Key considerations in navigating ticagrelor's reported effect on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia functional assays in a landscape of limited data

PURPOSE

This article discusses key considerations regarding ticagrelor's reported effect on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia functional assays, such as literature gaps and possible management strategies.

SUMMARY

Limited data indicate that ticagrelor may induce false-negative results in functional assays used in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. False-negative functional assays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia could have catastrophic consequences. The manufacturer labeling of ticagrelor now includes a warning for this potential drug-laboratory interaction. This article suggests areas that would benefit from further research and strategies in navigating this possible interaction.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should exercise caution when evaluating functional assays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving ticagrelor. This article offers suggestions for future areas of research and potential management strategies.

Improving Judicious Use of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Testing Through Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated drug reaction that can cause thromboembolism in the setting of thrombocytopenia. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay to screen for HIT antibodies (HAb) is available but has relatively low specificity and a correspondingly high false positive rate. The 4Ts score has been validated to determine the pretest probability of HIT. The authors hypothesized that an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool incorporating the 4Ts score would reduce the volume of HAb orders.

METHODS

After implementing a CDS tool into the EHR, the researchers retrospectively evaluated the impact from November 2019 to October 2021, compared to a preintervention period (January to October 2019). The primary outcome was average tests per month. Secondary outcomes included rates of tests ordered per total inpatient encounters and proportion of HAb sent despite low 4Ts score in the postintervention study period.

RESULTS

Of 1,833 HAb sent during the study period, 1,217 occurred in the postintervention period. In the postintervention period compared with the preintervention period, the average orders per month was 50.5 (standard deviation [SD] 9.7) vs. 61.6 (SD 7.2) (p = 0.003), and the order incidence rate was 8.0 per 1,000 patient encounters postintervention vs. 9.2 per 1,000 patient encounters preintervention (rate ratio [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96, p = 0.002). Postintervention, 252 (20.7%) had a 4Ts score calculated as low probability, 759 (62.4%) as intermediate probability, and 131 (10.8%) as high probability, and 75 had no associated 4Ts score.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a simple CDS tool reduced the rate of HAb orders, reducing unnecessary HAb testing.

Analysis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnostic and management strategies in individuals with inconclusive antibody optical densities

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but serious complication of exposure to heparin. Antibody optical densities (ODs) used to diagnose HIT exceeding 2 are highly suggestive of disease, whereas ODs less than 0.5 often 'rule out' HIT. Variation in the clinical care of patients with inconclusive ODs between 0.5 and 2 is likely. This single-centre, retrospective analysis evaluates the diagnosis, management and outcomes of those with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. We queried our institution's Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration (HERON) database to identify individuals with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. Chart review was completed to calculate 4T scores, corroborate diagnosis codes with documented information in our electronic health record (EHR) and evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcomes of these individuals. These data were evaluated using descriptive and univariate statistics. Among individuals evaluated for HIT between November 2007 and July 2020, we identified 302 individuals with ODs between 0.5 and 2. Serotonin release assays (SRAs) were assessed in 55% (165/302) and were positive in 12% (20/165). In those with available data, 96% with low 4T scores had negative SRAs and 4% had positive SRAs. As 4T scores and antibody ODs proportionally increased, SRA positivity also increased. Clinical management varied widely; however, 4T scoring remains a valuable assessment in this cohort. In those with HIT antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2, true positives were uncommon, and their clinical management varied widely. Fortunately, 4T scoring is a useful prognostic tool that improves the diagnosis and management among those with inconclusive HIT.

Evaluation of Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay Thresholds and HIT in Cardiothoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common differential diagnosis in cardiothoracic surgery. The latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA) is an enhanced immunoassay that has recently been introduced for the detection of total HIT immunoglobulin and retains a higher specificity of 95% compared to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if a semiquantitative relationship exists between increasing LIA levels beyond the current positivity threshold and its correlation to positive serotonin release assay results in cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, observational cohort of cardiothoracic surgery patients initiated on anticoagulation with heparin-based products. To conduct sensitivity and specificity analysis of LIA values, HIT positive was defined as a LIA value ≥1 unit/mL and HIT negative was defined as a LIA level <1 unit/mL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to evaluate the predictive performance of the LIA.

RESULTS

At manufactures' cutoffs of ≥1.0 unit/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 22%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 78%. At a higher cutoff of 4.5 units/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 71%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 29% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.75 (P = .01; 95% confidence interval: 0.621-0.889). Bivalirudin was initiated in 84.6% of false positive LIA results.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of the LIA can be optimized by increasing the LIA positivity threshold. Proposing a higher LIA cutoff, may mitigate unwarranted anticoagulation and bleeding outcomes.

Low ADAMTS-13 predicts adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening thrombotic complication after heparin exposure. However, the role of ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the disease process and outcomes of HIT is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential role of ADAMTS-13 and VWF in hospitalized patients suspected with HIT.

METHODS

Associations of the HIT tests, ADAMTS-13 activity, and VWF antigen or activity with other clinical parameters and outcomes in the patients suspected with HIT were determined.

RESULTS

Of 261 patients, 87 (33.3%) were positive and 174 (66.7%) were negative for a HIT antibody determined by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Of these 87 EIA+ patients, 31 (35.6%) were also positive but 56 (64.4%) were negative for serotonin-releasing assay (SRA). There was no statistically significant difference among all three groups (i.e., EIA-, EIA+/SRA+, and EIA+/SRA-) as to their demographic features, reasons for admission to the hospital, type of procedures performed, and in-hospital mortality. Compared to those in the healthy controls, plasma ADAMTS-13 activity in patients suspected with HIT was significantly lower but plasma VWF antigen (VWFAg) and activity (VWFAc) in these patients were significantly higher. While there was no statistically significant difference among all three groups regarding plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 activity, VWFAg, and VWFAc, plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 activity <50% or the low ratios of ADAMTS-13 activity to VWFAg (or VWFAc) are highly predictive for a 90-day mortality rate, particularly in the EIA+SRA+ group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that relative deficiency of plasma ADAMTS-13 activity in hospitalized patients suspected with HIT is common, which may contribute at least in part to the adverse outcomes in this patient population, particularly in those with true HIT.

Research on clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after surgery for acute type a aortic dissection

Purpose

The present study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection and perform a relevant prognostic analysis.

Methods

After continuous observation and analysis of 204 patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection, we found that blood platelets decreased significantly after surgery and that these patients can be suspected to suffer HIT based on relevant 4Ts scores. For these suspected HIT patients, a latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay was conducted to detect heparin-induced antibodies. Perioperative clinical data of patients in HIT and non-HIT groups were recorded as were blood platelet counts, HIT antibody test results, 4Ts scores, thromboembolic complications, clinical prognosis and outcomes.

Results

In the present study, 38 suspected HIT patients, 16 HIT patients and 188 non-HIT patients were selected in the clinical setting. Among them, HIT patients were found to have prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (223 min on average vs. 164 min) and delayed aortic cross-clamp time (128 min on average vs. 107 min), and these differences between HIT patients and non-HIT patients were significant (P < 0.05). Additionally, the HIT group required longer operation time and higher dose of heparin, but showing no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The transfusions of blood platelets in the HIT group and non-HIT group were 18.7 ± 5.0u and 15.6 ± 7.34 u, respectively. In the HIT group, the mechanic ventilation time and the length of ICU stay were longer comparing the non-HIT group(P < 0.05), though no significant differences in total length of stay or In-hospital mortality were observed (P > 0.05). The incidence of continuous renal replacement therapy in HIT group was higher than the non-HIT group (P < 0.05). Additionally,there were no significant differences in 24-h postoperative drainage or reoperation for bleeding in both group(P > 0.05). However, the HIT antibody titer in the HIT group was significantly higher than that in the Suspected HIT group (2.7 ± 0.8 U/mL vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 U/mL) (P < 0.05). Among patients diagnosed with HIT, the incidence of thromboembolism reached 31.5%.For example, two HIT patients newly developed thromboembolism in both lower extremities,and three patients experienced cerebral infarction.

Conclusions

After surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, HIT patients developed postoperative complications, the duration of ventilatory support and length of ICU stay were extended, and the incidence of thromboembolism increased. HIT antibody detection and risk classification should be implemented for high-risk patients showing early clinical characteristics.

A prospective, blinded study of a PF4-dependent assay for HIT diagnosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, prothrombotic, antibody-mediated disorder. To maximize the likelihood of recovery, early and accurate diagnosis is critical. Widely available HIT assays, such as the platelet factor 4 (PF4) heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) lack specificity, and the gold-standard carbon 14-labeled serotonin release assay (SRA) is of limited value for early patient management because it is available only through reference laboratories. Recent studies have demonstrated that pathogenic HIT antibodies selectively activate PF4-treated platelets and that a technically simpler assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), may provide an option for rapid and conclusive results. Based upon predefined criteria that combined 4Ts scores and HIT ELISA results, 409 consecutive adults suspected of having HIT were classified as disease positive, negative, or indeterminate. Patients deemed HIT indeterminate were considered disease negative in the primary analysis and disease positive in a sensitivity analysis. The ability of PEA and SRA to identify patients judged to have HIT was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve statistics. Using these predefined criteria, the diagnostic accuracy of PEA was high (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.0) and similar to that of SRA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.0). In sensitivity analysis, the AUCs of PEA and SRA were also similar at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96), respectively. The PEA, a technically simple nonradioactive assay that uses ∼20-fold fewer platelets compared with the SRA, had high accuracy for diagnosing HIT. Widespread use of the PEA may facilitate timely and more effective management of patients with suspected HIT.

Computerised risk scores to guide recognition and diagnosis in patients with possible heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The heparin-induced thrombocytopenia computerised risk (HIT-CR) score is designed to aid in the diagnosis of HIT. We sought to evaluate its potential clinical utility. In this retrospective cohort study, we collected HIT-CR scores on all inpatients receiving heparin over a 4-month period and performed chart reviews on the subset who independently underwent clinical diagnostic testing for HIT to identify patients with HIT. In all, 34 342 patients received heparin, 1744 had high-risk HIT-CR scores of ≥3 and 220 had the maximal risk score of 4. Only 6% of high-risk and 10% of maximal-risk patients underwent testing for HIT. Conversely, among all 317 patients who underwent independent testing for HIT, 67% had low-risk HIT-CR scores (<3). Among patients independently tested, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 6·6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4·9-8·8%] and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99·5% (95% CI 97·1-99·9%) at a HIT-CR score cut-off of 3, and the PPV was 22·7% (95% CI 12·7-37·4%) and NPV was 99·0% (95% CI 97·6-99·6%) at a cut-off of 4. This study suggests clinicians fail to test most high-risk patients and unnecessarily test many low-risk patients for HIT. A reasonable approach to clinical application of HIT-CR scores would be recommending no testing for patients with a score of <3 and recommend testing for patients with a score of 4.

Association between the HLA-DRB1*03:01-DQB1*02:01 haplotype and PF4/heparin antibodies

HLA-DRB1*03:01-DQB1*02:01 haplotype patients develop higher anti–platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) levels following IV heparin exposure. HLA-restricted antigen presentation may play a role in the formation of anti-PF4/H antibodies.

Comparison of polyspecific versus IgG specific ELISA in predominately cardiac patients with suspected heparin induced thrombocytopenia

A diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) must often be made based on clinical and laboratory evidence. This was a quasi-experimental study of patients admitted from June 2016 to October 2017. The primary endpoint was the incidence of false positive results in polyspecific and IgG specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); then we compared the sensitivity and specificity of each assays in predominately cardiac patients with suspected HIT. A sensitivity/specificity analysis was conducted using serotonin release assay (SRA) as the 'gold standard'. The secondary outcome measures included length of hospital stay. We identified a total of 155 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Confirmatory tests with SRA on both groups were completed; false positive result was higher in the polyspecific group when compared to the IgG group [60% vs. 5%]. The IgG specific ELISA test yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% however, the polyspecific ELISA had a low yield for specificity of 24% but maintained 100% sensitivity. In the IgG specific group with HIT-, their median length of stay was halved compared to those who were HIT + ; hospital LOS in days, IQR [30 (27-81) vs. 15 (7-33) p = 0.023] and a shorter median LOS in the ICU, IQR [24 (5-47) vs. 6 (2-14); p = 0.079]. Hospital or ICU LOS was the same in both (HIT+ and HIT-) groups managed with polyspecific ELISA. The IgG specific test had few false positive results and a high sensitivity score. Ensuring appropriate testing can bring a substantial decrease in drug expenditure, reduced length of stay and prevent unnecessary anticoagulation.

ROC Anatomy-Getting the Most Out of Your Diagnostic Test

Clinical decision-making relies heavily on making a correct diagnosis. Clinicians have a responsibility to understand the full spectrum of the diagnostic information conveyed by a physical exam finding, laboratory test result, or imaging. Many laboratory tests, such as troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), are continuous tests with many possible results. Yet, there is a tendency to dichotomize tests into positive and negative, and use sensitivity and specificity to describe the test characteristics. This approach can lead to waste of important diagnostic information and substandard clinical decision-making. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the role of ROC curves in developing a more comprehensive understanding of diagnostic information portrayed by continuous tests to augment clinical decision-making.

Cardiac Surgery Successfully Managed With Cangrelor in a Patient With Persistent Anti-PF4/Heparin Antibodies 8 Years After Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

A 66-YEAR-OLD female requiring cardiac surgery had persisting anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies (HIT-abs) 8 years after heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In 2010, she developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) (ADAMTS-13 <5%, inhibitor at 1.0 BU/mL), which was treated successfully with corticotherapy, plasmapheresis, and intravenous heparin. While taking heparin, she developed HIT, as evidenced by a positive functional test. Her platelet count fully resolved without thrombotic complications with danaparoid treatment. In 2018, the preoperative titer of HIT-abs was still 0.38 U/mL by chemoluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and positive by particle-gel agglutination immunoassay (PaGIA) with a titer of 2 and was strongly positive on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The authors of the case report chose to use cangrelor combined with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Cangrelor was used without increased postoperative bleeding or thrombotic complications. Postoperatively she exhibited a huge rise in HIT-abs (14.22 U/mL on postoperative day 11) with a positive functional assay. There was no recurrence of HIT, however. This case illustrates the importance of excluding the presence of persisting HIT-abs before CPB and ensuring close medical follow-up after even a single exposure to heparin.

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical-pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet-activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The "iceberg" model summarizes the inter-relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4-dependent immunoassays, with platelet-activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin-release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet-activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains "autoimmune HIT" disorders (delayed-onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin "flush," fondaparinux-associated). Recently, SRA-negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet-activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4-enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG-specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real-time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real-time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi-)quantitative CLIA- and LIA-positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.

Clotting Catastrophies in the Intensive Care Unit

Clotting catastrophies are rarely encountered challenges in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and their presentation and progress maybe devastating and fulminant. Dramatic onset and involvement of multiple vascular beds should alert the clinician to look for these disorders. Outcomes may be improved with rapid diagnosis and prompt institution of specific therapies and interdisciplinary liaison holds the key to success.

An unusual case of bilateral pulmonary embolism in a patient on dual venous thromboprophylaxis, secondary to heparin induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin Induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, immune-mediated complication of heparin, associated with both thrombocytopenia and paradoxical thrombotic events. Initial diagnosis is made clinically when platelet count falls by 30% to <100 × 10⁹cells/l or a > 50% decrease from baseline count in association with heparin therapy. Thromboembolic complications are seen in 50% of the cases. We present a case of acute pulmonary embolism (aPE) in a 65 year old male secondary to HIT while on unfractionated heparin for venous thromboprophylaxis. He was admitted to the hospital for severe acute exacerbation of asthma and was on heparin and venodyne boots for venous thrombo-prophylaxis. His chief presenting complaints improved until day 13, when he had severe pleuritic chest pain with worsening of shortness of breath and was desaturating while breathing ambient air. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest with intravenous contrast revealed aPE involving bilateral upper lobe segmental pulmonary arteries. Given the pattern and timing of thrombocytopenia prior to onset of his symptoms and acute thromboembolism, diagnosis of HIT was made which was later supported by positive platelet factor- ELISA and serotonin release assay (SRA) laboratory testing. Heparin and heparin-related products were promptly discontinued and argatroban was started. Later platelet count increased over 150 × 10³/μL and argatroban was switched to warfarin prior to discharge. As heparin is extensively used, all physicians are required to be attentive of this life threatening complication. Discontinuing heparin while substituting with an alternative anticoagulant such as argatroban may become a life-saving strategy in such a case.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) is a severe and potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Patients become extremely hypercoagulable, and this can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis with a mortality of 5%-10%. HIT is an antibody-mediated process in which platelet activation occurs. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion along with a scoring system and laboratory testing. Patients suspected of having HIT must not receive any further heparin or low-molecular weight heparin and must be started on an alternative anticoagulant such as argatroban or danaparoid. Fondaparinux may also be considered but is not licenced for this indication.

A novel diagnostic algorithm for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

While diagnostic algorithm using PF4-heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density (OD), and heparin neutralization assay (HNA), or 4T score have been proposed to replace serotonin-release assay (SRA) for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), their performance against SRA is unclear. In this study, we proposed and validated the performance of a new algorithm combining PF4-heparin ELISA optical density (OD), HNA and 4T score against SRA for HIT diagnosis.

METHODS

Heparin neutralization assays were performed on specimens submitted for HIT testing with positive PF4-heparin ELISA from December 2015 to September 2017, which were separated into a "training" and a "validation" data set. 4T scores were calculated for ELISA positive cases.

RESULTS

A total of 123 consecutive unique patient samples had positive PF4-heparin ELISA with also HNA data, SRA data, and 4T scores available. Compared to SRA, a "laboratory criteria" (ELISA OD ≥ 1.4 and HNA ≥ 70%) had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16) and specificity of 91% (42/46), and a "combined criteria" (4T score = 8, or 4T score = 6 or 7 and ELISA OD ≥ 1.0, or 4T score = 4 or 5 and ELISA OD ≥ 2.0) had a sensitivity of 75% (12/16) and specificity of 98% (45/46) in the training data set. Laboratory and combined criteria had 90% (56/62) concordance rate. Importantly, for these concordant cases, the diagnostic specificity is 100% (46/46). Based on the data, a novel diagnostic algorithm combining these 2 criteria was proposed and validated prospectively.

CONCLUSION

A novel algorithm has high diagnostic accuracy and potentially could eliminate the need for SRA testing in at least 90% patients with suspected HIT.

Clinical and laboratory tests for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A rapid diagnostic work-up is required in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, diagnosis of HIT is challenging due to a number of practical issues and methodological limitations. Many laboratory tests and a few clinical scoring systems are available but the individual characteristics and the diagnostic accuracy of these are hard to appraise. The 4Ts score is a well evaluated clinical assessment tool with the potential to rule out HIT in many patients. Still, it requires experience and is subject to a relevant inter-observer variability. Immunoassays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays or recently developed rapid assays are able to exclude HIT in a number of patients. But, accuracy of immunoassays differs depending on type of assay, threshold, antibody specificity and even manufacturer. Due to a comparatively low positive predictive value, HIT cannot be confirmed by immunoassays alone. In addition, only some of them are immediately accessible, particularly in small laboratories. While functional assays such as the serotonin release assay (SRA) and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) are considered as gold standard for diagnosis of HIT, they require a highly specialised laboratory. In addition, some of them are not adequately evaluated. In clinical practice, we recommend an integrated diagnostic approach combining not only clinical assessment (the 4Ts score) but immunoassays and functional assays as well. We propose a clear diagnostic algorithm supporting clinical decision-making. Furthermore, we provide an overview of all current laboratory techniques for HIT and discuss diagnostic pathways and strategies to reduce diagnostic errors, and future perspectives.

Evaluation of a Reflex Testing Algorithm for Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVES

We implemented a policy of reflex serotonin-release assay (SRA) testing for all patients with a positive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) immunoassay.

METHODS

We identified all patients who had SRA testing sent as a consequence of a positive HIT immunoassay test. We reviewed charts of patients to calculate the 4Ts clinical score, determined the effect of testing on clinical management, and documented the change in utilization of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs).

RESULTS

The likelihood of a positive SRA varied with the optical density (OD) of the immunoassay. The performance of the immunoglobulin G (IgG)-specific and polytypic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was not statistically different. Both OD and 4Ts score correlated with the likelihood of a positive SRA but demonstrated poor specificity. Discontinuation of DTIs in patients with negative SRAs resulted in decreased drug utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

The IgG-specific HIT immunoassay OD correlates with the likelihood of a positive SRA but does not achieve high specificity. The reflex testing algorithm allows for definitive classification of patients, and the cost of such a reflex testing program may be offset by decreased utilization of DTIs.

The Clinical Utility of the Heparin Neutralization Assay in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains diagnostically challenging. Immunoassays including PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have high sensitivity but low specificity. Whether the heparin neutralization assay (HNA) improves the diagnostic accuracy of the PF4/heparin ELISA for HIT is uncertain. In this study, to assess its clinical utility and evaluate whether it improves the diagnostic accuracy for HIT, we implemented HNA in conjunction with PF4/heparin ELISA over a 1-year period. A total of 1194 patient samples were submitted to the laboratory for testing from December 2015 to November 2016. Heparin neutralization assay alone is a poor predictor for HIT, but it has high negative predictive value (NPV): Cases with %inhibition <70% are always negative for serotonin release assay. It improves the diagnostic positive predictive value (PPV) of ELISA without compromising sensitivity: ELISA optical density (OD) ≥1.4 alone has a sensitivity of 88% (14/16) and a PPV of 61% (14/23); with HNA %inhibition ≥70%, the sensitivity remains 88% (14/16) and PPV is 82% (14/17). 4Ts score correlates with ELISA OD and predicts HIT; the predictive accuracy of 4Ts score is further improved by HNA. Interestingly, HNA %inhibition of <70% correlates with low 4Ts scores. Based on its high NPV, HNA has the potential to facilitate more timely and accurate HIT diagnosis.

Clinical effectiveness of a Bayesian algorithm for the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Essentials We previously published a diagnostic algorithm for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In this study, we validated the algorithm in an independent large healthcare system. The accuracy was 98%, sensitivity 82% and specificity 99%. The algorithm has potential to improve accuracy and efficiency in the diagnosis of HIT.

SUMMARY

Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening drug reaction caused by antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/H) antibodies. Commercial tests to detect these antibodies have suboptimal operating characteristics. We previously developed a diagnostic algorithm for HIT that incorporated 'four Ts' (4Ts) scoring and a stratified interpretation of an anti-PF4/H enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and yielded a discriminant accuracy of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.00). Objectives The purpose of this study was to validate the algorithm in an independent patient population and quantitate effects that algorithm adherence could have on clinical care. Methods A retrospective cohort comprised patients who had undergone anti-PF4/H ELISA and serotonin release assay (SRA) testing in our healthcare system from 2010 to 2014. We determined the algorithm recommendation for each patient, compared recommendations with the clinical care received, and enumerated consequences of discrepancies. Operating characteristics were calculated for algorithm recommendations using SRA as the reference standard. Results Analysis was performed on 181 patients, 10 of whom were ruled in for HIT. The algorithm accurately stratified 98% of patients (95% CI, 95-99%), ruling out HIT in 158, ruling in HIT in 10 and recommending an SRA in 13 patients. Algorithm adherence would have obviated 165 SRAs and prevented 30 courses of unnecessary antithrombotic therapy for HIT. Diagnostic sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.48-0.98), specificity 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00), PPV 0.90 (95% CI, 0.56-0.99) and NPV 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00). Conclusions An algorithm incorporating 4Ts scoring and a stratified interpretation of the anti-PF4/H ELISA has good operating characteristics and the potential to improve management of suspected HIT patients.

Apixaban for treatment of confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report and review of literature

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life and limb-threatening condition caused by the binding of platelet-activating antibodies (IgG) to multimolecular platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes because of heparin exposure. The by-product of this interaction is thrombin formation which substantially increases the risk of venous and/or arterial thromboembolism. Currently, only one anticoagulant, argatroban, is United States Food and Drug Administration-approved for management of HIT; however, this agent is expensive and can only be given by intravenous infusion. Recently, several retrospective case-series, case reports, and one prospective study suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are also efficacious for treating HIT. We further review the literature regarding current diagnosis and clinical management of HIT.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male patient developed HIT beginning on day 5 post-cardiovascular surgery; the platelet count nadir on day 10 measured 16 × 10⁹/L. Both the PF4-dependent ELISA and Serotonin-release assay were strongly positive. Despite initial anticoagulation with argatroban (day 6), the patient developed symptomatic Doppler ultrasound-documented bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis on day 14 post-surgery. The patient was transitioned to the DOAC, apixaban, while still thrombocytopenic (platelet count 108) and discharged to home, with platelet count recovery and no further thrombosis at 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions

We report a patient with serologically confirmed HIT who developed symptomatic bilateral lower limb deep vein thrombosis despite anticoagulation with argatroban. The patient was switched to oral apixaban and made a complete recovery. Our patient case adds to the emerging literature suggesting that DOAC therapy is safe and efficacious for management of proven HIT.

Diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific versus polyspecific enzyme-linked immunoassays in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Essentials Immunoassay specificity varies in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. This meta-analysis examined 9 studies that tested samples by both IgG and polyspecific methods. IgG-specific assays confer superior diagnostic accuracy compared with polyspecific assays. These results further support recommendations in favor of IgG-specific testing.

SUMMARY

Background There are conflicting data on whether the IgG-specific or polyspecific antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is preferred for the laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Objectives To directly compare diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific versus polyspecific ELISA in HIT. Patients/Methods A systematic search yielded nine studies comprising 1948 patients with suspected HIT tested by both IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISAs and a reference standard against which the diagnostic accuracy of the ELISAs could be measured. Study quality was assessed by QUADAS-2 criteria. Results There was identical sensitivity for IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISAs (0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.99) and superior specificity of IgG-specific compared with polyspecific ELISA (0.87 [0.85-0.88] vs. 0.82 [0.80-0.84], respectively). Performance was similar in subgroups using the serotonin release assay and a single commercial ELISA manufacturer. The negative predictive values of IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISA were similarly high (0.99, [0.99-1.00], but the positive predictive value was superior with IgG-specific compared with polyspecific ELISA (0.56 [0.52-0.61] vs. 0.32 [0.28-0.35], respectively). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) was higher in IgG-specific than polyspecific ELISA, although negative LRs were similar. There was high risk of quality concerns in domains of index test and reference standard. Conclusions The superior diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific ELISA reinforces the ISTH-SSC recommendation for standardization of laboratory testing for HIT. Likelihood ratios of individual assays may be used in combination with clinical scoring systems as part of an integrated diagnostic algorithm for HIT.

Profile of Instrumentation Laboratory's HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) assay for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Immunoassays play an essential role in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The objective of this article is to review HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA), a new chemiluminescent immunoassay for HIT. Areas covered: The authors searched the published literature for evaluation studies of HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) and sought information from the manufacturer. In this paper, the authors discuss the analytical principle and technical aspects of the assay; describe its diagnostic performance in validation studies; report on its reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory status; and discuss the implications of the assay on clinical practice and means of integrating it in diagnostic pathways. HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) is compared with other rapid assays and widely used enzyme-linked immunoassays for the diagnosis of HIT. Expert commentary: HemosIL® AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) is automatable, can be performed 24 h per day, offers a rapid turnaround time, and appears to have favorable diagnostic accuracy, particularly at thresholds above that listed in the label. These advantages could lead to improved patient outcomes through rapid provision of results at the point of care, enhancing the accuracy of initial diagnosis.

Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but serious immune-mediated complication of heparin treatment. HIT is characterized by an acute, transient prothrombotic state combined with thrombocytopenia and is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that bind to complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4. The diagnosis of HIT relies on clinical presentation and the demonstration of HIT antibodies. One approach to improve the efficacy of laboratory analysis is to use a diagnostic algorithm.

AIM

To evaluate one diagnostic algorithm for HIT where the 4 T's clinical risk score is combined with immunochemical and/or functional assays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The quality of the diagnostic algorithm was retrospectively evaluated in 101 patients with suspected HIT. Laboratory results obtained from the diagnostic algorithm were compared to Heparin-Induced Platelet Aggregation (HIPA) and clinico-pathological evaluation of patients' medical records.

RESULTS

We found that the algorithm had a diagnostic efficacy of 94%, with specificity of 94% and sensitivity 94%. Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 16.0, and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 15.5. The efficacy of PaGIA (n=95) was 0.46, and IgG-specific HPF4-abELISA (n=54) was 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic algorithm for HIT is sufficiently accurate and leads to in overall faster results and decreased cost of analysis. The weakest link of the algorithm is the risk of miscalculated 4T's scores, which is inevitably exacerbated by the insufficient experience most clinicians have with HIT. This highlights the importance of clear instructions from the laboratory and coagulation clinic.

Inappropriate documentation of heparin allergy in the medical record because of misdiagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: frequency and consequences

Essentials Misdiagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be associated with adverse outcomes. We conducted a study of patients with a heparin allergy in the chart due to misdiagnosis of HIT. 42% of patients with a heparin allergy due to suspected HIT were clearly HIT-negative. 68% were unnecessarily treated with an alternative anticoagulant, 66% of whom had major bleeding.

SUMMARY

Background It is recommended that heparin be added to the allergy list of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Misdiagnosis of HIT could lead to inappropriate documentation of a heparin allergy and adverse outcomes. Objectives To determine the frequency and consequences of inappropriate documentation of a heparin allergy because of misdiagnosis of HIT. Methods We conducted a cohort study of patients with an inappropriate heparin allergy listed in the electronic medical record (EMR) because of misdiagnosis of HIT. We searched the EMR for patients with a new heparin allergy. Patients were eligible if the reason for allergy listing was suspected acute HIT and laboratory testing for HIT was performed within 60 days. Subjects were defined as 'HIT-negative' if they had a 4Ts score of ≤ 3 or negative laboratory test results. Results Of 239 subjects with a new heparin allergy documented because of concern regarding HIT, 100 (42%) met the prespecified definition of HIT-negative. Sixty-eight (68%) HIT-negative subjects unnecessarily received an alternative parenteral anticoagulant for a median duration of 10.5 days. Among these 68 patients, 45 (66%) met criteria for major bleeding. Sixty-eight (68%) of the 100 HIT-negative subjects had an inappropriate allergy to heparin documented that persisted in the EMR for > 3 years beyond the index hospitalization. Conclusions Inappropriate listing of heparin as an allergy in the EMR because of misdiagnosis of HIT is common, is associated with substantial rates of unnecessary alternative anticoagulant use and major bleeding, and tends to persist beyond the index admission.

Non-haemorrhagic, bilateral adrenal infarction in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome along with lupus myocarditis

A 40-year-old woman with antiphospholipid syndrome presented with a 5-day history of right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain, radiating posteriorly, associated with fever and vomiting. She was admitted 1-week prior with an upper respiratory infection and erythema multiforme. Clinical assessment revealed sepsis with RUQ tenderness and positive Murphy's sign. Laboratory results showed raised inflammatory markers, along with renal and liver impairment. CT showed bilateral adrenal infarction and inferior vena cava thrombus. The patient was managed for sepsis and started on heparin. Further immunological investigations revealed a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematous, an exacerbation of which culminated in lupus myocarditis. This case illustrates the importance of promptly recognising adrenal insufficiency in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and the possible causative agents, which require careful consideration and exclusion to prevent further thrombotic events. It also highlights the importance of undertaking imaging, namely CT, in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with abdominal pain as well as considering concomitant autoimmune conditions.

Comparison of an IgG-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Cutoff of 0.4 Versus 0.8 and 1.0 Optical Density Units for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated optimized diagnostic accuracy in utilizing higher antiheparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density (OD) thresholds for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe the incidence of positive serotonin release assay (SRA) results, as well as performance characteristics, for antiheparin-PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units in the diagnosis of HIT at our institution.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, we conducted a single-center retrospective chart review on adult inpatients with a differential diagnosis of HIT evaluated by both antiheparin-PF4 ELISA and SRA from 2012 to 2014. The major endpoints were to assess incidence of positive SRA results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy at antiheparin-PF4 ELISA values ≥0.4 OD units when compared to values ≥0.8 and ≥1.0 OD units. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, laboratory values, clinical and safety outcomes, length of stay, and mortality, were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients with 140 antiheparin-PF4 ELISA and SRA values were evaluated, of which 23 patients were SRA positive (16.4%) and 117 patients were SRA negative (83.6%). We identified a sensitivity of 91.3% versus 82.6% and 73.9%, specificity of 61.5% versus 87.2% and 91.5%, PPV of 31.8% versus 55.9% and 63.0%, NPV of 97.3% versus 96.2% and 94.7%, and accuracy of 66.4% versus 86.4% and 88.6% at antiheparin-PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests an increased antiheparin-PF4 ELISA threshold of 0.8 or 1.0 OD units enhances specificity, PPV, and accuracy while maintaining NPV with decreased sensitivity.

Does my patient have HIT? There should be an app for that

In this issue of Blood, Nagler et al present a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of immunoassays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Their data, when combined with the 4T score, provide an easy-to-use, evidence-based framework for estimating the probability of HIT

A Novel PF4-Dependent Platelet Activation Assay Identifies Patients Likely to Have Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia/Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Almost without exception, patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT) have antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) in a complex with heparin; however, many heparin-treated patients without HIT are also antibody-positive. A platelet activation test, the serotonin release assay (SRA), is useful for identifying a subset of antibodies that are platelet-activating and most likely to cause HIT. However, this "gold standard" assay for HIT diagnosis is technically demanding and is routinely available only through referral laboratories, limiting its availability for timely diagnosis and management.

METHODS

We compared the diagnostic performance of the SRA with that of a technically simple platelet activation assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), which uses platelets pretreated with PF4 as targets for antibody detection. Archived serum samples from 91 patients for whom clinical information (HIT 4Ts [thrombocytopenia, timing of platelet count fall, thrombosis, and other causes of thrombocytopenia] score) was available were used. Patients with an intermediate 4Ts score and a PF4 ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) optical density ≥ 2.0, or a high 4Ts score and a PF4 ELISA optical density ≥ 1.0, were considered HIT positive; others were designated HIT negative.

RESULTS

The PEA had higher diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.92 vs 0.82; P = .02) than the SRA, using this definition of HIT. Eleven of 16 serum samples that were PEA positive and SRA negative were HIT positive. Studies done with identical target platelets and serially diluted samples from patients with HIT showed that the PEA is inherently more sensitive than the SRA for the detection of platelet-activating antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEA is technically less demanding than the SRA and may be more accurate for the diagnosis of HIT.

Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: impact of an avoid-heparin program

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring in up to 5% of patients exposed to unfractionated heparin (UFH). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide strategy for avoiding heparin on the incidence of HIT, HIT with thrombosis (HITT), and HIT-related costs. The Avoid-Heparin Initiative, implemented at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, since 2006, involved replacing UFH with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Consecutive cases with suspected HIT from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed. Rates of suspected HIT, adjudicated HIT, and HITT, along with HIT-related expenditures were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and the avoid-heparin (2007-2012) phases. The annual rate of suspected HIT decreased 42%, from 85.5 per 10 000 admissions in the pre-intervention phase to 49.0 per 10 000 admissions in the avoid-heparin phase ( ITALIC! P< .001). The annual rate of patients with a positive HIT assay decreased 63% from 16.5 to 6.1 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), adjudicated HIT decreased 79% from 10.7 to 2.2 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), and HITT decreased 91% from 4.6 to 0.4 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001). Hospital HIT-related expenditures decreased by $266 938 per year in the avoid-heparin phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the success and feasibility of a hospital-wide HIT prevention strategy.

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid immunoassays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A systematic review and meta-analysis

The platelet factor 4/heparin ELISA has limited specificity for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and frequently does not provide same-day results. Rapid immunoassays (RIs) have been developed which provide results in 30 minutes or less. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of RIs for HIT. We searched the literature for studies in which samples from patients with suspected HIT were tested using a RI and a functional assay against which the performance of the RI could be measured. We performed sensitivity analyses of studies that directly compared different RIs with each other and with ELISAs. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity for each RI were calculated. Twenty-three articles, collectively involving six different RIs, met eligibility criteria. All RIs exhibited high sensitivity (0.96 to 1.00); there was wider variability in specificity (0.68 to 0.94). Specificity of the IgG-specific chemiluminescent assay (IgG-CA) was greater than the polyspecific chemiluminescent assay [0.94 (95 %CI 0.89-0.99) vs 0.82 (0.77-0.87)]. The particle gel immunoassay demonstrated greater specificity than the polyspecific ELISA [0.96 (0.95-0.97) vs 0.91 (0.89-0.92)]. The IgG-CA and lateral flow immunoassay [0.94 (0.91-0.97)] exhibited greater specificity than the IgG-specific ELISA [0.86 (0.82-0.90)]. Given their high sensitivity and rapid turnaround time, RIs are a reliable means of excluding HIT at the point-of-care in patients with low or intermediate clinical probability. Additionally, some RIs have greater specificity than HIT ELISAs. In summary, IgG-specific RIs appear to have improved diagnostic accuracy compared with ELISAs in patients with suspected HIT and may reduce misdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with a high optical density anti-platelet factor 4 ELISA test

PURPOSE

Diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a potentially catastrophic immune-mediated disorder, continues to pose significant challenges for clinicians, as both clinical and laboratory tools lack specificity. There is mounting evidence supporting a positive correlation between definitive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and optical density (OD) positivity from the widely available anti-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (PF4 ELISAs). However, the clinical features distinguishing these patients remain poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To better characterize this group, we conducted a case-controlled, retrospective chart review of patients from two large, urban academic institutions who underwent a PF4 ELISA at a central laboratory. Associations between OD and 18 clinical characteristics were calculated using the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

In total, 184 negative patients (OD <0.7), and 121 positive patients (OD >0.7), including 74 low-positive patients (0.7< OD <1.4) and 47 high-positive patients (OD >1.4) were identified. Several clinical variables were significantly different in the negative group compared with the positive group, including hospital day (P<0.001), previous admission within the past 3 months (P<0.001), and the presence of a new thrombus (P=0.003). However, many of these variables were not different between the negative and low-positive group, and were only distinct between the negative and high-positive group. When the low-positive and high-positive groups were compared, only the 4T score was significantly different (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that those with OD >1.4 form a distinct clinical group and support the clinical utility of the 4T score.

Diagnostic value of immunoassays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunoassays are essential in the workup of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, the diagnostic accuracy is uncertain with regard to different classes of assays, antibody specificities, thresholds, test variations, and manufacturers. We aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy measures of available immunoassays and to explore sources of heterogeneity. We performed comprehensive literature searches and applied strict inclusion criteria. Finally, 49 publications comprising 128 test evaluations in 15 199 patients were included in the analysis. Methodological quality according to the revised tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies was moderate. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated with the unified model (comprising a bivariate random-effects model and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model). Important differences were observed between classes of immunoassays, type of antibody specificity, thresholds, application of confirmation step, and manufacturers. Combination of high sensitivity (>95%) and high specificity (>90%) was found in 5 tests only: polyspecific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with intermediate threshold (Genetic Testing Institute, Asserachrom), particle gel immunoassay, lateral flow immunoassay, polyspecific chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) with a high threshold, and immunoglobulin G (IgG)-specific CLIA with low threshold. Borderline results (sensitivity, 99.6%; specificity, 89.9%) were observed for IgG-specific Genetic Testing Institute-ELISA with low threshold. Diagnostic accuracy appears to be inadequate in tests with high thresholds (ELISA; IgG-specific CLIA), combination of IgG specificity and intermediate thresholds (ELISA, CLIA), high-dose heparin confirmation step (ELISA), and particle immunofiltration assay. When making treatment decisions, clinicians should be a aware of diagnostic characteristics of the tests used and it is recommended they estimate posttest probabilities according to likelihood ratios as well as pretest probabilities using clinical scoring tools.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following coronary artery bypass grafting: a diagnostic dilemma

The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a challenge in post-cardiac surgery patients because of the high incidence of non-immune thrombocytopenia and heparin–platelet factor 4 antibodies in these groups. We present a case of HIT in a post coronary artery bypass surgery patient, which was successfully treated with prompt recognition and discontinuation of heparin products.

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of heparin-Induced thrombocytopenia: A 6-year experience from a reference laboratory

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is contingent on accurate and timely laboratory testing. Recently, alternative anticoagulants for the treatment of HIT have been introduced along with algorithms for better HIT diagnosis. However, the increased reliance on immunoassays for the diagnosis of HIT may have harmful consequences due to the high rate of false positive results. To compare trends and implications of current HIT testing approaches, we analyzed results over a six-year period from the McMaster University Platelet Immunology Reference Laboratory. From 2008 to 2013, 8,546 samples were investigated for HIT using both an in-house IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and the serotonin-release assay (SRA). Of 8,546 samples tested, 13.4% were true-positives (positive in both assays); 65.6% were true-negatives (negative in both assays); 20.9% were presumed false positive for HIT (EIA-positive/SRA-negative); and 0.2% were EIA-negative/SRA-positive. The frequency of EIA-positive/SRA-negative results increased over time (from 12.9% in 2008 to 22.9% in 2013). We found that the number of SRA-negative samples was reduced from referring centers that used an immunoassay as an initial screen; however, 41% of those samples tested negative in the immunoassay and in the SRA at the reference laboratory. The suspicion of HIT continues at a high rate and the agreement between the EIA and SRA test results remains problematic.

The platelet serotonin-release assay

Few laboratory tests are as clinically useful as The platelet serotonin-release assay (SRA): a positive SRA in the appropriate clinical context is virtually diagnostic of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic disorder caused by anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies that activate platelets, thereby triggering serotonin-release. The SRA's performance characteristics include high sensitivity and specificity, although caveats include indeterminate reaction profiles (observed in ∼4% of test sera) and potential for false-positive reactions. As only a subset of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies detectable by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) are additionally platelet-activating, the SRA has far greater diagnostic specificity than the EIA. However, requiring a positive EIA, either as an initial screening test or as an SRA adjunct, will reduce risk of a false-positive SRA (since a negative EIA in a patient with a "positive" SRA should prompt critical evaluation of the SRA reaction profile). The SRA also provides useful information on whether a HIT serum produces strong platelet activation even in the absence of heparin: such heparin-"independent" platelet activation is a marker of unusually severe HIT, including delayed-onset HIT and severe HIT complicated by consumptive coagulopathy with risk for microvascular thrombosis.

Advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent developments in understanding the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and in applying this knowledge to the treatment of patients with suspected and proven HIT.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIT pathophysiology is dynamic and complex. HIT pathophysiology is initiated by four essential components--heparin (Hep), platelet factor 4 (PF4), IgG antibodies against the Hep-PF4 complex, and platelet FcγRIIa. HIT is propagated by activated platelets, monocytes, endothelial cells, and coagulation proteins. Insights into the unique HIT antibody response continue to emerge, but without consensus as to the relative roles of B cells, T cells, and antigen-presenting cells. Platelet activation via FcγRIIa, the sine qua non of HIT, has become much better appreciated. Therapy remains challenging for several reasons. Suspected HIT is more frequent than proven HIT, because of the widespread use of Hep and the inadequacies of current diagnostic tests and scoring systems. In proven HIT, approved treatments reduce but do not eliminate thrombosis, and have substantial bleeding risk. Rational novel therapeutic strategies, directed at the initiating steps in HIT pathophysiology and with potential combinations staged over time, are in various phases of development.

SUMMARY

Progress continues in understanding the breadth of molecular and cellular players in HIT. Translation to improved diagnosis and treatment is needed.

Safety and economic considerations of argatroban use in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) causes thromboembolic complications which threaten life and limb. Heparin is administered to virtually every critically ill patient as a protective measure against thromboembolism. Argatroban is a promising alternative anticoagulant agent. However, a safe dose which still provides effective thromboembolic prophylaxis without major bleeding still needs to be identified.

Methods

Critically ill patients (n = 42) diagnosed with HIT at a tertiary medical center intensive care unit from 2005 to 2010 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient records were perused for preexisting history of HIT, heparin dosage before HIT, argatroban dosage, number of transfusions required, thromboembolic complications and length of ICU stay (ICU LOS). Patients were allocated to Simplified Acute Physiology Scores above and below 30 (SAPS >30, SAPS <30), respectively. For calculations, patients (n = 19) without previous history of HIT were compared to patients (n = 23) with a history of HIT before initiation of argatroban.

Results

The mean initial argatroban dosage was below 0.4 mcg/kg/min regardless of SAPS score. Maintenance dosage had to be increased in patients with SAPS <30 to 0.54 ± 0.248 mcg/kg/min (p >0.05) to achieve effective anticoagulation. No thromboembolic complications were encountered. Argatroban had to be discontinued temporarily in 16 patients for a total of 57 times due to diagnostic or surgical procedures, supratherapeutic aPTT and bleeding without increasing the number of transfusions. A history of HIT was associated with a shorter ICU LOS and significantly reduced transfusion need when compared to patients with no history of HIT. Cost calculation favour argatroban due to increased transfusion needs during heparin administration and increase ICU LOS.

Conclusion

Argatroban can be used at doses < 0.4 mcg/kg/min without an increase in transfusion requirements and at a reduced overall treatment cost compared to heparin.

Heparin-independent, PF4-dependent binding of HIT antibodies to platelets: implications for HIT pathogenesis

Antibodies specific for platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes are the hallmark of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HIT), but many antibody-positive patients have normal platelet counts. The basis for this is not fully understood, but it is believed that antibodies testing positive in the serotonin release assay (SRA) are the most likely to cause disease. We addressed this issue by characterizing PF4-dependent binding of HIT antibodies to intact platelets and found that most antibodies testing positive in the SRA, but none of those testing negative, bind to and activate platelets when PF4 is present without any requirement for heparin (P < .0001). Binding of SRA-positive antibodies to platelets was inhibited by chondroitinase ABC digestion (P < .05) and by the addition of chondroitin-4-sulfate (CS) or heparin in excess quantities. The findings suggest that although all HIT antibodies recognize PF4 in a complex with heparin, only a subset of these antibodies recognize more subtle epitopes induced in PF4 when it binds to CS, the major platelet glycosaminoglycan. Antibodies having this property could explain "delayed HIT" seen in some individuals after discontinuation of heparin and the high risk for thrombosis that persists for weeks in patients recovered from HIT.