1
|
Sivertsen DM, Becker U, Andersen O, Kirk JW. Between acute medicine and municipal alcohol treatment: Cross-sectoral collaborations regarding patients with alcohol problems. NORDIC STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS 2024; 41:403-425. [PMID: 39309201 PMCID: PMC11412477 DOI: 10.1177/14550725241252256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: The aim was to examine cross-sectoral collaborations of a Danish emergency department (ED) and two municipal treatment centres in the uptake area regarding patients with alcohol problems. Methods: The study was a qualitative exploratory study. We conducted individual interviews with ED nurses and secretaries (n = 21) and group interviews (n = 2) in municipal alcohol treatment centres with three and four participants, respectively. Interviews were analysed, first with qualitative content analysis, then by applying the analytical concept "boundary object". Results: Three themes emerged: (1) Responsibilities in practice; (2) Professional contrasts; and (3) The social nurse in a unique position. Themes illuminated a low degree of collaboration characterising the intersectoral work. Blurred responsibilities, challenged communication and acute versus long-term focus were some of the factors not supporting cross-sector collaborations. However, the function of the social nurse was highly appreciated in both sectors and plays a central role. Nonetheless, implicit limitations of this function entail that not all patients with alcohol problems are referred and handled within an ED setting. Conclusions: Overall, we found a lack of collaborative work between healthcare professionals in ED and municipalities for patients with alcohol problems. However, the "social nurse" function was greatly valued in both sectors due to a mediating role, since healthcare professionals in both sectors experienced lack of organisational structures supporting collaborative network, perceived temporal barriers, limited knowledge exchange and differences in approaches to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Maria Sivertsen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Capital Region of Denmark Psychiatry, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Becker
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Ove Andersen
- Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nissilä E, Hynninen M, Jalkanen V, Kuitunen A, Bäcklund M, Inkinen O, Hästbacka J. The effectiveness of a brief intervention for intensive care unit patients with hazardous alcohol use: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2024; 28:145. [PMID: 38689346 PMCID: PMC11061909 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04925-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for hazardous alcohol use and performing brief interventions (BIs) are recommended to reduce alcohol-related negative health consequences. We aimed to compare the effectiveness (defined as an at least 10% absolute difference) of BI with usual care in reducing alcohol intake in intensive care unit survivors with history of hazardous alcohol use. METHODS We used Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) score to assess history of alcohol use. PATIENTS Emergency admitted adult ICU patients in three Finnish university hospitals, with an AUDIT-C score > 5 (women), or > 6 (men). We randomized consenting eligible patients to receive a BI or treatment as usual (TAU). INTERVENTION BI was delivered by the time of ICU discharge or shortly thereafter in the hospital ward. CONTROLS Control patients received TAU. OUTCOME The primary outcome was self-reported alcohol consumption during the preceding week 6 and 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes were the change in AUDIT-C scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months, health-related quality of life, and mortality. The trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment during the pandemic. RESULTS We randomized 234 patients to receive BI (N = 117) or TAU (N = 117). At 6 months, the median alcohol intake in the BI and TAU groups were 6.5 g (interquartile range [IQR] 0-141) and 0 g (0-72), respectively (p = 0.544). At 12 months, it was 24 g (0-146) and 0 g (0-96) in the BI and TAU groups, respectively (p = 0.157). Median change in AUDIT-C from baseline to 6 months was - 1 (- 4 to 0) and 2 (- 6 to 0), (p = 0.144) in the BI and TAU groups, and to 12 months - 3 (- 5 to - 1) and - 4 (- 7 to - 1), respectively (p = 0.187). In total, 4% (n = 5) of patients in the BI group and 11% (n = 13) of patients in the TAU group were abstinent at 6 months, and 10% (n = 12) and 15% (n = 17), respectively, at 12 months. No between-groups difference in mortality emerged. CONCLUSION As underpowered, our study cannot reject or confirm the hypothesis that a single BI early after critical illness is effective in reducing the amount of alcohol consumed compared to TAU. However, a considerable number in both groups reduced their alcohol consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03047577).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliisa Nissilä
- Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Units, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 2, PL 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Marja Hynninen
- Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Units, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 2, PL 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville Jalkanen
- Department of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing District of Pirkanmaa and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anne Kuitunen
- Department of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing District of Pirkanmaa and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Minna Bäcklund
- Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Units, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 2, PL 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Outi Inkinen
- Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Wellbeing District of Southwest Finland and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Hästbacka
- Department of Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Units, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Haartmaninkatu 2, PL 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing District of Pirkanmaa and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adhikari K, Teare GF, Belon AP, Lee B, Kim MO, Nykiforuk C. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for tobacco consumption, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity: an equity-informed rapid review. Public Health 2024; 226:237-247. [PMID: 38091812 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This rapid review systematically synthesizes evidence of the effectiveness of the Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral (SBIR/T) approach for tobacco use, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity. STUDY DESIGN This was a rapid review. METHODS We searched primary studies between 2012 and 2022 in seven electronic databases. The search strategy used concepts related to alcohol-related disorders, intoxication, cigarette, nicotine, physical activity, exercise, sedentary, screening, therapy, and referral. We reviewed both title/abstract and full-text using a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify the eligible studies. We appraised study quality, extracted data, and summarized the characteristics of the included studies. We applied health equity lenses in the synthesis. RESULTS Of the 44 included studies, most focused on alcohol misuse. SBIR/T improved patients' attitudes toward alcohol behavior change, improved readiness and referral initiation for change, and effectively reduced alcohol consumption. Few studies pertained to smoking and physical inactivity. Most studies on smoking demonstrated effectiveness pertaining to patients' acceptance of referral recommendations, improved readiness and attempts to quitting smoking, and reduced or cessation of smoking. Findings were mixed about the effectiveness of SBIR/T in improving physical activity. Minimal studies exist on the impacts of SBIR/T for these three risk factors on healthcare resource use or costs. Studies considering diverse population characteristics in the design and effectiveness assessment of the SBIR/T intervention are lacking. CONCLUSIONS More research on the impacts of SBIR/T on tobacco use, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity is required to inform the planning and delivery of SBIR/T for general and disadvantaged populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Adhikari
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
| | - G F Teare
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - A P Belon
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - B Lee
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - M O Kim
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - C Nykiforuk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sivertsen DM, Andersen KV, Becker U, Lisby M, Andersen O, Brünes N, Kirk JW. Acceptability Among Frontline Staff Toward Distributing an Anonymous Alcohol Survey in Emergency Departments: A Mixed Methods Study. J Addict Nurs 2023; 34:E53-E64. [PMID: 37669345 PMCID: PMC10510809 DOI: 10.1097/jan.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Emergency departments (EDs) serve as the front line when patients encounter the hospital system. Limited data are available of patients' alcohol habits collected during Danish ED visits, and no studies have, to our knowledge, examined frontline staffs' (registered nurses and medical secretaries) acceptability to deliver anonymous alcohol surveys to patients. We aimed at examining the proportion of survey respondents and the prevalence of patients' alcohol habits and also exploring frontline staff acceptability of the distribution of an anonymous survey regarding patients' alcohol habits in EDs. Intendedly, all eligible patients ≥18 years old entering two EDs in March 2019 should receive a survey based on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. The study was an explanatory, sequential, mixed methods design, and results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and a deductive content analysis based on the theoretical framework of acceptability. In total, 15% (n = 1,305) of the total 8,679 patients in the EDs returned the survey. Qualitative analysis of interviews (n = 31) with staff showed that they had been reluctant to distribute the survey primarily because of ethical concerns of anonymity, freedom of choice, and being nonjudgmental toward patients. Hence, patients with no obvious alcohol problems were more likely to receive the survey. Still, we found that 23% of the respondents had an Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test score ≥ 8. Results indicate that frontline staffs' recognition of patients' alcohol use is inadequate, and findings show a low degree of acceptability among staff to deliver an anonymous survey, which is in line with earlier described barriers toward screening activities in EDs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Murphy CE, Coralic Z, Wang RC, Montoy JCC, Ramirez B, Raven MC. Extended-Release Naltrexone and Case Management for Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 81:440-449. [PMID: 36328851 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of initiating treatment for alcohol use disorder with extended-release naltrexone and case management services in the emergency department (ED) and measure the intervention's impact on daily alcohol consumption and quality of life. METHODS This is a 12-week prospective open-label single-arm study of a multimodal treatment for alcohol use disorder consisting of monthly extended-release naltrexone injections and case management services initiated at an urban academic ED. Participants were actively drinking adult patients in ED with known or suspected alcohol use disorder and an AUDIT-C score more than 4. The main feasibility outcomes included the rates of participant enrollment, retention in the study, and continuing treatment after study completion. Efficacy outcomes were the change in daily alcohol consumption (drinks per day; 14 g ethanol per drink), measured by a 14-day timeline followback, and the change in quality of life measured with a single-item Kemp quality of life scale. RESULTS One hundred seventy-nine patients were approached, and 32 were enrolled (18%). Of the 32 enrolled patients, 25 (78%) completed all visits, and 22 (69%) continued naltrexone after the trial. The mean baseline daily alcohol consumption was 7.6 drinks per day (interquartile range, 4.5, 13.4), and the mean quality of life was 3.6 (SD 1.7) on a 7-point scale. The median daily alcohol consumption change was -7.5 drinks per day (Hodges-Lehmann 95% confidence interval -8.6, -5.9). The mean quality of life change was 1.2 points (95% confidence interval 0.5, 1.9; P<.01). CONCLUSION We found that initiation of treatment of alcohol use disorder with extended-release naltrexone and case management is feasible in an ED setting and observed significant reductions in drinking with improved quality of life in the short term. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Murphy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Zlatan Coralic
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Bianca Ramirez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Maria C Raven
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Notley C, Clark L, Belderson P, Ward E, Clark AB, Parrott S, Agrawal S, Bloom BM, Boyle AA, Morris G, Gray A, Coats T, Man MS, Bauld L, Holland R, Pope I. Cessation of smoking trial in the emergency department (CoSTED): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064585. [PMID: 36657751 PMCID: PMC9853266 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Attendees of emergency departments (EDs) have a higher than expected prevalence of smoking. ED attendance may be a good opportunity to prompt positive behaviour change, even for smokers not currently motivated to quit. This study aims to determine whether an opportunist smoking cessation intervention delivered in the ED can help daily smokers attending the ED quit smoking and is cost-effective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-arm pragmatic, multicentred, parallel-group, individually randomised, controlled superiority trial with an internal pilot, economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation. The trial will compare ED-based brief smoking cessation advice, including provision of an e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services (intervention) with the provision of contact details for local stop smoking services (control). Target sample size is 972, recruiting across 6 National Health Service EDs in England and Scotland. Outcomes will be collected at 1, 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome at 6 months is carbon monoxide verified continuous smoking abstinence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial was approved by the South Central-Oxford B Research Committee (21/SC/0288). Dissemination will include the publication of outcomes, and the process and economic evaluations in peer-reviewed journals. The findings will also be appropriately disseminated to relevant practice, policy and patient representative groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04854616; protocol V.4.2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Notley
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Lucy Clark
- Norwich Clincial Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Pippa Belderson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Emma Ward
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Allan B Clark
- Norwich Clincial Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sanjay Agrawal
- Institute of Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Ben M Bloom
- Emergency Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Adrian A Boyle
- Emergency Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Geraint Morris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alasdair Gray
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tim Coats
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Mei-See Man
- Norwich Clincial Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Linda Bauld
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh Division of Medical and Radiological Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ian Pope
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Verheij C, Haagsma JA, Koch BCP, Segers AEM, Schuit SCE, Rood PPM. Screening for hazardous alcohol use in the Emergency Department: Comparison of phosphatidylethanol with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Timeline Follow-back. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2022; 46:2225-2235. [PMID: 36520053 PMCID: PMC10107187 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 15% of all visits to the Emergency Department (ED) are alcohol related. Identification of problematic alcohol use is important in this setting because it allows for intervention and prevention efforts. This study investigated the correlation between the objective phosphatidylethanol (PEth) marker and the subjective Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Timeline Followback Questionnaire (TLFB) as screening methods for hazardous alcohol use in the general ED population. METHODS This prospective cohort study included 301 ED patients (57% male) who were seen in the ED and required to give a blood sample. The correlation between the values of PEth (PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:2) and the scores on the AUDIT and TLFB were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Differences between risk categories of PEth and AUDIT were also examined. RESULTS The Spearman correlation coefficients between PEth 16:0/18:1|PEth 16:0/18:2 values and the AUDIT scores were moderate (PEth 16:0/18:1: 0.67, p < 0.001; PEth 16:0/18:2: 0.67, p < 0.001). Of the patients who scored 'low risk drinking/abstinence' according to the AUDIT questionnaire, respectively 1% and 4% had PEth 16:0/18:1|PEth 16:0/18:2 values indicating excessive alcohol use, and another 10% and 12% had PEth 16:0/18:1|PEth 16:0/18:2 values indicating moderate alcohol consumption. Of the 12 (PEth 16:0/18:1) and 25 (PEth 16:0/18:2) patients with high-risk values, respectively 25% and 40% scored in the lowest risk category on the AUDIT questionnaire. Spearman correlation coefficients between PEth 16:0/18:1|PEth 16:0/18:2 values and TLFB two-week scores were high (PEth 16:0/18:1: 0.74, p < 0.001; PEth 16:0/18:2: 0.82, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AUDIT scores were moderately correlated with PEth values in the general ED population. In almost all cases where there was not a good correlation, patients had high PEth values with low AUDIT scores. We conclude that PEth identifies patients with problematic alcohol use who are missed by the AUDIT questionnaire and therefore PEth could be used as an additional screening method for hazardous alcohol use in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolien Verheij
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit C P Koch
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Segers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie C E Schuit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Board of Directors, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Pleunie P M Rood
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Narasimha VL, Arvind BA, Holla B, Tadepalli R, Kandasamy A, Murthy P. Title of the study: Practice and attitude of doctors towards patients with substance use: A study from south India. Asian J Psychiatr 2022; 77:103247. [PMID: 36084532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the practice and attitude of doctors towards substance use disorders (SUD) and their management. METHODS Following stratified proportionate random sampling, selected doctors in the south zone of Bengaluru, India, were interviewed face-to-face using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS 150 doctors were interviewed. In their practice, a quarter of patients (median of 27.5 (IQR: 11.45-45) use one or other form of Alcohol, Tobacco or Other Drugs of abuse (ATOD). Doctors, in general, enquire about substance use but do not actively intervene. They have mixed attitudes (both positive and negative) towards persons with SUD. A significant positive correlation was noted between the number of years of experience (post-MBBS) with practices related to "brief-intervention" (p = 0.014) and "concerned and sympathetic" attitudes (p < 0.001). However, a significant negative correlation was observed between the number of years of experience and "substance-specific management" practices (p < 0.001). Further, there was a positive correlation between "brief-interventions" practices with the attitude of being "concerned and sympathetic" (p < 0.001). A mediation analysis revealed that nearly a third of the overall effect of the number of years of experience on brief-interventions practices was mediated by a concerned and sympathetic attitude. CONCLUSIONS Serious efforts must be made to train doctors in the effective management of SUD. Attitudes of the doctors influence practices such as brief interventions. Programs directed towards changing the attitudes of doctors can bring changes in their practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Banavaram Anniappan Arvind
- Department of Epidemiology, Centre for Public Health, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru 560029, India
| | - Bharath Holla
- Department of Integrative Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru 560029, India
| | | | - Arun Kandasamy
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru 56002, India
| | - Pratima Murthy
- Director and Senior Professor of Psychiatry,National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru 560029, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gettel CJ, Yiadom MYA, Bernstein SL, Grudzen CR, Nath B, Li F, Hwang U, Hess EP, Melnick ER. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types. Acad Emerg Med 2022; 29:1247-1257. [PMID: 35475533 PMCID: PMC9790188 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) focus on correlation between treatment and outcomes in real-world clinical practice, yet a guide highlighting key study considerations and design types for emergency medicine investigators pursuing this important study type is not available. Investigators conducting emergency department (ED)-based PCTs face multiple decisions within the planning phase to ensure robust and meaningful study findings. The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 (PRECIS-2) tool allows trialists to consider both pragmatic and explanatory components across nine domains, shaping the trial design to the purpose intended by the investigators. Aside from the PRECIS-2 tool domains, ED-based investigators conducting PCTs should also consider randomization techniques, human subjects concerns, and integration of trial components within the electronic health record. The authors additionally highlight the advantages, disadvantages, and rationale for the use of four common randomized study design types to be considered in PCTs: parallel, crossover, factorial, and stepped-wedge. With increasing emphasis on the conduct of PCTs, emergency medicine investigators will benefit from a rigorous approach to clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J. Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maame Yaa A.B. Yiadom
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Corita R. Grudzen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bidisha Nath
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Edward R. Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roberts E, Smith R, Hotopf M, Drummond C. The efficacy and tolerability of pharmacologically active interventions for alcohol-induced hangover symptomatology: a systematic review of the evidence from randomised placebo-controlled trials. Addiction 2022; 117:2157-2167. [PMID: 34972259 DOI: 10.1111/add.15786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To compare quantitatively the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacologically active interventions in the treatment and prevention of alcohol-induced hangover. METHODS Systematic review of placebo-controlled randomised trials in healthy adults that evaluated any pharmacologically active intervention in the treatment or prevention of hangover. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL from database inception until 1 August 2021. The primary efficacy outcome was any continuous measure of overall hangover symptoms and the primary tolerability outcome the number of people dropping out because of adverse events (AEs). Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included reporting on 386 participants. No two studies reported on the same intervention; as such, meta-analysis could not be undertaken. Methodological concerns and imprecision resulted in all studied efficacy outcomes being rated as very low quality. When compared with placebo, individual studies reported a statistically significant reduction in the mean percentage overall hangover symptom score for clove extract (42.5% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001), tolfenamic acid (84.0% vs 50.0%, P < 0.001), pyritinol (34.1% vs 16.2%, P < 0.01), Hovenia dulcis fruit extract (P = 0.029), L-cysteine (P = 0.043), red ginseng (21.1% vs 14.0%, P < 0.05) and Korean pear juice (41.5% vs 33.3%, P < 0.05). All studied tolerability outcomes were of low or very low quality with no studies reporting any drop-outs because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS Only very low quality evidence of efficacy is available to recommend any pharmacologically active intervention for the treatment or prevention of alcohol-induced hangover. Of the limited interventions studied, all had favourable tolerability profiles and very low quality evidence suggests clove extract, tolfenamic acid and pyritinol may most warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmert Roberts
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Smith
- South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deluca P, Coulton S, Alam MF, Boniface S, Donoghue K, Gilvarry E, Kaner E, Lynch E, Maconochie I, McArdle P, McGovern R, Newbury‐Birch D, Patton R, Pellat‐Higgins T, Phillips C, Phillips T, Pockett RD, Russell IT, Strang J, Drummond C. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of face-to-face and electronic brief interventions versus screening alone to reduce alcohol consumption among high-risk adolescents presenting to emergency departments: three-arm pragmatic randomized trial (SIPS Junior high risk trial). Addiction 2022; 117:2200-2214. [PMID: 35315170 PMCID: PMC9540754 DOI: 10.1111/add.15884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Alcohol use increases throughout adolescence. Emergency department (ED) attendance is an opportunity for alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI), which is effective for adults. This trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ASBI compared with screening alone (SA) in high-risk adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Multi-centre, three-group, single-blind, individually randomized trial with follow-ups after 6 and 12 months in 10 ED settings in England. From October 2014 to May 2015 we screened 3327 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years, of whom 756 (22.7%) scored at least 3 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: consumption (AUDIT-C) and consented to participate in this trial. Mean age was 16.1 years; 50.2% were female and 84.9% were white. INTERVENTIONS Interventions were personalized feedback and brief advice (PFBA), personalized feedback plus electronic brief intervention (eBI) and SA. MEASURES The primary outcome was the weekly alcohol consumed in standard UK units (8 g ethanol) at 12 months post-randomization, derived from extended AUDIT-C. Economic outcomes included quality of life and service use, from perspectives of both the National Health Service and personal social services (NHS&PSS) and society. FINDINGS At 12 months, mean weekly consumption was 2.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.38-3.70] standard units for the SA group, 3.56 (95% CI = 2.90, 4.32) for PFBA and 3.18 (95% CI = 2.50, 3.97) for eBI, showing no significant differences. The PFBA group consumed mean 0.57 (-0.36, 1.70) units more than SA; and eBIs consumed 0.19 (-0.71, 1.30) more. Bayes factors suggested lack of effectiveness explained non-significance. From the NHS&PSS perspective, economic analysis showed that PFBA and eBI were not cost-effective compared with SA: PFBA yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £6213 (-£736 843, £812 884), with the intervention having 54% probability of being cost-effective compared with SA at the £20 000 WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS In emergency departments in England, neither personalized feedback and brief advice nor personalized feedback plus electronic brief intervention showed evidence of being effective or cost-effective when compared with screening alone in reducing alcohol consumption among adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Deluca
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services StudiesUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
| | - Mohammed Fasihul Alam
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU HealthQatar UniversityQatar
| | - Sadie Boniface
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,Institute of Alcohol StudiesAlliance HouseLondonUK
| | - Kim Donoghue
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas HospitalNewcastle upon TyneUK,Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley‐Clark BuildingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley‐Clark BuildingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ellen Lynch
- Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley‐Clark BuildingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ian Maconochie
- Paediatric Emergency MedicineImperial College London, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing, St Mary's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Paul McArdle
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas HospitalNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley‐Clark BuildingNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | | - Robert Patton
- School of Psychology, Elizabeth Fry Building (AD)University of SurreyGuildfordUK
| | | | | | - Thomas Phillips
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,Institute for Clinical and Applied Health ResearchUniversity of HullHullUK
| | | | - Ian T. Russell
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - John Strang
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Addictions DepartmentNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Newbury-Birch D, Ferguson J, Connor N, Divers A, Waller G. A Rapid Systematic Review of Worldwide Alcohol Use Disorders and Brief Alcohol Interventions in the Criminal Justice System. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:900186. [PMID: 35873244 PMCID: PMC9301009 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the relationship is complex, there is an association between alcohol use and offending behavior with an interplay between the amount drank, the pattern of drinking and individual and contextual factors. Alcohol brief interventions have been shown to be effective in primary healthcare, however there is currently a lack of compelling evidence in the criminal justice system. We carried out a rapid systematic review of the literature, which updated our review conducted in 2016. Following systematic searches, we included 36 papers on prevalence and 13 papers on effectiveness. Between 26 and 88% of individuals in the policy custody setting scored positive for an alcohol use disorder. In the magistrates court this was 95%; 31-86% in the probation setting and between 19 and 86% in the prison system. In relation to probable dependence, between 21 and 38% of individuals were shown to have probable alcohol dependence in the police custody suite setting; 39 per cent in the magistrate court system; 17-36% in the probation setting and between 18 and 48% in the prison system. This compares to 6% in the general population. We included 13 studies of effectiveness with differing outcome measures and outcomes. We conclude more studies are needed in the field to develop the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothy Newbury-Birch
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith JJ, Spanakis P, Gribble R, Stevelink SAM, Rona RJ, Fear NT, Goodwin L. Prevalence of at-risk drinking recognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 235:109449. [PMID: 35461086 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a prominent "treatment gap" in relation to at-risk drinking (ARD), whereby a minority of at-risk drinkers ever access treatment. Research suggests that recognition of problem drinking is a necessary precursor for help-seeking and treatment. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of ARD recognition within those meeting criteria for ARD. METHOD PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and MEDLINE were searched using the terms: problem* AND (recogni* OR perceive* OR perception OR self-identif*) AND alcohol - to identify studies published in English between 2000 and 2022. Studies reported the frequency (weighted or unweighted) of participants meeting ARD criteria that also directly identified ARD, perceived a need for help, or endorsed a readiness to change. The prevalence of ARD recognition was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS 17 studies were included which provided data for 33,349 participants with ARD. Most (n = 14) were US studies. ARD was self-identified via a single indicator in 7 studies, whereas recognition was assessed via stages of change in 4 studies and need for help in 6 studies. The pooled prevalence of ARD recognition was 31% (95% CI: 25%-36%), and subgroup analyses indicated alcohol use severity, measure of recognition, and population type to be significant sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Most individuals with ARD fail to recognise their drinking problem so preventive approaches that promote recognition may be helpful. However, we must be cautious of how inconsistency in question framing affects self-reported problem recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Smith
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Rachael Gribble
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon A M Stevelink
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto J Rona
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola T Fear
- King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Department of Military Mental Health, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Goodwin
- Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom; Liverpool Centre for Alcohol Research, Liverpool Centre for Alcohol Research, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ingrid A, Olaya L, Cuevas V, Castillo JS, Becerra N, Delgado J, Cañas A, Alba LH. Effectiveness of brief counselling in a hospital setting for smoking cessation and risky alcohol drinking reduction: randomised clinical trial protocol. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE PSIQUIATRIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 51:146-152. [PMID: 35717385 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcpeng.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic diseases are a public health problem, and 80% of them are related to modifiable risk factors such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, smoking, and risky alcohol consumption. Although the intervention in smoking and hazardous alcohol drinking has proven to be effective in Primary Care, it is unknown whether it works in the same way in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of brief counselling in order to modify the stage of change in smokers and at-risk drinkers treated in a high complexity hospital. METHODS A Randomised controlled trial to be conducted, in which an evaluation is made of four brief counselling strategies for smoking cessation and risky alcohol consumption compared to usual care, selected according to the patient's stage of change. The primary result will be the proportion of patients in each of the groups (intervention and control) with identified progress in the stage of change. The reduction of consumption will be also be analysed. Protocol registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03521622). RESULTS The results will be published in scientific journals, and its application aims to generate behavioural intervention protocols for modifiable risk factors in high complexity hospitals. The trial was presented and approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (Approval 01/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almonacid Ingrid
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Lina Olaya
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Virginia Cuevas
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Juan Sebastián Castillo
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Nelci Becerra
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jimena Delgado
- Programa de Promoción y Prevención, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alejandra Cañas
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luz Helena Alba
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coulton S, Giles EL, McGeechan GJ, Deluca P, Drummond C, Howel D, Kaner E, McColl E, McGovern R, Scott S, Sumnall H, Vale L, Albani V, Boniface S, Ferguson J, Gilvarry E, Hendrie N, Howe N, Ramsay A, Newbury-Birch D. The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Brief Alcohol Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in Young People in the High School Setting: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (SIPS JR-HIGH). Alcohol Alcohol 2022; 57:261-269. [PMID: 35134128 PMCID: PMC8919403 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agab087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Emma L Giles
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Grant J McGeechan
- Centre for Applied Psychological Science, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Paolo Deluca
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College, London, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College, London, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Stephanie Scott
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Harry Sumnall
- Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Viviana Albani
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | | | - Jennifer Ferguson
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Nadine Hendrie
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Amy Ramsay
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Crawford M, Drummond C. Professor Robin Touquet, RD, FRCS, FRCP, FCEM. Alcohol Alcohol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agac002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Crawford
- Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addiction Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 4 Windsor Walk, London SE5 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lid TG, Karlsson N, Thomas K, Skagerström J, O'Donnell A, Abidi L, Nilsen P. Addressing Patients' Alcohol Consumption-A Population-Based Survey of Patient Experiences. Int J Public Health 2021; 66:1604298. [PMID: 34795555 PMCID: PMC8592895 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the proportion of the population that had experienced that alcohol was addressed in health care the previous year, to explore experiences and perceived effects of addressing alcohol, and to investigate the proportion of risky drinkers in the population. Methods: Cross-sectional national web-based survey with 1,208 participants. Socio-demographic data, alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C), and experiences with alcohol conversations were investigated. Results: Approximately four in five respondents had visited health care the past 12 months, and one in six reported having experienced addressing alcohol. Women and older respondents were less likely to report having experienced alcohol conversations compared to other groups. Risky drinkers were not more likely to have experienced an alcohol conversation, but reported longer duration of alcohol conversations and more frequently perceived addressing alcohol as awkward or judgmental. Almost a third of respondents were classified as risky drinkers. Conclusion: The proportion experiencing addressing alcohol in routine health care is low, also among risky drinkers, and risky drinkers more frequently experienced the conversations as judgmental. More sensitive and relevant ways of addressing alcohol in health care is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torgeir Gilje Lid
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Nadine Karlsson
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Kristin Thomas
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Amy O'Donnell
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Latifa Abidi
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sivertsen DM, Becker U, Andersen O, Kirk JW. An Ethnographic study of unhealthy alcohol use in a Danish Emergency Department. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2021; 16:60. [PMID: 34600564 PMCID: PMC8487327 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-021-00269-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emergency Departments (EDs) are important arenas for the detection of unhealthy substance use. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for unhealthy alcohol use has been used in some ED settings with funding support from external sources. However, widespread sustained implementation is uncommon, and research aimed at understanding culture as a determinant for implementation is lacking. This study aims to explore cultural practices concerning the handling of patients with unhealthy alcohol use admitted to an ED. Methods An ethnographic study was conducted in an ED in the Capital Region of Denmark. The data consists of participant observations of Health Care Professionals (HCPs) and semi-structured interviews with nurses. Data was collected from July 2018 to February 2020. A cultural analysis was performed by using Qualitative Content Analysis as an analytic tool. Results 150 h of observation and 11 interviews were conducted. Three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Setting the scene describes how subthemes “flow,” “risky environment,” and “physical spaces and artefacts” are a part of the contextual environment of an ED, and their implications for patients with unhealthy alcohol use, such as placement in certain rooms; (2) The encounter presents how patients’ and HCPs’ encounters unfold in everyday practice. Subtheme “Professional differences” showcases how nurses and doctors address patients’ alcohol habits differently, and how they do not necessarily act on the information provided, due to several factors. These factors are shown in remaining sub-themes “gut-feeling vs. clinical parameters,” “ethical reasoning,” and “from compliance to zero-tolerance”; and (3) Collective repertoires shows how language shapes the perception of patients with unhealthy alcohol use, which may cause stigma and stereotyping. Subthemes are “occupiers” and “alcoholic or party animal?”. Conclusions Unhealthy alcohol use in the ED is entangled in complex cultural networks. Patients with severe and easily recognizable unhealthy alcohol use—characterized by an alcohol diagnosis in the electronic medical record, intoxication, or unwanted behavior—shape the general approach and attitude to unhealthy alcohol use. Consequently, from a prevention perspective, this means that patients with less apparent unhealthy alcohol use tend to be overlooked or neglected, which calls for a systematic screening approach. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13722-021-00269-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ulrik Becker
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Nursing, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Panken S, Wauters L, Gijbels R, Quintens H, Dorette AAA, Verelst S. The 12 -year evolution of emergency department alcohol-related admissions in a student city. Acta Clin Belg 2021; 77:742-747. [PMID: 34412571 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1966582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the trends in incidence of alcohol-intoxicated patients who present at the emergency department (ED), as well as the characteristics of these patients. METHODS Retrospective observational study based on data collected from 2008 until 2019 in two EDs in Leuven, Belgium. As a routine ED procedure, a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test is ordered for all patients suspected of alcohol use as a primary presenting sign. Patients older than 10 years of age with a BAC ≥ 0.1 g/L were included. BAC levels, age, gender and proportion of repeat admissions were analysed. RESULTS The absolute number of patients with a positive BAC test increased from 1260 in 2008 to 1908 in 2019 (51.4%). Male-to-female ratio remained stable (2:1). In the University Hospital Leuven , the most represented age group shifted from 20-29 and 40-49 year olds (2008) to 50-59 year olds (2019). The most common age groups in Heilig Hart Leuven were 10-19 year olds and 20-29 year olds, which remained stable over the study period. The readmission rate was 18% within the entire study period with a range of 2 to 46 times. CONCLUSION Our study showed an annual increase in alcohol-related admissions. The highest rates of alcohol-related ED visits occurred in the age group 50-59. Patients with a repeat admission accounted for a large number of the total alcohol-related visits, placing a major burden on our healthcare system. It will be a challenge to timely detect patients at risk, regardless of their age, to prevent future ED admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Panken
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ku Leuven - University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lina Wauters
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ku Leuven - University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roos Gijbels
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ku Leuven - University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Quintens
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sandra Verelst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ku Leuven - University, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gobeil K, Medling T, Tavares P, Sawalha K, Abozenah M, Friedmann PD, Naimi T, Pack QR. Frequency of Hazardous and Binge Drinking Alcohol Among Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients. Am J Cardiol 2021; 153:119-124. [PMID: 34210505 PMCID: PMC8316379 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Excessive alcohol use is a risk factor for most cardiac diseases. The prevalence of unhealthy alcohol use among hospitalized cardiac patients is uncertain as is the frequency with which it is addressed. We performed a single center, patient-level anonymous survey among hospitalized cardiac patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation. Hazardous drinking was defined as an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 8 or greater. Binge drinking was defined as 5+ drinks for men or 4+ for women on ≥1 occasion within the past 30 days. Unhealthy drinking was defined as either hazardous or binge drinking. Of 300 patients approached, 290 (96.7%) completed the survey. Mean ( ± SD) age was 69 ± 11 years; 70% were male and 31% were cardiac surgical patients. The proportion (95% CI) of hazardous, binge, and unhealthy drinking was 12% (9 to 16), 16% (12 to 20), and 18% (14-23), respectively. Overall, 58% of subjects reported being screened for alcohol use, mostly by nurses (56%). Those with unhealthy drinking reported being counseled more frequently about their alcohol use compared to non-unhealthy drinkers (11% versus 3%, p = 0.03), but the large majority (89%) of unhealthy drinkers reported receiving no advice about their alcohol use while admitted. In conclusion, almost one-fifth of hospitalized cardiac patients reported unhealthy drinking, these patients were only screened about half of the time, and were rarely counseled about their alcohol use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Gobeil
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts
| | - Theodore Medling
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester Massachusetts
| | - Paolo Tavares
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester Massachusetts
| | - Khalid Sawalha
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts
| | - Mohammed Abozenah
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts
| | - Peter D Friedmann
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts; Institute of Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts
| | - Timothy Naimi
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Massachusetts
| | - Quinn R Pack
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts; Institute of Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Deluca P, Coulton S, Alam MF, Boniface S, Cohen D, Donoghue K, Gilvarry E, Kaner E, Maconochie I, McArdle P, McGovern R, Newbury-Birch D, Patton R, Pellatt-Higgins T, Phillips C, Phillips T, Pockett RD, Russell I, Strang J, Drummond C. Brief interventions to prevent excessive alcohol use in adolescents at low-risk presenting to Emergency Departments: Three-arm, randomised trial of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 93:103113. [PMID: 33487528 PMCID: PMC8261826 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol consumption and related harm increase rapidly from the age of 12 years. We evaluated whether alcohol screening and brief intervention is effective and cost-effective in delaying hazardous or harmful drinking amongst low-risk or abstaining adolescents attending Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS This ten-centre, three-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, pragmatic, individually randomised trial screened ED attenders aged between 14 and 17 years for alcohol consumption. We sampled at random one third of those scoring at most 2 on AUDIT-C who had access to the internet and, if aged under 16, were Gillick competent or had informed consent from parent or guardian. We randomised them between: screening only (control intervention); one session of face-to-face Personalised Feedback and Brief Advice (PFBA); and PFBA plus an electronic brief intervention (eBI) on smartphone or web. We conducted follow-up after six and 12 months. The principal outcomes were alcohol consumed over the 3 months before 12-month follow up, measured by AUDIT-C; and quality-adjusted life-years. FINDINGS Between October 2014 and May 2015, we approached 5,016 eligible patients of whom 3,326 consented to be screened and participate in the trial; 2,571 of these were low-risk drinkers or abstainers, consuming an average 0.14 units per week. We randomised: 304 to screening only; 285 to PFBA; and 294 to PFBA and eBI. We found no significant difference between groups, notably in weekly alcohol consumption: those receiving screening only drank 0.10 units (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.18); PFBA 0.12 (0.06 to 0.21); PFBA and eBI 0.10 (0.05 to 0.19). INTERPRETATION While drinking levels remained low in this population, this trial found no evidence that PFBA with or without eBI was more effective than screening alone in reducing or delaying alcohol consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Deluca
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK.
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Sadie Boniface
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK
| | - David Cohen
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - Kim Donoghue
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian Maconochie
- Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Paul McArdle
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dorothy Newbury-Birch
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Robert Patton
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Ceri Phillips
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - Thomas Phillips
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK,Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Rhys D. Pockett
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - Ian Russell
- Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - John Strang
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barticevic NA, Poblete F, Zuzulich SM, Rodriguez V, Quevedo D, Sena BF, Bradshaw L. A Health Technician-delivered Brief Intervention linked to AUDIT for reduction of alcohol use in Chilean primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2021; 16:39. [PMID: 34130748 PMCID: PMC8207593 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-021-00248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the shortage of health professionals in Chilean primary care, Health Technicians (HT) are providing Brief Interventions (BI) for risky alcohol consumption. We compared the efficacy of two AUDIT-linked interventions provided by HTs: an informative leaflet and a BI plus leaflet. METHODS This is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization. Participants were identified through screening with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) at five primary care centers between March 2016 and July 2017. People older than 18 years at intermediate-risk (AUDIT score 8 to 15, inclusive) were randomized to receive either an HT-delivered BI (n = 174) or an informative leaflet (n = 168). Only data from participants (n = 294) who completed the 6-month assessment were analyzed. The leaflet was delivered without further advice. It contains alcohol consumption limits, a change planner, and strategies to decrease drinking. The BI was a 5-min discussion on the leaflet´s content plus normative feedback, tailored information on alcohol and health, and a change plan. The change in the AUDIT risk category six months after randomization (primary outcome) was compared among groups with a Chi-squared test. Changes in the secondary outcomes, which were scores on the AUDIT and the AUDIT´s consumption items (AUDIT-C), were compared with T-tests. Mixed-effects linear models adjusted for potential confounders. Outcome adjudicators were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS At 6-month follow-up, low-risk alcohol consumption was observed in 119 (80%) participants in the BI group, and in 103 (71%) in the leaflet group, with no difference among groups ([Formula: see text] [1, N = 294] = 2.6, p = 0.1; adjusted odds ratio 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34, 1.05). The mean AUDIT score decreased by 5.76 points in the BI group, and by 5.07 in the leaflet group, which represents a 0.86 AUDIT point reduction attributable to the BI (secondary outcome) (T = 2.03, p = 0.043; adjusted mean difference 0.86 CI 0.06, 1.66). CONCLUSIONS The AUDIT-linked BI delivered by HTs was not associated with a greater reduction of risky alcohol consumption than an informative leaflet. Delivering a leaflet could be more efficient than a BI when provided by HTs; however, more research on the effectiveness of the leaflet is needed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02642757 (December 30, 2015) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02642757 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas A Barticevic
- School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Poblete
- School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Soledad M Zuzulich
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Nursing School. Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile
| | - Victoria Rodriguez
- School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile
| | - Diego Quevedo
- School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile
| | - Brena F Sena
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Laura Bradshaw
- School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, 8331150, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Garnett C, Oldham M, Angus C, Beard E, Burton R, Field M, Greaves F, Hickman M, Kaner E, Loebenberg G, Michie S, Munafò M, Pizzo E, Brown J. Evaluating the effectiveness of the smartphone app, Drink Less, compared with the NHS alcohol advice webpage, for the reduction of alcohol consumption among hazardous and harmful adult drinkers in the UK at 6-month follow-up: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Addiction 2021; 116:412-425. [PMID: 33067856 PMCID: PMC8436762 DOI: 10.1111/add.15287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Digital interventions are effective for reducing alcohol consumption but evidence is limited regarding smartphone apps. Drink Less is a theory- and evidence-informed app to help people reduce their alcohol consumption that has been refined in terms of its content and design for usability across the sociodemographic spectrum. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of recommending Drink Less at reducing alcohol consumption compared with usual digital care. DESIGN Two-arm individually randomised controlled trial. SETTING Online trial in the United Kingdom (UK). PARTICIPANTS Hazardous or harmful drinkers (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score ≥8) aged 18+ who want to drink less alcohol (n = 5562). Participants will be recruited from July 2020 to May 2022 using multiple strategies with a focus on remote digital methods. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR Participants will be randomised to receive either an email recommending that they use Drink Less (intervention) or view the National Health Service (NHS) webpage on alcohol advice (comparator). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome is change in self-reported weekly alcohol consumption, assessed using the extended AUDIT-Consumption, between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include change in self-reported weekly alcohol consumption assessed at 1- and 3-month follow-ups, and the proportion of hazardous drinkers; alcohol-related problems and injury; health-related quality of life; and use of health services assessed at 6-month follow-up. Effectiveness will be examined with adjusted regression models, adjusting for baseline alcohol consumption and using an intention-to-treat approach. A mixed-methods process evaluation will assess engagement, acceptability and mechanism of action. Economic evaluations will be conducted using both a short- and longer-term time horizon. COMMENTS This study will establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Drink Less app at reducing alcohol consumption among hazardous and harmful adult drinkers and will be the first randomised controlled trial of an alcohol reduction app for the general population in the United Kingdom. This study will inform the decision on whether it is worth investing resources in large-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Garnett
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondon
| | - Melissa Oldham
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondon
| | - Colin Angus
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffield
| | - Emma Beard
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondon
| | | | - Matt Field
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffield
| | - Felix Greaves
- Public Health EnglandLondon
- Department of Primary Care and Public HealthImperial College LondonLondon
| | - Matthew Hickman
- Bristol Population Health Science InstituteUniversity of BristolBristol
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Population Health Sciences InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne
| | - Gemma Loebenberg
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondon
| | - Susan Michie
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondon
| | - Marcus Munafò
- School of Psychological ScienceUniversity of BristolBristol
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Department of Applied Health ResearchUniversity College LondonLondon
| | - Jamie Brown
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Almonacid I, Olaya L, Cuevas V, Castillo JS, Becerra N, Delgado J, Cañas A, Alba LH. Effectiveness of Brief Counseling in a Hospital Setting for Smoking Cessation and Risky Alcohol Drinking Reduction: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE PSIQUIATRIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2020; 51:S0034-7450(20)30085-8. [PMID: 33735015 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcp.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic diseases are a public health problem, and 80% of them are related to modifiable risk factors such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, smoking, and risky alcohol consumption. Although the intervention in smoking and hazardous alcohol drinking has proven to be effective in Primary Care, it is unknown whether it works in the same way in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of brief counselling in order to modify the stage of change in smokers and at-risk drinkers treated in a high complexity hospital. METHODS A Randomised controlled trial to be conducted, in which an evaluation is made of four brief counselling strategies for smoking cessation and risky alcohol consumption compared to usual care, selected according to the patient's stage of change. The primary result will be the proportion of patients in each of the groups (intervention and control) with identified progress in the stage of change. The reduction of consumption will be also be analysed. Protocol registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03521622). RESULTS The results will be published in scientific journals, and its application aims to generate behavioural intervention protocols for modifiable risk factors in high complexity hospitals. The trial was presented and approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (Approval 01/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Almonacid
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Lina Olaya
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Virginia Cuevas
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Juan Sebastián Castillo
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Nelci Becerra
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jimena Delgado
- Programa de promoción y prevención, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alejandra Cañas
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luz Helena Alba
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gamblin D, Tobutt C, Patton R. Alcohol identification and brief advice in England’s criminal justice system: a review of the evidence. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1745311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Gamblin
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Clive Tobutt
- Department of Interprofessional Studies, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Robert Patton
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gargaritano KL, Murphy C, Auyeung AB, Doyle F. Systematic Review of Clinician-Reported Barriers to Provision of Brief Advice for Alcohol Intake in Hospital Inpatient and Emergency Settings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2020; 44:2386-2400. [PMID: 33119905 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hospital inpatient and emergency care settings provide frequent opportunities for clinicians to screen and provide brief interventions to patients who engage in the harmful use of alcohol. However, these services are not always provided, with several reasons given in different studies. We aimed to systematically review clinician-reported barriers in the provision of brief alcohol screening, brief advice, and intervention specific to hospital inpatient and emergency department (ED) settings. A systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify the barriers perceived by healthcare workers in the provision of alcohol screening and brief intervention. These barriers were then categorized according to the capability, opportunity, and motivation (COM-B) model of behavior change theory. Twenty-five articles were included in this study, which involved questionnaires, surveys, interviews, and conference call discussions. The most commonly cited barriers (i.e., greater than half of the studies) were related to capability (lack of knowledge cited in 60% of studies); opportunity (lack of time and resources, 76 and 52% of studies, respectively); and motivation (personal discomfort in 60% of studies). Twenty-two other barriers were reported but with lower frequency. Clinicians cite a multitude of factors that impede their delivery of alcohol screening and brief interventions in the hospital inpatient and ED settings. These barriers were explored further under the framework of the COM-B model, which allows for intervention design. As such, changes can be made at the policy, managerial, and educational levels to address these barriers and help improve the self-efficacy and knowledge of clinicians who counsel patients on alcohol use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Lou Gargaritano
- From the, Division of Population Health Sciences (Health Psychology), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Murphy
- From the, Division of Population Health Sciences (Health Psychology), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Austin B Auyeung
- From the, Division of Population Health Sciences (Health Psychology), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- From the, Division of Population Health Sciences (Health Psychology), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Elphinston RA, Wyder M, De Andrade D, Nguyen KH, Gude A, Hipper L. Impact of a new specialist alcohol and drug brief intervention service model integrated into the emergency department: An interrupted time series analysis. Emerg Med Australas 2020; 33:67-73. [PMID: 32734696 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and examine the impact of a new specialist drug and alcohol brief intervention team (DABIT) model integrated into the ED on the identification of individuals at risk of future alcohol and other drug (AOD)-related harm. A cost-outcome analysis was conducted to assess the impact on costs per referral. METHODS An interrupted time series analysis examined the changes in number of referrals following the implementation of the DABIT model over 2 years (January 2015-December 2016) within a large 436-bed public hospital. The primary outcome of interest was the number of AOD-related referrals per month identified following ED presentations. The independent variables were: time (measured in months), implementation periods (pre-implementation; a transition period of adjustment during which the new DABIT model of care was developed; post-implementation period with a fully operational DABIT model); and the number of full-time equivalent staff per month to account for the increase in labour productivity. In a second time series analysis, the outcome was cost per referral per month. RESULTS After controlling for changes in labour productivity, the number of referrals was significantly higher following the implementation of the DABIT model when compared to those during the pre-implementation and transition periods. Costs were significantly lower following DABIT implementation resulting in $1096 net cost savings per referral. CONCLUSIONS Integration of a specialist brief intervention AOD model to support ED care may increase uptake of specialist AOD treatment and could be beneficial from an economic efficiency viewpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Elphinston
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marianne Wyder
- Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dominique De Andrade
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim-Huong Nguyen
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan Gude
- Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Hipper
- Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Snowden C, Lynch E, Avery L, Haighton C, Howel D, Mamasoula V, Gilvarry E, McColl E, Prentis J, Gerrand C, Steel A, Goudie N, Howe N, Kaner E. Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-176. [PMID: 32131964 DOI: 10.3310/hta24120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heavy alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and extended hospital stay. Alcohol consumption therefore represents a modifiable risk factor for surgical outcomes. Brief behavioural interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing alcohol consumption among increased risk and risky drinkers in other health-care settings and may offer a method of addressing preoperative alcohol consumption. OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility of introducing a screening process to assess adult preoperative drinking levels and to deliver a brief behavioural intervention adapted for the target population group. To conduct a two-arm (brief behavioural intervention plus standard preoperative care vs. standard preoperative care alone), multicentre, pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of proceeding to a definitive trial. To conduct focus groups and a national web-based survey to establish current treatment as usual for alcohol screening and intervention in preoperative assessment. DESIGN A single-centre, qualitative, feasibility study was followed by a multicentre, two-arm (brief behavioural intervention vs. treatment as usual), individually randomised controlled pilot trial with an embedded qualitative process evaluation. Focus groups and a quantitative survey were employed to characterise treatment as usual in preoperative assessment. SETTING The feasibility study took place at a secondary care hospital in the north-east of England. The pilot trial was conducted at three large secondary care centres in the north-east of England. PARTICIPANTS Nine health-care professionals and 15 patients (mean age 70.5 years, 86.7% male) participated in the feasibility study. Eleven health-care professionals and 68 patients (mean age 66.2 years, 80.9% male) participated in the pilot randomised trial. An additional 19 health-care professionals were recruited to one of three focus groups, while 62 completed an electronic survey to characterise treatment as usual. INTERVENTIONS The brief behavioural intervention comprised two sessions. The first session, delivered face to face in the preoperative assessment clinic, involved 5 minutes of structured brief advice followed by 15-20 minutes of behaviour change counselling, including goal-setting, problem-solving and identifying sources of social support. The second session, an optional booster, took place approximately 1 week before surgery and offered the opportunity to assess progress and boost self-efficacy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility was assessed using rates of eligibility, recruitment and retention. The progression criteria for a definitive trial were recruitment of ≥ 40% of eligible patients and retention of ≥ 70% at 6-month follow-up. Acceptability was assessed using themes identified in qualitative data. RESULTS The initial recruitment of eligible patients was low but improved with the optimisation of recruitment processes. The recruitment of eligible participants to the pilot trial (34%) fell short of the progression criteria but was mitigated by very high retention (96%) at the 6-month follow-up. Multimethod analyses identified the methods as acceptable to the patients and professionals involved and offers recommendations of ways to further improve recruitment. CONCLUSIONS The evidence supports the feasibility of a definitive trial to assess the effectiveness of brief behavioural intervention in reducing preoperative alcohol consumption and for secondary outcomes of surgical complications if recommendations for further improvements are adopted. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36257982. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 12. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Snowden
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ellen Lynch
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Leah Avery
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Catherine Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Valentina Mamasoula
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Newcastle Addictions Service, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James Prentis
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Alison Steel
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicola Goudie
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Beyer FR, Campbell F, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Saunders JB, Pienaar ED, Muirhead CR, Kaner EFS. The Cochrane 2018 Review on Brief Interventions in Primary Care for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Consumption: A Distillation for Clinicians and Policy Makers. Alcohol Alcohol 2020; 54:417-427. [PMID: 31062859 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agz035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS An updated Cochrane systematic review assessed effectiveness of screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in general practice or emergency care settings. This paper summarises the implications of the review for clinicians. METHODS Cochrane methods were followed. Reporting accords with PRISMA guidance. We searched multiple resources to September 2017, seeking randomised controlled trials of brief interventions to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in people attending general practice, emergency care or other primary care settings for reasons other than alcohol treatment. Brief intervention was defined as a conversation comprising five or fewer sessions of brief advice or brief lifestyle counselling and a total duration of less than 60 min. Our primary outcome was alcohol consumption, measured as or convertible to grams per week. We conducted meta-analyses to assess change in consumption, and subgroup analyses to explore the impact of participant and intervention characteristics. RESULTS We included 69 studies, of which 42 were added for this update. Most studies (88%) compared brief intervention to control. The primary meta-analysis included 34 studies and provided moderate-quality evidence that brief intervention reduced consumption compared to control after one year (mean difference -20 g/wk, 95% confidence interval -28 to -12). Subgroup analysis showed a similar effect for men and women. CONCLUSIONS Brief interventions can reduce harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption in men and women. Short, advice-based interventions may be as effective as extended, counselling-based interventions for patients with harmful levels of alcohol use who are presenting for the first time in a primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F R Beyer
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - F Campbell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - N Bertholet
- Alcohol Treatment Center, Department of Community Medicine and Health, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J B Daeppen
- Alcohol Treatment Center, Department of Community Medicine and Health, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J B Saunders
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland/Royal Brisbane Hospital, Australia
| | - E D Pienaar
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C R Muirhead
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - E F S Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Deluca P, Coulton S, Alam MF, Boniface S, Donoghue K, Gilvarry E, Kaner E, Lynch E, Maconochie I, McArdle P, McGovern R, Newbury-Birch D, Patton R, Pellatt-Higgins T, Phillips C, Phillips T, Pockett R, Russell IT, Strang J, Drummond C. Screening and brief interventions for adolescent alcohol use disorders presenting through emergency departments: a research programme including two RCTs. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar08020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Alcohol consumption and related harm increase steeply from the ages of 12–20 years. Adolescents in the UK are among the heaviest drinkers in Europe. Excessive drinking in adolescents is associated with increased risk of accidents, injuries, self-harm, unprotected or regretted sex, violence and disorder, poisoning and accidental death. However, there is lack of clear evidence for the most clinically effective and cost-effective screening and brief interventions for reducing or preventing alcohol consumption in adolescents attending emergency departments (EDs).
Objectives
To estimate the distribution of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems and alcohol use disorders in adolescents attending EDs; to develop age-appropriate alcohol screening and brief intervention tools; and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Design
The research has been conducted in three linked stages: (1) a prevalence study, (2) intervention development and (3) two linked randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Setting
Twelve EDs in England (London, North East, and Yorkshire and The Humber).
Participants
A total of 5376 participants in the prevalence study [mean age 13.0 years, standard deviation (SD) 2.0 years; 46.2% female] and 1640 participants in the two linked RCTs (mean age 15.6 years, SD 1.0 years; 50.7% female).
Interventions
Personalised feedback and brief advice (PFBA) and personalised feedback plus electronic brief intervention (eBI), compared with alcohol screening alone. These age-appropriate alcohol interventions were developed in collaboration with the target audience through a series of focus groups and evaluations during stage 2 of the research programme and following two literature reviews.
Main outcome measures
Total alcohol consumed in standard UK units (1 unit = 8 g of ethanol) over the previous 3 months at 12-month follow-up, assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Consumption (3 items) (AUDIT-C).
Results
In the prevalence study, 2112 participants (39.5%) reported having had a drink of alcohol that was more than a sip in their lifetime, with prevalence increasing steadily with age and reaching 89.5% at the age of 17 years. The prevalence of at-risk alcohol consumption was 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 16%] and the optimum cut-off point of the AUDIT-C in identifying at-risk drinking was ≥ 3. Associations of alcohol consumption and early onset of drinking with poorer health and social functioning were also found. In the RCT, the analysis of the primary outcome (average weekly alcohol consumption at month 12) identified no significant differences in effect between the three groups in both trials. In the high-risk drinking trial, the mean difference compared with control was 0.57 (95% CI –0.36 to 1.70) for PFBA and 0.19 (95% CI –0.71 to 1.30) for eBI. In the low-risk drinking trial, the mean difference compared with control was 0.03 (95% CI –0.07 to 0.13) for PFBA and 0.01 (95% CI –0.10 to 0.11) for eBI. The health economic analysis showed that eBI and PFBA were not more cost-effective than screening alone.
Conclusions
The ED can offer an opportunity for the identification of at-risk alcohol use in adolescents. A simple, short, self-completed screening instrument, the AUDIT-C, is an effective tool for identifying adolescents who are at risk of alcohol-related problems. Associations of alcohol consumption and earlier onset of drinking with poorer health and social functioning were observed in the prevalence study. The trials were feasible to implement and exceeded the recruitment target and minimum follow-up rates. However, PFBA and eBI were not found to be more effective than screening alone in reducing or preventing alcohol consumption in 14- to 17-year-olds attending EDs.
Limitations and future work
Only one-third of participants engaged with the application program; this is likely to have limited the effect of the intervention. We recommend that future research should focus on methods to maximise engagement with digital interventions and evaluate the effect of such engagement on clinical outcomes.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45300218.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 8, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Deluca
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Sadie Boniface
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kim Donoghue
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ellen Lynch
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian Maconochie
- Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul McArdle
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Robert Patton
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Ceri Phillips
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Thomas Phillips
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Rhys Pockett
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - John Strang
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Identifying alcohol problems among suicide attempters visiting the emergency department. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:350. [PMID: 31703656 PMCID: PMC6842213 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2347-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many suicide attempters brought to our emergency department (ED) have been found to have alcohol problems, and this should be taken serious consideration because alcohol use disorder is a risk factor for suicide reattempt. In this study, we aimed to estimate the effectiveness of alcohol-related biochemical markers and Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test Consumption (AUDIT-C) in suicide attempters who visited our ED based on the gold standard for clinical diagnosis used by psychiatrists for alcohol use disorder. Moreover, we aimed to search for a significant standard when clinicians make correct predictions about alcohol use disorder using these markers. METHODS Among the subjects who visited ED following a suicide attempt, a total of 203 subjects were selected. Following a psychiatric interview, the subjects who met the criteria for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence according to DSM-IV-TR in the past year were defined as the "alcohol use disorder" group. Although some subjects did not meet these criteria, men with a weekly alcohol intake of ≥14 drinks and women with a weekly alcohol intake of ≥7 drinks were classified as the "risky drinking" group. AUDIT-C was used as a self-report; further, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) were assayed using standard methods, and GGT-CDT was calculated using this formula: 0.8 × ln(GGT) + 1.3 × ln(%CDT). RESULTS In total, 88 subjects met the criteria for alcohol use disorder and 115 were included in the reference group. In the screening for alcohol use disorder, the AUC of AUDIT-C was 0.89 for men and 0.87 for women. In the screening for risky drinking, the AUC of AUDIT-C was 0.99 for men and 0.93 for women. Compared with other biochemical markers, AUDIT-C showed the highest AUC value for screening for both alcohol use disorder and risky drinking, with the trend being more prominent in men. CONCLUSIONS Among the biochemical markers, AUDIT-C yielded the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing alcohol use disorder among suicide attempters in ED. Comparison of results revealed that the use of AUDIT-C with biochemical markers or its use alone can help screen for alcohol use disorder or risky drinking in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Roberts E, Morse R, Epstein S, Hotopf M, Leon D, Drummond C. The prevalence of wholly attributable alcohol conditions in the United Kingdom hospital system: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Addiction 2019; 114:1726-1737. [PMID: 31269539 PMCID: PMC6771834 DOI: 10.1111/add.14642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The prevalence of alcohol-related conditions is often reported as higher in hospital in-patients compared with the general population. However, formal prevalence estimates are commonly derived from small studies which report highly varied results. This systematic review and meta-analysis, within the UK hospital system, aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of the 26 ICD-10 conditions that are wholly attributable to alcohol in in-patient settings. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and CENTRAL from database inception until 1 May 2018. We included studies of any design that reported the prevalence of one of 26 wholly attributable alcohol conditions defined by the ICD-10. Studies were required to be conducted in one or more of the constituent nations of the United Kingdom and in an in-patient setting (general wards, intensive care units, accident and emergency departments or mental health in-patient units). Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression tested study and patient factors contributing to variation. Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS A total of 124 studies were included, reporting on a total of 1 657 614 patients. The majority of studies reported on harmful use of alcohol and alcohol dependence, for which the pooled prevalence was 19.76% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.61-24.26%] and 10.25% (95% CI = 7.06-13.96%), respectively. Mean patient age and type of in-patient setting were identified as the main sources of variation in prevalence estimates, but not date of data collection. Both estimates were deemed very low quality according to GRADE. CONCLUSIONS An estimated one in five patients in the UK hospital system use alcohol harmfully, and one in 10 are alcohol-dependent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmert Roberts
- National Addiction Centre and the Department of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Rachel Morse
- Brighton and Sussex Medical SchoolUniversity of Brighton and the University of SussexBrightonUK
| | - Sophie Epstein
- NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- Department of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - David Leon
- Department of Non‐communicable Disease EpidemiologyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addiction Centre and the Department of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Edward KL, Giandinoto JA, Weiland TJ, Hutton J, Reel S. Brief interventions to de-escalate disturbances in emergency departments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 27:322-327. [PMID: 29561674 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.6.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically review evidence to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological brief interventions in the emergency department to reduce the incidence, severity and impact of acute behavioural disturbances. The literature search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 18 articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria and read in full. Following a full read and a consensus discussion, it was subsequently considered the studies chosen had not met the inclusion criteria. Research into the use of non-pharmacological brief interventions in the management of acute behavioural disturbance in the emergency department is warranted given the absence of evidence found by this systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen-Leigh Edward
- Professor of Nursing and Practice Based Research, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology; Visiting Professor, St Vincent's Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Visiting Professor, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield
| | | | - Tracey J Weiland
- Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennie Hutton
- Emergency Physician, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne and the University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Reel
- Senior Lecturer in Podiatry, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Moriarty KJ. Alcohol care teams: where are we now? Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 11:293-302. [PMID: 32582422 PMCID: PMC7307041 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Alcohol consumption affects the risks of approximately 230 three-digit disease and injury codes in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10th Revision. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals comprise 17 challenging goals with 169 targets, which the 193 Member States aim to achieve by 2030. Action to reduce the harmful use of alcohol, especially addressing global health inequalities, will contribute to achieving many of the health-related goals and targets. Alcohol care teams, mainly developed in acute UK hospitals, reduce acute hospital admissions, readmissions and mortality, improve the quality and efficiency of alcohol care, and have 11 key evidence-based, cost-effective and aspirational components. A clinician-led, multidisciplinary team, with integrated alcohol treatment pathways across primary, secondary and community care, coordinated alcohol policies for emergency departments and acute medical units, a 7-day alcohol specialist nurse service, addiction and liaison psychiatry services, an alcohol assertive outreach team, and consultant hepatologists and gastroenterologists with liver disease expertise facilitate collaborative, multidisciplinary, person-centred care. Quality metrics, national indicators, audit, workforce planning, training and accreditation support research and education of the public and healthcare professionals. Hospitals should collaborate with local authorities, public health, clinical commissioning groups, patients and key stakeholders to develop and disseminate cost-effective prevention and treatment strategies. Globally, alcohol care teams can support the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and should be advocated and implemented through the WHO global alcohol strategy. This requires collaborative care planning by key stakeholders, a skilled workforce, targeted financial resources and dedicated political commitment.
Collapse
|
35
|
Katikireddi SV, Beeston C, Millard A, Forsyth R, Deluca P, Drummond C, Eadie D, Graham L, Hilton S, Ludbrook A, McCartney G, Phillips T, Stead M, Ford A, Bond L, Leyland AH. Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028482. [PMID: 31221890 PMCID: PMC6596978 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Scotland is the first country to carry out a national implementation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol. MUP aims to reduce alcohol-related harms, which are high in Scotland compared with Western Europe, and to improve health equalities. MUP is a minimum retail price per unit of alcohol. That approach targets high-risk alcohol users. This work is key to a wider evaluation that will determine whether MUP continues. There are three study components. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Component 1 sampled an estimated 2800 interviewees at a baseline and each of two follow-ups from four Emergency Departments in Scotland and Northern England. Research nurses administered a standardised survey to assess alcohol consumption and the proportion of attendances that were alcohol-related.Component 2 covered six Sexual Health Clinics with similar timings and country allocation. A self-completion survey gathered information on potential unintended effects of MUP on alcohol source and drug use.Using a natural experiment design and repeated cross-sectional audit, difference between Scotland (intervention) and North England (control) will be tested for outcomes using regression adjusting for differences at baseline. Differential impacts by age, gender and socioeconomic position will be investigated.Component 3 used focus groups with young people and heavy drinkers and interviews with stakeholders before and after MUP implementation. The focus groups will allow exploration of attitudes, experiences and behaviours and the potential mechanisms by which impacts arise. The interviews will help characterise the implementation process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Study components 1 and 2 have been ethically approved by the NHS, and component 3 by the University of Stirling. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations, policy maker briefings and, in view of high public interest and the high political profile of this flagship policy, communication with the public via media engagement and plain language summaries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN16039407; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clare Beeston
- Scottish Public Health Observatory, NHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Millard
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow School of Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ross Forsyth
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow School of Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas Eadie
- School of Health Sciences, Institute for Social Marketing, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Shona Hilton
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow School of Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne Ludbrook
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Gerry McCartney
- Scottish Public Health Observatory, NHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thomas Phillips
- Faculty of Health Sciences Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Martine Stead
- Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling and the Open University, Stirling, UK
| | - Allison Ford
- Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Lyndal Bond
- Australian Health Policy Collaboration, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alastair H Leyland
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow School of Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Giles EL, McGeechan GJ, Coulton S, Deluca P, Drummond C, Howel D, Kaner E, McColl E, McGovern R, Scott S, Stamp E, Sumnall H, Todd L, Vale L, Albani V, Boniface S, Ferguson J, Gilvarry E, Hendrie N, Howe N, Mossop H, Ramsay A, Stanley G, Newbury-Birch D. Brief alcohol intervention for risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in secondary schools: the SIPS JR-HIGH RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/phr07090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Adverse effects from young people’s alcohol consumption manifest in a range of physical and psychosocial factors, including neurological issues, cognitive impairment and risk-taking behaviours. The SIPS JR-HIGH pilot trial showed alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) to be acceptable to young people and schools in the north-east of England.
Objectives
To conduct a two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ASBI for risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in the school setting, to monitor the fidelity of ASBI and to explore the barriers to, and facilitators of, implementation with staff, young people and parents.
Design
A baseline survey with a 12-month follow-up. Interviews with 30 school staff, 21 learning mentors and nine teachers, and 33 young people and two parents.
Setting
Thirty state schools in four areas of England: north-east, north-west, Kent and London.
Participants
Year 10 school pupils who consented to the study (aged 14–15 years, recruited between November 2015 and June 2016), school-based staff and parents of the young people who took part in the study.
Interventions
Young people who screened positively on a single alcohol screening question and consented were randomised to the intervention or control arm (blinded). The intervention was a 30-minute one-to-one structured brief intervention with a trained learning mentor and an alcohol leaflet. The control group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet (no alcohol information).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was total alcohol consumed in the last 28 days. Secondary outcomes related to risky drinking, general psychological health, sexual risk-taking, energy drink consumption, age of first smoking, quality of life, quality-adjusted life-years, service utilisation and demographic information.
Results
A total of 4523 young people completed the baseline survey, with 1064 screening positively (24%) and 443 being eligible to take part in the trial. Of those 443, 233 (53%) were randomised to the control arm and 210 were randomised to the intervention arm. Of the 443, 374 (84%) were successfully followed up at 12 months (intervention, n = 178; control, n = 196). The results were that the intervention showed no evidence of benefit for any alcohol-related measure when compared with the control arm. At 12 months we found a reduction from 61.9% to 43.3% using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test cut-off point of 8 and cut-off point of 4 (69.0% to 60.7%). These results were not significant. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the average net cost saving of the brief intervention was £2865 (95% confidence interval –£11,272 to £2707) per year compared with usual practice, with the intervention showing a 76% probability of being cost saving compared with usual practice. The interview findings showed that school was an acceptable setting to carry out ASBI among staff and young people.
Limitations
Recruitment of parents to take part in interviews was poor. Only 18 ASBI sessions were recorded, making it difficult to assess internal validity.
Conclusions
Although the intervention was ineffective in reducing risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years, it was well received by the young people and school staff who participated.
Future work
Uniform reporting of the outcomes used for ASBI would generate more robust conclusions on the effectiveness of ASBI in the future. Pilot feasibility studies should include more than one geographical area. Future work on involving parents is needed.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45691494.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Giles
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Grant J McGeechan
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Paolo Deluca
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephanie Scott
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Elaine Stamp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Harry Sumnall
- Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Liz Todd
- School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Viviana Albani
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sadie Boniface
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Ferguson
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nadine Hendrie
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen Mossop
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amy Ramsay
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Grant Stanley
- Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Miller P, Droste N, Egerton‐Warburton D, Caldicott D, Fulde G, Ezard N, Preisz P, Walby A, Lloyd‐Jones M, Stella J, Sheridan M, Baker T, Hall M, Shakeshaft A, Havard A, Bowe S, Staiger PK, D'Este C, Doran C, Coomber K, Hyder S, Barker D, Shepherd J. Driving change: A partnership study protocol using shared emergency department data to reduce alcohol‐related harm. Emerg Med Australas 2019; 31:942-947. [DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Miller
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | - Nicolas Droste
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | | | - David Caldicott
- Calvary Health Care Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - Gordian Fulde
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Nadine Ezard
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Paul Preisz
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Andrew Walby
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | | | | | | | - Tim Baker
- Southwest Health Care Warrnambool Victoria Australia
| | - Michael Hall
- The Canberra Hospital and Health Service Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - Anthony Shakeshaft
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, The University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Alys Havard
- Centre for Big Data Research in HealthThe University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Steve Bowe
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | - Petra K Staiger
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | - Catherine D'Este
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthThe Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
- The University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Chris Doran
- Central Queensland University Rockhampton Queensland Australia
| | - Kerri Coomber
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | - Shannon Hyder
- School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
| | - Daniel Barker
- Central Queensland University Rockhampton Queensland Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Phillips T, Coulton S, Drummond C. Burden of Alcohol Disorders on Emergency Department Attendances and Hospital Admissions in England. Alcohol Alcohol 2019; 54:516-524. [PMID: 33724349 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agz055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS This study aims to estimate the prevalence and burden of alcohol disorders on Emergency Department (ED) and hospital inpatients in England through the exploratory analysis of NHS data. METHODS ED attendances and admission data were linked using hospital episode statistics. Diagnoses were preserved at a patient level to identify individuals who had an alcohol attributable diagnosis. Four groups were identified; a) individuals with no alcohol disorder (NAD), b) acute alcohol disorder (AAD), c) chronic alcohol disorder (CAD) and d) those with any alcohol disorder (AD) (b) and c) combined). Associations between ED diagnosis and alcohol disorders were examined using logistic regression adjusted for hospital provider, age and sex. Non-parametric tests were employed examining ED and hospital service use. Cost differences by group was explored using a propensity scored match sample. RESULTS Of the 1.2million subjects 6.7% were identified as having one or more AD accounting for 11.7% of ED attendances, 9.2% of hospital admissions and 7.2% total bed days. Bootstrapped derived means identified that hospital service use varied significantly between AAD and CAD. Whilst AAD accounted for greater attendances than NAD (2.78; 95% CI 2.680-2.879) those with CAD accounted for even greater attendances (4.33; 95% CI. 4.136-4.515), admissions (2.56; 95% CI. 2.502-2.625) and total bed days (15.14; 95% CI. 14.716-15.559). CONCLUSIONS AD place a disproportionate impact on hospital services with CAD exerting the greatest burden on hospital utilization. The complexity and burden of CAD suggests this group should be a priority for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Phillips
- Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK.,Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Addictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bové HM, Lisby M, Norlyk A. Scheduled care-As a way of caring: A phenomenological study of being cared for when suffering from alcohol use disorders. J Clin Nurs 2018; 28:1174-1182. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Morkenborg Bové
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
- Section for Nursing, Department of Public Health; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
| | - Marianne Lisby
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - Annelise Norlyk
- Section for Nursing, Department of Public Health; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Addison M, Mcgovern R, Angus C, Becker F, Brennan A, Brown H, Coulton S, Crowe L, Gilvarry E, Hickman M, Howel D, Mccoll E, Muirhead C, Newbury-Birch D, Waqas M, Kaner E. Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT). Alcohol Alcohol 2018; 53:548-559. [PMID: 29889245 PMCID: PMC6104624 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agy039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims There is a clear association between alcohol use and offending behaviour and significant police time is spent on alcohol-related incidents. This study aimed to test the feasibility of a trial of screening and brief intervention in police custody suites to reduce heavy drinking and re-offending behaviour. Short summary We achieved target recruitment and high brief intervention delivery if this occurred immediately after screening. Low rates of return for counselling and retention at follow-up were challenges for a definitive trial. Conversely, high consent rates for access to police data suggested at least some outcomes could be measured remotely. Methods A three-armed pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with an embedded qualitative interview-based process evaluation to explore acceptability issues in six police custody suites (north east and south west of the UK). Interventions included: 1. Screening only (Controls), 2. 10 min Brief Advice 3. Brief Advice plus 20 min of brief Counselling. Results Of 3330 arrestees approached: 2228 were eligible for screening (67%) and 720 consented (32%); 386 (54%) scored 8+ on AUDIT; and 205 (53%) were enroled (79 controls, 65 brief advice and 61 brief counselling). Follow-up rates at 6 and 12 months were 29% and 26%, respectively. However, routinely collected re-offending data were obtained for 193 (94%) participants. Indices of deprivation data were calculated for 184 (90%) participants; 37.6% of these resided in the 20% most deprived areas of UK. Qualitative data showed that all arrestees reported awareness that participation was voluntary, that the trial was separate from police work, and the majority said trial procedures were acceptable. Conclusion Despite hitting target recruitment and same-day brief intervention delivery, a future trial of alcohol screening and brief intervention in a police custody setting would only be feasible if routinely collected re-offending and health data were used for outcome measurement. Trial registration ISRCTN number: 89291046.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Addison
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth Mcgovern
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Angus
- School of Health and Related Research, Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Frauke Becker
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Brennan
- School of Health and Related Research, Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Heather Brown
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Lisa Crowe
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle & North Tyneside Addictions Service, Plummer Court, Carliol Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Matthew Hickman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine Mccoll
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Muirhead
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Muhammad Waqas
- Economics Division, Leeds University Business School, Leeds, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Corresponding author: Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. Tel: +44 (0)191 208 7884; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Baldacchino A, O'Rourke L, Humphris G. Investigating the effect of Alcohol Brief Interventions within accident and emergency departments using a data informatics methodology. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 188:47-52. [PMID: 29747037 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol Brief Interventions (ABI) have been implemented throughout Scotland since 2008 and aim to reduce hazardous drinking through a Scottish Government funded initiative delivered in a range of settings, including Accident and Emergency (A and E) departments. PURPOSE To study the extent to which Alcohol Brief Interventions (ABI) are associated with later health service use. METHOD An opportunistic informatics approach was applied. A unique patient identifier was used to link patient data with core datasets spanning two years previous and two years post ABI. Variables included inpatient attendance, outpatient attendance, psychiatric admissions, and A and E attendance and prescribing. Patients (N = 1704) who presented at A and E departments who reported an average alcohol consumption of more than 8 units daily received the ABI. Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST) was used to assess patients for hazardous alcohol consumption. Multilevel linear modelling was employed to predict post-intervention utilisation using pre-ABI variables and controlling for person characteristics and venue. RESULTS Significant decrease in A and E usage was found at one and two years following the ABI intervention. Previous health service use was predictive of later service use. A single question (Item 4) on the FAST was predictive of A and E attendance at one and two years. CONCLUSIONS This investigation and methodology used provide support for the delivery of the ABI. However, it cannot be ascertained whether this is due to the ABI or simply is a result of making contact with a specialist in the addiction field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Baldacchino
- St Andrews Medical School, Division of Population and Behavioural Science, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | - Louise O'Rourke
- St Andrews Medical School, Division of Population and Behavioural Science, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | - Gerry Humphris
- St Andrews Medical School, Division of Population and Behavioural Science, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF Scotland, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
McGovern R, Stamp E, Javanbakht M, McColl E, Hickman M, Kaner E. Promoting Alcohol Reduction in Non-Treatment Seeking parents (PAReNTS): a protocol for a pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of alcohol screening and brief interventions to reduce parental alcohol use disorders in vulnerable families. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:111. [PMID: 29930865 PMCID: PMC5994069 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0305-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research estimates that 30% of children under the age of 16 years in the UK live with at least one parent with an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Parental AUDs are associated with adverse childhood experiences and poorer outcomes for children. The PAReNTS (Promoting Alcohol Reduction in Non-Treatment Seeking parents) trial aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial of brief alcohol interventions to reduce parental alcohol misuse. Methods The cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted within early help family support and children’s social care services in three local authorities in the North East of England: Newcastle, Durham and North Tyneside. All eligible parents the caseloads of participating practitioners will be screened for an AUD using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test – Consumption (AUDIT-C) screening tool by the social care practitioners within routine appointments. All parents who score 5 or more on the AUDIT-C will be invited to participate in the trial. Consenting participants will complete a baseline questionnaire before receiving one of three randomised interventions: (i) healthy lifestyle leaflet (control intervention); (ii) a brief alcohol advice intervention delivered by the social care practitioner plus healthy lifestyle leaflet; (iii) a brief alcohol advice intervention delivered by the social care practitioner, healthy lifestyle leaflet plus a 40-min behaviour change intervention with an optional review session delivered by the local alcohol service. Follow-up data will be collected 6 and 12 months post recruitment. A linked qualitative study will explore participating parent and practitioner views on the acceptability of trial processes and interventions. Discussion The PAReNTS trial will provide a robust estimate of recruitment, retention and consent rates in order to inform the design of a future definitive study examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief interventions to reduce parental AUDs within vulnerable families. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN60291091; protocol version 2; 17.10.2016 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0305-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth McGovern
- 1Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine Stamp
- 1Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mehdi Javanbakht
- 1Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- 1Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Matthew Hickman
- 2School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- 1Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Coulton S, Bland M, Crosby H, Dale V, Drummond C, Godfrey C, Kaner E, Sweetman J, McGovern R, Newbury-Birch D, Parrott S, Tober G, Watson J, Wu Q. Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Opportunistic Screening and Stepped-care Interventions for Older Alcohol Users in Primary Care. Alcohol Alcohol 2018; 52:655-664. [PMID: 29016980 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agx065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention versus a minimal intervention for the treatment of older hazardous alcohol users in primary care. Method Multi-centre, pragmatic RCT, set in Primary Care in UK. Patients aged ≥ 55 years scoring ≥ 8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test were allocated either to 5-min of brief advice or to 'Stepped Care': an initial 20-min of behavioural change counselling, with Step 2 being three sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Step 3 referral to local alcohol services (progression between each Step being determined by outcomes 1 month after each Step). Outcome measures included average drinks per day, AUDIT-C, alcohol-related problems using the Drinking Problems Index, health-related quality of life using the Short Form 12, costs measured from a NHS/Personal Social Care perspective and estimated health gains in quality adjusted life-years measured assessed EQ-5D. Results Both groups reduced alcohol consumption at 12 months but the difference between groups was small and not significant. No significant differences were observed between the groups on secondary outcomes. In economic terms stepped care was less costly and more effective than the minimal intervention. Conclusions Stepped care does not confer an advantage over a minimal intervention in terms of reduction in alcohol use for older hazardous alcohol users in primary care. However, stepped care has a greater probability of being more cost-effective. Trial Registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN52557360. Short summary A stepped care approach was compared with brief intervention for older at-risk drinkers attending primary care. While consumption reduced in both groups over 12 months there was no significant difference between the groups. An economic analysis indicated the stepped care which had a greater probability of being more cost-effective than brief intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK
| | - Martin Bland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Veronica Dale
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College, London SE5 8BB, UK
| | - Christine Godfrey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Jennifer Sweetman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4AX, UK
| | | | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Judith Watson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hamilton FL, Hornby J, Sheringham J, Linke S, Ashton C, Moore K, Stevenson F, Murray E. DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management ON Demand): a feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use recruiting in hospital emergency departments and online. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:114. [PMID: 29946479 PMCID: PMC6003139 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The harmful use of alcohol is a causal factor in more than 200 disease and injury conditions and leads to over 3 million deaths every year worldwide. Relatively few problem alcohol users access treatment due to stigma and lack of services. Alcohol-specific digital health interventions (DHI) may help them, but trial data comparing DHI with face-to-face treatment are lacking. METHODS We conducted a feasibility RCT of an alcohol DHI, testing recruitment, online data-collection and randomisation processes, with an embedded process evaluation. Recruitment ran from October 2015 for 12 months. Participants were adults, drinking at hazardous and harmful levels, recruited from hospital emergency departments (ED) in London or recruited online. Participants were randomised to HeLP-Alcohol, a six module DHI with weekly reminder prompts (phone, email or text message), or to face-to-face treatment as usual (TAU). Participants were invited to take part in qualitative interviews after the trial. RESULTS The trial website was accessed 1074 times: 420 people completed online eligibility questionnaires; 350 did not meet eligibility criteria, 51 declined to participate, and 19 were recruited and randomised. Follow-up data were collected from three participants (retention 3/19), and four agreed to be interviewed for the process evaluation. The main themes of the interviews were:Participants were not at equipoise. They wanted to try the website and were disappointed to be randomised to face-to-face, so they were less engaged and dropped out.Other reasons for drop out included not accepting that they had a drink problem; problem drinking interfering with their ability to take part in a trial or forgetting appointments; having a busy life and being randomised to TAU made it difficult to attend appointments. CONCLUSIONS This feasibility RCT aimed to test recruitment, randomisation, retention, and data collection methods, but recruited only 19 participants. This illustrates the importance of undertaking feasibility studies prior to fully powered RCTs. From the qualitative interviews we found that potential recruits were not at equipoise for recruitment. An alternative methodology, for example a preference RCT recruiting from multiple locations, needs to be explored in future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN31789096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona L. Hamilton
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Jo Hornby
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | | | - Stuart Linke
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kevin Moore
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Fiona Stevenson
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B, Sniehotta FF, Petrie DJ, Jones C, Norrie J, Evans JMM, Emslie C, Rice PM, Slane PW, Humphris G, Ricketts IW, Melson AJ, Donnan PT, McKenzie A, Huang L, Achison M. Text message intervention to reduce frequency of binge drinking among disadvantaged men: the TRAM RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/phr06060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Socially disadvantaged men are more likely to binge drink frequently and to experience high levels of alcohol-related harm.
Objectives
To test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a text message intervention in reducing the frequency of binge drinking among disadvantaged men.
Study design
A four-centre, parallel-group, pragmatic, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted. Randomisation was carried out using a secure remote web-based system. It was stratified by participating centre and recruitment method and restricted using block sizes of randomly varying lengths.
Setting
The study was conducted in the community. Members of the public helped to develop the study methods.
Participants
Participants were men aged 25–44 years who had ≥ 2 episodes of binge drinking (> 8 units of alcohol in a single session) in the preceding 28 days. Men were recruited from areas of high deprivation.
Interventions
An empirically and theoretically based text message intervention was delivered by 112 interactive text messages over a 12-week period. The control group received an attentional control comprising 89 text messages on general health.
Primary outcome measure
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of men consuming > 8 units of alcohol on ≥ 3 occasions (in the previous 28 days) at 12 months post intervention.
Results
The recruitment target of 798 was exceeded and 825 men were randomised. Retention was high and similar in the intervention (84.9%) and control (86.5%) groups. Most men in the intervention group engaged enthusiastically with the text messages: almost all (92%) replied to text messages and over two-thirds (67%) replied more than 10 times. The intervention was estimated to have had a modest, statistically non-significant effect on the primary outcome at the 12-month follow-up [odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.08]. This corresponds to a net reduction of 5.7% in regular binge drinking. Five secondary outcomes showed small non-significant and inconsistent effects on alcohol consumption, with one suggesting a positive effect and four suggesting an adverse effect. Both the short- and the long-term cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) analysis suggested that the brief intervention was dominated by a ‘do-nothing’ option. The intervention’s impacts on patterns of alcohol consumption, QALYs and downstream costs were inconsistent and uncertain.
Limitations
The study used an active control that, combined with the recruitment procedures and baseline assessments, could have biased the treatment effect towards the null. The measurement of alcohol consumption relied on self-reported drinking.
Conclusions
The trial has demonstrated that it is possible to recruit and retain large numbers of socially disadvantaged men in a research study. The text messages delivered a complex theoretically and empirically based intervention that fostered enthusiastic engagement with the key components of the behaviour change sequence. The intervention produced a modest, statistically non-significant effect on the primary outcome, with wide CIs. Further research is needed to reduce uncertainty about the treatment effect. The methods developed for this study provide a platform for the design and testing of interventions to reduce inequalities in health.
Future work
A future trial could reduce the uncertainty around the treatment effect of the intervention.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN07695192.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 6, No. 6. See NIHR Journals Library website for further information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain K Crombie
- Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Linda Irvine
- Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Brian Williams
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Falko F Sniehotta
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dennis J Petrie
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claire Jones
- Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Josie MM Evans
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Carol Emslie
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter M Rice
- Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Peter W Slane
- Erskine Practice, Arthurstone Medical Centre, Dundee, UK
| | - Gerry Humphris
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | | | - Ambrose J Melson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter T Donnan
- Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Andrew McKenzie
- Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Li Huang
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marcus Achison
- Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McNicholl B, Goggin D, O’Donovan D. Alcohol-related presentations to emergency departments in Ireland: a descriptive prevalence study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021932. [PMID: 29794104 PMCID: PMC5988151 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of alcohol-related presentations in all 29 emergency departments (EDs) in Ireland and compare with non-alcohol-related presentations in order to identify opportunities for improvements in the quality of patient care and related data collection. DESIGN AND SETTING Descriptive prevalence study reviewing all records in the same four 6-hour periods in every 24-hour ED in the country. PARTICIPANTS 3194 persons who attended EDs over four specified 6-hour periods. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The prevalence of alcohol-related presentations, comparison with non-alcohol-related presentations and the categorisation of these presentations according to WHO International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes. RESULTS The total number of presentations was 3194 in the four 6-hour periods, of whom 189 (5.9%) were alcohol related, varying from 29.0% in the early hours of Sunday morning to 1.2% on Monday morning (p>0.0001). The alcohol-related presentations were more likely to be men, attend on early hours of Sunday morning, arrive by ambulance, leave before being seen by a doctor or leave against medical advice; and they were less likely to be admitted to hospital. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol-related presentations are a significant burden on EDs and ambulance services, especially in the early hours of Sunday mornings. Addressing the alcohol-related burden on EDs requires improvements in data collection and information systems, the development of appropriate interventions and related referral services and better preventive actions for alcohol-related harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian McNicholl
- Emergency Department, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Goggin
- Department of Public Health, Health Service Executive, Merlin Park, Galway, Ireland
| | - Diarmuid O’Donovan
- Department of Public Health, Health Service Executive, Merlin Park, Galway, Ireland
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bruguera P, Barrio P, Oliveras C, Braddick F, Gavotti C, Bruguera C, López‐Pelayo H, Miquel L, Segura L, Colom J, Ortega L, Vieta E, Gual A. Effectiveness of a Specialized Brief Intervention for At-risk Drinkers in an Emergency Department: Short-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25:517-525. [PMID: 29418049 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs have been developed, evaluated, and shown to be effective, particularly in primary care and general practice. Nevertheless, effectiveness of SBIRT in emergency departments (EDs) has not been clearly established. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an SBIRT program conducted by highly specialized professionals in the ED of a tertiary hospital. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the feasibility and efficacy of an SBIRT program conducted by alcohol specialists for at-risk drinkers presenting to the ED, measured with the three-item version of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT-C). Patients were randomized to two groups, with the control group receiving two leaflets-one regarding alcohol use and the other giving information about the study protocol. The intervention group received the same leaflets as well as a brief motivational intervention on alcohol use and, where appropriate, a referral to specialized treatment. The primary outcomes were the proportion of at-risk alcohol use measured by AUDIT-C scale and the proportion of patients attending specialized treatment at 1.5 months. RESULTS Of 3,027 patients presenting to the ED, 2,044 (67%) were potentially eligible to participate, 247 (12%) screened positive for at-risk drinking, and 200 agreed to participate. Seventy-two percent of the participating sample were men, and the mean (±SD) age was 43 (±16.7) years. Follow-up rates were 76.5%. At 1.5 months, the intervention group showed greater reductions in alcohol consumption and fewer patients continuing with at-risk alcohol use (27.8% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.01). The SBIRT program also increased the probability of attending specialized treatment, compared to the control condition (23% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.0119) CONCLUSION: The SBIRT program in the ED was found to be feasible and effective in identifying at-risk drinkers, reducing at-risk alcohol use, and increasing treatment for alcohol problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pol Bruguera
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Pablo Barrio
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Clara Oliveras
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
| | - Fleur Braddick
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
| | - Carolina Gavotti
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
| | - Carla Bruguera
- Program on Substance Abuse Public Health Agency Government of Catalonia Barcelona Spain
| | - Hugo López‐Pelayo
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Laia Miquel
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Lídia Segura
- Program on Substance Abuse Public Health Agency Government of Catalonia Barcelona Spain
| | - Joan Colom
- Program on Substance Abuse Public Health Agency Government of Catalonia Barcelona Spain
| | - Lluisa Ortega
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) Madrid Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| | - Antoni Gual
- Addictive Behaviors Unit Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Addiccions Clínic Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Universitat de Barcelona Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RETICS) Barcelona Spain
- Bipolar Disorder Program Institute of Neuroscience Hospital Clínic University of Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kaner EFS, Beyer FR, Muirhead C, Campbell F, Pienaar ED, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Saunders JB, Burnand B. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 2:CD004148. [PMID: 29476653 PMCID: PMC6491186 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 259] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excessive drinking is a significant cause of mortality, morbidity and social problems in many countries. Brief interventions aim to reduce alcohol consumption and related harm in hazardous and harmful drinkers who are not actively seeking help for alcohol problems. Interventions usually take the form of a conversation with a primary care provider and may include feedback on the person's alcohol use, information about potential harms and benefits of reducing intake, and advice on how to reduce consumption. Discussion informs the development of a personal plan to help reduce consumption. Brief interventions can also include behaviour change or motivationally-focused counselling.This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2007. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention to reduce excessive alcohol consumption in hazardous or harmful drinkers in general practice or emergency care settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and 12 other bibliographic databases to September 2017. We searched Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Science Database (to December 2003, after which the database was discontinued), trials registries, and websites. We carried out handsearching and checked reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of brief interventions to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in people attending general practice, emergency care or other primary care settings for reasons other than alcohol treatment. The comparison group was no or minimal intervention, where a measure of alcohol consumption was reported. 'Brief intervention' was defined as a conversation comprising five or fewer sessions of brief advice or brief lifestyle counselling and a total duration of less than 60 minutes. Any more was considered an extended intervention. Digital interventions were not included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We carried out subgroup analyses where possible to investigate the impact of factors such as gender, age, setting (general practice versus emergency care), treatment exposure and baseline consumption. MAIN RESULTS We included 69 studies that randomised a total of 33,642 participants. Of these, 42 studies were added for this update (24,057 participants). Most interventions were delivered in general practice (38 studies, 55%) or emergency care (27 studies, 39%) settings. Most studies (61 studies, 88%) compared brief intervention to minimal or no intervention. Extended interventions were compared with brief (4 studies, 6%), minimal or no intervention (7 studies, 10%). Few studies targeted particular age groups: adolescents or young adults (6 studies, 9%) and older adults (4 studies, 6%). Mean baseline alcohol consumption was 244 g/week (30.5 standard UK units) among the studies that reported these data. Main sources of bias were attrition and lack of provider or participant blinding. The primary meta-analysis included 34 studies (15,197 participants) and provided moderate-quality evidence that participants who received brief intervention consumed less alcohol than minimal or no intervention participants after one year (mean difference (MD) -20 g/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -28 to -12). There was substantial heterogeneity among studies (I² = 73%). A subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that both men and women reduced alcohol consumption after receiving a brief intervention.We found moderate-quality evidence that brief alcohol interventions have little impact on frequency of binges per week (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.02; 15 studies, 6946 participants); drinking days per week (MD -0.13, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.04; 11 studies, 5469 participants); or drinking intensity (-0.2 g/drinking day, 95% CI -3.1 to 2.7; 10 studies, 3128 participants).We found moderate-quality evidence of little difference in quantity of alcohol consumed when extended and no or minimal interventions were compared (-14 g/week, 95% CI -37 to 9; 6 studies, 1296 participants). There was little difference in binges per week (-0.08, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.12; 2 studies, 456 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or difference in days drinking per week (-0.45, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.09; 2 studies, 319 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Extended versus no or minimal intervention provided little impact on drinking intensity (9 g/drinking day, 95% CI -26 to 9; 1 study, 158 participants; low-quality evidence).Extended intervention had no greater impact than brief intervention on alcohol consumption, although findings were imprecise (MD 2 g/week, 95% CI -42 to 45; 3 studies, 552 participants; low-quality evidence). Numbers of binges were not reported for this comparison, but one trial suggested a possible drop in days drinking per week (-0.5, 95% CI -1.2 to 0.2; 147 participants; low-quality evidence). Results from this trial also suggested very little impact on drinking intensity (-1.7 g/drinking day, 95% CI -18.9 to 15.5; 147 participants; very low-quality evidence).Only five studies reported adverse effects (very low-quality evidence). No participants experienced any adverse effects in two studies; one study reported that the intervention increased binge drinking for women and two studies reported adverse events related to driving outcomes but concluded they were equivalent in both study arms.Sources of funding were reported by 67 studies (87%). With two exceptions, studies were funded by government institutes, research bodies or charitable foundations. One study was partly funded by a pharmaceutical company and a brewers association, another by a company developing diagnostic testing equipment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found moderate-quality evidence that brief interventions can reduce alcohol consumption in hazardous and harmful drinkers compared to minimal or no intervention. Longer counselling duration probably has little additional effect. Future studies should focus on identifying the components of interventions which are most closely associated with effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen FS Kaner
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietyRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Fiona R Beyer
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietyRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Colin Muirhead
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietyRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Fiona Campbell
- The University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related ResearchRegent StreetSheffieldUKS1 4DA
| | - Elizabeth D Pienaar
- South African Medical Research CouncilCochrane South AfricaPO Box 19070TygerbergCape TownSouth Africa7505
| | - Nicolas Bertholet
- Lausanne University HospitalAlcohol Treatment Center, Department of Community Medicine and HealthLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Jean B Daeppen
- Lausanne University HospitalAlcohol Treatment Center, Department of Community Medicine and HealthLausanneSwitzerland
| | - John B Saunders
- Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalDepartment of PsychiatryCentre for Drug & Alcohol StudiesSchool of MedicineUniversity of Queensland/Royal Brisbane HospitalQueenslandAustralia4029
| | - Bernard Burnand
- Lausanne University HospitalCochrane Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive MedicineBiopôle 2Route de la Corniche 10LausanneVaudSwitzerlandCH‐1010
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dienes Z, Coulton S, Heather N. Using Bayes factors to evaluate evidence for no effect: examples from the SIPS project. Addiction 2018; 113:240-246. [PMID: 28804980 DOI: 10.1111/add.14002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To illustrate how Bayes factors are important for determining the effectiveness of interventions. METHOD We consider a case where inappropriate conclusions were drawn publicly based on significance testing, namely the SIPS project (Screening and Intervention Programme for Sensible drinking), a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial in each of two health-care settings and in the criminal justice system. We show how Bayes factors can disambiguate the non-significant findings from the SIPS project and thus determine whether the findings represent evidence of absence or absence of evidence. We show how to model the sort of effects that could be expected, and how to check the robustness of the Bayes factors. RESULTS The findings from the three SIPS trials taken individually are largely uninformative but, when data from these trials are combined, there is moderate evidence for a null hypothesis (H0) and thus for a lack of effect of brief intervention compared with simple clinical feedback and an alcohol information leaflet (B = 0.24, P = 0.43). CONCLUSION Scientists who find non-significant results should suspend judgement-unless they calculate a Bayes factor to indicate either that there is evidence for a null hypothesis (H0) over a (well-justified) alternative hypothesis (H1), or that more data are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltan Dienes
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Nick Heather
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Baldassarre M, Caputo F, Pavarin RM, Bossi MM, Bonavita ME, Caraceni P, Grignaschi A, Balloni M, Cavazza M, Bernardi M, Domenicali M. Accesses for alcohol intoxication to the emergency department and the risk of re-hospitalization: An observational retrospective study. Addict Behav 2018; 77:1-6. [PMID: 28918344 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 08/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorders (AUD) are a frequent cause of admission to emergency departments (EDs) for acute alcohol intoxication (AAI). Patients with AUD present a higher risk of readmission to EDs for AAI than the general population, however, the distinction between sporadic AAI and AAI in the context of AUD in the ED setting is difficult. AIMS To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted to EDs because of AAI and to identify factors associated with repeated admissions in order to develop a risk stratification system for patients with AUD based on objective data that can be easily applied in an ED setting. METHODS An observational retrospective study was performed. All patients with diagnosis of AAI at admission in 2014 were enrolled. RESULTS Five hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled, of which 92 (16%) were admitted more than once to the ED. At multivariate analysis, factors associated with readmission were past episodes of alcohol abuse, social discomfort, previous traumas and psychiatric disorders. Basing on this parameter, a risk-score for re-hospitalization was developed. This score has a high predictive power for the risk of readmission to the ED (AROC 0.837, 95%CI 0.808-0.866), moreover, the cumulative probability of readmission within one year, increased in parallel with score value, being highest in patients presenting 3 or more risk factors. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates that several risk factors stratify the risk of re-hospitalization in patients admitted to EDs for AAI, allowing the identification of those presenting more severe conditions and who would likely benefit from multidisciplinary intervention.
Collapse
|