Enrollment of Non-White Participants and Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Phase III Trials of Multiple Sclerosis DMTs: A Systematic Review

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of diroximel fumarate in a cohort of Black patients with multiple sclerosis from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been well studied in racial and ethnic minorities, as these populations are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Black or African Americans comprise ∼13 % of the US population, yet are represented by as little as 5 % in clinical trials. Differences in disease course and progression have been reported between races and ethnicities, so there is a need to understand the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in Black patients, to inform evidence-based approaches to treatment in this population.

METHODS

EVOLVE-MS-1 (NCT0234307) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study assessing the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of diroximel fumarate (DRF) over 96 weeks in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Patients were either newly initiated to DRF or rolled over from completing EVOLVE-MS-2 (NCT03093324). In this post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study, we evaluate the safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes for DRF in Black and non-Black patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 1057 patients enrolled, 72 (6.8 %) were Black. In Black vs non-Black patients, mean age was 42 vs 43 years and 75 % vs 72 % were female, respectively. In both groups, median (range) duration of DRF exposure was 1.8 (0.0-2.0) years and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was 2.7. The most common prior DMTs for both Black vs non-Black patients were interferons (47 % vs 37 %) and glatiramer acetate (36 % vs 24 %). DRF treatment was discontinued in 33 (46 %) Black and 224 (23 %) non-Black patients; most common reasons for discontinuation were withdrawal by patient (n = 11, 15.3 %), adverse events (AEs; n = 7, 9.7 %), and lost to follow-up (n = 7, 9.7 %) in Black patients; AEs (8.2 %) and withdrawal by patient (7.0 %) in non-Black patients. AEs were reported in 90 % Black and 89 % non-Black patients; most AEs were mild or moderate in both groups. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs were reported in 36 % Black and 32 % non-Black patients; no Black patients discontinued due to GI AEs, vs 7 (0.7 %) non-Black patients. The most commonly reported AE was flushing (18 % Black and 28 % non-Black patients). No AEs of lymphopenia were reported in Black patients compared with 13 % of non-Black patients. Mean absolute lymphocyte count declined from baseline to week 48 by 15 % in Black patients and 29 % in non-Black patients, then plateaued and remained above the lower limit of normal (LLN; 0.91 × 109/L). Adjusted annualized relapse rate (95 % confidence interval) was reduced by 78.2 % (54.6 - 89.5; p < 0.0001) in Black patients, from 12 months before to 96 weeks after DRF treatment; similar to 81.7 % (78.5 - 84.5 %; p < 0.0001) reduction in non-Black patients. Mean number of patients free from confirmed disability progression was 93.4 % by week 48, then 86.2 % vs 90.4 % by week 96 in Black vs non-Black patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study presents the first analysis of safety and efficacy of DRF in Black patients. Relapse rates remained low in Black patients on DRF, consistent with non-Black patients, and there were no new safety signals identified in the Black patient subgroup in EVOLVE-MS-1. Together, these outcomes support DRF as an effective treatment option in Black patients with RRMS.

Sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in motor neuron disease: clinical trial enrolment

OBJECTIVE

Motor neuron disease (MND) is a group of neurological diseases, the majority being amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with varying clinical presentations across demographics. Clinical trial enrollment reflecting global disease burden improves understanding of diverse presentations and aids personalized therapy development. We assessed the sex, racial, and ethnic composition of MND/ALS clinical trial participants relative to global disease burdens.

METHODS

We searched 'motor neuron disease OR amyotrophic lateral sclerosis' on ClinicalTrials.gov from 02/2000-04/2024. We extracted trial (start year, study site, sponsor location, phase, masking, intervention) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity) from randomized interventional studies. We obtained sex-based MND/ALS disease burden estimates from the Global Burden of Disease database. For females, we calculated pooled participation-to-prevalence ratio (PPR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with PPR of 0.8-1.2 indicating adequate enrollment. We used Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare demographic groups across trial characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 85 trials, females comprised 37.47% (n = 5011) of 13,372 participants; the pooled female PPR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.77-1.16). Of 41 trials (9340 participants) reporting race, 121 (1.30%) participants were Black or African American, 16 (0.17%) American Indian or Alaskan Native, and 6 (0.06%) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. 24 trials (595 participants) reported ethnicity, with a minority of Hispanic participants (n = 153; 2.57%).

CONCLUSIONS

MND/ALS clinical trials had adequate female enrollment relative to global disease burdens. Race and ethnicity data were underreported. However, there were enrollment disparities of racial and ethnic groups. Increased trial leadership diversity, equitable enrollment policies, and addressing barriers to participation could improve enrollment diversity.

Comorbidity and Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis

Importance

Multiple studies suggest that comorbidity worsens clinically relevant outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS), including the severity of disability at diagnosis and rate of disability worsening after diagnosis. However, less is known regarding the association of comorbidity with measures of disease activity, such as relapse rate and magnetic resonance imaging lesion accrual, which are relevant to clinicians and clinical trialists.

Objective

To evaluate the association of comorbidities with disease activity in clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in populations with MS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A 2-stage meta-analytic approach was used in this cohort study of individual participant data from phase 3 clinical trials of MS DMTs that had 2 years of follow-up and were conducted from November 2001 to March 2018. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to June 2024.

Exposure

Comorbidity burden and individual comorbidities present at trial enrollment, including hypertension; hyperlipidemia; functional cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease; diabetes; autoimmune thyroid and miscellaneous autoimmune conditions; migraine; lung and skin conditions; depression; anxiety; and other psychiatric disorders.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was evidence of disease activity (EDA) over 2 years of follow-up, defined as confirmed relapse activity, disability worsening, or any new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

A total of 16 794 participants with MS were included from 17 clinical trials (67.2% female). Over the 2-year follow-up, 61.0% (95% CI, 56.2%-66.3%; I2 = 97.9%) of the pooled trials had EDA. After adjusting for multiple factors, the presence of 3 or more comorbidities was associated with an increased hazard of EDA (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28) compared with no comorbidity. Presence of 2 or more cardiometabolic conditions was also associated with an increased hazard of EDA (AHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37) compared with no cardiometabolic comorbidity. Presence of 1 psychiatric disorder was associated with an increased hazard of EDA (AHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, a higher burden of comorbidity was associated with worse clinical outcomes in people with MS, although comorbidity could potentially be a partial mediator of other negative prognostic factors. Our findings suggest a substantial adverse association of the comorbidities investigated with MS disease activity and that prevention and management of comorbidities should be a pressing concern in clinical practice.

Diversity and representation within the literature on sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Sexual dysfunction (SD) is a common and distressing symptom for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS). Populations included in existing studies of SD may not fully reflect the diversity of people living with MS, with important implications for wider applicability. We aimed to evaluate reporting of sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and ethnicity across studies of SD in MS.

METHODS

A systematic search of four databases was performed. Two independent authors evaluated all papers. Reporting of sex and gender identity, sexual orientation, and ethnicity were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 419 papers were reviewed, and 204 studies with 77,902 participants met the criteria for evaluation. Of 204 studies, 98 (48.0%) included both male and female participants; 78 (38.2%) included females only, and 27 (13.2%) males only. In 19 (9.3%) studies, participants were asked their gender. No studies reported asking a two-step question on sex and gender identity. No studies reported including non-binary patients or gender identities other than male or female. No studies reported including intersex patients. Only 10 (4.9%) studies reported the inclusion of homosexual or bisexual participants, or participants from other sexual minority groups. The overwhelming majority of studies (181; 88.7%) did not report ethnicity or race of participants.

CONCLUSION

Sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and ethnicity are poorly reported in studies on SD in MS. These variables must be adequately evaluated to ensure research applies across diverse MS patient populations.

Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Race and ethnicity may influence the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Incidence of MS in ethnically diverse groups may be higher; however, these populations are under-represented in MS trials. This post hoc analysis compared the proportion of patients achieving 3-parameter no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) with ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants with relapsing MS (RMS) enrolled in the ASCLEPIOS I/II trials by race/ethnicity subgroup.

METHODS

ASCLEPIOS I/II were identical, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trials. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 30 months. Pooled data were used to determine the efficacy/safety of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, Hispanic/Latino, or non-Hispanic White. Participants who did not self-identify into one of these groups were classified as other/unknown.

RESULTS

Of the 1,882 participants, 64 (3.4%) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, 71 (3.8%) as non-Hispanic Asian, 145 (7.7%) as Hispanic/Latino, and 1,538 (81.7%) as non-Hispanic White. Baseline participant demographics/characteristics were largely balanced across subgroups, aside from minor variations in sex, disease duration, and MRI lesions. From months 0 to 24, the proportion of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide-treated patients achieving NEDA-3 (odds ratio [95% CI]) was as follows: non-Hispanic Black, 33.3% vs 3.4% (15.9 [1.67-151.71; p = 0.0162]); non-Hispanic Asian, 42.9% vs 21.9% (3.18 [0.95-10.59; p = 0.06]); Hispanic/Latino, 36.6% vs 18.6% (3.21 [1.32-7.79; p = 0.01]); and non-Hispanic White, 37.4% vs 16.6% (3.57 [2.73-4.67; p < 0.0001]). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups and across race/ethnicity subgroups; no new or unexpected safety signals were identified.

DISCUSSION

Ofatumumab was associated with greater proportions of NEDA-3 achievement than teriflunomide across race/ethnicity subgroups in the ASCLEPIOS trials. Within each treatment group, the proportion of patients achieving NEDA-3 from months 0 to 24 was similar across the subgroups and overall pooled population. Both ofatumumab and teriflunomide were well tolerated. Future MS trials should include ethnically diverse groups to better inform treatment decisions and improve real-world patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792218 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792218), NCT02792231 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792231). Submission date: June 2, 2016. First enrollment: August 26, 2016.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that among patients aged 18-55 years with RMS, the improvement in NEDA-3 with ofatumumab was comparably better than with teriflunomide among patients self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino, and other/unknown.

Recruitment, retention and reporting of variables related to ethnic diversity in randomised controlled trials: an umbrella review

OBJECTIVE

This umbrella review synthesises evidence on the methods used to recruit and retain ethnically diverse participants and report and analyse variables related to ethnic diversity in randomised controlled trials.

DESIGN

Umbrella review.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane and Campbell Libraries for review papers published between 1 January 2010 and 13 May 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language systematic reviews focusing on inclusion and reporting of ethnicity variables. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool.

RESULTS

Sixty-two systematic reviews were included. Findings point to limited representation and reporting of ethnic diversity in trials. Recruitment strategies commonly reported by the reviews were community engagement, advertisement, face-to-face recruitment, cultural targeting, clinical referral, community presentation, use of technology, incentives and research partnership with communities. Retention strategies highlighted by the reviews included frequent follow-ups on participants to check how they are doing in the study, provision of incentives, use of tailored approaches and culturally appropriate interventions. The findings point to a limited focus on the analysis of variables relevant to ethnic diversity in trials even when they are reported in trials.

CONCLUSION

Significant improvements are required in enhancing the recruitment and retention of ethnically diverse participants in trials as well as analysis and reporting of variables relating to diversity in clinical trials.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022325241.

Clinical effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis stratified by disease-modifying treatment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with a dampened humoral and/or cellular immune response in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were concurrently on disease-modifying treatment (DMT) with B-cell depleting agents or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Our main goal was to investigate the impact of these DMT classes on the clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS

Since March 2020, demographics and clinical data of patients with MS who developed COVID-19 have been collected at the Belgian National MS Centre in Melsbroek. Patients were considered to be 'protected by vaccination' if they were (i) fully vaccinated and (ii) tested positive for COVID-19 in the period ranging from 14 days to 6 months after the last administered vaccine.

RESULTS

On 19 December 2022, 418 COVID-19 cases were retrospectively identified in 389 individual patients. Hospitalization and mortality rates resulting from the infection were 10.8% and 2.4%, respectively. Being 'unprotected by vaccination' was significantly associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (i.e., hospitalization and/or death) in the total cohort (N = 418, odds ratio [OR] 3.96), in patients on ongoing DMT other than anti-CD20 agents or S1PRMs (N = 123, OR 31.75) and in patients without DMT (N = 182, OR 5.60), but not in those receiving anti-CD20 agents (N = 91, OR 0.39); the S1PRMs subgroup was considered too small (22 infections) for any meaningful analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination protects against severe infection in patients with MS but it was not possible to confirm this effect in those on DMT with B-cell depleting agents.

Race and ethnicity in multiple sclerosis phase 3 clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications.

METHODS

We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications.

RESULTS

Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed.

CONCLUSION

More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population.

Polygenic liability for anxiety in association with comorbid anxiety in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Comorbid anxiety occurs often in MS and is associated with disability progression. Polygenic scores offer a possible means of anxiety risk prediction but often have not been validated outside the original discovery population. We aimed to investigate the association between the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item scale polygenic score with anxiety in MS.

METHODS

Using a case-control design, participants from Canadian, UK Biobank, and United States cohorts were grouped into cases (MS/comorbid anxiety) or controls (MS/no anxiety, anxiety/no immune disease or healthy). We used multiple anxiety measures: current symptoms, lifetime interview-diagnosed, and lifetime self-report physician-diagnosed. The polygenic score was computed for current anxiety symptoms using summary statistics from a previous genome-wide association study and was tested using regression.

RESULTS

A total of 71,343 individuals of European genetic ancestry were used: Canada (n = 334; 212 MS), UK Biobank (n = 70,431; 1,390 MS), and the USA (n = 578 MS). Meta-analyses identified that in MS, each 1-SD increase in the polygenic score was associated with ~50% increased odds of comorbid moderate anxious symptoms compared to those with less than moderate anxious symptoms (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.09-1.99). We found a similar direction of effects in the other measures. MS had a similar anxiety genetic burden compared to people with anxiety as the index disease.

INTERPRETATION

Higher genetic burden for anxiety was associated with significantly increased odds of moderate anxious symptoms in MS of European genetic ancestry which did not differ from those with anxiety and no comorbid immune disease. This study suggests a genetic basis for anxiety in MS.

Diversity of US participants in AstraZeneca-sponsored clinical trials

BACKGROUND

To develop medicines that are safe and efficacious to all patients, clinical trials must enroll appropriate target populations, but imbalances related to race, ethnicity and sex have been reported. A comprehensive analysis and improvement in understanding representativeness of patient enrollment in industry-sponsored trials are key public health needs.

METHODS

We assessed race/ethnicity and sex representation in AstraZeneca (AZ)-sponsored clinical trials in the United States (US) from 2010 to 2022, compared with the 2019 US Census.

RESULTS

In total, 246 trials representing 95,372 patients with complete race/ethnicity and sex records were analyzed. The proportions of different race/ethnicity subgroups in AZ-sponsored clinical trials and the US Census were similar (White: 69.5% vs 60.1%, Black or African American: 13.3% vs 12.5%, Asian: 1.8% vs 5.8%, Hispanic: 14.4% vs 18.5%). We also observed parity in the proportions of males and females between AZ clinical trials and US Census (males: 52.4% vs 49.2%, females: 47.6% vs 50.8%). Comparisons of four distinct therapy areas within AZ (Respiratory and Immunology [R&I]; Cardiovascular, Renal, and Metabolism [CVRM]; Solid Tumors; and Hematological Malignancies), including by trial phases, revealed greater variability, with proportions observed above and below US Census levels.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides the first detailed insights into the representativeness of AZ trials. Overall, the proportions of different race/ethnicity and sex subgroups in AZ-sponsored clinical trials were broadly aligned with the US Census. We outline some of AZ's planned health equity initiatives that are intended to continue to improve equitable patient enrollment.

A framework for evaluating the diversity of clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

The topic of diversity in clinical trials is rising to the forefront of many conversations in evidence-based medicine, and efforts are being made to improve the diversity of clinical trials. However, there is little uniformity in the methods used to evaluate these efforts. In this article, we describe our Clinical trial Diversity Rating (CDR) framework and the development process, including the broader considerations for evaluating the demographic diversity of clinical trials and their implications, and demonstrate its use through an illustrative example.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The development of the framework was a four-step process, including a scoping review, a cross-sectional study, creation of the tool, and integration of feedback from an advisory group.

RESULTS

Our scoping review identified 110 publications that examined clinical trial diversity. Race/ethnicity, sex, and age were the most common characteristics evaluated. About 85% clearly defined the benchmark used for evaluation, but less than half (48%) used disease prevalence as the benchmark. Only 64% of studies defined what would be considered adequate representation. The cross-sectional study, which applied some of the approaches identified in the literature, helped to identify the complexities of evaluating multinational trials and certain demographic characteristics. Key decisions for the CDR framework, such as the demographic characteristics to be evaluated, the benchmark and thresholds for evaluation, and how these factors contribute to the overall rating of clinical trial diversity, were informed by the two earlier phases and feedback from an advisory group.

CONCLUSION

The CDR framework provides an objective and transparent approach to evaluating clinical trial diversity. Groups such as Health Technology Assessment bodies, clinical trial regulators, policymakers, journal editors, and individual researchers can use this tool to examine, monitor, and improve diversity in clinical trials.

The role of ethnicity and native-country income in multiple sclerosis: the Italian multicentre study (MS-MigIT)

OBJECTIVE

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disorder in which environmental and genetic factors interact modifying disease risk and course. This multicentre, case-control study involving 18 Italian MS Centres investigated MS course by ethnicity and native-country economic status in foreign-born patients living in Italy.

METHODS

We identified 457 MS patients who migrated to Italy and 893 age- and sex-matched native-born Italian patients. In our population, 1225 (93.2%) subjects were White Europeans and White Northern Americans (WENA) and 89 (6.8%) patients were from other ethnical groups (OEG); 1109 (82.1%) patients were born in a high-income (HI) Country and 241 (17.9%) in a low-middle-income (LMI) Country. Medical records and patients interviews were used to collect demographic and disease data.

RESULTS

We included 1350 individuals (973 women and 377 men); mean (SD) age was 45.0 (11.7) years. At onset, 25.45% OEG patients vs 12.47% WENA (p = 0.039) had > 3 STIR spine lesions. At recruitment, the same group featured mean (SD) EDSS score of 2.85 (2.23) vs 2.64 (2.28) (p = 0.044) reached in 8.9 (9.0) vs 12.0 (9.0) years (p = 0.018) and underwent 1.10 (4.44) vs. 0.99 (0.40) annual MRI examinations (p = 0.035). At disease onset, patients from LMI countries had higher EDSS score than HI patients (2.40 (1.43) vs 1.99 (1.17); p = 0.032).

DISCUSSION

Our results suggested that both ethnicity and socio-economic status of native country shape MS presentation and course and should be considered for an appropriate management of patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the impact of ethnicity in MS at an individual level and beyond an ecological population-perspective.

A Review of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery and Treatment Options

Poststroke aphasia, which impacts expressive and receptive communication, can have detrimental effects on the psychosocial well-being and the quality of life of those affected. Aphasia recovery is multidimensional and can be influenced by several baseline, stroke-related, and treatment-related factors, including preexisting cerebrovascular conditions, stroke size and location, and amount of therapy received. Importantly, aphasia recovery can continue for many years after aphasia onset. Behavioral speech and language therapy with a speech-language pathologist is the most common form of aphasia therapy. In this review, the authors also discuss augmentative treatment methodologies, collaborative goal setting frameworks, and recommendations for future research.

Investigating the Prevalence of Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial Populations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Comorbidity is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) with the most prevalent conditions being depression, anxiety, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Limited information regarding the representation of comorbidity status is available from phase III clinical trials in MS leading to concern about the potential underrepresentation of individuals with comorbidity in clinical trials. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of comorbidities in MS clinical trial populations.

METHODS

Individual-level data from multiple sponsors were requested for a 2-stage meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials of MS disease-modifying therapies. To ensure consistency of our approach across trials, we followed the Maelstrom retrospective harmonization guidelines. Chronic comorbidities at clinical trial enrollment recommended by the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS were considered (depression, anxiety, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, migraine, diabetes, chronic lung disease). Additional comorbidities were also classified. Classification was based on medical history data. Individual comorbidities were summed and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3. We report the pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of comorbidity. The pooled prevalence and prevalence ratios across age, sex, race, disability level, and treatment were also reported. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials involving 17,926 participants were included. Fourteen trials enrolled participants with relapsing MS (RMS) while 3 enrolled participants with progressive MS (PMS). The distributions of sex, age, and disability level were generally consistent within RMS and PMS trials. When pooled, almost half of trial participants (46.5%) had ≥1 comorbidity (1: 25.0%, 95% CI 23.0-27.0, I2 = 89.9; 2: 11.4% [9.3-14.0], I2 = 96.3; ≥3: 6.0% [4.2-8.4], I2 = 97.7). Depression (16.45% [12.96-20.88], I2 = 98.3) was the most prevalent comorbidity reported, followed by hypertension (10.16% [8.61-11.98], I2 = 93.2). Heterogeneity was high across trials. Older age and female participants were associated with increased number of comorbidities. Older individuals and male participants had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, while older individuals and female participants had a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety.

DISCUSSION

Individuals with comorbidities are included in clinical trials, although they may still be underrepresented compared with the general MS population. Given the comorbidity prevalence in the trial populations and studies suggesting an association of comorbidities with disease activity, comorbidity may influence outcomes in clinical trials.

Clinical trials for progressive multiple sclerosis: progress, new lessons learned, and remaining challenges

Despite the success of disease-modifying treatments in relapsing multiple sclerosis, for many individuals living with multiple sclerosis, progressive disability continues to accrue. How to interrupt the complex pathological processes underlying progression remains a daunting and ongoing challenge. Since 2014, several immunomodulatory approaches that have modest but clinically meaningful effects have been approved for the management of progressive multiple sclerosis, primarily for people who have active inflammatory disease. The approval of these drugs required large phase 3 trials that were sufficiently powered to detect meaningful effects on disability. New classes of drug, such as Bruton tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, are coming to the end of their trial stages, several candidate neuroprotective compounds have been successful in phase 2 trials, and innovative approaches to remyelination are now also being explored in clinical trials. Work continues to define intermediate outcomes that can provide results in phase 2 trials more quickly than disability measures, and more efficient trial designs, such as multi-arm multi-stage and futility approaches, are increasingly being used. Collaborations between patient organisations, pharmaceutical companies, and academic researchers will be crucial to ensure that future trials maintain this momentum and generate results that are relevant for people living with progressive multiple sclerosis.

Introducing a core dataset for real-world data in multiple sclerosis registries and cohorts: Recommendations from a global task force

BACKGROUND

As of September 2022, there was no globally recommended set of core data elements for use in multiple sclerosis (MS) healthcare and research. As a result, data harmonisation across observational data sources and scientific collaboration is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To define and agree upon a core dataset for real-world data (RWD) in MS from observational registries and cohorts.

METHODS

A three-phase process approach was conducted combining a landscaping exercise with dedicated discussions within a global multi-stakeholder task force consisting of 20 experts in the field of MS and its RWD to define the Core Dataset.

RESULTS

A core dataset for MS consisting of 44 variables in eight categories was translated into a data dictionary that has been published and disseminated for emerging and existing registries and cohorts to use. Categories include variables on demographics and comorbidities (patient-specific data), disease history, disease status, relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and treatment data (disease-specific data).

CONCLUSION

The MS Data Alliance Core Dataset guides emerging registries in their dataset definitions and speeds up and supports harmonisation across registries and initiatives. The straight-forward, time-efficient process using a dedicated global multi-stakeholder task force has proven to be effective to define a concise core dataset.

Podcast on Identifying and Understanding Barriers to Care in Underserved Populations With MS in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can affect people from all racial and ethnic backgrounds, but, historically, the incidence of MS in the United States was thought to be highest in White individuals. More recent data suggest that the incidence of MS in Black or African American individuals is comparable to that in White individuals. In Hispanic or Latino individuals, incidence of MS is lower, but age of onset may be earlier compared with White individuals. Additionally, there are important differences in MS disease severity, disease progression, and mortality in Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino populations. Compared with their White counterparts, individuals from these underrepresented groups are more likely to be affected by MS in specific areas of the nervous system, such as accelerated loss of retinal and brain tissue in Black or African American individuals and optic neuritis in Hispanic individuals. Additionally, Black or African American individuals with MS tend to have an aggressive disease course, earlier disability, and higher risk of requiring ambulatory assistance. Although these differences may be attributed to genetic factors, systemic racism and biases and barriers to accessing care may perpetuate health disparities. Moreover, non-White communities remain broadly underrepresented in clinical trials; however, it is vital that these populations are appropriately represented so that any potential differences in drug efficacy or safety implications are detected. Thus, it is important to increase awareness of MS in these populations. In this podcast, the authors discuss characteristics of MS in Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino populations, identify barriers to care, and propose solutions to improve access to MS care in these populations. MP4 (358385 KB).

Racial and ethnic diversity in global neuroscience clinical trials

Background

Despite efforts to increase diversity in neuroscience trials, racial and ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented. Disparities in clinical trial participation could reflect unequal opportunities to participate and may contribute to decreased generalizability of findings and failure to identify important differences in efficacy and safety outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the F. Hoffmann-La Roche database for global, multicenter, neuroscience clinical trials from February 2016 to February 2021 and summarized and stratified race and ethnicity distributions by clinical trial therapeutic area and by country. These data were then compared to national population data for each study's targeted age group (available for studies conducted in the US, Canada, and the UK). The underrepresentation or overrepresentation of each racial and ethnic group was summarized.

Results

The analysis population included 8015 participants from 47 countries. Globally, 85.6 % of participants were White, 7.1 % were Asian, 1.6 % were Black, 1.3 % were American Indian or Alaska Native, less than 0.1 % were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 0.7 % were of multiple races, and 3.6 % were of other/unknown race. White individuals predominated in all but one trial. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials but one. Asian individuals were overrepresented in approximately 20 % of trials. In the US, 7.3 % of participants were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity vs 16.4 % of the US population.

Conclusion

The findings and learnings from this summary and analysis demonstrate the need for continued awareness and new approaches in designing studies that reflect population diversity.

Ethnic disparities in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder which affects 2.8 million people world-wide. A growing body of evidence shows ethnic disparities in MS. This review aims to evaluate differences, based upon ethnic background, in the incidence, prevalence, disease course, and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among people with MS (PwMS).

METHOD

Ethnicities were classified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern and North African (MENA). A literature search was conducted using the PubMed search engine to identify articles on MS and ethnicity that were published in the English language between 01/01/2005 and 31/05/2022.

RESULTS

101 studies met all inclusion criteria. Although the incidence and prevalence of MS varied among ethnicities, findings were inconsistent and depended on the continent of the study. Ethnicity may have an impact on the disease course. PwMS from Black, Hispanic, and MENA, but not Asian ethnicities, appeared to accumulate physical disability at a faster rate than those from White ethnicity. Although there was a lack of studies evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of DMTs among various ethnicities, interferon-beta was found to be less efficacious in PwMS from Black ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies, with more uniform definitions of ethnicity are required to comprehensively understand ethnic disparities in MS, in particular to identify underlying causes, to facilitate the delivery of personalised medical care and avoid inequity.

Inclusion of optic neuritis in dissemination in space improves the performance of McDonald 2017 criteria in Hispanic people with suspected multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Hispanic people compared to White people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are two times more likely to present with optic neuritis (ON). ON in dissemination in space (DIS) after a single attack is not part of the current McDonald 2017 criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if adding ON in DIS (ON-modified criteria) improves the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria in the diagnosis of MS after a single attack of ON.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 102 patients of Hispanic background. Cases were reviewed between 2017 and 2021. Clinical ON was reported for 35 cases. ON in DIS was verified for 28 patients via MRI, optical coherence tomography, and/or visual evoked potential. We investigated the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria and ON-modified criteria and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.

RESULTS

The ON-modified criteria significantly improved the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria (p = 0.003) and identified an additional nine patients. Both sensitivity and accuracy increased from 64% to 74% and 62% to 71%, respectively, while specificity remained unchanged (40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10, 0.70)).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that the inclusion of ON in DIS improved the overall performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria among Hispanic people.

Perceptions of people with multiple sclerosis on social determinants of health: Mixed methods

OBJECTIVE

To explore the social determinants of health (SDOH) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with SDOH, elucidating the SDOH variables of highest salience in this geographical region.

METHODS

Focus groups and a structured survey of Massachusetts residents with SDOH and a diagnosis of MS were conducted by a neurologist and staff, December 2022-July 2023, via Zoom™. Twenty-one consecutively-recruited, convenience-sampled adults participated in four groups. A thematic inductive approach was taken.

RESULTS

Participants (average age 45 years old; average time since MS diagnosis 13.7 years; 14 cisgender female, 1 transgender female, 5 cisgender male, 1 non-binary; 33 % white, 57 % black, 5 % Asian, 5 % other; 18 % Hispanic/Latinx; modal response of 5 SDOH) identified the following key SDOH: (1) race and ethnicity, related to (a) diagnostic delays in MS, (b) limited familiarity with MS and its etiology, and (c) value of ongoing MS care; (2) gender, focused on limited published data in African American men and transgender people; (3) social and community contexts; and (4) financial burdens, related to (a) out-of-pocket costs of MS disease modifying therapies, (b) lost work time, and (c) transportation. Lower frequency SDOH variables were access to public toilets, lost job promotions, environmental exposures, and concern about discrimination. Unmet needs emphasized (1) public understanding of MS; (2) financial support for DMT costs, closer access to infusion centers, and culturally competent care; (3) support for research participation; (4) reliable transportation; and (5) patient awareness of extant services and support programs.

CONCLUSIONS

This in-depth assessment of people with MS who possess multiple SDOH identified the most salient and commonly experienced SDOH, common themes related to the SDOH in MS, unmet needs, and future opportunities.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness After 5 Years of Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Black and Hispanic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in ESTEEM

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials have included low numbers of patients from racial and ethnic minority populations; therefore, it is uncertain whether differences exist in response to disease-modifying therapies. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment over 5 years in four patient cohorts: Black, non-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic people with relapsing-remitting MS.

METHODS

ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in people with MS. The analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 393 sites globally.

RESULTS

Overall, 5251 patients were analyzed (220 Black, 5031 non-Black; 105 Hispanic, 5146 non-Hispanic). Median (min-max) months of follow-up was 32 (0-72) for Black, 29 (1-77) for Hispanic, and 41 (0-85) for both the non-Black and non-Hispanic populations. In total, 39 (18%) Black and 29 (28%) Hispanic patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation versus 1126 (22%) non-Black and 1136 (22%) non-Hispanic patients; gastrointestinal disorders were the most common in all subgroups. Median lymphocyte counts decreased by 37% in Black, 40% in non-Black, 10% in Hispanic, and 39% in non-Hispanic patients in the first year, then remained stable and above the lower limit of normal in most patients. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (95% confidence intervals) up to 5 years were 0.054 (0.038-0.078) for Black, 0.077 (0.072-0.081) for non-Black, 0.069 (0.043-0.112) for Hispanic, and 0.076 (0.072-0.081) for non-Hispanic populations, representing reductions of 91-92% compared with ARR 12 months before study entry (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of DMF in these subgroups was consistent with the overall ESTEEM population. Relapse rates remained low in Black and Hispanic patients, and consistent with non-Black and non-Hispanic patients. These data demonstrate a comparable real-world treatment benefit of DMF in Black and Hispanic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02047097.

A narrative review of neuro-ophthalmologic disease in African Americans and Hispanics with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common non-traumatic cause of disability in young people, with vision loss in the disease representing the second largest contributor to disability. In particular, African-American patients with MS are noted to have lower vision than their Caucasian counterparts. In this review, we examine the disparities in eye diseases in the MS population with our gaps in knowledge and discuss the underlying nature of pathological disparities.

Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect in multiple sclerosis trials

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is heterogeneous with respect to outcomes, and evaluating possible heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) is of high interest. HTE is non-random variation in the magnitude of a treatment effect on a clinical outcome across levels of a covariate (i.e. a patient attribute or set of attributes). Multiple statistical techniques can evaluate HTE. The simplest but most bias-prone is conventional one variable-at-a-time subgroup analysis. Recently, multivariable predictive approaches have been promoted to provide more patient-centered results, by accounting for multiple relevant attributes simultaneously. We review approaches used to estimate HTE in clinical trials of MS.

Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The selection and description of participants in clinical trials enables health care providers to determine generalizability of findings to the populations they serve. Limited diversity of participants in trials restricts evidence-based decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent to which diverse participants are being included in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of MS rehabilitation trials published since January 2002 using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. Article selection required randomized control design, a rehabilitation intervention, and a functional status outcome. Data extracted included details of intervention(s), outcomes, and participant selection and description using a social determinants of health framework.

RESULT

A total of 243 studies were included. Exercise interventions and impairment-focused outcomes were most common. Most studies used only a MS Clinic for recruitment. Common exclusion criteria were physical or mental comorbidities, disability, age, and cognitive impairment. Participant age and sex were reported for almost all trials; reporting of other social determinants of health was atypical.

CONCLUSION

MS rehabilitation trials have used limited recruitment methods, restricted samples, and reported few participant descriptors. Changes are required to enhance participant diversity and the descriptions of participant characteristics.

Enhancing diversity of clinical trial populations in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Demographic characteristics, social determinants of health (SDoH), health inequities, and health disparities substantially influence the general and disease-specific health outcomes of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Participants in clinical trials do not represent all people with MS treated in practice.

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhancing diversity and inclusion in clinical trials in MS.

METHODS

We held an international workshop under the Auspices of the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS (the "Committee") to develop recommendations regarding diversity and inclusivity of participants of clinical trials in MS. Workshop attendees included members of the Committee as well as external participants. External participants were selected based on expertise in trials, SDoH, health equity and regulatory science, and diversity with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, and geography.

RESULTS

Recommendations include use of diversity plans, community engagement and education, cultural competency training, biologically justified rather than templated eligibility criteria, adaptive designs that allow broadening of eligibility criteria over the course of a trial, and logistical and practical adjustments to reduce study participant burden. Investigators should report demographic and SDoH characteristics of participants.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations provide sponsors and investigators with methods of improving diversity and inclusivity of clinical trial populations in MS.

Do magnetic resonance imaging features differ between persons with multiple sclerosis of various races and ethnicities?

Those of African American or Latin American descent have been demonstrated to have more severe clinical presentations of multiple sclerosis (MS) than non-Latin American White people with MS. Concurrently, radiological burden of disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in African Americans with MS has also been described as being more aggressive. Here, we review MRI studies in diverse racial and ethnic groups (adult and pediatric) investigating lesion burden, inflammation, neurodegeneration, and imaging response to disease modifying therapy. We also discuss why such disparities may exist beyond biology, and how future studies may provide greater insights into underlying differences.

Understanding humoral immunity and multiple sclerosis severity in Black, and Latinx patients

People identified with Black/African American or Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity are more likely to exhibit a more severe multiple sclerosis disease course relative to those who identify as White. While social determinants of health account for some of this discordant severity, investigation into contributing immunobiology remains sparse. The limited immunologic data stands in stark contrast to the volume of clinical studies describing ethnicity-associated discordant presentation, and to advancement made in our understanding of MS immunopathogenesis over the past several decades. In this perspective, we posit that humoral immune responses offer a promising avenue to better understand underpinnings of discordant MS severity among Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latinx-identifying patients.

Health Disparities in Multiple Sclerosis among Hispanic and Black Populations in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an acquired demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Historically, research on MS has focused on White persons with MS. This preponderance of representation has important possible implications for minority populations with MS, from developing effective therapeutic agents to understanding the role of unique constellations of social determinants of health. A growing body of literature involving persons of historically underrepresented races and ethnicities in the field of multiple sclerosis is assembling. Our purpose in this narrative review is to highlight two populations in the United States: Black and Hispanic persons with multiple sclerosis. We will review the current understanding about the patterns of disease presentation, genetic considerations, response to treatment, roles of social determinants of health, and healthcare utilization. In addition, we explore future directions of inquiry as well as practical methods of meeting these challenges.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Natalizumab in African American and Hispanic/Latino Patients with Early Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: STRIVE Data Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In STRIVE, natalizumab treatment demonstrated effectiveness in clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This post hoc analysis examined the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in patients who self-identified as either Black/African American (AA) or Hispanic/Latino.

METHODS

Clinical, MRI, and PROs were assessed for the Black/AA subgroup (n = 40) and compared with the non-Hispanic White subgroup (n = 158). As a result of the very small sample size, outcomes for the Hispanic/Latino subgroup (n = 18) were assessed separately, including a sensitivity analysis with Hispanic/Latino patients who completed the 4-year study on natalizumab.

RESULTS

Clinical, MRI, and PROs were comparable between the Black/AA and non-Hispanic White subgroups except for MRI outcomes at year 1. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic White than Black/AA patients achieved MRI no evidence of disease activity (NEDA; 75.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.0121) and no new or newly enlarging T2 lesions (77.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.0031) at year 1; these differences were not observed in years 2-4 of the study. For the Hispanic/Latino subgroup in the intent-to-treat population, 46.2% and 55.6% achieved NEDA at years 1 and 2; 66.7% and 90.0% achieved clinical NEDA at years 3 and 4. Annualized relapse rate was reduced by 93.0% at year 1 versus the year before natalizumab initiation; this reduction was maintained throughout the study. Over 4 years, 37.5-50.0% of patients had a clinically meaningful improvement in their Symbol Digit Modalities Test score, and 81.8-100.0% and 90.9-100.0% had stable/improved Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 physical and psychological scores, respectively. Similar results were observed in the sensitivity analysis with Hispanic/Latino subgroup of the 4-year natalizumab completers.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in patients with early RRMS who self-identified as Black/AA or Hispanic/Latino.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT01485003.

Mapping two decades of multiple sclerosis rehabilitation trials: A systematic scoping review and call to action to advance the study of race and ethnicity in rehabilitation research

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS), is prevalent across many racial and ethnic groups, and disproportionately impacts racially minoritized populations. Rehabilitation interventions are an important component of comprehensive MS care. Yet, we do not know the extent to which MS rehabilitation trials consider race and ethnicity in defining eligibility criteria, planning recruitment strategies, selecting outcome measures, supporting intervention delivery, and designing approaches to promote adherence and retention.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and Web of Science) to locate randomized controlled rehabilitation trials published from January 2002 to March 2022. We extracted data from relevant studies, assessed their methodological quality, and narratively summarized results. Reporting of this review is in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies of neurorehabilitation (n = 3), cognitive rehabilitation (n = 6), exercise training (n = 9) and self-management (n = 38) interventions were included in this review. The studies were predominantly from North America (n = 44; 73%) or Europe (n = 12; 20%) and included 4280 participants. Most participants (n = 3669; 86%) were Caucasians. Less than 10% of participants were Black (n = 282), Latinx/Hispanic (n = 60), Asian (n = 46), Indigenous (n = 7), or Arab (n = 2). Few studies discussed how race and/or ethnicity were considered in trial planning or execution.

CONCLUSIONS

Without consistent and systematic attention to race and ethnicity, both in terms of trial design and reporting, it is impossible to know how MS rehabilitation interventions will translate into real-world applications. This call to action - to the MS rehabilitation research community to ensure trial and intervention processes that accommodate the needs of diverse racial and ethnic groups - is an important first step in addressing inequities in rehabilitation care for persons with MS.

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors affecting the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS) and reviews the pathophysiologic characteristics of both relapsing and progressive MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of MS has increased in recent decades, and costs of care for patients with MS have risen dramatically. Black, Asian, and Hispanic individuals may be at risk for more severe MS-related disability. Multiple genetic MS risk factors have been identified. Factors such as low vitamin D levels and a history of Epstein-Barr virus, smoking, and obesity, especially during childhood, also influence MS risk. Traditionally thought to be a T-cell-mediated disease, recent research has highlighted the additional roles of B cells and microglia in both relapsing and progressive MS.

SUMMARY

Complex interactions between genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors affect the risk for MS as well as the disease course. People of color have historically been underrepresented in both MS clinical trials and literature, but current research is attempting to better clarify unique considerations in these groups. MS pathology consists of the focal inflammatory lesions that have been well characterized in relapsing MS, as well as a more widespread neurodegenerative component that is posited to drive progressive disease. Recent advances in characterization of both the inflammatory and neurodegenerative aspects of MS pathophysiology have yielded potential targets for future therapeutic options.