1
|
Wilcox JA, Chukwueke UN, Ahn MJ, Aizer AA, Bale TA, Brandsma D, Brastianos PK, Chang S, Daras M, Forsyth P, Garzia L, Glantz M, Oliva ICG, Kumthekar P, Le Rhun E, Nagpal S, O'Brien B, Pentsova E, Lee EQ, Remsik J, Rudà R, Smalley I, Taylor MD, Weller M, Wefel J, Yang JT, Young RJ, Wen PY, Boire AA. Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus review on clinical management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1781-1804. [PMID: 38902944 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options, and clinical research protocols for patients with LM from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansions in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multimodality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of LM, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of LM and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of San Francisco California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Livia Garzia
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- The Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Barbara O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jan Remsik
- Laboratory for Immunology of Metastatic Ecosystems, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospitals, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Inna Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Neuro-oncology Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grigsby-Rocca G, Bermudez C, White JD, Neth BJ, Uhm JH, Mustafa R. Response to Letter by Zagardo, et al. Neurohospitalist 2024; 14:471. [PMID: 39308472 PMCID: PMC11412471 DOI: 10.1177/19418744241273115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bryan J. Neth
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joon H. Uhm
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rafid Mustafa
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rogawski D, Cao T, Ma Q, Roy-O'Reilly M, Yao L, Xu N, Nagpal S. Durable responses to trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer with variable HER2 expression. J Neurooncol 2024; 170:209-217. [PMID: 39073687 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04788-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emerging data suggest that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an active treatment for brain metastases from HER2 + breast cancer. We aimed to characterize the activity of T-DXd in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from a range of HER2-altered cancers. METHODS We reviewed neuro-oncology clinic records between July 2020 and December 2023 to identify patients who received T-DXd to treat LM. RESULTS Of 18 patients identified, 6 had HER2 + breast cancer, 8 had HER2-low/negative breast cancer, 2 had HER2 + gastroesophageal cancer, and 2 had HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 10/18 (56%) patients had cytologically confirmed LM by CSF cytology or circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture. A partial response (PR) on MRI using the EORTC/RANO-LM Revised-Scorecard occurred in 4/6 (67%) patients with HER2 + breast LM, 2/8 (25%) patients with HER2-low/negative breast cancer, and 0/4 (0%) patients with HER2 + gastroesophageal cancer or HER2-mutant NSCLC. Median overall survival after initiating T-DXd was 5.8 months. Survival after initiating T-DXd was numerically longer for HER2 + breast cancer patients compared with HER2-low/negative breast and HER2-altered non-breast cancer patients (13.9 months vs. 5.2 months and 4.6 months, respectively). Landmark analysis showed that patients with radiologic LM response to T-DXd by 2.5 months had longer survival than non-responders (14.2 months vs. 2.6 months, HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.63, p < 0.05), and landmark analyses at 3.5 and 4.5 months after starting T-DXd showed a similar but nonsignificant trend. CONCLUSION T-DXd induces LM responses in a subset of patients, and such responses may be associated with prolongation of survival. Prospective trials are needed to clarify the role of T-DXd in treating LM and which patients are most likely to benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rogawski
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Toni Cao
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Qian Ma
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Meaghan Roy-O'Reilly
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Lilian Yao
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Nova Xu
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takeda K, Umezawa R, Yamamoto T, Takahashi N, Jingu K. Craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal metastasis of solid tumors: survival analysis and prognostic factors. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:667-675. [PMID: 39154378 PMCID: PMC11420835 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
We conducted a study to examine the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for patients who underwent craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for leptomeningeal metastasis of solid tumors. This retrospective study included patients who received CSI for leptomeningeal metastasis at a single institute between 2010 and 2021. Data from clinical records and the radiation information system were obtained and analyzed. A total of 25 patients were included in the study. Eighteen patients (72%) completed the scheduled CSI. The median overall survival (OS) period was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.2-10.0 months). Symptom relief was achieved in four out of 23 symptomatic patients (17%). Non-hematological adverse events occurred in 12 patients (48%), with 1 patient (4%) developing Grade 3 bacterial meningitis and the other patients having Grade 1-2 events. Twenty patients (80%) had hematological adverse events of Grade 3 or higher. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities occurred in 3 patients (12%) due to neutropenia and in 11 patients (44%) due to lymphopenia. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was identified as the only significant parameter for predicting OS. The median OS periods for patients with SII < 607 and SII ≥ 607 were 6.1 and 2.1 months, respectively (P = 0.003). In conclusion, this study showed the treatment outcomes of CSI for leptomeningeal metastasis of solid tumors. It was shown that a high baseline SII was associated with shorter OS after CSI. The findings will contribute to the evaluation of prognosis after CSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuya Takeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, South Miyagi Medical Center, 38-1 Nishi, Ogawara, Shibata, Miyagi 989-1253, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hawkins A, Khawand-Azoulai M, Tanenbaum R, Oltmann C, Benjamin C, Diwanji T, Guillermo Prieto Eibl MDP, Siegel C, Sharma A. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for People with Leptomeningeal Disease. J Palliat Med 2024. [PMID: 39315927 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), spread of cancer to the lining of the brain and its protective coverings, is a feared complication of many different types of cancer. LMD negatively affects prognosis across tumor types. Palliative care (PC) clinicians caring for patients with advanced cancer may be faced with discussing limited prognosis, assisting with symptom management, and helping with medical decision making for patients with LMD. An understanding of pathophysiology, symptomatology, prognosis, and treatment options is essential in providing optimal care. This article, written by clinicians who work across the cancer spectrum, uses an accessible "ten tips" format to help increase PC providers' confidence and competence around caring for people with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Hawkins
- Palliative Care, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Rachel Tanenbaum
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carina Oltmann
- Emory Palliative Care Center at Grady Memorial Hospital. Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Tejan Diwanji
- Radiation Oncology, Mid Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Cara Siegel
- Neurology and Palliative Care, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Akanksha Sharma
- Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute/Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morris CD, Humphrey C, Dillon P. A comprehensive review of current treatment modalities for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 204:104513. [PMID: 39278427 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a metastatic complication of breast cancer that imparts a very poor prognosis and distressing neurologic symptoms in affected patients. While the incidence of LC has risen with improving survival rates for cancer patients, there remains no established treatment protocol for LC and clinical trial data comparing available therapies is limited. Here, a comprehensive literature search of the pubmed and Cochrane databases was performed. Current treatment modalities and their safety/ efficacy profiles are summarized for LC in breast cancer. Roles for emerging therapies in LC are discussed, including targeted agents, CAR-T, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CDK inhibitors and novel antibody conjugates. A treatment pathway for LC is also proposed to guide clinicians through management of this severe metastatic complication of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D Morris
- Emily Couric Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Clare Humphrey
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Patrick Dillon
- Emily Couric Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Corrales-García EM, Aristu-Mendioroz JJ, Castro-Novais J, Matute-Martín R, Learra-Martínez MC, Delgado-López PD. Current state of proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system in Spain: physical bases, indications, controversies and perspectives. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03624-z. [PMID: 39207674 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03624-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The unique biophysical properties of proton therapy (PT), regarding the precise dose distribution, a remarkable better sparing of surrounding normal tissues, and the decreasing costs have promoted the spread of this technique worldwide. In Spain, eleven new PT centers, added to the currently two in function, are expected to be available in the near future. Indications for PT are currently evolving. The suitability of PT in central nervous system tumors of the adult population has been extrapolated from the favorable experience in children and adolescents. Given the lack of appropriate randomized trials, controversies remain regarding its use in lower grade tumors, re-irradiation, and other clinical scenarios in which an a priori dose distribution benefit is expected compared to photon-based radiotherapy. PT is a reasonable option in many brain and spinal tumors associating long life expectancy, in which cognitive decline, and the appearance of radiation-induced neoplasms can be minimized.Estado actual de la terapia con protones en los tumores del sistema nervioso central en España: bases físicas, indicaciones, controversias y perspectivas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Juan Castro-Novais
- Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica, Centro de Protonterapia. Hospital Universitario Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl Matute-Martín
- Servicio Oncología Radioterápica, Centro de Protonterapia, Hospital Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Concepción Learra-Martínez
- Comisión de Protonterapia de La Comunidad de Castilla y LeónServicio de Atención Hospitalaria y CoordinaciónDirección Técnica de Asistencia SanitariaDirección General de Asistencia Sanitaria y HumanizaciónGerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pedro David Delgado-López
- Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Avda Islas Baleares 3, 09006, Burgos, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frechette KM, Breen WG, Brown PD, Sener UT, Webb LM, Routman DM, Laack NN, Mahajan A, Lehrer EJ. Radiotherapy and Systemic Treatment for Leptomeningeal Disease. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1792. [PMID: 39200256 PMCID: PMC11351760 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequelae of metastatic spread that affects approximately 5% of cancer patients. The incidence of LMD is increasing due to advancements in systemic therapy and enhanced detection methods. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the evidence in the detection, prognostication, and treatment of LMD. A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED was conducted to identify articles reporting on LMD including existing data and ongoing clinical trials. We found a wide array of treatment options available for LMD including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy as well as several choices for radiotherapy including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Despite treatment, the prognosis for patients with LMD is dismal, typically 2-4 months on average. Novel therapies and combination approaches are actively under investigation with the aim of improving outcomes and quality of life for patients with LMD. Recent prospective data on the use of proton CSI for patients with LMD have demonstrated its potential survival benefit with follow-up investigations underway. There is a need for validated metrics to predict prognosis and improve patient selection for patients with LMD in order to optimize treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey M. Frechette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - William G. Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - Ugur T. Sener
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (U.T.S.); (L.M.W.)
| | - Lauren M. Webb
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (U.T.S.); (L.M.W.)
| | - David M. Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (W.G.B.); (P.D.B.); (D.M.R.); (N.N.L.); (A.M.); (E.J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weller M, Remon J, Rieken S, Vollmuth P, Ahn MJ, Minniti G, Le Rhun E, Westphal M, Brastianos PK, Soo RA, Kirkpatrick JP, Goldberg SB, Öhrling K, Hegi-Johnson F, Hendriks LEL. Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 130:102807. [PMID: 39151281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Jordi Remon
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Lower Saxony (CCC-N), University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Division for Computational Radiology & Clinical AI, Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery and Institute for Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Ross A Soo
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, Bajpai J, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Biganzoli L, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Chavez-MacGregor M, Chidebe R, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Dent RA, El Saghir NS, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Franco Millan SX, Gilchrist J, Gligorov J, Gradishar WJ, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaur R, Kiely B, Kim SB, Koppikar S, Kuper-Hommel MJJ, Lecouvet FE, Mason G, Mertz SA, Mueller V, Myerson C, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Penault-Llorca F, Prat A, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Sledge GW, Swain SM, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Vuylsteke P, Wiseman T, Xu B, Costa A, Norton L, Winer EP. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast 2024; 76:103756. [PMID: 38896983 PMCID: PMC11231614 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital - Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Leonor Matos
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Karen Gelmon
- BC Cancer Agency, Department of Medical Oncology, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matti S Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | | | - Carlos H Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laura Biganzoli
- Department of Oncology, Hospital of Prato - Azienda USL Toscana Centro Prato, Italy and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Italy
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation and Lisbon University, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa A Carey
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Health Services Research, Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Houston, USA
| | | | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid and Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nagi S El Saghir
- NK Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alexandru Eniu
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland and European School of Oncology (ESO), United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Joseph Gligorov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Est APHP Tenon, University Paris VI, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, Paris, France
| | - William J Gradishar
- Northwestern Medicine, Illinois, USA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), USA
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, University of Munich, Munich and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ranjit Kaur
- Breast Cancer Welfare Association, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Belinda Kiely
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Centre, Department of Oncology, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Smruti Koppikar
- Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Asian Cancer Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Marion J J Kuper-Hommel
- Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Midland Regional Cancer Centre, NZ ABC Guidelines, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut Roi Albert II and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ginny Mason
- Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, West Lafayette, USA
| | - Shirley A Mertz
- MBC US Alliance and Metastatic Breast Cancer Network US, Inverness, USA
| | - Volkmar Mueller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Silvia Neciosup
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, ABC Latin America Guidelines, Peru
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Denmark
| | - Shinji Ohno
- Breast Oncology Centre, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Breast Oncology, Boston, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), USA
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, F-63000, Clermont Ferrand, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, France
| | - Aleix Prat
- Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - George W Sledge
- Division of Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington DC, USA
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Peter Vuylsteke
- University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana and CHU UCL Namur Hospital, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, United Kingdom and European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS), United Kingdom
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Alberto Costa
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy and Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Larry Norton
- Breast Cancer Programs, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saberian C, Milton DR, Simon J, Amaria RN, Diab A, McQuade J, Patel SP, Tawbi H, Yee C, Wong MK, McCutcheon IE, Davies MA, Ferguson SD, Glitza Oliva IC. Survival and treatment outcomes in patients with leptomeningeal disease from metastatic melanoma. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:452-463. [PMID: 39006528 PMCID: PMC11241361 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Melanoma leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has a poor prognosis. However, the management of patients with advanced melanoma has evolved with time, including those with LMD. We reviewed a large cohort of melanoma LMD patients to assess factors associated with survival. Methods Retrospective clinical data was collected on patients diagnosed with LMD at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2015 to 2020. Overall survival (OS) was determined from LMD diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate OS and to assess univariate group differences, respectively. Multivariable associations of survival with variables of interest were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results A total of 172 patients were identified. The median age at LMD diagnosis was 53 (range 20-79) years, and all patients had radiographic evidence of LMD on magnetic resonance imaging of either brain or spine. In total 143 patients previously received systemic therapy (83%), with a median of 2 prior treatments (range 0-5). 81 patients (47%) had concurrent uncontrolled systemic disease and 80 patients (53%) had elevated serum LDH at the time of diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 4.0 months (range 0.1-65.3 months), median OS for all patients from LMD diagnosis was 4.9 months. Patients (n = 45) who received intrathecal therapy or systemic immunotherapy for LMD had a median OS of 8.0 months and 10.2 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, decreased performance status, positive CSF cytology, elevated LDH, and whole brain radiation were associated with worse OS. Conclusions Despite many advances in therapeutic options, the outcomes of melanoma patients with LMD remains poor. However, a subset of patients appears to derive benefit from LMD-directed treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Saberian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julie Simon
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cassian Yee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hartsell WF, Simone CB, Godes D, Maggiore J, Mehta MP, Frank SJ, Metz JM, Choi JI. Temporal Evolution and Diagnostic Diversification of Patients Receiving Proton Therapy in the United States: A Ten-Year Trend Analysis (2012 to 2021) From the National Association for Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1069-1077. [PMID: 38163519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The National Association for Proton Therapy conducted 8 surveys of all operational United States proton centers (2012-2021) and analyzed the patients treated, diagnoses, and treatment complexity to evaluate trends and diversification of patients receiving proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Detailed surveys were sent in 2015, which requested data from 2012 to 2014, and then annually thereafter to active proton centers in the United States. The numbers of patient treated at each center for the preceding calendar year(s) were collated for tumors in the following categories: central nervous system, intraocular, pituitary, skull base/skeleton, head/neck, lung, retroperitoneal/soft tissue sarcoma, pediatric (solid tumors in children of age ≤18), gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, female pelvic, prostate, breast, and "other." Complexity levels were assessed using Current Procedural Terminology codes 77520-77525. RESULTS Survey response rates were excellent (100% in 2015 to 94.9% in 2021); additional publicly available information provided near-complete information on all centers. Trend comparisons between 2012 and 2021 showed that the total annual number of patients treated with protons gradually increased from 5377 to 15,829. The largest numeric increases were for head/neck (316 to 2303; 7.3-fold), breast (93 to 1452; 15.6-fold), and gastrointestinal tumors (170 to 1259; 7.4-fold). Patient numbers also increased significantly for central nervous system (598 to 1743; 2.9-fold), pediatric (685 to 1870; 2.7-fold), and skull base tumors (179 to 514; 2.9-fold). For prostate cancer, the percentage of proton-treated patients decreased from 43.4% to 25.0% of the total. Simple compensated treatments decreased from 43% in 2012 to 7% in 2021, whereas intermediate complexity treatments increased from 45% to 73%. CONCLUSIONS The number of patients treated with protons is gradually increasing, with a substantial proportionate decline in patients with prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. The number of patients treated for "commonly accepted" indications for protons (eg, pediatric, central nervous system, and skull base tumors) is gradually increasing. Greater proportional increases were observed for breast, lung, head/neck, and gastrointestinal tumors. Treatment complexity is gradually increasing over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Hartsell
- Ascension Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James M Metz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nagpal S, Milano MT, Chiang VL, Soltys SG, Brackett A, Halasz LM, Garg AK, Sahgal A, Ahluwalia MS, Tom MC, Palmer JD, Knisley JPS, Chao ST, Gephart MH, Wang TJC, Lo SS, Chang EL. Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated-mutated and ALK-fusion non-small cell lung cancer. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1195-1212. [PMID: 38459978 PMCID: PMC11226873 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
The American Radium Society (ARS) Central Nervous System (CNS) committee reviewed literature on epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) and ALK-fusion (ALK+) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of brain metastases (BrMs) from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) to generate appropriate use guidelines addressing use of TKIs in conjunction with or in lieu of radiotherapy (RT). The panel developed three key questions to guide systematic review: can radiotherapy be deferred in patients receiving EGFR or ALK TKIs at (1) diagnosis or (2) recurrence? Should TKI be administered concurrently with RT (3)? Two literature searches were performed (May 2019 and December 2023). The panel developed 8 model cases and voted on treatment options using a 9-point scale, with 1-3, 4-6 and 7-9 corresponding to usually not appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually appropriate (respectively), per the UCLA/RAND Appropriateness Method. Consensus was achieved in only 4 treatment scenarios, all consistent with existing ARS-AUC guidelines for multiple BrM. The panel did not reach consensus that RT can be appropriately deferred in patients with BrM receiving CNS penetrant ALK or EGFR TKIs, though median scores indicated deferral may be appropriate under most circumstances. Whole brain RT with concurrent TKI generated broad disagreement except in cases with 2-4 BrM, where it was considered usually not appropriate. We identified no definitive studies dictating optimal sequencing of TKIs and RT for EGFRm and ALK+ BrM. Until such studies are completed, the committee hopes these cases guide decision- making in this complex clinical space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Alexandria Brackett
- Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Amit K Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Albuquerque, New Mexico , USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Colombus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jonathan P S Knisley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lochrin SE, Buonocore DJ, Young RJ, Kaley TJ, Postow MA, Wolchok JD, Shoushtari AN, Momtaz P, Betof Warner AS, Callahan MK. Durable complete response in a patient with leptomeningeal melanoma after treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, and nivolumab. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2024. [PMID: 38960393 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of melanoma with a dismal prognosis. We present the case of a young man with stage IV BRAF V600E mutant melanoma with lung, lymph node, and brain metastases initially treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, who subsequently developed LMD. Upon change to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy with nivolumab, a durable complete response was achieved and remains ongoing, off treatment, 7 years from diagnosis. Management of symptomatic LMD remains a critical unmet clinical challenge, with limited clinical trial data. This exceptional case is instructive, as the first published case of the use of the triplet, and the first durable response with therapy discontinuation, in melanoma LMD. The triple-drug regimen may be considered a viable option in fit patients. This case highlights the potential for long-term disease control and the critical and urgent need to develop clinical trials inclusive of patients with LMD to define the best treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lochrin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Darren J Buonocore
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Thomas J Kaley
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Allison S Betof Warner
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Margaret K Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mills MN, Uno A, Li P, Liveringhouse C, Kim Y, Oliver DE, Perez BA, Creelan BC, Yu M, Forsyth PA, Pina Y, Ahmed KA. Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease Following Receipt of EGFR-Targeted Therapy, Immune-Checkpoint Blockade, Intrathecal Chemotherapy, or Radiation Therapy Alone. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:417-423.e1. [PMID: 38719648 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EGFR-targeted therapy (ETT) and immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown promising results in treating NSCLC brain metastases (BM). However, little is known of their effect in treating leptomeningeal disease (LMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective review of 80 patients diagnosed with NSCLC LMD from January 2014 to March 2021. Patients were grouped based on initial LMD treatment: radiotherapy (RT) alone, ETT, ICB, and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). RESULTS EGFR mutation was present in 22 patients (28%). Twenty patients had positive cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, while 60 patients were diagnosed based on MRI with clinical correlation. The RT alone group consisted primarily of whole brain radiation (n = 20; 77%), stereotactic radiation (n = 3; 12%), and palliative spine radiation (n = 2; 7%). There were no significant differences amongst the treatment groups in age, performance status, or neurologic symptoms. Overall, the 6-month overall survival (OS) and craniospinal progression free survival (CS-PFS) were 35% and 24%, respectively. The 6-month OS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 64%, 33%, 57%, and 29% respectively (log-rank P = .026). The 6-month CS-PFS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 43%, 33%, 29%, and 19% respectively (log-rank P = .049). Upon univariate analysis, receipt of ETT compared to RT alone reached significance for OS (HR 0.35, P = .006) and CS-PFS (HR 0.39, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis for patients with NSCLC LMD remains poor overall. However, the receipt of ETT for patients with EGFR-positive disease was associated with improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Akihiro Uno
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Pinxue Li
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Daniel E Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Bradford A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Benjamin C Creelan
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Yolanda Pina
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Remsik J, Boire A. The path to leptomeningeal metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2024; 24:448-460. [PMID: 38871881 PMCID: PMC11404355 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00700-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
The leptomeninges, the cerebrospinal-fluid-filled tissues surrounding the central nervous system, play host to various pathologies including infection, neuroinflammation and malignancy. Spread of systemic cancer into this space, termed leptomeningeal metastasis, occurs in 5-10% of patients with solid tumours and portends a bleak clinical prognosis. Previous, predominantly descriptive, clinical studies have provided few insights. Recent development of preclinical leptomeningeal metastasis models, alongside genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic sequencing efforts, has provided groundwork for mechanistic understanding and identification of long-needed therapeutic targets. Although previously understood as an anatomically isolated compartment, the leptomeninges are increasingly appreciated as a major conduit of communication between the systemic circulation and the central nervous system. Despite the unique nature of the leptomeningeal microenvironment, the general principles of metastasis hold true: cells metastasizing to the leptomeninges must gain access to the new environment, survive within the space and evade the immune system. The study of leptomeningeal metastasis has the potential to uncover novel site-specific metastatic principles and illuminate the physiology of the leptomeningeal space. In this Review, we provide a biology-focused overview of how metastatic cells reach the leptomeninges, thrive in this nutritionally sparse environment and evade the detection of the omnipresent immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Remsik
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Laboratory for Immunology of Metastatic Ecosystems, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Brain Tumour Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pabon CM, Yeboa DN, O'Brien BJ, Majd NK, Wang C, Blum Murphy MA. Intrathecal topotecan with systemic checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal cancer with leptomeningeal involvement: two case reports and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 15:1331-1340. [PMID: 38989402 PMCID: PMC11231862 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in gastroesophageal (GE) malignancies are exceedingly rare. Historically, treatment for LM has included steroids, radiation, chemotherapy, and intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy. However, the outcomes in GE malignancies with LM remain poor. Unfortunately, clinical trials in GE malignancies have traditionally excluded those with LM, limiting advances in therapeutic strategies. Given that LM poses potentially devastating neurologic and psychologic sequelae, there is an urgent need for more effective treatments. Case Description Patient 1 is a 44-year-old woman with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma who undergoes neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. Seven months following surgery, she develops ataxia, weakness, and nausea/vomiting. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveals intracranial disease that is subsequently successfully resected and then treated with gamma knife (GK) radiation. Pathology confirms metastases. Three months later she is found to have LM. She receives palliative whole brain radiation therapy as well as focal radiation to the spine. Following this she transitioned to concurrent IT topotecan plus intravenous (IV) ipilumumab/nivolumab with durable response beyond 14 months. Patient 2 is a 71-year-old man with de novo metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma with durable response to 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan. Asymptomatic intracranial metastases are detected on surveillance scans 2 years after initial diagnosis for which he receives GK. Follow up MRI identifies new LM. As such, to treat the LM, he was transitioned to IT topotecan and IV pembrolizumab with good response for 6 months until death from a gastrointestinal bleed. Conclusions We present two cases of LM in patients with GE adenocarcinoma who had longer survival than what has been reported. They were treated with combination IT topotecan and IV checkpoint inhibition. Further studies evaluating the central nervous system tumor immune-microenvironment can help expand our understanding of how this combination has worked well in our patients and how to care for others with similar scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy M Pabon
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barbara J O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nazanin K Majd
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chenyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mariela A Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Press RH, Mehta MP. Proton Therapy: Current Status and Controversies. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:747-749. [PMID: 38547434 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Expert commentary on the evolving role of proton therapy, discussing the current status and controversies of proton therapy in the modern era.
Collapse
|
19
|
Howard TP, McClelland S, Jimenez RB. Evolving Role of Proton Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:771-777. [PMID: 38377440 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
With the expansion of proton radiation therapy centers across the United States and a gradually expanding body of academic evidence supporting its use, more patients are receiving-and asking about-proton therapy than ever before. Here, we outline, for nonradiation oncologists, the theoretical benefits of proton therapy, the clinical evidence to date, the controversies affecting utilization, and the numerous randomized trials currently in progress. We also discuss the challenges of researching and delivering proton therapy, including the cost of constructing and maintaining centers, barriers with insurance approval, clinical situations in which proton therapy may be approached with caution, and the issue of equitable access for all patients. The purpose of this review is to assist practicing oncologists in understanding the evolving role of proton therapy and to help nonradiation oncologists guide patients regarding this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bian DJ, Lazaratos AM, Maritan SM, Quaiattini A, Zeng Z, Zhu Z, Sener U, Malani R, Kim YJ, Ichihara E, Cohen V, Rose AA, Bouganim N, Dankner M. Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29668. [PMID: 38698967 PMCID: PMC11064091 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS). Results 128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients. Conclusion Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J.H. Bian
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anna-Maria Lazaratos
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M. Maritan
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea Quaiattini
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zhimin Zeng
- Department of Oncology, the Second affiliated hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rachna Malani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yu Jung Kim
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Eiki Ichihara
- Department of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Victor Cohen
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - April A.N. Rose
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathaniel Bouganim
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew Dankner
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barbour AB, Blouw B, Taylor LP, Graber JJ, McGranahan T, Blau M, Halasz LM, Lo SS, Tseng YD, Venur V, Yang JT. Prognostic value of cerebrospinal fluid tumor cell count in leptomeningeal disease from solid tumors. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:509-514. [PMID: 38441840 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04615-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment decisions for leptomeningeal disease (LMD) rely on patient risk stratification, since clinicians lack objective prognostic tools. The introduction of rare cell capture technology for identification of cerebrospinal fluid tumor cells (CSF-TCs), such as CNSide assay, improved the sensitivity of LMD diagnosis, but prognostic value is unknown. This study assesses the prognostic value of CSF-TC density in patients with LMD from solid tumors. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated LMD from a single institution who had CNSide assay testing for CSF-TCs from 2020 to 2023. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were conducted with Cox proportional-hazards modeling. Maximally-selected rank statistics were used to determine an optimal cutpoint for CSF-TC density and survival. RESULTS Of 31 patients, 29 had CSF-TCs detected on CNSide. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) CSF-TC density was 67.8 (4.7-639) TCs/mL. CSF cytology was positive in 16 of 29 patients with positive CNSide (CNSide diagnostic sensitivity = 93.5%, negative predictive value = 85.7%). Median (IQR) survival from time of CSF-TC detection was 176 (89-481) days. On univariable and multivariable analysis, CSF-TC density was significantly associated with survival. An optimal cutpoint for dichotomizing survival by CSF-TC density was 19.34 TCs/mL. The time-dependent sensitivity and specificity for survival using this stratification were 76% and 67% at 6 months and 65% and 67% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CSF-TC density may carry prognostic value in patients with LMD from solid tumors. Integrating CSF-TC density into LMD patient risk-stratification may help guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Lynne P Taylor
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington- Alvord Brain Tumor Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jerome J Graber
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington- Alvord Brain Tumor Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tresa McGranahan
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Scripps Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Molly Blau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Vyshak Venur
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington- Alvord Brain Tumor Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freret ME, Boire A. The anatomic basis of leptomeningeal metastasis. J Exp Med 2024; 221:e20212121. [PMID: 38451255 PMCID: PMC10919154 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20212121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), or spread of cancer to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled space surrounding the central nervous system, is a fatal complication of cancer. Entry into this space poses an anatomical challenge for cancer cells; movement of cells between the blood and CSF is tightly regulated by the blood-CSF barriers. Anatomical understanding of the leptomeninges provides a roadmap of corridors for cancer entry. This Review describes the anatomy of the leptomeninges and routes of cancer spread to the CSF. Granular understanding of LM by route of entry may inform strategies for novel diagnostic and preventive strategies as well as therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Borm KJ, Behzadi ST, Hörner-Rieber J, Krug D, Baumann R, Corradini S, Duma MN, Dunst J, Fastner G, Feyer P, Fietkau R, Haase W, Harms W, Hehr T, Matuschek C, Piroth MD, Schmeel LC, Souchon R, Strnad V, Budach W, Combs SE. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:259-275. [PMID: 38488902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02202-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Borm
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie T Behzadi
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Rene Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinics of Schwerin-University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany
- Department for Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Petra Feyer
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wulf Haase
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, St.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hehr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc D Piroth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Partner Site Munich, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Perlow HK, Matsui JK, Ewing A, Cadieux C, Dibs K, Upadhyay R, Blakaj DM, Beyer SJ, Thomas EM, Grecula JC, Raval RR, Palmer JD. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Craniospinal Irradiation Utilizing a Vertebral Body Sparing Approach: An Alternative Approach to Improve Access and Minimize Toxicity. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101424. [PMID: 38379893 PMCID: PMC10877680 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is indicated for adult patients diagnosed with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Proton-based vertebral body sparing (VBS) CSI has been explored with pediatric patients to minimize hematologic toxicity; however, utilization of VBS in an adult population is limited. A recent phase II trial has shown efficacy of proton-based CSI to treat non-small cell lung and breast cancer with LMD. We hypothesize that VBS CSI using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could also effectively reduce dose to vertebral bodies and surrounding organs at risk, minimizing toxicity for adult patients with LMD and comparing favorably to proton-based CSI. Methods and Materials Consecutive patients with LMD received VMAT VBS CSI, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, as a part of a prospective registry. Full VMAT arcs for the brain fields matched to 2 spine isocenters for the upper and lower spine were created using limited posterior arcs. To further decrease the vertebral body dose, an avoid entry and exit contour was created. Acute toxicity data were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Results Ten adult patients were treated in this cohort. One patient experienced grade 2 neutropenia with the remaining 9 experiencing grade 1 hematologic toxicity. Three patients experienced grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity with the remaining 7 experiencing grade 1 nausea. No patient experienced grade 3+ toxicities in this cohort. One patient experienced a 5-day delay in systemic therapy initiation due to neutropenia; otherwise, all patients planned for systemic therapy started without delay. Conclusions In this study, VMAT VBS CSI led to acceptable toxicity compared with patients treated with proton CSI on a phase 2 clinical trial. Given its promising early results, future prospective evaluation of the technique is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Ashlee Ewing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Catherine Cadieux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Khaled Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sasha J. Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Evan M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John C. Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sener U, Webb M, Breen WG, Neth BJ, Laack NN, Routman D, Brown PD, Mahajan A, Frechette K, Dudek AZ, Markovic SN, Block MS, McWilliams RR, Dimou A, Kottschade LA, Montane HN, Kizilbash SH, Campian JL. Proton Craniospinal Irradiation with Immunotherapy in Two Patients with Leptomeningeal Disease from Melanoma. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY AND PRECISION ONCOLOGY 2024; 7:1-6. [PMID: 38327758 PMCID: PMC10846635 DOI: 10.36401/jipo-23-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. Methods In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma. Results The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. Conclusion Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mason Webb
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William G. Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bryan J. Neth
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kelsey Frechette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barbour AB, Kotecha R, Lazarev S, Palmer JD, Robinson T, Yerramilli D, Yang JT. Radiation Therapy in the Management of Leptomeningeal Disease From Solid Tumors. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101377. [PMID: 38405313 PMCID: PMC10885590 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is clinically detected in 5% to 10% of patients with solid tumors and is a source of substantial morbidity and mortality. Prognosis for this entity remains poor and treatments are palliative. Radiation therapy (RT) is an essential tool in the management of LMD, and a recent randomized trial demonstrated a survival benefit for proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in select patients. In the setting of this recent advance, we conducted a review of the role of RT in LMD from solid tumors to evaluate the evidence basis for RT recommendations. Methods and Materials In November 2022, we conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, as well as a review of ongoing clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, to inform a discussion on the role of RT in solid tumor LMD. Because of the paucity of high-quality published evidence, discussion was informed more by expert consensus and opinion, including a review of societal guidelines, than evidence from clinical trials. Results Only 1 prospective randomized trial has evaluated RT for LMD, demonstrating improved central nervous system progression-free survival for patients with breast and lung cancer treated with proton CSI compared with involved-field RT. Modern photon CSI techniques have improved upon historical rates of acute hematologic toxicity, but the overall benefit of this modality has not been prospectively evaluated. Multiple retrospective studies have explored the use of involved-field RT or the combination of RT with chemotherapy, but clear evidence of survival benefit is lacking. Conclusions Optimal management of LMD with RT remains reliant upon expert opinion, with proton CSI indicated in patients with good performance status and extra-central nervous system disease that is either well-controlled or for which effective treatment options are available. Photon-based CSI traditionally has been associated with increased marrow and gastrointestinal toxicities, though intensity modulated RT/volumetric-modulated arc therapy based photon CSI may have reduced the toxicity profile. Further work is needed to understand the role of radioisotopes as well as combined modality treatment with intrathecal or central nervous system penetrating systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B. Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington – Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Timothy Robinson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington – Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bartsch R, Jerzak KJ, Larrouquere L, Müller V, Le Rhun E. Pharmacotherapy for leptomeningeal disease in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102653. [PMID: 38118373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Clinical data supporting the best therapeutic approach in leptomeningeal disease (LMD; also known as leptomeningeal metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) are lacking. Despite the development of new agents and increasing incidence of central nervous system metastases, patients with LMD are often excluded from clinical trials in breast cancer, with very few conducted specifically in LMD. Consequently, current evidence may not provide an accurate reflection of real-world clinical practice. This review aims to provide further insight into the treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer and LMD. We explore differences between clinical and real-world studies, considering inclusion criteria, levels of evidence for LMD diagnosis, and time between diagnosis of LMD and LMD-specific treatment initiation. Patient prognosis is poor; median overall survival is limited to several months, with approximately 10% of patients alive at 12 months. Efficacy results have been reported for various systemic and intrathecal agents in LMD to date. Systemic therapies under investigation for LMD in breast cancer include tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and paclitaxel trevatide; trastuzumab is the main intrathecal agent currently under investigation. Recent trials investigating systemic or intrathecal therapies are typically small, single-arm studies, and most are restricted to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the variability among inclusion criteria and response assessment tools makes the interpretation of results difficult. Large retrospective cohorts with various inclusion criteria and treatment regimens provide some real-world data. However, there remains an urgent need for randomised clinical trials which include patients with LMD across all breast cancer subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bardhan M, Dey D, Suresh V, Javed B, Venur VA, Joe N, Kalidindi R, Ozair A, Khan M, Mahtani R, Lo S, Odia Y, Ahluwalia MS. An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:77-103. [PMID: 38145503 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2293223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Bardhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Vinay Suresh
- King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Binish Javed
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Neha Joe
- St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Smalley I, Boire A, Brastianos P, Kluger HM, Hernando-Monge E, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA, Smalley KSM, Ferguson S, Davies MA, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma: An update on the developments in pathophysiology and clinical care. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2024; 37:51-67. [PMID: 37622466 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a major challenge in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma patients. Outcomes for patient remain poor, and patients with LMD continue to be excluded from almost all clinical trials. However, recent trials have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting prospective clinical trials in these patients. Further, new insights into the pathophysiology of LMD are identifying rational new therapeutic strategies. Here we present recent advances in the understanding of, and treatment options for, LMD from metastatic melanoma. We also annotate key areas of future focus to accelerate progress for this challenging but emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Smalley
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla Brastianos
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Eva Hernando-Monge
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Keiran S M Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Malani R, Bhatia A, Warner AB, Yang JT. Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis from Solid Tumor Malignancies: Treatment Strategies and Biomarkers. Semin Neurol 2023; 43:859-866. [PMID: 37989214 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases/diseases (LMDs) are a late-stage complication of solid tumor or hematologic malignancies. LMD is spread of cancer cells to the layers of the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid maters) and subarachnoid space seen in 3 to 5% of cancer patients. It is a disseminated disease which carries with it significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. Our understanding of disease pathophysiology is currently lacking; however, advances are being made. As our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has improved, treatment strategies have evolved. Mainstays of treatment such as radiotherapy have changed from involved-field radiotherapy strategies to proton craniospinal irradiation which has demonstrated promising results in recent clinical trials. Systemic treatment strategies have also improved from more traditional chemotherapeutics with limited central nervous system (CNS) penetration to more targeted therapies with better CNS tumor response. Many challenges remain from earlier clinical detection of disease through improvement of active treatment options, but we are getting closer to meaningful treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachna Malani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ankush Bhatia
- Department of Neurology, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Allison Betof Warner
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Imber BS, Sehgal R, Saganty R, Reiner AS, Ilica AT, Miao E, Li BT, Riely GJ, Yu HA, Panageas KS, Young RJ, Pike LR, Moss NS. Intracranial Outcomes of De Novo Brain Metastases Treated With Osimertinib Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed EGFR-Mutant NSCLC. JTO Clin Res Rep 2023; 4:100607. [PMID: 38124791 PMCID: PMC10730363 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC have a high incidence of brain metastases. The EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib has intracranial activity, making the role of local central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapies, such as radiation and surgery, less clear. Methods Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases who received osimertinib as initial therapy after brain metastasis diagnosis were included. Individual lesion responses were assessed using adapted RANO-BM criteria. CNS progression and local progression of brain metastasis from osimertinib start were analyzed using cumulative incidence treating death as a competing risk. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results There were 36 patients who had a median interval from brain metastasis diagnosis to first-line osimertinib initiation of 25 days. In total, 136 previously untreated brain metastases were tracked from baseline. Overall, 105 lesions (77.2%) had complete response and 31 had partial response reflecting best objective response of 100%. Best response occurred at a median of 96 days (range: 28-1113 d) from baseline magnetic resonance imaging. This reflects a best objective response rate of 100%. Two-year overall survival was 80%. CNS progression rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-years post-osimertinib were 21%, 32%, and 41%, respectively. Lesion-level local failure was estimated to be 0.7% and 4.7% at 1- and 2-years post-osimertinib, respectively. No clinicodemographic factors including brain metastasis number were associated with post-osimertinib progression. Conclusions Intracranial response to osimertinib is excellent for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with de novo, previously untreated brain metastases. Very low local failure rates support a strategy of upfront osimertinib alone in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon S. Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ryka Sehgal
- Department of Neurosurgery and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rachel Saganty
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S. Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - A. Turan Ilica
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bob T. Li
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Helena A. Yu
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J. Young
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Luke R.G. Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelson S. Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery and Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Primdahl D, Cohen-Nowak A, Kumthekar P. Novel approaches to treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:592-602. [PMID: 37865856 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases is increasing in the setting of improved survival from systemic cancers. In more recent years, our understanding of leptomeningeal metastasis pathogenesis, how to diagnose and treat has been evolving. RECENT FINDINGS Diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis has been challenging due to the limitations of cytology and neuroimaging; However, newer techniques detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential advantage with diagnosis, quantification and detection of oncogenic mutations. The use of small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy has shown some promise in specific leptomeningeal metastasis subtypes. SUMMARY These new discoveries have improved clinical trials' ability to assess treatment response and thereby more optimally compare different treatments. Furthermore, they have helped the individual clinician better diagnose, monitor the disease and provide novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Primdahl
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Adam Cohen-Nowak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Berlin E, Eisenberg R, Hill-Kayser C, Lustig RA, Kurtz G, Cummings E, LaRiviere M. Delivery of re-irradiation and complex palliative radiotherapy using proton therapy in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30708. [PMID: 37794575 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intent of this study is to characterize indications for pediatric palliative-intent proton radiation therapy (PIPRT). PROCEDURE We retrospectively reviewed patients 21 years and younger who received PIPRT. We defined PIPRT as radiotherapy (RT) aimed to improve cancer-related symptoms/provide durable local control in the non-curative setting. Mixed proton/photon plans were included. Adjacent re-irradiation (reRT) was defined as a reRT volume within the incidental dose cloud of a prior RT target, whereas direct reRT was defined as in-field overlap with prior RT target. Acute toxicity during RT until first inspection visit was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The Kaplan-Meier method, measured from last PIPRT fraction, was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Eighteen patients underwent PIPRT between 2014 and 2020. Median age at treatment start was 10 years [2-21]. Median follow-up was 8.2 months [0-48]. Treatment sites included: brain/spine [10], abdomen/pelvis [3], thorax [3], and head/neck [2]. Indications for palliation included: durable tumor control [18], neurologic symptoms [4], pain [3], airway compromise [2], and great vessel compression [1]. Indications for protons included: reRT [15] (three adjacent, 12 direct), craniospinal irradiation [4], reduction of dose to normal tissues [3]. Sixteen experienced grade (G) 1-2 toxicity; two G3. There were no reports of radionecrosis. Median PFS was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-16.3]. Median OS was 8.3 months [95% CI: 5.5-26.3]. CONCLUSIONS The most common indication for PIPRT was reRT to provide durable tumor control. PIPRT appears to be safe, with no cases of high-grade toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Berlin
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Eisenberg
- Albany Medical College, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Cummings
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael LaRiviere
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sherman WJ, Romiti E, Michaelides L, Moniz-Garcia D, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Porter AB. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1962-1977. [PMID: 38158477 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Sherman
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Edoardo Romiti
- Vita e Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Loizos Michaelides
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Diogo Moniz-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wilcox JA, Estrera R, Boire A. The Spectrum of Headache in Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Comprehensive Review with Clinical Management Guidelines. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:695-706. [PMID: 37874457 PMCID: PMC10713777 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01180-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headaches are a common, oftentimes debilitating symptom in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. RECENT FINDINGS The third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders provides a useful diagnostic framework for headaches secondary to leptomeningeal metastases based on the temporal relationship of headache with disease onset, change in headache severity in correlation with leptomeningeal disease burden, and accompanying neurologic signs such as cranial nerve palsies and encephalopathy. However, headaches in patients with leptomeningeal metastases can be further defined by a wide range of varying cancer- and treatment-related pathophysiologies, each requiring a tailored approach. A thorough review of the literature and expert opinion on five observed headache sub-classifications in patients with leptomeningeal metastases is provided, with attention to necessary diagnostic testing, recommended first-line treatments, and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Estrera
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chew SM, Seidman AD. New strategies for the treatment of breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:500-506. [PMID: 37820086 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Leptomeningeal metastasis is a complication of metastatic breast cancer that has a rising incidence likely due to the increased availability of novel systemic therapies, which have improved survival with better extracranial disease control but with limited intracranial efficacy. A poor prognosis of less than 6 months has historically been associated with leptomeningeal metastasis and it is often an exclusion factor for enrollment in clinical trials. There are limited evidence-based data supporting use of therapeutics in leptomeningeal metastasis patients and recommendations are largely derived from retrospective reports and small prospective studies. However, in recent years, there has been a surge in effective modern therapeutics with promising intracranial activity. RECENT FINDINGS The study aims to review the most recent updates in the management of leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer. We discuss the effectiveness and limitations of intrathecal administration, predictive biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid, proton radiation therapy and promising new systemic therapies such as antibody drug conjugates. SUMMARY Ongoing development of clinical trials that allow inclusion of leptomeningeal metastasis are essential for establishing efficacy potential and discovering new treatment options in this population of great unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya M Chew
- Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, van den Bent M, Brandsma D, Furtner J, Rudà R, Schadendorf D, Seoane J, Tonn JC, Wesseling P, Wick W, Minniti G, Peters S, Curigliano G, Preusser M. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101624. [PMID: 37863528 PMCID: PMC10619142 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M van den Bent
- Department of The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam; Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Webb MJ, Breen WG, Laack NN, Leventakos K, Campian JL, Sener U. Proton craniospinal irradiation with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab for leptomeningeal disease: a case report. CNS Oncol 2023; 12:CNS101. [PMID: 37491842 PMCID: PMC10410687 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2023-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a challenging condition with a dismal prognosis. In this case study, we report partial response of LMD in a patient with metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma following treatment with proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI), bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab. Two years after the initial diagnosis, he presented with LMD. He underwent proton CSI with bevacizumab followed by combination therapy with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. He had a partial disease response with progression-free survival after LMD diagnosis of 4.6 months. He unfortunately developed pembrolizumab induced hypophysitis, after which he experienced rapid neurologic clinical progression. Overall, this novel combination led to a durable partial response which warrants prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason J Webb
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Jian L Campian
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rooney MK, Andring LM, Corrigan KL, Bernard V, Williamson TD, Fuller CD, Garden AS, Gunn B, Lee A, Moreno AC, Morrison WH, Phan J, Rosenthal DI, Spiotto M, Frank SJ. Hypothyroidism following Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Opportunities to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4321. [PMID: 37686597 PMCID: PMC10486996 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a central component for the treatment of many head and neck cancers. In this systematic review of the literature, we aimed to characterize and quantify the published evidence on RT-related hypothyroidism, including estimated incidence, clinical risk factors, and dosimetric parameters that may be used to guide clinical decision making. Furthermore, we aimed to identify potential areas of improvement in the prevention and clinical management of RT-induced hypothyroidism, including the role of modern advanced therapeutic techniques. (2) Methods: We conducted a systemic review of the literature in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify original research articles describing the incidence, mechanism, dosimetry, treatment, or prevention of radiation-related hypothyroidism for adults receiving RT for the treatment of head and neck cancers. The snowball method was used to identify additional articles. For identified articles, we tabulated several datapoints, including publication date, patient sample size, estimated hypothyroidism incidence, cancer site/type, follow-up period, radiation modality and technique, use of multimodality therapy, method of thyroid function evaluation, and proposed dosimetric predictors of hypothyroidism. (3) Results: One hundred and eleven articles met inclusion criteria, reflecting a range of head and neck cancer subtypes. There was a large variation in the estimated incidence of RT-related hypothyroidism, with a median estimate of 36% (range 3% to 79%). Reported incidence increased in later publication dates, which was likely related to improved screening and longer follow up. There were a wide variety of predictive metrics used to identify patients at high risk of hypothyroidism, the most common of which were volumetric and mean dosimetrics related to the thyroid gland (Vxx%, Dmean). More recently, there has been increasing evidence to suggest that the thyroid gland volume itself and the volume of the thyroid gland spared from high-dose radiation (VSxx) may better predict thyroid function after RT. There were no identified studies investigating the role of advanced radiotherapeutic techniques such as MRI-guided RT or particle therapy to decrease RT-related hypothyroidism. Conclusions: Hypothyroidism is a common toxicity resulting from therapeutic radiation for head and neck cancer with recent estimates suggesting 40-50% of patients may experience hypothyroidism after treatment. Dosimetric predictive models are increasingly able to accurately identify patients at risk of hypothyroidism, especially those utilizing thyroid VS metrics. Further investigation regarding the potential for advanced radiotherapeutic therapies to decrease RT-induced thyroid dysfunction is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K. Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (V.B.); (T.D.W.); (S.J.F.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Simonsen MK, Vrou Offersen B, Jensen AB. Prognosis of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis treated with radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:871-879. [PMID: 37498539 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2238551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Life expectancy for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (BC) has improved in recent years, especially due to better systemic treatment. This has led to an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM), and BC is now the leading cause of BM in women. Treatment of BM primarily consists of surgery and/or radiotherapy. We aimed to investigate survival time and prognostic factors for BC patients treated with radiotherapy for BM. MATERIAL & METHODS During the period 1st of January 2015 to 1st of June 2020, 144 consecutive BC patients treated for BM from one centre were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were either diagnosed with BM as the first metastatic lesion, or developed BM during palliative therapy for distant non-brain metastasis. The study was approved by the Central Denmark Region. RESULTS Median age at BM diagnosis was 66 years, and 90% of the patients already had extracranial metastatic disease at BM diagnosis. Median overall survival after diagnosis of BM was 6.1 months. Short survival was observed for patients with poor performance status, leptomeningeal metastasis or more than three solid BM. Several of these factors were overrepresented in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours who had poorer survival than patients with different receptor status. CONCLUSION The number of metastatic BC patients developing BM is high, and survival following local treatment remains poor. Several prognostic factors appear to influence survival after radiotherapy. Treatment of BC patients with BM should be individualized according to performance status, leptomeningeal disease, number of BM, and receptor status of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University
| | - Anders Bonde Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Baskaran AB, Bhatia A, Kumthekar P, Boire A, Lukas RV. Cerebrospinal fluid-administered therapies for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors. Future Oncol 2023; 19:1801-1807. [PMID: 37737023 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims/purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Several approaches are used to treat LM, including intrathecally administered therapies. We consolidated current studies exploring intrathecal therapies for LM treatment. Patients & methods: A review of clinical trials using intrathecal agents was conducted with outcomes tabulated and trends described. 48 trials met the inclusion criteria. Initial investigations began with cytotoxic agents; following this were formulations with longer cerebrospinal fluid half-lives, targeted antibodies and radionucleotides. Results & conclusion: Outcomes were not reported consistently. Survival, when reported, remained poor. Intrathecal therapies for LM remain a viable option. Their use can be informed by an understanding of efficacy, safety and toxicity. They may be an important component of future LM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archit B Baskaran
- Resident, Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Ankush Bhatia
- Section Head of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Medicine, & Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Geoffrey Beene Junior Faculty Chair, Department of Neurology, Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Associate Professor, Regional Ambulatory Medical Director, Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thill M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Würstlein R, Janni W, Park-Simon TW. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:306-315. [PMID: 37900553 PMCID: PMC10601669 DOI: 10.1159/000531579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2023 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Fachklinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow & Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf/Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitäts Spital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Steininger J, Gellrich FF, Engellandt K, Meinhardt M, Westphal D, Beissert S, Meier F, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal Metastases in Melanoma Patients: An Update on and Future Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11443. [PMID: 37511202 PMCID: PMC10380419 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. Among solid tumours, malignant melanoma (MM) has one of the highest rates of metastasis to the leptomeninges, with approximately 10-15% of patients with advanced disease developing LMD. Tumour cells that metastasise to the brain have unique properties that allow them to cross the blood-brain barrier, evade the immune system, and survive in the brain microenvironment. Metastatic colonisation is achieved through dynamic communication between metastatic cells and the tumour microenvironment, resulting in a tumour-permissive milieu. Despite advances in treatment options, the incidence of LMD appears to be increasing and current treatment modalities have a limited impact on survival. This review provides an overview of the biology of LMD, diagnosis and current treatment approaches for MM patients with LMD, and an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Despite the still limited efficacy of current therapies, there is hope that emerging treatments will improve the outcomes for patients with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Steininger
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Friedrich Gellrich
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kay Engellandt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Dana Westphal
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Graeff C, Volz L, Durante M. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles. PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS 2023; 131:104046. [PMID: 37207092 PMCID: PMC7614547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Cancer therapy with accelerated charged particles is one of the most valuable biomedical applications of nuclear physics. The technology has vastly evolved in the past 50 years, the number of clinical centers is exponentially growing, and recent clinical results support the physics and radiobiology rationale that particles should be less toxic and more effective than conventional X-rays for many cancer patients. Charged particles are also the most mature technology for clinical translation of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy. However, the fraction of patients treated with accelerated particles is still very small and the therapy is only applied to a few solid cancer indications. The growth of particle therapy strongly depends on technological innovations aiming to make the therapy cheaper, more conformal and faster. The most promising solutions to reach these goals are superconductive magnets to build compact accelerators; gantryless beam delivery; online image-guidance and adaptive therapy with the support of machine learning algorithms; and high-intensity accelerators coupled to online imaging. Large international collaborations are needed to hasten the clinical translation of the research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baskaran AB, Buerki RA, Khan OH, Gondi V, Stupp R, Lukas RV, Villaflor VM. Building Team Medicine in the Management of CNS Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3901. [PMID: 37373596 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
CNS metastases are often terminal for cancer patients and occur at an approximately 10-fold higher rate than primary CNS tumors. The incidence of these tumors is approximately 70,000-400,000 cases annually in the US. Advances that have occurred over the past two decades have led to more personalized treatment approaches. Newer surgical and radiation techniques, as well as targeted and immune therapies, have enanled patient to live longer, thus increasing the risk for the development of CNS, brain, and leptomeningeal metastases (BM and LM). Patients who develop CNS metastases have often been heavily treated, and options for future treatment could best be addressed by multidisciplinary teams. Studies have indicated that patients with brain metastases have improved survival outcomes when cared for in high-volume academic institutions using multidisciplinary teams. This manuscript discusses a multidisciplinary approach for both parenchymal brain metastases as well as leptomeningeal metastases implemented in three academic institutions. Additionally, with the increasing development of healthcare systems, we discuss optimizing the management of CNS metastases across healthcare systems and integrating basic and translational science into our clinical care to further improve outcomes. This paper summarizes the existing therapeutic approaches to the treatment of BM and LM and discusses novel and emerging approaches to optimizing access to neuro-oncologic care while simultaneously integrating multidisciplinary teams in the care of patients with BM and LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archit B Baskaran
- Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Robin A Buerki
- Health System Clinician of Neurology (Neuro-Oncology), Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA
| | - Osaama H Khan
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL 60190, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nothwestern Medicine West Region, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA
| | - Roger Stupp
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Neurological Surgery, Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Victoria M Villaflor
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lazaratos AM, Maritan SM, Quaiattini A, Darlix A, Ratosa I, Ferraro E, Griguolo G, Guarneri V, Pellerino A, Hofer S, Jacot W, Stemmler HJ, van den Broek MPH, Dobnikar N, Panet F, Lahijanian Z, Morikawa A, Seidman AD, Soffietti R, Panasci L, Petrecca K, Rose AAN, Bouganim N, Dankner M. Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases. Breast 2023; 69:451-468. [PMID: 37156650 PMCID: PMC10300571 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS 7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine. CONCLUSIONS The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Lazaratos
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M Maritan
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea Quaiattini
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amelie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Emanuela Ferraro
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Nika Dobnikar
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Francois Panet
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zubin Lahijanian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aki Morikawa
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Lawrence Panasci
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - April A N Rose
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathaniel Bouganim
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew Dankner
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Khaled ML, Tarhini AA, Forsyth PA, Smalley I, Piña Y. Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD) in Patients with Melanoma Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061884. [PMID: 36980770 PMCID: PMC10047692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication caused by seeding malignant cells to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the leptomeningeal membrane. LMD is diagnosed in 5-15% of patients with systemic malignancy. Management of LMD is challenging due to the biological and metabolic tumor microenvironment of LMD being largely unknown. Patients with LMD can present with a wide variety of signs and/or symptoms that could be multifocal and include headache, nausea, vomiting, diplopia, and weakness, among others. The median survival time for patients with LMD is measured in weeks and up to 3-6 months with aggressive management, and death usually occurs due to progressive neurologic dysfunction. In melanoma, LMD is associated with a suppressive immune microenvironment characterized by a high number of apoptotic and exhausted CD4+ T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and a low number of CD8+ T-cells. Proteomics analysis revealed enrichment of complement cascade, which may disrupt the blood-CSF barrier. Clinical management of melanoma LMD consists primarily of radiation therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors as targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes the biology and anatomic features of melanoma LMD, as well as the current therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Lotfy Khaled
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Inna Smalley
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Yolanda Piña
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pellerino A, Garbossa D, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:464-474. [PMID: 36990824 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, in the past, most of central nervous system metastases from solid tumors were associated with an advanced phase of the disease needing palliation only, while to date they increasingly develop as an early and/or solitary relapse in patients with the systemic disease under control. This review will cover all the aspects of a modern management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases from diagnosis to the different therapeutic options, either local (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance) or systemic. Particular emphasis is reserved to the new-targeted drugs, that allow to target specifically driver molecular alterations. These new compounds pose new problems in terms of monitoring efficacy and adverse events, but increasingly they allow improvement of outcome in comparison to historical controls.
Collapse
|
50
|
Freret ME, Wijetunga NA, Shamseddine AA, Higginson DS, Schmitt AM, Yamada Y, Lis E, Boire A, Yang JT, Xu AJ. Early Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101154. [PMID: 36845624 PMCID: PMC9943781 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The management of patients with advanced solid malignancies increasingly uses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Advanced cancer patients are at risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely collected during computed tomography (CT) myelography for spinal SBRT planning, offering an opportunity for early LM detection by CSF cytology in the absence of radiographic LM or LM symptoms (subclinical LM). This study tested the hypothesis that early detection of tumor cells in CSF in patients undergoing spine SBRT portends a similarly poor prognosis compared with clinically overt LM. Methods and Materials We retrospectively analyzed clinical records for 495 patients with metastatic solid tumors who underwent CT myelography for spinal SBRT planning at a single institution from 2014 to 2019. Results Among patients planned for SBRT, 51 (10.3%) developed LM. Eight patients (1.6%) had subclinical LM. Median survival with LM was similar between patients with subclinical versus clinically evident LM (3.6 vs 3.0 months, P = .30). Patients harboring both parenchymal brain metastases and LM (29/51) demonstrated shorter survival than those with LM alone (2.4 vs 7.1 months, P = .02). Conclusions LM remains a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Subclinical LM detected by CSF cytology in spine SBRT patients has a similarly poor prognosis compared with standardly detected LM and warrants consideration of central nervous system-directed therapies. As aggressive local therapies are increasingly used for metastatic patients, more sensitive CSF evaluation may further identify patients with subclinical LM and should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - N. Ari Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Achraf A. Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel S. Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam M. Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|