1
|
Denbeigh JM, Howard ME, Garcia DA, Debrot EK, Cole KC, Remmes NB, Beltran CJ. Characterizing Proton-Induced Biological Effects in a Mouse Spinal Cord Model: A Comparison of Bragg Peak and Entrance Beam Response in Single and Fractionated Exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:924-935. [PMID: 38310485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is a dynamic variable influenced by factors like linear energy transfer (LET), dose, tissue type, and biological endpoint. The standard fixed proton RBE of 1.1, currently used in clinical planning, may not accurately represent the true biological effects of proton therapy (PT) in all cases. This uncertainty can contribute to radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in patients. In late-responding tissues such as the spinal cord, toxicity can cause devastating complications. This study investigated spinal cord tolerance in mice subjected to proton irradiation and characterized the influence of fractionation on proton- induced myelopathy at entrance (ENT) and Bragg peak (BP) positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Cervical spinal cords of 8-week-old C57BL/6J female mice were irradiated with single- or multi-fractions (18x) using lateral opposed radiation fields at 1 of 2 positions along the Bragg curve: ENT (dose-mean LET = 1.2 keV/μm) and BP (LET = 6.9 keV/μm). Mice were monitored over 1 year for changes in weight, mobility, and general health, with radiation-induced myelopathy as the primary biological endpoint. Calculations of the RBE of the ENT and BP curve (RBEENT/BP) were performed. RESULTS Single-fraction RBEENT/BP for 50% effect probability (tolerance dose (TD50), grade II paresis, determined using log-logistic model fitting) was 1.10 ± 0.06 (95% CI) and for multifraction treatments it was 1.19 ± 0.05 (95% CI). Higher incidence and faster onset of paralysis were seen in mice treated at the BP compared with ENT. CONCLUSIONS The findings challenge the universally fixed RBE value in PT, indicating up to a 25% mouse spinal cord RBEENT/BP variation for multifraction treatments. These results highlight the importance of considering fractionation in determining RBE for PT. Robust characterization of proton-induced toxicity, aided by in vivo models, is paramount for refining clinical decision-making and mitigating potential patient side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Michelle E Howard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Darwin A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Emily K Debrot
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristin C Cole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dok R, Vanderwaeren L, Verstrepen KJ, Nuyts S. Radiobiology of Proton Therapy in Human Papillomavirus-Negative and Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1959. [PMID: 38893080 PMCID: PMC11171379 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Photon-based radiotherapy (XRT) is one of the most frequently used treatment modalities for HPV-negative and HPV-positive locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, locoregional recurrences and normal RT-associated toxicity remain major problems for these patients. Proton therapy (PT), with its dosimetric advantages, can present a solution to the normal toxicity problem. However, issues concerning physical delivery and the lack of insights into the underlying biology of PT hamper the full exploitation of PT. Here, we assessed the radiobiological processes involved in PT in HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC cells. We show that PT and XRT activate the DNA damage-repair and stress response in both HPV-negative and HPV-positive cells to a similar extent. The activation of these major radiobiological mechanisms resulted in equal levels of clonogenic survival and mitotic cell death. Altogether, PT resulted in similar biological effectiveness when compared to XRT. These results emphasize the importance of dosimetric parameters when exploiting the potential of increased clinical effectiveness and reduced normal tissue toxicity in PT treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rüveyda Dok
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura Vanderwaeren
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kevin J. Verstrepen
- Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Microbial and Plant Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holtzman AL, Mohammadi H, Furutani KM, Koffler DM, McGee LA, Lester SC, Gamez ME, Routman DM, Beltran CJ, Liang X. Impact of Relative Biologic Effectiveness for Proton Therapy for Head and Neck and Skull-Base Tumors: A Technical and Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1947. [PMID: 38893068 PMCID: PMC11171304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has emerged as a crucial tool in the treatment of head and neck and skull-base cancers, offering advantages over photon therapy in terms of decreasing integral dose and reducing acute and late toxicities, such as dysgeusia, feeding tube dependence, xerostomia, secondary malignancies, and neurocognitive dysfunction. Despite its benefits in dose distribution and biological effectiveness, the application of proton therapy is challenged by uncertainties in its relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Overcoming the challenges related to RBE is key to fully realizing proton therapy's potential, which extends beyond its physical dosimetric properties when compared with photon-based therapies. In this paper, we discuss the clinical significance of RBE within treatment volumes and adjacent serial organs at risk in the management of head and neck and skull-base tumors. We review proton RBE uncertainties and its modeling and explore clinical outcomes. Additionally, we highlight technological advancements and innovations in plan optimization and treatment delivery, including linear energy transfer/RBE optimizations and the development of spot-scanning proton arc therapy. These advancements show promise in harnessing the full capabilities of proton therapy from an academic standpoint, further technological innovations and clinical outcome studies, however, are needed for their integration into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L. Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Homan Mohammadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Keith M. Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Daniel M. Koffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Scott C. Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Mauricio E. Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David M. Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vieceli M, Park J, Hsi WC, Saki M, Mendenhall NP, Johnson P, Artz M. Potential Therapeutic Improvements in Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy with LET d Optimization and Disease-Specific RBE Models. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:780. [PMID: 38398171 PMCID: PMC10886728 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of improving prostate cancer patient outcomes with PBS proton LETd optimization. METHODS SFO, IPT-SIB, and LET-optimized plans were created for 12 patients, and generalized-tissue and disease-specific LET-dependent RBE models were applied. The mean LETd in several structures was determined and used to calculate mean RBEs. LETd- and dose-volume histograms (LVHs/DVHs) are shown. TODRs were defined based on clinical dose goals and compared between plans. The impact of robust perturbations on LETd, TODRs, and DVH spread was evaluated. RESULTS LETd optimization achieved statistically significant increased target volume LETd of ~4 keV/µm compared to SFO and IPT-SIB LETd of ~2 keV/µm while mitigating OAR LETd increases. A disease-specific RBE model predicted target volume RBEs > 1.5 for LET-optimized plans, up to 18% higher than for SFO plans. LET-optimized target LVHs/DVHs showed a large increase not present in OARs. All RBE models showed a statistically significant increase in TODRs from SFO to IPT-SIB to LET-optimized plans. RBE = 1.1 does not accurately represent TODRs when using LETd optimization. Robust evaluations demonstrated a trade-off between increased mean target LETd and decreased DVH spread. CONCLUSION The demonstration of improved TODRs provided via LETd optimization shows potential for improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Vieceli
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Jiyeon Park
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Wen Chien Hsi
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Mo Saki
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Perry Johnson
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Mark Artz
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winter SF, Vaios EJ, Shih HA, Grassberger C, Parsons MW, Gardner MM, Ehret F, Kaul D, Boehmerle W, Endres M, Dietrich J. Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1524-1549. [PMID: 37728819 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Central nervous system (CNS) radiotoxicity remains a challenge in neuro-oncology. Dose distribution advantages of protons over photons have prompted increased use of brain-directed proton therapy. While well-recognized among pediatric populations, the benefit of proton therapy among adults with CNS malignancies remains controversial. We herein discuss the role of protons in mitigating late CNS radiotoxicities in adult patients. Despite limited clinical trials, evidence suggests toxicity profile advantages of protons over conventional radiotherapy, including retention of neurocognitive function and brain volume. Modelling studies predict superior dose conformality of protons versus state-of-the-art photon techniques reduces late radiogenic vasculopathies, endocrinopathies, and malignancies. Conversely, potentially higher brain tissue necrosis rates following proton therapy highlight a need to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impact of variable biological effectiveness of protons on dose distribution. Clinical trials comparing best photon and particle-based therapy are underway to establish whether protons substantially improve long-term treatment-related outcomes in adults with CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F Winter
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M Gardner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Boehmerle
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- ExcellenceCluster NeuroCure, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sioen S, Vanhove O, Vanderstraeten B, De Wagter C, Engelbrecht M, Vandevoorde C, De Kock E, Van Goethem MJ, Vral A, Baeyens A. Impact of proton therapy on the DNA damage induction and repair in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16995. [PMID: 37813904 PMCID: PMC10562436 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42362-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is of great interest to pediatric cancer patients because of its optimal depth dose distribution. In view of healthy tissue damage and the increased risk of secondary cancers, we investigated DNA damage induction and repair of radiosensitive hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) exposed to therapeutic proton and photon irradiation due to their role in radiation-induced leukemia. Human CD34+ HSPCs were exposed to 6 MV X-rays, mid- and distal spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) protons at doses ranging from 0.5 to 2 Gy. Persistent chromosomal damage was assessed with the micronucleus assay, while DNA damage induction and repair were analyzed with the γ-H2AX foci assay. No differences were found in induction and disappearance of γ-H2AX foci between 6 MV X-rays, mid- and distal SOBP protons at 1 Gy. A significantly higher number of micronuclei was found for distal SOBP protons compared to 6 MV X-rays and mid- SOBP protons at 0.5 and 1 Gy, while no significant differences in micronuclei were found at 2 Gy. In HSPCs, mid-SOBP protons are as damaging as conventional X-rays. Distal SOBP protons showed a higher number of micronuclei in HSPCs depending on the radiation dose, indicating possible changes of the in vivo biological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sioen
- Radiobiology, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Oniecha Vanhove
- Radiobiology, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Barbara Vanderstraeten
- Medical Physics, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carlos De Wagter
- Medical Physics, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Monique Engelbrecht
- Separated Sector Cyclotron Laboratory, Radiation Biophysics Division, iThemba LABS (NRF), Cape Town, 7131, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Separated Sector Cyclotron Laboratory, Radiation Biophysics Division, iThemba LABS (NRF), Cape Town, 7131, South Africa
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Evan De Kock
- Separated Sector Cyclotron Laboratory, Radiation Biophysics Division, iThemba LABS (NRF), Cape Town, 7131, South Africa
| | - Marc-Jan Van Goethem
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Vral
- Radiobiology, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ans Baeyens
- Radiobiology, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Henjum H, Tjelta J, Fjæra LF, Pilskog S, Stokkevåg CH, Lyngholm E, Handeland AH, Ytre-Hauge KS. Influence of beam pruning techniques on LET and RBE in proton arc therapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1155310. [PMID: 37731633 PMCID: PMC10508957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1155310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an emerging treatment modality that holds promise to improve target volume coverage and reduce linear energy transfer (LET) in organs at risk. We aimed to investigate if pruning the highest energy layers in each beam direction could increase the LET in the target and reduce LET in tissue and organs at risk (OAR) surrounding the target volume, thus reducing the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose and sparing healthy tissue. Methods PAT plans for a germinoma, an ependymoma and a rhabdomyosarcoma patient were created in the Eclipse treatment planning system with a prescribed dose of 54 Gy(RBE) using a constant RBE of 1.1 (RBE1.1). The PAT plans was pruned for high energy spots, creating several PAT plans with different amounts of pruning while maintaining tumor coverage, denoted PX-PAT plans, where X represents the amount of pruning. All plans were recalculated in the FLUKA Monte Carlo software, and the LET, physical dose, and variable RBE-weighted dose from the phenomenological Rørvik (ROR) model and an LET weighted dose (LWD) model were evaluated. Results and discussion For the germinoma case, all plans but the P6-PAT reduced the mean RBE-weighted dose to the surrounding healthy tissue compared to the PAT plan. The LET was increasingly higher within the PTV for each pruning iteration, where the mean LET from the P6-PAT plan was 1.5 keV / μm higher than for the PAT plan, while the P4- and P5-PAT plans provided an increase of 0.4 and 0.7 keV / μm , respectively. The other plans increased the LET by a smaller margin compared to the PAT plan. Likewise, the LET values to the healthy tissue were reduced for each degree of pruning. Similar results were found for the ependymoma and the rhabdomyosarcoma case. We demonstrated a PAT pruning technique that can increase both LET and RBE in the target volume and at the same time decreased values in healthy tissue, without affecting the target volume dose coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johannes Tjelta
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Camilla H. Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Erlend Lyngholm
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andreas H. Handeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taasti VT, Decabooter E, Eekers D, Compter I, Rinaldi I, Bogowicz M, van der Maas T, Kneepkens E, Schiffelers J, Stultiens C, Hendrix N, Pijls M, Emmah R, Fonseca GP, Unipan M, van Elmpt W. Clinical benefit of range uncertainty reduction in proton treatment planning based on dual-energy CT for neuro-oncological patients. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230110. [PMID: 37493227 PMCID: PMC10461272 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several studies have shown that dual-energy CT (DECT) can lead to improved accuracy for proton range estimation. This study investigated the clinical benefit of reduced range uncertainty, enabled by DECT, in robust optimisation for neuro-oncological patients. METHODS DECT scans for 27 neuro-oncological patients were included. Commercial software was applied to create stopping-power ratio (SPR) maps based on the DECT scan. Two plans were robustly optimised on the SPR map, keeping the beam and plan settings identical to the clinical plan. One plan was robustly optimised and evaluated with a range uncertainty of 3% (as used clinically; denoted 3%-plan); the second plan applied a range uncertainty of 2% (2%-plan). Both plans were clinical acceptable and optimal. The dose-volume histogram parameters were compared between the two plans. Two experienced neuro-radiation oncologists determined the relevant dose difference for each organ-at-risk (OAR). Moreover, the OAR toxicity levels were assessed. RESULTS For 24 patients, a dose reduction >0.5/1 Gy (relevant dose difference depending on the OAR) was seen in one or more OARs for the 2%-plan; e.g. for brainstem D0.03cc in 10 patients, and hippocampus D40% in 6 patients. Furthermore, 12 patients had a reduction in toxicity level for one or two OARs, showing a clear benefit for the patient. CONCLUSION Robust optimisation with reduced range uncertainty allows for reduction of OAR toxicity, providing a rationale for clinical implementation. Based on these results, we have clinically introduced DECT-based proton treatment planning for neuro-oncological patients, accompanied with a reduced range uncertainty of 2%. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study shows the clinical benefit of range uncertainty reduction from 3% to 2% in robustly optimised proton plans. A dose reduction to one or more OARs was seen for 89% of the patients, and 44% of the patients had an expected toxicity level decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Trier Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Decabooter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tim van der Maas
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Kneepkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Schiffelers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cissy Stultiens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Hendrix
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirthe Pijls
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Emmah
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriel Paiva Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirko Unipan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Magrin G, Palmans H, Stock M, Georg D. State-of-the-art and potential of experimental microdosimetry in ion-beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109586. [PMID: 36842667 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
In radiotherapy, radiation-quality should be an expression of the biological and physical characteristics of ionizing radiation such as spatial distribution of ionization or energy deposition. Linear energy transfer (LET) and lineal energy (y) are two descriptors used to quantify the radiation quality. These two quantities are connected and exhibit similar features. In ion-beam therapy (IBT), lineal energy can be measured with microdosimeters, which are specifically designed to cope with the high fluence of particles in clinical beams, while the quantification of LET is generally based on calculations. In pre-clinical studies, microdosimetric spectra are used for the indirect determination of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), e.g., using the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) or biophysical response functions. In this context it is important to consider saturation effects, which occur when the highest values of y become less biologically relevant compared to the relative contribution they make to the physical dose. Recent clinical data suggests that local tumor control and normal tissue effects can be linked to macroscopic and microscopic dosimetry parameters. In particular, positive clinical outcomes have been correlated to the highest LET values in the density distribution, and there is no evident link to the saturation discussed above. A systematic collection of microdosimetric information in combination with clinical data in retrospective studies may clarify the role of radiation quality at the highest LET. In the clinical setting, microdosimetry is not widely used yet, despite its potential to be linked with LET by experimentally-determined y values. Through this connection, both play an important role in complex therapy techniques such as intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT), LET-painting and multi-ion optimization. This review summarizes the current state of microdosimetry for IBT and its potential, as well as research and development needed to make experimental microdosimetry a mature procedure in a clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Magrin
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Hugo Palmans
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Universität, Krems, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Missiaggia M, Cartechini G, Tommasino F, Scifoni E, La Tessa C. Investigation of In-Field and Out-of-Field Radiation Quality With Microdosimetry and Its Impact on Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1269-1282. [PMID: 36442542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using microdosimetry, this study investigated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and quality factor (Q¯) variations in field and out of field as a function of radiation quality for clinical protons. METHODS AND MATERIALS A water phantom with a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) was irradiated to acquire microdosimetric spectra at several distal and lateral depths with a tissue equivalent proportional counter. The measurements were used as inputs to microdosimetric kinetic and Loncol models to determine the RBE spatial distribution and compare it with predictions from the dose-averaged linear energy transfer-based McNamara model. Q¯ values and biological and dose equivalent values were also calculated. RESULTS The data demonstrated that radiation quality changed more rapidly with depth than lateral distance from the SOBP. In beam, yD ranged from approximately 4 keV/μm at the entrance to 8 keV/μm at the SOBP far end, reaching approximately 15 keV/μm at the penumbra. Out of field, the overall highest value of 23 ± 2 keV/μm was observed at the beam-edge penumbra. Radiation quality changes caused RBE deviations from the clinical value of 1.1, whose extent depends on the approach used for assessing radiation quality as well as on the radiobiological model. For RBE10, microdosimetry-based models appeared to better reproduce the radiobiological data than the dose-averaged linear energy transfer model. Out of field, both the RBE and Q¯ values appeared to have limitations in describing the radiation biological effectiveness. This research also presents a first comprehensive benchmark of TOPAS code against in-field and out-of-field microdosimetric spectra of therapeutic protons. CONCLUSIONS Further investigation will be necessary to evaluate the quantitative effects of RBE variations on treatment planning and assess the clinical consequences in terms of both tumor control and normal-tissue toxicity. The achievement of this goal calls for accurate radiobiological data to validate the RBE models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Missiaggia
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Giorgio Cartechini
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Chiara La Tessa
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hasan S, Lazarev S, Garg M, Gozland R, Chang J, Hartsell W, Chen J, Tsai H, Vargas C, Simone CB, Gorovets D. Proton therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: Results from the Proton Collaborative Group PCG 001-09 prospective registry trial. Prostate 2023; 83:850-856. [PMID: 36946610 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data for proton therapy in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) are limited. Using the Proton Collaborative Group prospective registry, we evaluated outcomes for HRPC patients treated with proton therapy. METHODS A totsl of 605 men with localized HRPC treated with proton therapy from 8/2009 to 3/2019 at nine institutions were selected. Outcomes examined included freedom from progression (FFP), metastasis free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Multivariable cox/binomial regression models were used to assess predictors of FFP and toxicity. RESULTS Median age was 71 years. Gleason grade groups 4 (49.4%) and 5 (31.7%) were most common, as were clinical stage T1c (46.1%) and cT2 (41.3%). The median pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 9.18 and median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 6. Androgen deprivation therapy was given in 63.6%. Median dose was 79.2 GyE in 44 fractions. Pelvic lymph nodes were treated in 58.2% of cases. Pencil beam scanning was used in 54.5%, uniform scanning in 38.8%, and a rectal spacer in 14.2%. At a median followup of 22 months, the 3- and 5-year FFP were 90.7% and 81.4%, respectively. Five-year MFS and OS were 92.8% and 95.9%, respectively. Independent correlates of FFP included Gleason ≥8, PSA > 10, and cT2 (all p < 0.05). No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. There were 23 (5%) grade 2 and 0 grade 3 gastrointestinal events. Prevalence of late grade 3, late grade 2, acute grade 3, and acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 1.7%, 5.8%, 0%, and 21.8%, respectively. Prevalence of grade 2 and 3 erectile dysfunction at 2 years was 48.4% and 8.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the largest series published to date, our results suggest early outcomes using proton therapy for HRPC are encouraging for both safety and efficacy. Further evaluation is needed to determine if an advantage exists to use protons over other radiation techniques in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Madhur Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Rachel Gozland
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - John Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - William Hartsell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jonathan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Henry Tsai
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey, USA
| | - Carlos Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jeong S, Kim C, An S, Kwon YC, Pak SI, Cheon W, Shin D, Lim Y, Jeong JH, Kim H, Lee SB. Determination of the proton LET using thin film solar cells coated with scintillating powder. Med Phys 2023; 50:1194-1204. [PMID: 36135795 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The amount of luminescent light detected in a scintillator is reduced with increased proton linear energy transfer (LET) despite receiving the same proton dose, through a phenomenon called quenching. This study evaluated the ability of a solar cell coated with scintillating powder (SC-SP) to measure therapeutic proton LET by measuring the quenching effect of the scintillating powder using a solar cell while simultaneously measuring the dose of the proton beam. METHODS SC-SP was composed of a flexible thin film solar cell and scintillating powder. The LET and dose of the pristine Bragg peak in the 14 cm range were calculated using a validated Monte Carlo model of a double scattering proton beam nozzle. The SC-SP was evaluated by measuring the proton beam under the same conditions at specific depths using SC-SP and Markus chamber. Finally, the 10 and 20 cm range pristine Bragg peaks and 5 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in the 14 cm range were measured using the SC-SP and the Markus chamber. LETs measured using the SC-SP were compared with those calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS The quenching factors of the SC-SP and solar cell alone, which were slopes of linear fit obtained from quenching correction factors according to LET, were 0.027 and 0.070 µm/keV (R2 : 0.974 and 0.975). For pristine Bragg peaks in the 10 and 20 cm ranges, the maximum differences between LETs measured using the SC-SP and calculated using Monte Carlo simulations were 0.5 keV/µm (15.7%) and 1.2 keV/µm (12.0%), respectively. For a 5 cm SOBP proton beam, the LET measured using the SC-SP and calculated using Monte Carlo simulations differed by up to 1.9 keV/µm (18.7%). CONCLUSIONS Comparisons of LETs for pristine Bragg peaks and SOBP between measured using the SC-SP and calculated using Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the solar cell-based system could simultaneously measure both LET and dose in real-time and is cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seonghoon Jeong
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chankyu Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Seohyeon An
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Physics, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Cheol Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Il Pak
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Wonjoong Cheon
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dongho Shin
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Youngkyung Lim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jong Hwi Jeong
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Haksoo Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Se Byeong Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Russ E, Davis CM, Slaven JE, Bradfield DT, Selwyn RG, Day RM. Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. TOXICS 2022; 10:toxics10100628. [PMID: 36287908 PMCID: PMC9609561 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation can occur during medical treatments, from naturally occurring sources in the environment, or as the result of a nuclear accident or thermonuclear war. The severity of cellular damage from ionizing radiation exposure is dependent upon a number of factors including the absorbed radiation dose of the exposure (energy absorbed per unit mass of the exposure), dose rate, area and volume of tissue exposed, type of radiation (e.g., X-rays, high-energy gamma rays, protons, or neutrons) and linear energy transfer. While the dose, the dose rate, and dose distribution in tissue are aspects of a radiation exposure that can be varied experimentally or in medical treatments, the LET and eV are inherent characteristics of the type of radiation. High-LET radiation deposits a higher concentration of energy in a shorter distance when traversing tissue compared with low-LET radiation. The different biological effects of high and low LET with similar energies have been documented in vivo in animal models and in cultured cells. High-LET results in intense macromolecular damage and more cell death. Findings indicate that while both low- and high-LET radiation activate non-homologous end-joining DNA repair activity, efficient repair of high-LET radiation requires the homologous recombination repair pathway. Low- and high-LET radiation activate p53 transcription factor activity in most cells, but high LET activates NF-kB transcription factor at lower radiation doses than low-LET radiation. Here we review the development, uses, and current understanding of the cellular effects of low- and high-LET radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Russ
- Graduate Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Catherine M. Davis
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - John E. Slaven
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Dmitry T. Bradfield
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Reed G. Selwyn
- Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Regina M. Day
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Silicon 3D Microdosimeters for Advanced Quality Assurance in Particle Therapy. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app12010328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The Centre for Medical Radiation Physics introduced the concept of Silicon On Insulator (SOI) microdosimeters with 3-Dimensional (3D) cylindrical sensitive volumes (SVs) mimicking the dimensions of cells in an array. Several designs of high-definition 3D SVs fabricated using 3D MEMS technology were implemented. 3D SVs were fabricated in different sizes and configurations with diameters between 18 and 30 µm, thicknesses of 2–50 µm and at a pitch of 50 µm in matrices with volumes of 20 × 20 and 50 × 50. SVs were segmented into sub-arrays to reduce capacitance and avoid pile up in high-dose rate pencil beam scanning applications. Detailed TCAD simulations and charge collection studies in individual SVs have been performed. The microdosimetry probe (MicroPlus) is composed of the silicon microdosimeter and low-noise front–end readout electronics housed in a PMMA waterproof sheath that allows measurements of lineal energies as low as 0.4 keV/µm in water or PMMA. Microdosimetric quantities measured with SOI microdosimeters and the MicroPlus probe were used to evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of heavy ions and protons delivered by pencil-beam scanning and passive scattering systems in different particle therapy centres. The 3D detectors and MicroPlus probe developed for microdosimetry have the potential to provide confidence in the delivery of RBE optimized particle therapy when introduced into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Parisi A, Olko P, Swakon J, Horwacik T, Jablonski H, Malinowski L, Nowak T, Struelens L, Vanhavere F. Microdosimetric characterization of a clinical proton therapy beam: comparison between simulated lineal energy distributions in spherical water targets and experimental measurements with a silicon detector. Phys Med Biol 2021; 67. [PMID: 34933289 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective Treatment planning based on computer simulations were proposed to account for the increase in the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton radiotherapy beams near to the edges of the irradiated volume. Since silicon detectors could be used to validate the results of these simulations, it is important to explore the limitations of this comparison. Approach Microdosimetric measurements with a MicroPlus Bridge V2 silicon detector (thickness = 10 µm) were performed along the Bragg peak of a clinical proton beam. The lineal energy distributions, the dose mean values, and the RBE calculated with a biological weighting function were compared with simulations with PHITS (microdosimetric target = 1 µm water sphere), and published clonogenic survival in vitro RBE data for the V79 cell line. The effect of the silicon-to-water conversion was also investigated by comparing three different methodologies (conversion based on a single value, novel bin-to-bin conversions based on SRIM and PSTAR). Main results Mainly due to differences in the microdosimetric targets, the experimental dose-mean lineal energy and RBE values at the distal edge were respectively up to 53% and 28% lower than the simulated ones. Furthermore, the methodology chosen for the silicon-to-water conversion was proven to affect the dose mean lineal energy and the RBE10 up to 32% and 11% respectively. The best methodology to compensate for this underestimation was the bin-to-bin silicon-to-water conversion based on PSTAR. Significance This work represents the first comparison between PHITS-simulated lineal energy distributions in water targets and corresponding experimental spectra measured with silicon detectors. Furthermore, the effect of the silicon-to-water conversion on the RBE was explored for the first time. The proposed methodology based on the PSTAR bin-to-bin conversion appears to provide superior results with respect to commonly used single scaling factors and is recommended for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pawel Olko
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Jan Swakon
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Tomasz Horwacik
- IF PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, Kraków, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Hubert Jablonski
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Leszek Malinowski
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Tomasz Nowak
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith EAK, Winterhalter C, Underwood TSA, Aitkenhead AH, Richardson JC, Merchant MJ, Kirkby NF, Kirby KJ, Mackay RI. A Monte Carlo study of different LET definitions and calculation parameters for proton beam therapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 8. [PMID: 34874308 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac3f50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The strongin vitroevidence that proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) varies with Linear Energy Transfer (LET) has led to an interest in applying LET within treatment planning. However, there is a lack of consensus on LET definition, Monte Carlo (MC) parameters or clinical methodology. This work aims to investigate how common variations of LET definition may affect potential clinical applications. MC simulations (GATE/GEANT4) were used to calculate absorbed dose and different types of LET for a simple Spread Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) and for four clinical PBT plans covering a range of tumour sites. Variations in the following LET calculation methods were considered: (i) averaging (dose-averaged LET (LETd) & track-averaged LET); (ii) scoring (LETdto water, to medium and to mass density); (iii) particle inclusion (LETdto all protons, to primary protons and to particles); (iv) MC settings (hit type and Maximum Step Size (MSS)). LET distributions were compared using: qualitative comparison, LET Volume Histograms (LVHs), single value criteria (maximum and mean values) and optimised LET-weighted dose models. Substantial differences were found between LET values in averaging, scoring and particle type. These differences depended on the methodology, but for one patient a difference of ∼100% was observed between the maximum LETdfor all particles and maximum LETdfor all protons within the brainstem in the high isodose region (4 keVμm-1and 8 keVμm-1respectively). An RBE model using LETdincluding heavier ions was found to predict substantially different LET-weighted dose compared to those using other LET definitions. In conclusion, the selection of LET definition may affect the results of clinical metrics considered in treatment planning and the results of an RBE model. The authors' advocate for the scoring of dose-averaged LET to water for primary and secondary protons using a random hit type and automated MSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward A K Smith
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Carla Winterhalter
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tracy S A Underwood
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adam H Aitkenhead
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny C Richardson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J Merchant
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Norman F Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Karen J Kirby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ranald I Mackay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Trybula SJ, Youngblood MW, Kemeny HR, Clark JR, Karras CL, Hartsell WF, Tomita T. Radiation Induced Cavernomas in the Treatment of Pediatric Medulloblastoma: Comparative Study Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:760691. [PMID: 34707999 PMCID: PMC8542782 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation induced cavernomas among children with medulloblastoma are common following external beam radiation (XRT) treatment with either photon or proton beams. However, with the increased utilization of proton beam therapy over the last decade we sought to determine if there was any difference in the development or natural history of these cavernous malformations (CM) or CM-like lesions. We performed a retrospective analysis of 79 patients from 2003 to 2019 who had undergone resection of medulloblastoma and subsequent XRT (30 photon or 49 proton beam therapy). The average age of patients at radiation treatment was 8.7 years old. Average follow up for patients who received photon beam therapy was 105 months compared to 56.8 months for proton beam therapy. A total of 68 patients (86.1%) developed post-radiation CMs, including 26 photon and 42 proton patients (86.7% and 85.7% respectively). The time to cavernoma development was significantly different, with a mean of 40.2 months for photon patients and 18.2 months for proton patients (p = 1.98 x 10-4). Three patients, one who received photon and two who received proton beam radiation, required surgical resection of a cavernoma. Although CM or CM-like lesions are detected significantly earlier in patients after receiving proton beam therapy, there appears to be no significant difference between the two radiation therapy modalities in the development of significant CM requiring surgical resection or intervention other than continued follow up and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Joy Trybula
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Mark W Youngblood
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Hanna R Kemeny
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Clark
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Constantine L Karras
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - William F Hartsell
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Tadanori Tomita
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Parisi A, Struelens L, Vanhavere F. Comparison between the results of a recently-developed biological weighting function (V79-RBE 10BWF) and the in vitroclonogenic survival RBE 10of other repair-competent asynchronized normoxic mammalian cell lines and ions not used for the development of the model. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34710862 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
728 simulated microdosimetric lineal energy spectra (26 different ions between 1H and 238U, 28 energy points from 1 to 1000 MeV/n) were used in combination with a recently-developed biological weighting function (Parisi et al., 2020) and 571 published in vitro clonogenic survival curves in order to: 1) assess prediction intervals for the in silico results by deriving an empirical indication of the experimental uncertainty from the dispersion in the in vitro hamster lung fibroblast (V79) data used for the development of the biophysical model; 2) explore the possibility of modeling the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the 10% clonogenic survival of asynchronized normoxic repair-competent mammalian cell lines other than the one used for the development of the model (V79); 3) investigate the predictive power of the model through a comparison between in silico results and in vitro data for 10 ions not used for the development of the model. At first, different strategies for the assessment of the in silico prediction intervals were compared. The possible sources of uncertainty responsible for the dispersion in the in vitro data were also shortly reviewed. Secondly, also because of the relevant scatter in the in vitro data, no statistically-relevant differences were found between the RBE10 of the investigated different asynchronized normoxic repair-competent mammalian cell lines. The only exception (Chinese Hamster peritoneal fibroblasts, B14FAF28), is likely due to the limited dataset (all in vitro ion data were extracted from a single publication), systematic differences in the linear energy transfer (LET) calculations for the employed very-heavy ions, and the use of reference photon survival curves extracted from a different publication. Finally, the in silico predictions for the 10 ions not used for the model development were in good agreement with the corresponding in vitro data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Parisi
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibration, Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgiun, Mol, 2400, BELGIUM
| | - Lara Struelens
- Radiation Protection, Dosimetry and Calibration, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK.CEN, Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, BELGIUM
| | - Filip Vanhavere
- Institute of Advanced Nuclear Systems, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK.CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Mol, BELGIUM
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iizumi T, Ishikawa H, Sekino Y, Tanaka K, Takizawa D, Makishima H, Numajiri H, Mizumoto M, Nakai K, Okumura T, Sakurai H. Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 69:198-207. [PMID: 34664410 PMCID: PMC9163454 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Daichi Takizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed and brainstem during photon and proton therapy for pediatric tumors of the posterior fossa: dosimetric impact and predictive factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1113-1123. [PMID: 34351450 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01828-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem radionecrosis is an important issue during the irradiation of tumors of the posterior fossa. The aim of the present study is to analyze postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed (TB) and brainstem (BS) and their impact on dosimetry. METHODS Retrospective collection of data from pediatric patients treated at a single institution. Availability of presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was verified; availability of at least two postsurgical MRIs was considered a further inclusion criterion. The following metrics were analyzed: total volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Haudsdorff distances (HD). RESULTS Fourteen patients were available for the quantification of major postsurgical geometrical variations of TB. DSC, HD max, and HD average values were 0.47 (range: 0.08;0.76), 11.3 mm (7.7;24.5), and 2.6 mm (0.7;6.7) between the first and the second postoperative MRI, respectively. Postsurgical geometrical variations of the BS were also observed. Coverage to the TB was reduced in one patient (D95: -2.9 Gy), while D2 to the BS was increased for the majority of patients. Overall, predictive factors for significant geometrical changes were presurgical gross tumor volume (GTV) > 33 mL, hydrocephaly at diagnosis, Luschka foramen involvement, and younger age (≤ 8 years). CONCLUSION Major volume changes were observed in this cohort, with some dosimetric impact. The use of a recent co-registration MRI is advised. The 2-3 mm HD average observed should be considered in the planning target volume/planning organ at risk volume (PTV/PRV) margin and/or robust optimization planning. Results from wider efforts are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
|
21
|
Prasanna PG, Rawojc K, Guha C, Buchsbaum JC, Miszczyk JU, Coleman CN. Normal Tissue Injury Induced by Photon and Proton Therapies: Gaps and Opportunities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1325-1340. [PMID: 33640423 PMCID: PMC8496269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT) and cancer treatment, patients still experience adverse effects. Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a valuable RT modality that can improve treatment outcomes. Normal tissue injury is an important determinant of the outcome; therefore, for this review, we analyzed 2 databases: (1) clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and (2) the literature on PT in PubMed, which shows a steady increase in the number of publications. Most studies in PT registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with results available are nonrandomized early phase studies with a relatively small number of patients enrolled. From the larger database of nonrandomized trials, we listed adverse events in specific organs/sites among patients with cancer who are treated with photons and protons to identify critical issues. The present data demonstrate dosimetric advantages of PT with favorable toxicity profiles and form the basis for comparative randomized prospective trials. A comparative analysis of 3 recently completed randomized trials for normal tissue toxicities suggests that for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, no meaningful comparison could be made between stereotactic body RT and stereotactic body PT due to low accrual (NCT01511081). In addition, for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a comparison of intensity modulated RTwith passive scattering PT (now largely replaced by spot-scanned intensity modulated PT), PT did not provide any benefit in normal tissue toxicity or locoregional failure over photon therapy. Finally, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, proton beam therapy provided a lower total toxicity burden but did not improve progression-free survival and quality of life (NCT01512589). The purpose of this review is to inform the limitations of current trials looking at protons and photons, considering that advances in technology, physics, and biology are a continuum, and to advocate for future trials geared toward accurate precision RT that need to be viewed as an iterative process in a defined path toward delivering optimal radiation treatment. A foundational understanding of the radiobiologic differences between protons and photons in tumor and normal tissue responses is fundamental to, and necessary for, determining the suitability of a given type of biologically optimized RT to a patient or cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pataje G Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kamila Rawojc
- The University Hospital in Krakow, Department of Endocrinology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Krakow, Poland
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Justyna U Miszczyk
- Department of Experimental Physics of Complex Systems, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cunningham C, de Kock M, Engelbrecht M, Miles X, Slabbert J, Vandevoorde C. Radiosensitization Effect of Gold Nanoparticles in Proton Therapy. Front Public Health 2021; 9:699822. [PMID: 34395371 PMCID: PMC8358148 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.699822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of proton therapy facilities and the clinical usage of high energy proton beams for cancer treatment has substantially increased over the last decade. This is mainly due to the superior dose distribution of proton beams resulting in a reduction of side effects and a lower integral dose compared to conventional X-ray radiotherapy. More recently, the usage of metallic nanoparticles as radiosensitizers to enhance radiotherapy is receiving growing attention. While this strategy was originally intended for X-ray radiotherapy, there is currently a small number of experimental studies indicating promising results for proton therapy. However, most of these studies used low proton energies, which are less applicable to clinical practice; and very small gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Therefore, this proof of principle study evaluates the radiosensitization effect of larger AuNPs in combination with a 200 MeV proton beam. CHO-K1 cells were exposed to a concentration of 10 μg/ml of 50 nm AuNPs for 4 hours before irradiation with a clinical proton beam at NRF iThemba LABS. AuNP internalization was confirmed by inductively coupled mass spectrometry and transmission electron microscopy, showing a random distribution of AuNPs throughout the cytoplasm of the cells and even some close localization to the nuclear membrane. The combined exposure to AuNPs and protons resulted in an increase in cell killing, which was 27.1% at 2 Gy and 43.8% at 6 Gy, compared to proton irradiation alone, illustrating the radiosensitizing potential of AuNPs. Additionally, cells were irradiated at different positions along the proton depth-dose curve to investigate the LET-dependence of AuNP radiosensitization. An increase in cytogenetic damage was observed at all depths for the combined treatment compared to protons alone, but no incremental increase with LET could be determined. In conclusion, this study confirms the potential of 50 nm AuNPs to increase the therapeutic efficacy of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charnay Cunningham
- Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Maryna de Kock
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Monique Engelbrecht
- Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Xanthene Miles
- Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jacobus Slabbert
- Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Keta O, Petković V, Cirrone P, Petringa G, Cuttone G, Sakata D, Shin WG, Incerti S, Petrović I, Ristić Fira A. DNA double-strand breaks in cancer cells as a function of proton linear energy transfer and its variation in time. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1229-1240. [PMID: 34187289 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1948140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The complex relationship between linear energy transfer (LET) and cellular response to radiation is not yet fully elucidated. To better characterize DNA damage after irradiations with therapeutic protons, we monitored formation and disappearance of DNA double-strand breaks (DNA DSB) as a function of LET and time. Comparisons with conventional γ-rays and high LET carbon ions were also performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the present work, we performed immunofluorescence-based assay to determine the amount of DNA DSB induced by different LET values along the 62 MeV therapeutic proton Spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) in three cancer cell lines, i.e. HTB140 melanoma, MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma and HTB177 non-small lung cancer cells. Time dependence of foci formation was followed as well. To determine irradiation positions, corresponding to the desired LET values, numerical simulations were carried out using Geant4 toolkit. We compared γ-H2AX foci persistence after irradiations with protons to that of γ-rays and carbon ions. RESULTS With the rise of LET values along the therapeutic proton SOBP, the increase of γ-H2AX foci number is detected in the three cell lines up to the distal end of the SOBP, while there is a decrease on its distal fall-off part. With the prolonged incubation time, the number of foci gradually drops tending to attain the residual level. For the maximum number of DNA DSB, irradiation with protons attain higher level than that of γ-rays. Carbon ions produce more DNA DSB than protons but not substantially. The number of residual foci produced by γ-rays is significantly lower than that of protons and particularly carbon ions. Carbon ions do not produce considerably higher number of foci than protons, as it could be expected due to their physical properties. CONCLUSIONS In situ visualization of γ-H2AX foci reveal creation of more lesions in the three cell lines by clinically relevant proton SOBP than γ-rays. The lack of significant differences in the number of γ-H2AX foci between the proton and carbon ion-irradiated samples suggests an increased complexity of DNA lesions and slower repair kinetics after carbon ions compared to protons. For all three irradiation types, there is no major difference between the three cell lines shortly after irradiations, while later on, the formation of residual foci starts to express the inherent nature of tested cells, therefore increasing discrepancy between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otilija Keta
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladana Petković
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Pablo Cirrone
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nuceare, Catania, Italy.,Physics and Astronomy Department "E. Majorana", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Centro Siciliano di Fisica Nucleare e Struttura della Materia (CSFNSM), Catania, Italy
| | - Giada Petringa
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nuceare, Catania, Italy.,Institute of Physics (IoP) of the Czech Academy of Science (CAS), ELI-Beamlines, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Giacomo Cuttone
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nuceare, Catania, Italy.,Physics and Astronomy Department "E. Majorana", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Dousatsu Sakata
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, NIRS, Chiba, QST, Japan
| | - Wook-Geun Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Ivan Petrović
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lecornu M, Lesueur P, Salleron J, Balosso J, Stefan D, Kao W, Plouhinec T, Vela A, Dutheil P, Bouter J, Marty PA, Thariat J, Quintyn JC. Prospective Assessment of Early Proton Therapy-Induced Optic Neuropathy in Patients With Intracranial, Orbital or Sinonasal Tumors: Impact of A Standardized Ophthalmological Follow Up. Front Oncol 2021; 11:673886. [PMID: 34211847 PMCID: PMC8239302 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.673886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) can be a good option to achieve tumor control while reducing the probability of radiation induced toxicities compared to X-ray-based radiotherapy. However, there are still uncertainties about the effects of PT on the organs in direct contact with the irradiated volume. The aim of this prospective series was to report 6-month follow-up of clinical and functional optic neuropathy rates of patients treated by proton therapy using a standardized comprehensive optic examination. METHODS AND MATERIALS Standardized ophthalmological examinations were performed to analyze subclinical anomalies in a systematic way before treatment and 6 months after the end of proton therapy with: Automatic visual field, Visual evoked potential (VEP) and optic coherence of tomography (OCT). RESULTS From October 2018 to July 2020 we analyzed 81 eyes. No significant differences were found in the analysis of the clinical examination of visual functions by the radiation oncologist. However, considering VEP, the impairment was statistically significant for both fibers explored at 30'angle (p:0.007) and 60'angle (p <0.001). In patients with toxicity, the distance of the target volume from the optical pathways was more important with a p-value for 30'VEP at 0.035 and for 60'VEP at 0.039. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm uncertainties concerning relative biological effectiveness of proton therapy, linear energy transfer appears to be more inhomogeneous especially in areas close to the target volumes. The follow-up of patients after proton therapy is not an easy process to set up but it is necessary to improve our knowledges about the biological effects of proton therapy in real life. Our study which will continue during the coming years, suggests that follow-up with in-depth examinations such as VEP as a biomarker could improve the detection of early abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lecornu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Guillaume le Conquérant, Caen, France
- ISTCT UMR6030-CNRS, CEA, Université de Caen-Normandie, Equipe CERVOxy, Caen, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Cellule Data Biostatistique, Instistut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - William Kao
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Anthony Vela
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jordan Bouter
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chan CC, Chen FH, Hsiao YY. Impact of Hypoxia on Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio for a 62-MeV Therapeutic Proton Beam. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2997. [PMID: 34203882 PMCID: PMC8232608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This study uses the yields of double-strand breaks (DSBs) to determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton beams, using cell survival as a biological endpoint. DSB induction is determined when cells locate at different depths (6 positions) along the track of 62 MeV proton beams. The DNA damage yields are estimated using Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) software. The repair outcomes are estimated using Monte Carlo excision repair (MCER) simulations. The RBE for cell survival at different oxygen concentrations is calculated using the repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model. Using 60Co γ-rays (linear energy transfer (LET) = 2.4 keV/μm) as the reference radiation, the RBE for DSB induction and enzymatic DSB under aerobic condition (21% O2) are in the range 1.0-1.5 and 1.0-1.6 along the track depth, respectively. In accord with RBE obtained from experimental data, RMF model-derived RBE values for cell survival are in the range of 1.0-3.0. The oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) for cell survival (10%) decreases from 3.0 to 2.5 as LET increases from 1.1 to 22.6 keV/μm. The RBE values for severe hypoxia (0.1% O2) are in the range of 1.1-4.4 as LET increases, indicating greater contributions of direct effects for protons. Compared with photon therapy, the overall effect of 62 MeV proton beams results in greater cell death and is further intensified under hypoxic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Chieh Chan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan;
| | - Fang-Hsin Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan;
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital—Linkou Branch, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Yun Hsiao
- Department of Radiology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The RBE in ion beam radiotherapy: In vivo studies and clinical application. Z Med Phys 2021; 31:105-121. [PMID: 33568337 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Ion beams used for radiotherapy exhibit an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which depends on several physical treatment parameters as well as on biological factors of the irradiated tissues. While the RBE is an experimentally well-defined quantity, translation to patients is complex and requires radiobiological studies, dedicated models to calculate the RBE in treatment planning as well as strategies for dose prescription. Preclinical in vivo studies and analysis of clinical outcome are important to validate and refine RBE-models. This review describes the concept of the experimental and clinical RBE and explains the fundamental dependencies of the RBE based on in vitro experiments. The available preclinical in vivo studies on normal tissue and tumor RBE for ions heavier than protons are reviewed in the context of the historical and present development of ion beam radiotherapy. In addition, the role of in vivo RBE-values in the development and benchmarking of RBE-models as well as the transition of these models to clinical application are described. Finally, limitations in the translation of experimental RBE-values into clinical application and the direction of future research are discussed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Clinical Progress in Proton Radiotherapy: Biological Unknowns. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040604. [PMID: 33546432 PMCID: PMC7913745 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton radiation therapy is a more recent type of radiotherapy that uses proton beams instead of classical photon or X-rays beams. The clinical benefit of proton therapy is that it allows to treat tumors more precisely. As a result, proton radiotherapy induces less toxicity to healthy tissue near the tumor site. Despite the experience in the clinical use of protons, the response of cells to proton radiation, the radiobiology, is less understood. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about proton radiobiology. Abstract Clinical use of proton radiation has massively increased over the past years. The main reason for this is the beneficial depth-dose distribution of protons that allows to reduce toxicity to normal tissues surrounding the tumor. Despite the experience in the clinical use of protons, the radiobiology after proton irradiation compared to photon irradiation remains to be completely elucidated. Proton radiation may lead to differential damages and activation of biological processes. Here, we will review the current knowledge of proton radiobiology in terms of induction of reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, DNA damage response, as well as cell death after proton irradiation and radioresistance.
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu C, Zheng D, Bradley JA, Mailhot Vega RB, Zhang Y, Indelicato DJ, Mendenhall N, Liang X. Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:252-259. [PMID: 33063569 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1834141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the LETd-weighted biological dose to OARs in proton therapy for breast cancer and to study the relationship of the LETd-weighted biological dose relative to the standard dose (RBE = 1.1) and thereby to provide estimations of the biological dose uncertainties with the standard dose calculations (RBE = 1.1) commonly used in clinical practice. METHOD This study included 20 patients who received IMPT treatment to the whole breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The LETd distributions were calculated along with the physical dose using an open-source Monte Carlo simulation package, MCsquare. Using the McMahon linear model, the LETd-weighted biological dose was computed from the physical dose and LETd. OAR doses were compared between the Dose (RBE = 1.1) and the LETd-weighted biological dose, on brachial plexus, rib, heart, esophagus, and Ipsilateral lung. RESULTS On average, the LETd-weighted biological dose compared to the Dose (RBE = 1.1) was higher by 8% for the brachial plexus D0.1 cc, 13% for the ribs D0.5 cc, 24% for mean heart dose, and 10% for the esophagus D0.1 cc, respectively. The LETd-weighted doses to the Ipsilateral lung V5, V10, and V20 were comparable to the Dose (RBE = 1.1). No statistically significant difference in biological dose enhancement to OARs was observed between the intact breast group and the CW group, with the exception of the ribs: the CW group experienced slightly greater biological dose enhancement (13% vs. 12%, p = 0.04) to the ribs than the intact breast group. CONCLUSION Enhanced biological dose was observed compared to standard dose with assumed RBE of 1.1 for the heart, ribs, esophagus, and brachial plexus in breast/CW and regional nodal IMPT plans. Variable RBE models should be considered in the evaluation of the IMPT breast plans, especially for OARs located near the end of range of a proton beam. Clinical outcome studies are needed to validate model predictions for clinical toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hofmaier J, Dedes G, Carlson DJ, Parodi K, Belka C, Kamp F. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for uncertainties in proton therapy: A framework to assess the effect of simultaneous uncertainties in range, positioning, and RBE model predictions on RBE-weighted dose distributions. Med Phys 2020; 48:805-818. [PMID: 33210739 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment plans in proton therapy are more sensitive to uncertainties than in conventional photon therapy. In addition to setup uncertainties, proton therapy is affected by uncertainties in proton range and relative biological effectiveness (RBE). While to date a constant RBE of 1.1 is commonly assumed, the actual RBE is known to increase toward the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak. Several models for variable RBE predictions exist. We present a framework to evaluate the combined impact and interactions of setup, range, and RBE uncertainties in a comprehensive, variance-based sensitivity analysis (SA). MATERIAL AND METHODS The variance-based SA requires a large number (104 -105 ) of RBE-weighted dose (RWD) calculations. Based on a particle therapy extension of the research treatment planning system CERR we implemented a fast, graphics processing unit (GPU) accelerated pencil beam modeling of patient and range shifts. For RBE predictions, two biological models were included: The mechanistic repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model and the phenomenological Wedenberg model. All input parameters (patient position, proton range, RBE model parameters) are sampled simultaneously within their assumed probability distributions. Statistical formalisms rank the input parameters according to their influence on the overall uncertainty of RBE-weighted dose-volume histogram (RW-DVH) quantiles and the RWD in every voxel, resulting in relative, normalized sensitivity indices (S = 0: noninfluential input, S = 1: only influential input). Results are visualized as RW-DVHs with error bars and sensitivity maps. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The approach is demonstrated for two representative brain tumor cases and a prostate case. The full SA including ∼ 3 × 10 4 RWD calculations took 39, 11, and 55 min, respectively. Range uncertainty was an important contribution to overall uncertainty at the distal end of the target, while the relatively smaller uncertainty inside the target was governed by biological uncertainties. Consequently, the uncertainty of the RW-DVH quantile D98 for the target was governed by range uncertainty while the uncertainty of the mean target dose was dominated by the biological parameters. The SA framework is a powerful and flexible tool to evaluate uncertainty in RWD distributions and DVH quantiles, taking into account physical and RBE uncertainties and their interactions. The additional information might help to prioritize research efforts to reduce physical and RBE uncertainties and could also have implications for future approaches to biologically robust planning and optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - George Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Garching b. Munich, 85748, Germany
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Garching b. Munich, 85748, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Howard ME, Denbeigh JM, Debrot EK, Remmes NB, Herman MG, Beltran CJ. A High-Precision Method for In Vitro Proton Irradiation. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:62-69. [PMID: 33274258 PMCID: PMC7707323 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00007.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although proton therapy has become a well-established radiation modality, continued efforts are needed to improve our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms occurring during treatment. Such studies are challenging, requiring many resources. The purpose of this study was to create a phantom that would allow multiple in vitro experiments to be irradiated simultaneously with a spot-scanning proton beam. Materials and Methods The setup included a modified patient-couch top coupled with a high-precision robotic arm for positioning. An acrylic phantom was created to hold 4 6-well cell-culture plates at 2 different positions along the Bragg curve in a reproducible manner. The proton treatment plan consisted of 1 large field encompassing all 4 plates with a monoenergetic 76.8-MeV posterior beam. For robust delivery, a mini pyramid filter was used to broaden the Bragg peak (BP) in the depth direction. Both a Markus ionization chamber and EBT3 radiochromic film measurements were used to verify absolute dose. Results A treatment plan for the simultaneous irradiation of 2 plates irradiated with high linear energy transfer protons (BP, 7 keV/μm) and 2 plates irradiated with low linear energy transfer protons (entrance, 2.2 keV/μm) was created. Dose uncertainty was larger across the setup for cell plates positioned at the BP because of beam divergence and, subsequently, variable proton-path lengths. Markus chamber measurements resulted in uncertainty values of ±1.8% from the mean dose. Negligible differences were seen in the entrance region (<0.3%). Conclusion The proposed proton irradiation setup allows 4 plates to be simultaneously irradiated with 2 different portions (entrance and BP) of a 76.8-MeV beam. Dosimetric uncertainties across the setup are within ±1.8% of the mean dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ho AY, Wright JL, Blitzblau RC, Mutter RW, Duda DG, Norton L, Bardia A, Spring L, Isakoff SJ, Chen JH, Grassberger C, Bellon JR, Beriwal S, Khan AJ, Speers C, Dunn SA, Thompson A, Santa-Maria CA, Krop IE, Mittendorf E, King TA, Gupta GP. Optimizing Radiation Therapy to Boost Systemic Immune Responses in Breast Cancer: A Critical Review for Breast Radiation Oncologists. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:227-241. [PMID: 32417409 PMCID: PMC7646202 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancer. Radiation therapy (RT)-particularly when delivered at high doses using newer techniques-may be capable of generating systemic antitumor effects when combined with immunotherapy in breast cancer. These systemic effects might be due to the local immune-priming effects of RT resulting in the expansion and circulation of effector immune cells to distant sites. Although this concept merits further exploration, several challenges need to be overcome. One is an understanding of how the heterogeneity of breast cancers may relate to tumor immunogenicity. Another concerns the need to develop knowledge and expertise in delivery, sequencing, and timing of RT with immunotherapy. Clinical trials addressing these issues are under way. We here review and discuss the particular opportunities and issues regarding this topic, including the design of informative clinical and translational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Y Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Cancer Center, Brooklandville, Maryland
| | - Rachel C Blitzblau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dan G Duda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Larry Norton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura Spring
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan H Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer R Bellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Corey Speers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Samantha A Dunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cesar A Santa-Maria
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Mittendorf
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tari A King
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gaorav P Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Burnet NG, Mackay RI, Smith E, Chadwick AL, Whitfield GA, Thomson DJ, Lowe M, Kirkby NF, Crellin AM, Kirkby KJ. Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190873. [PMID: 31860337 PMCID: PMC7066938 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The UK has an important role in the evaluation of proton beam therapy (PBT) and takes its place on the world stage with the opening of the first National Health Service (NHS) PBT centre in Manchester in 2018, and the second in London coming in 2020. Systematic evaluation of the role of PBT is a key objective. By September 2019, 108 patients had started treatment, 60 paediatric, 19 teenagers and young adults and 29 adults. Obtaining robust outcome data is vital, if we are to understand the strengths and weaknesses of current treatment approaches. This is important in demonstrating when PBT will provide an advantage and when it will not, and in quantifying the magnitude of benefit.The UK also has an important part to play in translational PBT research, and building a research capability has always been the vision. We are perfectly placed to perform translational pre-clinical biological and physical experiments in the dedicated research room in Manchester. The nature of DNA damage from proton irradiation is considerably different from X-rays and this needs to be more fully explored. A better understanding is needed of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, especially at the end of the Bragg peak, and of the effects on tumour and normal tissue of PBT combined with conventional chemotherapy, targeted drugs and immunomodulatory agents. These experiments can be enhanced by deterministic mathematical models of the molecular and cellular processes of DNA damage response. The fashion of ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation also needs to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ed Smith
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, and University of Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Amy L Chadwick
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, and University of Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - David J Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, and University of Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | | | - Norman F Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | | | - Karen J Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Thariat J, Valable S, Laurent C, Haghdoost S, Pérès EA, Bernaudin M, Sichel F, Lesueur P, Césaire M, Petit E, Ferré AE, Saintigny Y, Skog S, Tudor M, Gérard M, Thureau S, Habrand JL, Balosso J, Chevalier F. Hadrontherapy Interactions in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 21:E133. [PMID: 31878191 PMCID: PMC6981652 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The resistance of cancer cells to radiotherapy is a major issue in the curative treatment of cancer patients. This resistance can be intrinsic or acquired after irradiation and has various definitions, depending on the endpoint that is chosen in assessing the response to radiation. This phenomenon might be strengthened by the radiosensitivity of surrounding healthy tissues. Sensitive organs near the tumor that is to be treated can be affected by direct irradiation or experience nontargeted reactions, leading to early or late effects that disrupt the quality of life of patients. For several decades, new modalities of irradiation that involve accelerated particles have been available, such as proton therapy and carbon therapy, raising the possibility of specifically targeting the tumor volume. The goal of this review is to examine the up-to-date radiobiological and clinical aspects of hadrontherapy, a discipline that is maturing, with promising applications. We first describe the physical and biological advantages of particles and their application in cancer treatment. The contribution of the microenvironment and surrounding healthy tissues to tumor radioresistance is then discussed, in relation to imaging and accurate visualization of potentially resistant hypoxic areas using dedicated markers, to identify patients and tumors that could benefit from hadrontherapy over conventional irradiation. Finally, we consider combined treatment strategies to improve the particle therapy of radioresistant cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Samuel Valable
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Carine Laurent
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Elodie A. Pérès
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Myriam Bernaudin
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - François Sichel
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Mathieu Césaire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Edwige Petit
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Aurélie E. Ferré
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Yannick Saintigny
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Sven Skog
- Sino-Swed Molecular Bio-Medicine Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China;
| | - Mihaela Tudor
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-63, 077125 Magurele, Romania
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, R-050095 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Michael Gérard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Sebastien Thureau
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - François Chevalier
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Slater JM, Shih HA. Pseudoprogression in low-grade glioma. Transl Cancer Res 2019; 8:S580-S584. [PMID: 35117135 PMCID: PMC8798295 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.11.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Slater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McNamara A, Willers H, Paganetti H. Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190334. [PMID: 31738081 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose in proton radiotherapy is generally prescribed by scaling the physical proton dose by a constant value of 1.1. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is defined as the ratio of doses required by two radiation modalities to cause the same level of biological effect. The adoption of an RBE of 1.1. assumes that the biological efficacy of protons is similar to photons, allowing decades of clinical dose prescriptions from photon treatments and protocols to be utilized in proton therapy. There is, however, emerging experimental evidence that indicates that proton RBE varies based on technical, tissue and patient factors. The notion that a single scaling factor may be used to equate the effects of photons and protons across all biological endpoints and doses is too simplistic and raises concern for treatment planning decisions. Here, we review the models that have been developed to better predict RBE variations in tissue based on experimental data as well as using a mechanistic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee McNamara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mavragani IV, Nikitaki Z, Kalospyros SA, Georgakilas AG. Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: From Prediction to Detection Challenges and Biological Significance. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E1789. [PMID: 31739493 PMCID: PMC6895987 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological responses to ionizing radiation (IR) have been studied for many years, generally showing the dependence of these responses on the quality of radiation, i.e., the radiation particle type and energy, types of DNA damage, dose and dose rate, type of cells, etc. There is accumulating evidence on the pivotal role of complex (clustered) DNA damage towards the determination of the final biological or even clinical outcome after exposure to IR. In this review, we provide literature evidence about the significant role of damage clustering and advancements that have been made through the years in its detection and prediction using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. We conclude that in the future, emphasis should be given to a better understanding of the mechanistic links between the induction of complex DNA damage, its processing, and systemic effects at the organism level, like genomic instability and immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alexandros G. Georgakilas
- DNA Damage Laboratory, Department of Physics, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 15780 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Luo WR, Chen FH, Huang RJ, Chen YP, Hsiao YY. Effects of indirect actions and oxygen on relative biological effectiveness: estimate of DSB inductions and conversions induced by therapeutic proton beams. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 96:187-196. [PMID: 31682784 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1688883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by indirect actions and its misrepairs to estimate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton beams.Materials and methods: From experimental data, DSB induction was evaluated in cells irradiated by 62 MeV proton beams in the presence of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) and under hypoxic conditions. The DNA damage yields for calculating the RBE were estimated using Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) software. The repair outcomes (correct repairs, mutations and DSB conversions) were estimated using Monte Carlo Excision Repair (MCER) simulations.Results: The values for RBE of 62 MeV protons (LET = 1.051 keV/μm) for DSB induction and enzymatic DSB under aerobic condition (21% O2) was 1.02 and 0.94, respectively, as comparing to 60Co γ-rays (LET = 2.4 keV/μm). DMSO mitigated the inference of indirect action and reduced DSB induction to a greater extent when damaged by protons rather than γ-rays, resulting in a decreased RBE of 0.86. DMSO also efficiently prevented enzymatic DSB yields triggered by proton irradiation and reduced the RBE to 0.83. However, hypoxia (2% O2) produced a similar level of DSB induction with respect to the protons and γ-rays, with a comparable RBE of 1.02.Conclusions: The RBE values of proton beams estimated from DSB induction and enzymatic DSB decreased by 16% and 12%, respectively, in the presence of DMSO. Our findings indicate that the overall effects of DSB induction and enzymatic DSB could intensify the tumor killing, while alleviate normal tissue damage when indirect actions are effectively interrupted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Ren Luo
- Department of Radiology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Hsin Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Kweishan, Taiwan.,Radiation Biology Research Center, Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University/Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ren-Jing Huang
- Department of Radiology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Pin Chen
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Manicipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Yun Hsiao
- Department of Radiology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mutter RW, Jethwa KR, Wan Chan Tseung HS, Wick SM, Kahila MMH, Viehman JK, Shumway DA, Corbin KS, Park SS, Remmes NB, Whitaker TJ, Beltran CJ. Incorporation of Biologic Response Variance Modeling Into the Clinic: Limiting Risk of Brachial Plexopathy and Other Late Effects of Breast Cancer Proton Beam Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 10:e71-e81. [PMID: 31494289 PMCID: PMC7734652 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) rises with increasing linear energy transfer toward the end of proton tracks. Presently, there is no consensus on how RBE heterogeneity should be accounted for in breast cancer proton therapy treatment planning. Our purpose was to determine the dosimetric consequences of incorporating a brachial plexus (BP) biologic dose constraint and to describe other clinical implications of biologic planning. Methods and Materials: We instituted a biologic dose constraint for the BP in the context of MC1631, a randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated postmastectomy intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). IMPT plans of 13 patients treated before the implementation of the biologic dose constraint (cohort A) were compared with IMPT plans of 38 patients treated on MC1631 after its implementation (cohort B) using (1) a commercially available Eclipse treatment planning system (RBE = 1.1); (2) an in-house graphic processor unit-based Monte Carlo physical dose simulation (RBE = 1.1); and (3) an in-house Monte Carlo biologic dose (MCBD) simulation that assumes a linear relationship between RBE and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (product of RBE and physical dose = biologic dose). Results: Before implementation of a BP biologic dose constraint, the Eclipse mean BP D0.01 cm3 was 107%, and the MCBD estimate was 128% (ie, 64 Gy [RBE = biologic dose] in 25 fractions for a 50-Gy [RBE = 1.1] prescription), compared with 100.0% and 116.0%, respectively, after the implementation of the constraint. Implementation of the BP biologic dose constraint did not significantly affect clinical target volume coverage. MCBD plans predicted greater internal mammary node coverage and higher heart dose than Eclipse plans. Conclusions: Institution of a BP biologic dose constraint may reduce brachial plexopathy risk without compromising target coverage. MCBD plan evaluation provides valuable information to physicians that may assist in making clinical judgments regarding relative priority of target coverage versus normal tissue sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Stephanie M Wick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Jason K Viehman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Friedrich T. Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190291. [PMID: 31437004 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypofractionated radiotherapy is attractive concerning patient burden and therapy costs, but many aspects play a role when it comes to assess its safety. While exploited for conventional photon therapy and carbon ion therapy, hypofractionation with protons is only rarely applied. One reason for this is uncertainty in the described dose, mainly due to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which is small for protons, but not negligible. RBE is generally dose-dependent, and for higher doses as used in hypofractionation, a thorough RBE evaluation is needed. This review article focuses on the RBE variability in protons and associated issues or implications for hypofractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Friedrich
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hasse FC, Koerber SA, Prigge ES, Liermann J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Debus J, Sterzing F. Overcoming radioresistance in WiDr cells with heavy ion irradiation and radiosensitization by 2-deoxyglucose with photon irradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:52-58. [PMID: 31517070 PMCID: PMC6733777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
2-DG acts as a radiosensitizer to photons depending on the time of its application. There is no sensitization to 12C irradiation by 2-DG. 12C combination therapy still has the higher dose effectiveness.
Background and purpose Radiosensitizers and heavy ion irradiation could improve therapy for female patients with malignant tumors located in the pelvic region through dose reduction. Aim of the study was to investigate the radiosensitizing potential of 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) in combination with carbon ion-irradiation (12C) in representative cell lines of cancer in the female pelvic region. Materials and methods The human cervix carcinoma cell line CaSki and the colorectal carcinoma cell line WiDr were used. 2-DG was employed in two different settings, pretreatment and treatment simultaneous to irradiation. Clonogenic survival, α and β values for application of the linear quadratic model and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) were determined. ANOVA tests were used for statistical group comparison. Isobolograms were generated for curve comparisons. Results The comparison of monotherapy with 12C versus photons yielded RBE values of 2.4 for CaSki and 3.5 for WiDr along with a significant increase of α values in the 12C setting. 2-DG monotherapy reduced the colony formation of both cell lines. Radiosensitization was found in WiDr for the combination of photon irradiation with synchronous application of 2-DG. The same setup for 12C showed no radiosensitization, but rather an additive effect. In all settings with CaSki, the combination of irradiation and 2-DG exhibited additive properties. Conclusion The combination of 2-DG and photon therapy, as well as irradiation with carbon ions can overcome radioresistance of tumor cells such as WiDr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Christian Hasse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Alexander Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Sophie Prigge
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Li X, Zhang W, Wang X, Chen X, Pan H, Ruan Y, Khaledi N, Wei T, He X, Zhuo W, Shao C, Pan Y, Shi L, Fu S, Wang X. Charged particle radiobiology beamline using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions: a pilot study on the track-end radiation quality, variable biological effectiveness and Bayesian beam dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:165004. [PMID: 31096198 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab21fa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
For in vitro cell irradiation using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions, by TOPAS simulation, a pilot study of performance evaluation is presented on a collimation beamline for 3 MeV protons and 10 MeV carbon ions from a 2 × 3 MV tandem accelerator. Based on the elements and source parameters, a collimated beam of 2.8 MeV protons or 2.5 MeV carbon ions, with 5.175 mm or 5.166 mm full width tenth maximum (FWTM), respectively, can be delivered to the target cell dish. TOPAS simulations and/or deterministic algorithms present a Bragg curve of linear energy transfer (LET) (10-70 keV μm-1) along a 138 μm range of the proton beam, and a declining LET of the carbon beam (900-100 keV μm-1) within 4 μm range. Based on the biophysical models for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, TOPAS RBE scorers presents a set of depth-variation curves of the proton RBE (for V79 and DU145 cells), linearly related to the Bragg curve of the proton LET. Based on the microdosimetric-kinetic (MK) theory, in the 4 μm range for a monolayer cell thickness, the mean RBEα (V79 cells) of the carbon ion beam is estimated as 3.612 (late S phase) and 1.737 (G 1/S phase) for the mean LET of 492 keV μm-1. For practical irradiations, a tunable proton RBE can be acquired by changing the thickness of the cell dish. For the low-energy high-fluence (rate) beams, indirect beam measurements are proposed to detect the proton-beam induced scattering/recoil protons from a beam-intercepting Mylar film, and the carbon-beam induced backscattered electrons from a gold-deposited Havar-foil beam window. Statistical dosimetry for the indirect measurement is established, using a Bayesian model based on the preset number of detection counts, by which the mean value of the whole-dish dose can be prescribed and the uncertainty introduced in the survival data can be corrected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Li
- Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China. Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China. Co-first authors having equal contribution to this work
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nystrom H, Jensen MF, Nystrom PW. Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years? Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190304. [PMID: 31356107 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment planning is the process where the prescription of the radiation oncologist is translated into a deliverable treatment. With the complexity of contemporary radiotherapy, treatment planning cannot be performed without a computerized treatment planning system. Proton therapy (PT) enables highly conformal treatment plans with a minimum of dose to tissues outside the target volume, but to obtain the most optimal plan for the treatment, there are a multitude of parameters that need to be addressed. In this review areas of ongoing improvements and research in the field of PT treatment planning are identified and discussed. The main focus is on issues of immediate clinical and practical relevance to the PT community highlighting the needs for the near future but also in a longer perspective. We anticipate that the manual tasks performed by treatment planners in the future will involve a high degree of computational thinking, as many issues can be solved much better by e.g. scripting. More accurate and faster dose calculation algorithms are needed, automation for contouring and planning is required and practical tools to handle the variable biological efficiency in PT is urgently demanded just to mention a few of the expected improvements over the coming 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Nystrom
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Skandionkliniken, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Petra Witt Nystrom
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Skandionkliniken, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Qi Tan H, Yang Calvin Koh W, Kuan Rui Tan L, Hao Phua J, Wei Ang K, Yong Park S, Siang Lew W, Cheow Lei Lee J. Dependence of LET on material and its impact on current RBE model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:135022. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1c90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
44
|
Carrier F, Liao Y, Mendenhall N, Guerrieri P, Todor D, Ahmad A, Dominello M, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Special Debate: I would treat prostate cancer with proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:7-14. [PMID: 31166085 PMCID: PMC6612688 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- France Carrier
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Yixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation OncologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoILUSA
| | | | | | - Dorin Todor
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVAUSA
| | - Anis Ahmad
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of MedicineMiamiFLUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Comparison of Proton and Photon Beam Irradiation in Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury Using a Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20081894. [PMID: 30999572 PMCID: PMC6514697 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20081894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When radiotherapy is applied to the abdomen or pelvis, normal tissue toxicity in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered a major dose-limiting factor. Proton beam therapy has a specific advantage in terms of reduced doses to normal tissues. This study investigated the fundamental differences between proton- and X-ray-induced intestinal injuries in mouse models. C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with 6-MV X-rays or 230-MeV protons and were sacrificed after 84 h. The number of surviving crypts per circumference of the jejunum was identified using Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. Diverse intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations and apoptotic cells were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay, respectively. The crypt microcolony assay revealed a radiation-dose-dependent decrease in the number of regenerative crypts in the mouse jejunum; proton irradiation was more effective than X-ray irradiation with a relative biological effectiveness of 1.14. The jejunum is the most sensitive to radiations, followed by the ileum and the colon. Both types of radiation therapy decreased the number of radiosensitive, active cycling ISC populations. However, a higher number of radioresistant, reserve ISC populations and Paneth cells were eradicated by proton irradiation than X-ray irradiation, as shown in the IHC analyses. The TUNEL assay revealed that proton irradiation was more effective in enhancing apoptotic cell death than X-ray irradiation. This study conducted a detailed analysis on the effects of proton irradiation versus X-ray irradiation on intestinal crypt regeneration in mouse models. Our findings revealed that proton irradiation has a direct effect on ISC populations, which may result in an increase in the risk of GI toxicity during proton beam therapy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Parisi A, Chiriotti S, De Saint-Hubert M, Van Hoey O, Vandevoorde C, Beukes P, de Kock EA, Symons J, Camero JN, Slabbert J, Mégret P, Debrot E, Bolst D, Rosenfeld A, Vanhavere F. A novel methodology to assess linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy using pairs of differently doped thermoluminescent detectors. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:085005. [PMID: 30650402 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaff20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
A new methodology for assessing linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy beams using thermoluminescent detectors is presented. The method is based on the different LET response of two different lithium fluoride thermoluminescent detectors (LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P) for measuring charged particles. The relative efficiency of the two detector types was predicted using the recently developed Microdosimetric d(z) Model in combination with the Monte Carlo code PHITS. Afterwards, the calculated ratio of the expected response of the two detector types was correlated with the fluence- and dose- mean values of the unrestricted proton LET. Using the obtained proton dose mean LET as input, the RBE was assessed using a phenomenological biophysical model of cell survival. The aforementioned methodology was benchmarked by exposing the detectors at different depths within the spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) of a clinical proton beam at iThemba LABS. The assessed LET values were found to be in good agreement with the results of radiation transport computer simulations performed using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4. Furthermore, the estimated RBE values were compared with the RBE values experimentally determined by performing colony survival measurements with Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells during the same experimental run. A very good agreement was found between the results of the proposed methodology and the results of the in vitro study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Parisi
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK·CEN, Mol, Belgium. University of Mons, Faculty of Engineering, Mons, Belgium. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Guan F, Geng C, Carlson DJ, Ma DH, Bronk L, Gates D, Wang X, Kry SF, Grosshans D, Mohan R. A mechanistic relative biological effectiveness model-based biological dose optimization for charged particle radiobiology studies. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 64:015008. [PMID: 30523805 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf5df] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In charged particle therapy, the objective is to exploit both the physical and radiobiological advantages of charged particles to improve the therapeutic index. Use of the beam scanning technique provides the flexibility to implement biological dose optimized intensity-modulated ion therapy (IMIT). An easy-to-implement algorithm was developed in the current study to rapidly generate a uniform biological dose distribution, namely the product of physical dose and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), within the target volume using scanned ion beams for charged particle radiobiological studies. Protons, helium ions and carbon ions were selected to demonstrate the feasibility and flexibility of our method. The general-purpose Monte Carlo simulation toolkit Geant4 was used for particle tracking and generation of physical and radiobiological data needed for later dose optimizations. The dose optimization algorithm was developed using the Python (version 3) programming language. A constant RBE-weighted dose (RWD) spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom was selected as the desired target dose distribution to demonstrate the applicability of the optimization algorithm. The mechanistic repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model was incorporated into the Monte Carlo particle tracking to generate radiobiological parameters and was used to predict the RBE of cell survival in the iterative process of the biological dose optimization for the three selected ions. The post-optimization generated beam delivery strategy can be used in radiation biology experiments to obtain radiobiological data to further validate and improve the accuracy of the RBE model. This biological dose optimization algorithm developed for radiobiology studies could potentially be extended to implement biologically optimized IMIT plans for patients.
Collapse
|