Will routine therapeutic drug monitoring have a place in clozapine therapy?

Schizophrenia Patients Discharged on Clozapine Plus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics From a Public Psychiatric Hospital in Taiwan, 2006-2021

BACKGROUND

Some schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine experience an inadequate response and adherence problems. The purpose of this study was to compare time to rehospitalization within 6 months in schizophrenia patients discharged on 3 clozapine regimens. Additionally, the temporal trend of prescription rate in each group was also explored.

METHODS

Schizophrenia patients discharged from the study hospital from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2021, (n = 3271) were included in the analysis. The type of clozapine prescribed at discharge was divided into 3 groups: clozapine plus long-acting injectable antipsychotics (clozapine + LAIs), clozapine plus other oral antipsychotics (clozapine + OAPs), and clozapine monotherapy. Survival analysis was used to compare time to rehospitalization within 6 months after discharge among the 3 groups. The temporal trend in the prescription rate of each group was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage Trend test.

RESULTS

Patients discharged on clozapine + LAIs had a significantly longer time to rehospitalization than those on clozapine + OAPs or clozapine monotherapy. The prescription rates of clozapine + LAIs and clozapine + OAPs significantly increased over time, whereas the prescription rates of clozapine monotherapy significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the clozapine + OAPs group, the clozapine + LAIs group had a lower risk of rehospitalization and a lower dose of clozapine prescribed. Therefore, if a second antipsychotic is required for patients who are taking clozapine alone, LAIs should be considered earlier.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine]

Clozapine is a prototypical atypical antipsychotic used to treat severe schizophrenia and for which a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is quite commonly proposed. Clozapine is rapidly absorbed (maximum concentration reached within 1 to 4hours), and is extensively metabolized in the liver by CYP1A2 to an active metabolite (and to a lesser extent, to inactive metabolites via other enzymes). Its half-life is 8 to 16h. A therapeutic range has been proposed for clozapine as some studies have reported both a relationship between low plasmatic concentrations and resistance to treatment (threshold level is likely between 250 and 400μg/L), and a relationship between high plasmatic concentrations and an increase in the occurrence of toxicity (alert level=1000μg/L). Given the data obtained in different studies, the TDM was evaluated for this molecule, to recommended.

Routine clozapine assay monitoring to improve the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia

AIMS AND METHOD

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring in clozapine therapy has previously not been considered justifiable. Using observational data, the clinical utility of annual clozapine assay monitoring is explored within a large mental health trust.

RESULTS

After the introduction of routine monitoring, the rate of clozapine assays rose to 2.3 per patient per year, with a consistent reduction in high-risk clozapine assays (<0.1 mg/L or >1.0 mg/L or any result more than 24 months old). High-risk assays are associated with a mortality rate of 31.6 deaths per 1000 patients, more than twice that of those within the target range (0.35-0.60 mg/L and conducted within the past 12 months) (P = 0.048).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Routine clozapine assay monitoring has significant clinical utility. Our simple but targeted approach can be readily implemented to reduce the number of patients with high-risk clozapine assay levels, potentially reduce all-cause mortality and provide optimal treatment for those with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Clozapine and Norclozapine Plasma Levels in Patients Switched Between Different Liquid Formulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is the drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary objective of this study was to compare plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine levels in patients switched between 2 liquid formulations [Denzapine suspension and clozapine oral solution (St George's ZTAS)]. Secondary objectives included comparison of safety, tolerability, and patient acceptability.

METHODS

This was a noninterventional, observational, prospective follow-up of patients consecutively switched between formulations of clozapine liquid in a large inner-city NHS mental health trust. The authors also performed retrospective analysis of outcomes from patient case notes.

RESULTS

The authors identified 43 patients receiving Denzapine suspension in the trust. Data were available for 43 patients switched from Denzapine to clozapine oral solution (St George's ZTAS), among whom, 15 (32%) were excluded from the analysis. Of the 28 patients for whom data were available, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of mean values for corrected Cmin 91.5 (85.2%-98.4%) and uncorrected Cmin 91.2 (84.4%-98.6%) were within the guideline range of bioequivalence (80%-125%). Safety and tolerability profiles were comparable between the 2 formulations (P = 0.10). Patient acceptability was also similar between the brands in most domains. However, there was a taste preference for Denzapine suspension.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in clozapine plasma levels was observed after switching from Denzapine suspension to a recently introduced clozapine solution. This study also highlights the significance of medicinal characteristics such as taste for patient acceptability and compliance.

Towards personalized pharmacology: Antipsychotics and schizophrenia

Since the discovery of the first antipsychotic in 1952, many antipsychotic drugs have been developed, each with different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The pharmacological heterogeneity of antipsychotic drugs should allow a personalized drug prescription adapted to the different clinical picture of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a chronic disease, during which 3 stages of pharmacological intervention can be identified: the first episode psychotic (FEP), the phase of therapeutic stabilization that can progress to situations of resistance, and the question of long-term prescription. During FEP, the choice of the first antipsychotic treatment seems to be underpinned by its safety profile in relation to the patient for whom it is prescribed, according to the adage start low and go-slow. The therapeutic stabilization phase is based on treatment optimization through a rigorous evaluation of the benefits-harm balance, with the use of tools such as personalized therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetics. Generally speaking, while some antipsychotic drugs seem to present a more favorable efficacy profile in certain situations, the differences are small, whereas the differences in safety are more important and should be considered in the first line. Individual factors such as the presence of co-morbidities, as well as previously experienced treatments must also be taken into account. Finally, the question of maintaining the prescription of antipsychotic drugs over the long term arises in view of the iatrogenic risk with controversial current data. Overall, the personalized prescription of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia remains limited by a lack of data in the literature, justifying the development of clinical studies in this field. But at present, the dogma remains that of primum non nocere.

Bupropion With Clozapine: Case Reports of Seizure After Coadministration

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is more effective than other atypical antipsychotics for treatment resistant schizophrenia, but has serious side effects. Clozapine has an estimated cumulative seizure risk of 10% in patients treated for 3.8 years. Bupropion can also induce seizures and its estimated risk is 0.4% at recommended doses. While some risk factors for seizures are known, much remains unknown about predicting seizure risk. Cases: We present 2 cases of seizures in patients treated with clozapine and bupropion without a seizure history. In the first case, a patient with schizoaffective disorder treated with dual antipsychotic therapy had a witnessed generalized tonic-clonic seizure. With the exception of bupropion/naltrexone which was started 2.5 months prior for weight loss, she had not had any recent medication changes. In the second case, a patient with schizoaffective disorder was treated with clozapine and was prescribed bupropion SR for smoking cessation for an extended duration. He had cut back on cigarette use in the 2 months prior to reporting "spells." The neurologist's assessment was probable epileptic seizures which resolved after the bupropion was stopped and divalproex was started for seizure prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine and bupropion are known to lower the seizure threshold, but little information is available regarding the risk when used in combination. It is unclear whether these agents, when used in combination, have additive seizure risk or possible synergistic effects. Bupropion should be used cautiously in patients treated with clozapine. Safer agents that do not lower the seizure threshold should be utilized whenever possible.

Understanding variability in the pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics - focus on clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole population models

Antipsychotic medicines are widely used for the management of psychotic symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Most atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism prior to excretion. Various factors may influence their pharmacokinetics, particularly elimination, leading to highly variable drug concentrations between individual patients following the same dosing regimen. Population pharmacokinetic approach, based on nonlinear mixed effects modeling, is a useful tool to identify covariates explaining pharmacokinetic variability, as well as to characterize and distinguish unexplained residual and between-subject (interindividual) variability. In addition, this approach allows the use of both sparsely and intensively sampled data. In this paper, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole, focusing on a population modeling approach. In particular, models based on a nonlinear mixed effects approach performed by NONMEM^® software in order to identify and quantify sources of pharmacokinetic variability are presented. Population models were identified through systematic searches of PubMed and sixteen studies were selected. Some of the factors identified that significantly contribute to variability in elimination among clozapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are demographic characteristics, body weight, genetic polymorphism, smoking and in some cases drug interactions. Scientific research based on pharmacometric modeling is useful to further characterize sources of variability and their combined effect.

Quantification of the steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine in Japanese patients with schizophrenia using a novel HPLC method and the effects of CYPs and ABC transporters polymorphisms

Background This study developed a novel high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the simultaneous quantification of clozapine and its active metabolite, N-desmethylclozapine, in human plasma and investigated the effects of various factors, including genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, CYP3A5, ABCB1 and ABCG2, on the steady-state plasma trough concentrations (C₀) of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Methods Forty-five patients had been receiving fixed doses of clozapine for at least four weeks. The CYP2D6 ( CYP2D6*2, CYP2D6*5, CYP2D6*10), CYP3A5 ( CYP3A5*3), ABCB1 (1236C > T, 2677G > T/A, 3435C > T) and ABCG2 (421 C > A) genotypes were identified by polymerase chain reaction. Results The within- and between-day coefficients of variation (CV) were less than 11.0%, and accuracy was within 9.0% over the linear range from 10 to 2500 ng/mL for both analytes, and their LOQs were each 10 ng/mL. The median C₀/dose (C₀/D) ratios of clozapine were significantly higher in patients with the ABCG2 421 A allele than in those with the 421 C/C genotype ( P = 0.010). However, there were no significant differences in C₀/D ratios of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine among ABCB1, CYP2D6 or CYP3A5 genotypes. In multiple regression analysis, including polymorphisms, age, body weight and biochemical data of patients, the ABCG2 polymorphism alone was correlated with the C₀/D ratios of clozapine ( R²= 0.139, P = 0.016). Conclusions Among the various CYPs and drug transporters, BCRP appeared to most strongly influence clozapine exposure. Knowledge of the patient's ABCG2 421 C > A genotype before initiating therapy may be useful when making dosing decisions aimed at achieving optimal clozapine exposure.

Fusing Sensor Paradigms to Acquire Chemical Information: An Integrative Role for Smart Biopolymeric Hydrogels

The Information Age transformed our lives but it has had surprisingly little impact on the way chemical information (e.g., from our biological world) is acquired, analyzed and communicated. Sensor systems are poised to change this situation by providing rapid access to chemical information. This access will be enabled by technological advances from various fields: biology enables the synthesis, design and discovery of molecular recognition elements as well as the generation of cell-based signal processors; physics and chemistry are providing nano-components that facilitate the transmission and transduction of signals rich with chemical information; microfabrication is yielding sensors capable of receiving these signals through various modalities; and signal processing analysis enhances the extraction of chemical information. The authors contend that integral to the development of functional sensor systems will be materials that (i) enable the integrative and hierarchical assembly of various sensing components (for chemical recognition and signal transduction) and (ii) facilitate meaningful communication across modalities. It is suggested that stimuli-responsive self-assembling biopolymers can perform such integrative functions, and redox provides modality-spanning communication capabilities. Recent progress toward the development of electrochemical sensors to manage schizophrenia is used to illustrate the opportunities and challenges for enlisting sensors for chemical information processing.

Seizure associated with clozapine: incidence, etiology, and management

Seizures are a known adverse effect of clozapine therapy. The literature varies on incidence rates of seizures, secondary to varying time frames in which each seizure occurred. Tonic-clonic seizures comprise the majority of seizures experienced secondary to clozapine use, but it is imperative to recognize the potential variety of seizure presentation. The exact etiology of clozapine-induced seizure is unknown. Conflicting reports regarding total oral dose, serum concentration, dose titration, and concomitant medications make it difficult to identify a single cause contributing to seizure risk. Following seizure occurrence, it may be in the best interests of the patient to continue clozapine treatment. In this clinical situation, the use of an antiepileptic drug (AED) for seizure prophylaxis may be required. The AED of choice appears to be valproate, but several successful case reports also support the use of lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Well-designed clinical trials regarding clozapine seizure prophylaxis are lacking. Given clozapine's strong evidence for efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, every attempt to manage side effects, including seizure, should be implemented to allow for therapeutic continuation.

Electrochemical study of the catechol-modified chitosan system for clozapine treatment monitoring

This work presents a thorough electrochemical and reliability analysis of a sensing scheme for the antipsychotic clozapine. We have previously demonstrated a novel detection approach for this redox-active drug, highly effective in schizophrenia treatment, based on a catechol-modified chitosan film. The biomaterial film enables amplification of the oxidative current generated by clozapine through redox cycling. Here, we study critical electrochemical and material aspects of the redox cycling system to overcome barriers in point-of-care monitoring in complex biological samples. Specifically, we explore the electrochemical parameter space, showing that enhanced sensing performance depends on the presence of a reducing mediator as well as the electrochemical technique applied. These factors account for up to 1.75-fold and 2.47-fold signal enhancement, respectively. Looking at potential interferents, we illustrate that the redox cycling system allows for differentiation between selected redox-active species, clozapine's structurally largely analogous metabolite norclozapine as well as the representative catecholamine dopamine. Furthermore, we investigate material stability and fouling with reuse as well as storage. We find no evidence of film fouling due to clozapine; slow overall biomaterial degradation with successive use accounts for a 2.2% absolute signal loss and can be controlled for. Storage of the redox cycling system appears feasible over weeks when kept in solution with only 0.26%/day clozapine signal degradation, while ambient air exposure of three or more days reduces performance by 58%. This study not only advances our understanding of the catechol-modified chitosan system, but also further establishes the viability of applying it toward sensing clozapine in a clinical setting. Such point-of-care monitoring will allow for broader use of clozapine by increasing convenience to patients as well as medical professionals, thus improving the lives of people affected by schizophrenia through personalized medicine.

The influence of 5-HTTLPR genotype on the association between the plasma concentration and therapeutic effect of paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) can differ depending on the patient's serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) genotype, and the effects of varying plasma concentrations of drugs can also vary. We investigated the association between the paroxetine plasma concentration and clinical response in patients with different 5-HTTLPR genotypes.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was used to evaluate patients at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. The patients' paroxetine plasma concentrations at week 6 were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Additionally, their 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms (alleles S and L) were analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction with specific primers. We divided the participants into two groups based on their L haplotype: the SS group and the SL and LL group. We performed single and multiple regression analyses to investigate the associations between MADRS improvement and paroxetine plasma concentrations or other covariates for each group.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to demographic or clinical data. In the SS group, the paroxetine plasma concentration was significantly negatively correlated with improvement in MADRS at week 6. In the SL and LL group, the paroxetine plasma concentration was significantly positively correlated with improvement in MADRS at week 6 according to the results of the single regression analysis; however, it was not significantly correlated with improvement in MADRS at week 6 according to the results of the multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with MDD who do not respond to paroxetine, a lower plasma concentration or a lower oral dose of paroxetine might be more effective in those with the SS genotype, and a higher plasma concentration might be more effective in those with the SL or LL genotype.

Clozapine and therapeutic drug monitoring: is there sufficient evidence for an upper threshold?

RATIONALE

Clozapine levels are advocated in the monitoring of patients on this drug and have now been used for a number of years. A safety-related threshold has also been proposed, as well as therapeutic lower and upper thresholds. While there has been reasonable consensus regarding a lower therapeutic threshold, this is not the case for the upper thresholds.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to review available evidence related to upper thresholds.

METHODS

We carried out an electronic search of different databases and a manual search of articles between 1960 and 2011, cross-referencing the following terms with clozapine-interactions, monitoring, pharmacokinetics, plasma levels, serum levels, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine articles met our search criteria and these could be divided into reviews (11), studies (24), and case reports (35). Study quality was evaluated, and none met criteria for a prospective, randomized controlled trial specifically addressing higher plasma levels, e.g., >500 ng/ml. Case reports emphasize in particular the impact of interactions, e.g., antidepressants and smoking. There is clear evidence indicating a dose-related increased risk of seizures, at least to 500-600 mg/day, but a lack of data to suggest such a relationship between plasma levels, dose, and side effects linked to safety, e.g., seizures, myocarditis, and agranulocytosis. The very limited evidence addressing an upper threshold related to clinical response suggests a "ceiling effect" in the range of 600-838 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the current safety-related threshold is not supported by evidence. There may be an upper threshold for clinical response, beyond which chance of response falls off, although further studies are warranted.

A review of the use of clozapine levels to guide treatment and determine cause of death

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature to examine the use of clozapine levels to (i) guide therapy and prevent toxicity in clinical care and (ii) determine cause of death in post-mortem examination of patients who were treated with clozapine.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched in December 2010 using the following keywords: 'clozapine levels', 'clozapine and toxicity', 'clozapine and death', 'clozapine and mortality' and 'post-mortem redistribution'. Data was also collected from the 2010 MIMS Annual.

RESULTS

The literature reported significant variation in clozapine levels attained with any given dose, and considerable variability in the clinical response achieved at any given clozapine level. The lowest effective clozapine levels ranged from 250 to 550 µg/L, while the recommended upper limit to prevent toxicity varied from 600 to 2000 µg/L. There was minimal correlation between clozapine levels and side effects, with the exception of sedation, hypotension and seizure activity. The risk of seizures increased with plasma clozapine levels greater than 600 µg/L or rapid upward titration. In addition to prescribed dose, there are many factors that influence plasma clozapine levels. After death, the process of post-mortem drug redistribution resulted in 3.00 to 4.89 times increases in clozapine levels in central blood vessels and 1.5 fold increases in peripheral vessels compared to ante-mortem levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The exact range of clozapine levels that corresponds to toxicity remains unclear. However, levels between 350 µg/L and 1000 µg/L achieved with gradual upward titration are more likely to be effective and less likely to cause toxicity. Ongoing clozapine level monitoring is indicated, especially when (i) prescribing higher doses (> 600 mg/day) of clozapine, (ii) there has been a change in a patient's concomitant pharmacotherapy or cigarette use and (iii) there has been a suboptimal response to treatment. The use of post-mortem clozapine levels to determine clozapine toxicity as a cause of death is unreliable.

Cytochromes P450: Roles in the Biotransformation of Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke and Impact of Smoking Cessation on Concurrent Drug Therapy

Cigarette smoke contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that activate the expression of cytochrome P450 family 1 (CYP1) enzymes in liver and other tissues; this process is dependent on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) transcription factor. An important CYP1 enzyme, CYP1A2, has a critical role in the oxidation of drugs such as clozapine, olanzapine and theophylline; these drugs exhibit a high incidence of adverse effects that are linked to plasma concentrations. This article reviews the impact of smoking and smoking cessation on therapy with toxic drugs that undergo CYP-mediated elimination. PAHs in cigarette smoke activate the AhR and upregulate CYP1A2, which enhances the clearance of these drugs, diminishes their efficacy and necessitates the use of higher doses. However, smoking cessation decreases PAH exposure, which leads to a decline in clearance of CYP1A2 substrate drugs. Dose reductions and close therapeutic monitoring for such drugs are recommended in patients who cease smoking.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for drugs used in the treatment of substance-related disorders: literature review using a therapeutic drug monitoring appropriateness rating scale

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of drugs for the treatment of substance-related disorders is moderate at best. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be an instrument to improve outcomes. Because TDM for most of those drugs is not established, the authors reviewed the literature and built a rating scale to detect the potential added value of TDM for these pharmacologic agents.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for acamprosate, bupropion, buprenorphine, clomethiazole, disulfiram, methadone, naltrexone, and varenicline. The rating scale included 22 items and was divided in five categories: efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, patient characteristics, and cost-effectiveness. Three reference substances with established TDM were similarly assessed for comparison: clozapine, lithium, and nortriptyline. The three reference substances achieved scores of 15, 12, and 14 points, respectively.

RESULTS

Drugs for treatment of substance-related disorders achieved 3 to 17 points, 17 for methadone, 11 for buprenorphine, 10 for disulfiram, also 10 for naltrexone for the indication opioid-dependence and 9 for the indication alcohol dependence as well as bupropion, 7 points for acamprosate, 6 points for clomethiazole, and 3 for varenicline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that systematic evaluation of drug- and patient-related variables with the new rating scale can estimate the appropriateness of TDM. Because their rating revealed similar scores as the three reference drugs, it is proposed that TDM should be established for bupropion, buprenorphine, disulfiram or a metabolite, methadone, and naltrexone. An objective rating of drug- and patient-related characteristics could help laboratories focus their method development on the most likely drugs to require TDM along with a thorough drug use evaluation.

Inverse correlation between clinical response to paroxetine and plasma drug concentration in patients with major depressive disorders

OBJECTIVE

There are few data concerning a clear relationship between the clinical effect of paroxetine and plasma drug concentrations, although therapeutic ranges have been established for some tricyclic antidepressants.

METHODS

In this study, 120 patients with major depressive disorders were treated with 10-40 mg/day of paroxetine for 6 weeks, and a total of 89 patients completed the protocol. A clinical evaluation using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was performed at 0, 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the plasma concentrations of paroxetine and the percentage improvement in the total MADRS scores (r = -0.282, p < 0.01) and the final MADRS scores at 6 weeks (r = 0.268, p < 0.05). The conventional receiver-operating-characteristic curve showed the fraction of true positive results and false negative results for various cut-off levels of paroxetine concentration for response and remission. The thresholds for both response and remission that gave the maximal sensitivity and specificity for paroxetine concentrations were 64.2 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that plasma paroxetine concentrations are negatively associated with improvement and that response occurs at the upper threshold of 64.2 ng/ml of paroxetine. These findings should be replicated with a larger patient sample.

Psychiatrists' attitude towards and knowledge of clozapine treatment

Clozapine is, in most countries, underutilized and the initiation of clozapine is often delayed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reasons for the delay and the underutilization of clozapine. One hundred psychiatrists were interviewed by phone. The interview was a structured interview with questions regarding attitude to, knowledge of and experiences with clozapine. Forty-eight (48%) psychiatrists had treatment responsibility of fewer than five patients treated with clozapine and 31 of the interviewed psychiatrists (31%) had started clozapine within the last 3 months. Seven psychiatrists (7%) had never prescribed clozapine despite the fact that they had been working more than five years in general psychiatry. Sixty-four psychiatrists (64%) would rather combine two antipsychotics than use clozapine. Sixty-six psychiatrists (66%) believed that patients treated with clozapine were less satisfied with their treatment when compared with those treated with other atypical antipsychotics. Many psychiatrists are reluctant to use clozapine and this might be due to less experience and knowledge of clozapine. A reason for the low awareness of clozapine's properties might be that clozapine is now a generic drug, and therefore, the marketing and education in using the drug is sparse.

Role of CYP pharmacogenetics and drug-drug interactions in the efficacy and safety of atypical and other antipsychotic agents

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug oxidases play a pivotal role in the elimination of antipsychotic agents, and therefore influence the toxicity and efficacy of these drugs. Factors that affect CYP function and expression have a major impact on treatment outcomes with antipsychotic agents. In particular, aspects of CYP pharmacogenetics, and the processes of CYP induction and inhibition all influence in-vivo rates of drug elimination. Certain CYPs that mediate the oxidation of antipsychotic drugs exhibit genetic variants that may influence in-vivo activity. Thus, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP genes have been shown to encode enzymes that have decreased drug oxidation capacity. Additionally, psychopharmacotherapy has the potential for drug-drug inhibitory interactions involving CYPs, as well as drug-mediated CYP induction. Literature evidence supports a role for CYP1A2 in the clearance of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine; CYP1A2 is inducible by certain drugs and environmental chemicals. Recent studies have suggested that specific CYP1A2 variants possessing individual SNPs, and possibly also SNP combinations (haplotypes), in the 5′-regulatory regions may respond differently to inducing chemicals. CYP2D6 is an important catalyst of the oxidation of chlorpromazine, thioridazine, risperidone and haloperidol. Certain CYP2D6 allelic variants that encode enzymes with decreased drug oxidation capacity are more common in particular ethnic groups, which may lead to adverse effects with standard doses of psychoactive drugs. Thus, genotyping may be useful for dose optimization with certain psychoactive drugs that are substrates for CYP2D6. However, genotyping for inducible CYPs is unlikely to be sufficient to direct therapy with all antipsychotic agents. In-vivo CYP phenotyping with cocktails of drug substrates may assist at the commencement of therapy, but this approach could be complicated by pharmacokinetic interactions if applied when an antipsychotic drug regimen is ongoing.

Clozapine exposure and the impact of smoking and gender: a population pharmacokinetic study

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of concentration exposure to clozapine and norclozapine in a real-world clinical setting, with a focus on smoking status, using population pharmacokinetic methodologies. A retrospective review of plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations taken from inpatients at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, from 2001 to 2007 was conducted. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed using NONMEM, including age, gender, weight, smoking status, and dosage formulation as covariates. Pharmacokinetic parameters and interindividual and residual variabilities were estimated with 1- and 2-compartment models. A total of 519 plasma clozapine concentrations from 197 patients (138 males; mean +/- SD age, 38 +/- 13 years; schizophrenia spectrum disorder 98.2%) were included for the analysis. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the data. Apparent volume of distribution was fixed to a previously reported value in the literature of 7 L/kg.The population-predicted oral clearance of clozapine and norclozapine was 18.0 and 39.0 L/h, respectively; both the predicted clearance values vary nearly 6-fold (range, 9.18-59.06 and 16.29-97.84 L/h, respectively). For clozapine, smokers and males showed increased oral clearance by 6.0 and 4.5 L/h, respectively. For norclozapine, smokers and male gender were associated with an increased oral clearance of 11.3 and 7.6 L/h, respectively. The formulation of clozapine administered had an impact on the absorption rate with a Ka of 0.14/h for tablet and 10.3/h for the suspension form.The data suggest that smoking and male gender are associated with lower exposure to clozapine and norclozapine due to the higher oral clearance. These findings may account for some of the variability in clozapine exposure and have important implications for individualized drug dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring.

ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 polymorphisms: clinical pharmacogenetics of clozapine

To examine the genetic factors influencing clozapine kinetics in vivo, 75 patients treated with clozapine were genotyped for CYPs and ABCB1 polymorphisms and phenotyped for CYP1A2 and CYP3A activity. CYP1A2 activity and dose-corrected trough steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine correlated significantly (r = -0.61; P = 1 x 10), with no influence of the CYP1A2*1F genotype (P = 0.38). CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (*2/*2 genotype) had 2.3-fold higher (P = 0.036) clozapine concentrations than the extensive metabolizers (non-*2/*2). In patients comedicated with fluvoxamine, a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor, clozapine and norclozapine concentrations correlate with CYP3A activity (r = 0.44, P = 0.075; r = 0.63, P = 0.007, respectively). Carriers of the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a 1.6-fold higher clozapine plasma concentrations than noncarriers (P = 0.046). In conclusion, this study has shown for the first time a significant in vivo role of CYP2C19 and the P-gp transporter in the pharmacokinetics of clozapine. CYP1A2 is the main CYP isoform involved in clozapine metabolism, with CYP2C19 contributing moderately, and CYP3A4 contributing only in patients with reduced CYP1A2 activity. In addition, ABCB1, but not CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, nor CYP3A7 polymorphisms, influence clozapine pharmacokinetics.

Bioequivalence of clozapine orally disintegrating 100-mg tablets compared with clozapine solid oral 100-mg tablets after multiple doses in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

This study compared the bioequivalence of FazaClo (clozapine orally disintegrating tablets) 100 mg to Clozaril (clozapine standard oral tablets) 100 mg after multiple doses in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose study in which patients with schizophrenia received FazaClo or Clozaril 100 mg twice daily for 5 days before crossing over to the alternate therapy. Blood samples were obtained at regular intervals during and after the completion of treatment, and standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Safety and patient satisfaction with FazaClo were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 33 completed the study and 30 were included in the steady-state analyses. All pharmacokinetic parameters for clozapine and desmethylclozapine (the major metabolite of clozapine) were similar between FazaClo and Clozaril in both the completer and steady-state populations. Geometric mean values for steady-state maximum and minimum concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for FazaClo were all within 95-105% of those for Clozarilwell within the range considered by the US FDA as acceptable for bioequivalence (80-125%). Patients also expressed a high level of satisfaction with the FazaClo orally disintegrating tablet formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

FazaClo produced pharmacokinetic profiles almost identical to those of Clozaril. This should provide clinicians with reassurance that patients who receive FazaClo will achieve plasma drug concentrations similar to those produced by the same daily dose of Clozaril, and that no cross-titration is necessary when switching from one of these clozapine formulations to the other.

Clozapine treatment of childhood-onset schizophrenia: evaluation of effectiveness, adverse effects, and long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is a unique atypical antipsychotic with superior efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Plasma concentration of clozapine and its major metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) as well as the ratio of NDMC to clozapine have been reported to be predictors of clozapine response. Here we evaluate these as well as other measures in an effort to find predictors of response to clozapine in our early-onset treatment-refractory population.

METHOD

Fifty-four children and adolescents participated in double-blind (n = 22) or open-label (n = 32) clozapine trials. Clinical evaluations took place at baseline, week 6 on clozapine, and at 2- to 6-year follow-up. The data were analyzed in relation to demographics, age at onset, IQ, clozapine dose, and plasma concentrations of prolactin, clozapine, NDMC, and NDMC/clozapine ratio. Stepwise regression and correlation analyses were performed to find predictors of treatment response.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement after 6 weeks of clozapine treatment, as measured by the percentage of improvement on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, was strongly associated with the NDMC/clozapine ratio at the 6-week time point (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.41; p < .01 for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and r = 0.43; p < .01 for Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms). Although the rate of side effects was higher than that typically found in the adult population, it did not appear to be related to clozapine dose, clozapine or NDMC plasma concentrations, or NDMC/clozapine ratio. Outcome at long-term follow-up, as measured by Children's Global Assessment Scale, was associated with lesser illness severity at baseline and with greater improvement during the initial 6 weeks of clozapine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The NDMC/clozapine ratio may be a valuable predictor of response to clozapine and may suggest new approaches to clozapine treatment.

Monitoring the safe use of clozapine: a consensus view from Victoria, Australia

Clozapine is an important antipsychotic agent that has a unique profile of clinical benefits, but that has also been associated with several serious and potentially life-threatening safety concerns. In order to minimise the impact of haematological adverse events, health professionals treating patients with clozapine are currently required to register their patients on a centrally administered data network and to conform to strict protocols. The consensus statement documented in this article extends existing protocols by recommending monitoring of patients treated with clozapine for additional adverse effects during treatment. This consensus statement reflects the current practice at five major public psychiatric hospitals in Victoria, Australia, for the monitoring and management of clozapine-related adverse events, and has been implemented at these sites because of emerging safety concerns associating clozapine with cardiovascular and metabolic adverse effects.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Atypical Antipsychotics

In the past, the information about the dose-clinical effectiveness of typical antipsychotics was not complete and this led to the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. This, together with the intention of improving patients' quality of life and therapeutic compliance, resulted in the development of atypical or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). This review will concentrate on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, amisulpride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and sertindole, and will discuss the main aspects of their pharmacodynamics. In psychopharmacology, therapeutic drug monitoring studies have generally concentrated on controlling compliance and avoiding adverse effects by keeping long-term exposure to the minimal effective blood concentration. The rationale for using therapeutic drug monitoring in relation to SGAs is still a matter of debate, but there is growing evidence that it can improve efficacy, especially when patients do not respond to therapeutic doses or when they develop adverse effects. Here, we review the literature concerning the relationships between plasma concentrations of SGAs and clinical responses by dividing the studies on the basis of the length of their observation periods. Studies with clozapine evidenced a positive relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical response, with a threshold of 350-420 ng/mL associated with good clinical response. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring is well established because high plasma concentrations of clozapine can increase the risk of epileptic seizures. Plasma clozapine concentrations seem to be influenced by many factors such as altered cytochrome P450 1A4 activity, age, sex and smoking. The pharmacological effects of risperidone depend on the sum of the plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxyrisperidone metabolite, so monitoring the plasma concentrations of the parent compound alone can lead to erroneous interpretations. Despite a large variability in plasma drug concentrations, the lack of studies using fixed dosages, and discrepancies in the results, it seems that monitoring the plasma concentrations of the active moiety may be useful. However, no therapeutic plasma concentration range for risperidone has yet been clearly established. A plasma threshold concentration for parkinsonian side effects has been found to be 74 ng/mL. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring may be particularly useful in the switch between the oral and the long-acting injectable form. The reviewed studies on olanzapine strongly indicate a relationship between clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations. Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring can be considered very useful in assessing therapeutic efficacy and controlling adverse events. A therapeutic range of 20-50 ng/mL has been found. There is little evidence in favour of the existence of a relationship between plasma quetiapine concentrations and clinical responses, and an optimal therapeutic range has not been identified. Positron emission tomography studies of receptor blockade indicated a discrepancy between the time course of receptor occupancy and plasma quetiapine concentrations. The value of quetiapine plasma concentration monitoring in clinical practice is still controversial. Preliminary data suggested that a therapeutic plasma amisulpride concentration of 367 ng/mL was associated with clinical improvement. A therapeutic range of 100-400 ng/mL is proposed from non-systematic clinical experience. There is no direct evidence concerning optimal plasma concentration ranges of ziprasidone, aripiprazole or sertindole.

Higher Plasma Drug Concentration in Clozapine-treated Schizophrenic Patients With Side Effects of Obsessive/Compulsive Symptoms

Clozapine-induced obsessive/compulsive symptoms (OCS) have been reported by many authors. This study investigated the incidence of these side effects, together with the relation between these side effects and the plasma concentration (Cps) of clozapine and its metabolites norclozapine and clozapine-N-oxide in schizophrenic patients. One hundred and two schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine were interviewed and screened with questionnaires testing for OCS during a 1-year study period. Cps of clozapine and the metabolites were monitored using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Thirty-nine patients (38.2%) presented with OCS, and, of these, 29 patients (28.4%) were classified as clozapine-induced, with an average latent period of 39.8+/-22.5 months. The Cps of clozapine and norclozapine were significantly higher in patients with OCS than in those without (595.1+/-364.9 vs. 433.5+/-252.8 ng/mL, P=0.001 and 266.4+/-144.4 vs. 203.1+/-119.8 ng/mL) OCS. Clozapine-induced OCS were not uncommon side effects. The authors suggest that the emergence of these side effects may be related to higher Cps of clozapine and clinicians should routinely check for and manage these side effects.

Plasma antipsychotic concentration and receptor occupancy, with special focus on risperidone long-acting injectable

Although effective plasma concentration ranges have been established for some antipsychotics, conventional and atypical, there is considerable inter-patient pharmacokinetic variation. Positron-emission tomography (PET) can be used to estimate D(2)-like receptor occupancy in the brain needed for an antipsychotic effect and the level above which extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) develop. For conventional antipsychotics, the window occupancy is approximately 70-80%. For the atypical antipsychotic risperidone, the antipsychotic effect starts at approximately 60% occupancy, with occupancy above 80% leading to EPS. The new formulation, risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI), comprises risperidone in a biodegradable polymer. It is effective long-term at doses of 25 or 50 mg injected i.m. every 2 weeks. The constant and slow release of the long-acting formulation leads to less fluctuation in plasma levels and to a D(2)-like receptor occupancy which is below the threshold for EPS.

Increased clozapine plasma concentrations and side effects induced by smoking cessation in 2 CYP1A2 genotyped patients

Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic, depends mainly on cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) for its metabolic clearance. CYP1A2 is inducible by smoking, and lower plasma concentrations of clozapine are measured in smokers than in nonsmokers. Case reports have been published on the effects of discontinuing smoking in patients receiving clozapine, which might lead to elevated plasma concentrations and severe side effects. We present 2 cases on the consequences of smoking cessation in patients receiving this drug. In the first patient, smoking cessation resulted, within 2 weeks, in severe sedation and fatigue, with an approximately 3-fold increase of plasma clozapine concentrations. In the second patient, a very high plasma concentration of clozapine (3004 ng/mL) was measured 6 days following a 16-day stay in a general hospital, during which smoking was prohibited. In the latter patient, the replacement of omeprazole, a strong CYP1A2 inducer, by pantoprazole, a weaker CYP1A2 inducer, could have contributed, in addition to smoking cessation, to the observed strong increase of plasma clozapine concentrations. Genotyping of the 2 patients revealed that they were carriers of the AA genotype for the -164C>A polymorphism (CYP1A2*1F) in intron 1 of CYP1A2 gene, which has previously been shown to confer a high inducibility of CYP1A2 by smoking. Thus, at the initiation of clozapine treatment, smoking patients should be informed that, if they decide to stop smoking, they are encouraged to do so but must inform their prescriber beforehand. Also, because of the increased use of no-smoking policies in many hospitals, studies examining the consequences of such policies on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, taking into account different CYP1A2 genotypes, are needed.

High throughput therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine and metabolites in serum by on-line coupling of solid phase extraction with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

The characteristics of automated on-line solid phase extraction with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS) are very amenable for flexibility and throughput in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We demonstrate this concept of automated, on-line SPE-LC-MS for the analysis of clozapine and metabolites (desmethylclozapine and clozapine-N-oxide) in serum. Method development, optimisation and validation are described and a comparison with previously published methods for the determination of clozapine and metabolites in serum and plasma is made. Optimisation of chromatographic and SPE conditions for increased throughput resulted in SPE-LC-MS cycle times of only about 2.2 min, demonstrating the great potential of automated on-line SPE-LC-MS for TDM. The new method is shown to be clearly favourable, in particular in terms of ease of sample handling, throughput and detection limits. Recovery is essentially quantitative. Detection limits are at about 0.15-0.3 ng ml(-1), depending on the ionisation source used. Calibration follows a quadratic model for clozapine and its N-oxide and a linear model for the desmethyl metabolite (all cases: R > 0.99). Accuracy, evaluated at three concentration levels spanning the whole therapeutic range, shows that bias is less than 10%. Precision (intra - and inter assay) ranges from about 5% R.S.D. at the high end of the therapeutic range (700-1,000 ng ml(-1)) to about 20% R.S.D. (OECD defined limit) at the lower limit of quantitation ( approximately 50 ng ml(-1)). The lower limit of quantitation is well below the low end of the therapeutic range at 350 ng ml(-1).

CYP1A2 activity is an important determinant of clozapine dosage in schizophrenic patients

Clozapine is an effective atypical antipsychotic drug applied in the treatment of resistant schizophrenia. The drug is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes especially the isozyme CYP1A2. Remarkably, the effective dosage varies widely among patients, making it necessary to individualize drug therapy with clozapine. The explanation for dosage variation may be differences in drug metabolism, and more specifically of CYP1A2 activity. This study is aimed at determining to what extent variability in clozapine dose can be explained by pharmacokinetic (PK) factors and more specifically by CYP1A2 activity in effectively treated psychiatric patients. In 22 evaluable patients with a schizophrenic disorder chronically using clozapine, the CYP1A2 activity and the clozapine clearance were estimated. For calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of clozapine, population PK software based upon Bayesian analysis was used. Caffeine clearance was estimated with the paraxanthine/caffeine ratio and served as estimate of CYP1A2 activity.A significant linear relationship was found between the clozapine dose and clozapine clearance (R: 0.71; P<0.05), whereas no relationship was found between clozapine dosage and clozapine serum trough concentration. Moreover, individual caffeine and clozapine clearances were found to be significantly related (R: 0.62; P<0.05) as were clozapine dose per kg body weight and P/C mol ratio (R: 0.44; P<0.05). We conclude that CYP1A2 activity is an important determinant of the variability of effective clozapine doses in psychiatric patients.

Nonresponse to clozapine and ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity: clinical data and analysis of CYP1A2 gene

Clozapine (CLO), an atypical antipsychotic, depends mainly on cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) for its metabolic clearance. Four patients treated with CLO, who were smokers, were nonresponders and had low plasma levels while receiving usual doses. Their plasma levels to dose ratios of CLO (median; range, 0.34; 0.22 to 0.40 ng x day/mL x mg) were significantly lower than ratios calculated from another study with 29 patients (0.75; 0.22 to 2.83 ng x day/mL x mg; P < 0.01). These patients were confirmed as being CYP1A2 ultrarapid metabolizers by the caffeine phenotyping test (median systemic caffeine plasma clearance; range, 3.85; 3.33 to 4.17 mL/min/kg) when compared with previous studies (0.3 to 3.33 mL/min/kg). The sequencing of the entire CYP1A2 gene from genomic DNA of these patients suggests that the -164C > A mutation (CYP1A2*1F) in intron 1, which confers a high inducibility of CYP1A2 in smokers, is the most likely explanation for their ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity. A marked (2 patients) or a moderate (2 patients) improvement of the clinical state of the patients occurred after the increase of CLO blood levels above the therapeutic threshold by the increase of CLO doses to very high values (ie, up to 1400 mg/d) or by the introduction of fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, at low dosage (50 to 100 mg/d). Due to the high frequency of smokers among patients with schizophrenia and to the high frequency of the -164C > A polymorphism, CYP1A2 genotyping could have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with CLO.

What is an adequate trial with clozapine?: therapeutic drug monitoring and time to response in treatment-refractory schizophrenia

Clozapine is the gold standard and 'last resort' in treatment of refractory schizophrenia. It is important to know whether a trial with clozapine is adequate or not. Six studies show a significantly higher response rate at clozapine plasma trough levels above a therapeutic threshold of 350-400 micro g/L. The absolute risk reduction is about 40%. An additional study found best results with plasma levels between 300 and 700 micro g/L, and one (probably too small) study could not detect a significantly different response rate for 350-450 micro g/L in comparison to 200-300 micro g/L. In addition, two extension studies showed conversion from nonresponders to responders if plasma levels increased above the threshold. Investigations on time to response in treatment with clozapine are often hampered by not controlling for time until plateau of dose titration or clozapine concentration. One of the better studies found 34 responders within 8 weeks after the last dose escalation. The remaining 16 non-responding patients did not change their status during a mean follow-up of 75 weeks. A second 1 year trial found a superior differential response rate for clozapine in comparison to haloperidol only during the first 6 weeks. A third study combined regular clozapine plasma level assays with assessment of response status. At the time of response 17 out of 19 responders showed clozapine concentrations above 350 micro g/L. The nine non-responders remained below this threshold throughout the rest of the year. These results favour an approach of raising the clozapine plasma level in treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients who do not respond to an initial low-to-medium dose treatment with clozapine. Some patients, especially young male smokers, will need dosages higher than 900 mg/day. Addition of low-dose fluvoxamine while closely monitoring clozapine levels can help decrease the high number of necessary pills. An adequate trial with clozapine should last at least 8 weeks on a plasma trough level above 350-400 micro g/L.

Predictors of clinical outcome in schizophrenic patients responding to clozapine

Many of the patients who respond better to clozapine (CLZ) than to typical antipsychotics still have residual psychopathology, but CLZ drug resistance data are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible predictive factors of a clinical response to CLZ in a group of 20 schizophrenic patients (DSM-IV: 13 males and 7 females with a mean age of 35.5 years +/- 7.1 SD) resistant to typical antipsychotics but CLZ responders as assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (>20% improvement). After a 1-week washout period, CLZ was started at a dose of 25 mg/d, which was increased by the third week up to a maximum of 600 mg/d (mean 365.00 +/- 129.88 mg/d SD) and remained unchanged until the end of the study (week 8). The patients showed a significant improvement in the mean scores of the rating scales for positive (SAPS) and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SANS) (P < 0.003, P < 0.02). All of the patients included in the study were BPRS responders; 65% were also SAPS and 75% SANS responders (>20% improvement). The improvement in the SANS score was significantly greater among the female patients (P < 0.05). The SAPS and SANS responders had a significantly higher mean metabolic ratio [MR = (NCLZ/CLZ)] than the nonresponders (P < 0.01), and the percentage of improvement significantly correlated with the increase in MR. This finding suggests that the individual pharmacogenetics indicated by metabolic capacity may be related to clinical response. All of the patients showed a reduction in white blood cell counts, but this was significantly less in the SANS responders than the SANS nonresponders (P = 0.047). The SAPS responders had significantly lower neutrophil counts than the nonresponders (P = 0.03). Our results seem to suggest the importance of pharmacodynamic, constitutional, and genetic data over strict pharmacokinetics in determining the clinical response to CLZ.

Metabolic drug interactions with new psychotropic agents

New psychotropic drugs introduced in clinical practice in recent years include new antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and 'third generation' antidepressants, and atypical antipsychotics, i.e. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and amisulpride. These agents are extensively metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and are therefore susceptible to metabolically based drug interactions with other psychotropic medications or with compounds used for the treatment of concomitant somatic illnesses. New antidepressants differ in their potential for metabolic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, while nefazodone is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. These antidepressants may be involved in clinically significant interactions when coadministered with substrates of these isoforms, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. Other new antidepressants including sertraline, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and reboxetine are weak in vitro inhibitors of the different CYP isoforms and appear to have less propensity for important metabolic interactions. The new atypical antipsychotics do not affect significantly the activity of CYP isoenzymes and are not expected to impair the elimination of other medications. Conversely, coadministration of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isoenzymes involved in metabolism of the various antipsychotic compounds may alter their plasma concentrations, possibly leading to clinically significant effects. The potential for metabolically based drug interactions of any new psychotropic agent may be anticipated on the basis of knowledge about the CYP enzymes responsible for its metabolism and about its effect on the activity of these enzymes. This information is essential for rational prescribing and may guide selection of an appropriate compound which is less likely to interact with already taken medication(s).

Identification of a novel splice-site mutation in the CYP1A2 gene

AIMS

To identify the molecular basis for a low CYP1A2 metabolic status, as determined by a caffeine phenotyping test, in a 71-year-old, nonsmoking, Caucasian woman who presented with very high clozapine concentrations despite being administered a standard dose of the drug.

METHODS

The nucleotide sequence of the 7 exons, exon-intron boundaries and 5'-flanking region of the CYP1A2 gene was analysed by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Only one heterozygous point mutation was identified in the donor splice site of intron 6 (3534G > A) of CYP1A2. This mutation could cause abnormal RNA splicing and therefore lead to a truncated nonfunctional enzyme. No other carrier of this mutation was identified in a population of 100 unrelated healthy Caucasians.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of a splice-site mutation affecting the CYP1A2 gene. This polymorphism is a likely explanation for the low CYP1A2 activity associated with high clozapine concentrations in this patient.

Monitoring clozapine: are fingerprick blood and plasma clozapine levels equivalent to arm venipuncture blood and plasma levels?

The objective of this pilot study was to determine whether fingerprick blood and plasma clozapine levels were equivalent to arm venipuncture blood and plasma levels for the purpose of therapeutic monitoring. A convenient sample of 10 outpatients from the Elgin Program of Assertive Community Treatment Team (PACT) participated in the study. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously from both the arm and finger in patients at steady state to measure clozapine levels. Each site provided a blood and plasma clozapine level, and they were compared. Clozapine levels from arm and finger sites were found to be equivalent in both blood and plasma. Although plasma clozapine levels were consistently greater than those in whole blood by a mean value of 27%, the plasma therapeutic threshold level (350-400 micro g/L) was considered an adequate target for monitoring. A fingerprick blood sample of 50 micro L was sufficient to measure clozapine levels accurately at steady state. We therefore concluded that fingerprick blood testing is as effective as the traditional arm venipuncture method in obtaining accurate clozapine levels. This procedure may provide certain benefits for the seriously mentally ill.

Serum clozapine levels: a review of their clinical utility

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is frequently utilized in the treatment of psychiatric conditions, but its clinical application concerning the use of clozapine is unclear. We present three case reports of patients taking clozapine, review the relevant literature, and propose guidelines to aid the clinical use of TDM of clozapine. Due to its complex metabolism, there are significant inter- and intra-individual variations in clozapine serum levels, for a given dose. However, the range of serum levels that corresponds with toxicity remains unclear. Although central nervous system side-effects may correlate with serum level, many adverse effects of clozapine appear to be unrelated, including haematological and cardiac events. There are numerous clinically significant interactions between clozapine and other substances, including prescribed medications, nicotine and caffeine. TDM of clozapine may be of clinical value in certain situations, such as poor clinical response; signs of toxicity; onset of seizures; changes in concurrent medication, caffeine or nicotine; liver disease; and suspected non-compliance. The current literature does not support the routine testing of serum clozapine levels in everyday clinical practice.