The Weekend Effect in Hospitalized Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Short-term associations between precipitation and gastrointestinal illness-related hospital admissions: A multi-city study in Texas

The ongoing climate change crisis presents challenges to the global public health system. The risk of gastrointestinal illness (GI) related hospitalization increases following extreme weather events but is largely under-reported and under-investigated. This study assessed the association between precipitation and GI-related hospital admissions in four major cities in Texas. Daily data on GI-related hospital admissions and precipitation from 2004 to 2014 were captured from the Texas Department of State Health Services and the National Climate Data Center. Distributed lagged nonlinear modeling approaches were employed to examine the association between precipitation and GI-related hospital admissions. Results showed that the cumulative risk ratios (RRs) of GI-related hospital admissions were elevated in the 2 weeks following precipitation events; however, there were differences observed across study locations. The cumulative RR of GI-related hospitalizations was significantly higher when the amount of daily precipitation ranged from 3.3 mm to 13.5 mm in Dallas and from 6.0 mm to 24.5 mm in Houston. Yet, substantial increases in the cumulative RRs of GI-related hospitalizations were not observed in Austin or San Antonio. Age-specific and cause-specific GI-related hospitalizations were also found to be associated with precipitation events following the same pattern. Among them, Houston depicted the largest RR for overall GI and subgroup GI by age and cause, particularly for the overall GI among children aged 6 and under (RR = 1.35; 95 % CI = 1.11, 1.63), diarrhea-caused GI among children aged 6 and under (RR = 1.38, 95 % CI = 1.13, 1.69), and other-caused GI among children age 6 and under (RR = 1.46; 95 % CI = 1.12, 1.80). The findings underscore the need for public health interventions and adaptation strategies to address climate change-related health outcomes such as GI illness associated with extreme precipitation events.

Impact of Weekday on Short-term Surgical Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether weekday lumbar spine fusion surgery has an impact on surgical and inpatient physical therapy (PT) outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Timing of surgery has been implicated as a factor that may impact outcomes after spine surgery. Previous literature suggests that there may be an adverse effect to having surgery on the weekend.

METHODS

All patients ≥18 years who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were subdivided into an early subgroup (surgery between Monday and Wednesday) and a late subgroup (surgery between Thursday and Friday). Surgical outcome variables included inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year revisions. PT data from the first inpatient PT session included hours to PT session, AM-PAC Daily Activity or Basic Mobility scores, and total gait trial distance achieved.

RESULTS

Of the 1239 patients identified, 839 had surgery between Monday and Wednesday and 400 had surgery between Thursday and Friday. Patients in the later surgery subgroup were more likely to experience a nonsurgical neurologic complication (3.08% vs. 0.86%, P =0.008); however, there was no difference in total complications. Patients in the early surgery subgroup had their first inpatient PT session earlier than patients in the late subgroup (15.7 vs. 18.9 h, P <0.001). However, patients in the late subgroup achieved a farther total gait distance (98.2 vs. 75.4, P =0.011). Late surgery was a significant predictor of more hours of PT (est.=0.256, P =0.016) and longer length of stay (est.=2.277, P =0.001). There were no significant differences in readmission and revision rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo surgery later in the week may experience more nonsurgical neurologic complications, longer wait times for inpatient PT appointments, and longer lengths of stay. This analysis showed no adverse effect of later weekday surgery as it relates to total complications, readmissions, and reoperations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effect of admission time of arrival on quality of in-hospital care in acute ischemic stroke patients in China

OBJECTIVES

The quality of care for patients may be partly determined by the time they are admitted to the hospital. This study was conducted to explore the effect of admission time and describe the pattern and magnitude of weekly variation in the quality of patient care.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Medical Care Quality Management and Control System for Specific (Single) Diseases in China. A total of 238,122 patients treated for acute ischemic stroke between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The primary outcomes were completion of the ten process indicators and in-hospital death.

RESULTS

The quality of in-hospital care varied according to hospital arrival time. We identified several patterns of variation across the days of the week. In the first pattern, the quality of four indicators, such as stroke physicians within 15 min, was lowest for arrivals between 08:00 and 11:59, increased throughout the day, and peaked for arrivals between 20:00 and 23:59 or 00:00 and 03:59. In the second pattern, the quality of four indicators, such as the application of antiplatelet therapy within 48 h, was not significantly different between days and weeks. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the different admission times.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of admission time on the quality of in-hospital care of patients with acute ischemic stroke showed several diurnal patterns. Detecting the times when quality is relatively low may lead to quality improvements in health care. Quality improvement should also focus on reducing diurnal temporal variation.

Are heart attacks deadlier on weekends? Evidence of weekend effect in Brazil

This article aims to examine the effects of weekend admission on in-hospital mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Brazil. Information from the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (SIH/SUS) of urgently admitted patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 2008 and 2018 was used, made available through the Hospital Admission Authorization (AIH). Multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for observable patient characteristics, hospital characteristics and year and hospital-fixed effects, were used. The results were consistent with the existence of the weekend effect. For the model adjusted with the inclusion of all controls, the chance of death observed for individuals hospitalized on the weekend is 14% higher. Our results indicated that there is probably an important variation in the quality of hospital care depending on the day the patient is hospitalized. Weekend admissions were associated with in-hospital AMI mortality in Brazil. Future research should analyze the possible channels behind the weekend effect to support public policies that can effectively make healthcare equitable.

Quality and Safety in Nursing: Recommendations From a Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

As a consistent 24-hour presence in hospitals, nurses play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and safety (Q&S) of patient care. However, a comprehensive review of evidence-based recommendations to guide nursing interventions that enhance the Q&S of patient care is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our systematic review was to create evidence-based recommendations for the Q&S component of a nursing professional practice model for military hospitals. To accomplish this, a triservice military nursing team used Covidence software to conduct a systematic review of the literature across five databases. Two hundred forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. From these articles, we created 94 recommendations for practice and identified eight focus areas from the literature: (1) communication; (2) adverse events; (3) leadership; (4) patient experience; (5) quality improvement; (6) safety culture/committees; (7) staffing/workload/work environment; and (8) technology/electronic health record. These findings provide suggestions for implementing Q&S practices that could be adapted to many healthcare delivery systems.

Does Surgical Day of Week Affect Patient Outcomes and Hospital Costs Following Lumbar Fusion?

Background As the population ages, surgical intervention for degenerative spine conditions is increasing, and this causes a commiserate increase in healthcare expenditures associated with these procedures. Little research has been done on the effect of early-week versus later-week surgeries on patient outcomes, cost, and length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare LOS, patient outcomes, and hospital costs between patients having surgery early in the week and later in the week. Methods A retrospective review of 771 patients undergoing a one-, two-, or three-level lumbar fusion from December 2020 to December 2023 at a single institution was performed. Demographics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes and cost were compared between patients who had surgery on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, to those having surgery Thursday or Friday. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the groups. Results There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, race, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, number of operative levels or inpatient/outpatient status between early- and late-week surgeries. Postoperatively the only significant difference was cost, late-week surgeries were, on average, $3,697 more expensive than early-week surgeries ($26,506 vs. $22,809; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis late-week surgeries were 2.47 times more likely to have a non-home discharge (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.24 to 4.95; p=0.010) and 2.19 times more likely to have a 30-day readmission (OR: 2.19, 95% CI:1.01 to 4.74; p=0.044) Additionally, late-week surgeries were $2,041.55 (β:2,041.55, 95% CI: 804.72 to 3,278.38; p=0.001) more expensive than early-week surgeries. Conclusions At our institution, patients undergoing one- to three-level lumbar fusion surgery on Thursday or Friday had a higher risk of non-home discharge, 30-day readmission, and incurred higher cost than those having early-week surgery. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons for these findings and to evaluate interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients undergoing surgery later in the week.

Investigation of the weekend effect on perioperative complications and mortality after carotid revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes for weekend surgical interventions are associated with higher rates of mortality and complications than weekday interventions. Although prior investigations have reported the "weekend effect" for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), this association remains unclear for transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS). We investigated the weekend effect for all three carotid revascularization methods.

METHODS

We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative for patients who underwent CEA, TCAR, and TFCAS between 2016 and 2022. χ2 and logistic regression modeling analyzed outcomes including in-hospital stroke, death, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality by weekend vs weekday intervention. Backward stepwise regression was used to identify significant confounding variables and was ultimately included in each final logistic regression model. Logistic regression of outcomes was substratified by symptomatic status. Secondary multivariable analysis compared outcomes between the three revascularization methods by weekend vs weekday interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 155,962 procedures were analyzed including 103,790 CEA, 31,666 TCAR, and 20,506 TFCAS. Of these, 1988 CEA, 246 TCAR, and 820 TFCAS received weekend interventions. Logistic regression demonstrated no significant differences for TCAR and increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction for CEA (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.65) and TFCAS (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96) weekend procedures. Asymptomatic TCAR patients had nearly triple the odds of 30-day mortality (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.06-7.68, P = .038). Similarly, odds of in-hospital death were nearly tripled for asymptomatic CEA (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.30-6.43, P = .009) and asymptomatic TFCAS (OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.34-5.76, P = .006) patients. Secondary analysis demonstrated that CEA and TCAR had no significant differences for all outcomes. TFCAS was associated with increased odds of stroke and death compared with CEA and TCAR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational cohort study, we found that weekend carotid revascularization is associated with increased odds of complications and mortality. Furthermore, asymptomatic weekend patients perform worse in the CEA and TFCAS procedural groups. Among the three revascularization methods, TFCAS is associated with the highest odds of perioperative stroke and mortality. As such, our findings suggest that TFCAS procedures should be avoided over the weekend in favor of CEA or TCAR. In patients who are poor candidates for CEA, TCAR offers the lowest morbidity and mortality for weekend procedures.

Day and Time of Admission to ICU Affects Patient Outcome: An Illogical Belief?

How to cite this article: Krishna B. Day and Time of Admission to ICU Affects Patient Outcome: An Illogical Belief? Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):414-415.

Investigating the weekend effect in decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion: An observational cohort study of 460 cases (2018-2023)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if weekend surgery is associated with poorer outcomes in dogs with acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE) undergoing decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

A total of 460 consecutive cases were reviewed, with 401 dogs undergoing weekday surgery (Cohort WD), and 59 dogs undergoing weekend surgery (Cohort WE).

METHODS

Medical records of a surgical referral center in the UK were reviewed. Preoperative patient demographic and clinical data, and postoperative outcome data were collected with a minimum 28-day follow-up period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to model the odds of a negative outcome.

RESULTS

Cohort WE had a higher preoperative proportion of nonambulatory dogs (p = .0115) but there were no significant differences between the nonambulatory (p = .3762) and deep-pain negative subgroups (p = .6199). Cohort WE had a higher risk of not recovering ambulation compared to Cohort WD [79.2% vs. 91.6% recovery; adjusted OR 3.010 (95% CI: 1.259-7.190); p = .0132] and had a higher risk of postoperative morbidity [32.2% vs. 17.2%; adjusted OR 2.015 (95% CI: 1.089-3.729); p = .0257]. There were no significant differences in other outcome measures between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Weekend surgery in canine decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy may be associated with poorer patient outcomes, specifically higher postoperative morbidity and a poorer rate of recovery of ambulation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates a weekend effect in veterinary surgery, which may be important in surgical decision-making in acute thoracolumbar IVDE. Further scrutiny of the patient's journey through the veterinary healthcare system is warranted.

Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the influence of weekend admission on patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion by investigating hospital readmission outcomes and analyzing differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative factors.

METHODS

The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify adult patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend admission patients. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and discharge status data were compiled. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission. Univariate logistic regression analyzed the relationship between weekday or weekend admission and 30- or 90-day readmission, and multivariate regression determined the impact of covariates.

RESULTS

177,847 patients were identified in total, with 176,842 in the weekday cohort and 1005 in the weekend cohort. Multivariate regression analysis found that 30-day readmissions were significantly greater for the weekend cohort after adjusting for sex, age, Medicare or Medicaid status, and comorbidity status (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.60-2.48; P < .001), and 90-day readmissions were also greater for the weekend cohort after adjustment (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.68-2.40, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery who are initially admitted on weekends are more likely to experience hospital readmission. These patients have increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis, postoperative infection, and non-routine discharge status. These factors are potential areas of focus for reducing the impact of the "weekend effect" and improving outcomes for elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Association of Discharge Location Following Pediatric Tracheostomy with Social Determinants of Health: A National Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the breakdown of discharge locations among pediatric tracheostomy patients and determine the impact of demographic variables and social determinants of health.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of the 2016 and 2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (HCUP KID).

SETTING

A total of 4000 United States community hospitals, defined as short-term, non-Federal, general, and specialty hospitals.

METHODS

ICD-10-PCS, ICD-10 CM codes, and HCUP data elements were selected for patients and variables of interest. Bivariate comparisons were performed using Rao-Scott Chi-square tests; significance levels in post hoc pairwise testing were adjusted using Bonferroni adjustment. Multinomial generalized logistic regression models were used to determine the average annual odds ratio (OR) of 3 dispositions at discharge relative to discharge home for self-care.

RESULTS

Patients aged 11-17, patients from large metropolitan areas, and patients of "Other" race have an increased odds of discharge to a short- or long-term care facility (all P < .001). Weekend admissions, nonelective admissions, patients in Northeast hospitals, and patients at urban nonteaching hospitals are also more likely to be discharged to a short- or long-term care facility (all P < .001). Mean and median total costs of admission were $424,387 and $243,479, respectively, with a median total charge of $854,499.

CONCLUSION

Among pediatric tracheostomy patients, demographic factors that affect discharge disposition include age, community type, and race, and significant hospital factors include day and type of admission, geographic region, and hospital type. Hospitalizations are associated with high overall costs and charges to the patient, which are increasing over time.

Pupillary dilation velocity is reduced in intensive care unit patients with septic shock

BACKGROUND

Septic shock is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). The pathophysiology is poorly understood but prolonged sympathetic activation leading to autonomic dysfunction may be involved. Pupillary light response (PLR) is a fast, inexpensive, noninvasive way to measure autonomic nervous system function. The aim of the study was to observe dilation velocity of the PLR (PLRdil.vel. ) in patients with and without septic shock and explore whether other factors influenced the possible association. We hypothesized that the presence of septic shock in intensive care patients is associated with changes in sympathetic autonomic tone, which can be observed as changes in PLRdil.vel. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we included 91 adult patients acutely admitted to a mixed ICU. The patients were followed for the development of septic shock until ICU discharge. PLRdil.vel. was measured with a portable pupillometer two times a day. We used linear mixed models to analyze for an association between PLRdil.vel and septic shock along with several covariables.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were enrolled and of these, 35 were in septic shock. Septic shock was associated with a slowed PLRdil.vel of 0.3 mm/s (95% confidence intervals [CI -0.4; -0.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Septic shock may be associated with changes in sympathetic autonomic tone which is supported by the findings from this study that septic shock was associated with a slower dilation velocity in the pupillary light reflex. Further studies should examine if the pupillary dilation velocity may serve as surrogate marker for changes in sympathetic autonomic nervous system activity in intensive care patients in septic shock. If so, future interventional studies should test if use of the pupillary dilation velocity may be used for earlier detection of septic shock, which could mean earlier institution of treatment measures for this condition.

The dose-response effect of time between emergency admission and inpatient care on mortality

To analyse mortality associated to emergency admissions on weekends, differentiating whether the patients were admitted to the Internal Medicine department or to the hospital as a whole. Retrospective follow-up study of patients discharged between 2015 and 2019 in: (a) the Internal Medicine department (n = 7656) and (b) the hospital as a whole (n = 83,146). Logistic regression models were fitted to analyse the risk of death, adjusting for age, sex, severity, Charlson index, sepsis, pneumonia, heart failure and day of admission. Cox models were also adjusted for the time from admission until normal inpatient care. There was a significant increase in mortality for patients admitted in weekends with short stays in Internal Medicine (48, 72 and 96 h: OR = 2.50, 1.89 and 1.62, respectively), and hospital-wide (OR = 2.02, 1.41 and 1.13, respectively). The highest risk in weekends occurred on Fridays (stays ≤ 48 h: OR = 3.92 [95% CI 2.06-7.48]), being no significative on Sundays. The risk increased with the time elapsed from admission until the inpatient department took over care (OR = 5.51 [95% CI 1.42-21.40] when this time reached 4 days). In Cox models patients reached HR = 2.74 (1.00-7.54) when the delay was 4 days. Whether it was Internal Medicine or hospital-wide patients, the risk of death associated with emergency admission in WE increased with the time between admission and transfer of care to the inpatient department; consequently, Friday was the day with the highest risk while Sunday lacked a weekend effect. Healthcare systems should correct this serious problem.

Weekend Admission and Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis

Objective

Previous studies have reported the presence of a "weekend effect" with respect to mortality in serious emergency admissions, including cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the relationship between weekend hospitalization and TBI mortality has not been fully established. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of available evidence and investigate differences in mortality among TBI patients between weekday and weekend admissions.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were used to obtain relevant articles. Mortality, as the primary outcome of interest, encompassed in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Mortality rates were compared between the 2 groups, weekend and weekday admissions. Additionally, meta-regression analysis was performed on potential confounders to verify and provide comparative results.

Results

A total of 7 studies involving 522,942 TBI patients were eligible for inclusion in the synthesis of the systematic review. Of these patients, 71.6% were admitted during weekdays, whereas 28.4% were hospitalized on weekends. The overall integrated mortality was 11.0% (57,286/522,942), with a mortality rate of 10.8% in the weekday group and 11.3% in the weekend group. Pooled analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality between the weekday and weekend groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.09; p=0.78). Furthermore, the meta-regression analysis for sensitivity assessment showed no modifying effect on mortality (p=0.79).

Conclusion

This study found no difference in mortality rates between weekday and weekend admissions among TBI patients. Additional sensitivity analyses also demonstrated no significant increase in the risk of mortality in the weekend group.

Association of Hospital Mortality With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation on a Weekend: A Retrospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE

Increased mortality in patients admitted to hospitals on weekends is a well-described phenomenon labeled the "weekend effect." Studies evaluating the weekend effect in intensive care units (ICUs) have arrived at conflicting results. Identifying a weekend effect for critically-ill patients may inform clinical care pathways and resource allocation.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the association of initiation of mechanical ventilation (MV) upon admission on a weekend versus weekday with hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-surgical adult patients using the California Patient Discharge Database from 2018 to 2019. We identified MV initiated on the day of admission and diagnoses using discharge billing codes. The primary exposure was admission and initiation of MV on a weekend versus weekday and the primary outcome was hospital mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to determine the association between hospital mortality and MV initiation timing, adjusting for case-mix.

RESULTS

Among 90 288 admissions in 2018 and 2019 meeting inclusion criteria, 24 771 (27.5%) had MV initiated on weekends, while 65 517 (72.6%) had MV initiated on weekdays. Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Chronic alcohol and substance use disorders, and acute intoxications and traumas were more prevalent among patients with MV initiated on weekends. No difference in hospital mortality was observed with initiation of MV on weekends versus weekdays (23.1% vs 22.8%, ARD = 0.3%, aOR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98, 1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to prior studies, no increased mortality was observed among newly admitted patients initiated on MV on weekends compared to weekdays. While weekend effects may exist in other settings, newly admitted patients likely have MV initiated in the emergency department or ICU, which tend to have more consistent staffing levels. Further research is needed to determine if care patterns in these units could be used as a model for units where weekend effects continue to impact outcomes.

Admission on weekends does not increase mortality after hip fracture: a meta-analysis of 1.4 million patients

BACKGROUND

The "weekend" effect resulting in increased complication rates in patients admitted on weekends has been noted in many diseases.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collate adjusted data from published studies to assess if admission on weekends as compared to weekdays increases mortality rates in hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 31st December 2022 for studies comparing mortality between weekend versus weekday admission of hip fracture patients. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were pooled.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 1,487,986 patients were analyzed. Most studies were from Europe and North America. Results showed no difference in mortality rates of hip fracture patients admitted on weekends versus weekdays (HR: 1.00 95% 0.96, 1.04 I2 = 75%). There was no publication bias and results did not change on the leave-one-out analysis. Subgroup analysis based on sample size and treatment did not change outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has shown no apparent weekend effect in cases of hip fractures. Patients admitted on weekends had similar mortality rates as compared to those admitted on weekdays. Current data has high heterogeneity and is mostly from developed countries.

The Reduction of After-Hours and Weekend Effects in Upper Gastro-intestinal Bleeding Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic Compared to the Pre-Pandemic Period

Background

In upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), admissions after normal working hours and during weekends may be associated with increased mortality.

Aim

To assess the evolution of the after-hours and weekend effects during the COVID-19 pandemic as a result of progressive improved management despite management challenges during the pandemic.

Methods

We performed an observational study of patients admitted for UGIB at a tertiary academic center between March 2020 and December 2021, compared to the corresponding timeframe before the pandemic. Admissions were assessed based on regular hours versus after-hours and weekdays versus weekends. We stratified patients based on demographic data, etiology, prognostic scores, the time between symptom onset and admission, as and between admission and endoscopy. The outcomes included mortality, rebleeding rate, the requirement for surgery and transfusion, and hospitalization days.

Results

802 cases were recorded during the pandemic, and 1006 cases before the pandemic. The overall mortality rate was 12.33%. Patients admitted after hours and during weekends had a higher mortality rate compared to those admitted during regular hours and weekdays (15.18% versus 10.22%, and 15.25% versus 11.16%), especially in cases of non-variceal bleeding. However, the difference in mortality rates was reduced by 2/3 during the pandemic, despite the challenges posed by COVID-19 infection. This suggests that there was an equalization effect of care in UGIB, regardless of the admission time. The differences observed in mortality rates for after-hours and weekend admissions seem to be primarily related to a higher proportion of patients who did not undergo endoscopy, while the proportion of severe cases remained similar. Blood requirements, hospital days, and rebleeding rate were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Admissions during weekends and after-hours have been associated with increased mortality, particularly in cases of non-variceal bleeding. However, the impact of this association was significantly reduced during the pandemic.

Is there a weekend effect in spine surgery?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

The concept of a weekend effect is that patients admitted to hospitals on the weekend tend to have poorer outcomes compared to those admitted on a weekday. Whether there is a weekend effect among patients receiving spine surgery is not well described in the literature. We sought to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to explore whether a weekend effect exists among patients experiencing spinal surgery.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched for relevant articles. Meta-analyses were performed using functions available in the metafor package within the R software. We obtained adjusted odds ratios (OR) from included studies and pooled OR through an inverse variance method. A random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis and effect sizes were presented with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our search strategy identified 316 references from electronic databases and eventually 6 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled result of 5 studies reporting overall complication rate indicated significant increased risk of complications among the weekend admission group (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.80). The pooled results of 3 studies demonstrated no difference in overall mortality rates between these 2 groups of patients (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.97).

CONCLUSIONS

In spinal surgical patients, the weekend effect significantly contributes to a higher complication rate. Knowledge of potential adverse events in patients admitted on weekends is necessary for spinal surgeons and caregivers to improve patient outcomes with spinal surgery.

Clinical Outcomes according to Timing to Non Invasive Ventilation Initiation in COPD Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nighttime and non-working days are characterized by a shortage of dedicated staff and available resources. Previous studies have highlighted that patients admitted during the weekend had higher mortality than patients admitted on weekdays ("weekend effect"). However, most studies have focused on specific conditions and controversial results were reported. We conducted an observational, monocentric, retrospective cohort study, based on data collected prospectively to evaluate the impact of the timing of NIV initiation on clinical outcomes in COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). A total of 266 patients requiring NIV with a time gap between diagnosis of ARF and NIV initiation <48 h were included. Interestingly, 39% of patients were not acidotic (pH = 7.38 ± 0.09 vs. 7.26 ± 0.05, p = 0.003) at the time of NIV initiation. The rate of NIV failure (need for intubation and/or all-cause in-hospital death) was similar among three different scenarios: "daytime" vs. "nighttime", "working" vs. "non-working days", "nighttime or non-working days" vs. "working days at daytime". Patients starting NIV during nighttime had a longer gap to NIV initiation compared to daytime (219 vs. 115 min respectively, p = 0.01), but this did not influence the NIV outcome. These results suggested that in a training center for NIV management, the failure rate did not increase during the "silent" hours.

The "Weekday Effect"-Does It Impact Esophageal Cancer Surgery Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Increased 30-day mortality rates have been reported in patients undergoing elective surgery later compared with earlier in the week. However, these reports have been conflicting for esophageal surgery. We conducted a study to assess the differences in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer earlier in the week (Tuesday) versus later (Friday).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database included patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophageal resection in a tertiary cancer center between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017. We compared patients operated on Tuesdays versus Fridays. The primary outcome was a composite of major morbidity (defined as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more) and/or mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of post-operative ventilation, and length of ICU and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Among 1300 patients included, 733 were operated on a Tuesday and 567 on a Friday. Patient and surgery characteristics were similar in the two groups. The primary outcome (composite of major morbidity and mortality) was 23.6% in the Tuesday group versus 26.3% in the Friday group. Mortality was similar in the two groups (6.0%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the day of surgery was not a predictor of major morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing esophagectomy at tertiary care high volume cancer center, there was no difference in major morbidity and mortality whether the surgery was performed early in the week (Tuesday) or closer to the weekend (Friday).

Patterns and outcomes of weekend admission for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The "weekend effect" describes worse care delivery during off-hours or weekends and has been demonstrated in multiple sub-specialties. Off-hours care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, there is less data about the "weekend effect" on endovascular thrombectomy (ET) outcomes.

METHODS

We used Medicare 100% sample datasets and included all AIS admissions from 2018-2019, using validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify AIS and comorbidities. Medicare provides the date of admission for all hospitalizations, and the day of the week was determined and assigned to weekend (Saturday or Sunday) or weekday (Monday through Friday). We defined 3 major outcomes: inpatient mortality, discharge home (vs. other destination), and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 471427 AIS admissions,13.0% and 12.9% of all AIS admissions occurred on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively, less than the expected 14.3% occurring on any given day (p-value <0.0001). AIS admissions on a weekend were less likely to receive IV thrombolysis (13.6% on Saturday and 12.9% on Sunday) and ET (13.1% on Saturday and 13.2% on Sunday), p-value <0.0001. Among all AIS admissions, weekend admission was associated with worse outcomes, including higher odds of inpatient mortality (adjusted OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01-1.08, p<0.0001]), lower odds of discharge home (0.94 [0.93-0.96, p<0.0001]), and higher odds of 30-day mortality (1.06 [1.04-1.08, p<0.0001]). However, among AIS patients treated with ET, there was no association of weekend admission with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national and contemporary dataset, we observed that the proportion of thrombolysis and ET cases was less over the weekend, and outcomes (inpatient mortality, 30-day mortality and odds of discharge home) were worse overall. We did not observe this association among AIS patients undergoing ET on a weekend vs. weekday.

Burden and patient characteristics associated with repeat consultation for unscheduled care within 30 days in primary care: a retrospective case control study with implications for aging and public health

Introduction

Repeated consultations in primary care represent a significant burden on healthcare services. Characterizing the patients who repeatedly attend ambulatory care would enhance our understanding of the healthcare needs of this population, with a view to providing appropriate services. The aim of this study was therefore to identify the factors associated with repeated consultation in unscheduled care. Our secondary aim was to explore the specific profile of patients aged >65 years.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study comparing re-consultation within 30 days at a primary care facility versus non-reconsulting patients, defined as those who did not reconsult within 30 days, among patients consulting over a period of 1 year (1 January to 31 December 2019). Data was collected for a random sample of 5,059 consultations. Patients and controls were matched for age ± 5 years, and sex.

Results

The main factors associated with repeat consultation were an initial consultation late at night (midnight to 6.00 am; OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.20-1.44), and psychological disorders as the main diagnosis (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.20-1.48). Conversely, consulting at the weekend was associated with a lower likelihood of repeat consultation (OR 0.82, 95% 0.85-0.91).

Conclusion

30-day reconsultations were significantly more frequent after late night consultation. This could be used as an indicator of the quality of care to assess performance of general practice teams with implications for improving overall health of an aging population.

Weekend effect in emergency laparotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The 'weekend effect' is the term given to the observed discrepancy regarding patient care and outcomes on weekends compared to weekdays. This study aimed to determine whether the weekend effect exists within Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL), given recent advances in management of EL patients.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted across five hospitals, comparing the outcomes of weekend and weekday acute EL. A propensity-score matched analysis was used to remove potential confounding patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 487 patients included, 132 received EL over the weekend. There was no statistically significant difference between patients undergoing EL over the weekend compared to weekdays. Mortality rates were comparable between the weekday and weekend cohorts (P = 0.464).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that modern perioperative care practice in New Zealand obviates the 'weekend' effect.

Oncology mortality: weekend and summer vacation effect

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigated the effect of the weekend and summer vacation on mortality in patients with cancer.

METHODS

All patient data were obtained from their hospital registry records and the Death Notification System of the Ministry of Health.

RESULTS

The majority of patients died in the hospital compared at home, 80.8% versus 19.2%, respectively. Patients aged <65 died mostly in hospital, which was the opposite of those aged ≥65, who died at home. While tumour location and histopathological type had no effect on the place of death, patients with metastasis (including single organ metastasis), diffuse metastases (diffuse metastases: multiple organ metastases) and patients with locally advanced stage disease were found to die more frequently in the hospital. Deaths in the hospital occurred most frequently in August, while deaths at home occurred most frequently in April and October. Deaths in the hospital occurred most frequently on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, while deaths at home occurred more frequently on Monday. It was determined that the deaths in the hospital were significantly higher at the weekend.

CONCLUSION

This study contains data supporting the weekend effect in oncology patients. Moreover, it provides new data on the increased death rates in August, which coincides with the summer vacation leave month.

Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Cervical Spinal Fusion

Objective: The “weekend effect” occurs when patients cared for during weekends versus weekdays experience worse outcomes. But reasons for this effect are unclear, especially amongst patients undergoing elective cervical spinal fusion (ECSF). Our aim was to analyze whether index weekend admission affects 30- and 90-day readmission rates post-ECSF.Methods: All ECSF patients > 18 years were retrospectively identified from the 2016–2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), using unique patient linkage codes and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate logistic regression analyzed primary outcomes of 30- and 90-day readmission rates in weekday or weekend groups. Multivariate regression determined the impact of complications on readmission rates.Results: Compared to the weekday group (n = 125,590), the weekend group (n = 1,026) held a higher percentage of Medicare/Medicaid insurance, incurred higher costs, had longer length of stay, and fewer routine home discharge (all p < 0.001). There was no difference in comorbidity burden between weekend versus weekday admissions, as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.527). Weekend admissions had higher 30-day (4.30% vs. 7.60%, p < 0.001) and 90-day (7.80% vs. 16.10%, p < 0.001) readmission rates, even after adjusting for sex, age, insurance status, and comorbidities. All-cause complication rates were higher for weekend admissions (8.62% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), specifically deep vein thrombosis, infection, neurological conditions, and pulmonary embolism.Conclusion: Index weekend admission increases 30- and 90-day readmission rates after ECSF. In patients undergoing ECSF on weekends, postoperative care for patients at risk for specific complications will allow for improved outcomes and health care utilization.

The weekend effect in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a single centre experience and review

Clinical outcomes for patients admitted to hospital during weekend hours have been reported to be poorer than for those admitted during the week. Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating form of haemorrhagic stroke, with a mortality rate greater than 30%. A number of studies have reported higher mortality for patients with aSAH who are admitted during weekend hours. This study evaluates the effect of weekend admission on patients in our unit with aSAH in terms of time to treatment, treatment type, rebleeding rates, functional outcome, and mortality. We analysed a retrospective database of all patients admitted to our tertiary referral centre with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage between February 2016 and February 2020. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used to compare weekday and weekend demographic and clinical variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess for any association between admission during weekend hours and increased neurological morbidity (assessed via Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months) and mortality. Of the 571 patients included in this study, 191 were admitted during on-call weekend hours. There were no significant differences found in time to treatment, type of treatment, rebleeding rates, neurological morbidity, or mortality rates between patients admitted during the week and those admitted during weekend hours. Weekend admission was not associated with worsened functional outcome or increased mortality in this cohort. These results suggest that provision of 7-day cover by vascular neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists in high-volume centres could mitigate the weekend effect sometimes reported in the aSAH cohort.

Heart transplant offers are less likely to be accepted on weekends, holidays, and conferences

BACKGROUND

The existence of a "weekend effect" in heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied. The present study sought to determine whether the odds of (HTx) offer acceptance differed for adult and pediatric candidates depending upon the day on which the offer occurred.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing data were used to identify all HTx offers to adult (listing age ≥18) and pediatric candidates from 2000-2019. Odds of offer acceptance were studied, comparing weekends, holidays, and conferences (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS], American Association for Thoracic Surgery [AATS], International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT]) to "baseline" (all other days). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of offer nonacceptance, controlling for the impacts of program transplant volume, region, and candidate characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 323,953 offers occurred - 298,405 to adults and 25,548 to pediatric candidates. Clinically significant differences did not exist in donor or candidate characteristics between baseline or other events. The number of offers per day was stable throughout the year for both adults (p = 0.191) and pediatrics (p = 0.976). In adults, independently lower odds of acceptance existed on weekends (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]), conferences in aggregate (0.86 [0.77-0.95]), and holidays in aggregate (0.81 [0.72-0.91]). In children, independently lower odds of acceptance were seen on weekends (0.88 [0.79-0.98]), during STS (0.46 [0.25-0.83], and during Christmas (0.32 [0.14-0.76]).

CONCLUSIONS

The day on which a HTx offer occurs significantly impacts its likelihood of acceptance. Further work can determine the impacts of human behavior or resource distribution, but knowledge of this phenomenon can inform efforts to ensure ideal organ allocation throughout the year.

Mortality among acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays in Taiwan

Weekend effect has been considered to be associated with poorer quality of care and patient's survival. For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, the question of whether patients admitted during off-hours have worse outcomes as compared with patients admitted during on-hours is still inconclusive. We conducted this study to explore the weekend effect in AMI patients, using a nationwide insurance database in Taiwan. Using Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database, we designed a retrospective cohort study, and extracted 184,769 incident cases of AMI through the NHI claims database between January 2006 and December 2014. We divided the patients into weekend admission group and weekday admission group. Patients were stratified as ST elevation/non-ST elevation AMI and receiving/not receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a logistic regression model to examine the relative risk of in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality which were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry between study groups. We found no difference between weekend group and weekday group for risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 16.2%, standardized difference 0.0118) and risk of 1-year mortality (30.2% vs 30.9%, standardized difference 0.0164). There was no statistically significant difference among all the comparisons through the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for all the covariates and stratifying by the subtypes of AMI and whether or not executing PCI during hospitalization. As for AMI patients in Taiwan, admission on weekends or weekdays did not have a significant impact on either in-hospital mortality or 1-year cumulative mortality.

Associations between unit workloads and outcomes of first extubation attempts in extremely premature infants below a gestational age of 26 weeks

Objective

The objective was to explore whether high workloads in neonatal intensive care units were associated with short-term respiratory outcomes of extremely premature (EP) infants born <26 weeks of gestational age.

Methods

This was a population-based study using data from the Norwegian Neonatal Network supplemented by data extracted from the medical records of EP infants <26 weeks GA born from 2013 to 2018. To describe the unit workloads, measurements of daily patient volume and unit acuity at each NICU were used. The effect of weekend and summer holiday was also explored.

Results

We analyzed 316 first planned extubation attempts. There were no associations between unit workloads and the duration of mechanical ventilation until each infant's first extubation or the outcomes of these attempts. Additionally, there were no weekend or summer holiday effects on the outcomes explored. Workloads did not affect the causes of reintubation for infants who failed their first extubation attempt.

Conclusion

Our finding that there was no association between the organizational factors explored and short-term respiratory outcomes can be interpreted as indicating resilience in Norwegian neonatal intensive care units.

Analysis of the Weekend Effect at a High-Volume Center for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The "weekend effect" is the negative effect on disease course and treatment resulting from being admitted to the hospital during a weekend. Whether the weekend effect is associated with worse outcomes for patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is unknown. We assessed neurologic outcomes of patients with aSAH admitted during the weekend versus during the week.

METHODS

A retrospective database was reviewed to identify all patients with aSAH who received open or endovascular treatment from August 1, 2007, to July 31, 2019, at a quaternary center. The primary outcome was a poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2). Propensity adjustment included age, sex, treatment type, Hunt and Hess grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

A total of 1014 patients (women, 703 [69.3%]; men, 311 [30.7%]; mean age, 56 [standard deviation, 14]) met inclusion criteria; 726 (71.6%) had weekday admissions, and 288 (28.4%) had weekend admissions. There was no significant difference between patients with a weekday versus a weekend admission in mean (standard deviation) time to treatment (0.85 [1.29] vs. 0.93 [1.30] days, P = 0.10) or length of stay (19 [9] vs. 19 [9] days, P = 0.04). Total cost and rates of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm were similar between the admission groups, both overall and within the open and endovascular treatment cohorts. After propensity adjustment, weekend admission was not a significant predictor of a modified Rankin Scale score greater than 2 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 1.12 [0.85-1.49]; P = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

No difference in neurologic outcomes was associated with weekend admission among this cohort of patients with aSAH.

The Effect of Admission During the Weekend On In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

Background Previous studies have shown that patients with heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have worse outcomes when admitted over the weekend. Since peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a cause of CS and persisting HF, it is reasonable to extrapolate that admission over the weekend would also have deleterious effects on PPCM outcomes. However, the impact of weekend admission has not been specifically evaluated in patients with PPCM. Methods We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. The International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) codes were used to identify all admissions with a primary diagnosis of PPCM. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend groups. We performed a multivariate regression analysis to estimate the effect of weekend admission on specified outcomes. Results A total of 6,120 admissions met the selection criteria, and 25.3% (n=1,550) were admitted over the weekend. The mean age was 31.3 ± 6.4 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between study groups. After multivariate analysis, weekend admission for PPCM was not associated with in-hospital mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, thromboembolic events, cardiovascular implantable electronic device placement, and mechanical circulatory support insertion. Conclusion In conclusion, although HF and CS have been associated with worse outcomes when admitted over the weekend, we did not find weekend admission for PPCM to be independently associated with worse clinical outcomes after multivariate analysis. These findings could reflect improvement in the coordination of care over the weekend, improvement in physician handoff, and increased utilization of shock teams.

Impact of Off-Hour Admission with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis assessed the impact of off-hour hospitalization (weekends, and evenings or nighttime on weekdays) on mortality and morbidity in patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for studies comparing outcomes between patients with nontraumatic SAH hospitalized during off-hour and on-hour periods (daytime on weekdays). The primary outcome was mortality (in-hospital and at different follow-up periods after hospitalization). Secondary outcomes included delays in treatment, and complications. Sensitivity analysis including only studies in which adjusted multivariate analyses were performed for any of the outcomes, and meta-regression controlling for clinically important patient factors, were also performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.09; P = 0.30) and at all follow-up periods (7/14 days and 1/3/6 months) after hospitalization between SAH patients who were admitted during off-hour compared with on-hour periods, despite adjusted multivariate meta-analysis being performed. However, patients who were admitted during off-hour periods experienced greater delays from their initial scan to treatment (mean difference, 42.7, 25.2-60.1 hours; P < 0.0001) and had higher rates of pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.65, 1.12-2.44; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis has not shown an increased risk of mortality in the short-term and long-term among patients with nontraumatic SAH who were hospitalized during off-hour compared with on-hour periods, despite adjusting for potentially confounding patient factors. The delays to treatment and higher observed rates of pneumonia highlight areas in which hospital services and resources should be targeted during these off-hour periods in patients presenting with nontraumatic SAH.

Weekend delivery and maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies in the United States: A population-based analysis of 3-million live births

BACKGROUND

Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a "weekend effect" in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low-risk pregnancies in nationwide data.

METHODS

A population-based study of all low-risk pregnancies (in-hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5-minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3 011 577 low-risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother-newborn pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.

Effect of weekend hospitalization on the duration of fasting in patients with aspiration pneumonia

Background

Decreased swallowing function is an important risk factor for the development of aspiration pneumonia. A previous study reported that a long duration of fasting decreased swallowing function and increased mortality. The purpose of this study is to clarify the relationship between weekend hospitalization and fasting duration in older patients with aspiration pneumonia.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study using hospital claims data and electronic medical record data between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020, 238 patients hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia were enrolled. Patients admitted from Monday to Friday were defined as the weekday admission group, and patients admitted on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays were defined as the weekend admission group. The primary endpoint was the duration of fasting. Multiple regression analysis was performed with age, gender, place of living, Functional Oral Intake Scale before admission, severity of pneumonia, and weekend admission as the independent variables.

Results

There were 41 patients in the weekend admission group and 103 patients in the weekday admission group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. There was a median difference in the fasting duration of 23.3 h; the fasting duration in the weekend admission group was significantly longer than the weekday admission group by 20.03 h (95% confidence interval: 2.81-37.25) in the multiple regression analysis.

Conclusions

Weekend hospitalization was significantly associated with a longer fasting duration in patients hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia. There is a need to establish a system to enable early meal initiation for patients admitted on weekends.

Outcomes of Common General Surgery Patients Discharged Over Weekends at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Taif, Saudi Arabia

Introduction: The admission of patients on weekends in multiple health centers has been associated with poorer outcomes relative to care provided during regular weekday hours. This study aimed to assess and compare the health outcomes of patients discharged on weekends and weekdays after undergoing surgery in a tertiary hospital in Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods: The data of patients were collected from hospital records in a retrospective manner, and the outcomes were assessed after discharge. Patients discharged on Friday and Saturday were considered weekend discharges, and those discharged on other days were considered weekday discharges. Data related to readmission and emergency department (ED) visits included the primary diagnosis, number of days post-primary discharge, length of stay, chief complaint, and the number of ED visits. A logistic regression model was done to assess the predictive factor for 30-readmission after surgery. 

Results: The frequency of discharge over the weekend was 9.1%. About 6.5% and 7.3% were found to have 30-day readmission and 30-day ED visits, respectively. A statistically significant association was not observed between weekend discharge and the development of postoperative complications (p>0.05). A multinomial logistic regression showed that patients who had emergency admission, postoperative complications, and the presence of cancer were found to be independently associated with 30-day readmission after discharge (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Proactive strategies to reduce costly readmissions after surgery can be designed once the high-risk patient subset is identified.

Orthopaedic trauma on the weekend: Longer surgical wait times, and increased after-hours surgery

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic trauma does not present in a linear fashion. Fluctuations in trauma volumes, after-hours surgery and surgical wait times impact orthopaedic surgeons and patients. There is little research focussing on how surgical trauma volumes change throughout the week. This study investigated the relationship between day of the week and surgical orthopaedic trauma volumes, after-hours surgery, and wait times for orthopaedic trauma patients.

METHODS

All unscheduled surgical orthopaedic trauma cases presenting to one level I and three level IV urban adult trauma centers between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fluctuations in orthopaedic trauma volumes and amount of after-hours surgeries completed were investigated using Multivariable Poisson regression. Fluctuations in patient wait times were investigated using linear regression.

RESULTS

Weekends were associated with increased surgical wait times (8.9%, p<0.001) despite decreased surgical trauma volumes (9.1%, p<0.001). Surgical orthopaedic trauma volumes were elevated on weekdays and decreased on weekends. More after-hours surgeries were performed from Thursday to Saturday with most performed on Friday night (26.6%, p<0.001). Surgical wait times increased midweek and remained high until Saturday.

CONCLUSION

With a lack of dedicated trauma resources on the weekend, a significant increase in after-hours surgery and surgical wait times was identified following surgical volumes peaking on Thursday and Friday. We suggest adapting resource allocation to reflect surgical volumes. Dedicated weekend orthopaedic trauma resources or an adaptable schedule during increased orthopaedic trauma have the potential to ease this bottleneck, improve patient care, and decrease hospital costs.

[What about the weekend effect? Impact of the day of admission on in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost of hospitalization]

INTRODUCTION

There is no agreement on the existence of the weekend effect in healthcare or, if it exists, on its possible causes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the differences in healthcare outcomes between patients admitted on weekdays or weekends in a high-complexity hospital.

METHODS

Observational and retrospective study of patients admitted between 2016 and 2019 in a public hospital with more than 1300 beds. Hospitalization episodes were classified according to whether admission took place between Friday at 3:00 p.m. and the following Monday at 8:00 a.m. (weekend admission) or not (admission on weekdays). Mortality, length of stay and associated costs were compared, applying their respective risk-adjustment models.

RESULTS

Of the total 169,495 hospitalization episodes analyzed, 48,201 (28.44%) corresponded to the weekend, presenting an older age (54.9 years vs. 53.9; P<.001), a higher crude mortality rate (5.22% vs. 4.59%; P<0.001), and a longer average length of stay (7.42 days vs. 6.74; P<.001), than those admitted on weekdays. The median crude cost of stay was lower (€731.25 vs. €850.88; P<0.001). No significant differences were found when applying the adjustment models, with a risk-adjusted mortality ratio of 1.03 (0.99-1.08) vs. 0.98 (0.95-1.01), risk-adjusted length of stay of 1.002 (0.98-1.005) vs. 0.999 (0.997-1.002) and risk-adjusted cost of stay of 0.928 (0.865-0.994) vs. 0.901 (0.843-0.962).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study reveal that the assistance provided during the weekends does not imply worse health outcomes or increased costs. Comparing the impact between hospitals will require a future homogenization of temporal criteria and risk adjustment models.

Association Between Health System Factors and Utilization of Routine Laboratory Tests in Clinical Teaching Units: a Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have looked at health system factors associated with laboratory test use.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between health system factors and routine laboratory test use in medical inpatients.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult patients admitted to clinical teaching units over a 3-year period (January 2015 to December 2017) at three tertiary care hospitals in Calgary, Alberta.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were assigned to a Case Mix Group+ (CMG+) category based on their clinical characteristics, and patients in the top 10 CMG+ groups were included in the cohort.

EXPOSURES

The examined health system factors were (1) number of primary attending physicians seen by a patient, (2) number of attending medical teams seen by a patient, (3) structure of the medical team, and (4) day of the week.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the total number of routine laboratory tests ordered on a patient during their admission. Statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, length of stay, Charlson comorbidity index, and CMG+ group.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisting of 36,667 patient-days in hospital (mean (SD) age 62.5 (18.4) years) represented 5071 unique hospitalizations and 4324 unique patients. Routine laboratory test use was increased when patients saw multiple attending physicians; with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.37-1.55) for two attending physicians, and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.23-2.79) for three or more attending physicians compared to a single attending physician. The number of routine laboratory tests was slightly lower on weekends (IRR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and on teams without a senior resident as part of their team structure (IRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.830.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The associations observed in this study suggest that breaks in continuity of care, including increased frequency in patient transfer of care, may impact the utilization of routine laboratory tests.

Frequency and Duration of, and Risk Factors for, Diagnostic Delays Associated with Histoplasmosis

Histoplasmosis is often confused with other diseases leading to diagnostic delays. We estimated the incidence, length of, and risk factors for, diagnostic delays associated with histoplasmosis. Using data from IBM Marketscan, 2001–2017, we found all patients with a histoplasmosis diagnosis. We calculated the number of visits that occurred prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis and the number of visits with symptomatically similar diagnoses (SSDs). Next, we estimated the number of visits that represented a delay using a simulation-based approach. We also computed the number of potential opportunities for diagnosis that were missed for each patient and the length of time between the first opportunity and the diagnosis. Finally, we identified risk factors for diagnostic delays using a logistic regression model. The number of SSD-related visits increased significantly in the 97 days prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis. During this period, 97.4% of patients had a visit, and 90.1% had at least one SSD visit. We estimate that 82.9% of patients with histoplasmosis experienced at least one missed diagnostic opportunity. The average delay was 39.5 days with an average of 4.0 missed opportunities. Risk factors for diagnostic delays included prior antibiotic use, history of other pulmonary diseases, and emergency department and outpatient visits, especially during weekends. New diagnostic approaches for histoplasmosis are needed.

Relationship Between Time of Admission, Help-Seeking Behavior, and Psychiatric Outcomes: "From Dusk Till Dawn"

INTRODUCTION

Day and time of admission influence treatment outcomes and prognosis in several medical specialties; this seems related to resources' ability. It is largely unknown whether this also applies to mental health services. We investigate the relationship between time of admission, patients' demographic and clinical profile, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical profiles of admitted and discharged patients to a general psychiatric ward between January 1st, 2013 and December 31st, 2020, were analyzed. In addition, we used the last year (i.e., 2020) to monitor rehospitalization. Time of admission was defined as weekdays (working day, weekend) and dayshifts (daytime, dusk, and dawn).

RESULTS

During the study period, 12,449 patient admissions occurred. The mean age of the sample was 48.05 ± 20.90 years, with 49.32% (n = 6,140) females. Most admissions (n = 10,542, 84%) occurred on working days. Two-fifths of admissions (39.7%, n = 4,950) were compulsory, with a higher rate outside daytime hours. Patients had slight differences in the clinical profile, resulting from evaluating the different items of the Health of Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS). Patients admitted on night shifts, weekends, and holidays showed a shorter length of stay; patients compulsorily admitted during daytime (disregarding the day of the week) had a longer length of stay. All patient groups achieved a robust clinical improvement (i.e., an HoNOS score reduction of around 50%), with similar readmission rates.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of our study is the relationship between "daytime hours" and fewer compulsory admissions, a result of the interplay between demographics, clinical characteristics, and out-of-clinic service availability (such as ambulatory psychiatric- psychological praxis; day-clinic; home-treatment). The differing clinical profile, in turn, determines differences in treatment selection, with patients admitted after office hours experiencing a higher rate of coercive measures. The shorter length of stay for out-of-office admissions might result from the hospitalization as an intervention. These results should encourage the implementation of outpatient crisis-intervention services, available from dusk till dawn.

The weekend effect on mechanical thrombectomy: A nationwide analysis before and after the pivotal 2015 trials

OBJECTIVES:

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

The Weekend Effect in Septic Shock Patients Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Database

BACKGROUND

The weekend effect is the increased mortality in hospitalized patients admitted on the weekend. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of weekend admissions on septic shock patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of the 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Database. Septic shock patients were included in this study using ICD-9-CM codes. Descriptive analysis was done, in addition to bivariate analysis to compare variables based on admission day. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the association between admission day and mortality in septic shock patients after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 364,604 septic shock patients were included in this study. The average age was 67.19 years, and 51.1% were males. 73.0% of patients presented on weekdays. 32.3% of septic shock patients died during their hospital stay. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the emergency department or in-hospital mortality of septic shock patients admitted on the weekend compared with those admitted during weekdays, (OR = 1.00 [95% CI: 0.97-1.03], P value = 0.985).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality between septic shock patients admitted on the weekend or weekday. Our results are contradictory to previous studies showing an increased mortality with the weekend effect. The previous observations that have been made may not stand up with current treatment protocols.

Do hospitals have a higher mortality rate on weekend admissions? An observational study to analyse weekend effect on urgent admissions to hospitals in Catalonia

BACKGROUND

'Weekend effect' is a term used to describe the increased mortality associated with weekend emergency admissions to hospital, in contrast with admission on weekdays. The objective of the present study is to determine whether the weekend effect is present in hospitals in Catalonia.

METHODS

We analysed all urgent admissions in Catalonia in 2018, for a group of pathologies. Two groups were defined (those admitted on a weekday and those admitted on a weekend). We obtained mortality at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days, and applied a proportions test to both groups. Additionally, we used Cox's regression for mortality at 30 days, using the admission on a weekend as the exposition, adjusting by socioeconomic and clinical variables. We used the hospital discharge database and the Central Registry of the Insured Population.

RESULTS

72 427 admissions for the selected pathologies during 2018 were found. No statistically significant differences in mortality at 30 days (p=0.524) or at 15 days (p=0.119) according to the day of admission were observed. However, significant differences were found in mortality at 7 days (p=0.025) and at 3 days (p=0.002). The hazard rate associated with the weekend was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.23). By contrast, the adjusted HR of the weekend interaction with time was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a weekend effect, but it is not constant in time. This could suggest the existence of dysfunctions in the quality of care during the weekend.

Universal thermal climate index associations with mortality, hospital admissions, and road accidents in Bavaria

When meteorological conditions deviate from the optimal range for human well-being, the risks of illness, injury, and death increase, and such impacts are feared in particular with more frequent and intense extreme weather conditions resulting from climate change. Thermal indices, such as the universal thermal climate index (UTCI), can better assess human weather-related stresses by integrating multiple weather components. This paper quantifies and compares the seasonal and spatial association of UTCI with mortality, morbidity, and road accidents in the federal state of Bavaria, Germany. Linear regression was applied to seasonally associate daily 56 million hospital admissions and 2.5 million death counts (1995-2015) as well as approximately 930,000 road accidents and 1.7 million people injured (2002-2015) with spatially interpolated same day- and lagged- (up to 14 days) average UTCI values. Additional linear regressions were performed stratifying by age, gender, region, and district. UTCI effects were clear in all three health outcomes studied: Increased UTCI resulted in immediate (1-2 days) rises in morbidity and even more strongly in mortality in summer, and lagged (up to 14 days) decreases in fall, winter, and spring. The strongest UTCI effects were found for road accidents where increasing UTCI led to immediate decreases in daily road accidents in winter but pronounced increases in all other seasons. Differences in UTCI effects were observed e.g. between in warmer north-western regions (Franconia, more districts with heat stress-related mortality, but hospital admissions for lung, heart and external reasons decreasing with summer heat stress), the touristic alpine regions in the south (immediate effect of increasing UTCI on road accidents in summer), and the colder south-eastern regions (increasing hospital admissions for lung, heart and external reasons in winter with UTCI). Districts with high percentages of elderly suffered from higher morbidity and mortality, particularly in winter. The influences of UTCI as well as the spatial and temporal patterns of this influence call for improved infrastructure planning and resource allocation in the health sector.

Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in the Labor and Delivery Setting

Quality assurance (QA) is the maintenance of a desired level of quality, whereas quality improvement (QI) is the continuous process of creating systems to make things better. Implementation science promotes the systematic uptake of best practices. Bundles are a structured list of best practices whereas toolkits provide the necessary details, rationale, and implementation materials, such as sample policies and protocols. Metrics that can guide care on the labor and delivery (L&D) floor may be related to team structure (obstetric, multidisciplinary, anesthetic), processes (patient monitoring, team effects), and outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, venous thromboembolism). Multiple anesthetic quality metrics have been proposed, including the mode of anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Factors associated with potentially avoidable interhospital transfers in emergency general surgery-A call for quality improvement efforts

BACKGROUND

Emergency general surgery conditions are common, require urgent surgical evaluation, and are associated with high mortality and costs. Although appropriate interhospital transfers are critical to successful emergency general surgery care, the performance of emergency general surgery transfer systems remains unclear. We aimed to describe emergency general surgery transfer patterns and identify factors associated with potentially avoidable transfers.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of emergency general surgery episodes in 8 US states using the 2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases and the American Hospital Association Annual Surveys. We identified Emergency Department-to-Inpatient and Inpatient-to-Inpatient interhospital emergency general surgery transfers. Potentially avoidable transfers were defined as discharge within 72 hours after transfer without undergoing any procedure or operation at the destination hospital. We examined transfer incidence and characteristics. We performed multilevel regression examining patient-level and hospital-level factors associated with potentially avoidable transfers.

RESULTS

Of 514,410 adult emergency general surgery episodes, 26,281 (5.1%) involved interhospital transfers (Emergency Department-to-Inpatient: 65.0%, Inpatient-to-Inpatient: 35.1%). Over 1 in 4 transfers were potentially avoidable (7,188, 27.4%), with the majority occurring from the emergency department. Factors associated with increased odds of potentially avoidable transfers included self-pay (versus government insurance, odds ratio: 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.45, P = .002), level 1 trauma centers (versus non-trauma centers, odds ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.47, P = .01), and critical access hospitals (versus non-critical access, odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.47, P < .001). Hospital-level factors (size, trauma center, ownership, critical access, location) accounted for 36.1% of potentially avoidable transfers variability.

CONCLUSION

Over 1 in 4 emergency general surgery transfers are potentially avoidable. Understanding factors associated with potentially avoidable transfers can guide research, quality improvement, and infrastructure development to optimize emergency general surgery care.