1
|
Fuchs S, Caserto JS, Liu Q, Wang K, Shariati K, Hartquist CM, Zhao X, Ma M. A Glucose-Responsive Cannula for Automated and Electronics-Free Insulin Delivery. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2024; 36:e2403594. [PMID: 38639424 PMCID: PMC11223976 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202403594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Automated delivery of insulin based on continuous glucose monitoring is revolutionizing the way insulin-dependent diabetes is treated. However, challenges remain for the widespread adoption of these systems, including the requirement of a separate glucose sensor, sophisticated electronics and algorithms, and the need for significant user input to operate these costly therapies. Herein, a user-centric glucose-responsive cannula is reported for electronics-free insulin delivery. The cannula-made from a tough, elastomer-hydrogel hybrid membrane formed through a one-pot solvent exchange method-changes permeability to release insulin rapidly upon physiologically relevant varying glucose levels, providing simple and automated insulin delivery with no additional hardware or software. Two prototypes of the cannula are evaluated in insulin-deficient diabetic mice. The first cannula-an ends-sealed, subcutaneously inserted prototype-normalizes blood glucose levels for 3 d and controls postprandial glucose levels. The second, more translational version-a cannula with the distal end sealed and the proximal end connected to a transcutaneous injection port-likewise demonstrates tight, 3-d regulation of blood glucose levels when refilled twice daily. This proof-of-concept study may aid in the development of "smart" cannulas and next-generation insulin therapies at a reduced burden-of-care toll and cost to end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Fuchs
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Julia S. Caserto
- Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, 14853, USA
| | - Qingsheng Liu
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Kecheng Wang
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Kaavian Shariati
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Chase M. Hartquist
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xuanhe Zhao
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Minglin Ma
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah VN, Akturk HK, Trahan A, Piquette N, Wheatcroft A, Schertz E, Carmello K, Mueller L, White K, Fu L, Sassan-Katchalski R, Messer LH, Habif S, Constantin A, Pinsker JE. Safety and Feasibility Evaluation of Automated User Profile Settings Initialization and Adaptation With Control-IQ Technology. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241229074. [PMID: 38323362 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241229074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimization of automated insulin delivery (AID) settings is required to achieve desirable glycemic outcomes. We evaluated safety and efficacy of a computerized system to initialize and adjust insulin delivery settings for the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS After a 2-week continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) run-in period, adults with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) (N = 33, mean age 36.1 years, 57.6% female, diabetes duration 19.7 years) were transitioned to 13 weeks of Control-IQ technology usage. A computerized algorithm generated recommendations for initial pump settings (basal rate, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and correction factor) and weekly follow-up settings to optimize glycemic outcomes. Physicians could override the automated settings changes for safety concerns. RESULTS Time in range 70 to 180 mg/dL improved from 45.7% during run-in to 69.1% during the last 30 days of Control-IQ use, a median improvement of 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.6-23.9, P < .001). This improvement was evident early in the study and was sustained over 13 weeks. Time <70 mg/dL showed a gradual decreasing trend over time. Percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7% went from zero at baseline to 55% at study end (P < .001). Only six of the 318 automated settings adaptations (1.9%) were overridden by study investigators. CONCLUSIONS Computerized initiation and adaptation of Control-IQ technology settings from baseline MDI therapy was safe in adults with T1D. The use of this simplified system for onboarding and optimizing Control-IQ technology may be useful to increase uptake of AID and reduce staff and patient burden in clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viral N Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Halis K Akturk
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Larry Fu
- Tandem Diabetes Care, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Messer LH, D’Souza E, Merchant G, Mueller L, Farnan J, Habif S, Pinsker JE. Smartphone Bolus Feature Increases Number of Insulin Boluses in People With Low Bolus Frequency. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:10-13. [PMID: 37605474 PMCID: PMC10899852 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231191796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The t:connect mobile app from Tandem Diabetes Care recently added a feature to allow t:slim X2 insulin pump users to initiate an insulin bolus from their personal smartphone. User experience and user interface considerations prioritized safety and ease of use, and we examined whether the smartphone bolus feature changed bolus behavior in individuals who bolused less than three times/day. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of t:slim X2 insulin pump users in the United States who had remotely updated their insulin pump software to be compatible with the smartphone bolus version of the app and who gave less than three boluses per day prior to the smartphone bolus update. RESULTS Of the 4470 early adopters who met these criteria, the median number of boluses was 2.2 per day (prior to smartphone bolus update) versus 2.7 per day (after smartphone bolus update), equating to approximately half a bolus more delivered per day (P < .001). Overall, a median of one bolus per day was administered by smartphone app as opposed to being initiated from the screen on the insulin pump. CONCLUSION This analysis found a significant increase in bolusing behavior among early adopters of the smartphone bolus feature of the t:connect mobile app.
Collapse
|
4
|
Messer LH, Breton MD. Therapy Settings Associated with Optimal Outcomes for t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology in Real-World Clinical Care. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:877-882. [PMID: 37751154 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To determine insulin dosing parameters that are associated with and predict optimal outcomes for people using t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology (CIQ). Methods: Retrospective deidentified data from CIQ users were analyzed to determine the effect of Correction Factor, Carbohydrate-to-Insulin (C:I) Ratio, and basal rate settings (standardized by total daily insulin [TDI]) on glycemic control. We performed an associative analysis followed by linear regressions to determine the relative importance of the settings and confounding variables (e.g., age or number of user-initiated boluses) in predicting consensus glycemic outcomes. Results: Data from 20,764 individuals were analyzed (median age 39 years [interquartile range 19, 59], 55% female, TDI 46.4 U [33-65.2]). More aggressive Correction Factor settings, C:I ratio settings, and basal programs were all strongly associated with higher time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) and to a lesser degree to higher time <70 mg/dL. In linear regression, more aggressive Correction Factor predicted higher TIR, lower coefficient of variation, and importantly had only negligible impact on time below range. Higher basal rate settings and lower C:I ratio predicted increased TIR as well as increased hypoglycemia. The most important predictor in all glycemic outcomes was the average number of user-given boluses per day. Conclusion: Basal rates, C:I ratios, and Correction Factor settings all impact glycemic outcomes in CIQ users in usual clinical care. The correction Factor setting may be the most impactful "lever to pull" for clinicians and CIQ users to optimize TIR while not increasing hypoglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang W, Wang S, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Li D, Liu S. Multivariable identification based MPC for closed-loop glucose regulation subject to individual variability. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2023:1-14. [PMID: 37982220 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2282952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
The controller is important for the artificial pancreas to guide insulin infusion in diabetic therapy. However, the inter- and intra-individual variability and time delay of glucose metabolism bring challenges to control glucose within a normal range. In this study, a multivariable identification based model predictive control (mi-MPC) is developed to overcome the above challenges. Firstly, an integrated glucose-insulin model is established to describe insulin absorption, glucose-insulin interaction under meal disturbance, and glucose transport. On this basis, an observable glucose-insulin dynamic model is formed, in which the individual parameters and disturbances can be identified by designing a particle filtering estimator. Next, embedded with the identified glucose-insulin dynamic model, a mi-MPC method is proposed. In this controller, plasma glucose concentration (PGC), an important variable and indicator of glucose regulation, is estimated and controlled directly. Finally, the method was tested on 30 in-silico subjects produced by the UVa/Padova simulator. The results show that the mi-MPC method including the model, individual identification, and the controller can regulate glucose with the mean value of 7.45 mmol/L without meal announcement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Wang
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi, China
- Department of Endocrinology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi, China
| | - Shaoping Wang
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-based Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuwei Zhang
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Yixuan Geng
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Deng'ao Li
- College of Data Science, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi, China
| | - Shiwei Liu
- Department of Endocrinology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mingorance Delgado A, Lucas F. The Tandem Control-IQ advanced hybrid system improves glycemic control in children under 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes and night rest in caregivers. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2023; 70 Suppl 3:27-35. [PMID: 37598004 DOI: 10.1016/j.endien.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of switching from the predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) system to the advanced hybrid Tandem Control-IQ system on glucometrics and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at one year. To assess the impact on the quality of life perceived by parents. METHOD Prospective study in 71 patients aged 6-18 years with type 1 diabetes (DM1), in treatment with PLGS, who switched to an advanced hybrid system. Glucometric data were collected before the change, at 4 and 8 weeks, and at one year of use; HbA1c before the change and after one year. The Diabetes Impact and Devices Satisfaction (DIDS) questionnaire was used at weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS An increase in time in range (TIR) was observed with a median of 76% (P<.001) at 4 weeks, which was maintained after one year (+8% in the total group). Overall, 73.24% of patients achieved a TIR above 70%. The subgroup with an initial TIR of less than 56% increased it by 14.4%. After one year there was a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c. Level 1 hypoglycaemia, level 1 and level 2 hyperglycaemia, mean glucose (GM) and coefficient of variation (CV) decreased. Auto mode stayed on 97% of the time and no dropouts occurred. Caregivers had a perception of better glycaemic control and less need to monitor blood glucose variations during the night. None of them would switch back to the previous system and they feel safe with the new system. CONCLUSIONS The Tandem Control-IQ advanced hybrid system was shown to be effective one year after its implementation with improvement in all glucometric parameters and HbA1c, as well as night-time rest in caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Mingorance Delgado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL) - Diabetes y enfermedades metabólicas asociadas, Alicante, Spain; Unidad de Endocrinología y Diabetes Pediátrica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Fernando Lucas
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL) - Diabetes y enfermedades metabólicas asociadas, Alicante, Spain; Unidad de Diabetes, Servicio de Endocrinología, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cambuli VM, Baroni MG. Intelligent Insulin vs. Artificial Intelligence for Type 1 Diabetes: Will the Real Winner Please Stand Up? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13139. [PMID: 37685946 PMCID: PMC10488097 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Research in the treatment of type 1 diabetes has been addressed into two main areas: the development of "intelligent insulins" capable of auto-regulating their own levels according to glucose concentrations, or the exploitation of artificial intelligence (AI) and its learning capacity, to provide decision support systems to improve automated insulin therapy. This review aims to provide a synthetic overview of the current state of these two research areas, providing an outline of the latest development in the search for "intelligent insulins," and the results of new and promising advances in the use of artificial intelligence to regulate automated insulin infusion and glucose control. The future of insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes appears promising with AI, with research nearly reaching the possibility of finally having a "closed-loop" artificial pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Maria Cambuli
- Diabetology and Metabolic Diseaseas, San Michele Hospital, ARNAS Giuseppe Brotzu, 09121 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Marco Giorgio Baroni
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Neuroendocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zahid M, Dowlatshahi S, Kansara AH, Sadhu AR. The Evolution of Diabetes Technology - Options Towards Personalized Care. Endocr Pract 2023:S1530-891X(23)00387-7. [PMID: 37100350 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Advances in diabetes technology, especially in the last few decades, have transformed our ability to deliver care to persons with diabetes (PWD). Developments in glucose monitoring, especially continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGM), have revolutionized diabetes care and empowered our patients to manage their disease. CGM has also played an integral role in advancing automated insulin delivery systems. Currently available and upcoming advanced hybrid-closed loop systems aim to decrease patient involvement and are approaching the functionality of a fully automated artificial pancreas. Other advances, such as smart insulin pens and daily patch pumps, offer more options for patients and require less complicated and costly technology. Evidence to support the role of diabetes technology is growing, and PWD and clinicians must choose the right type of technology with a personalized strategy to manage diabetes effectively. Here, we review currently available diabetes technologies, summarize their individual features and highlight key patient factors to consider when creating a personalized treatment plan. We also address current challenges and barriers to the adoption of diabetes technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maleeha Zahid
- Fellow, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Samaneh Dowlatshahi
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Assistant Clinical Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Abhishek H Kansara
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Archana R Sadhu
- System Director, Diabetes Program at Houston Methodist, Medical Director, Pancreas Transplantation and Transplant Endocrinology, Houston Methodist J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Assistant Clinical Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Texas A&M Health Sciences.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Almurashi AM, Rodriguez E, Garg SK. Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases. J Indian Inst Sci 2023; 103:1-26. [PMID: 37362851 PMCID: PMC10043869 DOI: 10.1007/s41745-022-00348-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade there have been many advances in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM s), insulin-delivery devices, and hybrid closed loop systems . Now most CGMs (Medtronic-Guardian, Dexcom-G6, and Abbott-Libre-2) have MARD values of < 10%, in contrast to two decades ago when the MARD used to be > 20%. In addition, the majority of the new CGMs do not require calibrations, and the latest CGMs last for 10-14 days. An implantable 6-months CGM by Eversense-3 is now approved in the USA and Europe. Recently, the FDA approved Libre 3 which provides real-time glucose values every minute. Even though it is approved as an iCGM it is not interoperable with automatic-insulin-delivery (AID) systems. The newer CGMs that are likely to be launched in the next few months in the USA include the 10-11 days Dexcom G7 (60% smaller than the existing G6), and the 7-days Medtronic Guardian 4. Most of the newer CGM have several features like automatic initialization, easy insertion, predictive alarms, and alerts. It has also been noticed that an arm insertion site might have better accuracy than abdomen or other sites, like the buttock for kids. Lag time between YSI and different sensors have been reported differently, sometimes it is down to 2-3 min; however, in many instances, it is still 15-20 min, especially when the rate of change of glucose is > 2 mg/min. We believe that in the next decade there will be a significant increase in the number of people who use CGM for their day-to-day diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhalim M. Almurashi
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, 1775 Aurora Ct, Rm 1324, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
- Madinah Health Cluster, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Erika Rodriguez
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, 1775 Aurora Ct, Rm 1324, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Satish K. Garg
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, 1775 Aurora Ct, Rm 1324, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Palmer BA, Soltys K, Zimmerman MB, Norris AW, Tsalikian E, Tansey MJ, Pinnaro CT. Diabetes Device Downloading: Benefits and Barriers Among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:381-389. [PMID: 34809477 PMCID: PMC10012364 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211059537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) fail to meet glycemic targets despite increasing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use. We therefore aimed to determine the proportion of caregivers who review recent glycemic trends ("retrospective review") and make ensuant insulin adjustments based on this data ("retroactive insulin adjustments"). We additionally considered that fear of hypoglycemia and frequency of severe hypoglycemia would be associated with performing retrospective review. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of youth with T1D, collecting demographics, diabetes technology usage, patterns of glucose data review/insulin dose self-adjustment, and Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS). RESULTS Nineteen percent of eligible caregivers (191/1003) responded. Performing retrospective review was associated with younger child age (12.2 versus 15.4, P = .0001) and CGM use (92% versus 73%, P = .004), but was not associated with a significant improvement in child's HbA1c (7.89 versus 8.04, P = .65). Retrospective reviewers had significantly higher HFS-behavior scores (31.9 versus 27.7, P = .0002), which remained significantly higher when adjusted for child's age and CGM use (P = .005). Linear regression identified a significant negative association between HbA1c (%) and number of retroactive insulin adjustments (0.24 percent lower mean HbA1c per additional adjustment made, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Retrospective glucose data review is associated with improved HbA1c when coupled with data-driven retroactive insulin adjustments. Barriers to data downloading existed even in this cohort of predominantly CGM-using T1D families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A. Palmer
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
| | - Karissa Soltys
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
| | | | - Andrew W. Norris
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes
Research Center, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Eva Tsalikian
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
| | - Michael J. Tansey
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes
Research Center, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Catherina T. Pinnaro
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes,
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA,
USA
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes
Research Center, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Catherina T. Pinnaro, MD, MS, Division of
Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, The
University of Iowa, 216 MRC, 501 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodríguez-Sarmiento DL, León-Vargas F, García-Jaramillo M. Artificial pancreas systems: experiences from concept to commercialisation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:877-894. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2150546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
12
|
Subcutaneous amperometric biosensors for continuous glucose monitoring in diabetes. Talanta 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
13
|
Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Deshpande S, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Church MM, Desrochers H, Ekhlaspour L, Kaur RJ, Levister C, Shi D, Lum JW, Kollman C, Doyle FJ. Outpatient Randomized Crossover Comparison of Zone Model Predictive Control Automated Insulin Delivery with Weekly Data Driven Adaptation Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump: Results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:635-642. [PMID: 35549708 PMCID: PMC9422791 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single-hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings. Methods: Adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with noninferiority in percent time below 54 mg/dL as a hierarchical outcome. Results: Thirty-five participants completed the trial (mean age 39 ± 16 years, HbA1c at enrollment 6.9% ± 1.0%). Mean time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL was 66% with SAP versus 69% with AID (mean adjusted difference +2% [95% confidence interval: -1% to +6%], P = 0.22). Median time <70 mg/dL improved from 3.0% with SAP to 1.6% with AID (-1.5% [-2.4% to -0.5%], P = 0.002). The adaptation system decreased initial basal rates by a median of 4% (-8%, 16%) and increased initial carbohydrate ratios by a median of 45% (32%, 59%) after 13 weeks. Conclusions: Automated adaptation of insulin delivery settings with AID use did not significantly improve time-in-range in this very well-controlled population. Additional study and further refinement of the adaptation system are needed, especially in populations with differing degrees of baseline glycemic control, who may show larger benefits from adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sunil Deshpande
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Hannah Desrochers
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ravinder Jeet Kaur
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dawei Shi
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Francis J. Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vijayanand S, Stevenson PG, Broad E, Davis EA, Taplin CE, Jones TW, Abraham MB. Evaluation of real-life clinical outcomes in Australian youth with type 1 diabetes on hybrid closed-loop therapy: A retrospective study. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:1578-1583. [PMID: 35642299 PMCID: PMC9545883 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the clinical outcomes and evaluate the perspectives of children with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents managing their child on hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy. METHODS Children with T1D on HCL attending a tertiary diabetes centre between April 2019 and July 2021 were included. A retrospective analysis of glycaemic data was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes. Time spent in closed loop, time in target glucose range (TIR 3.9-10 mmol/L), hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-HCL. User experience was assessed by questionnaires administered to parents of children with T1D. RESULTS Seventy-one children, mean (SD) age of 12.2 (3.2) years were commenced on HCL. Ten (14%) discontinued HCL use, with 60% discontinuing within the first 6 months. Glycaemic outcomes were analysed in 52 children. Time spent in closed loop was 78 (21) % at 4 weeks, declined to 69 (28) % at 3 months (P = 0.037) and 63 (34) % at 6 months (P = 0.001). The mean %TIR increased from 59.8 at baseline to 67.6 at 3 months and 65.6 at 6 months with a mean adjusted difference of 7.8% points [95% CI 3.6, 11.9] and 5.5% points [95% CI 1.4, 9.5], respectively. There was a reduction in time > 10 mmol/L and time < 3.9 mmol/L from baseline to 6 months. Although families faced challenges with technology, better glucose control with reduced glycaemic fluctuations were reported. CONCLUSIONS HCL therapy is associated with improved glycaemia; however, adequate support and education are required for best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathyakala Vijayanand
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Paul G Stevenson
- Telethon Kids InstituteUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Broad
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth A Davis
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Telethon Kids InstituteUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical SchoolThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Craig E Taplin
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Telethon Kids InstituteUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical SchoolThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Timothy W Jones
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Telethon Kids InstituteUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical SchoolThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Mary B Abraham
- Department of Endocrinology and DiabetesPerth Children's HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Telethon Kids InstituteUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical SchoolThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mingorance Delgado A, Lucas F. El sistema híbrido avanzado Tandem Control-IQ mejora el control glucémico en menores de 18 años con diabetes tipo 1 y el descanso nocturno de los cuidadores. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Luo X, Yu Q, Liu Y, Gai W, Ye L, Yang L, Cui Y. Closed-Loop Diabetes Minipatch Based on a Biosensor and an Electroosmotic Pump on Hollow Biodegradable Microneedles. ACS Sens 2022; 7:1347-1360. [PMID: 35442623 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.1c02337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Developing a miniaturized, low-cost, and smart closed-loop system for diabetes could significantly improve life quality and benefit millions of people. Conventional closed-loop devices are large in size and exorbitant. Here, we unprecedentedly demonstrate an electrically controlled flexible closed-loop patch for continuous diabetes management by integrating hollow biodegradable microneedles with a biosensing device and an electroosmotic pump. The hollow microneedles were fabricated using a combination of soft lithography and micromachining. The outer layer of the microneedles was functionalized to serve as a biosensing device for the in situ sensitive and accurate monitoring of interstitial glucose. The inner layer of the microneedles was integrated with a flexible electroosmotic pump to deliver insulin, and the delivery rate was electrically controlled by the glucose level from the biosensing device. The closed-loop system successfully stabilized the blood glucose levels of diabetic rats in a normal and safe range. The system is painless, miniaturized, cost-effective, and flexible. It is anticipated that it could open up exciting new avenues for fundamental studies of new closed-loop devices as well as practical applications for diabetes management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojin Luo
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
| | - Qi Yu
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, P. R. China
| | - Yiqun Liu
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
| | - Weixin Gai
- School of Integrated Circuits, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
| | - Le Ye
- School of Integrated Circuits, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
| | - Li Yang
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, P. R. China
| | - Yue Cui
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lim MH, Cho YM, Kim S. Multi-task disentangled autoencoder for time-series data in glucose dynamics. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2022; 26:4702-4713. [PMID: 35588418 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3175928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to propose MD-VAE: a multi-task disentangled variational autoencoders (VAE) for exploring characteristics of latent representations (LR) and exploiting LR for diverse tasks including glucose forecasting, event detection, and temporal clustering.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ware J, Hovorka R. Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery. Metabolism 2022; 127:154953. [PMID: 34890648 PMCID: PMC8792215 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of insulin 100 years ago, we have seen considerable advances across diabetes therapies. The more recent advent of glucose-responsive automated insulin delivery has started to revolutionise the management of type 1 diabetes in children and adults. Evolution of closed-loop insulin delivery from research to clinical practice has been rapid, and multiple systems are now commercially available. In this review, we summarise key evidence on currently available closed-loop systems and those in development. We comment on dual-hormone and do-it-yourself systems, as well as reviewing clinical evidence in special populations such as very young children, older adults and in pregnancy. We identify future directions for research and barriers to closed-loop adoption, including how these might be addressed to ensure equitable access to this novel therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bassi M, Strati MF, Andreottola V, Calevo MG, d’Annunzio G, Maghnie M, Minuto N. To sleep or not to sleep: An Italian Control-IQ-uestion. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:996453. [PMID: 36578959 PMCID: PMC9790911 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.996453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tandem Control-IQ is an advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system with a Sleep Activity Mode to intensify glycemic control overnight. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using Sleep Mode or not among Tandem Control-IQ users. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a retrospective Tandem Control-IQ data download for patients followed at IRCCS G. Gaslini Pediatric Diabetes Centre. We divided the patients into group 1 (Sleep Mode users) and group 2 (non-users) and compared their overall glycemic data, particularly during nighttime. RESULTS Group 1 (n = 49) does not show better nocturnal glycemic control as expected when compared with group 2 (n = 34). Group 2 shows a nighttime TIR% of 69.50 versus 66.25 (p = 0.20). Only the patients who do not use Sleep Mode and with sensor and automatic mode use ≥90% reached TIR >70% during nighttime, as well as lower nocturnal TAR% (18.80 versus 21.78, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that evaluates the real-life effectiveness of the use of Sleep Mode in young patients with T1D. Control-IQ Sleep Activity Mode may not be as effective in Italian patients as in American patients due to the different habits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Bassi
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marina Francesca Strati
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Valentina Andreottola
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Calevo
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Mohamad Maghnie
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola Minuto
- Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
- *Correspondence: Nicola Minuto,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cappon G, Pighin E, Prendin F, Sparacino G, Facchinetti A. A Correction Insulin Bolus Delivery Strategy for Decision Support Systems in Type 1 Diabetes. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2021; 2021:1832-1835. [PMID: 34891643 DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires affected individuals to perform multiple daily actions to keep their blood glucose levels within the safe rage and avoid adverse hypo-/hyperglycemic episodes. Decision support systems (DSS) for T1D are composite tools that implement multiple software modules aiming to ease such a burden and to improve glucose control. At the University of Padova, we are developing a new DSS that currently integrate a smart insulin bolus calculator for optimal insulin dosing and a rescue carbohydrate intake advisor to tackle hypoglycemia. However, a module specifically targeting hyperglycemia, that suggests the administration of corrective insulin boluses (CIB), is still missing. For such a scope, this work aims to assess a recent literature methodology, proposed by Aleppo et al., which provides a simple strategy for dealing with hyperglycemia. The methodology is tested retrospectively on clinical data of individuals with T1D. In particular, here we leveraged a novel in silico tool that first identifies a non-linear model of glucose-insulin dynamics on data, then uses such model to simulate and compare the glucose trace obtained by "replaying" the recorded scenario and the glucose trace obtained using the CIB delivery strategy under evaluation. Results show that the CIB delivery strategy significantly reduce the percentage of time spent in hyperglycemia (-15.63%) without inducing any hypoglycemic episode, demonstrating both safety and efficacy of its use. These preliminary results suggest that the CIB delivery strategy proposed by Aleppo et al. is a promising candidate to be included in our system to counteract hyperglycemia. Future work will extensively evaluate the methodology and will compare it against other competing approaches.
Collapse
|
21
|
Moon SJ, Jung I, Park CY. Current Advances of Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence. Diabetes Metab J 2021; 45:813-839. [PMID: 34847641 PMCID: PMC8640161 DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Since Banting and Best isolated insulin in the 1920s, dramatic progress has been made in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, dose titration and timely injection to maintain optimal glycemic control are often challenging for T1DM patients and their families because they require frequent blood glucose checks. In recent years, technological advances in insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring systems have created paradigm shifts in T1DM care that are being extended to develop artificial pancreas systems (APSs). Numerous studies that demonstrate the superiority of glycemic control offered by APSs over those offered by conventional treatment are still being published, and rapid commercialization and use in actual practice have already begun. Given this rapid development, keeping up with the latest knowledge in an organized way is confusing for both patients and medical staff. Herein, we explore the history, clinical evidence, and current state of APSs, focusing on various development groups and the commercialization status. We also discuss APS development in groups outside the usual T1DM patients and the administration of adjunct agents, such as amylin analogues, in APSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Joon Moon
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Inha Jung
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol-Young Park
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang W, Wang S, Geng Y, Qiao Y, Wu T. An OGI model for personalized estimation of glucose and insulin concentration in plasma. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2021; 18:8499-8523. [PMID: 34814309 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2021420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Plasma glucose concentration (PGC) and plasma insulin concentration (PIC) are two essential metrics for diabetic regulation, but difficult to be measured directly. Often, PGC and PIC are estimated from continuous glucose monitoring and insulin delivery data. Nevertheless, the inter-individual variability and external disturbance (e.g. carbohydrate intake) bring challenges for accurate estimations. This study is to estimate PGC and PIC adaptively by identifying personalized parameters and external disturbances. An observable glucose-insulin (OGI) dynamic model is established to describe insulin absorption, glucose regulation, and glucose transport. The model parameters and disturbances can be extended to observable state variables and be identified dynamically by Bayesian filtering estimators. Two basic Gaussian noise based Bayesian filtering estimators, extended Kalman filtering (EKF) and unscented Kalman filtering (UKF), are implemented. Recognizing the prevalence of non-Gaussian noise, in this study, two new filtering estimators: particle filtering with Gaussian noise (PFG), and particle filtering with mixed non-Gaussian noise (PFM) are designed and implemented. The proposed OGI model in conjunction with the estimators is evaluated using the data from 30 in-silico subjects and 10 human participants. For in-silico subjects, the OGI with PFM estimator has the ability to estimate PIC and PGC adaptively, achieving RMSE of PIC 9.49±3.81 mU/L, and PGC 0.89±0.19 mmol/L. For human, the OGI with PFM has the promise to identify disturbances (95.46%±0.65% accurate rate of meal identification). OGI model provides a way to fully personalize the parameters and external disturbances in real time, and has potential clinical utility for artificial pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Wang
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Shaoping Wang
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yixuan Geng
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yajing Qiao
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Teresa Wu
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University and College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Tempe AZ 85281, the USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Messer LH, Berget C, Ernst A, Towers L, Slover RH, Forlenza GP. Initiating hybrid closed loop: A program evaluation of an educator-led Control-IQ follow-up at a large pediatric clinic. Pediatr Diabetes 2021; 22:586-593. [PMID: 33502062 PMCID: PMC8252603 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Control-IQ (Tandem Diabetes) is a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system that users self-initiate after completing online training. Best practices for clinical follow-up are not known. Our quality improvement objective was to evaluate the usefulness of an educator-led follow-up program for new HCL users in a type 1 diabetes pediatric clinic. METHODS We implemented an ''HCLCheck-in'' program, first determining when users started HCL, then having diabetes educators contact them for a follow-up call 2-weeks after start. Educators used a Clinical Tool to inform insulin dose and behavior recommendations, and used four benchmarks to determine need for further follow-up: ≥71% HCL use, ≥71% CGM use, ≥60% Time-in-Range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL), <5% below 70 mg/dL. Family and educator satisfaction were surveyed. RESULTS One-hundred-twenty-three youth [mean age 13.6 ± 3.7 y, 53.7% female, mean HbA1c 7.6 ± 1.4% (60 mmol/mol)] completed an HCLCheck-in call a median (IQR) of 18(15, 21) days post-HCL start. 74 users (60%) surpassed benchmarks with 94% HCL use and 71% TIR. Of the 49 who did not, 16 completed a second call, and improved median TIR 12.5% (p = 0.03). HCL users reported high satisfaction with the program overall [median 10 (9, 10) out of 10]. Educators spent a median of 45 (32,70) minutes per user and rated satisfaction with the program as 8 (7,9.5) and the Tool as 9 (9, 10). CONCLUSION Our HCLCheck-in program received high satisfaction ratings and resulted in improved TIR for those initially not meeting benchmarks, suggesting users may benefit from early follow-up. Similar programs may be beneficial for other new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel H. Messer
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Cari Berget
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Ashlee Ernst
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Lindsey Towers
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Robert H. Slover
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverColoradoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Asarani NAM, Reynolds AN, Elbalshy M, Burnside M, de Bock M, Lewis DM, Wheeler BJ. Efficacy, safety, and user experience of DIY or open-source artificial pancreas systems: a systematic review. Acta Diabetol 2021; 58:539-547. [PMID: 33128136 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIYAPS) is a patient-driven initiative with the potential to revolutionise diabetes management, automating insulin delivery with existing pumps and CGM combined with open-source algorithms. Given the considerable interest in this topic within the diabetes community, we have conducted a systematic review of DIYAPS efficacy, safety, and user experience. Following recognised procedures and reporting standards, we identified 10 eligible publications of 730 participants within the peer-reviewed literature. Overall, studies reported improvements in time in range, HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), reduced hypoglycaemia, and improved quality of life with DIYAPS use. While results were positive, the identified studies were small, and the majority were observational and at high risk of bias. Further research including well-designed randomised trials comparing DIYAPS with appropriate comparators is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A M Asarani
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - A N Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - M Elbalshy
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - M Burnside
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - M de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - B J Wheeler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nimri R, Grosman B, Roy A, Nir J, Fisch Shvalb N, Kurtz N, Loewenthal N, Gillon-Keren M, Muller I, Atlas E, Phillip M. Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System with Automated Insulin Correction Boluses. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:268-276. [PMID: 33185480 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: The Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G system adjusts basal insulin delivery in response to continuous glucose monitoring levels and is already in use in clinical practice. We tested the home-based feasibility of the new MiniMed advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system, which includes several algorithm enhancements and an optional autocorrection bolus mode. Methods: Twelve adolescents and young adults (eight females) with type 1 diabetes [median (interquartile range)] aged 16.6 (15.9, 18.2) years and diabetes duration of 7.1 (4.7, 8.8) years] participated in this single-arm study. The first stage was a 6-day open-loop run-in period, with the predictive low-glucose suspend feature on. This was followed by 6 days/5 nights in a supervised hotel setting, using the AHCL system, including closed-loop challenges (missed meal bolus, late meal bolus, and physical activity); and finally, 3 weeks with unrestricted home use. Glycemic parameters were compared between the open-loop and closed-loop periods. Results: Participants spent 93.3% (4.7) of the time in SmartGuard™ Auto Mode. Hemoglobin A1C levels decreased from median (interquartile range) 7.1% (6.7, 7.9) at baseline to 6.8% (6.6, 7.4) at study end, after 4 weeks (P = 0.0027). Time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) was 68.4% (10.6) and time below 70 mg/dL was 4% (3.5) during open-loop; and 74% (6.1) and 2.6% (1.9), respectively, during the closed-loop at home phase (P = 0.06, P = 0.27). TIR increased during the nighttime, from 64.6% (17.4) to 80.7% (7.8), P = 0.007, without change in time below 70 mg/dL (P = 0.15). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: The new AHCL system demonstrated safety and effectiveness in controlling day and night glucose levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Revital Nimri
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | | | - Anirban Roy
- Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, California, USA
| | - Judith Nir
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Naama Fisch Shvalb
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | | | - Neta Loewenthal
- Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Michal Gillon-Keren
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Ido Muller
- DreaMed Diabetes Ltd., Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Eran Atlas
- DreaMed Diabetes Ltd., Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Moshe Phillip
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dicembrini I, Cosentino C, Monami M, Mannucci E, Pala L. Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol 2021; 58:401-410. [PMID: 32789691 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01589-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) represented a major breakthrough in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the effect of continues glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM), on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present analysis includes randomized clinical trials comparing CGM or FGM with SMBG, with a duration of at least 12 weeks, identified in Medline or clinicaltrials.gov. The principal endpoint was HbA1c at the end of the trial. A secondary endpoint was severe hypoglycemia. Mean and 95% confidence intervals for HbA1c and Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio [MH-OR] for severe hypoglycemia were calculated, using random effect models. A sensitivity analysis was performed using fixed effect models. In addition, the following secondary endpoints were explored, using the same methods: time in range, health-related quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Separate analyses were performed for trials comparing CGM with SMBG, and those comparing CGM + CSII and SMBG + MDI and CGM-regulated insulin infusion system (CRIS) and CSII + SMBG. RESULTS CGM was associated with a significantly lower HbA1c at endpoint in comparison with SMBG (- 0.24 [- 0.34, - 0.13]%); CGM was associated with a significantly lower risk of severe hypoglycemia than SMBG. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life were not measured, or not reported, in the majority of studies. FGM showed a significant reduction in the incidence of mild hypoglycemia and an increased treatment satisfaction, but no significant results are shown in HbA1c. CGM + CSII in comparison with SMBG + MDI was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c. Only two trials with a duration of at least 12 weeks compared a CRIS with SMBG + CSII; HbA1c between the two treatment arms was not statistically significant (difference in means: - 0.23 [- 0.91; 0.46]%; p = 0.52). CONCLUSION GCM compared to SMBG has showed a reduction in HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia in patient with type 1 diabetes. The comparison between CGM + CSII and SMBG + MDI showed a large reduction in HbA1c; it is conceivable that the effects of CSII + CGM on glycemic control additives. The only comparison available between FGM and SMBG was conducted in patients in good control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Dicembrini
- Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
- University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - C Cosentino
- Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - M Monami
- Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - E Mannucci
- Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
- University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L Pala
- Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eberle C, Stichling S, Löhnert M. Diabetology 4.0: Scoping Review of Novel Insights and Possibilities Offered by Digitalization. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e23475. [PMID: 33759789 PMCID: PMC8074865 DOI: 10.2196/23475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus and associated morbidity worldwide justifies the need to create new approaches and strategies for diabetes therapy. Therefore, the ongoing digitalization offers novel opportunities in this field. Objective The aim of this study is to provide an updated overview of available technologies, possibilities, and novel insights into diabetes therapy 4.0. Methods A scoping review was carried out, and a literature search was performed using electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science). The results were categorized according to the type of technology presented. Results Different types of technology (eg, glucose monitoring systems, insulin pens, insulin pumps, closed-loop systems, mobile health apps, telemedicine, and electronic medical records) may help to improve diabetes treatment. These improvements primarily affect glycemic control. However, they may also help in increasing the autonomy and quality of life of people who are diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Diabetes technologies have developed rapidly over the last few years and offer novel insights into diabetes therapy and a chance to improve and individualize diabetes treatment. Challenges that need to be addressed in the following years relate to data security, interoperability, and the development of standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Eberle
- Medicine with Specialization in Internal Medicine and General Medicine, Hochschule Fulda - University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany
| | - Stefanie Stichling
- Medicine with Specialization in Internal Medicine and General Medicine, Hochschule Fulda - University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany
| | - Maxine Löhnert
- Medicine with Specialization in Internal Medicine and General Medicine, Hochschule Fulda - University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ergun-Longmire B, Clemente E, Vining-Maravolo P, Roberts C, Buth K, Greydanus DE. Diabetes education in pediatrics: How to survive diabetes. Dis Mon 2021; 67:101153. [PMID: 33541707 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is the most common abnormal carbohydrate metabolism disorder affecting millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by hyperglycemia as a result of ß-cell destruction or dysfunction by both genetic and environmental factors. Over time chronic hyperglycemia leads to microvascular (i.e., retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy) and macrovascular (i.e., ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease) complications of diabetes. Diabetes complication trials showed the importance of achieving near-normal glycemic control to prevent and/or reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. There is a staggering rate of increased incidence of diabetes in youth, raising concerns for future generations' health, quality of life and its enormous economic burden. Despite advancements in the technology, diabetes management remains cumbersome. Training individuals with diabetes to gain life-long survival skills requires a comprehensive and ongoing diabetes education by a multidisciplinary team. Diabetes education and training start at the time of diagnosis of diabetes and should be continuous throughout the course of disease. The goal is to empower the individuals and families to gain diabetes self-management skills. Diabetes education must be individualized depending on the individual's age, education, family dynamics, and support. In this article, we review the history of diabetes, etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children as well as adolescents. We then focus on diabetes management with education methods and materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berrin Ergun-Longmire
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
| | - Ethel Clemente
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Patricia Vining-Maravolo
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Cheryl Roberts
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Koby Buth
- Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Donald E Greydanus
- Professor, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
30
|
Berget C, Lange S, Messer L, Forlenza GP. A clinical review of the t:slim X2 insulin pump. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 17:1675-1687. [PMID: 32842794 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1814734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Insulin pumps are commonly used for intensive insulin therapy to treat type 1 diabetes in adults and youth. Insulin pump technologies have advanced dramatically in the last several years to integrate with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) and incorporate control algorithms. These control algorithms automate some insulin delivery in response to the glucose information received from the CGM to reduce the occurrence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and improve overall glycemic control. The t:slim X2 insulin pump system became commercially available in 2016. It is an innovative insulin pump technology that can be updated remotely by the user to install new software onto the pump device as new technologies become available. Currently, the t:slim X2 pairs with the Dexcom G6 CGM and there are two advanced software options available: Basal-IQ, which is a predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) technology, and Control-IQ, which is a Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) technology. This paper will describe the different types of advanced insulin pump technologies, review how the t:slim X2 insulin pump works, and summarize the clinical studies leading to FDA approval and commercialization of the Basal-IQ and Control-IQ technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cari Berget
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Samantha Lange
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laurel Messer
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brown SA, Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Laffel LM, Wadwa RP, Kudva YC, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Ambler-Osborn L, Anderson SM, Church MM, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Levister C, Simha V, Breton MD, Kollman C, Lum JW, Kovatchev BP. Glycemic Outcomes of Use of CLC Versus PLGS in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:1822-1828. [PMID: 32471910 PMCID: PMC7372060 DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited information is available about glycemic outcomes with a closed-loop control (CLC) system compared with a predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After 6 months of use of a CLC system in a randomized trial, 109 participants with type 1 diabetes (age range, 14-72 years; mean HbA1c, 7.1% [54 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned to CLC (N = 54, Control-IQ) or PLGS (N = 55, Basal-IQ) groups for 3 months. The primary outcome was continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-measured time in range (TIR) for 70-180 mg/dL. Baseline CGM metrics were computed from the last 3 months of the preceding study. RESULTS All 109 participants completed the study. Mean ± SD TIR was 71.1 ± 11.2% at baseline and 67.6 ± 12.6% using intention-to-treat analysis (69.1 ± 12.2% using per-protocol analysis excluding periods of study-wide suspension of device use) over 13 weeks on CLC vs. 70.0 ± 13.6% and 60.4 ± 17.1% on PLGS (difference = 5.9%; 95% CI 3.6%, 8.3%; P < 0.001). Time >180 mg/dL was lower in the CLC group than PLGS group (difference = -6.0%; 95% CI -8.4%, -3.7%; P < 0.001) while time <54 mg/dL was similar (0.04%; 95% CI -0.05%, 0.13%; P = 0.41). HbA1c after 13 weeks was lower on CLC than PLGS (7.2% [55 mmol/mol] vs. 7.5% [56 mmol/mol], difference -0.34% [-3.7 mmol/mol]; 95% CI -0.57% [-6.2 mmol/mol], -0.11% [1.2 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS Following 6 months of CLC, switching to PLGS reduced TIR and increased HbA1c toward their pre-CLC values, while hypoglycemia remained similarly reduced with both CLC and PLGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue A Brown
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carol J Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | | | - Eyal Dassau
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA.,Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Stacey M Anderson
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | - Vinaya Simha
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Marc D Breton
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fuchs J, Hovorka R. Closed-loop control in insulin pumps for type-1 diabetes mellitus: safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17:707-720. [PMID: 32569476 PMCID: PMC7441745 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1784724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Type 1 diabetes is a lifelong disease with high management burden. The majority of people with type 1 diabetes fail to achieve glycemic targets. Algorithm-driven automated insulin delivery (closed-loop) systems aim to address these challenges. This review provides an overview of commercial and emerging closed-loop systems. AREAS COVERED We review safety and efficacy of commercial and emerging hybrid closed-loop systems. A literature search was conducted and clinical trials using day-and-night closed-loop systems during free-living conditions were used to report on safety data. We comment on efficacy where robust randomized controlled trial data for a particular system are available. We highlight similarities and differences between commercial systems. EXPERT OPINION Study data shows that hybrid closed-loop systems are safe and effective, consistently improving glycemic control when compared to standard therapy. While a fully closed-loop system with minimal burden remains the end-goal, these hybrid closed-loop systems have transformative potential in diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Fuchs
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Treatments for type 1 diabetes have advanced significantly over recent years. There are now multiple hybrid closed-loop systems commercially available and additional systems are in development. Challenges remain, however. This review outlines the recent advances in closed-loop systems and outlines the remaining challenges, including post-prandial hyperglycemia and exercise-related dysglycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Jackson
- Division of Endocrinology, Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jessica R. Castle
- Division of Endocrinology, Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Talking Points for Helping Your Type 1 Diabetes Patient Decide About Hybrid Closed Loop. Can J Diabetes 2020; 44:356-358. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
35
|
Polsky S, Akturk HK. Case series of a hybrid closed-loop system used in pregnancies in clinical practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36:e3248. [PMID: 31758630 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy is rarely studied in pregnancy. We present three cases of women with type 1 diabetes who used the Medtronic 670G HCL system for most or all of gestation. METHODS The Medtronic 670G system has a manual mode (no automated insulin delivery) and an auto mode (AM, HCL therapy). Women in this case series used AM off-label in gestation. RESULTS Case 1 started HCL therapy in the second trimester, her sensor glucose time spent <3.9 and >10 mmol/L improved thereafter. Case 1 had average sensor glucose (ASG) levels of 6.4 ± 2.4 mmol/L in the first trimester, 7.0 ± 2.7 mmol/L in the second trimester before HCL use, 7.1 ± 2.1 mmol/L in the second trimester after HCL use, and 6.8 ± 1.9 mmol/L in the third trimester. Case 1 continued AM during operative delivery and post-partum. Cases 2 and 3 used HCL therapy throughout gestation but with inconsistent time in AM. When they increased time in AM their glycaemic indices improved. Case 2 had ASG of 9.5 ± 3.4, 8.6 ± 2.9, and 7.9 ± 2.5 mmol/L in the first through third trimesters, respectively. Case 3 had ASG of 11.1 ± 4.8 and 3.9 to 10 mmol/L in the first and second trimesters, respectively. Case 2 continued HCL therapy post-partum, Case 3 did not. CONCLUSIONS CareLink® Clinical Software only reports the non-pregnant time in range. Nonetheless, this represents the first report of HCL therapy in pregnancy with a system approved by the Food and Drug Administration in non-pregnant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarit Polsky
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Halis K Akturk
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Renard E. Certified Interoperability Allows a More Secure Move to the Artificial Pancreas Through a New Concept: "Make-It-Yourself". J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:195-197. [PMID: 31958988 PMCID: PMC7196868 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820901612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes,
Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics,
University of Montpellier, France
- INSERM Clinical Investigation Centre,
Montpellier, France
- Eric Renard, MD, PhD, Department of
Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Lapeyronie
Hospital, Avenue Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier cedex 5 34295, France.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sherr JL, Buckingham BA, Forlenza GP, Galderisi A, Ekhlaspour L, Wadwa RP, Carria L, Hsu L, Berget C, Peyser TA, Lee JB, O'Connor J, Dumais B, Huyett LM, Layne JE, Ly TT. Safety and Performance of the Omnipod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adults, Adolescents, and Children with Type 1 Diabetes Over 5 Days Under Free-Living Conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22:174-184. [PMID: 31596130 PMCID: PMC7047109 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and performance of the Omnipod® personalized model predictive control (MPC) algorithm in adults, adolescents, and children aged ≥6 years with type 1 diabetes (T1D) under free-living conditions using an investigational device. Materials and Methods: A 96-h hybrid closed-loop (HCL) study was conducted in a supervised hotel/rental home setting following a 7-day outpatient standard therapy (ST) phase. Eligible participants were aged 6-65 years with A1C <10.0% using insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injections. Meals during HCL were unrestricted, with boluses administered per usual routine. There was daily physical activity. The primary endpoints were percentage of time with sensor glucose <70 and ≥250 mg/dL. Results: Participants were 11 adults, 10 adolescents, and 15 children aged (mean ± standard deviation) 28.8 ± 7.9, 14.3 ± 1.3, and 9.9 ± 1.0 years, respectively. Percentage time ≥250 mg/dL during HCL was 4.5% ± 4.2%, 3.5% ± 5.0%, and 8.6% ± 8.8% per respective age group, a 1.6-, 3.4-, and 2.0-fold reduction compared to ST (P = 0.1, P = 0.02, and P = 0.03). Percentage time <70 mg/dL during HCL was 1.9% ± 1.3%, 2.5% ± 2.0%, and 2.2% ± 1.9%, a statistically significant decrease in adults when compared to ST (P = 0.005, P = 0.3, and P = 0.3). Percentage time 70-180 mg/dL increased during HCL compared to ST, reaching significance for adolescents and children: HCL 73.7% ± 7.5% vs. ST 68.0% ± 15.6% for adults (P = 0.08), HCL 79.0% ± 12.6% vs. ST 60.6% ± 13.4% for adolescents (P = 0.01), and HCL 69.2% ± 13.5% vs. ST 54.9% ± 12.9% for children (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The Omnipod personalized MPC algorithm was safe and performed well over 5 days and 4 nights of use by a cohort of participants ranging from youth aged ≥6 years to adults with T1D under supervised free-living conditions with challenges, including daily physical activity and unrestricted meals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Sherr
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Address correspondence to: Jennifer L. Sherr, MD, PhD, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, One Long Wharf Drive Suite 503, New Haven, CT 06511
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Alfonso Galderisi
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lori Carria
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Liana Hsu
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Cari Berget
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The advent of insulin pump therapy marked an important milestone in diabetes treatment in the past few decades and has become the tipping point for the development of automated insulin delivery systems (AID). Standalone insulin pump systems have evolved over the course of years and have been replaced by modern high-technology insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitor interface allowing real-time insulin dose adjustment to optimize treatment. This review summarizes evidence from AID studies conducted in children with type 1 diabetes and discusses the outlook for future generation AID systems from a pediatric treatment perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Cengiz
- Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kovatchev BP, Kollar L, Anderson SM, Barnett C, Breton MD, Carr K, Gildersleeve R, Oliveri MC, Wakeman CA, Brown SA. Evening and overnight closed-loop control versus 24/7 continuous closed-loop control for type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2:e64-e73. [PMID: 32864597 PMCID: PMC7453908 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30218-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Automated closed-loop control (CLC), known as the "artificial pancreas" is emerging as a treatment option for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), generally superior to sensor-augmented insulin pump (SAP) treatment. It is postulated that evening-night (E-N) CLC may account for most of the benefits of 24-7 CLC; however, a direct comparison has not been done. Methods In this trial (NCT02679287), adults with T1D were randomised 1:1 to two groups, which followed different sequences of four 8-week sessions, resulting in two crossover designs comparing SAP vs E-N CLC and E-N CLC vs 24-7 CLC, respectively. Eligibility: T1D for at least 1 year, using an insulin pump for at least six months, ages 18 years or older. Primary hypothesis: E-N CLC compared to SAP will decrease percent time <70mg/dL (3.9mmol/L) measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without deterioration in HbA1c. Secondary Hypotheses: 24-7 CLC compared to SAP will increase CGM-measured time in target range (TIR, 70-180mg/dL; 3.9-10mmol/L) and will reduce glucose variability during the day. Findings Ninety-three participants were randomised and 80 were included in the analysis, ages 18-69 years; HbA1c levels 5.4-10.6%; 66% female. Compared to SAP, E-N CLC reduced overall time <70mg/dL from 4.0% to 2.2% () resulting in an absolute difference of 1.8% (95%CI: 1.2-2.4%), p<0.0001. This was accompanied by overall reduction in HbA1c from 7.4% at baseline to 7.1% at the end of study, resulting in an absolute difference of 0.3% (95% CI: 0.1-0.4%), p<0.0001. There were 5 severe hypoglycaemia adverse events attributed to user-directed boluses without malfunction of the investigational device, and no diabetic ketoacidosis events. Interpretation In type 1 diabetes, evening-night closed-loop control was superior to sensor-augmented pump therapy, achieving most of the glycaemic benefits of 24-7 closed-loop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Kollar
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Stacey M. Anderson
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Charlotte Barnett
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Marc D. Breton
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Kelly Carr
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Rachel Gildersleeve
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Mary C. Oliveri
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | | | - Sue A Brown
- Address for Correspondence: Sue A. Brown, M.D., University of Virginia, Center for Diabetes Technology, 560 Ray C. Hunt Drive, Second Floor, Charlottesville, VA, Tel: +1-434-982-0602,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Revital Nimri
- Diabetes Technology Center, Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Molly Piper
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA
| | | | - Eyal Dassau
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beck RW, Brown SA, Lum JW, Kovatchev BP. Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: The End of Fingersticks? Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22:67-68. [PMID: 31657622 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sue A Brown
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - Boris P Kovatchev
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Anderson SM, Church MM, Dadlani V, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Kollman C, Beck RW. Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1707-1717. [PMID: 31618560 PMCID: PMC7076915 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1907863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 564] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Closed-loop systems that automate insulin delivery may improve glycemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS In this 6-month randomized, multicenter trial, patients with type 1 diabetes were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with a closed-loop system (closed-loop group) or a sensor-augmented pump (control group). The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the blood glucose level was within the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS A total of 168 patients underwent randomization; 112 were assigned to the closed-loop group, and 56 were assigned to the control group. The age range of the patients was 14 to 71 years, and the glycated hemoglobin level ranged from 5.4 to 10.6%. All 168 patients completed the trial. The mean (±SD) percentage of time that the glucose level was within the target range increased in the closed-loop group from 61±17% at baseline to 71±12% during the 6 months and remained unchanged at 59±14% in the control group (mean adjusted difference, 11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 14; P<0.001). The results with regard to the main secondary outcomes (percentage of time that the glucose level was >180 mg per deciliter, mean glucose level, glycated hemoglobin level, and percentage of time that the glucose level was <70 mg per deciliter or <54 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter]) all met the prespecified hierarchical criterion for significance, favoring the closed-loop system. The mean difference (closed loop minus control) in the percentage of time that the blood glucose level was lower than 70 mg per deciliter was -0.88 percentage points (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.57; P<0.001). The mean adjusted difference in glycated hemoglobin level after 6 months was -0.33 percentage points (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.13; P = 0.001). In the closed-loop group, the median percentage of time that the system was in closed-loop mode was 90% over 6 months. No serious hypoglycemic events occurred in either group; one episode of diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in the closed-loop group. CONCLUSIONS In this 6-month trial involving patients with type 1 diabetes, the use of a closed-loop system was associated with a greater percentage of time spent in a target glycemic range than the use of a sensor-augmented insulin pump. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; iDCL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03563313.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue A Brown
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Boris P Kovatchev
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - John W Lum
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Lori M Laffel
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Carol J Levy
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Jordan E Pinsker
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Eyal Dassau
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Francis J Doyle
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Stacey M Anderson
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Mei Mei Church
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Vikash Dadlani
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Elvira Isganaitis
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - David W Lam
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Craig Kollman
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Roy W Beck
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Laffel LM, Pickup JC. Advances in technology for management of type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2019; 394:1265-1273. [PMID: 31533908 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31142-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Technological advances have had a major effect on the management of type 1 diabetes. In addition to blood glucose meters, devices used by people with type 1 diabetes include insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and, most recently, systems that combine both a pump and a monitor for algorithm-driven automation of insulin delivery. In the next 5 years, as many advances are expected in technology for the management of diabetes as there have been in the past 5 years, with improvements in continuous glucose monitoring and more available choices of systems that automate insulin delivery. Expansion of the use of technology will be needed beyond endocrinology practices to primary-care settings and broader populations of patients. Tools to support decision making will also need to be developed to help patients and health-care providers to use the output of these devices to optimise diabetes management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet and Health Partners, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John C Pickup
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Saunders A, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. MiniMed 670G hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:845-853. [PMID: 31540557 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1670639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Automated insulin delivery for people with type 1 diabetes has been a major goal in the diabetes technology field for many years. While a fully automated system has not yet been accomplished, the MiniMed™ 670G artificial pancreas (AP) system is the first commercially available insulin pump that automates basal insulin delivery, while still requiring user input for insulin boluses. Determining the safety and efficacy of this system is essential to the development of future devices striving for more automation. Areas Covered: This review will provide an overview of how the MiniMed 670G system works including its safety and efficacy, how it compares to similar devices, and anticipated future advances in diabetes technology currently under development. Expert Opinion: The ultimate goal of advanced diabetes technologies is to reduce the burden and amount of management required of patients with diabetes. In addition to reducing patient workload, achieving better glucose control and improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values are essential for reducing the threat of diabetes-related complications further down the road. Current devices come close to reaching these goals, but understanding the unmet needs of patients with diabetes will allow future technologies to achieve these goals more quickly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aria Saunders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Denver , Denver , CO , USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. A Clinical Overview of Insulin Pump Therapy for the Management of Diabetes: Past, Present, and Future of Intensive Therapy. Diabetes Spectr 2019; 32:194-204. [PMID: 31462873 PMCID: PMC6695255 DOI: 10.2337/ds18-0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IN BRIEF Insulin pump therapy is advancing rapidly. This article summarizes the variety of insulin pump technologies available to date and discusses important clinical considerations for each type of technology.
Collapse
|
47
|
Messer LH, Berget C, Forlenza GP. A Clinical Guide to Advanced Diabetes Devices and Closed-Loop Systems Using the CARES Paradigm. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21:462-469. [PMID: 31140878 PMCID: PMC6653788 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel H. Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
- Address correspondence to: Laurel H. Messer, RN, MPH, CDE, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, 1775 Aurora CT MS A140, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Cari Berget
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kovatchev B. A Century of Diabetes Technology: Signals, Models, and Artificial Pancreas Control. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2019; 30:432-444. [PMID: 31151733 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Arguably, diabetes mellitus is one of the best-quantified human conditions: elaborate in silico models describe the action of the human metabolic system; real-time signals such as continuous glucose monitoring are readily available; insulin delivery is being automated; and control algorithms are capable of optimizing blood glucose fluctuation in patients' natural environments. The transition of the artificial pancreas (AP) to everyday clinical use is happening now, and is contingent upon seamless concerted work of devices encompassing the patient in a digital treatment ecosystem. This review recounts briefly the story of diabetes technology, which began a century ago with the discovery of insulin, progressed through glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin delivery, and is now rapidly advancing towards fully automated clinically viable AP systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Kovatchev
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, UVA Center for Diabetes Technology, Ivy Translational Research Building, 560 Ray C. Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2981, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Forlenza GP, Ekhlaspour L, Breton M, Maahs DM, Wadwa RP, DeBoer M, Messer LH, Town M, Pinnata J, Kruse G, Buckingham BA, Cherñavvsky D. Successful At-Home Use of the Tandem Control-IQ Artificial Pancreas System in Young Children During a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21:159-169. [PMID: 30888835 PMCID: PMC6909715 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) artificial pancreas (AP) systems are now moving from research settings to widespread clinical use. In this study, the inControl algorithm developed by TypeZero Technologies was embedded to a commercial Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump, now called Control-IQ, paired with a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitor and tested for superiority against sensor augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Both groups were physician-monitored throughout the clinical trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a randomized controlled trial, 24 school-aged children (6-12 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) participated in a 3-day home-use trial at two sites: Stanford University and the Barbara Davis Center (50% girls, 9.6 ± 1.9 years of age, 4.5 ± 1.9 years of T1D, baseline hemoglobin A1c 7.35% ± 0.68%). Study subjects were randomized 1:1 at each site to either HCL AP therapy with the Control-IQ system or SAP therapy with remote monitoring. RESULTS The primary outcome, time in target range 70-180 mg/dL, using Control-IQ significantly improved (71.0% ± 6.6% vs. 52.8% ± 13.5%; P = 0.001) and mean sensor glucose (153.6 ± 13.5 vs. 180.2 ± 23.1 mg/dL; P = 0.003) without increasing hypoglycemia time <70 mg/dL (1.7% [1.3%-2.1%] vs. 0.9% [0.3%-2.7%]; not significant). The HCL system was active for 94.4% of the study period. Subjects reported that use of the system was associated with less time thinking about diabetes, decreased worry about blood sugars, and decreased burden in managing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The use of the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ HCL AP system significantly improved time in range and mean glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia in school-aged children with T1D during remote monitored home use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| | - Marc Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David M. Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Mark DeBoer
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Laurel H. Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marissa Town
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| | - Jennifer Pinnata
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel Cherñavvsky
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Current Diabetes Technology: Striving for the Artificial Pancreas. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 9:diagnostics9010031. [PMID: 30875898 PMCID: PMC6468523 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes technology has continually evolved over the years to improve quality of life and ease of care for affected patients. Frequent blood glucose (BG) checks and multiple daily insulin injections have become standard of care in Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) management. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) allow patients to observe and discern trends in their glycemic control. These devices improve quality of life for parents and caregivers with preset alerts for hypoglycemia. Insulin pumps have continued to improve and innovate since their emergence into the market. Hybrid closed-loop systems have harnessed the data gathered with CGM use to aid in basal insulin dosing and hypoglycemia prevention. As technology continues to progress, patients will likely have to enter less and less information into their pump system manually. In the future, we will likely see a system that requires no manual patient input and allows users to eat throughout the day without counting carbohydrates or entering in any blood sugars. As technology continues to advance, endocrinologists and diabetes providers need to stay current to better guide their patients in optimal use of emerging management tools.
Collapse
|