1
|
Lamot M, Kerman K, Kirbiš A. Ideological differences in COVID-19 vaccine intention: the effects of trust in the healthcare system, in complementary and alternative medicine, and perceived threat from the disease. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1332697. [PMID: 38375112 PMCID: PMC10875337 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Politically left-leaning individuals are more likely to get vaccinated against COVID-19, although little is known about the mechanisms underlying the ideological differences in vaccination intentions. Understanding the extent to which trust in the healthcare system, in complementary and alternative medicine, and the perceived threat from the disease contribute to these disparities is crucial, as it could inform targeted interventions to address vaccine hesitancy across the political spectrum. Methods The present cross-sectional study conducted among adults living in Slovenia (n = 858) examined the mediating role of trust in the healthcare system, trust in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and the perceived threat from the virus on COVID-19 vaccination intention. Results We found that leftist ideology and trust in the healthcare system positively predicted vaccination intention, whereas CAM negatively predicted this intention. In addition, left-leaning individuals expressed greater trust in the healthcare system and lower trust in CAM, resulting in higher levels of COVID-19 vaccination intention. The serial mediation model confirmed that trust in CAM was a negative predictor, while trust in the healthcare system positively predicted perceived threat. Discussion When dealing with vaccine hesitancy among right-oriented individuals, strategies should focus on enhancing trust in the healthcare system and critically evaluating the reliance on CAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Lamot
- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Katja Kerman
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Kirbiš
- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koong A, McDermott R, Kaplan R. Examining American attitudes toward vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of negative and positive rights. Politics Life Sci 2023; 42:291-305. [PMID: 37987573 DOI: 10.1017/pls.2023.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
We examine the likely acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in the period prior to political polarization around vaccine mandates. Two representative cross-sectional surveys of 1,000 respondents were fielded in August and December 2020. The surveys included items about the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine mandates. Respondents self-identifying as liberal were the least likely to believe the vaccine had undisclosed harmful effects (p< .001), conservatives were the most likely (p < .001), and moderates fell in between. Individuals with a bachelor's degree were less likely to think the vaccine had undisclosed harmful effects than individuals without a bachelor's degree (p < .001), and 60.5% of those individuals did not support a government vaccine mandate. Political ideology was more often strongly associated with avoiding government involvement compared to education level. In summary, both liberal political ideology and higher education were significantly associated with endorsing intended vaccine uptake. We discuss these results in terms of positive versus negative rights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Koong
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA, Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA and Clinical Excellence Research Center at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rose McDermott
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA, Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA and Clinical Excellence Research Center at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA,
| | - Robert Kaplan
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA, Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA and Clinical Excellence Research Center at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao T, Wang C, Zhang S, Chen L, Han B, Liu H, Xie M, Cai X, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Li G, Liu B, Du J, Zeng J, Liu Y, Lu Q, Cui F. What Causes the Discrepancy in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Between Parental Hesitancy for Themselves and for Their Children During Lockdown Period? J Epidemiol Glob Health 2023; 13:422-434. [PMID: 37378822 PMCID: PMC10468446 DOI: 10.1007/s44197-023-00122-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents are usually the decision-makers for vaccinations of children. Therefore, it is important to understand parental beliefs and attitudes toward severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine for themselves and their children when it was approved for children age 3-17. METHOD A cross-sectional survey based on an anonymous online questionnaire for parents was conducted in seven provinces of China, and demographic information, vaccination history, parental decision motives, and health belief model toward themselves and their children were collected, respectively. RESULTS The overall parental hesitancy rate toward themselves was 20.30%, and that toward their children was 7.80%. More parental concerns on disease severity (odd ratio [OR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.61) and susceptibility (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01-1.63) of children could be the causes of discrepancy in hesitancy for themselves and for their children. Parents who hesitated to vaccinate themselves might also be hesitated to vaccinate their children (β = 0.077, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Threat perception may lead to inconsistencies in parental vaccination decisions toward themselves and toward their children. Correcting misinformation and strengthening education about COVID-19 are of great significance in addressing vaccine hesitancy among parents and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianshuo Zhao
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Sihui Zhang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Linyi Chen
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Bingfeng Han
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Hanyu Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingzhu Xie
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianming Cai
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Shanshan Zhang
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Yiguo Zhou
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Guoxing Li
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Puyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Henan, 457005, People's Republic of China
| | - Bei Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Yaqiong Liu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingbin Lu
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Fuqiang Cui
- Department of Laboratorial Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
- Vaccine Research Center, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zheng B, Yan J, Wang X, Tang Y, Xiang Y. Using the '4Ps' social marketing strategy to overcome vaccination hesitancy: COVID-19 vaccine coverage in a Chinese college as an example. Saudi Med J 2023; 44:560-596. [PMID: 37343992 PMCID: PMC10284222 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.6.20220696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the role of the '4Ps' social marketing strategy on vaccine hesitancy and its impact on public vaccine coverage. The '4Ps' strategy (place, price, product and promotion) is a social marketing tool that had addressed many public issues and vaccinations. METHODS This study was a retrospective before-after study. A total of 10795 people were enrolled. The routine COVID-19 immunization method was used for the first vaccination doses from 23 March to 11 April, 2021. Then we carried out a '4Ps' social marketing strategy for vaccination from 12 April to 1 May 2021. The vaccine hesitancy and the coverage rate of the first dosage of COVID-19 vaccine in the target population were collected and compared before and after the '4Ps' social marketing strategy. RESULTS The coverage reached only 6.19% during routine immunization. However, vaccine hesitancy of the target population decreased (52% versus [vs.] 3.1%, before vs. after '4Ps' strategy) and degree of coverage (94.8%, vs. routine vaccination method, p<0.001) significantly increased after taking '4Ps' social marketing strategy. Furthermore, the '4Ps' social marketing strategy also consolidated the completion of the second dosage of COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSION The '4Ps' social marketing strategy greatly reduced vaccine hesitancy and enhanced vaccination coverage and provided a more effective and reliable promotion method in the face of current virus mutations and new vaccination in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baojia Zheng
- From the Department of Health Management Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
| | - Jiao Yan
- From the Department of Health Management Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
| | - Xiaoqing Wang
- From the Department of Health Management Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
| | - Yuxin Tang
- From the Department of Health Management Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
| | - Yali Xiang
- From the Department of Health Management Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Viskupič F, Wiltse DL. Political Partisanship and Trust in Government Predict Popular Support for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Various Professions and Demographic Groups: A Research Note. AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH 2023; 51:139-146. [PMID: 38603210 PMCID: PMC9364069 DOI: 10.1177/1532673x221118888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Due to the slow rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and the spread of the highly contagious Omicron variant, governments are considering mandating COVID-19 vaccination for specific professions and demographic groups. This study evaluates popular attitudes toward such policies. We fielded a survey of 535 registered voters in South Dakota to examine popular attitudes towards vaccine mandates for five groups-children 12 and older, K-12 teachers, medical staff, nursing homes staff, and police personnel. We estimated a series of logistic regression models and presented predicted probabilities to find the primary determinants of these attitudes. Results revealed that political partisanship and trust in government are strong predictors of support for vaccine mandates across all models. Should government and public health officials wish to increase the proportion of people vaccinated for COVID-19, they must recognize the limitations of current public health campaigns, and reshape their efforts in congruence with scientific findings.
Collapse
|
6
|
Halimatusa'diyah I, Durriyah TL. Political Partisanship, Trust, and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccines in Indonesia. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2023; 48:35-61. [PMID: 36112927 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10171076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT This study examines the extent to which political partisanship-measured as support for either the incumbent candidate for Indonesia's presidency, Joko Widodo (popularly known as Jokowi), or for Jokowi's challenger, Prabowo-affects individuals' risk perception of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal as well as beliefs about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS The authors performed multinomial logistic and ordinary least squares regression analyses on a nationally representative sample of a national survey on public trust in COVID-19 vaccines and vaccinations that was conducted in December 2020. FINDINGS Individuals who voted for Prabowo in the 2019 presidential election were more likely to have a lower level of willingness and a higher level of hesitancy to get the COVID-19 vaccine than those who cast their ballot for Jokowi as the Indonesian president. CONCLUSIONS Political partisanship does matter in shaping individuals' hesitancy or refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Indonesia. The effect of partisanship is also significant in shaping individuals' trust in the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, but it is not significantly associated with individuals' risk perceptions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Associations between Vaccination Behavior and Trust in Information Sources Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines under Emergency Approval in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020233. [PMID: 36851111 PMCID: PMC9965898 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
We examined the association between COVID-19 vaccination behavior and trust in COVID-19-related information sources during the initial period of COVID-19 vaccination in Japan. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2021, 5 months after the start of COVID-19 vaccination for the general public under emergency approval. Participants were recruited using non-probability quota sampling from among Japanese residents who were under a declared state of emergency. Sociodemographic data, vaccination behavior, and levels of trust in eight media sources of information and three interpersonal information sources were assessed using an online survey form. A total of 784 participants completed the survey. The results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that age, household income, underlying medical conditions, and living with family were significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccination behavior. Regarding COVID-19 vaccine information sources, trust in public health experts as a source of media information and primary care physicians as a source of interpersonal information showed significantly positive associations with COVID-19 vaccination behavior (odds ratio [OR] = 1.157, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.017-1.31; OR = 1.076; 95% CI 1.006-1.150, respectively). Increasing trust in public health experts and primary care physicians and disseminating vaccine information from these sources will help promote vaccination under emergency approval.
Collapse
|
8
|
Fadda M, Bezani K, Amati R, Fiordelli M, Crivelli L, Albanese E, Suggs LS, Caiata-Zufferey M. Decision-making on COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative study among health care and social workers caring for vulnerable individuals. SSM. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH 2022; 2:100181. [PMID: 36267682 PMCID: PMC9561372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
In January 2021, the Swiss government introduced the first COVID-19 vaccines and prioritized allocation to at-risk individuals and professionals working with them. Despite this opportunity, vaccine uptake among staff employed in retirement homes and institutes for people with disabilities was suboptimal. This study aimed to capture real-time decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine among staff employed in nursing homes and institutes for people with disabilities in Southern Switzerland. We conducted semi-structured phone-interviews with 25 staff employed in retirement homes and institutes for people with disabilities between February and May 2021, i.e., when participants had to decide whether they wanted to adhere to the priority vaccination programme. Among participants, 21 either signed up for the COVID-19 vaccination or were fully or partly vaccinated at the time of the interview. For most participants, the vaccination choice was a challenging process: information appeared to be lacking and conflicting; numerous moral principles were at stake and contradictory; the way vaccination was organized clashed with the health values to which respondents had been previously exposed; finally, the fear of discrimination for those who decided not to get vaccinated loomed over the vaccination choice. Participants decided for or against vaccination based on principles, traditions, emotions, and a reflexive assessment of the personal vs. collective benefit of the vaccination, the latter being the most common within the investigated sample. This study shows that deciding to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is a nuanced process and that individuals cannot simply be categorized as "novax" or "provax" based on their vaccination decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fadda
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland,Corresponding author
| | - Kleona Bezani
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Amati
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Maddalena Fiordelli
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino 11, 6928, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - L. Suzanne Suggs
- Institute of Public Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Maria Caiata-Zufferey
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino 11, 6928, Manno, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ali RF, Arif Siddiqi D, Mirza A, Naz N, Abdullah S, Kembhavi G, Tam CC, Offeddu V, Chandir S. Adolescent girls' recommendations for the design of a human papillomavirus vaccination program in Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2045856. [PMID: 35240928 PMCID: PMC9196803 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2045856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Vaccination of adolescent girls against human papillomavirus (HPV) significantly reduces the incidence of cervical cancer. HPV vaccines are available in Pakistan but plans to develop HPV vaccination program are at a nascent stage. We conducted a formative study to explore adolescent girls' knowledge and perspectives on HPV and cervical cancer and collect their recommendations for implementing an HPV vaccination program in their community. METHODS Using qualitative exploratory study design, we conducted four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 12 adolescent girls per group in District West, Karachi. We recruited unmarried girls aged 16-19 years from schools and community settings between May-December 2020. Data analysis was done using NVivo. RESULTS Overall, participants displayed a positive attitude toward HPV vaccine. However, they were unfamiliar with basic concepts related to female reproductive health. Female relatives were indicated as girls' preferred point of contact for discussions on HPV and cervical cancer, but fathers were portrayed as decision-making authority on vaccination. Participants indicated vaccine hesitancy among parents may affect HPV vaccination uptake. Girls suggested individual household visits and community-based camps as strategies for successful implementation of HPV vaccination program. A solid foundation of trust between girls' families, program managers, and other stakeholders emerged as a key asset for the program's success. CONCLUSION Adolescent girls' suggestions of informing key decision-makers in the family (particularly fathers) of the benefits of HPV vaccination, establishing trust with vaccine providers, and increasing accessibility of vaccinations should be explored for successful implementation of an HPV vaccination program in Pakistan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rozina Feroz Ali
- Maternal & Child Health Program, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Amna Mirza
- Maternal & Child Health Program, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Nowshaba Naz
- Maternal & Child Health Program, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sara Abdullah
- Maternal & Child Health Program, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Gayatri Kembhavi
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarence C Tam
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Subhash Chandir
- Maternal & Child Health Program, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan.,IRD Global, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Trust in the public health system as a source of information on vaccination matters most when environments are supportive. Vaccine 2022; 40:4693-4699. [PMID: 35753840 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand whether health insurance coverage of vaccine costs and discussing vaccination with a healthcare provider are necessary for trust in CDC (Centers for Disease Control) to increase the uptake of the vaccine. METHOD A nationally representative sample of 2,549 adults from the United States answered questions about trust in CDC, insurance coverage, interactions with healthcare providers, and risk perceptions, and then provided longitudinal reports of actual vaccination against influenza during the course of the 2018-19 flu season. RESULTS Trust in CDC as a source of information on vaccines was a strong precursor of vaccination. According to multilevel regressions, however, this effect was localized to respondents who had insurance coverage or whose providers discussed the vaccine with them. Further, the effect of trust was even stronger when both insurance coverage and healthcare provider discussions were present. CONCLUSIONS Environmental factors supportive of vaccination increased the positive influence of trust in CDC on vaccine uptake by almost 50 percent. Insurance companies and healthcare providers can promote vaccination by covering the costs of vaccination and discussing vaccines in personalized conversations with patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang Q, Shi Y, English AS. COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in the Context of the First Delta Outbreak in China During the Early Summer of 2021: The Role of Geographical Distance and Vaccine Talk. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2022; 15:1203-1214. [PMID: 35711278 PMCID: PMC9196912 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s361024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Vaccination is essential to control the prevalence of COVID-19. However, vaccine hesitancy has been a major issue globally. Some studies have suggested that community outbreaks might boost vaccine uptake. Consistent with that idea, vaccination rates increased dramatically during the first outbreak of the COVID-19 Delta variant in Guangdong, China, in June 2021. Based on the risk perception attitude theory, this study attempted to explore the joint effect of geographical distance to the outbreak and the frequency of talking about the COVID-19 vaccine (vaccine talk) on people’s COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Methods An anonymous self-report online questionnaire was completed by citizens living in Guangdong Province, China, from June 6 to 11, 2021, during the Delta variant outbreak in that region. The relationship between COVID-19 vaccine uptake, geographical distance to the epicenter of the outbreak, and vaccine talk was analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results Data from 350 respondents were included in the final analysis. Results showed a negative association between geographical distance and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Furthermore, the relationship was moderated by vaccine talk. Specifically, when individuals infrequently discussed vaccine talk with others, close distance to the epicenter of the outbreak served as a motivator for getting vaccinated, whereas for people who frequently discussed the vaccine, geographical distance might have played less of a role in motivating them to get vaccinated. Conclusion This research highlights the joint effect of geographical distance to the outbreak of COVID-19 and vaccine talk in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. While the findings may only be a starting point for launching a public health awareness campaign, encouraging people to engage in more conversations about vaccines may be a promising solution for future health emergencies, especially among people far from the outbreak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qionghan Zhang
- School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanwei Shi
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Alexander Scott English
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Viskupič F, Wiltse DL, Meyer BA. Trust in physicians and trust in government predict COVID-19 vaccine uptake. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY 2022; 103:509-520. [PMID: 35600052 PMCID: PMC9115527 DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We consider how trust in government, trust in physicians, and interpersonal trust affect the likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. METHODS A survey of 3057 registered South Dakota voters was fielded in April 2021 that measured COVID-19 vaccine uptake, three aspects of trust, and several other factors related to vaccine hesitancy. Logistic regression was utilized to analyze the responses. RESULTS We found positive, statistically significant, and substantively impactful effects for trust in government and trust in physicians on the likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and null results for interpersonal trust. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between trust and COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and suggest that public health official as well as physicians should strive to increase the public's trust in the medical community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Viskupič
- The SDSU Poll, School of American and Global StudiesSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsSouth DakotaUSA
| | - David L. Wiltse
- The SDSU Poll, School of American and Global StudiesSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsSouth DakotaUSA
| | - Brittney A. Meyer
- College of Pharmacy and Allied Health ProfessionsSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsSouth DakotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fadda M, Camerini AL, Fiordelli M, Corna L, Levati S, Amati R, Piumatti G, Crivelli L, Suggs LS, Albanese E. Why Vaccinate Against COVID-19? A Population-Based Survey in Switzerland. Int J Public Health 2022; 67:1604226. [PMID: 35418817 PMCID: PMC8997237 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intention at the very beginning of the vaccination campaign in a representative sample of the population in southern Switzerland. Methods: In March 2021, we measured vaccination intention, beliefs, attitudes, and trust in a sample of the Corona Immunitas Ticino study. Results: Of the 2681 participants, 1933 completed the questionnaire (response rate = 72%; 55% female; meanage = 41, SD = 24, rangeage = 5-91). Overall, 68% reported an intention to get vaccinated. Vaccination intention was higher in social/healthcare workers, and increased with age, trust in public health institutions, and confidence in the vaccine efficacy. Prior infection of a family member, predilection for waiting for more evidence on the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, and for alternative protective means were negatively associated with intention. Conclusion: In view of needs of COVID-19 vaccine boosters and of suboptimal vaccination coverage, our results have relevant public health implications and suggest that communication about vaccine safety and efficacy, and aims of vaccination programs, should be bi-directional, proportionate, and tailored to the concerns, expectations, and beliefs of different population subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fadda
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Anne Linda Camerini
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Maddalena Fiordelli
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Laurie Corna
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Sara Levati
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Amati
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Piumatti
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
- Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - L. Suzanne Suggs
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- Institute of Public Health, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Political Ideologies, Government Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182010655. [PMID: 34682401 PMCID: PMC8536119 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the correlation between political ideologies, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among South Korea’s general population and 1000 respondents (aged 18 years and older) were included. We used multivariate logistic regression models to identify the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Respondents who self-identified as liberal or held “no political opinion” had higher rates of vaccine hesitancy than conservative respondents. People’s trust in the government’s countermeasures was associated with vaccination. Respondents who had risk perceptions (affective and cognitive) of COVID-19 had lower rates of vaccine hesitancy. Perceptions that the vaccine was not safe and being aged 18–29, 30–39, or 40–49 were associated with a higher probability of vaccine hesitancy. This study found that even if vaccine safety and risk perceptions toward COVID-19 were adjusted, self-rated political ideologies and government trust was associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. More effort to communicate with those who are *liberal or “no political opinion”, younger, and have lower level of trust in the government are required to dissolve vaccine hesitancy. Further studies should analyze the mechanism of COVID-19 vaccine uptake for effective herd immunity.
Collapse
|
15
|
A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors. Nat Hum Behav 2021; 5:834-846. [PMID: 34183799 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01136-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Social and behavioural factors are critical to the emergence, spread and containment of human disease, and are key determinants of the course, duration and outcomes of disease outbreaks. Recent epidemics of Ebola in West Africa and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) globally have reinforced the importance of developing infectious disease models that better integrate social and behavioural dynamics and theories. Meanwhile, the growth in capacity, coordination and prioritization of social science research and of risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) practice within the current pandemic response provides an opportunity for collaboration among epidemiological modellers, social scientists and RCCE practitioners towards a mutually beneficial research and practice agenda. Here, we provide a review of the current modelling methodologies and describe the challenges and opportunities for integrating them with social science research and RCCE practice. Finally, we set out an agenda for advancing transdisciplinary collaboration for integrated disease modelling and for more robust policy and practice for reducing disease transmission.
Collapse
|
16
|
Maidment I, Young E, MacPhee M, Booth A, Zaman H, Breen J, Hilton A, Kelly T, Wong G. Rapid realist review of the role of community pharmacy in the public health response to COVID-19. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050043. [PMID: 34135054 PMCID: PMC8210681 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Community pharmacists and their teams have remained accessible to the public providing essential services despite immense pressures during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have successfully expanded the influenza vaccination programme and are now supporting the delivery of the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out. AIM This rapid realist review aims to understand how community pharmacy can most effectively deliver essential and advanced services, with a focus on vaccination, during the pandemic and in the future. METHOD An embryonic programme theory was generated using four diverse and complementary documents along with the expertise of the project team. Academic databases, preprint services and grey literature were searched and screened for documents meeting our inclusion criteria. The data were extracted from 103 documents to develop and refine a programme theory using a realist logic of analysis. Our analysis generated 13 context-mechanism-outcome configurations explaining when, why and how community pharmacy can support public health vaccination campaigns, maintain essential services during pandemics and capitalise on opportunities for expanded, sustainable public health service roles. The views of stakeholders including pharmacy users, pharmacists, pharmacy teams and other healthcare professionals were sought throughout to refine the 13 explanatory configurations. RESULTS The 13 context-mechanism-outcome configurations are organised according to decision makers, community pharmacy teams and community pharmacy users as key actors. Review findings include: supporting a clear role for community pharmacies in public health; clarifying pharmacists' legal and professional liabilities; involving pharmacy teams in service specification design; providing suitable guidance, adequate compensation and resources; and leveraging accessible, convenient locations of community pharmacy. DISCUSSION Community pharmacy has been able to offer key services during the pandemic. Decision makers must endorse, articulate and support a clear public health role for community pharmacy. We provide key recommendations for decision makers to optimise such a role during these unprecedented times and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Maidment
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Young
- The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Maura MacPhee
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Juanita Breen
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Andrea Hilton
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Tony Kelly
- NHS Birmingham and Solihull Clinical Commissioning Group, Birmingham, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blanchard-Rohner G, Caprettini B, Rohner D, Voth HJ. Impact of COVID-19 and intensive care unit capacity on vaccination support: Evidence from a two-leg representative survey in the United Kingdom. J Virus Erad 2021; 7:100044. [PMID: 34026244 PMCID: PMC8127519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2021.100044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overcoming coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will likely require mass vaccination. With vaccination scepticism rising in many countries, assessing the willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 is of crucial global health importance. Objective The goal of this study was to examine how personal and family COVID-19 risk and ICU (intensive care unit) availability just before the pandemics influence the acceptance of future COVID-19 vaccines. Methods A two-leg survey was carried out for comparing vaccination attitudes pre-and post-COVID-19. UK residents were surveyed in October 2019 about their vaccination attitudes, and again in a follow-up survey in April 2020, containing the previous questions and further ones related to COVID-19 exposure and COVID-19 vaccine attitudes. The study combined survey results with local COVID-19 incidence and pre-COVID-19 measures of ICU capacity and occupancy. Regression analysis of the impact of individual and public health factors on attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination was performed. Results The October 2019 survey included a nationally representative sample of 1653 UK residents. All of them were invited for the follow-up survey in April 2020, and 1194 (72%) participated. The April 2020 sample remained nationally representative. Overall, 85% of respondents (and 55% of vaccine sceptics) would be willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Higher personal and family risk for COVID-19 was associated with stronger COVID-19 vaccination willingness, whereas low pre-COVID-19 ICU availability was associated with lower trust in medical experts and lower COVID-19 vaccine support. Further, general vaccination support has risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion Support for COVID-19 vaccination is high amongst all groups, even vaccine sceptics, boding well for future vaccination take-up rates. Vaccination willingness is correlated with health care availability during the COVID-19 crisis, suggesting a powerful synergy between health care system performance during crisis and the general population's trust in the medical profession - as reflected in vaccination support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Géraldine Blanchard-Rohner
- Pediatric Immunology and Vaccinology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center of Vaccinology, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland
- Corresponding author. Pediatric Immunology and Vaccinology University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Willy-Donzé 6, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland.
| | | | - Dominic Rohner
- Department of Economics, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thaker J. The Persistence of Vaccine Hesitancy: COVID-19 Vaccination Intention in New Zealand. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 26:104-111. [PMID: 33719898 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1899346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Building public trust and willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 is as important as developing an effective vaccine. However, a significant minority of the public are unwilling or hesitant to take a COVID-19 vaccine, when available. A nationally representative sample survey (N = 1040) was conducted in July 2020 in New Zealand to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intention. A 14-item general vaccine hesitancy scale was tested and found to be significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine intention. A communication campaign from trusted scientific experts, with information that addresses prevailing concerns about vaccines, is likely to help increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagadish Thaker
- School of Communication, Journalism & Marketing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Atkinson KM, Mithani SS, Bell C, Rubens-Augustson T, Wilson K. The digital immunization system of the future: imagining a patient-centric, interoperable immunization information system. Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2020; 8:2515135520967203. [PMID: 33681700 PMCID: PMC7900792 DOI: 10.1177/2515135520967203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
To ensure the effectiveness of increasingly complex immunization programs in upper-middle and high-income settings, comprehensive information systems are needed to track immunization uptake at individual and population levels. The maturity of cloud systems and mobile technologies has created new possibilities for immunization information systems. In this paper, we describe a vision for the next generation of digital immunization information systems for upper-middle and high-income settings based on our experience in Canada. These systems center on the premise that the public is engaged and informed about the immunization process beyond their interaction with primary care, and that they will be a contributor and auditor of immunization data. The digital immunization system of the future will facilitate reporting of adverse events following immunization, issue digital immunization receipts, permit identification of areas of need and allow for delivery of interventions targeting these areas. Through features like immunization reminders and targeted immunization promotion campaigns, the system will reduce many of the known barriers that influence immunization rates. In light of the global COVID-19 pandemic, adaptive digital public health information systems will be required to guide the rollout and post-market surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M. Atkinson
- Department of Global Public Health,
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, CANImmunize Inc,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Salima Saleem Mithani
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa
Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Kumanan Wilson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa
Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON
K1Y4E9, Canada
- CANImmunize Inc, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa,
ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Risk of disease and willingness to vaccinate in the United States: A population-based survey. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003354. [PMID: 33057373 PMCID: PMC7561115 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination complacency occurs when perceived risks of vaccine-preventable diseases are sufficiently low so that vaccination is no longer perceived as a necessary precaution. Disease outbreaks can once again increase perceptions of risk, thereby decrease vaccine complacency, and in turn decrease vaccine hesitancy. It is not well understood, however, how change in perceived risk translates into change in vaccine hesitancy. We advance the concept of vaccine propensity, which relates a change in willingness to vaccinate with a change in perceived risk of infection-holding fixed other considerations such as vaccine confidence and convenience. METHODS AND FINDINGS We used an original survey instrument that presents 7 vaccine-preventable "new" diseases to gather demographically diverse sample data from the United States in 2018 (N = 2,411). Our survey was conducted online between January 25, 2018, and February 2, 2018, and was structured in 3 parts. First, we collected information concerning the places participants live and visit in a typical week. Second, participants were presented with one of 7 hypothetical disease outbreaks and asked how they would respond. Third, we collected sociodemographic information. The survey was designed to match population parameters in the US on 5 major dimensions: age, sex, income, race, and census region. We also were able to closely match education. The aggregate demographic details for study participants were a mean age of 43.80 years, 47% male and 53% female, 38.5% with a college degree, and 24% nonwhite. We found an overall change of at least 30% in proportion willing to vaccinate as risk of infection increases. When considering morbidity information, the proportion willing to vaccinate went from 0.476 (0.449-0.503) at 0 local cases of disease to 0.871 (0.852-0.888) at 100 local cases (upper and lower 95% confidence intervals). When considering mortality information, the proportion went from 0.526 (0.494-0.557) at 0 local cases of disease to 0.916 (0.897-0.931) at 100 local cases. In addition, we ffound that the risk of mortality invokes a larger proportion willing to vaccinate than mere morbidity (P = 0.0002), that older populations are more willing than younger (P<0.0001), that the highest income bracket (>$90,000) is more willing than all others (P = 0.0001), that men are more willing than women (P = 0.0011), and that the proportion willing to vaccinate is related to both ideology and the level of risk (P = 0.004). Limitations of this study include that it does not consider how other factors (such as social influence) interact with local case counts in people's vaccine decision-making, it cannot determine whether different degrees of severity in morbidity or mortality failed to be statistically significant because of survey design or because participants use heuristically driven decision-making that glosses over degrees, and the study does not capture the part of the US that is not online. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that different degrees of risk (in terms of local cases of disease) correspond with different proportions of populations willing to vaccinate. We also identified several sociodemographic aspects of vaccine propensity. Understanding how vaccine propensity is affected by sociodemographic factors is invaluable for predicting where outbreaks are more likely to occur and their expected size, even with the resulting cascade of changing vaccination rates and the respective feedback on potential outbreaks.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cadeddu C, Daugbjerg S, Ricciardi W, Rosano A. Beliefs towards vaccination and trust in the scientific community in Italy. Vaccine 2020; 38:6609-6617. [PMID: 32788138 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017 the Italian government introduced compulsory vaccination for Italian school children for ten diseases, in response to an alarmingly decrease in coverage and measles outbreak. A hot social debate arose around the issue of the law. Studies on the opinion of Italians on this topic are rare, so we investigated the socio-cultural profile of Italians about beliefs towards vaccination. METHODS Data were extracted from the Italian section of the European Social Survey (ESS), conducted by the Italian National Institute for Public Policies Analysis during 2017. The main outcome assessed was the opinion about the supposed harmfulness of vaccines. We analysed the association between the outcome and a selected group of socio-cultural characteristics, with a specific interest in examining the interaction between our main outcome and the perceived trust in the scientific community in regards to vaccines. A principal component analysis was then performed for determining the socio-cultural profile of respondents. RESULTS Among the 2,626 subjects interviewed face to face, 19% believed that vaccines were harmful and 10% did not have trust in the scientific community in regards to vaccines. Out of the respondents who believed in the harmfulness of vaccines, 29% neither had trust in the scientific community. Principal Component Analysis suggested that this group (Anti-vax/science sceptic) was characterised by low participation in political and cultural life, being male, older of age and politically oriented towards the right. People agreeing about harmfulness of vaccines are mostly males, have a lower education level, poor attendance in political and cultural life and are politically oriented to the right. CONCLUSIONS The ESS survey is unique in its capacity to deal with emerging themes of the social debates. Results paint a picture of the opinions of Italians on vaccines. This profile may be useful for policymakers to design targeted vaccination campaigns and to intervene more efficaciously in the public debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Cadeddu
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
| | - Signe Daugbjerg
- Alta Scuola di Economia e Management Sanitario (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Rosano
- Unit of Statistics, National Institute for Public Policies Analysis (INAPP), Corso d'Italia 33, 00198 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Noyman-Veksler G, Greenberg D, Grotto I, Shahar G. Parents' malevolent personification of mass vaccination solidifies vaccine hesitancy. J Health Psychol 2020; 26:2164-2172. [PMID: 32098523 DOI: 10.1177/1359105320903475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Parental hesitancy to vaccinate their children derails the success of mass vaccination campaigns. We examined the effect of parents' personification of the vaccinating agency on vaccine hesitancy (i.e. negative or positive mind change) in 555 parents in a mass wild poliovirus vaccination campaign. Parents were assessed before and after the campaign on attitudes toward vaccination and the vaccinating agency ("The Israeli MoH is caring" vs "hysteric"). Positive mind change was predicted by a gender and malevolent personification. A negative mind change was predicted by parental anxiety. We conclude that parental hesitancy is influenced by parents' attachment to the vaccinating agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Greenberg
- Pediatrics Department, Infectious Diseases Unit, Soroka Hospital, Israel.,Ben-Gurion University School of Medicine, Israel
| | - Itamar Grotto
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Public Health Unit, Israel.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ben-Gurion University School of Medicine, Israel
| | - Golan Shahar
- Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| |
Collapse
|