Effects of 2 years' treatment of osteoporosis with 1 alpha-hydroxy vitamin D3 on bone mineral density and incidence of fracture: a placebo-controlled, double-blind prospective study

Effect of vitamin D supplementation or fortification on bone turnover markers in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation/fortification on bone turnover markers in women. All human randomised clinical trials reported changes in bone resorption markers (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX)) or bone formation factors (osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) following vitamin D administration in women (aged ≥ 18 years) were considered. Mean differences (MD) and their respective 95 % CI were calculated based on fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity status. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression models, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, publication bias and the quality of the included studies were also evaluated. We found that vitamin D supplementation had considerable effect on sCTX (MD: -0·038, n 22) and OC (MD: -0·610, n 24) with high heterogeneity and uNTX (MD: -8·188, n 6) without heterogeneity. Our results showed that age, sample size, dose, duration, baseline vitamin D level, study region and quality of studies might be sources of heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis also revealed significant reductions in P1NP level in dose less than 600 μg/d and larger study sample size (>100 participants). Moreover, no significant change was found in BALP level. Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women. However, results were inconsistent for bone formation markers.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Bone Mineral Density for Osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We primarily aim to review differences in bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis among different racial/ethnic groups and to highlight the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in obesity and diabetes. We also explore the factors contributing to the BMD differences among various subgroups. In addition, we investigate the existing disparities in research, educational initiatives, screening practices, and treatment options for osteoporosis and discuss these findings' clinical and public health implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Racial/ethnic differences in BMD for osteoporosis exist in the USA and other countries. There are disparities regarding osteoporosis screening and treatment. Understanding the factors contributing to these differences can help develop targeted interventions and policies to reduce their impact. Clinicians should consider the racial/ethnic differences in BMD when making treatment decisions and providing preventive care. Future research could contribute to developing effective strategies for preventing osteoporosis among different racial/ethnic groups. This review offered a comprehensive examination of differences in BMD across various racial and ethnic groups, elucidating the influence of genetic, lifestyle, and cultural factors on these differences. This review also highlighted the disparities in osteoporosis screening, treatment options, research on medical effectiveness, and educational outreach tailored to each subgroup. Recognizing the importance of addressing these inequalities, we present this review to advocate for targeted interventions to reduce disparities in osteoporosis and improve bone health for all populations.

Prescription of vitamin D was associated with a lower incidence of hip fractures

Patients with osteoporosis are prone to fragility fractures. Evidence of the effects of active forms of vitamin D on hip fracture prevention is insufficient. We examined the association between vitamin D prescription and incidence of new fractures using the data of osteoporotic patients from the nationwide health insurance claims database of Japan. The follow-up period was 3 years after entry. The untreated patients were never prescribed vitamin D during follow-up (n = 422,454), and the treated patients had a vitamin D medication possession ratio of ≥ 0.5 at all time points (n = 169,774). Propensity score matching was implemented on these groups, yielding 105,041 pairs, and subsequently, the control and treatment groups were established and analyzed. The incidence of new fractures was significantly lower in the treatment group compared with the control group (6.25% vs. 5.69%, hazard ratio 0.936 [95% confidence interval 0.904-0.970], p < 0.001*). By site, hip fractures significantly decreased (0.89% vs. 0.42%, p < 0.001), but not vertebral and radial fractures. Subgroup analysis by vitamin D type showed a significantly lower incidence of total fractures only in alfacalcidol (hazard ratio 0.676 [95% confidence interval 0.628-0.728], p < 0.001*). The results suggest that vitamin D prescription was associated with a reduced incidence of hip fractures.

Real-world evaluation of osteoporotic fractures using the Japan Medical Data Vision database

In Japanese patients who experienced an osteoporotic fracture, 10.8% and 18.6% had a subsequent fracture within 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. Although the burden of hip and vertebral fractures has been reported widely, we found that patients with non-hip non-vertebral (NHNV) fractures had a 26% higher risk of subsequent fracture than patients with hip fractures; therefore, NHNV fractures should also be considered an important risk factor for subsequent fracture.

INTRODUCTION

To investigate imminent risk and odds of subsequent osteoporotic fractures and associated risk factors in patients who experienced an initial osteoporotic fracture.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 osteoporotic fracture were analyzed from Japan's Medical Data Vision (MDV) database of claims from acute-care hospitals (January 2012-January 2017). Multivariable models were constructed to explore the impact of key comorbidities and medications on the subsequent fracture risk: Cox proportional hazards model for time to subsequent fracture and logistic regression models for odds of subsequent fracture within 1 and 2 years from index fracture.

RESULTS

In total, 32,926 patients were eligible with a median follow-up duration of 12.3 months. The percentage of patients experiencing subsequent fractures was 14.1% across the study duration, and 10.8% and 18.6% in patients with 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards model, patients with vertebral or NHNV index fractures had a higher subsequent fracture risk than patients with a hip index fracture (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.11 and 1.26, respectively); subsequent fracture risk was lower in males than females (aHR 0.89). Patients with baseline claims for tranquilizers and glucocorticoids had a higher subsequent fracture risk than those without (aHR 1.14 and 1.08, respectively). Additionally, baseline claims for anti-Parkinson's medications, alcoholism, and stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with higher odds of subsequent fracture in the logistic regression models.

CONCLUSION

Several clinical and demographic factors were associated with a higher risk and odds of subsequent fracture. This may help to identify patients who should be prioritized for osteoporosis treatment.

Plain vitamin D or active vitamin D in the treatment of osteoporosis: where do we stand today?

Osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and its prevention in order to avert fractures was considered of great importance in maintaining well-being and independence among the elderly. Strategies for osteoporosis prevention are well delineated, but research shows that the treatment options offered today could still be improved. The role of plain vitamin D (cholecalciferol) in bone health and the prevention of osteoporosis are well documented; however, as a treatment for osteoporosis, either with or without calcium, it has been shown to be ineffective. This is due in part to the strong negative feedback mechanisms in place in vitamin D-replete patients. However, other factors linked directly to ageing such as oestrogen depletion, reduced kidney or liver function may also be involved in reducing the body's capability to activate plain vitamin efficiently. This is why active vitamin D analogues such as alfacalcidol, 1-α-(OH)D3, are of clinical interest. Alfacalcidol requires only one hydroxylation reaction to become active 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D3, and the 25-hydroxylase catalyzing this reaction is found in the liver and also interestingly in osteoblasts suggesting a local effect. Registered for use in postmenopausal osteoporosis, in most countries worldwide, alfacalcidol has also shown efficacy in glucocorticoid-induced and male osteoporosis. The present review provides compelling evidence for the efficacy of this compound in the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures both in monotherapy and when combined with other osteoporotic drugs where additive effects are clear. The safety profile of alfacalcidol is shown to be highly acceptable and it is considered less likely to induce hypercalcaemia than another more widely used analogue, calcitriol. Therefore, it remains unclear as to why alfacalcidol is not more widely used in clinical practice.

Advances in osteoporosis from 1970 to 2018

In 1970, there were no drugs under study for osteoporosis. Estrogen was used, but little was known about the correct dose for preventing bone loss. At that time, fractures were not even recognized as a disease, but regarded as part of normal aging. From 1970 to this year (2018), there have been extensive advances in the osteoporosis field ranging from fracture epidemiology to the remarkable invention of bone density measurements. There have been major advances in therapeutic options available for patients for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In parallel, the advances in the laboratory helped elucidate the process of bone remodeling, not only at the macroscopic level but also at the cellular level. This led to rapid advances in translational research from cellular biology to new therapies exemplified by the development of monoclonal antibodies for osteoporosis. Further understanding of the signaling pathways in bone cells will lead to new small molecules made for osteoporosis treatment, perhaps causing less adverse events. University-based research throughout the world has been a leader in most of these advances, and Pharma support for phase 1 to 4 studies helped bring these discoveries to patients. In the osteoporosis field alone, one sees the tremendous value of grant support for university research by National funding agencies such as the National Institute of Health in this country and similar agencies in other countries. There are clinical challenges that have to be solved with long-term compliance with osteoporosis medication if we want to reduce fracture incidence in the long term.

Activated vitamin D3 formulations can be safely used as concomitant medication for prevention of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

AIM

Denosumab prevents osteoporosis by potently inhibiting bone resorption, but requires oral therapy with calcium and vitamin D preparations to prevent the side effects of hypocalcemia. Generally, a combination drug containing calcium, natural vitamin D, and magnesium is used. However, if activated vitamin D has been used before the initiation of denosumab therapy, continued use of activated vitamin D is not uncommon. This study aimed to evaluate the combination vitamin D preparation, alfacalcidol, and eldecalcitol on the therapeutic effect on denosumab therapy, the preventive effect on hypocalcemia, and the effect on renal function, to determine the optimal choice of concomitant medication.

METHODS

This is a retrospective and single-center study. Among 39 patients who had used denosumab (60 mg dose) for at least 12 months between November 2013 and October 2015, those who used the combination medication concomitantly as the standard treatment, those who used alfacalcidol concomitantly, and those who used eldecalcitol concomitantly were compared.

RESULTS

Denosumab therapy markedly increased lumbar spine and femoral neck bone densities at 12 months in the three groups, showing no particular difference in the rate of increase of bone density. The three groups had marked decreases in bone metabolism markers, but had no intergroup differences. No hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, or obvious renal dysfunction occurred over 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the use of activated vitamin D preparations, as concomitant medications with denosumab therapy, is appropriate considering the therapeutic efficacy of denosumab, prevention of hypocalcemia, and influence on renal function.

Effects of activated vitamin D, alfacalcidol, and low-intensity aerobic exercise on osteopenia and muscle atrophy in type 2 diabetes mellitus model rats

Diabetes mellitus causes secondary osteoporosis and muscle atrophy. The ability of alfacalcidol (ALF) and exercise (Exe) to inhibit osteoporosis and muscle atrophy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) model rats was examined. Twenty-week-old Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats were randomized to ALF (orally 0.1 μg/kg/day), Exe (treadmill exercise at 10 m/min, 60 min/day, 5 days/week), Comb (ALF and Exe), and Cont (T2DM control treated with vehicle and no exercise) groups (n = 8–10 per group). Sedentary Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka rats were used as a non-hyperphagic control. After treatment for 2 or 6 weeks, blood glucose (BG) levels, cross-sectional area (CSA) of tibialis anterior muscle fibers, femoral bone mineral density (BMD), and relative quantities of muscle anabolic markers (Pax7, MyoD, and myogenin) and catabolic markers (Atrogin-1, MuRF1, and REDD1) of the soleus muscle assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were measured. Exe and Comb treatments for 6 weeks decreased BG levels compared with those of the Cont group. ALF, Exe, and Comb treatments for 2 and 6 weeks recovered the CSA compared with that of the Cont group. ALF and Comb treatments for 6 weeks increased femoral BMDs compared with those of the Cont group. After 2 weeks of treatment, Comb treatment increased MyoD expression and decreased MuRF1 expression. ALF or Exe monotherapy significantly decreased Atrogin-1 or MuRF1 expression after 2 weeks of treatment, respectively. After 6 weeks of treatment, ALF and Comb treatments decreased Atrogin-1 and REDD1. These results demonstrate that a combination of ALF and Exe improved CSA from the early phase of treatment by stimulating skeletal muscle differentiation and suppressing muscle catabolic genes. Improvements in BG, BMD, and CSA were observed as long-term effects of the combination therapy. Continued suppression of muscle catabolic genes was observed as a background to these effects.

Vitamin D, calcium homeostasis and aging

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and consequent increase in fracture risk. Evidence is accumulating for an important role of calcium deficiency as the process of aging is associated with disturbed calcium balance. Vitamin D is the principal factor that maintains calcium homeostasis. Increasing evidence indicates that the reason for disturbed calcium balance with age is inadequate vitamin D levels in the elderly. In this article, an overview of our current understanding of vitamin D, its metabolism, and mechanisms involved in vitamin D-mediated maintenance of calcium homeostasis is presented. In addition, mechanisms involved in age-related dysregulation of 1,25(OH)₂D₃ action, recommended daily doses of vitamin D and calcium, and the use of vitamin D analogs for the treatment of osteoporosis (which remains controversial) are reviewed. Elucidation of the molecular pathways of vitamin D action and modifications that occur with aging will be an active area of future research that has the potential to reveal new therapeutic strategies to maintain calcium balance.

Efficacy of alfacalcidol and alendronate on lumbar bone mineral density in osteoporotic patients using proton pump inhibitors

It has been indicated that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with a loss of the anti-fracture efficacy of alendronate (AD). However, there are few prospective studies that have investigated the efficacy of AD on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic patients who are using PPIs. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of alfacalcidol (AC) and AD on lumbar BMD in osteoporotic patients using PPIs. A prospective, randomized, active control study enrolled such osteoporotic patients (age, ≥50 years). The patients were randomly assigned to receive AC (1 µg/day) or AD (35 mg/week) and were followed up for one year. Patient profiles were maintained, and lumbar BMD, bone-specific alkaline-phosphatase (BAP) and collagen type-I cross-linked N-telopeptide (NTX), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy results, and the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG) were evaluated. Percentage changes in lumbar BMD, NTX, BAP, and change in FSSG score from baseline to the end of one year of treatment were investigated. Sixteen patients were eligible for analysis (eight assigned to receive AC, eight assigned to receive AD). The percentage change in lumbar BMD from baseline to the end of treatment was −0.4±4.0% for the AC group vs. 6.8±6.3% for the AD group (P=0.015). No significant percentage change of BAP and NTX between the two groups was observed. Subsequent to one year of treatment, the FSSG score did not change from the baseline values for either study group, and no new bone fractures or esophagitis were observed in either group of patients. The findings demonstrated that in osteoporotic patients using concomitant PPIs, there was a greater increase in lumbar BMD after one year of treatment with AD compared with AC. However, the number of study subjects was small; thus, further, large prospective studies are required to determine the effect of AD in osteoporotic patients using concomitant PPIs.

Treatment of osteoporosis with eldecalcitol, a new vitamin D analog: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Eldecalcitol (ELD) is an active form of vitamin D analog that has been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. Over recent years, a number of multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials have been conducted. Our goal is to comprehensively summarize the results from these studies.

METHODS

We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 28, 2015. Each database was searched using search terms "Eldecalcitol" and "ED-71" and the results were combined. The retrieved data from three independent clinical trials included a total of 1,332 patients with osteoporosis. After the data were pooled from three trials, RevMan software was used to conduct meta-analyses to determine the effects of ELD on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover marker (BTM) type I collagen amino-terminal telopeptide (NTX). Effects of ELD on some of the bone formation and bone resorption parameters, incidence of vertebral fractures at the lower spine, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with osteoporosis were also summarized.

RESULTS

With a test for overall effect Z=6.35, ELD could increase lumbar BMD (P<0.00001). In comparison with alphacalcidol, ELD suppressed the NTX level to a greater degree (test for overall effect Z=3.82,P<0.0001). ELD was also found to suppress bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) by 19% (P<0.01) and osteocalcin by 19% (P<0.01) at the dose of 0.75 μg/day. Compared to alfacalcidol, ELD showed higher potency in suppressing serum BALP (26±9 vs 32±11 U/L,P<0.05) and amino-terminal propeptide of procollagen I (PINP) (42±15 vs 59±23 ng/mL,P<0.05). In addition, ELD was found to be more effective in reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures at the lower spine (P=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that ELD was more potent than alphacalcidol in reducing BTM (NTX). Clinical data together suggest that ELD is efficient in treating osteoporosis by increasing lumbar BMD; suppressing BTMs, including NTX, BALP, osteocalcin, and PINP; resulting in the reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures at the lower spine; and increasing the HRQOL in patients with osteoporosis.

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D and related compounds have been used to prevent osteoporotic fractures in older people. This is the third update of a Cochrane review first published in 1996.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of vitamin D or related compounds, with or without calcium, for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (to December 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2012, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1966 to November Week 3 2012), EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 50), CINAHL (1982 to December 2012), BIOSIS (1985 to 3 January 2013), Current Controlled Trials (December 2012) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that compared vitamin D or related compounds, alone or with calcium, against placebo, no intervention or calcium alone, and that reported fracture outcomes in older people. The primary outcome was hip fracture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial risk of selection bias and aspects of methodological quality, and extracted data. Data were pooled, where possible, using the fixed-effect model, or the random-effects model when heterogeneity between studies appeared substantial.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 trials with a total of 91,791 participants. Thirty-one trials, with sample sizes ranging from 70 to 36,282 participants, examined vitamin D (including 25-hydroxy vitamin D) with or without calcium in the prevention of fractures in community, nursing home or hospital inpatient populations. Twelve of these 31 trials had participants with a mean or median age of 80 years or over.Another group of 22 smaller trials examined calcitriol or alfacalcidol (1-alphahydroxyvitamin D3), mostly with participants who had established osteoporosis. These trials were carried out in the setting of institutional referral clinics or hospitals.In the assessment of risk of bias for random sequence generation, 21 trials (40%) were deemed to be at low risk, 28 trials (53%) at unclear risk and four trials at high risk (8%). For allocation concealment, 22 trials were at low risk (42%), 29 trials were at unclear risk (55%) and two trials were at high risk (4%).There is high quality evidence that vitamin D alone, in the formats and doses tested, is unlikely to be effective in preventing hip fracture (11 trials, 27,693 participants; risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.98 to 1.29) or any new fracture (15 trials, 28,271 participants; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.11).There is high quality evidence that vitamin D plus calcium results in a small reduction in hip fracture risk (nine trials, 49,853 participants; RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96; P value 0.01). In low-risk populations (residents in the community: with an estimated eight hip fractures per 1000 per year), this equates to one fewer hip fracture per 1000 older adults per year (95% CI 0 to 2). In high risk populations (residents in institutions: with an estimated 54 hip fractures per 1000 per year), this equates to nine fewer hip fractures per 1000 older adults per year (95% CI 2 to 14). There is high quality evidence that vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a statistically significant reduction in incidence of new non-vertebral fractures. However, there is only moderate quality evidence of an absence of a statistically significant preventive effect on clinical vertebral fractures. There is high quality evidence that vitamin D plus calcium reduces the risk of any type of fracture (10 trials, 49,976 participants; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99).In terms of the results for adverse effects: mortality was not adversely affected by either vitamin D or vitamin D plus calcium supplementation (29 trials, 71,032 participants, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.01). Hypercalcaemia, which was usually mild (2.6 to 2.8 mmol/L), was more common in people receiving vitamin D or an analogue, with or without calcium (21 trials, 17,124 participants, RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.57 to 3.31), especially for calcitriol (four trials, 988 participants, RR 4.41, 95% CI 2.14 to 9.09), than in people receiving placebo or control. There was also a small increased risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (15 trials, 47,761 participants, RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08), especially for calcium plus vitamin D (four trials, 40,524 participants, RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09), and a significant increase in renal disease (11 trials, 46,548 participants, RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33). Other systematic reviews have found an increased association of myocardial infarction with supplemental calcium; and evidence of increased myocardial infarction and stroke, but decreased cancer, with supplemental calcium plus vitamin D, without an overall effect on mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D alone is unlikely to prevent fractures in the doses and formulations tested so far in older people. Supplements of vitamin D and calcium may prevent hip or any type of fracture. There was a small but significant increase in gastrointestinal symptoms and renal disease associated with vitamin D and calcium. This review found that there was no increased risk of death from taking calcium and vitamin D.

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

BACKGROUND

Available evidence on the effects of vitamin D on mortality has been inconclusive. In a recent systematic review, we found evidence that vitamin D3 may decrease mortality in mostly elderly women. The present systematic review updates and reassesses the benefits and harms of vitamin D supplementation used in primary and secondary prophylaxis of mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in healthy adults and adults in a stable phase of disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index-Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (all up to February 2012). We checked references of included trials and pharmaceutical companies for unidentified relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials that compared any type of vitamin D in any dose with any duration and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention in adult participants. Participants could have been recruited from the general population or from patients diagnosed with a disease in a stable phase. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol)) or as an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Six review authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RRs). To account for trials with zero events, we performed meta-analyses of dichotomous data using risk differences (RDs) and empirical continuity corrections. We used published data and data obtained by contacting trial authors.To minimise the risk of systematic error, we assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Trial sequential analyses controlled the risk of random errors possibly caused by cumulative meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 159 randomised clinical trials. Ninety-four trials reported no mortality, and nine trials reported mortality but did not report in which intervention group the mortality occurred. Accordingly, 56 randomised trials with 95,286 participants provided usable data on mortality. The age of participants ranged from 18 to 107 years. Most trials included women older than 70 years. The mean proportion of women was 77%. Forty-eight of the trials randomly assigned 94,491 healthy participants. Of these, four trials included healthy volunteers, nine trials included postmenopausal women and 35 trials included older people living on their own or in institutional care. The remaining eight trials randomly assigned 795 participants with neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory or rheumatoid diseases. Vitamin D was administered for a weighted mean of 4.4 years. More than half of the trials had a low risk of bias. All trials were conducted in high-income countries. Forty-five trials (80%) reported the baseline vitamin D status of participants based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Participants in 19 trials had vitamin D adequacy (at or above 20 ng/mL). Participants in the remaining 26 trials had vitamin D insufficiency (less than 20 ng/mL).Vitamin D decreased mortality in all 56 trials analysed together (5,920/47,472 (12.5%) vs 6,077/47,814 (12.7%); RR 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 0.99); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%). More than 8% of participants dropped out. 'Worst-best case' and 'best-worst case' scenario analyses demonstrated that vitamin D could be associated with a dramatic increase or decrease in mortality. When different forms of vitamin D were assessed in separate analyses, only vitamin D3 decreased mortality (4,153/37,817 (11.0%) vs 4,340/38,110 (11.4%); RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98); P = 0.002; I(2) = 0%; 75,927 participants; 38 trials). Vitamin D2, alfacalcidol and calcitriol did not significantly affect mortality. A subgroup analysis of trials at high risk of bias suggested that vitamin D2 may even increase mortality, but this finding could be due to random errors. Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D3, with the cumulative Z-score breaking the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, corresponding to 150 people treated over five years to prevent one additional death. We did not observe any statistically significant differences in the effect of vitamin D on mortality in subgroup analyses of trials at low risk of bias compared with trials at high risk of bias; of trials using placebo compared with trials using no intervention in the control group; of trials with no risk of industry bias compared with trials with risk of industry bias; of trials assessing primary prevention compared with trials assessing secondary prevention; of trials including participants with vitamin D level below 20 ng/mL at entry compared with trials including participants with vitamin D levels equal to or greater than 20 ng/mL at entry; of trials including ambulatory participants compared with trials including institutionalised participants; of trials using concomitant calcium supplementation compared with trials without calcium; of trials using a dose below 800 IU per day compared with trials using doses above 800 IU per day; and of trials including only women compared with trials including both sexes or only men. Vitamin D3 statistically significantly decreased cancer mortality (RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.98); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%; 44,492 participants; 4 trials). Vitamin D3 combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.34); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%; 42,876 participants; 4 trials). Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18 (95% CI 1.17 to 8.68); P = 0.02; I(2) = 17%; 710 participants; 3 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D3 seemed to decrease mortality in elderly people living independently or in institutional care. Vitamin D2, alfacalcidol and calcitriol had no statistically significant beneficial effects on mortality. Vitamin D3 combined with calcium increased nephrolithiasis. Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased hypercalcaemia. Because of risks of attrition bias originating from substantial dropout of participants and of outcome reporting bias due to a number of trials not reporting on mortality, as well as a number of other weaknesses in our evidence, further placebo-controlled randomised trials seem warranted.

Multifunctional and potent roles of the 3-hydroxypropoxy group provide eldecalcitol's benefit in osteoporosis treatment

Eldecalcitol (1α,25-dihydroxy-2β-(3-hydroxypropoxy)vitamin D3, [developing code: ED-71]), a new osteoporosis treatment drug that was recently approved in Japan, is a best-in-class drug in the class of calcitriol (1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) and its prodrug alfacalcidol (1α-hydroxyvitamin D3), which have been used to treat osteoporosis for 30 years. In a comparative Phase III clinical study with alfacalcidol in osteoporosis patients, eldecalcitol demonstrated superior efficacy in the endpoints of increment of bone mineral density and reduction of bone fracture with equivalent safety to alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol was discovered by searching synthetic analogs of calcitriol and alfacalcidol, and its main structural characteristic is having the 3-hydroxypropoxy group at the 2β-position. This review discusses why introducing the group leads to excellent efficacy and safety in osteoporosis treatment and elucidates the functional roles of the 3-hydroxypropoxy group. Briefly, the functional roles of the group are, first, realizing the metabolism switching in which eldecalcitol shows resistance to CYP24A1 and is metabolized in the liver; second, increasing the affinity to the serum carrier protein and prolonging the half-life to 53h; and third, stabilizing the eldecalcitol-receptor complex. Taken together, these functional roles of the 3-hydroxypropoxy group are beneficial in osteoporosis treatment. This review attempts to give a detailed account of the mode of action of eldecalcitol by clarifying these multifunctional roles of the 3-hydroxypropoxy group from the medicinal chemist's perspective.

[Vitamin D level in Hungarian patients with inflammatory bowel diseases]

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin D has an important role in the immune regulation. Vitamin D is essential for innate and adaptive immune systems and it plays a significant role in the formation of immune tolerance, as well.

AIM

Vitamin D deficiency has been observed in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in Western Europe, but there is no data available from Eastern Europe.

METHOD

The study included 169 patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

The median vitamin D level was 22.7±10.6 ng/ml. Only 20% of the patients had adequate vitamin D level (>30 ng/ml), 52% had vitamin D insufficiency (15-30 ng/ml), and 28% of them had severe vitamin D deficiency (<15 ng/ml). Vitamin D concentration failed to correlate with clinical activity indexes (partial Mayo score: r = -0.143; Crohn's disease activity index: r = -0.253) and with inflammatory parameters (C-reactive protein: r = 0.008; erythrocyte sedimentation rate: r = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Since vitamin D deficiency can be frequently observed in Hungarian patients with inflammatory bowel disease, its level should be tested in these patients.

Eldecalcitol for the treatment of osteoporosis

Eldecalcitol (1α, 25-dihydroxy-2β-[3-hydroxypropyloxy] vitamin D₃; ED-71) is a new analog of the active form of vitamin D. Eldecalcitol has recently been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. In addition to regulation of calcium metabolism carried out by conventional vitamin D analogs, eldecalcitol possesses a strong inhibitory effect on bone resorption and causes a significant increase in bone mineral density. A Phase III clinical trial on osteoporosis showed that eldecalcitol reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures over 3 years by 26% compared with alfacalcidol. Although the overall risk of nonvertebral fractures was not reduced by eldecalcitol, the risk of wrist fracture was decreased significantly in the eldecalcitol group (71%) compared with the alfacalcidol group. The serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) was normalized by supplementation of native vitamin D in this trial, so the desirable effects on bone by eldecalcitol were considered to be derived from its distinctive pharmacological action. Increased blood calcium was observed in 21% of patients treated with eldecalcitol, and hypercalcemia (>11.5 mg/dL) occurred in 0.4% of eldecalcitol recipients, so serum calcium concentration should be monitored after starting eldecalcitol treatment. Eldecalcitol has dual effects on the metabolism of bone and calcium and is useful for the treatment of osteoporosis, especially for elderly patients (who frequently suffer from vitamin D deficiency). This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Why not use your own body weight to prevent falls? A randomized, controlled trial of balance therapy to prevent falls and fractures for elderly people who can stand on one leg for ≤15 s

BACKGROUND

Maintaining or improving motor (balance) ability is essential to extending the healthy lifespan of elderly people, and developing effective and efficient strategies to prevent falls of elderly people is an urgent. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of balance exercise on fall and fracture prevention for elderly people with poor balance.

METHODS

A 6-month, randomized controlled trial was conducted to verify whether one-leg standing with eyes open for a total of 1 min, three times a day (dynamic flamingo exercise) prevents falls and fractures. Setting and participants were elderly people ≥75 years of age and one-leg standing time ≤15.0 s living in their own home. They were visiting orthopaedic clinics for orthopaedic handicaps. Subjects with poor balance were allowed to hold on to something. If a subject's lifted leg touched the ground during the exercise, they were allowed to lift it again and continue so that they stood on one leg for a total of 60 s.

RESULTS

The dynamic flamingo exercise group (410 people; 86 men, 324 women) and the no exercise group (455 people; 78 men, 377 women) were compared. After dynamic flamingo exercise for 6 months, significant differences were seen in the increase in one-leg standing time with eyes open (men right/left, women right/left), in the improvement in independence in daily living (women), number of people who fell during the 6 months (women), and adverse events (women). The number of fractures was not significantly different for men or women.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic flamingo exercise prevents falls but no significant difference was demonstrated in fracture prevention in elderly women with poor balance.

A new active vitamin D3 analog, eldecalcitol, prevents the risk of osteoporotic fractures--a randomized, active comparator, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Eldecalcitol is an analog of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) that improves bone mineral density; however, the effect of eldecalcitol on the risk of fractures is unclear. The objective of this study is to examine whether eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in preventing osteoporotic fractures. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144456.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This 3 year randomized, double-blind, active comparator, superiority trial tested the efficacy of daily oral 0.75 μg eldecalcitol versus 1.0 μg alfacalcidol for prevention of osteoporotic fractures. 1054 osteoporotic patients 46 to 92 years old were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive eldecalcitol (n=528) or alfacalcidol (n=526). Patients were stratified by study site and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. Patients with low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (<50 nmol/L) were supplemented with 400 IU/day vitamin D(3). Primary end point was incident vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included any non-vertebral fractures and change in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. Compared with the alfacalcidol group, the incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in eldecalcitol group after 36 months of treatment (13.4 vs. 17.5%; hazard ratio, 0.74; predefined 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.97). Eldecalcitol reduced turnover markers and increased bone mineral density more strongly than alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol reduced the incidence of three major non-vertebral fractures, which was due to a marked reduction in wrist fractures by a post-hoc analysis (1.1 vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77). Among the adverse events, the incidence of increase in serum and urinary calcium was higher in the eldecalcitol group, without any difference in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Eldecalcitol is more efficacious than alfacalcidol in preventing vertebral and wrist fractures in osteoporotic patients with vitamin D sufficiency, with a safety profile similar to alfacalcidol.

Management of osteoporosis in patients hospitalized for hip fractures

Hip fracture is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden worldwide. It is also a major risk factor for a subsequent fracture. A literature search on the management of osteoporosis in patients with hip fracture was performed on the Medline database. Only one clinical drug trial was conducted in patients with a recent hip fracture. Further studies that specifically address post-fracture management of hip fracture are needed. The efficacy of anti-osteoporosis medication in older individuals and those at high risk of fall is reviewed in this paper. Adequate nutrition is vital for bone health and to prevent falls, especially in malnourished patients. Protein, calcium, and vitamin D supplementation is associated with increased hip BMD and a reduction in falls. Fall prevention, exercise, and balance training incorporated in a comprehensive rehabilitation program are essential to improve functional disability and survival. Exclusion of secondary causes of osteoporosis and treatment of coexistent medical conditions are also vital. Such a multidisciplinary team approach to the management of hip fracture patients is associated with a better clinical outcome. Although hip fracture is the most serious of all fractures, osteoporosis management should be prioritized to prevent deterioration of health and occurrence of further fracture.

Impaired regulatory T-cell homeostasis due to vitamin D deficiency in undifferentiated connective tissue disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a quantitative and functional analysis of natural CD4+CD25(high)Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (nTregs) and CD4+IL-17+ T cells, and to assess the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) before and after 5 weeks of 0.5 μg/day alfacalcidol supplementation.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with UCTD were enrolled in an open-label trial of alfacalcidol. Plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were assessed by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Flow cytometry was used for the quantification of nTregs and the IL-17 expression of T-helper (Th)17 cells. The serum concentrations of cytokines interleukin (IL)-12, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-23, IL-17, IL-6, and IL-10 were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Treatment with alfacalcidol raised 25(OH)D levels from a mean of 23.5 ± 5.6 to 34.5 ± 7.4 ng/mL (p = 0.059; NS). Alfacalcidol treatment decreased both Th1- (IL-12 and IFN-γ) and Th17-related (IL-23, IL-17, IL-6) cytokine levels in UCTD patients, while the soluble IL-10 level increased (IL-12: 156.7 ± 75.2 vs. 87.5 ± 42.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001; IFN-γ: 41.5 ± 12.0 vs. 21.7 ± 9.9 pg/mL, p < 0.001; IL-23: 385.2 ± 82.2 vs. 210.0 ± 69.3 pg/mL, p < 0.001; IL-17: 37.8 ± 9.6 vs. 17.8 ± 4.5 pg/mL, p = 0.009; IL-6: 39.4 ± 11.3 vs. 23.5 ± 6.3 pg/mL, p < 0.001, IL-10: 8.4 ± 3.0 vs. 21.4 ± 9.7 pg/mL, p < 0.001). Alfacalcidol improved the Th17/nTreg imbalance, as it inhibited the IL-17 expression of Th17 cells, and increased the number of nTregs. The alfacalcidol might increase the capacity of nTreg cells to suppress the proliferation of autologous CD4+CD25⁻ cells.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the idea that vitamin D influences the Th17/nTreg imbalance in vitamin D-insufficient patients with UCTD and could be beneficial in the management of the disease.

Vitamin D and bone health: potential mechanisms

Osteoporosis is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and significant economic and health costs. Vitamin D is a secosteriod hormone essential for calcium absorption and bone mineralization which is positively associated with bone mineral density [BMD]. It is well-established that prolonged and severe vitamin D deficiency leads to rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Sub-optimal vitamin D status has been reported in many populations but it is a particular concern in older people; thus there is clearly a need for effective strategies to optimise bone health. A number of recent studies have suggested that the role of vitamin D in preventing fractures may be via its mediating effects on muscle function (a defect in muscle function is one of the classical signs of rickets) and inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation can improve muscle strength which in turn contributes to a decrease in incidence of falls, one of the largest contributors to fracture incidence. Osteoporosis is often considered to be an inflammatory condition and pro-inflammatory cytokines have been associated with increased bone metabolism. The immunoregulatory mechanisms of vitamin D may thus modulate the effect of these cytokines on bone health and subsequent fracture risk. Vitamin D, therefore, may influence fracture risk via a number of different mechanisms.

[Austrian guidance for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women--update 2009]

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by diminished bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased fragility and subsequent increased fracture risk. Therapeutic measures therefore aim at reducing individual fracture risk. In Austria, the following drugs, all of which have been proven to reduce fracture risk, are currently registered for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: alendronate, risedronate, etidronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, teriparatide (1-34 PTH), 1-84 PTH, strontium ranelate and salmon calcitonin. Fluorides are still available, but their role in daily practice has become negligible. Currently, there is no evidence that a combination of two or more of these drugs could improve anti-fracture potency. However, treatment with PTH should be followed by the treatment with an anticatabolic drug such as bisphosphonates. Calcium and vitamin D constitute an important adjunct to any osteoporosis treatment.

The combination therapy with alfacalcidol and risedronate improves the mechanical property in lumbar spine by affecting the material properties in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis

Background

We conducted the present study to investigate the therapeutic effects of a combination treatment of alfacalcidol (ALF) and risedronate (RIS) on the bone mechanical properties of bone and calcium (Ca) metabolism using an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of osteoporosis.

Methods

Female Wistar rats were OVX- or sham-operated at 40 weeks of age. Twelve weeks post-surgery, rats were randomized into seven groups: 1) sham + vehicle, 2) OVX + vehicle, 3) OVX + ALF 0.025 μg/kg/day, 4) OVX + ALF 0.05 μg, 5) OVX + RIS 0.3 mg, 6) OVX + RIS 3.0 mg, 7) OVX + ALF 0.025 μg + RIS 0.3 mg. Each drug was administered orally five times a week for 12 weeks. After treatment, we evaluated the mechanical properties of the lumbar vertebra and femoral midshaft. In the lumbar vertebra, structural and material analyses were performed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and microbeam X-ray diffraction (micro-XRD), respectively. Biochemical markers in serum and urine were also determined.

Results

(1) With respect to improvement in the mechanical strength of the lumbar spine and the femoral midshaft, the combination treatment of ALF and RIS at their sub-therapeutic doses was more effective than each administered as a monotherapy; (2) In the suppression of bone resorption and the amelioration of microstructural parameters, the effects of ALF and RIS were considered to be independent and additive; (3) The improvement of material properties, such as microstructural parameters and the biological apatite (Bap) c-axis orientation, contributed to the reinforcement of spinal strength; and (4) The combination treatment of ALF and RIS normalized urinary Ca excretion, suggesting that this treatment ameliorated the changes in Ca metabolism.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that the combination treatment of ALF and RIS at their sub-therapeutic doses can improve the mechanical properties of the spine as well as the femur and ameliorate changes in Ca metabolism in an animal model of osteoporosis, suggesting that the combination treatment of ALF and RIS has a therapeutic advantage over each monotherapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D and related compounds have been used to prevent osteoporotic fractures in older people.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of vitamin D or related compounds, with or without calcium, for preventing fractures in older people.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and reference lists of articles. Most recent search: October 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing vitamin D or related compounds, alone or with calcium, against placebo, no intervention, or calcium alone, reporting fracture outcomes in older people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Data were pooled, where admissible, using the fixed-effect model, or random-effects model if heterogeneity between studies appeared high.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-five trials were included. Vitamin D alone appears unlikely to be effective in preventing hip fracture (nine trials, 24,749 participants, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.33), vertebral fracture (five trials, 9138 participants, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.92) or any new fracture (10 trials, 25,016 participants, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.09).Vitamin D with calcium reduces hip fractures (eight trials, 46,658 participants, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96). Although subgroup analysis by residential status showed a significant reduction in hip fractures in people in institutional care, the difference between this and the community-dwelling subgroup was not significant (P = 0.15).Overall hypercalcaemia is significantly more common in people receiving vitamin D or an analogue, with or without calcium (18 trials, 11,346 participants, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.59 to 3.47); this is especially true of calcitriol (four trials, 988 participants, RR 4.41, 95% CI 2.14 to 9.09). There is a modest increase in gastrointestinal symptoms (11 trials, 47,042 participants, RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08, P = 0.04) and a small but significant increase in renal disease (11 trials, 46,537 participants, RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Frail older people confined to institutions may sustain fewer hip fractures if given vitamin D with calcium. Vitamin D alone is unlikely to prevent fracture. Overall there is a small but significant increase in gastrointestinal symptoms and renal disease associated with vitamin D or its analogues. Calcitriol is associated with an increased incidence of hypercalcaemia.

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography is useful to monitor response to alendronate therapy in postmenopausal women

A forearm fracture (Colles' fracture) is often the first sign of osteoporosis and may suggest underlying skeletal fragility. Therefore, establishment of a more accurate and reliable method for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius would be beneficial for patients who suffer from osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to monitor the response to alendronate therapy at the distal radius in early postmenopausal Japanese women. Thirty-two early postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia were randomized to either alendronate or control treatment. We analyzed the BMD of the distal radius by pQCT, lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the biochemical markers of bone turnover (deoxypyridinoline) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. The control group showed a significant decrease from baseline in the trabecular BMD of the radius at 12 months (3.5 +/- 3.7%; p < 0.01), whereas the alendronate group showed a significant increase (4.3 +/- 8.1%). The changes in the trabecular BMD of the radius between the alendronate and control groups were statistically different at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.01). However, in the total BMD at the diaphysis of the radius, no significant differences were seen in the changes in bone densities between the alendronate and control groups after 1 year of treatment. pQCT detected significant differences in BMD of the radius in early postmenopausal women after 1 year of treatment with alendronate. Collectively, our preliminary clinical trial showed that pQCT might be useful to monitor response to alendronate therapy, especially at the radius, and it might explain why alendronate prevents Colles' fracture.

Effects of risedronate or alfacalcidol on bone mineral density, bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in Japanese men with primary osteoporosis: results of a two-year strict observational study

Although osteoporosis in men is already a major public health problem, there is still a dearth of data about the effects of risedronate in male osteoporosis, especially in Japanese with primary osteoporosis. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the effects of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in these patients prospectively for two years (at baseline, three months, six months, twelve months, and twenty-four months) both longitudinally and compared with those of alfacalcidol. The subjects enrolled for this study were 66 Japanese male patients with untreated primary osteoporosis (mean age 63.52 +/- 8.7 years), who were divided into two groups (44 with risedronate and 22 with alfacalcidol). We measured BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at three sites-the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal radius. Risedronate treatment significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine and at the femoral neck, reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), and reduced back pain, both longitudinally and compared with alfacalcidol treatment. We observed a lower rate of incident fracture in risedronate users. However, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that this trend was not statistically significant, possibly because of the small number of patients enrolled. These potentially beneficial effects of risedronate on bone in male patients with primary osteoporosis suggest the possibility that osteoporosis should be treated with risedronate regardless of gender in order to effectively prevent subsequent osteoporotic fractures.

Efficacy of combined treatment with raloxifene and alfacalcidol on bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Because both raloxifene (RLX) and alfacalcidol (ALF) have been established as therapeutic agents for osteoporosis, it is tempting to speculate that the combination therapy of RLX and ALF might provide benefits over that of either one alone. However, the efficacy of the combination therapy has not been reported yet. The purpose of this study was thus to assess the efficacy of the combination therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Sixty postmenopausal patients (mean age 71.62 +/- 9.9 years) with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study, and were randomly divided into two groups by therapeutic regimen. Group A consisted of 28 patients treated with RLX plus ALF, while Group B consisted of 32 patients with RLX alone. Among them, 20 in group A and 22 in group B completed this study. Contrary to our expectations, at either 6 months or 12 months after the initiation of treatment, RLX plus ALF did not increase BMD at any of the skeletal sites measured, including lumbar spine, femur, and radius, nor did it reduce bone-specific alkaline phosphatase or N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen more than RLX alone. Our results do not support the hypothesis that the combination therapy of RLX and ALF exerts more beneficial effects on bone compared than with RLX alone. However, it still remains unclear from this study whether the combination therapy of RLX and ALF is more efficacious in preventing fractures compared with RLX alone. Further studies are needed to clarify these issues.

Systematic review of the benefits and harms of calcitriol and alfacalcidol for fractures and falls

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review on the benefits and harms of calcitriol and alfacalcidol in the reduction of fracture and fall risk. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these agents to placebo or calcium and reporting fracture and fall incidence were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Twenty-three RCTs were included (2139 participants), and 16 trials had sufficient data for meta-analysis. Vertebral fractures were not significantly reduced based on the combined results of 13 trials; however, subgroup analyses demonstrated a significant reduction with alfacalcidol [odds ratio (OR) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25-0.98], but not with calcitriol. There was a significant reduction in nonvertebral fractures (six trials, OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.88), and falls (two trials, OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.44-0.98). There was an increased risk of hypercalcemia (OR = 3.63, 95% CI, 1.51-8.73) and a trend toward an increased risk of hypercalciuria. There is evidence to suggest that these agents may reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures and falls; however, their benefit on vertebral fracture reduction may depend on the type of active vitamin D. Hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria are potential side effects.

Estimating the Effects of Time-Varying Treatments

BACKGROUND

In the absence of unmeasured confounding, standard methods for estimating the effects of time-varying treatments on an event are biased when a time-dependent risk factor for the event also predicts subsequent treatments and when past treatment history predicts subsequent risk factor levels. In contrast, structural models provide unbiased estimates of effects when unmeasured confounding is absent.

METHODS

We describe a multiplicative structural mean model and use it to estimate the effects of time-varying osteoporosis treatments on incidence of fractures among 1328 postmenopausal women over 40 years of age in a hospital-based cohort study in Japan. The parameters of the structural mean model are estimated by g-estimation.

RESULTS

The number of vertebral fractures and bone mineral density levels predicted the selection of subsequent treatments and were affected by the previous treatments. Incidence rate ratios of bisphosphonates, active vitamin D3, and conjugated estrogen compared with no drug therapy were 0.58 (95% confidence interval = 0.44-0.77), 0.82 (0.48-1.38), and 0.60 (0.47-0.76), respectively, after adjusting time-dependent confounders. For initial treatments estimated by the standard Poisson-GEE, incidence rate ratios were 1.61 (1.23-2.10), 1.16 (0.96-1.40), and 0.73 (0.52-1.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis using the structural mean model showed that bisphosphonates, active vitamin D3, and conjugated estrogen all had preventive effects on the incidence of fractures by appropriate adjustments for time-dependent confounders. The results from standard Poisson-GEE analysis were the opposite of these results and of evidence from randomized trials. We consider our methods useful to estimate time-varying treatments within observational data.

Ethnic Variation in Risk for Osteoporosis among Women: A Review of Biological and Behavioral Factors

Most studies of risk factors for osteoporosis and nontraumatic fracture involve white women, although more research is being geared toward bone health among various ethnic groups. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of health disparity in osteoporosis, including assessment of bone mineral density (BMD), bone health screening, lifestyle risk factors, and treatment involving white, black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American women. This review summarizes evidence that white, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American women are more at risk for osteoporosis than black women. These conclusions are supported by the disparity in BMD between white and black women, although the reason for this biological difference is not well characterized. Additional research is needed to determine if there is a significant difference in BMD among Hispanic, Asian, and Native American women independent of body weight and size. Similarly, there is also disparity in fracture rates, with the causes presumed to be multifactorial. Calcium intake is lower than recommended in all females at all ages; however, it is much lower in black and Native American women and highest in white and Hispanic women. Black women also have a lower vitamin D status than white women, with mean vitamin D status of Hispanic American women lying between that of black and white women. Similarly, although white women are more active than black and Hispanic women at all ages, data are lacking about physical activity habits of women of other ethnic backgrounds and how this impacts bone health. Finally, screening protocols for women of various ethnicities and effectiveness of treatments are not well established and remain a priority in women's health.

Randomized trial comparing low-dose hormone replacement therapy and HRT plus 1alpha-OH-vitamin D3 (alfacalcidol) for treatment of postmenopausal bone loss

We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label 2-year trial with 76 postmenopausal women aged > or =60 years with low (T-score less than -1) lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). The hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group received a low dose of conjugated estrogen (CEE) at a dose of 0.31 mg/day +/- medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg/day. Group HRT/D received the same dose of HRT together with alfacalcidol in a daily dose of 1.0 microg/day. Changes in lumbar BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were followed every 6 months for 2 years. The lumbar BMD of group HRT increased 3.37% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6%-5.2%], 4.00% (95%CI 1.6%-6.4%), and 2.32% (95%CI -0.7% to 5.3%) at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively, when the baseline value was taken as 0%. Lumbar BMD of group HRT/D showed a significant increase beyond 6 months. The percent increases for this group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 6.18 (95%CI 1.3%-6.6%), 6.18% (95%CI 3.9%-8.5%), 7.17% (95%CI 4.3%-10.0%), and 8.75% (95%CI 6.0%-11.5%), respectively. In addition, there was a significant difference in the changes of the lumbar BMD between the two groups at 24 months, suggesting that the combination of HRT and alfacalcidol is more effective than HRT alone in terms of the BMD effect. This study is the first prospective trial demonstrating an additive effect of alfacalcidol on lumbar BMD in postmenopausal women receiving low-dose HRT. It suggests that the combination therapy can be considered to be a promising mode of treatment for bone loss after menopause.

Effects of alfacalcidol alone or in combination with elcatonin on incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with spondylosis

Osteoporosis and spondylosis often occur simultaneously. However, there are no previous reports about the effects of osteoporosis medication on incidence of vertebral fractures in people with spondylosis. In this study, we conducted a retrospective investigation of the effects of alfacalcidol alone or in combination with elcatonin on incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women with spondylosis. The present subjects were 101 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged >60 years, divided into three groups: D group (n = 45), treated for >5 years with alfacalcidol; D+ECT group (n = 26), treated for >5 years with alfacalcidol plus elcatonin; control group (n = 30), who received no medications for >5 years. Over the 5-year treatment period, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur did not significantly change in the D and D+ECT groups, but they significantly decreased in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of incident vertebral fractures per patient was significantly higher in the control group (2.9) than in the D group (1.2) and D+ECT group (1.5) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in BMD or incident vertebral fractures between the D and D+ECT groups. In all three groups, the number of incident vertebral fractures positively correlated with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures (0.303 </= r </= 0.434), and negatively correlated with baseline BMD (-0.703 </= r </= -0.326) and the osteophyte score representing the degree of spondylosis (-0.769 </= r </= -0.365). Further multiple regression analysis revealed that the medication (D or D+ECT, P < 0.001) and the osteophyte score (P < 0.001) were the most significant contributors for the number of incident vertebral fractures. In conclusion, elcatonin had no additive effects on BMD or prevention of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women receiving alfacalcidol. Presence of spondylosis (indicated by a high osteophyte score) appears to have an effect on prevention of vertebral fractures.

Superiority of alfacalcidol compared to vitamin D plus calcium in lumbar bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis

In a randomized multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study a comparison of the efficacy and safety of 1 microg alfacalcidol to 880 IU vitamin D plus calcium carbonate (1 g calcium) once daily per os was performed on 148 postmenopausal osteoporotic Caucasian patients with normal vitamin D serum levels for 18 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline, 12 and 18 months. Safety parameters were followed during the entire study period. Sixty-nine (90.8%) in the alfacalcidol group and 67 (93.1%) in the vitamin D group were included in the ITT analysis. Lumbar BMD in the alfacalcidol group increased by 0.017 g/cm2 (2.33%) and 0.021 g/cm2 (2.87%) from baseline (P<0.001) at 12 and 18 months, respectively, whereas in the vitamin D plus calcium group the increase was 0.005 g/cm2 (0.70%) from baseline (N.S.) at both 12 and 18 months. The higher changes from baseline in the alfacalcidol group, as compared to the changes in the vitamin D plus calcium group at both 12 and 18 months, were found to be statistically significant (P=0.018, 0.005). A small increase of mean femoral BMD was achieved in both groups (N.S.). Adverse events were similar in both groups. No significant differences were noted between the groups in serum calcium. In conclusion, alfacalcidol was found to be superior in significantly increasing lumbar BMD as compared to vitamin D plus calcium while safety characteristics were found to be similar in both treatments.

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post-menopausal osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D and related compounds have been used to prevent fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of vitamin D or analogues, with or without calcium, in the prevention of fractures in older people.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and reference lists of articles. Most recent search: March 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing vitamin D or an analogue, alone or with calcium, against placebo, no intervention, or calcium, reporting fracture outcomes, in older people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Data were pooled, where admissible, using the fixed-effect model, or random-effects model if the relative risks were heterogeneous.

MAIN RESULTS

Vitamin D alone showed no statistically significant effect on hip fracture (seven trials, 18,668 participants, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.41), vertebral fracture (four trials, 5698 participants, RR (random effects) 1.13, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.55) or any new fracture (eight trials, 18,903 participants, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09). Vitamin D with calcium marginally reduced hip fractures (seven trials, 10,376 participants, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.96), non-vertebral fractures (seven trials, 10,376 participants, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97), but there was no evidence of effect of vitamin D with calcium on vertebral fractures. The effect appeared to be restricted to those living in institutional care. Hypercalcaemia was more common when vitamin D or its analogues was given compared with placebo or calcium (14 trials, 8035 participants, RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.71). The risk was particularly high with calcitriol (three trials, 742 participants, RR 14.94, 95% CI 2.95 to 75.61). There was no evidence that vitamin D increased gastro-intestinal symptoms (seven trials, 10,188 participants, RR (random effects) 1.03, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36) or renal disease (nine trials, 10,107 participants, RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.87).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Frail older people confined to institutions may sustain fewer hip and other non-vertebral fractures if given vitamin D with calcium supplements. Effectiveness of vitamin D alone in fracture prevention is unclear. There is no evidence of advantage of analogues of vitamin D compared with vitamin D. Calcitriol may be associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects. Dose, frequency, and route of administration of vitamin D in older people require further investigation.

D-hormone analog alfacalcidol: an update on its role in post-menopausal osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis management

Alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3) is a non-endogenous analog of vitamin D which can bypass the renal and intestinal regulatory mechanisms that control the production of calcitriol (1,25-hydroxyvitamin D3, the active form of vitamin D, D-Hormone). Alfacalcidol may be metabolized into calcitriol with a limited risk of hypercalcemia. Alfacalcidol and calcitriol have been evaluated in animal and human studies assessing their effects on bone mineral density and fracture rates. More recently, they have been shown to produce beneficial effects in muscle, immune system, and autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. This paper discusses the therapeutic efficacy of alfacalcidol in reports in which it has been proposed as an interesting alternative to vitamin D or calcitriol. Some recent findings about general metabolism and regulation of vitamin D and its analogs are discussed. The biological and clinical effects of alfacalcidol in post-menopausal osteoporosis are reviewed, followed by critical appraisal of its efficacy in preventing bone loss and falls in the elderly. The last two sections discuss the role of D analogs in regulating the immune system, with particular regard to rheumatoid arthritis. The main results of this review show that alfacalcidol may have a wider range of therapeutic applicability, beyond simply restricting it to patients in hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis with high serum levels of intact PTH.

Vitamin D analogs versus native vitamin D in preventing bone loss and osteoporosis-related fractures: a comparative meta-analysis

It has been suggested that early postmenopausal women and patients treated with steroids should receive preventive therapy (calcium, vitamin D, vitamin D analogs, estrogens, or bisphosphonates) to preserve their bone mineral density (BMD) and to avoid fragility fractures. We designed the present study to compare the effects of native vitamin D to its hydroxylated analogs alfacalcidol 1-alpha(OH)D and calcitriol 1,25(OH)(2)D. All randomized, controlled, double-blinded trials comparing oral native vitamin D and its analogs, alfacalcidol or calcitriol, to placebo or head-to-head trials in primary or corticosteroids-induced osteoporosis were included in the meta-analysis. Sources included the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and a hand search of abstracts and references lists. The study period January 1985 to January 2003. Data were abstracted by two investigators, and methodological quality was assessed in a similar manner. Heterogeneity was extensively investigated. Results were expressed as effect-size (ES) for bone loss and as rate difference (RD) for fracture while allocated to active treatment or control. Publication bias was investigated. Fourteen studies of native vitamin D, nine of alfacalcidol, and ten of calcitriol fit the inclusion criteria. The two vitamin D analogs appeared to exert a higher preventive effect on bone loss and fracture rates in patients not exposed to glucocorticoids. With respect to BMD, vitamin D analogs versus placebo studies had an ES of 0.36 (P < 0.0001), whereas native vitamin D versus placebo had an ES of 0.17 (P = 0.0005), the interclass difference being highly significant (ANOVA-1, P < 0.05). When restricted to the lumbar spine, this intertreatment difference remained significant: ES = 0.43 (P = 0.0002) for vitamin D analogs and ES = 0.21 (P = 0.001) for native vitamin D (analysis of variance [ANOVA-1], P = 0.047). There were no significant differences regarding their efficacies on other measurement sites (ANOVA-1, P = 0.36). When comparing the adjusted global relative risks for fracture when allocated to vitamin D analogs or native vitamin D, alfacalcidol and calcitriol provided a more marked preventive efficacy against fractures: RD = 10% (95% Confidence interval [CI-2] to 17) compared to RD = 2% (95% CI, 1 to 2), respectively. The analysis of the spinal and nonspinal showed that fracture rates differed between the two classes, thereby confirming the benefits of vitamin D analogs, with significant 13.4% (95% CI 7.7 to 19.8) and. 6% (95% CI 1 to 12) lower fracture rates for vitamin D analogs, respectively. In patients receiving corticosteroid therapy, both treatments provided similar global ESs for BMD: ES = 0.38 for vitamin D analogs and ES = 0.41 for native vitamin D (ANOVA-1, P = 0.88). When restriced to spinal BMD, D analogs provided significant effects, whereas native vitamin D did not: ES = 0.43 (P < 0.0001) and ES = 0.33 (P = 0.21), respectively. The intertreatment difference was nonsignificant (ANOVA-1, P = 0.52). Neither D analogs for native vitamin D significantly prevented fractures in this subcategory of patients: RD = 2.6 (95%CI, -9.5 to 4.3) and RD = 6.4 (95%CI, -2.3 to 10), respectively. In head-to-head studies comparing D analogs and native vitamin D in patients receiving corticosteroids, significant effects favoring D analogs were found for femoral neck BMD: ES = 0.31 at P = 0.02 and spinal fractures: RD = 15% (95%CI, 6.5 to 25). Publication bias was not significant. Our analysis demonstrates a superiority of the D analogs atfacalcidol and calcitriol in preventing bone loss and spinal fractures in primary osteoporosis, including postmenopausal women. In corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, the efficacy of D analogs differed depending on the comparative approach: indirect comparisons led to nonsignificant differences, whereas direct comparison did provide significant differences. In this setting, D analogs seem to prevent spinal fractures to a greater extent than do native vitamin D, but this assumption should be confirmed on a comprehensive basis in multiarm studies including an inactive comparator.

Prevention and therapy of osteoporosis: the roles of plain vitamin D and alfacalcidol

Severe vitamin D deficiency was identified only in the first decades of the last century as the most common aetiology of rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. It was later shown that vitamin D is not, as had been supposed, the biologically active principle for healing bone disease but must be hydroxylated in the liver and then finally in the kidney to become 1alpha,25-dihydroxy-cholecalciferol, a biologically highly active renal hormone. This study reviews the various principles, mechanisms, and approaches to the treatment of different forms of osteoporosis using vitamin D, alfacalcidol, and calcitriol therapy regimens.

Effect of treatment with oral calcitriol on calcium metabolism and fasting serum 25(OH)- or 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D level in Japanese postmenopausal women

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of daily oral administration of calcitriol on calcium metabolism in Japanese postmenopausal women. For this purpose, we administered 0.5 microg of daily calcitriol to 18 Japanese postmenopausal women for up to 24 weeks. During the first 28 days, daily administration of 0.5 microg of oral calcitriol increased fasting serum 1,25(OH) 2D levels significantly in 9 women (Group B) (p<0.005), while no significant change was seen in another 9 women without calcitriol administration (Group A). The first 28-day calcitriol supplement increased fasting urinary calcium excretion (urinary Ca/Cr) from 0.133 +/- 0.072 to 0.171 +/- 0.089 (p<0.05) and fractional excretion of calcium (FECa) without changing serum Ca2+. Urinary NTx/Cr excretion, an index of bone resorption, decreased significantly from 64.8 +/- 24.5 to 50.3 +/- 27.2 nMBCE/mMCr in Group B. Following the 28-day control period, 0.5 microg of oral calcitriol was also administered to women in Group A for another 20 weeks. At the end of the 24-week investigation period, the effects of oral calcitriol on urinary calcium excretion and bone resorption were still significant in both Group A and B. A positive correlation was found between urinary Ca/Cr and NTx/Cr excretion at the start (r = 0.657, p<0.05), but this correlation was lost by calcitriol treatment (r = 0.135). These results indicated that calcitriol supplement was effective in suppressing bone resorption in postmenopausal women, and that an increased fasting urinary calcium excretion due to calcitriol supplement was predominantly caused by increased intestinal calcium absorption in these women.

Pharmacokinetics of doxercalciferol, a new vitamin D analogue that lowers parathyroid hormone

BACKGROUND

This is the first detailed pharmacokinetic report published on the administration of doxercalciferol [1alpha(OH)D(2)] recently introduced to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

1alpha(OH)D(2) was administered in a range of single and multiple doses to volunteers with and without normal renal and/or hepatic function. Subsequent serial blood samples were assayed by HPLC/radioimmunoassay for the metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(2) [1,25(OH)(2)D(2)], the major active species.

RESULTS

Bioavailability of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) from a single 5 micro g 1alpha(OH)D(2) oral-capsule dose was estimated to be normally approximately 42% of that from a 5 micro g intravenous injection. Steady-state serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) were attainable within 8 day, and fluctuated approximately 2.5-fold from peak to trough when oral 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses were taken every second day, and the terminal half-life was 34+/-14 h. Mean steady-state serum concentrations rose less than proportionally (from 20 to 45 pg/ml) on increasing oral 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses from 5 to 15 micro g every 48 h. Renal patients showed 39+/-37% increase in serum 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) concentration during 3-4 h haemodialysis sessions, but no other difference in steady-state pharmacokinetics was found between these or hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the sensitivity limits of current assays, the pharmacokinetics of this and other vitamin-D compounds is best elucidated from steady-state studies. The pharmacokinetics of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) from 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses appears to be similar to that of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) from 1alpha(OH)D(3) doses, albeit D(3) data have to date largely derived from single-dose studies. Deviation of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) pharmacokinetics from linearity appears to be marginal enough to be clinically manageable with adequate precaution.

Comparison of incadronate and alfacalcidol on increased bone turnover caused by ovariectomy in rats

Mineral density of trabecular bone at the metaphyses of right tibiae was measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in ovariectomized rats. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreased dramatically in the 4 weeks following ovariectomy, suggesting that the method is sensitive enough to detect decreased bone mineral density within a short period. Orally administered incadronate dose dependently inhibited the decrease in trabecular bone mineral density induced by ovariectomy, as assessed 4 weeks after surgery. Significant inhibition was observed at doses of more than 0.3 mg/kg/day. Moreover, incadronate at doses of 1 mg/kg or more inhibited the increase in urinary deoxypyridinoline levels induced by ovariectomy, and although slightly increased serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were observed, no significant alteration in serum calcium ion levels or urinary calcium excretion occurred. In contrast, while alfacalcidol inhibited the decrease in bone mineral density and the increase in urinary deoxypyridinoline levels at a dose of 300 ng/kg, it significantly lowered serum intact PTH levels and elevated serum free calcium levels as well as urinary calcium excretion. These results suggest that incadronate exerts its pharmacological effect (inhibition of bone resorption and increase in bone mass) by a mechanism different from that of alfacacidol.

Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis

The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of fracture probability at which interventions become cost-effective. We modeled the effects of a treatment costing $500/year, given for 5 years, that decreased the risk of all osteoporotic fractures by 35%, followed by a waning of effect for 5 years. Sensitivity analyses included a range of effectiveness (10%-50%) and a range of intervention costs (200-500 dollars/year). Data on costs and risks were from Sweden. Costs included direct costs and costs in added years of life, but excluded indirect costs due to morbidity. A threshold for cost-effectiveness of 60,000 dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was used. Costs of added years were excluded in a sensitivity analysis for which a threshold value of 30,000 dollars per QALY was used. In the base case, intervention was cost-effective when treatment was targeted to women at average risk at age of >or=65 years. Irrespective of the efficacy modeled (10%-50%) or of cost of intervention (200-500 dollars/year) segments of the population at average risk could be targeted cost-effectively: The lower the intervention cost and the higher the effectiveness, the lower the age at which intervention was cost-effective. With the base case (500 dollars/year; 35% efficacy) treatment in women was cost-effective with a 10 year hip fracture probability that ranged from 1.4% at the age of 50 years to 4.4% at the age of 65 years. The exclusion of osteoporotic fractures other than hip fracture would increase the threshold to a 9%-11% 10 year probability because of the substantial morbidity from fractures other than hip fracture, particularly at younger ages. We conclude that the inclusion of all osteoporotic fractures has a marked effect on intervention thresholds, that these vary with age, and that available treatments can be cost-effectively targeted to individuals at moderately increased risk.

Optimal age for preventing osteoporosis after menopause depends on effects of stopping treatment

The aim of this study was to model the effect of short (3 year) treatments for osteoporosis at different times after menopause on the risk of osteoporotic fracture and to assess the impact of strategies to target high-risk individuals. Treatment efficacy for hip, proximal forearm, shoulder, and spine fracture were computed from the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture in women from Sweden. Treatment that increased hip bone mineral density by 6% over untreated women saved 126 vertebral, hip, proximal humerus, and forearm fractures per 1000 women at the age of 50 years, provided that the effects of treatment persisted. Targeting women with osteoporosis at this age would save an additional 50% of fractures. With age, the number of fractures saved decreased moderately. At the age of 70 years, 133 fractures would be saved in women with osteoporosis compared to 198 in women with osteoporosis at the age of 50 years. Where the effect of treatment was assumed to wear off over 20 years after stopping treatment, the efficacy of treatment was reduced at all ages, but most markedly at the age of 50 years. Where all women aged 50 years were treated, the number of fractures saved per 1000 women decreased from 127 to 15 and, in the case of targeting women with osteoporosis, decreased from 198 to 27 per 1000 women. By contrast, with a persisting effect of treatment, the number of fractures saved increased markedly with advancing age. If all women were targeted at the age of 50 years, 15 fractures would be saved, whereas this increased to 55 per 1000 women at the age of 70 years. When treatment effects wore off more rapidly with an offset half-time of 2.5 years only 5 fractures were saved per 1000 women at the age of 50 years. This figure rose to 23 per 1000 at the age of 70 years. We conclude that, although uncertainty exists concerning the offset of effect of treatments, treatments should be optimally given to women without prior fractures in later life.

Additive effect of alfacalcidol on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in Taiwanese postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement therapy and calcium supplementation: a randomized 2-year study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy and calcium supplement.

DESIGN

A randomized, prospective 2-year clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

A total of 240 postmenopausal women were enrolled with randomized assignment of 120 patients to each treatment group (the D + E group of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 + sequential combined HRT + calcium supplement; the E group: sequential combined HRT + calcium supplement). None of the patients had received HRT for menopausal syndrome or osteoporosis before being enrolled in our study. Serum biochemical assays, electrolytes and calcitonin were performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) of L2-L4 was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the initial assessment and after 12 and 24 months of treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients (87.5%) in the D + E group and 92 patients (76.7%) in the E group completed the first 1-year study. Ninety-six patients (80%) in the D + E group and 80 patients (66.7%) in the E group completed the 2-year trial. Renal function, liver function, electrolytes and calcitonin showed no significant changes during the first year of follow-up. In the D + E group, the BMD of L2-4 increased 3.24 +/- 0.32% from baseline after 1 year (P < 0.05) and 5.32 +/- 0.23% after 2 years of treatment (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the changes of BMD in the E group were 1.12 +/- 0.34% after 1 year (P < 0.05) and 2.42 +/- 0.26% after 2 years of treatment (P < 0.05). The changes of BMD of L2-L4 of the D + E group were higher than the changes of the E group after both 1 and 2 years of treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that combination of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 with HRT is superior to HRT alone for the preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women under calcium supplementation.

Targeting of hormone replacement therapy immediately after menopause

The aim of this study was to model the effect of short (3-year) treatments with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at the time of menopause on the risk of osteoporotic fracture, and to assess the impact of strategies to target high-risk individuals. From the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk, treatment that increased bone mineral density at the hip by 6% over untreated women would save 35 vertebral, 62 hip, 13 proximal humeral, and 16 forearm fractures per 1000 women. The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one of these fractures was 8. The NNT fell modestly by targeting HRT to women with low bone mass or osteoporosis (NNT 6 and 5, respectively). The gains in fractures saved from targeting women with low bone mass or osteoporosis were offset by the requirement for assessment by BMD. Changes in the assumptions about the efficacy of HRT had a modest impact on fractures saved compared with the effect of changing assumptions concerning the offset of effect when treatment was stopped. We conclude that comparatively short courses of HRT might be effectively offered to all suitable women at menopause provided that the effects on bone persist when treatment is stopped.

Preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A review of recent controlled trials of antiresorptive agents

The evidence from randomised, controlled trials of the ability of antiresorptive treatments to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is reviewed and summarised. The aminobisphosphonates, alendronic acid and risedronic acid, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene have all been shown to reduce the incidence of radiographic vertebral fractures. Only alendronic acid and risedronic acid have been shown to reduce the incidence of non-spine fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is evidence of antifracture efficacy for calcium plus vitamin D, primarily in a nursing home setting or in people with low intakes of these nutrients. Furthermore, since both the placebo and active treatment groups received calcium and vitamin D in most controlled trials of antiresorptive agents, it appears that the other agents provide benefits beyond those of calcium and vitamin D alone. There is insufficient published evidence from randomised controlled trials to convincingly support the antifracture efficacy of other agents, including calcitonin, estrogen and etidronic acid, at this time. Data from observational studies suggest, however, that estrogen and etidronic acid may have antifracture efficacy in this population.

Vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) effectively prevents fractures and sustains lumbar bone mineral density in osteoporosis

We attempted to investigate whether vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) treatment effectively prevents the incidence of new fractures in osteoporosis. A total of 241 osteoporotic patients were enrolled in a 24-month randomized open label study. The control group (without treatment; n = 121) and the vitamin K2-treated group (n = 120), which received 45 mg/day orally vitamin K2, were followed for lumbar bone mineral density (LBMD; measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) and occurrence of new clinical fractures. Serum level of Glu-osteocalcin (Glu-OC) and menaquinone-4 levels were measured at the end of the follow-up period. Serum level of OC and urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (DPD) were measured before and after the treatment. The background data of these two groups were identical. The incidence of clinical fractures during the 2 years of treatment in the control was higher than the vitamin K2-treated group (chi2 = 10.935; p = 0.0273). The percentages of change from the initial value of LBMD at 6, 12, and 24 months after the initiation of the study were -1.8 +/- 0.6%, -2.4 +/- 0.7%, and -3.3 +/- 0.8% for the control group, and 1.4 +/- 0.7%, -0.1 +/- 0.6%, and -0.5 +/- 1.0% for the vitamin K2-treated group, respectively. The changes in LBMD at each time point were significantly different between the control and the treated group (p = 0.0010 for 6 months, p = 0.0153 for 12 months, and p = 0.0339 for 24 months). The serum levels of Glu-OC at the end of the observation period in the control and the treated group were 3.0 +/- 0.3 ng/ml and 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), while the serum level of OC measured by the conventional radioimmunoassay (RIA) showed a significant rise (42.4 +/-6.9% from the basal value) in the treated group at 24 months (18.2 +/- 6.1% for the controls;p = 0.0081). There was no significant change in urinary DPD excretion in the treated group. These findings suggest that vitamin K2 treatment effectively prevents the occurrence of new fractures, although the vitamin K2-treated group failed to increase in LBMD. Furthermore, vitamin K2 treatment enhances gamma-carboxylation of the OC molecule.

Osteoporosis. Medical prevention and treatment

Osteoporosis is a bone disorder characterized by deficient bone mass and fragility fractures of the hip, wrist, and spine. The therapeutic strategies for treating osteoporosis are designed to maximize peak bone mass through proper nutrition, appropriate intake of calcium and vitamin D, maintenance of physiologic menstrual cycles, and a program of weight bearing and strengthening exercises. For the conditions of high bone turnover--osteoporosis in which osteoclastic resorption is increased--efficacious treatment options include hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, and bisphosphonates. Osteoporosis with low bone turnover results from deficient osteoblastic bone formation and responds to the experimental drug programs of fluoride, parathyroid hormone, and parathyroid hormone related peptide analogues. Determination of bone density defines the patient's current condition, measurement of the level of N-telopeptides (collagen breakdown products) predicts the patient's future regarding osteoporotic fractures, and the presence of risk factors for hip fracture establish the therapeutic window for treatment.