Potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Although potent P2Y12 inhibitors, such as ticagrelor and prasugrel, are standard treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), evidence for their efficacy and safety compared with clopidogrel is limited in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

Among 28,949 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-V, a total of 1482 patients (5.1%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit vessel were selected. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of cardiac death, MI, repeat revascularization and definite stent thrombosis) and major secondary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or greater bleeding at 2 years.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 537 patients (36.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors and 945 patients (63.8%) received clopidogrel after index procedure. The risk of MACE was significantly lower in the potent P2Y12 inhibitors group than in the clopidogrel group (16.6% versus 24.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.99]; P = 0.046). Regarding BARC type 2 or greater bleeding, there was no significant difference between the potent P2Y12 inhibitors group and the clopidogrel group (12.5% versus 10.7%; adjusted HR, 1.36 [95% CI 0.98-1.88]; P = 0.064). Significant interaction was observed in patients aged ≥ 75 years (interaction P = 0.021) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) use (interaction P = 0.015) for significantly increased risk of BARC type 2 or greater bleeding following the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel, without an increased risk of BARC type 2 or greater bleeding. The current data supports the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock, except in patients aged ≥ 75 years or receiving VA-ECMO support.

Impact of symptom-to-balloon time in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions

AIMS

Considering the limited data regarding clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment on the ECG elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), this study compared the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents stratified by the presence/absence of complex lesions and symptom-to-balloon time (SBT; <48 h or ≥48 h).

METHODS

We enrolled 4373 patients with NSTEMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health dataset and stratified them into the complex group (2106 patients; SBT < 48 h, n  = 1365; SBT ≥48 h, n  = 741) and the noncomplex group (2267 patients; SBT < 48 h, n  = 1573; SBT ≥48 h, n  = 694). The primary outcome was the 3-year all-cause mortality rate. The secondary outcomes were any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death (CD), recurrent myocardial infarction, and stroke.

RESULTS

The incidence of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.656; P  = 0.009), CD ( P  = 0.037), and MACE ( P  = 0.047) in the complex group and of stroke in the noncomplex group ( P  = 0.020) were significantly lower in patients with SBT < 48 h than in those with SBT ≥48 h. Among patients with SBT < 48 h, the stroke incidence ( P  = 0.019) was higher in the complex group than in the noncomplex group, while among patients with SBT ≥48 h, the MACE incidence ( P  = 0.011) was higher in the former than in the latter.

CONCLUSION

SBT reduction effectively decreased the 3-year mortality in patients with NSTEMI in the complex group compared with the noncomplex group.

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There are no clinical data on the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

Among a total of 28 732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH (November, 2011 to December, 2015) and KAMIR-V (January, 2016 to June, 2020), we selected a total of 1833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE than angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.45-0.77; P<.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.72; P<.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (Odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death.

Optimal duration of medical therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction

Optimal medical therapy, including Beta-blockers (BB), inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and statins, is recommended for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the absence of contraindications. However, the optimal duration of these medications has not been clearly established in clinical studies. This observational study aimed to investigate the period during which these medications are associated with improved clinical outcomes. Among patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH), in-hospital survivors were selected. In a Cox-proportional hazard analysis of 12,200 patients, BB (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57-0.95; P = .019), RAS inhibitors (HR 0.70; 95% CI = 0.55-0.89; P = .004), and statins at discharge (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.48-0.87; P = .004) were all associated with lower 1-year cardiac mortality. At 1-year, 10,613 patients without all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or re-hospitalization due to heart failure were selected for further analysis. RAS inhibitors (HR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.37-0.76; P = .001) and statins (HR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.14-0.61; P = .001) prescribed at 1-year were associated with lower 2-year cardiac mortality, whereas BB were not (HR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.51-1.23; P = .23). However, none of these medications prescribed at 2-years were associated with reduced 3-year cardiac mortality among the 9232 patients who remained event-free until then. RAS inhibitors and statins were associated with reduced cardiac mortality for up to 2-years, and BB for up to 1-year after the initial attack. The effectiveness of these medications beyond these periods remains questionable.

The Western Denmark Heart Registry and Population-Based National Health Registries

The Western Denmark Heart Registry (WDHR) is a semi-national, multicenter-based clinical registry with unique potential for cardiovascular research. The registry has provided detailed prospectively registered information on patient and procedure characteristics since 1999. WDHR data can be linked to additional data in other healthcare registries in Denmark. Therefore, the WDHR is a valuable data resource for cardiovascular research, providing a foundation for numerous research projects and publications. This review describes three currently available cohorts from the WDHR containing individual-level information on: i) 200,647 first-time coronary angiographies from 2003 to 2021, ii) 88,630 first-time percutaneous coronary interventions from 1999 to 2022, and iii) 85,512 first-time coronary computed tomography angiographies from 2008 to 2021. Furthermore, we describe other frequently cross-linked Danish healthcare registries containing information on various patient characteristics and outcomes, such as vital status, cause of death, hospitalizations, medications, and laboratory test results. The comprehensive overview of these cohorts aims to assist researchers, collaborators, and other interested parties in understanding the scope and potential applications of the available data. All cohorts are regularly updated, thereby supporting continuing research on cardiovascular clinical practice and prognosis in Denmark.

Comparison of Outcomes Between ST-Segment Elevation and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: This study was conducted to address the lack of reports comparing the clinical outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and STEMI based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A total of 9854 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health dataset were classified into three LVEF categories: heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF, n = 1250), HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, n = 2383), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, n = 6221). Each group was further divided into NSTEMI and STEMI groups. The primary clinical outcome was the incidence of patient-oriented composite outcomes, defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularization, hospitalization for HF, and stroke. Results: Following adjustment, in-hospital mortality rates were comparable between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFrEF and HFmrEF groups. However, 3-year mortality rates were higher in the NSTEMI group. In contrast, in the HFpEF group, the STEMI group had higher rates of in-hospital all-cause death (p = 0.001) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) compared to the NSTEMI group, which was associated with increased 3-year all-cause death (p = 0.026) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) in the STEMI group. When in-hospital mortality was excluded, no difference in 3-year mortality rates was observed between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFpEF group. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality and 3-year outcomes varied across LVEF groups. Therefore, comparing NSTEMI and STEMI based on LVEF provides valuable insights into the differences in patient outcomes.

Ten-year trends in lipid management among patients after myocardial infarction in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for acute myocardial infarction. However, real-world data on its prevalence and lipid management trends for Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction are limited. This study aimed to determine the 10-year temporal trends in dyslipidemia prevalence and lipid management in this patient population.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The study used a merged database of two nationwide observational cohorts (2011-2020) that included 26,751 participants. The primary endpoints were the achievement rates of the (1) absolute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L), (2) relative LDL-C target reduction of >50% from the baseline, (3) absolute or relative LDL-C target (American target), and (4) both absolute and relative LDL-C targets (European target). The dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 11.1% to 17.1%, whereas the statin prescription rate increased from 92.9% to 97.0% from 2011 to 2020. The rate of high-intensity statin use increased from 12.80% in 2012 to 69.30% in 2020. The rate of ezetimibe use increased from 4.50% in 2016 to 22.50% in 2020. The high-intensity statin and ezetimibe prescription rates (0.20% to 9.30% from 2016 to 2020) increased gradually. The absolute and relative LDL-C target achievement rates increased from 41.4% and 20.8% in 2012 to 62.5% and 39.5% in 2019, respectively. The American (45.7% in 2012 to 68.6% in 2019) and European (16.5% in 2012 to 33.8% in 2019) target achievement rates also increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of lipid management guidelines in clinical practice has improved. However, continued efforts are needed to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events.

Two-year clinical outcome of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the prospective KAMIR-NIH Registry

Background

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI.

Methods

We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%-49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization.

Results

Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40-2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.18; p = 0.999).

Conclusions

Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF.

Clinical Trial Registration

cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT-0000863.

Three-year outcomes following non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, stratified by patient age (under and over 75 years) and left ventricular ejection fraction: A prospective cohort study

Due to limited published data, we investigated 3-year outcomes according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients older and younger than 75 years with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent successful newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. This research analyzed the data of 4558 patients (1032 older adults [≥75 years] and 3526 younger adults [<75 years]) from the Korea Acute MI Registry-NIH. We further divided the older group based on LVEF: heart failure (HF) with reduced EF (HFrEF, ≤40%, n = 196; group A), HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, 41-49%, n = 228; group B), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, ≥50%, n = 608; group C). Similarly, the younger group was divided into HFrEF (group D, n = 353), HFmrEF (group E, n = 577), and HFpEF (group F, n = 2596). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years, including all-cause death, recurrent MI, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for HF. MACE rates were highest in the HFrEF groups (A and D), followed by the HFmrEF groups (B and E), and lowest in the HFpEF groups (C and F) for both age groups. All-cause death, cardiac death (CD), all-cause death or MI, and hospitalization for HF rates were higher in group A than in groups B and C, and higher in group D than in groups E and F. Across all LVEF categories, MACE, all-cause death, CD, and non-CD, and all-cause death or MI rates were higher in the older group. This multicenter cohort study demonstrates that older patients have higher mortality rates compared to younger patients. Additionally, MACE rates were highest in the HFrEF group, followed by the HFmrEF group, and lowest in the HFpEF group across both age groups. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of hemoglobin A1c change on 24-month clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The average glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) may not accurately reflect glycemic control status during the mid-term after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to evaluate changes in HbA1c and their effect on mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and AMI.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with diabetes ( n  = 967) who underwent HbA1c measurement in the Korean nationwide registry. These patients were categorized into three groups based on changes in HbA1c from index admission to the 1-year follow-up visit: a decrease in HbA1c > 1%, changes in HbA1c within 1%, and an increase in HbA1c > 1%. Clinical outcomes at 24 months were examined.

RESULTS

The baseline HbA1c levels were 8.55 ± 0.85, 7.00 ± 0.98 and 7.07 ± 1.05 ( P  = 0.001) and HbA1c levels after 1 year were 6.62 ± 0.73, 7.05 ± 0.98 and 9.26 ± 1.59 ( P  = 0.001) for patients with 3 groups, respectively. Patients with a 1% decrease in HbA1c had significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, and rehospitalization after 24 months than those with a 1% increase in HbA1c. However, in the Cox regression analysis, a >1% decrease in HbA1c change was not an independent factor for MACE, cardiac death, and rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis indicates that an HbA1c decrease of >1% within the first 12 months was not an independent prognostic factor until the 24-month mark. Therefore, standard diabetic control is recommended for patients with diabetes and AMI for up to 2 years.

The impact of sex differences on 3-year outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after successful stent implantation according to symptom-to-balloon time

BACKGROUND

Because no data are available, we compared the 3-year outcomes of patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on sex and symptom-to-balloon time (SBT).

METHODS

This study included 4910 patients who were divided into two groups based on SBT: SBT <48 h (n = 3,293, 67.1%) and SBT ≥48 h (n = 1,617, 32.9%). The primary outcome was all-cause death during the 3-year follow-up period. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or repeat coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

After adjustment, the in-hospital mortality rates for males and females in the SBT <48 h and SBT ≥48 h groups were similar. During a 3-year follow-up period, females in the SBT <48 h group had significantly higher rates of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.482; P = 0.006), cardiac death (CD, aHR, 1.617; P = 0.009), and MACE (aHR, 1.268; P = 0.024) than those males in the same groups. Females and males in the SBT ≥48 h group did not differ significantly in the primary and secondary outcomes. In males, the rates of all-cause death (P = 0.008) and CD (P = 0.024) were significantly higher in the SBT ≥48 h group than in the SBT <48 h group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified a higher 3-year mortality rate in female patients with NSTEMI and SBT <48 h compared to their male counterparts. As such, a more preventive approach may be required to reduce mortality in these female patients.

Clinical outcomes of adjusted-dose versus standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The comparative efficacy and safety of adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. This study aimed to comparatively assess the ischaemic and bleeding outcomes of adjusted-dose (maintenance dose: 3.75 mg) and standard-dose (maintenance dose: 10 mg) prasugrel in East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI.

METHODS

From a combined dataset sourced from nationwide AMI registries in Japan and South Korea (n = 17,118), patients treated with either adjusted- or standard-dose prasugrel were identified. Patients who did not undergo emergent PCI, those on oral anticoagulants, and those meeting the criteria of contraindication of prasugrel in South Korea (age ≥ 75 years, body weight < 60 kg, or history of stroke) were excluded. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding events were compared between the adjusted-dose (n = 1160) and standard-dose (n = 1086) prasugrel groups.

RESULTS

Within the propensity-matched cohort (n = 702 in each group), no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital MACE between the adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel groups (1.85% vs. 2.71%, odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.38, p = 0.286). However, the incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was significantly lower in the adjusted-dose prasugrel group than in the standard-dose group (0.43% vs. 1.71%, OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.88, p = 0.031). The cumulative 12-month incidence of MACE was equivalent in both groups (4.70% vs. 4.70%, OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.61-1.64, p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Among East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI, those administered adjusted-dose prasugrel exhibited a lower risk of in-hospital bleeding events than those administered standard-dose prasugrel, while maintaining a comparable 1-year incidence of MACE.

Risk of Bleeding and Ischemia in Elderly East Asian Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Treated with either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor: From the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-V

Prescribing a P2Y12 inhibitor for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging because of the risk of bleeding and ischemia. We compared the risk of ischemia and bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in elderly East Asian patients with diabetes using the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR)-V data. This study included 838 patients enrolled in the KAMIR-V who were >75 years, had DM, AMI, and had undergone PCI. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment drug. After propensity score matching, 466 patients (ticagrelor: clopidogrel= 233:233) were included in the Cox regression analyses to determine the risk of bleeding and ischemia. The baseline characteristics were not different. The type of antiplatelet therapy did not affect the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 bleeding. There was no significant difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel treatment outcomes with respect to ischemia risk. This prospective study of a Korean patient cohort (elderly Korean patients with DM) showed no differences in bleeding and ischemia risks based on the use of either ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Large scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the optimal antiplatelet agents for these patients.

Optimal timing of revascularization for patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction

Optimal timing of revascularization for patients who presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is unclear. A total of 386 NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction from the nationwide, multicenter, and prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry V (KAMIR-V) were enrolled. Severe LV dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Patients with cardiogenic shock were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: PCI within 24 hours (early invasive group) and PCI over 24 hours (selective invasive group). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause death, non-fatal MI, repeat revascularization, and stroke at 12 months after index procedure. Early invasive group showed higher incidence of in-hospital death (9.4% vs 3.3%, P = .036) and cardiogenic shock (11.5% vs 4.6%, P = .030) after PCI. Early invasive group also showed higher maximum troponin I level during admission (27.7 ± 44.8 ng/mL vs 14.9 ± 24.6 ng/mL, P = .001), compared with the selective invasive group. Early invasive group had an increased risk of 12-month MACCE, compared with selective invasive group (25.6% vs 17.1%; adjusted HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.17-3.77, P = .006). Among NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction, the early invasive strategy did not improve the clinical outcomes. This data supports that an individualized approach may benefit high-risk NSTEMI patients rather than a routine invasive approach.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes based on left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHODS

We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), was the primary outcome. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) (1.610, 2.120, and 2.489; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (2.234, 3.920, and 5.215; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users.

CONCLUSION

In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields clinical outcomes comparable to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, there is a scarcity of data comparing the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for patients with AMI in the era of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES).

METHODS

We identified 5260 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a second-generation DES for AMI under IVUS or OCT guidance from pooled data derived from a series of Korean AMI registries between 2011 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 535 (10.2%) and 4725 (89.8%) patients were treated under OCT and IVUS guidance, respectively. The 1-year target lesion failure rates were comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups before and after propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.42-2.05, P=.84). The OCT utilization rate did not exceed 5% of total patients treated with second-generation DES implantation during the study period. The primary factors for the selection of OCT over IVUS were the absence of chronic kidney disease, non-left main vessel disease, single-vessel disease, stent diameter <3mm, and stent length ≤ 25mm.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT-guided PCI in patients with AMI treated with a second-generation DES provided comparable clinical outcomes for 1-year target lesion failure compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

Prognostic Implications of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the prognostic implications of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 13,104 patients in the nationwide Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, 3,083 patients with NSTEMI who underwent PCI were included in the present study. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 3 years, a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure. NT-proBNP was measured at the time of initial presentation for the management of NSTEMI, and patients were divided into a low (<700 pg/mL; n=1,813) and high (≥700 pg/mL; n=1,270) NT-proBNP group. The high NT-proBNP group had a significantly higher risk of MACE, driven primarily by a higher risk of cardiac death or admission for heart failure. These results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NSTEMI who underwent PCI, an initial elevated NT-proBNP concentration was associated with higher risk of MACE at 3 years, driven primarily by higher risks of cardiac death or admission for heart failure. These results suggest that the initial NT-proBNP concentration may have a clinically significant prognostic value in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI.

The impact of renal function on the three-year outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Due to limited data availability, we compared the 3-year outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and those with obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA) according to renal function.

METHODS

From a final cohort of 10,774 patients with AMI were classified into 2 groups: the chronic kidney disease (CKD) group (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 2,854 patients; MINOCA, 123; MIOCA, 2,731) and the non-CKD group (7,920 patients; MINOCA, 256; MIOCA, 7,664). The primary outcome was the 3-year all-cause death rate, and the secondary outcomes included cardiac death (CD), non-CD death (NCD), recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and any revascularization.

RESULTS

In both the CKD and non-CKD groups, the adjusted in-hospital mortality, 3-year all-cause death, CD, and recurrent MI rates were similar between the MINOCA and MIOCA groups, but the adjusted 3-year any revascularization rates were significantly higher in the MIOCA group than in the MINOCA group. Characteristically, in the CKD group, the adjusted 3-year NCD rate (P = 0.032) was higher in the MINOCA group than in the MIOCA group, and sepsis was the main cause of NCD in this group. In both the MINOCA and MIOCA groups, all-cause death and NCD were significantly higher in the CKD group than in the non-CKD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of renal function, the MINOCA and MIOCA groups had comparable mortality rates. However, patients with MINOCA and CKD had higher NCD rates. Close monitoring of renal function and enhanced strategies are required to reduce mortality in patients with MINOCA.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

The benefits of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clinical context of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. We aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011-2020, we identified 1418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. In total, 294 (20.7%) and 1124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. The 1-year TLF was not significantly different between groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.34, p = 0.70). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30 days and between 30 days and 1 year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve the 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Registration: URL:  http://cris.nih.go.kr . KCT0000863 and KCT0008355.

Prediction of longitudinal clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction using a dynamic machine learning algorithm

Several regression-based models for predicting outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been developed. However, prediction models that encompass diverse patient-related factors over time are limited. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model to predict longitudinal outcomes after AMI. This study was based on a nationwide prospective registry of AMI in Korea (n = 13,104). Seventy-seven predictor candidates from prehospitalization to 1 year of follow-up were included, and six machine learning approaches were analyzed. Primary outcome was defined as 1-year all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included all-cause deaths, cardiovascular deaths, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at the 1-year and 3-year follow-ups. Random forest resulted best performance in predicting the primary outcome, exhibiting a 99.6% accuracy along with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.874. Top 10 predictors for the primary outcome included peak troponin-I (variable importance value = 0.048), in-hospital duration (0.047), total cholesterol (0.047), maintenance of antiplatelet at 1 year (0.045), coronary lesion classification (0.043), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (0.039), body mass index (BMI) (0.037), door-to-balloon time (0.035), vascular approach (0.033), and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (0.032). Notably, BMI was identified as one of the most important predictors of major outcomes after AMI. BMI revealed distinct effects on each outcome, highlighting a U-shaped influence on 1-year and 3-year MACE and 3-year all-cause death. Diverse time-dependent variables from prehospitalization to the postdischarge period influenced the major outcomes after AMI. Understanding the complexity and dynamic associations of risk factors may facilitate clinical interventions in patients with AMI.

Long-term air pollution exposure is associated with higher incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and in-hospital cardiogenic shock

Previous studies have reported the association between myocardial infarction (MI) and air pollution (AP). However, limited information is available regarding the long-term effects of AP on the relative incidence rates of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and Non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). We investigated the association between long-term exposure to AP and the incidence of STEMI. Between January 2006 and December 2015, a total of 45,619 eligible patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) were enrolled in the Korea Acute MI Registry (KAMIR) and KAMIR-National Institutes of Health. Mixed-effect regression models were used to examine the association between the annual average ambient AP before MI onset and the incidence of STEMI, and to evaluate the association of AP with the incidence of in-hospital cardiogenic shock. After mixed-effect regression model analysis, particulate matter (PM) 10 µm or less in diameter (PM10) was associated with increased incidence of STEMI compared with NSTEMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.009, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.002-1.016; p = 0.012). For in-hospital cardiogenic shock complication, PM10 and SO2 were associated with increased risk, PM10 (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.018-1.050; p < 0.001), SO2 (OR 1.104, 95% CI 1.006-1.212; p = 0.037), respectively. Policy-level strategies and clinical efforts to reduce AP exposure are necessary to prevent the incidence of STEMI and severe cardiovascular complications.

Time to presentation and mortality outcomes among patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Due to limited real-world evidence on the association between time to presentation (T2P) and outcomes following acute myocardial infarction and diabetes (AMI-DM), we investigated the characteristics of patients with AMI-DM and their outcomes based on their T2P.

METHODS

4,455 patients with AMI-DM from a Korean nationwide observational cohort (2011-2015) were divided into early and late presenters according to symptom-to-door time. The effects of T2P on three-year all-cause mortality were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and survival analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of all-cause mortality was consistently higher in late presenters than in early presenters (11.4 vs. 17.2%; p < 0.001). In the IPTW-adjusted dataset, the incidence of all-cause mortality was numerically higher in late presenters than in early presenters (9.1 vs. 12.4%; p = 0.072). In the survival analysis, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in late presenters than in early presenters before and after IPTW. In the subgroup with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, late presenters had a higher incidence of cardiac death than early presenters before (4.8 vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001) and after IPTW (4.2 vs. 9.7%; p = 0.034). In the initial glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)-stratified analysis, these effects were attenuated in patients with HbA1c ≥ 9.0% before (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-2.64) and after IPTW (adjusted HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.40-1.67).

CONCLUSION

Late presentation was associated with higher mortality in patients with AMI-DM; therefore, multifaceted and systematic interventions are needed to decrease pre-hospital delays.

Effect of risk factor-tailored autonomy enhancement education in the first-time middle-aged patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

It is important for middle-aged patients who have undergone acute treatment for coronary artery disease to voluntarily improve their lifestyle and risk factors based on their recognition as patients with chronic diseases. This study conducted individual education to improve risk factors and tried to verify its effectiveness.

METHODS

The hypothesis was verified by applying a randomized controlled pre- and post-test design through random assignment of two groups. Middle-aged (40-64 years) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for the first time were recruited from a university hospital in Seoul, Korea. For the experimental group, based on the Self-Determination Theory, risk factor- tailored counseling and education were provided individually for one hour based on the education booklet, and telephone counseling was conducted twice for 12 weeks. Differences in autonomous motivation, resilience, self-care compliance and biochemical indicators measured after 12 weeks in the experimental group and the control group were compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS/WIN ver. 22.0.

RESULTS

The autonomous motivation, resilience, and self-care compliance of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p < .05). Body mass index (p = .005) and current smoking rate (p < .001) were also significantly decreased in the experimental group but there was no significant difference in other biochemical parameters.

CONCLUSION

For middle-aged patients with first coronary intervention, risk factor-tailored education emphasizing autonomy by nurses should be provided early after discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered in the Clinical Research Information Service and the identification number is KCT0008698(11/08/2023).

Effect of delayed hospitalization on patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation

In the absence of available data, we evaluated the effects of delayed hospitalization (symptom-to-door time [SDT] ≥ 24 h) on major clinical outcomes after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and complex lesions. In total, 4373 patients with NSTEMI were divided into complex (n = 2106) and non-complex (n = 2267) groups. The primary outcome was the 3-year rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent MI, and any repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes included the individual MACE components. In the complex group, all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.752; p = 0.004) and cardiac death (aHR, 1.966; p = 0.010) rates were significantly higher for patients with SDT ≥ 24 h than for those with SDT < 24 h. In the non-complex group, all patients showed similar clinical outcomes. Patients with SDT < 24 h (aHR, 1.323; p = 0.031) and those with SDT ≥ 24 h (aHR, 1.606; p = 0.027) showed significantly higher rates of any repeat revascularization and all-cause death, respectively, in the complex group than in the non-complex group. Thus, in the complex group, delayed hospitalization was associated with higher 3-year mortalities.

Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there are no data regarding the benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study used data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, a large, multicenter prospective cohort. We evaluated 1,759 patients with AMI and CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and patients were classified into 2 groups: with and without IVUS. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of TLF according to eGFR was also analyzed. A total of 1,759 patients with AMI and CKD who underwent IVUS-guided PCI (19.2%) had a significantly lower risk of TLF at 3 years (8.9% vs. 15.3%; HR 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.81; P=0.002) than those who underwent angiography-guided PCI, regardless of their eGFR and the presence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The results were consistent after confounder adjustment and inversed probability weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD and AMI who underwent PCI with 2nd-generation DES implantation, the use of IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year TLF and showed consistently favorable outcomes regardless of eGFR and ESRD.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitions and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Renal Impairment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment (AMI-RI) treated with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in real-world clinical settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 4790 consecutive patients with AMI-RI between November 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, were subdivided into ACEI (n=2845) and ARB (n=1945) treatment groups. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, any revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, rehospitalization, and stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for group differences.

RESULTS

The ARB group had a significantly higher incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (at 3-year follow-up) than the ACEI group according to the unadjusted analysis (3-year hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.78) and the PSM-adjusted analysis (3-year HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.56). However, any revascularization (3-year HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.54) and rehospitalization (3-year HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.67) were not significantly different between groups in the PSM-adjusted analysis. Compared with the ARB group, the ACEI group had lower rates of all-cause mortality at estimated glomerular filtration rates of at least 15 or less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the unadjusted data and at least 60 or less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the PSM-adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ACEIs seemed to be more beneficial than treatment with ARBs for patients with AMI-RI; further prospective studies are required to confirm these results.

Identifying and Solving Gaps in Pre- and In-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarction Care in Asia-Pacific Countries

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Asia-Pacific region, and mortality rates differ between countries in the region. Systems of care have been shown to play a major role in determining AMI outcomes, and this review aims to highlight pre-hospital and in-hospital system deficiencies and suggest possible improvements to enhance quality of care, focusing on Korea, Japan, Singapore and Malaysia as representative countries. Time to first medical contact can be shortened by improving patient awareness of AMI symptoms and the need to activate emergency medical services (EMS), as well as by developing robust, well-coordinated and centralized EMS systems. Additionally, performing and transmitting pre-hospital electrocardiograms, algorithmically identifying patients with high risk AMI and developing hospital networks that appropriately divert such patients to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals have been shown to be beneficial. Within the hospital environment, developing and following clinical practice guidelines ensures that treatment plans can be standardised, whilst integrated care pathways can aid in coordinating care within the healthcare institution and can guide care even after discharge. Prescription of guideline directed medical therapy for secondary prevention and patient compliance to medications can be further optimised. Finally, the authors advocate for the establishment of more regional, national and international AMI registries for the formal collection of data to facilitate audit and clinical improvement.

Triage body temperature and its influence on patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Fever can occur after acute myocardial infarction (MI). The influence of body temperature (BT) after hospital arrival on patients with acute MI has rarely been investigated.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with acute MI in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary teaching hospital between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 were enrolled. Based on the tympanic temperature obtained at the ED triage, patients were categorized into normothermic (35.5°C-37.5°C), hypothermic (< 35.5°C), or hyperthermic (> 37.5°C) groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), while the secondary outcomes were adverse events. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 440 enrollees; significant differences were found among the normothermic (n = 369, 83.9%), hypothermic (n = 27, 6.1%), and hyperthermic (n = 44, 10.0%) groups in the triage respiratory rate (median [IQR]) (20.0 [4.0] cycles/min versus 20.0 [4.0] versus 20.0 [7.5], p = 0.009), triage heart rate (88.0 [29.0] beats/min versus 82.0 [28.0] versus 102.5 [30.5], p < 0.001), presence of ST-elevation MI (42.0% versus 66.7% versus 31.8%, p = 0.014), need for cardiac catheterization (87.3% versus 85.2% versus 72.7%, p = 0.034), initial troponin T level (165.9 [565.2] ng/L versus 49.1 [202.0] versus 318.8 [2002.0], p = 0.002), peak troponin T level (343.8 [1405.9] ng/L versus 218.7 [2318.2] versus 832.0 [2640.8], p = 0.003), length of ICU stay (2.0 [3.0] days versus 3.0 [8.0] versus 3.0 [9.5], p = 0.006), length of hospital stay (4.0 [4.5] days versus 6.0 [15.0] versus 10.5 [10.8], p < 0.001), and infection during hospitalization (19.8% versus 29.6% versus 63.6%, p < 0.001) but not in IHCA (7.6% versus 14.8% versus 11.4%, p = 0.323) or any adverse events (50.9% versus 48.1% versus 63.6%, p = 0.258). Multivariable analysis showed no significant association of triage BT with IHCA or any major complication.

CONCLUSION

Triage BT did not show a significant association with IHCA or adverse events in patients with acute MI. However, triage BT could be associated with different clinical presentations and should warrant further investigation.

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes Based on Pre-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Blood Flow Grade and Symptom-to-Balloon Time in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

We compared the 3-year clinical outcomes according to the degree of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade (pre-PCI TIMI) and symptom-to-balloon time (SBT) individuals who underwent successful stent implantation with a diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A total of 4910 patients with NSTEMI were divided into two groups: pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 (SBT < 48 h: n = 1328, SBT ≥ 48 h: n = 558) and pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 (SBT < 48 h: n = 1965, SBT ≥ 48 h: n = 1059). The primary outcome was a 3-year all-cause death rate, and the secondary outcome was the composite endpoint of 3-year all-cause death, recurrent MI, or any repeat revascularization rate. After adjustment, in the pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 group, the 3-year all-cause death (p = 0.003), cardiac death (CD, p < 0.001), and secondary outcome (p = 0.030) values were significantly higher in the SBT ≥ 48 h group than in the SBT < 48 h group. However, patients with pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 had similar primary and secondary outcomes, regardless of the SBT group. Within the SBT < 48 h group, the pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 group exhibited significantly higher rates of 3-year all-cause death, CD, recurrent MI, and secondary outcome values than the pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 group. Patients in the SBT ≥ 48 h group with either pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 or TIMI 2/3 had similar primary and secondary outcomes. Our results suggest that shortening the SBT may confer a survival benefit in patients with NSTEMI and those in the pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 group compared to those in the pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 group.

Baseline Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) is a known independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the prognostic impact of the baseline lipoprotein(a) levels on long-term clinical outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction remain unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed 1,908 patients with acute myocardial infarction from November 2011 to October 2015 from a single center in Korea. They were divided into 3 groups according to their baseline lipoprotein(a) levels: groups I (< 30 mg/dL, n = 1,388), II (30-49 mg/dL, n = 263), and III (≥50 mg/dL, n = 257). Three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiac death) at 3 years were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for 1094.0 (interquartile range, 1,033.8-1,095.0) days, during which a total of 326 (17.1%) three-point major adverse cardiovascular events occurred. Group III had higher rates of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events compared with Group I (23.0% vs. 15.7%; log-rank P = 0.009). In the subgroup analysis, group III had higher rates of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events compared with group I in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (27.0% vs. 17.1%; log-rank P = 0.006), but not in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (14.4% vs. 13.3%; log-rank P = 0.597). However, in multivariable Cox time-to-event models, baseline lipoprotein(a) levels were not associated with an increased incidence of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events, regardless of the type of acute myocardial infarction. Sensitivity analyses in diverse subgroups showed similar findings to those of the main analysis.

CONCLUSION

Baseline lipoprotein(a) levels in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction were not independently associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years.

Effects of delayed hospitalization on the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with or without diabetes who had non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and underwent new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation

Clinical outcomes after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients with (symptom-to-door time [SDT] ≥ 24 h) or without (SDT < 24 h) delayed hospitalization among patients with or without diabetes were compared. From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health, a total of 4517 patients with NSTEMI who underwent new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation were recruited and they were classified into the diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM groups. These two groups were subdivided into groups with and without delayed hospitalization. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was the occurrence of individual components of MACCE and stent thrombosis. Although after multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses in the DM group, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes between the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups were similar; in the non-DM group, all-cause (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) and cardiac (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) death rates were significantly higher in the SDT ≥ 24 h group than in the SDT < 24 h group. Our results suggested that there was no significant difference in prognosis between diabetic patients with and without delayed SDT, but delayed SDT was associated with poor prognosis in nondiabetic patients.

Sex Differences in Delayed Hospitalization in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

We compared the effects of sex differences in delayed hospitalization (symptom-to-door time [SDT], ≥24 h) on major clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. A total of 4593 patients were classified into groups with (n = 1276) and without delayed hospitalization (SDT < 24 h, n = 3317). Thereafter, these two groups were subdivided into male and female groups. The primary clinical outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was stent thrombosis. After multivariable- and propensity score-adjusted analyses, in-hospital mortalities were similar between the male and female groups in both the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups. However, during a 3-year follow-up period, in the SDT < 24 h group, all-cause death (p = 0.013 and p = 0.005, respectively) and cardiac death (CD, p = 0.015 and p = 0.008, respectively) rates were significantly higher in the female group than those in the male group. This may be related to the lower all-cause death and CD rates (p = 0.022 and p = 0.012, respectively) in the SDT < 24 h group than in the SDT ≥ 24 h group among male patients. Other outcomes were similar between the male and female groups and between the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups. In this prospective cohort study, female patients showed higher 3-year mortality, especially in the SDT < 24 h, compared to male patients.

Prognosis after discontinuing renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor for heart failure with restored ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction

Prognostic effect of discontinuing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system-inhibitor (RAASi) for patients with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) whose left ventricular (LV) systolic function was restored during follow-up is unknown. To investigate the outcome after discontinuing RAASi in post-AMI HF patients with restored LV ejection fraction (EF). Of 13,104 consecutive patients from the nationwide, multicenter, and prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry, HF patients with baseline LVEF < 50% that was restored to ≥ 50% at 12-month follow-up were selected. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous MI, or rehospitalization for HF at 36-month after index procedure. Of 726 post-AMI HF patients with restored LVEF, 544 maintained RAASi (Maintain-RAASi) beyond 12-month, 108 stopped RAASi (Stop-RAASi), and 74 did not use RAASi (RAASi-Not-Used) at baseline and follow-up. Systemic hemodynamics and cardiac workloads were similar among groups at baseline and during follow-up. Stop-RAASi group showed elevated NT-proBNP than Maintain-RAASi group at 36-month. Stop-RAASi group showed significantly higher risk of primary outcome than Maintain-RAASi group (11.4% vs. 5.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adjust] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.46, P = 0.028), mainly driven by increased risk of all-cause death. The rate of primary outcome was similar between Stop-RAASi and RAASi-Not-Used group (11.4% vs. 12.1%; HR_adjust 1.18 [0.47-2.99], P = 0.725). In post-AMI HF patients with restored LV systolic function, RAASi discontinuation was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause death, MI, or rehospitalization for HF. Maintaining RAASi will be necessary for post-AMI HF patients, even after LVEF is restored.

Effects of Hypertension on Two-Year Outcomes According to Glycemic Status in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

The effects of hypertension on long-term outcomes according to glycemic status in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have not been fully investigated. In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 11,911 patients were classified into 6 groups according to their glycemic status and presence or absence of hypertension. The major outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), or any revascularization. In patients without hypertension, the major outcomes were similar between the normoglycemia and prediabetes groups. However, MACE, all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), Re-MI rates were higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in normoglycemic patients. Additionally, Re-MI was higher in patients with T2DM than in prediabetic patients. In patients with hypertension, although the major outcomes were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups, in both the prediabetes and T2DM groups, MACE, all-cause death, and CD rates were higher than those in the normoglycemia group. During a 2-year follow-up, the comparable harmful effects of hypertension in patients with AMI and prediabetes or T2DM were observed. Effective blood pressure and glucose control should be strengthened to reduce mortality in these patients.

Early Invasive Strategy Based on the Time of Symptom Onset of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

A limitation of the current guidelines regarding the timing of invasive coronary angiography for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome is the randomization time. To date, no study has reported the clinical outcomes of invasive strategy timing on the basis of the time of symptom onset.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of invasive strategy timing from the time of symptom onset on the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHODS

Among 13,104 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, 5,856 patients with NSTE myocardial infarction were evaluated. The patients were categorized according to symptom-to-catheter (StC) time (<48 or ≥48 hours). The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,919 patients (66.9%) were classified into the StC time <48 hours group. This group had lower all-cause mortality than the group with StC time ≥48 hours (7.3% vs 13.4%; P < 0.001). The lower risk for all-cause mortality in the group with StC time <48 hours group was consistent in all subgroups. Notably, emergency medical service use (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.19-0.52) showed a lower risk for all-cause mortality than no emergency medical service use (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46-0.65; P value for interaction = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

An early invasive strategy on the basis of StC time was associated with a decreased risk for all-cause mortality in patients with NSTEMI. Because the study was based on a prospective registry, the results should be considered hypothesis generating, highlighting the need for further research. (iCReaT Study No. C110016).

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers on clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients with acute myocardial infarction

There has been a concern that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) may increase myocardial infarction (MI) in hypertensive patients compared with other classes of anti-hypertensive drugs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) is recommended as a first-line inhibitor of renin-angiotensin system (RASI) in patients with acute MI (AMI), but ARB is also frequently used to control blood pressure. This study investigated the association of ARB vs. ACEI with the long-term clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients with AMI. Among patients enrolled in the nationwide AMI database of South Korea, the KAMIR-NIH, 4,827 hypertensive patients, who survived the initial attack and were taking ARB or ACEI at discharge, were selected for this study. ARB therapy was associated with higher incidence of 2-year major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, all-cause death, MI than ACEI therapy in entire cohort. After propensity score-matching, ARB therapy was still associated with higher incidence of 2-year cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.14; P = 0.001), all-cause death (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.44-2.28; P < 0.001), and MI (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.46; P = 0.001) than the ACEI therapy. It was concluded that ARB therapy at discharge in hypertensive patients with AMI was inferior to ACEI therapy with regard to the incidence of CD, all-cause death, and MI at 2-year. These data suggested that ACEI be a more appropriate RASI than ARB to control BP in hypertensive patients with AMI.

Impact of Comorbid Disease Burden on Clinical Outcomes of Female Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients

Owing to the paucity of information on the clinical outcomes in female patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to the comorbid disease burden, we explored the differences in their clinical outcomes and identified predictive indicators. A total of 3,419 female AMI patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (those with zero or one comorbid diseases) (n=1,983) and Group B (those with two to five comorbid diseases) (n=1,436). Five comorbid conditions were considered: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, prior coronary artery disease, and prior cerebrovascular accidents. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). The incidence of MACCEs was higher in Group B than in Group A in both the unadjusted and propensity score-matched data. Among the comorbid conditions, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and prior coronary artery disease were found to be independently associated with an increased incidence of MACCEs. Higher comorbid disease burden was positively associated with adverse outcomes in the female population with AMI. Since both hypertension and diabetes mellitus are modifiable and independent predictors of adverse outcomes after AMI, it may be necessary to focus on the optimal management of blood pressure and glucose levels to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Sex difference after acute myocardial infarction patients with a history of current smoking and long-term clinical outcomes: Results of KAMIR Registry

BACKGROUND

The contribution of sex as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease still remains controversial. The present study investigated the impact of sex on long-term clinical outcomes in Korean acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with a history of current smoking on admission after drug-eluting stents (DESs).

METHODS

A total of 12,565 AMI patients (male: n = 11,767 vs. female: n = 798) were enrolled. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) comprising all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization were the primary outcomes that were compared between the two groups. Probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST) was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

After adjustment, the early (30 days) cumulative incidences of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.457; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.021-2.216; p = 0.035) and all-cause death (aHR: 1.699; 95% CI: 1.074-2.687; p = 0.023) were significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. At 2 years, the cumulative incidences of all-cause death (aHR: 1.561; 95% CI: 1.103-2.210; p = 0.012) and Re-MI (aHR: 1.800; 95% CI: 1.089-2.974; p = 0.022) were significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. However, the cumulative incidences of ST were similar between the two groups (aHR: 1.207; 95% CI: 0.583-2.497; p = 0.613).

CONCLUSIONS

The female group showed worse short-term and long-term clinical outcomes compared with the male group comprised of Korean AMI patients with a history of current smoking after successful DES implantation. However, further studies are required to confirm these results.

Triple Antiplatelet Therapy with Cilostazol and Favorable Early Clinical Outcomes after Acute Myocardial Infarction Compared to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Standard or Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors

Current guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recommend potent P2Y12 inhibitors rather than clopidogrel to prevent ischemic events. However, their ischemic benefits are offset by an increased major bleeding risk. We compared the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol in the first month after AMI. This study investigated 16,643 AMI patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in nationwide, real-world, multicenter registries in Korea. Patients were divided into DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel, n = 11,285), Triple (aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol, n = 2547), and Potent (aspirin and ticagrelor/prasugrel, n = 2811) groups. The primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and TIMI major bleeding one month after AMI. After adjusting for covariates, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of death from any cause, MI, or stroke between the three groups. However, the risk of TIMI major bleeding was significantly greater in the Potent group than in the DAPT and Triple groups (p < 0.001). Accordingly, NACE was significantly higher in the DAPT (HR 1.265; 95% CI 1.006−1.591, p = 0.044) and Potent groups (HR 1.515; 95% CI 1.142−2.011, p = 0.004) than in the Triple group. Triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol was associated with an improved net clinical outcome in the first month after AMI without increasing the risk of bleeding compared to potent or standard P2Y12 inhibitor-based DAPT.

Prediabetes versus type 2 diabetes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and current smoking

BACKGROUND

Smoking is linked with increased risk of cardiovascular events among diabetic patients. Prediabetes is associated with increased risk for microvascular and macrovascular complications. We compared the 2-year clinical outcomes of current smoking between prediabetic and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

METHODS

A total of 5161 AMI patients who were currently smoking were classified into normoglycemia (group A: 1,416), prediabetes (group B: 1,740), and T2DM (group C: 2,005) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST) and stroke.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of all primary and secondary endpoints including MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.150; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.891-1.484; P = 0.284), ST, and stroke were similar between group B and group C. The cumulative incidences of MACEs (aHR: 1.385; 95% CI: 1.007-1.904; P = 0.045) and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in group B than in group A. The cumulative incidences of MACEs (aHR: 1.572; 95% CI: 1.157-2.137; P = 0.004), all-cause death, Re-MI, and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in group C than in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Current smoking leads to worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI and prediabetes, and thus, similarly to T2DM patients, more attention and more intensive treatment strategy including quitting smoking would be advantageous.

Impact of intravascular ultrasound in acute myocardial infarction patients at high ischemic risk

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence for the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high ischemic risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients at high ischemic risk of AMI.

METHODS

Among 13 104 patients with AMI enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, we selected 8890 patients who underwent successful PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and classified them into 2 groups based on whether or not they were at high ischemic risk or not, defined as any of the following: number of stents implanted ≥ 3, 3 vessels treated, ≥ 3 lesions treated, total stent length> 60mm, left main PCI, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The primary outcome was target lesion failure including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years.

RESULTS

In 4070 AMI patients at high ischemic risk, IVUS-guided PCI (21.6%) was associated with a significantly lower risk of target lesion failure at 3 years (6.7% vs 12.0%; HR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.41-0.72; P <.001) than angiography-guided PCI. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment, inversed probability weighting, and propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients at high ischemic risk of AMI who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, use of IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year target lesion failure. iCreaT study No. C110016.

Association of the medical therapy with beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system with clinical outcomes in patients with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction

In the era of the initial optimal interventional and medical therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a number of patients with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (41%-49%) have been increasing. This observational study aimed to investigate the association between the medical therapy with oral beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with mildly reduced EF after AMI. Among patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health, propensity-score matched patients who survived the initial attack and had mildly reduced EF were selected according to beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor therapy at discharge. Beta-blocker therapy at discharge was associated with lower 2-year major adverse cardiac events which was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization and re-hospitalization due to heart failure (8.7 vs 12.8/100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.93; P = .015), and no significant interaction between EF ≤ 45% and > 45% was observed (Pinteraction = 0.354). This association was mainly driven by lower myocardial infarction in patients with beta-blockers (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.95; P = .035). Inhibitors of RAS at discharge were associated with lower re-hospitalization due to heart failure (1.8 vs 3.5/100 patient-years; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.33-0.86; P = .010) without a significant interaction between EF ≤ 45% and > 45% (Pinteraction = 0.333). In patients with mildly reduced EF after AMI, the medical therapy with beta-blockers or RAS inhibitors at discharge was associated with better 2-year clinical outcomes.

Impact of P2Y12 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes of Korean acute myocardial infarction patients with baseline thrombocytopenia

Background

Antiplatelet therapy is crucial for managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and reducing adverse ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. However, the ideal P2Y12 inhibitor for patients—particularly East Asians—with AMI and low platelet levels remains unknown. We evaluated the impact of various potencies of P2Y12 receptors on major cardiovascular outcomes of AMI patients with thrombocytopenia in Korea.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical and outcome data of 800 AMI patients with baseline platelet counts &lt;150 × 103/μL who underwent PCI between November 2011 and June 2015. All patient data were obtained from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry–National Institutes of Health registry. Subjects were allocated to group A (n = 244; treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors) or group B (n = 556; treated with clopidogrel). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

Results

At the 3-year follow-up, clinical outcomes appeared better in group A than in Group B. However, after propensity score weighting-adjusted analysis, these findings were statistically attenuated, showing a similar incidence of MACCEs between the two groups.

Conclusions

Clopidogrel may be reasonable for patients with low platelet counts and is associated with comparable outcomes to potent P2Y12 inhibitors for Korean AMI patients.

Long-term use of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction is not associated with survival benefits: Analysis of data from the Korean acute myocardial infarction registry-national institutes of health registry

Introduction

Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) have shown survival benefits after acute myocardial infarction (MI), but the role of routine long-term use of RASi remains unclear. Thereby, we explored the therapeutic effects of RASi medication at 1-year follow-up from acute MI.

Methods

Using the nationwide Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry, we included and analyzed 10,822 subjects. Patients were stratified into those taking RASi at 1-year follow-up (n = 7,696) and those not taking RASi at 1-year follow-up (n = 3,126). Patients were followed up for 2-years from the 1-year follow-up; 2-year all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality were analyzed as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.

Results

The use of RASi at 1-year follow-up was not associated with decreased all-cause mortality (log-rank P = 0.195) or cardiac mortality (log-rank P = 0.337). In multivariate analyses, RASi medication at 1-year follow-up did not reduce all-cause mortality (P = 0.758) or cardiac mortality (P = 0.923), while RASi medication at discharge substantially reduced 1-year all-cause and cardiac mortality. Treatment with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker at 1-year follow-up did not show survival benefits from 1-year follow-up, respectively. The use of RASi at 1-year follow-up did not show a prognostic interaction between previous history of chronic kidney disease, post-MI acute heart failure, concomitant use of beta-blockers at 1-year follow-up, or 1-year LVEF.

Conclusion

Acute MI patients taking RASi at 1-year follow-up were not associated with improved 2-year all-cause mortality or cardiac mortality from the 1-year follow-up. This study provides valuable information regarding tailored medication strategy after acute MI.

Clinical trial registration

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [KCT0000863].

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Non-ST-Segment and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations

Using a new-generation drug-eluting stent, we compared the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM concomitant with a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 11,798 patients with acute myocardial infarction were classified into two groups: DM (NSTEMI, n = 2399; STEMI, n = 2693) and non-DM (NSTEMI, n = 2694; STEMI, n = 4012). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any coronary repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. In all the patients, both multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses revealed that the incidence rates of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.214; p = 0.006 and aHR, 1.298; p = 0.002, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), and non-CD rate were significantly higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group. Additionally, among patients with NSTEMI, there was a higher non-CD rate (aHR, 2.200; p = 0.007 and aHR, 2.484; p = 0.004, respectively) in the DM group and a higher CD rate (aHR, 2.688; p < 0.001 and 2.882; p < 0.001, respectively) in the non-DM group. In this retrospective study, patients with NSTEMI had a significantly higher 2-year mortality rate than those with STEMI did. Furthermore, strategies to reduce the non-CD rate in patients with DM and the CD rate in patients without DM could be beneficial for those with NSTEMI.

Comparison of 3-Year Outcomes between Early and Delayed Invasive Strategies in Older and Younger Adults with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

We evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of early invasive (EI) and delayed invasive (DI) strategies in older and younger adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to reflect current real-world practice. Overall, 4513 patients with NSTEMI were recruited from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health and divided into two groups according to age: group A (age ≥ 65 years, n = 2253) and group B (age < 65 years, n = 2260). These two groups were further divided into two subgroups: group EI (A1 and B1) and DI (A2 and B2). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent MI (re-MI), any repeat coronary revascularization, or stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). In both groups A and B, after multivariable-adjusted and propensity score-adjusted analyses, MACCE (group A, p = 0.137 and p = 0.255, respectively; group B, p = 0.171 and p = 0.135, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), non-CD, re-MI, any repeat revascularization, stroke, and ST rates were similar between the EI and DI groups. When including only those with complex lesions, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI groups. In the era of new-generation DESs, major clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI strategies in both older and younger adults with NSTEMI.

Prognostic implications for patients after myocardial infarction: an integrative literature review and in-depth interviews with patients and experts

Background

As patients with myocardial infarction (MI) survive for a long time after acute treatment, it is necessary to pay attention to the prevention of poor prognosis such as heart failure (HF). To identify the influencing factors of adverse clinical outcomes through a review of prospective cohort studies of post-MI patients, and to draw prognostic implications through in-depth interviews with post-MI patients who progressed to HF and clinical experts.

Methods

A mixed-method design was used that combined a scoping review of 21 prospective cohort studies, in-depth interviews with Korean post-MI patients with HF, and focus group interviews with cardiologists and nurses.

Results

A literature review showed that old age, diabetes, high Killip class, low left ventricular ejection fraction, recurrent MI, comorbidity of chronic disease and current smoking, and low socioeconomic status were identified as influencing factors of poor prognosis. Through interviews with post-MI patients, these influencing factors identified in the literature as well as a lack of disease awareness and lack of self-care were confirmed. Experts emphasized the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle after acute treatment with the recognition that it is a chronic disease that must go together for a lifetime.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the factors influencing poor prognosis after MI and the educational needs of post-MI patients with transition to HF. Healthcare providers should continue to monitor the risk group, which is expected to have a poor prognosis, along with education emphasizing the importance of self-care such as medication and lifestyle modification.

Association between baseline smoking status and clinical outcomes following myocardial infarction

Background

Whether the effect of smoking on clinical outcomes following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is beneficial or detrimental remains inconclusive. We invesetigated the effect of smoking on the clinical outcomes in patients following an AMI.

Methods

Among 13,104 patients between November 2011 and June 2015 from a nationwide Korean AMI registry, a total of 10,193 participants were extracted then classified into two groups according to their smoking habit: (1) smoking group (n = 6,261) and (2) non-smoking group (n = 3,932). The participants who smoked were further subclassified according to their smoking intensity quantified by pack years (PYs): (1) <20 PYs (n = 1,695); (2) 20–40 PYs (n = 3,018); and (3) ≥40 PYs (n = 2,048). Each group was compared to each other according to treatment outcomes. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which is a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI (NFMI), any revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, rehospitalization, and stent thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of MACCEs. The Cox proportional hazard regression method was used to evaluate associations between baseline smoking and clinical outcomes following an AMI. Two propensity score weighting methods were performed to adjust for confounders, including propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results

While the incidence of all clinical outcomes, except for stent thrombosis, was lower in the smoking group than in the non-smoking group in the unadjusted data, the covariates-adjusted data showed statistical attenuation of these differences but a higher all-cause mortality in the smoking group. For smokers, the incidence of MACCEs, all-cause mortality, cardiac and non-cardiac death, and rehospitalization was significantly different between the groups, with the highest rates of MACCE, all-cause mortality, non-cardiac death, and rehospitalization in the group with the highest smoking intensity. These differences were statistically attenuated in the covariates-adjusted data, except for MACCEs, all-cause mortality, and non-cardiac death, which had the highest incidence in the group with ≥40 PYs.

Conclusion

Smoking had no beneficial effect on the clinical outcomes following an AMI. Moreover, for those who smoked, clinical outcomes tended to deteriorate as smoking intensity increased.