Comparative Associations Between Measures of Anti-cholinergic Burden and Adverse Clinical Outcomes

Association of antidepressant and benzodiazepine use, and anticholinergic burden with cognitive performance in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is characterized by cognitive impairment affecting everyday functioning. Earlier research has hypothesized that antidepressants may associate with better cognitive functioning, but results are mixed. This study explored the association between antidepressant use and cognitive performance in terms of reaction time and visual learning in a clinical sample. In addition, we examined benzodiazepine use and anticholinergic burden. Study participants were drawn from the SUPER-Finland cohort, collected among patients with psychotic illnesses in 2016-2018 throughout Finland (n = 10,410). The analysis included adults with a schizophrenia diagnosis (F20) and results from a cognitive assessment (n = 3365). Information about medications and psychosocial factors were gathered through questionnaire and interview. Cognitive performance was assessed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) with two subtests measuring reaction time and visual learning. Almost 36 % of participants used at least one antidepressant. The use of antidepressants in general was not associated with performance in the reaction time and visual learning tasks. However, the use of SNRI antidepressants was associated with a faster reaction time. Benzodiazepine use and a higher anticholinergic burden were associated with poorer performance in both tests. The results strengthen earlier findings that there is no association between antidepressant use in general and cognitive performance in schizophrenia. However, the association of SNRI medications with a faster reaction time warrants further research. Moreover, the results suggest that more attention should be paid to the anticholinergic burden of the medications used by patients with schizophrenia, as well as avoiding continuous benzodiazepine use.

The effect of the anticholinergic burden on mortality following elective cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

The cumulative effect of drugs with anticholinergic properties may pose a significant risk in the post-discharge period of patients who have undergone elective cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between anticholinergic burden and 6-month postdischarge mortality in older cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

This study performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery at a tertiary care centre from January 2021 to January 2022. The Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index (D-CCI) was used to estimate the burden of comorbidities. The anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (ACB) and Drug Burden Index (DBI) scale. All-cause postdischarge mortality was determined from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 255 older adults who had undergone elective cardiac surgery and had been followed up for at least 6 months were included in this study. Approximately 12.5% (n = 32) of older patients died within 6 months of discharge. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ACB (HR:1.31, 95%CI:1.10-1.56 p = 0.01) and DBI (HR:2.08, 95%CI:1.27-3.39 p = 0.01) showed significantly increased risk of 6-month postdischarge mortality after adjusting for several possible confounders (age, gender, D-CCl, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score). Overall event-free survival differed significantly between patients undergoing cardiac surgery based on anticholinergic burden according to the group-stratified ACB and DBI scales (χ2: 5.907, log-rank test, p = 0.015 and χ2: 15.389, log-rank test, p < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The anticholinergic burden is associated with 6-month all-cause post-discharge mortality in older cardiac surgery patients. A deprescribing approach should be considered, especially for older adults in the perioperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05312684 Registered on 5 April 2022.

Dementia and comorbidities in primary care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

People with dementia (PwD) are known to have more chronic conditions compared to those without dementia, which can impact the clinical presentation of dementia, complicate clinical management and reduce overall quality of life. While primary care providers (PCPs) are integral to dementia care, it is currently unclear how PCPs adapt dementia care practices to account for comorbidities. This scoping review maps recent literature that describes the role for PCPs in the prevention, detection/diagnosis and management of dementia in the context of comorbidities, identifies critical knowledge gaps and proposes potential avenues for future research.

METHODS

We searched for peer-reviewed literature published between 2017-2022 in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using key terms related to dementia, primary care, and comorbidity. The literature was screened for relevance by title-abstract screening and subsequent full-text screening. The prioritized papers were categorized as either 'Risk Assessment and Prevention', 'Screening, Detection, and Diagnosis' or 'Management' and were further labelled as either 'Tools and Technologies', 'Recommendations for Clinical Practice' or 'Programs and Initiatives'.

RESULTS

We identified 1,058 unique records in our search and respectively excluded 800 and 230 publications during title-abstract and full-text screening. Twenty-eight articles were included in our review, where ~ 50% describe the development and testing of tools and technologies that use pre-existing conditions to assess dementia risk. Only one publication provides official dementia screening guidelines for PCPs in people with pre-existing conditions. About 30% of the articles discuss managing the care of PwD, where most were anchored around models of multidisciplinary care and mitigating potentially inappropriate prescribing.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review that examines the role for PCPs in the prevention, detection/diagnosis and management of dementia in the context of comorbidities. Given our findings, we recommend that future studies: 1) further validate tools for risk assessment, timely detection and diagnosis that incorporate other health conditions; 2) provide additional guidance into how comorbidities could impact dementia care (including prescribing medication) in primary care settings; 3) incorporate comorbidities into primary care quality indicators for dementia; and 4) explore how to best incorporate dementia and comorbidities into models/frameworks of holistic, person-centred care.

Medication overload: A closer look at polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications among older people in Taiwan and Japan

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) are widely recognized as vital quality indicators of pharmacotherapy in older adults. As Taiwan and Japan grapple with the ongoing challenges of population aging, obtaining an accurate understanding of the prevalence of these indicators is crucial for developing effective strategies to optimize pharmacotherapy in older populations. The present study aims to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs in Taiwan and two Japanese cohorts, shedding light on the similarities and differences in prescribing practices across these populations.

METHODS

This study employed a cross-sectional design to investigate individuals aged ≥65 years in Taiwan, as well as two Japanese cohorts: Japan Cohort 1 (dispensing data from chain pharmacies; year 2014 and 2019) and Japan Cohort 2 (claims data; year 2017 and 2019). The prescription records of these participants were collected from the national claims database in Taiwan for the years 2014, 2017, and 2019. To identify polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy, the study defined the use of 5-9 and 10+ drugs, respectively. Furthermore, the study identified PIMs based on the STOPP-J criteria. Notably, the study further explored the most frequently used PIMs (by categories) in Taiwan.

RESULTS

In the year 2019, the prevalence of polypharmacy exhibited similar rates in Taiwan (35.4%) and Japan Cohort 2 (33.1%), while surpassing that of Japan Cohort 1 (25.6%). Nonetheless, the incidence of PIMs in Taiwan was the highest (66.5%), exceeding those of the two Japanese cohorts (Cohort 1: 43.7% and Cohort 2: 40.2%) in the same year. Notably, the top three categories of commonly used PIMs in Taiwan comprised non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antithrombotic drugs, and benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the varying prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs between Taiwan and Japan, but emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts towards optimizing pharmacotherapy in older adults.

Association of anticholinergic drug exposure with the risk of dementia among older adults in Japan: The LIFE Study

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have investigated that anticholinergic drugs cause cognitive impairment. However, the risk of dementia associated with anticholinergics has not been extensively investigated in the super-aging society of Japan. We conducted this study to assess the association between anticholinergic drugs and the risk of dementia in older adults in Japan.

METHODS

This nested case-control study used data from the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence Study, which includes claim data in Japan from 2014 to 2020. We included 66,478 cases of diagnosed dementia and 328,919 matched controls aged ≥65 years, matched by age, sex, municipality, and cohort entry year. Primary exposure was the total cumulative anticholinergic drugs prescribed from cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, which was the total standardized daily doses for each patient, calculated by adding the total dose of different types of anticholinergic drugs in each prescription, divided by the World Health Organization-defined daily dose values. Odds ratios for dementia associated with cumulative exposure to anticholinergic drugs were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) age at index date was 84.3 (6.9), and the percentage of women was 62.1%. From cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, 18.8% of the case patients and 13.7% of the controls were prescribed at least one anticholinergic drug. In the multivariable-adjusted model, individuals with anticholinergic drugs prescribed had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with dementia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50 [95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.54]). Among specific types of anticholinergic drugs, a significant increase in risk was observed with the use of antidepressants, antiparkinsonian drugs, antipsychotics, and bladder antimuscarinics in a fully multivariable-adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

Several types of anticholinergic drugs used by older adults in Japan are associated with an increased risk of dementia. These findings suggest that the underlying risks should be considered alongside the benefits of prescribing anticholinergic drugs to this population.

Anticholinergic Burden and Cognitive Impairment in Nursing Homes: A Comparison of Four Anticholinergic Scales

BACKGROUND

Medications with anticholinergic effects are commonly used in nursing homes, and their cumulative effect is of particular concern for the risk of adverse effects on cognition.

OBJECTIVE

The relation between cognitive function and anticholinergic burden measured with four scales, the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) Scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, the German Anticholinergic Burden Scale, and the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale, is assessed according to the hypothesis that a higher anticholinergic burden is associated with reduced cognitive performance.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in a sample of Italian long-term-care nursing homes (NH). Sociodemographic details, diagnosis, and drug treatments of each NH resident were collected using medical records four times during 2018 and 2019. Cognitive status was rated with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The prevalence of anticholinergic use and its burden were calculated referring to the last time point for each patient. A longitudinal analysis was done on NH residents with at least two MMSE between 2018 and 2019 to assess the relation between the anticholinergic load and decline in MMSE. The relationship between drug-related anticholinergic burden and cognitive performance was analyzed using Poisson regression model theory. Multivariate analyses were adjusted according to the known risk factors of reduced cognitive performance available [age, sex, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and number of non-anticholinergic drugs] and for cholinesterase inhibitors. In view of the high number of subjects with an MMSE score = 0 among residents with dementia, for this group a zero-inflated Poisson regression model was used to give more consistent results. The association of anticholinergic burden with mortality was examined from each patient's last visit using a multivariate logistic model adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

RESULTS

Among 1412 residents recruited, a clear direct relationship was found between higher anticholinergic burden and cognitive impairment only for the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale. Residents taking an anticholinergic who scored 5 or more had 2.5 points more decline than those not taking them (p < 0.001). Among residents without dementia there was a trend toward direct relationship for the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale. Residents with higher scores had about 2 points more decline than residents not taking anticholinergic drugs. No relation was found between anticholinergic burden and cognitive decline or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative effect of medications with modest antimuscarinic activity may influence the cognitive performance of NH residents. The anticholinergic burden measured with the ACB scale should help identify NH residents who may benefit from reducing the anticholinergic burden. A clear direct relationship between anticholinergic burden and cognitive impairment was found only for the ACB Scale.

Frequency and Clinical Impact of Anticholinergic Burden in older patients: Comparing older patients with and without chronic kidney disease

AIM

This study aimed to determine the frequency and impact of anticholinergic burden in older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and compare the results to older adults without CKD.

METHOD

Age- and sex-matched older adults (age ≥60) were selected from a total cohort of 1557 subjects, and grouped as CKD (n = 589) and Non-CKD (n = 589). Groups were compared for the frequency, type of anticholinergic agents, and their effects on comprehensive geriatric assessment parameters. The anticholinergic burden was assessed using the anticholinergic burden (ACB) scale. An ACB of ≥2 was categorized as high anticholinergic burden.

RESULTS

The mean age of the partients was 81±6, and 66% were female. More patients in the CKD group experienced a high anticholinergic burden (45%, versus 38%, p = 0.015). Patients with CKD were more likely to receive beta blocker (25% versus 19%, p = 0.018), diuretic (19% versus 6%, p<0.001), while those who did not have CKD were more likely to be treated with dopaminergic agents (8% versus 12%, p = 0.039). A high anticholinergic burden was associated with sarcopenia (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.38, p = 0.015), geriatric depression scale (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02-2.20, p = 0.037), and polypharmacy (OR 4.05, 95% CI 2.38-6.90, p<0.001), after adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities in the CKD group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with CKD are more likely to be exposed to drugs with anticholinergic effects, but have less clinical implications than those without CKD. A high anticholinergic burden is associated with polypharmacy, depression and sarcopenia in CKD.

Using Hypothesis-Led Machine Learning and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to Identify Disease Pathways Prior to Dementia: Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Dementia development is a complex process in which the occurrence and sequential relationships of different diseases or conditions may construct specific patterns leading to incident dementia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify patterns of disease or symptom clusters and their sequences prior to incident dementia using a novel approach incorporating machine learning methods.

METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, data from 15,700 older people with dementia and 15,700 nondementia controls matched on age, sex, and index year (n=10,466, 67% for the training data set and n=5234, 33% for the testing data set) were retrieved for analysis. Using machine learning methods to capture specific hierarchical disease triplet clusters prior to dementia, we designed a study algorithm with four steps: (1) data preprocessing, (2) disease or symptom pathway selection, (3) model construction and optimization, and (4) data visualization.

RESULTS

Among 15,700 identified older people with dementia, 10,466 and 5234 subjects were randomly assigned to the training and testing data sets, and 6215 hierarchical disease triplet clusters with positive correlations with dementia onset were identified. We subsequently generated 19,438 features to construct prediction models, and the model with the best performance was support vector machine (SVM) with the by-group LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression method (total corresponding features=2513; accuracy=0.615; sensitivity=0.607; specificity=0.622; positive predictive value=0.612; negative predictive value=0.619; area under the curve=0.639). In total, this study captured 49 hierarchical disease triplet clusters related to dementia development, and the most characteristic patterns leading to incident dementia started with cardiovascular conditions (mainly hypertension), cerebrovascular disease, mobility disorders, or infections, followed by neuropsychiatric conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dementia development in the real world is an intricate process involving various diseases or conditions, their co-occurrence, and sequential relationships. Using a machine learning approach, we identified 49 hierarchical disease triplet clusters with leading roles (cardio- or cerebrovascular disease) and supporting roles (mental conditions, locomotion difficulties, infections, and nonspecific neurological conditions) in dementia development. Further studies using data from other countries are needed to validate the prediction algorithms for dementia development, allowing the development of comprehensive strategies to prevent or care for dementia in the real world.

Implementation and evaluation of STOPP/START criteria to address polypharmacy in older adults in an inpatient psychiatric setting

Background

There is a scarcity of research in applying the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria to older adults admitted to a psychiatric hospital.

Objectives

The primary aim of this study was to determine the extent of polypharmacy in older adults admitted to a psychiatric hospital and to assess the number of STOPP/START triggers detected and recommended by pharmacists. Secondary objectives include evaluating if the STOPP/START criteria is a useful tool to improve prescribing in this setting by assessing the implementation rates of STOPP/START triggers.

Methods

This was a prospective, longitudinal study in a psychiatry inpatient setting. Data were collected over a 7-week period. Explicit informed consent was obtained from participants. Medication reconciliation was completed and participants' medications were reviewed using STOPP/START criteria. The number of STOPP/START triggers detected, recommended and implemented was recorded.

Results

Sixty-two patients were included in the study. Ninety-four percent were prescribed ≥5 medications and 55% were prescribed ≥10 medications on admission. The mean number of medications prescribed per patient increased from 10 on admission to 12 at follow-up. Of 174 Potential Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) detected, 41% were recommended for review and, of these only 31% were implemented. 27% of the 77 Potential Prescribing Omissions (PPOs) detected were recommended for review and only 23% of those were implemented.

Conclusion

STOPP/START did not reduce the prevalence of polypharmacy in this setting. The implementation rates observed in this study were much lower than those observed in non-psychiatric settings.

Polypharmacy and medicine regimens in older adults in residential aged care

OBJECTIVE

To describe medicines regimens used by older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study presents baseline data from a randomised controlled trial in seventeen Australian RACFs that recruited residents aged 65 years and older at the participating facilities. The main outcome measures were to evaluation of medicines utilisation, including the number of medicines, medicine regimen complexity, potential under-prescribing and high-risk prescribing (prescribing cascades, anticholinergic or sedative medicines or other potentially inappropriate medicines) with data analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Medicines regimens were analysed for 303 residents (76% female) with a mean age of 85.0 ± 7.5 years, of whom the majority were living with dementia (72%). Residents were prescribed an average of 10.3 ± 4.5 regular medicines daily. Most participants (85%) had highly complex regimens. Most residents (92%) were exposed to polypharmacy (five or more medicines). Nearly all, 302 (98%) residents had at least one marker of potentially suboptimal prescribing. At least one instance of potential under-prescribing was identified in 86% of residents. At least one instance of high-risk prescribing was identified in 81% of residents including 16% of participants with at least one potential prescribing cascade.

CONCLUSION(S)

Potentially suboptimal prescribing affected almost all residents in this study, and most had highly complex medicines regimens. If generalisable, these findings indicate most older people in RACFs may be at risk of medicines-related harm from suboptimal prescribing, in addition to the burden of administration of complex medicines regimens for facility staff and residents.

The association of potentially inappropriate medications, polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden with readmission and emergency room revisit after discharge: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study

AIMS

While certain drug-use indicators are known to be associated with clinical outcomes, the relationship is unclear for some highly prevalent conditions in in patients aged ≥65 years. We examine correlations between 3 drug-use indicators and postdischarge healthcare services use by older patients according to the presence of dementia, advanced age and frailty.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed data collected from hospital electronic health records between April and December 2017. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and anticholinergic burden were assessed using the 2015 Beers Criteria and anticholinergic cognitive burden scale (ACBS) score. Minor and major polypharmacy were defined as the use of 5-9 and ≥10 drugs, respectively. Outcomes were set as emergency room revisits and readmissions at 1, 3 and 6 months postdischarge. The correlation between drug-use indicators and outcomes was analysed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 3061 patients for the analysis, and 2930, 2671 and 2560 patients were followed up to 1, 3 and 6 months after discharge. After controlling for confounders, all 3 drug-use indicators were significantly associated with readmission and emergency room revisits except for the relationship between PIMs and readmission within 6 months. These associations were significantly observed among patients without dementia, aged >80 years and with frailty.

CONCLUSION

PIMs, polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden are common at discharge and correlate with future use of healthcare services. In older patients, the absence of dementia, advanced age and frailty should be given extra consideration with regard to medication safety.

Anticholinergic Medication Burden in Parkinson's Disease Outpatients

BACKGROUND

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) may be especially vulnerable to future cognitive decline from anticholinergic medications.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize anticholinergic medication burden, determine the co-occurrence of anticholinergic and cholinesterase inhibitors, and to assess the correlations among anticholinergic burden scales in PD outpatients.

METHODS

We studied 670 PD outpatients enrolled in a clinic registry between 2012 and 2020. Anticholinergic burden was measured with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Drug Burden Index-Anticholinergic component (DBI-Ach). Correlations between scales were assessed with weighted kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Between 31.5 to 46.3% of PD patients were taking medications with anticholinergic properties. Among the scales applied, the ACB produced the highest prevalence of medications with anticholinergic properties (46.3%). Considering only medications with definite anticholinergic activity (scores of 2 or 3 on ACB, ADS, or ARS), the most common anticholinergic drug classes were antiparkinsonian (8.2%), antipsychotic (6.4%), and urological (3.3%) medications. Cholinesterase inhibitors and medications with anticholinergic properties were co-prescribed to 5.4% of the total cohort. The most highly correlated scales were ACB and ADS (κ= 0.71), ACB and ARS (κ= 0.67), and ADS and ARS (κ= 0.55).

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of PD patients (20%) were either taking antiparkinsonian, urological, or antipsychotic anticholinergic medications or were co-prescribed anticholinergic medications and cholinesterase inhibitors. By virtue of its detection of a high prevalence of anticholinergic medication usage and its high correlation with other scales, our data support use of the ACB scale to assess anticholinergic burden in PD patients.

Association of anticholinergic burden with undernutrition in older adults: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available concerning the contribution of drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAPs) to undernutrition among older adults. This study aimed to determine the potential association of anticholinergic burden (ACB) to nutrition status in older people.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled participants aged over 65 who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment between January 2017 and June 2020. Nutrition status was assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). The ACB was assessed using the ACB scale.

RESULTS

A total of 615 participants were included in the analysis (mean age ± SD, 78.5 ± 6.6 years; male, 55.3%). The prevalence of undernutrition (MNA-SF score <12) was 22.6% (n = 139). Participants with undernutrition were predominantly older (P < 0.001), had lower mean body mass index scores (undernutrition, 27.3 ± 5.4 vs healthy, 29.5 ± 8.0; P = 0.007), had a lower educational level (P = 0.016), had higher cardiovascular disease morbidity (P < 0.001), and had a higher ACB (P < 0.001) when compared with those with normal nutrition status. In adjusted analysis, the odds of having undernutrition were higher among participants with an ACB score >1 (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43; P = 0.044). The weighted multivariate linear regression analysis showed a significant inverse association between the total ACB score and MNA-SF score controlling for multiple confounders.

CONCLUSION

ACB appears to be inversely correlated with nutrition status among older adults. Undernutrition may be considered an additional reason to consider deprescribing DAPs in this population.

Intrinsic Capacity Impairment Patterns and their Associations with Unfavorable Medication Utilization: A Nationwide Population-Based Study of 37,993 Community-Dwelling Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to explore the patterns of intrinsic capacity (IC) impairments among community-dwelling older adults and the associations of these different patterns with excessive polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and adverse drug reactions in a nationwide population-based study.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study included older adults from the Taiwan Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) program in 2020.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study subjects comprised 38,308 adults aged 65 years and older who participated in the ICOPE Step 1 screening and assessed six domains of IC following the World Health Organization (WHO) ICOPE approach.

METHODS

Latent class analysis was adopted to identify distinct subgroups with different IC impairments patterns. The associations between different IC impairments patterns and unfavorable medication utilization, including excess polypharmacy (EPP), potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), were assessed by multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Latent class analysis identified five distinct subgroups with different IC impairment patterns: robust (latent class prevalence: 59.4%), visual impairment (17.7%), physio-cognitive decline (PCD) with sensory impairment (12.3%), depression with cognitive impairment (7.7%), and impairments in all domains (2.9%). Compared to the robust group, all other groups were at higher odds for unfavorable medication utilization. The "depression with cognitive impairment" group (EPP: aOR=4.35, 95% CI 3.52-5.39, p<0.01; PIMs: aOR=2.73, 95% CI 2.46-3.02, p<0.01) and the "impairment in all domains" group (EPP: aOR=9.02, 95% CI 7.16-11.37, p<0.01; PIMs: aOR=3.75, 95% CI 3.24-4.34, p<0.01) remained at higher odds for EPP and PIMs after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified five distinct impairment patterns of IC, and each impairment pattern, particularly the "depression with cognitive impairment" and "impairment in all domains", was associated with higher odds of EPP and PIMs. Further longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to explore long-term outcomes of different impairment pattern and their reversibility.

The Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Anticholinergic Burden in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Overactive Bladder in the US

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent condition commonly treated with anticholinergic medications. The extent to which anticholinergic burden is associated with costs and healthcare resource use (HCRU) in the long-stay nursing home (LSNH) setting is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This research evaluated the impact of anticholinergic burden on HCRU and related costs among LSNH residents with OAB.

METHODS

This was a cohort study based on 2013-2015 Minimum Data Set-linked Medicare claims data involving LSNH residents aged ≥ 65 years with OAB and having Parts A, B and D coverage 6 months pre- and ≥ 12 months post-nursing home admission date (index date). Cumulative anticholinergic burden was determined using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale and defined daily dose. Direct medical costs related to HCRU were examined. HCRU included inpatient, outpatient, emergency room (ER), and physician office visits. Costs and HCRU associated with levels of anticholinergic burden were evaluated using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

A total of 123,308 LSNH residents with OAB were included in this study. Most residents (87.2%) had some level (12.8%, none; 18.0%, low; 41.9%, moderate; and 27.3%, high) of cumulative anticholinergic burden. Results indicate that all types of resource utilization were higher among those with any level of anticholinergic burden than those with no burden. The outpatient, ER, and physician costs tended to be higher with increasing anticholinergic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs and HCRU patterns reflected increasing trends with anticholinergic burden. Targeted efforts towards reducing anticholinergic burden among LSNH residents with OAB may result in decreases in costs and HCRU.

Quantifying Anticholinergic Burden and Sedative Load in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review of Risk Scales and Models

BACKGROUND

Patients taking medication with high anticholinergic and sedative properties are at increased risk of experiencing poor cognitive and physical outcomes. Therefore, precise quantification of the cumulative burden of their drug regimen is advisable. There is no agreement regarding which scale to use to simultaneously quantify the burden associated with medications.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the strengths and limitations of available tools to quantify medication-related anticholinergic burden and sedative load in older adults. We discuss specific limitations and agreements between currently available scales and models and propose a comprehensive table combining drugs categorized as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic or sedative activity as excerpted from the selected studies.

METHODS

A targeted search was carried out using the National Library of Medicine through PubMed using medical subject heading terms and text words around the following search terms: (anticholinergic OR sedative) AND (load OR burden OR scale) for studies published between 1 January 1945 and 5 June 2021. In addition, the following databases were searched using the same terms: MEDLINE-EBSCO, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, OAIster, OVID-MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Screening by titles was followed by an abstract and full-text review. After blind evaluation, agreement between reviewers was reached to establish drug characteristics and categories.

RESULTS

After 3163 articles were identified, 13 were included: 11 assigned risk scores to anticholinergic drugs and two to sedative drugs. Considerable variability between anticholinergic scales was observed; scales included between 27 and 548 drugs. We generated a comprehensive table combining the anticholinergic and sedative activities of drugs evaluated and proposed a categorization of these drugs based on available scientific and clinical evidence. Our table combines information about 642 drugs and categorizes 44, 25, 99, and 474 drugs as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic and sedative activity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability and inconsistency exists among scales used to categorize drugs with anticholinergic or sedative burden. In this review, we provide a comprehensive table that proposes a new categorization of these drugs. A longitudinal study will be required to validate the new proposed anticholinergic and sedative burden catalog in an evidence-based manner.

A meta-analysis of observational studies on anticholinergic burden and fracture risk: evaluation of conventional burden scales

Background

Anticholinergic burden potentially increases the risk of fracture. Although there are various anticholinergic burden scales, little is known about the inter-scale compatibility regarding the relationship of anticholinergic burden with fracture risk. We performed meta-analysis to examine the association of fracture risk with anticholinergic burden measured using various scales.

Methods

Primary literature was retrieved from PubMed (1966 to March, 2021), the Cochrane Library (1974 to March, 2021), Scopus (1970 to March, 2021), and Ichushi-web (1983 to March, 2021). Cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the association between any fracture and anticholinergic drugs were included. Additionally, we included studies in which patients were administered anticholinergic drugs included on the anticholinergic risk scale (ARS), anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB), anticholinergic drug scale, or drug burden index-anticholinergic component. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) due to heterogeneity among the studies. Publication bias was examined by funnel plots and the Begg’s test.

Results

A total of 49 datasets from 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Six of the 10 studies included only patients aged over 65 years, who accounted for 93% of the total study population (453,186/487,247). Meta-analysis indicated a positive relationship between use of anticholinergic drugs and fracture risk, regardless of the anticholinergic burden scale used. However, the relationship between anticholinergic burden and fracture risk varied depending on the scale used. Fracture risk increased linearly with increasing anticholinergic burden measured using ARS. ARS 1 point was associated with 28% increase in fracture risk, ARS 1–2 point(s) with 39%, ARS 2 points with 54%, ARS 3 points with 66%, and ARS ≥ 4 points with 77%. On the other hand, ACB 1 point and ACB 2 points were associated with similar fracture risk (pooled RR [95% CI]: overall; 1.28 [1.18–1.39], 1 point; 1.12 [1.06–1.18], 2 points; 1.15 [1.08–1.23]).

Conclusions

This result suggests that the relationship between anticholinergic drug burden and fracture risk may differ depending on the anticholinergic burden scale used.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-021-00213-y.

Anticholinergic burden: First comprehensive analysis using claims data shows large variation by age and sex

Purpose

The cumulative effect of medication inhibiting acetylcholine activity—also known as anticholinergic burden (AB)—can lead to functional and cognitive decline, falls, and death. Given that studies on the population prevalence of AB are rare, we aimed to describe it in a large and unselected population sample.

Methods

Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) with claims data from ~20% of the German population we analyzed outpatient drug dispensations in 2016. Based on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, we classified persons into four categories and determined the cumulative AB as continuous variable.

Results

Among 16,470,946 persons (54% female), the prevalence of clinically relevant AB (ACB≥3) was 10% (women) and 7% (men). Below age 40 it was highest in persons ≤18 years (6% both sexes). At older ages (50–59 vs. 90–99 years), prevalence of ACB≥3 increased from 7% to 26% (men) and from 10% to 32% (women). Medication classes contributing to the cumulative AB differed by age: antihistamines, antibiotics, glucocorticoids (≤19 years), antidepressants (20–49 years), antidepressants, cardiovascular medication, antidiabetics (50–64 years), and additionally medication for urinary incontinence/overactive bladder (≥65 years). Medication dispensed by general physicians contributed most to the cumulative AB.

Conclusion

Although a clinically relevant AB is particularly common in older persons, prevalence in younger age groups was up to 7%. Given the risks associated with AB in older persons, targeted interventions at the prescriber level are needed. Furthermore, risks associated with AB in younger persons should be explored.

Anticholinergic burden (prognostic factor) for prediction of dementia or cognitive decline in older adults with no known cognitive syndrome

BACKGROUND

Medications with anticholinergic properties are commonly prescribed to older adults. The cumulative anticholinergic effect of all the medications a person takes is referred to as the 'anticholinergic burden' because of its potential to cause adverse effects. It is possible that high anticholinergic burden may be a risk factor for development of cognitive decline or dementia. There are various scales available to measure anticholinergic burden but agreement between them is often poor.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether anticholinergic burden, as defined at the level of each individual scale, is a prognostic factor for future cognitive decline or dementia in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to 24 March 2021: MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and ISI Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort and case-control observational studies with a minimum of one year' follow-up that examined the association between an anticholinergic burden measurement scale and future cognitive decline or dementia in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, and undertook data extraction, assessment of risk of bias, and GRADE assessment. We extracted odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and linear data on the association between anticholinergic burden and cognitive decline or dementia. We intended to pool each metric separately; however, only OR-based data were suitable for pooling via a random-effects meta-analysis. We initially established adjusted and unadjusted pooled rates for each available anticholinergic scale; then, as an exploratory analysis, established pooled rates on the prespecified association across scales. We examined variability based on severity of anticholinergic burden.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25 studies that met our inclusion criteria (968,428 older adults). Twenty studies were conducted in the community care setting, two in primary care clinics, and three in secondary care settings. Eight studies (320,906 participants) provided suitable data for meta-analysis. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (ACB scale) was the only scale with sufficient data for 'scale-based' meta-analysis. Unadjusted ORs suggested an increased risk for cognitive decline or dementia in older adults with an anticholinergic burden (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.96) and adjusted ORs similarly suggested an increased risk for anticholinergic burden, defined according to the ACB scale (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.29). Exploratory analysis combining adjusted ORs across available scales supported these results (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.38), and there was evidence of variability in risk based on severity of anticholinergic burden (ACB scale 1: OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.29; ACB scale 2: OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.01 to 3.56; ACB scale 3: OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.41 to 7.61); however, overall GRADE evaluation of certainty of the evidence was low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that older adults without cognitive impairment who take medications with anticholinergic effects may be at increased risk of cognitive decline or dementia.

Anticholinergic drugs and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dementia is one of the greatest global challenges for public health; however, the relationship between anticholinergic drugs and dementia remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive roles of anticholinergic drugs in dementia risk. After pooling fourteen longitudinal and case-control studies with a total of 1,564,181 subjects, anticholinergic drug use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Both low and high anticholinergic drug burdens were associated with dementia. Moreover, there was a dose-dependent relationship between anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia. With respect to the categories of anticholinergic drugs, antiparkinson, urological drugs, and antidepressants increased the risk for dementia; however, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal drugs played potentially protective roles. These findings underscore the importance of anticholinergic drugs as a potential modifiable risk factor for dementia and provide treatment priorities to optimize dementia prevention.

Anticholinergic load and delirium in end-of-life patients

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with negative outcomes, including worsening of cognitive and functional status and an increased burden on patients and caregivers. Medications with anticholinergic effect have been associated with delirium symptoms, but the relationship is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relation between delirium and anticholinergic load according to the hypothesis that the cumulative anticholinergic burden increases the risk of delirium.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of end-of-life patients in a hospice or living at home between February and August 2019. Delirium was diagnosed on admission using the 4 'A's Test (4AT) and each patient's anticholinergic burden was measured with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale.

RESULTS

Of the 461 eligible for analysis, 124 (26.9%) had delirium. Anticholinergic medications were associated with an increased risk of delirium in univariate (OR (95% CI) 1.26 (1.16-1.38), p < 0.0001) and multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, dementia, tumors, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, days of palliative assistance, and setting (OR (95% CI) 1.16 (1.05-1.28), p < 0.0001). Patients with delirium had a greater anticholinergic burden than those without, with a dose-effect relationship between total ACB score and delirium. Patients who scored 4 or more had 2 or 3 times the risk of delirium than those not taking anticholinergic drugs. The dose-response relationship was maintained in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticholinergic drugs may influence the development of delirium due to the cumulative effect of multiple medications with modest antimuscarinic activity.

Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Older people are at risk of anticholinergic side effects due to changes affecting drug elimination and higher sensitivity to drug's side effects. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) were developed to quantify the anticholinergic drug burden (ADB). We aim to identify all published ABS, to compare them systematically and to evaluate their associations with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all published ABS and a Web of Science citation (WoS) analysis to track validation studies implying clinical outcomes. Quality of the ABS was assessed using an adapted AGREE II tool. For the validation studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane tool Rob2.0. The validation studies were categorized into six evidence levels based on the propositions of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine with respect to their quality. At least two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments.

RESULTS

Out of 1297 records, we identified 19 ABS and 104 validations studies. Despite differences in quality, all ABS were recommended for use. The anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale and the German anticholinergic burden scale (GABS) achieved the highest percentage in quality. Most ABS are validated, yet validation studies for newer scales are lacking. Only two studies compared eight ABS simultaneously. The four most investigated clinical outcomes delirium, cognition, mortality and falls showed contradicting results.

CONCLUSION

There is need for good quality validation studies comparing multiple scales to define the best scale and to conduct a meta-analysis for the assessment of their clinical impact.

Comparative associations between anticholinergic burden and emergency department visits for anticholinergic adverse events in older Korean adults: a nested case-control study using national claims data for validation of a novel country-specific scale

BACKGROUND

Considering the limited generalizability of previous anticholinergic burden scales, the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale (KABS) as a scale specific to the Korean population was developed. We aimed to validate the KABS by detecting the associations between high anticholinergic burden, measured with the KABS, and emergency department (ED) visits compared to the pre-existing validated scales in older Korean adults.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted using national claims data. The cases included the first anticholinergic ED visits between July 1 and December 31, 2016. Anticholinergic ED visits were defined as ED visits with a primary diagnosis of constipation, delirium, dizziness, fall, fracture, or urinary retention. Propensity score-matched controls were identified. Average daily AB scores during 30 days before the index date were measured. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 461,034 were included. The highest proportion of those with high AB was identified with KABS (5.0%). Compared with those who had a KABS score of 0, older adults with a score ≥ 3 were at higher risk for overall anticholinergic ED visits (aOR, 1.62, 95% CI, 1.53-1.72), as well as visits for falls/fractures (aOR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.40-1.69), dizziness (aOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.30-1.59), delirium (aOR: 2.96, 95% CI: 2.28-3.83), constipation (aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.68-2.02), and urinary retention (aOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.79-2.55). High AB by KABS showed a stronger association with overall anticholinergic ED visits and visits due to delirium and urinary retention than those by other scales.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, KABS is superior to pre-existing scales in identifying patients with high AB and predicting high AB-related ED visits in older Korean adults.

Relation between anticholinergic burden and cognitive impairment: Results from the Monzino 80-plus population-based study

PURPOSE

We examined data collected in the Monzino 80-plus study to assess the relations between cognitive performance and ACB scores according to the hypothesis that a higher anticholinergic burden is associated with reduced cognitive performance.

METHODS

The Monzino 80-plus is an ongoing, prospective, door-to-door population-based study started in 2002 among all residents 80 years or older in eight municipalities of Varese province, Italy. To establish the relation between cognitive impairment and the anticholinergic drug burden we recorded the ACB score for each patient at baseline. The relations between ACB score and dementia or MMSE scores were also examined after exclusion of patients taking any antipsychotic.

RESULTS

A sample of 2140 elderly people was eligible for analysis. A significant dose-effect relationship was observed between total ACB score and diagnosis of dementia in univariate and multivariate models. Patients in ACB class ≥4 had about 4.5 times the risk of diagnosis of dementia. A relation was also found between higher ACB scores and lower MMSE scores; patients who scored 4 or more had a mean of 6.4 points lower than those not taking anticholinergic drugs. The dose-effect relationship between ACB score and diagnosis of dementia was not maintained after exclusion of patients using antipsychotics, while the association between higher ACB scores and lower MMSE scores was still present, with patients in ACB class ≥4 having a mean score about 4.4 lower.

CONCLUSIONS

There are clear relations between anticholinergic load and reduced cognitive performance, while the association with dementia remains uncertain. For primary care and geriatric clinicians, an ACB score ≥ 4 can be considered the cut-off to identify high-risk populations who may benefit from the evaluation of anticholinergic burden with the ACB scale.

Anticholinergic Burden and Fractures: A Systematic Review with Methodological Appraisal

Introduction

Medications with anticholinergic activity (MACs) are used to treat diseases common in older adults. Evidence on the association between anticholinergic burden (AB) and increased risk of fractures and osteoporosis or reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is inconsistent. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of observational studies on AB with fractures and osteoporosis or reduced BMD and provide methodological appraisal of included studies.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and CENTRAL as well as grey literature from database inception up to August 2020. Eligibility criteria were: observational design, AB-exposure measured through a scale, fracture of any type or osteoporosis or reduced BMD as outcome, and reported measure of association between exposure and outcome. No restrictions related to time, language or type of data were applied. Eligibility and risk of bias assessment as well as data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI Item Bank.

Results

The majority of the nine included studies had low risk of bias but heterogeneous methodology. No study used a new user design. Seven studies reported an increased risk of fractures associated with AB. In four studies using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), adjusted risk of fractures was increased by 2–61% for ARS = 1, by 0–97% for ARS = 2, by 19–84% for ARS = 3, and by 56–96% for ARS ≥ 4; in three studies the ARS was aggregated, risk increased by 39% for ARS = 1–2 and 17% for ARS = 2–3. Two studies reported increased risk of fractures of 14 and 52% in the highest AB-category and one study reported that change in ARS of ≥ 3 during hospitalization was associated with a 321% increased risk in fractures. Two studies did not find an association between AB and fractures. The association between AB and osteoporosis or reduced BMD could only be assessed in two studies, one reporting increased risk of lower BMD at Ward’s triangle, the other reporting no association between AB and BMD T-score change at the femoral neck.

Discussion

Our study suggests an association between AB and increased risk of fractures with possible dose-exposure gradient in studies using the ARS. The low number of studies and heterogeneity of methods calls for the conduct of more studies.

Plain language summary

We conducted a study investigating the risk of fractures associated with anticholinergic burden, which is the result of taking one or more medication with anticholinergic activity. The results of our study suggest that persons who experience anticholinergic burden might have a higher risk of fractures. However, since we were only able to include nine studies, more studies conducted in a similar way are needed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40266-020-00806-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Delirium Superimposed on Dementia in Perioperative Period and Intensive Care

Delirium is a life-threatening condition, the causes of which are still not fully understood. It may develop in patients with pre-existing dementia. Delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD) can go completely unnoticed with routine examination. It may happen in the perioperative period and in the critical care setting, especially in the ageing population. Difficulties in diagnosing and lack of specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment make DSD a seriously growing problem. Patient-oriented, multidirectional preventive measures should be applied to reduce the risk of DSD. For this reason, anesthesiologists and intensive care specialists should be aware of this interesting condition in their everyday clinical practice.

Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review

Purpose

Older people are at risk of anticholinergic side effects due to changes affecting drug elimination and higher sensitivity to drug’s side effects. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) were developed to quantify the anticholinergic drug burden (ADB). We aim to identify all published ABS, to compare them systematically and to evaluate their associations with clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all published ABS and a Web of Science citation (WoS) analysis to track validation studies implying clinical outcomes. Quality of the ABS was assessed using an adapted AGREE II tool. For the validation studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane tool Rob2.0. The validation studies were categorized into six evidence levels based on the propositions of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine with respect to their quality. At least two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments.

Results

Out of 1297 records, we identified 19 ABS and 104 validations studies. Despite differences in quality, all ABS were recommended for use. The anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale and the German anticholinergic burden scale (GABS) achieved the highest percentage in quality. Most ABS are validated, yet validation studies for newer scales are lacking. Only two studies compared eight ABS simultaneously. The four most investigated clinical outcomes delirium, cognition, mortality and falls showed contradicting results.

Conclusion

There is need for good quality validation studies comparing multiple scales to define the best scale and to conduct a meta-analysis for the assessment of their clinical impact.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02994-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Decrease of Anticholinergic Drug Use in Nursing Home Residents in the United States, 2009 to 2017

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the time course of anticholinergic drug use in nursing home residents and assess if any temporal change in anticholinergic use varied by nursing home quality rating.

DESIGN

Retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis of Medicare enrollment, Parts A, B, and D, claims data linked to the Minimum Data Set from 2009 to 2017.

SETTING

Medicare-certified nursing homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Long-term residents 65 years or older with nursing home stay of at least 100 consecutive days within a given calendar year.

MEASUREMENTS

Estimates of anticholinergic drug prescription rates between 2009 and 2017 were based on a binary variable indicating whether a resident received a drug with high anticholinergic activity, as defined by the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale, for at least 1 day during the initial 100 consecutive days of nursing home stay in a given calendar year. We used mixed effects logistic regression models to determine adjusted rates of anticholinergic use each year and test the interaction between nursing home quality rating and year, while adjusting for patient and nursing home characteristics.

RESULTS

The cohort included 786,858 100-day nursing home stays (299,354 unique residents) in 6,703 nursing homes for the years 2009 to 2017. Prescription rates were stable at approximately 34% to 35% between 2009 and 2011, then gradually decreased to 24.3% in 2017 (P < .0001), with the decline being more pronounced in nursing homes having high quality ratings (P < .0001). Rates for anticholinergic drugs in nursing homes with 4 to 5 star quality rating (33.7% in 2011 to 23.3% in 2017) showed a steeper decline over time relative to nursing homes with 1 to 2 star quality rating (34.2% in 2011 to 25.2% in 2017) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of drugs with high anticholinergic activity has declined from 2009 to 2017, with a greater decline in higher-quality nursing homes.

Dose response relationship of cumulative anticholinergic exposure with incident dementia: validation study of Korean anticholinergic burden scale

Background

The dose response relationship of nine-year cumulative anticholinergic exposure and dementia onset was investigated using the Korean version anticholinergic burden scale (KABS) in comparison with the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB). We also examined the effect of weak anticholinergics in the prediction of dementia.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted comprising 86,576 patients after 1:2 propensity score matching using the longitudinal national claims database. For cumulative anticholinergic burden estimation, average daily anticholinergic burden score during the 9 years prior to dementia onset was calculated using KABS and ACB and categorized as minimal, < 0.25; low, 0.25–1; intermediate, 1–2; and high, ≥ 2. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) between cumulative anticholinergic burden and incident dementia was estimated.

Results

Patients with high exposure according to KABS and ACB comprised 3.2 and 3.4% of the dementia cohort and 2.1 and 2.8% of the non-dementia cohort, respectively. Dose-response relationships were observed between anticholinergic burden and incident dementia. After adjusting covariates, compared with minimal exposure, patients with high exposure according to KABS and ACB had a significantly higher risk for incident dementia with aOR of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55–1.87) and 1.22 (CI 1.12–1.33), respectively. With the exclusion of weak anticholinergics, the association became stronger, i.e., 1.41 (CI 1.14–1.75) with ACB whereas the association became slightly weaker with KABS, i.e., 1.60 (CI 1.38–1.86).

Conclusion

This study confirmed the dose response relationship for cumulative anticholinergic burden measured using the Korean specific anticholinergic burden scale with incident dementia.

Anticholinergic Burden and Safety Outcomes in Older Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AIM

Older patients with chronic hepatitis C infection starting direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are frequently prescribed multiple medications that may be categorized as inappropriate. Anticholinergic burden has been shown to be a predictor of adverse health and functional outcomes. Different scales are available to calculate anticholinergic burden. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of anticholinergic medication among older patients treated with DAAs and the risk factors associated using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) and analyze the resulting safety consequences.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients ≥65 years old receiving DAAs and taking concomitant medication. This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology Statement.

RESULTS

236 patients were included. The average age was 71.7 years, 73.3% cirrhotic, and 47% patients took ≥5 medicines. According to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales, 35.2% (n = 83), 10.6% (n = 25) and 34.3% (n = 81) of the patients were treated with anticholinergic medication. Two hundred-and-six (86%) patients presented any adverse events (AEs) during therapy. ARS scale showed a significant relationship between presence of anticholinergic medication and AEs. A large number of patients suffered anticholinergic events, with more events per patient in patients taking anticholinergic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Older hepatitis C chronic patients are exposed to potentially inappropriate polypharmacy and anticholinergic risk, according to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales. The three scales showed different results. Only the ARS scale was associated with AEs, but the rate of anticholinergic effects per patient was significantly higher in patients with anticholinergic drugs, regardless of the scale used. Consider quality of pharmacotherapy when starting DAA with a multidisciplinary approach could improve health outcomes.

Use of Medications with Anticholinergic Properties and the Long-Term Risk of Hospitalization for Falls and Fractures in the EPIC-Norfolk Longitudinal Cohort Study

The consumption of medications with anticholinergic activity has been suggested to result in the adverse effects of mental confusion, visual disturbance, and muscle weakness, which may lead to falls. Existing published evidence linking anticholinergic drugs with falls, however, remains weak. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) and the long-term risk of hospitalization with falls and fractures in a large population study. The dataset comprised information from 25,639 men and women (aged 40-79 years) recruited from 1993 to 1997 from Norfolk, United Kingdom into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk study. The time to first hospital admission with a fall with or without fracture was obtained from the National Health Service hospital information system. Cox-proportional hazards analyses were conducted to adjust for confounders and competing risks. The fall hospitalization rate was 5.8% over a median follow-up of ~ 19.4 years. The unadjusted incidence rate ratio for the use of any drugs with anticholinergic properties was 1.79 (95% CI 1.66-1.93). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for ACB scores of 1, 2-3, and ≥ 4 compared with ACB = 0 for fall hospitalization were 1.20 (1.09-1.33), 1.42 (1.25-1.60), and 1.39 (1.21-1.60) after adjustment for age, gender, medical conditions, physical activity, and blood pressure. Medications with anticholinergic activity are associated with an increased risk of subsequent hospitalization with a fall over a 19-year follow-up period. The biological mechanisms underlying the long-term risk of hospitalization with a fall or fracture following baseline ACB exposure remains unclear and requires further evaluation.

Benzodiazepines, z-Hypnotics, and Risk of Dementia: Special Considerations of Half-Lives and Concomitant Use

The utilization of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and z-hypnotics has substantially increased with the aging of the population, but the risk of BZDs and z-hypnotics in the development of dementia remains a strong concern. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of BZDs and z-hypnotics for subsequent dementia development with a special consideration of their half-lives and the concomitant use of these medications. People aged 65 years and older who were newly prescribed oral BZDs or z-hypnotics between 2003 and 2012 were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. All BZDs were categorized as long-acting drugs (≥ 20 h) or short-acting drugs (< 20 h) for further comparisons, and data were collected on a quarterly basis, starting on the first date of drug prescription and ending on the date of death, occurrence of dementia, or end of the follow-up period (December 31, 2012), whichever came first. All dementia events except vascular dementia occurring during the follow-up period were identified. Among 260,502 eligible subjects, short-acting BZDs and z-hypnotics users were at greater risk of dementia than long-acting users [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) in short-acting BZD users, 1.98 (1.89-2.07); z-hypnotic users, 1.79 (1.68-1.91); and long-acting BZD users, 1.47 (1.37-1.58)]. In addition, subjects concomitantly using 2 or more BZDs or z-hypnotics had a higher risk of dementia than those who used 1 of these drugs (4.79 (3.95-5.81)). The use of BZDs and z-hypnotics was strongly associated with the risk of dementia development, especially the short-acting BZDs, z-hypnotics, and concomitant use of multiple agents. These findings deserve further interventional studies for clarification.

Anticholinergic burden and fractures: a protocol for a methodological systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Medications with anticholinergic activity are used in the treatment of many diseases common in old age, including depression, psychosis, Parkinson's disease, allergies, pain and urinary incontinence. A high anticholinergic burden (ACB) is considered a major risk factor for fractures in older adults but recent studies reported inconsistent results. These inconsistencies may partly be due to differences in methodological aspects. However, no systematic review so far has addressed this association and considered study methods. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies addressing the association of ACB with fractures and to provide a methodological appraisal of the included studies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, CENTRAL and grey literature using a strategy that combines the terms anticholinergic and fractures. We will hand search reference lists of articles. Two reviewers will independently screen all identified abstracts for eligibility and evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and RTI item bank. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or consultation with a third researcher. We will conduct a meta-analysis, either for the overall population or for specific and more homogeneous subgroups, if the number of studies retrieved and their heterogeneity allows it.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval will be sought, as no original data will be collected for this review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018116737.

Influence of opioid prescribing standards on drug use among patients with long-term opioid use: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

In mid-2016, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (CPSBC) issued prescribing standards and guidelines relating to opioid drugs. We evaluated the impact of these regulatory standards and guidelines on prescription drug use among patients in the province with long-term opioid use.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study with monthly repeated measures using administrative health data in British Columbia. Patients with long-term prescription opioid use were followed for a 12-month prepolicy period and 10-month postpolicy period, and were compared with a historical control cohort. We excluded patients with a history of long-term care, palliative care or cancer. We estimated changes in use of opioids, high-dose opioids (> 90 mg of morphine equivalents/d), opioids with sedatives/hypnotics, and opioid discontinuation.

RESULTS

The study population included 68 113 patients in the policy cohort and 68 429 patients in the historical control cohort. Following the introduction of the standards and guidelines, the average monthly use of opioids declined (adjusted difference -57 mg of morphine equivalents, 95% confidence interval [CI] -74 to -39) and discontinuation of opioids increased (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32). Among patients prescribed high-dose opioids, switching to lower-dose opioids increased (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.17), but discontinuation did not change significantly (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.59).

INTERPRETATION

The CPSBC's regulatory standards and guidelines were associated with modestly reduced opioid use and increased switching from high-dose to lower-dose opioids among patients with long-term use of prescribed opioids. Assessment of the potential impacts on health outcomes will be necessary for understanding the implications of the standards and guidelines.

Does Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Increase Risk of Dementia? Not Really! Results of the Group-Based Trajectory Analysis

Conflicting data of the potential association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and risk of dementia have been reported. This study aimed to examine the subsequent risk of incident dementia in older adults by categorizing subjects into different trajectories of longitudinal PPI use. A group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify distinct groups with regard to longitudinal PPI use over 3 years and to further examine the association between the trajectories of PPI use and dementia in a 5-year follow-up. Among 10,533 older adults who initiated PPIs, three distinct trajectories of longitudinal PPI use were identified: short-term (n = 7,406, 70.3%), intermittent (n = 1,528, 14.5%), and long-term users (n = 1,599, 15.2%). Long-term (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-1.17)) and intermittent PPI users (HR = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76-1.09)) were not associated with an increased risk of incident dementia compared with short-term users. Regardless of pattern of use, PPIs did not appear to significantly increase the risk of dementia over a mean follow-up period of 4 years.

Use of Anticholinergic Drugs According to Various Criteria and Their Association With Psychological Well-Being and Mortality in Long-Term Care Facilities

OBJECTIVES

To compare 3 internationally established criteria for drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAPs) and their associated factors in long-term care facilities, and to investigate the association between use of DAPs and psychological well-being (PWB) or mortality.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study and 1-year follow-up of all-cause mortality.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Of all 4449 residents living in long-term care facilities in Helsinki in 2011, 2432 (≥65 years of age) participated after exclusion of residents with severe dementia.

MEASUREMENTS

Data on demographics, medication use, and active diagnoses were collected by trained staff using structured questionnaires. DAP use was defined by the following 3 international criteria: Chew's list, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale, and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale. The total number of DAPs was counted and referred to as anticholinergic burden. PWB was assessed by a questionnaire and yielded a score ranging from 0 to 1. Mortality data was retrieved from central registers.

RESULTS

Of all participants, 85% were DAP users according to at least 1 of the 3 criteria used. Overlap between the 3 criteria was only moderate. DAP users were younger and a larger proportion of them had better cognition. However, they suffered more often from depression and other psychiatric diagnoses than nonusers. DAP users had lower PWB scores than those not using DAPs, and PWB decreased linearly in the overlapping groups from nonusers to those using DAPs according to all 3 criteria. The total number of DAPs used predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

DAP use and PWB appear to be negatively associated. When combining several criteria of DAPs, their burden predicted mortality. Clinicians should carefully consider the potential benefits and harms when prescribing DAPs to older persons.

Dementia-Related Results of "Costs of Medication in Older Patients: Before and After Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment"

Changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs in the presence of certain comorbidities and geriatric syndromes and reduced tolerability of potential drug side effects due to physiological changes with aging lead to difficulties in planning treatments in elderly adults, especially patients with dementia. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment has an important role in assessing polypharmacy and optimizing potentially inappropriate medications and potentially prescribing omissions in these patients. For this reason, we intend to reexamine our new study titled " Costs of medication in older patients: before and after comprehensive geriatric assessment," because most of these results are also very important for dementia practice.