1
|
Rantsi M, Kortelainen L, Hyttinen V, Jyrkkä J, Kankaanpää E. Trends in the use of psychotropics in older people with dementia: interrupted time series of Finnish clinical guidelines of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad094. [PMID: 37366328 PMCID: PMC10294559 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 90% of people with dementia experience behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) as part of their illness. Psychotropics are not recommended as the first-line treatment of BPSD because older people are more prone to adverse reactions. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the Finnish clinical guidelines of BPSD (published in 2017) on psychotropic use in people with dementia. METHODS This study is based on Finnish Prescription Register data from 2009 to 2020. The data included all community-dwelling Finnish people aged ≥65 and who had anti-dementia medication purchases (n = 217,778). We used three-phased interrupted time series design to evaluate the changes in levels and trends of monthly (n = 144) psychotropic user rates compared with the predicted trends. In addition, we evaluated the changes in levels and trends of monthly new psychotropic user rates. RESULTS The level of monthly psychotropic user rate decreased non-significantly during the intervention period (β -0.057, P = 0.853), and during the post-intervention period, there was an increase in the level (β 0.443, P = 0.091) and slope (β 0.199, P = 0.198), but not statistically significant. The level of monthly new psychotropic user rate (β -0.009, P = 0.949) during the intervention period and the level (β 0.044, P = 0.714) and slope (β 0.021, P = 0.705) during the post-intervention period were almost unchanged. CONCLUSIONS Results may indicate possible challenges in deprescribing and better adherence to the guidelines at the beginning of BPSD treatment. Further research into the barriers to implement BPSD guidelines and the availability of non-pharmacological treatments is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mervi Rantsi
- Address correspondence to: Mervi Rantsi. Tel: +358 46 920 2963.
| | - Lauri Kortelainen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Virva Hyttinen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Johanna Jyrkkä
- Information and Development Services Unit, Finnish Medicines Agency, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eila Kankaanpää
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris DA, Maclagan LC, Pequeno P, Iaboni A, Austin PC, Rosella LC, Guan J, Maxwell CJ, Bronskill SE. Variation and Correlation of Potential Unintended Consequences of Antipsychotic Reduction in Ontario Nursing Homes Over Time. Med Care 2023; 61:173-181. [PMID: 36728617 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use has declined in nursing homes over the past decade; however, increases in the documentation of relevant clinical indications (eg, delusions) and the use of other psychotropic medications have raised concerns about diagnosis upcoding and medication substitution. Few studies have examined how these trends over time vary across and within nursing homes, information that may help to support antipsychotic reduction efforts. OBJECTIVE To jointly model facility-level time trends in potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use, antidepressant use, and the indications used to define appropriate antipsychotic use. RESEARCH DESIGN We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of all nursing homes in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 using linked health administrative data (N=649). Each nursing home's quarterly prevalence of potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use, antidepressant use, and relevant indications were measured as outcome variables. With time as the independent variable, multivariate random effects models jointly estimated time trends for each outcome across nursing homes and the correlations between time trends within nursing homes. RESULTS We observed notable variations in the time trends for each outcome across nursing homes, especially for the relevant indications. Within facilities, we found no correlation between time trends for potentially inappropriate antipsychotic and antidepressant use ( r =-0.0160), but a strong negative correlation between time trends for potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use and relevant indications ( r =-0.5036). CONCLUSIONS Nursing homes with greater reductions in potentially inappropriate antipsychotics tended to show greater increases in the indications used to define appropriate antipsychotic use-possibly leading to unmonitored use of antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Harris
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
| | | | | | - Andrea Iaboni
- KITE Research Institute-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
| | - Peter C Austin
- ICES.,Sunnybrook Research Institute.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - Laura C Rosella
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.,ICES.,Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.,Vector Institute, Toronto
| | | | - Colleen J Maxwell
- ICES.,Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo
| | - Susan E Bronskill
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.,ICES.,Sunnybrook Research Institute.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Georgi U, Lämmel J, Datzmann T, Schmitt J, Deckert S. Do drug-related safety warnings have the expected impact on drug therapy? A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2020; 29:229-251. [PMID: 32045502 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for drug-related safety warnings is undisputed, and their impact should also be evaluated. This systematic review investigates and assesses the impact of safety warnings on drug therapy. METHODS Studies published in English between January 1998 and December 2018 were searched in EMBASE and MEDLINE, complemented by manual search. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies with a before/after component, and case-control studies were included, selected to predefined criteria, and assessed for their reporting and methodological quality. RESULTS Out of 7454 references identified, 72 studies were included. A total of 28/72 (39%) studies described the impact of safety warnings on drug therapy as being effective, whereas 12/72 (17%) studies did not. Further, 26/72 (36%) studies described a partial implementation of the warnings (one part of the warning had an impact on drug therapy and another did not). Unintended effects were investigated in 6/72 (8%) studies. While 34 (47%) studies examined safety warnings on psychotropic drugs using an interrupted time series (ITS) design (53%), a before/after (26%), and a time series design (21%), 38 (53%) studied other substances using an ITS design (34%), a before/after (40%), and a time series design (26%). The proportion of an effective impact on drug therapy was lower in the "psychotropic drugs" group (23%) than in the "others" group (53%). CONCLUSION Drug-related safety warnings induce intended and unintended effects. The included studies are of broadly varying methodological quality. To better compare their effectiveness, studies should be conducted using standardised procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Georgi
- Pharmacy Service of Clinical Center, Chemnitz, Germany.,Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Lämmel
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Pharmacy Service, Medical Center of the Carl Gustav Carus Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Datzmann
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefanie Deckert
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krivinko JM, Koppel J, Savonenko A, Sweet RA. Animal Models of Psychosis in Alzheimer Disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 28:1-19. [PMID: 31278012 PMCID: PMC6858948 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Psychosis in Alzheimer Disease (AD) represents a distinct clinicopathologic variant associated with increased cognitive and functional morbidity and an accelerated disease course. To date, extant treatments offer modest benefits with significant risks. The development of new pharmacologic treatments for psychosis in AD would be facilitated by validated preclinical models with which to test candidate interventions. The current review provides a brief summary of the process of validating animal models of human disease together with a critical analysis of the challenges posed in attempting to apply those standards to AD-related behavioral models. An overview of phenotypic analogues of human cognitive and behavioral impairments, with an emphasis on those relevant to psychosis, in AD-related mouse models is provided, followed by an update on recent progress in efforts to translate findings in the pathophysiology of psychotic AD into novel models. Finally, some future directions are suggested to expand the catalogue of psychosis-relevant phenotypes that may provide a sturdier framework for model development and targets for preclinical treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh M. Krivinko
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jeremy Koppel
- The Litwin-Zucker Research Center for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY
| | - Alena Savonenko
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Robert A. Sweet
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA,Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA,Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kesselheim AS, Sinha MS, Rausch P, Lu Z, Tessema FA, Lappin BM, Zhou EH, Dal Pan GJ, Zwanziger L, Ramanadham A, Loughlin A, Enger C, Avorn J, Campbell EG. Patients' Knowledge of Key Messaging in Drug Safety Communications for Zolpidem and Eszopiclone: A National Survey. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2019; 47:430-441. [PMID: 31560634 DOI: 10.1177/1073110519876176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) are used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to inform health care providers, patients, caregivers, and the general public about safety issues related to FDA-approved drugs. To assess patient knowledge of the messaging contained in DSCs related to the sleep aids zolpidem and eszopiclone, we conducted a large, cross-sectional patient survey of 1,982 commercially insured patients selected by stratified random sampling from the Optum Research Database who had filled at least two prescriptions for either zolpidem or eszopiclone between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. Among the 594 respondents (32.7% response rate), two-thirds reported hearing generally about drug safety information prior to starting a new drug, with the remaining one-third "rarely" or "never" hearing such information. Providers and pharmacists were primary sources of drug safety information. Two-thirds of zolpidem users and half of eszopiclone users reported having heard about the related DSC messages, ability to accurately identify the major factual messages was limited (overall median 2 correct out of 5, with men and those reporting higher educational level scoring higher [2/5 vs. 1/5, p=0.001]). Respondents reacted to new drug safety information about their sleep aids by reporting that they would want to learn about alternative ways to help them sleep (70%) and seek out more information about the safety of their specific sleeping pill (59-78%). Opportunities may exist for the FDA to work with providers and pharmacies to help ensure the DSC information is more widely received and is more fully understood by those taking the affected medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron S Kesselheim
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Michael S Sinha
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Paula Rausch
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Zhigang Lu
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Frazer A Tessema
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Brian M Lappin
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Esther H Zhou
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Gerald J Dal Pan
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Lee Zwanziger
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Amy Ramanadham
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Anita Loughlin
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Cheryl Enger
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Jerry Avorn
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| | - Eric G Campbell
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Michael S. Sinha, M.D., J.D., M.P.H. is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paula Rausch, Ph.D., R.N., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Zhigang Lu, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Frazer A. Tessema, B.A., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Brian M. Lappin, M.A., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Esther H. Zhou, M.D., Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Gerald J. Dal Pan, M.D., M.H.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Lee Zwanziger, Ph.D., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Amy Ramanadham, Pharm.D., M.S., is with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in Silver Spring, MD; Anita Loughlin, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Cheryl Enger, Ph.D., is with Optum in Boston, MA; Jerry Avorn, M.D., is with the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., is with the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado in Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalisch Ellett LM, Moffat AK, Gadzhanova S, Pratt NL, Apajee J, Woodward M, Roughead EE. Reduction in Use of Risperidone for Dementia in Australia Following Changed Guidelines. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7030100. [PMID: 31336574 PMCID: PMC6789876 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Risperidone is the only antipsychotic approved in Australia for the management of the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). In June 2015, the Australian Government Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) amended the indication to restrict use in BPSD to patients with Alzheimer's dementia for a maximum twelve-week duration. We aimed to determine whether the rate and duration of risperidone use for BPSD decreased following the regulatory changes. Methods: we conducted a study using the Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs administrative claims data and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample data. We included people aged 65 years or older and compared the rate and duration of risperidone use before and after the TGA labelling changes. Results: There was a sustained decrease in the trend of risperidone use for BPSD following the TGA labelling changes, with a monthly decrease of 1.7% in the aged care population, 0.5% in the community living population and 1.5% in the general older Australian population. Overall, in the 24 months post the TGA changes the reduction in the rate of use of risperidone ranged from 20% to 28% lower than compared to what the rate would have been without the TGA changes. The median duration of use of risperidone in aged-care residents decreased from 338 days in the year prior to the TGA labelling changes, to 240 days per person in the year after the changes. Conclusion: The TGA labelling changes were associated with a significant reduction in the rate of use of risperidone for BPSD in veterans living in both the aged care and community settings, and in the general older Australian population. The labelling changes were also associated with a reduced duration of risperidone use in aged care residents, although for most people the duration of use still exceeded the recommended 12-week maximum duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Kalisch Ellett
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
| | - Anna K Moffat
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | - Svetla Gadzhanova
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | - Nicole L Pratt
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | - Jemisha Apajee
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | - Michael Woodward
- Austin Health, GPO Box 5444, Heidelberg West, Victoria 3081, Australia
| | - Elizabeth E Roughead
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Role of European Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Effectiveness, Safety and Value Evaluation: Where Does Italy Stand? Drug Saf 2018; 42:347-363. [DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0732-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
8
|
Ivers NM, Taljaard M, Giannakeas V, Reis C, Williams E, Bronskill S. Public reporting of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: population-based interrupted time series analyses. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 28:121-131. [PMID: 30061102 PMCID: PMC6373421 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Although sometimes appropriate, antipsychotic medications are associated with increased risk of significant adverse events. In 2014, a series of newspaper articles describing high prescribing rates in nursing homes in Ontario, Canada, garnered substantial interest. Subsequently, an online public reporting initiative with home-level data was launched. We examined the impact of these public reporting interventions on antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes. Methods Time series analysis of all nursing home residents in Ontario, Canada, between 1 October 2013 and 31 March 2016. The primary outcome was the proportion of residents prescribed antipsychotics each month. Balance measures were prescriptions for common alternative sedating agents (benzodiazepines and/or trazodone). We used segmented regression to assess the effects on prescription trends of the newspaper articles and the online home-level public reporting initiative. Results We included 120 009 nursing home resident admissions across 636 nursing homes. Following the newspaper articles, the proportion of residents prescribed an antipsychotic decreased by 1.28% (95% CI 1.08% to 1.48%) and continued to decrease at a rate of 0.2% per month (95% CI 0.16% to 0.24%). The online public reporting initiative did not alter this trend. Over 3 years, there was a net absolute reduction in antipsychotic prescribing of 6.0% (95% CI 5.1% to 6.9%). Trends for benzodiazepine prescribing did not change as substantially during the period of observation. Trazodone use has been gradually increasing, but its use did not change abruptly at the time of the mass media report or the public reporting initiative. Interpretation The rapid impact of mass media on prescribing suggests both an opportunity to use this approach to invoke change and a warning to ensure that such reporting occurs responsibly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah M Ivers
- Women's College Research Institute and Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Reis
- Women's College Research Institute and Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Evelyn Williams
- Division of Long Term Care, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Bronskill
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caspar S, Davis ED, Douziech A, Scott DR. Nonpharmacological Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: What Works, in What Circumstances, and Why? Innov Aging 2018; 2:igy001. [PMID: 30480128 PMCID: PMC6176983 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) refer to the often distressing, noncognitive symptoms of dementia. BPSD appear in up to 90% of persons with dementia and can cause serious complications. Reducing the use of antipsychotic medications to treat BPSD is an international priority. This review addresses the following questions: What nonpharmacological interventions work to manage BPSD? And, in what circumstances do they work and why? Method A realist review was conducted to identify and explain the interactions among context, mechanism, and outcome. We searched electronic databases for empirical studies that reported a formal evaluation of nonpharmacological interventions to decrease BPSD. Results Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria. Three mechanisms emerged as necessary for sustained effective outcomes: the caring environment, care skill development and maintenance, and individualization of care. We offer hypotheses about how different contexts account for the success, failure, or partial success of these mechanisms within the interventions. Discussion Nonpharmacological interventions for BPSD should include consideration of both the physical and the social environment, ongoing education/training and support for care providers, and individualized approaches that promote self-determination and continued opportunities for meaning and purpose for persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sienna Caspar
- Faculty of Health Sciences-Therapeutic Recreation, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Erin D Davis
- Faculty of Health Sciences-Therapeutic Recreation, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aimee Douziech
- Faculty of Health Sciences-Therapeutic Recreation, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goedecke T, Morales DR, Pacurariu A, Kurz X. Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 84:419-433. [PMID: 29105853 PMCID: PMC5809349 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Evaluating the public health impact of regulatory interventions is important but there is currently no common methodological approach to guide this evaluation. This systematic review provides a descriptive overview of the analytical methods for impact research. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles with an empirical analysis evaluating the impact of European Union or non-European Union regulatory actions to safeguard public health published until March 2017. References from systematic reviews and articles from other known sources were added. Regulatory interventions, data sources, outcomes of interest, methodology and key findings were extracted. RESULTS From 1246 screened articles, 229 were eligible for full-text review and 153 articles in English language were included in the descriptive analysis. Over a third of articles studied analgesics and antidepressants. Interventions most frequently evaluated are regulatory safety communications (28.8%), black box warnings (23.5%) and direct healthcare professional communications (10.5%); 55% of studies measured changes in drug utilization patterns, 27% evaluated health outcomes, and 18% targeted knowledge, behaviour or changes in clinical practice. Unintended consequences like switching therapies or spill-over effects were rarely evaluated. Two-thirds used before-after time series and 15.7% before-after cross-sectional study designs. Various analytical approaches were applied including interrupted time series regression (31.4%), simple descriptive analysis (28.8%) and descriptive analysis with significance tests (23.5%). CONCLUSION Whilst impact evaluation of pharmacovigilance and product-specific regulatory interventions is increasing, the marked heterogeneity in study conduct and reporting highlights the need for scientific guidance to ensure robust methodologies are applied and systematic dissemination of results occurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Goedecke
- Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, Inspections Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees DivisionEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA)LondonE14 5EUUK
| | - Daniel R. Morales
- Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, Inspections Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees DivisionEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA)LondonE14 5EUUK
- Division of Population Health SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD2 4BFUK
| | - Alexandra Pacurariu
- Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, Inspections Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees DivisionEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA)LondonE14 5EUUK
- Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board3531AHUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Xavier Kurz
- Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, Inspections Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees DivisionEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA)LondonE14 5EUUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Antipsychotic Prescribing to Patients Diagnosed with Dementia Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Context of National Guidance and Drug Safety Warnings: Longitudinal Study in UK General Practice. Drug Saf 2018; 40:679-692. [PMID: 28439716 PMCID: PMC5519656 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0538-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Policy interventions to address inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotic drugs to older people diagnosed with dementia are commonplace. In the UK, warnings were issued by the Medicines Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in 2004, 2009 and 2012 and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance was published in 2006. It is important to evaluate the impact of such interventions. Methods We analysed routinely collected primary-care data from 111,346 patients attending one of 689 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to describe the temporal changes in the prescribing of antipsychotic drugs to patients aged 65 years or over diagnosed with dementia without a concomitant psychosis diagnosis from 2001 to 2014 using an interrupted time series and a before-and-after design. Logistic regression methods were used to quantify the impact of patient and practice level variables on prescribing prevalence. Results Prescribing of first-generation antipsychotic drugs reduced from 8.9% in 2001 to 1.4% in 2014 (prevalence ratio 2014/2001 adjusted for age, sex and clustering within practices (0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.16), whereas there was little change for second-generation antipsychotic drugs (1.01, confidence interval 0.94–1.17). Between 2004 and 2012, several policy interventions coincided with a pattern of ups and downs, whereas the 2006 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance was followed by a gradual longer term reduction. Since 2013, the decreasing trend in second-generation antipsychotic drug prescribing has plateaued largely driven by the increasing prescribing of risperidone. Conclusions Increased surveillance and evaluation of drug safety warnings and guidance are needed to improve the impact of future interventions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0538-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
12
|
Maxwell CJ, Campitelli MA, Hogan DB, Diong C, Austin PC, Amuah JE, Lapane K, Seitz DP, Gill SS, Gruneir A, Wodchis WP, Bronskill SE. Relevance of frailty to mortality associated with the use of antipsychotics among community-residing older adults with impaired cognition. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2018; 27:289-298. [PMID: 29318705 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the association between new antipsychotic use and mortality over 6 months among community-based older adults with cognitive impairment, and variation in risk by frailty and sex. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older (aged 66+) home care clients in Ontario, Canada, using linked administrative health and clinical databases. Included were clients with dementia and/or significant cognitive impairment assessed during April 2008 to March 2013. Frailty was defined using a validated 72-item index. Exposed were those newly dispensed an antipsychotic in the 6 months post cohort entry, with no such claims in the year prior to drug index date. Two-stage matching defined unexposed clients and their index date (matching on age, sex, frailty, assessment year, and propensity score). Outcome was time to death following index date. Cause-specific hazards models were used, and number needed to harm at 6 months was estimated from cumulative incidence function curves. RESULTS Among 4955 matched exposed-unexposed pairs, new antipsychotic users showed a significantly increased hazard of mortality at 1, 3, and 6 months relative to unexposed, with the highest risk observed in the first month (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.08 [95% CI, 1.79-2.43]). At 1 month, risk was significantly higher for robust (HR = 3.72 [95% CI, 2.45-5.66]) vs frail (HR = 1.74 [95% CI, 1.40-2.17], P = .002) clients. The number needed to harm was 22.7 and did not vary by frailty but was lower for men (14.9) than for women (35.0). CONCLUSIONS Risk of antipsychotic-associated mortality was highest in the first month following exposure, varied significantly by client frailty, and was greater among men than among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen J Maxwell
- Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David B Hogan
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Peter C Austin
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Schulich Heart Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joseph E Amuah
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health, and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kate Lapane
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Dallas P Seitz
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
- Providence Care, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sudeep S Gill
- Providence Care, Kingston, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Andrea Gruneir
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susan E Bronskill
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fulone I, Lopes LC. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions for elderly people taking antidepressant: comparative tools. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:278. [PMID: 29197326 PMCID: PMC5712132 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0674-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of psychotropic drugs by elderly people is widely spread around the world, given that prevalence of inappropriate medication is frequent. Strictly speaking, in Brazil, the vulnerable population of elderly people is more likely to use Potentially Inappropriate Psychotropic (PIP) due to the impact of social-economic characteristics, to the Brazilian Public Health System, and to the lack of patient monitoring. However, neither the use pattern nor the prevalence rate of PIP have been studied in Brazil so far. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of PIP in elderly outpatients taking antidepressants, and to compare the performance of two different tools (Beers, STOPP). Methods This cross-sectional study involved all the aged outpatients (≥ 60 years of age) taking antidepressants attended by the public health system in a city of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Data were obtained from a pharmacy database and medical records. All psychotropic drugs evaluated included: antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-epileptics and benzodiazepines. STOPP and Beers criteria were applied to detect PIP. Results One thousand one hundred forty prescriptions from 174 outpatients were subjected to two different screening tools. The average patient age was 67 (interquartile range 63–74) and the median number of drugs used was 3.0 (interquartile 2–4) per patient. The overall prevalence of PIP was 121 (69.5%). The levels of PIP observed according to tools were 39.6% (STOPP) and 29.9% (Beers).The long-term use of benzodiazepines was the most common PIP recognized, and the one which contributed more significantly to higher levels of PIP than other medications. Conclusions The prevalence of PIP was high among the elderly. STOPP criteria identified more PIP than Beers criteria. Knowledge of PIP prevalence should gear efforts to reduce the level of inappropriate prescriptions and may provide the need for developing national criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Fulone
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Post graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, UNISO, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, KM 92,5, Sorocaba, São Paulo, ZIP Code 18023-000, Brazil
| | - Luciane Cruz Lopes
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Post graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, UNISO, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, KM 92,5, Sorocaba, São Paulo, ZIP Code 18023-000, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Q, Wei F, Zhou S. Early warning systems for multi-variety and small batch manufacturing based on active learning. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS 2017. [DOI: 10.3233/jifs-169345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Quanbao Li
- School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Fajie Wei
- School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Shenghan Zhou
- School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Impact of US FDA and Health Canada Warnings Related to the Safety of High-dose Simvastatin. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2017; 4:215-223. [PMID: 28956294 PMCID: PMC5684045 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-017-0116-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Between 2010 and 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada issued warnings to healthcare professionals emphasizing the increased risk of muscle problems with high-dose simvastatin. Objective To measure the impact of the Health Canada safety warning regarding dose-dependent adverse effects of simvastatin on prescribing of low, medium, and high doses of simvastatin. Methods An interrupted time-series design was used to evaluate the impact of a Health Canada safety warning on 7 November 2012 regarding the safety of high-dose simvastatin. Monthly prescription records were analyzed for beneficiaries of the Nova Scotia Seniors’ Pharmacare Program aged 65 years or older who had received > 1 prescription of simvastatin between 1 January 1997 and 31 March 2015. Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average models were used to test changes in the proportion of beneficiaries dispensed a low dose (< 40 mg), medium dose (40 mg to < 80 mg), or high dose (≥ 80 mg) of simvastatin over time. Results There were 219 monthly periods, of which 29 periods occurred after the Health Canada warning. On average during the pre-warning periods there were 2944 simvastatin users per month, of whom 71% were dispensed a low dose, 26% a medium dose, and 2% a high dose. The proportion of beneficiaries dispensed low-dose simvastatin increased by 0.9% (one-sided p value 0.035; 90% CI 0.07–1.65), the proportion dispensed medium-dose simvastatin decreased by 0.7% (one-sided p value 0.0496; 90% CI −1.48 to −0), and there was no significant change in the proportion dispensed high-dose simvastatin (−0.15% change, one-sided p value 0.205; 90% CI −0.45 to 0.15). Conclusions The Health Canada Health Care Professional warning had a small effect on increasing the proportion of beneficiaries dispensed low and medium doses of simvastatin but not high doses of simvastatin. Nevertheless, there remain seniors in Nova Scotia receiving high-dose simvastatin for whom the benefit/risk potential may need to be re-evaluated.
Collapse
|
16
|
Trends and factors associated with antipsychotic use among elderly patients with dementia in Taiwan from 2005 to 2013: a population-based study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 32:262-270. [PMID: 28542035 DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the trends and factors associated with antipsychotic prescriptions for elderly outpatients with dementia in Taiwan from 2005 to 2013. We assessed the annual prescription patterns of antipsychotic medications among elderly patients attending outpatient visits for dementia between 2005 and 2013 using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We also carried out logistic regression analyses to test the trends and associated factors. We found that any antipsychotic prescriptions for elderly patients making visits for dementia increased slightly, from 25.5 to 26.5%, over the 9-year period. From 2005 to 2013, prescriptions for first-generation antipsychotics only decreased from 7.8 to 3.3%, whereas second-generation antipsychotic prescriptions only increased from 17.0 to 22.2%. Elderly dementia patients who were female, older, concomitantly using other psychotropic drugs (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and Z-drugs), and treated by psychiatrists and at regional/local hospitals were prescribed significantly more antipsychotics, whereas patients with comorbid hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and stroke used antipsychotics significantly less. Although physicians seemed to avoid prescribing antipsychotics for elderly outpatients with dementia and certain comorbid physical disorders, second-generation antipsychotic use increased during the study period. Physicians should balance the benefits and risks of antipsychotic use to ensure the safety of dementia patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Stock KJ, Amuah JE, Lapane KL, Hogan DB, Maxwell CJ. Prevalence of, and Resident and Facility Characteristics Associated With Antipsychotic Use in Assisted Living vs. Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from Alberta, Canada. Drugs Aging 2017; 34:39-53. [PMID: 27830567 PMCID: PMC5222893 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-016-0411-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use in long-term care (LTC) facilities has been the focus of significant policy and clinical attention over the past 20 years. However, most initiatives aimed at reducing the use of these medications have overlooked assisted living (AL) settings. Objective We sought to compare the prevalence of antipsychotic use (including potentially inappropriate use) among older AL and LTC residents and to explore the resident and facility-level factors associated with use in these two populations. Methods We performed cross-sectional analyses of 1089 residents (mean age 85 years; 77% female) from 59 AL facilities and 1000 residents (mean age 85 years; 66% female) from 54 LTC facilities, in Alberta, Canada. Research nurses completed comprehensive resident assessments at baseline (2006–2007). Facility-level factors were assessed using standardized administrator interviews. Generalized linear models were used to estimate odds ratios for associations, accounting for clustering by facility. Results Over a quarter of residents in AL (26.4%) and LTC (31.8%) were using antipsychotics (p = 0.006). Prevalence of potentially inappropriate use was similar in AL and LTC (23.4 vs. 26.8%, p = 0.09). However, among users, the proportion of antipsychotic use deemed potentially inappropriate was significantly higher in AL than LTC (AL: 231/287 = 80.5%; LTC: 224/318 = 70.4%; p = 0.004). In both settings, comparable findings regarding associations between resident characteristics (including dementia, psychiatric disorders, frailty, behavioral symptoms, and antidepressant use) and antipsychotic use were observed. Few facility characteristics were associated with overall antipsychotic use, but having a pharmacist on staff (AL), or an affiliated physician (LTC) was associated with a lower likelihood of potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use. Conclusion Our findings illustrate the importance of including AL settings in clinical and policy initiatives aimed at reducing inappropriate antipsychotic use among older vulnerable residents. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0411-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J Stock
- Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Joseph E Amuah
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kate L Lapane
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - David B Hogan
- Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Colleen J Maxwell
- Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. .,Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stock KJ, Hogan DB, Lapane K, Amuah JE, Tyas SL, Bronskill SE, Morris AM, Bell CM, Jeffs L, Maxwell CJ. Antipsychotic Use and Hospitalization Among Older Assisted Living Residents: Does Risk Vary by Frailty Status? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 25:779-790. [PMID: 28302438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine associations between baseline frailty measures, antipsychotic use, and hospitalization over 1 year and whether hospitalization risk associated with antipsychotic use varies by frailty level. METHODS In this prospective cohort study of 1,066 residents (mean age: 85 years; 77% women) from the Alberta Continuing Care Epidemiological Studies, trained research nurses conducted comprehensive resident assessments at baseline (2006-2007) for sociodemographic characteristics, health conditions, frailty status, behavioral problems, and all medications consumed during the past 3 days. Two separate measures of frailty were assessed, the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) phenotype and an 86-item Frailty Index (FI). Time to first hospitalization during follow-up was determined via linkage with the Alberta Inpatient Discharge Abstract Database. RESULTS Baseline frailty status (both measures), but not antipsychotic use, was significantly associated with hospitalization over 1 year. When stratified by frailty, FI-defined frail residents using antipsychotics showed a significantly increased risk for hospitalization (adjusted HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01-2.36) compared with frail nonusers. CHS-defined frail antipsychotic users versus frail nonusers also showed an elevated risk (adjusted HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.96-2.88). Nonfrail residents using antipsychotics were significantly less likely to be hospitalized compared with nonfrail nonusers whether defined by the FI (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.99) or CHS criteria (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40-0.96). CONCLUSION Frailty measures may be helpful in identifying those who are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects and those who may experience benefit with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J Stock
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - David B Hogan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kate Lapane
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Joseph E Amuah
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suzanne L Tyas
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan E Bronskill
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew M Morris
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaim M Bell
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne Jeffs
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen J Maxwell
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breining A, Bonnet-Zamponi D, Zerah L, Micheneau C, Riolacci-Dhoyen N, Chan-Chee C, Deligne J, Harlin JM, Boddaert J, Verny M, Leperre-Desplanques A. Exposure to psychotropics in the French older population living with dementia: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 32:750-760. [PMID: 27237864 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the level of psychotropic chronic exposure in all patients living with dementia. The aim of the study was to quantify chronic psychotropic exposure in older adults with dementia compared with the general population of the same age. METHODS This prospective cohort study was conducted in France between 2009 and 2011. Aged at least 65 years, 10,781,812 individuals (440,215 of them with dementia) either community based or nursing home residents were included. The numbers of single or combined prescriptions, per year for antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, or hypnotics were measured. RESULTS Of patients with dementia, 15.5% are exposed to antipsychotics compared with 2.2% of the age-matched population (relative risk [RR] = 6.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] [6.39-6.48]), 39.5% to antidepressants compared with 12.6% (RR = 4.10, 95% CI [.4.07-4.12]), and 39.6% to anxiolytics or hypnotics compared with 26.9% (RR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.72-1.75]). Among older adults with dementia, 13.8% simultaneously consumed at least three psychotropics. All class age of older patients with dementia is more exposed to all psychotropics except for long-acting benzodiazepines. During the study period, chronic anxiolytic/hypnotic and antipsychotic exposure slightly decreased in population with dementia while chronic exposure to antidepressant drugs tended to increase. CONCLUSION This nationwide, population-based, drug-used study showed for the first time that older patients with dementia are chronically overexposed not only to antipsychotics but also to psychotropics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Breining
- APHP, DHU FAST, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Gériatrie, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Bonnet-Zamponi
- OMEDIT Ile de France, Paris, France.,Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR 1123 INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Lorène Zerah
- APHP, DHU FAST, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Gériatrie, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 and CNRS, UMR 8256 B2A, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Jean Deligne
- Régime Social des Indépendants, Saint Denis la Plaine, France
| | - Jean-Marc Harlin
- Caisse Centrale de la Mutualité Sociale Agricole, Bagnolet, France
| | - Jacques Boddaert
- APHP, DHU FAST, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Gériatrie, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 and CNRS, UMR 8256 B2A, Paris, France
| | - Marc Verny
- APHP, DHU FAST, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Gériatrie, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 and CNRS, UMR 8256 B2A, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kesselheim AS, Donneyong M, Dal Pan GJ, Zhou EH, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S, Seeger JD. Changes in prescribing and healthcare resource utilization after FDA Drug Safety Communications involving zolpidem-containing medications. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017; 26:712-721. [PMID: 28449404 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Products containing the sedative/hypnotic zolpidem were subject to Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) in January and May 2013 describing the risk of next-morning impairment and recommending lower starting doses particularly for women. This study aimed to assess whether zolpidem DSCs were associated with prescribing-pattern changes between January 2011 and December 2013. METHODS We assessed overall dispensings of zolpidem-containing products between January 2011 and December 2013 by conducting a time-series analysis. Analyses were stratified by gender because the DSC contained gender-specific information. Participants were patients drawn from the Optum Clinformatics data source of commercially insured people in the USA. We evaluated changes in mean prescribed dose of the two drugs and health care utilization metrics. RESULTS Each month of the study, more than 80 000 patients received a zolpidem-containing product and approximately one-tenth as many received eszopiclone. The two DSCs did not affect the downward trajectory of new zolpidem prescriptions. However, there was an increase in use of lower-dose forms of zolpidem (30% increase, p < 0.001), coupled with a reduction in higher-dose forms (13% decrease, p = 0.03), so that the average dose decreased after the DSCs (from 9.7 mg to 9.4 mg, p < 0.001), a change that was not seen with eszopiclone (from 2.74 mg to 2.74 mg, p = 0.45). CONCLUSION The DSCs related to zolpidem-containing products shifted prescribing toward the lower-dose formulations, consistent with the recommendations in the DSCs. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron S Kesselheim
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Macarius Donneyong
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gerald J Dal Pan
- Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Esther H Zhou
- Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jerry Avorn
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sebastian Schneeweiss
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John D Seeger
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kirkham J, Sherman C, Velkers C, Maxwell C, Gill S, Rochon P, Seitz D. Antipsychotic Use in Dementia. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2017; 62:170-181. [PMID: 28212496 PMCID: PMC5317021 DOI: 10.1177/0706743716673321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Antipsychotics are necessary for many older adults to treat major mental illnesses or reduce distressing psychiatric symptoms. Current controversy exists over the role of antipsychotics in the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in persons with dementia. Although some NPS may be appropriately and safely treated with antipsychotics, a fine balance must be achieved between the benefits of these medications, which are often modest, and adverse events, which may have significant consequences. Approximately one-third of all persons with dementia are currently prescribed antipsychotic medications, and there is significant variation in the use of antipsychotics across care settings and providers. Reducing the inappropriate or unnecessary use of antipsychotics among persons with dementia has been the focus of increasing attention owing to better awareness of the potential problems associated with these medications. Several approaches can be used to curb the use of antipsychotics among persons with dementia, including policy or regulatory changes, public reporting, and educational outreach. Recently, there has been encouraging evidence of a downward trend in the use of antipsychotics in many long-term care settings, although prescribing rates are still higher than what is likely optimal. Although reducing the inappropriate use of antipsychotics is a complex task, psychiatrists can play an important role via the provision of clinical care and research evidence, contributing to improved care of persons with dementia in Canada and elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Kirkham
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
| | - Chelsea Sherman
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
| | - Clive Velkers
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
| | - Colleen Maxwell
- Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
| | - Sudeep Gill
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
| | - Paula Rochon
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Dallas Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Iaboni A, Rapoport MJ. Detecting and Managing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2017; 62:158-160. [PMID: 28212493 PMCID: PMC5317019 DOI: 10.1177/0706743716672409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Iaboni
- 1 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.,2 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Mark J Rapoport
- 2 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.,3 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tannenbaum C, Clow B, Haworth-Brockman M, Voss P. Sex and gender considerations in Canadian clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. CMAJ Open 2017; 5:E66-E73. [PMID: 28401121 PMCID: PMC5378537 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of sex and gender in the diagnosis and management of health conditions is well established, but the extent to which this evidence is integrated into clinical practice guidelines remains unknown. We aimed to determine the proportion of Canadian clinical practice guidelines that integrate evidence on sex and gender considerations. METHODS We searched the Canadian Medical Association's CPG Infobase, PubMed, all provincial/territorial websites and websites of professional organizations for English- and French-language Canadian clinical practice guidelines published between January 2013 and June 2015 on selected conditions identified as priorities by policy-makers and practitioners. Citations and text were searched electronically using keyword terms related to sex and gender. Three investigators independently analyzed and categorized the content of text-positive clinical practice guidelines based on clinical relevance for practitioners. RESULTS Of the 118 clinical practice guidelines that met the inclusion criteria, 79 (66.9%) were text-positive for sex and/or gender keywords; 8 (10%) of the 79 used the keywords only in relation to pregnancy. Of the remaining 71 guidelines, 25 (35%) contained sex-related diagnostic or management recommendations. An additional 5 (7%) contained recommendations for sex-specific laboratory reference values, 29 (41%) referred to differences in epidemiologic features or risk factors only, and 12 (17%) contained nonrelevant mentions of search keywords. Twenty-five (35%) of the text-positive guidelines used the terms "sex" and/or "gender" correctly. INTERPRETATION Recommendations related to sex and gender are inconsistently reported in Canadian clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines such as the Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines may help inform the meaningful inclusion of sex and gender evidence in the development of clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Tannenbaum
- Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy (Tannenbaum), Université de Montréal; Centre de Recherche (Tannenbaum), Institut universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Institute of Gender and Health (Tannenbaum, Voss), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Montréal, Que.; Barbara Clow Consulting (Clow); Department of History (Clow), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Sociology (Haworth-Brockman), Faculty of Arts, University of Winnipeg; Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (Haworth-Brockman), National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| | - Barbara Clow
- Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy (Tannenbaum), Université de Montréal; Centre de Recherche (Tannenbaum), Institut universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Institute of Gender and Health (Tannenbaum, Voss), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Montréal, Que.; Barbara Clow Consulting (Clow); Department of History (Clow), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Sociology (Haworth-Brockman), Faculty of Arts, University of Winnipeg; Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (Haworth-Brockman), National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| | - Margaret Haworth-Brockman
- Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy (Tannenbaum), Université de Montréal; Centre de Recherche (Tannenbaum), Institut universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Institute of Gender and Health (Tannenbaum, Voss), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Montréal, Que.; Barbara Clow Consulting (Clow); Department of History (Clow), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Sociology (Haworth-Brockman), Faculty of Arts, University of Winnipeg; Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (Haworth-Brockman), National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| | - Patrice Voss
- Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy (Tannenbaum), Université de Montréal; Centre de Recherche (Tannenbaum), Institut universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Institute of Gender and Health (Tannenbaum, Voss), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Montréal, Que.; Barbara Clow Consulting (Clow); Department of History (Clow), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Sociology (Haworth-Brockman), Faculty of Arts, University of Winnipeg; Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (Haworth-Brockman), National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kuo CL, Chien IC, Lin CH. Trends, correlates, and disease patterns of antipsychotic use among elderly persons in Taiwan. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2016; 8:278-286. [PMID: 26667822 DOI: 10.1111/appy.12230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We used the population-based database to investigate the trends, correlates, and disease patterns of antipsychotic use among elderly people in Taiwan. METHODS The National Health Research Institutes provided a database of 1,000,000 random subjects for health service studies. We analyzed a sample of subjects over the age of 65 years from 1997 to 2005. The trends in and factors associated with antipsychotic use were detected. We also examined the proportions of antipsychotics used for psychiatric and medical disorders. RESULTS The 1-year prevalence of antipsychotic use in elderly persons increased from 9.8% in 1997 to 12.8% in 2005. The prevalence of first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) use increased from 9.8% to 11.6%, and the prevalence of second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) use increased greatly from 0.01% to 2.02%. Higher prevalence of both FGAs and SGAs were associated with age and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores. Psychiatric disorders were commonly found in SGA users (80.8%), whereas only 19.3% of the FGA users had psychiatric disorders. Among the major psychiatric disorders, greater proportions of antipsychotic use were for senile and presenile organic psychotic conditions, other organic psychotic conditions, and affective psychoses. FGAs were much more commonly prescribed for nonpsychiatric disorders, including diseases of symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions, the digestive system, and the respiratory system. DISCUSSION The prevalence of antipsychotic use, particularly the use of SGAs, increased greatly from 1997 to 2005 among elderly persons in Taiwan. SGAs were most used by subjects with psychiatric disorders, and FGAs were most used by those with nonpsychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lun Kuo
- Tsaotun Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nantou, Taiwan.,Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - I-Chia Chien
- Tsaotun Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nantou, Taiwan. , .,Department of Public Health & Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. ,
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosich Martí I, Allepuz A, Rodriguez Palomar G, Ortin Font F, Soler Cera M. Impact of an intervention on the prescription of aliskiren after new evidence on safety reported. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 26:91-96. [PMID: 27859873 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of an intervention to disseminate safety alerts on the utilization of Aliskiren added to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB). METHODS Quasi-experimental design (non-randomized intervention) comparing the utilization of Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB in a primary care area-intervention (PCA-I) with a primary care area-control (PCA-C) following a safety alert. All physicians were provided with a list of diabetic patients (DM) on Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB. Physicians in the PCA-I received also a non-DM patients list, a report with recommendations and information on the utilization of Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB in their area. Information was obtained from electronic medical records, period from May 2010 to December 2012. Interrupted time series analysis were used to assess the effect of the intervention on the number of patients on Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB. RESULTS The number of DM receiving Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB at the time of the alert (23 December 2011) was 106 in the PCA-I (91 non-DM) and 45 in the PCA-C (25 non-DM). After the alert, a decreased in the number of patients on Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB was noted at both PCAs, although the average of daily treatments ended was significantly higher in the PCA-I, both in the DM group (slope after alert: -0.81, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.71 vs. -0.30, 95%CI -0.37 to -0.22) as well as in the non-DM group (-0.56, 95%CI -0.67 to -0.45 vs. -0.10 95%CI -0.17 to -0.04). CONCLUSIONS The prescription of Aliskiren + ACEI or ARB decreased at both PCAs, albeit such decreased was more significant at the PCA-I. The intervention led to a more expeditious implementation of the safety alert recommendations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Rosich Martí
- Primary Care Service Alt Penedès-Garraf, Catalan Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Allepuz
- Primary Care Service Alt Penedès-Garraf, Catalan Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sultana J, Fontana A, Giorgianni F, Pasqua A, Cricelli C, Spina E, Gambassi G, Ivanovic J, Ferrajolo C, Molokhia M, Ballard C, Sharp S, Sturkenboom M, Trifirò G. The Effect of Safety Warnings on Antipsychotic Drug Prescribing in Elderly Persons with Dementia in the United Kingdom and Italy: A Population-Based Study. CNS Drugs 2016; 30:1097-1109. [PMID: 27423216 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-016-0366-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antipsychotic (AP) drugs are commonly used to manage the behavioural symptoms of dementia. Nevertheless, international (i.e. the European Medicines Agency in Europe) and national (i.e. the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in the UK and the Italian Drug Agency) regulatory agencies issued safety warnings against AP use in dementia in 2004 and 2009. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to investigate the short- and long-term impact of safety warnings on the use of APs in UK and Italian persons with dementia using two nationwide databases: The Health Improvement Network (THIN) from the UK and the Health Search Database-Cegedim-Strategic Data-Longitudinal Patient Database (HSD-CSD-LPD) from Italy. METHODS We calculated the overall quarterly prevalence of AP use by class and by individual drug in persons with dementia aged ≥65 years and used generalized linear models to explore the effect of the safety warnings. RESULTS We identified 58,497 and 10,857 individuals aged ≥65 years with dementia from the THIN and HSD-CSD-LPD databases, respectively, over the period 2000-2012. After the 2004 warnings, the use of atypical APs decreased, whereas the use of conventional APs increased, in Italy and the UK until 2009. However, the trend for APs individually showed that the use of risperidone/olanzapine decreased, whereas the use of quetiapine increased in both countries. After the 2009 warnings (until 2012), the use of atypical and conventional APs decreased in the UK (from 11 to 9 and 5 to 3 %, respectively), but such use increased in Italy (from 11 to 18 and 9 to 14 %, respectively). CONCLUSION The 2004 warnings led to a reduction in the use of olanzapine and risperidone and increased the use of quetiapine/conventional APs in both countries. From 2009, the use of APs decreased in persons with dementia in the UK but not in Italy. Possible reasons for the difference in AP use between the two countries include a more proactive approach towards reducing the use of APs in the UK than in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Sultana
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Sicily, Italy.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Fontana
- Unit of Biostatistics, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Viale Cappuccini 1, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Giorgianni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Sicily, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pasqua
- Health Search, Italian College of General Practitioners, Via Sestese, 61, 50141, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudio Cricelli
- Health Search, Italian College of General Practitioners, Via Sestese, 61, 50141, Florence, Italy
| | - Edoardo Spina
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Sicily, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gambassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Jelena Ivanovic
- Italian Drug Agency (AIFA), 181 Via del Tritone, 00187, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Ferrajolo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Pharmacology section, Campania Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Second University of Naples, 7 Via L. De Crecchio, 80138, Naples, Italy.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariam Molokhia
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College, London Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, UK
| | - Clive Ballard
- Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
| | - Samantha Sharp
- Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
| | - Miriam Sturkenboom
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Sicily, Italy. .,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, Contrada Casazza, SS113, 98124, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zakarias JK, Jensen-Dahm C, Nørgaard A, Stevnsborg L, Gasse C, Andersen BG, Søren J, Waldorff FB, Moos T, Waldemar G. Geographical Variation in Antipsychotic Drug Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 54:1183-1192. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-160485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Købstrup Zakarias
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, Biomedicine Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Christina Jensen-Dahm
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ane Nørgaard
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lea Stevnsborg
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christiane Gasse
- National Centre for Register Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jakobsen Søren
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
| | - Frans Boch Waldorff
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Torben Moos
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, Biomedicine Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Carracedo-Martínez E, Pia-Morandeira A. Influence of health warnings on the use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in an area of Spain: A time-series study. SAGE Open Med 2016; 4:2050312116653054. [PMID: 27579167 PMCID: PMC4989582 DOI: 10.1177/2050312116653054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Throughout 2007 and January 2008, several glitazones health warnings were published on rosiglitazone myocardial infarction risk. The impact of such warnings on glitazones prevalence of utilization has been extensively studied in the United States but only in one European country (England), which has showed different pattern from US studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of such safety warnings on glitazones utilization in an area of another European country. Methods: We calculated the number of defined daily doses per thousand inhabitants per day of glitazones each month during the period from 2006 to 2008 in a health area of Spain. We analyzed the data graphically and through a segmented regression analysis. Results: Rosiglitazone defined daily doses per thousand inhabitants per day were growing before the safety warnings, after the warnings a change in trend occurred and rosiglitazone utilization showed a downturn slope. Pioglitazone defined daily doses per thousand inhabitants per day were stable before the safety warnings, and a linear growth was observed after the safety warnings. Throughout the study period, rosiglitazone defined daily doses per thousand inhabitants per day were higher than pioglitazone defined daily doses per thousand inhabitants per day until near the end of 2008. Conclusion: Despite the fact that cardiovascular warnings affected rosiglitazone and not pioglitazone, rosiglitazone was more utilized than pioglitazone until near the end of 2008 which is a pattern similar to the one found in another European studies in England, but very different from studies in the United States, where rosiglitazone was less utilized than pioglitazone from the first month after rosiglitazone cardiovascular safety warnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez
- Santiago of Compostela Health Area, Galician Health Service (Servizo Galego de Saude (Sergas)), Spanish National Health System, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Agustin Pia-Morandeira
- Santiago of Compostela Health Area, Galician Health Service (Servizo Galego de Saude (Sergas)), Spanish National Health System, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Singh RR, Nayak R. Impact of FDA Black Box Warning on Psychotropic Drug Use in Noninstitutionalized Elderly Patients Diagnosed With Dementia. J Pharm Pract 2016; 29:495-502. [DOI: 10.1177/0897190015579451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: The study seeks to investigate the impact of Food and Drug Administration's black box warning (BBW) on the use of atypical antipsychotics (AAP) and nonantipsychotic psychotropic alternatives in noninstitutionalized elderly population diagnosed with dementia. Method: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2004 through 2007) was utilized as the data source. Medication use in elderly patients (≥65 years) was defined as taking at least 1 medication for dementia. We performed a statistical comparison of prewarning (2004-2005) and postwarning (2006-2007) periods with respect to AAP and nonantipsychotic psychotropic use to examine the impact of labeling changes. Results: A bivariate analysis did not yield statistically significant change in either the AAP or nonantipsychotic psychotropic use, pre- versus postwarning. However, multivariate logistic-regression analyses revealed greater odds for antidementia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.976, P = .0195) and benzodiazepine (OR = 3.046, P = .0227) medication use in postwarning period compared to the prewarning period. Conclusion: The regulatory warnings and labeling changes regarding off-label use of AAPs in dementia treatment showed minimal impact on their actual use in noninstitutionalized populations. A corresponding increase in the use of nonantipsychotic psychotropics explains that BBW might have resulted in a compensatory shift in favor of benzodiazepines and antidementia medications. Additional research should be conducted to examine the long-term impact of BBW on antipsychotic prescribing changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh R. Singh
- Department of Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Rajesh Nayak
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Allied Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St John’s University, Queens, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Herdeiro MT, Soares S, Silva T, Roque F, Figueiras A. Impact of rosiglitazone safety alerts on oral antidiabetic sales trends: a countrywide study in Portugal. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2016; 30:440-9. [PMID: 27259384 DOI: 10.1111/fcp.12207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2016] [Revised: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacovigilance systems are important to monitor the safety of on-market drugs after approval. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of rosiglitazone safety alerts on trends in the sale of rosiglitazone and other oral antidiabetic drugs. An ecological study was conducted, using temporally aggregated data and linking safety alerts to countrywide sales of all oral antidiabetic drugs in Portugal from January 2002 to December 2012. Sales figures for oral antidiabetic drugs marketed in Portugal were supplied by IMS Health Portugal with a breakdown by active substance and fixed combinations. The number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DIDs) of each oral antidiabetic drug sold to the estimated diabetic population using oral antidiabetic drugs in Portugal was calculated. Particular attention was paid to the case of rosiglitazone, with the results being adjusted for changes in rosiglitazone reimbursement policies. A total of four safety alerts were issued about rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone sales registered an increase of 32.9% (0.202 DIDs; P < 0.001) after the first alert (risk of macular oedema or worsening of pre-existent macular oedema) in January 2006. After subsequent alerts about cardiovascular risks, this trend was not, however, repeated and sales fell. Following the January 2006 and January 2008 safety alerts, rosiglitazone sales described a long-term downward trend, with decreases of 3.75% (-0023 DIDs; P > 0.05) and 0.24% (-0.001 DIDs; P > 0.05), respectively. It is important to promote the dissemination and publication of drug safety alerts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria T Herdeiro
- Department of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. .,CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra, 1317 4585-116, Gandra, Portugal.
| | - Sara Soares
- Department of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Tânia Silva
- IMS Health Portugal, Lagoas Park Edifício 3-piso, 32740-266, Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Fátima Roque
- Department of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.,Research Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic Institute of Guarda (UDI/IPG), Av. Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro n°50, 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal
| | - Adolfo Figueiras
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), University of Santiago de Compostela, R/ de San Francisco, s/n15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benzodiazepine medications have well-documented side effects, and their prescription rates in older adults have been declining. Trazodone and quetiapine are medications with sedative properties when used at low doses and are commonly used off-label for sleep or behavioral symptoms in older adults. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to describe the shifting patterns of sedative prescription in older adults over time by comparing changes in benzodiazepine, trazodone, and quetiapine dispensing between community and long-term care settings. METHODS We conducted a population-based serial cross-sectional study to compare the patterns of sedative dispensing (specifically, benzodiazepines, trazodone, and quetiapine) to individuals aged ≥66 years between 1 January 2002 and 31 March 2013 in Ontario, Canada. We compared rates of use between long-term care and community settings and used linear regression models to characterize the magnitude and direction of the rate of change in sedative use by age, sex, and dementia status. RESULTS The dispensing of trazodone and quetiapine increased over time, and this coincided with a decrease in benzodiazepine dispensing. This pattern was particularly apparent in the oldest cohort and in those with dementia. Benzodiazepines, trazodone, and quetiapine were associated with high rates of psychotropic polypharmacy. Overall trends were similar in long-term care and the community. CONCLUSIONS While benzodiazepine prescribing is declining among older adults in Ontario over time, there is a corresponding shift towards low-dose, off-label prescribing of trazodone and quetiapine and psychotropic polypharmacy. These prescribing trends highlight sedative substitution and reinforce the need to confirm efficacy and safety of this practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Foster PD, Camacho X, Vigod S, Yao Z, Juurlink DN, Paterson JM, Mamdani MM, Martins D, Gomes T. Trends in the use and cost of antipsychotics among older adults from 2007 to 2013: a repeated cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2016; 4:E292-7. [PMID: 27398376 PMCID: PMC4933600 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20150095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, several new atypical antipsychotic agents have been introduced in Ontario, and regulatory warnings have been issued regarding use of atypical antipsychotics in older adults. We sought to establish the impact of newer atypical antipsychotics on prescribing rates and costs. METHODS We performed a population-based cross-sectional study of Ontario adults aged 65 years or more using atypical antipsychotics from Jan. 1, 2007, to Mar. 31, 2013. These people have universal access to publicly funded drugs through the Ontario Health Insurance Plan and the Ontario Drug Benefit. We conducted time-series analysis to assess the impact of the introduction of new atypical antipsychotics on rates of use of atypical antipsychotics and associated expenditures. RESULTS Rates of atypical antipsychotic use increased following the introduction of new agents in 2009, from 27.6 users per 1000 older adults in the third quarter of 2009 to 29.1 users per 1000 older adults at the end of the study period (p = 0.04). Although prescribing rates for the newer atypical agents (paliperidone, ziprasidone and aripiprazole) remained low relative to their older counterparts (risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine), rates of aripiprazole use rose to 1.0 user per 1000 older adults by the end of the study period. The proportion of prescriptions that were for brand-name agents fell from 57.5% in the second quarter of 2007 to 6.1% in the second quarter of 2009, and then rose to 11.7% by the end of the study period. By the first quarter of 2013, newer atypical antipsychotic agents were used by 4.4% of atypical antipsychotic users but accounted for 14.1% ($1.2 million of $8.5 million) of atypical antipsychotic expenditures. INTERPRETATION Although the overall prevalence of use of new atypical antipsychotic agents remains low, their introduction has led to increased prescribing of this class of drugs in older adults. Given the potential cost implications, further study of these trends would be prudent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Foster
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Ximena Camacho
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Simone Vigod
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Zhan Yao
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - David N Juurlink
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - J Michael Paterson
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Muhammad M Mamdani
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Diana Martins
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| | - Tara Gomes
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (Foster), Western University, London; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Camacho, Vigod, Yao, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Martins, Gomes), Toronto; Applied Health Research Centre (Foster, Mamdani, Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto; Women's College Hospital and Research Institute (Vigod), Toronto; Departments of Medicine (Juurlink)and Psychiatry (Vigod) and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Vigod, Juurlink, Paterson, Mamdani, Gomes), University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Family Medicine (Paterson), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Paul Foster, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes conceived the study. Ximena Camacho, Zhan Yao and Diana Martins acquired the data. Paul Foster and Tara Gomes drafted the manuscript, and Simone Vigod, David Juurlink, Michael Paterson, Muhammad Mamdani and Tara Gomes revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to act as guarantors of the work
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Trends in Psychotropic Dispensing Among Older Adults with Dementia Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: 2004-2013. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 23:1259-1269. [PMID: 26525997 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Guidelines worldwide have cautioned against the use of antipsychotics as first-line agents to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. We aimed to investigate the changes over time in the dispensing of antipsychotics and other psychotropics among older adults with dementia living in long-term care facilities. METHODS We used drug claims data from Ontario, Canada, to calculate quarterly rates of prescription dispensing of six psychotropic drug classes among all elderly (≥65 years of age) long-term care residents with dementia from January 1, 2004, to March 31, 2013. Psychotropic drugs were classified into the following categories: atypical and conventional antipsychotics, non-sedative and sedative antidepressants, anti-epileptics, and benzodiazepines. We used time-series analysis to assess trends over time. RESULTS The study sample increased by 21% over the 10-year study period, from 49,251 patients to 59,785 patients. The majority of patients (within the range of 75%-79%) were dispensed at least one psychotropic medication. At the beginning of the study period atypical antipsychotics (38%) were the most frequently dispensed psychotropic, followed by benzodiazepines (28%), non-sedative antidepressants (27%), sedative antidepressants (17%), anti-epileptics (7%), and conventional antipsychotics (3%). Dispensing of anti-epileptics (2% increase) and conventional antipsychotics (1% decrease) displayed modest changes over time, but we observed more pronounced changes in dispensing of benzodiazepines (11% decrease) and atypical antipsychotics (4% decrease). Concurrently, we observed a substantial growth in the dispensing of both sedative (15% increase) and non-sedative (9% increase) antidepressants. The proportion of patients dispensed two or more psychotropic drug classes increased from 42% in 2004 to 50% in 2013. CONCLUSIONS Utilization patterns of psychotropic drugs in institutionalized patients with dementia have changed over the past decade. Although their use declined slightly over the study period, atypical antipsychotics continue to be used at a high rate. A decline in the use of benzodiazepines along with an increased use of sedative and non-sedative antidepressants suggests that the latter class of drugs is being substituted for the former in the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Psychotropic polypharmacy continues to be highly prevalent in these patient samples.
Collapse
|
35
|
Foebel A, Ballokova A, Wellens NIH, Fialova D, Milisen K, Liperoti R, Hirdes JP. A retrospective, longitudinal study of factors associated with new antipsychotic medication use among recently admitted long-term care residents. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15:128. [PMID: 26482028 PMCID: PMC4615888 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0127-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Use of antipsychotic (AP) medications is high and often inappropriate among institutionalized populations. Little is known about the correlates of new AP drug use following admission to long-term care (LTC) settings. This study investigated the frequency and correlates of new AP drug use among newly admitted LTC residents. Methods This longitudinal, retrospective study used data from the interRAI - Nursing Home Minimum Data Set version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) instrument. Data about demographic, clinical and social characteristics, and medication use, were collected in Ontario, Canada, from 2003–2011 by trained nurses. Residents with complete admission and 3–6 month follow-up data were included (N = 47,768). Multivariate logistic regression analyses, stratified by gender, explored correlates of new AP drug use upon admission to LTC. Results New AP drug users comprised 7 % of the final cohort. Severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and motor agitation were significantly associated with new AP drug use among both sexes. Additionally, behavioural problems, conflicts with staff and reduced social engagement were strong correlates of new AP drug use. Conclusions Social factors were as strongly associated with new AP drug use after LTC admission as clinical factors. Strategies to prevent the potential misuse of AP drugs upon LTC admission should consider the social determinants of such prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Foebel
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm, Sweden. .,School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
| | - Anna Ballokova
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Nathalie I H Wellens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Geriatrics Center and Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Daniela Fialova
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Koen Milisen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Division of Geriatric Medicine, Leuven University Hospital, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| | - Rosa Liperoti
- Centro Medicina dell'Invecchiamento, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - John P Hirdes
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lexchin J. Formulary status of drugs in Ontario after Health Canada has issued a serious safety warning: a cohort study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE 2015; 27:135-42. [PMID: 26410247 DOI: 10.3233/jrs-150655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drugs are approved for formulary listing based on limited knowledge of their safety. Serious safety issues are often identified after a drug is marketed. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the listing status of drugs on the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Formulary changes following the identification of safety concerns by Health Canada and whether the results of reviews by people responsible for the ODB Formulary are made public. METHODS All new active substances (NAS) approved by Health Canada from January 1, 2002 to March 31, 2012 that subsequently had a warning issued about a serious safety concern were identified. Editions of the ODB Formulary were searched to find which of these drugs were listed on the Formulary before the safety warning was issued. RESULTS A total of 263 NAS were approved of which 42 subsequently acquired one or more serious safety warnings and 15 of these were listed on the ODB Formulary before the safety warning was issued. The listing status of 14 of the 15 drugs was unchanged after the release of the safety warning. No information is available about whether the listing status of these 14 drugs was reassessed. CONCLUSIONS The ODB Formulary should develop a set of criteria to determine whether the listing status of drugs should be reviewed after Health Canada issues a serious safety warning. The results of any reconsiderations should made public so that prescribers and patients alike know that the ODB Formulary officials still regard the drugs as having a positive benefit to harm ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Lexchin
- School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Emergency Department, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sahlberg M, Holm E, Gislason GH, Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, Andersson C. Association of Selected Antipsychotic Agents With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Noncardiovascular Mortality in Elderly Persons. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4:e001666. [PMID: 26330335 PMCID: PMC4599488 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.114.001666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data from observational studies have raised concerns about the safety of treatment with antipsychotic agents (APs) in elderly patients with dementia, but this area has been insufficiently investigated. We performed a head-to-head comparison of the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular mortality associated with individual APs (ziprasidone, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, levomepromazine, chlorprothixen, flupentixol, and haloperidol) in Danish treatment-naïve patients aged ≥70 years. METHODS AND RESULTS We followed all treatment-naïve Danish citizens aged ≥70 years that initiated treatment with APs for the first time between 1997 and 2011 (n=91 774, mean age 82±7 years, 35 474 [39%] were men). Incidence rate ratios associated with use of different APs were assessed by multivariable time-dependent Poisson regression models. For the first 30 days of treatment, compared with risperidone, incidence rate ratios of major adverse cardiovascular events were higher with use of levomepromazine (3.80, 95% CI 3.43 to 4.21) and haloperidol (1.85, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.05) and lower for treatment with flupentixol (0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.66), ziprasidone (0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.97), chlorprothixen (0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95), and quetiapine (0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.80). Relationships were generally similar for long-term treatment. The majority of agents were associated with higher risks among patients with cardiovascular disease compared with patients without cardiovascular disease (P for interaction <0.0001). Similar results were observed for noncardiovascular mortality, although differences in associations between patients with and without cardiovascular disease were small. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested some diversity in risks associated with individual APs but no systematic difference between first- and second-generation APs. Randomized placebo-controlled studies are warranted to confirm our findings and to identify the safest agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Sahlberg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Aalborg University HospitalAalborg, Denmark
| | - Ellen Holm
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Nykøbing Falster HospitalNykøbing Falster, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenDenmark
| | - Gunnar H Gislason
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Cardiology, Gentofte HospitalHellerup, Denmark
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern DenmarkCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenDenmark
- The Heart Centre, RigshospitaletCopenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Soares S, Roque F, Teixeira Rodrigues A, Figueiras A, Herdeiro MT. Safety Alerts: An Observational Study in Portugal. Clin Ther 2015; 37:2122-8. [PMID: 26256430 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The information that is available when marketing authorizations are approved is limited. Pharmacovigilance has an important role during the postauthorization period, and alerts published by national authorities allow health care professionals to be informed about new data on safety profiles. This study therefore sought to analyze all safety alerts published by the Portuguese National Authority of Medicines and Health Products I.P. (INFARMED). METHODS We conducted an observational study of all alerts published on the INFARMED website from January 2002 through December 2014. From the data included in the alerts, the following information was abstracted: active substance name (and trade name), event that led to the alert, and the resulting safety measures. Active substances were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code. FINDINGS A total of 562 alerts were published, and 304 were eligible for inclusion. The musculoskeletal system was the ATC code with more alerts (n = 53), followed by the nervous system (n = 42). Communication of the information and recommendations to the health care professionals and the public in general was the most frequent safety measure (n = 128), followed by changes in the Summary of the Product Characteristics and package information leaflet (n = 66). During the study period, 26 marketing authorizations were temporarily suspended and 10 were revoked. IMPLICATIONS The knowledge of the alerts published during the postmarketing period is very useful to the health care professionals for improving prescription and use of medicines and to the scientific community for the development of new researches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Soares
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine - iBiMED & Health Sciences Program, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Fátima Roque
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine - iBiMED & Health Sciences Program, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal; Research Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (Unidade de Investigação para o Desenvolvimento do Interior - UDI/IPG), Guarda, Portugal
| | - António Teixeira Rodrigues
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine - iBiMED & Health Sciences Program, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Adolfo Figueiras
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Maria Teresa Herdeiro
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine - iBiMED & Health Sciences Program, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal; CESPU, Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Science and Technologies, Gandra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Trifiró G, Sultana J, Spina E. Are the safety profiles of antipsychotic drugs used in dementia the same? An updated review of observational studies. Drug Saf 2015; 37:501-20. [PMID: 24859163 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-014-0170-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
With an increase in the global prevalence of dementia, there is also an increase in behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) for which antipsychotic drugs are often used. Despite several safety warnings on antipsychotic use in dementia, there is little evidence to support the efficacy of antipsychotics in individual BPSD symptoms or to evaluate the drug safety profile by individual antipsychotic drug. There is emerging but scarce evidence that suggests an inter-drug variability between antipsychotic safety outcomes in BPSD. The objective of this review was to examine the existing literature on antipsychotic drug use in dementia patients; in particular to see whether inter-drug differences regarding antipsychotic safety were reported. A literature search was conducted for observational studies published in the English language from 2004 to 2014 that reported the risk of all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular events, pneumonia and other outcomes such as hip/femur fracture, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and hyperglycaemia. Six of 16 mortality studies (38%), 7 of 28 stroke studies (25%), 1 of 6 pneumonia (17%) studies and 2 of 6 fracture studies (33%) investigated inter-drug safety outcomes in elderly patients/dementia patients, while to our knowledge, there are no studies investigating the inter-drug variation of deep-vein thrombosis and hyperglycaemia risk. The results of the observational studies provide mixed results on the safety of antipsychotics in BPSD but it is clear that there are differences between the safety profiles of antipsychotic drugs. Robust evidence of such inter-drug variability could significantly improve patient safety as antipsychotics become more targeted to clinical risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Trifiró
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology, University of Messina, Policlinco Universitario, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Saint-Laurent Thibault C, Özer Stillman I, Chen S, Getsios D, Proskorovsky I, Hernandez L, Dixit S. Cost-utility analysis of memantine extended release added to cholinesterase inhibitors compared to cholinesterase inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dementia of the Alzheimer's type in the US. J Med Econ 2015; 18:930-43. [PMID: 26086535 DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1063501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of memantine extended release (ER) as an add-on therapy to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) [combination therapy] for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) from both a healthcare payer and a societal perspective over 3 years when compared to AChEI monotherapy in the US. METHODS A phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of memantine ER for treatment of AD patients taking an AChEI. The analysis assessed the long-term costs and health outcomes using an individual patient simulation in which AD progression is modeled in terms of cognition, behavior, and functioning changes. Input parameters are based on patient-level trial data, published literature, and publicly available data sources. Changes in anti-psychotic medication use are incorporated based on a published retrospective cohort study. Costs include drug acquisition and monitoring, total AD-related medical care, and informal care associated with caregiver time. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), life years, care time for caregiver, time in community and institution, time on anti-psychotics, time by disease severity, and time without severe symptoms are reported. Costs and health outcomes are discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS Considering a societal perspective over 3 years, this analysis shows that memantine ER combined with an AChEI provides better clinical outcomes and lower costs than AChEI monotherapy. Discounted average savings were estimated at $18,355 and $20,947 per patient and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) increased by an average of 0.12 and 0.13 from a societal and healthcare payer perspective, respectively. Patients on combination therapy spent an average of 4 months longer living at home and spend less time in moderate-severe and severe stages of the disease. CONCLUSION Combination therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe AD is a cost-effective treatment compared to AChEI monotherapy in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shailja Dixit
- d d Forest Research Institute, LLC, an affiliate of Actavis, Inc. , Jersey City , NJ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
McIlroy G, Thomas SK, Coleman JJ. Second-generation antipsychotic drug use in hospital inpatients with dementia: the impact of a safety warning on rates of prescribing. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 37:346-52. [PMID: 24681910 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia are distressing for patients and are frequently treated with second-generation antipsychotics. Concerns about the drugs' safety resulted in a Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) warning against their use in March 2009. METHODS Second-generation antipsychotic drug use was determined amongst patients with dementia admitted to the University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, between July 2005 and December 2011. An interrupted time series analysis was carried out to investigate changes in rates of prescribing following the safety warning. Risperidone was analysed separately, in accordance with its limited licence for use in older adults with dementia, granted in October 2008. RESULTS Before the safety warning, second-generation antipsychotic use was increasing in patients with dementia. After the MHRA warning, their use fell by 1.9% per month compared with that before. Use of risperidone continued to rise over the same period, often against the terms of its licence. CONCLUSIONS Drug safety warnings may influence prescribing practice, although continued use of antipsychotics in dementia could reflect a lack of alternative treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham McIlroy
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sarah K Thomas
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Jamie J Coleman
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gridchyna I, Cloutier AM, Nkeng L, Craig C, Frise S, Moride Y. Methodological gaps in the assessment of risk minimization interventions: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014; 23:572-9. [PMID: 24616240 DOI: 10.1002/pds.3596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2013] [Revised: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of therapeutic risk management regulatory guidance, an increase in the number of risk minimization interventions (RMIs) published in the literature has been observed. Methods used to evaluate their effectiveness remain, however, poorly examined. OBJECTIVE This paper aimed to conduct a literature review on the methods of evaluation of effectiveness of RMIs and to identify methodological gaps. METHODS The search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010, and updated on 1 April 2013. The following characteristics were extracted from each study: target population for the RMI, target population for the assessment of effectiveness, study design, data sources, and effectiveness outcome(s). RESULTS A total of 188 unique RMIs were identified in the literature, of which effectiveness was evaluated in only 65 (34.6%) at the time of publication. The largest proportion of studies reviewed (n = 49, 75.4%) attempted to evaluate changes in behavior through prescribing or laboratory test practices. One quarter of studies evaluated the effect of RMIs on the occurrence of adverse events. Only a minority of studies used robust designs, such as randomized controlled trials (n = 6, 9.2%) or a quasi-experimental design with a parallel comparison group (n = 8, 12.3%). CONCLUSION Lack of robust methodological design used in published studies on RMI effectiveness evaluation is an important methodological gap in the evaluation of RMI effectiveness. © 2014 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Gridchyna
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gallini A, Andrieu S, Donohue JM, Oumouhou N, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Gardette V. Trends in use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: Impact of national safety warnings. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 24:95-104. [PMID: 24126116 PMCID: PMC4094113 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2013] [Revised: 09/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Based on evidence of an increased risk of death, drug agencies issued safety warnings about the use of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the elderly with dementia. The French agency issued a warning in 2004. which was extended to all antipsychotics in 2008. Little is known about the impact of these warnings on use. We conducted a quasi-experimental study (interrupted time-series) in France, for 2003-2011, including subjects aged ≥65 with dementia and subjects aged ≥65 without dementia in the EGB database (1/97th representative random sample of claims from the main Health Insurance scheme). Outcomes were monthly rates of use of antipsychotics (by class and agent) and of five comparison drug classes (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, dermatologicals, antidiabetics, antiasthmatics). Trends were analyzed by joinpoint regression, impact of warnings by linear segmented regression. In patients with dementia (n=7169), there was a 40% reduction in antipsychotic use from 14.2% in 2003 to 10.2% in 2011. The reduction began before 2004 and was unaffected by the warnings. Use of first generation antipsychotics declined over the period, while use of SGAs increased and leveled off from 2007. Use of the five comparison drug classes increased on the period. In subjects without dementia (n=91,942), rates of overall antipsychotic use decreased from 2.3% in 2003 to 1.8% in 2011 with no effect of the warnings. Meanwhile, use of SGAs continuously increased from 0.37% to 0.64%. Antipsychotic use decreased in the elderly between 2003 and 2011, especially in dementia. The timing of the decrease, however, did not coincide with safety warnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Gallini
- Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, Faculté de médecine, Département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; INSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; CHU de Toulouse, Service d'épidémiologie, F-31073, Toulouse, France.
| | - Sandrine Andrieu
- Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, Faculté de médecine, Département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; INSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; CHU de Toulouse, Service d'épidémiologie, F-31073, Toulouse, France
| | - Julie M Donohue
- University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Naïma Oumouhou
- Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, Faculté de médecine, Département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; INSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France
| | - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
- INSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, Faculté de médecine, Département de pharmacologie, F-31073, Toulouse, France; CHU de Toulouse, Service de pharmacologie médicale et clinique, F-31073, Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Gardette
- Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, Faculté de médecine, Département d'épidémiologie, économie de la santé et santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; INSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, F-31073, Toulouse, France; CHU de Toulouse, Service d'épidémiologie, F-31073, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Torsadogenic risk of antipsychotics: combining adverse event reports with drug utilization data across Europe. PLoS One 2013; 8:e81208. [PMID: 24278396 PMCID: PMC3835678 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Antipsychotics (APs) have been associated with risk of torsade de Pointes (TdP). This has important public health implications. Therefore, (a) we exploited the public FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to characterize their torsadogenic profile; (b) we collected drug utilization data from 12 European Countries to assess the population exposure over the 2005-2010 period. Methods FAERS data (2004-2010) were analyzed based on the following criteria: (1) ≥4 cases of TdP/QT abnormalities; (2) Significant Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR [Lower Limit of the 95% confidence interval>1], for TdP/QT abnormalities, adjusted and stratified (Arizona CERT drugs as effect modifiers); (3) ≥4 cases of ventricular arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death (VA/SCD); (4) Significant ROR for VA/SCD; (5) Significant ROR, combined by aggregating TdP/QT abnormalities with VA and SCD. Torsadogenic signals were characterized in terms of signal strength: from Group A (very strong torsadogenic signal: all criteria fulfilled) to group E (unclear/uncertain signal: only 2/5 criteria). Consumption data were retrieved from 12 European Countries and expressed as defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DID). Results Thirty-five antipsychotics met at least one criterium: 9 agents were classified in Group A (amisulpride, chlorpromazine, clozapine, cyamemazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone). In 2010, the overall exposure to antipsychotics varied from 5.94 DID (Estonia) to 13.99 (France, 2009). Considerable increment of Group A agents was found in several Countries (+3.47 in France): the exposure to olanzapine increased across all Countries (+1.84 in France) and peaked 2.96 in Norway; cyamemazine was typically used only in France (2.81 in 2009). Among Group B drugs, levomepromazine peaked 3.78 (Serbia); fluphenazine 1.61 (Slovenia). Conclusions This parallel approach through spontaneous reporting and drug utilization analyses highlighted drug- and Country-specific scenarios requiring potential regulatory consideration: levomepromazine (Serbia), fluphenazine (Slovenia), olanzapine (across Europe), cyamemazine (France). This synergy should be encouraged to support future pharmacovigilance activities.
Collapse
|
45
|
Alessi-Severini S, Dahl M, Schultz J, Metge C, Raymond C. Prescribing of psychotropic medications to the elderly population of a Canadian province: a retrospective study using administrative databases. PeerJ 2013; 1:e168. [PMID: 24109553 PMCID: PMC3792174 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Psychotropic medications, in particular second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and benzodiazepines, have been associated with harm in elderly populations. Health agencies around the world have issued warnings about the risks of prescribing such medications to frail individuals affected by dementia and current guidelines recommend their use only in cases where the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. This study documents the use of psychotropic medications in the entire elderly population of a Canadian province in the context of current clinical guidelines for the treatment of behavioural disturbances. Methods. Prevalent and incident utilization of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and related medications (zopiclone and zaleplon) were determined in the population of Manitobans over age 65 in the time period 1997/98 to 2008/09 fiscal years. Comparisons between patients living in the community and those living in personal care (nursing) homes (PCH) were conducted. Influence of sociodemographic characteristics on prescribing was assessed by generalized estimating equations. Non-optimal use was defined as the prescribing of high dose of antipsychotic medications and the use of combination therapy of a benzodiazepine (or zopiclone/zaleplon) with an antipsychotic. A decrease in intensity of use over time and lower proportions of patients treated with antipsychotics at high dose or in combination with benzodiazepines (or zopiclone/zaleplon) was considered a trend toward better prescribing. Multiple regression analysis determined predictors of non-optimal use in the elderly population. Results. A 20-fold greater prevalent utilization of SGAs was observed in PCH-dwelling elderly persons compared to those living in the community. In 2008/09, 27% of PCH-dwelling individuals received a prescription for an SGA. Patient characteristics, such as younger age, male gender, diagnoses of dementia (or use of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) or psychosis in the year prior the prescription, were predictors of non-optimal prescribing (e.g., high dose antipsychotics). During the period 2002/3 and 2007/8, amongst new users of SGAs, 10.2% received high doses. Those receiving high dose antipsychotics did not show high levels of polypharmacy. Conclusions. Despite encouraging trends, the use of psychotropic medications remains high in elderly individuals, especially in residents of nursing homes. Clinicians caring for such patients need to carefully assess risks and benefits.
Collapse
|
46
|
Impact of safety warnings on antipsychotic prescriptions in dementia: nothing has changed but the years and the substances. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 23:1034-42. [PMID: 23498307 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Revised: 01/31/2013] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Dementia patients suffering from behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD) are often treated with antipsychotics. Trial results document an increased risk for serious adverse events and mortality in dementia patients taking these agents. Furthermore, the efficacy of treating BPSD with antipsychotics seems to be only modest. Using data of a German statutory health insurance company, we examined prescription trends of antipsychotics in prevalent dementia patients in the context of official warnings. The study period is 2004-2009. We studied trends in demographics, age and sex, as well as need of care and the intake of typical and atypical antipsychotics. Seeking for linear trends adjusted for age, sex and level of care between 2004 and 2009, we obtained p-values from a multivariate logistic regression. Prescription volumes were calculated by number of packages as well as defined daily doses (DDDs) using multiple linear regressions for trends in prescriptions amount. We included 3460-8042 patients per year (mean age 80 years). The prescription prevalence of antipsychotics decreased from 35.5% in 2004 to 32.5% in 2009 (multivariate analysis for linear trend: p=0.1645). Overall prescriptions for typical antipsychotics decreased (from 27.2% in 2004 to 23.0% in 2009, p<0.0001) and prescriptions for atypical antipsychotics increased from 17.1% to 18.9% (p<0.0001). The mean DDD per treated patient increased from 80.5 to 91.2 (2004-2009; p=0.0047). Our findings imply that warnings of international drug authorities and manufacturers against adverse drug events in dementia patients receiving antipsychotics did not impact overall prescription behavior.
Collapse
|
47
|
Guthrie B, Clark SA, Reynish EL, McCowan C, Morales DR. Differential impact of two risk communications on antipsychotic prescribing to people with dementia in Scotland: segmented regression time series analysis 2001-2011. PLoS One 2013; 8:e68976. [PMID: 23874832 PMCID: PMC3714253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 06/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Regulatory risk communications are an important method for disseminating drug safety information, but their impact varies. Two significant UK risk communications about antipsychotic use in older people with dementia were issued in 2004 and 2009. These varied considerably in their content and dissemination, allowing examination of their differential impact. Methods Segmented regression time-series analysis 2001–2011 for people aged ≥65 years with dementia in 87 Scottish general practices, examining the impact of two pre-specified risk communications in 2004 and 2009 on antipsychotic and other psychotropic prescribing. Results The percentage of people with dementia prescribed an antipsychotic was 15.9% in quarter 1 2001 and was rising by an estimated 0.6%/quarter before the 2004 risk communication. The 2004 risk communication was sent directly to all prescribers, and specifically recommended review of all patients prescribed relevant drugs. It was associated with an immediate absolute reduction in antipsychotic prescribing of 5.9% (95% CI −6.6 to −5.2) and a change to a stable level of prescribing subsequently. The 2009 risk communication was disseminated in a limited circulation bulletin, and only specifically recommended avoiding initiation if possible. There was no immediate associated impact, but it was associated with a significant decline in prescribing subsequently which appeared driven by a decline in initiation, with the percentage prescribed an antipsychotic falling from 18.4% in Q1 2009 to 13.5% in Q1 2011. There was no widespread substitution of antipsychotics with other psychotropic drugs. Conclusions The two risk communications were associated with reductions in antipsychotic use, in ways which were compatible with marked differences in their content and dissemination. Further research is needed to ensure that the content and dissemination of regulatory risk communications is optimal, and to track their impact on intended and unintended outcomes. Although rates are falling, antipsychotic prescribing in dementia in Scotland remains unacceptably high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Guthrie
- Primary Care Medicine, Population Health Sciences Division, Medical Research Institute, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lexchin J, Wiktorowicz M, Moscou K, Eggertson L. Provincial drug plan officials' views of the Canadian drug safety system. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2013; 38:545-571. [PMID: 23418364 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2079514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The Canadian constitution divides the responsibility for pharmaceuticals between the federal and provincial governments. While the provincial governments are responsible for establishing public formularies, the majority of the safety and efficacy information that the provinces use comes from the federal government. We interviewed drug plan officials from eight of the ten provinces and two of three territories regarding their views on the Canadian drug safety system. Here we report on the following categories: the federal drug approval system; the strengths and weaknesses of the federal system of postmarket pharmaceutical safety (i.e., pharmacosurveillance); resources available to support provincial formulary decision making; provincial roles in pharmacosurveillance; how the drug safety system could be improved; and the role of the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network, a recently established virtual network designed to connect researchers throughout Canada who conduct postmarket drug research. Next, we place the Canadian system within an international context by comparing informational asymmetry between government institutions in the United States and the European Union and by looking at how institutions support each other's roles in sharing information and in jointly developing policy through the International Conference on Harmonization. Finally, we draw on international experiences and suggest potential solutions to the concerns that our key informants have identified.
Collapse
|
49
|
Vasilyeva I, Biscontri RG, Enns MW, Metge CJ, Alessi-Severini S. Movement disorders in elderly users of risperidone and first generation antipsychotic agents: a Canadian population-based study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e64217. [PMID: 23696870 PMCID: PMC3656145 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Accepted: 04/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite concerns over the potential for severe adverse events, antipsychotic medications remain the mainstay of treatment of behaviour disorders and psychosis in elderly patients. Second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs; e.g., risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine) have generally shown a better safety profile compared to the first-generation agents (FGAs; e.g., haloperidol and phenothiazines), particularly in terms of a lower potential for involuntary movement disorders. Risperidone, the only SGA with an official indication for the management of inappropriate behaviour in dementia, has emerged as the antipsychotic most commonly prescribed to older patients. Most clinical trials evaluating the risk of movement disorders in elderly patients receiving antipsychotic therapy have been of limited sample size and/or of relatively short duration. A few observational studies have produced inconsistent results. Methods A population-based retrospective cohort study of all residents of the Canadian province of Manitoba aged 65 and over, who were dispensed antipsychotic medications for the first time during the time period from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2007, was conducted using Manitoba's Department of Health's administrative databases. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in new users of risperidone compared to new users of FGAs. Results After controlling for potential confounders (demographics, comorbidity and medication use), risperidone use was associated with a lower risk of EPS compared to FGAs at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22–0.67; 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.73; 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33–0.77; 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45–0.94, respectively). At 360 days, the strength of the association weakened with an adjusted HR of 0.75, 95% CI: 0.54–1.05. Conclusions In a large population of elderly patients the use of risperidone was associated with a lower risk of EPS compared to FGAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Vasilyeva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Robert G. Biscontri
- Department of Accounting and Finance, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Murray W. Enns
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Colleen J. Metge
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Liu ME, Tsai SJ, Chang WC, Hsu CH, Lu T, Hung KS, Chiu WT, Chang WP. Population-based 5-year follow-up study in Taiwan of dementia and risk of stroke. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61771. [PMID: 23626726 PMCID: PMC3634021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Accepted: 03/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study estimates the risk of stroke within 5 years of newly diagnosed dementia among elderly persons aged 65 and above. We examined the relationship between antipsychotic usage and development of stroke in patients with dementia. Methods We conducted a nationwide 5-year population-based study using data retrieved from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005) in Taiwan. The study cohort comprised 2243 patients with dementia aged ≥65 years who had at least one inpatient service claim or at least 2 ambulatory care claims, whereas the comparison cohort consisted of 6714 randomly selected subjects (3 for every dementia patient) and were matched with the study group according to sex, age, and index year. We further classified dementia patients into 2 groups based on their history of antipsychotic usage. A total of 1450 patients were classified into the antipsychotic usage group and the remaining 793 patients were classified into the non-antipsychotic usage group. Cox proportional-hazards regressions were performed to compute the 5-year stroke-free survival rates after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Results The dementia patients have a 2-fold greater risk of developing stroke within 5 years of diagnosis compared to non-dementia age- and sex-matched subjects, after adjusting for other risk factors (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.58–3.08; P<.001). Antipsychotic usage among patients with dementia increases risk of stroke 1.17-fold compared to patients without antipsychotic treatment (95% CI = 1.01–1.40; P<.05). Conclusions Dementia may be an independent risk factor for stroke, and the use of antipsychotics may further increase the risk of stroke in dementia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-En Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Jen Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chiao Chang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Hung Hsu
- Department of Healthcare Management, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Ti Lu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Sheng Hung
- Department of Neurosurgery Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research, Taipei Medical University- Wan Fang Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Ta Chiu
- Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Pin Chang
- Department of Healthcare Management, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|