1
|
Cegla P, Hofheinz F, Czepczyński R, Witkowska K, van den Hoff J, Trojanowski M, Bos-Liedke A, Cholewinski W. Value of [ 18F]FDG PET/CT parameters of the primary tumor in assessing overall survival in NSCLC patients with cN1-cN3 lymph nodes involvement. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:97-102. [PMID: 39165594 PMCID: PMC11333082 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT parameters in cN1-cN3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and methods 59 consecutive patients (35 M, 24 F) with NSCLC who underwent pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT were enrolled to this study. Several primary tumor PET parameters, including the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean), the metabolic active tumor volume (MTV) and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG = MTVxSUVmean), were extracted and analysed. Overall survival was defined as time from primary diagnosis to death or the last info. Results In the whole analysed group 44 patients underwent curative treatment, while 15, because of the severity of the disease, were classified for palliative treatment. Univariate Cox analysis of clinical and metric PET parameters revealed that MTV was a significant prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.024), while TLG and curative treatment showed a trend for significance (p < 0.1). In multivariate Cox regression (MTV and curative treatment) MTV remained a significant factor (p = 0.047). Conclusions Metabolic tumor volume of the primary tumor was the only independent prognostic factor for cN1-cN3 NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rafał Czepczyński
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affidea, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maciej Trojanowski
- Greater Poland Cancer Registry, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Witold Cholewinski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sag SJM, Menhart K, Hitzenbichler F, Schmid C, Hofheinz F, van den Hoff J, Maier LS, Hellwig D, Grosse J, Sag CM. 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived total lesion glycolysis predicts abscess formation in patients with surgically confirmed infective endocarditis: Results of a retrospective study at a tertiary center. J Nucl Cardiol 2023; 30:2400-2414. [PMID: 37264215 PMCID: PMC10682046 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03285-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abnormal activity of 18F-FDG PET/CT is a major Duke criterion in the diagnostic work-up of infective prosthetic valve endocarditis (IE). We hypothesized that quantitative lesion assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived standard maximum uptake ratio (SURmax), metabolic volume (MV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) might be useful in distinct subgroups of IE patients (e.g. IE-related abscess formation). METHODS All patients (n = 27) hospitalized in our tertiary IE referral medical center from January 2014 to October 2018 with preoperatively performed 18F-FDG PET/CT and surgically confirmed IE were included into this retrospective analysis. RESULTS Patients with surgically confirmed abscess formation (n = 10) had significantly increased MV (by ~ fivefold) and TLG (by ~ sevenfold) as compared to patients without abscess (n = 17). Receiver operation characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated that TLG (calculated as MV × SURmean, i.e. TLG (SUR)) had the most favorable area under the ROC curve (0.841 [CI 0.659 to 1.000]) in predicting IE-related abscess formation. This resulted in a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88% at a cut-off value of 14.14 mL for TLG (SUR). CONCLUSION We suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived quantitative assessment of TLG (SUR) may provide a novel diagnostic tool in predicting endocarditis-associated abscess formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Julia Maria Sag
- Department of Internal Medicine II/Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karin Menhart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Hitzenbichler
- Department of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christof Schmid
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lars Siegfried Maier
- Department of Internal Medicine II/Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Hellwig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jirka Grosse
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Can Martin Sag
- Department of Internal Medicine II/Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Galvez T, Berkane I, Thézenas S, Eberlé MC, Flori N, Guillemard S, Ilonca AD, Santoro L, Kotzki PO, Senesse P, Deshayes E. Identification of 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters Associated with Weight Loss in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Nutrients 2023; 15:3042. [PMID: 37447367 DOI: 10.3390/nu15133042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
18F-FDG PET-CT is routinely performed as part of the initial staging of numerous cancers. Other than having descriptive, predictive and prognostic values for tumors, 18F-FDG PET-CT provides full-body data, which could inform on concurrent pathophysiological processes such as malnutrition. To test this hypothesis, we measured the 18F-FDG uptake in several organs and evaluated their association with weight loss in patients at diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Forty-eight patients were included in this retrospective monocentric study. 18F-FDG uptake quantification was performed in the brain, the liver, the spleen, bone marrow, muscle and the esophageal tumor itself and was compared between patients with different amounts of weight loss. We found that Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) and peak Standardized Uptake Values (SUVpeak) measured in the brain correlated with the amount of weight loss: TLG was, on average, higher in patients who had lost more than 5% of their usual weight, whereas brain SUVpeak were, on average, lower in patients who had lost more than 10% of their weight. Higher TLG and lower brain SUVpeak were associated with worse OS in the univariate analysis. This study reports a new and significant association between 18F-FDG uptake in the brain and initial weight loss in patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Galvez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Ikrame Berkane
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Simon Thézenas
- Biometry Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Marie-Claude Eberlé
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Nicolas Flori
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Guillemard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Alina Diana Ilonca
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Lore Santoro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - Pierre-Olivier Kotzki
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Senesse
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cowzer D, Keane F, Ku GY. Clinical Utility of 18F-2-Fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose PET Imaging in Locally Advanced Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:1884. [PMID: 37296735 PMCID: PMC10252409 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma, including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, is uncommon in the United States, but is associated with a rising incidence in young adults, and has a traditionally poor prognosis. Despite the incremental benefits that have been made with multimodality approaches to locally advanced disease, most patients will go on to develop metastatic disease, and long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Over the last decade, PET-CT has emerged as a key tool in the management of this disease, with several prospective and retrospective studies evaluating its role in this disease. Herein, we review the key data pertaining to the use of PET-CT in the management of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma, with a focus on staging, prognostication, PET-CT adapted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (D.C.); (F.K.)
| | - Fergus Keane
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (D.C.); (F.K.)
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (D.C.); (F.K.)
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cegla P, Hofheinz F, Burchardt E, Czepczyński R, Kubiak A, van den Hoff J, Nikulin P, Bos-Liedke A, Roszak A, Cholewinski W. Asphericity derived from [ 18F]FDG PET as a new prognostic parameter in cervical cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8423. [PMID: 37225735 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35191-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic value of asphericity (ASP) and standardized uptake ratio (SUR) in cervical cancer patients. Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 508 (aged 55 ± 12 years) previously untreated cervical cancer patients. All patients underwent a pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT study to assess the severity of the disease. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the cervical cancer was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. For the resulting ROIs the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. In addition, ASP and SUR were determined as previously described. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) and locoregional control (LRC) was performed. Additionally, a multivariate Cox regression including clinically relevant parameters was performed. In the survival analysis, MTV and ASP were shown to be prognostic factors for all investigated endpoints. Tumor metabolism quantified with the SUVmax was not prognostic for any of the endpoints (p > 0.2). The SUR did not reach statistical significance either (p = 0.1, 0.25, 0.066, 0.053, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the ASP remained a significant factor for EFS and LRC, while MTV was a significant factor for FFDM, indicating their independent prognostic value for the respective endpoints. The alternative parameter ASP has the potential to improve the prognostic value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for event-free survival and locoregional control in radically treated cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Garbary 15, 61-866, Poznan, Poland.
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ewa Burchardt
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan Univeristy of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynaecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Rafał Czepczyński
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Disease, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affidea Poznan, Poland
| | - Anna Kubiak
- Greater Poland Cancer Registry, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Pavel Nikulin
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Andrzej Roszak
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan Univeristy of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynaecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Witold Cholewinski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Garbary 15, 61-866, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan Univeristy of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abraham AG, Riauka T, Hudson M, Ghosh S, Zebak S, Alba V, Vaihenberg E, Warkentin H, Tankel K, Severin D, Bedard E, Spratlin J, Mulder K, Joseph K. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Parameters can Predict Long-Term Outcome Following Trimodality Treatment for Oesophageal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:177-187. [PMID: 36402622 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) is routinely used for the pre-treatment staging of oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction cancers (EGEJC). The aim of this study was to identify objective 18FDG-PET/CT-derived parameters that can aid in predicting the patterns of recurrence and prognostication in patients with EGEJC. PATIENTS AND METHODS EGEJC patients referred for consideration of preoperative chemoradiation therapy were identified and clinicopathological data were collected. 18FDG-PET/CT imaging data were reviewed and correlated with treatment outcomes. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis were assessed and association with recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LR-RFS), oesophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) and overall survival were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier models. RESULTS In total, 191 EGEJC patients completed trimodality treatment and 164 with 18FDG-PET/CT data were included in this analysis. At the time of analysis, 15 (9.1%), 70 (42.7%) and two (1.2%) patients were noted to have locoregional, distant and both locoregional and distant metastases, respectively. The median RFS was 30 months (9.6-50.4) and the 5-year RFS was 31.1%. The 5-year overall survival and ECSS were both noted to be 34.8%. Pre-treatment MTV25 > 28.5 cm3 (P = 0.029), MTV40 > 12.4 cm3 (P = 0.018) and MTV50 > 10.2 cm3 (P = 0.005) predicted for worse LR-RFS, ECSS and overall survival for MTV definition of voxels ≥25%, 40% and 50% of SUVmax. CONCLUSION 18FDG-PET/CT parameters MTV and total lesion glycolysis are useful prognostic tools to predict for LR-RFS, ECSS and overall survival in EGEJC. MTV had the highest accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes. The volume cut-off points we identified for different MTV thresholds predicted outcomes with significant accuracy and may potentially be used for decision making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Abraham
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - T Riauka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - M Hudson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - S Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - S Zebak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - V Alba
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - E Vaihenberg
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - H Warkentin
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - K Tankel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Severin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - E Bedard
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Spratlin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - K Mulder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - K Joseph
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takahashi N, Tanaka S, Umezawa R, Takanami K, Takeda K, Yamamoto T, Suzuki Y, Katsuta Y, Kadoya N, Jingu K. Development and validation of an [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT radiomic model for predicting progression-free survival for patients with stage II - III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who are treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:159-165. [PMID: 36794365 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2178859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics is a method for extracting a large amount of information from images and used to predict treatment outcomes, side effects and diagnosis. In this study, we developed and validated a radiomic model of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with stage II - III esophageal cancer who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT within 45 days before dCRT between 2005 and 2017 were included. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (85 patients) and a validation set (45 patients). Radiomic parameters inside the area of standard uptake value ≥ 3 were calculated. The open-source software 3D slicer and Pyradiomics were used for segmentation and calculating radiomic parameters, respectively. Eight hundred sixty radiomic parameters and general information were investigated.In the training set, a radiomic model for PFS was made from the LASSO Cox regression model and Rad-score was calculated. In the validation set, the model was applied to Kaplan-Meier curves. The median value of Rad-score in the training set was used as a cutoff value in the validation set. JMP was used for statistical analysis. RStudio was used for the LASSO Cox regression model. p < 0.05 was defined as significant. RESULTS The median follow-up periods were 21.9 months for all patients and 63.4 months for survivors. The 5-year PFS rate was 24.0%. In the training set, the LASSO Cox regression model selects 6 parameters and made a model. The low Rad-score group had significantly better PFS than that the high Rad-score group (p = 0.019). In the validation set, the low Rad-score group had significantly better PFS than that the high Rad-score group (p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS The [18F]FDG-PET/CT radiomic model could predict PFS for patients with esophageal cancer who received dCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Shohei Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kentaro Takanami
- Department of Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yu Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yoshiyuki Katsuta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu B, Jin H, Li X, Wu X, Xu J, Gao Y. The predictive value of total-body PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer for the PD-L1 high expression. Front Oncol 2022; 12:943933. [PMID: 36212409 PMCID: PMC9538674 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) provides faster scanning speed, higher image quality, and lower injected dose. To compensate for the shortcomings of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), we aimed to normalize the values of PET parameters using liver and blood pool SUV (SUR-L and SUR-BP) to predict programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and methods A total of 138 (104 adenocarcinoma and 34 squamous cell carcinoma) primary diagnosed NSCLC patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging were analyzed retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was performed for PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells with 22C3 antibody. Positive PD-L1 expression was defined as tumor cells no less than 50% or tumor-infiltrating immune cells no less than 10%. The relationships between PD-L1 expression and PET parameters (SUVmax, SUR-L, and SUR-BP) and clinical variables were analyzed. Statistical analysis included χ2 test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and binary logistic regression. Results There were 36 patients (26%) expressing PD-L1 positively. Gender, smoking history, Ki-67, and histologic subtype were related factors. SUVmax, SUR-L, and SUR-BP were significantly higher in the positive subset than those in the negative subset. Among them, the area under the curve (AUC) of SUR-L on the ROC curve was the biggest one. In NSCLC patients, the best cutoff value of SUR-L for PD-L1-positive expression was 4.84 (AUC = 0.702, P = 0.000, sensitivity = 83.3%, specificity = 54.9%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that age and SUR-L were correlated factors in adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. Conclusion SUVmax, SUR-L, and SUR-BP had utility in predicting PD-L1 high expression, and SUR-L was the most reliable parameter. PET/CT can offer reference to screen patients for first-line atezolizumab therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Junling Xu
- *Correspondence: Junling Xu, ; Yongju Gao,
| | - Yongju Gao
- *Correspondence: Junling Xu, ; Yongju Gao,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ma D, Zhang Y, Shao X, Wu C, Wu J. PET/CT for Predicting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6523-6539. [PMID: 36135082 PMCID: PMC9497704 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A portion of gastric cancer patients with negative lymph node metastasis at an early stage eventually die from tumor recurrence or advanced metastasis. Occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM] is a potential risk factor for the recurrence and metastasis in these patients, and it is highly important for clinical prognosis. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used to assess lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer due to its advantages in anatomical and functional imaging and non-invasive nature. Among the major metabolic parameters of PET, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is commonly used for examining lymph node status. However, SUVmax is susceptible to interference by a variety of factors. In recent years, the exploration of new PET metabolic parameters, new PET imaging agents and radiomics, has become an active research topic. This paper aims to explore the feasibility and predict the effectiveness of using PET/CT to detect OLNM. The current landscape and future trends of primary metabolic parameters and new imaging agents of PET are reviewed. For gastric cancer patients, the possibility to detect OLNM non-invasively will help guide surgeons to choose the appropriate lymph node dissection area, thereby reducing unnecessary dissections and providing more reasonable, personalized and comprehensive treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyu Ma
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
- Institute of Cell Therapy, Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
| | - Xiaoliang Shao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
| | - Chen Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
- Institute of Cell Therapy, Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
- Correspondence: (C.W.); (J.W.)
| | - Jun Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China
- Correspondence: (C.W.); (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Impact of Blood Parameters and Normal Tissue Dose on Treatment Outcome in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143504. [PMID: 35884564 PMCID: PMC9320742 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite technological advances, normal tissue sparing in photon beam irradiation is still challenging. Since in esophageal cancer this may inflict damage on the lungs, heart and bone marrow, possibly impacting on outcome, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of normal tissue dose and blood parameters on the survival of patients having undergone neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTx) followed by surgery. This retrospective study included 125 patients irradiated to 40−41.4 Gy with photons or protons combined with concurrent chemotherapy. On initial and restaging 18F-FDG-PET/CT, the lungs and heart were contoured as organs at risk for which standardized uptake values (SUV) were evaluated. The mean radiation dose (Dmean) to the lungs and heart, the volume of the lungs receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy_lung) and various pre- and per-treatment blood parameters were included in the Cox regression analyses. Results: The median follow-up time was 19.8 months and median overall survival 37 months (95% confidence interval: 16−58.9 months). In multivariate analysis, higher radiation doses to the lungs and heart were statistically significantly associated with decreased overall survival (Dmean_lung: p < 0.001; V20Gy_lung: p < 0.002; Dmean_heart: p = 0.005). Neither the 18F-FDG-PET nor blood parameters were predictive for overall survival. In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with RCTx, the radiation dose to the heart and lungs was significantly associated with overall survival.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zschaeck S, Weingärtner J, Lombardo E, Marschner S, Hajiyianni M, Beck M, Zips D, Li Y, Lin Q, Amthauer H, Troost EGC, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Kotzerke J, Ferentinos K, Karagiannis E, Kaul D, Gregoire V, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Nikulin P, Bachmann M, Kopka K, Krause M, Baumann M, Kazmierska J, Cegla P, Cholewinski W, Strouthos I, Zöphel K, Majchrzak E, Landry G, Belka C, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography of Head and Neck Cancer: Location and HPV Specific Parameters for Potential Treatment Individualization. Front Oncol 2022; 12:870319. [PMID: 35756665 PMCID: PMC9213669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is utilized for staging and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Some older publications on the prognostic relevance showed inconclusive results, most probably due to small study sizes. This study evaluates the prognostic and potentially predictive value of FDG-PET in a large multi-center analysis. Methods Original analysis of individual FDG-PET and patient data from 16 international centers (8 institutional datasets, 8 public repositories) with 1104 patients. All patients received curative intent radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT) and pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging. Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated for calculation of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Cox regression analyses were performed for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Results FDG-PET parameters were associated with patient outcome in the whole cohort regarding clinical endpoints (EFS, OS, LRC, FFDM), in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Several previously published cut-off values were successfully validated. Subgroup analyses identified tumor- and human papillomavirus (HPV) specific parameters. In HPV positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) SUVmax was well suited to identify patients with excellent LRC for organ preservation. Patients with SUVmax of 14 or less were unlikely to develop loco-regional recurrence after definitive CRT. In contrast FDG PET parameters deliver only limited prognostic information in laryngeal cancer. Conclusion FDG-PET parameters bear considerable prognostic value in HNSCC and potential predictive value in subgroups of patients, especially regarding treatment de-intensification and organ-preservation. The potential predictive value needs further validation in appropriate control groups. Further research on advanced imaging approaches including radiomics or artificial intelligence methods should implement the identified cut-off values as benchmark routine imaging parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent Gregoire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Leon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Pavel Nikulin
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Bachmann
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joanna Kazmierska
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Witold Cholewinski
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ewa Majchrzak
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tustumi F, Albenda DG, Sallum RAA, Nahas SC, Ribeiro Junior U, Buchpiguel CA, Cecconello I, Duarte PS. 18F-FDG-PET/CT-measured parameters as potential predictors of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Radiol Bras 2022; 55:286-292. [PMID: 36320366 PMCID: PMC9620845 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the maximum and mean standardized uptake values, together with
the metabolic tumor value and the total lesion glycolysis, at the primary
tumor site, as determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
positron-emission tomography/computed tomography
(18F-FDG-PET/CT), performed before and after neoadjuvant
chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), as predictors of residual disease (RD) in patients
with esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods The standardized uptake values and the volumetric parameters (metabolic tumor
value and total lesion glycolysis) were determined by
18F-FDG-PET/CT to identify RD in 39 patients before and after
nCRT for esophageal carcinoma. We used receiver operating characteristic
curves to analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT
parameters in the definition of RD. The standard of reference was
histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen. Results Eighteen patients (46%) presented RD after nCRT. Statistically significant
areas under the curve (approximately 0.72) for predicting RD were obtained
for all four of the variables evaluated after nCRT. Considering the presence
of visually detectable uptake (higher than the background level) at the
primary tumor site after nCRT as a positive result, we achieved a
sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 48% for the detection of RD. Conclusion The use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT can facilitate the detection of RD after
nCRT in patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee BM, Lee CG. Significance of mid-radiotherapy 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:114-120. [PMID: 35447284 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Metabolic parameters evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) are known as prognostic markers in various cancers. We aimed to validate the predictive value of mid-radiotherapy (RT) FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-three patients treated with RT with or without chemotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were included. PET parameters including metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, and mean (SUVmean) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were analyzed. Locoregional recurrence-free rate (LRFR) and distant metastasis-free rate (DMFR) were analyzed. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 10.5 months. Mid-RT SUVmax was significantly associated with LRFR (HR 1.07, p = 0.009) and DMFR (HR 1.13, p=0.047) while mid-RT MTV was associated with DMFR (HR 1.06, p=0.007). Treatment response after RT was associated with overall survival (HR, 1.52, p=0.025). Further, treatment response was significantly associated with mid-RT SUVmax. The optimal cutoff value for mid-RT SUVmax in predicting LRFR and DMFR was 11 while cutoff value for mid-RT MTV was 15. The patients with mid-RT SUVmax≤11 showed superior LRFR and DMFR compared to SUVmax>11 (1-year LRFR; 73.4% vs 48.4%, p=0.028, 1-year DMFR; 74.6% vs 40.7%, p=0.007). The 1-year DMFR was significantly different between patients with mid-RT MTV≤15 and >15 (1-year DMFR; 78.2% vs 31.9%, p=0.002). CONCLUSION Tumor metabolism changes during RT can be a useful predictive tool for treatment response and recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinicians may consider early response evaluation with PET during RT for information about prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Min Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Geol Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Beckford-Vera DR, Flavell RR, Seo Y, Martinez-Ortiz E, Aslam M, Thanh C, Fehrman E, Pardons M, Kumar S, Deitchman AN, Ravanfar V, Schulte B, Wu IWK, Pan T, Reeves JD, Nixon CC, Iyer NS, Torres L, Munter SE, Hyunh T, Petropoulos CJ, Hoh R, Franc BL, Gama L, Koup RA, Mascola JR, Chomont N, Deeks SG, VanBrocklin HF, Henrich TJ. First-in-human immunoPET imaging of HIV-1 infection using 89Zr-labeled VRC01 broadly neutralizing antibody. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1219. [PMID: 35264559 PMCID: PMC8907355 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28727-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
A major obstacle to achieving long-term antiretroviral (ART) free remission or functional cure of HIV infection is the presence of persistently infected cells that establish a long-lived viral reservoir. HIV largely resides in anatomical regions that are inaccessible to routine sampling, however, and non-invasive methods to understand the longitudinal tissue-wide burden of HIV persistence are urgently needed. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a promising strategy to identify and characterize the tissue-wide burden of HIV. Here, we assess the efficacy of using immunoPET imaging to characterize HIV reservoirs and identify anatomical foci of persistent viral transcriptional activity using a radiolabeled HIV Env-specific broadly neutralizing antibody, 89Zr-VRC01, in HIV-infected individuals with detectable viremia and on suppressive ART compared to uninfected controls (NCT03729752). We also assess the relationship between PET tracer uptake in tissues and timing of ART initiation and direct HIV protein expression in CD4 T cells obtained from lymph node biopsies. We observe significant increases in 89Zr-VRC01 uptake in various tissues (including lymph nodes and gut) in HIV-infected individuals with detectable viremia (N = 5) and on suppressive ART (N = 5) compared to uninfected controls (N = 5). Importantly, PET tracer uptake in inguinal lymph nodes in viremic and ART-suppressed participants significantly and positively correlates with HIV protein expression measured directly in tissue. Our strategy may allow non-invasive longitudinal characterization of residual HIV infection and lays the framework for the development of immunoPET imaging in a variety of other infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis R Beckford-Vera
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert R Flavell
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Youngho Seo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Enrique Martinez-Ortiz
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maya Aslam
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cassandra Thanh
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily Fehrman
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marion Pardons
- Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shreya Kumar
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amelia N Deitchman
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Vahid Ravanfar
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brailee Schulte
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - I-Wei Katherine Wu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tony Pan
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jacqueline D Reeves
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher C Nixon
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nikita S Iyer
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Leonel Torres
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sadie E Munter
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tony Hyunh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christos J Petropoulos
- Monogram Biosciences, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America, South San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Rebecca Hoh
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin L Franc
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lucio Gama
- Vaccine Research Center, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Koup
- Vaccine Research Center, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John R Mascola
- Vaccine Research Center, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicolas Chomont
- Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven G Deeks
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Henry F VanBrocklin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Timothy J Henrich
- Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li K, Ni X, Lin D, Li J. Incorporation of PET Metabolic Parameters With Clinical Features Into a Predictive Model for Radiotherapy-Related Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:812707. [PMID: 35296024 PMCID: PMC8918510 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.812707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether the addition of metabolic parameters from fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans to clinical factors could improve risk prediction models for radiotherapy-related esophageal fistula (EF) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods and Materials Anonymized data from 185 ESCC patients (20 radiotherapy-related EF-positive cases) were collected, including pre-therapy PET/CT scans and EF status. In total, 29 clinical features and 15 metabolic parameters from PET/CT were included in the analysis, and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model was used to construct a risk score (RS) system. The predictive capabilities of the models were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results In univariate analysis, metabolic tumor volume (MTV)_40% was a risk factor for radiotherapy (RT)-related EF, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.036 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.009–1.063, p = 0.007]. However, it was excluded from the predictive model using multivariate logistic regression. Predictive models were built based on the clinical features in the training cohort. The model included diabetes, tumor length and thickness, adjuvant chemotherapy, eosinophil count, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. The RS was defined as follows: 0.2832 − (7.1369 × diabetes) + (1.4304 × tumor length) + (2.1409 × tumor thickness) – [8.3967 × adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT)] − (28.7671 × eosinophils) + (8.2213 × MLR). The cutoff of RS was set at −1.415, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.977 (95% CI: 0.9536–1), a specificity of 0.929, and a sensitivity of 1. Analysis in the testing cohort showed a lower AUC of 0.795 (95% CI: 0.577–1), a specificity of 0.925, and a sensitivity of 0.714. Delong’s test for two correlated ROC curves showed no significant difference between the training and testing sets (p = 0.109). Conclusions MTV_40% was a risk factor for RT-related EF in univariate analysis and was screened out using multivariate logistic regression. A model with clinical features can predict RT-related EF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaixin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - XiaoLei Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Longyan Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Duanyu Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiancheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jiancheng Li,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cegla P, Hofheinz F, Cholewiński W, Czepczyński R, Kubiak A, van den Hoff J, Boś-Liedke A, Roszak A, Burchardt E. Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Primary Tumor MTV from [ 18F]FDG PET in Radically Treated Cervical Cancer Patients. Metabolites 2021; 11:metabo11120809. [PMID: 34940567 PMCID: PMC8706993 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11120809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of pretherapeutic primary tumor metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in the prognosis of radically treated cervical cancer patients. Retrospective, single-centre analysis was performed on a group of 508 cervical cancer patients. All patients underwent a pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT study for the assessment of the disease stage. Several PET-derived parameters—namely, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and MTV, as well as the clinical parameters, were analysed in terms of the overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), locoregional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Hyperthermia and brachytherapy were prognostic for EFS, OS, and LRC.FIGO stage > II showed a significant effect on EFS, OS, and FFDM. Moreover, hysterectomy was prognostic for OS and histology was prognostic for FFDM. From the PET-derived parameters only MTV of the primary tumor had a significant influence on OS (cutoff point: >12.7 mL, HR: 2.8, 1.75–4.48 95% CI, p < 0.001), LRC (cutoff point: >13.7 mL, HR 2.82, 1.42–5.61 95% CI, p = 0.003), EFS (cutoff point: >10.4 mL, HR: 2.57, 1.67–3.97 95% CI, p < 0.001) and FFDM (cutoff point: >10.4 mL, HR: 5.04, 1.82–13.99 95% CI, p = 0.002). Pretreatment MTV from the primary tumor is the only independent prognostic parameter in OS, LRC, EFS, and FFDM in radically treated cervical cancer patients and should be used in clinical practice in assessing prognosis in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznań, Poland;
- Correspondence: or
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany; (F.H.); (J.v.d.H.)
| | - Witold Cholewiński
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznań, Poland;
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland; (A.R.); (E.B.)
| | - Rafał Czepczyński
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affidea Poznan, 61-485 Poznań, Poland
| | - Anna Kubiak
- Greater Poland Cancer Registry, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznań, Poland;
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany; (F.H.); (J.v.d.H.)
| | - Agnieszka Boś-Liedke
- Department of Macromolecular Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland;
| | - Andrzej Roszak
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland; (A.R.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynaecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznań, Poland
| | - Ewa Burchardt
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland; (A.R.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynaecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61-866 Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fu Y, Xi X, Tang Y, Li X, Ye X, Hu B, Liu Y. Development and validation of tumor-to-blood based nomograms for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:2189-2197. [PMID: 34165236 PMCID: PMC8327690 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To develop and validate tumor‐to‐blood based nomograms for preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with lung cancer (LC). Methods A prediction model was developed in a primary cohort comprising 330 LN stations from patients with pathologically confirmed LC, these data having been gathered from January 2016 to June 2019. Tumor‐to‐blood variables of LNs were calculated from positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) images of LC and the short axis diameters of LNs were measured on CT images. Tumor‐to‐blood variables, number of stations suspected of harboring LN metastasis according to PET, and independent clinicopathological risk factors were included in the final nomograms. After being internally validated, the nomograms were used to assess an independent validation cohort containing 101 consecutive LN stations accumulated from July 2019 to March 2020. Results Four tumor‐to‐blood variables (left atrium, inferior vena cava, liver, and aortic arch) and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for LNs were found to be significantly associated with LN status (p < 0.001 for both primary and validation cohorts). Five predictive nomograms were built. Of these, one with LN SUVmax/left atrium SUVmax was found to be optimal for predicting LN status with AUC 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.774–0.886) in the primary cohort and AUC 0.865 (95% CI: 0.782–0.948) in the validation cohort. All models showed good discrimination, with a modest C‐index, and good calibration in both primary and validation cohorts. Conclusions We have developed tumor‐to‐blood based nomograms that incorporate identified clinicopathological risk factors and facilitate preoperative prediction of LN metastasis in LC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yili Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoying Xi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhua Tang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Ye
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nikulin P, Hofheinz F, Maus J, Li Y, Bütof R, Lange C, Furth C, Zschaeck S, Kreissl MC, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J. A convolutional neural network for fully automated blood SUV determination to facilitate SUR computation in oncological FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:995-1004. [PMID: 33006022 PMCID: PMC8041711 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04991-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standardized uptake value (SUV) is widely used for quantitative evaluation in oncological FDG-PET but has well-known shortcomings as a measure of the tumor's glucose consumption. The standard uptake ratio (SUR) of tumor SUV and arterial blood SUV (BSUV) possesses an increased prognostic value but requires image-based BSUV determination, typically in the aortic lumen. However, accurate manual ROI delineation requires care and imposes an additional workload, which makes the SUR approach less attractive for clinical routine. The goal of the present work was the development of a fully automated method for BSUV determination in whole-body PET/CT. METHODS Automatic delineation of the aortic lumen was performed with a convolutional neural network (CNN), using the U-Net architecture. A total of 946 FDG PET/CT scans from several sites were used for network training (N = 366) and testing (N = 580). For all scans, the aortic lumen was manually delineated, avoiding areas affected by motion-induced attenuation artifacts or potential spillover from adjacent FDG-avid regions. Performance of the network was assessed using the fractional deviations of automatically and manually derived BSUVs in the test data. RESULTS The trained U-Net yields BSUVs in close agreement with those obtained from manual delineation. Comparison of manually and automatically derived BSUVs shows excellent concordance: the mean relative BSUV difference was (mean ± SD) = (- 0.5 ± 2.2)% with a 95% confidence interval of [- 5.1,3.8]% and a total range of [- 10.0, 12.0]%. For four test cases, the derived ROIs were unusable (< 1 ml). CONCLUSION CNNs are capable of performing robust automatic image-based BSUV determination. Integrating automatic BSUV derivation into PET data processing workflows will significantly facilitate SUR computation without increasing the workload in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Nikulin
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Maus
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Catharina Lange
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tustumi F, Duarte PS, Albenda DG, Takeda FR, Sallum RAA, Junior UR, Buchpiguel CA, Cecconello I. Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography metabolic parameters measured in the primary tumor and suspicious lymph nodes before neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:437-443. [PMID: 33306638 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) metabolic parameters are prognostic indicators in several neoplasms. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the maximum and average standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVavg), metabolic tumor value (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured in the primary tumor and suspicious lymph nodes preneoadjuvant therapy in patients submitted to surgical resection for esophageal cancer. METHODS A cohort of 113 patients with esophageal cancer who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT preneoadjuvant therapy was assessed. The association of the SUV, MTV, and TLG measured in the primary tumor and in the suspicious lymph nodes with the overall survival was assessed. It was also analyzed other potentially confounding variables such as age, sex, clinical stage, and histologic subtype. The analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox regression. RESULTS The univariate analyses showed that the MTV and TLG in the primary tumor, the SUV in the suspicious lymph nodes, the age, the histologic subtype, and the clinical stage were associated with survival after surgery (P ≤ 0.05). In the Cox regression multivariate analyses, all variables identified in the univariate analyses but the clinical stage were associated with survival after surgery (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION In esophageal cancer patients, some of the 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters measured in the primary tumor and in the suspicious lymph nodes before the neoadjuvant therapy are independent indicators of overall survival and appear to be more important than the clinical stage in the prognostic definition of this group of patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hotta M, Minamimoto R, Toyohara J, Nohara K, Nakajima K, Takase K, Yamada K. Efficacy of cell proliferation imaging with 4DST PET/CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison study with FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2615-2623. [PMID: 33438100 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05179-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE 4'-[Methyl-11C] thiothymidine (4DST) incorporates into DNA directly and is a PET tracer used for cell proliferation imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prediction of prognosis with pretreatment 4DST PET/CT compared to fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS In this prospective study, we analyzed 46 patients (68.2 ± 10.0 years old) with pathologically proven esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent pretreatment 4DST and FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and total lesion proliferation (TLP) were measured for FDG and 4DST PET. The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients' clinical backgrounds, including age, histological type, clinical stage, and surgical treatment, were adjusted using the Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS In the follow-up period (median 18.8 (interquartile range: 10.1-29.0) months), 26 and 19 patients showed disease progression and cancer-related death, respectively. After adjusting for clinical variables, only the 4DST parameters (SUVmax (p = 0.001) and TLP (p = 0.022)) were statistically significant for predicting PFS. FDG MTV (p = 0.031), 4DST SUVmax (p = 0.022), and TLP (p = 0.023) were statistically significant for predicting OS. Of the PET parameters, 4DST SUVmax yielded the highest adjusted hazard ratio for both PFS (4.88, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.83-12.97) and OS (4.19, 95% CI: 1.23-14.20). CONCLUSION Higher accumulation of 4DST in the primary tumor may lead to shorter OS and PFS. 4DST PET/CT is useful for predicting prognosis and may outperform FDG PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Hotta
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
| | - Ryogo Minamimoto
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
| | - Jun Toyohara
- Functional Brain Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Kyoko Nohara
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Nakajima
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
| | - Kei Takase
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yamada
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang C, Zhao K, Hu S, Huang Y, Ma L, Li M, Song Y. The PET-Derived Tumor-to-Liver Standard Uptake Ratio (SUV TLR ) Is Superior to Tumor SUVmax in Predicting Tumor Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1630. [PMID: 33014819 PMCID: PMC7494965 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) derived from 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) have some well-known shortcomings in predicting treatment response and prognosis in oncology. The standardized SUVmax with an appropriate reference background may overcome this problem in some instances. This study explored the prognostic value of the tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (SUVTLR) and the tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUVTBR) in predicting the objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who were treated with CCRT. The SUVmax of primary tumor, SUVTLR, SUVTBR and clinicopathologic features data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the predictors of tumor response. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SUVTLR was superior to SUVmax and SUVTBR in predicting treatment response. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that advanced tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.67; 95% CI: 1.15-81.28; P = 0.037) and high SUVTLR (HR = 21.92; 95% CI: 2.26-212.96; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of poor treatment response. Cox regression analysis showed that good clinical tumor response (p < 0.014, HR =0.501; 95% CI: 0.288–0.871) was a favorable independent predictive factor for OS, while an advanced tumor stage (p = 0.018, HR = 1.796; 95% CI: 1.107-2.915) and a high SUVTLR (p < 0.002, HR = 2.660; 95% CI: 1.425–4.967) were prognostic factors for poor OS. The median OS of patients in the low SUVTLR and high SUVTLR groups was 13.47 vs. 19.30 months, respectively. Conclusions: PET-derived SUVTLR is superior to tumor SUVmax and SUVTBR in predicting treatment response and overall survival in patients with ESCC undergoing CCRT. High SUVTLR was an independent predictor of poor treatment response and shorter overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunsheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
| | - Kewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shanliang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
| | - Yong Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yipeng Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li KJ, Gu WY, Xia XF, Zhang P, Zou CL, Fei ZH. High Mean Corpuscular Volume as a Predictor of Poor Overall Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:7467-7474. [PMID: 32903963 PMCID: PMC7445527 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s230274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increasing numbers of recent studies have demonstrated that high mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is a predictor of poor overall survival (OS) and therapeutic response in patients with solid tumors. The aim of the present study was to explore the association between high MCV and OS in patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods Enrolled in this study were 249 patients with advanced EC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Pre-treatment MCV values were collected in all patients and their correlations with OS and pathophysiological characteristics were analyzed. The chi-square test was used to explore the correlation between MCV and various clinical pathophysiological characteristics, and the prognostic significance of high MCV using Kaplan–Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards model. All P-values were two-tailed and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results According to ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of MCV was 93.6 fL. The mean OS was 14.7 months in all 249 EC patients, 10.9 months in patients with MCV >93.6 fL, and 18.8 months in patients with MCV <93.6 fL; the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). Chi-square test showed that the MCV value was correlated with the N stage of the tumor and the therapeutic effect, indicating that the higher the MCV was, the higher the T stage of the tumor and the worse the therapeutic effect would be (p=0.012 and p <0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that MCV (OR = 1.864, 95% CI: 1.439–2.415) was an independent prognostic factor for OS in EC patients. Conclusion High MCV is a poor predictor of OS in patients with advanced EC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Yue Gu
- Department of Pathology, Yancheng Hospital Affiliated of Southeast University, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Fang Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Radiation and Medical Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Chang-Lin Zou
- Radiation and Medical Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng-Hua Fei
- Radiation and Medical Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zschaeck S, Li Y, Lin Q, Beck M, Amthauer H, Bauersachs L, Hajiyianni M, Rogasch J, Ehrhardt VH, Kalinauskaite G, Weingärtner J, Hartmann V, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. Prognostic value of baseline [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters MTV, TLG and asphericity in an international multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236841. [PMID: 32730364 PMCID: PMC7392321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters have shown prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC), mostly in monocenter studies. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of standard and novel PET parameters in a multicenter cohort of patients. Methods The established PET parameters metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as well as the novel parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) were evaluated in a retrospective multicenter cohort of 114 NPC patients with FDG-PET staging, treated with (chemo)radiation at 8 international institutions. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastases-free survival (FFDM), and locoregional control (LRC) was performed for clinical and PET parameters. Results When analyzing metric PET parameters, ASP showed a significant association with EFS (p = 0.035) and a trend for OS (p = 0.058). MTV was significantly associated with EFS (p = 0.026), OS (p = 0.008) and LRC (p = 0.012) and TLG with LRC (p = 0.019). TLG and MTV showed a very high correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.95), therefore TLG was subesequently not further analysed. Optimal cutoff values for defining high and low risk groups were determined by maximization of the p-value in univariate Cox regression considering all possible cutoff values. Generation of stable cutoff values was feasible for MTV (p<0.001), ASP (p = 0.023) and combination of both (MTV+ASP = occurrence of one or both risk factors, p<0.001) for OS and for MTV regarding the endpoints OS (p<0.001) and LRC (p<0.001). In multivariable Cox (age >55 years + one binarized PET parameter), MTV >11.1ml (hazard ratio (HR): 3.57, p<0.001) and ASP > 14.4% (HR: 3.2, p = 0.031) remained prognostic for OS. MTV additionally remained prognostic for LRC (HR: 4.86 p<0.001) and EFS (HR: 2.51 p = 0.004). Bootstrapping analyses showed that a combination of high MTV and ASP improved prognostic value for OS compared to each single variable significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04, respectively). When using the cohort from China (n = 57 patients) for establishment of prognostic parameters and all other patients for validation (n = 57 patients), MTV could be successfully validated as prognostic parameter regarding OS, EFS and LRC (all p-values <0.05 for both cohorts). Conclusions In this analysis, PET parameters were associated with outcome of NPC patients. MTV showed a robust association with OS, EFS and LRC. Our data suggest that combination of MTV and ASP may potentially further improve the risk stratification of NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Bauersachs
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent H. Ehrhardt
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Hartmann
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Belge G, Bilgin C, Ozkaya G, Kandemirli SG, Alper E. Prognostic value of pretreatment tumor-to-blood standardized uptake ratio (SUR) in rectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2020; 34:432-440. [PMID: 32297136 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01465-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prognostic value of SUV on pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with rectal cancer is a matter of debate. SUR is of prognostic value for survival in different cancers. In this study, we aimed to examine the potential prognostic value of SUR and other parameters in pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT for non-metastatic rectal cancer. METHODS One hundred four non-metastatic rectal cancer patients who underwent pretreatment PET/CT between March 2012 and January 2018 were included in the study. Firstly, SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG were calculated semi-automatically at the workstation. SUR was calculated as the ratio of tumor SUVmax to thoracic aorta blood SUVmean. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local recurrence (LR). Then, multivariate Cox regression analysis, which included the parameters that were significant in the univariate analysis, was performed. RESULTS Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that SUR was a prognostic factor for PFS. Age and T stage were prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. MTV was found to be independent risk factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS In our study, SUR was the only F-18 FDG PET/CT parameter found to be significant for PFS. The development of new parameters can increase the prognostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokce Belge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uludag University School of Medicine, 16059, Bursa, Turkey.
| | - Cem Bilgin
- Department of Radiology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Guven Ozkaya
- Department of Statistics, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | | | - Eray Alper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uludag University School of Medicine, 16059, Bursa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zschaeck S, Li Y, Bütof R, Lili C, Hua W, Troost ECG, Beck M, Amthauer H, Kaul D, Kotzerke J, Baur ADJ, Ghadjar P, Baumann M, Krause M, Hofheinz F. Combined tumor plus nontumor interim FDG-PET parameters are prognostic for response to chemoradiation in squamous cell esophageal cancer. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1427-1436. [PMID: 32010957 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
We have investigated the prognostic value of two novel interim 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) parameters in patients undergoing chemoradiation (CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): one tumor parameter (maximal standardized uptake ratio rSUR) and one normal tissue parameter (change of FDG uptake within irradiated nontumor-affected esophagus ∆SUVNTO ). PET data of 134 European and Chinese patients were analyzed. Parameter establishment was based on 36 patients undergoing preoperative CRT plus surgery, validation was performed in 98 patients receiving definitive CRT. Patients received PET imaging prior and during fourth week of CRT. Clinical parameters, baseline PET parameters, and interim PET parameters (rSUR and ∆SUVNTO ) were analyzed and compared to event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Combining rSUR and ∆SUVNTO revealed a strong prognostic impact on EFS, OS, LRC and FFDM in patients undergoing preoperative CRT. In the definitive CRT cohort, univariate analysis with respect to EFS revealed several staging plus both previously established interim PET parameters as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analyses revealed only rSUR and ∆SUVNTO as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.003, p = 0.008). Combination of these parameters with the cutoff established in preoperative CRT revealed excellent discrimination of patients with a long or short EFS (73% vs. 17% at 2 years, respectively) and significantly discriminated all other endpoints (OS, p < 0.001; LRC, p < 0.001; FFDM, p = 0.02), even in subgroups. Combined use of interim FDG-PET derived parameters ∆SUVNTO and rSUR seems to have predictive potential, allowing to select responders for definitive CRT and omission of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Chen Lili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wu Hua
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Xiamen First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China
| | - Esther C G Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander D J Baur
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radiologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prediction of lymph node metastasis by PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 40:933-939. [PMID: 31343610 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the capability of F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT)-related metabolic parameters to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) and occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Totally 84 patients undergoing curative esophagectomy with lymph node dissection were enrolled in this study. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was measured using threshold-based methods with a threshold of 40% maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The derivative of the volume (V)-threshold (T) function (volume difference/threshold difference) was defined as the heterogeneity factor (HF). In addition, SUVmax, SUVmean, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (SURmax), SURmean and several clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed to identify risk factors of LNM and OLNM. RESULTS SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG, SURmax, SURmean and HF were significantly different between LNM (+) and LNM (-). The optimal cut-off values of those parameters were 12.5, 8.34, 15.01, 117.185, 7.885, 4.855 and 0.300, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that MTV (OR = 1.127, P = 0.04) and SURmax (OR = 1.446, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of LNM, with sensitivity and specificity were 51.2%, 83.7% vs. 53.7%, 79.1%. In univariate and multivariate analysis, MTV was the sole parameter associated with OLMN (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION MTV and SURmax were statistically significant predictors of LNM in patients with ESCC, while MTV was a predictor of OLNM. High SURmax and MTV may indicate that the treatment planning should be tailored, which may improve patient prognosis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Vollenbrock SE, Voncken FEM, Bartels LW, Beets-Tan RGH, Bartels-Rutten A. Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:17-26. [PMID: 31431376 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23-59%) than poor responders (range 1.5-17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI. CONCLUSION DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E Vollenbrock
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W Bartels
- Image Sciences Institute, Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gabrielson S, Sanchez-Crespo A, Klevebro F, Axelsson R, Albert Tsai J, Johansson O, Nilsson M. 18F FDG-PET/CT evaluation of histological response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:578-585. [PMID: 30111193 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118791204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most parts of the world, curatively intended treatment for esophageal cancer includes neoadjuvant therapy, either with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, followed by esophagectomy. Currently 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is used for preoperative disease staging, but is not well established in the evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment. PURPOSE To evaluate changes in PET parameters in relation to the histological primary tumor response in the surgical specimen in patients randomized to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients were randomized between either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy.18F-FDG PET/CT exams were conducted at baseline and following neoadjuvant treatment. Standardized uptake ratio (SUR) values were measured in the primary tumor and compared as regards histological responders and non-responders as well as different treatment arms. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and 51 were available for analysis. A significant rate of SUR reduction was observed ( P = 0.02) in the primary tumor in histological responders compared to non-responders. Changes in SUR were significantly greater in responders following chemoradiotherapy ( P = 0.02), but not following chemotherapy alone ( P = 0.49). There was no statistically significant difference in SUR in patients with a complete histological response compared to those with a subtotal response. CONCLUSION Our results are similar to those of previous studies and show that changes in the rate of SUR can be used reliably to differentiate histological responders from non-responders after neoadjuvant treatment with either chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. Limitations of current PET technology are likely to restrict the possibility of accurately ruling out limited residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Gabrielson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Sanchez-Crespo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Klevebro
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rimma Axelsson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon Albert Tsai
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ove Johansson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:1485-1494. [PMID: 30949816 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04307-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis for patients with inoperable esophageal carcinoma is still poor and the reliability of individual therapy outcome prediction based on clinical parameters is not convincing. In a recent publication, we were able to show that PET can provide independent prognostic information in such a patient group and that the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) can improve the prognostic value of tracer uptake values. The present investigation addresses the question of whether the distinctly improved prognostic value of SUR can be confirmed in a similar patient group that was examined and treated at a different site. METHODS 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 147 consecutive patients (115 male, 32 female, mean age: 62 years) with newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma prior to definitive radiochemotherapy. In the PET images, the metabolic active volume (MTV) of the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. For the resulting ROIs, SUVmax and total lesion glycolysis (TLG = MTV × SUVmean) were computed. The blood SUV was determined by manually delineating the aorta in the low-dose CT. SUR values were computed as ratio of tumor SUV and blood SUV. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to overall survival (OS), distant-metastases-free survival (DM), and locoregional control (LRC) was performed. Additionally, a multivariate Cox regression including clinically relevant parameters was performed. RESULTS Univariate Cox regression revealed MTV, TLG, and SURmax as significant prognostic factors for OS. MTV as well as TLG were significant prognostic factors for LRC while SURmax showed only a trend for significance. None of the PET parameters was prognostic for DM. In univariate analysis, SUVmax was not prognostic for any of the investigated clinical endpoints. In multivariate analysis (T-stage, N-stage, MTV, and SURmax), MTV was an independent prognostic factor for OS and showed a trend for significance for LRC. SURmax was not an independent predictor for OS or LRC. When including the PET parameters separately in multivariate analysis, MTV as well as SURmax were prognostic factors for OS indicating that SURmax is independent from the clinical parameters but not from MTV. In addition, MTV was an independent prognostic factor for LRC in this separate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed a clearly improved prognostic value of tumor SUR compared to tumor SUV and confirms our previously published findings regarding OS. Furthermore, SUR delivers prognostic information beyond that provided by the clinical parameters alone, but does not add prognostic information beyond that provided by MTV in this patient group. Therefore, our results suggest that pretherapeutic MTV is the parameter of choice for PET-based risk stratification in the considered setting but further investigations are necessary to demonstrate that this suggestion is correct.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lv J, Gan H, Zhang W, Pan L, Wang R, Qin Y. Relative tumor volume is a better independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Results of a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14963. [PMID: 30946321 PMCID: PMC6456139 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study is to evaluate the significance in prognosis of relative tumor volume (RTV) in patients with non-resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated by definitive radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy.Fifty-eight consecutive patients with ESCC in UICC stage I to IV were retrospectively analyzed. Relative primary gross volume (RGTVp) was defined as primary gross volume (GTVp) divided by body volume. Relative primary gross volume for lymph nodes (RGTVnd) was defined as primary gross volume for lymph nodes (GTVnd) divided by body volume. The relationships were analyzed between overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and RGTVp (RGTVnd) in univariate and multivariate analyses.The cut-off values of 0.947 and 0.007 were determined for RGTVp and RGTVnd, respectively. The 3-year OS, DFS, and LRFS for patients with RGTVp ≤ 0.947 vs RGTVp > 0.947 was 65.4% vs 25.0% (P = .001), 46.2% vs 12.5% (P = .002), and 90.1% vs 42.0% (P < .001). RGTVp was an independent risk factor for OS (P = .046), DFS (P = .015) and LRFS (P = .032), but showed no association with DMFS in univariate and multivariate analyses. The 3-year DFS and DMFS for patients with RGTVnd ≤ 0.007 vs RGTVnd > 0.007 was 44.4% vs 20.0% (P = .023), and 62.9% vs 24.6% (P < .004). RGTVnd was associated with DMFS (P = .012) in multivariate, but showed no associated with DFS.The present study demonstrates that RTV was an independent factor relevant to prognosis for ESCC. It provides new clinical basis for personalized therapeutic regimens and might be included in the staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| | - Huimin Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| | - Linjiang Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| | - Rensheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| | - Yutao Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Medical Research Center of Guangxi, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hofheinz F, Maus J, Zschaeck S, Rogasch J, Schramm G, Oehme L, Apostolova I, Kotzerke J, den Hoff JV. Interobserver variability of image-derived arterial blood SUV in whole-body FDG PET. EJNMMI Res 2019; 9:23. [PMID: 30830508 PMCID: PMC6399366 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0486-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Today, the standardized uptake value (SUV) is essentially the only means for quantitative evaluation of static [18F-]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) investigations. However, the SUV approach has several well-known shortcomings which adversely affect the reliability of the SUV as a surrogate of the metabolic rate of glucose consumption. The standard uptake ratio (SUR), i.e., the uptake time-corrected ratio of tumor SUV to image-derived arterial blood SUV, has been shown in the first clinical studies to overcome most of these shortcomings, to decrease test-retest variability, and to increase the prognostic value in comparison to SUV. However, it is unclear, to what extent the SUR approach is vulnerable to observer variability of the additionally required blood SUV (BSUV) determination. The goal of the present work was the investigation of the interobserver variability of image-derived BSUV. Methods FDG PET/CT scans from 83 patients (72 male, 11 female) with non-small cell lung cancer (N = 46) or head and neck cancer (N = 37) were included. BSUV was determined by 8 individuals, each applying a dedicated delineation tool for the BSUV determination in the aorta. Two of the observers applied two further tools. Altogether, five different delineation tools were used. With each used tool, delineation was performed for the whole patient group, resulting in 12 distinct observations per patient. Intersubject variability of BSUV determination was assessed using the fractional deviations for the individual patients from the patient group average and was quantified as standard deviation (SD is), 95% confidence interval, and range. Interobserver variability of BSUV determination was assessed using the fractional deviations of the individual observers from the observer-average for the considered patient and quantified as standard deviations (SD p, SD d) or root mean square (RMS), 95% confidence interval, and range in each patient, each observer, and the pooled data respectively. Results Interobserver variability in the pooled data amounts to RMS = 2.8% and is much smaller than the intersubject variability of BSUV (SD is= 16%). Averaged over the whole patient group, deviations of individual observers from the observer average are very small and fall in the range [ − 0.96, 1.05]%. However, interobserver variability partly differs distinctly for different patients, covering a range of [0.7, 7.4]% in the investigated patient group. Conclusion The present investigation demonstrates that the image-based manual determination of BSUV in the aorta is sufficiently reproducible across different observers and delineation tools which is a prerequisite for accurate SUR determination. This finding is in line with the already demonstrated superior prognostic value of SUR in comparison to SUV in the first clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Jens Maus
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch 2, Berlin, 10178, Germany
| | - Julian Rogasch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Schramm
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU/UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liane Oehme
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Zentrum für Radiologie und Endoskopie, Abteilung für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2018; 43:887-894. [DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
35
|
Verloh N, Einspieler I, Utpatel K, Menhart K, Brunner S, Hofheinz F, van den Hoff J, Wiggermann P, Evert M, Stroszczynski C, Hellwig D, Grosse J. In vivo confirmation of altered hepatic glucose metabolism in patients with liver fibrosis/cirrhosis by 18F-FDG PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:98. [PMID: 30414009 PMCID: PMC6226405 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0452-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for quantitative assessment of hepatic metabolism in patients with different stages of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 37 patients either with or without liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, classified according to the METAVIR score (F0-F4) obtained from histopathological analysis of liver specimen, were analyzed retrospectively and classified as follows: no liver fibrosis (F0, n = 6), mild liver fibrosis (F1, n = 11), advanced liver fibrosis (F2, n = 6), severe liver fibrosis (F3, n = 5), and liver cirrhosis (F4, n = 11). The liver-to-blood ratio (LBR, scan time corrected for a reference time of 75 min) was compared between patient groups. RESULTS Patients with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (≥ F1; LBR 1.53 ± 0.35) showed a significant higher LBR than patients with normal liver parenchyma (F0, 1.08 ± 0.23; P = 0.004). In direct comparison, LBR increased up to the advanced stage of liver fibrosis (F2; 2.00 ± 0.40) and decreased until liver cirrhosis is reached (F4, 1.32 ± 0.14). CONCLUSION Functional changes in liver parenchyma during liver fibrosis/cirrhosis affect hepatic glucose metabolism and significantly differ between stages of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, classified according to the METAVIR scoring system, as demonstrated by LBR quantification by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Verloh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Ingo Einspieler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten Utpatel
- Department of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karin Menhart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Brunner
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Philipp Wiggermann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Hellwig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jirka Grosse
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Prediction of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis Using Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio and Metabolic Parameters in Clinical N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2018; 43:715-720. [PMID: 30106864 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate whether the tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (SUR) and metabolic parameters of F-FDG uptake could predict occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) in clinically node-negative (cN0) lung adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 157 patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma who underwent both preoperative F-FDG PET/CT and surgical resection with the systematic lymph node dissection. The SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor was measured on the PET/CT workstation. SURmax, SURmean, and TLGsur were derived from each of them divided by descending aorta SUVmean. These PET parameters and clinicopathological variables were analyzed for OLM. RESULTS In our study, OLM was detected in 31 (19.7%) of 157 patients. Significantly higher values of tumor size, SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLGsuv, SURmax, SURmean, and TLGsur were found in patients with OLM. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff values of the above parameters were 29.50, 4.38, 2.45, 6.37, 44.13, 5.30, 1.86, and 28.24, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that TLGsur (odds ratio, 1.024; P = 0.002) was the most potent associated factor for the prediction of OLM in cN0 lung adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS TLGsur showed the most powerful predictive performance than the other PET parameters for the prediction of OLM in cN0 lung adenocarcinoma. This normalized volumetric parameter would be helpful in selection of sublobar resection or aggressive tailored treatments in patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bütof R, Hofheinz F, Zöphel K, Schmollack J, Jentsch C, Zschaeck S, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J, Baumann M. Prognostic value of SUR in patients with trimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:jnumed.117.207670. [PMID: 30166358 PMCID: PMC8833854 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.207670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma remains dismal despite ongoing efforts to improve treatment options. For locally advanced tumors, several randomized trials have shown the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery compared to surgery alone. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the prognostic value of different baseline positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and their potentially additional prognostic impact at the end of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Furthermore, the standard uptake ratio (SUR) as a new parameter for quantification of tumor metabolism was compared to the conventional PET parameters metabolic active volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and standardized uptake value (SUV) taking into account known basic parameters. Methods:18F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in 76 consecutive patients ((60±10) years, 71 males) with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer before and during the last week of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. MTV of the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. The blood SUV was determined by manually delineating the aorta in the low dose CT. SUR values were computed as scan time corrected ratio of tumor SUVmax and mean blood SUV. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to locoregional control (LRC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), and overall survival (OS) was performed. Additionally, independence of PET parameters from standard clinical factors was analyzed with multivariate Cox regression. Results: In multivariate analysis two parameters showed a significant correlation with all endpoints: restaging MTV and restaging SUR. Furthermore, restaging TLG was prognostic for LCR and FFDM. For all endpoints the largest effect size was found for restaging SUR. The only basic factors remaining significant in multivariate analyses were histology for OS and FFDM and age for LRC. Conclusion: PET provides independent prognostic information for OS, LRC, and FFDM in addition to standard clinical parameters in this patient cohort. Our results suggest that the prognostic value of tracer uptake can be improved when characterized by SUR rather than by SUV. Overall, our investigation revealed a higher prognostic value of restaging parameters compared to baseline PET; therapy-adjustments would still be possible at this point of time. Further investigations are required to confirm these hypothesis-generating results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Schmollack
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Jentsch
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- PET Center, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; and
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology–OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Maus J, Hofheinz F, Apostolova I, Kreissl MC, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J. Monitoring scanner calibration using the image-derived arterial blood SUV in whole-body FDG-PET. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:38. [PMID: 29766311 PMCID: PMC5953910 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0391-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current de facto standard for quantification of tumor metabolism in oncological whole-body PET is the standardized uptake value (SUV) approach. SUV determination requires accurate scanner calibration. Residual inaccuracies of the calibration lead to biased SUV values. Especially, this can adversely affect multicenter trials where it is difficult to ensure reliable cross-calibration across participating sites. The goal of the present work was the evaluation of a new method for monitoring scanner calibration utilizing the image-derived arterial blood SUV (BSUV) averaged over a sufficiently large number of whole-body FDG-PET investigations. Data of 681 patients from three sites which underwent routine 18F-FDG PET/CT or PET/MR were retrospectively analyzed. BSUV was determined in the descending aorta using a three-dimensional ROI concentric to the aorta’s centerline. The ROI was delineated in the CT or MRI images and transferred to the PET images. A minimum ROI volume of 5 mL and a concentric safety margin to the aortic wall was observed. Mean BSUV, standard deviation (SD), and standard error of the mean (SE) were computed for three groups of patients at each site, investigated 2 years apart, respectively, with group sizes between 53 and 100 patients. Differences of mean BSUV between the individual groups and sites were determined. Results SD (SE) of BSUV in the different groups ranged from 14.3 to 20.7% (1.7 to 2.8%). Differences of mean BSUV between intra-site groups were small (1.1–6.3%). Only one out of nine of these differences reached statistical significance. Inter-site differences were distinctly larger (12.6–25.1%) and highly significant (P<0.001). Conclusions Image-based determination of the group-averaged blood SUV in modestly large groups of whole-body FDG-PET investigations is a viable approach for ensuring consistent scanner calibration over time and across different sites. We propose this approach as a quality control and cross-calibration tool augmenting established phantom-based procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Maus
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Zentrum für Radiologie und Endoskopie, Abteilung für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, Dresden, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Increased evidence for the prognostic value of FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus in irradiated patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:1752-1761. [PMID: 29679113 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3996-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-FDG uptake in irradiated non-tumour-affected oesophagus (NTO) on restaging PET is a potential surrogate for the measurement of radiation-induced inflammation. Radiation-induced inflammation itself has been shown to be of high prognostic relevance in patients undergoing preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. We assessed the prognostic relevance of FDG uptake in the NTO in an independent cohort of patients treated with definitive RCT. METHODS This retrospective evaluation included 72 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive RCT with curative intent. All patients underwent pretreatment and restaging FDG PET after receiving a radiation dose of 40-50 Gy. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax/SUVmean), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and relative changes from pretreatment to restaging PET (∆SUVmax/∆SUVmean) were determined within the tumour and NTO. Univariate Cox regression with respect to overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant metastases (DM) and treatment failure (TF) was performed. Independence of parameters was tested by multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS ∆SUVmax NTO and MTV were prognostic factors for all investigated clinical endpoints (OS, LC, DM, TF). Inclusion of clinical and PET tumour parameters in multivariate analysis showed that ∆SUVmax NTO was an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, multivariate analysis of ∆SUVmax NTO using previously published cut-off values from preoperatively treated patients revealed that ∆SUVmax NTO was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.88, p = 0.038), TF (HR = 2.11, p = 0.048) and DM (HR = 3.02, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION NTO-related tracer uptake during the course of treatment in patients with oesophageal carcinoma was shown to be of high prognostic relevance. Thus, metabolically activity of NTO measured in terms of ∆SUVmax NTO is a potential candidate for future treatment individualization (i.e. organ preservation).
Collapse
|
40
|
Takahashi N, Umezawa R, Takanami K, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa Y, Kozumi M, Takeda K, Kadoya N, Jingu K. Whole-body total lesion glycolysis is an independent predictor in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2017; 129:161-165. [PMID: 29108779 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine whether pretreatment whole-body total lesion glycolysis (TLGWB) and metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) are associated with outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients with stage II or III thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent FDG-PET/CT within 45 days before dCRT between 2005 and 2013 were reviewed. MTV and TLG of the primary lesion (MTVpri and TLGpri) and the sum of MTV and TLG for all lesions (MTVWB and TLGWB) were calculated. Predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 27.7 months. In multivariate analysis, MTVWB > median was an unfavorable predictor for OS (p = 0.027, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.15), LC (p = 0.039, HR: 1.98) and PFS (p = 0.041, HR: 1.96). TLGWB > median was an unfavorable predictor for OS (p = 0.019, HR: 2.26), LC (p = 0.015, HR: 2.36) and PFS (p = 0.014, HR: 2.33). SUVmax was not a predictor, and the HR of TLGWB was higher than that of MTVWB for OS, LC and PFS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION TLGWB and MTVWB are independent predictors in patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kentaro Takanami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Youjirou Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Maiko Kozumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Arnett AL, Packard AT, Mara K, Mansfield AS, Wigle DA, Haddock MG, Park SS, Olivier KR, Garces YI, Merrell KW. FDG-PET parameters as predictors of pathologic response and nodal clearance in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e531-e541. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
42
|
Löck S, Perrin R, Seidlitz A, Bandurska-Luque A, Zschaeck S, Zöphel K, Krause M, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, Zips D, Troost EGC, Baumann M. Residual tumour hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing primary radiochemotherapy, final results of a prospective trial on repeat FMISO-PET imaging. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:533-540. [PMID: 28843726 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypoxia is a well recognised parameter of tumour resistance to radiotherapy, a number of anticancer drugs and potentially immunotherapy. In a previously published exploration cohort of 25 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients on [18F]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography (FMISO-PET) we identified residual tumour hypoxia during radiochemotherapy, not before start of treatment, as the driving mechanism of hypoxia-mediated therapy resistance. Several quantitative FMISO-PET parameters were identified as potential prognostic biomarkers. Here we present the results of the prospective validation cohort, and the overall results of the study. METHODS FMISO-PET/CT images of further 25 HNSCC patients were acquired at four time-points before and during radiochemotherapy (RCHT). Peak standardised uptake value, tumour-to-background ratio, and hypoxic volume were analysed. The impact of the potential prognostic parameters on loco-regional tumour control (LRC) was validated by the concordance index (ci) using univariable and multivariable Cox models based on the exploration cohort. Log-rank tests were employed to compare the endpoint between risk groups. RESULTS The two cohorts differed significantly in several baseline parameters, e.g., tumour volume, hypoxic volume, HPV status, and intercurrent death. Validation was successful for several FMISO-PET parameters and showed the highest performance (ci=0.77-0.81) after weeks 1 and 2 of treatment. Cut-off values for the FMISO-PET parameters could be validated after week 2 of RCHT. Median values for the residual hypoxic volume, defined as the ratio of the hypoxic volume in week 2 of RCHT and at baseline, stratified patients into groups of significantly different LRC when applied to the respective other cohort. CONCLUSION Our study validates that residual tumour hypoxia during radiochemotherapy is a major driver of therapy resistance of HNSCC, and that hypoxia after the second week of treatment measured by FMISO-PET may serve as biomarker for selection of patients at high risk of loco-regional recurrence after state-of-the art radiochemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Rosalind Perrin
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Annekatrin Seidlitz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Anna Bandurska-Luque
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Steinbach
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany.
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, partner site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Quantification: there is more to worry about than good scanner hardware and reliable calibration. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1955-1957. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3808-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
44
|
Hofheinz F, Apostolova I, Oehme L, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J. Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in 18F-FDG PET: An Analysis of Data from Two Prospective Multicenter Trials. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1770-1775. [PMID: 28473598 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of radio- and chemotherapy response with 18F-FDG whole-body PET has attracted increasing interest in recent years. In most published work, SUV has been used for this purpose. In the context of therapy response assessment, the reliability of lesion SUVs, notably their test-retest stability, thus becomes crucial. However, a recent study demonstrated substantial test-retest variability (TRV) in SUVs. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (SUR) can improve TRV in tracer uptake. Methods: 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from the prospective multicenter trials ACRIN 6678 (n = 34) and MK-0646-008 (n = 39) were included in this study. All patients underwent two 18F-FDG PET/CT investigations on two different days (time difference, 3.6 ± 2.1 d; range, 1-7 d) before therapy. For each patient, up to 7 tumor lesions were evaluated. For each lesion, SUVmax and SUVpeak were determined. Blood SUV was determined as the mean value of a 3-dimensional aortic region of interest that was delineated on the attenuation CT image and transferred to the PET image. SURs were computed as the ratio of tumor SUV to blood SUV and were uptake time-corrected to 75 min after injection. TRV was quantified as 1.96 multiplied by the root-mean-square deviation of the fractional paired differences in SUV and SUR. The combined effect of blood normalization and uptake time correction was inspected by considering RTRV (TRVSUR/TRVSUV), a ratio reflecting the reduction in the TRV in SUR relative to SUV. RTRV was correlated with the group-averaged-value difference (δ) in CFmean (δCFmean) of the quantity δCF = |CF - 1|, where CF is the numeric factor that converts individual ratios of paired SUVs into corresponding SURs. This correlation analysis was performed by successively increasing a threshold value δCFmin and computing δCFmean and RTRV for the remaining subgroup of patients/lesions with δCF ≥ δCFminResults: The group-averaged TRVSUV and TRVSUR were 32.1 and 29.0, respectively, which correspond to a reduction of variability in SUR by an RTRV factor of 0.9 in comparison to SUV. This rather marginal improvement can be understood to be a consequence of the atypically low intrasubject variability in blood SUV and uptake time and the accordingly small δCF values in the investigated prospective study groups. In fact, subgroup analysis with increasing δCFmin thresholds revealed a pronounced negative correlation (Spearman ρ = -0.99, P < 0.001) between RTRV and δCFmean, where RTRV ≈ 0.4 in the δCFmin = 20% subgroup, corresponding to a more than 2-fold reduction of TRVSUR compared with TRVSUVConclusion: Variability in blood SUV and uptake time has been identified as a causal factor in the TRV in lesion SUV. Therefore, TRV in lesion uptake measurements can be reduced by replacing SUV with SUR as the uptake measure. The improvement becomes substantial for the level of variability in blood SUV and uptake time typically observed in the clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Klinik für Radiologie Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Germany; and
| | - Liane Oehme
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abbosh C, Birkbak NJ, Wilson GA, Jamal-Hanjani M, Constantin T, Salari R, Le Quesne J, Moore DA, Veeriah S, Rosenthal R, Marafioti T, Kirkizlar E, Watkins TBK, McGranahan N, Ward S, Martinson L, Riley J, Fraioli F, Al Bakir M, Grönroos E, Zambrana F, Endozo R, Bi WL, Fennessy FM, Sponer N, Johnson D, Laycock J, Shafi S, Czyzewska-Khan J, Rowan A, Chambers T, Matthews N, Turajlic S, Hiley C, Lee SM, Forster MD, Ahmad T, Falzon M, Borg E, Lawrence D, Hayward M, Kolvekar S, Panagiotopoulos N, Janes SM, Thakrar R, Ahmed A, Blackhall F, Summers Y, Hafez D, Naik A, Ganguly A, Kareht S, Shah R, Joseph L, Marie Quinn A, Crosbie PA, Naidu B, Middleton G, Langman G, Trotter S, Nicolson M, Remmen H, Kerr K, Chetty M, Gomersall L, Fennell DA, Nakas A, Rathinam S, Anand G, Khan S, Russell P, Ezhil V, Ismail B, Irvin-Sellers M, Prakash V, Lester JF, Kornaszewska M, Attanoos R, Adams H, Davies H, Oukrif D, Akarca AU, Hartley JA, Lowe HL, Lock S, Iles N, Bell H, Ngai Y, Elgar G, Szallasi Z, Schwarz RF, Herrero J, Stewart A, Quezada SA, Peggs KS, Van Loo P, Dive C, Lin CJ, Rabinowitz M, Aerts HJWL, Hackshaw A, Shaw JA, Zimmermann BG, Swanton C. Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature 2017; 545:446-451. [PMID: 28445469 PMCID: PMC5812436 DOI: 10.1038/nature22364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1174] [Impact Index Per Article: 167.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The early detection of relapse following primary surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer and the characterization of emerging subclones, which seed metastatic sites, might offer new therapeutic approaches for limiting tumour recurrence. The ability to track the evolutionary dynamics of early-stage lung cancer non-invasively in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has not yet been demonstrated. Here we use a tumour-specific phylogenetic approach to profile the ctDNA of the first 100 TRACERx (Tracking Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Evolution Through Therapy (Rx)) study participants, including one patient who was also recruited to the PEACE (Posthumous Evaluation of Advanced Cancer Environment) post-mortem study. We identify independent predictors of ctDNA release and analyse the tumour-volume detection limit. Through blinded profiling of postoperative plasma, we observe evidence of adjuvant chemotherapy resistance and identify patients who are very likely to experience recurrence of their lung cancer. Finally, we show that phylogenetic ctDNA profiling tracks the subclonal nature of lung cancer relapse and metastasis, providing a new approach for ctDNA-driven therapeutic studies.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Biopsy/methods
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/blood
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery
- Cell Lineage/genetics
- Cell Tracking
- Clone Cells/metabolism
- Clone Cells/pathology
- DNA Mutational Analysis
- DNA, Neoplasm/blood
- DNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- Disease Progression
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Early Detection of Cancer/methods
- Evolution, Molecular
- Humans
- Limit of Detection
- Lung Neoplasms/blood
- Lung Neoplasms/genetics
- Lung Neoplasms/pathology
- Lung Neoplasms/surgery
- Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnosis
- Neoplasm Metastasis/genetics
- Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Postoperative Care/methods
- Reproducibility of Results
- Tumor Burden
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Abbosh
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Nicolai J Birkbak
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Gareth A Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Mariam Jamal-Hanjani
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Tudor Constantin
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Raheleh Salari
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - John Le Quesne
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - David A Moore
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Selvaraju Veeriah
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Rachel Rosenthal
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Teresa Marafioti
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals, 21 University Street, London WC1 6JJ, UK
| | - Eser Kirkizlar
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Thomas B K Watkins
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Nicholas McGranahan
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Sophia Ward
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Advanced Sequencing Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Luke Martinson
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Joan Riley
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Maise Al Bakir
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Eva Grönroos
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Francisco Zambrana
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Raymondo Endozo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Fiona M Fennessy
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Nicole Sponer
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Diana Johnson
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Joanne Laycock
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Seema Shafi
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Justyna Czyzewska-Khan
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Andrew Rowan
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Tim Chambers
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Advanced Sequencing Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Nik Matthews
- Advanced Sequencing Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Tumour Profiling Unit Genomics Facility, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Crispin Hiley
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Siow Ming Lee
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Martin D Forster
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Tanya Ahmad
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Mary Falzon
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals, 21 University Street, London WC1 6JJ, UK
| | - Elaine Borg
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals, 21 University Street, London WC1 6JJ, UK
| | - David Lawrence
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Martin Hayward
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Shyam Kolvekar
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Sam M Janes
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, Rayne Building, University College London, 5 University Street, London WC1E 6JF, UK
| | - Ricky Thakrar
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Asia Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Fiona Blackhall
- Institute of Cancer Studies, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- The Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | | | - Dina Hafez
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Ashwini Naik
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Apratim Ganguly
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Stephanie Kareht
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Rajesh Shah
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - Leena Joseph
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - Anne Marie Quinn
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - Phil A Crosbie
- North West Lung Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - Babu Naidu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Gerald Langman
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK
| | - Simon Trotter
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK
| | - Marianne Nicolson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Hardy Remmen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Keith Kerr
- Department of Pathology, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Mahendran Chetty
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Lesley Gomersall
- Department of Radiology, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Apostolos Nakas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Sridhar Rathinam
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Girija Anand
- Department of Radiotherapy, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, UK
| | - Sajid Khan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet EN5 3DJ, UK
| | - Peter Russell
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow CM20 1QX, UK
| | - Veni Ezhil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St.Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Babikir Ismail
- Department of Pathology, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospital, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
| | - Melanie Irvin-Sellers
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospital, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
| | - Vineet Prakash
- Department of Radiology, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospital, Guildford Road, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
| | - Jason F Lester
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | | | - Richard Attanoos
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales and Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - Haydn Adams
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK
| | - Helen Davies
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK
| | - Dahmane Oukrif
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Ayse U Akarca
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - John A Hartley
- University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre GCLP Facility, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Helen L Lowe
- University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre GCLP Facility, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Sara Lock
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, N19 5NF, UK
| | - Natasha Iles
- University College London, Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Harriet Bell
- University College London, Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Yenting Ngai
- University College London, Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Greg Elgar
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Advanced Sequencing Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Zoltan Szallasi
- Centre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
- Computational Health Informatics Program (CHIP), Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- MTA-SE-NAP, Brain Metastasis Research Group, 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, 1091 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roland F Schwarz
- Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Javier Herrero
- Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Aengus Stewart
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Sergio A Quezada
- Cancer Immunology Unit, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Karl S Peggs
- Cancer Immunology Unit, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Research Department of Haematology, University College Cancer Institute, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Peter Van Loo
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Dive
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - C Jimmy Lin
- Natera Inc., 201 Industrial Road, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | | | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215-5450, USA
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- University College London, Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Jacqui A Shaw
- Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | | | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence London and Manchester, University College London Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shin S, Pak K, Kim IJ, Kim BS, Kim SJ. Prognostic Value of Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 51:233-239. [PMID: 28878849 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-016-0456-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2016] [Revised: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previously published studies showed that the standard tumor-to-blood standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio (SUR) was a more accurate prognostic method than tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). This study evaluated and compared prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and normalized value of PET parameters by blood pool SUV in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received curative surgery. METHODS Seventy-seven patients who underwent curative resection for NSCLC between January 2010 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed before surgery. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of each lesion was measured, on the workstation. SURmean, SURmax, and TLGSUR were calculated by dividing each of them by descending aorta SUVmean. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the effect of age, sex, pathological parameters, and PET parameters on recurrence and death. RESULTS In Cox regression analysis, N stage predicted for both recurrence (p < 0.0001) and death (p < 0.0001). SURmax predicted recurrence (p = 0.0014), not death. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SURmax was 0.759 with cutoff value 4.004. However, SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG, SURmean, and TLGSUR predicted neither recurrence nor death. CONCLUSIONS Among PET parameters, SURmax was the independent predictor of recurrence in NSCLC patients who received curative surgery. N stage was the independent prognostic factor for both recurrence and death. Both parameters could be used to stratify the risk of NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghyeon Shin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Kyoungjune Pak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - In Joo Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Bum Soo Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Seong Jang Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wartski M. La tomographie par émission de positons (TEP) en oncologie digestive. Presse Med 2016; 45:734-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
48
|
Arnett ALH, Merrell KW, Macintosh EM, James SE, Nathan MA, Shen KR, Ravi K, Neben Wittich MA, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Predicting Histopathologic Response in Esophageal Carcinoma following Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 12:121-128. [PMID: 27569732 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgical resection, complete histopathologic response (pCR) is associated with favorable overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) response to neoadjuvant CRT and pCR. METHODS Maximum standardized uptake values and standardized uptake ratios (SURs) were measured before and after CRT. SUR was normalized to liver uptake and mediastinal blood pool uptake. FDG PET complete response was defined as metabolic activity normalization to hepatic and blood pool activity. The correlation between FDG PET parameters and pCR was examined through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS In total, 193 patients were monitored for a median of 3.6 years after initiation of CRT. Most tumors were adenocarcinoma (85%) and stage T3 (75%). Complete FDG PET response and pCR occurred in 27% and 34% of patients, respectively. Histologic findings, chemotherapy type, tumor stage, and radiation dose were not significantly associated with complete radiographic response. The rates of pCR in patients with and without radiographic complete response were 42% and 31% (p = 0.17), respectively. No predictive correlation was found between pCR and change in maximum standardized uptake value (p = 0.25), in SUR normalized to blood pool uptake (p = 0.20), or in SUR normalized to liver uptake (p = 0.15). The 5-year OS rate was 46% for patients with a complete FDG PET response versus 44% without a complete response (p = 0.78). The 5-year OS rate of patients who achieved pCR was 49% versus 43% for patients with residual tumor (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION For patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, pretreatment and posttreatment FDG PET parameters did not correlate with pCR or OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah E James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark A Nathan
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - K Robert Shen
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karthik Ravi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Huang YTT, Park J, Chong S, Hugh TJ, Ng WL, Lin M. The prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography metabolic tumor volume in solitary colorectal liver metastasis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016; 13:e262-e270. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Tung T Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET; Sydney Australia
- University of New South Wales; Kensington Sydney Australia
| | - Joomann Park
- University of New South Wales; Kensington Sydney Australia
| | - Shanley Chong
- University of New South Wales; Kensington Sydney Australia
- Epidemiology, Healthy People and Places Unit; Southwestern Sydney Local Health District; Sydney Australia
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- Upper GI Surgical Unit; Royal North Shore Hospital and North Shore Private Hospital; St. Leonards Sydney Australia
- University of Sydney; Sydney Australia
| | - Weng Leong Ng
- University of New South Wales; Kensington Sydney Australia
- Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital; Sydney Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research; Liverpool; Sydney Australia
- University of Western Sydney; Sydney Australia
| | - Michael Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET; Sydney Australia
- University of New South Wales; Kensington Sydney Australia
- University of Western Sydney; Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET. EJNMMI Res 2016; 6:53. [PMID: 27334609 PMCID: PMC4917506 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0208-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We have demonstrated recently that the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) as a surrogate of the metabolic uptake rate Km of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), overcoming several of the known shortcomings of the SUV approach: excellent linear correlation of SUR and Km from Patlak analysis was found using dynamic imaging of liver metastases. However, due to the perfectly standardized uptake period used for SUR determination and the comparatively short uptake period, these results are not automatically valid and applicable for clinical whole-body examinations in which the uptake periods (T) are distinctly longer and can vary considerably. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the correlation between SUR derived from clinical static whole-body scans and Km-surrogate derived from dual time point (DTP) measurements. Methods DTP 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 90 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the PET images, the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. For determination of the blood SUV, an aorta region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually in the attenuation CT and transferred to the PET image. Blood SUV was computed as the mean value of the aorta ROI. SUR values were computed as ratio of tumor SUV and blood SUV. SUR values from the early time point of each DTP measurement were scan time corrected to 75 min postinjection (SURtc). As surrogate of Km, we used the SUR(T) slope, Kslope, derived from DTP measurements since it is proportional to the latter under the given circumstances. The correlation of SUV and SURtc with Kslope was investigated. The prognostic value of SUV, SURtc, and Kslope for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate Cox regression in a homogeneous subgroup (N=31) treated with primary chemoradiation. Results Correlation analysis revealed for both, SUV and SURtc, a clear linear correlation with Kslope (P<0.001). Correlation SUR vs. Kslope was considerably stronger than correlation SUV vs. Kslope (R2=0.92 and R2=0.69, respectively, P<0.001). Univariate Cox regression revealed SURtc and Kslope as significant prognostic factors for PFS (hazard ratio (HR) =3.4/ P=0.017 and HR =4.3/ P=0.020, respectively). For SUV, no significant effect was found. None of the investigated parameters was prognostic for OS. Conclusions Scan-time-corrected SUR is a significantly better surrogate of tumor FDG metabolism in clinical whole-body PET compared to SUV. The very high linear correlation of SUR and DTP-derived Kslope (which is proportional to actual Km) implies that for histologically proven malignant lesions, FDG-DTP does not provide added value in comparison to the SUR approach in NSCLC.
Collapse
|