Chlorpropamide-induced hyponatremia: incidence and risk factors

Inverse association between glucose-lowering medications and severe hyponatremia: a Swedish population-based case-control study

CONTEXT

Glucose-lowering medications have occasionally been reported to cause hyponatremia, but the evidence is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between glucose-lowering medications and severe hyponatremia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Subjects hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of hyponatremia (n = 14,359) were compared with matched controls (n = 57,383). Data were derived by linkage of national population-based registers. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for co-medication, diseases, previous hospitalizations, and socioeconomic factors was used to explore the association between hospitalization for hyponatremia and the use of different glucose-lowering medications. Furthermore, newly initiated (≤90 days) and ongoing use was investigated separately.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hospitalization due to hyponatremia.

RESULTS

The unadjusted ORs (95% CI) for hospitalization due to hyponatremia were 1.41 (1.29-1.54) for insulins, 1.38 (1.27-1.50) for metformin, and 1.22 (1.07-1.38) for sulfonylureas. However, after adjustment for confounding factors the association was consistently reversed. Thus, for any glucose-lowering medication the adjusted OR was 0.63 (0.58-0.68). For insulins, metformin and sulfonylureas, adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.58 (0.52-0.65), 0.81 (0.72-0.90) and 0.81 (0.69-0.94), respectively. Odds ratios for newly initated medications were overall higher while those for ongoing treatment were further decreased. Thus, adjusted ORs (95% CI) for ongoing treatment with insulins, metformin, and sulfonylureas were 0.54 (0.48-0.61), 0.82 (0.73-0.91) and 0.78 (0.66-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucose-lowering medications did not increase the risk for hospitalization due to severe hyponatremia. In fact, the association was inverse across all investigated drugs. The association may be mediated by pharmacologic mechanisms, but the uniform effects across drug-classes suggest properties of the diabetic disease are of importance.

Current perspective on the role of insulin and glucagon in the pathogenesis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

According to the World Health Organization, 422 million adults worldwide live with diabetes mellitus (DM), a significant portion of whom have type 2 diabetes. The discovery of insulin as a key regulator of glucose metabolism has revolutionized our understanding of DM and provided several therapeutic avenues. Most studies have so far predominantly focused on the role of insulin in type 2 diabetes. However, the balance between insulin and glucagon is essential in ensuring glucose homeostasis. In this review, we begin by evaluating the principal differences between insulin and glucagon with regard to their mechanism and control of their secretion. Next, we discuss their mode of action and effects on metabolism. We further explore how the two hormones impact the natural history of type 2 diabetes. Finally, we outline how current and emerging pharmacological agents attempt to exploit the properties of insulin and glucagon to benefit patients with type 2 diabetes.

Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice

Many anti-diabetic drugs with different mechanisms of action are now available for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sulfonylureas have been extensively used for treatment of type 2 diabetes for nearly 50 years and, even in our times, are widely used for treatment of this devastating chronic illness. Here, we review some of the available data on sulfonylureas, evaluating their mechanism of action and their effects on glycemic control. We can conclude that sulfonylureas are still the most used anti-diabetic agents: maybe this is due to their lower cost, to the possibility of mono-dosing and to the presence of an association with metformin in the same tablet. However, sulfonylureas, especially the older ones, are linked to a greater prevalence of hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular risk; newer prolonged-release preparations of sulfonylureas are undoubtedly safer, mainly due to reducing hypoglycemia, and for this reason should be preferred.

Update on Safety Issues Related to Antihyperglycemic Therapy

The American Diabetes Association emphasizes the importance of individualized patient care in the management of diabetes. One of the important considerations in choosing an antihyperglycemic agent is its side-effect and safety profile. This article reviews the common and clinically significant side effects of each class of agents, including ways to prevent and overcome their occurrence.

Disorders of sodium and water balance

Dysnatremias occur simultaneously with disorders in water balance. The first priority is to correct dehydration; once the patient is euvolemic, the sodium level can be reassessed. In unstable patients with hyponatremia, the clinician should rapidly administer hypertonic saline. In unstable patients with hypernatremia, the clinician should administer isotonic intravenous fluid. In stable patients with either hyponatremia or hypernatremia, the clinician should aim for correction over 24 to 48 hours, with the maximal change in serum sodium between 8 to 12 mEq/L over the first 24 hours. This rate of correction decreases the chances of cerebral edema or osmotic demyelination syndrome.

Complications of diabetes therapy

Current strategies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus promote individualized plans to achieve target glucose levels on a patient-by-patient basis while minimizing treatment related risks. Maintaining glycemic control over time is a significant challenge because of the progressive nature of diabetes as a result of declining β-cell function. This article identifies complications of non-insulin treatments for diabetes. The major classes of medications are reviewed with special focus on target population, mechanism of action, effect on weight, cardiovascular outcomes and additional class-specific side effects including effects on bone. Effects on β-cell function are also highlighted.

Hyponatremia and the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH)

The syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH), also recently referred to as the "syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis", is an often underdiagnosed cause of hypotonic hyponatremia, resulting for instance from ectopic release of ADH in lung cancer or as a side-effect of various drugs. In SIADH, hyponatremia results from a pure disorder of water handling by the kidney, whereas external Na+ balance is usually well regulated. Despite increased total body water, only minor changes of urine output and modest edema are usually seen. Renal function and acid-base balance are often preserved, while neurological impairment may range from subclinical to life-threatening. Hypouricemia is a distinguishing feature. The major causes and clinical variants of SIADH are reviewed, with particular emphasis on iatrogenic complications and hospital-acquired hyponatremia. Effective treatment of SIADH with water restriction, aquaretics, or hypertonic saline + loop diuretics, as opposed to worsening of hyponatremia during parenteral isotonic fluid administration, underscores the importance of an early accurate diagnosis and careful follow-up of these patients.

A review of drug-induced hyponatremia

Hyponatremia (defined as a serum sodium level < 134 mmol/L) is the most common electrolyte abnormality in hospitalized patients. Certain drugs (eg, diuretics, antidepressants, and antiepileptics) have been implicated as established causes of either asymptomatic or symptomatic hyponatremia. However, hyponatremia occasionally may develop in the course of treatment with drugs used in everyday clinical practice (eg, newer antihypertensive agents, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors). Physicians may not always give proper attention in time to undesirable drug-induced hyponatremia. Effective clinical management can be handled through awareness of the adverse effect of certain pharmaceutical compounds on serum sodium levels. Here, we review clinical information about the incidence of hyponatremia associated with specific drug treatment and discuss the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Disorders of water imbalance

Disorders of water imbalance manifest as hyponatremia and hypernatremia. To diagnose these disorders, emergency physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion, especially in the high-risk patient, because clinical presentations may be nonspecific. With severe water imbalance, inappropriate fluid resuscitation in the emergency department may have devastating neurological consequences. The rate of serum sodium concentration correction should be monitored closely to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome in hyponatremic patients and cerebral edema in hypernatremic patients.

Inappropriate medication prescribing in residential care/assisted living facilities

OBJECTIVES

To identify the extent to which inappropriately prescribed medications (IPMs) are administered to older patients in residential care/assisted living (RC/AL) facilities and to describe facility and resident factors associated with receipt of one or more IPMs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of a stratified, representative sample of 193 facilities in four states.

SETTING

We identified representative geographic regions within Florida, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Maryland and drew from within them a stratified random sample of 193 RC/AL facilities. Three subtypes of facilities were included in the sample: small homes (<16 beds), larger "new-model" homes, and larger "traditional" homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Within each larger home, a random sample of residents aged 65 and older was approached for consent; in smaller homes all residents were approached. The overall enrollment rate was 92%; 2,078 residents were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS

Questionnaires and on-site observations were used to gather data on facility administration and staffing and resident characteristics. All prescription and nonprescription medications taken at least 4 of the 7 days before data collection were taken from medication administration records and coded for analysis. IPM designation was based on modification of a list developed by Beers et al. and currently used by nursing home surveyors.

RESULTS

The majority of RC/AL patients were taking five or more medications; 16.0% of these patients were receiving IPMs. The most common IPMs were oxybutynin, propoxyphene, diphenhydramine, ticlopidine, doxepin, and dipyridamole. In multivariate analyses, using generalized estimating equations, IPM use was associated with the number of medications received, smaller facility bed size, moderate licensed practical nurse turnover, absence of dementia, low monthly fees, and absence of weekly physician visits.

CONCLUSIONS

IPMs remain a problem in long-term care, but rates in these RC/AL settings compare favorably with those reported for other frail older populations, suggesting that use of medications with severe adverse effects may be waning. Regular physician facility visits may improve prescribing, as will attention to high-risk groups such as individuals on multiple medications.

Oral agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: pharmacology, toxicity, and treatment

Currently available oral agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus include a variety of compounds from 5 different pharmacologic classes with differing mechanisms of action, adverse effect profiles, and toxicities. The oral antidiabetic drugs can be classified as either hypoglycemic agents (sulfonylureas and benzoic acid derivatives) or antihyperglycemic agents (biguanides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones). In this review, a brief discussion of the pharmacology of these agents is followed by an examination of the adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and toxicities. Finally, treatment of sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia is described, including general supportive care and the management of pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions. The adjunctive roles of glucagon, diazoxide, and octreotide for refractory hypoglycemia are also discussed.

Comparative tolerability of sulphonylureas in diabetes mellitus

The sulphonylurea drugs have been the mainstay of oral treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus since they were introduced. In general, they are well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects, although there are some differences between the drugs in the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Over the years, the drugs causing the most problems with hypoglycaemia have been chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), although this is a potential problem with all sulphonylureas because of their action on the pancreatic beta cell, stimulating insulin release. Other specific problems have been reported with chlorpropamide that occur only rarely, if at all, with other sulphonylureas. Hyponatraemia secondary to inappropriate antidiuretic hormone activity, and increased flushing following the ingestion of alcohol, have been well described. The progressive beta cell failure with time results in eventual loss of efficacy, as these agents depend on a functioning beta cell and are ineffective in the absence of insulin-producing capacity. Differences in this secondary failure rate have been reported, with chlorpropamide and gliclazide having lower failure rates than glibenclamide or glipizide. The reasons for this are unclear, but the more abnormal pattern of insulin release produced by glibenclamide may be partly responsible and, indeed, may explain the increased risk of hypoglycaemia with this agent. Previously reported increased mortality associated with tolbutamide therapy has not been substantiated, and more recent data have shown no increased mortality from sulphonylurea treatment. Indeed, benefit from glycaemic control, regardless of the agent used--insulin or sulphonylurea--was reported by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Nevertheless, there is still ongoing controversy in view of the experimental evidence, mainly from animal studies, of potential adverse effects on the heart from sulphonylureas, but these are difficult to extrapolate into clinical situations. Most of these studies have been carried out with glibenclamide, which makes comparison of possible risk difficult. Other cardiovascular risk factors may be modified by gliclazide, which seems unique among the sulphonylureas in this respect. Its reported haemobiological and free radical scavenging activity probably resides in the azabicyclo-octyl ring structure in the side chain. Reduced progression or improvement in retinopathy has been reported in comparative trials with other sulphonylureas, and the effect is unrelated to improvements in glycaemia. There are differences between the sulphonylureas in some adverse effects, risk of hypoglycaemia, failure rates and actions on vascular risk factors. As a group of drugs, they are very well tolerated, but differences in overall tolerability can be identified.

Drug-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Causes, diagnosis and management

Hyponatraemia is common among the elderly, and may be caused by physiological changes, disease processes or drugs. About half of elderly patients with hyponatraemia have features typical of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). It is important to establish whether drugs are the cause, as this is easily remediable. The clinical manifestations of SIADH are predominantly attributable to hyponatraemia and serum hypo-osmolality. The severity of the signs and symptoms depends on the degree of hyponatraemia and the rapidity with which the syndrome develops. Although a growing number of drugs have been reported to produce SIADH, most published reports concern vasopressin and its analogues, thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics, chlorpropamide, carbamazepine, antipsychotics, antidepressants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Old age is a risk factor for SIADH following the use of many of these drugs. The use of these drugs in combination, excessive fluid intake and other underlying conditions that limit free water excretion increase the risk. Drug-induced SIADH usually resolves following cessation of the offending agent(s). Additional measures are required in patients with symptomatic hyponatraemia, including fluid restriction and intravenous sodium chloride and/or furosemide (frusemide) therapy. Careful monitoring is essential, with particular attention paid to the rate and extent of correction of the hyponatraemia.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence

NIDDM in children and adolescents represents a heterogeneous group of disorders with different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Most subtypes of NIDDM that occur in childhood are uncommon, but some, such as early onset of "classic" NIDDM, seem to be increasing in prevalence. This observed increase is thought to be caused by societal factors that lead to sedentary lifestyles and an increased prevalence of obesity. In adults, hyperglycemia frequently exists for years before a diagnosis of NIDDM is made and treatment is begun. Microvascular complications, such as retinopathy, are often already present at the time of diagnosis. Children are frequently asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, so screening for this disorder in high-risk populations is important. Screening should be considered for children of high-risk ethnic populations with a strong family history of NIDDM with obesity or signs of hyperinsulinism, such as acanthosis nigricans. Even for children in these high-risk groups who do not yet manifest hyperglycemia, primary care providers can have an important role in encouraging lifestyle modifications that might delay or prevent onset of NIDDM.

Oral antidiabetic drug use in the elderly

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a metabolic disease that is common in the elderly, and is characterised by insulin insufficiency and resistance. Measures such as bodyweight reduction and exercise improve the metabolic defects, but pharmacological therapy is the most frequently used and successful therapy. The sulphonylureas stimulate insulin secretion. Metformin and troglitazone increase glucose disposal and decrease hepatic glucose output without causing hypoglycaemia. Acarbose is a dietary aid that spreads the dietary carbohydrate challenge to endogenous insulin over time. These pharmacological agents, either alone or in combination, should improve blood glucose regulation in patients with NIDDM.

Diabetes in the elderly

Diabetes affects at least 20% of the population over the age of 65. Half of these patients are unaware that they have the disease. Diabetes in middle-aged subjects is characterized by an impairment in glucose induced insulin release, increased fasting hepatic glucose output and resistance to insulin mediated glucose disposal. In contrast, diabetes in the elderly is primarily associated with insulin deficiency. The presentation of diabetes in the aged is often non-specific. The elderly have an increased frequency of complications from diabetes. They are particularly susceptible to hypoglycaemia, because of reduced awareness of hypoglycaemic warning symptoms and altered release of counterregulatory hormones. Although no data are yet available from randomized controlled trials, there is abundant epidemiological evidence to suggest that adequate control of blood glucose can be expected to reduce the risk of long-term complications. A team approach is ideal for the management of the elderly patient with diabetes. Little data is available on which to base a diet and exercise prescription for elderly patients. Gliclazide appears to be the sulphonylurea of choice in the aged because it is associated with a lower frequency of hypoglycaemic reactions. Urine glucose testing is unreliable, and capillary glucose monitoring is preferred. Fructosamine may prove to be superior to haemoglobin A1C for monitoring long-term control.

Comparative tolerability profiles of oral antidiabetic agents

The sulphonylureas and the biguanides are widely used as adjuncts to dietary measures in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Adverse effect profiles differ markedly between the sulphonylureas and biguanides, reflecting differences in chemical structure and mode of action. Sulphonylureas are generally well tolerated, although pharmacokinetic differences between these agents have important clinical implications. The main adverse effect associated with sulphonylureas is hypoglycaemia. This effect is a predictable consequence of the principal pharmacological effect of these drugs, i.e. sensitisation of the islet beta-cell to glucose, resulting in enhanced endogenous insulin secretion. Sulphonylurea-induced suppression of hepatic glucose production may cause profound and protracted hypoglycaemia, especially in elderly patients, in individuals with intercurrent illnesses and reduced caloric intake, or when taken in combination with other compounds with hypoglycaemic potential, e.g. alcohol (ethanol). Sulphonylureas with a longer duration of action, notably chlorpropamide and glibenclamide (glyburide), are more liable to induce serious hypoglycaemia, particularly when drug elimination is reduced by renal impairment. Other drugs such as salicylates may potentiate the actions of sulphonylureas, thereby increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Biguanide therapy is associated with alterations in lactate homeostasis which under certain clinical circumstances may result in fatal lactic acidosis. Phenformin is associated with a markedly greater risk of lactic acidosis than metformin. Phenformin has been withdrawn in many countries for this reason. All biguanides must be avoided in patients with renal impairment, hepatic dysfunction and cardiac failure--conditions where drug accumulation or disordered lactate metabolism may predispose to lactic acidosis. Phenformin should not be given to individuals who exhibit a severe, genetically conferred hepatic defect of hydroxylation which impedes metabolism of this drug. Less seriously, the biguanides are associated with a relatively high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects which limit compliance. Acarbose, a competitive inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases, has recently been introduced. In contrast to the sulphonylureas and biguanides, acarbose has not been associated with life-threatening adverse effects. This reflects the low systemic absorption of the drug and, predictably, its principal unwanted effects are gastrointestinal disturbances resulting from iatrogenic carbohydrate malabsorption.

Diuretic-induced severe hyponatremia. Review and analysis of 129 reported patients

Thiazides were responsible for severe diuretic-induced hyponatremia (serum sodium level < 115 mEq/L) in 94 percent of 129 cases reported in the literature between 1962 and 1990. The hyponatremia developed within 14 days in most of the patients receiving thiazides but in none of the patients who were treated with furosemide. Diuretic-induced hyponatremia was four times more common in women than in men. Advanced age was not associated with a higher tendency for hyponatremia. In the majority of the patients who received thiazides, excess antidiuretic hormone activity, hypokalemia, and excess water intake were accompanying findings which, singly or together, appeared to contribute to the development of hyponatremia. In 12 patients, mortality was directly related to hyponatremia. Rapid average correction of hyponatremia and a relatively high total correction (over 20 mEq/L) in the first 24 h were significantly associated with higher mortality or demyelinating syndrome. The presence of neurologic signs is an indication for active sodium replacement. The onset of thiazide-induced hyponatremia may in some cases occur within 1 day and therefore needs to be corrected rapidly, but within a total elevation of 20 mEq/L in the first 24 h. Where the onset is judged to have been slow (over several days), the level should be corrected at a slow rate, up to a total of 12 to 15 mEq/L in 24 h.

Chlorpropamide-induced hyponatremia in the veteran population

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and possible risk factors associated with chlorpropamide (CPA)-induced hyponatremia in the veteran population.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Federal tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

Veterans receiving CPA from our facility with at least one serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/L within the past year were eligible. A randomly selected control group consisting of patients taking CPA with normal sodium concentrations was also chosen. One hundred forty-five of 799 patients who had received CPA were included in the study.

RESULTS

The average daily dose of CPA was 425 +/- 207 mg (+/- SD). The incidence of hyponatremia associated with CPA was 7.1 percent (57/799 patients). The majority of patients were mildly hyponatremic (48/57 patients, 84 percent) with serum sodium concentrations between 130 and 134 mmol/L. The incidence of CPA-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone was 2.1 percent. Concurrent angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use was identified as a risk factor; thiazide diuretic use was not.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of hyponatremia related to CPA use in elderly veterans is consistent with other reports in the literature. ACE inhibitors may be a predisposing factor for CPA-induced hyponatremia.

The management of diabetes mellitus in older individuals

Nearly 50% of individuals with type II diabetes mellitus are over the age of 65 years. There are numerous reasons to maintain blood glucose levels below 11.1 nmol/L (200 mg/dl) in older persons, and there are a number of changes often seen with advancing age that persons, and there are a number of changes often seen with advancing age that may interfere with the management of diabetes mellitus, e.g. hypodipsia, anorexia, visual disturbance, altered renal and hepatic function, depression, impaired basoreceptor response and multiple medications. Hyperglycaemia appears to produce cognitive impairment which may lead to poor compliance. It is often difficult to manipulate diet in older people, and in fact dietary changes can lead to severe protein energy malnutrition. High maximum voluntary oxygen intake has been correlated with increased glucose disposal, but there is little evidence that physical exercise can improve diabetic control in the elderly. Oral sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents are extremely useful in the treatment of diabetes in these patients, but it should be remembered that they are more liable to develop hypoglycaemia than are younger diabetics. The role of metformin in the management of older diabetic patients is poorly studied. Many older persons can cope well with insulin therapy, but those with visual disturbances often make errors when drawing up insulin and require special attention. Combination therapy of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents is not recommended in this group of patients, and serum fructosamine is preferred to glycated haemoglobin to monitor control. Successful management of elderly diabetic patients thus requires an interdisciplinary team approach.

Trade-offs in treatment alternatives for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

In order to evaluate the choice among alternatives quantitatively, a formal decision model must be developed. Yet the literature does not currently include the information required to develop this model. Data tell us very little about what factors should be considered in the choice of treatment for NIDDM patients. Table 1 summarizes some of the advantages and disadvantages of insulin, sulfonylureas, and dietary treatments. Insulin may have the greatest effect upon blood glucose, but may also be associated with the greatest likelihood of nuisance for the patient. At the other extreme, dietary treatment may be safe, but may have a low probability of achieving long-term blood glucose control. There is remarkably little in the literature that considers nuisance factors for the patient, minor but persistent side effects, or the likelihood of other physical changes such as weight gain. We know even less about how to integrate preferences for benefits and side effects into a comprehensive decision. Although some profiles of laboratory results clearly dictate a treatment protocol, there is considerable variability in the treatment options for a large number of NIDDM patients. Consider, for example, the patient who has a fasting blood glucose of 250 mg/dl but no symptoms. There may be several treatment alternatives. Yet the chances of therapeutic success could be influenced by the patient's concern about being dependent upon medication, willingness to comply with life-style changes, and fear of using needles. We suggest that the patient must be active in negotiating the choice of treatment, and that patient preferences for expected outcomes, side effects, and nuisance factors need to be considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Oral hypoglycemic agents

The sulfonylureas remain the most important oral agents, although their chronic hypoglycemic actions are still unexplained and the evidence on their relative efficacy is inconclusive. Data on relative safety suggest that chlorpropamide is the most toxic sulfonylurea but glyburide causes dangerous hypoglycemia as often as chlorpropamide. For many patients, good blood glucose control will be achieved by taking tolbutamide or another sulfonylurea 30 minutes before breakfast and the main evening meal. The biguanide metformin, which is as safe as glyburide, is of use in treating overweight diabetic patients who do not have cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal dysfunction.

Adverse cardiovascular effects of sulphonylurea drugs. Clinical significance

Sulphonylureas are widely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Since the publication of the University Groups Diabetes Program (UGDP) results the discussion on their possible cardiovascular side effects has been lively and sometimes even passionate. The initial UGDP findings about the adverse effects of tolbutamide on the cardiovascular system have been criticised, particularly for shortcomings in the study design. The results of other epidemiological studies of the sulphonylurea effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality published this far have been contradictory. This is understandable because the factors involved are very complex. Most of these studies have used tolbutamide only, and the findings cannot necessarily be directly extrapolated to other sulphonylureas. Only properly performed prospective studies may provide further information on this issue. High concentrations of several sulphonylureas may have inotropic effects on heart muscle in in vitro animal models, but human studies performed in vivo do not support the view of clinically significant inotropy for sulphonylureas. High concentrations of tolbutamide or glibenclamide (glyburide) may affect the myocardial metabolism in isolated organs, but the possible clinical significance of these findings remains unknown. Some epidemiological and experimental studies have associated oral antidiabetic treatment with the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias or increased digitalis toxicity. Only a few results are available, and there may be differences between the sulphonylureas in this respect. Antiaggregatory properties have been postulated for some sulphonylureas. Gliclazide, in particular, has been studied, but some other compounds of this class have also been effective in short term studies. If confirmed, these effects on haemostasis would be noteworthy. The sulphonylurea effects on serum lipids, especially on HDL-cholesterol, have been discussed widely during the last few years. Decreases in HDL-cholesterol concentrations were suggested to be associated with sulphonylurea therapy. However, these findings were not confirmed in recent cross-sectional and longitudinal studies performed with different sulphonylureas. Chlorpropamide, and to a lesser extent tolbutamide, may cause dilutional hyponatraemia and aggravate existing heart failure. Glibenclamide may increase the clearance of water in the kidney.

Home blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin-dependent diabetics: the effect of gliclazide on blood glucose and weight control, a multicentre trial

The efficacy of the sulphonylurea gliclazide was assessed in 229 non-insulin-dependent diabetics attending U.K. outpatient diabetic clinics. Patients inadequately controlled by diet alone or oral hypoglycaemic agents used reflectance meters to monitor their blood glucose. After a 4-week run-in, in those whose control remained unsatisfactory, gliclazide was either added to diet, or given in place of existing drugs. Patients continued home-monitoring and were followed for 3 months. Gliclazide reduced mean random blood glucose in all groups, particularly those previously treated by diet alone or a first-generation sulphonylurea. The patients improved in their ability to measure glucose at home and within 2 months a good correlation with laboratory measurements was found. Mean body weight was reduced, particularly in obese and elderly subjects and those treated previously with sulphonylurea drugs. Side effects were mild and only two patients were withdrawn for this reason.

Review of glyburide after one year on the market

After one year on the American market, glyburide, a second-generation sulfonylurea, seems well accepted by physicians. If the hyperglycemia of patients with type II diabetes mellitus is not corrected by diet and exercise, glyburide can be used as adjunctive therapy. The drug is comparable in efficacy to the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide, but it has fewer reported side effects. Additionally, glyburide does not appear to interact with other medications and is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Although the drug had been reported to produce hypoglycemia, increased clinical experience--along with use of judicious dosages in appropriate patients--has decreased the incidence of hypoglycemia. Although still in the investigational stage, combination insulin/glyburide therapy may also benefit subgroups of type II diabetic patients. Glyburide is a useful and rational addition to therapy in properly selected patients with type II diabetes mellitus.

Glyburide: a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent. History, chemistry, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, clinical use and adverse effects

Glyburide, a second-generation hypoglycemic sulfonylurea, is 200 times as potent as tolbutamide. This increase is due to greater intrinsic hypoglycemic potency of the molecule rather than to a prolonged biologic half-life. Glyburide is inactivated by the liver to 4-trans-hydroxyglyburide and 3-cis-hydroxyglyburide; 50% of these compounds is excreted in the urine and 50% in the bile. Although the serum concentration of glyburide can be measured by radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography, the importance of its serum concentration in the reduction of hyperglycemia is not yet established. Glyburide has a therapeutic effectiveness comparable to that of the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide; however, it has a lower frequency of adverse effects. To date it has a low frequency of clinically significant interactions with other drugs. Glyburide should not be prescribed for patients with liver disease or significant renal disease. Because glyburide is a potent hypoglycemic agent, it should be prescribed in small initial doses, particularly for elderly patients with diabetes. At the present time there is no definite evidence that it modifies the increased risk of cardiovascular disease of diabetic patients. Although glyburide is a potent stimulator of pancreatic insulin secretion after short-term administration, an additional mechanism of action during long-term administration is to decrease the resistance of muscle and liver to the action of insulin. It is a useful medication for patients with type II diabetes whose hyperglycemia is not adequately reduced by dietary management and exercise. It can be used as the initial drug in these patients or as the replacement drug for those with primary or secondary failure during therapy with first-generation sulfonylureas.

Comparison of diabetic control in type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients treated with different sulphonylureas

Diabetic control was compared in groups of Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients treated concurrently for 1 year with five different sulphonylurea drugs: chlorpropamide (21), glipizide (24), gliquidone (22), gliclazide (22) and glibenclamide (23). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) levels decreased in all groups over the first 2 months, but tended to level off or increase thereafter. In a total of 96 patients assessed after 1 year, gliclazide produced normal HbA1 levels in a significantly greater number of patients than chlorpropamide (p = 0.01) and gliquidone (p = 0.038), and glibenclamide was also significantly better than chlorpropamide (p = 0.02). Significant improvements in HbA1 were produced overall in the gliquidone (p less than 0.01), gliclazide (p less than 0.01) and glibenclamide (p less than 0.02) groups and the gliquidone and gliclazide groups were significantly better than the glipizide group (p less than 0.01 in both cases). Only the glibenclamide group had a significant change in weight (p less than 0.05). There may be differences between different sulphonylureas which could be of clinical advantage in certain patients.