AE v3.0, occurring during the first cycle of treatment. The predictive value of uracil and the uracil/dihydrouracil ratio for early severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity were compared. Pharmacogenetic variants in DPYD (c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1129-5923C>G, and c.1601G>A) and TYMS (TYMS 5′-UTR VNTR and TYMS 3′-UTR 6-bp ins/del) were measured and tested for associations with severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity to compare predictive value with DPD phenotype. The Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate method was used to control for type I errors at level q<0.050 (corresponding to P<0.010).

Results:

Uracil was superior to the dihydrouracil/uracil ratio as a predictor of severe toxicity. High pretreatment uracil concentrations (>16 ng ml⁻¹) were strongly associated with global severe toxicity (OR 5.3, P=0.009), severe gastrointestinal toxicity (OR 33.7, P<0.0001), toxicity-related hospitalisation (OR 16.9, P<0.0001), as well as fatal treatment-related toxicity (OR 44.8, P=0.001). None of the DPYD variants alone, or TYMS variants alone, were associated with severe toxicity.

Conclusions:

High pretreatment uracil concentration was strongly predictive of severe, including fatal, fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity, and is a highly promising phenotypic marker to identify patients at risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity.

Correlative analysis of plasma SN-38 levels and DPD activity with outcomes of FOLFIRI regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer with UGT1A1 *28 and *6 wild type and its implication for individualized chemotherapy

It remains uncertain whether there is an correlation between clinical pharmacokinetic parameters and outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer especially with UGT1A1 *28 and *6 wild type (*1/*1-*1/*1) for serious events associated with Irinotecan are largely excluded. This study retrospectively analyzed the relationship between Irinotecan metabolite levels and outcomes of UGT1A1 *1/*1-*1/*1 genotype arrangement. Blood samples (n = 244) were collected for analysis of plasma DPD activity (before first chemotherapy) and SN-38 levels (1.5 and 49 hour after CPT-11 administration). Clinical variables such as toxicity and outcomes were then assessed. Of the *1/*1 -*1/*1 genotype combination, the median progression free survival of the C_{SN-38 1.5 h} > 50.24 ng/ml subset was remarkably longer than that of the C_{SN-38 1.5 h} ≤ 50.24 ng/ml subset. However, there were no differences between the C_{SN-38 49 h} > 15.25 ng/ml subgroup and the ≤ 15.25 ng/ml group. It was lower DPD activity that responsible for the relatively higher incidence of bone marrow hypocellular, diarrhea, and oral mucositis in the C_{SN-38 1.5 h} > 50.24 ng/ml and C_{SN-38 49 h} > 15.25 ng/ml subsets. Therefore, plasma SN-38 levels is related to outcomes for UGT1A1 *1/*1-*1/*1 genotype, to improve efficacy, patients with C_{SN-38 1.5 h} lower than 50.24 ng/ml, CPT-11 dosage could be added in next chemmotherapy on SN-38 plasma level monitoring. Additionally, in patients with DPD activity below 3.18 before treatment, appropriate reduction of 5-FU dose could be considered to minimize the incidence of adverse events.

Pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of 5-FU in modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japanese patients: a-JUST phase II clinical trial

PURPOSE

Dose adjustment of 5-fluorouracil (FU) based on pharmacokinetic monitoring has been shown to reduce toxicities and increase efficacy compared with dosing based on body surface area in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of FU in a modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) plus bevacizumab regimen in Japanese patients with previously untreated mCRC.

METHODS

This single-arm, multicenter phase II trial enrolled 48 patients with mCRC. Treatment consisted of 5 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab followed by mFOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1, infused leucovorin 200 mg/m², followed by a 2400 mg/m² infusion of FU for 46 h starting on day 1), repeated every 2 weeks. FU concentrations were measured by immunoassay between 18 and 36 h after the start of continuous FU infusion, and the FU dose was then adjusted if required in subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate.

RESULTS

The median initial area under the concentration-time curve for FU was 23 mg h/L. Twenty-nine patients (60%) achieved the target concentration at the first cycle, and all 48 achieved it within the fourth cycle. The overall frequency of grade 3/4 adverse effects was 38%, with no significant difference between patients who did and not require dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence intervals = 34-62%). The median progression-free and overall survival rates were 11.3 and 24.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of FU in mFOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab can optimize FU concentrations promptly and is safe in Japanese patients with mCRC.

Improving safety of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy by individualizing treatment based on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity - Ready for clinical practice?

Fluoropyrimidines remain the cornerstone of treatment for different types of cancer, and are used by an estimated two million patients annually. The toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine therapy is substantial, however, and affects around 30% of the patients, with 0.5-1% suffering fatal toxicity. Activity of the main 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolic enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), is the key determinant of 5-FU pharmacology, and accounts for around 80% of 5-FU catabolism. There is a consistent relationship between DPD activity and 5-FU exposure on the one hand, and risk of severe and potentially lethal fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity on the other hand. Therefore, there is a sound rationale for individualizing treatment with fluoropyrimidines based on DPD status in order to improve patient safety. The field of individualized treatment with fluoropyrimidines is now rapidly developing. The main strategies that are available, are based on genotyping of the gene encoding DPD (DPYD) and measuring of pretreatment DPD phenotype. Clinical validity of additional approaches, including genotyping of MIR27A has also recently been demonstrated. Here, we critically review the evidence on clinical validity and utility of strategies available to clinicians to identify patients at risk of developing severe and potentially fatal toxicity as a result of DPD deficiency. We evaluate the advantages and limitations of these methods when used in clinical practice, and discuss for which strategies clinical implementation is currently justified based on the available evidence and, in addition, which additional data will be required before implementing other, as yet less developed strategies.