Hospitalisation and adverse drug events in a geriatric oncology setting: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Geriatric Oncology is a specialty where a multidisciplinary approach can address the unmet needs of older adults with cancer. Older adults are at increased risk of adverse drug events (ADE) due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, increasing treatment complexity, and medication burden.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature to determine the incidence of unplanned hospitalisation due to ADE for all medications, both systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) and non-SACT medications.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The search included the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. A manual search of Scopus was then performed. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

Overall, three studies were included. One observational study reported 19 % of unplanned hospital admissions due to ADE in patients aged ≥70 years with cancer. The first retrospective study reported 24 % of unplanned hospital admissions are due to ADE in patients aged ≥70 years with cancer, and the second retrospective study reported 26 % of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had an unplanned hospital admission due to an ADE.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of studies assessing unplanned hospitalisation due to ADE in older adults with cancer. Future studies are needed and should account for the reporting of potential ADE relative to supportive care, ancillary medications, and indeed chronic medications used to treat long-standing comorbidities.

Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications in elderly with multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Elderly with cancer often have multimorbidity, which determines a higher risk of polypharmacy. This is related to negative clinical results such as adverse drug reaction and emergence service visits. Furthermore, polypharmacy increases the risk of using potentially inappropriate medications.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly with multiple myeloma and associated factors.

METHODS

The study was conducted with older adults with multiple myeloma treated at outpatient oncology and hematology services in a southeastern Brazilian capital. Potentially inappropriate medications were classified using the American Geriatric Society/Beers 2019 Criteria. Variables were described using frequency and proportions, performing multiple logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three older adults with multiple myeloma were included, with a median age of 70.9 years. The median number of medications was 8, and 63% of patients used polypharmacy. More than half (54%) of the patients used potentially inappropriate medications, and proton pump inhibitors (46%) and benzodiazepines (8%) were the most employed therapeutic classes. Older adults who used potentially inappropriate medications differed from those who did not use them in the following characteristics: income up to three minimum wages, higher schooling level, private service, multimorbidity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, adverse event, and polypharmacy. Higher schooling levels and polypharmacy were independently associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Potentially inappropriate medication use was high in patients with multiple myeloma studied. The use of polypharmacy and higher schooling levels were independently and positively associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications.

Assessing the ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group tool to predict chemotherapy toxicity in older Japanese patients: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) prediction tool was designed in the United States to predict grade ≥ 3 chemotherapy-related adverse events (CRAE) in older patients. However, its usefulness among Japanese people, who have different sensitivities to anticancer drugs and life expectancy, remains unknown. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of the CARG tool for predicting severe CRAE in older Japanese patients with cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors aged 65 years and older who commenced anticancer drug regimens from April 2018 to October 2020 were divided into three groups (low, medium, and high-risk) based on their CARG risk scores. Toxicity was prospectively observed by a pharmacist. The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRAE and the CARG risk score. The secondary objective was to evaluate hematological and non-hematological toxicities. CRAE incidence was compared among the three groups using a closed testing procedure: (1) Cochran-Armitage test for trend and (2) chi-square test for paired comparison.

RESULTS

The patients (N = 165) had a median age of 71 years (range: 65-89 years). CRAE in patients divided into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, based on CARG risk scores, were 39%, 55%, and 82%, respectively (low vs high; p < 0.001, medium vs high; p < 0.01). The incidence of severe hematologic toxicity was 37%, 35%, and 50% in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively; the incidence of severe non-hematologic toxicity was 15%, 36%, and 65%, respectively (low vs medium; p < 0.01, low vs high; p < 0.001, and medium vs high; p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective observational study to validate the CARG prediction tool in older Japanese patients with cancer. The CARG risk score may be effective in predicting the development of non-hematologic toxicities. These results should be considered when administering chemotherapy to older Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Polypharmacy and drug interactions in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: associated factors

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy leads to increased risks of drug interactions, translating in potential hazardous health outcomes. This study aims to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and severe-drug interactions (SDIs) in older patients with cancer. Antineoplastic agents (ANAs) involvement and possible risk contexts (comorbidities with cardiac risk, and high-risk medications) were also analysed.

METHODS

Observational study with older adults (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with cancer, who were treated with antineoplastic agents (ANAs); it was conducted in three hospitals from the north of Portugal. Data collection was obtained using self-reports and medical records. DDIs were identified and classified using Micromedex® software. Descriptive and association analyze statistics were performed. Statistical hypothesis tests with p value less than 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical procedures and analysis were performed with R version 4.1.3.

RESULTS

We enrolled 552 patients. Polypharmacy prevalence was 88.40%; 76.45% and 56.16% of the patients presented with DDIs and SDIs, respectively. SDIs with ANAs were found in 21.20% of the patients. High-risk medications were associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy, DDIs, and SDIs. Polypharmacy and DDIs were higher in patients with hypertension or diabetes. SDIs were higher in patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy, potential DDIs and SDIs were highly prevalent in older adults with cancer. A careful review of the medication administered is necessary to decrease it. These findings warrant further research to optimize medication in this population and decrease problems related to medication, which may lead to emergency room visits and hospitalisations, compromising patient safety and/or ongoing treatments.

The association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life among older adults with prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with prostate cancer (PC) are at risk of polypharmacy, which further complicates disease management and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study evaluated the association between polypharmacy and HRQoL among Medicare beneficiaries with PC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational, retrospective study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data resource. Beneficiaries aged ≥65 and enrolled in Medicare Advantage Organizations were included if they had a PC diagnosis and continuously enrolled in Part D for 12 months prior to the completion of MHOS. Polypharmacy was determined based on the unique number of concurrent Part D prescriptions during 12 months before survey: no polypharmacy (NP, n = 0-4), polypharmacy (PP, n = 5-9), and excessive polypharmacy (EPP, n ≥ 10). HRQoL was assessed using the Physical and Mental Component Summary T-scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) in MHOS. ANOVA and Pearson's Chi-Square tests were performed to assess variances between polypharmacy and continuous/categorical variables. Multivariate linear regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between polypharmacy and HRQoL. The severely impaired HRQoL cohort was identified based on normalized z-scores of PCS and MCS. Odds ratios were calculated to prioritize drug-drug and class-class pairs associated with patients with severely impaired HRQoL.

RESULTS

Data from 16,573 beneficiaries (24,126 records) showed that 44.4% had PP and 10.1% had EPP. Beneficiaries with PP and EPP had significantly lower mean PCS and MCS scores compared to those without polypharmacy (p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, beneficiaries with EPP had clinically significantly lower PCS (adjusted marginal difference: -8.47 [-9.00, -7.94]) and MCS (adjusted marginal difference: -4.32 [-4.89, -3.75]) compared to the NP group. Top-ranked drug-drug pairs like tiotropium bromide and oxycodone/acetaminophen exhibited significant associations with HRQoL decline. Analysis of class-class pairs highlighted (1) corticosteroid hormone receptor agonists and opioid agonists and (2) benzodiazepines and adrenergic beta2-agonists as having significant associations with HRQoL decline.

DISCUSSION

Polypharmacy exhibits a significant association with HRQoL declines among older adults with PC.

Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Prevalence and Associated Factors at the End of Life

Background: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) impose a burden on patients with advanced cancer near the end of their lives. However, only a few studies have addressed factors associated with PIMs in such patients. Objective: To examine polypharmacy and factors associated with PIMs in end-of-life patients with advanced cancer. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting/Subjects: We analyzed 265 patients with advanced cancer who died in a palliative care unit (PCU) or at home in a home medical care (HMC) from April 2018 to December 2022 in Japan. Measurements: Sociodemographic, clinical, and prescription data at the time of PCU admission or HMC initiation were collected from electronic medical records. PIMs were assessed using OncPal Deprescribing Guidelines. Results: Patients with advanced cancer with an average age of 76.3 years and median survival days of 20 were included in the analyses. The average number of medications was 6.4 (standard deviation = 3.4), and PIMs were prescribed to 50.2%. Frequent PIMs included antihypertensive medications, peptic ulcer prophylaxis, and dyslipidemia medications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥75 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-4.05), referral from an outpatient setting compared with inpatient setting (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.12-3.80), more than two comorbidities (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.08-3.29), and more than five medications (aOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.03-3.28) were associated with PIMs. Conclusions: Medication reconciliation is recommended at the time of transition to a PCU or HMC, especially for older patients with advanced cancer who were referred from an outpatient setting and present more comorbidities and prescriptions.

Polypharmacy, over-the-counter medications, and aromatase inhibitor adherence in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy is associated with negative health outcomes and decreased medication adherence. Polypharmacy is common in cancer populations, but few studies have evaluated the relationship between polypharmacy and aromatase inhibitor (AI) adherence. No studies have evaluated the relationship between over-the-counter (OTC) supplements and AI adherence. Our primary hypothesis was that polypharmacy would be associated with increased risk of premature AI discontinuation.

METHODS

This exploratory analysis used data from the Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetics (ELPh) trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled participants from 2005 to 2009. Included patients were female, postmenopausal, with stage 0-III breast cancer, who had completed indicated chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Participants were randomized to adjuvant exemestane or letrozole and completed serial clinical examinations and questionnaires for two years. Concomitant medication data were collected prospectively. Cox proportion models were used for statistical analysis of the relationship between polypharmacy, OTCs, medication class, and AI adherence.

RESULTS

In the 490 analyzed participants, use of any prescription medications at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.56, p = 0.02). Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.67, p = 0.04). Use of any OTCs was not associated with AI discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Baseline use of prescription medications but not OTCs was associated with increased AI persistence. Future research is needed to understand how this can be utilized to promote AI adherence.

Decreasing polypharmacy in older adults with cancer: A pilot cluster-randomized trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Polypharmacy is prevalent in older adults with cancer and associated with multiple adverse outcomes. A single-site, cluster-randomized clinical trial will enroll older adults with cancer and polypharmacy starting chemotherapy and will assess the effectiveness and feasibility of deprescribing interventions by comparing two arms: a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention and a patient educational brochure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study will be conducted in two phases. In phase I, focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews will guide adaptation of deprescribing interventions for the oncology clinic (phase Ia), and eight patients will undergo the pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention with iterative adaptations (phase Ib). In phase II, a pilot cluster-randomized trial (n = 72) will compare a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention with a patient education brochure, with treating oncologists as the cluster. Both efficacy (relative dose intensity of planned chemotherapy, potentially inappropriate medications successfully deprescribed, chemotherapy toxicity, functional status, hospitalizations, falls, and symptoms) and implementation outcomes (barriers and facilitators) will be assessed.

DISCUSSION

This study is anticipated to provide pilot data to inform a nationwide randomized clinical trial of deprescribing in older adults starting cancer treatment. The cluster randomization is intended to provide an initial estimate for the intervention effect as well as oncologists' intra-class correlation coefficient. Deprescribing interventions may improve outcomes in older adults starting cancer treatment, but these interventions are understudied in this population, and it is unknown how best to implement them into oncology practice. The results of this trial will inform the design of large, randomized phase III trials of deprescribing.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier:NCT05046171. Date of registration: September 16, 2021.

Lung cancer, comorbidities, and medication: the infernal trio

Most patients with lung cancer are smokers and are of advanced age. They are therefore at high risk of having age- and lifestyle-related comorbidities. These comorbidities are subject to treatment or even polypharmacy. There is growing evidence of a link between lung cancer, comorbidities and medications. The relationships between these entities are complex. The presence of comorbidities and their treatments influence the time of cancer diagnosis, as well as the diagnostic and treatment strategy. On the other hand, cancer treatment may have an impact on the patient's comorbidities such as renal failure, pneumonitis or endocrinopathies. This review highlights how some comorbidities may have an impact on lung cancer presentation and may require treatment adjustments. Reciprocal influences between the treatment of comorbidities and anticancer therapy will also be discussed.

Understanding the Extent of Polypharmacy and its Association With Health Service Utilization Among Persons With Cancer and Multimorbidity: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

Background: Cancer often co-occurs with other chronic conditions, which may result in polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased health service utilization. Objectives: This study examines the overall prevalence of polypharmacy (5 or more medications) among adults with cancer and multimorbidity, as well as the association of both minor polypharmacy (5-9 medications) and hyper-polypharmacy (10 or more medications) on high use of emergency room visits and hospitalizations, while controlling for age, sex, and type and stage of cancer. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study used linked health administrative databases and included persons 18 years and older diagnosed with cancer between April 2010 and March 2013 in Ontario, Canada. Data on the number of health service utilizations at or above the 90th percentile (high users), was collected up to March 2014 and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of polypharmacy. Results: The prevalence of polypharmacy was 46% prior to cancer diagnosis, and 57% one year after diagnosis. Polypharmacy prior to and after cancer diagnosis increased with the level of multimorbidity, increasing age, but did not differ by sex. It was also highest in persons with lung cancer (52.4%) and those diagnosed with stage 4 cancer (51.3%). Minor polypharmacy increased the odds of being a high user of emergency rooms (1.16; 99% CI: 1.09-1.24) and hospitalizations (1.03; 0.98-1.09) and the odds of high use was greater with hyper-polypharmacy (1.41; 1.33-1.51) and (1.23; 1.17-1.29) respectively. Conclusion: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent and is associated with high health service utilization among adults with cancer and multimorbidity.

Clinical impact and cost-saving analysis of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention in older patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Hospital admission and discharge are at high risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) in older patients with cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention (RECAP) to optimize drug therapy in patients with cancer ≥75 years admitted to oncology or geriatric wards.

METHOD

RECAP intervention was defined as follows: at admission and discharge, hospital pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reconciliation and review, identified relevant DRPs and provided optimization recommendations to prescribers; at discharge, pharmacists also provided patient education and shared information with primary care providers. The impact of the intervention was assessed by the rate of implementation of recommendations by the prescribers and the evolution of polypharmacy rate; a peer review of the clinical significance of DRPs was performed by an expert panel of geriatric oncologists and pharmacists. A cost saving analysis compared cost avoided through resolution of DRPs to cost of pharmacist's time.

RESULTS

From January 2019 and August 2020, 201 patients were included (median age 80 [75-97] years), 68.7% with solid tumors. DRPs requiring optimization were identified in 70.9% of patients at admission (mean 1.7 DRP/patient) and 47.7% at discharge (0.9 DRP/patient). Most pharmacist recommendations (70.8%) were followed by prescribers, allowing the correction of 1.2 DRP/patient at admission and 0.7 DRP/patient at discharge. Half of resolved DRPs were rated as clinically significant. However, polypharmacy rate was not reduced at discharge. Cost comparison showed $7.2 avoided for $1 invested, with an estimated total net benefit of $354,822 (mean $1766 per patient).

CONCLUSIONS

The RECAP model significantly reduces DRPs in hospitalized older patients with cancer. The model was cost saving, confirming the value of implementing it in routine practice.

The potential for deprescribing in a palliative oncology patient population: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The use of preventive medication in palliative oncology patients may be inappropriate due to limited life expectancy. Deprescribing tools are available but time-consuming and not always tailored to this specific population. Our primary goal was to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in palliative oncology patients with a life expectancy of up to 2 years using an adapted deprescribing tool. Our secondary aim was to identify patient characteristics associated with the presence of PIMs.

METHODS

Oncology patients with a life expectancy of up to 2 years were included cross-sectionally. An adapted deprescribing tool was developed to identify PIMs. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having PIMs.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were included in this study of which 56% had at least one PIM with a population mean of 1.1 PIM per patient. Most frequently defined PIMs were antihypertensive drugs and gastric acid inhibitors. Identification of PIMs by review took an estimated 5-10 min per patient. Polypharmacy, age >65 years and inpatient/outpatient status were found to be associated with having at least one PIM.

CONCLUSIONS

Deprescribing is possible in more than half of palliative oncology patients with a life expectancy of up to 2 years. The adapted deprescribing tool used is non-time consuming and suitable for palliative oncology patients, regardless of age.

Polypharmacy and potentially-inappropriate medications are prevalent in the elderly cancer patients receiving systemic cancer therapy and they co-relate with adverse outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Cancer is the disease of the ageing. Most of the elderly cancer patients have pre-existing illnesses requiring complexity of medical care. Excessive medications would lead not only futility, but also result in adverse outcomes especially if such over-prescription is not appropriate. This study was intended to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially-inappropriate medications (PIMs) among elderly cancer patients eligible for active cancer care and their associations with hospitalization and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted among the elderly non-hematologic cancer patients (≥ 65 years old) whom a medical oncologist had decided suitable for systemic cancer therapy. Demographic data including age, sex, primary site of cancer, cancer stage at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), numbers and kinds of medications used both prior to and during cancer treatment were recorded. Hospitalizations not related to systemic cancer therapy administration and mortality were prospectively monitored. All of the patients had to be followed at least one year after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 180 eligible participants. Median age in years (IQR) was 68 (65-73). One hundred patients (55.56%) were male and 80 patients (44.44%) were female. Breast (35, 19.44%), lung (31, 17.22%) and colorectal (18, 10%) cancers were the most common diagnoses. Eighty-six patients (47.78%) had metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis. One hundred twenty-two patients (67.78%) had PP (5 or more medications a day) and thirty-six patients (20%) had hyper-PP (10 or more medications a day). One hundred twenty five of the whole cohort (69.4%) had PIMs. Patients with more serious CCI scores were associated with PP and hyper-PP. While patients with primary lung cancer was only the only factor associated with PIMs. When excluding opioids, laxatives and anti-emetics, the most frequently prescribed drugs during cancer treatment, the so-called corrected PP did not associate with worse 1-year survival. Factors correlated with 1-year mortality were more advanced age group (70 years old or more) (OR 2.24; 95% C.I., 1.14-4.41; p = 0.019), primary lung cancer (OR 2.89; 95% C.I., 1.45-5.78; p = 0.003), metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis (OR 4.57; 95% C.I., 1.90-10.97; p = 0.001), and unplanned hospitalizations (OR 3.09; 95% C.I.,1.60-5.99; p = 0.001). While male gender (OR 2.35; 95% C.I., 1.17-4.71; p = 0.016), metastatic stage at cancer diagnosis (OR 2.74; 95% C.I., 1.33-5.66; p = 0.006) and corrected PP (OR 1.90; 95% C.I. 1.01-3.56; p = 0.046) were the significant predictive factors of unplanned hospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly cancer patients suitable for systemic cancer therapy, around two thirds of patients had PP and PIMs. Higher CCI score was the only significant predictor of PP and hyper-PP; while primary lung cancer was the sole independent factor predicting PIMs. PP was associated with unplanned hospitalizations, albeit not the survival.

Pharmaceutical care model in precision medicine in China

Pharmacy service is to provide individualized pharmaceutical care for patients, which should follow the current evidence-based pharmacy, and constantly verify the evidence and then produce new evidence. In pharmaceutical care, differences are often found in the efficacy and adverse reactions of drugs among individuals, even within individuals, which are closely related to patients' genetics, liver and kidney functions, disease states, and drug interactions. Back in the 1980s, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been applied to routinely monitor the blood drug concentration of patients taking antiepileptic drugs or immunosuppressants after transplantation to provide individualized dosage recommendations and accumulate a large amount of pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data. As individualized pharmaceutical care proceeds, the concept of precision medicine was introduced into pharmacy services in combination with evidence-based pharmacy, PK/PD theories, and big data to further promote the TDM technology and drugs, and carry out pharmacogenomics analysis. The TDM and pharmacogenomics have been applied gradually to the fields of antimicrobial, antitumor, and antipsychotic drugs and immunosuppressants. Based on the concept of precision pharmacy, we adopted approaches including PK/PD, quantitative pharmacology, population pharmacokinetics, and big data machine learning to provide more personalized pharmacy services, which is mainly for special patients, such as critical patients, patients with interaction risk of multiple drugs, patients with liver and renal insufficiency, pregnant women, children, and elderly patients. As the service pattern of precision pharmacy has been constructed and constantly improved, better evidence in clinical practice will be produced to provide patients with better precision pharmacy service.

Pharmaceutical care model in precision medicine in China

Pharmacy service is to provide individualized pharmaceutical care for patients, which should follow the current evidence-based pharmacy, and constantly verify the evidence and then produce new evidence. In pharmaceutical care, differences are often found in the efficacy and adverse reactions of drugs among individuals, even within individuals, which are closely related to patient's genetics, liver and kidney functions, disease states, and drug interactions. Back in the 1980s, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been applied to routinely monitor the blood drug concentration of patients taking antiepileptic drugs or immunosuppressants after transplantation to provide individualized dosage recommendations and accumulate a large amount of pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data. As individualized pharmaceutical care proceeds, the concept of precision medicine was introduced into pharmacy services in combination with evidence-based pharmacy, PK/PD theories and big data to further promote the TDM technology and drugs, and carry out pharmacogenomics analysis. The TDM and pharmacogenomics have been applied gradually to the fields of antimicrobial, antitumor and antipsychotic drugs and immunosuppressants. Based on the concept of precision pharmacy, we adpoted approaches including PK/PD, quantitative pharmacology, population pharmacokinetics, and big data machine learning to provide more personalized pharmacy services, which is mainly for special patients, such as critical patients, patients with interaction risk of multiple drugs, patients with liver and renal insufficiency, pregnant women, children and elderly patients. As the service pattern of precision pharmacy has been constructed and constantly improved, better evidence in clinical practice will be produced to provide patients with better precision pharmacy service.

Dexamethasone-sparing regimens with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in older patients (>65 years) fit for cisplatin: A sub-analysis from a phase 3 study

INTRODUCTION

We recently demonstrated the non-inferiority of two dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens with an oral fixed-combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) versus the guideline-recommended DEX use for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Since prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is critical in older patients, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of the DEX-sparing regimens in this subset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemo-naive patients aged >65 years treated with high-dose cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2) were eligible. Patients received NEPA and DEX on day 1 and were randomized to receive either (1) no further DEX (DEX1), (2) oral low-dose DEX (4 mg) on days 2-3 (DEX3), or (3) the guideline-recommended standard DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2-4 (DEX4). The primary efficacy endpoint of the parent study was complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1-5). No significant nausea (NSN; none or mild nausea) and the proportion of patients reporting no impact on daily life (NIDL) which was evaluated by the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire on day 6 (overall combined score > 108), were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among the 228 patients in the parent study, 107 were > 65 years. Similar CR rates [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were observed in patients over 65 years across treatment groups [DEX1: 75% (59.7-86.8%); DEX3: 80.6% (62.5-92.6%); DEX4: 75% (56.6-88.5%)] as well as versus the total study population. NSN rates were also similar in the older-patients across treatment groups (p = 0.480) but were higher compared with the total population. Similar rates of NIDL (95% CI) were reported in the older-patient subset across treatment groups [DEX1: 61.5% (44.6-76.6%); DEX3: 64.3% (44.1-81.4%); DEX4: 62.1% (42.3-79.3%); p = 1.0] during the overall phase, as well as versus total population. A similar proportion of older patients across treatment groups experienced DEX-related side effects.

DISCUSSION

This analysis shows that older-patients who are fit for cisplatin benefit from a simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX with neither loss in antiemetic efficacy nor the adverse impact on patient daily functioning. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04201769) on 17/12/2019 (retrospectively registered).

Hospitalization due to adverse drug events in older adults with cancer: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric oncology is a rapidly evolving field of practice, where comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) and multidisciplinary team (MDT) input have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Polypharmacy and potential drug interactions (PDI) have been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in older adults with cancer, receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). Our aim was to assess the incidence of unplanned hospitalization in older adults with cancer attending medical oncology outpatient clinics and to determine whether an unplanned hospitalization was potentially due to an adverse drug event (ADE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients who attended a medical oncology outpatient appointment from January 1 to March 31, 2018. Medical records were examined to identify any unplanned hospital admissions between the clinic visit date and three and six months after initial clinic visit. Incidences of unplanned hospitalization were assessed to determine if an ADE potentially occurred.

RESULTS

Data collected from 174 patients were analyzed. Over half (57%) were female, median age was 75 years and 53% had a favorable performance status. The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (GI) at 31% (n = 54), breast 29% (n = 51), and genitourinary 22% (n = 37). Seventy-two percent had advanced disease (stage III/IV) and 61% had systemic therapy (SACT and hormonal therapy). Polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was observed in 77% of patients. The total number of admissions at six months was 99, with 55% of these potentially due to an ADE. On multivariate analysis breast cancer (p ≤0.001), lung cancer (p = 0.034), performance status (p ≤0.001), monochemotherapy (p = 0.012), polychemotherapy (p ≤0.001), and radiotherapy (p = 0.048) were independent predictors of unplanned hospitalization. Breast cancer (p = 0.008), GI cancer (p = 0.019), monochemotherapy (p = 0.039), and polychemotherapy (p ≤0.001) were independent predictors of unplanned hospitalization due to ADE on multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

We observed that older adults with cancer have a high risk of unplanned hospitalization due to ADE. Medication review as part of a CGA in newly diagnosed older adults with cancer by a clinical pharmacist is recommended. This may identify opportunities to avoid medications that could potentially lead to unplanned hospitalization.

Evaluation of clinical effects of a multidisciplinary-collaborated cancer support team for gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy: prospective observational study protocol of M-CAST study

BACKGROUND

Although the multidisciplinary-collaborated team approach in cancer treatment has recently become popular, prospectively evaluated evidence is limited. We started a multidisciplinary-collaborated cancer support team (MCST) to facilitate cooperation across multidisciplinary medical staff in our hospital and established clinical evidence of supportive care. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the clinical activity and effect of MCST in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a single-center, single-arm, observational study. Patients with gastrointestinal cancer scheduled to receive chemotherapy are enrolled and supported by the MCST. The primary endpoints are the number of interventions by medical staff and the number of patients who showed improvement in side effects. The secondary endpoints are the severity of side effects, medical expenses, number of consultations, the acceptance rate of prescription recommendations, adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates, dose intensity, and time required for co-medical intervention. In addition, medical staff and attending physicians evaluate all adverse events.

DISCUSSION

This study is expected to contribute to establishing new cancer-supportive care teams for patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy and those with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as jRCT1030220495. The date of first registration, 29/11/2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search.

Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use among Underserved Older Latino Adults

BACKGROUND

Previous studies identified alarming increases in medication use, polypharmacy, and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among minority older adults with multimorbidity. However, PIM use among underserved older Latino adults is still largely unknown. The main objective of this study is to examine the prevalence of PIM use among underserved, community-dwelling older Latino adults. This study examines both the complexity of polypharmacy in this community and identifies associations between PIM and multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and access to medical care among this segment of our population.

METHODS

This community-based, cross-sectional study included 126 community-dwelling Latinos aged 65 years and older. The updated 2019 AGS Beers Criteria was used to identify participants using PIMs. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine the independent association of PIM with several independent variables including demographic characteristics, the number of chronic conditions, the number of prescription medications used, level of pain, and sleep difficulty. In addition, we present five cases in order to offer greater insight into PIM use among our sample.

RESULTS

One-third of participants had at least one use of PIM. Polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was observed in 55% of our sample. In addition, 46% took drugs to be used with caution (UWC). In total, 16% were taking between 9 and 24 medications, whereas 39% and 46% were taking 5 to 8 and 1 to 4 prescription medications, respectively. The multinomial logit regression analysis showed that (controlling for demographic variables) increased PIM use was associated with an increased number of prescription medications, number of chronic conditions, sleep difficulty, lack of access to primary care, financial strains, and poor self-rated health.

DISCUSSION

Both qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed recurrent themes in the missed identification of potential drug-related harm among underserved Latino older adults. Our data suggest that financial strain, lack of access to primary care, as well as an increased number of medications and co-morbidity are inter-connected. Lack of continuity of care often leads to fragmented care, putting vulnerable patients at risk of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions as clinicians lack access to a current and complete list of medications patients are using at any given time. Therefore, improving access to health care and thereby continuity of care among older Latino adults with multimorbidity has the potential to reduce both polypharmacy and PIM use. Programs that increase access to regular care and continuity of care should be prioritized among multimorbid, undeserved, Latino older adults in an effort toward improved health equity.

Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy for older patients at specialist outpatient clinics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is associated with negative clinical consequences. The efficacy of deprescribing interventions within medical specialist outpatient clinics remains unclear. Here, we reviewed the research on the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions implemented within specialist outpatient clinics for patients ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

Systematic searches of key databases were undertaken for studies published between January 1990 and October 2021. The diverse nature of the study designs made it unsuitable for pooling for meta-analysis, thus, a narrative review was conducted and presented in both text and tabular formats. The primary outcome for review was that intervention resulted in a change in medication load (either total number of medications or appropriateness of medication). Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of deprescription and clinical benefits. Methodological quality of the publications was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 10,914 participants were included for review. These included geriatric outpatient clinics, oncology/hematology clinics, hemodialysis clinics, and designated polypharmacy/multimorbidity clinics. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported statistically significant reductions in medication load with intervention; however, all studies had a high risk of bias. The inclusion of a pharmacist in outpatient clinics aims to increase deprescribing, however, the current evidence is mainly restricted to prospective and pilot studies. The data on secondary outcomes were very limited and highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist outpatient clinics may provide valuable settings for implementing deprescribing interventions. The addition of a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist and the use of validated medication assessment tools appear to be enablers. Further research is warranted.

The Association Between Medication Use in Older Women with Early-Stage Operable Primary Breast Cancer and Decision Regarding Primary Treatment

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is one factor contributing to increased mortality, hospitalization, and adverse drug reactions in older adults. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of polypharmacy in a cohort of older women with early-stage operable primary breast cancer and the relationship of polypharmacy to primary treatment decision and functional status.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients with a new diagnosis of early-stage operable primary breast cancer proven histologically were recruited as part of a prospective study. The average age was 77 years. Assessment using a cancer-specific Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) tool was conducted within 6 weeks of diagnosis of breast cancer. Association was determined between number of medications and treatment decision and physical status as measured by the CGA outcomes. Additional analysis was performed to determine the associations above with polypharmacy defined by ≥5 daily medications, and if cardiovascular-related diseases have a role in the treatment decision.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy was present in 48% of patients (n = 139). CGA determined that polypharmacy was associated with greater comorbidity (P < .001), reduced physical status rated by physicians (P = .009) and patients (P = .019), and reduced ability to perform activities of instrumental ADLs (P = .008). Similar findings were present in the analysis of cardiovascular-related diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

This work suggests that patients with polypharmacy are more likely to be frail. The number of medications could help us screen patients who should go on to receive full CGA.

The role of oncology pharmacists and comprehensive medication reconciliation in informing treatment plans for older adults with cancer and downstream outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Proper medication management is an essential part of older adult cancer care. An aging population, an increase in anticancer treatment options, and high rates of comorbid conditions make navigating general medication reconciliation complicated. This review will highlight the recent literature describing the roles of the oncology pharmacist in caring for older adults with cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The body of literature highlighting oncology pharmacist roles in this population is mainly focused on polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication assessments, deprescribing nonessential therapies, drug-drug interaction reviews, and immunization optimization. Outcomes associated with oncology pharmacist interventions are still lacking as well as the development of benchmarks for appropriate pharmacy-based care in the older adult oncology population.

SUMMARY

Oncology pharmacist interventions in older adults with cancer have the potential to improve patient care. Future randomized studies in this area of practice are warranted in order to clearly define the optimal impact of oncology pharmacists.

Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Optimizing medication use is a major issue in older patients with cancer and pharmacists are increasingly involved in their multidisciplinary care. The implementation of pharmaceutical care interventions must be supported by impact evaluations to enable their development and funding. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in older patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for articles reporting evaluations of pharmaceutical care interventions for patients with cancer aged 65 years or older.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the selection criteria. Most pharmacists were part of multidisciplinary geriatric oncology teams. Whether in outpatient or inpatient settings, interventions had common components, including patient interview, medication reconciliation, and comprehensive medication review to assess drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs were identified in 95% of patients with 1.7 to 3 DRPs on average. Pharmacist recommendations resulted in a 20-40% reduction in the total number of DRPs and a 20-25% decrease in the prevalence of DRP. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate or omitted medications and their subsequent deprescribing or addition varied greatly between studies, notably depending on detection tools used. Clinical impact was insufficiently evaluated. Only one study reported a reduction of anticancer treatment toxicities following a joint pharmaceutical and geriatric assessment. A single economic evaluation calculated a potential net benefit of $3,864.23 per patient resulting from the intervention.

DISCUSSION

These encouraging results must be confirmed by more robust evaluations to support the involvement of pharmacists in multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer.

Perspectives on medication safety from vulnerable older migrants and their relatives-A qualitative explorative study

Little is known about the combined effect of several risk factors occurring simultaneously, and the perspectives of patients with language barriers or dementia are lacking because these patients are often excluded as research participants. This study aimed at investigating medication safety among older migrants with cognitive disorders who use five or more medications daily from the perspective of older patients and their relatives. Eight semi-structured interviews with patients and relatives were conducted in their homes. The study adopted an inductive hermeneutic phenomenological approach and used both "Analyzing the present" and "Systematic text condensation" as inspiration for the analysis. Three main themes were identified: (i) potential medication safety and threats, (ii) communication and missing medication information and (iii) everyday life with medication. Threats to medication safety included medication perceptions, health perceptions, and cognitive impairment of the patient as well as miscommunication among departments, wrong diagnosis and medication, and unlocked medication cabinets. However, most families expressed having no problems concerning medication, which could be a result of limited engagement of the patient and relatives in the medical treatment and limited medication information provided to the families by healthcare professionals.

Impact of drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants on mortality in elderly with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

To evaluate the effect of drug interactions with chronic direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on mortality in older atrial fibrillation (AF) patients during the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods

We followed a total of 601 elderly patients (65 years of age) from the NOEL-Drug Registry cohort who were referred to a tertiary outpatient clinic between 9 March 2020 and 1 March 2021. We recorded clinical characteristics and medications for the last 3 months. In addition, all drug interactions were identified using Lexicomp®. Finally, we recorded retrospectively all death events, COVID-19 diagnosis, and relevant deaths from the database at the end of the study. According to logistic regression, we performed propensity score (PS) matching to reduce potential bias. Factors associated with total mortality in the 12 months were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportion hazard analysis.

Results

The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 74.5 (±6.9), and the male/female ratio was 337/264. The prevalence of total mortality was 16.9% (n = 102). A total of 4472 drugs were analyzed for DOAC interaction. 81.8% of older AF patients were not at risk in terms of potential interaction. In the Cox proportional hazard model after PS-matching, previous DOAC use with class X interaction was associated with significantly higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.745, 95% confidence interval: 1.465-5.172, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Our study showed that while most co-medications do not have significant interactions with DOACs, few serious drug interactions contribute to mortality in elderly patients with AF during the pandemic.

Impact of drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants on mortality in elderly with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of drug interactions with chronic direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on mortality in older atrial fibrillation (AF) patients during the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

We followed a total of 601 elderly patients (65 years of age) from the NOEL-Drug Registry cohort who were referred to a tertiary outpatient clinic between 9 March 2020 and 1 March 2021. We recorded clinical characteristics and medications for the last 3 months. In addition, all drug interactions were identified using Lexicomp®. Finally, we recorded retrospectively all death events, COVID-19 diagnosis, and relevant deaths from the database at the end of the study. According to logistic regression, we performed propensity score (PS) matching to reduce potential bias. Factors associated with total mortality in the 12 months were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportion hazard analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 74.5 (±6.9), and the male/female ratio was 337/264. The prevalence of total mortality was 16.9% (n=102). A total of 4472 drugs were analyzed for DOAC interaction. 81.8% of older AF patients were not at risk in terms of potential interaction. In the Cox proportional hazard model after PS-matching, previous DOAC use with class X interaction was associated with significantly higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.745, 95% confidence interval: 1.465-5.172, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that while most co-medications do not have significant interactions with DOACs, few serious drug interactions contribute to mortality in elderly patients with AF during the pandemic.

Prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in older lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: In older lung cancer patients, polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are commonly reported, but no systematic review or meta-analysis has been carried out to ascertain the prevalence and risk variables in this group. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of polypharmacy, PIMs and associated risk variables in older lung cancer patients. Methods: We searched for articles from the beginning to February 2022 in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science that related the use of PIMs and polypharmacy by older lung cancer patients (PROSPERO Code No: CRD42022311603). Meta-analysis was performed on observational studies describing the prevalence and correlation of polypharmacy or PIMs in older patients with lung cancer. Results: Of the 387 citations, 6 articles involving 16,890 patients were included in the final sample. In older lung cancer patients pooled by meta-analysis, 38% and 35% of PIMs and polypharmacy, respectively. The prevalence of PIMs was 43%, 49%, and 28%, respectively, according to the 2019 AGS Beers criteria, 2014 screening tool for older people's prescriptions/screening tool for alerting to the proper therapy (STOPP/START criteria) criteria, and other criteria. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a high prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs among older lung cancer patients. Therefore, it is essential to take rational interventions for older lung cancer patients to receive reasonable pharmacotherapy. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022311603].

Physicians’ Knowledge, Altitudes, and Perceived Barriers of Inappropriate Prescribing for Older Patients in Shanghai, China

Background: Inappropriate medication use is common around the world, particularly among older patients, and, despite potentially being preventable, often leads to adverse clinical and economic outcomes. However, there is a dearth of information regarding this prominent issue in China.

Objectives: To evaluate the extent to which the physician can correctly identify potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in older patients and to understand physicians’ attitudes towards improving PIM knowledge.

Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted anonymously among practicing physicians in China from November through December 2020. Knowledge of PIM was accessed using seven clinical vignettes covering a wide variety of therapeutic areas. Source of information and perceived barriers regarding PIM were also evaluated. We performed the ordinary least square regression analysis to understand the potential factors related to physicians’ knowledge of PIM.

Results: A total of 597 study participants were included in the analysis. More than half of them had never heard of any screening tool for PIMs (n = 328, 54.9%) and the most frequently acknowledged tool was the China PIM Criteria (n = 259, 43.4%). For the seven clinical vignettes testing physicians’ knowledge on the medications that should be generally avoided in older patients, the mean score was 2.91 points out of 7 (SD: 1.32), with the median score of three points (IQR: 2–4). Only one-third of the respondents were feeling confident when prescribing for older patients (n = 255, 35.08%). Package inserts have been used as the major source of PIM information (always, n = 177, 29.65%; frequently, n = 286, 47.91%). Perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing include polypharmacy (n = 460, 77.05%), lack of formal education on prescribing for the older patients (n = 428, 71.69%).

Conclusion: In this online survey evaluating physicians’ ability to detect PIM for older patients, approximately 40% of PIM were recognized, suggesting an insufficient level of knowledge about appropriate prescribing.

Complexity and clinical significance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in oncology: challenging issues in the care of patients regarding cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT)

Cancer patients have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolic events. Anticoagulation management includes prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the management of thrombosis in patients with cancer is complex due to various individual and disease-related factors, including drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Furthermore, DDIs may impact both, cancer and venous thrombosis, treatment effectiveness and safety; their relevance is highlighted by the advances in cancer therapeutics. Given that these new oncology drugs are extensively used, more attention should be given to monitoring potential DDIs to minimize risks. Recognition of DDIs is of utmost importance in an era of rapid developments in cancer treatments and introduction of novel treatments and protocols. When managing cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), the concomitant use of a DOAC and a moderate or strong modulator (inhibitor or inducer) of CYP3A4 or a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is most likely to be associated with significant DDIs. Therefore, LMWHs remain the first-line option for the long-term management of CAT under these circumstances and physicians must consider utilizing LMWHs as first line. This review describes the risk of DDIs and their potential impact and outcomes in patients with cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) receiving anticoagulation.

Association of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications With Frailty Among Older Adults With Blood Cancers

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among older adults with blood cancers, but their association with frailty and how to manage them optimally remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, patients aged ≥75 years presenting for initial oncology consult underwent screening geriatric assessment. Patients were determined to be robust, prefrail, or frail via deficit accumulation and phenotypic approaches. We quantified each patient's total number of medications and PIMs using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and a scale we generated using the NCCN Medications of Concern called the Geriatric Oncology Potentially Inappropriate Medications (GO-PIM) scale. We assessed cross-sectional associations of PIMs with frailty in multivariable regression models adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Of 785 patients assessed, 603 (77%) were taking ≥5 medications and 421 (54%) were taking ≥8 medications; 201 (25%) were taking at least 1 PIM based on the ARS and 343 (44%) at least 1 PIM based on the GO-PIM scale. Among the 468 (60%) patients on active cancer treatment, taking ≥8 medications was associated with frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.82; 95% CI, 1.92-4.17). With each additional medication, the odds of being prefrail or frail increased 8% (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12). With each 1-point increase on the ARS, the odds of being prefrail or frail increased 19% (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39); with each additional PIM based on the GO-PIM scale, the odds increased 65% (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.34-2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy and PIMs are prevalent among older patients with blood cancers; taking ≥8 medications is strongly associated with frailty. These data suggest careful medication reconciliation for this population may be helpful, and deprescribing when possible is high-yield, especially for PIMs on the GO-PIM scale.

Sociodemographic and Health-Related Factors Influencing Drug Intake among the Elderly Population

Excessive drugs intake among the elderly population, including self-medication, constitutes an important public health problem. Polypharmacy may lead to numerous adverse health effects, which become more prevalent when combined with biological changes in seniors. In this cross-sectional study, 500 Polish adults aged ≥60 years (M = 67.9 ± 4.2) were asked to complete a questionnaire via telephone calls, allowing us to identify sociodemographic and health-related factors influencing the daily medications consumption. Our findings revealed that all of the participants were receiving medications; 60.2% of them receive at least 1 to 3 drugs per day (301/500). The most commonly used medications included antihypertensive drugs and analgesics (51.0% and 46.0%, respectively). Taking into account clinical conditions, independent predictors of receiving over 3 medications per day turned out to be (1) coronary artery disease (OR = 6.77; CI 95%, 2.86–16.1), (2) diabetes (OR = 3.23, CI 95%, 1.75–5.95), (3) asthma (OR = 4.87, CI 95%, 2.13–11.1), (4) heart failure (OR = 3.38, CI 95%, 1.59–7.19) and (5) gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR = 1.93, CI 95%, 1.03–3.62). Participants suffering from depression were more likely to take drugs for hypertension (OR = 1.70, CI 95%, 1.04–2.78), while those with anxiety and social loneliness took more painkillers (OR = 2.59, CI 95%, 1.58–4.26 and OR = 2.08, CI 95%, 1.38–3.13, respectively). The most significant sociodemographic factors increasing the drugs intake among the population included in our study were high body mass and subsequent increased BMI values (OR = 2.68, CI 95%, 1.50–4.77). Furthermore, living in a city with over 400,000 inhabitants increased the likelihood of taking antidepressants (OR = 2.18, CI 95%, 1.20–3.94). Our study revealed factors increasing the risk of excessive medications intake and hence, increased susceptibility to some iatrogenic diseases among the elderly population. These factors should be considered by primary care physicians while prescribing appropriate drugs to elderly patients.

Medication management in Minority, Asian and Black ethnic older people in the United Kingdom: A mixed-studies systematic review

WHAT IS NEW AND OBJECTIVES

Older people from ethnic minorities experience the intersectionality of age and ethnicity in relation to complex medication management and polypharmacy. Minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom are at risk of poor medication management because factors such as cultural beliefs, language barriers, lack of knowledge of how the healthcare system works may affect their ability to safely manage their medications. The aim of this systematic review was to review the literature focussing on medication management in the older population amongst ethnic minority communities in United Kingdom.

METHODS

The review was conducted and reported according to methods in the Cochrane Handbook and in the PRISMA 2020 statement using databases such as EMBASE, ASSIA, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and others. Studies conducted in the United Kingdom on individuals over 60 years of age and from a minority ethnic background were included. A thematic analysis was used to synthesize the results.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Nine studies (eight from initial searches, one from a search update in 2021) met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes were identified: misbeliefs around medications, poor health literacy, communication and education as possible intervention to improve medication management. Misbeliefs around long-term illnesses exert a negative impact on medication management. Poor health literacy around medications influences patients' adherence to treatments. Poor communication is perceived as barrier to successful medication management. Despite extensive searching, the team identified a limited number of studies and a lack of intersectional studies focussing on minority ethnic groups and the older population.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest tailored education as a possible intervention to improve medication management amongst these minority groups. Future research should look at recruiting participants from specific ethnic groups and from rural as well as urban areas to explore how medication management operates in different areas of the United Kingdom.

How-to guide for medication reviews in older adults with cancer: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and Nursing & Allied Health Interest Group initiative

For patients with polypharmacy or potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use identified on geriatric assessment, a medication review is recommended. The medication review aims to ensure that the potential benefits of medication outweigh any potential harms and ensures the patient is receiving medication to effectively treat their medical conditions while minimizing risk of toxicity. The medication review encompasses: (1) collecting information to identify medication indications, efficacy and side effects, (2) evaluating adherence, (3) identifying PIMs, (4) identifying drug interactions, and (5) deprescribing. This paper provides the "how-to" guide to conduct a high-quality medication review by the cancer care multidisciplinary team.

Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with active cancer have a 4-sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) especially during systematic anticancer treatment. Simultaneously, surgery is an additional risk factor.

METHODS

The Metaxas's Hospital THromboprophylaxis program in Oncological & Surgical Patients (MeTHOS) is a prospective, phase IV, observational, non-interventional cohort study, aiming to record the thromboprophylaxis practice patterns in high-risk active cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment.

RESULTS

We are reporting results from 291 ambulatory patients (median age: 67 years, Q1-Q3: 59-73 years, 54.6% males) who received anti-neoplastic treatment and administered thromboprophylaxis. 59.8% had cardiovascular disease (mostly hypertension), 76.6% were reported as having at least one comorbidity, while 27.5% and 15.8% accumulated two and three comorbidities, respectively. 94.9% of the patients were receiving highly thrombogenic agents such as platinum-based agents, 5-FU, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics/anti-VEGF, or erythropoietin. 26.5% of the patients were initially surgically treated. In terms of anticoagulation, all patients were treated with tinzaparin (fixed dose, 10,000 Anti-Xa IU, OD). The median anticoagulation duration was 6.2 months. Six thrombotic events were observed (2.06%, 95% CI: 0.76-4.43%): 5 were DVT, and one PE. With respect to safety, 7 bleeding events occurred (2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0-5.3%); 6 of them were minor.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was safe and effective. Intermediate dose of tinzaparin seems to be an appropriate agent for cancer-associated thromboprophylaxis management.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04248348.

Validity of the Cancer and Aging Research Group Predictive Tool in Older Japanese Patients

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) predictive tool in older Japanese patients with cancer. Methods: Patients aged 65 years or older with solid tumors treated with new anticancer regimens in Kakogawa Central City Hospital between April 2016 and March 2019 were included. Grade 3 or higher risks of developing chemotherapy-related adverse events (CRAEs) were calculated using the tool (low-, intermediate-, or high-risk scores). The association between grade 3−5 CRAE incidence during the first course of each regimen and the calculated risk or the patient characteristics was evaluated. The difference in the incidences of CRAEs between the groups was evaluated by Fisher’s exact test. Results: This study examined 76 patients (mean age: 71 (65−82) years). The incidence of grade 3−5 CRAE was 38%, 55%, and 76% in patients classified as low, medium, and high CARG risk scores (p = 0.035), and the incidence of severe non-hematological toxicities was 4%, 31%, and 52% (p < 0.01), respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and age were not associated with chemotherapy toxicity. Conclusions: The CARG predictive tool was valid, suggesting its usefulness in optimizing chemotherapy outcomes in older patients with cancer.

Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications, and Drug-Drug Interactions in Vulnerable Older Adults With Advanced Cancer Initiating Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy is prevalent in older adults starting cancer treatment and associated with potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), potential drug-drug interactions (DDI), and drug-cancer treatment interactions (DCI). For a large cohort of vulnerable older adults with advanced cancer starting treatment, we describe patterns of prescription and nonprescription medication usage, the prevalence of PIM, and the prevalence, severity, and type of DDI/DCI.

METHODS

This secondary analysis used baseline data from a randomized study enrolling patients aged ≥70 years with advanced cancer starting a new systemic cancer treatment (University of Rochester Cancer Center [URCC] 13059; PI: Mohile). PIM were categorized using 2019 Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions. Potential DDI/DCI were evaluated using Lexi-Interact Online. Medication classification followed the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical system. Bivariate associations were evaluated between sociodemographic and geriatric assessment (GA) measures and medication measures. Chord diagrams and network analysis were used to understand and describe DDI/DCI.

RESULTS

Among 718 patients (mean age 77.6 years), polypharmacy (≥5 medications), excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications), and ≥1 PIM were identified in 61.3%,14.5%, and 67.1%, respectively. Cardiovascular medications were the most prevalent (47%), and nonprescription medications accounted for 26% of total medications and 40% of PIM. One-quarter of patients had ≥1 potential major DDI not involving cancer treatment, and 5.4% had ≥1 potential major DCI. Each additional medication increased the odds of a potential major DDI and DCI by 39% and 12%, respectively. Polypharmacy and PIM are associated with multiple GA domains.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of vulnerable older adults with advanced cancer starting treatment, polypharmacy, PIM, and potential DDI/DCI are very common. Nonprescription medications are frequently PIMs and/or involved in potential DDI/DCI.

Importance of medication reconciliation in cancer patients

Cancer patients are a complex and vulnerable population whose medication history is often extensive. Medication reconciliations in this population are especially essential, since medication discrepancies can lead to dire outcomes. This commentary aims to describe the significance of conducting medication reconciliations in this often-forgotten patient population. We discuss additional clinical interventions that can arise during this process as well. Medication reconciliations provide the opportunity to identify and prevent drug-drug and herb-drug interactions. They also provide an opportunity to appropriately adjust chemotherapy dosing according to renal and hepatic function. Finally, reconciling medications can also provide an opportunity to identify and deprescribe inappropriate medications. While clinical impact appears evident in this landscape, evidence of economic impact is lacking. As more cancer patients are prescribed a combination of oral chemotherapies, intravenous chemotherapies and non-anticancer medications, future studies should evaluate the advantages of conducting medication reconciliations in these patient populations across multiple care settings.

Incidence, risk factors, and management of bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis

Updated clinical practice guidelines recommend the long-term use of low-molecular-weight heparins or direct oral anticoagulants as the preferred option for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), using a personalized approach matching the right drug to the right patient. In most cases, the benefit of anticoagulant therapy outweighs the risk. However, the long-term use of anticoagulants is associated with a non-negligible risk of bleeding, which constitutes a rare but serious adverse effect. Bleeding complications have been reported to be overall 2 to 3 times more frequent in cancer patients with CAT receiving anticoagulation than in non-cancer patients, with a reported incidence of major bleeding ranging from 2.4 to 16.0% in randomized controlled trials (RCT). In the absence of validated risk assessment model to predict the risk of bleeding in these patients, a careful evaluation of each individual profile, with adequate selection of the most appropriate anticoagulant for each individual patient, is warranted for overcoming management challenges, taking in account the numerous factors which may potentiate the overall bleeding risk in these complex patients, such as advanced or metastatic disease, older age, anemia, thrombocytopenia, renal impairment, liver dysfunction, and concomitant anticancer therapies. The purpose of this review is to call for awareness on bleeding complications as a major safety issue of CAT treatment and to summarize data from recent RCT and real-world studies on the incidence and risk factors for bleeding in this unique and challenging population to further help clinicians in decision-making.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Associations of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication With Adverse Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Both polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) intake are highly prevailing in older cancer patients. However, only studies on the association of polypharmacy and postoperative complications have been meta-analyzed previously.

METHODS

A systematic review and a meta-analysis of prospective/retrospective observational studies reporting associations of polypharmacy or PIM with at least one out of five predefined adverse health outcomes in a population of older cancer patients (≥60 years) were carried out. PubMed and Web of Science were used to search for relevant studies published between January 1991 and March 2020. Data were pooled by adopting a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 publications were included in the systematic review. Meta-analyses could be performed on 39 studies about polypharmacy and 13 studies about PIM. Polypharmacy was found to be statistically significantly associated with all-cause mortality (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.37 [1.25-1.50]), hospitalization (1.53 [1.37-1.71]), treatment-related toxicity (1.22 [1.01-1.47]), and postoperative complications (1.73 [1.36-2.20]). The association of polypharmacy with prolongation of hospitalization was not statistically significant at the p < .05 significance level (1.62 [0.98-2.66]). With respect to PIM, a statistically significant association with all-cause mortality (1.43 [1.08-1.88]) was observed but not with other adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy was found to be associated with several adverse outcomes and PIM use with all-cause mortality in older cancer patients. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because about three-quarters of the studies identified did not adjust for comorbidity and are prone to confounding by indication.

Analysis of Age-Friendly Cancer Care Readiness

OBJECTIVES

Cancer care attuned to meeting the needs of older adults is imperative to ensure that they receive appropriate levels of treatment in accordance with their goals of care. Achieving age-friendly systems and geriatric-competent workforces require rethinking current models of cancer care delivery. This article reports on a descriptive study on the readiness of U.S. cancer programs to provide age-friendly cancer care.

SAMPLE & SETTING

A survey was sent to 567 ambulatory oncology leaders in the United States. Of the 81 respondents, 61 answered all questions.

METHODS & VARIABLES

The authors developed and administered an online survey assessing cancer programs' age-friendly cancer care practices and readiness. Survey questions were based on the elements of the 4Ms framework. Results were analyzed using frequencies and percentages for categorically measured survey items and measures of central tendency for continuously scaled survey items.

RESULTS

67% of respondents reported that their program could deliver age-friendly cancer care within five years. Respondents less frequently indicated that they employed specific 4Ms elements.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The results of this study suggest gaps in readiness to implement age-friendly cancer care. Recommendations to improve readiness include increasing awareness, expanding workforce preparation, and improving cancer program leadership engagement.

Use of potentially inappropriate medication in older patients with lung cancer at the end of life

OBJECTIVES

Medications at the end of life should be used for symptom control. Medications which potential adverse effects outweigh their expected benefits are called 'potentially inappropriate medications' (PIMs). PIMs are related with adverse drug events and reduced quality of life. In this study, we investigated to what extent PIMs are dispensed to older patients with lung cancer in the last month of life.

METHODS

We selected patients with lung cancer, aged 65+, diagnosed between 2009 and 2014, and who died before April 1st 2015 from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). The NCR is linked to the PHARMO Database Network, that includes medications dispensed by community pharmacies in the Netherlands. The eight PIM groups were based on the OncPal Deprescribing Guideline: aspirin, dyslipidaemia medications, antihypertensives, osteoporosis medications, peptic ulcer prophylaxis, oral hypoglycaemics, vitamins and minerals.

RESULTS

Data of 7864 patients with lung cancer were analyzed. Median age was 74 year (IQR = 70-79) and 67% was male. 45% of all patients received at least one PIM in their last month of life. Taking into account all dispensed medications, patients receiving PIMs received more different medications compared to those receiving no PIMs, respectively 10 (SD = 5) vs. 3 (SD = 4) different medications (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Almost half of the older patients with lung cancer in the Netherlands received PIMs in their last month of life. Since PIM use is associated with reduced quality of life, it is important that health care professionals continue to critically assess which medication can be discontinued at the end of life.

Association of co-medication quality with chemotherapy-related adverse drug reactions and survival in older colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the clinical relevance of appropriate co-medication among older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is sparse.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted with 3,239 CRC patients aged 65 years and older. To assess co-medication quality, we calculated the total Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) score and its sub-scores for medication overuse, underuse, and potentially inappropriate medication use. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards or logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the association of co-medication quality with up to 5-year overall survival, CRC-specific survival, and chemotherapy-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

Overall, 3,239 and 1,209 participants were included in analyses on survival and ADRs, respectively. The hazard ratios [95%-confidence intervals] for the total FORTA score ≥ 7 vs. 0-1 points were 1.83 [1.40-2.40] and 1.76 [1.22-2.52] for up to 5-year overall and CRC-specific survival, respectively. Worse up to 5-year OS and CSS was also evident for FORTA sub-scores for PIM use and overuse whereas no association was observed for underuse. Although results for the total FORTA and potentially inappropriate medication score were much stronger among patients receiving chemotherapy, no significant associations with chemotherapy-related ADRs were observed. Moreover, associations were particularly strong among men and rectal cancer patients as compared to women and colon cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor total co-medication quality was significantly associated with worse up to 5-year overall and CRC-specific survival. Randomized controlled trials are needed to test whether improved cancer co-medication management in older CRC patients prolongs survival.

Polypharmacy and Malnutrition Management of Elderly Perioperative Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Malnutrition, which commonly occurs in perioperative patients with cancer, leads to decreased muscle mass, hypoalbuminemia, and edema, thereby increasing the patient's risk of various complications. Thus, the nutritional management of perioperative patients with cancer should be focused on to ensure that surgical treatment is safe and effective, postoperative complications are prevented, and mortality is reduced. Pathophysiological and drug-induced factors in elderly patients with cancer are associated with the risk of developing malnutrition. Pathophysiological factors include the effects of tumors, cachexia, and anorexia of aging. Metabolic changes, such as inflammation, excess catabolism, and anabolic resistance in patients with tumor-induced cancer alter the body's ability to use essential nutrients. Drug-induced factors include the side effects of anticancer drugs and polypharmacy. Drug-drug, drug-disease, drug-nutrient, and drug-food interactions can significantly affect the patient's nutritional status. Furthermore, malnutrition may affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, potentiate drug effects, and cause side effects. This review outlines polypharmacy and malnutrition, the impact of malnutrition on drug efficacy, drug-nutrient and drug-food interactions, and intervention effects on polypharmacy or cancer cachexia in elderly perioperative patients with cancer.

Prioritising Risk Factors for Prescription Drug Overdose among Older Adults in South Korea: A Multi-Method Study

Older adults are vulnerable to drug overdose. We used a multi-method approach to prioritise risk factors for prescription drug overdose among older adults. The study was conducted in two stages. First, risk factors for drug overdose were classified according to importance and changeability through literature review, determined through 2-phase expert surveys. Second, prescription drug overdose cases during 2011–2015 were selected from a national cohort; the prevalence of ‘more important’ or ‘more changeable’ factors determined in stage one was investigated. Scores were assigned according to the Basic Priority Rating Scale formula, reflecting the problem size and seriousness and intervention effectiveness. In the first stage, polypharmacy, old-old age, female sex, chronic disease, psychiatric disease, and low socioeconomic status (SES) were selected as risk factors. In the second stage, 93.9% of cases enrolled had chronic medical disease; 78.3% were using multiple drugs. Low SES was more prevalent than other risk factors. As per the scoring formula, chronic medical disease, polypharmacy, psychiatric disease, low SES, female sex, and old-old age were the most important risk factors in order of priority. Patients with chronic medical disease and those using multiple medications should be prioritised in overdose prevention interventions among older adults.