Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Ambulatory BP in Patients With Sleep Apnea and Hypertension

Evaluating the impact of automatic positive airway pressure therapy on cardiovascular risk index and vascular behavior in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a study on heterogeneity in the therapeutic response

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the impact of automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) therapy on vascular behavior and its potential to lower cardiovascular risk in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as well as differentiating APAP therapy heterogeneity.

METHODS

All participants were diagnosed with OSA by portable monitoring, and pulse wave parameters and cardiac risk composite parameter index were obtained by photoplethysmography before and after APAP. Clustering analysis of pulse wave parameters before APAP in the high-risk population was performed using k-means clustering. Linear regression was used to assess the associations of changes in cardiac risk composite parameter index and pulse wave parameters with clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients with OSA underwent APAP therapy. The cardiac risk composite parameter index after APAP was significantly lower than before APAP (0.38 ± 0.33 and 0.58 ± 0.31, respectively; P < .001). All pulse wave parameters (except irregular pulse) were significantly different (P < .001) in patients with OSA and in the high-risk responders group after vs before APAP. The differences in pulse wave parameters after vs before APAP were not significant in the high-risk nonresponders group, except for the difference between the pulse rate acceleration index and the oxygen saturation index and pulse rate variability. Four clusters were obtained from the clustering analysis of pulse wave parameters before APAP in the high-risk responders group.

CONCLUSIONS

APAP reduces the cardiac risk composite parameter index in patients with OSA by altering vascular behavior. Overnight photoplethysmography monitoring of pulse wave parameters can be used to assess whether patients with OSA will benefit from APAP.

CITATION

Zhu W, Xiang L, Cao L, Tian Y, Li W, He L. Evaluating the impact of automatic positive airway pressure therapy on cardiovascular risk index and vascular behavior in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a study on heterogeneity in the therapeutic response. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(9):1435-1444.

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on very short-term blood pressure variability associated with sleep-disordered breathing by pulse transit time-based blood pressure measurements

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes independently of BP absolute values. We previously reported that pulse transit time (PTT) enables monitoring beat-to-beat BP, identifying a strong relationship between the extent of very short-term BPV and the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Here, we investigated the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on very short-term BPV.

METHODS

We studied 66 patients (mean age 62 years old, 73% male) with newly diagnosed SDB who underwent full polysomnography on two consecutive days for diagnosis (baseline) and CPAP, together with PTT-driven BP continuous recording. PTT index was defined as the average number of acute transient rises in BP (≥12 mmHg) within 30 s/h.

RESULTS

CPAP treatment effectively improved SDB parameters, and attenuated PTT-based BP absolute values during the night-time. Very short-term BPV that includes PTT index and standard deviation (SD) of systolic PTT-BP was significantly reduced by CPAP therapy. The changes in PTT index from baseline to CPAP were positively correlated with the changes in apnea-hypopnea index, obstructive apnea index (OAI), oxygen desaturation index, minimal SpO 2 , and mean SpO 2 . Multivariate regression analysis revealed that changes in OAI and minimal SpO 2 , as well as heart failure, were the independent factors in determining the reduction of PTT index following CPAP.

CONCLUSION

PTT-driven BP monitoring discovered the favorable effects of CPAP on very short-term BPV associated with SDB events. Targeting very short-term BPV may be a novel approach to identifying individuals who experience greater benefits from CPAP.

New perspective on exploring the predictive factors of blood pressure reduction during CPAP treatment in people with severe OSA and hypertension: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The predictive factors of blood pressure (BP) response to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are still being explored. We aimed to assess the antihypertensive effect of CPAP considering the obstructive respiratory event-triggered BP surge profiles in 130 subjects with severe OSA and untreated hypertension.

METHODS

Nocturnal BP was monitored continuously and synchronised with polysomnography. Event-triggered BP surge profiles were studied: BP surge as the value of event-related systolic BP (SBP) elevation; BP index as the number of BP surge events of ≥10 mm Hg per hour. Patients were then divided into two groups according to the median BP index (high and low BP surge groups) and assigned to 4 weeks of CPAP. Changes in BPs and plasma biomarkers were compared. After the initial evaluation, patients with a better BP response in the high BP surge group were then followed up for the second evaluation at 24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, a modest decrease was observed in both office and asleep BPs at the 4-week follow-up; however, BPs dropped more markedly in patients in the high BP surge group than those in the low BP surge group, in both office SBP (5.3 mm Hg vs 2.2 mm Hg, p=0.003) and diastolic BP (4.0 mm Hg vs 1.2 mm Hg, p<0.001), especially the asleep SBP (9.0 mm Hg vs 2.1 mm Hg, p<0.001). For 30 cases in the high BP surge group, optimal BP control was achieved in 60.0% of patients and BP<140/90 mm Hg reached up to 83.3% after 24 months of CPAP. Linear regression revealed that BP index was significantly associated with BP decrease during CPAP treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that high event-triggered BP surge was a sensitive predictor of BP response to CPAP in patients with severe OSA and untreated hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT03246022; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246022?term=NCT+03246022&draw=2&rank=1.

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults or those with unrecognized OSA symptoms to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and trial registries through August 23, 2021; surveillance through September 23, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies of screening test accuracy, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of screening or treatment of OSA reporting health outcomes or harms, and systematic reviews of treatment reporting changes in blood pressure and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality. Meta-analysis of intervention trials.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Test accuracy, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-related and general health-related quality of life (QOL), and harms.

RESULTS

Eighty-six studies were included (N = 11 051). No study directly compared screening with no screening. Screening accuracy of the Multivariable Apnea Prediction score followed by unattended home sleep testing for detecting severe OSA syndrome (AHI ≥30 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score &gt;10) measured as the area under the curve in 2 studies (n = 702) was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.82) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.90). Five studies assessing the accuracy of other screening tools were heterogeneous and results were inconsistent. Compared with inactive control, positive airway pressure was associated with a significant improvement in ESS score from baseline (pooled mean difference, -2.33 [95% CI, -2.75 to -1.90]; 47 trials; n = 7024), sleep-related QOL (standardized mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.42]; 17 trials; n = 3083), and general health-related QOL measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental health component summary score change (pooled mean difference, 2.20 [95% CI, 0.95 to 3.44]; 15 trials; n = 2345) and SF-36 physical health component summary score change (pooled mean difference, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.29 to 2.77]; 13 trials; n = 2031). Use of mandibular advancement devices was also associated with a significantly larger ESS score change compared with controls (pooled mean difference, -1.67 [95% CI, 2.09 to -1.25]; 10 trials; n = 1540). Reporting of other health outcomes was sparse; no included trial found significant benefit associated with treatment on mortality, cardiovascular events, or motor vehicle crashes. In 3 systematic reviews, positive airway pressure was significantly associated with reduced blood pressure; however, the difference was relatively small (2-3 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The accuracy and clinical utility of OSA screening tools that could be used in primary care settings were uncertain. Positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices reduced ESS score. Trials of positive airway pressure found modest improvement in sleep-related and general health-related QOL but have not established whether treatment reduces mortality or improves most other health outcomes.

Benefits of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with systemic hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials on the treatment of hypertension and OSA with CPAP, compared with sham CPAP or no CPAP, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to obtain weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nineteen trials (enrolling 1904 participants) met the inclusion criteria. CPAP had significant effects on 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD -5.01 mmHg, 95% CI -6.94 to -3.08; P < 0.00001), 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD -3.30 mmHg, 95% CI -4.32 to -2.28; P < 0.00001), daytime SBP (WMD -4.34 mmHg, 95% CI -6.27 to -2.40; P < 0.0001), daytime DBP (WMD -2.97 mmHg, 95% CI -3.99 to -1.95; P < 0.00001), nighttime SBP (WMD -3.55 mmHg, 95% CI -5.08 to -2.03; P < 0.00001), nighttime DBP (WMD -2.33 mmHg, 95% CI -3.27 to -1.40; P < 0.00001), office SBP (WMD -3.67 mmHg, 95% CI -5.76 to -1.58; P = 0.0006), office DBP (WMD -2.61 mmHg, 95% CI -4.25 to -0.97; P = 0.002), and heart rate (WMD -2.79 beats/min, 95% CI -4.88 to -0.71; P = 0.009). CPAP treatment was associated with BP reduction in patients with systemic hypertension and OSA, except when the follow-up period was shorter than 3 months.

Effect of different treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea on blood pressure

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common cause of secondary hypertension. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the effect of different OSA treatments on lowering blood pressure.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The search strategies included the concepts of OSA, blood pressure, hypertension, and blood pressure-reducing treatments without language or data restriction (from inception to 1 June 2021). The outcomes included office SBP, office DBP, daytime SBP (dSBP) and DBP (dDBP), and night-time SBP (nSBP) and DBP (nDBP). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, and mean differences with 95% credibility intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

We reviewed 49 randomized controlled trials involving 4893 patients and the following interventions: continuous positive-airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement devices, nocturnal supplemental oxygen, surgery, β-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), calcium channel blockers. MRAs were significantly associated with blood pressure reduction followed by ACEI/ARB. RDN could reduce office SBP, office DBP, 24-h SBP, 24-h DBP, dSBP, and dDBP. CPAP also demonstrated modest blood pressure lowering.

CONCLUSION

MRAs and ACEIs/ARBs can reduce blood pressure effectively in patients with OSA. RDN is a novel hypertension treatment that lowered blood pressure in such patients. CPAP was associated with mild but stable blood pressure reduction, and it might be helpful as an adjunctive therapy in OSA patients with hypertension.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42021240891.

Obstructive Sleep apnea and cardiovascular events in Elderly Patients

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, life expectancy has increased considerably. The cardiovascular effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the elderly lead to patient disability and high resource consumption. Intermittent nocturnal hypoxia leads to hemodynamic stress and adrenergic activation, which promotes cardiovascular disease. However, chronic intermittent hypoxia may protect elderly patients from cardiovascular events (CVE) due to biological adaptation.

AREAS COVERED

OSA patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. The severity of OSA increases cardiovascular risk, and this association also exists in the elderly. This article reviews the association between OSA, CPAP treatment, and CVE, particularly stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD), in the elderly. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched from inception to July 2021.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Although a positive association between OSA and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the elderly has been established, the role of sleep apnea in certain cardiovascular events remains controversial. Most authors agree that untreated OSA is a risk factor for stroke or worse stroke prognosis. However, the association between OSA and CHD is usually less pronounced than between OSA and stroke, especially in the elderly.

Socioeconomic status impacts blood pressure response to positive airway pressure treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) reduces blood pressure (BP). Retrospective data suggest that African Americans (AA), a group at high-risk for hypertensive organ dysfunction, may have a greater BP response to PAP therapy than European Americans (EA). We examined the difference in 24-hour BP response to three months of PAP treatment between AA and EA.

METHODS

Participants (N=259, 161 AA and 98 EA) with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/hour from two prospective cohorts were included. T-tests and multiple linear regression were used to examine BP outcomes in AA vs. EA, adjusting for PAP adherence, socioeconomic status (SES), and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Participants were middle-aged (mean ± standard deviation, 53.8±9.3 years), 86% (227) men, AHI 35.6±19.2/hour, and PAP adherence of 3.36±2.24 hours/day. The reductions in 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP (mm Hg) were not different in AA vs. EA (systolic=-1.13±12.1 vs. -0.61±12.8, p=0.80 and diastolic=-0.74±7.9 vs. -0.80±7.4, p=0.96), and race was not a predictor of 24-hour systolic or diastolic BP reduction (p=0.75 and 0.54). SES and PAP adherence demonstrated a significant interaction; low SES was associated with an increase in 24-hour systolic BP (β=19.3, p=0.03) in the absence of PAP use but a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP with higher PAP adherence (β=-3.96, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

24-hour BP response to PAP treatment is similar in AA and EA. Adherence to PAP treatment is more effective in improving 24-hour systolic BP in those with low SES.

The study was a clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01960465 and NCT01578031.

Treatment of Sleep Apnea with Positive Airway Pressure and Its Association with Diastolic Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis assessed the effect of long-term (>6 weeks) noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) on diastolic function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

We searched the databases for randomized clinical trials including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL from inception up to December 20, 2019. The search was not restricted to time, publication status, or language. Two independent investigators screened the studies and extracted the data, in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane collaboration tools.

RESULTS

A total of 2,753 abstracts were resulted from literature search. A total of 9 randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of long-term (>6 weeks) PAP on diastolic function in patients with OSA including 833 participants were included. The following echo parameters were found in treated patients: a decrease in deceleration time (-39.49 ms CI [-57.24, -21.74]; p = 0.000), isovolumic relaxation time (-9.32 ms CI [-17.08, -1.57]; p = 0.02), and the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular early diastolic velocity (-1.38 CI [-2.6, -0.16]; p = 0.03). However, changes in left-atrial volume index and the ratio of early to late mitral inflow velocities were not statistically different. The risk of bias was mild to moderate among the studies.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that chronic treatment of moderate to severe OSA with noninvasive PAP is associated with improvement in echocardiographic findings of diastolic dysfunction.

Obstructive sleep apnea and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: current evidence and research gaps

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common condition characterized by intermittent collapse of the upper airway during sleep, resulting in partial (hypopnoeas) and total obstructions (apneas). These respiratory events observed in OSA may trigger multiple pathways involved in the blood pressure (BP) instability during the night and potentially influencing daytime BP as well (carry-over effects). This review provides an update about the impact of OSA and its treatments on 24-h BP control. Overall, there is growing evidence suggest that OSA is associated with higher frequency of nondipping BP pattern and nocturnal hypertension in a dose-dependent manner. The presence of nondiping BP (especially the reverse pattern) is independently associated with OSA regardless of sleep-related symptoms suggesting a potential tool for screening OSA in patients with clinical indication for performing ABPM. Beyond dipping BP, preliminary evidence associated OSA with white-coat effect and higher frequency of masked hypertension and BP variability than the control group (no OSA). Unfortunately, most of the evidence on the evidence addressing the impact of OSA treatment on BP was limited to office measurements. In the last years, data from observational and randomized studies pointed that CPAP is able to promote 24-h BP decrease especially in patients with resistant and refractory hypertension. A randomized trial suggests that CPAP is able to decrease the rate of masked hypertension as compared to no treatment in patients with severe OSA. Interestingly, nondipping BP is a good predictor of BP response to CPAP making ABPM an interesting tool for better OSA management.

Effects of short-term aerobic training versus CPAP therapy on heart rate variability in moderate to severe OSA patients

We compared the effects of 2-month CPAP or exercise training (ET) therapies on the autonomic balance in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) through heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Thirty-nine OSA patients were divided into CPAP (n = 18) and ET (n = 21) groups, being further split into hypertensive and non-hypertensive subgroups. All patients were submitted to continuous ECG recordings for HRV analysis. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded by oscillometry. Excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep quality were assessed through the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh questionnaire, respectively. ET decreased systolic arterial pressure in hypertensive and non-hypertensive participants when compared to baseline values, whereas diastolic arterial pressure was decreased only in non-hypertensive ones. CPAP had no effect over hemodynamic parameters in either subgroup. ET significantly increased the HRV parameters SDNN and pNN50 in non-hypertensive participants, while reducing the LF/HF ratio in both subgroups. CPAP significantly decreased SDNN in both subgroups. ET significantly decreased excessive daytime sleepiness in both subgroups, but did not affect sleep quality. CPAP significantly improved sleep quality in both subgroups, although global scores were still those of poor sleepers, while excessive daytime sleepiness was normalized only in hypertensive patients. In conclusion, while short-term ET modulated different HRV parameters, leading to a predominant vagal tone in the cardiac sympathovagal balance and decreasing blood pressure in moderate to severe OSA, short-term CPAP had next to no effect in these parameters. We believe ET should be considered as an adjunct interventional strategy in the conservative management of hypertensive or non-hypertensive OSA patients.

Random-effects meta-analysis of combined outcomes based on reconstructions of individual patient data

Meta-analyses of clinical trials typically focus on one outcome at a time. However, treatment decision-making depends on an overall assessment of outcomes balancing benefit in various domains and potential risks. This calls for meta-analysis methods for combined outcomes that encompass information from different domains. When individual patient data (IPD) are available from all studies, combined outcomes can be calculated for each individual and standard meta-analysis methods would apply. However, IPD are usually difficult to obtain. We propose a method to estimate the overall treatment effect for combined outcomes based on first reconstructing pseudo IPD from available summary statistics and then pooling estimates from multiple reconstructed datasets. We focus on combined outcomes constructed from two continuous original outcomes. The reconstruction step requires the specification of the joint distribution of these two original outcomes, including the correlation which is often unknown. For outcomes that are combined in a linear fashion, misspecifications of this correlation affect efficiency, but not consistency, of the resulting treatment effect estimator. For other combined outcomes, an accurate estimate of the correlation is necessary to ensure the consistency of treatment effect estimates. To this end, we propose several ways to estimate this correlation under different data availability scenarios. We evaluate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies and apply these to two examples: (a) a meta-analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs control on treating type 2 diabetes; and (b) a meta-analysis of positive airway pressure therapy vs control on lowering blood pressure among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnoea treatment and blood pressure: which phenotypes predict a response? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement devices (MADs) is associated with blood pressure (BP) reduction; however, the overall effect is modest. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of such treatments on BP was to identify subgroups of patients who respond best to treatment.The article search was performed in three different databases with specific search terms and selection criteria. From 2289 articles, we included 68 RCTs that compared CPAP or MADs with either passive or active treatment. When all the studies were pooled together, CPAP and MADs were associated with a mean BP reduction of -2.09 (95% CI -2.78- -1.40) mmHg for systolic BP and -1.92 (95% CI -2.40- -1.43) mmHg for diastolic BP and -1.27 (95% CI -2.34- -0.20) mmHg for systolic BP and -1.11 (95% CI -1.82- -0.41) mmHg for diastolic BP, respectively. The subgroups of patients who showed a greater response were those aged <60 years (systolic BP -2.93 mmHg), with uncontrolled BP at baseline (systolic BP -4.14 mmHg) and with severe oxygen desaturations (minimum arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry <77%) at baseline (24-h systolic BP -7.57 mmHg).Although this meta-analysis shows that the expected reduction of BP by CPAP/MADs is modest, it identifies specific characteristics that may predict a pronounced benefit from CPAP in terms of BP control. These findings should be interpreted with caution; however, they are particularly important in identifying potential phenotypes associated with BP reduction in patients treated for OSA.

Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for the clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults using positive airway pressure (PAP).

METHODS

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of PAP with no treatment as well as studies that compared different PAP modalities. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using PAP in several modalities (ie, continuous PAP, auto-adjusting PAP, and bilevel PAP), to treat OSA in adults. In addition, meta-analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using an in-laboratory versus ambulatory strategy for the initiation of PAP, educational and behavioral interventions, telemonitoring, humidification, different mask interfaces, and flexible or modified pressure profile PAP in conjunction with PAP to treat OSA in adults. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 336 studies that met inclusion criteria; 184 studies provided data suitable for meta-analyses. The data demonstrated that PAP compared to no treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in disease severity, sleepiness, blood pressure, and motor vehicle accidents, and improvement in sleep-related quality of life in adults with OSA. In addition, the initiation of PAP in the home demonstrated equivalent effects on patient outcomes when compared to an in-laboratory titration approach. The data also demonstrated that the use of auto-adjusting or bilevel PAP did not result in clinically significant differences in patient outcomes compared with standard continuous PAP. Furthermore, data demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in PAP adherence with the use of educational, behavioral, troubleshooting, and telemonitoring interventions. Systematic reviews for specific PAP delivery method were also performed and suggested that nasal interfaces compared to oronasal interfaces have improved adherence and slightly greater reductions in OSA severity, heated humidification compared to no humidification reduces some continuous PAP-related side effects, and pressure profile PAP did not result in clinically significant differences in patient outcomes compared with standard continuous PAP.

Systemic hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea

There is consistent epidemiological evidence that sleep disordered breathing and systemic arterial hypertension are deeply associated, being linked through a bidirectional complex interaction among multiple mechanisms including autonomic nervous system alterations, inflammation, hormonal and hemodynamic components, sleep alterations. However there are several unanswered questions not only from a pathophysiological perspective, but also regarding the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment on arterial blood pressure values. At present, while many studies have supported the possibility to obtain at least a small blood pressure reduction with OSA treatment, in particular in hypertensive patients, large trials have not clearly confirmed a significant anti-hypertensive effect, nor a beneficial effect of this intervention on cardiovascular endpoints including cardiovascular mortality. Aim of the present review article is to address the relationship between OSA and hypertension in the light of the latest evidence in the field. Moreover we will discuss research topics which need to be investigated in the future, in order to better clarify still pending issues with the aim of obtaining an early diagnosis, a more suitable phenotyping including comorbidities, and better strategies to improve patients' compliance and adherence to treatment.

Effects of losartan and allopurinol on cardiorespiratory regulation in obstructive sleep apnoea

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? In sleep apnoea, a putative link between intermittent hypoxia and hypertension is the generation of oxygen radicals by angiotensin II and xanthine oxidase within the chemoreflex arc and vasculature. We tested whether chemoreflex control of sympathetic outflow, hypoxic vasodilatation and blood pressure are altered by angiotensin blockade (losartan) and/or xanthine oxidase inhibition (allopurinol). What is the main finding and its importance? Both drugs lowered blood pressure without altering sympathetic outflow, reducing chemoreflex sensitivity or enhancing hypoxic vasodilatation. Losartan and allopurinol are effective therapies for achieving blood pressure control in sleep apnoea.

ABSTRACT

Chemoreflex sensitization produced by chronic intermittent hypoxia in rats is attenuated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R) blockade. Both AT₁ R blockade and xanthine oxidase inhibition ameliorate chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced endothelial dysfunction. We hypothesized that treatment with losartan and allopurinol would reduce chemoreflex sensitivity and improve hypoxic vasodilatation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Eighty-six hypertensive patients with apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥25 events h^-1 and no other cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or metabolic disease were randomly assigned to receive allopurinol, losartan or placebo for 6 weeks. Treatment with other medications and/or continuous positive airway pressure remained unchanged. Tests of chemoreflex sensitivity and hypoxic vasodilatation were performed during wakefulness before and after treatment. Ventilation (pneumotachography), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), heart rate (electrocardiography), arterial oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry), blood pressure (sphygmomanometry), forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography) and cerebral flow velocity (transcranial Doppler ultrasound) were measured during eupnoeic breathing and graded reductions in inspired O₂ tension. Losartan and allopurinol lowered arterial pressure measured during eupnoeic breathing and exposure to acute hypoxia. Neither drug altered the slopes of ventilatory, sympathetic or cardiovascular responses to acute hypoxia. We conclude that losartan and allopurinol are viable pharmacotherapeutic adjuncts for achieving blood pressure control in hypertensive obstructive sleep apnoea patients, even those who are adequately treated with continuous positive airway pressure.

Acetazolamide Reduces Blood Pressure and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Patients With Hypertension and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide (AZT) modulates blood pressure at high altitude and reduces sleep-disordered breathing in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed to investigate the treatment effect of AZT and in combination with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on blood pressure in patients with hypertension and OSA.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, three-way crossover study, 13 male patients with hypertension and moderate to severe OSA (age 64 ± 7 years, body mass index 29 ± 4 kg/m², and mean apnea-hypopnea index 37 ± 23 events/h) received AZT, CPAP, or AZT plus CPAP for 2-week periods. Antihypertensive medication was washed out. Office and 24-hour blood pressure, arterial stiffness, polygraphic sleep study data, and blood chemistry were compared.

RESULTS

AZT alone and AZT plus CPAP, but not CPAP alone, reduced office mean arterial pressure compared to baseline (-7 [95% CI -11 to -4], -7 [95% CI -11 to -4] and -1 [95% CI -5 to 4] mmHg, respectively; repeated- measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA; P = .015). Aortic systolic pressure and augmentation index, assessed by radial artery oscillatory tonometry, were unaffected by CPAP but decreased after AZT and AZT plus CPAP (RM-ANOVA P = .030 and .031, respectively). The apnea-hypopnea index was significantly reduced in all three treatment arms, most prominently by AZT plus CPAP (RM-ANOVA P = .003). The reduction of venous bicarbonate concentration following AZT was correlated with the change of apnea-hypopnea index (r = 0.66, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

AZT reduced blood pressure, vascular stiffness, and sleep-disordered breathing in patients with OSA and comorbid hypertension. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition may constitute a potential target for drug therapy in patients with sleep apnea and comorbid hypertension.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT02220803; Title: A Short Term Open, Randomized Cross-over Trial Exploring the Effect of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition by Acetazolamide on Sleep Apnea Associated Hypertension and Vascular Dysfunction; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02220803 and Registry: EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT Number: 2013-004866-33; Title: A short term open, randomized cross over trial exploring the effect of carbonic anhydrase inhibition by acetazolamide on sleep apnea associated hypertension; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2013-004866-33.

Blood-pressure variability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often associated with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Blood pressure (BP) variability is part of the assessment of cardiovascular risk. In OSA, BP variability has been studied mainly as very short-term (beat-by-beat) and short-term (24-hour BP profile) variability. BP measured on consecutive heartbeats has been demonstrated to be highly variable, due to repeated peaks during sleep, so that an accurate assessment of nocturnal BP levels in OSA may require peculiar methodologies. In 24-hour recordings, BP frequently features a "nondipping" profile, ie, <10% fall from day to night, which may increase cardiovascular risk and occurrence of major cardiovascular events in the nocturnal hours. Also, BP tends to show a large "morning BP surge", a still controversial negative prognostic sign. Increased very short-term BP variability, high morning BP, and nondipping BP profile appear related to the severity of OSA. Treatment of OSA slightly reduces mean 24-hour BP levels and nocturnal beat-by-beat BP variability by abolishing nocturnal BP peaks. In some patients OSA treatment turns a nondipping into a dipping BP profile. Treatment of arterial hypertension in OSA usually requires both antihypertensive pharmacological therapy and treatment of apnea. Addressing BP variability could help improve the management of OSA and reduce cardiovascular risk. Possibly, drug administration at an appropriate time would ensure a dipping-BP profile.

Effect of CPAP, Weight Loss, or CPAP Plus Weight Loss on Central Hemodynamics and Arterial Stiffness

Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea tend to coexist. Little is known about the effects of obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, or their treatment on central aortic pressures and large artery stiffness. We randomized 139 adults with obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) and moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea to (1) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy (n=45), (2) weight loss (WL) therapy (n=48), or (3) combined CPAP and WL (n=46) for 24 weeks. We assessed the effect of these interventions on central pressures and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (a measure of large artery stiffness), measured with arterial tonometry. Central systolic pressure was reduced significantly only in the combination arm (-7.4 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -12.5 to -2.4 mm Hg; P=0.004), without significant reductions detected in either the WL-only (-2.3 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -7.5 to 3.0; P=0.39) or the CPAP-only (-3.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -8.3 to 2.0; P=0.23) arms. However, none of these interventions significantly changed central pulse pressure, pulse pressure amplification, or the central augmentation index. The change in mean arterial pressure (P=0.008) and heart rate (P=0.027) induced by the interventions was significant predictors of the change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. However, after adjustment for mean arterial pressure and heart rate, no significant changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were observed in any group. In obese subjects with obstructive sleep apnea, combination therapy with WL and CPAP is effective in reducing central systolic pressure. However, this effect is largely mediated by changes in mean, rather than central pulse pressure. WL and CPAP, alone or in combination, did not reduce large artery stiffness in this population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00371293.

Obstructive sleep apnea: in search of precision

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition that is viewed as a major global health concern, while affecting approximately 10% of the middle-aged population. OSA is a chronic disease that has been conclusively associated with poor quality of life, cognitive impairments and mood alterations, enhanced cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity, thereby leading to marked increments in healthcare costs.

Areas covered

The authors have reviewed the current evidence on the pathophysiology of OSA and its consequences, the heterogeneity of its phenotypic expression, the current therapeutic applications and their efficacy, and the implications for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up strategies in the context of the clinical management of OSA.

Expert commentary

Personalized medicine in OSA identifies different needs and approaches: i) phenotyping and defining the different and segregated clusters of OSA patients whose recognition may improve prognostic predictions and guide therapeutic strategies; ii) to further characterize and predict the impact of OSA and its treatment, particularly revolving around mortality and the processes closely related to ageing (cardiovascular diseases, cancer and neurocognitive diseases); iii) the introduction of new technologies including telemedicine that have shown promise in the implementation of personalized medicine approaches.

Verifying the Relative Efficacy between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy and Its Alternatives for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Network Meta-analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common breathing disorder, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy together with its alternatives has been developed to treat this disease. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed to compare the efficacy of treatments for OSA. Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for eligible studies. A conventional and NMA was carried out to compare all therapies. Sleeping characteristics, including Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), arterial oxygen saturation, and arousal index (AI), and changes of blood pressure were selected as outcomes. A total of 84 studies were finally included after rigorous screenings. For the primary outcomes of AHI and ESS, the value of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), CPAP, and oral appliance (OA) all showed statistically reduction compared with inactive control (IC). Similar observation was obtained in AI, with treatments of the three active interventions. A lower effect of IC in SaO₂ was exhibited when compared with APAP, CPAP, and OA. Similar statistically significant results were presented in 24 h systolic blood pressure and 24 h DBP when comparing with CPAP. Our NMA identified CPAP as the most efficacious treatment for OSA patients after the evaluation of sleeping characteristics and blood pressures. In addition, more clinical trials are needed for further investigation due to the existence of inconsistency observed in this study.

Circadian rhythms in blood pressure, heart rate, hormones, and on polysomnographic parameters in severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients: effect of continuous positive airway pressure

INTRODUCTION

Seventeen male patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS; apnea-hypopnea index>30/h) were monitored by polysomnography in the sleep lab before and after about 8 weeks of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Twelve of the patients were hypertensive, but treated by antihypertensive drugs. The circadian rhythms in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were determined by ambulatory BP monitoring and motor activity was monitored by a motion logger. As the sympathetic tone is reported to be increased in sleep apnea, the circadian rhythm in plasma norepinephrine was studied in parallel and as a marker rhythm of the biological clock plasma melatonin was determined around the clock by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Level and rhythm in BP and heart rate were not significantly affected by CPAP in this group of patients, but the number of dippers increased after CPAP intervention. The high 24 h plasma values of norepinephrine were lowered by CPAP therapy. In contrast, melatonin values were disturbed in OSAS patients with a loss in nocturnal increase; this pattern was not corrected by CPAP. Sleep functions (deep sleep, slow wave sleep, rapid eye movement sleep, arousal index, apnea-hypopnea index, desaturation index) were disturbed in OSAS patients as monitored by polysomnography and were significantly improved by CPAP therapy.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that BP-controlled hypertensive patients with OSAS can additionally benefit from CPAP therapy by increasing the number of dippers. This treatment significantly improved sleep functions and OSAS symptoms. In addition, arousal movements at night were also reduced and the high sympathetic tone during early morning hours was also decreased. However, there is still an indication of a disturbed function of the biological clock as the loss in the rhythm in plasma melatonin was not corrected by CPAP.

Trends in CPAP adherence over twenty years of data collection: a flattened curve

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder, and continuous airway positive pressure (CPAP) is considered to be the gold standard of therapy. CPAP however is known to have problems with adherence, with many patients eventually abandoning the device. The purpose of this paper is to assess secular trends in CPAP adherence over the long term to see if there have been meaningful improvements in adherence in light of the multiple interventions proposed to do so.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted using the Medline-Ovid, Embase, and Pubmed databases, searching for data regarding CPAP adherence over a twenty year timeframe (1994-2015). Data was assessed for quality and then extracted. The main outcome measure was reported CPAP non-adherence. Secondary outcomes included changes in CPAP non-adherence when comparing short versus long-term, and changes in terms of behavioral counseling.

RESULTS

Eighty-two papers met study inclusion/exclusion criteria. The overall CPAP non-adherence rate based on a 7-h/night sleep time that was reported in studies conducted over the twenty year time frame was 34.1 %. There was no significant improvement over the time frame. Behavioral intervention improved adherence rates by ~1 h per night on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of CPAP adherence remains persistently low over twenty years worth of reported data. No clinically significant improvement in CPAP adherence was seen even in recent years despite efforts toward behavioral intervention and patient coaching. This low rate of adherence is problematic, and calls into question the concept of CPAP as gold-standard of therapy for OSA.

The role of compliance with PAP use on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: is longer use a key-factor?

Scientific data about the effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment on blood pressure (BP) control are continuously increasing; however, they are controversial. We aimed to determine the long-term effects of compliance with PAP therapy on BP in both hypertensive and normotensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). One thousand one hundred sixty eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed OSAHS, who had been recommended PAP therapy, were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Patients with previous cardiovascular disease were excluded. BP was measured at baseline and after 2 years of PAP treatment. In addition, the correlation between the changes in BP with different levels of PAP compliance was assessed. At the end of the follow-up period, in the hypertensive group of patients (n=586), a significant decrease was shown in systolic (-11.2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and diastolic BP (-4.2 mm Hg, P<0.001). Furthermore, in the patients without hypertension (n=528), a significant decrease was noted both in systolic and diastolic BP (-3.6, P<0.001 and -2.4, P<0.001, respectively). A correlation between the magnitude of change in systolic and diastolic BP and hours of use of PAP (r=0.14, P=0.002 and r=0.1, P=0.025, respectively) was observed in all patients. Long-term use of PAP treatment, as well as increased hours of PAP in patients with OSAHS use showed significant reductions in BP not only in patients with hypertension, but also in normotensive patients. Therefore a significant potential reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity should be expected in these patients.

Comparative efficacy of CPAP, MADs, exercise-training, and dietary weight loss for sleep apnea: a network meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To synthesize evidence from available studies on the relative efficacies of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement device (MAD), supervised aerobic exercise training, and dietary weight loss in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis of 80 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) short-listed from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of science, and Cochrane register (inception - September 8, 2015).

PATIENTS

Individuals with OSA.

INTERVENTIONS

CPAP, MADs, exercise training, and dietary weight loss.

RESULTS

CPAP decreased apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) the most [by 25.27 events/hour (22.03-28.52)] followed by exercise training, MADs, and dietary weight loss. While the difference between exercise training and CPAP was non-significant [-8.04 (-17.00 to 0.92), a significant difference was found between CPAP and MADs on AHI and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) [-10.06 (-14.21 to -5.91) and -7.82 (-13.04 to -2.59), respectively]. Exercise training significantly improved Epworth sleepiness scores (ESS) [by 3.08 (0.68-5.48)], albeit with a non-significant difference compared to MADs and CPAP.

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP is the most efficacious in complete resolution of sleep apnea and in improving the indices of saturation during sleep. While MADs offer a reasonable alternative to CPAP, exercise training which significantly improved daytime sleepiness (ESS) could be used as adjunctive to the former two.

Blood Pressure Response to Losartan and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Hypertension and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

RATIONALE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in people with hypertension, particularly resistant hypertension. Treatment with an antihypertensive agent alone is often insufficient to control hypertension in patients with OSA.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) added to treatment with an antihypertensive agent has an impact on blood pressure (BP) levels.

METHODS

During the initial 6-week, two-center, open, prospective, case-control, parallel-design study (2:1; OSA/no-OSA), all patients began treatment with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, 50 mg daily. In the second 6-week, sex-stratified, open, randomized, parallel-design study of the OSA group, all subjects continued to receive losartan and were randomly assigned to either nightly CPAP as add-on therapy or no CPAP.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour BP monitoring included assessment every 15 minutes during daytime hours and every 20 minutes during the night. Ninety-one patients with untreated hypertension underwent a home sleep study (55 were found to have OSA; 36 were not). Losartan significantly reduced systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP in both groups (without OSA: 12.6, 7.2, and 9.0 mm Hg; with OSA: 9.8, 5.7, and 6.1 mm Hg). Add-on CPAP treatment had no significant changes in 24-hour BP values but did reduce nighttime systolic BP by 4.7 mm Hg. All 24-hour BP values were reduced significantly in the 13 patients with OSA who used CPAP at least 4 hours per night.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan reduced BP in OSA, but the reductions were less than in no-OSA. Add-on CPAP therapy resulted in no significant changes in 24-hour BP measures except in patients using CPAP efficiently. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00701428).​

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of oral mandibular advancement devices and continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea

Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (OSAH) causes excessive daytime sleepiness, impairs quality-of-life, and increases cardiovascular disease and road traffic accident risks. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment and mandibular advancement devices (MAD) have been shown to be effective in individual trials but their effectiveness particularly relative to disease severity is unclear. A MEDLINE, Embase and Science Citation Index search updating two systematic reviews to August 2013 identified 77 RCTs in adult OSAH patients comparing: MAD with conservative management (CM); MAD with CPAP; or CPAP with CM. Overall MAD and CPAP significantly improved apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (MAD -9.3/hr (p < 0.001), CPAP -25.4 (p < 0.001)). In direct comparisons mean AHI and Epworth sleepiness scale score were lower (7.0/hr (p < 0.001) and 0.67 (p = 0.093) respectively) for CPAP. There were no CPAP vs. MAD trials in mild OSAH but in comparisons with CM, MAD and CPAP reduced ESS similarly (MAD 2.01 (p < 0.001); CPAP 1.23 (p = 0.012). Both MAD and CPAP are clinically effective in the treatment of OSAH. Although CPAP has a greater treatment effect, MAD is an appropriate treatment for patients who are intolerant of CPAP and may be comparable to CPAP in mild disease.

Reconsidering first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is typically recommended as first line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea, but the adherence rate of CPAP is problematic. This study's objective was to systematically review the literature relating to CPAP as first line therapy for OSA and compare it to surgical literature on the same topic.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, examining Medline-Ovid, Embase, and Pubmed databases. The primary search objective was to identify all papers reporting the results of (1) randomized clinical trials (RCT) of CPAP for the treatment of adults with OSA; and (2) both randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and case series on the surgical treatment of OSA in adults. A PhD-level biostatistician first screened papers, and then those that met study criteria were retrieved and analyzed using standardized forms for each author. The primary outcomes were adherence rates of CPAP.

RESULTS

A total of 82 controlled clinical trials for CPAP and 69 controlled and non-controlled surgery trials were identified for analysis. Variation in CPAP use within reported RCT trials were identified, and the majority of patients in the studies would eventually be considered non-adherent to CPAP.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering the numerous patient-related factors that come into play when CPAP is prescribed, the concept of CPAP as gold-standard therapy for OSA should be reconsidered. In many cases surgery can provide a better overall outcome. This study's results suggest that certain patients with OSA may be managed more effectively with surgery than CPAP, without confounding issues of treatment adherence.

Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in lowering blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a critical review of the literature

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an extremely common comorbid condition in patients with hypertension, with a prevalence of ~50%. There is growing evidence suggesting that OSA is a secondary cause of hypertension, associated with both poor blood pressure (BP) control and target organ damage in patients with hypertension. The application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during sleep is the gold standard treatment of moderate- to-severe OSA and very effective in abolishing obstructive respiratory events. However, several meta-analyses showed that the overall impact of CPAP on BP is modest (~2 mmHg). There are several potential reasons for this disappointing finding, including the heterogeneity of patients studied (normotensive patients, controlled, and uncontrolled patients with hypertension), non-ideal CPAP compliance, clinical presentation (there is some evidence that the positive impact of CPAP on lowering BP is more evident in sleepy patients), and the multifactorial nature of hypertension. In this review, we performed a critical analysis of the literature evaluating the impact of CPAP on BP in several subgroups of patients. We finally discussed perspectives in this important research area, including the urgent need to identify predictors of BP response to CPAP and the importance of precision medicine in this scenario.

Sleep Disordered Breathing: Hypertension and Cardiac Structure and Function

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common form of sleep disordered breathing and has a relatively high prevalence in the general population. The frequency and severity of OSA is associated with age, male sex, and obesity, and OSA has been linked to cardiovascular complications and death. Importantly, OSA has a strong association with both prevalent and incidental hypertension and has a particularly high prevalence in patients with resistant hypertension. In these patients, CPAP and other OSA-directed treatments have been proposed as therapy to help control blood pressure (BP), especially in patients who have not attained optimal BP control despite maximum pharmacological therapy. OSA has also been associated with alterations in cardiac structure and function, although most studies are small and highly limited in study design. Existing data suggest an association between OSA greater left ventricle (LV) mass and hypertrophy that appears independent of confounders including hypertension and obesity. Although less clear and more controversial, OSA severity has been linked to LV systolic and diastolic function, pulmonary hypertension, and right ventricular hypertrophy. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential causal role of OSA in these observed associations with cardiac abnormalities.

The use of positive airway pressure therapy for treatment of resistant hypertension

It is well accepted that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for hypertension. In the subgroup of patients with resistant hypertension (rHTN), OSA appears to be particularly rampant; suggesting sleep disordered breathing may contribute to pathological mechanisms that make blood pressure difficult to control. This article explores potential mechanisms by which sleep apnea contributes to rHTN, and examines the impact of treating OSA with positive airway pressure therapy on blood pressure control. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in randomized controlled trials of positive airway pressure therapy in patients with OSA and rHTN, because patients with rHTN respond poorly to medications. As a result, identifying novel targets for blood pressure control in this high-risk population has become paramount.

Continuous positive airway pressure reduces blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea; a systematic review and meta-analysis with 1000 patients

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may lead to the development of hypertension and therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can promote reduction in blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to review systematically the effects of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with OSA.

METHODS

The search was conducted in the following databases, from their beginning until February 2013: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Lilacs and PEDro. In addition, a manual search was performed on references of published studies. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that used CPAP compared with placebo CPAP or subtherapeutic CPAP for treatment of patients with OSA and that evaluated office SBP and DBP and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure were selected.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs were included among 3409 publications, totaling 1166 patients. The use of CPAP resulted in reductions in office SBP [-3.20  mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.67 to -1.72] and DBP (-2.87  mmHg; 95% CI -5.18 to -0.55); in night-time SBP (-4.92  mmHg; 95% CI -8.70 to -1.14); in mean 24-h blood pressure (-3.56  mmHg; 95% CI -6.79 to -0.33), mean night-time blood pressure (-2.56  mmHg; 95% CI -4.43 to -0.68) and 24-h DBP (-3.46  mmHg; 95% CI -6.75 to -0.17). However, no significant change was observed in daytime SBP (-0.74  mmHg; 95% CI -3.90 to 2.41) and daytime DBP (-1.86  mmHg; 95% CI -4.55 to 0.83).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with CPAP promoted significantly but small reductions in blood pressure in individuals with OSA. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the effects of long-term CPAP and the impact on cardiovascular risk.

Comparison of the effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Excessive daytime sleepiness is the most important symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea and can affect work productivity, quality of life, and the risk of road traffic accidents. We aimed to quantify the effects of the two main treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea (continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices) on daytime sleepiness and to establish predictors of response to continuous positive airway pressure.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 31, 2015, to identify randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of continuous positive airway pressure, mandibular advancement devices or an inactive control (eg, placebo or no treatment) on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, range 0-24 points) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. We did a network meta-analysis using multivariate random-effects meta-regression to assess the effect of each treatment on ESS. We used meta-regression to assess the association of the reported effects of continuous positive airway pressure versus inactive controls with the characteristics of trials and their risk of bias.

FINDINGS

We included 67 studies comprising 6873 patients in the meta-analysis. Compared with an inactive control, continuous positive airway pressure was associated with a reduction in ESS score of 2·5 points (95% CI 2·0-2·9) and mandibular advancement devices of 1·7 points (1·1-2·3). We estimated that, on average, continuous positive airway pressure reduced the ESS score by a further 0·8 points compared with mandibular advancement devices (95% CI 0·1-1·4; p=0·015). However, there was a possibility of publication bias in favour of continuous positive airway pressure that might have resulted in this difference. We noted no evidence that studies reporting higher continuous positive airway pressure adherence also reported larger treatment effects (p=0·70).

INTERPRETATION

Continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices are effective treatments for reducing daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Continuous positive airway pressure seemed to be a more effective treatment than mandibular advancement devices, and had an increasingly larger effect in more severe or sleepier obstructive sleep apnoea patients when compared with inactive controls. However, mandibular advancement devices are an effective alternative treatment should continuous positive airway pressure not be tolerated.

FUNDING

Swiss National Science Foundation and the University of Zurich Clinical Research Priority Program Sleep and Health.

Sleep-disordered breathing and resistant hypertension

Hypertension is a highly prevalent problem worldwide, affecting at least one third of the adult general population. Although the exact prevalence is uncertain, it is estimated that at least 15% to 20% of individuals with hypertension have resistant hypertension. Resistant hypertension has been shown to predict more adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In 2003, the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recognized obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as an important cause of secondary hypertension. A large body of epidemiologic evidence has linked OSA to resistant hypertension, nondipping nocturnal blood pressure, as well as target organ damage, including left ventricular hypertrophy, arterial stiffness, and microalbuminuria. The importance of OSA as a risk factor for the development of hypertension independent of other confounding factors also was observed in a prospective longitudinal study. More importantly, OSA predicts an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and sudden cardiac death. This article discusses the associations between OSA and resistant hypertension and reviews the latest understanding on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of hypertension in OSA. Nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure therapy is regarded as the standard treatment for OSA. Prospective randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of prospective randomized controlled trials within the past 10 years that have examined the effects of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on blood pressure control in patients with OSA with or without hypertension are reviewed and summarized. The majority of the trials suggest a modest but significant benefit on blood pressure control with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Whether continuous positive airway pressure therapy may improve hard outcomes of patients with OSA and resistant hypertension warrants further investigation.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results from the randomised controlled Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (TOMADO) and long-term economic analysis of oral devices and continuous positive airway pressure

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (OSAH) causes excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), impairs quality of life (QoL) and increases cardiovascular disease and road traffic accident risks. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment is clinically effective but undermined by intolerance, and its cost-effectiveness is borderline in milder cases. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are another option, but evidence is lacking regarding their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in milder disease.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MADs against no treatment in mild to moderate OSAH. (2) Update systematic reviews and an existing health economic decision model with data from the Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (TOMADO) and newly published results to better inform long-term clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MADs and CPAP in mild to moderate OSAH.

TOMADO

A crossover RCT comparing clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three MADs: self-moulded [SleepPro 1™ (SP1); Meditas Ltd, Winchester, UK]; semibespoke [SleepPro 2™ (SP2); Meditas Ltd, Winchester, UK]; and fully bespoke [bespoke MAD (bMAD); NHS Oral-Maxillofacial Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK] against no treatment, in 90 adults with mild to moderate OSAH. All devices improved primary outcome [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI)] compared with no treatment: relative risk 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.89] for SP1; relative risk 0.67 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.76) for SP2; and relative risk 0.64 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.76) for bMAD (p < 0.001). Differences between MADs were not significant. Sleepiness [as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)] was scored 1.51 [95% CI 0.73 to 2.29 (SP1)] to 2.37 [95% CI 1.53 to 3.22 (bMAD)] lower than no treatment (p < 0.001), with SP2 and bMAD significantly better than SP1. All MADs improved disease-specific QoL. Compliance was lower for SP1, which was unpopular at trial exit. At 4 weeks, all devices were cost-effective at £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with SP2 the best value below £39,800/QALY.

META-ANALYSIS

A MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index search updating two existing systematic reviews (one from November 2006 and the other from June 2008) to August 2013 identified 77 RCTs in adult OSAH patients comparing MAD with conservative management (CM), MADs with CPAP or CPAP with CM. MADs and CPAP significantly improved AHI [MAD -9.3/hour (p < 0.001); CPAP -25.4/hour (p < 0.001)]. Effect difference between CPAP and MADs was 7.0/hour (p < 0.001), favouring CPAP. No trials compared CPAP with MADs in mild OSAH. MAD and CPAP reduced the ESS score similarly [MAD 1.6 (p < 0.001); CPAP 1.6 (p < 0.001)].

LONG-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS

An existing model assessed lifetime cost-utility of MAD and CPAP in mild to moderate OSAH, using the revised meta-analysis to update input values. The TOMADO provided utility estimates, mapping ESS score to European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions three-level version for device cost-utility. Using SP2 as the standard device, MADs produced higher mean costs and mean QALYs than CM [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) £6687/QALY]. From a willingness to pay (WTP) of £15,367/QALY, CPAP is cost-effective, although the likelihood of MADs (p = 0.48) and CPAP (p = 0.49) being cost-effective is very similar. Both were better than CM, but there was much uncertainty in the choice between CPAP and MAD (at a WTP £20,000/QALY, the probability of being the most cost-effective was 47% for MAD and 52% for CPAP). When SP2 lifespan increased to 18 months, the ICER for CPAP compared with MAD became £44,066. The ICER for SP1 compared with CM was £1552, and for bMAD compared with CM the ICER was £13,836. The ICER for CPAP compared with SP1 was £89,182, but CPAP produced lower mean costs and higher mean QALYs than bMAD. Differential compliance rates for CPAP reduces cost-effectiveness so MADs become less costly and more clinically effective with CPAP compliance 90% of SP2.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular advancement devices are clinically effective and cost-effective in mild to moderate OSAH. A semi-bespoke MAD is the appropriate first choice in most patients in the short term. Future work should explore whether or not adjustable MADs give additional clinical and cost benefits. Further data on longer-term cardiovascular risk and its risk factors would reduce uncertainty in the health economic model and improve precision of effectiveness estimates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered as ISRCTN02309506.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 67. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Use of continuous positive airway pressure for sleep apnea in the treatment of hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension are highly prevalent and treatable conditions that often coexist and both contribute to an increased cardiovascular risk. The ability of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to improve blood pressure in hypertensive patients with OSA is debated. This review highlights findings from recent studies that have investigated the impact of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with OSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Comparing the results of various studies is complicated by important methodological differences among them. In hypertensive patients with OSA, treatment with CPAP improves blood pressure to a smaller degree than that derived from antihypertensive medication. Patients with more severe OSA and with greater adherence to CPAP are likely to gain the most benefit from the therapy.

SUMMARY

CPAP should be used in combination with antihypertensive medications in hypertensive patients with OSA. CPAP has the additional benefits of restoring nocturnal dipping and improving arterial stiffness, thus potentially influencing cardiovascular morbidity in these high-risk patients.

Long-term effects of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure and prognosis in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease and obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can result in hypertension and significantly increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There are few reports on the long-term effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension with coronary heart disease (CHD) and OSA.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, long-term follow-up study in 83 patients with uncontrolled hypertension, CHD, and OSA randomized to control or CPAP groups. Daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (SCCEs) were recorded at baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients completed the study with a median follow-up of 36 (interquartile range = 24-54) months. The 2 groups had similar characteristics at baseline. CPAP was used for 4.5±1.1 hour/night. SBP in the CPAP group was significantly reduced at follow-up (143±7 mm Hg vs. 139±7 mm Hg, P = 0.04), and SBP decreased by 8mm Hg (95% confidence interval = 1.4-9.9; P = 0.01). Hypertension control was improved (CPAP, 69.4% for CPAP users vs. 43.2% for control subjects; P = 0.02); however, DBP did not reach statistical difference between the groups (81±10 mm Hg vs. 79±8 mm Hg; P = 0.49). In the CPAP group, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was markedly reduced (7.0±3.4 vs. 3.7±2.3; P < 0.001). There was 1 SCCE in the CPAP group (heart failure), and 5 SCCEs in the control group (acute myocardial infarction: 2 (with 1 death); stroke: 3), but there was no significant difference identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term CPAP application in uncontrolled hypertension with CHD and OSA significantly reduced daytime SBP, improved hypertension control and daytime sleepiness, and decreased the trend in SCCEs compared with control subjects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02059993.

The role of continuous positive airway pressure in blood pressure control for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim of this study was to review the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension. Biomedical databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CPAP with control among these patients. Seven RCTs reporting 24-hour ambulatory BP were identified for meta-analysis. CPAP was associated with significant reductions in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-2.32 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.65 to -1.00) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-1.98 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.82 to -1.14). CPAP led to more significant improvement in nocturnal SBP than that in diurnal SBP. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with resistant hypertension or receiving antihypertensive drugs benefited most from CPAP. Meta-regression indicated that CPAP compliance, age, and baseline SBP were positively correlated with decrease in 24-hour DBP, but not reduction in 24-hour SBP.

Overnight Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Its Treatment on Stroke Volume in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

We previously showed in heart failure (HF) patients that obstructive respiratory events during sleep and generation of negative intrathoracic pressure during Mueller manoeuvres, mimicking obstructive apneas, acutely reduced stroke volume (SV). We also showed that treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) increased left ventricular ejection fraction over a 1-month period. We therefore hypothesized that, in HF patients, those with OSA would have greater overnight declines in SV and cardiac output (CO) than in those without sleep apnea, and that therapy of OSA using CPAP would prevent these declines.

METHODS

We examined overnight percent change in SV and CO in 32 HF patients with and 28 without OSA using digital photoplethysmography. Among patients with OSA, we also examined changes in SV and CO during a CPAP titration study.

RESULTS

During the baseline polysomnogram SV and CO decreased more overnight in those with OSA than in those without sleep apnea (-12.6 ± 7.7% vs -3.2 ± 6.8%; P < 0.001 and -16.2 ± 9.9% vs -3.7 ± 8.3%; P < 0.001, respectively). Overnight changes in SV and CO correlated inversely with total apnea-hypopnea index (r = -0.551; P < 0.001 and r = -0.522; P < 0.001, respectively). In 21 patients with OSA, CPAP reduced the total apnea-hypopnea index from 37.7 ± 21.4 to 15.0 ± 16.0 (P < 0.001) in association with attenuation of the overnight reduction of SV (from -14.0 ± 7.9% to -3.4 ± 9.8%; P = 0.002) and CO (from -17.2 ± 9.0% to -9.7 ± 10.7%; P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF, coexisting OSA causes overnight declines in SV and CO that are prevented through reversal of OSA by CPAP.

Effect of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Body Mass Index in Obese Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Prospective Study

Because obesity is a common cause of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), weight loss can be an effective treatment. OSAS also may cause weight gain in some patients. Effective treatment of sleep apnea may facilitate weight loss in obese patients. We hypothesize that positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is associated with weight loss in obese patients with OSAS. This was a single-center observational prospective cohort study. Forty-five patients were diagnosed with OSAS after polysomnographic analysis in sleep laboratory and underwent continuous positive airway pressure titration. Patients were followed for 3 months in terms of change in body mass index (BMI) and compliance with PAP therapy. Of the 45 patients recruited, 3 patients were eliminated because of miss recruitment. Nine patients had incomplete data, and the rest (n = 33) were included for analysis. The mean age was 54.9 ± 16.9 years (mean ± SD), 93.9% were male, and 90.9% were whites. Mean apnea-hypopnea index was 36.3 ± 28.17 events per hour. Mean BMI before treatment was 34.7 ± 3.9 kg/m. Fifteen patients (45.5%) were compliant with therapy of OSAS with PAP. There was no difference in age, gender, neck circumference, BMI, and apnea-hypopnea index of patients compliant to therapy when compared with those who were not. There was a significant decrease in BMI in patients compliant with PAP therapy compared with noncompliant patients (-1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.3 ± 0.9 kg/m, P ≤ 0.001). PAP therapy may cause significant loss of weight within 3 months in obese patients with OSAS. Further study is needed to elucidate the physiological basis of this change.

Comparative effectiveness research in obstructive sleep apnea: bridging gaps between efficacy studies and clinical practice

Comparative effectiveness research encompasses research that compares two interventions to each other, and takes place in real-world settings without strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, according to the established standard of care. There is a need for comparative evaluations of the treatments for obstructive sleep apnea, a disease associated with increased cardiovascular risk, stroke and metabolic derangement. This article reviews the recent, representative literature that addresses obstructive sleep apnea intervention and treatment, paradigms for diagnosis and randomized control trials addressing the efficacy of interventions, in an effort to demonstrate examples of both traditional observational and randomized control trials, as well as to illustrate the considerable overlap between some traditional studies and comparative effectiveness research. Despite methodological challenges, the potentially large clinical and public health impact of obstructive sleep apnea, accompanied by considerable cost, mandates that randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research be systematically applied to identify both the efficacy and effectiveness of alternative diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with OSA/hypopnea a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

CPAP is considered the therapy of choice for OSA, but the extent to which it can reduce BP is still under debate. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to quantify the effect size of the reduction of BP by CPAP therapy compared with other passive (sham CPAP, tablets of placebo drug, conservative measures) or active (oral appliance, antihypertensive drugs) treatments.

METHODS

We searched four different databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) with specific search terms and selection criteria.

RESULTS

From 1,599 articles, we included 31 RCTs that compared CPAP with either passive or active treatment. In a random-effects meta-analysis vs passive treatment (29 RCTs, 1,820 subjects), we observed a mean±SEM net difference in systolic BP of 2.6±0.6 mm Hg and in diastolic BP of 2.0±0.4 mm Hg, favoring treatment with CPAP (P<.001). Among studies using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring that presented data on daytime and nighttime periods, the mean difference in systolic and diastolic BP was, respectively, 2.2±0.7 and 1.9±0.6 mm Hg during daytime and 3.8±0.8 and 1.8±0.6 mm Hg during nighttime. In meta-regression analysis, a higher baseline apnea/hypopnea index was associated with a greater mean net decrease in systolic BP (beta±SE, 0.08±0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias, and heterogeneity was mild ( I2, 34%-36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with CPAP significantly reduces BP in patients with OSA but with a low effect size. Patients with frequent apneic episodes may benefit the most from CPAP.

Blood pressure improvement with continuous positive airway pressure is independent of obstructive sleep apnea severity

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We sought to perform a patient-level meta-analysis using the individual patient data of the trials identified in our previous study-level meta-analysis investigating the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on blood pressure (BP).

DESIGN

Patient-level meta-analysis.

SETTING

N/A.

PARTICIPANTS

968 adult OSA subjects without major comorbidities drawn from eight randomized controlled trials.

INTERVENTIONS

Therapeutic PAP versus non-therapeutic control conditions (sham-PAP, pill placebo or standard care) over at least one week.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The mean reductions in BP between PAP and non-therapeutic control arms were -2.27 mm Hg (95% CI -4.01 to -0.54) for systolic BP and -1.78 mm Hg (95% CI -2.99 to -0.58) for diastolic BP. The presence of uncontrolled hypertension at baseline was significantly associated with a reduction in systolic BP of 7.1 mm Hg and diastolic BP of 4.3 mm Hg after controlling for OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, PAP level), patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index, use of antihypertensive medication/s), and measures of PAP efficacy (PAP adherence and treatment duration).

CONCLUSIONS

OSA patients with uncontrolled hypertension are likely to gain the largest benefit from PAP in terms of a substantial reduction in BP, even after controlling for disease severity.