Some Aspects of Genetic Polymorphism in the Biotransformation of Antidepressants

[Therapy of mental disorders in patients with hematological malignancies]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the possibilities of therapy with minimal effective doses (MED) of psychotropic drugs for mental disorders (MD) that manifest during the treatment of hematological malignancies (HM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at the National Medical Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), which included 204 (39.4%) men and 314 (60.6%) women (518 patients in total), aged 17 to 83 years (median 45 years), with various HM, in which the manifestation of MD occurred during the treatment of the underlying disease. To minimize the side-effects of psychotropic drugs and given the relatively mild level of MD, psychopharmacotherapy of patients was carried out mainly at MED. The severity of MD, manifested in patients, was assessed by the illness severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and the effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the improvement scale (CGI-I).

RESULTS

Mainly mild (188, 36%) and moderately pronounced (270, 52%) MD were noted in patients with HM during the treatment of the underlying disease. Severe psychopathological disorders (60, 12%) were observed much less often. Because of psychopharmacotherapy with MED, patients experienced a very significant (97, 19%) and significant improvement (354, 68%) of their mental state, less often the improvement was regarded as minimal (67, 13%). Therefore, almost all patients showed a stable relief of MD; in 87% (95% CI 84-90) of patients, this improvement was significant.

CONCLUSION

The tactics of treatment MD that manifest in patients with HM with MED of psychotropic drugs turned out to be therapeutically effective according to the results of the assessment on CGI scales.

Effectiveness of Genotype-Specific Tricyclic Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Evidence of the clinical benefit of pharmacogenetics-informed treatment (PIT) with antidepressants is still limited. Especially for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), pharmacogenetics may be of interest because therapeutic plasma concentrations are well defined, identification of optimal dosing can be time consuming, and treatment is frequently accompanied by adverse effects.

Objective

To determine whether PIT results in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA plasma concentrations compared with usual treatment in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial compared PIT with usual treatment among 111 patients at 4 centers in the Netherlands. Patients were treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine, or imipramine, with clinical follow-up of 7 weeks. Patients were enrolled from June 1, 2018, to January 1, 2022. At inclusion, patients had unipolar nonpsychotic MDD (with a score of ≥19 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17]), were aged 18 to 65 years, and were eligible for TCA treatment. Main exclusion criteria were a bipolar or psychotic disorder, substance use disorder, pregnancy, interacting comedications, and concurrent use of psychotropic medications.

Intervention

In the PIT group, the initial TCA dosage was based on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes. The control group received usual treatment, which comprised the standard initial TCA dosage.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was days until attainment of a therapeutic TCA plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms (measured by HAMD-17 scores) and frequency and severity of adverse effects (measured by Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating scores).

Results

Of 125 patients randomized, 111 (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [13.3] years; 69 [62.2%] female) were included in the analysis; of those, 56 were in the PIT group and 55 were in the control group. The PIT group reached therapeutic concentrations faster than the control group (mean [SD], 17.3 [11.2] vs 22.0 [10.2] days; Kaplan-Meier χ21 = 4.30; P = .04). No significant difference in reduction of depressive symptoms was observed. Linear mixed-model analyses showed that the interaction between group and time differed for the frequency (F6,125 = 4.03; P = .001), severity (F6,114 = 3.10; P = .008), and burden (F6,112 = 2.56; P = .02) of adverse effects, suggesting that adverse effects decreased relatively more for those receiving PIT.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, PIT resulted in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA concentrations, with potentially fewer and less severe adverse effects. No effect on depressive symptoms was observed. These findings indicate that pharmacogenetics-informed dosing of TCAs can be safely applied and may be useful in personalizing treatment for patients with MDD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548675.

Comprehensive in vitro and in silico assessments of metabolic capabilities of 24 genomic variants of CYP2C19 using two different substrates

Introduction: Most hepatically cleared drugs are metabolized by cytochromes P450 (CYPs), and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines provide curated clinical references for CYPs to apply individual genome data for optimized drug therapy. However, incorporating novel pharmacogenetic variants into guidelines takes considerable time. Methods: We comprehensively assessed the drug metabolizing capabilities of CYP2C19 variants discovered through population sequencing of two substrates, S-mephenytoin and omeprazole. Results: Based on established functional assays, 75% (18/24) of the variants not yet described in Pharmacogene Variation (PharmVar) had significantly altered drug metabolizing capabilities. Of them, seven variants with inappreciable protein expression were evaluated as protein damaging by all three in silico prediction algorithms, Sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT), Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen-2), and Combined annotation dependent depletion (CADD). The five variants with decreased metabolic capability (<50%) of wild type for either substrates were evaluated as protein damaging by all three in silico prediction algorithms, except CADD exact score of NM_000769.4:c.593T>C that was 19.68 (<20.0). In the crystal structure of the five polymorphic proteins, each altered residue of all those proteins was observed to affect the key structures of drug binding specificity. We also identified polymorphic proteins indicating different tendencies of metabolic capability between the two substrates (5/24). Discussion: Therefore, we propose a methodology that combines in silico prediction algorithms and functional assays on polymorphic CYPs with multiple substrates to evaluate the changes in the metabolism of all possible genomic variants in CYP genes. The approach would reinforce existing guidelines and provide information for prescribing appropriate medicines for individual patients.

An electrophysiological model of major depression: Relevance to clinical subtyping and pharmacological management

We present a neurochemical model of unipolar major depressive disorder that makes predictions for optimizing pharmacological treatment of this debilitating neuropsychiatric disorder. We suggest that there are two principal electrophysiological subtypes of depression, with the more common one involving a high excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) electrophysiological ratio, and a less common low E/I subtype. The high E/I subtype is paradoxically a variant of previous conceptions of atypical depression, whereas the low E/I subtype is a variant of melancholic depression. We focus on the ratio of norepinephrine (NE) to serotonin (5HT) as primary determinants of E/I ratio, which have opposing effects on mood regulation. We suggest that high NE/5HT (or E/I) ratio depressions should be treated with pharmacological agents that boost 5HT (such as SSRIs) and/or drugs that reduce noradrenergic transmission (such as clonidine, guanfacine, propranolol, prazosin). In contrast, low NE/5HT (or E/I) depressions should be treated with agents that boost NE (such as most tricyclics) and/or drugs that reduce serotonergic transmission. Our model predicts that the rapidly acting antidepressant ketamine (and possibly scopolamine), which has an acutely excitatory electrophysiological profile that may be followed by sustained increased inhibition, should improve the high NE/5HT subtype and worsen the low subtype.

Drug repurposing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Could these drugs help fight COVID-19 and save lives?

The current 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), an emerging infectious disease, is undoubtedly the most challenging pandemic in the 21st century. A total of 92,977,768 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 1,991,289 deaths were reported globally up to January 14, 2021. COVID-19 also affects people's mental health and quality of life. At present, there is no effective therapeutic strategy for the management of this disease. Therefore, in the absence of a specific vaccine or curative treatment, it is an urgent need to identify safe, effective and globally available drugs for reducing COVID-19 morbidity and fatalities. In this review, we focus on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: a class of antidepressant drugs with widespread availability and an optimal tolerability profile) that can potentially be repurposed for COVID-19 and are currently being tested in clinical trials. We also summarize the existing literature on what is known about the link between serotonin (5-HT) and the immune system. From the evidence reviewed here, we propose fluoxetine as an adjuvant therapeutic agent for COVID-19 based on its known immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties. Fluoxetine may potentially reduce pro-inflammatory chemokine/cytokines levels (such as CCL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α) in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, fluoxetine may help to attenuate neurological complications of COVID-19.

Therapy response prediction in major depressive disorder: current and novel genomic markers influencing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Major depressive disorder is connected with high rates of functional disability and mortality. About a third of the patients are at risk of therapy failure. Several pharmacogenetic markers especially located in CYP450 genes such as CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 are of relevance for therapy outcome prediction in major depressive disorder but a further optimization of predictive tools is warranted. The article summarizes the current knowledge on pharmacogenetic variants, therapy effects and side effects of important antidepressive therapeutics, and sheds light on new methodological approaches for therapy response estimation based on genetic markers with relevance for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and disease pathology identified in genome-wide association study analyses, highlighting polygenic risk score analysis as a tool for further optimization of individualized therapy outcome prediction.

Examination and characterisation of the effect of amitriptyline therapy for chronic neuropathic pain on neuropeptide and proteomic constituents of human cerebrospinal fluid

INTRODUCTION

Amitriptyline is prescribed to reduce the intensity of chronic neuropathic pain. There is a paucity of validated in vivo evidence in humans regarding amitriptyline's mechanism of action. We examined the effect of amitriptyline therapy on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neuropeptides and proteome in patients with chronic neuropathic pain to identify potential mechanisms of action of amitriptyline.

METHODS

Patients with lumbar radicular neuropathic pain were selected for inclusion with clinical and radiological signs and a >50% reduction in pain in response to a selective nerve root block. Baseline (pre-treatment) and 8-week (post-treatment) pain scores with demographics were recorded. CSF samples were taken at baseline (pre-treatment) and 8 weeks after amitriptyline treatment (post-treatment). Proteome analysis was performed using mass spectrometry and secreted cytokines, chemokines and neurotrophins were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

A total of 9/16 patients experienced a >30% reduction in pain after treatment with amitriptyline and GO analysis demonstrated that the greatest modulatory effect was on immune system processes. KEGG analysis also identified a reduction in PI3K-Akt and MAPK signalling pathways in responders but not in non-responders. There was also a significant decrease in the chemokine eotaxin-1 (p ​= ​0.02) and a significant increase in the neurotrophin VEGF-A (p ​= ​0.04) in responders.

CONCLUSION

The CSF secretome and proteome was modulated in responders to amitriptyline verifying many pre-clinical and in vitro models. The predominant features were immunomodulation with a reduction in pro-inflammatory pathways of neuronal-glia communications and evidence of a neurotrophic effect.

Defining screening panel of functional variants of CYP1A1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 genes in Serbian population

Plethora of drugs and toxic substances is metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450). These enzymes are coded by highly variable genes abundant with single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (indels) that affect the functionality of the enzymes, increasing or decreasing their activity. CYP genes genotyping, followed by haplotype inference, provides substrate specific metabolic phenotype prediction. This is crucial in pharmacogenetics and applicable in molecular autopsy. However, high number of alleles in CYP450 superfamily and interethnic variability in frequency distribution require precise gene panel customization. To estimate informativeness of SNVs and alleles in CYP gene families 1, 2, and 3, associated with metabolic alterations, 500 unrelated individuals from 5 regions of Serbia were genotyped using TaqMan assays to determine frequencies of CYP2C9 *2 and *3, CYP2C19 *2 and *17 alleles, four variants in CYP2D6 (rs3892097, rs1065852, rs28371725, rs28371706) gene, and CYP3A4*1B allele. In addition, CYP1A1 rs4646903 and rs1048943 (m1 and m2) variants were genotyped by RFLP. Our results showed that frequencies of tested variants in Serbian population corresponded to general European population and somewhat differed from neighboring populations. SNV rs1065852, the main contributor to non-functional CYP2D6 *4, significantly departed from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. With the exception of rs28371706 in CYP2D6 and rs2740574 in CYP3A4, which were very rare in our sample, all other tested variants in CYP2 family are informative and appropriate for pharmacogenetic testing, molecular autopsy, and medico-legal genetic analyses.

Multi-Ethnic Analysis of Cardiac Pharmacogenetic Markers of Cytochrome P450 and Membrane Transporters Genes in the Russian Population

Aim. To summarize Russian studies using pharmacogenetic testing as applied to cardiology.Material and methods. The authors conducted an online search for articles in December 2018 using the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, eLIBRARY. The search was carried out by keywords: "Russia", "Russian", "cardiology" together with the terms associated with the polymorphic marker, including: «P450», «CYP2C19», «CYP2D6», «CYP2B1», «CYP2B6», «CYP2Е1», «CYP2C8», «CYP2C9», «CYP3A4», «CYP3A5», «CYP1A1», «CYP1A2», «CYP4F2», «CYP4F1», «ABCB1», «SLCO1B1», «VKORC1», «GGCX», «SULT1A1», «CULT1», «CES1», «gene», «genes», «pharmacogenetics», «pharmacogenomics», «ethnic group».Results. Generalization of information allowed to identify obscure genes that need to be investigated in pharmacogenetic studies. This information can be used for the development of dosing algorithms and the priority choice of drugs, considering the results of pharmacogenetic testing and planning future research.Conclusion. The results of the literature review indicate the importance of studying the most clinically valid and clinically useful pharmacogenetic markers (CYP2C19, CYP2C9, VKORC1, SLCO1B1) among various ethnic groups in the Russian Federation. With the accumulation of evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility of other pharmacogenetic markers (CES1, CYP2D6*4, etc.), the problem of interethnic differences in the carriage of clinically significant polymorphisms of these genes identified in previous studies in the Russian Federation increasingly requires attention. The most promising for the introduction into the clinical practice in the Russian Federation in the near future are polymorphic markers of the CYP2C19, CYP2C9, VKORC1 and SLCO1B1 genes.

ADME pharmacogenetics: future outlook for Russia

This systematic review reflects the results of pharmacogenetic studies in the Russian Federation aimed at studying the genes involved in the drug biotransformation system. The works of Russian researchers found by us are mostly devoted to microsomal liver oxidation enzymes (metabolism) and membrane transporter systems (absorption and excretion). This review presents population-ethnic and associative clinical studies on the genes of the CYP450 system, noncytochrome oxidation enzymes ( SULT1A1, CES1), membrane transporter system genes ( ABCB1, SLCO1B1) and warfarin biotransformation enzymes ( VKORC1, GGCX). The information is structured in the form of 11 tables, divided by regions of the Russian Federation.

Effects of Digeda-4 Decoction on the CYP450 Activities in Rats Using a Cocktail Method by HPLC

Digeda-4 decoction is a traditional Mongolian medicine; its effects on cytochrome (CYP) enzymes are still unclear. CYP450 isoenzymes are the main drug metabolic enzymes, and their activities may be induced or inhibited by certain drugs, which lead to drug interactions in clinical use. Effects of Digeda-4 decoction on the activities of CYP450 subtype enzymes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 in rats were studied by cocktail method, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of five specific probe drugs (theophylline, tolbutamide, chlorzoxazone, omeprazole, and midazolam) were calculated by DAS software; changes of parameters can be used to evaluate the effects of Digeda-4 decoction on enzyme activities. The experimental rats were divided into three groups: control group, Digeda group, and positive group. Rats in Digeda group were given Digeda-4 decoction through continuous gavage for 14 days. After fasting for 12 hours, the mixed probes drug solution was injected into the tail vein; the blood samples were collected through the orbital vein at different time points. The concentrations of probe drugs in rat plasma were measured by HPLC. Compared with the control group, the half-life time (t_1/2) of the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, tolbutamide, omeprazole, and midazolam was prolonged, the area under the curve (AUC) increased, and the plasma clearance (CL) decreased in the Digeda group. Continuous gavage administration for 14 days may inhibit the activities of CYP450 subtype enzymes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 of rats. Herb-drug interaction should be noted between Digeda-4 decoction and the drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4.

Effect of 24 cytochrome P450 2D6 variants found in the Chinese population on the N-demethylation of amitriptyline in vitro

CONTEXT

Amitriptyline (AT), one of the tricyclic antidepressants, is still widely used for the treatment of the depression and control of anxiety states and panic disorders in the developing countries.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the catalytic activities of CYP2D6*1, CYP2D6*2, CYP2D6*10 and 22 novel alleles in Han Chinese population and their effects on the N-demethylation of AT in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CYP2D6*1 and 24 CYP2D6 allelic variants were highly expressed in insect cells, and all variants were characterized using AT as a substrate. Reactions were performed at 37 °C with 10-1000 μM substrate for 30 min. We established a HPLC method to quantify the levels of nortriptyline (NT). The kinetic parameters K_m, V_max and intrinsic clearance (V_max/K_m) of NT were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 24 CYP2D6 variants, all variants exhibited decreased intrinsic clearance values compared with wild-type CYP2D6.1. Kinetic parameters of two CYP2D6 variants (CYP2D6*92, *96) could not be determined because of absent enzyme activities.

CONCLUSIONS

The comprehensive in vitro assessment of CYP2D6 variants provides significant insight into allele-specific activity towards AT in vivo.

In Vitro Functional Characterisation of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 Allelic Variants CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is essential for the metabolism of clinically used drugs including omeprazole, proguanil, and S-mephenytoin. This hepatic enzyme exhibits genetic polymorphism with inter-individual variability in catalytic activity. This study aimed to characterise the functional consequences of CYP2C19*23 (271 G>C, 991 A>G) and CYP2C19*24 (991 A>G, 1004 G>A) in vitro. Mutations in CYP2C19 cDNA were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, and the CYP2C19 wild type (WT) as well as variants proteins were subsequently expressed using Escherichia coli cells. Catalytic activities of CYP2C19 WT and those of variants were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-based essay employing S-mephenytoin and omeprazole as probe substrates. Results showed that the level of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation activity of CYP2C19*23 (V _max 111.5 ± 16.0 pmol/min/mg, K _m 158.3 ± 88.0 μM) protein relative to CYP2C19 WT (V _max 101.6 + 12.4 pmol/min/mg, K _m 123.0 ± 19.2 μM) protein had no significant difference. In contrast, the K _m of CYP2C19*24 (270.1 ± 57.2 μM) increased significantly as compared to CYP2C19 WT (123.0 ± 19.2 μM) and V _max of CYP2C19*24 (23.6 ± 2.6 pmol/min/mg) protein was significantly lower than that of the WT protein (101.6 ± 12.4 pmol/min/mg). In vitro intrinsic clearance (CL_int = V _max/K _m) for CYP2C19*23 protein was 85.4 % of that of CYP2C19 WT protein. The corresponding CL_int value for CYP2C19*24 protein reduced to 11.0 % of that of WT protein. These findings suggested that catalytic activity of CYP2C19 was not affected by the corresponding amino acid substitutions in CYP2C19*23 protein; and the reverse was true for CYP2C19*24 protein. When omeprazole was employed as the substrate, K _m of CYP2C19*23 (1911 ± 244.73 μM) was at least 100 times higher than that of CYP2C19 WT (18.37 ± 1.64 μM) and V _max of CYP2C19*23 (3.87 ± 0.74 pmol/min/mg) dropped to 13.4 % of the CYP2C19 WT (28.84 ± 0.61 pmol/min/mg) level. Derived from V _max/K _m, the CL_int value of CYP2C19 WT was 785 folds of CYP2C19*23. K _m and V _max values could not be determined for CYP2C19*24 due to its low catalytic activity towards omeprazole 5'-hydroxylation. Therefore, both CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24 showed marked reduced activities of metabolising omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole. Hence, carriers of CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24 allele are potentially poor metabolisers of CYP2C19-mediated substrates.

Acute fluoxetine modulates emotional processing in young adult volunteers

BACKGROUND

Fluoxetine is generally regarded as the first-line pharmacological treatment for young people, as it is believed to show a more favourable benefit:risk ratio than other antidepressants. However, the mechanisms through which fluoxetine influences symptoms in youth have been little investigated. This study examined whether acute administration of fluoxetine in a sample of young healthy adults altered the processing of affective information, including positive, sad and anger cues.

METHOD

A total of 35 male and female volunteers aged between 18 and 21 years old were randomized to receive a single 20 mg dose of fluoxetine or placebo. At 6 h after administration, participants completed a facial expression recognition task, an emotion-potentiated startle task, an attentional dot-probe task and the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Subjective ratings of mood, anxiety and side effects were also taken pre- and post-fluoxetine/placebo administration.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo-treated participants, participants receiving fluoxetine were less accurate at identifying anger and sadness and did not show the emotion-potentiated startle effect. There were no overall significant effects of fluoxetine on subjective ratings of mood.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoxetine can modulate emotional processing after a single dose in young adults. This pattern of effects suggests a potential cognitive mechanism for the greater benefit:risk ratio of fluoxetine in adolescent patients.

Mechanisms of antidepressant resistance

Depression is one of the most frequent and severe mental disorder. Since the discovery of antidepressant (AD) properties of the imipramine and then after of other tricyclic compounds, several classes of psychotropic drugs have shown be effective in treating major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there is a wide range of variability in response to ADs that might lead to non response or partial response or in increased rate of relapse or recurrence. The mechanisms of response to AD therapy are poorly understood, and few biomarkers are available than can predict response to pharmacotherapy. Here, we will first review markers that can be used to predict response to pharmacotherapy, such as markers of drug metabolism or blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, the activity of specific brain areas or neurotransmitter systems, hormonal dysregulations or plasticity, and related molecular targets. We will describe both clinical and preclinical studies and describe factors that might affect the expression of these markers, including environmental or genetic factors and comorbidities. This information will permit us to suggest practical recommendations and innovative treatment strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antidepressants and Cytochrome P450 Genotyping in General Practice

In the psychiatric setting, therapeutic drug monitoring and genotyping for cytochrome P450 (CYP) polymorphisms help to ensure and maintain therapeutic drug levels. In this study, the authors extended the therapeutic drug monitoring and genotyping protocol routinely used in their psychiatric clinic to primary care patients treated with antidepressants. They examined the variation in serum concentrations and assessed the role of CYP polymorphisms, wrong dosing, and noncompliance in deviating serum concentrations. Of 227 serum concentrations obtained, 127 (56%) were more than 20% outside therapeutic ranges. Of these 127 cases, 64 (50%) were congruous with aberrant CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 genotypes, incorrect dosing, or a pharmacy record suggesting noncompliance. Prevalence of aberrant CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes did not differ significantly between the investigated primary care patients and 751 secondary care users of antidepressants. The therapeutic drug monitoring and the genotyping findings resulted in recommendations to physicians to alter the medication strategy of 146 (64%) patients. These results strongly suggest that the rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring and CYP genotyping when prescribing antidepressants in secondary care also applies to the primary care setting.

Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation

Cytochromes P450 (CYP) are a major source of variability in drug pharmacokinetics and response. Of 57 putatively functional human CYPs only about a dozen enzymes, belonging to the CYP1, 2, and 3 families, are responsible for the biotransformation of most foreign substances including 70-80% of all drugs in clinical use. The highest expressed forms in liver are CYPs 3A4, 2C9, 2C8, 2E1, and 1A2, while 2A6, 2D6, 2B6, 2C19 and 3A5 are less abundant and CYPs 2J2, 1A1, and 1B1 are mainly expressed extrahepatically. Expression of each CYP is influenced by a unique combination of mechanisms and factors including genetic polymorphisms, induction by xenobiotics, regulation by cytokines, hormones and during disease states, as well as sex, age, and others. Multiallelic genetic polymorphisms, which strongly depend on ethnicity, play a major role for the function of CYPs 2D6, 2C19, 2C9, 2B6, 3A5 and 2A6, and lead to distinct pharmacogenetic phenotypes termed as poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultrarapid metabolizers. For these CYPs, the evidence for clinical significance regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), drug efficacy and dose requirement is rapidly growing. Polymorphisms in CYPs 1A1, 1A2, 2C8, 2E1, 2J2, and 3A4 are generally less predictive, but new data on CYP3A4 show that predictive variants exist and that additional variants in regulatory genes or in NADPH:cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) can have an influence. Here we review the recent progress on drug metabolism activity profiles, interindividual variability and regulation of expression, and the functional and clinical impact of genetic variation in drug metabolizing P450s.

The neurobiology of depression and antidepressant action

We present a comprehensive overview of the neurobiology of unipolar major depression and antidepressant drug action, integrating data from affective neuroscience, neuro- and psychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuroanatomy, and molecular biology. We suggest that the problem of depression comprises three sub-problems: first episodes in people with low vulnerability ('simple' depressions), which are strongly stress-dependent; an increase in vulnerability and autonomy from stress that develops over episodes of depression (kindling); and factors that confer vulnerability to a first episode (a depressive diathesis). We describe key processes in the onset of a 'simple' depression and show that kindling and depressive diatheses reproduce many of the neurobiological features of depression. We also review the neurobiological mechanisms of antidepressant drug action, and show that resistance to antidepressant treatment is associated with genetic and other factors that are largely similar to those implicated in vulnerability to depression. We discuss the implications of these conclusions for the understanding and treatment of depression, and make some strategic recommendations for future research.

The promise and reality of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry

Existing psychotropic medications for the treatment of mental illnesses, including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics, are clinically suboptimal. They are effective in only a subset of patients or produce partial responses, and they are often associated with debilitating side effects that discourage adherence. There is growing enthusiasm in the promise of pharmacogenetics to personalize the use of these treatments to maximize their efficacy and tolerability; however, there is still a long way to go before this promise becomes a reality. This article reviews the progress that has been made in research toward understanding how genetic factors influence psychotropic drug responses and the challenges that lie ahead in translating the research findings into clinical practices that yield tangible benefits for patients with mental illnesses.

Antidepressant-induced suicidality: an update

Evidence suggests that antidepressant treatment may in some cases result in worsening depression and increased risk of suicidality in pediatric and adolescent patients. The United States Food and Drug Administration requires that antidepressants carry a black box warning regarding such a risk in patients up to age 24. Many studies of antidepressant-induced suicidality among adults have also reported an increased risk, while several other investigations involving that population have not supported such a finding. This article provides an update of the controversy surrounding antidepressants as a potential cause of suicidal ideations or behavior. Antidepressant-induced suicidality appears to be an uncommon occurrence but also a legitimate phenomenon. Close monitoring and a follow-up care should be provided for patients after initiation of a new antidepressant.

The promise and reality of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry

Existing psychotropic medications for the treatment of mental illnesses, including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics, are clinically suboptimal. They are effective in only a subset of patients or produce partial responses, and they are often associated with debilitating side effects that discourage adherence. There is growing enthusiasm in the promise of pharmacogenetics to personalize the use of these treatments to maximize their efficacy and tolerability; however, there is still a long way to go before this promise becomes a reality. This article reviews the progress that has been made in research toward understanding how genetic factors influence psychotropic drug responses and the challenges that lie ahead in translating the research findings into clinical practices that yield tangible benefits for patients with mental illnesses.

Is elevated noradrenaline an aetiological factor in a number of diseases?

1 Here I put forth the hypothesis that noradrenaline (NA), which is a signalling molecule in the brain and sympathetic nervous system (SNS), is an aetiological factor in a number of diseases. 2 In a previous paper (Fitzgerald, Int. J. Cancer, 124, 2009, 257), I examined evidence that elevated NA is a factor in various types of cancer. Here I extend the argument to several other diseases, including diabetes mellitus, open-angle glaucoma, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. 3 The principal hypothesis is that, largely as a result of genetics, elevated noradrenergic tone in the SNS predisposes a large number of individuals to a broad range of diseases. 4 For each of the above five diseases, I briefly examine the following four lines of evidence to assess the hypothesis: i) whether pharmacological studies in rodents that manipulate NA levels or receptors affect these diseases; ii) whether pharmacological manipulation of NA in humans affects these diseases; iii) whether bipolar disorder, excessive body weight, and hypertension, which may all three involve elevated NA, tend to be comorbid with these diseases and iv) whether psychological stressors tend to cause or exacerbate these conditions, since psychological stress is associated with increased release of NA. 5 The four lines of evidence tend to support the hypothesis.

Cooperative opioid and serotonergic mechanisms generate superior antidepressant-like effects in a mice model of depression

Although complete remission of symptoms is the goal of any depression treatment, many patients fail to attain or maintain a long-term, symptom-free status. The opioid system has been implicated in the aetiology of depression, and some preclinical and clinical data suggest that opioids possess a genuine antidepressant-like effect. This study aimed to investigate a potential antidepressant strategy combining different classes of monoaminergic compounds with the weak mu-opioid agonist codeine in the tail suspension test in mice, a paradigm aimed at screening potential antidepressants. The results showed that codeine produced an antidepressant-like effect when administered alone, that was effectively antagonized by the opioid antagonist naloxone. The combination of subeffective doses of codeine with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine or citalopram) lead to an accentuated reduction in immobility time. In contrast, immobility time remained unchanged when codeine was combined with a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (desipramine) or with a noradrenaline/serotonin reuptake inhibitor (duloxetine). The immobility time also remained unchanged with the combination of subeffective doses of codeine plus (+/-)-tramadol (weak mu-opioid agonist with serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor properties) or (-)-tramadol (noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor). Conversely, the combination with (+)-tramadol (mu-opioid agonist with serotonin reuptake inhibitor properties) produced a large decrease in the immobility time. All these combinations were without effects on motor behaviour in mice. These data support the hypothesis that a combination of classical serotonergic antidepressants and weak opioid receptor agonists may be a helpful new strategy in the treatment of refractory depression.

Neuropeptide and sigma receptors as novel therapeutic targets for the pharmacotherapy of depression

Among the most prevalent of mental illnesses, depression is increasing in incidence in the Western world. It presents with a wide variety of symptoms that involve both the CNS and the periphery. Multiple pharmacological observations led to the development of the monoamine theory as a biological basis for depression, according to which diminished neurotransmission within the CNS, including that of the dopamine, noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin systems, is the leading cause of the disorder. Current conventional pharmacological antidepressant therapies, using selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, aim to enhance monoaminergic neurotransmission. However, the use of these agents presents severe disadvantages, including a delay in the alleviation of depressive symptoms, significant adverse effects and high frequencies of non-responding patients. Neuroendocrinological data of recent decades reveal that depression and anxiety disorders may occur simultaneously due to hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis hyperactivity. As a result, the stress-diathesis model was developed, which attempts to associate genetic and environmental influences in the aetiology of depression. The amygdala and the hippocampus control the activity of the HPA axis in a counter-balancing way, and a plethora of regulatory neuropeptide signalling pathways are involved. Intervention at these molecular targets may lead to alternative antidepressant therapeutic solutions that are expected to overcome the limitations of existing antidepressants. This prospect is based on preclinical evidence from pharmacological and genetic modifications of the action of neuropeptides such as corticotropin-releasing factor, substance P, galanin, vasopressin and neuropeptide Y. The recent synthesis of orally potent non-peptide micromolecules that can selectively bind to various neuropeptide receptors permits the onset of clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy against depression.

Estimating the Danish populations' preferences for pharmacogenetic testing using a discrete choice experiment. The case of treating depression

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to estimate willingness-to-pay (WTP) for pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of depression.

METHODS

In a web-based discrete choice questionnaire, four attributes were included: 1) number of changes in antidepressants before symptom relief; 2) time with dosage adjustments due to adverse side effects and/or lack of effects; 3) cost of pharmacogenetic testing; 4) probability of benefits from pharmacogenetic testing. Respondents were asked to choose between two scenarios; 1) pharmacogenetic testing; and 2) an opt-out option reflecting a scenario without pharmacogenetic testing. The indirect utility model was assumed to be multiplicative in probability of benefits and reduced time with dosage adjustments as well as reduced number of antidepressant changes.

RESULTS

Most coefficients had the expected signs and were statistically significant. WTP for avoidance of one change in antidepressant medication is 1571 Danish Krone (DKK), whereas WTP for reducing the period with dosage-adjustments by 1 month is DKK604. Both were statistically significantly different from zero.

CONCLUSION

If diagnosed with depression, peoples' WTP for pharmacogenetic testing appears to exceed its price as long as there is a reasonable probability for improvements in treatment (in the present case 10%). Utility is associated with outcomes only. Hence, other modes of provision of similar improvements in treatment may be valued equally highly. WTP estimates and the associated policy implications appear to be robust because they were unaffected by estimation model.

Azoles and antidepressants: a mini-review of the tolerability of co-administration

Depression is a common condition in chronically ill immunosuppressed patients on long-term antifungal therapy with azoles. As both azoles and more recent antifungals are metabolised by the P450 enzymatic system in the liver, here we review the potential of clinically meaningful interactions between antidepressants and azoles. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are safer compared to tricycle antidepressants when co-administered with azoles. More pharmacovigilance is needed.

Functional pharmacogenetics/genomics of human cytochromes P450 involved in drug biotransformation

We investigated the elimination routes for the 200 drugs that are sold most often by prescription count in the United States. The majority (78%) of the hepatically cleared drugs were found to be subject to oxidative metabolism via cytochromes P450 of the families 1, 2 and 3, with major contributions from CYP3A4/5 (37% of drugs) followed by CYP2C9 (17%), CYP2D6 (15%), CYP2C19 (10%), CYP1A2 (9%), CYP2C8 (6%), and CYP2B6 (4%). Clinically well-established polymorphic CYPs (i.e., CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6) were involved in the metabolism of approximately half of those drugs, including (in particular) NSAIDs metabolized mainly by CYP2C9, proton-pump inhibitors metabolized by CYP2C19, and beta blockers and several antipsychotics and antidepressants metabolized by CYP2D6. In this review, we provide an up-to-date summary of the functional polymorphisms and aspects of the functional genomics of the major human drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450s, as well as their clinical significance.

Association of graded allele-specific changes in CYP2D6 function with imipramine dose requirement in a large group of depressed patients

The inactivation and clearance of the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine is dependent on CYP2D6 activity. First, CYP2C19 converts imipramine into the active metabolite desipramine, which is then inactivated by CYP2D6. This retrospective single center study aimed to prove whether CYP2C19 and ample CYP2D6 genotyping (taking into consideration four null alleles and three decreased-activity alleles) could be used to predict imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations in depressed patients, and whether genotype-based drug dose recommendations might assist in the early management of imipramine pharmacotherapy. In 181 subjects with major depressive disorder, drug doses were recorded, imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations were monitored and CYP2C19 (*2) and CYP2D6 genotype (*3, *4, *5, *6, *9, *10, *41 and gene duplication) were obtained, yielding graded allele-specific CYP2D6 patient groups. Desipramine and imipramine+desipramine plasma concentration per drug dose unit, imipramine dose at steady state, and imipramine dose requirement significantly depended on CYP2D6 genotype (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.0001). Mean (+/-s.d.) drug dose requirements were 131 (+/-109), 155 (+/-70), 217 (+/-95), 245 (+/-125), 326 (+/-213), and 509 (+/-292) mg imipramine/day in carriers of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and >2 active CYP2D6 genes, respectively. Our protocol for CYP2D6 genotyping will thus importantly aid in the prediction of imipramine metabolism, allowing for the use of an adjusted starting dose and faster achievement of predefined imipramine+desipramine plasma levels in all genetic patient subgroups. Therefore, therapeutic efficacy and efficiency may be improved, the number of adverse drug reactions decreased, and hospital stay reduced.

Pharmacokinetic genes do not influence response or tolerance to citalopram in the STAR*D sample

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether clinical response or tolerance to the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram is associated with genetic polymorphisms in potentially relevant pharmacokinetic enzymes.

METHODOLOGY

We used a two-stage case-control study design in which we split the sample of 1,953 subjects from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial into a discovery (n = 831) and validation set (n = 1,046). Fifteen polymorphisms from five (CYP2D6, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5) pharmacokinetic genes were genotyped. We examined the associations between these polymorphisms and citalopram response and tolerance. Significant associations were validated in the second stage for those polymorphism found to be statistically significant in the first stage.

CONCLUSIONS

No genetic polymorphism in the pharmacokinetic genes examined was significantly associated with our response or tolerance phenotypes in both stages. For managing pharmacological treatment with citalopram, routine screening of the common pharmacokinetic DNA variants that we examined appears to be of limited clinical utility.

SSRI adverse events: how to monitor and manage

Antidepressants are efficacious for pediatric major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and non-OCD anxiety disorders. Antidepressants should be used in an evidence-based fashion, with frequent monitoring for side effects, especially when initiating treatment and adjusting dosage. With diligence to appropriate prescribing and monitoring, the benefits of therapy outweigh the potential of treatment related risk.

Pharmacogenomics and migraine: possible implications

Pharmacogenomics is the science about how inherited factors influence the effects of drugs. Drug response is always a result of mutually interacting genes with important modifications from environmental and constitutional factors. Based on the genetic variability of pharmacokinetic and in some cases pharmacodynamic variability we mention possible implications for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Pharmacogenomics will most likely in the future be one part of our therapeutic armamentarium and will provide a stronger scientific basis for optimizing drug therapy on the basis of each patient’s genetic constitution.

Patient preferences for pharmacogenetic screening in depression

Objectives:The aims of this study were to estimate preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for genetic screening for CYP2D6 polymorphisms among a group of former and currently depressed patients.

Methods:A Web-based discrete choice questionnaire was sent to 89 respondents, age 18–65. Four attributes were included: (i) shifts in antidepressant medication before symptom relief, (ii) time with antidepressant medication without symptom relief, (iii) time with antidepressant medication without symptoms but with adverse side-effects, (iv) cost of genetic screening. We used a switching model with two scenarios, one representing patients’ own treatment history and the other a treatment scenario with genetic screening.

Results:In a main-effects model involving the four attributes all coefficients had the expected sign, indicating that as the number of shifts, price or time without symptom relief, and/or dosage-adjustments increased, the likelihood of choosing the screening test decreased. Price and number of shifts in medicine were significant. Marginal WTP for 5 percent probability of a reduction of one in antidepressant shifts was DKK2,599 (€350).

Conclusions:Patients value reductions in shifts in antidepressants and price when choosing between genetic screening and no screening. They do not focus on how the reductions are provided, nor do they value the genetic information the test provides irrespective of its effect on outcome. Given, that the test is able to provide a reduction of one shift in the number of antidepressant shifts with a probability of 5 percent, WTP for the test exceeds its cost.

Routine pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice: dream or reality?

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has become progressively popular in recent years, thanks to growing anticipation among scientists, healthcare providers and the general public for the incorporation of genetic tests into the diagnostic arsenal at the physician’s disposal. Indeed, much research has been dedicated to elucidation of genetic determinants underlying interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters, as well as drug safety and efficacy. However, few PGx applications have thus far been realized in healthcare management. This review uses examples from PGx research of psychiatric drugs to illustrate why the current published findings are inadequate and insufficient for utilization as routine clinical predictors of treatment safety, efficacy or dosing. I therefore suggest the necessary steps to demonstrate the validity, utility and cost–effectiveness of PGx. These recommendations include a whole range of aspects, starting from standardization of criteria and assessment of the technical quality of genotyping assays, up to design of prospective PGx studies, providing the basis for reimbursement programs to be recognized in routine clinical practice.

The CYP2D6 polymorphism in relation to the metabolism of amitriptyline and nortriptyline in the Faroese population

AIM

To determine the frequency of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) in a Faroese patient group medicated with amitriptyline (AT) and to investigate plasma concentrations of AT and metabolites in relation to CYP2D6.

METHODS

CYP2D6 phenotype and genotype were determined in 23 Faroese patients treated with AT. Plasma concentrations of AT and metabolites were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and investigated in relation to CYP2D6 activity.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients phenotyped and genotyped, five (22%) (95% confidence interval 7.5, 43.7) were CYP2D6 PMs. No difference was found in AT daily dosage between PMs (median 25 mg day(-1); range 5-80) and extensive metabolizers (EMs) (median 27.5 mg day(-1); range 10-100). The (E)-10-OH-nortriptyline (NT)/dose concentrations were higher in EMs than in PMs and the NT/(E)-10-OH-NT and AT/(E)-10-OH-AT ratios were higher in PMs compared with EMs. The log sparteine metabolic ratio correlated positively with the NT/(E)-10-OH-NT ratio (r(s) = 0.821; P < 0.0005) and the AT/(E)-10-OH-AT ratio (r(s) = 0.605; P < 0.006).

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of CYP2D6 PMs was found in a Faroese patient group medicated with AT. However, similar doses of AT and concentrations of AT and NT were noted in EMs and PMs, probably due to varying doses and indications for AT treatment.

The clinical role of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes

For most drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), the functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms have been examined. Variants leading to reduced or increased enzymatic activity as compared to the wild-type alleles have been identified. This review tries to define potential fields in the therapy of major medical conditions where genotyping (or phenotyping) of genetically polymorphic DMEs might be beneficial for drug safety or therapeutic outcome. The possible application of genotyping is discussed for depression, cardiovascular diseases and thromboembolic disorders, gastric ulcer, malignant diseases and tuberculosis. Some drugs used for relief of these ailments are metabolized with participation of genetically polymorphic DMEs including CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, thiopurine-S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase and N-acetyltransferase type 2. Current evidence suggests that taking genetically determined metabolic capacities of DMEs into account has the potential to improve individual risk/benefit relationship. However, more prospective studies with clinical endpoints are needed before the paradigm of 'personalized medicine' based on DME variants can be established.

Tricyclic antidepressant pharmacology and therapeutic drug interactions updated

New data on the pharmacology of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), their affinities for human cloned CNS receptors and their cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibition profiles, allow improved deductions concerning their effects and interactions and indicate which of the TCAs are the most useful. The relative toxicity of TCAs continues to be more precisely defined, as do TCA interactions with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). TCA interactions with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been, historically, an uncertain and difficult question, but are now well understood, although this is not reflected in the literature. The data indicate that nortriptyline and desipramine have the most pharmacologically desirable characteristics as noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), and as drugs with few interactions that are also safe when coadministered with either MAOIs or SSRIs. Clomipramine is the only available antidepressant drug that has good evidence of clinically relevant serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (SNRI). These data assist drug selection for monotherapy and combination therapy and predict reliably how and why pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions occur. In comparison, two newer drugs proposed to have SNRI properties, duloxetine and venlafaxine, may have insufficient NRI potency to be effective SNRIs. Combinations such as sertraline and nortriptyline may therefore offer advantages over drugs like venlafaxine that have fixed ratios of SRI/NRI effects that are not ideal. However, no TCA/SSRI combination is sufficiently safe to be universally applicable without expert knowledge. Standard texts (e.g. the British National Formulary) and treatment guidelines would benefit by taking account of these new data and understandings.

Risk of adverse behavioral effects with pediatric use of antidepressants

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews evidence that led the Food and Drug Administration to issue a "black box" warning about the risk of "suicidality" (suicidal thoughts and behavior) in children and adolescents during treatment with antidepressants.

RESULTS

Re-analysis of data from randomized clinical trials of antidepressants in the pediatric population revealed a significantly greater overall (all drugs across all indications) risk ratio for drug 1.95 (95% Cl, 1.28-2.98) compared to placebo in this sample of approximately 4,000 subjects.

DISCUSSION

The essential message of the "black box" is to remind prescribers and consumers about the importance of monitoring closely for adverse behavioral changes during the initiation of (or changes in) antidepressant therapy. Possible mechanisms that might account for this phenomenon, particularly the so-called activation syndrome, are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Empirical studies are needed to identify the precursors of suicidality and to predict which individuals are most susceptible to adverse behavioral side effects of antidepressants.

Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotics: useful for the clinician?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The concept of individualized drug therapy on the basis of pharmacogenetics has become a central focus in psychopharmacology of schizophrenia. This article reviews recent advances in this field with respect to their importance for the clinician.

RECENT FINDINGS

First, there is an increasing agreement about the importance of polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes and the effects of drug-drug interactions in relation to the incidence of adverse effects. Secondly, prediction of response on the basis of variants in candidate genes is incipient and remains elusive. Thirdly, some advances have been made in understanding the pharmacogenetics of weight gain.

SUMMARY

Despite much effort, only a few of the results are now ready for translation into clinical practice. Cytochrome P450 genotyping would be a big step forward towards a more individualized drug treatment based on molecular diagnostics and could improve treatment, reduce adverse effects and increase compliance of the patients. Another promising field may be that of predicting the antipsychotic-induced weight gain and it is hoped that commercially available DNA tests may be available within the next few years. Prediction of response is still hampered by many methodological and clinical problems and is not yet available to the clinician.