Effects of psychotropic drugs on seizure threshold

Clozapine-associated adverse drug reactions in 38,349 psychiatric inpatients: drug surveillance data from the AMSP project between 1993 and 2016

Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic drug that offers superior treatment results in patients with schizophrenia but is also associated with significant risks. This study analyzes data on pharmacotherapy with clozapine and the associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in an inpatient setting including 38,349 patients. Data about the use of clozapine and reports of severe ADRs within the period 1993-2016 were obtained from the multicentered observational pharmacovigilance program "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie" (AMSP). In total, 586 severe clozapine-associated ADRs were documented (1.53% of all patients exposed). Patients aged ≥65 years had a higher risk of ADRs than patients aged <65 years (1.96 vs. 1.48%; p = 0.021). Significantly more ADRs were attributed to clozapine alone (396; 67.6% of all 586 ADRs) than to a combination with other drugs. The most frequent ADRs were grand mal seizures (0.183% of all 38,349 patients exposed), delirium (0.180%), increased liver enzymes (0.120%), and agranulocytosis (0.107%). We detected 24 cases (0.063%) of clozapine-induced extrapyramidal symptoms, of which 8 (0.021%) were attributed to clozapine alone. Five ADRs resulted in death (0.013%): 2 due to agranulocytosis (41 cases total) (mortality = 4.88%) and 3 due to paralytic (sub)ileus (16 cases) (mortality = 18.75%). The median dose of clozapine in all patients treated was 300 mg/day, in patients who developed ADRs 250 mg/day. The main risk factor for an ADR was pre-existing damage of the affected organ system. Overall, the results of this study highlight the importance of alertness-especially of frequently overlooked symptoms-and appropriate monitoring during treatment with clozapine, even at low doses.

Efficacy of personalized rTMS to enhance upper limb function in subacute stroke patients: a protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled study

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely used therapy to enhance motor deficit in stroke patients. To date, rTMS protocols used in stroke patients are relatively unified. However, as the pathophysiology of stroke is diverse and individual functional deficits are distinctive, more precise application of rTMS is warranted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effects of personalized protocols of rTMS therapy based on the functional reserve of each stroke patient in subacute phase.

Methods

This study will recruit 120 patients with stroke in subacute phase suffering from the upper extremity motor impairment, from five different hospitals in Korea. The participants will be allocated into three different study conditions based on the functional reserve of each participant, measured by the results of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and brain MRI with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) evaluations. The participants of the intervention-group in the three study conditions will receive different protocols of rTMS intervention, a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks: high-frequency rTMS on ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1), high-frequency rTMS on ipsilesional ventral premotor cortex, and high-frequency rTMS on contralesional M1. The participants of the control-group in all three study conditions will receive the same rTMS protocol: low-frequency rTMS on contralesional M1. For outcome measures, the following assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), during-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and follow-up (T3) periods: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Box-and-block test, Action Research Arm Test, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, hand grip strength, Functional Ambulatory Category, fractional anisotropy measured by the DTI, and brain network connectivity obtained from MRI. The primary outcome will be the difference of upper limb function, as measured by FMA from T0 to T2. The secondary outcomes will be the differences of other assessments.

Discussion

This study will determine the effects of applying different protocols of rTMS therapy based on the functional reserve of each patient. In addition, this methodology may prove to be more efficient than conventional rTMS protocols. Therefore, effective personalized application of rTMS to stroke patients can be achieved based on their severity, predicted mechanism of motor recovery, or functional reserves.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06270238.

Iatrogenic Epileptogenicity Caused by CNS Drugs: A Short Case Series and Narrative Review

Multiple medications are known to increase epileptogenicity in patients with and without an underlying seizure disorder. Paradoxically, some of these medications include anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and other medications, such as psychotropics, that act on the central nervous system (CNS). This article aims to discuss 3 clinical cases that highlight the gamut of epileptogenic reactivity secondary to CNS drugs ranging from increased epileptogenicity in the form of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) without seizures, increased epileptogenicity on electroencephalogram (EEG) with associated non-epileptic movement disorders, and frank, de novo seizures. We also analyze the relevant literature on the impact of CNS medications on epileptogenicity.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of dopamine-receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

INTRODUCTION

Dopamine (D)2,3-receptor antagonists (RAs) were the first antiemetics used in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

AREAS COVERED

Eight D2,3-RAs, amisulpride, domperidone, droperidol, haloperidol, metoclopramide, metopimazine, olanzapine and prochlorperazine are reviewed focusing on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antiemetic effect and side effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Since the introduction of D2,3-RAs, antiemetics such as corticosteroids, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)3-RAs and neurokinin (NK)1-RAs have been developed. The classical D2,3-RAs are recommended in the prophylaxis of CINV from low emetic risk chemotherapy, but not as a fixed component of an antiemetic regimen for moderately or highly (HEC) emetic risk chemotherapy. D2,3-RAs are also used in patients with breakthrough nausea and vomiting. It should be emphasized, that most of these drugs are not selective for dopamine receptors.The multi-receptor targeting agent, olanzapine, is recommended in the prophylaxis of HEC-induced CINV as part of a four-drug antiemetic regimen, including a 5-HT3-RA, dexamethasone and a NK1-RA. Olanzapine is the most effective agent to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea.Side effects differ among various D2,3-RAs. Metopimazine and domperidone possess a low risk of extrapyramidal side effects. Domperidone and metoclopramide are prokinetics, whereas metopimazine delays gastric emptying and haloperidol does not influence gastric motility. Many D2,3-RAs increase the risk of prolonged QTc interval; other side effects include sedation and orthostatic hypotension.

Do psychotropic drugs cause seizures?

Patients with epilepsy often present with concurrent psychiatric disorders, posing unique challenges for healthcare providers. This review explores the intricate relationship between psychiatric comorbidities, epilepsy, and psychotropic medications to inform clinical decision-making. The bidirectional association between epilepsy and psychiatric conditions complicates treatment, with psychiatric symptoms preceding or following seizure onset. The review discusses the seizure risks associated with antidepressants, CNS stimulants, and antipsychotics, shedding light on both historical perspectives and recent empirical evidence. Antidepressants, particularly tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), are known to pose seizure risks, while newer agents like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) exhibit lower incidences and even potential anticonvulsant effects. Contrary to common beliefs, CNS stimulants used in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment show efficacy without significantly increasing seizure risk. However, the association between ADHD and seizures warrants careful consideration. Among antipsychotics, clozapine stands out for its heightened seizure risks, especially during titration and at high doses, necessitating close monitoring and individualized approaches. Understanding the nuanced seizure risks associated with different psychotropic medications is crucial for optimizing patient care and minimizing iatrogenic seizures in this vulnerable population. By recognizing the complexities of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and considering the unique challenges they pose, healthcare providers can make informed decisions to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes. This review offers practical insights to guide clinicians in navigating the intricate landscape of managing psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy.

Schizophrenia and epileptic comorbidity

Epileptic seizures have been widely considered as a complication of external or iatrogenic factors in schizophrenia. However, epidemiologic, neurodevelopmental and genetic data have changed regards on this topic considering the complexity of the bidirectional link between epilepsy and schizophrenia. We will examine these data constituting the pathophysiological aspects of this particular association and detail the particular impact of antipsychotics on the occurence of epileptic seizure in schizophrenia as well as the management strategies.

Pharmacological diversity amongst approved and emerging antiseizure medications for the treatment of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are rare neurodevelopmental disorders characterised by early-onset and often intractable seizures and developmental delay/regression, and include Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Rufinamide, fenfluramine, stiripentol, cannabidiol and ganaxolone are antiseizure medications (ASMs) with diverse mechanisms of action that have been approved for treating specific DEEs. Rufinamide is thought to suppress neuronal hyperexcitability by preventing the functional recycling of voltage-gated sodium channels from the inactivated to resting state. It is licensed for adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with LGS. Fenfluramine increases extracellular serotonin levels and may reduce seizures via activation of specific serotonin receptors and positive modulation of the sigma-1 receptor. Fenfluramine is licensed for adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and LGS. Stiripentol is a positive allosteric modulator of type-A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors. As a broad-spectrum inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes, its antiseizure effects may additionally arise through pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered ASMs. Stiripentol is licensed for treating seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients taking clobazam and/or valproate. The mechanism(s) of action of cannabidiol remains largely unclear although multiple targets have been proposed, including transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, G protein-coupled receptor 55 and equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. Cannabidiol is licensed as adjunctive treatment in conjunction with clobazam for seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and LGS, and as adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. Like stiripentol, ganaxolone is a positive allosteric modulator at GABAA receptors. It has recently been licensed in the USA for the treatment of seizures associated with cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 deficiency disorder. Greater understanding of the causes of DEEs has driven research into the potential use of other novel and repurposed agents. Putative ASMs currently in clinical development for use in DEEs include soticlestat, carisbamate, verapamil, radiprodil, clemizole and lorcaserin.

Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Effects of L-Methionine in the WAG/Rij Rat Model of Depression Comorbid with Absence Epilepsy

Depression is a severe and widespread psychiatric disease that often accompanies epilepsy. Antidepressant treatment of depression comorbid with epilepsy is a major concern due to the risk of seizure aggravation. SAMe, a universal methyl donor for DNA methylation and the synthesis of brain monoamines, is known to have high antidepressant activity. This study aimed to find out whether L-methionine (L-MET), a precursor of SAMe, can have antidepressant and/or anxiolytic effects in the WAG/Rij rat model of depression comorbid with absence epilepsy. The results indicate that L-MET reduces the level of anxiety and depression in WAG/Rij rats and suppresses associated epileptic seizures, in contrast to conventional antidepressant imipramine, which aggravates absence seizures. The antidepressant effect of L-MET was comparable with that of the conventional antidepressants imipramine and fluoxetine. However, the antidepressant profile of L-MET was more similar to imipramine than to fluoxetine. Taken together, our findings suggest that L-MET could serve as a promising new antidepressant drug with anxiolytic properties for the treatment of depression comorbid with absence epilepsy. Increases in the level of monoamines and their metabolites-DA, DOPAC, HVA, NA, and MHPG-in several brain structures, is suggested to be a neurochemical mechanism of the beneficial phenotypic effect of L-MET.

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Psychopharmacological Considerations for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

ABSTRACT

The field of transgender health has grown exponentially since the early 2010s. While this increased visibility has not been without controversy, there is growing acknowledgement of the needs of transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TNG) patients and the health disparities they experience compared to the cisgender population. There is also increased interest among clinicians and trainees in providing gender-affirming care in all medical specialties. This is particularly relevant in psychiatry as mental health disparities in TNG patients have been well-documented. TNG patients experience significant minority stress and higher rates of psychiatric illness, self-harm, suicidality, and psychiatric hospitalization compared to their cisgender peers. In this review, we will cover potential interactions and side effects relevant to psychiatric medication management for the three most common medication classes prescribed as part of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT): gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor agonists, estradiol, and testosterone. Although no studies directly examining the efficacy of psychiatric medications or their interactions with GAHT for TNG patients have been published yet, we have synthesized the existing literature from both cisgender and TNG patients to shed light on health care disparities seen in TNG patients. Since clinicians' lack of comfort and familiarity with gender-affirming care contributes significantly to these disparities, we hope this narrative review will help psychiatric prescribers provide TNG patients with the same quality of care that cisgender patients receive.

Second-generation antipsychotics and seizures - a systematic review and meta-analysis of serious adverse events in randomized controlled trials

Seizures are suspected to be side effects of antipsychotics. To examine a possible causal relationship, we compared the risk of seizures on second-generation antipsychotics to the risk on placebo in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) across diagnostic groups. The primary outcome was any seizure reported as International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP)-defined serious adverse event (SAEs). The risk ratio (RR) with antipsychotics versus placebo was synthesized in a pairwise common effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis. For 314 of 597 idenitified placebo-controlled RCTs information about all SAEs could be retrieved from publications, original investigators, pharmaceutical companies and the European Medical Agency. In those, 37 seizures occurred in 42,600 participants on antipsychotics (0.09%) and 28 in 25,042 participants on placebo (0.11%). The meta-analytic results (RR 0,68; 95% Confidence Interval 0.41-1.12) indicated a reduced risk on antipsychotics with a confidence interval including no difference (i.e. RR=1). Neither in sensitivity analyses (excluding events in the safety-follow-up of trials or first-generation antipsychotics; using odds ratios) nor in subgroup analyses (on specific antipsychotics, drug combinations, diagnostic categories, age groups, and study duration) there was evidence for an increased risk on antipsychotics, except for some weak indications of an increased risk on antipsychotics in older and/or demented participants (RRs 1.11 and 1.48, respectively, but with 95% CIs of 0.35-3.49 and 0.41-5.26 including no difference and subgroup tests with p=0.54 and p=0.66 not indicating differences between age groups or diagnostic categories). Consequently, there are no indications that second-generation antipsychotics cause seizures in middle-aged adults and children in most diagnostic groups; rather our results provide some weak evidence for a protective effect. However, there was no data on SAEs available for clozapine, for which observational studies provide the strongest associations with increased seizure rates, and for older and/or demented patients a small additional risk on antipsychotics cannot be excluded.

Optimization of Therapy in Patients with Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: Key Points

Psychiatric disorder comorbidity in patients with epilepsy (PWE) is very frequent with a mean percentage prevalence of up to 50% and even higher. Such a high frequency suggests that epilepsy and psychiatric disorders might share common pathological pathways. Various aspects contribute in making the matter very complex from a therapeutic point of view. Some antiseizure medications (ASMs), namely valproic acid, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine, have mood-stabilising effects and are routinely used for the treatment of bipolar disorder in patients who do not have epilepsy. Pregabalin and, to a lesser extent, gabapentin, exerts anxiolytic effects. However, several ASMs, in particular levetiracetam, topiramate, and perampanel, may contribute to psychiatric disorders, including depression, aggressive behaviour, and even psychosis. If these ASMs are prescribed, the patient should be monitored closely. A careful selection should be made also with psychotropic drugs. Although most of these can be safely used at therapeutic doses, bupropion, some tricyclic antidepressants, maprotiline, and clozapine may alter seizure threshold and facilitate epileptic seizures. Interactions between ASMs and psychotropic medication may make it difficult to predict individual response. Pharmacokinetic interactions can be assessed with drug monitoring and are consequently much better documented than pharmacodynamic interactions. Another aspect that needs a careful evaluation is patient adherence to treatment. Prevalence of non-adherence in PWE and psychiatric comorbidities is reported to reach values even higher than 70%. A careful evaluation of all these aspects contributes in optimizing therapy with a positive impact on seizure control, psychiatric wellbeing, and quality of life.

KM-408, a novel phenoxyalkyl derivative as a potential anticonvulsant and analgesic compound for the treatment of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy frequently coexists with neuropathic pain. Our approach is based on the search for active compounds with multitarget profiles beneficial in terms of potential side effects and on the implementation of screening for potential multidirectional central activity.

METHODS

Compounds were synthesized by means of chemical synthesis. After antiseizure and neurotoxicity screening in vivo, KM-408 and its enantiomers were chosen for analgesic activity evaluations. Further safety studies included acute toxicity in mice, the effect on normal electrocardiogram and on blood pressure in rats, whole body plethysmography in rats, and in vitro and biochemical assays. Pharmacokinetics has been studied in rats after iv and po administration. Metabolism has been studied in vivo in rat serum and urine. Radioligand binding studies were performed as part of the mechanism of action investigation.

RESULTS

Selected results for KM-408: K_i sigma = 7.2*10^-8; K_i 5-HT_1A = 8.0*10^-7; ED₅₀ MES (mice, ip) = 13.3 mg/kg; formalin test (I phase, mice, ip)-active at 30 mg/kg; SNL (rats, ip)-active at 6 mg/kg; STZ-induced pain (mice, ip)-active at 1 mg/kg (von Frey) and 10 mg/kg (hot plate); hot plate test (mice, ip)-active at 30 mg/kg; ED₅₀ capsaicin test (mice, ip) = 18.99 mg/kg; tail immersion test (mice)-active at 0.5%; corneal anesthesia (guinea pigs)-active at 0.125%; infiltration anesthesia (guinea pigs)-active at 0.125%.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the presented study a novel compound, R,S-2-((2-(2-chloro-6-methylphenoxy)ethyl)amino)butan-1-ol hydrochloride (KM-408) with dual antiseizure and analgesic activity has been developed for potential use in neuropathic pain treatment.

Bidirectionality of antiseizure and antipsychotic treatment: A population-based study

PURPOSE

To study the prevalence and directionality of comorbid epilepsy and psychosis in Norway.

METHODS

The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) provided individual-based information on all antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs (APDs) dispensed during 2004-2017. Subjects were ≥18 years of age at the end of the study period. Diagnosis-specific reimbursement codes from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases/2nd edition of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICD-10/ICPC-2) combined with ATC codes were used as indicators of diagnosis. Subjects had collected ASMs for epilepsy or APDs for psychosis at least four times, at least once issued with an ICD-10 code from the specialist healthcare service. Directionality was analyzed in subjects receiving both treatments. To reduce prevalent comorbidity bias, we employed a four-year comorbidity-free period (2004-2007). The use of specific ASMs and APDs was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 31,289 subjects had collected an ASM for epilepsy at least four times, 28,889 an APD for psychosis. Both the prevalence of treatment for epilepsy and of treatment for psychosis was 0.8%. Further, 891 subjects had been treated for both conditions; 2.8% with epilepsy had been treated for psychosis, and 3.1% with psychosis had been treated for epilepsy. Among 558 subjects included in the analyses of directionality, 56% had collected the first APD before an ASM, whereas 41% had collected an ASM first. During the last year prior to comorbidity onset, levetiracetam, topiramate, or zonisamide had been used for epilepsy by approximately 40%, whereas olanzapine and quetiapine were most used in patients with psychosis, and clozapine in 13%.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients with prior antipsychotic treatment at onset of epilepsy is higher than previously acknowledged, as demonstrated in this nation-wide study. Apart from a shared neurobiological susceptibility, the bidirectionality of epilepsy and psychosis may be influenced by various environmental factors, including the interaction of pharmacodynamic effects. APDs may facilitate seizures; ASMs may induce psychiatric symptoms. In patients with combined treatment, these potential drug effects should receive ample attention, along with the psychosocial consequences of the disorders. A prudent multi-professional approach is required.

A Guideline and Checklist for Initiating and Managing Clozapine Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) will affect about one in three patients with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the only treatment approved for TRS, and patients should be treated as soon as possible to improve their chances of achieving remission. Despite its effectiveness, concern over side effects, monitoring requirements, and inexperience with prescribing often result in long delays that can expose patients to unnecessary risks and compromise their chances of achieving favorable long-term outcomes. We critically reviewed the literature on clozapine use in TRS, focusing on guidelines, systematic reviews, and algorithms to identify strategies for improving clozapine safety and tolerability. Based on this, we have provided an overview of strategies to support early initiation of clozapine in patients with TRS based on the latest evidence and our clinical experience, and have summarized the key elements in a practical, evidence-based checklist for identifying and managing patients with TRS, with the aim of increasing confidence in prescribing and monitoring clozapine therapy.

Tardive Seizures After Electroconvulsive Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Seizures that occur spontaneously after termination of an electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) seizure are termed tardive seizures. They are thought to be a rare complication of ECT, influenced by risk factors that affect seizure threshold. However, there has been limited review of tardive seizures with modified ECT. We aimed to review the literature to provide clinical guidance for the use of ECT after tardive seizures.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to May 2021 to identify cases of modified ECT, with evidence of a seizure occurring within 7 days of a terminated ECT seizure. Data for demographic, medical, pharmacological, anesthetic, and ECT variables as well as management strategies were collected.

RESULTS

There have been 39 episodes of modified ECT-related tardive seizures published over a period of 40 years. In 97.4% of cases, there was at least 1 identified potential risk factor for seizures, including use of a seizure-lowering medication and/or preexisting neurological injury. Major complications were uncommon (<15% of cases); however, 1 fetal death and 1 subsequent suicide were reported. No case was diagnosed with epilepsy, although around 20% continued on antiepileptic medications. More than half of the included patients were retrialed on ECT, with only 15% developing further tardive seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures that occurred spontaneously after the termination of an ECT seizure are a rare complication of modified ECT. Recommencing ECT after a tardive seizure may occur after review of modifiable seizure risk factors and with consideration of antiepileptic medication and extended post-ECT monitoring.

Antipsychotic Medications for Low-Income Preschoolers: Long Duration and Psychotropic Medication Polypharmacy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate prescribing patterns of antipsychotic medication and factors that predict duration of use among low-income, preschool-age children.

METHODS

State Medicaid claims from 2012 to 2017 were used to identify antipsychotic medication use for children <6 years old. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to describe child diagnoses. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were used to determine patterns of antipsychotic medication use and factors that predicted duration of use.

RESULTS

In 2012, 316 children <6 years of age started an antipsychotic medication in a southeastern state. Most were non-Hispanic White (N=202, 64%) and boys (N=231, 73%). Diagnoses included attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (N=288, 91%), neurodevelopmental disorders (N=208, 66%), anxiety and trauma-related diagnoses (N=202, 64%), and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) (N=137, 43%). The mean±SD duration of exposure to antipsychotic medication for children in the cohort was 2.6±1.7 years, but 86 children (27%) had >4 years of exposure. Almost one-third (N=97, 31%) received polypharmacy of four or more medication classes, and 42% (N=131) received metabolic screening. Being male, being in foster care, and having a diagnosis of ASD or disruptive mood dysregulation disorder were significantly associated with duration of use of antipsychotic medications; race-ethnicity was not significantly associated with duration of use. Emergency department visits (N=277, 88%) and inpatient hospitalizations (N=107, 34%) were observed during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Many preschoolers received antipsychotic medications for substantial periods. Further research is needed to identify evidence-based practices to reduce medication use and improve outcomes.

Targeting the androgen receptor signaling pathway in advanced prostate cancer

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

This article summarizes current androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapies that have received regulatory approval for the treatment of advanced prostate adenocarcinoma (herein referred to as prostate cancer, PC).

SUMMARY

PC is an androgen-dependent malignancy in which ligands including testosterone and dihydrotestosterone bind to AR, initiating androgen-AR complex translocation to the nucleus followed by AR-mediated transcription of target genes. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), including gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with or without AR antagonists (antiandrogens), GnRH antagonists, or bilateral orchiectomy, forms the backbone of treatment for patients with metastatic castration-naive PC and/or castration-resistant PC (CRPC). ADT is also an option for high-risk, early-stage PC after prostatectomy and/or radiation. While ADT is often very effective as initial therapy, resistance ultimately develops despite suppression of gonadal and/or adrenal androgens, leading to CRCPC, which is characterized by mechanisms such as reactivation of the AR signaling pathway, AR overexpression, and gene mutations in the ligand-binding domain of AR that lead to disease progression, resulting in increased symptom burden and ultimately death. However, disease in patients with CRPC is still dependent on androgen signaling, and these patients continue on ADT to maintain a castrate level of serum testosterone. Novel hormonal therapies including agents that target AR directly (eg, AR antagonists) are often added to ADT in this setting. Targeting the AR signaling pathway led to the development of second-generation AR antagonists, examples of which include enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. These agents do not exhibit partial agonism or possess a higher affinity for AR and are not postulated to improve survival outcomes relative to their first-generation counterparts for patients with CRPC. Lastly, the emergence of ADT, including second-generation AR antagonists, has led to the development of supportive care for treatment-related adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Major advances have been made in targeting the AR signaling pathway in patients with advanced PC. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal sequencing of therapies to maximize treatment benefit. Mitigation of treatment-related adverse effects presents new opportunities to advance clinical pharmacy practice.

Association of Treatment With Antipsychotics, Antidepressants, or Both With Movement Disorders and Seizures Among Children and Adolescents With Depression in Korea

IMPORTANCE

Little evidence exists on neurological adverse events (movement disorders and seizures) that occur during adjuvant use of antipsychotics with antidepressants, especially in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between neurological adverse events (movement disorders, including parkinsonism, dystonia, extrapyramidal symptoms, chorea, and tic, and seizures) and the adjuvant use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with depression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims database in Korea between 2008 and 2018. The study population was children and adolescents aged 2 to 18 years with depression who began treatment with antidepressants between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed between December 9, 2020, and December 10, 2021.

EXPOSURE

Time-varying exposure to antidepressants, antipsychotics, and concomitant use of antidepressants and antipsychotics. Concomitant use was further subdivided according to the antipsychotic treatment status (dose and agent).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The extended Cox proportional hazards regression model, with adjustment for sex, age, health insurance type, psychiatric comorbidities, psychiatric hospitalization, and comedication with other psychotropic drugs, was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs for the associations of movement disorders and seizures with use of antidepressants and antipsychotics.

RESULTS

A total of 9890 patients were included in the study: 9541 (mean [SD] age, 14.8 [2.8] years; 4956 [51.9%] female) and 7731 (mean [SD] age, 14.9 [2.7] years; 4150 [53.7%] female) met the inclusion criteria for movement disorders and seizures, respectively. For movement disorders, associations were found between concomitant use (aHR, 3.68; 95% CI, 3.06-4.44) and antipsychotic-only use (aHR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.03-4.87) compared with antidepressant-only use, but their CIs overlapped. The associations with seizure were similar (concomitant use: aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.66-2.55; antipsychotic-only use: aHR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.53-2.75). With concomitant use, the aHRs gradually increased with increasing doses of antipsychotics. Haloperidol had the highest aHR, 7.15 (95% CI, 3.89-10.00) for movement disorders. The highest aHR for seizure was observed with quetiapine (aHR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.55-3.59), followed by aripiprazole (aHR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.52-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, adjunctive antipsychotics with antidepressants were associated with movement disorders and seizures compared with antidepressant monotherapy in children and adolescents with depression. These results suggest that careful consideration of the risk-benefit profile of the antipsychotic use as adjuvant therapy in this population is needed.

Adverse effects associated with bupropion therapeutic errors in adults reported to four United States Poison Centers

CONTEXT

Bupropion is a frequently used medication. Excessive doses may cause altered mental status, seizures, and dysrhythmias. There is a need for accurate estimate of seizure risk with therapeutic errors and determination if minor symptoms are harbingers of more severe effects.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult, acute, unintentional therapeutic error, single substance bupropion ingestions with known outcome reported to four poison centers from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2016. Data included age, gender, single error dose, total bupropion dose over 18 h, prior history of seizure, management site, observation time, occurrence of an out-of-hospital adverse event, "jittery"/anxious/agitated, tachycardia/palpitations, seizures, and dysrhythmias. We recorded the total bupropion dose over 18 h if known; otherwise, we used the single error dose. We compared means for parametric data. We used Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney for nonparametric data.

RESULTS

We identified 754 potential cases, of which 637 met inclusion criteria after case review. Median age was 42 years, and 76.1% were female. Cases were predominantly managed at home (56.2%). Outcomes were no effect (50.1%), minor (45.5%) and moderate (4.4%). The reported dose with no effect/minor outcome was 694 (±297) mg, and for moderate outcome was 1250 (±815) mg (p < 0.0001). Seizures occurred in four patients with median onset time of 7 h [range 2-21.5 h]. The median reported dose in patients who seized was 900 mg [range 600-3000 mg]. Of patients who developed a seizure and/or an out-of-hospital adverse event, 83% were "jittery"/anxious/agitated whereas "jittery"/anxious/agitated was present in 27% of cases that did not (p = 0.008). Tachycardia/palpitations was reported in 12% of cases; more serious dysrhythmias were not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes from single unintentional ingestions of bupropion in adults are overall mild and appear to be dose related. Home management may be an option with doses up to 900 mg in an appropriate patient population.

Prevalence of potentially harmful multidrug interactions on medication lists of elderly ambulatory patients

Background

It has been hypothesized that polypharmacy may increase the frequency of multidrug interactions (MDIs) where one drug interacts with two or more other drugs, amplifying the risk of associated adverse drug events (ADEs). The main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of MDIs in medication lists of elderly ambulatory patients and to identify the medications most commonly involved in MDIs that amplify the risk of ADEs.

Methods

Medication lists stored in the electronic health record (EHR) of 6,545 outpatients ≥60 years old were extracted from the enterprise data warehouse. Network analysis identified patients with three or more interacting medications from their medication lists. Potentially harmful interactions were identified from the enterprise drug-drug interaction alerting system. MDIs were considered to amplify the risk if interactions could increase the probability of ADEs.

Results

MDIs were identified in 1.3 % of the medication lists, the majority of which involved three interacting drugs (75.6 %) while the remainder involved four (15.6 %) or five or more (8.9 %) interacting drugs. The average number of medications on the lists was 3.1 ± 2.3 in patients with no drug interactions and 8.6 ± 3.4 in patients with MDIs. The prevalence of MDIs on medication lists was greater than 10 % in patients prescribed bupropion, tramadol, trazodone, cyclobenzaprine, fluoxetine, ondansetron, or quetiapine and greater than 20 % in patients prescribed amiodarone or methotrexate. All MDIs were potentially risk-amplifying due to pharmacodynamic interactions, where three or more medications were associated with the same ADE, or pharmacokinetic, where two or more drugs reduced the metabolism of a third drug. The most common drugs involved in MDIs were psychotropic, comprising 35.1 % of all drugs involved. The most common serious potential ADEs associated with the interactions were serotonin syndrome, seizures, prolonged QT interval and bleeding.

Conclusions

An identifiable number of medications, the majority of which are psychotropic, may be involved in MDIs in elderly ambulatory patients which may amplify the risk of serious ADEs. To mitigate the risk, providers will need to pay special attention to the overlapping drug-drug interactions which result in MDIs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02594-z.

Depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy and clinically associated features in a single tertiary center

Although depressive symptoms are the most common psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy, they remain underestimated and untreated in a large proportion of patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate depression severity and related clinical features in people with epilepsy using a well-reliable self-report index of mood, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). One-hundred seventeen adult patients with epilepsy were recruited from a tertiary epilepsy center and completed the BDI-II. A single-item analysis of the 21 questions of the BDI-II was computed and differences between women and men in each depressive symptom were evaluated. Correlation and regression analyses were used to identify clinical features associated with the severity of depression. Results showed gender differences in some items, with women reporting overall higher depression severity than men. The most common symptoms regarded domains of sleeping patterns, tiredness, and loss of energy. Regression evidence suggested that being female, having an epilepsy duration < 10 years, as well as being treated with psychotropic drugs and reporting generalized seizure, were associated with higher depression severity. Despite its cross-sectional nature, this study reinforces the importance of investigating and possibly treating depressive symptoms in adult patients with epilepsy, since they negatively impact well-being, daytime activities, and sleep. Further studies identifying pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for depression in epilepsy need to be planned.

An association between incontinence and antipsychotic drugs: A systematic review

To date, due to the increasing prevalence of psychiatric diseases, the use of antipsychotic drugs has expanded. One of the proven side effects of these drugs is incontinence. Treatment of this complication improves the quality of life in these patients, increases self-confidence, and betters cope with their psychiatric illness. The exact mechanism of this side effect is not fully understood, but various methods have been used experimentally to deal with it. Strategies such as behavior therapy, discontinuation or change of drugs, reducing the dose of drugs, and adding drugs with less incontinence have been used. Each of these methods and studies has different results that need to be summarized to make optimal use of them. Since most of these reports are case reports with a low statistical population, our study has systematically reviewed these studies to find a comprehensive model to deal with this complication.

Do Psychotropic Drugs Cause Epileptic Seizures? A Review of the Available Evidence

Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy are common. A bidirectional relationship has been well described where not only patients with epilepsy have a higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities but also patients with primary psychiatric disorders are at an increased risk of developing seizures. The aim of this review is to highlight the complex relationship between epilepsy and common psychiatric disorders and to answer the question whether psychotropic medications are proconvulsant by reviewing the preclinical and clinical literature. The evidence shows that the majority of psychotropic medications are not proconvulsant when used in therapeutic doses with the exception of a subset of medications, mainly bupropion IR and certain antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine. An effective treatment of psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy must consider not only the potential therapeutic effect of the drug, but also its potential iatrogenic effects on the seizure disorder.

Seizure risk with repetitive TMS: Survey results from over a half-million treatment sessions

BACKGROUND

Seizures are rare during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment, but estimating risk is difficult because of study heterogeneity and sampling limitations. Moreover, there are few studies comparing rates between device manufacturers.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to calculate rTMS seizure rates across various FDA-cleared devices in naturalistic clinical settings.

METHODS

In July and August 2018, approximately 500 members of the Clinical TMS Society (CTMSS) were electronically surveyed about seizures in their practices. Seizures were distinguished from non-seizures by a remote semi-structured interview with a Board-certified neurologist and Co-Chair of the CTMSS Standards Committee. Exact Poisson calculations were used to estimate seizure rates and confidence intervals across the four most widely used manufacturers.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 134 members, with 9 responses excluded because of data inconsistencies. In total, 18 seizures were reported in 586,656 sessions and 25,526 patients across all device manufacturers. The overall seizure rate was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.48) per 10,000 sessions, and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.42, 1.11) per 1000 patients. The Brainsway H-coil seizure rate of 5.56 per 1000 patients (95% CI: 2.77,9.95) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the three most widely used figure- 8 coil devices' combined seizure rate of 0.14 per 1000 patients (95% CI: 0.01, 0.51).

CONCLUSION

The absolute risk of a seizure with rTMS is low, but generic Brainsway H-coil treatment appears to be associated with a higher relative risk than generic figure- 8 coil treatment. Well-designed prospective studies are warranted to further investigate this risk.

Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: Coil design and neuroanatomical variability considerations

High-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) has received FDA clearance for both the figure-of-8 coil (figure-8 coil) and the H1 coil. The FDA-cleared MDD protocols for both coils include high frequency (10-18 Hz) stimulation targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) at an intensity that is 120% of the right-hand resting motor threshold. Despite these similar parameters, the two coils generate distinct electrical fields (e-fields) which result in differences in the cortical stimulation they produce. Due to the differences in coil designs, the H1 coil induces a stimulation e-field that is broader and deeper than the one induced by the figure-8 coil. In this paper we review theoretical and clinical implications of these differences between the two coils and compare evidence of their safety and efficacy in treating MDD. We present the design principles of the coils, the challenges of identifying, finding, and stimulating the optimal brain target of each individual (both from functional and connectivity perspectives), and the possible implication of stimulating outside that target. There is only one study that performed a direct comparison between clinical effectiveness of the two coils, using the standard FDA-approved protocols in MDD patients. This study indicated clinical superiority of the H1 coil but did not measure long-term effects. Post-marketing data suggest that both coils have a similar safety profile in clinical practice, whereas effect size comparisons of the two respective FDA pivotal trials suggests that the H1 coil may have an advantage in efficacy. We conclude that further head-to-head experiments are needed, especially ones that will compare long-term effects and usage of similar temporal stimulation parameters and similar number of pulses.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Seizures at the End of Life

Seizures are physically burdensome and emotionally distressing for patients, families, caregivers, and clinicians. Patients with neurological diseases are at increased risk of having complex, difficult-to-control seizures at the end of life. Palliative care (PC) clinicians asked to provide management of these seizures may not be familiar or comfortable with more complex seizures or epilepsy. A team of neurologists and PC specialists have compiled a list of tips to guide clinicians on how to care for patients having seizures and to support their families/caregivers.

Seizures and Sepsis: A Narrative Review

Patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) can develop convulsive or nonconvulsive seizures. The cytokine storm and the overwhelming systemic inflammation trigger the electric circuits that promote seizures. Several neurologic symptoms, associated with this disease, range from mild consciousness impairment to coma. Focal or generalized convulsive seizures are frequent in sepsis, although nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) are often misdiagnosed and prevalent in SAE. In order to map the trigger zone in all patients that present focal or generalized seizures and also to detect NCS, EEG is indicated but continuous EEG (cEEG) is not very widespread; timing, duration, and efficacy of this tool are still unknown. The long-term risk of seizures in survivors is increased. The typical stepwise approach of seizures management begins with benzodiazepines and follows with anticonvulsants up to anesthetic drugs such as propofol or thiopental, which are able to induce burst suppression and interrupt the pathological electrical circuits. This narrative review discusses pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of seizures in sepsis.

Vortioxetine increases absence-like seizures in WAG/Rij rats but decreases penicillin- and pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in Wistar rats

AIM

Depression is the major psychiatric disorder in patients with epilepsy. Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant drug for the treatment of major depressive disorders. In the present study, effects of vortioxetine were evaluated in different experimental epilepsy models of rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six adult male Wistar rats and 28 WAG/Rij rats were divided into 12 groups of 7 rats each. Experiments were conducted with penicillin (500 IU, i.c.) and pentylenetetrazole models (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) in Wistar rats and genetic absence epileptic WAG/Rij rats. The vortioxetine (1, 5, or 10 mg/kg, i.p.) was evaluated in these three models. All groups were compared with their control groups.

RESULTS

In the penicillin-induced seizure model, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg vortioxetine administration significantly decreased mean spike frequency. In the pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure model, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg vortioxetine demonstrated a significant dose-dependent decrease in mean spike frequency, an increase in the latency to minor and major seizures, and a decrease in total duration of major seizure and convulsion stage. In genetic absence epileptic WAG/Rij rats, 1 mg/kg vortioxetine caused no significant alteration in the number and duration of SWDs compared to the controls, while 5 and 10 mg/kg doses of vortioxetine increased the number and duration of SWDs. Amplitude of the epileptiform activity did not change in any of the experimental epilepsy models.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggested that vortioxetine has anticonvulsant activity in penicillin- and pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure models. However, it exhibited proconvulsant activity in the absence epileptic WAG/Rij rats.

Risk of seizures associated with antipsychotic treatment in pediatrics with psychiatric disorders: a nested case-control study in Korea

Antipsychotic drugs raise seizure risk in adults, and antipsychotic drug use is increasing among pediatric psychiatric disorder patients. However, few studies have examined seizure risk in this younger patient population. To evaluate seizure risk in pediatric patients on antipsychotics, we conducted a nested case-control study using a nationwide database. Patient information was retrieved from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database from 2008-2018. Antipsychotic use among newly diagnosed psychiatric patients was gathered starting 1 year before the index date and categorized as recent, past, consistent, or none. Seizure cases among these patients were defined based on (1) prescription of antiepileptic drugs or (2) an electroencephalography (EEG) examination among patients with seizure diagnostic code. A conditional logistic regression model was constructed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for seizure risk due to antipsychotic use. In total, 1523 seizure cases and 6092 seizure-free controls aged 8-19 years with newly diagnosed psychiatric disorders were included for analysis. Logistic regression revealed a significant association between antipsychotic use and seizure development (recent users OR = 4.03, 95% CI 3.4-4.79; consistent users: OR = 2.84, 95% CI 2.44-3.3). Seizure risk enhanced further with an increase in the number of antipsychotic drugs used. Risperidone, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, and blonanserin were independently associated with greater seizure risk. Pediatric patients receiving antipsychotics, especially new or multiple antipsychotic users, should be carefully monitored for seizure development.

Amitriptyline Dependence and Its Associations: A Case Report and Literature Review

Amitriptyline, the second antidepressant invented next to imipramine, is indicated in many psychiatric conditions as well as for some organic disorders. The drug acts by increasing the availability of monoamines in the central nervous system postsynaptic clefts. Amitriptyline has long been suspected for abusive potential based on a few case reports, and the reports add evidence in favor of the hypothesis. This case report brings such material to the arena of evidence and discusses the probable mechanisms by which patients turn to abusing and be addicted to the drug. The article also argues matters associated with drug dispensing that might raise the risk of misuse of the drug, especially in countries where strict legislation for accessibility of prescribed drugs is not in practice.

Depression Part 3: Medication Related Problems

When selecting and managing psychoactive medications in older people, it is equally important to focus on avoidance of toxicity as it is to focus on efficacy. Higher psychoactive medication load is associated with increased rate and risk of all cause hospitalization. The medication classes used to treat depression and related comorbidities include antidepressants, antipsychotics, stimulants, mood stabilizers, lithium, anxiolytics and sedative hypnotics. This discussion will examine considerations to help avoid medication related problems relevant to medications used to treat depression in the antidepressant pharmacological class.

Association Between Antipsychotic Treatment and Neurological Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea

Background: Potential adverse effects might be caused by increasing the number of antipsychotic prescriptions. However, the empirical evidence regarding pediatric psychiatric patients is insufficient. Therefore, we explored the antipsychotic-induced adverse effects focusing on the neurological system. Method: Using the medical information of pediatric patients retrieved from the claims data of Health Insurance Review and Assessment in Korea, we identified those psychiatric patients who were started on antipsychotic treatment at age 2-18 years between 2010 and 2018 (n = 10,969). In this study, movement disorders and seizures were considered as major neurological adverse events. The extended Cox model with time-varying covariates was applied to explore the association between antipsychotic medication and adverse events. Findings: Total 1,894 and 1,267 cases of movement disorders and seizures occurred in 32,046 and 33,280 person-years, respectively. The hazard risks of neurological adverse events were 3-8 times higher in the exposed to antipsychotics period than in the non-exposure period. Among the exposure periods, the most dangerous period was within 30 days of cumulative exposure. High doses or polypharmacy of antipsychotics was associated with increased risks of neurological adverse events. Among individual antipsychotics, haloperidol showed the highest risk of developing movement disorders among the examined agents. Quetiapine showed a lower risk of developing movement disorders but a higher risk of developing seizures than risperidone. Conclusion: These findings suggest that antipsychotics should be used with caution in pediatric patients, especially regarding initial exposure, high dose, and polypharmacy.

ASHP Therapeutic Position Statement on the Use of Antipsychotic Medications in the Treatment of Adults with Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Principles of Pharmacotherapy of Seizures and Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency with an outcome that is highly associated with the initial pharmacotherapy management that must be administered in a timely fashion. Beyond first-line therapy of status epilepticus, treatment is not guided by robust evidence. Optimal pharmacotherapy selection for individual patients is essential in the management of seizures and status epilepticus with careful evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors. With the addition of newer antiseizure agents to the market, understanding their role in the management of status epilepticus is critical. Etiology-guided therapy should be considered in certain patients with drug-induced seizures, alcohol withdrawal, or autoimmune encephalitis. Some patient populations warrant special consideration, such as pediatric, pregnant, elderly, and the critically ill. Seizure prophylaxis is indicated in select patients with acute neurological injury and should be limited to the acute postinjury period.

Acute Seizures-Work-Up and Management in Children

Seizures are common in the pediatric population; however, most children do not go on to develop epilepsy later in life. Selecting appropriate diagnostic modalities to determine an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment as well as with counseling families regarding the etiology and prognosis of seizures, is essential. This article will review updated definitions of seizures, including provoked versus unprovoked, as well as the International League Against Epilepsy operational definition of epilepsy. A variety of specific acute symptomatic seizures requiring special consideration are discussed, along with neonatal seizures and seizure mimics, which are common in pediatric populations.

The Gut-Brain-Axis on the Manifestation of Depressive Symptoms in Epilepsy: An Evidence-Driven Hypothesis

Epilepsy is a severe neurological disorder involving 70 million people around the globe. Epilepsy-related neuropsychiatric comorbidities such as depression, which is the most common, is an additional factor that negatively impacts the living quality of epilepsy patients. There are many theories and complexities associated with both epilepsy and associated comorbidities, one of which is the gut-brain-axis influence. The gut microbiome is hypothesized to be linked with many neurological disorders; however, little conclusive evidence is available in this area. Thus, highlighting the role will create interest in researchers to conduct detailed research in comprehending the influence of gut-brain-axis in the manifestation of depressive symptoms in epilepsy. The hypothesis which is explored in this review is that the gut-brain-axis do play an important role in the genesis of epilepsy and associated depression. The correction of this dysbiosis might be beneficial in treating both epilepsy and related depression. This hypothesis is illustrated through extensive literature discussion, proposed experimental models, and its applicability in the field. There is indirect evidence which revealed some specific bacterial strains that might cause depression in epilepsy.

The role of dopamine D2-like receptors in a "depotentiation-like effect" of deep brain stimulation in kindled rats

The mechanisms involved in the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) have not been completely determined. However, G_i-protein-coupled receptors, including D₂-like receptors, may have a role in mediating these effects. In the present study, the role of D₂-like receptors in LFS' anti-seizure action was investigated. Rats were kindled with semi-rapid (6 stimulations per day), electrical stimulation of the hippocampal CA1 area. In LFS-treated groups, subjects received four trials of LFS at 5 min, 6 h, 24 h, and 30 h following the last kindling stimulation. Each LFS set occurred at 5 min intervals, and consisted of 4 trains. Each train contained 200, 0/1 ms long, monophasic square wave pulses at 1 Hz. Haloperidol (D₂-like receptors antagonist, 2 µm) and/or bromocriptine (D₂-like receptors agonist 2 µg/µlit) were microinjected into the lateral ventricle immediately after the last kindling, before applying LFS. Obtained results showed that applying LFS in fully-kindled subjects led to a depotentiation-like decrease in kindling-induced potentiation and reduced the amplitude and rise slope of excitatory and inhibitory post-synaptic currents in whole-cell recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons. In addition, LFS restored the kindling-induced, spatial learning and memory impairments in the Barnes maze test. A D₂-like receptor antagonist inhibited these effects of LFS, while a D₂-like receptor agonist mimicked these effects. In conclusion, a depotentiation-like mechanism may be involved in restoring LFS' effects on learning and memory, and synaptic plasticity. These effects depend on D₂-like receptors activity.

Trazodone increases seizures in a genetic WAG/Rij rat model of absence epilepsy while decreasing them in penicillin-evoked focal seizure model

AIM

Psychiatric disorders, especially depression and anxiety, are among the most disabling comorbidities in patients with epilepsy, and they are difficult to treat because many antidepressants cause proconvulsive effects. Thus, it is important to identify the seizure risks associated with antidepressants. Trazodone is one of the most frequently prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant drugs for the treatment of depression and anxiety. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of trazodone on epileptiform activity in a penicillin-evoked focal seizure model in Wistar rats and in a genetic absence epilepsy model in Wistar Albino Glaxo/Rijswijk strain (WAG/Rij) rats.

METHODS

Trazodone at 5-, 10-, and 30-mg/kg doses was injected intraperitoneally in Wistar rats 30 min after penicillin injection, and spike frequency and amplitude of penicillin-induced epileptiform activity were evaluated. In a separate experimental model, the same trazodone doses were injected in WAG/Rij rats to elucidate their effects on number, duration, and amplitude of spike-and-wave discharges (SWDs) and on depression-anxiety like behavior. In both experimental groups, after trazodone injections recordings were made for 3 h. Depression-anxiety like behaviors in WAG/Rij rats were examined using forced swim test and open-field test.

RESULTS

Trazodone at 10- and 30-mg/kg doses significantly reduced the frequency of penicillin-induced epileptiform activity without changing the amplitude. Trazodone at a 5-mg/kg dose had no effect on either frequency or amplitude of epileptiform activity. Trazodone at all doses significantly increased number and duration of SWDs without changing the amplitude. In addition, all doses of trazodone decreased the number of squares crossed and duration of grooming in open-field test, and reduced swimming time activity and increased immobility time in forced swim test.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that depending on the dose used, trazodone had an anticonvulsant effect or no effect on penicillin-evoked focal seizure model, but all trazodone doses resulted in proconvulsant and depression-anxiety like behavior in WAG/Rij rats, which represent a genetic absence model of epilepsy.

Exploring the genetic overlap between psychiatric illness and epilepsy: A review

There is a long-documented epidemiological link between epilepsy and psychiatric disorders. People with epilepsy are at an increased risk for a variety of psychiatric illnesses, as are their family members, and people with epilepsy may experience psychiatric side effects because of their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In recent years, large-scale, collaborative international studies have begun to shed light on the role of genetic variation in both epilepsy and psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety. But so far, finding shared genetic links between epilepsy and psychiatric illness has proven surprisingly difficult. This review will discuss the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy, recent advances in genetic research into both epilepsy and psychiatric illness, and the extent of our current knowledge of the genetic overlap between these two important neurobiological conditions.

Generalised tonic–clonic seizures on the subtherapeutic dose of olanzapine

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic. Incidence of olanzapine-induced seizures (OIS) is low with monotherapy. Combination therapy with another antipsychotic, drug metabolism and old age are risk factors for OIS. Our patient was a 71-year-old man, admitted to the psychiatry unit. He was managed on the lines of bipolar affective disorder current episode depression and dementia. He was started on olanzapine 1.25 mg two times/day. The patient developed generalised tonic–clonic seizure that lasted for around two and a half minutes within 24 hours of olanzapine treatment. His electroencephalogram showed findings that were suggestive of mild slowing. Our case discusses the incidence of OIS on the subtherapeutic dose. This presentation involves multiple risk factors for OIS: a history of stroke, poststroke seizure, old age and cognitive impairment. Due to scarcity of evidence of OIS; mostly with recommended therapeutic dose range physicians may underestimate seizure risk at subtherapeutic doses.

Seizure rates under treatment with antipsychotic drugs: Data from the AMSP project

Objectives: The study aimed to assess seizure rates related to different antipsychotic drugs (APDs) in a clinical setting using data from the drug safety programme Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie (AMSP).Methods: Psychotropic drug use data and reports of APD-related seizures were collected in 89 psychiatric hospitals in Austria, Germany and Switzerland from 1993 to 2015.Results: Of 475,096 patients under surveillance, 320,383 patients were treated with APDs for the main indications of schizophrenic disorders, mood disorders and organic disorders. A total of 144 APD-related tonic clonic seizures were identified (0.04%). The butyrophenones ranked slightly lower (0.03%) compared to the phenothiazines, thioxanthenes and second-generation APDs (0.05% each). No significant differences were observed when comparing first- and second-generation APDs. Clozapine was related to the highest seizure rate (0.18%). In 107 cases (74.3%), more than one drug was considered responsible for seizure induction. With the exception of clozapine, seizures imputed to a single APD were in the clear minority. Seizure rates under the combinations of APDs with tricyclic antidepressants or lithium, as well as under triple combinations of APDs, were increased approximately two-fold. Young age (≤30 years), the male gender, and diagnosis of schizophrenic disorder were associated with significantly higher seizure rates (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Closely reflecting daily clinical practice, the present results provide supplementary information regarding APD therapy for patients not only at risk for seizures but also seizure-unaffected psychiatric inpatients.

Meloxicam-desmopressin drug-drug interaction producing hyponatremia

BACKGROUND

People with schizophrenia and medical comorbidities are often on multiple medications to manage their symptoms. Herein we present a case of drug-drug interaction (meloxicam and desmopressin), in a patient also on clozapine, that ultimately resulted in hyponatremia and seizure.

METHODS

The patient provided consent to have his case published. We searched PubMed and after reviewing 321 articles, 11 were chosen for relevance.

RESULTS

Meloxicam enhanced the adverse effect (hyponatremia) of desmopressin and was the likely culprit.

CONCLUSIONS

In a patient with higher ADH levels, as in our patient taking desmopressin, the addition of an NSAID could further increase water retention and worsen hyponatremia; indeed, meloxicam was the only new medication added to the patient's regimen, and a drug interaction calculator supports the desmopressin-meloxicam drug-drug interaction as the culprit. We urge clinicians to avoid the use of desmopressin in patients with schizophrenia as this can lead to water intoxication. As meloxicam may worsen desmopressin-induced hyponatremia and could result in seizure, one should avoid using NSAIDs in patients with schizophrenia whom are also prescribed vasopressin/desmopressin. Serum sodium levels should be closely monitored in patients with schizophrenia whose regimen includes desmopressin.

A protocol for a randomised controlled, double-blind feasibility trial investigating fluoxetine treatment in improving memory and learning impairments in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Fluoxetine, Learning and Memory in Epilepsy (FLAME trial)

BACKGROUND

People with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) report significant problems with learning and memory. There are no effective therapies for combatting these problems in people with TLE, resulting in an unmet therapeutic need. The lack of treatment is, in part, due to a poor understanding of the neurobiology underlying these memory deficits. We know that hippocampal neurogenesis, a process believed to be important in learning and memory formation, is permanently reduced in chronic TLE, and this may go some way to explain the learning and memory impairments seen in people with TLE.The common anti-depressant drug fluoxetine has been shown to stimulate neurogenesis both in the healthy brain and in neurological diseases where neurogenesis is impaired. In an animal model of TLE, administration of fluoxetine was found to restore neurogenesis and improve learning on a complex spatial navigational task. We now want to test this effect in humans by investigating whether administration of fluoxetine to people with TLE can improve learning and memory.

METHODS

This is a single-centre randomised controlled, double-blind feasibility trial. We plan to recruit 20 participants with a diagnosis of TLE and uni-lateral hippocampal sclerosis, confirmed by 3T MRI. Eligible participants will undergo baseline assessments of learning and memory prior to being randomised to either 20 mg/day fluoxetine or matching placebo for 60 days. Follow-up assessments will be conducted after 60 days of trial medication and then again at 60 days after cessation of trial medication. Feasibility will be assessed on measures of recruitment, retention and adherence against pre-determined criteria.

DISCUSSION

This trial is designed to determine the feasibility of conducting a double-blind randomised controlled trial of fluoxetine for the treatment of learning and memory impairments in people with TLE. Data collected in this trial will inform the design and utility of any future efficacy trial involving fluoxetine for the treatment of learning and memory in people with TLE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT 2014-005088-34, registered on May 18, 2015.