1
|
Mein S, Wuyckens S, Li X, Both S, Carabe A, Vera MC, Engwall E, Francesco F, Graeff C, Gu W, Hong L, Inaniwa T, Janssens G, de Jong B, Li T, Liang X, Liu G, Lomax A, Mackie T, Mairani A, Mazal A, Nesteruk KP, Paganetti H, Pérez Moreno JM, Schreuder N, Soukup M, Tanaka S, Tessonnier T, Volz L, Zhao L, Ding X. Particle arc therapy: Status and potential. Radiother Oncol 2024; 199:110434. [PMID: 39009306 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
There is a rising interest in developing and utilizing arc delivery techniques with charged particle beams, e.g., proton, carbon or other ions, for clinical implementation. In this work, perspectives from the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) 2022 physics workshop on particle arc therapy are reported. This outlook provides an outline and prospective vision for the path forward to clinically deliverable proton, carbon, and other ion arc treatments. Through the collaboration among industry, academic, and clinical research and development, the scientific landscape and outlook for particle arc therapy are presented here to help our community understand the physics, radiobiology, and clinical principles. The work is presented in three main sections: (i) treatment planning, (ii) treatment delivery, and (iii) clinical outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sophie Wuyckens
- UCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Macarena Chocan Vera
- UCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Wenbo Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Liu Hong
- Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Bas de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Antony Lomax
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; ETH, Department of Physics, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Mackie
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Konrad P Nesteruk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sodai Tanaka
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Solov’yov AV, Verkhovtsev AV, Mason NJ, Amos RA, Bald I, Baldacchino G, Dromey B, Falk M, Fedor J, Gerhards L, Hausmann M, Hildenbrand G, Hrabovský M, Kadlec S, Kočišek J, Lépine F, Ming S, Nisbet A, Ricketts K, Sala L, Schlathölter T, Wheatley AEH, Solov’yov IA. Condensed Matter Systems Exposed to Radiation: Multiscale Theory, Simulations, and Experiment. Chem Rev 2024; 124:8014-8129. [PMID: 38842266 PMCID: PMC11240271 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
This roadmap reviews the new, highly interdisciplinary research field studying the behavior of condensed matter systems exposed to radiation. The Review highlights several recent advances in the field and provides a roadmap for the development of the field over the next decade. Condensed matter systems exposed to radiation can be inorganic, organic, or biological, finite or infinite, composed of different molecular species or materials, exist in different phases, and operate under different thermodynamic conditions. Many of the key phenomena related to the behavior of irradiated systems are very similar and can be understood based on the same fundamental theoretical principles and computational approaches. The multiscale nature of such phenomena requires the quantitative description of the radiation-induced effects occurring at different spatial and temporal scales, ranging from the atomic to the macroscopic, and the interlinks between such descriptions. The multiscale nature of the effects and the similarity of their manifestation in systems of different origins necessarily bring together different disciplines, such as physics, chemistry, biology, materials science, nanoscience, and biomedical research, demonstrating the numerous interlinks and commonalities between them. This research field is highly relevant to many novel and emerging technologies and medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nigel J. Mason
- School
of Physics and Astronomy, University of
Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NH, United
Kingdom
| | - Richard A. Amos
- Department
of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
| | - Ilko Bald
- Institute
of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
| | - Gérard Baldacchino
- Université
Paris-Saclay, CEA, LIDYL, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- CY Cergy Paris Université,
CEA, LIDYL, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Brendan Dromey
- Centre
for Light Matter Interactions, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Falk
- Institute
of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 61200 Brno, Czech Republic
- Kirchhoff-Institute
for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juraj Fedor
- J.
Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 3, 18223 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Gerhards
- Institute
of Physics, Carl von Ossietzky University, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Hausmann
- Kirchhoff-Institute
for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Hildenbrand
- Kirchhoff-Institute
for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty
of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences
Aschaffenburg, Würzburger
Str. 45, 63743 Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | | | - Stanislav Kadlec
- Eaton European
Innovation Center, Bořivojova
2380, 25263 Roztoky, Czech Republic
| | - Jaroslav Kočišek
- J.
Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 3, 18223 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Franck Lépine
- Université
Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière
Matière, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Siyi Ming
- Yusuf
Hamied Department of Chemistry, University
of Cambridge, Lensfield
Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- Department
of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
| | - Kate Ricketts
- Department
of Targeted Intervention, University College
London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Leo Sala
- J.
Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 3, 18223 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Thomas Schlathölter
- Zernike
Institute for Advanced Materials, University
of Groningen, Nijenborgh
4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
- University
College Groningen, University of Groningen, Hoendiepskade 23/24, 9718 BG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew E. H. Wheatley
- Yusuf
Hamied Department of Chemistry, University
of Cambridge, Lensfield
Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom
| | - Ilia A. Solov’yov
- Institute
of Physics, Carl von Ossietzky University, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stengl C, Muñoz ID, Arbes E, Rauth E, Christensen JB, Vedelago J, Runz A, Jäkel O, Seco J. Dosimetric study for breathing-induced motion effects in an abdominal pancreas phantom for carbon ion mini-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38631000 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Particle mini-beam therapy exhibits promise in sparing healthy tissue through spatial fractionation, particularly notable for heavy ions, further enhancing the already favorable differential biological effectiveness at both target and entrance regions. However, breathing-induced organ motion affects particle mini-beam irradiation schemes since the organ displacements exceed the mini-beam structure dimensions, decreasing the advantages of spatial fractionation. PURPOSE In this study, the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution was examined at the target and organs at risk(OARs) during carbon ion mini-beam irradiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS As a first step, the carbon ion mini-beam pattern was characterized with Monte Carlo simulations. To analyze the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution of a virtual pancreas tumor as target and related OARs, the anthropomorphic Pancreas Phantom for Ion beam Therapy (PPIeT) was irradiated with carbon ions. A mini-beam collimator was used to deliver a spatially fractionated dose distribution. During irradiation, varying breathing motion amplitudes were induced, ranging from 5 to 15 mm. Post-irradiation, the 2D dose pattern was analyzed, focusing on the full width at half maximum (FWHM), center-to-center distance (ctc), and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). RESULTS The mini-beam pattern was visible within OARs, while in the virtual pancreas tumor a more homogeneous dose distribution was achieved. Applied motion affected the mini-beam pattern within the kidney, one of the OARs, reducing the PVDR from 3.78 ± $\pm$ 0.12 to 1.478 ± $\pm$ 0.070 for the 15 mm motion amplitude. In the immobile OARs including the spine and the skin at the back, the PVDR did not change within 3.4% comparing reference and motion conditions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an initial understanding of how breathing-induced organ motion affects spatial fractionation during carbon ion irradiation, using an anthropomorphic phantom. A decrease in the PVDR was observed in the right kidney when breathing-induced motion was applied, potentially increasing the risk of damage to OARs. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the clinical viability of mini-beam radiotherapy with carbon ions when irradiating abdominal regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Rauth
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ma C, Zhou J, Chang CW, Wang Y, Patel PR, Yu DS, Tian S, Yang X. Streamlined pin-ridge-filter design for single-energy proton FLASH planning. Med Phys 2024; 51:2955-2966. [PMID: 38214381 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) with ultra-high dose rate has yielded promising results in reducing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Planning with single-energy proton beams modulated by ridge filters (RFs) has been demonstrated feasible for FLASH-RT. PURPOSE This study explored the feasibility of a streamlined pin-shaped RF (pin-RF) design, characterized by coarse resolution and sparsely distributed ridge pins, for single-energy proton FLASH planning. METHODS An inverse planning framework integrated within a treatment planning system was established to design streamlined pin RFs for single-energy FLASH planning. The framework involves generating a multi-energy proton beam plan using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning based on downstream energy modulation strategy (IMPT-DS), followed by a nested pencil-beam-direction-based (PBD-based) spot reduction process to iteratively reduce the total number of PBDs and energy layers along each PBD for the IMPT-DS plan. The IMPT-DS plan is then translated into the pin-RFs and the single-energy beam configurations for IMPT planning with pin-RFs (IMPT-RF). This framework was validated on three lung cases, quantifying the FLASH dose of the IMPT-RF plan using the FLASH effectiveness model. The FLASH dose was then compared to the reference dose of a conventional IMPT plan to measure the clinical benefit of the FLASH planning technique. RESULTS The IMPT-RF plans closely matched the corresponding IMPT-DS plans in high dose conformity (conformity index of <1.2), with minimal changes in V7Gy and V7.4 Gy for the lung (<3%) and small increases in maximum doses (Dmax) for other normal structures (<3.4 Gy). Comparing the FLASH doses to the doses of corresponding IMPT-RF plans, drastic reductions of up to nearly 33% were observed in Dmax for the normal structures situated in the high-to-moderate-dose regions, while negligible changes were found in Dmax for normal structures in low-dose regions. Positive clinical benefits were seen in comparing the FLASH doses to the reference doses, with notable reductions of 21.4%-33.0% in Dmax for healthy tissues in the high-dose regions. However, in the moderate-to-low-dose regions, only marginal positive or even negative clinical benefit for normal tissues were observed, such as increased lung V7Gy and V7.4 Gy (up to 17.6%). CONCLUSIONS A streamlined pin-RF design was developed and its effectiveness for single-energy proton FLASH planning was validated, revealing positive clinical benefits for the normal tissues in the high dose regions. The coarsened design of the pin-RF demonstrates potential advantages, including cost efficiency and ease of adjustability, making it a promising option for efficient production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoqiong Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chih-Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yinan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Pretesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galts A, Hammi A. FLASH radiotherapy sparing effect on the circulating lymphocytes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy: impact of hypofractionation and dose rate. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:025006. [PMID: 38081067 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad144e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Purpose. The sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy has been reported, but its potential to mitigate depletion of circulating blood and lymphocytes (CL) has not been investigated in pencil-beam scanning-based (PBS) proton therapy, which could potentially reduce the risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia.Material and methods. A time-dependent framework was used to score the dose to the CL during the course of radiotherapy. For brain patients, cerebral vasculatures were semi-automatic segmented from 3T MR-angiography data. A dynamic beam delivery system was developed capable of simulating spatially varying instantaneous dose rates of PBS treatment plans, and which is based on realistic beam delivery parameters that are available clinically. We simulated single and different hypofractionated PBS intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) FLASH schemes using 600 nA beam current along with conventionally fractionated IMPT treatment plan at 2 nA beam current. The dosimetric impact of treatment schemes on CL was quantified, and we also evaluated the depletion in subsets of CL based on their radiosensitivity.Results. The proton FLASH sparing effect on CL was observed. In single-fraction PBS FLASH, just 1.5% of peripheral blood was irradiated, whereas hypofractionated FLASH irradiated 7.3% of peripheral blood. In contrast, conventional fractionated IMPT exposed 42.4% of peripheral blood to radiation. PBS FLASH reduced the depletion rate of CL by 69.2% when compared to conventional fractionated IMPT.Conclusion. Our dosimetric blood flow model provides quantitative measures of the PBS FLASH sparing effect on the CL in radiotherapy for brain cancer. FLASH Single treatment fraction offers superior CL sparing when compared to hypofractionated FLASH and conventional IMPT, supporting assumptions about reducing risks of lymphopenia compared to proton therapy at conventional dose rates. The results also indicate that faster conformal FLASH delivery, such as passive patient-specific energy modulation, may further enhance the sparing of the immune system.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lyu ZQ, Xie YZ, Zhou Y, Cheng YH, Jiang M. Development of a compact high-current repetitive pulsed x-ray system. THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 2023; 94:103311. [PMID: 37882669 DOI: 10.1063/5.0159227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Pulsed x-rays are crucial for various applications such as radiography, biological effects, and the system-generated electromagnetic pulse effect. X rays with a higher dose rate and a higher total dose can generate more significant radiation effects and more effective radiography. However, most pulsed sub-100 keV x-ray systems with high dose rates operate in the single pulse mode with limited total dose, and most repetitive pulsed x-ray systems have a low dose rate. This paper develops a compact high-current repetitive pulsed x-ray system with a low-impedance diode to generate high dose rate pulsed x-rays with an average energy below 100 keV. A diode with a double-ring cathode is designed and tested to produce uniform pulsed x-rays. In order to investigate the x-ray intensity and the pulse number of repetitions for different anode thicknesses, five typical thicknesses are tested. The experimental results show that this system can operate stably at a repetitive rate of 0.2 Hz with a peak voltage of about 200 kV and a peak current of about 100 kA. The dose rate is about 2.4 × 105 Gy(LiF)/s, and the average x-ray energy is about 55 keV with the 40 µm thick tantalum anode. The x-ray uniformity is better than 2:1 over the measuring plane.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Qi Lyu
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yan-Zhao Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yin-Hui Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710049 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Audouin J, Hofverberg P, Ngono-Ravache Y, Desorgher L, Baldacchino G. Intermediate LET-like effect in distal part of proton Bragg peak revealed by track-ends imaging during super-Fricke radiolysis. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15460. [PMID: 37726376 PMCID: PMC10509149 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Upstream of the efficiency of proton or carbon ion beams in cancer therapy, and to optimize hadrontherapy results, we analysed the chemistry of Fricke solutions in track-end of 64-MeV protons and 1.14-GeV carbon ions. An original optical setup is designed to determine the primary track-segment yields along the last millimetres of the ion track with a sub-millimetre resolution. The Fe3+-yield falls in the Bragg peak to (4.9 ± 0.4) × 10-7 mol/J and 1.9 × 10-7 mol/J, under protons and carbon ions respectively. Beyond the Bragg peak, a yield recovery is observed over 1 mm for proton beams. It is attributed to the intermediate-LET of protons in this region where their energy decreases and energy distribution becomes broader, in relation with the longitudinal straggling of the beam. Consequently to this LET decrease in the distal part of the Bragg peak, Fe3+-yield increases. For the first time, this signature is highlighted at the chemical level under proton irradiation. Nevertheless, this phenomenon is not identified for carbon ion beams since their straggling is lower. It would need a greater spatial resolution to be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Audouin
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, LIDYL, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | | | - Y Ngono-Ravache
- CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-UNICAEN, Normandy University, Cedex 04, 14050, Caen, France
| | - L Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1007, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Baldacchino
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, LIDYL, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Masilela TAM, Prezado Y. Monte Carlo study of the free radical yields in minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:5115-5134. [PMID: 37211907 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel technique which has been shown to widen the therapeutic window through significant normal tissue sparing. Despite the heterogeneous dose distributions, tumor control is still ensured. Nevertheless the exact radiobiological mechanisms responsible for MBRT efficacy are not fully understood. PURPOSE Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from water radiolysis were investigated given their implications not only on targeted DNA damage, but also for their role in the immune response and non-targeted cell signalling effects: two potential drivers of MBRT efficacy. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations were performed using TOPAS-nBio to carry out the irradiation of a water phantom with beams of protons (pMBRT), photons (xMBRT), 4 He ions (HeMBRT), and 12 C ions (CMBRT). Primary yields at the end of the chemical stage were calculated in spheres of 20 μm diameter, located in the peaks and valleys at various depths up to the Bragg peak. The chemical stage was limited to 1 ns to approximate biological scavenging, and the yield of · OH, H2 O2 , ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ was recorded. RESULTS Beyond 10 mm, there were no substantial differences in the primary yields between peaks and valleys of the pMBRT and HeMBRT modalities. For xMBRT, there was a lower primary yield of the radical species · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ at all depths in the valleys compared to the peaks, and a higher primary yield of H2 O2 . Compared to the peaks, the valleys of the CMBRT modality were subject to a higher · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ yield, and lower H2 O2 yield. This difference between peaks and valleys became more severe in depth. Near the Bragg peak, the increase in the primary yield of the valleys over the peaks was 6% and 4% for · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ respectively, while there was a decrease in the yield of H2 O2 by 16%. Given the similar ROS primary yields in the peaks and valleys of pMBRT and HeMBRT, the level of indirect DNA damage is expected to be directly proportional to the peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR). The difference in the primary yields implicates a lower level of indirect DNA damage in the valleys compared to the peaks than what would be suggested by the PVDR for xMBRT, and a higher level for CMBRT. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the notion that depending on the particle chosen, one can expect different levels of ROS in the peaks and valley that goes beyond what would be expected by the macroscopic PVDR. The combination of MBRT with heavier ions is shown to be particularly interesting as the primary yield in the valleys progressively diverges from the level observed in the peaks as the LET increases. While differences in the reported · OH yields of this work implicated the indirect DNA damage, H2 O2 yields particularly implicate non-targeted cell signalling effects, and therefore this work provides a point of reference for future simulations in which the distribution of this species at more biologically relevant timescales could be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thongchai A M Masilela
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Averbeck D. Low-Dose Non-Targeted Effects and Mitochondrial Control. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11460. [PMID: 37511215 PMCID: PMC10380638 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-targeted effects (NTE) have been generally regarded as a low-dose ionizing radiation (IR) phenomenon. Recently, regarding long distant abscopal effects have also been observed at high doses of IR) relevant to antitumor radiation therapy. IR is inducing NTE involving intracellular and extracellular signaling, which may lead to short-ranging bystander effects and distant long-ranging extracellular signaling abscopal effects. Internal and "spontaneous" cellular stress is mostly due to metabolic oxidative stress involving mitochondrial energy production (ATP) through oxidative phosphorylation and/or anaerobic pathways accompanied by the leakage of O2- and other radicals from mitochondria during normal or increased cellular energy requirements or to mitochondrial dysfunction. Among external stressors, ionizing radiation (IR) has been shown to very rapidly perturb mitochondrial functions, leading to increased energy supply demands and to ROS/NOS production. Depending on the dose, this affects all types of cell constituents, including DNA, RNA, amino acids, proteins, and membranes, perturbing normal inner cell organization and function, and forcing cells to reorganize the intracellular metabolism and the network of organelles. The reorganization implies intracellular cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling of important proteins, activation of autophagy, and mitophagy, as well as induction of cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis, and senescence. It also includes reprogramming of mitochondrial metabolism as well as genetic and epigenetic control of the expression of genes and proteins in order to ensure cell and tissue survival. At low doses of IR, directly irradiated cells may already exert non-targeted effects (NTE) involving the release of molecular mediators, such as radicals, cytokines, DNA fragments, small RNAs, and proteins (sometimes in the form of extracellular vehicles or exosomes), which can induce damage of unirradiated neighboring bystander or distant (abscopal) cells as well as immune responses. Such non-targeted effects (NTE) are contributing to low-dose phenomena, such as hormesis, adaptive responses, low-dose hypersensitivity, and genomic instability, and they are also promoting suppression and/or activation of immune cells. All of these are parts of the main defense systems of cells and tissues, including IR-induced innate and adaptive immune responses. The present review is focused on the prominent role of mitochondria in these processes, which are determinants of cell survival and anti-tumor RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dietrich Averbeck
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology, PRISME, UMR CNRS 5822/IN2P3, IP2I, Lyon-Sud Medical School, University Lyon 1, 69921 Oullins, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tan HS, Teo KBK, Dong L, Friberg A, Koumenis C, Diffenderfer E, Zou JW. Modeling ultra-high dose rate electron and proton FLASH effect with the physicochemical approach. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/ace14d. [PMID: 37352867 PMCID: PMC10472835 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ace14d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective. A physicochemical model built on the radiochemical kinetic theory was recently proposed in (Labarbeet al2020) to explain the FLASH effect. We performed extensive simulations to scrutinize its applicability for oxygen depletion studies and FLASH-related experiments involving both proton and electron beams.Approach. Using the dose and beam delivery parameters for each FLASH experiment, we numerically solved the radiochemical rate equations comprised of a set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations to obtain the area under the curve (AUC) of radical concentrations.Main results. The modeled differences in AUC induced by ultra-high dose rates appeared to correlate well with the FLASH effect. (i) For the whole brain irradiation of mice performed in (Montay-Gruelet al2017), the threshold dose rate values for memory preservation coincided with those at which AUC started to decrease much less rapidly. (ii) For the proton pencil beam scanning FLASH of (Cunninghamet al2021), we found linear correlations between radicals' AUC and the biological endpoints: TGF-β1, leg contracture and plasma level of cytokine IL-6. (iii) Compatible with the findings of the proton FLASH experiment in (Kimet al2021), we found that radicals' AUC at the entrance and mid-Spread-Out Bragg peak regions were highly similar. In addition, our model also predicted ratios of oxygen depletionG-values between normal and UHDR irradiation similar to those observed in (Caoet al2021) and (El Khatibet al2022).Significance. Collectively, our results suggest that the normal tissue sparing conferred by UHDR irradiation may be due to the lower degree of exposure to peroxyl and superoxide radicals. We also found that the differential effect of dose rate on the radicals' AUC was less pronounced at lower initial oxygen levels, a trait that appears to align with the FLASH differential effect on normal versus tumor tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Siong Tan
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Kevin Boon Keng Teo
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Lei Dong
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Andrew Friberg
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Eric Diffenderfer
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Wei Zou
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Song H, Kim Y, Sung W. Modeling of the FLASH effect for ion beam radiation therapy. Phys Med 2023; 108:102553. [PMID: 37021608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Normal tissue sparing has been shown in preclinical studies under the ultra-fast dose rate condition, so-called FLASH radiotherapy. The preclinical and clinical FLASH studies are being conducted with various radiation modalities such as photons, protons, and heavy ions. The aim of this study is to propose a model to predict the dependency of the FLASH effect on linear energy transfer (LET) by quantifying the oxygen depletion. METHODS We develop an analytical model to examine the FLASH sparing effect by incorporating time-varying oxygen depletion equation and oxygen enhancement ratios according to LET. The variations in oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) are quantified over time with different dose rate (Gy/s) and LET (keV/μm). The FLASH sparing effect (FSE) is defined as the ratio of DFLASH/Dconv where Dconv is the reference absorbed dose delivered at the conventional dose rate, and DFLASH is the absorbed dose delivered at a high dose rate that causes the same amount of biological damage. RESULTS Our model suggests that the FLASH effect is significant only when the oxygen amount is at an intermediate level (10 ∼ 100 mmHg). The FSE is increased as LET decreases, suggesting that LET less than 100 keV/μm is required to induce FLASH sparing effects in normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS Oxygen depletion and recovery provide a quantitative model to understand the FLASH effect. These results highlight the FLASH sparing effects in normal tissue under the conditions with the intermediate oxygen level and low-LET region.
Collapse
|
12
|
Mali SB, Dahivelkar S. Flash radiotherapy-gateway to promised land or another mirage. Oral Oncol 2023; 139:106342. [PMID: 36821983 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy damages cancer cells with ionizing radiation, leading to their death. However, radiation‑induced toxicity limits the dose delivered to the tumor, thereby constraining the control effect of radiotherapy n tumor growth. In addition, the delayed toxicity caused by radiotherapy significantly harms the physical and mental health of patients. FLASH‑RT, an emerging class of radiotherapy, causes a phenomenon known as the 'FLASH effect', which delivers radiotherapy at an ultra‑high dose rate with lower toxicity to normal tissue than conventional radiotherapy to achieve local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrikant B Mali
- MDS Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir's Dental College and Hospital Nashik, India.
| | - Sachinkumar Dahivelkar
- MDS Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir's Dental College and Hospital Nashik, India.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Espinosa-Rodriguez A, Villa-Abaunza A, Díaz N, Pérez-Díaz M, Sánchez-Parcerisa D, Udías J, Ibáñez P. Design of an X-ray irradiator based on a standard imaging X-ray tube with FLASH dose-rate capabilities for preclinical research. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
14
|
The Normal, the Radiosensitive, and the Ataxic in the Era of Precision Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246252. [PMID: 36551737 PMCID: PMC9776433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. When delivering a tumoricidal dose, the risk of severe late toxicities is usually kept below 5% using dose-volume constraints. However, individual radiation sensitivity (iRS) is responsible (with other technical factors) for unexpected toxicities after exposure to a dose that induces no toxicity in the general population. Diagnosing iRS before radiotherapy could avoid unnecessary toxicities in patients with a grossly normal phenotype. Thus, we reviewed iRS diagnostic data and their impact on decision-making processes and the RT workflow; (2) Methods: following a description of radiation toxicities, we conducted a critical review of the current state of the knowledge on individual determinants of cellular/tissue radiation; (3) Results: tremendous advances in technology now allow minimally-invasive genomic, epigenetic and functional testing and a better understanding of iRS. Ongoing large translational studies implement various tests and enriched NTCP models designed to improve the prediction of toxicities. iRS testing could better support informed radiotherapy decisions for individuals with a normal phenotype who experience unusual toxicities. Ethics of medical decisions with an accurate prediction of personalized radiotherapy's risk/benefits and its health economics impact are at stake; (4) Conclusions: iRS testing represents a critical unmet need to design personalized radiotherapy protocols relying on extended NTCP models integrating iRS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang M, Wang X, Guan F, Titt U, Iga K, Jiang D, Takaoka T, Tootake S, Katayose T, Umezawa M, Schüler E, Frank S, Lin SH, Sahoo N, Koong AC, Mohan R, Zhu XR. Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35853442 PMCID: PMC9422888 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Irradiation with ultra-high dose rates (>40 Gy s−1), also known as FLASH irradiation, has the potential to shift the paradigm of radiation therapy because of its reduced toxicity to normal tissues compared to that of conventional irradiations. The goal of this study was to (1) achieve FLASH irradiation conditions suitable for pre-clinical i
n vitro and in vivo biology experiments using our synchrotron-based proton beamline and (2) commission the FLASH irradiation conditions achieved. Approach. To achieve these suitable FLASH conditions, we made a series of adaptations to our proton beamline, including modifying the spill length and size of accelerating cycles, repurposing the reference monitor for dose control, and expanding the field size with a custom double-scattering system. We performed the dosimetric commissioning with measurements using an Advanced Markus chamber and EBT-XD films as well as with Monte Carlo simulations. Main results. Through adaptations, we have successfully achieved FLASH irradiation conditions, with an average dose rate of up to 375 Gy s−1. The Advanced Markus chamber was shown to be appropriate for absolute dose calibration under our FLASH conditions with a recombination factor ranging from 1.002 to 1.006 because of the continuous nature of our synchrotron-based proton delivery within a spill. Additionally, the absolute dose measured using the Advanced Markus chamber and EBT-XD films agreed well, with average and maximum differences of 0.32% and 1.63%, respectively. We also performed a comprehensive temporal analysis for FLASH spills produced by our system, which helped us identify a unique relationship between the average dose rate and the dose in our FLASH irradiation. Significance. We have established a synchrotron-based proton FLASH irradiation platform with accurate and precise dosimetry that is suitable for pre-clinical biology experiments. The unique time structure of the FLASH irradiation produced by our synchrotron-based system may shed new light onto the mechanism behind the FLASH effect.
Collapse
|
16
|
Rahman M, Trigilio A, Franciosini G, Moeckli R, Zhang R, Böhlen TT. FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:210-221. [PMID: 35964763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rothwell B, Lowe M, Traneus E, Krieger M, Schuemann J. Treatment planning considerations for the development of FLASH proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:222-230. [PMID: 35963397 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
With increasing focus on the translation of the observed FLASH effect into clinical practice, this paper presents treatment planning considerations for its development using proton therapy. Potential requirements to induce a FLASH effect are discussed along with the properties of existing proton therapy delivery systems and the changes in planning and delivery approaches required to satisfy these prerequisites. For the exploration of treatment planning approaches for FLASH, developments in treatment planning systems are needed. Flexibility in adapting to new information will be important in such an evolving area. Variations in definitions, threshold values and assumptions can make it difficult to compare different published studies and to interpret previous studies in the context of new information. Together with the fact that much is left to be understood about the underlying mechanism behind the FLASH effect, a systematic and comprehensive approach to information storage is encouraged. Collecting and retaining more detailed information on planned and realised dose delivery as well as reporting the assumptions made in planning studies creates the potential for research to be revisited and re-evaluated in the light of future improvements in understanding. Forward thinking at the time of study development can help facilitate retrospective analysis. This, we hope, will increase the available evidence and accelerate the translation of the FLASH effect into clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Rothwell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Matthew Lowe
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Miriam Krieger
- Varian Medical Systems Particle Therapy GmbH & Co. KG, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Division of Physics, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Bourhis J, Vozenin MC, Ozsahin EM, Bochud F, Bailat C, Moeckli R. Normal tissue sparing by FLASH as a function of single fraction dose: A quantitative analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:1032-1044. [PMID: 35810988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) compared to conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiation without compromising tumor control. Understanding the magnitude of this effect and its dependency on dose are essential requirements for an optimized clinical translation of FLASH radiation therapy. In this context, we evaluated available experimental data on the magnitudes of normal tissue sparing provided by the FLASH effect as a function of dose, and followed a phenomenological data-driven approach for its parameterization. METHODS We gathered available in vivo data of the normal tissue sparing of CONV compared to UHDR single fraction doses and converted it to a common scale using isoeffect dose ratios, hereafter referred to as FLASH modifying factors (FMF). We then evaluated the suitability of a piecewise linear function with two pieces to parametrize FMF × D as a function of dose D. RESULTS We found that the magnitude of FMF generally decreases (i.e., sparing increases) as function of single fraction dose and that individual data series can be described by the piecewise linear function. The sparing magnitude appears organ specific. Pooled skin reaction data followed a consistent trend as a function of dose. Average FMF values and their standard deviations were 0.95±0.11 for all data below 10 Gy, 0.92±0.06 for mouse gut data between 10-25 Gy, and 0.96±0.07 and 0.71±0.06 for mammalian skin reaction data between 10-25 Gy and >25 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of normal tissue sparing by FLASH is increasing with dose and is dependent on the irradiated tissue. A piecewise linear function can parameterize currently available individual data series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland..
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Winter J, Dimroth A, Roetzer S, Zhang Y, Krämer KL, Petrich C, Matejcek C, Aulenbacher K, Zimmermann M, Combs SE, Galek M, Natour G, Butzek M, Wilkens JJ, Bartzsch S. Heat management of a compact x-ray source for microbeam radiotherapy and FLASH treatments. Med Phys 2022; 49:3375-3388. [PMID: 35315089 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbeam and x-ray FLASH radiation therapy are innovative concepts that promise reduced normal tissue toxicity in radiation oncology without compromising tumor control. However, currently only large third-generation synchrotrons deliver acceptable x-ray beam qualities and there is a need for compact, hospital-based radiation sources to facilitate clinical translation of these novel treatment strategies. PURPOSE We are currently setting up the first prototype of a line-focus x-ray tube (LFxT), a promising technology that may deliver ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) of more than 100Gy/s from a table-top source. The operation of the source in the heat capacity limit allows very high dose rates with micrometer-sized focal spot widths. Here, we investigate concepts of effective heat management for the LFxT, a prerequisite for the performance of the source. METHODS For different focal spot widths, we investigated the temperature increase numerically with Monte Carlo simulations and finite element analysis (FEA). We benchmarked the temperature and thermal stresses at the focal spot against a commercial x-ray tube with similar power characteristics. We assessed thermal loads at the vacuum chamber housing caused by scattering electrons in Monte Carlo simulations and FEA. Further, we discuss active cooling strategies and present a design of the rotating target. RESULTS Conventional focal spot widths led to a temperature increase dominated by heat conduction, while very narrow focal spots led to a temperature increase dominated by the heat capacity of the target material. Due to operation in the heat capacity limit, the temperature increase at the focal spot was lower than for the investigated commercial x-ray tube. Hence, the thermal stress at the focal spot of the LFxT was considered uncritical. The target shaft and the vacuum chamber housing require active cooling to withstand the high heat loads. CONCLUSIONS The heat capacity limit allows very high power densities at the focal spot of the LFxT and thus facilitates very high dose rates. Numerical simulations demonstrated that the heat load imparted by scattering electrons requires active cooling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Neuherberg, 85764, Germany.,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Anton Dimroth
- Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics (ZEA-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52425, Germany.,Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52056, Germany
| | - Sebastian Roetzer
- Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Yunzhe Zhang
- Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Karl-Ludwig Krämer
- Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Christian Petrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Neuherberg, 85764, Germany.,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Christoph Matejcek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute for Nuclear Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55099, Germany
| | - Kurt Aulenbacher
- Accelerator Design and Integrated Detectors, Helmholtz Institute Mainz, Mainz, 55099, Germany.,Institute for Nuclear Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55099, Germany.,GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, 64291, Germany
| | - Markus Zimmermann
- Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | - Marek Galek
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Applied Sciences Munich, Munich, 80335, Germany
| | - Ghaleb Natour
- Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics (ZEA-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52425, Germany.,Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52056, Germany
| | - Michael Butzek
- Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics (ZEA-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52425, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, 85748, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 81675, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moghaddasi L, Reid P, Bezak E, Marcu LG. Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3366. [PMID: 35328787 PMCID: PMC8954016 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The continuously evolving field of radiotherapy aims to devise and implement techniques that allow for greater tumour control and better sparing of critical organs. Investigations into the complexity of tumour radiobiology confirmed the high heterogeneity of tumours as being responsible for the often poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic subvolumes, a subpopulation of cancer stem cells, as well as the inherent or acquired radioresistance define tumour aggressiveness and metastatic potential, which remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-conventional irradiation techniques, such as spatially fractionated radiotherapy, have been developed to tackle some of these challenges and to offer a high therapeutic index when treating radioresistant tumours. The goal of this article was to highlight the current knowledge on the molecular and radiobiological mechanisms behind spatially fractionated radiotherapy and to present the up-to-date preclinical and clinical evidence towards the therapeutic potential of this technique involving both photon and proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyla Moghaddasi
- Department of Medical Physics, Austin Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia;
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
| | - Paul Reid
- Radiation Health, Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| | - Eva Bezak
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Loredana G. Marcu
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
- Faculty of Informatics and Science, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buchsbaum JC, Espey MG, Obcemea C, Capala J, Ahmed M, Prasanna PG, Vikram B, Hong JA, Teicher B, Aryankalayil MJ, Bylicky MA, Coleman CN. Tumor Heterogeneity Research and Innovation in Biologically Based Radiation Therapy From the National Cancer Institute Radiation Research Program Portfolio. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1861-1869. [PMID: 35245101 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Thariat J, Martel A, Matet A, Loria O, Kodjikian L, Nguyen AM, Rosier L, Herault J, Nahon-Estève S, Mathis T. Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051194. [PMID: 35267502 PMCID: PMC8909862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective. Abstract The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534—ARCHADE, Unicaen—Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Service d’Oncologie Oculaire, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Loria
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Anh-Minh Nguyen
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
| | - Laurence Rosier
- Centre Rétine Galien, Centre d’Exploration et de Traitement de la Rétine et de la Macula, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Joël Herault
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (A.M.); (S.N.-E.)
- INSERM, Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon, France; (O.L.); (L.K.); (A.-M.N.)
- UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
- Correspondence: (J.T.); (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
A new platform for ultra-high dose rate radiobiological research using the BELLA PW laser proton beamline. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1484. [PMID: 35087083 PMCID: PMC8795353 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the current standard of care for more than 50% of all cancer patients. Improvements in radiotherapy (RT) technology have increased tumor targeting and normal tissue sparing. Radiations at ultra-high dose rates required for FLASH-RT effects have sparked interest in potentially providing additional differential therapeutic benefits. We present a new experimental platform that is the first one to deliver petawatt laser-driven proton pulses of 2 MeV energy at 0.2 Hz repetition rate by means of a compact, tunable active plasma lens beamline to biological samples. Cell monolayers grown over a 10 mm diameter field were exposed to clinically relevant proton doses ranging from 7 to 35 Gy at ultra-high instantaneous dose rates of 107 Gy/s. Dose-dependent cell survival measurements of human normal and tumor cells exposed to LD protons showed significantly higher cell survival of normal-cells compared to tumor-cells for total doses of 7 Gy and higher, which was not observed to the same extent for X-ray reference irradiations at clinical dose rates. These findings provide preliminary evidence that compact LD proton sources enable a new and promising platform for investigating the physical, chemical and biological mechanisms underlying the FLASH effect.
Collapse
|
25
|
Krieger M, van de Water S, Folkerts MM, Mazal A, Fabiano S, Bizzocchi N, Weber DC, Safai S, Lomax AJ. A quantitative FLASH effectiveness model to reveal potentials and pitfalls of high dose rate proton therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:2026-2038. [PMID: 35032035 PMCID: PMC9305944 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In ultrahigh dose rate radiotherapy, the FLASH effect can lead to substantially reduced healthy tissue damage without affecting tumor control. Although many studies show promising results, the underlying biological mechanisms and the relevant delivery parameters are still largely unknown. It is unclear, particularly for scanned proton therapy, how treatment plans could be optimized to maximally exploit this protective FLASH effect. Materials and Methods To investigate the potential of pencil beam scanned proton therapy for FLASH treatments, we present a phenomenological model, which is purely based on experimentally observed phenomena such as potential dose rate and dose thresholds, and which estimates the biologically effective dose during FLASH radiotherapy based on several parameters. We applied this model to a wide variety of patient geometries and proton treatment planning scenarios, including transmission and Bragg peak plans as well as single‐ and multifield plans. Moreover, we performed a sensitivity analysis to estimate the importance of each model parameter. Results Our results showed an increased plan‐specific FLASH effect for transmission compared with Bragg peak plans (19.7% vs. 4.0%) and for single‐field compared with multifield plans (14.7% vs. 3.7%), typically at the cost of increased integral dose compared to the clinical reference plan. Similar FLASH magnitudes were found across the different treatment sites, whereas the clinical benefits with respect to the clinical reference plan varied strongly. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the threshold dose as well as the dose per fraction strongly impacted the FLASH effect, whereas the persistence time only marginally affected FLASH. An intermediate dependence of the FLASH effect on the dose rate threshold was found. Conclusions Our model provided a quantitative measure of the FLASH effect for various delivery and patient scenarios, supporting previous assumptions about potentially promising planning approaches for FLASH proton therapy. Positive clinical benefits compared to clinical plans were achieved using hypofractionated, single‐field transmission plans. The dose threshold was found to be an important factor, which may require more investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Krieger
- Varian Medical Systems Particle Therapy GmbH & Co. KG, Troisdorf, 53842, Germany.,Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland
| | - Steven van de Water
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Silvia Fabiano
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bizzocchi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
27
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
28
|
Durante M, Debus J, Loeffler JS. Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions. NATURE REVIEWS. PHYSICS 2021; 3:777-790. [PMID: 34870097 PMCID: PMC7612063 DOI: 10.1038/s42254-021-00368-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy should have low toxicity in the entrance channel (normal tissue) and be very effective in cell killing in the target region (tumour). In this regard, ions heavier than protons have both physical and radiobiological advantages over conventional X-rays. Carbon ions represent an excellent combination of physical and biological advantages. There are a dozen carbon-ion clinical centres in Europe and Asia, and more under construction or at the planning stage, including the first in the USA. Clinical results from Japan and Germany are promising, but a heated debate on the cost-effectiveness is ongoing in the clinical community, owing to the larger footprint and greater expense of heavy ion facilities compared with proton therapy centres. We review here the physical basis and the clinical data with carbon ions and the use of different ions, such as helium and oxygen. Research towards smaller and cheaper machines with more effective beam delivery is necessary to make particle therapy affordable. The potential of heavy ions has not been fully exploited in clinics and, rather than there being a single 'silver bullet', different particles and their combination can provide a breakthrough in radiotherapy treatments in specific cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
- Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jay S. Loeffler
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oxygen Depletion in Proton Spot Scanning: A Tool for Exploring the Conditions Needed for FLASH. RADIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/radiation1040024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy is a rapidly developing field which promises improved normal tissue protection compared to conventional irradiation and no compromise on tumour control. The transient hypoxic state induced by the depletion of oxygen at high dose rates provides one possible explanation. However, studies have mostly focused on uniform fields of dose and there is a lack of investigation into the spatial and temporal variation of dose from proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS). A model of oxygen reaction and diffusion in tissue has been extended to simulate proton PBS delivery and its impact on oxygen levels. This provides a tool to predict oxygen effects from various PBS treatments, and explore potential delivery strategies. Here we present a number of case applications to demonstrate the use of this tool for FLASH-related investigations. We show that levels of oxygen depletion could vary significantly across a large parameter space for PBS treatments, and highlight the need for in silico models such as this to aid in the development and optimisation of FLASH radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Rahman M, Ashraf MR, Gladstone DJ, Bruza P, Jarvis LA, Schaner PE, Cao X, Pogue BW, Hoopes PJ, Zhang R. Treatment Planning System for Electron FLASH Radiotherapy: Open-source for Clinical Implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:1023-1032. [PMID: 34762969 PMCID: PMC10386889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A Monte Carlo (MC) beam model and its implementation in a clinical treatment planning system (TPS, Varian Eclipse) are presented for a modified ultra-high dose-rate electron FLASH radiotherapy LINAC (eFLASH-RT) utilizing clinical accessories and geometry. METHODS The gantry head without scattering foils or targets, representative of the LINAC modifications, was modelled in Geant4-based GAMOS MC toolkit. The energy spectrum (σE) and beam source emittance cone angle (θcone) were varied to match the calculated open field central-axis percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral profiles with Gafchromic film measurements. The beam model and its Eclipse configuration were validated with measured profiles of the open field and nominal fields for clinical applicators. A MC forward dose calculation was conducted for a mouse whole brain treatment and an eFLASH-RT plan was compared to a conventional (Conv-RT) electron plan in Eclipse for a human patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS The eFLASH beam model agreed best with measurements at σE=0.5 MeV and θcone=3.9±0.2 degrees. The model and its Eclipse configuration were validated to clinically acceptable accuracy (the absolute average error was within 1.5% for in-water lateral, 3% for in-air lateral, and 2% for PDD's). The forward calculation showed adequate dose delivery to the entire mouse brain, while sparing the organ-at-risk (lung). The human patient case demonstrated the planning capability with routine accessories to achieve an acceptable plan (90% of the tumor volume receiving 95% and 90% of the prescribed dose for eFLASH and conventional, respectively). CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first functional beam model commissioned in a clinical TPS for eFLASH-RT, enabling planning and evaluation with minimal deviation from Conv-RT workflow. It facilitates the clinical translation as eFLASH-RT and Conv-RT plan quality were comparable for a human patient involving complex geometries and tissue heterogeneity. The methods can be expanded to model other eFLASH irradiators with different beam characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US.
| | - M Ramish Ashraf
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - David J Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US; Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Petr Bruza
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - Lesley A Jarvis
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Philip E Schaner
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Xu Cao
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - Brian W Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA; Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - P Jack Hoopes
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US; Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA; Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US; Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Averbeck D, Rodriguez-Lafrasse C. Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222011047. [PMID: 34681703 PMCID: PMC8541263 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Until recently, radiation effects have been considered to be mainly due to nuclear DNA damage and their management by repair mechanisms. However, molecular biology studies reveal that the outcomes of exposures to ionizing radiation (IR) highly depend on activation and regulation through other molecular components of organelles that determine cell survival and proliferation capacities. As typical epigenetic-regulated organelles and central power stations of cells, mitochondria play an important pivotal role in those responses. They direct cellular metabolism, energy supply and homeostasis as well as radiation-induced signaling, cell death, and immunological responses. This review is focused on how energy, dose and quality of IR affect mitochondria-dependent epigenetic and functional control at the cellular and tissue level. Low-dose radiation effects on mitochondria appear to be associated with epigenetic and non-targeted effects involved in genomic instability and adaptive responses, whereas high-dose radiation effects (>1 Gy) concern therapeutic effects of radiation and long-term outcomes involving mitochondria-mediated innate and adaptive immune responses. Both effects depend on radiation quality. For example, the increased efficacy of high linear energy transfer particle radiotherapy, e.g., C-ion radiotherapy, relies on the reduction of anastasis, enhanced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and immunogenic (antitumor) responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dietrich Averbeck
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology, PRISME, UMR CNRS 5822/IN2P3, IP2I, Lyon-Sud Medical School, University Lyon 1, 69921 Oullins, France;
- Correspondence:
| | - Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology, PRISME, UMR CNRS 5822/IN2P3, IP2I, Lyon-Sud Medical School, University Lyon 1, 69921 Oullins, France;
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Diffenderfer ES, Sørensen BS, Mazal A, Carlson DJ. The current status of preclinical proton FLASH radiation and future directions. Med Phys 2021; 49:2039-2054. [PMID: 34644403 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
We review the current status of proton FLASH experimental systems, including preclinical physical and biological results. Technological limitations on preclinical investigation of FLASH biological mechanisms and determination of clinically relevant parameters are discussed. A review of the biological data reveals no reproduced proton FLASH effect in vitro and a significant in vivo FLASH sparing effect of normal tissue toxicity observed with multiple proton FLASH irradiation systems. Importantly, multiple studies suggest little or no difference in tumor growth delay for proton FLASH when compared to conventional dose rate proton radiation. A discussion follows on future areas of development with a focus on the determination of the optimal parameters for maximizing the therapeutic ratio between tumor and normal tissue response and ultimately clinical translation of proton FLASH radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brita S Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alejandro Mazal
- Department of Medical Physics, Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A Brief Overview of the Preclinical and Clinical Radiobiology of Microbeam Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:705-712. [PMID: 34454806 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is the delivery of spatially fractionated beams that have the potential to offer significant improvements in the therapeutic ratio due to the delivery of micron-sized high dose and dose rate beams. They build on longstanding clinical experience of GRID radiotherapy and more recently lattice-based approaches. Here we briefly overview the preclinical evidence for MRT efficacy and highlight the challenges for bringing this to clinical utility. The biological mechanisms underpinning MRT efficacy are still unclear, but involve vascular, bystander, stem cell and potentially immune responses. There is probably significant overlap in the mechanisms underpinning MRT responses and FLASH radiotherapy that needs to be further defined.
Collapse
|
34
|
Evans T, Cooley J, Wagner M, Yu T, Zwart T. Demonstration of the FLASH Effect Within the Spread-out Bragg Peak After Abdominal Irradiation of Mice. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:68-75. [PMID: 35530182 PMCID: PMC9009457 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The effects of FLASH-level dose rates delivered at the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) on normal tissue damage in mice were investigated. Materials and Methods Fifty nontumor-bearing mice received abdominal irradiation, 30 at FLASH dose rates (100 Gy/s) and 20 at conventional dose rates (0.1 Gy/s). Total dose values ranged from 10 to 19 Gy, delivered in a single spot by a synchrocyclotron proton therapy system. Centered on the abdomen, the collimated field delivered was an 11-mm diameter circle with a water-equivalent depth of 2.4 cm from entrance to distal 80% dose. A ridge filter was used to provide dose uniformity over the full 2.4-cm range. The spatial distribution was identical for both the FLASH and conventional deliveries. Results Overall survival and individual mouse weights were tracked for 21 days after the exposure date, and LD50 values were compared for the FLASH and conventional dose rate groups. Mice exposed to FLASH dose rates had a higher LD50 value as compared with mice exposed to conventional dose rates, with a dose-dependent improvement in survivability of 10% to 20%. The FLASH cohort also showed greater or equal percent population survival for each day of the study. Conclusion These results are preliminary confirmation of the potential for the combination of the advantages of the Bragg peak with the normal tissue sparing benefits of FLASH treatments. This experiment also confirms that pulsed synchrocyclotrons can be used for the purpose of FLASH research and treatment.
Collapse
|
35
|
Durante M. Failla Memorial Lecture: The Many Facets of Heavy-Ion Science. Radiat Res 2021; 195:403-411. [PMID: 33979440 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00029.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Heavy ions are riveting in radiation biophysics, particularly in the areas of radiotherapy and space radiation protection. Accelerated charged particles can indeed penetrate deeply in the human body to sterilize tumors, exploiting the favorable depth-dose distribution of ions compared to conventional X rays. Conversely, the high biological effectiveness in inducing late effects presents a hazard for manned space exploration. Even after half a century of accelerator-based experiments, clinical applications and flight research, these two topics remain both fascinating and baffling. Heavy-ion therapy is very expensive, and despite the clinical success it remains controversial. Research on late radiation morbidity in spaceflight led to a reduction in uncertainty, but also pointed to new risks previously underestimated, such as possible damage to the central nervous system. Recently, heavy ions have also been used in other, unanticipated biomedical fields, such as treatment of heart arrhythmia or inactivation of viruses for vaccine development. Heavy-ion science nicely merges physics and biology and remains an extraordinary research field for the 21st century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; and Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143549. [PMID: 34298762 PMCID: PMC8303986 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To quantitatively assess target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose rate based on three proposed proton PBS dose rate metrics and study FLASH intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using transmission beams. An in-house FLASH planning platform was developed to optimize transmission (shoot-through) plans for nine consecutive lung cancer patients previously planned with proton SBRT. Dose and dose rate calculation codes were developed to quantify three types of dose rate calculation methods (dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), average dose rate (ADR), and dose-threshold dose rate (DTDR)) based on both phantom and patient treatment plans. Two different minimum MU/spot settings were used to optimize two different dose regimes, 34-Gy in one fraction and 45-Gy in three fractions. The OAR sparing and target coverage can be optimized with good uniformity (hotspot < 110% of prescription dose). ADR, accounting for the spot dwelling and scanning time, gives the lowest dose rate; DTDR, not considering this time but a dose-threshold, gives an intermediate dose rate, whereas DADR gives the highest dose rate without considering any time or dose-threshold. All three dose rates attenuate along the beam direction, and the highest dose rate regions often occur on the field edge for ADR and DTDR, whereas DADR has a better dose rate uniformity. The differences in dose rate metrics have led a large variation for OARs dose rate assessment, posing challenges to FLASH clinical implementation. This is the first attempt to study the impact of the dose rate models, and more investigations and evidence for the details of proton PBS FLASH parameters are needed to explore the correlation between FLASH efficacy and the dose rate metrics.
Collapse
|
37
|
Miles X, Vandevoorde C, Hunter A, Bolcaen J. MDM2/X Inhibitors as Radiosensitizers for Glioblastoma Targeted Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:703442. [PMID: 34307171 PMCID: PMC8296304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibition of the MDM2/X-p53 interaction is recognized as a potential anti-cancer strategy, including the treatment of glioblastoma (GB). In response to cellular stressors, such as DNA damage, the tumor suppression protein p53 is activated and responds by mediating cellular damage through DNA repair, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Hence, p53 activation plays a central role in cell survival and the effectiveness of cancer therapies. Alterations and reduced activity of p53 occur in 25-30% of primary GB tumors, but this number increases drastically to 60-70% in secondary GB. As a result, reactivating p53 is suggested as a treatment strategy, either by using targeted molecules to convert the mutant p53 back to its wild type form or by using MDM2 and MDMX (also known as MDM4) inhibitors. MDM2 down regulates p53 activity via ubiquitin-dependent degradation and is amplified or overexpressed in 14% of GB cases. Thus, suppression of MDM2 offers an opportunity for urgently needed new therapeutic interventions for GB. Numerous small molecule MDM2 inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical evaluation, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy and/or other targeted agents. In addition, considering the major role of both p53 and MDM2 in the downstream signaling response to radiation-induced DNA damage, the combination of MDM2 inhibitors with radiation may offer a valuable therapeutic radiosensitizing approach for GB therapy. This review covers the role of MDM2/X in cancer and more specifically in GB, followed by the rationale for the potential radiosensitizing effect of MDM2 inhibition. Finally, the current status of MDM2/X inhibition and p53 activation for the treatment of GB is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xanthene Miles
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alistair Hunter
- Radiobiology Section, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Julie Bolcaen
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Morris Z, Dohopolski M, Rahimi A, Timmerman R. Future Directions in the Use of SAbR for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:253-262. [PMID: 34090653 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The role of local therapy as a sole therapy or part of a combined approach in treating metastatic cancer continues to evolve. The most obvious requirements for prudent implementation of local therapies like stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) to become mainstream in treating oligometastases are (1) Clear guidance as to what particular patients might benefit, and (2) Confirmation of improvements in outcome after such treatments via clinical trials. These future directional requirements are non-negotiable. However, innovation and research offer many more opportunities to understand and improve therapy. Identifying candidates and personalizing their therapy can be afforded via proteomic, genomic and epigenomic characterization techniques. Such molecular profiling along with liquid biopsy opportunities will both help select best therapies and facilitate ongoing monitoring of response. Technologies both to find targets and help deliver less-toxic therapy continue to improve and will be available in the marketplace. These technologies include molecular-based imaging (eg, PET-PSMA), FLASH ultra-high dose rate platforms, Grid therapy, PULSAR adaptive dosing, and MRI/PET guided linear accelerators. Importantly, a treatment approach beyond oligometastastic could evolve including a rationale for using SAbR in the oligoprogressive, oligononresponsive, oligobulky and oligolethal settings as well as expansion beyond oligo- toward even plurimetastastic disease. In any case, lessons learned and experiences required by the implementation of using SAbR in oligometastatic cancer will be revisited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Asal Rahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rahman M, Ashraf MR, Zhang R, Gladstone DJ, Cao X, Williams BB, Hoopes PJ, Pogue BW, Bruza P. Spatial and temporal dosimetry of individual electron FLASH beam pulses using radioluminescence imaging. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:10.1088/1361-6560/ac0390. [PMID: 34015774 PMCID: PMC10468779 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose.In this study, spatio-temporal beam profiling for electron ultra-high dose rate (UHDR; >40 Gy s-1) radiation via Cherenkov emission and radioluminescence imaging was investigated using intensified complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor cameras.Methods.The cameras, gated to FLASH optimized linear accelerator pulses, imaged radioluminescence and Cherenkov emission incited by single pulses of a UHDR (>40 Gy s-1) 10 MeV electron beam delivered to the isocenter. Surface dosimetry was investigated via imaging Cherenkov emission or scintillation from a solid water phantom or Gd2O2S:Tb screen positioned on top of the phantom, respectively. Projected depth-dose profiles were imaged from a tank filled with water (Cherenkov emission) and a 1 g l-1quinine sulfate solution (scintillation). These optical results were compared with projected lateral dose profiles measured by Gafchromic film at different depths, including the surface.Results.The per-pulse beam output from Cherenkov imaging agreed with the photomultiplier tube Cherenkov output to within 3% after about the first five to seven ramp-up pulses. Cherenkov emission and scintillation were linear with dose (R2 = 0.987 and 0.995, respectively) and independent of dose rate from ∼50 to 300 Gy s-1(0.18-0.91 Gy/pulse). The surface dose distribution from film agreed better with scintillation than with Cherenkov emission imaging (3%/3 mm gamma pass rates of 98.9% and 88.8%, respectively). Using a 450 nm bandpass filter, the quinine sulfate-based water imaging of the projected depth optical profiles agreed with the projected film dose to within 5%.Conclusion.The agreement of surface dosimetry using scintillation screen imaging and Gafchromic film suggests it can verify the consistency of daily beam quality assurance parameters with an accuracy of around 2% or 2 mm. Cherenkov-based surface dosimetry was affected by the target's optical properties, prompting additional calibration. In projected depth-dose profiling, scintillation imaging via spectral suppression of Cherenkov emission provided the best match to film. Both camera-based imaging modalities resolved dose from single UHDR beam pulses of up to 60 Hz repetition rate and 1 mm spatial resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - M. Ramish Ashraf
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - David J. Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Xu Cao
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| | - Benjamin B. Williams
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - P. Jack Hoopes
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
- Department of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
- Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - Brian W. Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
- Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - Petr Bruza
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, US
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
First theoretical determination of relative biological effectiveness of very high energy electrons. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11242. [PMID: 34045625 PMCID: PMC8160353 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Very high energy electrons (VHEEs, E > 70 MeV) present promising clinical advantages over conventional beams due to their increased range, improved penumbra and relative insensitivity to tissue heterogeneities. They have recently garnered additional interest in their application to spatially fractionated radiotherapy or ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) therapy. However, the lack of radiobiological data limits their rapid development. This study aims to provide numerical biologically-relevant information by characterizing VHEE beams (100 and 300 MeV) against better-known beams (clinical energy electrons, photons, protons, carbon and neon ions). Their macro- and microdosimetric properties were compared, using the dose-averaged linear energy transfer ([Formula: see text]) as the macroscopic metric, and the dose-mean lineal energy [Formula: see text] and the dose-weighted lineal energy distribution, yd(y), as microscopic metrics. Finally, the modified microdosimetric kinetic model was used to calculate the respective cell survival curves and the theoretical RBE. From the macrodosimetric point of view, VHEEs presented a potential improved biological efficacy over clinical photon/electron beams due to their increased [Formula: see text]. The microdosimetric data, however, suggests no increased biological efficacy of VHEEs over clinical electron beams, resulting in RBE values of approximately 1, giving confidence to their clinical implementation. This study represents a first step to complement further radiobiological experiments.
Collapse
|
41
|
Chabi S, To THV, Leavitt R, Poglio S, Jorge PG, Jaccard M, Petersson K, Petit B, Roméo PH, Pflumio F, Vozenin MC, Uzan B. Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH and Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation Differentially Affect Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Normal Hematopoiesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:819-829. [PMID: 33075474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has been shown to minimize side effects of irradiation in various organs while keeping antitumor efficacy. This property, called the FLASH effect, has caused enthusiasm in the radiation oncology community because it opens opportunities for safe dose escalation and improved radiation therapy outcome. Here, we investigated the impact of ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH versus conventional-dose-rate (CONV) total body irradiation (TBI) on humanized models of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and normal human hematopoiesis. METHODS AND MATERIALS We optimized the geometry of irradiation to ensure reproducible and homogeneous procedures using eRT6/Oriatron. Three T-ALL patient-derived xenografts and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and CD34+ cells isolated from umbilical cord blood were transplanted into immunocompromised mice, together or separately. After reconstitution, mice received 4 Gy FLASH and CONV-TBI, and tumor growth and normal hematopoiesis were studied. A retrospective study of clinical and gene-profiling data previously obtained on the 3 T-ALL patient-derived xenografts was performed. RESULTS FLASH-TBI was more efficient than CONV-TBI in controlling the propagation of 2 cases of T-ALL, whereas the third case of T-ALL was more responsive to CONV-TBI. The 2 FLASH-sensitive cases of T-ALL had similar genetic abnormalities, and a putative susceptibility imprint to FLASH-RT was found. In addition, FLASH-TBI was able to preserve some HSPC/CD34+ cell potential. Interestingly, when HSPC and T-ALL were present in the same animals, FLASH-TBI could control tumor development in most (3 of 4) of the secondary grafted animals, whereas among the mice receiving CONV-TBI, treated cells died with high leukemia infiltration. CONCLUSIONS Compared with CONV-TBI, FLASH-TBI reduced functional damage to human blood stem cells and had a therapeutic effect on human T-ALL with a common genetic and genomic profile. The validity of the defined susceptibility imprint needs to be investigated further; however, to our knowledge, the present findings are the first to show benefits of FLASH-TBI on human hematopoiesis and leukemia treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Chabi
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Thi Hong Van To
- Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ron Leavitt
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sandrine Poglio
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Maud Jaccard
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Benoit Petit
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henri Roméo
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire de la Régulation de la Transcription dans les cellules Souches, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Françoise Pflumio
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Benjamin Uzan
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Paganetti H, Beltran C, Both S, Dong L, Flanz J, Furutani K, Grassberger C, Grosshans DR, Knopf AC, Langendijk JA, Nystrom H, Parodi K, Raaymakers BW, Richter C, Sawakuchi GO, Schippers M, Shaitelman SF, Teo BKK, Unkelbach J, Wohlfahrt P, Lomax T. Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcd16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
43
|
Mazal A, Vera Sanchez JA, Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Udias JM, España S, Sanchez-Tembleque V, Fraile LM, Bragado P, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Gordillo N, Garcia G, Castro Novais J, Perez Moreno JM, Mayorga Ortiz L, Ilundain Idoate A, Cremades Sendino M, Ares C, Miralbell R, Schreuder N. Biological and Mechanical Synergies to Deal With Proton Therapy Pitfalls: Minibeams, FLASH, Arcs, and Gantryless Rooms. Front Oncol 2021; 10:613669. [PMID: 33585238 PMCID: PMC7874206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has advantages and pitfalls comparing with photon therapy in radiation therapy. Among the limitations of protons in clinical practice we can selectively mention: uncertainties in range, lateral penumbra, deposition of higher LET outside the target, entrance dose, dose in the beam path, dose constraints in critical organs close to the target volume, organ movements and cost. In this review, we combine proposals under study to mitigate those pitfalls by using individually or in combination: (a) biological approaches of beam management in time (very high dose rate “FLASH” irradiations in the order of 100 Gy/s) and (b) modulation in space (a combination of mini-beams of millimetric extent), together with mechanical approaches such as (c) rotational techniques (optimized in partial arcs) and, in an effort to reduce cost, (d) gantry-less delivery systems. In some cases, these proposals are synergic (e.g., FLASH and minibeams), in others they are hardly compatible (mini-beam and rotation). Fixed lines have been used in pioneer centers, or for specific indications (ophthalmic, radiosurgery,…), they logically evolved to isocentric gantries. The present proposals to produce fixed lines are somewhat controversial. Rotational techniques, minibeams and FLASH in proton therapy are making their way, with an increasing degree of complexity in these three approaches, but with a high interest in the basic science and clinical communities. All of them must be proven in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Sedecal Molecular Imaging, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Udias
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel España
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Sanchez-Tembleque
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Mario Fraile
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Gordillo
- Department of Applied Physics, U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Garcia
- Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Objective Particle radiobiology has contributed new understanding of radiation safety and underlying mechanisms of action to radiation oncology for the treatment of cancer, and to planning of radiation protection for space travel. This manuscript will highlight the significance of precise physical and biologically effective dosimetry to this translational research for the benefit of human health. This review provides a brief snapshot of the evolving scientific basis for, and the complex current global status, and remaining challenges of hadron therapy for the treatment of cancer. The need for particle radiobiology for risk planning in return missions to the Moon, and exploratory deep-space missions to Mars and beyond are also discussed. Methods Key lessons learned are summarized from an impressive collective literature published by an international cadre of multidisciplinary experts in particle physics, radiation chemistry, medical physics of imaging and treatment planning, molecular, cellular, tissue radiobiology, biology of microgravity and other stressors, theoretical modeling of biophysical data, and clinical results with accelerator-produced particle beams. Results Research pioneers, many of whom were Nobel laureates, led the world in the discovery of ionizing radiations originating from the Earth and the Cosmos. Six radiation pioneers led the way to hadron therapy and the study of charged particles encountered in outer space travel. Worldwide about 250,000 patients have been treated for cancer, or other lesions such as arteriovenous malformations in the brain between 1954 and 2019 with charged particle radiotherapy, also known as hadron therapy. The majority of these patients (213,000) were treated with proton beams, but approximately 32,000 were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. There are 3500 patients who have been treated with helium, pions, neon or other ions. There are currently 82 facilities operating to provide ion beam clinical treatments. Of these, only 13 facilities located in Asia and Europe are providing carbon ion beams for preclinical, clinical, and space research. There are also numerous particle physics accelerators worldwide capable of producing ion beams for research, but not currently focused on treating patients with ion beam therapy but are potentially available for preclinical and space research. Approximately, more than 550 individuals have traveled into Lower Earth Orbit (LEO) and beyond and returned to Earth. Conclusion Charged particle therapy with controlled beams of protons and carbon ions have significantly impacted targeted cancer therapy, eradicated tumors while sparing normal tissue toxicities, and reduced human suffering. These modalities still require further optimization and technical refinements to reduce cost but should be made available to everyone in need worldwide. The exploration of our Universe in space travel poses the potential risk of exposure to uncontrolled charged particles. However, approaches to shield and provide countermeasures to these potential radiation hazards in LEO have allowed an amazing number of discoveries currently without significant life-threatening medical consequences. More basic research with components of the Galactic Cosmic Radiation field are still required to assure safety involving space radiations and combined stressors with microgravity for exploratory deep space travel. Advances in knowledge The collective knowledge garnered from the wealth of available published evidence obtained prior to particle radiation therapy, or to space flight, and the additional data gleaned from implementing both endeavors has provided many opportunities for heavy ions to promote human health.
Collapse
|
45
|
Held KD, Lomax AJ, Troost EGC. Proton therapy special feature: introductory editorial. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20209004. [PMID: 32081045 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20209004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|