Standard chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: is it a myth?

Recent trend in gastric cancer treatment in the USA

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is estimated as the fifteenth most common cancer in the USA. Incidence rate has been gradually decreasing, but prognosis remains dismal. For patients with locally advanced GAC (stage > T1B and < T4B), multimodality therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, are needed. Perioperative chemotherapy or postoperative chemoradiation/chemotherapy is recommended. For metastatic GAC patients, combination of two cytotoxics (platinum compound and fluoropyrimidine) has become a common place in the USA, and when HER2 is positive, trastuzumab is added. When GAC progresses after the first line therapy, additional biomarkers (microsatellite instability and programmed death ligand 1) should be tested so that checkpoint inhibitors can be used. Overall, the options for advanced GAC patients are limited and more research is needed.

Global chemotherapy development for gastric cancer

To combat the dismal mortality rates from metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), new drugs and treatment strategies are needed. Today, metastatic GAC is predominantly treated by empiric chemotherapy. Combination of two cytotoxic agents has become commonplace in North America, Europe, and Asia. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) overexpression (protein or gene copy numbers) has resulted in the addition of trastuzumab in the first-line chemotherapy combination in patients whose tumor is HER2 positive. The addition of trastuzumab in this select population has provided a modest survival advantage. In this review we trace the global development of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic GAC and ponder what lies in the future.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan

Among advanced gastric cancer cases, peritoneal dissemination is a life-threatening mode of metastasis, and any strategy to control peritoneal metastasis will significantly improve treatment outcomes. Since intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs can induce an extremely high concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal chemotherapy would appear to be a reasonable and promising strategy to control the peritoneal dissemination. However, it has been reported in the past that intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C or cisplatin resulted in no significant clinical effects against peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. In contrast, intraperitoneal paclitaxel is expected to remain inside the peritoneal cavity due to its large molecular weight and fat solubility, leading to a high concentration of the drug in the peritoneal cavity. In fact, promising results in several phase II clinical trials using intraperitoneal paclitaxel have been reported, including a median survival time of 16.2-24.6 months and a 1-year overall survival rate of 69-78 %. Thereafter, a phase III randomized control study (PHOENIX-GC trial) with intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel in comparison to systemic S-1 plus cisplatin was conducted in Japan. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with systemic capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is currently ongoing in Singapore. In this review, based on clinical experience from Singapore and Japan, the clinical significance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease is discussed.

Treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis

Although the treatment of gastric cancer improves the clinical outcomes, the survival of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is still very poor. Effective drugs against peritoneal metastasis, coupled with new therapeutic modalities, are needed to improve the prognoses of these patients. Paclitaxel and TS-1 are candidate drugs for peritoneal metastasis, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy and targeted therapy are potential new therapeutic modalities. Two phase II studies using TS-1 and intraperitoneal and systemic paclitaxel for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis showed respectable survival results. In addition, peritoneal metastatic lesions showed high levels of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (ECAM) and very low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), thus indicating that an anti-ECAM monoclonal antibody, catumaxomab, would be effective against gastric cancer-derived peritoneal metastasis. Although catumaxomab and intraperitoneally administered paclitaxel are not generally used in Japan at present, these treatment strategies might therefore be effectively used in Japan in the near future.

Phase II study of single intraperitoneal chemotherapy followed by systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study involving a single administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by sequential systemic chemotherapy with S-1+ paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered intraperitoneally at staging laparoscopy. Within 7 days, patients received systemic chemotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14) plus paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8), followed by 7-days rest. The responders to this chemotherapy underwent second-look laparoscopy, and gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in patients when the disappearance of peritoneal metastasis had been confirmed. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. All patients were confirmed as having localized peritoneal metastasis by staging laparoscopy. Eventually, gastrectomy was performed in 22 patients. The median survival time of the total patient population and those patients in which gastrectomy was performed was 21.3 and 29.8 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 65.7 % for all patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia and leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 was well tolerated in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine and cisplatin, administered in combination with or without trastuzumab, in Japanese patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Patients eligible for this PK study (study JP19959), which was carried out during treatment Cycle 1 of the ToGA study, received either capecitabine and cisplatin (XP arm) or trastuzumab plus capecitabine and cisplatin (HXP arm). All patients received capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) orally, twice daily for 14 days) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on Day 1). Patients in the HXP arm also received trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenous infusion on Day 1), concurrently with capecitabine. No further study medication was administered during study JP19959. Serial plasma samples for PK analysis were obtained at intervals before and after the administration of capecitabine and cisplatin on Day 1.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this PK study: eight in the HXP arm and 14 in the XP arm. All blood samples were available for PK analysis. Co-administration of trastuzumab resulted in no statistically or clinically significant changes in the PK profiles of capecitabine or its metabolites, or of cisplatin (total or unbound platinum).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in the AUC(last) and C (max) values for the capecitabine was consistent with the known PK profile of capecitabine and fell within established limits. Concurrent trastuzumab therapy is unlikely to alter the PK or safety profile of capecitabine or cisplatin in Japanese patients with HER2-positive AGC.

Predicting factors of unexpected peritoneal seeding in locally advanced gastric cancer: indications for staging laparoscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate predictive factors for unexpected peritoneal seeding from clinically resectable advanced gastric cancers to suggest the indications for staging laparoscopy (SL).

METHODS

A total of consecutive 589 gastric cancer patients who were clinically diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer with no metastatic disease underwent operations at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients (including 35 patients with seeding to distant peritoneum) were surgically diagnosed with peritoneal seeding. Borrmann type 3 (OR: 4.475) or type 4 (OR: 8.243) cancer, tumor invasion of T3 (OR: 2.794) or T4 (OR: 6.841) and tumor size (4  cm  ≤  tumor size  <  8  cm; OR: 3.723 and 8  cm  ≤  tumor size; OR: 6.971) were predictive factors for overall peritoneal seeding. Borrmann type 3 (OR: 3.524) or 4 (OR: 4.695) cancer, tumor invasion of T3 (OR: 4.378) or T4 (OR: 15.817), and tumors involving the anterior wall (OR: 2.762) also turned out to be predictive factors for distant peritoneal seeding.

CONCLUSIONS

If SL were performed by these predictive factors, this should have been performed in 42.4% of advanced gastric cancers and the detection rates for overall peritoneal seeding would have been 24.0%.

S9511: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study of trimetrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the response rate for trimetrexate in conjunction with 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) (= TFL) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in a phase II, cooperative group setting.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach received trimetrexate 110 mg/m IV over 60 minutes day 1, followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m IV bolus and LV 200 mg/m IV over 60 minutes day 2, followed by oral LV 15 mg every 6 hours x 7 doses, all weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest, continued until progression.

RESULTS

Characteristics for 37 eligible patients: median age 63 (range: 23-83); male/female: 69% of 31%; performance status 0/1/2 15/20/1. The confirmed response rate was 19%, and median overall survival was 6 months. Two patients died as a result of therapy, 1 because of infection without significant neutropenia, and 1 due to perforation of a responding gastric lesion. Seventy-two percent experienced grades 3 and 4 toxicity, most commonly diarrhea, fatigue, and lymphopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen achieves response rates comparable to other 5-FU-based regimens, when used in treatment of incurable gastric cancer. Toxicity appears manageable.

Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of weekly i.v. and i.p. paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 was carried out in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination and/or cancer cells on peritoneal cytology were enrolled. PTX was administered i.v. at 50 mg/m(2) and i.p. at 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. The primary end point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, efficacy against malignant ascites and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, including 21 with primary tumors with peritoneal dissemination, 13 with peritoneal recurrence and six with positive peritoneal cytology only. The median number of courses was 7 (range 1-23). The 1-year OS rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 65% to 90%). The overall response rate was 56% in 18 patients with target lesions. Malignant ascites disappeared or decreased in 13 of 21 (62%) patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (18%) and anemia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy of i.v. and i.p. PTX with S-1 is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Quality of life of palliative chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction treated with irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid: results of a randomised phase III trial

Purpose

The quality of life (QL) of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (IF arm) or cisplatin with 5-FU (CF arm) is presented.

Methods

Patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer received IF weekly for 6/7 weeks or CF q4 weeks. QL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, subsequently every 8 weeks until progression and thereafter every 3 months until death. The QL data were analysed using several statistical methods including summary measures and pattern-mixture modelling.

Results

A total of 333 patients were randomised and treated (IF 170, CF 163). The time-to-progression for IF and CF was 5.0 and 4.2 months (P = 0.088), respectively. The overall compliance rates for QL questionnaire completion were 60 and 56% in the IF and CF arms, respectively. Significant treatment differences were observed for the physical functioning scale (P = 0.024), nausea\vomiting (P = 0.001) and EQ-5D thermometer (P = 0.020) in favour of the IF treatment arm.

Conclusion

There was a trend in favour of IF over CF in time-to-progression. The IF group also demonstrated a better safety profile than CF and a better QL on a number of multi-item scales, suggesting that IF offers an alternative first-line platinum-free treatment option for advanced gastric cancer.

Locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer: current management and new treatment developments

The management of gastric cancer remains a challenge. In recent years, the most important advances have been achieved in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced disease, where significant survival benefits have been demonstrated for both perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings have changed the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. In the setting of metastatic gastric cancer, the development of new cytotoxic regimens must consider the balance between efficacy and toxicity in patients whose overall prognosis is poor. Major advances in recent years include the development of orally administered fluoropyrimidine analogues, which can be used in place of intravenous fluorouracil, and the addition of newer agents such as oxaliplatin and docetaxel, which have demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced disease. Targeted therapies have had a major impact on the management of certain malignancies, and while their evaluation in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains early, it is likely that these agents will continue to be developed and studied in combination with chemotherapy. This article reviews recent advances in the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Targeted therapies, their mechanisms of action and emerging data supporting their use in gastric cancer are also discussed. The two randomized phase III trials supporting adjuvant therapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer are discussed in detail, together with strategies for future trials in this area. Overall, there remains optimism that further incremental gains will be achieved with future studies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapies, both in the adjuvant and metastatic disease settings.

Emerging drugs in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastroesopheal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. If detected early, curative treatment is possible. Often, gastroesophageal cancer is detected at an advanced stage when therapy is palliative.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a critical evaluation of historic and recently developed chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Published clinical trials in AGC as well as selected abstracts presented at international oncology meetings were selected.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy has demonstrated a benefit over best supportive care alone by improving the quality and quantity of life for patients with advanced disease. Recent Phase III trials investigating cytotoxic chemotherapy and Phase II trials incorporating biotherapy for the treatment of AGC show promise for the future.

Salvage chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel and epirubicin as salvage chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer patients with documented progression after 5-fluorouracil/platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) were administered on days 1 and 2, respectively, every 3 weeks. Treatment continued until progression of disease or until a life-threatening adverse event occurred. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety profile and response rate to this treatment regimen.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-six patients had locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, and 8 patients had recurrent disease after surgical resection of the primary tumor. A total of 157 chemotherapy cycles were administered. Seven (21.8%) patients had a partial response and 12 (37.5%) patients had stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival were 4.1 and 13.4 months, respectively. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 16 patients (47%) and febrile neutropenia in 8 patients (24%). Nonhematologic toxicities were rare.

CONCLUSION

A combination of chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin showed moderate activity as salvage treatment in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer, especially in patients who had responded to prior chemotherapy.

Docetaxel, capecitabine and carboplatin in metastatic esophagogastric cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

A Phase I investigation of docetaxel, carboplatin, and capecitabine at our institution demonstrated the safety and tolerability of this regimen in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. The objectives of this Phase II study were to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival for patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer treated with this regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy naïve patients with metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer received a regimen comprised of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC = 2, Days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2), Days 1-10 in 21-Day cycles. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Twelve of 25 patients (48 percent) had a Grade 3/4 toxicity. There were no Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities, and 1 patient (4 percent) had neutropenic fever. There were 3 complete responses, and 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48 percent. The median survival was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5-13 months), and the 1-year survival was 36 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with capecitabine was an easily administered outpatient regimen. The response rate and 1-year survival were similar to more complex regimens. Future trials may investigate the substitution of carboplatin with more active agents.

Phase II study of docetaxel and S-1 combination therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in combination with a novel oral 5-fluorouracil analogue S-1 for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the stomach and up to one previous chemotherapy regimen were treated with i.v. docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral S-1 80 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (median age, 65 years; range, 25-75 years) received a total of 272 treatment cycles (median, 4; range, 1-17). No complete responses and 27 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 56.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 38-66%]. Eighteen patients (37.5%) had stable disease and three patients (6.3%) had progressive disease as best response. The tumor control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 93.8% (95% CI, 83-98%). Median overall survival was 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.7-20.3 months) and median time to tumor progression was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.0 months). The most common grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (58.3%), leukopenia (41.7%), febrile neutropenia (8.3%), and anemia (8.3%). The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included anorexia (14.6%), stomatitis (8.3%), and nausea (6.3%). No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities were reported and all treatment-related toxicities were resolved.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel/S-1 combination is highly active and well tolerated in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Further investigation in randomized studies is warranted.

A Phase I Study of Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin are important new agents in esophagogastric cancer. The Brown University Oncology Group initiated a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric cancers received docetaxel and oxaliplatin on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine in divided doses, twice daily, on days 1 to 10, with each cycle repeated every 21 days. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3 at escalating dose levels. The docetaxel dose ranged from 30 to 35 mg/m2, the oxaliplatin dose from 40 to 50 mg/m2, and the capecitabine dose from 750 to 850 mg/m2 BID.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled over 4 dose levels. The median age was 59 years. Eight patients had esophageal cancer and 9 had gastric cancer. Grade 3/4 dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 of 4 patients at dose level 3. An intermediate dose level was added (2A), reducing the capecitabine dose to 750 mg/m2. One of 6 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity at level 2A.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 with capecitabine 750 mg/m2 BID for 10 days in 21-day cycles may represent a promising, easily administered regimen for metastatic esophageal and gastric cancer. A phase II study will be initiated.

Simple combinations of 5-FU pathway genes predict the outcome of metastatic gastric cancer patients treated by S-1

We evaluated the expression of 5-FU pathway genes in prechemotherapeutic fresh frozen samples obtained from primary tumors to predict response and survival of 59 metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 monotherapy as first line treatment. Five 5-FU pathway genes, including thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and uridine phosphorylase (UP), were analyzed by the quantitative real-time reverse transcriptional PCR method. Median values of each gene were selected for cut-off values separating high and low gene expressions. In univariate analyses, low TS, high OPRT and low TP were significantly associated with a tumor shrinkage and a long survival, whereas DPD and UP gene expressions did not correlate with response and survival. Multivariate analyses revealed that independent variables were OPRT and TS for response and TS and TP for survival. When OPRT and TS were combined, a significantly increased accuracy rate of 91.5% was seen for response. Similarly, an increased hazard ratio of 10.29 was observed for survival in patients possessing low TS and low TP, compared with those with high TS or high TP. The simple combinations of 2 genes, OPRT and TS for response and TS and TP for survival, may allow identification of gastric cancer patients who will benefit from S-1 chemotherapy.

Correlation between tumor response to first-line chemotherapy and prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In advanced gastric cancer, the relationship between tumor response and prognosis is far from clear.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis on published data from 4593 patients in 25 randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. A weighed analysis was used to investigate the correlation between objective response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival time (OS).

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was found between RR and TTP and OS (r = 0.49 and r = 0.45, respectively) in all 25 trials. In treatment arms without new drugs including irinotecan, taxanes, or oxaliplatin, RR also was associated with TTP and OS (r = 0.56 and r = 0.47, respectively). However, no association between RR and OS was found, whereas there was a moderate correlation between RR and TTP (r = 0.41) in treatment arms using new drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that response to treatment was related to TTP and OS. The potential role of objective response as a surrogate in chemotherapy trials of advanced gastric cancer warrants further investigation, especially with regard to treatment with new drugs.

Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West

There are still remarkable disparities in the treatment of gastric cancer between the East and West. Treatment outcomes for this disease have improved in Japan due to early detection and surgical resection with systematic node dissections, such as D2, whereas gastric cancer remains a virulent disease in Western countries. Differences in the types of surgery and their outcomes affect how adjuvant trials are conducted and interpreted. Recent Western randomized trials demonstrated the significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or intensive combination chemotherapy. However, baseline surgical quality and outcomes were quite different from those in Japan, and Japanese surgical/medical oncologists have not accepted the Western results. Several disparities are also evident in the results of chemotherapy trials for advanced gastric cancer. Although similar results were obtained with randomized studies using older regimens, the interpretation of the results differed between Japan and other countries. A combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil was used as the reference arm in ongoing randomized trials in most countries, whereas single-agent fluorouracil or S-1 alone was used in Japanese trials. Two triplet regimens have already demonstrated significant prolongation of survival in Western studies. However, these benefits seem to be marginal and these regimens may be replaced by newer regimens, which will soon be available in Europe and Asia, where a total of 2,600 patients have been accrued. Although these disparities between regions must be overcome, it is time for both Eastern and Western investigators to pursue further benefits by incorporating new agents into treatment regimens.

Phase I study of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin in metastatic esophagogastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

A phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic esophageal and gastric cancers.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were treated over 5 dose levels in a 21-day cycle. Patients received carboplatin (AUC = 2) on days 1 and 8, docetaxel (35-40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine (500-2000 mg/m2) on days 1 to 10.

RESULTS

There were no DLTs in the first cycle of treatment. Dose reductions were required in 10 of 15 patients at the final dose level due to neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, and hand/foot syndrome following a median of 3 cycles of treatment. Therefore, escalation beyond dose level 5 was not attempted. The MTD was docetaxel, 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 8; carboplatin, AUC = 2 days 1 and 8; and capecitabine, 1500 to 2000 mg/m2 days 1 to 10 in a 21-day cycle. Ten of 25 patients who could be evaluated (40%) responded and 8 of 14 patients treated at the final dose level responded (57%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative gastrointestinal toxicities and neutropenia were the DLTs of docetaxel, capecitabine, and carboplatin. This combination represents an easily administered, active regimen for patients with metastatic gastric and esophageal cancers. Further evaluation of this regimen is indicated.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of gastric cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer remains a major challenge. After decades of investigation that have yielded little improvement in survival rates, several important studies have recently emerged that provide renewed optimism for future research endeavors. This article reviews the important advances over the past several years in the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

As a result of the Intergroup trial, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after operation has emerged as a new standard of care for patients who have undergone resection for carcinoma of the stomach. Strategies currently being tested to build on the Intergroup results include the use of new chemotherapy combinations with radiotherapy and the development of modern conformal techniques to deliver radiation therapy. The preliminary results of a large neoadjuvant chemotherapy study have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach with tumor downstaging and increase in the curative R0 resection rate. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer, newer generation cytotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and taxanes show promising activity. In the near future, these agents will likely be evaluated for their role as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

SUMMARY

Major advances in the treatment of gastric cancer have occurred during the past several years and have improved the care of patients with this form of tumor.

Available options in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: the current developments in Japan

Although techniques for early diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer have been established, standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer has not. 5-Flourouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin containing regimens, including 5-FU plus cisplatin, epirubicin plus cisplatin and 5-FU, and docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-FU, are considered to be the most effective regimens for advanced gastric cancer in US, Europe and Korea. In Japan, oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 is currently considered to be the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. S-1-based combination therapies with other promising drugs, including cis-platin, irinotecan and taxanes, are expected to yield good results. Above all, S-1 plus cisplatin therapy showed high efficacy and expected to be a standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Further evaluation by well-controlled clinical trials is still required.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: slow but further progress

Gastric cancer remains a significant problem in terms of global health, and is the most common cancer in Korea. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for localized gastric cancer, but most cases present at an advanced stage. Randomized trials have demonstrated that chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer improves the quality of life and extends survival, by 4 approximately 6 months, compared with best supportive care alone. Single agents with a proven activity in a first-line setting include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, mitomycin C, cisplatin, taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) and oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and TS-1). Based on the results from several large scale randomized trials, FP (5-FU/cisplatin) and ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU) combinations are the most widely used regimen against advanced gastric cancer. Phase II studies of the FP and ECF combination reported a 40~51% response rate in previously untreated patients, and this regimen also produced a significantly higher response rate than the FAM (5-FU/doxorubicin/mitomycin) and FAMTX (5-FU/doxorubicin/methotrexate) regimens, respectively. However, significant treatment related-toxicities and discomfort were reported from ECF, which prevents this combination from becoming the standard treatment regimen. While no one combination chemotherapy regimen is accepted as the standard for advanced gastric cancer, FP is currently considered a suitable reference regimen worldwide. New agents, such as taxane, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, combined with old agents, such as cisplatin and 5-FU, are currently under evaluation to further improve treatment outcomes. Also, oral 5-FU prodrugs are replacing the cumbersome 5-FU long-term infusion due to its convenience and superior toxicity profile. However, the low complete response rate and short response duration are still the main obstacles in the chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Only large scale comparative clinical trials will give clues to improve the results of gastric cancer treatments.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C).

RESULTS

The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.

Thymidylate synthase predictive power is overcome by irinotecan combination therapy with S-1 for gastric cancer

The predictive values of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene expressions were retrospectively evaluated in patients with gastric cancer treated by a regimen containing S-1. The study population consisted of 53 patients registered into different two phase II studies for metastatic gastric cancer; 27 patients treated by S-1-alone study: 26 patients treated with S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11). TS and DPD gene expressions in primary tumours were measured by the real-time reverse transcription PCR method. There was no statistical difference in DPD gene expression in terms of response in cases treated with S-1 alone and those treated with S-1 plus CPT-11. TS mRNA of responding tumours was lower than that of nonresponding ones when treated with S-1 (P<0.005). In the S-1-alone group, taking TS cutoff as the median values, the response rate in the low TS group was 50%, but only 8% in the high TS group (P<0.05). Patients with low TS gene expression survived longer than those with high TS gene expression (P<0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in response rate and survival between patients with low TS tumours and those with high TS tumours, when the cutoff was taken as the median value of TS gene expression in the group treated with S-1 plus CPT-11. In conclusion, treatment effects of S-1 monotherapy for gastric cancer were determined by the status of TS gene expression, regardless of DPD gene expression. TS predictive power was overcome by CPT-11 combination therapy with S-1.

Phase II Study of Sequential Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy Against Peritoneally Disseminated Gastric Cancer with Malignant Ascites: a Report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, JCOG 9603 Trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of systemic chemotherapy against peritoneal dissemination from advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear, because the peritoneal dissemination was not defined as a measurable lesion in conventional phase II studies. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential MTX and 5FU therapy (MF) in chemotherapy-naive patients with AGC accompanied by malignant ascites in a phase II setting.

METHODS

The treatment schedule comprised weekly administration of MTX (100 mg/m2, i.v. bolus) followed by 5FU (600 mg/m2, i.v. bolus) with a 3 h interval. Leucovorin rescue (10 mg/m2 every 6 h, for a total of six times) was commenced 24 h after MTX administration.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven chemotherapy-naive patients with AGC presenting with malignant ascites were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 60 years (range, 25-74 years) and most patients (86%) had a performance status of 0-1. In total, 355 administrations of the sequential MTX/5FU therapy were performed. Major toxicity consisted of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.8% of the patients. The overall objective response rate was 5.7% (two partial responses in 35 patients; 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.2%). However, the response rate of ascites was 35.1% (complete disappearance in three patients and apparent decrease in 10 patients; 95% confidence interval: 20.2-52.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential MTX/5FU therapy is effective against AGC with malignant ascites with acceptable toxicity and warrants further investigations in a phase III setting.

Chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer: population-based perceptions and practice patterns of medical oncologists

Although randomised trials in metastatic gastric cancer have shown a survival benefit from chemotherapy, a significant proportion of medical oncologists do not believe that it prolongs survival or improves quality of life, including those who routinely treat metastatic gastric cancer. There was wide variation in what was considered to be ‘standard therapy’ and a statistically significant difference between what medical oncologists consider ‘standard therapy’ and what they use in every day practice.

Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205)

PURPOSE

To compare fluorouracil (FU) alone with FU plus cisplatin (FP) and with uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin (UFTM) for patients with advanced gastric cancer in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 280 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly allocated and analyzed for survival, response, and toxicity. The survival curves were compared between groups by log-rank test on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At the interim analysis, the UFTM arm showed a significantly inferior survival with higher incidences of hematologic toxic effects than did control arm FU alone, and the registration to UFTM was terminated. Both investigational regimens, FP and UFTM, had a significantly higher incidence of hematologic toxic effects than FU alone, although the effects were manageable. The overall response rates of the FU-alone, FP, and UFTM arms were 11%, 34%, and 9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months with FU alone, 3.9 months with FP, and 2.4 months with UFTM, respectively. Although FP demonstrated a higher response rate (P <.001) and longer progression-free survival than did FU alone (P <.001), no differences in overall survival were observed between the arms. The median survival times and 1-year survival rates were 7.1 months and 28% with FU, 7.3 months and 29% with FP, and 6.0 months and 16% with UFTM, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neither investigational regimen, FP nor UFTM, showed a survival advantage as compared with FU alone. FU alone will remain a reference arm in our future trial for advanced gastric cancer.

A phase II study of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A phase II study testing the safety and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11). 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LCV) was conducted in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or stomach were entered onto this study. Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not allowed. Treatment consisted of repeated 6-week cycles comprising CPT-11 125 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) followed immediately by LCV 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v., all given weekly for four weeks followed by a two-week rest.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and 36 eligible patients received protocol therapy. Grade 3-5 toxicities consisted primarily of neutropenia (36%) and diarrhea (28%). Neutropenic infection was observed in 14% of patients, with 3 (8%) dying of neutropenic sepsis. The overall response rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5% to 35.5%). Median survival was 7.6 months, and median time to progression was 4.4 months.

CONCLUSION

This weekly regimen of CPT-11 with bolus 5-FU/LCV is active in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. While rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those observed historically in patients receiving this regimen for colorectal cancer, neutropenic fever/sepsis appeared to be more frequent, and dose modifications were substantial. Future trials of this combination in patients with gastric cancer should decrease the absolute starting drug doses and/ or employ altered scheduling that better accommodates the pattern of toxicity.