1
|
Li J, Lin N, Zhang S, Weng L, Chen C, Ou W, Cao Y. Characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer brain metastasis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e34876. [PMID: 39157383 PMCID: PMC11328047 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The difference in the tumor microenvironment (TME) between primary breast cancer (PBC) and breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is still unknown. Herein, we present the landscape of the TME in PBC and BCBM to better understand the process of BCBM. Methods The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to obtain suitable PBC and BCBM data. Hub genes that were differentially expressed between the two groups were searched. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG were used to define the gene's function. Single-cell data were also analyzed to determine the difference between PBC and BCBM. Results Two datasets (GSE100534 and GSE125989) were used to search for hub genes, and 79 genes were either upregulated or downregulated between the two groups. Four hub genes (COL1A1, PDGFR, MMP3 and FZD7) were related to prognosis. GO and KEGG analyses showed that extracellular matrix and focal adhesion play major roles in the metastasis process. Another two datasets (GSE176078 and GSE186344) were enrolled for single-cell analysis. Single-cell analysis demonstrated that immune cells (66.6 %) form the main part of PBC, while cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) (21.7 %) are the main component of BCBM. Immune cell proportion analysis showed that CD4+/CD8+ T cells (28.9 % and 14.3 %, respectively) and macrophages(M2) accounted for the majority of cells in PBC and BCBM, respectively. Further analysis of the classification of CAFs showed that apCAFs were significantly higher in PBC. Conclusions This study presents the landscape of BCBM with hub gene searching and single-cell analysis. Showing the difference in the tumor/immune microenvironment of PBC and BCBM, would be beneficial to explore immunotherapy and targeted therapy for BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingrong Li
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Nanping Lin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Shengcen Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Lihong Weng
- Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Wenshi Ou
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| | - Yingping Cao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Turna M, Yıldırım BA, Numanoglu Ç, Akboru MH, Rzazade R, Çağlar HB. Comprehensive analysis of stereotactic Radiosurgery outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The influence of immunotherapy and prognostic factors. Breast 2024; 76:103757. [PMID: 38843710 PMCID: PMC11214515 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer stands as the second most common solid tumors with a propensity for brain metastasis. Among metastatic breast cancer cases, the brain metastasis incidence ranges from 10 % to 30 %, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displaying a heightened risk and poorer prognosis. SRS has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for brain metastases; however, data on its outcomes specifically in pure triple-negative subtype remain scarce. METHOD We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all brain metastasis (BM) TNBC patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate local control (LC), distant brain metastasis free survival (DBMFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in TNBC patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases while identifying potential prognostic factors. RESULT Forty-three patients with TNBC and brain metastases treated with SRS between January 2017 and 2023 were included. The study found rates of LC (99 % at 1 year) and DBMFS (76 % at 1 year) after SRS, with brain metastasis count (p = 0,003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0,001) being significant predictors of DBMFS. The median OS following SRS was 19.5 months, with neurological deficit (p = 0.003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0.019) identified as significant predictors of OS. CONCLUSION SRS demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of local control and distant brain metastasis-free survival in TNBC. Neurological deficit and systemic treatment significantly influence overall survival, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI surveillance based on these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menekse Turna
- Anadolu Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey.
| | - Berna Akkus Yıldırım
- Cemil Taşcıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - Çakır Numanoglu
- Cemil Taşcıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - Mustafa Halil Akboru
- Cemil Taşcıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - Rashad Rzazade
- Anadolu Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey.
| | - Hale Başak Çağlar
- Anadolu Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang L, Zhang W, Chen L. Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2024; 16:379-392. [PMID: 39071808 PMCID: PMC11278000 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s460856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Background Research on the sequencing of brain radiotherapy and targeted chemotherapy after brain metastasis (BM) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients is limited and inconclusive. This study investigated the efficacy of sequential delivery of radiotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with BM. Methods Fifty-seven patients were categorized into two groups: the targeted-radiotherapy group (receiving 2-8 cycles of anti-HER2-targeted therapy followed by radiotherapy after BM) and the radiotherapy-targeted group (undergoing radiotherapy first, followed by regular anti-HER2-targeted therapy). The study endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival. Factors associated with intracranial progression and mortality were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results Patients in the radiotherapy-targeted group had better iPFS (P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.145). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that different sequential treatment groups were independent prognostic factors for iPFS. In patients with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0, the median survival time was 26 months in the radiotherapy-targeted group and 22 months in the targeted-radiotherapy group (P = 0.019). Conclusion Overall, radiotherapy followed by targeted therapy may improve survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with BM, particularly in those with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifeng Tang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou People’s Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Liuzhou People’s Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang L, Qiao Z, Yao Y, Li Z, Hu L, Mao Y, Liu X, Chen W, Zeng Q, Zhao H. A prognostic model for triple-negative breast cancer patients with liver metastasis: A population-based study. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27837. [PMID: 38560265 PMCID: PMC10979062 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
However, it is still difficult for clinicians to establish prognostic stratifications and therapeutic strategies because of the lack of tools for predicting the survival of triple-negative breast cancer patients with liver metastases (TNBC-LM). Based on clinical data from large populations, a sensitive and discriminative nomogram was developed and validated to predict the prognosis of TNBC patients with LM at initial diagnosis or at the later course. Introduction/background Liver metastasis (LM) in TNBC patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to construct a clinical model to predict the survival of TNBC-LM patients. Materials and methods Clinicopathologic data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (FAFSYU). Based on patients with newly diagnosed TNBC with LM (nTNBC-LM) from the SEER database, a predictive nomogram was established and validated. Its predictive effect on TNBC patients with LM at later disease course by enrolling TNBC patients from FAFSYU who developed LM later. The prognostic effect of different treatment for nTNBC-LM was further assessed. Results A prognostic model was developed and validated to predict the prognosis of TNBC-LM patients. For LM patients diagnosed at the initial or later treatment stage, the C-index (0.712, 0.803 and 0.699 in the training, validation and extended groups, respectively) and calibration plots showed the acceptable prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability of the nomogram. Surgical resection on the primary tumour and chemotherapy were found to be associated with significantly better overall survival (OS). Conclusion A sensitive and discriminative model was developed to predict OS in TNBC-LM patients both at and after initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liguo Zhang
- The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
- Department of Thyroid & Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, PR China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Zhen Qiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Yinsheng Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangzhou District People's Hospital, Zhuhai, PR China
| | - Zhiqiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangzhou District People's Hospital, Zhuhai, PR China
| | - Lingzhi Hu
- The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Yinyan Mao
- The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Xiuling Liu
- The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Weirong Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhuhai Center for Maternal and Child Health Care, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Qing'an Zeng
- Department of Thyroid & Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, PR China
| | - Hong Zhao
- The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cacho-Díaz B, Tripathy D, Arrieta VA, Escamilla-Ramirez A, Alvarado-Miranda A, Rodríguez-Mayoral O. Real-World Experience in Hispanic Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases Using Different Prognostic Tools. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00305-5. [PMID: 38364945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Only a small percentage of Hispanic patients have been included in studies that developed prognostic models for breast cancer and brain metastases. Therefore, there is a clear need for tools tailored to this demographic. This study assesses the efficacy of common prognostic tools in a Hispanic population. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed a data set of Hispanic patients with breast cancer and newly diagnosed brain metastases from 2009 to 2023 at a single referral center. For each prognostic tool, Kaplan-Meier curves were built. The performances of the models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC), C-statistic, and Akaike information criteria (AIC). RESULTS Of 492 patients, the median time from breast cancer to brain metastasis diagnosis was 22.7 months (IQR, 12.1-53.3). The median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.4). All models were validated as prognostic tools (P < .001). The model with the better performance was the breast graded prognostic assessment (GPA; AIC, 402; AUC, 0.65), followed by the modified GPA (AIC, 406; AUC, 0.64), the disease-specific GPA (AIC, 407; AUC, 0.62), recursive partitioning analysis (AIC, 421; AUC, 0.62), and GPA (AIC, 422; AUC, 0.60). CONCLUSIONS The breast GPA demonstrated superior accuracy in prognosticating outcomes for Hispanic patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This underscores the critical importance of incorporating racial and ethnic diversity in creating and validating medical prognostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Cacho-Díaz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor A Arrieta
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu H, Wang Y, Li L, Han Y, Wu Y, Sa Q, Xu B, Wang J. New insights into HER2-low breast cancer brain metastasis: A retrospective analysis. Breast 2024; 73:103669. [PMID: 38176304 PMCID: PMC10791565 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A considerable number of patients with breast cancer will suffer from brain metastasis in the advanced setting. The HER2 status serves as a significant prognostic factor and the reference of applying treatment for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). METHODS Between January 2010 and July 2021, patients with BCBM who had available HER2 status were identified. The patients with HER2 1+ in immunohistochemistry (IHC) or IHC 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative were categorized as HER2-low. Comparisons were conducted between the HER2-low and HER2-zero population. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of BCBM. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS In this study, we analyzed 71 patients with the HER2-low breast cancer subtype and 64 patients with the HER2-zero subtype. Despite the limited sample size, our findings revealed a significantly better OS for patients with HER2-low cancer compared to their HER2-zero counterparts (26 m vs 20 m, p = 0.0017). This trend was particularly notable in the HR-negative group (26 m vs 13 m, p = 0.0078), whereas no significant difference was observed among the HR-positive patients. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that the HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for better survival in the HR-negative patients (p = 0.046 in multivariate analysis). CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with HER2-low BCBM exhibited a more favorable prognosis than those with HER2-zero BCBM, particularly within the HR-negative subgroup. The low expression of HER2 is supposed to be linked to the prolonged survival of BCBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangcheng Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Medical Records, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yiqun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yun Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Sa
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ribeiro LM, Bomtempo FF, Rocha RB, Telles JPM, Neto EB, Figueiredo EG. Development and adaptations of the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) scale: a systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023; 40:445-463. [PMID: 37819546 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10237-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score has the best accuracy among prognostic scales for patients with brain metastases (BM). A wide range of GPA-derived scales have been established to different types of primary tumor BM. However, there is a high variability between them, and their characteristics have not been described altogether yet. We aim to summarize the features of the existent GPA-derived scales and to compare their predictor factors and their uses in clinical setting. Medline was searched from inception until January 2023 to identify studies related to the development, update, or validation of GPA. The initial search yielded 1,083 results. 16 original studies and 16 validation studies were included, comprising a total of 33,348 patients. 13 different scales were assessed, including: GPA, Diagnosis-Specific GPA, Extracranial Score, Lung-molGPA, Updated Renal GPA, Updated Gastrointestinal GPA, Modified Breast GPA, Integrated Melanoma GPA, Melanoma Mol GPA, Sarcoma GPA, Hepatocellular Carcinoma GPA, Colorectal Cancer GPA, and Uterine Cancer GPA. The most prevalent prognostic predictors were age, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of BM, and presence or absence of extracranial metastases. Treatment modalities consisted of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, cranial radiotherapy, gamma knife radiosurgery, and BRAF inhibitor therapy. Median survival rates with no treatment and with a specific treatment ranged from 6.1 weeks to 33 months and from 3.1 to 21 months, respectively. Original GPA and GPA-derived scales are valid prognostic tools, but with heterogeneous survival results when compared to each other. More studies are needed to improve scientific evidence of these scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Eliseu Becco Neto
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu Q, Sun MS, Liu YH, Ye JM, Xu L. Development and external validation of a prediction model for brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12333-12353. [PMID: 37432458 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05125-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients with brain metastasis (BM) have a poor prognosis. This study aims to identify the risk factors of BM in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and establish a competing risk model for predicting the risk of brain metastases at different time points along the course of disease. METHODS Patients with MBC admitted to the breast disease center of Peking University First Hospital from 2008 to 2019 were selected and retrospectively analyzed to establish a risk prediction model for brain metastases. Patients with MBC admitted to eight breast disease centers from 2015 to 2017 were selected for external validation of the competing risk model. The competing risk approach was used to estimate cumulative incidence. Univariate Fine-Gray competing risk regression, optimal subset regression, and LASSO Cox regression were used to screen potential predictors of brain metastases. Based on the results, a competing risk model for predicting brain metastases was established. The discrimination of the model was evaluated using AUC, Brier score, and C-index. The calibration was evaluated by the calibration curves. The model was assessed for clinical utility by decision curve analysis (DCA), as well as by comparing the cumulative incidence of brain metastases between groups with different predicted risks. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, a total of 327 patients with MBC in the breast disease center of Peking University First Hospital were admitted into the training set for this study. Among them, 74 (22.6%) patients developed brain metastases. From 2015 to 2017, a total of 160 patients with MBC in eight breast disease centers were admitted into the validation set for this study. Among them, 26 (16.3%) patients developed brain metastases. BMI, age, histological type, breast cancer subtype, and extracranial metastasis pattern were included in the final competing risk model for BM. The C-index of the prediction model in the validation set was 0.695, and the AUCs for predicting the risk of brain metastases within 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.674, 0.670, and 0.729, respectively. Time-dependent DCA curves demonstrated a net benefit of the prediction model with thresholds of 9-26% and 13-40% when predicting the risk of brain metastases at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the cumulative incidence of brain metastases between groups with different predicted risks (P < 0.05 by Gray's test). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a competing risk model for BM was innovatively established, with the multicenter data being used as an independent external validation set to confirm the predictive efficiency and universality of the model. The C-index, calibration curves, and DCA of the prediction model indicated good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, respectively. Considering the high risk of death in patients with metastatic breast cancer, the competing risk model of this study is more accurate in predicting the risk of brain metastases compared with the traditional Logistic and Cox regression models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Ming-Shuai Sun
- Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Yin-Hua Liu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jing-Ming Ye
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Ling Xu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Galve-Calvo E, Alonso-Babarro A, Martínez-García M, Pi-Figueras M, Villalba G, Alonso S, Contreras J. Narrative Review of Multidisciplinary Management of Central Nervous Involvement in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Focus on Elderly Patients. Adv Ther 2023; 40:3304-3331. [PMID: 37291377 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02538-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The tumor biology of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) promotes the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, with 25% of patients with HER2-positive BC developing CNS metastases. Furthermore, the incidence of HER2-positive BC brain metastases has increased in the last decades, likely because of the improved survival with targeted therapies and better detection methods. Brain metastases are detrimental to quality of life and survival and represent a challenging clinical problem, particularly in elderly women, who comprise a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with BC and often have comorbidities or an age-related decline in organ function. Treatment options for patients with BC brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents. Ideally, local and systemic treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team, with input from several specialties, based on an individualized prognostic classification. In elderly patients with BC, additional age-associated conditions, such as geriatric syndromes or comorbidities, and the physiologic changes associated with aging, may impact their ability to tolerate cancer therapy and should be considered in the treatment decision-making process. This review describes the treatment options for elderly patients with HER2-positive BC and brain metastases, focusing on the importance of multidisciplinary management, the different points of view from the distinct disciplines, and the role of oncogeriatric and palliative care in this vulnerable patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Galve-Calvo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Basurto (OSI Bilbao-Basurto), Avda. Montevideo 18, 48013, Bilbao, Bisczy, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jorge Contreras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Simonsen MK, Vrou Offersen B, Jensen AB. Prognosis of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis treated with radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:871-879. [PMID: 37498539 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2238551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Life expectancy for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (BC) has improved in recent years, especially due to better systemic treatment. This has led to an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM), and BC is now the leading cause of BM in women. Treatment of BM primarily consists of surgery and/or radiotherapy. We aimed to investigate survival time and prognostic factors for BC patients treated with radiotherapy for BM. MATERIAL & METHODS During the period 1st of January 2015 to 1st of June 2020, 144 consecutive BC patients treated for BM from one centre were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were either diagnosed with BM as the first metastatic lesion, or developed BM during palliative therapy for distant non-brain metastasis. The study was approved by the Central Denmark Region. RESULTS Median age at BM diagnosis was 66 years, and 90% of the patients already had extracranial metastatic disease at BM diagnosis. Median overall survival after diagnosis of BM was 6.1 months. Short survival was observed for patients with poor performance status, leptomeningeal metastasis or more than three solid BM. Several of these factors were overrepresented in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours who had poorer survival than patients with different receptor status. CONCLUSION The number of metastatic BC patients developing BM is high, and survival following local treatment remains poor. Several prognostic factors appear to influence survival after radiotherapy. Treatment of BC patients with BM should be individualized according to performance status, leptomeningeal disease, number of BM, and receptor status of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University
| | - Anders Bonde Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Warrior S, Cohen-Nowak A, Kumthekar P. Modern Management and Diagnostics in HER2+ Breast Cancer with CNS Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112908. [PMID: 37296873 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have seen improved survival and outcomes over the past two decades. As patients live longer, the incidence of CNS metastases has increased in this population. The authors' review outlines the most current data in HER2-positive brain and leptomeningeal metastases and discuss the current treatment paradigm in this disease. Up to 55% of HER2-positive breast cancer patients go on to experience CNS metastases. They may present with a variety of focal neurologic symptoms, such as speech changes or weakness, and may also have more diffuse symptoms related to high intracranial pressure, such as headaches, nausea, or vomiting. Treatment can include focal treatments, such as surgical resection or radiation (focal or whole-brain radiation), as well as systemic therapy options or even intrathecal therapy in the case of leptomeningeal disease. There have been multiple advancements in systemic therapy for these patients over the past few years, including the availability of tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. Hope remains high as clinical trials for CNS metastases receive greater attention and as other HER2-directed methods are being studied in clinical trials with the goal of better outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Warrior
- Department of Hematology, Oncology Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Adam Cohen-Nowak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bottosso M, Griguolo G, Sinoquet L, Guarascio MC, Aldegheri V, Miglietta F, Vernaci G, Barbieri C, Girardi F, Jacot W, Guarneri V, Darlix A, Dieci MV. Prognostic impact of extracranial disease control in HER2+ breast cancer-related brain metastases. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1286-1293. [PMID: 36717671 PMCID: PMC10049979 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02153-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are common among HER2+ breast cancer (BC) and prognostic stratification is crucial for optimal management. BC-GPA score and subsequent refinements (modified-GPA, updated-GPA) recapitulate prognostic factors. Since none of these indexes includes extracranial disease control, we evaluated its prognostic value in HER2+ BCBM. METHODS Patients diagnosed with HER2+ BCBM at Istituto Oncologico Veneto-Padova (2002-2021) and Montpellier Cancer Institute (2001-2015) were included as exploratory and validation cohorts, respectively. Extracranial disease control at BM diagnosis (no disease/stable disease/response vs. progressive disease) was evaluated. RESULTS In the exploratory cohort of 113 patients (median OS 12.2 months), extracranial control (n = 65, 57.5%) was significantly associated with better OS at univariate (median OS 17.7 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.005) and multivariate analysis after adjustment for BC-GPA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94), modified-GPA (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and updated-GPA (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). The prognostic impact of extracranial disease control (n = 66, 56.4%) was then confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 117) at univariate (median OS 20.2 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis adjusting for BC-GPA (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61), modified-GPA (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) and updated-GPA (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63). CONCLUSIONS Extracranial disease control provides independent prognostic information in HER2+ BCBM beyond commonly used prognostic scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Bottosso
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. .,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
| | - Léa Sinoquet
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Cristina Guarascio
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Federica Miglietta
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Grazia Vernaci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Caterina Barbieri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Girardi
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - William Jacot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS - University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Batista MFFV, Eiriz I, Fitzpatrick A, Le Du F, Braga S, Alpuim Costa D. Refining Therapy in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:524-532. [PMID: 36590149 PMCID: PMC9801402 DOI: 10.1159/000526431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastasis (BM) is a major clinical problem in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), occurring in 50% of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Historically omitted from clinical trials, recent studies of novel HER2-targeted agents have focused on HER2+ BM patients, addressing stable but also progressing BM and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC). Summary This review aimed to summarize the most relevant data on treating patients with HER2+ BM and LMC. Key Messages The treatment paradigm for patients with HER2+ MBC has changed. Local therapies play an important role, but accumulating evidence on the intracranial activity and clinical benefit of anti-HER2 targeting therapies might lead to a shift in the paradigm on treating BM in the next few years towards more widespread use of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inês Eiriz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Amanda Fitzpatrick
- Oncology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Oncology Department, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Fanny Le Du
- Oncology Department, CRLCC Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Sofia Braga
- Oncology Department, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
- Haematology and Oncology Department, CUF Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tripathy D, Tolaney SM, Tagliaferri M. Etirinotecan Pegol Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1700-1701. [PMID: 36136348 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hulsbergen AFC, Lo YT, Awakimjan I, Kavouridis VK, Phillips JG, Smith TR, Verhoeff JJC, Yu KH, Broekman MLD, Arnaout O. Survival Prediction After Neurosurgical Resection of Brain Metastases: A Machine Learning Approach. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:381-388. [PMID: 35608378 PMCID: PMC10553019 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current prognostic models for brain metastases (BMs) have been constructed and validated almost entirely with data from patients receiving up-front radiotherapy, leaving uncertainty about surgical patients. OBJECTIVE To build and validate a model predicting 6-month survival after BM resection using different machine learning algorithms. METHODS An institutional database of 1062 patients who underwent resection for BM was split into an 80:20 training and testing set. Seven different machine learning algorithms were trained and assessed for performance; an established prognostic model for patients with BM undergoing radiotherapy, the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, was also evaluated. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration. RESULTS The logistic regression showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.71 in the hold-out test set, a calibration slope of 0.76, and a calibration intercept of 0.03. The diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment had an AUC of 0.66. Patients were stratified into regular-risk, high-risk and very high-risk groups for death at 6 months; these strata strongly predicted both 6-month and longitudinal overall survival ( P < .0005). The model was implemented into a web application that can be accessed through http://brainmets.morethanml.com . CONCLUSION We developed and internally validated a prediction model that accurately predicts 6-month survival after neurosurgical resection for BM and allows for meaningful risk stratification. Future efforts should focus on external validation of our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F. C. Hulsbergen
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Tung Lo
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ilia Awakimjan
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Vasileios K. Kavouridis
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - John G. Phillips
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Radiation Oncology, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kun-Hsing Yu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Marike L. D. Broekman
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Omar Arnaout
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang T, Chen J, Yang J, Fu M, Hua W, Jia W, Liu Y, Wang B, Yan M, Zhou J, Hao C, Chen J, Ou D, Jiang T, Mao Y, Jiang Z. CSCO expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer brain metastasis. TRANSLATIONAL BREAST CANCER RESEARCH : A JOURNAL FOCUSING ON TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH IN BREAST CANCER 2022; 3:22. [PMID: 38751521 PMCID: PMC11092996 DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-22-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, breast cancer affected more Chinese women than any other cancer in 2020. The brain is an increasingly common metastatic sites of breast cancer. Although the risk of developing brain metastases (BMs) is lower in breast cancer than in lung cancer and melanoma, due to its high prevalence, it is the second most common cause of BM among solid tumors, being second only to lung cancer. The incidence of breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) differs by molecular subtype. Half of patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive and one-third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) develop BM. The clinical manifestations of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are often non-specific and may manifest as a variety of signs and symptoms, mainly including brain parenchyma involvement and meningeal irritation syndromes cranial nerve involvement, increased intracranial pressure, and progressive brain dysfunction. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Committee has developed this expert consensus on BM, in an effort to improve the overall prognosis of BCBM and promote the standardized diagnosis and treatment of this disease. During the development of this expert consensus, we carried out a comprehensive literature review and referred to some of the most authoritative guidelines in China and abroad. In this consensus, we will discuss clinical manifestations, imaging examinations, pathological diagnosis, treatments, prognosis, follow-up and monitoring. We hope this consensus will be of help to all the clinicians majored in breast cancer and other similar professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Wang
- Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ruijin Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Yang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi‘an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Minjie Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Hua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wang Jia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Pathology, Fourth Hospital Affiliated of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Biyun Wang
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, ShanghaiChina
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Juan Zhou
- Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunfang Hao
- Department of Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiaxin Chen
- Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ruijin Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zefei Jiang
- Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - the CSCO expert panel of breast cancer*TengYueeZhangQingyuanLiManJinFengJiangZefeiWangTaoWenJuyiHaoChunfangGengCuizhiLiuYunjiangLiuYuepingZhangJunYanMinWanHaiboYuZhigangYinYongmeiPanYueyinChenJiayiWangBiyunWangXiaojiaOuyangQuchangLiuJiaLiuShuLiuQiangWangKunWangShusenNieJianyunLiHongyuanLiuXinlanSunGangXueYanYangJin
- Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ruijin Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi‘an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Pathology, Fourth Hospital Affiliated of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, ShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
- Department of Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tripathy D, Tolaney SM, Seidman AD, Anders CK, Ibrahim N, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Diéras V, Müller V, Du Y, Currie SL, Hoch U, Tagliaferri M, Hannah AL, Cortés J. Treatment With Etirinotecan Pegol for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: Final Results From the Phase 3 ATTAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1047-1052. [PMID: 35552364 PMCID: PMC9100460 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high clinical need for novel treatments; however, historically, studies have often excluded these patients. Although the BEACON study did not meet its primary end point, treatment with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for the prespecified patient subgroup with preexisting, pretreated, and nonprogressive BM. Objective To compare clinical outcomes in patients with BM treated with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice in a confirmatory trial. Design, Setting, and Participants This study was a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (ATTAIN) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a history of stable pretreated BM who experienced disease progression while receiving chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The trial took place at 47 sites in 10 countries, and patients were enrolled between March 7, 2017, and November 6, 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive etirinotecan pegol, 145 mg/m2, every 21 days or chemotherapy (eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was OS. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and the clinical benefit rate. Results A total of 178 female patients (9 [5.1%] Asian, 8 [4.5%] Black or African American, and 123 [69.1] White individuals) were randomized to receive treatment with etirinotecan pegol (92 [51.7%]; median [range] age, 53 [27-79] years) or chemotherapy (86 [48.3%]; median [range] age, 52 [24-77] years). Median OS was similar in both groups (etirinotecan pegol, 7.8 months; chemotherapy, 7.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60). Median progression-free survival for non-central nervous system metastases per blinded independent central review for etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy was 2.8 and 1.9 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.16; P = .18) and 3.9 vs 3.3 months, respectively, for central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05; P = .07). Safety profiles between the groups were largely comparable. Conclusions and Relevance The results of the ATTAIN randomized clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between treatment with etirinotecan pegol and chemotherapy in patients with BM. However, this study represents one of the largest published trials dedicated to patients with breast cancer and BM and may help to inform further research. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915744.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | - Nuhad Ibrahim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, England
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yining Du
- Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Ute Hoch
- Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Plichta JK, Thomas SM, Sergesketter AR, Greenup RA, Rosenberger LH, Fayanju OM, Kimmick G, Force J, Hyslop T, Hwang ES. A Novel Staging System for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Refines Prognostic Estimates. Ann Surg 2022; 275:784-792. [PMID: 32657941 PMCID: PMC7794098 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to identify prognostic groups within a de novo metastatic cohort, incorporating both anatomic and biologic factors. BACKGROUND Staging for breast cancer now includes anatomic and biologic factors, although the guidelines for stage IV disease do not account for how these factors may influence outcomes. METHODS Adults with de novo metastatic breast cancer were selected from the National Cancer DataBase (2010-2013). Recursive partitioning analysis was used to group patients with similar overall survival (OS) based on clinical T/N stage, tumor grade, ER, PR, HER2, number of metastatic sites, and presence of bone-only metastases. Categories were created by amalgamating homogeneous groups based on 3-year OS rates (stage IVA: >50%, stage IVB: 30%-50%, stage IVC: <30%). RESULTS 16,187 patients were identified; median follow-up was 32 months. 65.2% had 1 site of distant metastasis, and 42.9% had bone-only metastases. Recursive partitioning analysis identified the number of metastatic sites (1 vs >1) as the first stratification point, and ER status as the second stratification point for both resulting groups. Additional divisions were made based on HER2 status, PR status, cT stage, tumor grade, and presence of bone-only metastases. After bootstrapping, significant differences in 3-year OS were noted between the 3 groups [stage IVB vs IVA: HR 1.58 (95% confidence interval 1.50-1.67), stage IVC vs IVA: HR 3.54 (95% confidence interval 3.33-3.77)]. CONCLUSIONS Both anatomic and biologic factors yielded reliable and reproducible prognostic estimates among patients with metastatic disease. These findings support formal stratification of de novo stage IV breast cancer into 3 distinct prognosis groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Samantha M. Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Rachel A. Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Laura H. Rosenberger
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeremy Force
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Michel A, Darkwah Oppong M, Rauschenbach L, Dinger TF, Barthel L, Pierscianek D, Wrede KH, Hense J, Pöttgen C, Junker A, Schmidt T, Iannaccone A, Kimmig R, Sure U, Jabbarli R. Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061437. [PMID: 35326590 PMCID: PMC8946189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases requiring surgical treatment determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. We aimed to develop the scores for the prediction of short (<6 months) and long (≥3 years) survival after BCBM surgery. Methods: Female patients with BCBM surgery between 2008 and 2019 were included. The new scores were constructed upon independent predictors for short and long postoperative survival. Results: In the final cohort (n = 95), 18 (18.9%) and 22 (23.2%) patients experienced short and long postoperative survival, respectively. Breast-preserving surgery, presence of multiple brain metastases and age ≥ 65 years at breast cancer diagnosis were identified as independent predictors of short postoperative survival. In turn, positive HER2 receptor status in brain metastases, time interval ≥ 3 years between breast cancer and brain metastases diagnosis and KPS ≥ 90% independently predicted long survival. The appropriate short and long survival scores showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of short (AUC = 0.773) and long (AUC = 0.775) survival than the breast Graded Prognostic Assessment score (AUC = 0.498/0.615). A cumulative survival score (total score) showed significant association with overall survival (p = 0.001). Conclusion: We identified predictors independently impacting the prognosis after BCBM surgery. After external validation, the presented scores might become useful tools for the selection of proper candidates for BCBM surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Michel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-1230; Fax: +49-201-723-1220
| | - Marvin Darkwah Oppong
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Laurèl Rauschenbach
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Thiemo Florin Dinger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Lennart Barthel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Daniela Pierscianek
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Karsten H. Wrede
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andreas Junker
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Teresa Schmidt
- Department of Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Antonella Iannaccone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Ulrich Sure
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Ramazan Jabbarli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Cabel L, Patsouris A, Levy C, Verret B, Pasquier D, Debled M, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, Lecouillard I, Bachelot T, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Mouret-Reynier MA, Chevrot M, De Maio E, Uwer L, Frenel JS, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Darlix A, Bozec L. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients with isolated central nervous system metastases in the multicentre ESME database. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221077082. [PMID: 35237352 PMCID: PMC8883300 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221077082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As a result of progress in diagnosis and treatment, there is a growing prevalence of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with isolated CNS metastases. This study describes the largest-to-date real-life cohort of this clinical setting and compares it to other clinical presentations. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database including patients who initiated treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Descriptive statistics and multivariate Cox model were used. Results: Of 22,266 patients, 647 (2.9%) and 929 (4.2%) patients had isolated first-site CNS metastases or combined with extra-CNS metastases, with longer OS for the group with isolated CNS metastases (16.9 versus 13.9 months, adjusted HR = 1.69 (95% CI: 1.50–1.91), p < 0.001). Among the 541 (2.4%) patients with isolated CNS metastases and no intrathecal therapy (excluding leptomeningeal metastases), HER2+ cases were preponderant over TN or HR+ /HER2− cases (41.6% versus 26.1% versus 28.5%, respectively, p < 0.01). The treatment strategy consisted of a combination of local treatment and systemic therapy (49.2%), local treatment only (35.5%) or systemic therapy only (11.4%), or symptomatic therapy only (3.9%). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.7–6.8). Median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 17.3–24.3), reaching 37.9 months (95% CI: 25.9–47.6) in the HR+ /HER2+ subgroup. Older age, TN subtype, MBC-free interval of 6–12 months, lower performance status, and WBRT were associated with poorer survival. Patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months from MBC diagnosis had longer OS (24.1 versus 16.1 months, p = 0.031), but this was not significant on multivariate analysis [HR = 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7–1.3), p = 0.806]. Conclusions: Patients with isolated CNS metastases at MBC diagnosis represent a distinct population for which the role of systemic therapy needs to be further investigated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Carausu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Benjamin Verret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | - Eleonora De Maio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest–René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM U1191-CNRS UMR 5203, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Usefulness of Prognostic Tools in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051099. [PMID: 35267407 PMCID: PMC8909185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available to breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM), establishing the proper therapy is challenging. Since 1997, several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed with variable precision in determining the overall survival. The majority of prognostic tools include the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM, the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastases status as an outcome of systemic therapy efficacy. It is necessary to update the prognostic indices used by physicians as advances in local and systemic treatments develop and change the parameters of survival. Free access to prognostic tools online may increase their routine adoption in clinical practice. Clinical trials on BC patients with BM remains a broad field for the application of prognostic tools. Abstract Background: Determining the proper therapy is challenging in breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available. Several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic. Methods: We searched PubMed for prognostic tools concerning BC patients with BM, published from January 1997 (since the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group developed) to December 2021. Our criteria were limited to adults with newly diagnosed BM regardless of the presence or absence of any leptomeningeal metastases. Results: 31 prognostic tools were selected: 13 analyzed mixed cohorts with some BC cases and 18 exclusively analyzed BC prognostic tools. The majority of prognostic tools in BC patients with BM included: the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM (rarely the volume), the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastasis status as a result of systemic therapy. The prognostic tools differed in their specific cut-off values. Conclusion: Prognostic tools have variable precision in determining the survival of BC patients with BM. Advances in local and systemic treatment significantly affect survival, therefore, it is necessary to update the survival indices used depending on the type and period of treatment.
Collapse
|
22
|
Radiographic markers of breast cancer brain metastases: relation to clinical characteristics and postoperative outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:439-449. [PMID: 34677686 PMCID: PMC8854251 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective Occurrence of brain metastases BM is associated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer (BC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard of care in the diagnosis of BM and determines further treatment strategy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the radiographic markers of BCBM on MRI with other patients’ characteristics and overall survival (OS). Methods We included 88 female patients who underwent BCBM surgery in our institution from 2008 to 2019. Data on demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics of the patients and postoperative survival were collected from the electronic health records. Radiographic features of BM were assessed upon the preoperative MRI. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results The median OS was 17 months. Of all evaluated radiographic markers of BCBM, only the presence of necrosis was independently associated with OS (14.5 vs 22.5 months, p = 0.027). In turn, intra-tumoral necrosis was more often in individuals with shorter time interval between BC and BM diagnosis (< 3 years, p = 0.035) and preoperative leukocytosis (p = 0.022). Moreover, dural affection of BM was more common in individuals with positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (p = 0.015) and supratentorial BM location (p = 0.024). Conclusion Intra-tumoral necrosis demonstrated significant association with OS after BM surgery in patients with BC. The radiographic pattern of BM on the preoperative MRI depends on certain tumor and clinical characteristics of patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05026-4.
Collapse
|
23
|
Novel prognostic classification predicts overall survival of patients receiving salvage whole-brain radiotherapy for recurrent brain metastasis from breast cancer: A recursive partitioning analysis (KROG 16-12). Breast 2021; 60:272-278. [PMID: 34814043 PMCID: PMC8609050 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate outcomes of salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for recurrent brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC), to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS), and to propose a novel prognostic classification for OS in these patients. Materials and methods We identified 54 patients who had received salvage WBRT as the second brain-focused treatment for recurrent BM from BC (2000–2014). The median follow-up duration was 4.9 months. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to develop a model to predict OS at the time of salvage WBRT. Results The median OS was 6.8 months. OS according to BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), modified breast-GPA, and updated breast-GPA did not represent our cohort. In the multivariate analysis, a long time before salvage WBRT (≥16 months), control of primary BC or extracranial metastases, systemic treatment after salvage WBRT, and administration of a biologically effective dose for an α/β of 10 Gy (BED10) of salvage WBRT >37.5 Gy showed superior OS. We proposed three RPA classes based on the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and BED10 of salvage WBRT: class I, class II, and class III. In this model, patients with class I experienced the best OS (34.6 months; class II, 5.0 months; class III, 2.4 months; P < 0.001). Conclusions In our RPA classification according to the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and the dose of salvage WBRT, significant differences in OS were observed. The subsequent use of a systemic treatment showed better OS. Multicenter retrospective study of salvage WBRT for recurrent brain metastasis. Subsequent use of systemic treatment after salvage WBRT showing better OS. Limitations of previous graded prognostic assessments for recurrent brain metastasis. Novel RPA classification consisting of four simple clinical factors predicts OS.
Collapse
|
24
|
Niu L, Lv H, Zhang M, Zeng H, Wang L, Cui S, Liu Z, Yan M. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer with brain metastases and establishment of a prognostic model: a 10-year, single-center, real-world study of 559 cases. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1331. [PMID: 34532468 PMCID: PMC8422096 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-3734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background This study involved a retrospective analysis of 559 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with brain metastasis (BM). We aimed to establish the effectiveness of different preferred treatment methods and factors affecting overall survival following BM diagnosis (BMOS) and explore the feasibility of systemic treatment for MBC patients with BM. Methods Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the efficacy of different preferred treatments and other factors associated with BMOS, and a nomogram was then established based on the results of the univariate analysis. Results Patients that initially received systemic drug therapy exhibited a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 43.9% and an intracranial disease control rate (DCR) of 80.6%. The median time between BM diagnosis and the requirement for local intracranial treatment due to worsening disease status was 10.0 months for these patients (95% CI: 7.811–12.189 months). The median follow-up was 28.0 months, and the median BMOS was 16.0 months. Following BM diagnosis, the systemic drug treatment group had a better outcome than the local brain treatment group, with a respective median BMOS of 22.0 and 16.0 months (χ2=7.743, P=0.005). At the time of BM diagnosis, the median BMOS for patients without neurological symptoms diagnosed by regular screen was significantly longer than that of patients with neurological symptoms (18.0 vs. 13.0 months, respectively; χ2=11.371, P=0.001). Based on these analyses, a nomogram was constructed that incorporated disease-free survival (DFS), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), molecular subtype, number of extracranial metastases, BM location, number of BMs, neurological symptoms, and the preferred treatment approach, with a prediction probability (c-index) value of 0.76. Conclusions Systemic drug treatment has a beneficial effect on brain lesions, and effective treatment delays the need for local intracranial treatment. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening can detect asymptomatic BM in MBC patients (particularly those with HER2−positive or triple-negative disease), offering these patients an opportunity to undergo systemic drug therapy, thereby prolonging their survival. To our knowledge, this is a well-fitted nomogram including current treatment and medical examination strategies to predict BMOS probability that offers value as an adjunct for the prognostic evaluation of MBC-BM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limin Niu
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huimin Lv
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mengwei Zhang
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huiai Zeng
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lifeng Wang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shude Cui
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhen Liu
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ji L, Fan L, Zhu X, Gao Y, Wang Z. Prognostic Score for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis and Its Predictive Value of Locoregional Treatment Benefit. Front Oncol 2021; 11:651636. [PMID: 34513662 PMCID: PMC8432710 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.651636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a significant survival difference and lack of effective treatment among breast cancer patients with liver metastasis. This present study aimed to construct a novel prognostic score for predicting the prognosis and locoregional treatment benefit of de novo metastatic breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM). Methods In total, 2,398 eligible patients between 2010 and 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They were assigned to the training set including 1,662 patients (2010–2014) and validation set comprising 736 patients (2015–2016) depending on the time of diagnosis. The prognostic score was based on regression coefficients in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. And then, patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups by the prognostic score. The discrimination and calibration of prognostic score were evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and calibration curves, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate locoregional surgery and chemotherapy benefit in different risk groups. Results Age, race, insurance and marital status, T stage, pathological grade, molecular subtypes, and extrahepatic metastasis were identified as independent prognostic variables in the prognostic score. The prognostic score showed high discrimination power with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 and 0.72 and excellent agreement suggested by calibration plots in the training and validation sets, respectively. Intermediate-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.09–2.73, P<0.001] and high-risk groups (HR 4.88; 95% CI 4.13–5.76; P<0.001) had significantly worse prognosis in comparison with the low-risk group. The median overall survival (OS) in three prognostic groups were 44, 18, and 7 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 56, 23, and 7%, respectively. Apart from the high-risk group (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.10; P=0.157), the low-risk (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49–0.84; P=0.001) and intermediate-risk groups (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.55–0.85; P=0.001) could benefit from the surgery of primary site, while chemotherapy improved prognosis in all risk groups. Conclusions A prognostic score was developed to accurately predict the prognosis of de novo BCLM patients. Moreover, it may be useful for further subdividing them into different risk groups and helping guide clinicians in treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Fan
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiuzhi Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhonghua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hiya S, Fujiwara S, Nakagawa A, Sato Y, Omura Y, Hara S, Kohara N, Kawamoto M. Isolated progression of miliary brain metastasis in a patient with stable lung adenocarcinoma successfully treated with whole-brain radiotherapy: A case report. eNeurologicalSci 2021; 25:100366. [PMID: 34504961 PMCID: PMC8413885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ensci.2021.100366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Miliary brain metastasis is a rare form of metastasis commonly associated with advanced stages of cancer. In this article, we report a case of a 38-year-old male with solitary progression of miliary brain metastasis originating from stage 4 EML-ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Multiple brain lesions were first detected upon the patient's inclusion in a brigatinib clinical trial. The brain lesions dissipated, and the lung and bone lesions decreased in size after starting the brigatinib therapy; however, the brain lesions later increased in number. A biopsy revealed miliary brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was successfully treated with whole brain therapy, in addition to brigatinib. This case suggests that it is possible for an isolated miliary brain metastasis to occur during the effective suppression of systemic cancer progression. Whole brain radiotherapy while continuing effective systemic therapy is a good strategy for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satomi Hiya
- Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Satoru Fujiwara
- Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nakagawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Yuki Sato
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Omura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Shigeo Hara
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Nobuo Kohara
- Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Michi Kawamoto
- Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zheng Y, Geng D, Yu T, Xia W, She D, Liu L, Yin B. Prognostic value of pretreatment MRI texture features in breast cancer brain metastasis treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Acta Radiol 2021; 62:1208-1216. [PMID: 32910684 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120956296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) was recommended for treating patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM), but predictions of the existing prognostic models for therapeutic responsiveness vary substantially. PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment clinical, MRI radiologic, and texture features in patients with BCBM undergoing GKS. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of 81 BCBMs in 44 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Progressive disease was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the longest diameter of the target lesion or the presence of new intracranial lesions on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) imaging. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CE-T1W images, T2-weighted (T2W) images, and ADC maps. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to identify independent predictors associated with BCBM-specific progression-free survival (PFS). A nomogram was constructed and its calibration ability was assessed. RESULTS The cumulative BCBM-specific PFS was 52.27% at six months and 11.36% at one year, respectively. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06; P = 0.004) and CE-T1W-based kurtosis (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.92; P = 0.008) were the independent predictors. The combination of CE-T1W-based kurtosis and age displayed a higher C-index (C-index 0.70; 95% CI 0.63-0.77) than did CE-T1W-based kurtosis (C-index 0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.73) or age (C-index 0.63; 95% CI 0.56-0.70) alone. The nomogram based on the combinative model provided a better performance over age (P < 0.05). The calibration curves elucidated good agreement between prediction and observation for the probability of 7- and 12-month BCBM-specific PFS. CONCLUSION Pretreatment CE-T1W-based kurtosis combined with age could improve prognostic ability in patients with BCBM undergoing GKS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyan Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Daoying Geng
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
- Institute of Functional and Molecular Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Tonggang Yu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Gamma Hospital, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Wei Xia
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
- Academy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
- Department of Medical Imaging, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Dejun She
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Bo Yin
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
- Institute of Functional and Molecular Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hulsbergen AFC, Abunimer AM, Ida F, Kavouridis VK, Cho LD, Tewarie IA, Mekary RA, Schucht P, Phillips JG, Verhoeff JJC, Broekman MLD, Smith TR. Neurosurgical resection for locally recurrent brain metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:2085-2094. [PMID: 34270740 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with locally recurrent brain metastases (LRBMs), the role of (repeat) craniotomy is controversial. This study aimed to analyze long-term oncological outcomes in this heterogeneous population. METHODS Craniotomies for LRBM were identified from a tertiary neuro-oncological institution. First, we assessed overall survival (OS) and intracranial control (ICC) stratified by molecular profile, prognostic indices, and multimodality treatment. Second, we compared LRBMs to propensity score-matched patients who underwent craniotomy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (NDBM). RESULTS Across 180 patients, median survival after LRBM resection was 13.8 months and varied by molecular profile, with >24 months survival in ALK/EGFR+ lung adenocarcinoma and HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, 102 patients (56.7%) experienced intracranial recurrence; median time to recurrence was 5.6 months. Compared to NDBMs (n = 898), LRBM patients were younger, more likely to harbor a targetable mutation and less likely to receive adjuvant radiation (p < 0.05). After 1:3 propensity matching stratified by molecular profile, LRBM patients generally experienced shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.67 and 1.36 for patients with or without a mutation, p < 0.05) but similar ICC (hazard ratio 1.11 in both groups, p > 0.20) compared to NDBM patients with similar baseline. Results across specific molecular subgroups suggested comparable effect directions of varying sizes. CONCLUSIONS In our data, patients with LRBMs undergoing craniotomy comprised a subgroup of brain metastasis patients with relatively favorable clinical characteristics and good survival outcomes. Recurrent status predicted shorter OS but did not impact ICC. Craniotomy could be considered in selected, prognostically favorable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Abdullah M Abunimer
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Fidelia Ida
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Vasileios K Kavouridis
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Logan D Cho
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States
| | - Ishaan A Tewarie
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Philippe Schucht
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bern, Kanton Bern, Switzerland
| | - John G Phillips
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Breast cancer subtype predicts clinical outcomes after stereotactic radiation for brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:591-601. [PMID: 33742358 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03735-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the prognostic ability of tumor subtype for patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) treated with stereotactic radiation (SRT). METHODS This is a retrospective review of 181 patients who underwent SRT to 664 BCBM from 2004 to 2019. Patients were stratified by subtype: hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-), HR-positive, HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+), HR-negative, HER2-positive (HR-/HER2+), and triple negative (TN). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of SRT. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Median follow up from SRT was 11.4 months. Of the 181 patients, 47 (26%) were HR+/HER2+, 30 (17%) were HR-/HER2+, 60 (33%) were HR+/HER2-, and 44 (24%) were TN. Of the 664 BCBMs, 534 (80%) received single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with a median dose of 21 Gy (range 12-24 Gy), and 130 (20%) received fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT), with a median dose of 25 Gy (range 12.5-35 Gy) delivered in 3 to 5 fractions. One-year LC was 90%. Two-year DIC was 35%, 23%, 27%, and 16% (log rank, p = 0.0003) and 2-year OS was 54%, 47%, 24%, and 12% (log rank, p < 0.0001) for HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, and TN subtypes, respectively. On MVA, the TN subtype predicted for inferior DIC (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.00-2.60, p = 0.049). The modified breast-Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) significantly predicted DIC and OS (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Subtype is prognostic for OS and DIC for patients with BCBM treated with SRT.
Collapse
|
30
|
Validation and comparison of Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment scores in patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1761-1768. [PMID: 33704689 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02577-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases (BM) occur in 15-35% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, conferring poor prognosis and impairing quality of life. Clinical scores have been developed to classify patients according to their prognosis. We aimed to check the utility of the Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (B-GPA) and its modified version (mB-GPA) and compare them in routine clinical practice. METHODS This is an ambispective study including all patients with breast cancer BM treated in a single cancer comprehensive center. We analyzed the overall survival (OS) from BM diagnosis until death. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model were used in the analyses. ROC curves were performed to compare both scores. RESULTS We included 169 patients; median age was 50 years. HER2-positive and triple negative patients were 33.7% and 20.7%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 90% of the patients had died. Median OS was 12 months (95% confidence interval 8.0-16.0 months). OS was worse in patients with > 3 BM and in patients with triple negative subtype. CONCLUSIONS In our series, we confirm that B-GPA and mB-GPA scores correlated with prognosis. ROC curves showed that B-GPA and mB-GPA have similar prognostic capabilities, slightly in favor of mB-GPA.
Collapse
|
31
|
Mills MN, Walker C, Thawani C, Naz A, Figura NB, Kushchayev S, Etame A, Yu HHM, Robinson TJ, Liu J, Vogelbaum MA, Forsyth PA, Czerniecki BJ, Soliman HH, Han HS, Ahmed KA. Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and stereotactic radiation in the management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:223. [PMID: 33663447 PMCID: PMC7934378 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07971-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to recent concerns about the toxicity of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with stereotactic radiation, we assessed our institutional outcomes treating HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) with T-DM1 and stereotactic radiation. Methods This is a single institution series of 16 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who underwent 18 stereotactic sessions to 40 BCBM from 2013 to 2019 with T-DM1 delivered within 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant intracranial control (DIC), and systemic progression-free survival (sPFS) from the date of SRS. A neuro-radiologist independently reviewed follow-up imaging. Results One patient had invasive lobular carcinoma, and 15 patients had invasive ductal carcinoma. All cases were HER2-positive, while 10 were hormone receptor (HR) positive. Twenty-four lesions were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a median dose of 21 Gy (14–24 Gy). Sixteen lesions were treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation (FSRT) with a median dose of 25 Gy (20-30Gy) delivered in 3 to 5 fractions. Stereotactic radiation was delivered concurrently with T-DM1 in 19 lesions (48%). Median follow up time was 13.2 months from stereotactic radiation. The 1-year LC, DIC, sPFS, and OS were 75, 50, 30, and 67%, respectively. There was 1 case of leptomeningeal progression and 1 case (3%) of symptomatic radionecrosis. Conclusions We demonstrate that stereotactic radiation and T-DM1 is well-tolerated and effective for patients with HER2-positive BCBM. An increased risk for symptomatic radiation necrosis was not noted in our series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Mills
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Chelsea Walker
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Chetna Thawani
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Afrin Naz
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Nicholas B Figura
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Sergiy Kushchayev
- Departments of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold Etame
- Departments of Neuro Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Timothy J Robinson
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - James Liu
- Departments of Neuro Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Departments of Neuro Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Departments of Neuro Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Departments of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hatem H Soliman
- Departments of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Departments of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ren B, Zou L, Guo Q, Tian Y. Survival and effective prognostic factors in lung cancer patients with brain metastases treated with whole brain radiotherapy. RADIATION MEDICINE AND PROTECTION 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmp.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
33
|
Wang W, He H, Marín-Ramos NI, Zeng S, Swenson SD, Cho HY, Fu J, Beringer PM, Neman J, Chen L, Schönthal AH, Chen TC. Enhanced brain delivery and therapeutic activity of trastuzumab after blood-brain barrier opening by NEO100 in mouse models of brain-metastatic breast cancer. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1656-1667. [PMID: 33659980 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The antitumor efficacy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies, such as humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Roche), in patients with breast-to-brain cancer metastasis is hindered by the low permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). NEO100 is a high-purity version of the natural monoterpene perillyl alcohol, produced under current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations, that was shown previously to reversibly open the BBB in rodent models. Here we investigated whether NEO100 could enable brain entry of trastuzumab to achieve greater therapeutic activity. METHODS An in vitro BBB, consisting of human astrocytes and brain endothelial cells, was used to determine trastuzumab penetration in the presence or absence of NEO100. For in vivo studies, we administered intravenous (IV) trastuzumab or the trastuzumab-drug conjugate ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla®, Roche), to mouse models harboring intracranial HER2+ breast cancer, with or without BBB opening via IA NEO100. Brain and tumor tissues were examined for the presence of trastuzumab and infiltration of immune cells. Therapeutic impact was evaluated based on overall survival. RESULTS NEO100 greatly increased trastuzumab penetration across an in vitro BBB. In vivo, IA NEO100-mediated BBB opening resulted in brain tumor-selective accumulation of trastuzumab, without detectable presence in normal brain tissue, along with increased presence of immune cell populations. IV delivery of trastuzumab or T-DM1 achieved significantly greater overall survival of tumor-bearing mice when combined with IA NEO100. CONCLUSION IA NEO100 facilitates brain tumor entry of trastuzumab and T-DM1 and significantly enhances their therapeutic efficacy, along with increased antibody-dependent immune cell recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijun Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Haiping He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Nagore I Marín-Ramos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shan Zeng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Steven D Swenson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hee-Yeon Cho
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jie Fu
- Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Paul M Beringer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Josh Neman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ligang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Axel H Schönthal
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Thomas C Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ratosa I, Vidmar MS. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer brain oligometastases - molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:1-11. [PMID: 33948296 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC) who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for a limited number of brain metastases (BM) and to identify factors influencing overall survival (OS) and local control. Materials and methods The records of 45 patients who underwent SRS for 72 brain lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Statistics included the chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method, and the multivariate Cox model. Results The median number of treated BM was 2 (range 1-10). Median OS from BM diagnosis and post-SRS were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.8-40.5) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 11.1-25.8), respectively. One-year and two-year survival rates after BM diagnosis were 55% and 41%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the Luminal-B-human-epidermal-growth-receptor-positive (HER2+) subtype had the longest median OS at 39.1 months (95% CI: 34.1-44.1, p = 0.004). In an adjusted analysis, grade 2 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6, p = 0.005), craniotomy (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7; p = 0.006), and ≥ 2 systemic therapies received (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9, p = 0.028) were associated with improved OS. One-year and two-year intracranial progression-free survival rates were 85% and 63%, respectively. Four factors for a higher risk of any intracranial recurrence remained significant in the adjusted analysis, as follows: age < 50 years (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.3-36.3; p = 0.014), grade 3 (HR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1-13.2; p = 0.038), HER2+ (HR: 6.9; 95% CI: 1.3-36.3; p = 0.023), and whether the brain was the first metastatic site (HR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6-14.5; p = 0.006). Conclusion Intrinsic BC characteristics are important determinants for both survival and intracranial control for patients undergoing SRS for oligometastatic brain disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Marija Skoblar Vidmar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Use of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective 11-year single center study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021; 52:214-222. [PMID: 33549504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM To analyse the use of radiotherapy (RT) and factors affecting overall survival (OS) after RT in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. METHODS Breast cancer patients treated from 2008 to 2018 with whole brain RT (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at a large regional cancer referral center were identified from the hospital's RT register. Clinical variables were extracted from medical records. OS was calculated from date of first RT until death or last follow up. Potential factors affecting OS were analyzed. RESULTS 255 females with WBRT (n = 206) or SRS (n = 49) as first RT were included. An increased use of initial SRS was observed in the second half of the study period. The most common WBRT fractionation regimen was 3 Gy × 10. SRS was most often single fractions; 18 or 25 Gy between 2009 and 2016, while fractionated SRS was mostly used in 2017 and 2018. Median OS in the WBRT group was 6 months (CI 1-73) relative to 23 (CI 0-78) in the SRS group. Age, performance status, initial RT technique, extracranial disease, brain metastasis surgery, number of brain metastases and DS-GPA score had significant impact on OS. Only ECOG 0 and brain metastasis surgery were associated with superior OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION WBRT was the most frequent primary RT. An increased use of initial SRS was observed in the second half of the study period. Only ECOG 0 and brain metastasis surgery were associated with superior OS in multivariate analysis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Xie Y, Luo X, Li H, Xu Q, He Z, Zhao Q, Zuo Z, Ren J. autoRPA: A web server for constructing cancer staging models by recursive partitioning analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:3361-3367. [PMID: 33294132 PMCID: PMC7688999 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer staging provides a common language that is used to describe the severity of an individual's cancer, which plays a critical role in optimizing cancer treatment. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) is the most widely accepted method for cancer staging. Despite its widespread use, to date, only limited tools have been developed to implement the RPA algorithm for cancer staging. Moreover, most of the available tools can be accessed only from command lines and also lack visualization, making them difficult for clinical investigators without programing skills to use. Therefore, we developed a web server called autoRPA that is dedicated to supporting the construction of prognostic staging models and performance comparisons among different staging models. Based on the RPA algorithm and log-rank test statistics, autoRPA can establish a decision-making tree from survival data and provide clinicians an intuitive method to further prune the decision tree. Moreover, autoRPA can evaluate the contribution of each submitted covariate that is involved in the grouping process and help identify factors that significantly contribute to cancer staging. Four indicators, including hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, percentage of variation explained, and sample size balance, are introduced to validate the performance of the designed staging models. In addition, autoRPA can also be used to compare the performance of different prognostic staging models using a standard bootstrap evaluation method. The web server of autoRPA is freely available at http://rpa.renlab.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubin Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaotong Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Huiqin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Qingxian Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhihao He
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Qi Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhixiang Zuo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jian Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zhao J, Yang Y, Pang D, Yu Y, Lin X, Chen K, Ye G, Tang J, Hu Q, Chai J, Bi Z, Ding L, Wu W, Zeng Y, Gui X, Liu D, Yao H, Wang Y. Development and validation of a nomogram in survival prediction among advanced breast cancer patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1446. [PMID: 33313191 PMCID: PMC7723627 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) varies greatly. Although molecular subtype is known as the most important factor in OS differentiation, significant differences in OS among patients with the same molecular subtype still occur, leading to the need for a more accurate prognostic prediction model. This study aimed to develop a prediction model (nomogram) based on current diagnosis and treatment to predict the OS of newly diagnosed ABC patients in China. Methods From the institution’s database, we collected data of 368 ABC patients from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (national hospital) as a training set to establish a nomogram with prognostic risk factors that calculated the predicted probability of survival. Nomograms were independently validated with 278 patients with ABC from two other institutions using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and risk group stratifications. Results The initial primary tumor stage, molecular subtype, disease-free survival (DFS), presence of brain metastasis, and the tumor burden of metastasis disease (local recurrence, oligo-metastatic disease, or multiple-metastatic disease) were included in the prognostic nomogram. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.77 and 0.71 in the training and the validation sets, respectively. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups, respectively (HR 6.81, 95% CI: 4.69 to 9.89, P<0.001). In the lower risk score group (risk score <11), there was no significant difference between the OS with chemotherapy and hormone therapy (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.47, P=0.48). Conclusions We have constructed a novel prediction nomogram that can guide the physicians to select personalized treatment options. Furthermore, our study is the first to add oligo-metastatic disease and primary endocrine/trastuzumab resistance into the prognostic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianli Zhao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaping Yang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Danmei Pang
- Department of Breast Cancer Oncology. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Yunfang Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guolin Ye
- Department of Breast Surgery. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Hu
- Department of Breast Cancer Oncology. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Jie Chai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuofei Bi
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Linxiaoxiao Ding
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenjing Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinduo Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiujuan Gui
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Donggeng Liu
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Herui Yao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ji L, Fan L, Zhu X, Gao Y, Wang Z. A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1342. [PMID: 33014776 PMCID: PMC7493788 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer with liver metastasis consists of a group of heterogeneous diseases, and survival time may be significantly different, ranging from a few months to several years. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM). Methods: In total, 1022 eligible patients from January 2007 to December 2018 were selected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and were temporally in the training (n = 715) and validation (n = 307) set. According to regression coefficients found in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the final results were transformed into the prognostic scores. On the basis of these scores, patients were finally classified into three risk groups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. Then, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were used to assess discrimination and calibration of this prognostic model in the validation set. Results: Molecular subtypes, metastatic-free interval (MFI), extrahepatic metastasis, and liver function tests were identified as independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. According to risk stratification, intermediate-risk (hazard ratio (HR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74–2.58, P < 0.001) and high-risk groups (HR 6.94, 95% CI 5.25–9.16, P < 0.001) had significantly worse prognoses in comparison with the low-risk group regarding overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. The median OS in these three groups were 39.97, 21.03, and 8.80 months, respectively. These results were confirmed in the internal and external validation cohorts. Conclusions: Based on molecular classification of tumors, routine laboratory tests, and other clinical information easily accessible in daily clinical practice, we developed a clinical tool for BCLM patients to predict their prognosis. Moreover, it may be useful for identifying the subgroup with unfavorable prognosis and individualization of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Fan
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiuzhi Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhonghua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Weykamp F, El Shafie RA, König L, Seidensaal K, Forster T, Arians N, Regnery S, Hoegen P, Deutsch TM, Schneeweiss A, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1557. [PMID: 33014802 PMCID: PMC7493741 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for 203 brain metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to assess OS, local control (LC), distant cranial control (DCC), and extracranial control (EC). Cox regression was applied to detect prognostic outcome factors. A point scoring system was designed to stratify patients based on outcome. Nine established prognostic indexes were analyzed using the concordance index (c-index). Results: Two out of nine analyzed prognostic indexes for OS showed a significant c-index, the breast graded prognostic assessment (bGPA; 0.631; 95% CI, 0.514–0.748; p = 0.037) and the modified bGPA (mod-bGPA; 0.662; 95% CI, 0.547–0.777; p = 0.010). Significant results from multivariate analysis (Karnofsky Performance Score, Her2/neu receptor status, extracranial control) were used to generate a new point system: the breast cancer stereotactic radiotherapy score (bSRS), which discriminated three significantly different prognostic groups, for LC, DCC, EC, and OS, respectively. However, the c-index was only significant for OS (0.689; 95% CI, 0.577–0.802; p = 0.003). Conclusions: The new bSRS score was superior to the bGPA and mod-bGPA scores for prognosis of OS. The bSRS is easy to use and the first tool, which might also provide outcome assessment beyond mere OS. Future studies need to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Datsenko PV, Gerasimov VA, Belikova AA. [Short-term survival prediction scale in patients with metastatic brain disease caused by lung and breast cancer]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2020; 84:26-35. [PMID: 32759924 DOI: 10.17116/neiro20208404126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a prognostic scale suitable for distinguishing a group of poor prognosis with low survival prior to deciding on the appropriateness of radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed only those patients with reliably known date of death after previous WBRT to determine objective criteria allowing WBRT abandonment. WBRT was carried out in 100 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (n=49) and breast cancer (n=51) and confirmed metastatic brain disease. All procedures have been conducted at the radiotherapy department of the Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute since January 2014. The prescribed dose of 3 Gy was ensured in all patients. Total focal dose of 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions was achieved in 77 cases, 36 Gy delivered in 12 fractions - in 23 cases. RESULTS Death date was recorded in all patients (n=100) by January 2020. In the electronic SPSS database, death information was digitized for each patient up to 2-24 months, respectively. We identified eight the most significant factors by using of correlation analysis: primary tumor (controlled (0), uncontrolled (1)), number of brain metastases (<17 (0), ≥17 (1)), volume of brain metastases (<48 cm3 (0) ≥48 cm3 (1)), extracranial control (no metastases (0), metastases with positive dynamics after chemotherapy (1), continued growth after chemotherapy (2)), metastatic lesion of liver and lungs, respectively (no (0), yes (1)), functional status (≥ 70% (0), ≤ 60% (1)), carcinomatosis of the meninges (no (0), yes (1)). A simple summation of digital variables for factors 1-8 in each patient resulted a prognostic scale. Low risk of early mortality after WBRT was determined by 0-3 scores, intermediate risk - 4-5 scores, high risk - 6-9 scores. According to univariate analysis (log-rank 0.000), median survival rate varied in these groups: low risk - 15.5 months (11.4-19.7), intermediate risk - 5.26 months (4.6-6.0), high risk - only 1.35 months (0.9-1.8). Only 1 out of 15 high-risk patients (6-9 scores) survived 3 months (3.25 months). Inclusion of all eight factors into multivariate analysis revealed significant impact of only risk group on short-term survival. A 3-month survival in the high-risk group was 20.6 times lower (p=0.002) compared to the low and intermediate risk groups. CONCLUSION High significance of prognostic model and low informative value of each of the included factors emphasize the advisability of determining risk groups for short-term survival according to the suggested scale for each patient scheduled for WBRT. A simple assessment of separate predictors is pointless to decide whether WBRT is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P V Datsenko
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Gerasimov
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Belikova
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Miliary breast cancer brain metastasis: a rare and aggressive form of central nervous system metastasis. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:1349-1350. [PMID: 32747746 PMCID: PMC7591525 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-1001-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Although breast cancer brain metastasis is an increasingly common occurrence, relatively little is known about miliary brain metastases, a rare subtype that presents unique diagnostic and management challenges. The present study from Bashour et al. proposes the first objective diagnostic imaging criteria, enabling improved future study.
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee KL, Chen G, Chen TY, Kuo YC, Su YK. Effects of Cancer Stem Cells in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Solutions. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082122. [PMID: 32751846 PMCID: PMC7463650 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A higher propensity of developing brain metastasis exists in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Upon comparing the metastatic patterns of all breast cancer subtypes, patients with TNBC exhibited increased risks of the brain being the initial metastatic site, early brain metastasis development, and shortest brain metastasis-related survival. Notably, the development of brain metastasis differs from that at other sites owing to the brain-unique microvasculature (blood brain barrier (BBB)) and intracerebral microenvironment. Studies of brain metastases from TNBC have revealed the poorest treatment response, mostly because of the relatively backward strategies to target vast disease heterogeneity and poor brain efficacy. Moreover, TNBC is highly associated with the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which contribute to circulating cancer cell survival before BBB extravasation, evasion from immune surveillance, and plasticity in adaptation to the brain-specific microenvironment. We summarized recent literature regarding molecules and pathways and reviewed the effects of CSC biology during the formation of brain metastasis in TNBC. Along with the concept of individualized cancer therapy, certain strategies, namely the patient-derived xenograft model to overcome the lack of treatment-relevant TNBC classification and techniques in BBB disruption to enhance brain efficacy has been proposed in the hope of achieving treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kha-Liang Lee
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Gao Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Yuan Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Che Kuo
- Taipei Medical University (TMU) Research Center for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Kai Su
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, Cagney D, Aizer A, Lin NU, Nesbit E, Kruser TJ, Chan J, Braunstein S, Lee J, Kirkpatrick JP, Breen W, Brown PD, Shi D, Shih HA, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Shanley R, Sperduto W, Lou E, Everett A, Boggs DH, Masucci L, Roberge D, Remick J, Plichta K, Buatti JM, Jain S, Gaspar LE, Wu CC, Wang TJC, Bryant J, Chuong M, Yu J, Chiang V, Nakano T, Aoyama H, Mehta MP. Beyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases From 1985 to Today. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:334-343. [PMID: 32084525 PMCID: PMC7276246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases are a common sequelae of breast cancer. Survival varies widely based on diagnosis-specific prognostic factors (PF). We previously published a prognostic index (Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA]) for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM), based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), then updated it, reporting the effect of tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400). The purpose of this study is to update the Breast GPA with a larger contemporary cohort (C) and compare treatment and survival across the 3 cohorts. METHODS AND MATERIALS A multi-institutional (19), multinational (3), retrospective database of 2473 patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, was created and compared with prior cohorts. Associations of PF and treatment with survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared with log-rank tests. PF were weighted and the Breast GPA was updated such that a GPA of 0 and 4.0 correlate with the worst and best prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B, and C improved over time (from 11, to 14 to 16 months, respectively; P < .01), despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, Karnofsky Performance Status, age, number of BCBMs, and extracranial metastases (all P < .01). MS for GPA 0 to 1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 was 6, 13, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Between cohorts B and C, the proportion of human epidermal receptor 2 + subtype decreased from 31% to 18% (P < .01) and MS in this subtype increased from 18 to 25 months (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS MS has improved modestly but varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. New PF are identified and incorporated into an updated Breast GPA (free online calculator available at brainmetgpa.com). The Breast GPA facilitates clinical decision-making and will be useful for stratification of future clinical trials. Furthermore, these data suggest human epidermal receptor 2-targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes in some patients with BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | | | - Jing Li
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ayal Aizer
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Diana Shi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Emil Lou
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Laura Masucci
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Yu
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mills MN, Figura NB, Arrington JA, Yu HHM, Etame AB, Vogelbaum MA, Soliman H, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Han HS, Ahmed KA. Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:279-300. [PMID: 32030570 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05552-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners. METHODS In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM. RESULTS We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale. CONCLUSIONS BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Nicholas B Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hatem Soliman
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Treatment Patterns and Survival of Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:60-66. [PMID: 29965807 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study was to analyze treatment patterns of elderly patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), evaluate characteristics associated with treatment selection, and to analyze trends in overall survival (OS) over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included women with BCBM reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare Program from 1992 to 2012. Treatments were recorded from Medicare claims from the date of brain metastases diagnosis until 60 days after. Treatments included resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. Cochran-Armitage tests were used for analysis of treatment patterns. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to determine factors associated with treatment selection. Cox regression modelled OS trends within each treatment modality across time. RESULTS Among 5969 patients included, treatment rates increased from 50% in 1992 to 64.1% in 2012 (P<0.01). Therapy combining radiation, resection, and/or chemotherapy also increased from 8.8% to 18% over the same period (P<0.01). Combined therapy was significantly more likely among patients with extracranial metastases, those with estrogen-negative tumors, younger age at diagnosis, no comorbidities and more recently diagnosed brain metastases. OS improved over time for patients who received a combination of ≥2 treatments (hazard ratio, 0.89 per every 5 more recent diagnosis years; P<0.05). Older patients, those with extracranial metastases, or estrogen/progesterone-negative tumors showed significantly shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS We observed substantial changes in treatment patterns and OS over time in patients with BCBM. We identified several factors associated with specific treatment use. Patients who underwent a combination of ≥2 treatments experienced a significant improvement in OS over time.
Collapse
|
46
|
Darlix A, Louvel G, Fraisse J, Jacot W, Brain E, Debled M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Delaloge S, Campone M, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Fumet JD, Lecouillard I, Cottu P, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Robain M, Chevrot M, Pasquier D, Bachelot T. Impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohort. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:991-1000. [PMID: 31719684 PMCID: PMC6964671 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0619-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) behaviour differs depending on hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) statuses. METHODS The kinetics of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (CNS metastasis-free survival, CNSM-FS) and subsequent patient's prognosis (overall survival, OS) according to the molecular subtype were retrospectively assessed in 16703 MBC patients of the ESME nationwide multicentre MBC database (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS CNS metastases occurred in 4118 patients (24.6%) (7.2% at MBC diagnosis and 17.5% later during follow-up). Tumours were HER2-/HR+ (45.3%), HER2+/HR+ (14.5%), HER2+/HR- (14.9%) and triple negative (25.4%). Median age at CNS metastasis diagnosis was 58.1 years (range: 22.8-92.0). The median CNSM-FS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 16.5-17.9) among patients who developed CNS metastases. Molecular subtype was independently associated with CNSM-FS (HR = 3.45, 95% CI: 3.18-3.75, triple-negative and HER2-/HR+ tumours). After a 30-month follow-up, median OS after CNS metastasis diagnosis was 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4). OS was independently associated with subtypes: median OS was 18.9 months (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.64) for HER2+/HR+ , 13.1 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) for HER2+/HR-, 4.4 months (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42-1.69) for triple-negative and 7.1 months for HER2-/HR+ patients (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Tumour molecular subtypes strongly impact incidence, kinetics and prognosis of CNS metastases in MBC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03275311.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Guillaume Louvel
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Fraisse
- Biometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 15 rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Lecouillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kancharla P, Ivanov A, Chan S, Ashamalla H, Huang RY, Yanagihara TK. The effect of brain metastasis location on clinical outcomes: A review of the literature. Neurooncol Adv 2019; 1:vdz017. [PMID: 32642653 PMCID: PMC7212918 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
It is common clinical practice to consider the location of a brain metastasis when making decisions regarding local therapies and, in some scenarios, estimating clinical outcomes, such as local disease control and patient survival. However, the location of a brain metastasis is not included in any validated prognostic nomogram and it is unclear if this is due to a lack of a relationship or a lack of support from published data. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on studies that have investigated a relationship between brain metastasis location and clinical outcomes, including patient survival. The vast majority of reports anatomically categorized brain metastases as supratentorial or infratentorial whereas some reports also considered other subdivisions of the brain, including different lobes or with particular areas defined as eloquent cortex. Results were variable across studies, with some finding a relationship between metastasis location and survival, but the majority finding either no relationship or a weak correlation that was not significant in the context of multivariable analysis. Here, we highlight the key findings and limitations of many studies, including how neurosurgical resection might influence the relative importance of metastasis location and in what ways future analyses may improve anatomical categorization and resection status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pragnan Kancharla
- Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Alexander Ivanov
- Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York.,Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Susie Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Hani Ashamalla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ted K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dong R, Ji J, Liu H, He X. The evolving role of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 143:20-26. [PMID: 31449983 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30-50% of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer patients will develop brain metastases (BMs) during the disease course. Brain metastases may become a main limitation of life expectancy and a half of them will die from brain progression. Even in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer managed with curative therapy, the risk of brain metastases is also increased. Central nervous system (CNS) may usually present as the first site of recurrence in HER2-positive breast cancer. Local treatments including radiotherapy and surgery are essential while new chemotherapy and biological agents appear to contribute a significant role in the future treatment field of CNS metastases. This article will review recent progresses in HER2-positive breast cancer with BM, with a focus on the efficacy of the HER2 targeted agents-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongrong Dong
- Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Jiali Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Xuexin He
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Znidaric T, Gugic J, Marinko T, Gojkovic Horvat A, Paulin Kosir MS, Golo D, Ivanetic Pantar M, Ratosa I. Breast cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease: 10-year results of a national cohort with validation of prognostic indexes. Breast J 2019; 25:1117-1125. [PMID: 31286623 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Development of brain metastasis (BM) and leptomeningeal (LM) disease in breast cancer (BC) patients indicates poor prognosis and impairs patients' quality of life. Prognostic survival scores for BM can help predict expected survival in order to choose the most appropriate treatment. The aim of our study was to analyze national data for BC patients treated with radiation therapy for BM/LM disease and validate the applicability of different survival prognostic scores. We retrospectively evaluated medical records of 423 BC patients with BM/LM disease receiving radiation therapy between April 2005 and December 2015. Patients were classified by BC Recursive Partitioning Analysis (B-RPA), Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast-GPA), Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (MB-GPA), and Simple Survival score for patients with BM from BC (SS-BM). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the development of BM/LM disease to death or last follow-up date. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, the median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.5-7.8, range 0-146.4) and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 35% and 17%, respectively. Survival analysis showed significant differences in median OS regarding biologic subtypes (P < 0.0001), as follows: 3.2 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.5-3.9), 3.9 (95% CI 2.3-5.6), 7.1 (95% CI 4.3-9.8), 12.1 (95% CI 8.3-15.9), and 15.4 (95% CI 8.8-22.1) months for primary triple-negative BC (TNBC), Luminal B HER2-negative, Luminal A, HER2-enriched, and Luminal B HER2-positive tumors, respectively. Good Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), single metastasis, and absence of LM or extracranial disease all demonstrated better OS in univariate and multivariate analysis. All four employed prognostic indexes provided good prognostic value in predicting survival. SS-BM and MB-GPA showed the best discriminating ability (Concordance indexes C were 0.768 and 0.738, respectively). This study presents one of the largest single-institution series validating prognostic scores for BC patients with BM/LM. SS-BM and MB-GPA proved to be useful tools in the clinical decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Znidaric
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Jasenka Gugic
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tanja Marinko
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Danijela Golo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ou D, Cao L, Xu C, Kirova Y, Chen J. Upfront brain radiotherapy may improve survival for unfavorable prognostic breast cancer brain metastasis patients with Breast‐GPA 0‐2.0. Breast J 2019; 25:1134-1142. [PMID: 31286612 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation oncology, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| | - Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation oncology, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation oncology, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology Institut Curie Paris France
| | - Jia‐Yi Chen
- Department of Radiation oncology, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| |
Collapse
|