Suburban Families' Experience With Food Insecurity Screening in Primary Care Practices

Food insecurity and pediatric HIV: patient perspectives on clinical solutions

Food insecurity is a prevalent social determinant of health for people living with HIV and is associated with suboptimal treatment outcomes. While clinic-based efforts to address food insecurity have increased over the past decade, few studies have explored the perspectives of paitents and caregivers managing chronic illnesses such as HIV. Caregiver insights are particularly critical in pediatric HIV care, where caregivers often play a central role in screening and referral processes. This study examined the experiences of adolescents and young adults living with HIV and caregivers of children with HIV, to inform screening and referral practices within a pediatric palliative care clinic in Atlanta, GA. We conducted audio-recorded, in-depth interviews (n = 14) and focus groupswith 10 patients and caregivers living with food insecurity. Thematic analysis, guided by our interview topics, revealed five key themes: (1) trust in providers, (2) coping by "making it work", (3) barriers to healthy eating, (4) challenges to medication adherence, and (5) recommendations for cross-sector resource connection. Our findings underscore the need for partnerships between clinics and community-based organizations, bolstered by structural and systems-level interventions and policies, to promote food security and well-being for pediatric patients in complex care settings.

Medical-financial partnerships for improving financial and medical outcomes for lower-income Americans: A systematic review

Background

Poverty is considered one of the social determinants of health (i.e., a range of social and environmental conditions that affect health and well-being) because of its association with significant health problems. In recent years, healthcare settings have emerged as focal points for poverty interventions with direct health implications. Medical institutions are increasingly implementing financial partnerships to provide interventions targeted at improving the financial well-being of patients with the dual objective of boosting appointment attendance rates and alleviating financial burdens on patients. While medical-financial partnerships (MFPs) appear to be growing in popularity, it is unclear if these interventions positively impact financial and/or health outcomes.

Objectives

The purpose of this review is to inform policy and practice relevant to MFPs by analyzing and synthesizing empirical evidence related to their health and financial outcomes. The primary objectives of this review is to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the extent and quality of MFP intervention research? (2) What are the effects on financial outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings? (3) What are the effects on health-related outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings?

Search Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search for published and gray literature from September to December 2023. We searched for and retrieved published studies from Google, Google Scholar, and 10 Electronic databases. We also searched five relevant websites and two trial registries for registered studies. We harvested from the reference lists of included studies and conducted forward citation searching using Google Scholar. Lastly, we contacted the first authors of the four included studies and requested information about unpublished studies, studies in progress, and published studies potentially missed in the other search activities.

Selection Criteria

Studies eligible for this review met the following criteria. First, studies must have used a prospective randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental (QED) research design with parallel cohorts. Second, studies must have involved an intervention that provides financial services on-site within a healthcare setting. Third, the studies must have measured a financial outcome. Fourth, to meet the criteria for on-site financial services, interventions must have included at least one of the following: (1) financial education, counseling or coaching, (2) credit counseling, or (3) the provision of services that assist patients to access financial products or services, such as free tax preparation services, or (4) services to increase income, such as screening for public benefits and assistance with the application process, as well as employment services (e.g., assistance with resume writing and job interviewing skills). Health-related outcomes were extracted and analyzed, but were not required for eligibility.

Data Collection and Analysis

Searches were saved in the reference management software EndNote2, and duplicates were removed and uploaded to Rayyan. Four reviewers then completed title and abstract screening on 66,807 entries in Rayyan. Three reviewers independently reviewed the 26 articles that were moved forward for full-text screening. A fourth reviewer reviewed discrepancies and made the final decision to include or exclude. Four studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were retained for data extraction using a standardized extraction form. Because the included studies did not measure and report sufficient data to calculate effect sizes for similar outcomes, quantitative synthesis was not possible. Effect sizes were calculated when possible, and study outcomes were described.

Main Results

Of the four unique studies included in this review, two were randomized control trials and two were QEDs. Three of the four studies were conducted in pediatric settings. Two of the studies focused on tax preparation only as their financial intervention, both offering a VITA tax clinic on-site in the healthcare clinic setting. One study featured financial coaching, which included a bundle of services such as one-on-one case management, budgeting and goal setting, and the fourth study provided financial counseling over two sessions delivered remotely. All four studies reported at least one financial outcome, and two studies reported at least one health-related outcome. The evidence on the health and financial impacts of MFPs is limited due to the small number of included studies and lack of authors reporting data to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate small and nonsignificant effects of MFPs on financial outcomes reported, and some author-reported positive statistically significant effects on attending appointments and adhering to vaccination schedules. The risk of bias assessment indicated important methodological weaknesses across included studies.

Authors' Conclusions

Although MFPs are becoming popular and have the potential to improve financial and health outcomes, there is an overall lack of evidence about whether MFPs are meeting their goals. Very few studies met inclusion criteria, and those that did were generally low quality, and therefore, we were unable to draw any conclusions regarding the intervention effects. Given the nascent nature of the research, the high level of enthusiasm for MFPS seems to be outpacing the evidence about their effectiveness on important outcomes. We advocate that healthcare settings invest first in rigorous research on pilot MFPs and disseminate their findings widely before making a determination about taking them to scale in practice and/or move ahead to integrate them into healthcare policy.

Food Insecurity Screening and Referral Practices of Pediatric Clinicians in Metropolitan Washington, DC

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

In 2022, 17.3% of US households with children experienced food insecurity (FI). The objective of this study was to examine pediatric clinicians' FI screening and management immediately following the release of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2015 FI Policy Statement.

METHODS

Data were collected in 2016 from 85 primary care pediatric clinicians via an online survey of clinicians in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. Descriptive statistics were calculated using univariate/bivariate analyses. Fisher's exact test and Chi-square tests were used to explore the association between FI screening, health insurance, and clinician demographics.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of clinicians indicated that they infrequently screened for FI. Only 13% of clinicians used a standardized FI screening tool. Forty-five percent of clinicians screened for FI only when they perceived an acute concern. About 70% of them screened for FI when a patient presented with poor weight gain or was underweight.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediately after the release of the AAP Policy Statement, it was found that few pediatric clinicians appropriately and frequently screened for FI in our regional sample. Our data emphasize the common misconceptions held by clinicians around FI and the necessity to incorporate training that underscores the invisibility of FI along with effective techniques to screen and intervene.

Understanding experiences and perspectives in addressing unmet social needs of children and families in a paediatric weight management program: a qualitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to describe the experiences and perceptions of caregivers who participated in a community systems navigator intervention that addressed unmet social needs.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS

A qualitative descriptive study with caregivers of children enrolled in a clinical trial addressing unmet social needs of families with children cared for in a tertiary pediatric weight management clinic, through community systems navigation. Participants were asked open-ended questions related to perceptions of social needs screening in clinical settings. Interviews were recorded and analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach to thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten parent participants were interviewed. Social needs screening perception and acceptability varied between participants. Social needs screening was comfortable for most but stressful for others. Participants noted that trusting relationships promote comfort with sharing social needs information, and this data should be shared on the electronic health record if accurate and purposeful. They found the online screening tool convenient but thought it could also limit opportunities to elaborate. Some participants noted the intervention of community systems navigation helpful; however, others described the need for more tailored resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for unmet social needs in clinical settings is complex and should be family centred, including the consideration of the mode of screening, data sharing in the electronic health record and ensuing interventions. Perspectives of families should drive the design of future larger scale community navigation interventions to address unmet social needs in clinical settings.

Comparison of Caregiver and Provider Food Insecurity Screening Preferences Within a Health System

Food insecurity is a public health concern associated with poor health. Evidence guiding how to best implement screening for food insecurity across a pediatric health care system is lacking. We performed a single-center, multi-department, cross-sectional study of caregivers and health care providers in outpatient and inpatient settings to describe the beliefs, barriers, preferences, and preferred food insecurity screening location. Most providers and caregivers underestimated the pervasiveness of food insecurity while acknowledging the benefit of screening. Caregivers are overall receptive to food insecurity screening and disagree with feelings of discomfort or shame when disclosing food insecurity status. Providers acknowledged perceived caregiver discomfort, lack of community food resources, and lack of a validated screening tool as barriers to screening. Both caregivers and providers identified the primary care setting as the preferred screening setting.

Families Benefit After Utilization of a Clinic-Based Food Pantry Irrespective of Food Insecurity Experiences in a Pediatric Obesity Treatment Program

PURPOSE

To evaluate the congruence between food insecurity screening outcome and clinic-based food pantry utilization and to examine caregiver reported comfort, motivation, and benefits of utilization.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods study.

SETTING

Academic pediatric obesity treatment clinic.

SUBJECTS

Convenience sample of caregivers.

INTERVENTION

Clinic-based food pantry offered irrespective of food insecurity screening outcome.

MEASURES

Food insecurity screening (Hunger Vital Sign) and severity, self-rated caregiver health, willingness to disclose food insecurity and receive food, and food-related stress.

ANALYSIS

Chi-square and t-tests were utilized to examine associations and descriptive analysis explored benefits. Rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to identify themes.

RESULTS

Caregivers of 120 children were included (child mean age 11.8; 56.7% female, 67.6% Non-Hispanic Black), with 47 of 59 eligible completing follow-up surveys and 14 completing in-depth interviews. Approximately half (N = 30/59, 50.8%) of families utilizing the food pantry screened negative for food insecurity. Families utilizing the food pantry were more likely to report severe food insecurity (N = 23/59; 38.9%) compared to those declining (N = 3/61; 4.9%, P < .001). Caregivers accepting food were able to meet a child health goal (N = 30/47, 63.8%). Caregivers reported feeling comfortable receiving food (N = 13/14) and felt utilizing the food pantry led to consumption of healthier foods (N = 7/14).

CONCLUSIONS

Families who screened both positive and negative for food insecurity utilized and benefited from a clinic-based food pantry. Clinics should consider strategies offering food resources to all families irrespective of screening outcome.

Food Insecurity Screening in High-Income Countries, Tool Validity, and Implementation: A Scoping Review

Household food insecurity has significant negative implications across the lifespan. While routine screening is recommended, particularly in healthcare, guidelines are lacking on selection of screening tools and best-practice implementation across different contexts in non-stigmatizing ways. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize evidence on household food insecurity screening tools, including psychometrics, implementation in a range of settings, and experiences of carrying out screening or being screened. Four electronic databases were searched for studies in English published from 1990 until June 2023. A total of 58 papers were included, 21 of which focused on tool development and validation, and 37 papers described implementation and perceptions of screening. Most papers were from the USA and described screening in healthcare settings. There was a lack of evidence regarding screening in settings utilized by Indigenous people. The two-item Hunger Vital Sign emerged as the most used and most valid tool across settings. While there is minimal discomfort associated with screening, screening rates in practice are still low. Barriers and facilitators of screening were identified at the setting, system, provider, and recipient level and were mapped onto the COM-B model of behavior change. This review identifies practical strategies to optimize screening and disclosure.

Integration of social determinants of health information within the primary care electronic health record: a systematic review of patient perspectives and experiences

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the non-medical factors that impact health. Although geographical measures of deprivation are used, individual measures of social risk could identify those most at risk and generate more personalised care and targeted referrals to community resources. We know SDOH are important to health care, but it is not yet known whether their collection via the electronic health record (EHR) is acceptable and useful from the patient perspective.

AIM

To synthesise relevant literature to explore patient perspectives on integrating information about SDOH into primary care EHRs, and the opportunities and challenges of its implementation in a general practice setting.

DESIGN & SETTING

Systematic review of primary care-based qualitative and mixed-method studies using thematic framework analysis.

METHOD

Key databases were searched for articles reporting patient perspectives of SDOH collection within the primary care EHR. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies written in English were included. A framework analysis was conducted to identify themes.

RESULTS

From 14 included studies, the following five main themes were identified: rationale for SDOH screening and the anticipated outcomes; impact of the provider-patient relationship on patient perceptions; data, which included privacy concerns; screening process and referral; and recommendations for future research.

CONCLUSION

Integration of information on SDOH into the EHR appears acceptable to patients. This review has added to the discussion of whether and how to implement SDOH screening and referral programmes into UK primary care systems.

Feasibility of Using Text Messaging to Identify and Assist Patients With Hypertension With Health-Related Social Needs: Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Health-related social needs are associated with poor health outcomes, increased acute health care use, and impaired chronic disease management. Given these negative outcomes, an increasing number of national health care organizations have recommended that the health system screen and address unmet health-related social needs as a routine part of clinical care, but there are limited data on how to implement social needs screening in clinical settings to improve the management of chronic diseases such as hypertension. SMS text messaging could be an effective and efficient approach to screen patients; however, there are limited data on the feasibility of using it.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with hypertension to determine the feasibility of using SMS text messaging to screen patients for unmet health-related social needs.

METHODS

We randomly selected 200 patients (≥18 years) from 1 academic health system. Patients were included if they were seen at one of 17 primary care clinics that were part of the academic health system and located in Forsyth County, North Carolina. We limited the sample to patients seen in one of these clinics to provide tailored information about local community-based resources. To ensure that the participants were still patients within the clinic, we only included those who had a visit in the previous 3 months. The SMS text message included a link to 6 questions regarding food, housing, and transportation. Patients who screened positive and were interested received a subsequent message with information about local resources. We assessed the proportion of patients who completed the questions. We also evaluated for the differences in the demographics between patients who completed the questions and those who did not using bivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients, the majority were female (n=109, 54.5%), non-Hispanic White (n=114, 57.0%), and received commercial insurance (n=105, 52.5%). There were no significant differences in demographics between the 4446 patients who were eligible and the 200 randomly selected patients. Of the 200 patients included, the SMS text message was unable to be delivered to 9 (4.5%) patients and 17 (8.5%) completed the social needs questionnaire. We did not observe a significant difference in the demographic characteristics of patients who did versus did not complete the questionnaire. Of the 17, a total of 5 (29.4%) reported at least 1 unmet need, but only 2 chose to receive resource information.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that only 8.5% (n=17) of patients completed a SMS text message-based health-related social needs questionnaire. SMS text messaging may not be feasible as a single modality to screen patients in this population. Future research should evaluate if SMS text message-based social needs screening is feasible in other populations or effective when paired with other screening modalities.

Views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within routine antenatal care

BACKGROUND

Food insecurity is a public health concern that has profound impact on physical and mental health, and on social well-being. Pregnancy is a period in which food insecurity is likely to be particularly deleterious, due to the serious impact on both mother and child. Food insecurity is not routinely screened in antenatal healthcare settings, and the preferences of pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within antenatal healthcare.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study used face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted in February and March 2023, to gain the views of purposively sampled food-insecure, pregnant women in Melbourne, Australia. Food insecurity was evidenced by an affirmative response to at least one of three assessment items in a screening questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to summarise the views and preferences of women.

RESULTS

Nineteen food-insecure pregnant women were interviewed. Three themes were identified: (1) acceptability of being screened for food insecurity, (2) concerns about the consequences of disclosure and (3) preferences regarding food insecurity screening and supportive strategies that could be offered within an antenatal healthcare setting.

CONCLUSION

Women were accepting of food insecurity screening being conducted within routine healthcare. Women identified potential benefits of routine screening, such as feeling supported by their clinician to have a healthy pregnancy and less pressure to voluntarily ask for food assistance. Women gave suggestions for the implementation of food insecurity screening to optimise their healthcare experience, maintain their dignity and feel able to disclose within a safe and caring environment. These results indicate that food insecurity screening in the antenatal setting is likely to have support from pregnant women and is urgently needed in the interest of promoting optimal nutrition for women and children.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

Pregnant women with lived experience of food insecurity were purposively sampled to obtain their insights regarding screening and support within a pregnancy healthcare setting. Member-checking occurred following data collection, whereby all participants were offered the opportunity to review their interview transcript to ensure trustworthiness of the data.

Improving food insecurity screening across a health system throughout the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Food insecurity has direct and indirect negative outcomes on the physical and mental health of children, with impacts throughout adult life. Rates of food insecurity have increased dramatically since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends paediatricians screen and intervene to address food insecurity. We aimed to increase the percentage of patient encounters with food insecurity screening completion at the paediatric medical home from 0% to 85% by July 2020 with extension to the paediatric emergency department (ED) and paediatric specialty clinic in the following year.

METHODS

This multicentre project occurred in three sites within our health system: a teaching safety-net, paediatric medical home; a paediatric ED; and five divisions within paediatric specialty medical clinics. A screening tool was created using the validated Hunger Vital Sign Questionnaire. A standard screening, documentation and referral process was developed. The Model for Improvement was used testing changes via Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.

RESULTS

The percentage of households screened for food insecurity increased from a median of 0% to 30% for all sites combined. There was significant variability in screening with the ED screening a median of 24% and the medical home screening 80% by the end of the study period. A total of 9842 households (20.9%) screened were food insecure. During the study period, 895 families with 3925 household members received 69 791 pounds of food from our primary community resource using our clinic's food prescription. Of these families, 44% (398) also qualified for the US Department of Agriculture programme ensuring ongoing food distribution up to twice a month.

DISCUSSION

Using quality improvement methodology to address a critical community need, we implemented food insecurity screening across a hospital system including multiple sites and specialties and provided critical resources to households in need.

Screening for Financial Hardship: Comparing Patient Survey Responses Using Two Different Screening Tools

BACKGROUND

Healthcare delivery organizations are increasingly screening patients for social risks using tools that vary in content and length.

OBJECTIVES

To compare two screening tools both containing questions related to financial hardship.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of adult patients (n = 471) in three primary care clinics.

MAIN MEASURES

Participants randomly assigned to self-complete either: (1) a screening tool developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) consisting of six questions on financial hardship (housing stability, housing quality, food security, transportation security, utilities security); or (2) social and behavioral risk measures recommended by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), including one question on financial hardship (financial strain). We compared patient acceptability of screening, positive screening rates for financial hardship, patient interest in assistance, and self-rated health.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of eligible/interested patients completed the relevant survey questions to be included in the study (N = 471/516). Patient acceptability was high for both tools, though more participants reported screening was appropriate when answering the CMS versus NAM questions (87% vs. 79%, p = 0.02). Of respondents completing the CMS tool, 57% (132/232) reported at least one type of financial hardship; on the NAM survey, 52% (125/239) reported financial hardship (p = 0.36). Nearly twice as many respondents indicated interest in assistance related to financial hardship after completing items on the CMS tool than on the NAM question (39% vs. 21%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported high acceptability of both social risk assessment tools. While rates of positive screens for financial hardship were similar across the two measures, more patients indicated interest in assistance after answering questions about financial hardship on the CMS tool. This might be because the screening questions on the CMS tool help patients to appreciate the types of assistance related to financial hardship that may be available after screening. Future research should assess the validity and comparative validity of individual measures and measure sets. Tool selection should be based on setting and population served, screening goals, and resources available.

Feasibility and Impact Assessment of a Food Insecurity Protocol in a Large Urban Pediatric Primary Care Network

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

In 2022, 1 in 6 households with children experienced food insecurity (FI) in the United States. The negative impact of FI on child health is well documented and pediatric clinicians are encouraged to actively screen and intervene in clinical settings. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and impact of a FI management protocol implemented in 2017 at a pediatric primary care health network serving patients who are Medicaid-eligible in Washington, DC.

METHODS

In 2019, an 18-item electronic survey was sent to a convenience sample of 42 pediatric clinicians within the health network to understand their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors surrounding implementation. Both quantitative and qualitative responses were collected and analyzed. We report frequencies of the Likert-type responses, including perceived compliance with protocol components and intervention efficacy. We evaluated the relationship between FI knowledge level and rates of clinician documentation compliance by chi square and Cramer's V statistic for effect size. Open-ended responses were reviewed, and common themes were identified and used to provide context for quantitative results.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Out of 42 clinicians invited to complete the survey, 35 completed responses. All respondents reported universal screening for FI (100%) at routine examinations, 80% reported frequently electronically documenting FI in medical records, and 91% of clinicians reported frequently referring families who screened positive for FI to at least one FI resource, with 24% reporting that resources met families' needs. Open-ended responses revealed increased awareness of FI prevalence and of patient experiences in households experiencing FI, increased satisfaction with clinical management of FI, but also concerns around having limited clinical time to do the protocol and the usefulness and accessibility of referred resources. In conclusion, implementing this pilot FI protocol was feasible, but clinicians perceived limited impact of the protocol on alleviating FI and desired more robust intervention options. Further improvements include shifting the burden of performing the protocol away from the clinician, such as by streamlining the protocol or identifying a resource staff member, and establishing more accessible and effective FI interventions such as "Food as Medicine" offerings in partnership with community organizations.

PROTOCOL: Medical-financial partnerships for improving financial and health outcomes for lower-income Americans: A systematic review

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The primary objectives of this review is to answer the following research questions using formal research studies: What is the extent and quality of MFP intervention research? What are the effects on financial outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings? What are the effects on health-related outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings?

Effect of a Social Care Intervention on Health Care Experiences of Caregivers of Hospitalized Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Health-related social risks (HRSRs), like food and housing insecurity, are stigmatized conditions that, when addressed in clinical settings, could inadvertently compromise health care experiences.

Objective

To test the noninferiority hypothesis that a low-intensity, high-scale social care intervention does not promote experiences of discrimination or diminish satisfaction with care compared to usual care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2020 to June 2022 with 12-month follow-up analyzing data obtained 1 week after baseline intervention at a 155-bed academic urban children's hospital with 5300 annual admissions. Participants were recruited from their children's hospital rooms during their children's inpatient hospital stays. Inclusion criteria were identifying as the primary caregiver of a child younger than 18 years who was hospitalized in the general, intensive care, or transplant units; living in 1 of 42 target zip codes; and consenting to receive text messages. Caregivers of healthy newborns and caregivers of children expected to be hospitalized for less than 24 hours or greater than 30 days were excluded. A total of 637 eligible parents and caregivers were enrolled.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to usual care or usual care plus CommunityRx, a low-intensity, universally delivered, electronic medical record-integrated social care assistance intervention providing personalized information about local resources alongside education about HRSRs and how to access additional support. Usual care included an admission brochure about hospital-based free food options and nonsystematic provision of resource information.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Experiences of discrimination, measured using the Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale (range 7-35; higher scores indicate more frequent discrimination) and satisfaction with hospital discharge 1 week postdischarge using Child HCAHPS (range 0-100; higher scores indicate higher satisfaction). The a priori noninferiority margins (control minus intervention) were -0.9 (discrimination) and 1.6 (satisfaction).

Results

Of 637 eligible caregiver participants, most identified as female (n = 600 [94.3%]), Black (n = 505 [79.4%]), and had household income less than $50 000 per year (n = 488 [78.5%]). One-third were experiencing food insecurity (n = 223). Half of participants reported discrimination experiences during the pediatric hospitalization (n = 259). Discrimination experiences among the intervention group were noninferior to those among the control group (mean [SD] score: control, 10.3 [4.7] vs intervention, 10.0 [4.6]; difference, 0.2; 90% CI, -0.5 to 0.9). Mean (SD) satisfaction with discharge was high (control, 84.2 [23.8] vs intervention, 81.9 [24.8]), but evidence was insufficient to support intervention noninferiority for this end point (difference, 2.3; 90% CI, -1.2 to 5.8). Food security status did not moderate the relationship between intervention and either outcome.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that a universally delivered social care assistance intervention did not promote caregiver experiences of discrimination during a child's hospitalization but were inconclusive regarding satisfaction.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04171999.

A Qualitative Study of Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Social and Behavioral Risk Screening Among Primary Care Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite its relevance for healthcare settings, social and behavioral risk screening is not systematically performed by clinicians or healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVE

To address clinician concerns, such as social and behavioral risk screening disrupting the clinician-patient relationship and lack of resources to respond, we interviewed primary care patients at an academic medical center regarding their perceptions and preferences on social and behavioral risk screening.

PARTICIPANTS

Between September and December 2020, we recruited a convenience sample of 14 English-speaking primary care patients 18 years + from three clinics affiliated with an academic medical center.

APPROACH

Using a semi-structured interview guide, we asked about the importance of social and behavioral risk screening, whether or not and how to share social and behavioral risk factors, and how social and behavioral risk factors are addressed. We used a multi-step analytic process to identify the range and commonality of participants' responses thematically.

KEY RESULTS

Participants recognized that social and behavioral risk factor domains were relevant to primary care and important for treating the patient as a whole person. Participants preferred a conversation regarding social and behavioral risk factor with their primary care providers (PCPs), and suggested that, if surveys are used, they be followed with an open-ended, in-person discussion. Participants also suggested framing the discussion as something that is done routinely with all patients so that patients do not feel judged. Participants felt comfortable sharing social and behavioral risk factors when they trusted their PCPs, and felt that discussing social and behavioral risk factors with their PCPs built trust. Participants recognized that resources exist outside of the clinic, and suggested that PCPs distribute lists of relevant community resources to patients.

CONCLUSION

In our study of primary care patients on perceptions and preferences about screening and addressing social and behavioral risk factors, we found that patients were willing to share social and behavioral risk factors with their PCP, preferred an in-person discussions with or without a survey, and wanted a list of community resources to address their needs.

"I Felt Like I Had Something I Could Do About It": Pediatric Clinician Experiences With a Food Insecurity-Focused Produce Prescription Program

Efforts to address food insecurity (FI) in pediatric clinics have increased over the last decade, particularly after a groundbreaking 2015 American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement supporting universal routine screening and intervening. Produce prescription programs are a novel strategy addressing FI. Limited data exist on effectiveness and feasibility in pediatric clinical settings. This study explored clinician experiences after enrolling patients who completed a produce prescription program in an urban primary-care clinic in Washington, DC. One year after program completion, the experiences of 11 clinicians were explored through qualitative interviews and coded using thematic content analysis. Identified themes explored changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Clinicians expressed that the program offered a tangible resource to address FI, building trust and strengthening their sense of self-efficacy in addressing families' concerns. Incorporation of a produce prescription intervention to address FI was feasible and well accepted by pediatric primary-care clinicians.

Caregiver Perspectives on Social Needs Screening and Interventions in an Urban Children's Hospital

OBJECTIVES

Caregiver opinions of inpatient social needs screening and ways of addressing positive screens are not well understood. We aimed to explore caregiver perspectives and goals surrounding inpatient screening and determine how helpful provided resources are at meeting these goals.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients admitted to an urban tertiary care children's hospital from April to August 2021. English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers who screened positive for at least 1 social need on a standardized 10-item questionnaire were invited to participate in an interview 2 to 4 months after discharge. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 2 independent coders using rapid qualitative methods.

RESULTS

We completed 20 interviews, with 14 English-speaking and 6 Spanish-speaking caregivers. Four themes emerged: (1) All caregivers expressed support for inpatient social needs screening. (2) Many caregivers cited it as an effective means to support families and help providers better understand their social situation. (3) Caregivers who recalled receiving a resource packet found it useful and at times even shared the resources with others. (4) The majority of caregivers expressed interest in longitudinal support, such as contact after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers are in support of inpatient screening as a means for providers to optimize comprehensive care that explores how unmet social needs influence health. Although inpatient social work and resource packets may be helpful, longitudinal support after discharge may improve the effectiveness of social needs interventions, patient outcomes, and caregiver satisfaction.

"Addressing the bigger picture": A qualitative study of internal medicine patients' perspectives on social needs data collection and use

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in collecting sociodemographic and social needs data in hospital settings to inform patient care and health equity. However, few studies have examined inpatients' views on this data collection and what should be done to address social needs. This study describes internal medicine inpatients' perspectives on the collection and use of sociodemographic and social needs information.

METHODS

A qualitative interpretive description methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 patients admitted to a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling for diverse genders, races, and those with and without social needs. Interviews were coded using a predominantly inductive approach and a thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Patients expressed that sociodemographic and social needs data collection is important to offer actionable solutions to address their needs. Patients described a gap between their ideal care which would attend to social needs, versus the reality that hospital-based teams are faced with competing priorities and pressures that make it unfeasible to provide such care. They also believed that this data collection could facilitate more holistic, integrated care. Patients conveyed a need to have a trusting and transparent relationship with their provider to alleviate concerns surrounding bias, discrimination, and confidentiality. Lastly, they indicated that sociodemographic and social needs data could be useful to inform care, support research to inspire social change, and assist them with navigating community resources or creating in-hospital programs to address unmet social needs.

CONCLUSIONS

While the collection of sociodemographic and social needs information in hospital settings is generally acceptable, there were varied views on whether hospital staff should intervene, as their priority is medical care. The results can inform the implementation of social data collection and interventions in hospital settings.

Experiences with Pandemic Food Access Among Clinic-Based Community Supported Agriculture Program Participants

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic intensified food insecurity (FI) across the country, and families with children were disproportionately affected. This study explores experiences with FI and social resources during the pandemic among families participating in a free, clinic-based community supported agriculture (CSA) program.

METHODS

Free weekly boxes of organic produce from local farms were distributed to pediatric caregivers for 12 weeks at two pediatric outpatient centers associated with a children's hospital in a low-income, urban area. Demographics and a two-question FI screen were collected. Caregivers were purposively selected to participate in semi-structured interviews about experiences with FI and community or federal nutrition programs during the pandemic. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Content analysis with constant comparison was used to code interviews inductively and identify emerging themes.

RESULTS

The 31 interviewees were predominantly female; more than half were Black, FI, and SNAP beneficiaries. Study participants were more likely to have repeat participation in the CSA program. Interviews elucidated four major themes of barriers to food access during the pandemic: (1) fluctuations in price, availability, and quality of food; (2) financial strain; (3) faster consumption with all family members home; (4) shopping challenges: infection fears, store closures, childcare. SNAP, WIC, and school meal programs were generally facilitators to food access. Increased SNAP allotments were particularly useful, and delays of mailed WIC benefits were challenging.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

This qualitative study describes facilitators and barriers to food access among clinic-based CSA program participants during the pandemic. The findings highlight areas for further exploration and potential policy intervention.

Intersection of food insecurity and moral experiences of those involved in paediatric healthcare: A scoping review of child, caregiver and healthcare provider perspectives

Food insecurity is a significant social and health issue for children in high-income countries and contributes to sub-optimal child outcomes. This scoping review examines how food insecurity intersects with the moral experiences of those involved in providing and receiving paediatric health care. Multiple databases were searched using a priori inclusion criteria, papers were screened by multiple reviewers. Searches yielded nine papers. Descriptive data was summarised and qualitative results extracted from included papers were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Four main themes emerged: Food insecurity threatens caregiver and healthcare provider identity; is food insecurity the business of health? is screening for food insecurity surveillance or facilitating assistance? and the lived experience of navigating the tension of managing food insecurity and a child's health condition. The moral experiences lens has magnified the countless everyday encounters in which values and beliefs about what is 'right' or 'just' can be realised or thwarted in the context of the intersection between healthcare and food insecurity. Review findings have implications relating to the inclusion of children's voices in healthcare settings, healthcare practice and policy design, and the development and use of FI screening tools.

"It Made Me Feel like Things Are Starting to Change in Society:" A Qualitative Study to Foster Positive Patient Experiences during Phone-Based Social Needs Interventions

Many healthcare organizations are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Due to both the COVID-19 pandemic and limited time during clinical visits, much of this screening is now happening by phone. To promote healing and avoid harm, it is vital to understand patient experiences and recommendations regarding these activities. We conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a HRSN intervention. We applied maximum variation sampling, completed recruitment and interviews by phone, and carried out an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. From August to November 2021 we interviewed 34 patients, developed 6 themes, and used these themes to create a framework for generating positive patient experiences during phone-based HRSN interventions. First, we found patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention. Second, we identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience: transparency and respect for patient autonomy; kind demeanor; genuine intention to help; and attentiveness and responsiveness to patients' situations. Finally, we found patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources. Healthcare organizations can incorporate our framework into trainings for team members carrying out phone-based HRSN interventions.

Perspectives of Caregivers Experiencing Persistent Food Insecurity at an Academic Primary Care Clinic

OBJECTIVE

Food insecurity (FI) is often transitory and instigated by changes in family circumstances or environmental events. Clinics have developed interventions to address FI, yet families may face persistent FI. Little is known about persistently food insecure families' experiences with clinic-based interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of caregivers experiencing persistent FI in a clinical setting.

METHODS

We conducted 40 semistructured interviews at one academic primary care clinic between July 2019 and December 2019. The clinic routinely screened families for FI at every visit; families screening positive could meet with a care navigator and receive bags of nonperishable foods. Caregivers who received food bags at ≥3 visits, spoke English or Spanish, and were ≥18 years old were eligible to participate. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and systematically coded using inductive content analysis. A modified constant comparative method was used to iteratively review codes, identify emerging themes, and resolve differences through consensus.

RESULTS

Forty caregivers were interviewed; all were women; 45% were Hispanic/Latinx and 37.5% African American/Black. Three major themes emerged: 1) unmet social and medical needs and the challenges of caregiving complicate FI; 2) social supports help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources; and 3) caregivers provide practical recommendations for addressing persistent FI.

CONCLUSION

Families experiencing persistent FI described important social supports that help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources. Clinic-based resources were welcomed interventions, but their impact may be limited; practical recommendations were made.

Understanding Caregiver Perspective on Social Determinants of Health Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care

Comprehensive social risk screening has become standard practice in primary care. Evidence is lacking, however, on whether and how interventions provided for positive screens are being utilized. This study aimed to create a standardized follow-up process to evaluate caregiver perspective and usage of community resources provided during well-child visits. Follow-up calls were made to families with positive screens for food insecurity (FI) and/or utility insecurity (UI) (n = 347). Phone interviews assessed resource usage, effectiveness, influence on stress level, and current insecurity status. Caregiver responses regarding barriers to resource usage were inductively analyzed and developed into major themes. The sample included 228 (65.7%) families with positive screens for FI and 166 (47.8%) families screening positive for UI. Of those who completed interviews (n = 108), 77 (71.3%) caregivers recalled being provided resources during their child's visit with only 33 (42.9%) reporting use of those resources. Twelve (36.4%) of those caregivers who used the resources confirmed that their insecurity was still a concern. Five major themes for barriers to resource usage emerged: (1) improved situation, (2) perception, (3) access barriers, (4) conflicting priorities, and (5) too busy/overwhelmed. The majority of caregivers (95.7% of asked) noted that their insecurity caused increased stress with 70.5% acknowledging decreased stress levels after discussion with a provider. Integrating caregiver input through a standardized follow-up protocol into provided interventions for screened social risks can improve not only the quality and effectiveness of provided resources, but also provide insight into the impact of those interventions on insecurity from the caregiver perspective.

Community Resource Connection for Pediatric Caregivers With Unmet Social Needs: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric health systems are increasingly screening caregivers for unmet social needs. However, it remains unclear how best to connect families with unmet needs to available and appropriate community resources. We aimed to explore caregivers' perceived barriers to and facilitators of community resource connection.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients admitted to one inpatient unit of an academic quaternary care children's hospital. All caregivers who screened positive for one or more unmet social needs on a tablet-based screener were invited to participate in an interview. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 independent coders using content analysis, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

We interviewed 28 of 31 eligible caregivers. Four primary themes emerged. First, caregivers of children with complex chronic conditions felt that competing priorities related to their children's medical care often made it more challenging to establish connection with resources. Second, caregivers cited burdensome application and enrollment processes as a barrier to resource connection. Third, caregivers expressed a preference for geographically tailored, web-based resources, rather than paper resources. Last, caregivers expressed a desire for ongoing longitudinal support in establishing and maintaining connections with community resources after their child's hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric caregivers with unmet social needs reported competing priorities and burdensome application processes as barriers to resource connection. Electronic resources can help caregivers identify locally available services, but longitudinal supports may also be needed to ensure caregivers can establish and maintain linkages with these services.

Identifying Barriers to Effective Patient-Provider Communication About Food Insecurity Screenings in Outpatient Clinical Settings in Central Florida: A Mixed-Methods Study

OBJECTIVE

Screening for food insecurity in health care settings is inconsistently performed among health care providers. This study examined how patient-provider interactions influenced patient comfort discussing food insecurity, an important social determinant of health.

DESIGN

We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study and surveyed patients on their experiences with patient-centered care when communicating and interacting with their providers, and their comfort level being screened for food insecurity. Telephone interviews were also conducted to better understand the concepts in the survey.

SETTING

Various clinical organizations in Central Florida, as well as food pantries affiliated with Second Harvest Food Bank.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-six patients in Central Florida completed the survey, 12 of whom completed qualitative portions of the study (7 completing the qualitative survey questions and 5 completing a telephone interview).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Patient comfort discussing food insecurity with their health care providers.

RESULTS

Quantitative findings show that patient involvement in care planning and cultural sensitivity of health care providers were 2 important factors associated with patient comfort being screened for food insecurity. Qualitative findings suggest that providers' effective communication and empathy are other factors that can influence patient comfort.

CONCLUSION

To effectively address food insecurity of vulnerable patients and communities, it is important that providers conduct screenings within their practice. This study points to specific actions that providers may employ to increase patient comfort discussing this topic. Efficiently identifying food-insecure patients and connecting them to appropriate community resources would improve patient health and aid in efforts to eliminate health disparities.

Clinical and public policy interventions to address food insecurity among children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes the impacts of food insecurity (FI) on child health, outlines clinical and public policy interventions to mitigate FI in children, and defines new paradigms in population health to ameliorate the harmful effects of FI in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rates of FI among children have dramatically increased with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with particular adverse impact on low-income children. Population health innovations in screening, referral, and social service integration offer new opportunities to address FI.

SUMMARY

Despite advances in clinical practice and public policy, FI remains a persistent issue for many US children. Clinicians and policymakers have opportunities to leverage clinical and community-based integration to improve service delivery opportunities to ameliorate childhood hunger and racial and socioeconomic inequity in the United States.

Patient Preferences for Discussing and Acting on Health-Related Needs in Primary Care

Background:

Addressing social needs, health behaviors, and mental health may help patients more than traditional medical care. However, these root causes of poor health are difficult to address and the role of primary care is unclear. This qualitative study assesses patient’s willingness and motivations to discuss and accept assistance for these needs from their primary care team.

Methods:

In July and August of 2020, semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with family medicine patients (n = 6) and residents of low resource neighborhoods (n = 11) in Richmond, Virginia. Interviews were conducted over Zoom. We conducted a qualitative analysis of patient and resident interview transcripts. A rapid qualitative analysis approach and immersion-crystallization processes were used to identify themes and categories.

Results:

Interviewees reported varying degrees of comfort discussing topics with their health care team. They were less comfortable discussing needs they considered outside the realm of “traditional primary care” including finances, transportation, and housing, but interviewees expressed willingness to discuss these needs under certain conditions. Important factors were a strong patient-clinician relationship to create a trusted and safe space for discussion, adequate time for discussion during visits, communication of practices’ ability to provide resources to help patients, and ensuring appropriate high quality referrals.

Conclusions:

Primary care provides opportunity for identifying and addressing needs that adversely impact health. Some needs are more sensitive for patients to work with their care team on, though, there was willingness to work on any need when a strong provider relationship and clinic structure for providing support were in place. This study highlights critical care delivery factors which may be used to enhance patient comfort accepting support for their needs and ultimately improve clinical care and chronic disease management.

Telehealth and food insecurity screenings: challenges and lessons learned

Food insecurity remains a persistent problem in the United States and affected 35.2 million Americans in 2019. In the wake of COVID-19, food insecurity has increased in many communities. Given that food insecurity exacerbates poor health or health conditions, screening of food insecurity within medical settings is frequently identified within the literature as an important first step in effectively addressing this social concern and improving the health outcomes of patients. However, health care providers often do not screen for food insecurity for a variety of reasons. In this article review, we discuss the challenges associated with incorporating food insecurity screenings within the medical model and how the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges. Specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic has substantially increased the delivery of health care services via telehealth, making screening for food insecurity even more difficult via remote videoconferencing. We examine the strengths and weaknesses of telehealth and their implications for food insecurity screenings. We discuss how these implications might inform future research regarding the use of telehealth as a means of screening patients for social determinants of health in the COVID-19 era. Given that the use of telehealth is not expected to back to pre-pandemic levels, it is important to understand how to best screen for social determinants of health via videoconferencing.

Risk Factors for Veteran Food Insecurity: Findings from a National US Department of Veterans Affairs Food Insecurity Screener

Objective:

Food insecurity is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. The US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) began universal food insecurity screening in 2017. This study examined prevalence and correlates of food insecurity among Veterans screened.

Design:

Retrospective cross-sectional study using VHA administrative data. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to identify sociodemographic and medical characteristics associated with a positive food insecurity screen.

Setting:

All US Veterans Administration (VA) medical centres (n 161). Participants: All Veterans were screened for food insecurity since screening initiation (July 2017–December 2018).

Results:

Of 3 304 702 Veterans screened for food insecurity, 44 298 were positive on their initial screen (1·3 % of men; 2·0 % of women). Food insecurity was associated with identifying as non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic. Veterans who were non-married/partnered, low-income Veterans without VA disability-related compensation and those with housing instability had higher odds of food insecurity, as did Veterans with a BMI < 18·5, diabetes, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Prior military sexual trauma (MST) was associated with food insecurity among both men and women. Women screening positive, however, were eight times more likely than men to have experienced MST (48·9 % v. 5·9 %).

Conclusions:

Food insecurity was associated with medical and trauma-related comorbidities as well as unmet social needs including housing instability. Additionally, Veterans of colour and women were at higher risk for food insecurity. Findings can inform development of tailored interventions to address food insecurity such as more frequent screening among high-risk populations, onsite support applying for federal food assistance programs and formal partnerships with community-based resources.

Inpatient Food Insecurity in Caregivers of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Among US households with children, 14% are food insecure. Household food insecurity (FI) is associated with poorer health outcomes and increased hospital admissions. There is less known about caregivers' ability to obtain adequate food during hospitalization (inpatient FI).

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study of primary caregivers of hospitalized children 0 to 18 years. A modified US Household Food Security Survey was used to identify inpatient FI. Associated factors were identified using logistic regression adjusted for covariables. Caregiver semistructured interviews were conducted to elicit perceptions on food accessibility and effects of and solutions for inpatient FI.

RESULTS

The prevalence of inpatient FI was 43%. Household FI was present in 38% of families. Inpatient FI was associated with household FI (P < .01). In multivariable analysis, odds of inpatient FI were increased among caregivers with annual household income <$30,000 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.14), public transportation use (aOR 6.33), living >30 miles from the hospital (aOR 2.80), self-rated fair/poor health (aOR 3.31), maternity leave (aOR 4.75), and past/current Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefit utilization (aOR 2.52). Qualitative analysis identified barriers to food access, such as lack of affordable options, and found that caregivers made sacrifices for their hospitalized child, including skipping meals. Caregivers viewed their presence at their child's bedside and personal nourishment as important factors affecting their child's care.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient FI may affect a significant proportion of hospitalized children's caregivers. Pediatric hospitals should ensure that caregivers have access to food in order to fully engage in their child's care.

Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

It is broadly accepted that poverty is associated with poor health, and the health impact of poverty has been explored in numerous high-income country settings. There is a large and growing body of evidence of the role that primary care practitioners can play in identifying poverty as a health determinant, and in interventions to address it.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

This study maps the published peer-reviewed and grey literature on primary care setting interventions to address poverty in high-income countries in order to identify key concepts and gaps in the research. This scoping review seeks to map the tools in use to identify and address patients' economic needs; describe the key types of primary care-based interventions; and examine barriers and facilitators to successful implementation.

METHODS

Using a scoping review methodology, we searched five databases, the grey literature and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify studies on interventions to address the economic needs-related social determinants of health that occur in primary health care delivery settings, in high-income countries. Findings were synthesized narratively, and examined using thematic analysis, according to iteratively identified themes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen papers were included in the review and fell into two broad categories of description and evaluation: screening tools, and economic needs-specific interventions. Primary care-based interventions that aim to address patients' financial needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection upon patient registration, through referral to external services, to direct intervention in addressing patients' income needs.

CONCLUSION

Tools and processes to identify and address patients' economic social needs range from those tailored to individual health practices, or addressing one specific dimension of need, to wide-ranging protocols. Primary care-based interventions to address income needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection, through referral to external services, to direct intervention. Measuring success has proven challenging. The decision to undertake this work requires courage on the part of health care providers because it can be difficult, time-consuming and complex. However, it is often appreciated by patients, even when the scope of action available to health care providers is quite narrow.

Assessment of risk for food insecurity among African American urban households: utilizing cumulative risk indices and latent class analysis to examine accumulation of risk factors

African American caregivers in low-income, urban communities have high rates of food insecurity. Unemployment, education, smoking, stress, and depressive symptoms are associated with household food insecurity. A cumulative risk model suggests that accumulation of risk may compound food insecurity risk, and certain risk factors are more likely to co-occur. This study utilizes two approaches to examine food insecurity risk among African American caregivers with an adolescent daughter-a cumulative risk index to examine accumulation of risk and food insecurity risk; latent class analysis (LCA) to determine if certain risk profiles exist and their relation to food insecurity risk. Caregivers completed surveys including demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral questions (to create a cumulative risk index) and a validated 2-item food insecurity screen. LCA was used to identify risk profiles. Logistic regression was used to examine relations between cumulative risk, risk profiles, and food insecurity risk. Each additional cumulative risk index factor was associated with a 54% increase in odds of risk of food insecurity. LCA identified three subgroups: high stress/depression (class #1), low education/low stress and depression (class #2), and low risk overall (class #3). Odds of food insecurity risk were 4.7 times higher for class #1, and 1.5 times higher for class #2 compared with class #3. This study contributes to understanding of how food insecurity risk relates to cumulative risk and risk profiles. Findings can be used to improve food insecurity risk screening in clinical settings, enhancing intervention/referral for food security risk and mental health among African American caregivers and their households.

Food for Thought: A Qualitative Evaluation of Caregiver Preferences for Food Insecurity Screening and Resource Referral

OBJECTIVE

Although there is growing interest in screening for food insecurity (FI) in the clinical setting, little research exists describing the effect of screening practices on caregiver comfort and willingness to disclose social risk, or what factors affect eventual engagement with food resources.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we conducted 40 semistructured interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients who reported FI in the emergency department of an urban, freestanding children's hospital. All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. We used content analysis with constant comparison to code interviews inductively and identified emerging themes through an iterative process.

RESULTS

Three primary themes emerged as factors affecting caregiver comfort in FI screening and engagement with resources: perceived negative repercussions associated with screening, perception of need, and effective connection with food resources. While most caregivers reported comfort with FI screening, intentional steps to provide anonymity and reduce stigma in the screening process were important in facilitating disclosure of social need. Engagement with resources was influenced by caregiver prioritization of food access within a milieu of life stressors, and the perception of personal need relative to their peers. Furthermore, caregivers suggested practices to facilitate effective connection with food resources such as use of mobile health technology, geographically based resources, and personalized connections.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the importance of screening methods that reduce judgment and preserves caregiver privacy, referring families to resources that are geographically accessible, and developing creative strategies that enhance families' connection to resources, such as with use of mobile technology.

Assessment of Social Risk Factors and Interest in Receiving Health Care-Based Social Assistance Among Adult Patients and Adult Caregivers of Pediatric Patients

IMPORTANCE

Health care organizations are increasingly incorporating social risk screening into patient care. Studies have reported wide variations in patients' interest in receiving health care-based assistance for identified social risks. However, no study to date has examined the factors associated with patients' interest in receiving assistance, including whether interest in receiving assistance varies based on specific patient demographic characteristics. Targeted research on this topic could improve the success of health care-based programs that offer social care services.

OBJECTIVE

To identify participant characteristics associated with interest in receiving health care-based social risk assistance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 7 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments in 9 US states between July 2, 2018, and February 13, 2019. A convenience sample of adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients completed a screening survey that measured social risk factors and participants' interest in receiving assistance for identified social risks. Participants were randomly selected to receive 1 of 2 versions of the survey, which differed based on the order in which questions about social risks and interest in receiving assistance were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the associations between covariates and participants' interest in receiving assistance, stratified by social risk screening results. Data were analyzed from September 8, 2019, to July 30, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Social risk screening questions assessed risk factors comprising housing, food, transportation, utilities, and exposure to interpersonal violence. Additional questions assessed participants' interest in receiving assistance and their perspectives on health care-based social risk screening.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participant interest in receiving health care-based social risk assistance.

RESULTS

A total of 1021 adult participants with complete survey responses were included in the analysis. Of those, 709 of 1004 participants (70.6%) were female, and 544 of 1007 participants (54.0%) were aged 18 to 44 years. Overall, 353 of 662 participants (53.3%) with positive screening results for 1 or more social risk factors were interested in receiving assistance, whereas 31 of 359 participants (8.6%) with negative screening results for all social risks were interested in receiving assistance. Participants with positive screening results for 1 or more social risk factors had a higher likelihood of being interested in receiving assistance if they answered the question about interest in receiving assistance before they answered the questions about social risk factors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.07), had positive screening results for a higher number of social risk factors (aOR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.68-3.42), reported lower household income levels (aOR, 7.78; 95% CI, 2.96-20.44), or self-identified as having non-Hispanic Black ancestry (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.37-3.60). Among those with negative screening results for all social risk factors, the interest in receiving assistance was higher if the participants reported lower household income levels (aOR, 12.38; 95% CI, 2.94-52.15), previous exposure to health care-based social risk screening (aOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.47-3.74), higher perceived appropriateness of social risk screening (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.08-12.55), or worse health status (aOR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.09-16.31).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, multiple factors were associated with participants' interest in receiving social risk assistance. These findings may have implications for how and when social risk assistance is offered to patients. As the health care system's role in addressing social risk factors evolves, an understanding of patients' perspectives regarding screening and their interest in receiving assistance may be important to implementing patient-centered interventions.

Screening for Immigration-Related Health Concerns in a Federally Qualified Health Center Serving a Diverse Latinx Community: A Mixed Methods Study

Immigration-related concerns can impact health and are an important consideration while caring for a multinational Latinx immigrant community. Patients and caregivers waiting for a non-urgent clinic appointment were randomly screened with one of two social risk screening tools. One tool included a question about "any health or stability concerns related to immigration status." The other tool did not include an immigration health question. Immediately following, respondents were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview regarding their social risk screening experience. 201 screens were completed, and 20 patients agreed to an interview. There were no significant sociodemographic differences between groups. Of those screened for immigration, 11% reported a concern. In both arms, interviewees felt that social risk screening was acceptable in a clinic setting. Questions about immigration are timely, important, and relevant, and can be considered when implementing social assessments in communities where there are high levels of trust in providers.

Feasibility of Mobile Technology to Identify and Address Patients' Unmet Social Needs in a Primary Care Clinic

Mobile health tools may overcome barriers to social needs screening; however, there are limited data on the feasibility of using these tools in clinical settings. The objective was to determine the feasibility of using a mobile health system to screen for patients' social needs. In one large primary care clinic, the authors tested a tablet-based system that screens patients for social needs, transmits results to the electronic health record, and alerts providers. All adult patients presenting for a nonurgent visit were eligible. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the system and conducted follow-up surveys to determine acceptability and if patients accessed resources through the process. All providers were surveyed. Of the 252 patients approached, 219 (86.9%) completed the screen. Forty-three (19.6%) required assistance with the tablet, and 150 (68.5%) screened positive for at least 1 unmet need (food, housing, or transportation). Of the 150, 103 (68.7%) completed a follow-up survey. The majority agreed that people would learn to use the tablet quickly. Forty-eight patients (46.6%) reported contacting at least 1 community organization through the process. Of the 27 providers, 23 (85.2%) completed a survey and >70% agreed the system would result in patients having better access to resources. It was feasible to use a tablet-based system to screen for social needs. Clinics considering using mobile tools will need to determine how to screen patients who may need assistance with the tool and how to connect patients to resources through the system based on the burden of unmet needs.

Beyond clinical food prescriptions and mobile markets: parent views on the role of a healthcare institution in increasing healthy eating in food insecure families

Background

Children in food-insecure families face increased barriers to meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption. Hospitals and pediatric healthcare institutions have attempted to alleviate food-insecurity through various internal programs like food prescriptions, yet little evidence for these programs exist. Consistent with a patient-centered perspective, we sought to develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption and a parent-driven agenda for healthcare system action.

Methods

We conducted six qualitative focus group discussions (four in English, two in Spanish) with 29 parents and caregivers of patients who had screened positive for food-insecurity during visits to a large pediatric healthcare system in a midwestern U.S. city. Our iterative analysis process consisted of audio-recording, transcribing and coding discussions, aiming to produce a) a conceptual framework of barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption and b) a synthesis of participant programmatic suggestions for their healthcare system.

Results

Participants were 90% female, 38% Black/African American and 41% Hispanic/Latino. Barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption in their families fell into three intersecting themes: affordability, accessibility and desirability. Participant-generated intervention recommendations were multilevel, suggesting healthcare systems focus not only on clinic and community-based action, but also advocacy for broader policies that alleviate barriers to acquiring healthy foods.

Conclusion

Parents envision an expanded role for healthcare systems in ensuring their children benefit from a healthy diet. Findings offer critical insight on why clinic-driven programs aimed to address healthy eating may have failed and healthcare organizations may more effectively intervene by adopting a multilevel strategy.

High Level of Food Insecurity among Families with Children Seeking Routine Care at Federally Qualified Health Centers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Objective

To assess food insecurity during pediatric visits to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic.

Study design

Interviews using the validated American Academy of Pediatrics 2-question food insecurity screen were performed with 200 consecutive families presenting for pediatric care to 2 FQHC in Central Texas from April 14 to May 20, 2020, during the initial phase of the pandemic in Texas. Brief qualitative interviews were conducted to determine whether families found a worsening of food insecurity during the pandemic.

Results

Overall, 47% of families had a positive food insecurity screen. More than 90% of these were worrying about food running out and about 60% were positive for the question related to food not lasting. Among families with food insecurity, 94% indicated this had begun or worsened during the pandemic. Of the 115 families volunteering information about employment, 46% reported job loss during this time period. Both ethnicity (P < .001) and Special Supplementation Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) participation (P = .03) were associated with greater levels of food insecurity. Among primarily Spanish-speaking families participating in the WIC program, 64% reported food insecurity.

Conclusions

Approximately one-half of families receiving routine pediatric care at a FQHC during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic reported food insecurity and this was associated with loss of jobs during the pandemic. Participation in the WIC program was not protective against food insecurity. Increased frequency of food insecurity was detected in Hispanic and Spanish-speaking families. Screening of families at an FQHC should be strongly considered as a part of routine pediatric care. Knowledge of community resources is important for providers to share with patients. (J Pediatr: X 2020;4:100044).

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04378595

Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Social and economic contexts shape children's short- and long-term health. Efforts to address contextual risk factors are increasingly incorporated into pediatric health care.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of 2 social risk-related interventions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This randomized clinical trial included English- and/or Spanish-speaking caregiver-child dyads recruited from a pediatric urgent care clinic nested in a large, urban, safety-net hospital. Study recruitment, enrollment, and follow-up were conducted from July 18, 2016, to March 8, 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2019, to January 20, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Following standardized social risk assessment, caregivers were randomly assigned to receive either written information regarding relevant government and community social services resources or comparable written information plus in-person assistance and follow-up focused on service access.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Caregiver-reported number of social risk factors and child health 6 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

Among 611 caregiver-child dyads enrolled in the study, 302 dyads were randomized to the written resources group and 309 dyads were randomized to the written resources plus in-person assistance group. The mean (SD) age of children was 6.1 (5.0) years; 483 children (79.1%) were Hispanic; and 315 children (51.6%) were girls. There were no significant differences between groups in the effects of the interventions. In post hoc secondary analyses, the number of reported social risks decreased from baseline to 6-month follow-up in both groups: caregivers who received written resources alone reported a mean (SE) of 1.28 (0.19) fewer risks at follow-up, while those receiving written resources plus in-person assistance reported 1.74 (0.21) fewer risks at follow-up (both P < .001). In both groups, there were small but statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up in child health (mean [SE] change: written resources, 0.37 [0.07]; written resources plus in-person assistance, 0.24 [0.07]; both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial compared 2 approaches to addressing social risks in a pediatric urgent care setting and found no statistically significant differences in the social risk and child and caregiver health effects of providing written resources at the point of care with vs without in-person longitudinal navigation services. Caregivers in both groups reported fewer social risks and improved child and caregiver health 6 months after the intervention. These findings deepen understanding of effective doses of social risk-related interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02746393.

Written Versus Verbal Food Insecurity Screening in One Primary Care Clinic

OBJECTIVE

Clinics are increasingly interested in identifying food insecurity (FI), but there are limited data on how to implement FI screening. Our objective was to determine the difference in FI disclosure rates by parents/guardians screened by a written questionnaire compared to verbally.

METHODS

The study occurred in 1 pediatric primary care clinic in which we screened for FI using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign. We used interrupted time series to evaluate the effect of changing from the clinician verbal screening to a written questionnaire. Screening results were extracted for all well-child visits from 4/2017 to 10/2018 for children age 0 to 18 years. The outcome was the proportion who screened positive for FI 9 months before and 9 months after the implementation of the written questionnaire. We estimated the difference in the level and trend of positive screens using ordinary least squares regression using Newey-West standard errors and adjusting for autocorrelation.

RESULTS

In 7996 well-child visits, 1141 patients (14.3%) screened positive. In bivariate analysis, there was a significant difference in the FI disclosure rates between patients screened by written questionnaire compared to verbally (16.3% vs 10.4%, P < .001). In interrupted time series, changing to the written questionnaire was associated with a significant increase in FI disclosure rates (β = .04, 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.07; P = .02). There was no significant change in the trend in disclosure rates.

DISCUSSION

Multiple barriers exist to effectively implementing FI screening in clinical care. Changing from a verbal to a written questionnaire resulted in an immediate and significant increase in the number of parents/guardians who reported FI.

Caregivers' Experiences With Food Insecurity Screening and Impact of Food Insecurity Resources

We explored caregivers' experiences with food insecurity screening in a primary care setting and the impact of resources provided. English- and Spanish-speaking food insecure caregivers of children aged 1 to 5 years were recruited. In-depth individual semistructured interviews were conducted (n = 17) eliciting caregivers' experiences with food insecurity, clinic screening, and resources provided. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were double-coded and thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. All caregivers described multiple and repeat experiences with food insecurity. Food insecurity screening was acceptable, but families were not always connected with resources. Caregivers described WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) as the most commonly used program to address food insecurity and infrequently utilized other food insecurity resources. Screening for food insecurity in primary care was generally well accepted by this sample of food insecure caregivers. Future studies are needed to determine how to improve connecting resources with families most in need.

Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities' social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019.

RESULTS

Screening was reported as appropriate by 79% of participants; 65% reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95% CI=1.04, 2.07).

CONCLUSIONS

A strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier.

SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION

This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to better understand patient and caregiver perspectives on social risk screening across different healthcare settings.

METHODS

As part of a mixed-methods multisite study, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients who had completed the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities social risk screening tool between July 2018 and February 2019. Interviews, conducted in English or Spanish, asked about reactions to screening, screening acceptability, preferences for administration, prior screening experiences that informed perspectives, and expectations for social assistance. Basic thematic analysis and constant comparative methods were used to code and develop themes.

RESULTS

Fifty interviews were conducted across 10 study sites in 9 states, including 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments. There was broad consensus among interviewees across all sites that social risk screening was acceptable. The following 4 main themes emerged: (1) participants believed screening for social risks is important; (2) participants expressed insight into the connections between social risks and overall health; (3) participants emphasized the importance of patient-centered implementation of social risk screening; and (4) participants recognized limits to the healthcare sector's capacity to address or resolve social risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite gaps in the availability of social risk-related interventions in healthcare settings, patient-centered social risk screening, including empathy and attention to privacy, may strengthen relationships between patients and healthcare teams.

SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION

This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Food Insecurity Screening Among Families of Children With Diabetes

Little is known about screening in clinical settings for food insecurity (FI) among households of children with diabetes. This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of an FI screening initiative in a pediatric diabetes clinic that was implemented to help diabetes dietitian educators tailor management plans for families of children with type 1 or type 2 diabetes facing FI. The initiative comprised three validated screening questions, a care algorithm, a community resource handout, and a poster. In total, 50 families of children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were screened for FI. In-person semi-structured interviews combining open-ended and Likert-scale questions were conducted with 37 of the screened families and the three diabetes dietitian educators who conducted the screening. Perceived barriers and facilitators of the screening initiative were identified using content analysis, and Likert-scale questionnaires rated interviewees' comfort level with the screening questions. A reflective journal kept by an onsite research interviewer also facilitated the data interpretation process. Most families felt comfortable answering the screening questions. Families with FI appreciated the opportunity to express their concerns and learn about affordable food resources. However, ∼20% of these families described stigma and fear of judgment by clinicians if they screened positive for FI. Diabetes educators also felt comfortable with the screening questions but reported lack of time to screen all families and to follow-up with resources after a positive screen. A self-reported intake form was recommended to ensure that everyone is systematically screened. A standardized and respectful method of assessing FI could help clinicians better tailor treatment plans and support for families of children with diabetes who face FI. Based on these findings, similar FI screening initiatives should be implemented in other clinical settings as part of routine clinical practice.

Acceptability of Adolescent Social and Behavioral Health Screening in the Emergency Department

PURPOSE

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine screening for social and behavioral health risks (SBHR) in adolescents. Because adolescents who seek care in emergency departments (EDs) may have riskier behaviors than adolescents who access primary care, the ED may be a strategic additional setting for screening. We sought to identify acceptable domains for comprehensive SBHR screening in a pediatric ED.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess adolescent and caregiver acceptance of ED-based SBHR screening across multiple domains. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with screening acceptance. McNemar's test was used to assess agreement within patient/caregiver dyads across domains.

RESULTS

Among our 516 study participants (347 adolescents and 169 caregivers), those who indicated that they "agree" or "strongly agree" that ED-based screening should be conducted were classified as finding screening acceptable. Acceptability rates ranged from 45.0% (firearm access) to 77.5% (suicidality) among adolescents and 61.5% (firearm access) to 84.0% (substance use) among caregivers. After adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, adolescents were less accepting than caregivers of screening for: substance use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: .51; .31, .83; p < .01); violence (aOR: .63; .41, .97; p = .04); depression (aOR: .65; .42, .99; p = .04); human trafficking (aOR: .58; .39, .86; p < .01); and access to firearms (aOR: .47; .32, .70; p < .01). Shared agreement within adolescent/caregiver dyads ranged from 25.2% to 67.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of adolescents and caregivers agree that ED-based SBHR screening should be conducted across most domains. Caregivers generally had higher rates of screening acceptance than adolescents.

Perceptions and Experience of Patients, Staff, and Clinicians with Social Needs Assessment

CONTEXT

Assessment of social needs is expanding at Kaiser Permanente (KP), but little is known about how members and clinicians experience the incorporation of social needs into health care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess how KP members and clinicians experience social needs assessments incorporated into care.

DESIGN

Qualitative and descriptive analysis of data from member and clinician focus groups, interviews, and surveys among 68 members and family caregivers who had participated in social needs assessment programs and 90 clinicians and staff in the KP Colorado, Georgia, Northern California, Northwest, and Southern California Regions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Members' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences of social needs assessment.

RESULTS

Members and clinicians understood the impact of social needs on health and why a health care system representative would ask about food, housing, transportation, and other social needs. Members and clinicians supported social needs assessment at KP and agreed that KP should help address identified social needs. However, both groups emphasized the importance of assessments yielding actionable information. Members were also concerned about how the information would be used and by whom.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the continuing assessment of social needs at KP and identify issues that require attention as it expands. Assessment should not outpace organizational capacity to connect members with resources. Careful attention to communications is required because members may be uncertain or concerned about the purpose of the assessment and the dissemination of sensitive information. Messaging should assure members about data use and dissemination and what they can expect after screening.

Identifying Food Insecurity in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Evidence

This systematic scoping review explores evidence on food insecurity (FI) screening measures, acceptability, and program implementation in health care settings. Validation studies on brief screening tools suggest that instruments exist that adequately measure the construct of FI. Patients and clinicians found FI screening acceptable in a range of clinical settings, though studies are not high quality and rarely reflect substantial patient diversity. Targeted interventions successfully increased screening rates and reduced screening barriers. More research is needed to understand implementation and effectiveness of FI screening in diverse populations to ensure that evolving practices in this area do not widen health inequities.

Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care

The social determinants of health (SDoH) are defined by the World Health Organization as the "conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age." Within pediatrics, studies have highlighted links between these underlying social, economic, and environmental conditions, and a range of health outcomes related to both acute and chronic disease. Additionally, within the adult literature, multiple studies have shown significant links between social problems experienced during childhood and "adult diseases" such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A variety of potential mechanisms for such links have been explored including differential access to care, exposure to carcinogens and pathogens, health-affecting behaviors, and physiologic responses to allostatic load (i.e., toxic stress). This robust literature supports the importance of the SDoH and the development and evaluation of social needs interventions. These interventions are also driven by evolving economic realities, most importantly, the shift from fee-for-service to value-based payment models. This article reviews existing evidence regarding pediatric-focused clinical interventions that address the SDoH, those that target basic needs such as food insecurity, housing insecurity, and diminished access to care. The paper summarizes common challenges encountered in the evaluation of such interventions. Finally, the paper concludes by introducing key opportunities for future inquiry.