Sumatriptan. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache

Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with CB/TiO2 Layer for Sensitive Determination of Sumatriptan by Means of Voltammetry and Flow Injection Analysis

Sumatriptan is an organic chemical compound from the tryptamine group. It is used as a medicine for migraine attacks and in the treatment of cluster headaches. In this work, a new voltammetric method is proposed for highly sensitive SUM determination, using glassy carbon electrodes modified with carbon black and titanium dioxide suspension. The novelty of the presented work is the usage of the mixture of carbon black and TiO₂ as glassy carbon electrode modifier for the first time for SUM determination. The mentioned sensor was characterized by great repeatability and sensitivity of measurements, which resulted in the obtention of a wide range of linearity and a low detection limit. The electrochemical properties of the CB-TiO₂/GC sensor was characterized using the LSV and EIS method. The effect of different factors on the SUM peak, such as supporting electrolyte type, preconcentration time and potential, or influence of interferents, were tested using the square wave voltammetry technique. The linear voltammetric response for the analyte was obtained in the concentration range of 5 nmol L^-1 to 150 μmol L^-1 with a detection limit of 2.9 nmol L^-1 for a preconcentration time of 150 s in the 0.1 mol L^-1 phosphate buffer pH 6.0. The proposed method was successfully applied for highly sensitive sumatriptan determination in complex matrices, such as tablets, urine, and plasma, with a good recovery parameter (94-105%). The presented CB-TiO₂/GC electrode is characterized by great stability, it was used for 6 weeks without significant changes in the SUM peak current. Amperometric and voltammetric measurements of SUM under the flow injection conditions were also performed to indicate the possibility of its fast and accurate determination with a time of single analysis of approx. 30 s.

CGRP-Targeted Therapy for Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic cluster headache (CH) substantially affects patients' quality of life, and treatment remains challenging. The current article reviewed controlled studies for new treatment options targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptors in CH and discussed the current gaps and future directions for the treatment of chronic CH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (i.e., galcanezumab and fremanezumab) completed randomized-control trials for efficacy for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic CH. Galcanezumab was effective for preventing episodic CH but not chronic CH. Fremanezumab was ineffective in preventing episodic and chronic CH. Studies for other anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and CGRP antagonists are still pending for results. There are no randomized controlled trials for CGRP-targeted therapies that showed efficacy for chronic CH prevention. The different responses to galcanezumab between episodic and chronic CH may be due to the study design, i.e., the allowance of concomitant preventive therapies in the chronic CH study but not in the episodic CH study. Another reason for the discrepancies is the different roles and sensitivity of CGRP in chronic CH.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of pyridinylmethylenepiperidine derivatives as potent 5-HT1F receptor agonists for migraine therapy

Migraine is a common neurovascular disease which has been classified as the sixth most disabling disorder. Current migraine therapy was triptans, however, riptans can cause contraction of blood vessels. Therefore, novel drugs without cardiovascular effects emerged, such as CGRP and selective 5-HT1F receptor agonists. In this work, a series of pyridinylmethylenepiperidine derivatives were designed, synthesized and evaluated for their 5-HT1F receptor agonist activity. The results in vitro showed that compound C1-C6 displayed potent agonist activities compared with positive drug lasmiditan. Pharmacokinetic properties in rat indicated that 2,4,6-trifluoro-N-(6-(fluoro(1-methylpiperidin-4-ylidene)methyl)pyridin-2-yl)benzamide (C5) possessed high AUC and good bioavailability. In two rodent models of migraine, C5 significantly inhibited dural plasma protein extravasation and c-fos expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Moreover, C5 showed no effect on vasoconstriction. Through these studies, we identified C5 as a potent 5-HT1F receptor agonist for migraine therapy.

Beyond its anti-migraine properties, sumatriptan is an anti-inflammatory agent: A systematic review

Sumatriptan is the first available medication from triptans family that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for migraine attacks and cluster headaches in 1991. Most of its action is mediated by selective 5-HT_1B/1D receptor agonism. Recent investigations raised the possibility of repositioning of this drug to other indications beyond migraine, as increasing evidence suggests for an anti-inflammatory property of sumatriptan. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using "inflammation AND sumatriptan" or "inflammation AND 5HT1B/D" as the keywords. Then, articles were screened for their relevance and those directly discussing the correlation between inflammation and sumatriptan or 5HT1B/D were included. Total references reviewed or inclusion/exclusion were 340 retrieved full-text articles (n = 340), then based on critical assessment 66 of them were included in this systematic review. Our literature review indicates that at low doses, sumatriptan can reduce inflammatory markers (e.g., interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and nuclear factor-κB), affects caspases and changes cells lifespan. Additionally, nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide signaling seem to be regulated by this drug. It also inhibits the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide. Sumatriptan protects against many inflammatory conditions including cardiac and mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion, skin flap, pruritus, peripheral, and central nervous system injuries such as spinal cord injury, testicular torsion-detorsion, oral mucositis, and other experimental models. Considering the safety and potency of low dose sumatriptan compared to corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive medications, it is worth to take advantage of sumatriptan in inflammatory conditions.

The in vitro pharmacology and non-clinical cardiovascular safety studies of a novel 5-HT4 receptor agonist, DSP-6952

The pharmacological activity of DSP-6952, a novel compound was investigated, compared to that of clinically efficacious gastrointestinal (GI) prokinetic 5-hydroxytryptamine₄ (5-HT₄) receptor agonists. DSP-6952 had a strong affinity of Ki = 51.9 nM for 5-HT_4(b) receptor, and produced contraction in the isolated guinea pig colon with EC₅₀ of 271.6 nM and low intrinsic activity of 57%, similar to tegaserod and mosapride. In the development of the 5-HT₄ receptor agonists, cardiovascular risk was deliberately evaluated, because some related prokinetics were reported to cause with cardiovascular adverse events, such as ventricular arrhythmias or ischemia. DSP-6952 showed minimal effects up to 100 μM in human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels or guinea pig cardiomyocytes. In telemetered conscious monkeys, DSP-6952 did not affect blood pressure or any electrocardiogram (ECG) up to 180 mg/kg, p.o.; however, DSP-6952 transiently increased heart rate, as well as in anesthetized dogs. The positive chronotropic effects of DSP-6952 were completely antagonized by a 5-HT₄ receptor antagonist, and another 5-HT₄ receptor agonist, TD-5108 also increased heart rate. These effects are considered a class effect seen in clinically developing and marketed 5-HT₄ receptor agonists, and have not been regarded as a critical issue in clinical use. DSP-6952 did not induce contraction in the rabbit coronary artery up to 100 μM, which differed from tegaserod or sumatriptan. These results show that DSP-6952 does not have cardiac ischemic risk via coronary vasoconstriction. In conclusion, DSP-6952 is a promising GI prokinetic compound with partial 5-HT₄ receptor agonistic activity as well as a favorable cardiovascular safety profile.

Cluster headache

Cluster headache is an excruciating, strictly one-sided pain syndrome with attacks that last between 15 minutes and 180 minutes and that are accompanied by marked ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, such as lacrimation and conjunctival injection. The pain is so severe that female patients describe each attack as worse than childbirth. The past decade has seen remarkable progress in the understanding of the pathophysiological background of cluster headache and has implicated the brain, particularly the hypothalamus, as the generator of both the pain and the autonomic symptoms. Anatomical connections between the hypothalamus and the trigeminovascular system, as well as the parasympathetic nervous system, have also been implicated in cluster headache pathophysiology. The diagnosis of cluster headache involves excluding other primary headaches and secondary headaches and is based primarily on the patient's symptoms. Remarkable progress has been achieved in developing effective treatment options for single cluster attacks and in developing preventive measures, which include pharmacological therapies and neuromodulation.

A human trigeminovascular biomarker for antimigraine drugs: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with sumatriptan

Objective

The objective of this report is to establish a biomarker for the CGRP-interfering effect of antimigraine drugs.

Methods

We quantified the effect of sumatriptan on the trigeminal nerve-mediated rise in forehead dermal blood flow (DBF), induced by capsaicin application (0.6 mg/ml) and electrical stimulation (0.2–1.0 mA), in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy male ( n = 11, age ± SD: 29 ± 8 years) and female ( n = 11, 32 ± 7 years) individuals.

Results

DBF responses to capsaicin were attenuated by sumatriptan (ΔDBF, mean ± SEM: 82 ± 18 AU, p = 0.0002), but not by placebo (ΔDBF: 21 ± 12 AU, p = 0.1026).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that sumatriptan inhibits increases in DBF, induced by the release of, most likely, CGRP. Thus, our model may be used as a biomarker to establish the trigeminovascular effects of (potential) antimigraine drugs, such as CGRP receptor antagonists or antibodies directed against CGRP or its receptor.

Comparison of Rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg Tablets and Sumatriptan 25 mg and 50 mg Tablets

This randomized, double-blind, two-attack, placebo-controlled, crossover study explored the efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan 10 mg compared with sumatriptan 50 mg as well as rizatriptan 5 mg compared with sumatriptan 25 mg in the acute treatment of migraine. Following randomization to one of six possible treatment sequences, patients ( n = 1447) treated two sequential attacks, of moderate or severe intensity, separated by at least 5 days. Patients assessed pain severity, migraine-associated symptoms, and functional disability at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 h post treatment. Compared with placebo, all treatments were effective. On the primary endpoint of time to pain relief, rizatriptan 10 mg was not statistically different from sumatriptan 50 mg [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, P = 0.161], and rizatriptan 5 mg was statistically superior to sumatriptan 25 mg (OR 1.22, P = 0.007). In general, rizatriptan 10 mg and 5 mg treatment resulted in improvement compared with the corresponding doses of sumatriptan on measures of pain severity, migraine symptoms, and functional disability and the 5-mg dose reached statistical significance on almost all measures. All treatments were generally well tolerated.

Dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan in isolated human coronary artery, middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein

BACKGROUND

Dihydroergotamine (DHE) and sumatriptan are contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease because of their vasoconstricting properties, which have originally been explored in proximal coronary arteries. Our aim was to investigate DHE and sumatriptan in the proximal and distal coronary artery, middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein.

METHODS

Blood vessel segments were mounted in organ baths and concentration response curves for DHE and sumatriptan were constructed.

RESULTS

In the proximal coronary artery, meningeal artery and saphenous vein, maximal contractions to DHE (proximal: 8 ± 4%; meningeal: 32 ± 7%; saphenous: 52 ± 11%) and sumatriptan (proximal: 17 ± 7%; meningeal: 61 ± 18%, saphenous: 37 ± 8%) were not significantly different. In the distal coronary artery, contractions to DHE (5 ± 2%) were significantly smaller than those to sumatriptan (17 ± 9%). At clinically relevant concentrations, mean contractions to DHE and sumatriptan were below 3% in proximal coronary arteries and below 6% in distal coronary arteries. Contractions in the meningeal artery and saphenous vein were higher (7%-38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contractions to DHE in distal coronary arteries are smaller than those to sumatriptan, while at clinical concentrations they both induce only slight contractions. In meningeal arteries contractions to DHE and sumatriptan are significantly larger, showing their cranioselectivity. Contractions to DHE in the saphenous vein are higher than those in the arteries, confirming its venous contractile properties.

Comparison of the vasodilator responses of isolated human and rat middle meningeal arteries to migraine related compounds

Background

Migraine attacks occur spontaneously in those who suffer from the condition, but migraine-like attacks can also be induced artificially by a number of substances. Previously published evidence makes the meninges a likely source of migraine related pain. This article investigates the effect of several vasodilators on meningeal arteries in order to find a connection between the effect of a substance on a meningeal vessel and its ability to artificially induce migraine.

Methods

A myograph setup was used to test the vasodilator properties of the substances acetylcholine (ACh), sodium nitroprusside (SNP), sildenafil, prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide-38 (PACAP-38), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and NaCl buffer on meningeal arteries from human and rat. An unpaired t-test was used to statistically compare the mean E_max(%) at the highest concentration of each substance to the E_max(%) of NaCl buffer.

Results

In the human experiments, all substances except PACAP-38 had an E_max (%) higher than the NaCl buffer, but the difference was only significant for SNP and CGRP. For the human samples, clinically tested antimigraine compounds (sumatriptan, telcagepant) were applied to the isolated arteries, and both induced a significant decrease of the effect of exogenously administrated CGRP. In experiments on rat middle meningeal arteries, pre-contracted with PGF_2α, similar tendencies were seen. When the pre-contraction was switched to K⁺ in a separate series of experiments, CGRP and sildenafil significantly relaxed the arteries.

Conclusions

Still no definite answer can be given as to why pain is experienced during an attack of migraine. No clear correlation was found between the efficacy of a substance as a meningeal artery vasodilator in human and the ability to artificially induce migraine or the mechanism of action. Vasodilatation could be an essential trigger, but only in conjunction with other unknown factors. The vasculature of the meninges likely contributes to the propagation of the migrainal cascade of symptoms, but more research is needed before any conclusions can be drawn about the nature of this contribution.

Selective coordination ability of sulfamethazine Schiff-base ligand towards copper(II): molecular structures, spectral and SAR study

In the present work, a combined experimental and theoretical study of the N-(4,6-Dimethyl-pyrimidin-2-yl)-4-[(2-hydroxy-benzylidene)amino]benzenesulfonamide ligand (H2L) and its mononuclear and magnetically diluted binuclear Cu(II) complexes has been performed using IR, TG/DTA, magnetic, EPR, and conductivity measurements. Calculated g-tensor values showed best agreement with experimental values from EPR when carried out using the MPW1PW91 functional. Coordination of H2L to a Cu(II) center, regardless of the binding site and Cu:L stoichiometry, leads to a significant decrease in the antibacterial activity compared to the free ligand as well as reference drugs in the case of Staphylococcus aureus. Structural-activity relationship suggests that ELUMO, ΔE, dipole moment, polarizability and electrophilicity index were the most significant descriptors for the correlation with the antibacterial activity.

Triptans for acute cluster headache

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2010 (Law 2010). Cluster headache is an uncommon,severely painful, and disabling condition, with rapid onset. Validated treatment options are limited; first-line therapy includes inhaled oxygen. Other therapies such as intranasal lignocaine and ergotamine are not as commonly used and are less well studied. Triptans are successfully used to treat migraine attacks and they may also be useful for cluster headache.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the triptan class of drugs compared to placebo and other active interventions in the acute treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache in adult patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists for studies from inception to 22 January 2010 for the original review, and from 2009 to 4 April 2013 for this update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of triptans for acute treatment of cluster headache episodes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants with different levels of pain relief,requiring rescue medication, and experiencing adverse events and headache-associated symptoms in treatment and control groups were used to calculate relative risk and numbers needed to treat for benefit (NNT) and harm (NNH).

MAIN RESULTS

New searches in 2013 did not identify any relevant new studies.All six included studies used a single dose of triptan to treat an attack of moderate to severe pain intensity. Subcutaneous sumatriptan was given to 131 participants at a 6 mg dose, and 88 at a 12 mg dose. Oral or intranasal zolmitriptan was given to 231 participants ata 5 mg dose, and 223 at a 10 mg dose. Placebo was given to 326 participants.Triptans were more effective than placebo for headache relief and pain-free responses. By 15 minutes after treatment with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg, 48% of participants were pain-free and 75% had no pain or mild pain (17% and 32% respectively with placebo).NNTs for subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg were 3.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 5.0) and 2.4 (1.9 to 3.2) respectively. Intranasal zolmitriptan 10mg was of less benefit, with 12% of participants pain-free and 28% with no or mild pain (3% and 7% respectively with placebo).NNTs for intranasal zolmitriptan 10 mg were 11 (6.4 to 49) and 4.9 (3.3 to 9.2) respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on limited data, subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg was superior to intranasal zolmitriptan 5 mg or 10 mg for rapid (15 minute)responses, which are important in this condition. Oral routes of administration are not appropriate.

Triptan use in pediatric migraine: focus on rizatriptan

Migraines are a common complaint in children and can cause a significant burden to both the child and their families, with a substantial loss in both school and work days, as well as having negative effects on the child’s self-esteem and peer relations. It has become clear that migraine-specific medications are needed in this population of patients and their use may result in a significant improvement of the child’s headaches and quality of life. Rizatriptan benzoate (Maxalt®) is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine/serotonin1B/1D (5-HT1B/1D ) agonist that was approved by the US FDA in 1998 for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults. Despite having been widely used in the pediatric population, rizatriptan was most recently approved in December 2011 for pediatric use in children aged 6–17 years. The advantage of rizatriptan over some other triptans is its rapid onset of action, which is thought to be beneficial in the generally shorter migraine attacks of children when compared with adults. It may also be an appealing choice for young children because it comes in an orally disintegrating form for those who may have difficulty in swallowing tablets or who have significant gastrointestinal complaints accompanying their headaches, including nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain.

Determination of structural and vibrational spectroscopic properties of 2-, 3-, 4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide using FT-IR and FT-Raman experimental techniques and DFT quantum chemical calculations

In this work, the molecular conformation and vibrational analysis of 2-, 3-, 4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (abbreviated as 2-, 3-, 4-NBSA) were presented for the ground state using experimental techniques (FT-IR and FT-Raman) and density functional theory (DFT) employing B3LYP exchange correlation with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. The complete assignments of fundamental vibrations were performed on the basis of the experimental results and total energy distribution (TED) of the vibrational modes, calculated with scaled quantum mechanics (SQM) method. The effects of the nitro group substituent on the characteristic benzene sulfonamides bands in the spectra were discussed. Raman activities calculated by DFT method have been converted to the corresponding Raman intensities using Raman scattering theory. Optimized structure of compounds were interpreted and compared with the earlier reported experimental values for studied molecules. The observed and the calculated geometric parameters and vibrational wavenumbers were compared and found to be in good agreement.

FT-IR, FT-Raman spectroscopy and computational study of (E)-4-((anthracen-9-ylmethylene)amino)-N-carbamimidoylbenzene sulfonamide

The infrared and Raman spectra of (E)-4-((anthracen-9-ylmethylene)amino)-N-carbamimidoylbenzene sulfonamide have been recorded and analysed. Geometry and harmonic vibrational wavenumbers were calculated theoretically using Gaussian03 set of quantum chemistry codes. The data obtained from vibrational wavenumber calculations are used to assign vibrational bands found in infrared and Raman spectra of the studied molecule. The red-shift of the NH stretching band in the infrared spectrum from the computed wavenumber indicates the weakening of the NH bond. The NH stretching band has split into a doublet in the IR spectrum owing to the Davydov coupling between neighbouring units. The geometrical parameters of the title compound are in agreement with the reported similar derivatives. The calculated first hyperpolarizability is comparable with the reported value of similar structures and may be an attractive object for further studies on non-linear optics. The important thermodynamical parameters are also reported.

Triptans for acute cluster headache

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache is an uncommon, but severely painful and disabling condition, with rapid onset. Validated treatment options are limited, and first-line therapy includes inhaled oxygen. Alternative therapies such as intranasal lignocaine and ergotamine are not as commonly used and are less well studied. Triptans are successfully used to treat migraine attacks and, because of this, they may also be useful for cluster headache.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of triptans for the acute treatment of cluster headaches.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies through 22 January 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of triptans for acute treatment of cluster headache episodes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants with different levels of pain relief, requiring rescue medication and experiencing adverse events and headache-associated symptoms in treatment and control groups were used to calculate relative risk and numbers needed to treat (NNT) and harm (NNH).

MAIN RESULTS

All six included studies used a single dose of triptan to treat an attack of moderate to severe pain intensity. In total 231 participants received zolmitriptan 5 mg, 223 received zolmitriptan 10 mg, 131 received sumatriptan 6 mg, 88 received sumatriptan 12 mg, and 326 received placebo. Zolmitriptan was administered either orally or intranasally, and sumatriptan either subcutaneously or intranasally.Overall, the triptans studied were better than placebo for headache relief and pain-free responses, with an NNT of 2.4 for 15 minute pain relief with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg (75% with sumatriptan and 32% with placebo), and 2.8 for 30 minute pain relief with intranasal zolmitriptan 10 mg (62% with zolmitriptan and 26% with placebo). Fewer participants need rescue medication with triptan than with placebo, but more experienced adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan and sumatriptan are effective in the acute treatment of cluster headaches and may provide a useful treatment option, potentially offering convenience over oxygen therapy and a better safety and tolerability profile than ergotamine. Non-oral routes of administration are likely to provide better and more rapid responses.

Sumatriptan-naproxen fixed combination for acute treatment of migraine: a critical appraisal

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including naproxen and naproxen sodium, are effective yet nonspecific analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs, which work for a variety of pain and inflammatory syndromes, including migraine. In migraine, their analgesic effect helps relieve the headache, while their anti-inflammatory effect decreases the neurogenic inflammation in the trigeminal ganglion. This is the hypothesized mechanism by which they prevent the development of central sensitization. Triptans, including sumatriptan, work early in the migraine process at the trigeminovascular unit as agonists of the serotonin receptors (5-HT receptors) 1B and 1D. They block vasoconstriction and block transmission of signals to the trigeminal nucleus and thus prevent peripheral sensitization. Therefore, combining these two drugs is an attractive modality for the abortive treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan-naproxen fixed combination tablet (Treximet [sumatriptan-naproxen]) proves to be an effective and well tolerated drug that combines these two mechanisms; yet is far from being the ultimate in migraine abortive therapy, and further research remains essential.

The phe-124-Cys and A-161T variants of the human 5-HT1B receptor gene are not major determinants of the clinical response to sumatriptan

BACKGROUND

The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan is highly effective in the treatment of migraine. However, some patients do not respond to sumatriptan or experience recurrence of the headache after initial relief. In addition, some patients report chest symptoms after the use of sumatriptan.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether 2 genetic variants (F124C changing a phenylalanine for a cysteine and polymorphism A/T at nucleotide position -161 in the 5' regulatory region) of the 5-HT(1B) receptor play a major role in the therapeutic response to sumatriptan. The 5-HT(1B) receptor most likely mediates the therapeutic action and coronary side effects of sumatriptan, and both F124C and A-161T have relevant functional consequences on either the affinity of sumatriptan to bind to the 5-HT(1B) receptor or on receptor expression level itself, respectively.

METHOD

Genomic DNA of a relatively small but very well-characterized set of migraine patients with consistently good response to sumatriptan (n = 14), with no response (n = 12), with recurrence of the headache (n = 12), with chest symptoms (n = 13), and patients without chest symptoms (n = 27) was available for the genetic analyses and screened for the F124C variant and the A-161T polymorphism in the human 5-HT(1B) receptor gene.

RESULTS

F124C was not detected in any of the patients studied. In addition, we did not observe drastic changes in allele frequencies of the A-161T polymorphism that might hint to a causal relation with the therapeutic effect of sumatriptan.

CONCLUSION

We have not obtained any evidence that variants F124C and A-161T of the 5-HT(1B) receptor are major determinants in the clinical response to sumatriptan.

Should We Advise Patients to Treat Migraine Attacks Early: Methodologic Issues

In clinical trials of triptans in acute migraine, patients have traditionally been required to take their medication only when their pain reached moderate or severe intensity. This methodology better ensured that migraine attacks rather than nonmigraine headaches were treated, minimized the placebo response and simplified comparison of improvement as all patients start from the same baseline pain level. In clinical practice, patients do not take medication in this way, and there is some theoretical evidence that early treatment might be beneficial. There are increasing numbers of reports claiming advantages of 'early' treatment, when the pain is mild, over 'late' treatment, when pain is moderate or severe, but these studies raise significant methodologic issues. Treating 'early' may equate with treating 'mild' in slowly progressing attacks only but this may not always be the case in rapidly progressing attacks; these two types of migraine attacks should be distinguished carefully and investigated separately. Trials should be placebo-controlled, blinded, assess the therapeutic gain versus placebo rather than the absolute rates, and use the sustained pain-free endpoint. Early treatment may also increase the risk of medication overuse headaches. At present, there is no scientific support to advise patient to treat early. Patients should be advised to take their medication as soon as they are sure they are developing a migraine headache, but not during the aura phase.

Zolmitriptan 5 mg Nasal Spray: Efficacy and Onset of Action in the Acute Treatment of Migraine-Results From Phase 1 of the REALIZE Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of phase 1 (reported here) of this two-phase study was to assess the efficacy of zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray, in terms of ability to provide relief from all migraine symptoms, in a controlled setting, designed to replicate clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Zolmitriptan nasal spray has been shown to be fast acting and highly effective in the treatment of migraine, as assessed using standard endpoints, such as headache response and pain-free rates.

METHODS

In the double-blind first phase of the study, patients with migraine were randomized to receive zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray or placebo to treat a single migraine attack. Attacks were treated according to patients' normal patterns of use, in order to closely reflect clinical practice; that is, no specific regimen was dictated in terms of time to treatment or at what level of pain intensity the headache should be treated. Patients could take a second dose of study medication or an agreed escape medication if adequate pain relief had not been achieved 2 hours after the first dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was total symptom relief (freedom from pain, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia) 1 hour after the first dose. Secondary efficacy endpoints included headache response, pain-free status and sustained pain-free status, and ability to perform normal activities.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population comprised 461 zolmitriptan nasal spray recipients and 451 placebo recipients. The total symptom relief rate 1 hour post-dose was significantly higher in the zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray group than in the placebo group (14.5% vs. 5.1%; P < .0001); the difference between the groups was significant from 30 minutes post-dose. Treatment with zolmitriptan nasal spray, compared with placebo, also produced a higher headache response rate from 10 minutes post-dose (15.1% vs. 9.1%; P = .0079) and a higher pain-free rate from 30 minutes post-dose (7.7% vs. 3.2%; P = .0039). Zolmitriptan nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo in terms of sustained pain-free status and patients' ability to perform normal activities. Zolmitriptan nasal spray was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the efficacy demonstrated by zolmitriptan nasal spray in previous clinical trials.

Substituted furo[3,2-b]pyridines: novel bioisosteres of 5-HT 1F receptor agonists

Synthesis and evaluation of a series of 2,3,5- and 3,5-substituted furo[3,2-b]pyridines were undertaken in order to investigate their utility as bioisosteres of 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist indole analogues, 1-3. The replacement proved to be effective, providing compounds with similar 5-HT(1F) receptor affinity and improved selectivity when compared with the indole analogues. Through these studies we identified 4-fluoro-N-[3-(1-methyl-piperidin-4-yl)-furo[3,2-b]pyridin-5-yl]-benzamide (5), a potent and selective 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist with the potential to treat acute migraine.

Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications

The triptans represent a relatively new class of compounds effective in the treatment of migraine. The safety and tolerability of these drugs have been extensively investigated since the first triptan (sumatriptan) became commercially available. A report on a very large population of patients tested during clinical trials and in postmarketing studies, confirms that these drugs are safe and well tolerated when correctly used. Adverse events are frequently reported, but are usually mild and only a few patients discontinue therapy because of them. These adverse events include, in particular, the so-called 'triptan symptoms' (tingling, sensation of warmth, etc.). The exact mechanism of chest symptoms reported by 20% of patients with migraine treated with triptans remains unclear, but are exceptionally related to a cardiac mechanism. CNS adverse events (i.e. somnolence) are also reported, but it is a matter of debate whether they are related to the pharmacological properties (i.e. lipophilicity) of the drug or are symptoms of the disease itself. The potential risk for drug overuse must be taken into account when the triptans are given to patients with a high frequency of migraine attacks. Clinical interaction of triptans with other drugs metabolised in the liver may theoretically influence the incidence of adverse events, but there is little evidence to support this assumption. There is no evidence of a teratogenic risk of triptans in pregnant women taking these drugs.

Single use of sumatriptan: a patient interview study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possible reasons associated with the use of a single prescription of sumatriptan.

BACKGROUND

A few population-based studies concerning the usage patterns of sumatriptan have revealed a relatively high incidence (approximately 40%) of sumatriptan users who utilize only a single prescription of the drug.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Using automated prescription data from 11 community pharmacies, we identified single and multiple sumatriptan prescription recipients. The data were collected from May 1, 1998, to April 30, 2000. Several patient- and medication-related variables possibly associated with single recipiency of sumatriptan were analyzed. In addition, single recipients of sumatriptan were invited for an interview and asked a number of questions related to their clinical status and their experience with the medication.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-five, first-time users of sumatriptan were identified during the patient selection period, of whom 38% were single recipients of sumatriptan. Of the latter, 102 patients were considered eligible for interview. Reasons for terminating treatment after only 1 prescription included: inefficacy and/or occurrence of side effects, 78% (n=79); uncertain diagnosis of migraine, 39.2% (n=40); and reduction in headache frequency, 33.3% (n=34). Almost half of the population had terminated treatment without having consulted their physician. More than half relied upon the use of over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics after having tried sumatriptan. Compared to multiple users of sumatriptan, single recipients were far less likely to have used another form of migraine treatment prior to (odds ratio, 0.35; [95% confidence interval, 019 to 0.67]) and after (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.63]) initiating sumatriptan. Furthermore, single recipients had demonstrated an increased tendency towards benzodiazepine use prior to receiving sumatriptan (odds ratio, 1.80 [95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 3.28]).

CONCLUSIONS

Single use of a sumatriptan prescription reveals some issues that may impact negatively the provision of effective migraine management. These include: rapidly developing dissatisfaction with the treatment provided and a lower tendency to seek out medical care. Our results also suggest that the drug may be used (inappropriately) as a diagnostic tool.

The antimigraine 5-HT 1B/1D receptor agonists, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and dihydroergotamine, attenuate pain-related behaviour in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain

1. Peripheral lesion to the trigeminal nerve may induce severe pain states. Several lines of evidence have suggested that the antimigraine effect of the triptans with 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist properties may result from inhibition of nociceptive transmission in the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve by these drugs. On this basis, we have assessed the potential antinociceptive effects of sumatriptan and zolmitriptan, compared to dihydroergotamine (DHE), in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain. 2. Chronic constriction injury was produced by two loose ligatures of the infraorbital nerve on the right side. Responsiveness to von Frey filament stimulation of the vibrissal pad was used to evaluate allodynia. 3. Two weeks after ligatures, rats with a chronic constriction of the right infraorbital nerve displayed bilateral mechanical hyper-responsiveness to von Frey filament stimulation of the vibrissal pad with a mean threshold of 0.38+/-0.04 g on the injured side and of 0.43+/-0.04 g on the contralateral (left) side (versus > or =12.5 g on both sides in the same rats prior to nerve constriction injury). 4. Sumatriptan at a clinically relevant dose (100 microg kg(-1), s.c.) led to a significant reduction of the mechanical allodynia-like behaviour on both the injured and the contralateral sides (peak-effects 6.3+/-1.1 g and 4.4+/-0.7 g, respectively). A more pronounced effect was obtained with zolmitriptan (100 microg kg(-1), s.c.) (peak-effects: 7.4+/-0.9 g and 3.2+/-1.3 g) whereas DHE (50-100 microg kg(-1), i.v.) was less active (peak-effect approximately 1.5 g). 5. Subcutaneous pretreatment with the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, GR 127935 (3 mg kg(-1)), prevented the anti-allodynia-like effects of triptans and DHE. Pretreatment with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (2 mg kg(-1), s.c.), did not alter the effect of triptans but significantly enhanced that of DHE (peak effect 4.3+/-0.5 g). 6. In a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain, which consisted of a unilateral loose constriction of the sciatic nerve, neither sumatriptan (50-300 microg kg(-1)) nor zolmitriptan (50-300 microg kg(-1)) modified the thresholds for paw withdrawal and vocalization in response to noxious mechanical stimulation. 7. These results support the rationale for exploring the clinical efficacy of brain penetrant 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists as analgesics to reduce certain types of trigeminal neuropathic pain in humans.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of intranasal sumatriptan

A substantial proportion of migraine patients have gastric stasis and suffer severe nausea and/or vomiting during their migraine attack. This may lead to erratic absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and make oral treatment unsatisfactory. For such patients, an intranasal formulation may be advantageous. Sumatriptan is a potent serotonin 5HT(1B/1D) agonist widely used in the treatment of migraine; the effectiveness of the intranasal formulation (20mg) has been well established in several clinical studies. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of intranasal sumatriptan and includes comparisons with oral and subcutaneous administration. After intranasal administration, sumatriptan is directly and rapidly absorbed, with 60% of the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) occurring at 30 minutes after administration of a single 20mg dose. Following intranasal administration, approximately 10% more sumatriptan is absorbed probably via the nasal mucosa when compared with oral administration. Mean C(max) after a 20mg intranasal dose is approximately 13.1 to 14.4 ng/mL, with median time to C(max) approximately 1 to 1.75 hours. When given as a single dose, intranasal sumatriptan displays dose proportionality in its extent of absorption and C(max) over the dose range 5 to 10mg, but not between 5 and 20mg for C(max). The elimination phase half-life is approximately 2 hours, consistent with administration by other routes. Sumatriptan is metabolised by monoamine oxidase (MAO; predominantly the A isozyme, MAO-A) to an inactive metabolite. Coadministration with a MAO-A inhibitor, moclobemide, leads to a significant increase in sumatriptan plasma concentrations and is contraindicated. Single-dose pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adolescent patients following intranasal sumatriptan were studied to determine the effect of changes in nasal morphology during growth, and of body size, on pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic profile observed in adults was maintained in the adolescent population; generally, factors such as age, bodyweight or height did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics. In children below 12 years, C(max) is comparable to that seen in adolescents and adults, but total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) was lower in children compared with older patients, especially in younger children treated with 5mg. Clinical experience suggests that intranasal sumatriptan has some advantages over the tablet (more rapid onset of effect and use in patients with gastrointestinal complaints) or subcutaneous (noninvasive and fewer adverse events) formulations.

Rizatriptan: an update of its use in the management of migraine

Rizatriptan is an orally active serotonin 5-HT(1) receptor agonist that potently and selectively binds to 5-HT(1B/1D) subtypes. Earlier clinical trials demonstrated that rizatriptan 5 or 10mg is more effective than placebo at providing pain relief and a pain-free state, relieving associated symptoms of migraine, normalising functional ability and improving patient quality of life, and showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recently, rizatriptan 10mg was shown to be more effective than zolmitriptan 2.5mg or naratriptan 2.5mg at producing a pain-free state 2 hours postdose. Furthermore, compared with naratriptan, significantly more patients who received rizatriptan were pain free or had pain relief from 1 hour onwards. The number of patients with normal functional ability at 2 hours was significantly higher after rizatriptan than after naratriptan or zolmitriptan. Rizatriptan was also generally more effective than zolmitriptan or naratriptan at relieving migraine-associated symptoms. Rizatriptan is generally well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The most common adverse events associated with rizatriptan in recent randomised trials were asthenia/fatigue, dizziness, somnolence and nausea. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of adverse events with rizatriptan compared with zolmitriptan (31.2 vs 38.8%). However, rizatriptan was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than naratriptan (39 vs 29%). The incidence of chest pain was similar after the administration of rizatriptan, zolmitriptan or naratriptan (2 to 4%).

CONCLUSION

Rizatriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe migraine. Oral rizatriptan 5 and 10mg have shown greater efficacy than placebo in providing pain relief, an absence of pain, relief from associated symptoms, normal functional ability and an improvement in patient quality of life. Earlier results showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recent studies have shown that rizatriptan 10mg provides faster pain relief and a higher percentage of patients with an absence of pain and normal functional ability at 2 hours than naratriptan 2.5mg or zolmitriptan 2.5mg. The efficacy of rizatriptan is retained when used in the long term and the drug is generally well tolerated. Although well designed studies comparing rizatriptan with almotriptan, eletriptan and frovatriptan would further define the position of rizatriptan, current data suggest rizatriptan should be considered as a first-line treatment option in the management of migraine.