Sequential Versus Single High-Dose Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

[Conventional versus high-dose salvage chemotherapy for relapsed testicular germ cell tumours]

Since the introduction of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, patients with metastatic germ cell tumours achieve very high cure rates of >80%. Nevertheless, about 30% of patients relapse despite guideline-endorsed first-line treatment. Of these, again about 50% of patients can still achieve cure with platinum-based salvage chemotherapy and eventually post-chemotherapy residual mass resection.Salvage chemotherapy generally involves platinum-based combination chemotherapy, either as conventional dose cisplatin-based combinations again or as high-dose chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation.To date, high level evidence from randomised trials supporting the use of salvage high-dose chemotherapy for all patients relapsing after first-line treatment remains lacking, but a large international retrospective registry study had shown a 15% overall survival benefit for patients undergoing salvage high-dose chemotherapy.In this article, we summarise the available literature on the different salvage treatment approaches and discuss these in the light of current treatment guideline recommendations for the management of testicular cancer.

High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Salvage Therapy of Relapsed/Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors remains unsettled. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as salvage therapy in patients who progressed after at least one line of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reported the results of 133 patients who underwent HDCT and ASCT as salvage therapy from 2016 to 2021. Patients received 3 cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfomide and cisplatin (TIP) regimen as induction and 1 cycle of carboplatin 700 mg/m2 on days 1-3 plus etoposide 750 mg/m2 on days 1-3, followed by ASCT. Demographic and clinicopathological features of patients, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk group at diagnosis, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels before HDCT, treatment-related complications and survival outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 31 (range 18-62). The median follow-up was 31.1 months (95% CI, 28.9-33.3 months). During the median follow-up period, 74 of the 133 patients were still alive, and 63 of these were in complete remission. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.8 months (95% CI, 8.1-43.4 months). The 2-year PFS rate was 50.3% and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 60.8%. Variables that remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis and were associated with poor prognosis were mediastinal primary tumor location, presence of brain metastases, and higher AFP and HCG levels at baseline.

CONCLUSION

One course of HDCT and ASCT after induction with TIP is an effective and feasible treatment option for salvage treatment of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors, with cure rates of up to 60%.

Ototoxicity associated with high-dose carboplatin for patients with previously treated germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

High-dose carboplatin is an essential part of curative high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for patients with previously treated germ cell tumors (GCTs). Although hearing loss (HL) is a known side effect of HDCT, data on its severity and characteristics are limited.

METHODS

Eligible patients received HDCT for GCTs from 1993 to 2017 and had audiograms before and after HDCT. HL severity was classified by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria, and mean change in hearing threshold at each frequency (0.25-8 kHz) was estimated from pre- to post-HDCT and between HDCT cycles.

RESULTS

Of 115 patients (median age, 32 years), 102 (89%) received three cycles of HDCT. Of 106 patients with normal hearing to mild HL in the speech frequencies (0.5-4 kHz) before HDCT, 70 (66%) developed moderate to profound HL in the speech frequencies after HDCT. Twenty-five patients (22%) were recommended for hearing aids after HDCT. Patients with moderate to profound HL isolated to the higher frequencies (6-8 kHz) before HDCT were more likely to develop moderate to profound HL in the speech frequencies after HDCT (94% vs. 61%; p = .01) and to be recommended for hearing aids (39% vs. 18%; p = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

HL was frequent after HDCT for GCTs, with most patients developing at least moderate HL in the speech frequencies and approximately one in five recommended for hearing aids. Moderate to profound HL isolated to high frequencies at baseline was predictive of more clinically significant hearing impairment after HDCT.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Some patients with germ cell tumors, the most common malignancy in adolescent and young adult men, are not cured with standard-dose chemotherapy and require high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Using detailed hearing assessments of patients receiving HDCT, we found that most patients developed significant hearing loss and that one in five needed hearing aids. Thus, strategies to reduce this side effect are urgently needed, and all patients receiving HDCT should have a hearing test after therapy.

The Use of Salvage Chemotherapy for Patients with Relapsed Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (GCT) in Canada: A National Survey

BACKGROUND

Although metastatic germ cell tumor (GCT) is highly curable with initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT), 20-30% of patients relapse. Salvage CT options include conventional (CDCT) and high dose chemotherapy (HDCT), however definitive comparative data remain lacking. We aimed to characterize the contemporary practice patterns of salvage CT across Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a 30-question online survey for Canadian medical and hematological oncologists with experience in treating GCT, assessing treatment availability, patient selection, and management strategies used for relapsed GCT patients.

RESULTS

There were 30 respondents from 18 cancer centers across eight provinces. The most common CDCT regimens used were TIP (64%) and VIP (25%). HDCT was available in 13 centers (70%). The HDCT regimen used included carboplatin and etoposide for two cycles (76% in 7 centers), three cycles (6% in 2 centers), and the TICE protocol (11%, in 2 centers). "Bridging" CDCT was used by 65% of respondents. Post-HDCT treatments considered include surgical resection for residual disease (87.5%), maintenance etoposide (6.3%), and surveillance only (6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

HDCT is the most commonly used GCT salvage strategy in Canada. Significant differences exist in the treatment availability, selection, and delivery of HDCT, highlighting the need for standardization of care for patients with relapsed testicular GCT.

Challenges in the management of relapsed germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the remarkable advances in the treatment of germ cell tumors (GCTs), a significant number of patients relapse after first line treatment. This review aims to highlight the challenges in management of relapsed GCT, discuss treatment options, and review novel therapeutics in development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with relapsed disease after first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy can still be cured and should be referred to centers with expertise in GCTs. Patients with anatomically confined relapse should be considered for salvage surgery. The systemic treatment of patients with disseminated disease at the time of relapse after first line treatment remains unsettled. Treatment options include using salvage standard-dose cisplatin-based regimens with drugs not previously used or high-dose chemotherapy. Patients who relapse after salvage chemotherapy have poor outcomes and development of novel treatment options is required in this setting.

SUMMARY

Management of patients with relapsed GCT requires a multidisciplinary approach. Patients should be preferably evaluated at tertiary care centers with expertise in the management of these patients. There remains a subset of patients who relapse after salvage therapy and development of novel therapeutic approaches is needed in this setting.

Pediatric Extracranial Germ Cell Tumors: Review of Clinics and Perspectives in Application of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Pediatric extracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, accounting for approximately 3.5% of childhood cancers. Since the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy, the survival rate of patients has improved to more than 80%. However, poor-risk subtypes of pediatric extracranial GCTs do not respond well to chemotherapy, leading to refractory or relapsed (R/R) diseases. For example, long-term survival rates of mediastinal GCTs or choriocarcinoma are less than 50%. According to reports in recent years for adult patients with R/R GCTs, the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has clinical advantages; however, HDCT combined with ASCT has rarely been reported in pediatric GCTs. The R/R and poor-risk groups of pediatric GCTs could benefit from HDCT and ASCT.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with extracranial germ cell tumors - experience of two Brazilian pediatric centers

Malignant extracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare in pediatric patients and are usually extremely sensitive to chemotherapy. Relapsed or refractory tumors, although rare, established the need for second-line therapies, including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT). However, there are few data on its use in children with GCTs. We present a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with extracranial GCTs who received HDCT/ASCT at two Brazilian pediatric cancer centers from May 1999 to December 2019. We identified a total of 34 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 2.8 years (range, 0 to 18.8), who received HDCT/ASCT. Most patients (73%) received carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan (CEM) as a HDCT regimen. Fourteen patients received a second-line conventional dose chemotherapy (CDCT), 14 received a third-line CDCT and five received even a fourth-line CDCT prior to HDCT/ASCT. After a median follow-up of 22.7 months (range, 0.3 to 198.1), 16 patients had died after tumor relapse/progression and 2 patients died from HDCT/ASCT toxicity. We observed a 5-year OS of 47.1% and 5-year EFS of 44.1%. The 5-year OS for patients referred for HDCT/ASCT with progressive disease was 10% compared to 62.5% for those who achieved disease control before HDCT/ASCT (p = 0.001). In our experience, heavily pretreated children and adolescents with extracranial GCTs achieved considerable survival rates with HDCT/ASCT since, at least, partial control of their disease was possible before starting HDCT/ASCT. The role of HDCT/ASCT in pediatric patients with GCTs should be investigated in prospective trials.

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy 'Rechallenge' in Advanced Non-ovarian Solid Malignancies

Platinum-based chemotherapy forms the backbone of treatment for many solid cancers. However, resistance inevitably develops in those with advanced disease. Platinum rechallenge is a well-established concept in the management of ovarian cancer, small cell lung cancer and germ cell tumours. In other solid malignancies there is a lack of quality evidence to support platinum rechallenge, yet it is a widely adopted strategy. Often, patients are within the last year of life, making questions of efficacy, treatment-related toxicity and quality of life critical factors for treatment recommendations. In this overview we appraise the available evidence for platinum rechallenge and strategies being developed to attempt resensitisation of tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Phase II study of Disulfiram and Cisplatin in Refractory Germ Cell Tumors. The GCT-SK-006 phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple relapsed/refractory germ cell tumor (GCT) patients have extremely poor prognosis. Cisplatin resistant testicular GCTs overexpress aldehyde-dehydrogenase (ALDH) isoforms and inhibition of ALDH activity by disulfiram is associated with reconstitution of cisplatin sensitivity in vitro as well as in animal model. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of ALDH inhibitor disulfiram in combination with cisplatin in patients with multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs.

METHODS

Disulfiram was administered at a dose of 400 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity, cisplatin was administered at dose 50 mg/m² day 1 and 2, every 3 weeks. Twelve evaluable patients had to be enrolled into the first cohort, and if 0 of 12 patients had treatment response, the study was to be terminated. The results of the first stage of the trial are presented in this report.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs were enrolled in the phase II study from May 2019 to September 2021. Median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range 1-6). None of patients achieved objective response to treatment, therefore the study was terminated in first stage. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months, 95% CI (0.7-1.5 months), and median overall survival was 2.9 months 95% CI (1.5-4.7 months). Disease stabilization for at least 3 months was observed in 2 (16.7%) patients. Treatment was well tolerated, however, 5 (41.7%) of patients experienced grade 3/4 fatigue, 4 (33.3%) thrombocytopenia, 3 (25.0%) anemia, while 2 (16.7%) experienced neutropenia, nausea and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to achieve its primary endpoint and our data suggest limited efficacy of disulfiram in restoring sensitivity to cisplatin in multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs.

Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases

The problems with anticancer therapy are resistance and toxicity. From 3000 Cisplatin derivatives tested as antitumor agents, most of them have been rejected, due to toxicity. The aim of current study is the comparison of therapeutic combinations of the currently applied in clinical practice: Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, Heptaplatin, and Satraplatin. The literature data show that the strategies for the development of platinum anticancer agents and bypassing of resistance to Cisplatin derivatives and their toxicity are: combination therapy, Pt IV prodrugs, the targeted nanocarriers. The very important strategy for the improvement of the antitumor effect against different cancers is synergistic combination of Cisplatin derivatives with: (1) anticancer agents-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Cytarabine, Fludarabine, Pemetrexed, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Topotecan, Etoposide, Amrubicin, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel; (2) modulators of resistant mechanisms; (3) signaling protein inhibitors-Erlotinib; Bortezomib; Everolimus; (4) and immunotherapeutic drugs-Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Bevacizumab, Cemiplimab, Cetuximab, Durvalumab, Erlotinib, Imatinib, Necitumumab, Nimotuzumab, Nivolumab, Onartuzumab, Panitumumab, Pembrolizumab, Rilotumumab, Trastuzumab, Tremelimumab, and Sintilimab. An important approach for overcoming the drug resistance and reduction of toxicity of Cisplatin derivatives is the application of nanocarriers (polymers and liposomes), which provide improved targeted delivery, increased intracellular penetration, selective accumulation in tumor tissue, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The advantages of combination therapy are maximum removal of tumor cells in different phases; prevention of resistance; inhibition of the adaptation of tumor cells and their mutations; and reduction of toxicity.

High-dose chemotherapy for relapsed germ cell tumours: outcomes in low-volume specialized centres

OBJECTIVE

To report treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients with relapsed and refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs) treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation in low-volume specialized centres within the widely dispersed populations of Australia and New Zealand between 1999 and 2019.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 111 patients across 13 institutions. Patients were identified from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry. We reviewed treatment regimens, survival outcomes, deliverability and toxicities. Primary endpoints included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association of survival outcomes with patient and treatment factors.

RESULTS

The median (range) age was 30 (14-68) years and GCT histology was non-seminomatous in 84% of patients. International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG) prognostic risk category was very low/low, intermediate, high and very high in 18%, 36%, 25% and 21% of patients, respectively. Salvage conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) was administered prior to HDCT in 59% of patients. Regimens included paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (50%), carboplatin and etoposide (CE; 28%), carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide (CEI; 6%), carboplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (CEC; 5%), CEC-paclitaxel (6%) and other (5%). With a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 1-, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 62%, 57% and 52%, respectively, and OS rates were 73%, 65% and 61%, respectively. There were five treatment-related deaths. Progression on treatment occurred in 17%. In a univariable analysis, worse International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) and IPFSG prognostic groups were associated with inferior survival outcomes. An association of inferior survival was not found with the number of high-dose cycles received nor when HDCT was delivered after salvage CDCT.

CONCLUSION

This large dual-national registry-based study reinforces the efficacy and deliverability of HDCT for relapsed and refractory metastatic GCT in low-volume specialized centres in Australia and New Zealand, with survival outcomes comparable to those found in international practice.

Standard versus high-dose chemotherapy in mediastinal germ cell tumors: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to analyze feasibility and toxicities of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to standard dose chemotherapy (SDCT) in patients affected by mediastinal germ cell tumors (MGCTs), discussing factors that may affect therapeutic choices, such as: management of residual disease, early response predictors for chemotherapeutic efficacy and determinants of chemotherapeutic resistance. In this review, we discuss the main clinical experiences with HDCT and SDCT in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients specifically in those affected by MGCT.

BACKGROUND

MGCTs represent a very small subset characterized by a poor prognosis, despite improvements in their clinical management and in understanding their biology. From early 1970s, HDCT has become an alternative to SDCT for both first-line and salvage therapeutic settings in advanced GCT patients. Several HDCT schedules-either cisplatin or carboplatin-based-have been tested so far, both in clinical randomized trial and in single-center experiences, with divergent results in terms of clinical outcomes and tolerability. Moreover, the majority of these studies included, but were not exclusively designed for, advanced MGCT patients, making difficult to infer data for this specific subset.

METHODS

an extended review of literature through PubMed was conducted using the keywords "mediastinal germinal cell tumors", "standard dose chemotherapy" and "high dose chemotherapy".

CONCLUSIONS

HDCT regimens could not be considered to date a standard option as first-line therapy in advanced MGCT patients, whilst they could be an alternative to SDCT regimens in relapsed tumors after proper patient selection.

Current Status of Stem Cell Transplant in Treatment of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to discuss the history of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplant in testicular germ cell tumors, prognostic factors to consider prior to transplant, and issues both during and after transplant while also touching on the use of conventional-dose vs. high-dose chemotherapy for initial salvage treatment in patients with relapsed disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advancements in the treatment of testicular cancer have led to the majority of patients even with distant metastases being cured of their malignancy. Despite this, around 20% of patients with metastatic disease will relapse after first-line therapy, and the majority of these patients will go on to need further salvage chemotherapy, either with conventional-dose chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplant is an effective salvage therapy and will still remarkably result in cures for the majority of patients with relapsed disease. While patients receiving it as even third-line salvage therapy may achieve cures, earlier administration likely results in greater efficacy.

First-line salvage treatment options for germ cell tumor patients failing stage-adapted primary treatment : A comprehensive review compiled by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

In this review, we summarize and discuss contemporary treatment standards and possible selection criteria for decision making after failure of adjuvant or first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for primarily localized or metastatic germ cell tumors.

METHODS

This work is based on a systematic literature search conducted for the elaboration of the first German clinical practice guideline to identify prospective clinical trials and retrospective comparative studies published between Jan 2010 and Feb 2021. Study end points of interest were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), and/or safety.

RESULTS

Relapses of clinical stage I (CS I) patients irrespective of prior adjuvant treatment after orchiectomy are treated stage adapted in accordance for primary metastatic patients. Surgical approaches for sole retroperitoneal relapses are investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The appropriate salvage chemotherapy for metastatic patients progressing or relapsing after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy is still a matter of controversy. Conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the international guideline-endorsed standard of care, but based on retrospective data high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation may offer a 10-15% survival benefit for all patients. Secondary complete surgical resection of all visible residual masses irrespective of size is paramount for treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients relapsing after definite treatment of locoregional disease are to be treated by stage-adapted first-line standard therapy for metastatic disease. Patients with primary advanced/metastatic disease failing one line of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy should be referred to GCT expert centers. Dose intensity is a matter of ongoing debate, but sequential high-dose chemotherapy seems to improve patients' survival.

Recent advances in testicular germ cell tumours

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common solid tumours in young men and have an excellent overall cure rate and prognosis. In most patients, localised disease is cured by surgery alone, and a minority of patients receive short-course adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the risk of further relapse. Also, in about 80% of patients, metastatic disease can be cured by systemic cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, for a proportion of patients, the disease exhibits platinum resistance and relapse occurs. Despite further lines of systemic treatment, cure can be difficult to achieve in these patients and ultimately about 20% of them will die from disease progression. Addressing the mechanisms underpinning platinum resistance is critical to improving the survival and chances of cure for these patients. This review describes the latest advances in TGCT research, focusing on the identification of novel biomarkers, genetic characteristics and exploring novel treatments.

Current Management of Refractory Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common solid tumors affecting men between ages of 20 and 34 years. Most of the cases, even in advanced disease, will have good prognosis. However, around 20-30% of advanced disease will be refractory or develop relapse after treatment. Herein, we review the current management of refractory/relapsed GCTs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Salvage treatment of GCTs has been a controversial topic for the last few decades. Conventional dose chemotherapy (CDCT), high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with stem cell infusion, and surgical salvage were proven to be effective and curative options in some cases. The international randomized trial (TIGER) will ultimately answer which chemotherapy approach may be optimal. Furthermore, the usage of immunotherapy is still under investigation with limited data so far in the setting of relapsed/refractory GCTs. Curative paradigms including with CDCT and HDCT are possible, although novel approaches beyond HDCT are still needed to eliminate mortality from this disease.

Gemcitabine, carboplatin and veliparib in multiple relapsed/refractory germ cell tumours: The GCT-SK-004 phase II trial

Background Patients with multiple relapsed/refractory germ cell tumours (GCTs) have an extremely poor prognosis. PARP (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase) is overexpressed in GCTs compared to normal testes, and PARP overexpression is an early event in GCT development. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, carboplatin and the PARP inhibitor veliparib in patients with multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs. Methods Fifteen patients with multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs were enrolled in this phase II study from October 2016 to October 2020. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; carboplatin at a target AUC of 4 on day 1 every 3 weeks; and veliparib at a dose of 250 mg b.i.d. throughout. The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Results The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range 2-8). Twelve-month PFS was achieved in 1 (6.7 %) patient. The median PFS was 3.1 months (95 % CI 2.2-3.9), and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95 % CI 8.9-11.1). Partial remission was achieved in 4 (26.7 %) patients, and disease stabilization was observed in 5 (33.3 %) patients. A favourable response was achieved in 3 (20.0 %) patients. Treatment was well tolerated; however, 11 (73.3 %) patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, 10 (66.7 %) experienced thrombocytopenia, 5 (33.3 %) anaemia and 2 (13.3 %) febrile neutropenia. Conclusions This study failed to achieve its primary endpoint, and our data suggest limited efficacy of gemcitabine, carboplatin and veliparib for multiple relapsed/refractory GCTs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860819, registered August 9, 2016.

Survival Outcomes After High-dose Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplantation in the Salvage Setting for Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Cancers

BACKGROUND/AIM

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) have been established as the standard of care in patients with relapsed germ cell tumours (GCTs). We evaluated the safety, efficacy and tolerability of HDCT/ SCT in patients with relapsed GCTs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with relapsed GCTs, treated with HDCT, were included in this study. The conditioning regime was carboplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Clinical, radiological imaging and tumour markers determined treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age was 35 years (range=21-57 years) with 26 males and 2 females. Median time to first relapse was 6 months. Median time to progression after 2^nd line chemotherapy was 17.3 months. Fourteen patients hadMedian survival was 62 months and 16 patients (57%) are in clinical follow-up with surveillance.

CONCLUSION

In relapsed GCT patients, median survival may exceed 5 years post-HDCT and SCT.

Promising novel therapies for relapsed and refractory testicular germ cell tumors

INTRODUCTION

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common solid malignancies in young men. The overall cure rate of GCT patients in metastatic stage is excellent, however; patients with relapsed or refractory disease have poor prognosis. Attempts to treat refractory disease with novel effective treatment to improve prognosis have been historically dismal and the ability to predict prognosis and treatment response in GCTs did not sufficiently improve in the last three decades.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE to identify original and review articles (years 1964-2020) reporting on current improvement salvage treatment in GCTs and novel treatment options including molecularly targeted therapy and epigenetic approach. Review articles were further searched for additional original articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite multimodal treatment approaches the treatment of relapsed or platinum-refractory GCTs remains a challenge. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) regimens with autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) from peripheral blood showed promising results in larger retrospective studies. Promising results from in vitro studies raised high expectations in molecular targets. So far, the lacking efficacy in small and unselected trials do not shed a light on targeted therapy. Currently, wide inclusion of patients into clinical trials is highly advised.

Treating relapsed and refractory metastatic germ cell tumours with high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

To demonstrate the real-life data about patients who underwent AHSCT due to GCT.

METHODS

Between November 2016 and April 2020, 64 patients who received CE as high-dose chemotherapy for AHSCT in the Gulhane Education and Research Hospital were included in the study. Sixty-one patients received one AHSCT with CE chemotherapy regimen. Survival data and clinical characteristics were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients were 31.9 ± 9 (min-max:18-55). With a median follow-up of 10.7 ± 8.7 months, the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 57.8%, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 77.5%. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 21.5 ± 1.8 (95% CI: 14.5-33.4) and 20 ± 2 months, respectively. The response rate was 72%. There were three treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

This sizeable single-centre study shows that patients with relapsed metastatic GCT are curable by CE as high dose chemotherapy plus AHSCT with reliable toxicity even for a single cycle.

Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study

Purpose

Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification.

Results

Of 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group.

Conclusion

Compared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved.

[Intensification by high dose chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors, still an ongoing subject?]

More than 80 % of patient with metastatic germ cell tumor are cured with first line chemotherapy. Twenty to 30 % of patients will experience relapse or refractory disease with a very poor long-term prognosis. Most of them had metastatic germ cell tumors with a poor prognosis according to the international germ cell classification collaborative group (IGCCCG). The role of treatment intensification by high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by stem cell rescue has not been demonstrated yet in the first line setting compared to standard chemotherapy. The role of HDCT in first or second salvage is also not yet demonstrated, many studies have been published in this situation with a lot of different regimen. Outside clinical trial, HDCT remains an option in salvage therapy, depending on many factors including prognostics factors, previous therapy, general condition and reference center consideration to select eligible patient who could benefit the most of this approach. Results from the international randomized trial TIGER will provide evidence-based information for HDCT strategy.

Over a decade of experience with carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring in a childhood cancer setting in the United Kingdom

The widely used platinum agent carboplatin represents a good example of an anticancer drug where clear relationships between pharmacological exposure and clinical response and toxicity have previously been shown. Within the setting of childhood cancer, there are defined groups of patients who present a particular challenge when dosing with carboplatin, including neonates and infants, those who are anephric, and poor prognosis patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. For these groups, nonstandard chemotherapy dosing regimens are currently utilised, often with different approaches between clinical study protocols and between treatment centres. For the treatment of these patient populations in the UK, there is now significant experience in carrying out therapeutic drug monitoring, aiming to consistently achieve target drug exposures, maximise drug efficacy and minimise treatment-related side effects. An ongoing clinical trial is currently providing information on drug exposure for a wide range of anticancer agents in these hard to treat patient populations. In addition to supporting dosing decisions for individual patients, the collection and analysis of these data may allow the development of future dosing regimens. For example, current reduced dosing approaches for neonates and infants based on age or body weight, may well be better replaced by regimens based on a sound pharmacological rationale. The successful use of adaptive carboplatin dosing in childhood cancer should encourage the development of therapeutic drug monitoring approaches more widely in an oncology setting.

Management of Late Relapses After Chemotherapy in Testicular Cancer: Optimal Outcomes with Dose-intense Salvage Chemotherapy and Surgery

BACKGROUND

Late relapse (LR) in testicular cancer is defined as disease recurrence more than 2yr after primary treatment. Optimal management for this rare group is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostic factors relevant to outcomes in a large LR series following primary treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated for advanced testicular cancer within the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Network between 1995 and 2016. We identified 53 cases of LR following initial treatment for metastatic disease with platinum-based chemotherapy, and collected data on patient and tumour characteristics, treatments, and outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for all patients. Survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analysis of descriptive variables was performed using the log-rank method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Across the cohort, PFS at 36 mo was 41% and OS was 61%. Multiple factors were correlated with PFS. Use of dose-intense or high-dose chemotherapy was associated with better PFS compared to conventional-dose chemotherapy (PFS 48 vs 9.8 mo; p=0.0036). Resection of residual disease post-relapse chemotherapy was associated with better PFS (hazard ratio 3.46; p=0.0076). There was a nonsignificant trend towards worse PFS in very late (>7 yr) relapses. The study is limited by its retrospective nature and selection bias cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new insight into prognostic factors in LR. It confirms that surgery is critical to optimal outcomes, and suggests that dose-intense or high-dose chemotherapy in multisite nonresectable disease should be considered wherever feasible.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied patients with testicular cancer that recurred at least 2yr after initial treatment with chemotherapy. We found that patients who are able to have surgery to remove cancer and who have more intensive chemotherapy may be more likely to live longer.

Outcome of Men With Relapses After Adjuvant Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Clinical Stage I Nonseminoma

PURPOSE

Clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS) is a disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant chemotherapy. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience relapse after such treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 51 patients with CSI NS who experienced a relapse after adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) from 18 centers/11 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survivals calculated from day 1 of treatment at first relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse and rate of subsequent relapses.

RESULTS

Median time to relapse was 13 months, with the earliest relapse 2 months after start of adjuvant treatment and the latest after 25 years. With a median follow-up of 96 months, the 5-year PFS was 67% (95% CI, 54% to 82%) and the 5-year OS was 81% (95% CI, 70% to 94%). Overall, 19 (37%) of 51 relapses occurred later than 2 years. Late relapses were associated with a significantly higher risk of death from NS (hazard ratio, 1.10 per year; P = .01). Treatment upon relapse was diverse: the majority of patients received a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a subsequent relapse. At last follow-up, 41 patients (80%) were alive and disease-free, eight (16%) had died of progressive disease, and one patient (2%) each had died from therapy-related or other causes.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of patients with relapse after adjuvant BEP seem better compared with patients who experience relapse after treatment of metastatic disease but worse compared with those who have de-novo metastatic disease. We found a substantial rate of late and subsequent relapses. There seem to be three patterns of relapse with different outcomes: pure teratoma, early viable NS relapse (< 2 years), and late viable NS relapse (> 2 years).

ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Current pharmacotherapy for testicular germ cell cancer

INTRODUCTION

With the implementation of platinum-based chemotherapy, germ cell tumors (GCTs) became a model for a curable solid tumor, with survival rates of 95% in all patients with >80% survival in metastatic stages.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the current standards of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I GCTs as well as first-line and salvage treatments for metastatic disease. Novel approaches for refractory disease are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Active surveillance should be considered for all stage I patients and is the preferred approach for stage I seminoma. In stage I non-seminomas with vascular invasion, one cycle of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) substantially reduces the relapse risk. For most advanced GCTs, BEP remains the first-line standard of care. For poor prognosis disease treatment, stratification according to tumor marker decline is recommended. The role of primary high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for selected very high-risk patients remains to be prospectively evaluated. Salvage HDCT at relapse seems superior to conventional chemotherapy, retrospectively. The treatment of multiply relapsed disease remains challenging. The gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/paclitaxel (GOP) protocol is considered the standard for refractory disease. However, overall, outcomes are poor and new treatment approaches are urgently needed with targeted therapies so far failing to yield relevant clinical activity.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Male Germ Cell Tumors: Improved Outcomes Over 3 Decades

The curative potential of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) for male germ cell tumors (GCTs) is well established. The optimal timing and number (single transplant [ST] versus tandem transplants [TT] versus triple transplants) of autoHCT are controversial, with wide practice variations. We examined survival trends among 2395 recipients of autoHCT for male GCTs between 1990 and 2015 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Trends and outcomes were analyzed by year of transplantation for intervals 1990 to 1994 (N = 288), 1995 to 1999 (N = 351), 2000 to 2004 (N = 376), 2005 to 2009 (N = 509), and 2010 to 2015 (N = 871). Multivariate analysis was restricted to the subset from 2000 to 2015 with research-level data (n = 267). The median duration of follow-up was 51 months. The median age at autoHCT was 31 years; 633 patients (26%) had primary extragonadal GCT, and 1167 (49%) underwent TT. The 3-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) improved from 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18% to 31%) and 35% (95% CI, 29% to 40%), respectively, in 1990 to 1994 to 47% (95% CI, 43% to 50%) and 54% (95% CI, 50% to 57%), respectively, in 2010 to 2015 (P < .0001). TT recipients were more likely than ST recipients to undergo autoHCT as first salvage treatment. The proportion of TTs increased from 38% of all autoHCTs in 2000 to 2004 to 77% in 2010 to 2015. Nonseminoma histology, residual disease at autoHCT, >1 line of pretransplantation chemotherapy, and ST versus TT were associated with inferior PFS and OS. Post-transplantation survival has improved significantly over time for relapsed/refractory male GCT and is associated with the increased use of TTs (compared with STs) and performance of autoHCT earlier in the disease course.

Treatment of refractory germ cell tumors in children with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin: A report from the Children's Oncology Group AGCT0521 study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin (TIP) is commonly used as salvage for malignant germ cell tumors (MGCT) in adults; however, additional administration of cisplatin at a young age could cause significant short- and long-term toxicities in a group of patients with high expected salvage. Because carboplatin has been shown to be effective in pediatric MGCT with less toxicity, the TIP regimen was modified by substituting carboplatin for cisplatin.

METHODS

The Children's Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial between November 2007 and June 2011 evaluating "TIC" (paclitaxel 135 mg/m² /day Day 1, ifosfamide 1,800 mg/m² /dose Days 1-5 and carboplatin with AUC 6.5 Day 1) in children < 21 years with relapsed MGCT. The endpoint of the trial was response after two cycles, incorporating RECIST response and marker decline.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (12 male, median age 13.5 years) were enrolled. Seventeen patients had tumor markers ≥10 times above normal. After two cycles, by RECIST criteria, 8 patients achieved a partial response (response rate 40%), 10 had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease. A ≥ 1 log reduction was achieved in 10/17 patients (58.8%) with elevated markers. By study defined criteria, combining response by RECIST and marker decline, the response rate was 44%.

CONCLUSION

TIC is active in relapsed pediatric MGCT and should be considered for salvage therapy in children. In adolescents and older adults with relapse MGCT, TIP or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell remain the standard therapy.

Management of Refractory Germ Cell Cancer

Over the past 5 decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies has resulted in high cure rates in newly diagnosed patients with germ cell cancer. However, about 30% of those with metastatic disease at initial presentation will experience refractory disease. Salvage treatment is far more complex and less validated than first-line treatment because it is rare, patient cohorts are more heterogeneous, and prognostic factors seem to have greater impact. Prior to the initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations must be made, including assessment of known prognostic factors and choice of the optimal salvage strategy. Evaluation of patients according to their disease biology, response to prior treatment, and the extent of their tumor burden at the time of salvage treatment is crucial for establishing the optimal salvage strategy. Patients with metastatic germ cell cancer in whom adequate cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy fails should be included in the ongoing randomized TIGER trial comparing conventional-dose chemotherapy with high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment. Outside this trial, patients may be treated with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy depending on the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors, availability of resources, and patient and physician preferences.

The Role of Salvage High-Dose Chemotherapy in Relapsed Male Germ Cell Tumors

Germ cell tumors (GCT) are a unique tumor entity with excellent cure rates if guideline-endorsed treatment is thoroughly applied. Even patients with widespread metastatic disease can often be cured with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy as part of a multimodal treatment approach. However, about 30% of patients with metastatic disease at initial presentation, corresponding to about 5-10% of all GCT patients, relapse or progress despite first-line treatment and therefore require salvage chemotherapy. Salvage systemic treatment either consists of conventional-dose cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy or sequential high-dose treatment with carboplatin and etoposide plus subsequent autologous stem cell support. This review is based on a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE and conference proceedings of ESMO, ASCO, and EAU meetings until 2018 and provides an overview of current treatment options for germ cell cancer patients relapsing after or progressing during first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Conventional-Dose versus High-Dose Chemotherapy for Relapsed Germ Cell Tumors

The majority of metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs) are cured with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but 20–30% of patients will relapse after first-line chemotherapy and require additional salvage strategies. The two major salvage approaches in this scenario are high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT). Both CDCT and HDCT have curative potential in the management of relapsed/refractory GCT. However, due to a lack of conclusive randomized trials, it remains unknown whether sequential HDCT or CDCT represents the optimal initial salvage approach, with practice varying between tertiary institutions. This represents the most pressing question remaining for defining GCT treatment standards and optimizing outcomes. The authors review prognostic factors in the initial salvage setting as well as the major studies assessing the efficacy of CDCT, HDCT, or both, describing the strengths and weaknesses that formed the rationale behind the ongoing international phase III “TIGER” trial.

Therapeutic approaches for refractory germ cell cancer

INTRODUCTION

Most germ cell cancer patients with metastatic disease are cured by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. 30% of metastatic patients will develop relapse or progress despite adequate first-line treatment and will require salvage therapy, with about 10% of metastasized patients ultimately developing platinum-resistant and fatal disease. Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings of ESMO, ASCO and EAU meetings, this review provides an overview on current and potential future treatment options for platinum-refractory germ cell cancer patients including cytostatics and molecularly targeted therapies. Expert commentary: Treatment of platinum-refractory disease remains challenging and long-term survival is rarely achieved despite multimodal treatment approaches. Targeted treatment approaches do not yet play a role in the treatment of platinum-refractory disease due to lacking efficacy in small, unselected clinical trials. Inclusion of patients into clinical trials is strongly recommended.

Retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory testicular nonseminous germ cell tumors treated with autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

About 20-25% of the testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are relapsed or refractory after first line therapy and optimal treatment for this group is poorly defined. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in this patient group.Material and.

METHODS

19 patients with 28 ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated with BEP (Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) as first line therapy and TIP(paclitexalifosfamide, cisplatin) was given as salvage chemotherapy. Stem cell collection was performed with TIP and granulocyte stimulating factor. ASCT was performed with carboplatin(700mg/m2) and etoposite(750mg /m 2). The results were provided as median(min-max). P<0.05 was accepted as statistical significant level.

RESULTS

After ASCT, complete(CR) and partial remission (PR) rates were 47.3% and 31 .5% respectively. The median overall survival(OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 18(0-37.4 months) and 7(0-15months) months respectively. Estimated 2-year OS was 47.4% and PFS was 35.3%. Grade 3/4 toxicities including diarrhea, mucositis, and toxic hepatitis were observed in 5 patients. Only one patient died due to complication of transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of the patients in this study is limited, ASCT seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality in relapsed refractory non-seminomatousTGCT with an acceptable OS, PFS and mortality rates.

High β-1,4-Galactosyltransferase-I expression in peripheral T-lymphocytes is associated with a low risk of relapse in germ-cell cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell reinfusion

Survival of patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) and primary progression or relapse after cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy is highly heterogeneous, ranging from close to zero to more than 70%. We investigated β-1,4-Galactosyltransferase-I (B4GALT1) expression levels in peripheral lymphocytes in a cohort of 46 testicular cancer patients. B4GALT1 enhances immune cell crosstalk via glycosylation of surface molecules. A high expression level of B4GALT1 in T-lymphocytes, but not in monocytes, was associated with a lower risk of relapse with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) of HR: 0.45-0.97; p = 0.02) upon multivariate Cox regression analysis. Correspondingly, interleukin 10 (IL10), a cytokine released by cytotoxic T-cells, was likewise significantly elevated in T-lymphocytes of non-relapse GCC patients (HR: 0.3; 95% CI of HR: 0.14-0.65; p = 0.002). Our data indicate that glycosylation and activation of T-lymphocytes may play a pivotal role in disease control in GCC patients with primary progressive or relapsed disease.

Modern Management of Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is a rare urological malignancy with high cure rate. The development of highly effective systemic treatment regimens along with advances in surgical treatment of advanced disease has led to continued improvement in outcomes. Patients with testicular cancer who are treated following the treatment guideline mostly achieved high quality of life and long-term survival. However, patients who were identified as having non-guideline directed care were at significantly higher risk of relapse. In this book chapter, we introduce in depth the modern management of testicular cancer, including diagnosis, staging and risk stratification, treatment strategies of seminoma and non-seminoma germ cell tumors, follow-up protocols, and salvage treatment for disease relapse. We also review new studies and updates on medical and surgical management of advanced testicular cancer.

Salvage Therapy for Patients With Germ Cell Tumor

The introduction of cisplatin combination chemotherapy, 40 years ago, transformed metastatic testicular germ cell tumors from an almost uniformly fatal disease into a model for a curable neoplasm. Before the era of platinum combination chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate among men with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors was 5% to 10%. Currently, the 5-year survival rate is 80% for patients with metastatic disease and 95% overall. Despite the substantial advances in the treatment of germ cell tumors, 20% to 30% of patients will relapse after first-line chemotherapy and will require additional salvage therapies. Standard-dose or high-dose chemotherapy can cure ≤ 50% of these patients. Relapses after high-dose chemotherapy generally carry a poor prognosis; however, cure is still possible in a small percentage of patients by using further salvage chemotherapy or salvage surgery.

Consensus Recommendations from the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group on the Use of High-dose Chemotherapy in Germ Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been studied in several clinical scenarios in advanced germ cell cancer (GCC).

OBJECTIVE

To establish a clinical practice guideline for HDCT use in the treatment of GCC patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

An expert panel reviewed information available from the literature. The panel addressed relevant issues concerning and related to HDCT. The guideline was externally reviewed by two international experts.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The efficacy of HDCT has been demonstrated in selected GCC patients. The most conclusive evidence comes from retrospective analyses that need to be interpreted with caution. HDCT can cure a significant proportion of heavily treated GCC patients. When indicated, sequential HDCT with regimens containing carboplatin and etoposide, as well as peripheral stem-cell support, is recommended. There is no conclusive evidence to recommend HDCT as first-line therapy. According to a multinational retrospective pooled analysis, HDCT might be superior to conventional CT as first salvage treatment in selected patients. There is an urgent need for prospective clinical trials addressing the value of HDCT in GCC patients who experience failure on first-line cisplatin-based CT. In patients who progress on conventional-dose salvage CT, HDCT should be considered. Treatment of these patients at experienced centers is strongly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been demonstrated that HDCT cures selected GCC patients who experience disease progression on conventional rescue regimens. The panel recommends the inclusion of GCC patients in randomized clinical trials including HDCT.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This consensus establishes clinical practice guidelines for the use and study of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell cancer.

High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Peripheral-Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors: The Indiana University Experience

Purpose Patients with relapsed metastatic germ cell tumor (GCT) can be cured with second-line and even third-line regimens. We report survival outcomes of patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) at Indiana University between 2004 and 2014. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 364 consecutive patients with GCT who progressed after cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and were subsequently treated with HDCT and PBSCT. Three hundred forty-one patients received two consecutive courses of HDCT consisting of 700 mg/m² carboplatin and 750 mg/m² etoposide, each for 3 consecutive days, and each followed by PBSCT. Twenty-three patients received only a single course of HDCT because of progressive disease or toxicity. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test predictors of disease progression. Results The median age was 32 years (range, 17 to 70 years). With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 60% (95% CI, 55% to 65%) and the 2-year overall survival was 66% (95% CI, 60% to 70%). Three hundred three patients received HDCT as second-line therapy with a 2-year PFS of 63% (95% CI, 57% to 68%), and 61 patients received HDCT as third-line or later therapy with a 2-year PFS of 49% (95% CI, 36% to 61%). In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with disease progression included use of HDCT as third-line or later therapy, platinum-refractory disease, mediastinal primary tumor site, nonseminoma histology, intermediate- or poor-risk disease at the time of GCT diagnosis, and human chorionic gonadotropin ≥ 1,000 mIU/mL at initiation of HDCT. There were nine treatment-related deaths. Secondary leukemia developed in five patients. Conclusion This large single-institution study demonstrates that patients with relapsed metastatic GCT are curable by HDCT plus PBSCT even when used in third-line or later therapy.

Testicular germ cell tumours

Testicular germ cell tumours are at the crossroads of developmental and neoplastic processes. Their cause has not been fully elucidated but differences in incidences suggest that a combination of genetic and environment factors are involved, with environmental factors predominating early in life. Substantial progress has been made in understanding genetic susceptibility in the past 5 years on the basis of the results of large genome-wide association studies. Testicular germ cell tumours are highly sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy and hence have among the best outcomes of all tumours. Because the tumours occur mainly in young men, preservation of reproductive function, quality of life after treatment, and late effects are crucial concerns. In this Seminar, we provide an overview of advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, genetics, and biology of testicular germ cell tumours. We also summarise the consensus on how to treat testicular germ cell tumours and focus on a few controversies and improvements in the understanding of late effects of treatment and quality of life for survivors.