Serotonin (5-HT)3-receptor antagonism of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzimidazole derivatives against 5-HT-induced bradycardia in anesthetized rats

Serotonin and vasovagal syncope

PURPOSE

The goal of this manuscript was to review the biological and clinical evidence that serotonin neurotransmission might play an important role in the  physiology and treatment of vasovagal syncope.

METHODS

The authors reviewed PubMed and handsearches of secondary sources for papers related to the Bezold-Jarisch reflex and serotonin, the plausible involvement of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex in vasovagal syncope, and three lines of clinical evidence involving serotonin and the syncope.

RESULTS

The Bezold-Jarisch reflex was first described following the infusion of veratrum alkaloids into animals in the 19th century. The reflex is triggered by serotonin stimulation chemoreceptors and mechanoreceptors in the the left ventricle. The afferent component of the reflex is carried by unmyelinated type C vagal nerve fibers, which results in parasympathetic efferent stimulation that causes bradycardia. The similarity of the combination of hypotension and bradycardia in the Bezold-Jarisch reflex and in vasovagal syncope led to the suggestion that the reflex was the cause of the syndrome.  Three lines of evidence implicate the serotonin 5HT3 receptors in the heart in the reflex. There is genetic and physiologic evidence for the serotonin 5HT1A and 5HT3 receptors and the serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT). Acute blockade of SERT induces vasovagal syncope in humans undergoing head-up tilt table testing, and SERT inhibition reduces hypotension and bradycardia during spinal anaesthesia. Finally, three randomized clinical trials of SERT inhibitors uniformly reported that they significantly reduce the likelihood of vasovagal syncope recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Multiple lines of evidence implicate serotonin neurotransmission in the cause of vasovagal syncope.

Control of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Adults

Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) occurs frequently, particularly in the elderly and in patients undergoing caesarean section. SAIH is caused by arterial and venous vasodilatation resulting from the sympathetic block along with a paradoxical activation of cardioinhibitory receptors. Bradycardia after spinal anesthesia (SA) must always be treated as a warning sign of an important hemodynamic compromise. Fluid preloading (before initiation of the SA) with colloids such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES) effectively reduces the incidence and severity of arterial hypotension, whereas crystalloid preloading is not indicated. Co-loading with crystalloid or colloid is as equally effective to HES preloading, provided that the speed of administration is adequate (ie, bolus over 5 to 10 minutes). Ephedrine has traditionally been considered the vasoconstrictor of choice, especially for use during SAIH associated with bradycardia. Phenylephrine, a α₁ adrenergic receptor agonist, is increasingly used to treat SAIH and its prophylactic administration (ie, immediately after intrathecal injection of local anesthetics) has been shown to decrease the incidence of arterial hypotension. The role of norepinephrine as a possible alternative to phenylephrine seems promising. Other drugs, such as serotonin receptor antagonists (ondansetron), have been shown to limit the blood pressure drop after SA by inhibiting the Bezold–Jarisch reflex (BJR), but further studies are needed before their widespread use can be recommended.

Ephedrine versus ondansetron in the prevention of hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Maternal hypotension is common after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We compared the effects of prophylactic ephedrine with ondansetron on post-spinal blood pressure.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-eight term, singleton parturients were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either prophylactic intravenous ephedrine 10mg (Group E), ondansetron 8mg (Group O) or normal saline (Group P) immediately after spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was maternal blood pressure between spinal block and delivery; secondary outcomes were nausea and vomiting scores, Apgar scores, numbers requiring intraoperative vasoconstrictors and the dose of vasoconstrictors required.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were recruited to each group, but two in Group P were excluded from the analysis owing to protocol violations. There were no significant differences between the groups in maternal systolic, diastolic or mean arterial pressures, or the proportion of patients experiencing hypotension. The proportion of patients in Group E requiring intraoperative ephedrine or any vasoconstrictor (ephedrine and/or norepinephrine) was significantly lower than that in Group P (P=0.023 and 0.034, respectively). The proportion of patients in Group O requiring intraoperative norepinephrine was significantly lower than that in Group P (P=0.02). There was no difference in the proportions of patients in Groups E and O requiring any vasoconstrictors (P=0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in maternal blood pressure in women administered prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery compared with placebo. Ephedrine reduced the proportion of patients requiring a rescue vasoconstrictor before delivery.

Effect of ondansetron on prevention of post-induction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

Background:

Elderly patients are susceptible to post-induction hypotension. Volume loading and vasopressors for prevention of hypotension in elderly patients may increase perioperative cardiovascular risks. Ondansetron by blocking Bezold–Jarisch reflex (BJR) through inhibition of serotonin receptors has been effective in the prevention of post-spinal hypotension, and bradycardia. Bradycardia frequently accompanies post-induction hypotension in elderly patients, which signifies a possible preventing role for ondansetron. No previous study has evaluated the prophylactic effects of ondansetron for the prevention of post-induction hypotension.

Materials and Methods:

In this randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, ondansetron 4 mg was given intravenously to 65 elderly patients, 20 min before induction of general anesthesia, and the rate of post-induction hypotension defined as 25% or more reduction in mean arterial blood pressure, compared with a placebo groups.

Results:

A total of 114 patients completed the study (58 in ondansetron and 56 in the placebo group). Proportions of post-induction hypotension were 9 (16%) and 25 (45%) in ondansetron and placebo groups, respectively, (P = 0.001). Forty-five patients (40%) developed bradycardia. Rates of bradycardia were not significantly different between two groups.

Conclusions:

The results of this study show the effectiveness of intravenous ondansetron for prevention of post-induction hypotension in elderly patients. The mechanism of this effect largely is unknown. Role of ondansetron for prevention of post-induction hypotension may not fully understandable by its interaction with BJR, as has been shown in post-spinal hypotension.

Effect of intravenous ondansetron on reducing the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia events during shoulder arthroscopy in sitting position under interscalene brachial plexus block: A prospective randomized trial

Background and Aims:

Sudden, profound hypotension and bradycardia events (HBEs) have been reported in more than 20% of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the sitting position. The present study was designed to know whether intravenous (IV) ondansetron (selective 5-hydroxy tryptamine 3-antagonist) can help in reducing the HBEs associated with shoulder arthroscopy performed in sitting position under interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB).

Methods:

A total of 100 patients (age 20–50 years) undergoing shoulder arthroscopy performed in the sitting position under ISBPB were assigned randomly to one of the two groups: Group C received 10 ml of normal saline and Group T received 4 mg of ondansetron diluted in 10 ml of normal saline` IV. All patients received ISBPB using levobupivacaine 0.5%. Assessment of motor and sensory blockade, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, respiration, and side effects were noted every 5 min for first 30 min and every 10 min till the end of surgery. HBEs were recorded in both groups.

Results:

IV injection of ondansetron significantly reduces the incidence of HBEs from 11 (22.44% in Group C) to 3 (6.1% in Group T). The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group C (8.1 ± 3.3) in comparison with Group T (6.3 ± 4.2 h).

Conclusion:

We conclude that 4 ml of IV ondansetron can significantly reduce the HBEs during shoulder arthroscopy done in the sitting position under ISBPB.

Effect of ondansetron on post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

One of the most exhausting complications of spinal anesthesia, especially in parturients, is post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). This headache is not responsive to the usual pain killers. Ondansetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist which is generally used for the prophylactic management of nausea and vomiting; however, studies have found that ondansetron might decrease the incidence of PDPH. Therefore, we aimed to evalute the effect of ondansetron on decreasing the incidence of PDPH.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, 210 parturients who underwent elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. The intervention group received 0.15 mg/kg ondansetron, while the control group received 5 ml normal saline. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded during surgery. Furthermore, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and PDPH in the two groups were noted by an anesthetic nurse for 3 days and compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of PDPH in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group (P = 0.001). The incidence of PONV was also significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). However, MAP was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding heart rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg) appeared to reduce the incidence of PDPH, as well as the incidence of hypotension and PONV, in parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Effect of Ondansetron on the Occurrence of Hypotension and on Neonatal Parameters during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study

To prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section, we assessed IV ondansetron of invasive maternal hemodynamic and fetal gazometric parameters.

Comparing Two Different Doses of Intravenous Ondansetron With Placebo on Attenuation of Spinal-induced Hypotension and Shivering

Background:

Side effects of spinal anesthesia are hypotension, bradycardia and shivering. Five-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT), a serotonergic receptor, may be an important factor associated with inducing the Bezold Jarish reflex (BJR) that may lead to the bradycardia and hypotension in the setting of decreased blood volume.

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the effect of intravenous administration of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which could attenuate spinal-induced hypotension, bradycardia and shivering.

Patients and Methods:

Two hundred and ten patients aged 20-50 years old were scheduled for spinal anesthesia and were divided randomly into three equal groups. The control group received normal saline and intervention groups received 6 mg or 12 mg of intravenous ondansetron 5 minutes before spinal anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and shivering were recorded before and after spinal anesthesia every 5 minutes during first 20 minutes of surgery.

Results:

Demographic data were not statistically different among groups. HR was statistically different between the experimental groups and the control group. Ten patients (14%) in the control group had HR < 50 bpm, that required intravenous atropine compared to experimental groups (P =0.02). In the control group 12 (17%) patients had MAP < 80 mm Hg and required vasopressors compared to experimental groups (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in MAP and HR between the experimental groups (P =0.06). Incidence of shivering in the control group was 45% (32.70) that was statistically more than experimental groups (P = 0.02).

Conclusions:

Administration of two different doses of intravenous ondansetron, 6 mg and 12 mg, significantly attenuates spinal induced hypotension, bradycardia and shivering compared to the control saline group. However, the hemodynamic profiles and shivering in experimental groups were not statistically different.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ramosetron in the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disease with persisting gastrointestinal symptoms that has been classified into four subtypes. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) plays important physiological roles in the contraction and relaxation of smooth muscle. Intraluminal distension of the intestine is known to stimulate the release of endogenous 5-HT from enterochromaffin cells, activating 5-HT3 receptors located on primary afferent neurons and leading to increases in intestinal secretions and peristaltic activity. Ramosetron, a potent and selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, has been in development for use in patients suffering from diarrhea-predominant IBS. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 418 patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS-D, once-daily 5 μg and 10 μg doses of ramosetron increased the monthly responder rates of IBS symptoms compared to placebo. In a 12-week randomized controlled trial of 539 patients, a positive response to treatment was reported by 47% of a once-daily 5 μg dose of ramosetron-treated individuals compared to 27% of patients receiving placebo (P<0.001). Furthermore, the responder rate was increased in the oral administration of 5 μg of ramosetron for at least 28 weeks (up to 52 weeks), and long-term efficacy for overall improvement of IBS symptoms was also demonstrated. The rate was further increased subsequently. Adverse events were reported by 7% in ramosetron treatment. No serious adverse events, eg, severe constipation or ischemic colitis, were reported for long-term treatment with ramosetron. In conclusion, further studies to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ramosetron are warranted in the form of randomized controlled trials.

Evaluation of the pharmacological profile of ramosetron, a novel therapeutic agent for irritable bowel syndrome

We examined the pharmacological profile of ramosetron, a 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, comparing it with those of other 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, alosetron and cilansetron, and the anti-diarrheal agent loperamide. Ramosetron showed high affinity for cloned human and rat 5-HT(3) receptors, with K(i) values of 0.091 +/- 0.014 and 0.22 +/- 0.051 nmol/L, respectively, while its affinities for other receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes were negligible. Dissociation of ramosetron from the human 5-HT(3) receptor was extremely slow (t(1/2) = 560 min), while alosetron (t(1/2) = 180 min) and cilansetron (t(1/2) = 88 min) dissociated relatively rapidly. Ramosetron competitively inhibited 5-HT-induced contraction of isolated guinea-pig colon, with pA(2) values of 8.6 (8.5 - 9.0). Ramosetron given orally also dose-dependently inhibited the von Bezold-Jarisch reflex in rats, with an ED(50) value of 1.2 (0.93 - 1.6) microg/kg. In addition, oral ramosetron dose-dependently inhibited restraint stress-induced defecation in rats, with an ED(50) value of 0.62 (0.17 - 1.2) microg/kg. In all of these experiments, the potencies of ramosetron were greater than those of alosetron, cilansetron, or loperamide. These results indicate that ramosetron is a highly potent and selective 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist, with beneficial effects against stress-induced abnormal defecation in rats.

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Hydroxy Lerisetron Metabolite L6-OH in Rats: An Integrated Parent–Metabolite Model

PURPOSE

The twofold aim of this study was to characterize in vivo in rats the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of L6-OH, a metabolite of lerisetron with in vitro pharmacological activity, and evaluate the extent to which L6-OH contributes to the overall effect.

METHODS

The PK of L6-OH was determined directly postmetabolite i.v. dose (PK-1), and also simultaneously for L (lerisetron concentration) and for generated L6-OH after lerisetron dose (200 microg kg(-1), i.v.), using Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modeling with an integrated parent-metabolite PK model (PK-2). Surrogate effect was measured by inhibition of serotonin-induced bradycardia. Protein binding was assayed via ultrafiltration and all quantification was performed via liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

L6-OH showed elevated plasma and renal clearances, and volume of distribution (PK-1). The in vivo potency (PD) of L6-OH was high (EC(50) = 0.098 ng mL(-1) and EC(50unbound) = 0.040 ng mL(-1)). Total clearance for L (PK-2) in the presence of generated L6-OH (CL(L) = CL(-->L6-OH) + CL(n)) was 0.0139 L min(-1). Most of this clearance was L6-OH formation (F(c) = 99.6%), but only an 8.6% fraction of L6-OH was released into the bloodstream. The remainder undergoes biliar and fecal elimination. The parameters estimated from PK-2 were used to predict concentrations of L6-OH (Cp(L6)) generated after a lerisetron therapeutic dose (10 microg kg(-1)) in the rat. These concentrations are needed for the PD model and are below the quantification limit. Cp(L6max) was less than the EC(50) of L6-OH.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that after lerisetron administration, L6-OH is extensively formed in the rat but it is quickly eliminated; therefore, besides being equipotent with the parent drug, the L6-OH metabolite does not influence the effect of lerisetron.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effect of lerisetron, a new 5-HT3 antagonist, in rats

The pharmacokinetics of lerisetron, a novel 5HT(3) antagonist, are studied together with its efficacy in inhibiting the serotonin (5-HT)-evoked transient bradycardia reflex (von Bezold-Jarisch reflex) in Sprague Dawley rats. [(14)C]Lerisetron (50, 100, and 200 microg/kg) was given to rats by intravenous (iv) injection and plasma levels of unchanged (UL) and total (unchanged + changed, TL) drug were measured by liquid chromatography with radioactivity monitoring and scintillation counting, respectively. Linearity of UL and TL pharmacokinetics over the dose range was established by noncompartmental analysis. Protein binding of lerisetron was measured in vitro by ultrafiltration. The unbound fraction was 14.4 +/- 1.4%. A nonlinear mixed effects ("population") bicompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that volume of distribution and clearance (CL) were high for both forms of the drug, but CL was significantly smaller for TL [(mean +/- SEM) 0.014 +/- 0.03 L/min for UL versus 0.006 +/- 0.03 L/min for TL, p < 0.05)]. Large interindividual variabilities were observed for both forms. The response to lerisetron administration (inhibition of bradycardia) was evaluated at different doses (2, 3, 5, 6, and 10 microg/kg, iv) at times 2-180 min after dose administration and related to simulated concentrations. Inhibition was 100% 5 min after the 10-microg/kg dose and, 3 h later, it was still > 10%. Response to lerisetron was dose related in the range studied. Pharmacodynamic parameters were estimated by a sigmoid E(max) naive-pooled model. The parameters were also different between the two forms: EC(50) was 0.44 ng/mL (CV = 5.9%) for UL and 0.88 ng/mL (CV = 4.9%) for TL. We conclude that UL and TL pharmacokinetics were linear and that the differences in the kinetics and dynamics between the two forms suggest the presence of at least one metabolite.

Comparative study of [3H]ramosetron and [3H]granisetron binding in the cloned human 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors

Characteristics of the binding of [3H]ramosetron to cloned human 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptors were investigated and directly compared to those of [3H]granisetron binding. Saturation studies revealed that [3H]ramosetron labeled more sites with high affinity (Kd=0.15+/-0.01 nM, Bmax =653 +/- 30 fmol/mg protein) than [3H]granisetron (Kd=1.17+/-0.25 nM, Bmax=427+/-43 fmol/mg protein). Kinetic studies revealed that dissociation of [3H]ramosetron was slower than that of [3H]granisetron. These results suggest that ramosetron is a highly potent 5-HT3-receptor antagonist.

Effect of ramosetron on short-circuit current response in rat colonic mucosa

We investigated the effects of ramosetron (YM060, (-)-(R)-5-[(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)carbonyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1 H-benzimidazole monohydrochloride) on the short-circuit current (Isc) responses to 5-HT receptor agonists in the rat distal colon, and compared its potency to that of other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) concentration-dependently increased Isc. The Isc response to 5-HT was partially reduced by tetrodotoxin and ramosetron, and strongly inhibited by GR113808 ([[1-[(2-methyl-sulphonyl) amino]ethyl]-4-piperidin-yl]methyl 1-methyl-1 H-indole-3-carboxylate). 2-Methyl-5-HT and 5-methoxytryptamine also increased Isc. The former response was inhibited by ramosetron, and the latter was abolished by GR113808. Ramosetron, YM114 (KAE-393, (-)-(R)-5-[(1-indolinyl)carbonyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1 H-benzimidazole monohydrochloride) and granisetron concentration-dependently antagonized the Isc responses to 2-methyl-5-HT with reduction in the maximal response at higher concentrations. Apparent pA2 values for these antagonists were 10.40, 10.37 and 8.99, respectively. Ondansetron produced clear rightward shifts of the concentration-response curves to 2-methyl-5-HT, with a pA2 value of 8.53. These results suggest that 5-HT increases Isc through the 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors, and that ramosetron is a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist in rat colonic mucosa.

Studies on serotonin (5-HT)3-receptor antagonist effects of enantiomers of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzimidazole derivatives

We assessed the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist effects of 4,5,6,7-1H-benzimidazole compounds which are derivatives of YM060, a potent and selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, in isolated guinea pig colon. YM114 (KAE-393), YM-26103-2, YM-26308-2 (3 x 10(-9) to 3 x 10(-8) M) produced concentration-dependent shifts to the right of the dose-response curves for both 5-HT and 2-methyl-5-HT (2-Me-5-HT). YM114 (pA2 = 9.08 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.88 against 2-Me-5-HT), YM-26103-2 (pA2 = 8.27 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.19 against 2-Me-5-HT), and YM-26308-2 (pA2 = 8.58 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.4 against 2-Me-5-HT) showed similar pA2 values irrespective of the agonist used, suggesting that they have 5-HT3-receptor blocking activity irrespective of the N-position at the aromatic ring. Since these compounds have an asymmetric center, their enantiomers exist. The S-isomers were one to three orders of magnitude less potent than the respective R-isomer compounds, indicating that the stereochemical configuration of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzimidazoles is an important determinant of their affinity for 5-HT3 receptors. These results suggest that the highly potent 5-HT3 receptor antagonism and high selectivity for 5-HT3 receptors of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzimidazole derivatives are conserved irrespective of the position of the nitrogen atom in the aromatic ring and that 5-HT3 receptors favor the R-isometric conformation of these compounds.