1
|
Waddell O, Keenan J, Frizelle F. Challenges around diagnosis of early onset colorectal cancer, and the case for screening. ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 39206626 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer in the world, with an estimated 1.93 million cases diagnosed in 2020. While the overall CRC incidence in many countries is falling there has been a dramatic increase in CRC in those aged under 50 (early onset colorectal cancer, EOCRC). The reason for this increase in EOCRC is unknown. As the best predictor of survival is stage at diagnosis, early diagnosis is likely to be beneficial and population screening may facilitate this. METHODS A narrative review of the literature was undertaken. RESULTS Improving time to diagnosis in symptomatic patients is beneficial. However, by the time symptoms develop, over a third of patients already have metastatic disease. Screening asymptomatic patients (with Faecal Immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy) has been proved to be effective in older patients (>60 years). In younger populations, the decreasing incidence rates of CRC previously made cost effectiveness, compliance and therefore benefit questionable. Now, with the increasing incidence of CRC in those under 50 years of age, modelling suggests screening with FIT and colonoscopy is cost effective from 40 years of age. There is evidence that some countries screening below 50 have prevented the rise in EOCRC incidence. Additionally the use of new and novel non-invasive biomarkers may also be able to improve the accuracy of screening asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION Diagnosis of EOCRC once symptoms develop is often too late, and screening patients from age 40 is the best way to improve outcomes in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Waddell
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jacqueline Keenan
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Frank Frizelle
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helgestad ADL, Larsen MB, Njor S, Tranberg M, Petersen LK, Andersen B. Increasing coverage in cervical and colorectal cancer screening by leveraging attendance at breast cancer screening: A cluster-randomised, crossover trial. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004431. [PMID: 39137185 PMCID: PMC11321549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening participation remains suboptimal in cervical cancer (CC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening despite their effectiveness in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effectiveness of an intervention by leveraging the high participation rate in breast cancer (BC) screening as an opportunity to offer self-sampling kits to nonparticipants in CC and CRC screening. METHODS AND FINDINGS A pragmatic, unblinded, cluster-randomised, multiple period, crossover trial was conducted in 5 BC screening units in the Central Denmark Region (CDR) between September 1, 2021 and May 25, 2022. On each of 100 selected weekdays, 1 BC screening unit was randomly allocated as the intervention unit while the remaining units served as controls. Women aged 50 to 69 years attending BC screening at the intervention unit were offered administrative check-up on their CC screening status (ages 50 to 64 years) and CRC screening status (aged 50 to 69), and women with overdue screening were offered self-sampling. Women in the control group received only standard screening offers according to the organised programmes. The primary outcomes were differences between the intervention group and the control group in the total screening coverage for the 2 programmes and in screening participation among women with overdue screening, measured 6 months after the intervention. These were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis, reporting risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 27,116 women were included in the trial, with 5,618 (20.7%) in the intervention group and 21,498 (79.3%) in the control group. Six months after the intervention, total coverage was higher in the intervention group as compared with the control group in CC screening (88.3 versus 83.5, difference 4.8 percentage points, 95% CI [3.6, 6.0]; p < 0.001) and in CRC screening (79.8 versus 76.0, difference 3.8 percentage points, 95% CI [2.6, 5.1]; p < 0.001). Among women overdue with CC screening, participation in the intervention group was 32.0% compared with 6.1% in the control group (difference 25.8 percentage points, 95% CI [22.0, 29.6]; p < 0.001). In CRC screening, participation among women overdue with screening in the intervention group was 23.8% compared with 8.9% in the control group (difference 14.9 percentage points, 95% CI [12.3, 17.5]; p < 0.001). Women who did not participate in BC screening were not included in this study. CONCLUSIONS Offering self-sampling to women overdue with CC and CRC screening when they attend BC screening was a feasible intervention, resulting in an increase in participation and total coverage. Other interventions are required to reach women who are not participating in BC screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05022511. The record of processing activities for research projects in the Central Denmark Region (R. No.: 1-16-02-217-21).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Dorte Lerche Helgestad
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Unit, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Sisse Njor
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Data, Innovation and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle; University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Tranberg
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Lone Kjeld Petersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Helgestad ADL, Andersen B, Njor SH, Larsen MB. The association of demographic and socioeconomic variables with cancer screening participation: A national cross-sectional study of three cancer screening programs in Denmark. Heliyon 2024; 10:e31163. [PMID: 39044972 PMCID: PMC11263647 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze the demographic and socioeconomic determinants of non-participation in cervical, colorectal and breast cancer screening programs in Denmark. Study design and setting We conducted a cross-sectional study involving all women aged 53-65 years residing in Denmark on March 31, 2018, utilizing comprehensive individual data from population registries. Logistic regression models were employed to assess associations between demographic and socioeconomic factors and non-participation compared with participating in one, two, and three cancer screening programs, presenting odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Both unadjusted and adjusted models were applied for each level of screening participation. Results Significant associations with non-participation in the three cancer screening programs were observed across all demographic and socioeconomic covariates considered. Women with low incomes demonstrated the highest likelihood of non-participation (none vs. three programs attended, OR: 2.95, 95 % CI: 2.82-3.08). Similarly, increased odds of non-participation were noted among immigrants (Western immigrants: OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.96-2.21; non-Western immigrants OR 1.26 95 % CI: 1.20-1.32), women living alone (OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 2.02-2.14), women outside the labor force (OR: 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.86-1.99), and women with lower educational levels (OR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.39-1.50) in the model comparing non-participation to participating in three screening programs. A progressive intensification of the association with non-participation was noted with each incremental increase in screening participation (from one to two to three programs). Conclusions Demographic and socioeconomic variables are significantly associated with non-participation in all three Danish cancer screening programs, particularly affecting women from vulnerable demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Future research should prioritize strategies to enhance participation within this subgroup, aiming to alleviate social inequities in cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Dorte Lerche Helgestad
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Data, Innovation and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Research Unit, Horsens Regional Hospital, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baech J, Jakobsen LH, Simonsen MR, Severinsen MT, Frederiksen H, Niemann CU, Brown P, Jørgensen JM, Dann EJ, Johnsen SP, El-Galaly TC. Survival outcomes and healthcare utilization between immigrant patients and Danish-born patients with hematological cancers: a Danish population-based study. Eur J Epidemiol 2024:10.1007/s10654-024-01139-z. [PMID: 38963616 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01139-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Overall survival (OS) for patients with a hematological cancer may differ between immigrant and Danish-born patients due to disparities in socioeconomic status, health literacy, and language proficiency. This cohort study aimed to investigate survival and hospitalization according to immigrant status while controlling for confounders. Patients with newly diagnosed hematological cancer in 2000-2020 were identified in the Danish nationwide hematological registers and stratified into Danish-born, Western, and non-Western patients. Patients were followed from diagnosis until death, 31st December 2021, or emigration, whichever came first. Crude OS, standardized OS, and 5-years OS differences were computed using flexible parametric models and hazard ratios using Cox regression. Number of hospitalization days in the year before and after diagnosis, respectively, were calculated using Poisson regression. A total of 2,241 immigrants and 41,519 Danish-born patients with a hematological cancer were included. Standardized 5-years OS was similar between groups with 58% (95% confidence interval 57-58%) for Danish-born patients, 57% (55-60%) for Western, and 56% (53-58%) for non-Western immigrant patients. Subgroup analyses identified OS differences in selected subgroups. Non-Western immigrant patients had 1.3 (0.5-2.1) more hospitalization days in the year before diagnosis and an adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospitalization days of 1.14 (1.13-1.15) in the year after diagnosis compared with Danish-born patients. In conclusion, there were no overall differences in survival when comparing immigrant patients to Danish-born patients after controlling for relevant confounders. Healthcare utilization was slightly higher among non-Western immigrant patients before and after diagnosis, but differences were small on an individual patient level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Baech
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Lasse Hjort Jakobsen
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Runason Simonsen
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Marianne Tang Severinsen
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Henrik Frederiksen
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense University Hospital, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense, Denmark
| | - Carsten Utoft Niemann
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Brown
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Eldad J Dann
- Department of Haematology, Rambam Medical Center, and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel
| | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomsen MK, Jørgensen MD, Pedersen L, Erichsen R, Sørensen HT, Mikkelsen EM. Mental disorders, participation, and trajectories in the Danish colorectal cancer programme: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:518-527. [PMID: 37353263 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00179-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with mental disorders exhibit increased mortality due to colorectal cancer, despite having a similar incidence to the general population. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which people with mental disorders participate in organised colorectal cancer screening. METHODS We conducted a population-based cohort study of all Danish residents aged 50-74 years who were invited to undergo biennial faecal immunochemical testing between March 1, 2014, and Sept 30, 2018. We used national registry data from all first-time invitees. The primary endpoint was participation within 90 days of invitation. We calculated the proportion who participated and assessed their screening results and adherence to and completeness of follow-up colonoscopy according to their history of mental disorders, classified as none, mild or moderate, or severe. We computed crude and adjusted participation differences in percentage points and participation ratios using the pseudo-observations method. FINDINGS Of 2 036 704 people who were invited, we included 2 036 352 in the final cohort, of whom 1 008 045 (49·5%) were men and 1 028 307 (50·5%) were women, with a mean age of 60·7 years (SD 8·3, range 49-78). Data on ethnicity were not collected. Compared with people with no mental disorders, the adjusted analysis showed lower participation among people with mild or moderate mental disorders (men: participation difference -4·4 percentage points [95% CI -4·7 to -4·1]; women: -3·8 percentage points [-4·1 to -3·6]) and severe mental disorders (men: participation difference -13·8 percentage points [-14·3 to -13·3]; women: -15·4 percentage points [-15·8 to -14·9]). People with mental disorders had a higher proportion of positive faecal immunochemical test results, lower adherence to colonoscopy, and more incomplete colonoscopies than people without mental disorders. INTERPRETATION People with mental disorders were less likely to participate in colorectal cancer screening than those without these disorders. Patients with mental disorders could benefit from support or encouragement from their general practitioner or mental health-care facility to participate in cancer screening. Potential interventions should consider type of mental disorder, as needs might differ. FUNDING Danish Cancer Society, Danish Health Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Kielsholm Thomsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; CASTLE - Cancer Survivorship and Treatment Late Effects, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Dahl Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Henrik Toft Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ellen M Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Jonge L, van Vuuren AJ, Dekker E, Spaander MCW, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Kemenade FJ, van Leerdam ME, Toes-Zoutendijk E. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112942. [PMID: 37406529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participation rates are essential for a screening programme to be beneficial. To reach non-participants in a targeted manner, insight in characteristics of non-participants is needed. We investigated demographic differences between participants and non-participants in the Dutch faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. METHODS In this population-based cohort study, we included all invitees for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019. Participation status, birth year, and sex were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system and linked to demographic characteristics from Statistics Netherlands, including migration background, level of education, socioeconomic category, household composition, and household income. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between demographic factors and participation. RESULTS A total of 4,383,861 individuals were invited for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019, of which 3,170,349 (72.3%) participated. Individuals were less likely to participate when they were single and/or living with others (single with other residents versus couple: odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.38), had a migration background (e.g. Moroccan migrant versus Dutch background: OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.42-0.44), or had a low income (lowest versus highest quintile: OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.44-0.45). Although to a lesser extent, non-participation was also significantly associated with being male, being younger, receiving social welfare benefits and having a low level of education. CONCLUSION We found that individuals who were single and/or living with others, immigrants from Morocco or individuals with low income were the least likely to participate in the Dutch CRC screening programme. Targeted interventions are needed to minimise inequities in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian R B Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chand BR, Phillipson L, Ha T. Factors influencing organised faecal occult blood test screening participation in culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a scoping review. Public Health 2023; 219:67-72. [PMID: 37120935 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature examining factors influencing participation in organised faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening programmes in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This article addresses gaps in the literature by providing a mixed methods review of the multilevel influences on FOBT screening in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations. This review was guided by the question "What are the factors influencing participation in organised FOBT screening programs in CALD populations?" STUDY DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS A scoping review methodology was used to summarise the available evidence. A thematic analysis of the included studies was undertaken to identify factors influencing organised FOBT screening participation in CALD populations from the literature. RESULTS FOBT screening participation was lower by ethnicity, religion, birthplace and language spoken. Barriers to screening included, faecal aversion, fatalism, fear of cancer, language and literacy barriers, difficulty accessing translated materials and low colorectal screening knowledge and awareness. CALD populations also had lower perceived benefits, susceptibility and cues to action, higher perceived barriers and greater perceived external health locus control than non-CALD populations. Facilitators of screening included positive attitudes to screening, general practitioner recommendations and social support. Group education sessions and narrative-based screening information were found to increase screening participation. CONCLUSION This review highlights the range of interrelated factors influencing participation in organised FOBT screening programmes in CALD populations and proposes multicomponent interventions to address low screening uptake. Features of successful community-level interventions should be explored further. Narratives show promise for engaging CALD populations. Accessibility of screening information should be addressed at the system level. Leveraging the general practitioner relationship in promoting FOBT screening programmes may also be an effective strategy to target 'hard-to-reach' populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Chand
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia.
| | - L Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - T Ha
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vanaclocha-Espí M, Pinto-Carbó M, Martín-Pozuelo J, Romeo-Cervera P, Peiró-Pérez R, Barona C, Ortiz F, Nolasco A, Castán S, Salas D, Molina-Barceló A. Construction of an individual socioeconomic status index for analysing inequalities in colorectal cancer screening. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278275. [PMID: 36454740 PMCID: PMC9714724 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To construct an individual socioeconomic status index (ISESI) with information available in the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia, Spain, and use it to analyse inequalities in a colorectal cancer screening programme (CRCSP). METHODS Cross-sectional study of men and women aged between 50 and 75 at the time of the study (2020) that were selected from the target population of the Region of Valencia CRCSP. (study sample 1,150,684). First, a multiple correspondence analysis was performed to aggregate information from the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia into an ISESI. Second, data from the 2016 Region of Valencia Health Survey were used for validation, and finally the relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI was analysed by logistic regression models. RESULTS The variables included in the index were nationality, employment status, disability, healthcare coverage, risk of vulnerability and family size. The most important categories for determining the highest socioeconomic status were being employed and not being at risk of social vulnerability, and being unemployed and at risk of social vulnerability for determining the lowest socioeconomic status. Index validation demonstrated internal and external coherence for measuring socioeconomic status. The relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI categorised by quartile (Q) showed that Q4 (the lowest socioeconomic status) was less likely to participate OR = 0.769 (0.757-0.782) than Q1 (the highest socioeconomic status), and the opposite was found for Q2 OR = 1.368 (1.347-1.390) and Q3 OR = 1.156 (1.137-1.175). CONCLUSIONS An ISESI was constructed and validated using Population Information System data and made it possible to evaluate inequalities in colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espí
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Marina Pinto-Carbó
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Martín-Pozuelo
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Romeo-Cervera
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rosana Peiró-Pérez
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- General Directorate of Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
| | - Carmen Barona
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- General Directorate of Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
- Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Ortiz
- Health Insurance Service and the SIP of the Conselleria de Sanitat, Valencian Community, Spain
| | | | - Susana Castán
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- General Directorate of Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
| | - Dolores Salas
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
- General Directorate of Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
| | - Ana Molina-Barceló
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research-Public Health Research FISABIO–Public Health Research, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pelullo CP, Torsiello L, Della Polla G, Di Giuseppe G, Pavia M. Screening for colorectal cancer: awareness and adherence among Italian women. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:1231-1237. [PMID: 36165054 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate women's awareness about and attendance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs in an area of Southern Italy, and to investigate related potential determinants. METHODS The survey was conducted among women through a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Overall, only 20.3% of respondents knew the three cancer screening tests offered to women and this knowledge, at the multivariate logistic regression analysis, resulted to be significantly higher in women who knew the two most common cancers in females, in those who were graduated, had a personal or family history of cancer, and had been informed about cancer prevention by physicians. Only 29.2% of women had ever undergone FOBT, 25% for screening purposes and, of these, 76.4% in the previous 2 years. Among those who had never undergone FOBT, 28.9% reported they had not been invited to attend, 34.5% that the test had not been prescribed by anyone, and 19.1% had no time to undergo. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model revealed that significant determinants of having undergone FOBT for screening purposes were having undergone mammography, having at least one chronic disease, not reporting alcohol consumption and having been informed about cancer screening by physicians. CONCLUSION Our findings have revealed a concerning low awareness about and adherence to CRC screening in women and have highlighted the fundamental role of healthcare workers and of enabling factors in the decision process. Interventions should be directed to increasing awareness, and to promote cancer prevention screening pathways more centered on women's health needs and convenience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Livio Torsiello
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'
| | - Giorgia Della Polla
- Health Direction, Teaching Hospital, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | | | - Maria Pavia
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Larsen MB, Hedelund M, Flander L, Andersen B. The impact of pre-notifications and reminders on participation in colorectal cancer screening - A randomised controlled trial. Prev Med 2022; 164:107229. [PMID: 36057390 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to test whether participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be increased by combining the standard invitation procedure with a pre-notification and/or an extra reminder. In a non-blinded randomised controlled trial nested in a population-based CRC screening programme employing the faecal immunochemical test, Group I received a three-staged invitation procedure (pre-notification, invitation and one reminder), Group II received a three-staged invitation procedure (invitation and two reminders) and Group III received a four-staged invitation procedure (pre-notification, invitation and two reminders). The control group received the invitation and one reminder (usual procedure). A total of 59,041 participants were included in the analyses. Overall participation rates increased from 66.9% in the control group to 69.8% in the four-staged invitation procedure corresponding to an increase in overall participation rate of 2.9% (95% CI: 1.8 to 4.0). In the age group 50-59 years, the four-staged invitation procedure increased the participation rate by 4.0% (95% CI: 2.4 to 5.6). An extra reminder increased participation with 2.7% (95% CI: 1.1; 4.2) for males compared to 1.1% (95% CI: -0.3; 2.5) for females. In conclusion, the four-staged invitation procedure was the most effective invitation procedure indicating that multiple invitation procedures are most effective, especially in the youngest age group. If a three-staged invitation procedure is applied, a second reminder should be preferred over a pre-notification. Trial registration The project was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 26 February 2020 and patient enrolment began in August 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04292366.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark.
| | - Mette Hedelund
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark
| | - Louisa Flander
- University of Melbourne, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Incuba Skejby, Building 2, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jørgensen MD, Mikkelsen EM, Erichsen R, Thomsen MK. Mental illness and participation in colorectal cancer screening: a scoping review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:1216-1226. [PMID: 35639472 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2073185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compared with the background population, persons with mental illness have increased colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. Screening has the potential to alleviate the increased cancer mortality due to mental illness, but the extent to which persons with mental illness participate in CRC screening programs is uncertain. This scoping review aims to summarize the literature on CRC screening participation among persons with mental illness. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched four databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) to identify published literature on mental illness and participation in CRC screening programs. We included full-text papers available in English, published before February 2021, and excluded papers on dementia, intellectual disabilities, and developmental disabilities. RESULTS In total, we included 17 studies and categorized the findings according to severity of mental illness. Across varying study designs, the studies found that persons with severe mental illness, e.g. schizophrenia, participate less in CRC screening compared with the background population. The results were ambiguous for common mental illness, such as depression and anxiety. In general, studies were small or lacked comparison groups and the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION This is the first scoping review to evaluate participation in CRC screening programs among persons with mental illness. Overall, the existing literature lacks high quality evidence from large population-based studies and comparison groups based on organized screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie D Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ellen M Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Mette K Thomsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Njor SH, Larsen MB, Søborg B, Andersen B. Colorectal cancer mortality after randomized implementation of FIT-based screening - a nationwide cohort study. J Med Screen 2022; 29:241-248. [DOI: 10.1177/09691413221102212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective Evidence of reduction in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality following CRC screening based on the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is insufficient. This study aimed to analyse if CRC mortality was reduced after implementing FIT-based screening. Setting The Danish national CRC screening programme. Methods This nationwide cohort study included residents aged 50–71 years invited to the prevalence round of the screening programme. Invitation order was decided by randomising on birth month; the first two birth months to be invited were classified as invited and the five last were classified as not-yet-invited and given a pseudo invitation data. Follow-up was from (pseudo)invitation date until 31 December 2017, emigration or death. Relative risk (RR) of CRC death was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 897,812 residents were included (29% invited and 71% not-yet-invited). The median follow-up was 3.3 years. The RR of CRC death at end of follow-up was 0.83 (95% CI 0.66; 1.03) among those invited to screening compared with those not yet invited. For men aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.49; 0.94). For those participating in screening compared with a similar group of not-yet-invited residents, the RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.46–1.08). For male participants aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.27−0.89). For women and men aged 50–59 years, RRs were small and statistically non-significant. Conclusion This nationwide study showed that even within a median follow-up of only 3.3 years, implementing FIT-based CRC screening reduced CRC mortality among older men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Bo Søborg
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomsen MK, Pedersen L, Erichsen R, Lash TL, Sørensen HT, Mikkelsen EM. Risk-stratified selection to colonoscopy in FIT colorectal cancer screening: development and temporal validation of a prediction model. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1229-1235. [PMID: 35058592 PMCID: PMC9023517 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01709-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) yield many false positives and challenge colonoscopy capacity in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. We aimed to develop a risk-based selection of participants to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy. METHODS The study was observational and used registry data from the Danish CRC screening programme. We included all participants invited 2014-2016 with a positive FIT (≥ 20 μg fHb/g) who underwent colonoscopy (n = 56,459). We predicted the risk of CRC or advanced neoplasia (AN) from age, gender and FIT value using logistic regression. We evaluated calibration and discrimination and conducted temporal validation. We compared the number of CRCs and adenomas identified by risk cut-offs and by a corresponding FIT cut-off. RESULTS AUCs were 74.9% (95% CI: 73.6; 76.3) and 67.4% (95% CI: 66.8%; 68.0%) for the models predicting CRC and AN in the validation dataset. The cut-off of CRC risk calculated from age, gender and FIT value identified 1.03 times (95% CI: 1.02; 1.05) more CRCs and 1.01 times (95% CI: 1.01; 1.01) more medium/high-risk adenomas compared with the corresponding FIT cut-off. CONCLUSIONS With existing data, risk-stratified FIT screening using a risk cut-off instead of a FIT cut-off can slightly improve the selection to colonoscopy of those at highest risk of cancer and adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Kielsholm Thomsen
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Pedersen
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.415677.60000 0004 0646 8878Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Timothy L. Lash
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Henrik T. Sørensen
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ellen M. Mikkelsen
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The relative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening to detect adenomas and cancer in different demographic and socioeconomic groups. A nationwide cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2022; 31:489-496. [PMID: 35485399 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed at analyzing the relative effectiveness in removal of adenomas and detection of cancer of implementing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in different demographic and socioeconomic groups. METHODS This register-based retrospective cohort study included residents aged 50-72 years. Those randomly selected to be invited for CRC screening from 1 March 2014 to 30 June 2015 were classified as invited; those invited from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017 were classified as not yet invited. Strata-specific relative risks (RRs) of having adenomas removed and CRC detected were estimated. RESULTS A total of 1 343 090 individuals were included. The RR of having adenomas removed were higher among men compared with women [RRwomen = 6.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.08-8.09), RRmen = 7.74 (95% CI: 6.16-9.73), P < 0.01] and among Danes compared with immigrants [RRDanes = 4.71 (95% CI: 3.73-5.93), RRWestern = 4.76 (95% CI: 3.39-6.69), RRnon-Western = 3.35 (95% CI: 2.39-4.69), P = 0.03]. Regarding detection of CRC, the effectiveness increased with increasing age ranging from RR = 1.53 (95% CI: 0.93- 2.51) to RR = 1.97 (95% CI: 1.22-3.17) (P = 0.04) and was higher among men compared with women (RRwomen = 1.75 (95% CI: 1.10-2.76), RRmen = 2.07 (95% CI: 1.32-3.26), P = 0.02. CONCLUSION Attention must be paid to the potential differences in screening effectiveness among diverse subpopulations; first, by securing equal opportunities for participation across subpopulations and second, by considering sex and age-specific screening programs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Flander L, Dekker E, Andersen B, Larsen MB, Steele RJ, Malila N, Sarkeala T, van der Vlugt M, de Klerk C, Knottnerus B, Bertels L, Woudstra A, Spaander MCW, Fransen M, Heinavaara S, Dillon M, Ait Ouakrim D, Jenkins M. What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia? Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221121383. [PMID: 35969473 PMCID: PMC9381723 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221121383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in men and women and second most common cause of cancer death in Australia; Australia’s CRC incidence and mortality are among the world’s highest. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program began in 2006; however, only 33% of those approached for the first time by the Program between 2018 and 2019 returned the kit. Of the 5.7 million kits sent during this period, only 44% were returned. Our aim was to identify practices and features of national bowel cancer screening programs in countries with similar programs but higher screening participation, to identify potential interventions for optimising Australian CRC screening participation. Methods We searched published and grey literature for CRC screening programs reporting at least 50% screening participation using postal invitation and free return of iFOBT home kits. Interviews were conducted with cancer registry staff and academic researchers, focused on participant and practitioner engagement in screening. Results National programs in Netherlands, Scotland, Denmark, and Finland reported over 50% screening participation rates for all invitation rounds. Shared characteristics include small populations within small geographic areas relative to Australia; relatively high literacy; a one-sample iFOBT kit; national registration systems for population cancer screening research; and screening program research including randomised trials of program features. Conclusions Apart from the one-sample kit, we identified no single solution to persistent Australian low uptake of screening. Research including randomised trials within the program promises to increase participation. Impact This screening program comparison suggests that within-program intervention trials will lead to increased Australian screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, 53198Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, 53198Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Robert J Steele
- Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, 3042University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Nea Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Clasine de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bart Knottnerus
- 8123Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lucinda Bertels
- 113896Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anke Woudstra
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Mary Dillon
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Information and Service Management, 4321Aalto University, Finland
| | - Driss Ait Ouakrim
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Harper DM, Tariq M, Alhawli A, Syed N, Patel M, Resnicow K. Cancer risk perception and physician communication behaviors on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening. eLife 2021; 10:e70003. [PMID: 34427182 PMCID: PMC8384416 DOI: 10.7554/elife.70003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women 50-65 years of age have the lowest cervical and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among ages recommended for screening. The primary aim of this work is to determine how cancer risk perceptions and provider communication behaviors, in addition to known demographic factors, influence the uptake of both cervical and CRC screening or a single screen among women in southeast Michigan. Methods Fourteen health services and communication behavior questions were adapted from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and administered to a multiethnic sample of adults in southeast Michigan. The outcome variable was self-reported up-to-date cervical cancer and/or CRC screening as defined by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Demographic and cancer risk/communication behavior responses of the four screening populations (both tests, one test, no tests) were analyzed with multinomial regression for all comparisons. Results Of the 394 respondents, 54% were up to date for both cervical and CRC screening, 21% were up to date with only cervical cancer screening and 12% were up to date for only CRC screening. Of the 14 risk perception and communication behavior questions, only 'Did your primary care physician (PCP) involve you in the decisions about your health care as much as you wanted?' was significantly associated with women having both screens compared to only cervical cancer screening (aOR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.57). The multivariate model showed age, and Middle East and North African (MENA) ethnicity and Black race, in addition to PCP-patient dyad decision-making to be associated with the cancer screenings women completed. Conclusions Optimizing PCP-patient decision-making in health care may increase opportunities for both cervical cancer and CRC screening either in the office or by self-sampling. Understanding the effects of age and the different interventional strategies needed for MENA women compared to Black women will inform future intervention trials aimed to increase both cancer screenings. Funding This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center P30CA046592-29-S4 grants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane M Harper
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUnited States
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUnited States
- Department of Women’s Studies, University of Michigan, College of Literature, Science and the ArtsAnn ArborUnited States
| | - Madiha Tariq
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Asraa Alhawli
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Nadia Syed
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Minal Patel
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of PublicAnn ArborUnited States
- Outreach and Health Disparities Research, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterAnn ArborUnited States
| | - Ken Resnicow
- Outreach and Health Disparities Research, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterAnn ArborUnited States
- Center for Health Communications Research, University of Michigan, School of Public HealthAnn ArborUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tatari CR, Andersen B, Brogaard T, Badre-Esfahani S, Jaafar N, Kirkegaard P. The SWIM study: Ethnic minority women's ideas and preferences for a tailored intervention to promote national cancer screening programmes-A qualitative interview study. Health Expect 2021; 24:1692-1700. [PMID: 34232543 PMCID: PMC8483185 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethnic minority women from non-Western countries are less likely than the native women to participate in screening programmes for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer. This social inequality can result in loss of possibility for prevention, delayed diagnosis and treatment and, ultimately, lower chance of survival. Developing a tailored intervention might be the solution to reduce social inequalities in cancer screening, and a key feature in intervention research is to consult the target group. OBJECTIVE To explore ethnic minority women's own ideas and preferences for a cancer screening intervention and identify their attitudes to different strategies. METHODS An interview study with five focus group interviews, two group interviews with an interpreter and three individual interviews. Thirty-seven women from 10 non-Western countries contributed to the study. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim followed by a thematic analysis. RESULTS According to the women, a tailored intervention should focus on knowledge in the form of face-to-face teaching. The women further suggested information material in their own language with a simple, positive and concrete communication strategy. They would like to be involved in an awareness strategy and share the knowledge with their network. CONCLUSION Ethnic minority women were interested in a tailored intervention, and they were keen to contribute with ideas and preferences. The findings emphasized the potential of a tailored intervention with specific suggestions to the content when attempting to reduce inequality in cancer screening participation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Minority women were involved in the interview study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rahr Tatari
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sara Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Negin Jaafar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gram MA, Therkildsen C, Clarke RB, Andersen KK, Mørch LS, Tybjerg AJ. The influence of marital status and partner concordance on participation in colorectal cancer screening. Eur J Public Health 2021; 31:340-346. [PMID: 33417705 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening program using a fecal immunochemical test aims to reduce morbidity and mortality through early detection. Although screening participation is free-of-charge, almost 40% of the invited individuals choose not to participate. To bring new insight into how non-participation can be identified and targeted, we examined the association between marital status and screening participation; with a focus on partner concordance in participation and sex differences. METHODS This nationwide cross-sectional study included all Danish citizens aged 50-74 years, who were invited to colorectal cancer screening between 2014 and 2017. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) of participation while adjusting for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS A total of 1 909 662 individuals were included in the analysis of which 62.7% participated in the screening program. Participation was highest among women. Stratified by marital status, screening participation was markedly lower in widowed (61.5%), divorced (54.8%) and single (47.3%), while participation reached 68.4% in married individuals. This corresponded to ORs of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58-0.59) for widowed, 0.56 (95% CI 0.55-0.56) for divorced and 0.47 (95% CI 0.47-0.48) for single, compared to married individuals. Individuals married to a participating partner were five times more likely to participate than married individuals with a non-participating partner, regardless of gender. CONCLUSIONS Marital status was strongly associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening, and participation was even higher in married individuals with a participating partner. Future efforts to increase participation in colorectal cancer screening could potentially benefit from considering the role of partner concordance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mie Agermose Gram
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Therkildsen
- The Danish HNPCC Register, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Rebecca B Clarke
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus K Andersen
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lina S Mørch
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Julie Tybjerg
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing total colectomy for IBD may develop cancer in the rectal remnant, but the association is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine the risk and prognosis of rectal cancer after total colectomy for IBD. DESIGN This is a nationwide population-based study. SETTING Treatment of the patients took place in Denmark from 1977 to 2013. PATIENTS Patients with IBD undergoing total colectomy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We examined the incidence of rectal cancer among patients with IBD and total colectomy and compared cancer stage to that of other patients with rectal cancer in Denmark. We used Kaplan-Meier methodology to estimate survival and Cox regression to estimate adjusted mortality rate ratios following a rectal cancer diagnosis, comparing patients with and without IBD and a rectal remnant. RESULTS We identified 4703 patients with IBD (1026 Crohn's disease; 3677 ulcerative colitis) who underwent total colectomy with a rectal remnant. During 29,725 years of follow-up, 30 rectal cancers were observed, compared with 8 rectal cancers expected (standardized incidence ratio = 3.6 (95% CI, 2.4-5.1)). Cancer stage distributions were similar. Risk of rectal cancer 35 years after total colectomy was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.9%). Five years after rectal cancer diagnosis, survival was 28% (95% CI, 12%-47%) and 38% (95% CI, 37%-38%) for patients with and without IBD and a rectal remnant. The adjusted mortality rate ratio 1 to 5 years after a rectal cancer diagnosis was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.6-3.9). Median time from last recorded nondiagnostic proctoscopy to rectal cancer diagnosis for patients with IBD and total colectomy was 1.1 years. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by the few outcomes and the use of administrative and not clinical data. CONCLUSION Long-term risk of rectal cancer following total colectomy for IBD was low. Survival following a diagnosis of rectal cancer was poorer for patients with IBD and total colectomy than for patients who had rectal cancer without IBD and total colectomy. Endoscopic surveillance, as it appeared to be practiced in this cohort, may be inadequate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B497. RIESGO DE CÁNCER DE RECTO Y SUPERVIVENCIA DESPUÉS DE UNA COLECTOMÍA TOTAL POR ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONAL: Los pacientes sometidos a colectomía total por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) pueden desarrollar cáncer en el remanente rectal, pero la asociación es poco conocida.Examinar el riesgo y el pronóstico del cáncer de recto después de una colectomía total para la EII.Estudio poblacional a nivel nacional.Dinamarca 1977-2013.Pacientes con EII sometidos a colectomía total.Examinamos la incidencia de cáncer de recto entre pacientes con EII y colectomía total y comparamos el estadio del cáncer con el de otros pacientes con cáncer de recto en Dinamarca. Utilizamos la metodología de Kaplan-Meier para estimar la supervivencia y la regresión de Cox para estimar las tasas de mortalidad ajustadas (aMRR) después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto, comparando pacientes con y sin EII y un remanente rectal.Identificamos 4.703 pacientes con EII (1.026 enfermedad de Crohn; 3.677 colitis ulcerosa) que se sometieron a colectomía total con remanente rectal. Durante 29,725 años de seguimiento, se observaron 30 cánceres de recto, en comparación con los 8 esperados [razón de incidencia estandarizada (SIR) = 3.6, (intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%: 2.4-5.1)]. Las distribuciones de las etapas del cáncer fueron similares. El riesgo de cáncer de recto 35 años después de la colectomía total fue del 1,9% (IC del 95%: 1,1% -2,9%). Cinco años después del diagnóstico de cáncer de recto, la supervivencia fue del 28% (IC del 95%: 12% -47%) y del 38% (IC del 95%: 37% -38%) para los pacientes con y sin EII y un remanente rectal, respectivamente. La aMRR 1-5 años después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto fue de 2,5 (IC del 95%: 1,6-3,9). La mediana de tiempo desde la última proctoscopia no diagnóstica registrada hasta el diagnóstico de cáncer de recto en pacientes con EII y colectomía total fue de 1,1 años.Pocos resultados, uso de datos administrativos y no clínicos.El riesgo a largo plazo de cáncer de recto después de una colectomía total para la EII fue bajo. La supervivencia después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto fue más pobre para los pacientes con EII y colectomía total que para los pacientes con cáncer de recto sin EII y colectomía total. La vigilancia endoscópica, como parecía practicarse en esta cohorte, puede ser inadecuada. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B497. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang A, Lee B, Patel S, Whitaker E, Issaka RB, Somsouk M. Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review. J Med Screen 2021; 28:379-388. [PMID: 33683155 DOI: 10.1177/0969141321997482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Digital health care offers an opportunity to scale and personalize cancer screening programs, such as mailed outreach for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, studies that describe the patient selection strategy and process for CRC screening are limited. Our objective was to evaluate implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening programs in large health care systems. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of 30 studies along with key informant surveys and interviews to describe programmatic implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening. PubMed and Embase were searched since inception through December 2018, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists but none were incorporated (n = 0). No language exclusions were applied. RESULTS Common criteria for outreach exclusion included: being up-to-date with routine CRC screening (n = 22), comorbidities (n = 20), and personal history (n = 22) or family history of cancer (n = 9). Key informant surveys and interviews were performed (n = 28) to understand data sources and practices for patient outreach selection, and found that 13 studies leveraged electronic medical care records, 10 studies leveraged a population registry (national, municipal, community, health), 4 studies required patient opt-in, and 1 study required primary care provider referral. Broad ranges in fecal immunochemical test completion were observed in community clinic (n = 8, 31.0-59.6%), integrated health system (n = 5, 21.2-82.7%), and national regional CRC screening programs (n = 17, 23.0-64.7%). Six studies used technical codes, and four studies required patient self-reporting from a questionnaire to participate. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides health systems with the diverse outreach practices and technical tools to support efforts to automate patient selection for CRC screening outreach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Wang
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Briton Lee
- Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shreya Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Evans Whitaker
- University of California San Francisco Medical Library, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research and Public Health Science Divisions, Fred Hutchinson, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pallesen AVJ, Herrstedt J, Westendorp RGJ, Mortensen LH, Kristiansen M. Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:323-332. [PMID: 33427545 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1869829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) does not affect different sociodemographic groups uniformly. CRC screening programmes could seek to reduce this inequality; however, the screening programmes themselves might be subject to differential participation across sociodemographic groups. This study investigates the sociodemographic inequality at all steps in Denmark's nationwide CRC screening programme: screening participation, faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results, colonoscopy compliance, CRC diagnosis, and cancer stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cohort study includes all first-time invitees from the beginning of the Danish population-based CRC screening programme from 1 March 2014 to 31 December 2017. RESULTS Sixty-four percent of the invitees participated in the screening programme, and of those 7% were FIT-positive. After being invited to further diagnostic procedures, 90% responded to the invitation, and among those 5% were CRC-positive. Among those diagnosed with CRC, 9% were stage IV. Through multivariable analyses, we identified sociodemographic inequalities in all steps of the screening programme from returning a stool sample to being diagnosed with CRC. Specifically, we identified inequalities across sex, age, migration status, relationship status, the screening status of one's partner, education, income, and use of health services. Women were more likely to participate compared to men (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.12-1.13), but had a lower risk of a positive FIT result (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.66-0.68) and of a CRC diagnosis (RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.93) compared to men. The likelihood of participating as well as the risk of positive FIT results and CRC diagnosis increased with age. CONCLUSION All steps of the screening programme were subject to sociodemographic inequalities. Interventions are needed to target groups identified as having lower uptake as well as high-risk of being FIT- and/or CRC-positive. These groups include males, individuals aged 60+ years and individuals who do not visit their GP regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Vera Jørring Pallesen
- Department of Public Health & Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Naestved, Denmark
| | - Rudi G. J. Westendorp
- Department of Public Health & Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laust Hvas Mortensen
- Department of Public Health & Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Kristiansen
- Department of Public Health & Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gabel P, Larsen MB, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Andersen B. Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241703. [PMID: 33170877 PMCID: PMC7654753 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision to take up colorectal cancer screening has to be made on informed grounds balancing benefits and harms. Self-administered decision aids can support citizens in making an informed choice. A self-administered web-based decision aid targeting citizens with lower educational attainment has been evaluated within the target population. However, the effectiveness in the general screening population remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice among previous non-participants in colorectal cancer screening. METHODS AND FINDINGS The study was designed as a parallel randomised controlled trial among non-participants in colorectal cancer screening in Central Denmark Region (men and women aged 53-74 years). Respondents to baseline and follow-up questionnaires comprised the study population (n = 1,723). The intervention group received the decision aid electronically along with the second reminder. The control group received only the second reminder. The main outcomes (knowledge, attitudes, uptake and decisional conflict) were obtained through questionnaires data and from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database. The decision aid increased the uptake rate by 8 percentage points (95% CI: 3.4;12.6) but had no effect on either knowledge (scale score differences: 0.09; 95% CI: -0.05;0.24) or attitudes (0.45; 95% CI: -0.00;0.91). Decisional conflict decreased by 1.69 scale points (95% CI: -3.18;-0.20). The effect was similar across educational attainment levels. CONCLUSIONS The web-based decision aid offers a feasible way to provide individualised screening information in a "one size fits all" approach that may hold the potential to increase informed CRC screening uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03253888.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pallesen AVJ, Herrstedt J, Westendorp RGJ, Mortensen LH, Kristiansen M. Do we know the effects of colorectal cancer screening? A short communication on selective uptake and differential effects of colorectal cancer screening in Scandinavia. Scand J Public Health 2020; 49:841-844. [PMID: 33016227 DOI: 10.1177/1403494820960641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) contributes extensively to the overall cancer burden, with substantial and increasing social inequality in both incidence and survival. In several countries, this social inequality in incidence and survival has been increasing over time, and the increase is expected to continue. To overcome this, it is advised to implement nationwide CRC screening programmes, as these are effective in detecting possible signs of CRC, hence identifying earlier-stage cancer and reducing mortality. However, little is known about the distribution of these effects across population groups. It is possible that the outcomes of CRC screening are not equally distributed among participants, but rather that the screening programme serves some population groups better than others. The aim of this short communication based on published data is to describe the status of selective uptake according to sociodemographic and economic factors in CRC screening in Scandinavia. Furthermore, we raise questions that need to be addressed in future research in order to grasp the full effects of the screening programme and ultimately to ensure high uptake as well as participation in subsequent diagnostic procedures across population groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Vera Jørring Pallesen
- Department of Public Health and Centre for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Denmark
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care Units, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Rudi G J Westendorp
- Department of Public Health and Centre for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laust Hvas Mortensen
- Department of Public Health and Centre for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Denmark
| | - Maria Kristiansen
- Department of Public Health and Centre for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kjeldgaard AH, Hørslev-Petersen K, Wehberg S, Soendergaard J, Primdahl J. Does socioeconomic status make a difference? A register-based study on the extent to which cardiovascular screening in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to recommended follow-up in general practice. RMD Open 2020; 6:rmdopen-2019-000940. [PMID: 32868450 PMCID: PMC7507734 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate to what extent patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) follow recommendations given in a secondary care nurse-led cardiovascular (CV) risk screening consultation to consult their general practitioner (GP) to reduce their CV risk and whether their socioeconomic status (SES) affects adherence. METHODS Adults with IA who had participated in a secondary care screening consultation from July 2012 to July 2015, based on the EULAR recommendations, were identified. Patients were considered to have high CV risk if they had risk Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) ≥5%, according to the European SCORE model or systolic blood pressure ≥145 mmHg, total cholesterol ≥8 mmol/L, LDL cholesterol ≥5 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥42 mmol/mol or fasting glucose ≥6 mmol/L. The primary outcome was a consultation with their GP and at least one action focusing on CV risk factors within 6 weeks after the screening consultation. RESULTS The study comprised 1265 patients, aged 18-85 years. Of these, 336/447 (75%) of the high-risk patients and 580/819 (71%) of the low-risk patients had a GP consultation. 127/336 (38%) of high-risk patients and 160/580 (28%) of low-risk patients received relevant actions related to their CV risk, for example, blood pressure home measurement or prescription for statins, antihypertensives or antidiabetics. Education ≥10 years increased the odds for non-adherence (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.0.37 to 0.92, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS 75% of the high-risk patients consulted their GP after the secondary care CV risk screening, and 38% of these received an action relevant for their CV risk. Higher education decreased adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Soenderborg 6400, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - Sonja Wehberg
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - Jens Soendergaard
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - Jette Primdahl
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Soenderborg 6400, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark.,Hospital of Southern Jutland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa 6200, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Clarke RB, Therkildsen C, Gram MA, Andersen KK, Mørch LS, Tybjerg AJ. Use of primary health care and participation in colorectal cancer screening - a Danish national register-based study. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1002-1006. [PMID: 32286136 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1750697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Therkildsen
- The Danish HNPCC Register, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tatari CR, Andersen B, Brogaard T, Badre-Esfahani SK, Jaafar N, Kirkegaard P. Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:921. [PMID: 32532227 PMCID: PMC7291658 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening programmes for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer have been implemented in many Western countries to reduce cancer incidence and mortality. Ethnic minority women are less likely to participate in cancer screening than the majority population. In worst case this can result in higher incidence rates, later diagnosis and treatment and ultimately inferior survival. In this paper we explored the perceptions about cancer and perceived barriers towards cancer screening participation among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. METHODS Interview study with ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim followed by an inductive content analysis. RESULTS Cancer was perceived as a deadly disease that could not be treated. Cancer screening was perceived as only relevant if the women had symptoms. Knowledge about cancer screening was fragmented, often due to inadequate Danish language skills and there was a general mistrust in the Danish healthcare system due to perceived low medical competences in Danish doctors. There was, however, a very positive and curious attitude regarding information about the Danish cancer screening programmes and a want for more information. CONCLUSION Ethnic minority women did not have sufficient knowledge about cancer and the purpose of cancer screening. Perceptions about cancer screening were characterised by openness and the study showed positive and curious attitudes towards screening participation. The findings emphasise the importance of culturally adapted interventions for ethnic minority women in attempts to reduce inequality in screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rahr Tatari
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sara Koed Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Negin Jaafar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Horshauge PM, Gabel P, Larsen MB, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Andersen B. The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep 2020; 19:101132. [PMID: 32551215 PMCID: PMC7287294 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53-74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petricia Marie Horshauge
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lal N, Singh HK, Majeed A, Pawa N. The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in London. J Med Screen 2020; 28:114-121. [PMID: 32295488 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320916206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Screening programmes based on the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) can reduce mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a significant variation exists in uptake of the test within the UK. Disproportionate uptake risks increasing inequity during staging at diagnosis and survival from CRC. This study aims to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of CRC screening (FOBT) in London. METHODS A retrospective review of the "Vanguard RM Informatics" database was performed to identify eligible individuals for CRC screening across all general practices across London over 30 months (2014-2017). The postcodes of the general practices were used to obtain the deprivation data via the "Indices of Deprivation" database. A Spearman's rho correlation was performed to quantify the impact of the deprivation variables on FOBT uptake. RESULTS Overall, 697,402 individuals were eligible for screening across 1359 London general practices, within 5 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs); 48.4% (range: 13%-74%) participated in CRC screening with the lowest participation rates in North West (46%) and North East (47%) London CCGs. All indices of deprivation had a significant correlation with the uptake of FOBT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This is the largest study across London to date demonstrating a significant positive correlation between deprivation indices and FOBT uptake, highlighting areas of particular risk. Further studies are imperative to quantify the impact of deprivation on CRC morbidity and mortality, together with focused strategies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in screening in these high risk areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Lal
- Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Harpreet Ksi Singh
- Colorectal Surgical Department, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, Isleworth, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Pawa
- Colorectal Surgical Department, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, Isleworth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gabel P, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, Larsen MB, Andersen B. The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:359-368. [PMID: 31451360 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This trial tested the effectiveness of a self-administered web-based decision aid, targeted at citizens with lower educational attainment, on informed choice about colorectal cancer screening participation as assessed by group levels of knowledge, attitudes and uptake. METHODS The randomised controlled trial was conducted among 2702 screening-naïve Danish citizens, 53-74 years old, with lower educational attainment. Baseline questionnaire respondents (62%) were allocated to intervention and control groups. Intervention group citizens received the decision aid. Outcomes were informed choice, worries and decisional conflict. RESULTS Analyses were conducted among 339 eligible citizens. The mean difference in knowledge score change between intervention and control group was 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.38;0.38). Trends towards more positive screening attitudes (mean difference in score change: 0.72, 95% CI: -0.38;1.81) and higher screening uptake (7.6%, 95% CI:-2.2;17.4%) were observed. Worries (-0.33, 95% CI: -0.97;0.32) and decisional conflict (mean difference: -3.5, 95%CI: -7.0;-0.1) were slightly reduced. CONCLUSIONS The decision aid did not affect informed choice or knowledge. However, there were trends towards increased screening uptake and more positive screening attitudes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Being a simple intervention and easily administered, the decision aid could represent a cost-effective way of enhancing screening uptake, and some elements of informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim BC, Kang M, Park E, Shim JI, Kang S, Lee J, Tchoe HJ, Kong KA, Kim DH, Kim YJ, Choi KS, Moon CM. Clinical Factors Associated with Adherence to the Follow-Up Examination after Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test in National Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E260. [PMID: 31963658 PMCID: PMC7019756 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The compliance with the follow-up examination after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is lower than expected. We aimed to evaluate the adherence rate to the follow-up examination in patients with a positive FOBT and to identify the clinical factors associated with this adherence. METHODS The study population comprised adults aged ≥50 years who participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in 2013. Compliance was defined as undergoing follow-up examination within 1 year of a positive FOBT. RESULTS From 214,131 individuals with a positive FOBT, 120,911 (56.5%) were in the compliance group and 93,220 (43.5%) were in the non-compliance group. On multivariate analysis, good compliance was associated with men (odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09-1.15)), younger ages (70-79 years, OR = 2.19 (2.09-2.31); 60-69 years, OR = 3.29 (3.13-3.46); 50-59 years, OR = 3.57 (3.39-3.75) vs. >80 years), previous experience of CRC screening (a negative FOBT, OR = 1.18 (1.15-1.21); a positive FOBT, OR = 2.42 (2.31-2.54)), absent previous experience of colonoscopy or barium enema (OR = 2.06 (1.99-2.13)), higher economic income (quartile, 75%, OR = 1.14 (1.11-1.17); 100%, OR = 1.22 (1.19-1.25)), current smokers (OR = 1.12 (1.09-1.15)), alcohol intake (OR = 1.03 (1.01-1.05)), active physical activity (≥3 times/week, OR = 1.13 (1.11-1.15)), depression (OR = 1.11 (1.08-1.14)), and present comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index, ≥1). CONCLUSION This study identified clinical factors, namely, male, younger ages, prior experience of fecal test, absent history of colonoscopy or double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) within 5 years, and high socioeconomic status to be associated with good adherence to the follow-up examination after a positive FOBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, Cancer Epidemiology Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea;
| | - Minjoo Kang
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Eunjung Park
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Jeong-Im Shim
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Shinhee Kang
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Jessie Lee
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Ha Jin Tchoe
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea; (M.K.); (E.P.); (J.-I.S.); (S.K.); (J.L.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Kyeong Ae Kong
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea;
| | - Duk Hwan Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do 11160, Korea;
| | - Yu Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangwon-do 24252, Korea;
| | - Kui Son Choi
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Korea
| | - Chang Mo Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07985, Korea
- Tissue Injury Defense Research Center, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Degett TH, Christensen J, Thomsen LA, Iversen LH, Gögenur I, Dalton SO. Nationwide cohort study of the impact of education, income and social isolation on survival after acute colorectal cancer surgery. BJS Open 2019; 4:133-144. [PMID: 32011820 PMCID: PMC6996631 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute colorectal cancer surgery has been associated with a high postoperative mortality. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between socioeconomic position and the likelihood of undergoing acute versus elective colorectal cancer surgery. A secondary aim was to determine 1‐year survival among patients treated with acute surgery. Methods All patients who had undergone a surgical procedure according to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database, or who were registered with stent or diverting stoma in the National Patient Register from 2007 to 2015, were reviewed. Socioeconomic position was determined by highest attained educational level, income, urbanicity and cohabitation status, obtained from administrative registries. Co‐variables included age, sex, year of surgery, Charlson Co‐morbidity Index score, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, stage and tumour localization. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of acute colorectal cancer surgery, and Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used for analysis of 1‐year overall survival. Results In total, 35 661 patients were included; 5310 (14·9 per cent) had acute surgery. Short and medium education in patients younger than 65 years (odds ratio (OR) 1·58, 95 per cent c.i. 1·32 to 1·91, and OR 1·34, 1·15 to 1·55 respectively), low income (OR 1·12, 1·01 to 1·24) and living alone (OR 1·35, 1·26 to 1·46) were associated with acute surgery. Overall, 40·7 per cent of patients died within 1 year of surgery. Short education (hazard ratio (HR) 1·18, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 1·36), low income (HR 1·16, 1·01 to 1·34) and living alone (HR 1·25, 1·13 to 1·38) were associated with reduced 1‐year survival after acute surgery. Conclusion Low socioeconomic position was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing acute colorectal cancer surgery, and with reduced 1‐year overall survival after acute surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H Degett
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - J Christensen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L A Thomsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L H Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Denmark
| | - I Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Denmark
| | - S O Dalton
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Health educational background as a predictor of non-participation in national colorectal cancer screening: A cross-sectional population study among 886,088 invited Danes. Prev Med 2019; 125:69-76. [PMID: 31150740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Health information knowledge may affect attitude toward colorectal cancer screening, but the participation of health educated citizens are unknown. Therefore, we investigated non-participation in a sample of 886,088 invited participants, based on educational length, type, and level. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of non-participation in Danish men and women based on educational type and length. Models were adjusted for age, income, marital status and immigration status. Information was derived from National registers. Men with long educational length level had increased odds of non-participation if their education was within the field of medicine/medical science (OR 1.87) or belonged to other long health educations, but not in nursing and health care, compared to other long educations after full model adjustment. Women with long educational length level had increased odds of non-participation if they were educated in the field of medicine/medical science (OR 1.47), whereas they had decreased odds in the fields of nursing and health care and other long health educations, compared to other long educations after full model adjustment. Men within short educational length level did not have different odds of nonparticipation, after full model adjustments, whereas women within short health educations were at increased odds in the youngest age group and at decreased odds in the eldest age group. Having an education in the field of medicine/medical science is associated with non-participation in colorectal cancer screening in Denmark 2014-2015. Opposite, an educational background in nursing and health care increased participation in women, but not in men.
Collapse
|
33
|
Knowledge, attitudes, and worries among different health literacy groups before receiving first invitation to colorectal cancer screening: Cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep 2019; 14:100876. [PMID: 31080706 PMCID: PMC6506556 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer screening uptake is associated with knowledge, attitudes and worries about screening. People with higher levels of health literacy usually have higher screening-related knowledge, but its association with attitudes and worries is sparsely described.The aim of this study was to describe knowledge, attitudes, and worries about colorectal cancer screening among unscreened citizens, and to estimate the association between these and health literacy. Methods In a cross-sectional study 10,030 53-74 year-old Central Denmark Region citizens received a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes, worry and health literacy. Socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark after data collection. Results In total, 7142 (71.2%) questionnaires were completed. A good general level of knowledge was observed (4.91 and 5.13 out of 7 for men and women, respectively). Citizens tended to be positive towards screening (21.4 and 21.3 on a 4-28 range scale for men and women respectively), and showed low levels of worries (8.8 and 9.09 on a 3-15 range scale for men and women respectively). Knowledge decreased and worries increased with lower levels of health literacy. Further, attitudes tended to be more positive with higher levels of health literacy. Conclusions In general, citizens tend to have good knowledge, positive attitudes and few worries about colorectal cancer screening. People with lower health literacy could benefit from targeted interventions that address knowledge and worries about screening to support informed decision making.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hvidberg L, Virgilsen LF, Pedersen AF, Vedsted P. Cancer beliefs and participation in screening for colorectal cancer: A Danish cohort study based on data from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership and national registers. Prev Med 2019; 121:11-17. [PMID: 30690041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Line Hvidberg
- Research Unit for General Practice and Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - Line Flytkjær Virgilsen
- Research Unit for General Practice and Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - Anette Fischer Pedersen
- Research Unit for General Practice and Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice and Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Deding U, Henig AS, Torp-Pedersen C, Bøggild H. The effects of reminders for colorectal cancer screening: participation and inequality. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:141-150. [PMID: 30386888 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3178-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of sending out reminders for colorectal cancer screening on socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in screening uptake. METHODS All citizens aged 50-74 in Denmark are invited every 2 years for colorectal cancer screening. Non-participants receive an electronically distributed reminder. Data for these analyses were derived from national registers. Socioeconomic status was measured by income and educational level. Demographic variables included age, gender and marital status, and the analyses were stratified by immigration status. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of non-participation for invited citizens and for reminded citizens divided by socioeconomic and demographic predictors. RESULTS Of 763,511 native Danes invited for screening from 2014 to 2015, 387,116 (50.70%) participated after the initial invitation and 133,470 after receiving a reminder. Differences in participation were present in relation to all subgroups among both the invited citizens and reminded citizens. Differences persisted after full model adjustments with reductions for demographic variables. Odds ratio (OR) for non-participation in the eldest age group was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.32; 0.33) before and 1.11 (95% CI 1, 0.08; 1.14) after the reminder, compared to those under 55 years. OR for the 4th income quartile was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.53; 0.55) before and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.43; 0.45) after the reminder, compared to 1st quartile. CONCLUSIONS Reminders increased the overall participation, and the inequalities in participation in relation to demographic factors were reduced after the distribution of reminders. The age differences were especially reduced. The inequalities in participation related to socioeconomic status were, however, slightly increased after reminder distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Deding
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, DK-9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
| | - Anna Sharon Henig
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, DK-9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark
| | - Christian Torp-Pedersen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, DK-9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark
- Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Henrik Bøggild
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, DK-9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark
- Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thomsen MK, Rasmussen M, Njor SH, Mikkelsen EM. Demographic and comorbidity predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:1733-1742. [PMID: 30538577 PMCID: PMC6257139 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s176923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening with a stool sample screening modality have been widely studied, but adherence to subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive screening test has received less attention. We aimed to determine predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from National Health Service registries. We included 8,112 individuals invited to screening between March 3, 2014, and August 31, 2014, who had a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test. Potential predictors were gender, age, region of residence, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, specific diseases (cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and cancer), and number of prior hospital stays. We estimated prevalence proportion differences (PPDs) for the associations between potential predictors and adherence. RESULTS Overall, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy was 88.6%. Adherence was lower in individuals aged 75 years compared with those aged <70 years, PPD=-4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.19; -2.20). Adherence decreased with a higher level of comorbidity: PPD=-2.30 (95% CI: -3.87; -0.74) for a CCI score of 1-2 and PPD=-9.24 (95% CI: -12.30; -6.19) for a CCI score of ≥3 compared to 0. For specific diseases, adherence was decreased in those with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, or diabetes, but less for cancer. When comorbidity was measured as number of prior hospital stays, the adjusted PPDs were -2.41 (95% CI: -4.43;-0.39) for one to two stays and -14.50 (95% CI: -20.30; -8.74) for three or more stays compared with no in-hospital stays. CONCLUSION Major predictors of nonadherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test were older age, a CCI score of 1 or more, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and one or more in-hospital stays within the last year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Department of Digestive Diseases K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark,
- Department of Public Health Programs, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gabel P, Larsen MB, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Andersen B. The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:543. [PMID: 30305114 PMCID: PMC6180588 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2921-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening participation is a preference-sensitive choice, in which trade-offs between benefits and harms must be made by individual citizens. Often the decision is made without any contact with healthcare professionals. Citizens with lower educational attainment tend to participate less in colorectal cancer screening than citizens with average educational attainment. Further, they tend to have lower levels of knowledge about colorectal cancer screening. Providing lower educational attainment citizens with a targeted decision aid embracing their diverse information needs might increase these citizens' ability to make informed decisions. The aim of this trial is to test the effectiveness of such a newly developed self-administered decision aid. METHODS The LEAD (Lower Educational Attainment Decision aid) trial will be conducted as a two-arm randomized controlled trial among 10,000 50-74-year-old citizens, resident in the Central Denmark Region not yet invited to take up colorectal cancer screening. Citizens will receive a baseline questionnaire. Respondents will be allocated into the intervention or the control groups. Citizens in the intervention group will receive the decision aid whereas the control group will not. Those who return a stool sample within 45 days after receiving the screening invitation and those with medium or higher educational attainment are excluded. Both groups will receive a follow-up questionnaire 90 days after being invited to colorectal cancer screening. A historic cohort consisting of 5000 50-74-year-old citizens resident in the Central Denmark Region, having received their screening invitation in the beginning of 2017 will be included. This cohort will receive a follow-up questionnaire 6-9 months after they received the screening invitation. Informed choice will be evaluated by assessing levels of knowledge, attitudes, and screening uptake. Analyses will be conducted as intention-to-treat analyses. Additionally, differences between levels of worry and decisional conflict between groups will be assessed as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION This trial will evaluate whether a targeted decision aid is a feasible way of enhancing informed choice among lower educational attainment citizens in colorectal cancer screening. Further, it may guide decisions about providing information material in cancer screening in general. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03253888 . Registered on 17 August 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NØ, Denmark.
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NØ, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hofmann B, Stanak M. Nudging in screening: Literature review and ethical guidance. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1561-1569. [PMID: 29657111 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nudging is the purposeful alteration of choices presented to people that aims to make them choose in predicted ways. While nudging has been used to assure high uptake and good outcome of screening programs, it has been criticized for being paternalistic, undermining free choice, and shared decision making. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to explore a) nudging strategies identified in screening, b) arguments for and against nudging; and on basis of this, to c) suggest a tentative conclusion on how to handle nudging in screening. METHODS Literature searches in Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO for combinations of screening and nudging. Screening based on content analysis of titles, abstracts, and articles. RESULTS 239 references were identified and 109 were included. Several forms of nudging were identified: framed information, default bias, or authority bias. Uptake and public health outcome were the most important goals. Arguments for nudging were bounded rationality, unavoidability, and beneficence, while lack of transparency, crowding out of intrinsic values, and paternalism were arguments against it. The analysis indicates that nudging can be acceptable for screenings with (high quality) evidence for high benefit-harm ratio (beneficence), where nudging does not infringe other ethical principles, such as justice and non-maleficence. In particular, nudging should not only focus on attendance rates, but also on making people "better choosers." PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Four specific recommendations follow from the review and the analysis: 1) Nudging should be addressed in an explicit and transparent manner. 2) The means of nudging have to be in proportion to the benefit-harm ratio. 3) Disagreement on the evidence for either benefits or harms warrants special care. 4) Assessing and assuring the intended outcome of nudging appears to be crucial, as it can be context dependent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjørn Hofmann
- Institute for the Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjovik, Norway; Centre of Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Michal Stanak
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Vienna, Austria; Faculty of Philosophy and Education, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|