Surgical treatment of brain metastases from melanoma: a retrospective study of 91 patients

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.

Melanoma brain metastasis mimicking cortical laminar necrosis

Background

Metastatic lesions to the brain are common in patients with melanoma. Imaging characteristics can support the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma, but alternative diagnoses should be considered.

Case Description

Here, we present a case of a 57-year-old man in whom a metastatic melanoma initially mimicked the imaging characteristics of cortical laminar necrosis.

Conclusion

This comprises the first report of melanoma brain metastasis presenting with these imaging characteristics and emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for metastatic lesions in patients with known cancer.

Melanoma central nervous system metastases: An update to approaches, challenges, and opportunities

Brain metastases are the most common brain malignancy. This review discusses the studies presented at the third annual meeting of the Melanoma Research Foundation in the context of other recent reports on the biology and treatment of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Although symptomatic MBM patients were historically excluded from immunotherapy trials, efforts from clinicians and patient advocates have resulted in more inclusive and even dedicated clinical trials for MBM patients. The results of checkpoint inhibitor trials were discussed in conversation with current standards of care for MBM patients, including steroids, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Advances in the basic scientific understanding of MBM, including the role of astrocytes and metabolic adaptations to the brain microenvironment, are exposing new vulnerabilities which could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. Technical advances including single-cell omics and multiplex imaging are expanding our understanding of the MBM ecosystem and its response to therapy. This unprecedented level of spatial and temporal resolution is expected to dramatically advance the field in the coming years and render novel treatment approaches that might improve MBM patient outcomes.

In Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases, Is Combination Immune Checkpoint Inhibition a Safe and Effective First-Line Treatment? A Critically Appraised Topic

BACKGROUND

Combined PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition for the has been shown to produce superior results in the treatment of malignant melanoma when compared to monotherapy. However, patients with intracranial disease were excluded from these studies given their poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence supporting the co-administration of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.

METHODS

The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and a content expert in the field of neuro-oncology.

RESULTS

A recent, open-label, non-comparative randomized phase II trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in 79 adult patients with untreated, asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases. The rates of the primary outcome (intracranial response at ≥12 wk) in the primary endpoint cohort were 46% for cohort A (combination therapy) and 20% for cohort B (nivolumab monotherapy). No treatment related deaths were observed in the study. Grade 4 adverse events occurred in 9% of patients in cohort A and none in cohort B.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of ipilimumab and nivolumab as first-line therapy is effective in the treatment of asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases, with an acceptable safety profile.

Outcomes After Curative Metastasectomy for Patients with Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the role of curative metastasectomy (CM) for malignant melanoma (MM) patients is limited, especially in the current era of effective systemic therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to ascertain the role of CM compared with incomplete or nonsurgical treatment for patients with MM.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating CM for MM until 30 September 2021. The review included studies that compared CM with no-CM and reported a hazard ratio (HR) after multivariate analysis for overall survival. A random-effects model with inverse variance was used to calculate pooled HR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

For the final analysis, 40 studies including 31,282 patients (CM, 9958; no-CM, 21,324) were considered. Compared with no-CM, CM was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.47; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that the outcome was independent of the effective systemic therapy and anatomic location of metastasis. An unfavorable prognosis was associated with advancing age, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), male gender, prior stage 3 disease, multiple metastases and organ sites, and shorter disease-free interval.

CONCLUSION

Curative metastasectomy for MM is associated with a lower risk of death than non-curative treatment methods. Selection bias and underlying weakness of studies reduced the strength of evidence in this review. However, CM should be a part of the multimodality treatment of MM whenever technically feasible.

Impact of radiotherapy and sequencing of systemic therapy on survival outcomes in melanoma patients with previously untreated brain metastasis: a multicenter DeCOG study on 450 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG

BACKGROUND

Despite of various therapeutic strategies, treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) still is a major challenge. This study aimed at investigating the impact of type and sequence of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy (TT), radiotherapy, and surgery on the survival outcome of patients with MBM.

METHOD

We assessed data of 450 patients collected within the prospective multicenter real-world skin cancer registry ADOREG who were diagnosed with MBM before start of the first non-adjuvant systemic therapy. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 450 MBM patients, 175 (38.9%) received CTLA-4+PD-1 ICB, 161 (35.8%) PD-1 ICB, and 114 (25.3%) BRAF+MEK TT as first-line treatment. Additional to systemic therapy, 67.3% of the patients received radiotherapy (stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); conventional radiotherapy (CRT)) and 24.4% had surgery of MBM. 199 patients (42.2%) received a second-line systemic therapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed the application of radiotherapy (HR for SRS: 0.213, 95% CI 0.094 to 0.485, p<0.001; HR for CRT: 0.424, 95% CI 0.210 to 0.855, p=0.016), maximal size of brain metastases (HR for MBM >1 cm: 1.977, 95% CI 1.117 to 3.500, p=0.019), age (HR for age >65 years: 1.802, 95% CI 1.016 to 3.197, p=0.044), and ECOG performance status (HR for ECOG ≥2: HR: 2.615, 95% CI 1.024 to 6.676, p=0.044) as independent prognostic factors of OS on first-line therapy. The type of first-line therapy (ICB vs TT) was not independently prognostic. As second-line therapy BRAF+MEK showed the best survival outcome compared with ICB and other therapies (HR for CTLA-4+PD-1 compared with BRAF+MEK: 13.964, 95% CI 3.6 to 54.4, p<0.001; for PD-1 vs BRAF+MEK: 4.587 95% CI 1.3 to 16.8, p=0.022 for OS). Regarding therapy sequencing, patients treated with ICB as first-line therapy and BRAF+MEK as second-line therapy showed an improved OS (HR for CTLA-4+PD-1 followed by BRAF+MEK: 0.370, 95% CI 0.157 to 0.934, p=0.035; HR for PD-1 followed by BRAF+MEK: 0.290, 95% CI 0.092 to 0.918, p=0.035) compared with patients starting with BRAF+MEK in first-line therapy. There was no significant survival difference when comparing first-line therapy with CTLA-4+PD-1 ICB with PD-1 ICB.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MBM, the addition of radiotherapy resulted in a favorable OS on systemic therapy. In BRAF-mutated MBM patients, ICB as first-line therapy and BRAF+MEK as second-line therapy were associated with a significantly prolonged OS.

Factors Associated with Hemorrhage of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted/Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies

Simple Summary

Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have a high propensity for hemorrhage (HA) after treatment. Our retrospective analysis evaluated factors associated with HA of MBM after robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the era of modern systemic therapy, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on this side effect. A total of 55 patients with 279 MBM were treated. The use of anticoagulants was the only predictive factor, both for radiologically evident HA and HA causing grade 3 toxicity. The interval between the administration of systemic therapy and SRS was also significant with regard to HA causing grade 1 toxicity, but it appears that the combination was safe, at least concerning grade 3 toxicity. We believe that our study is a useful contribution to the current literature, as it provides insights regarding the factors that correlate with HA.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with hemorrhage (HA) of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) after Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern era of systemic therapy. A total of 55 patients with 279 MBM were treated in 93 fractions. The median age, SRS dose, radiological follow-up, and time to HA were 60.4 years, 20 Gy, 17.7 months, and 10.7 months, respectively. Radiologically evident HA was documented in 47 (16.8%) metastases. Of the 55 patients, 25 (45.4%) suffered an HA. Among those, HA caused grade 3 toxicity in 10 patients (40%) and grade 1 symptoms in 5 patients (20%). Ten patients (40%) with HA experienced no toxicity. Logistic regression revealed the use of anticoagulants and the administration of systemic therapy within 7/15 days from SRS to be predictive for HA. When considering the HA causing grade 3 symptomatology, only the use of anticoagulants was significant, with the delivery of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) before the HA narrowly missing statistical significance. Our retrospective analysis showed that the administration of modern systemic therapy within 7/15 days from SRS may contribute to HA of MBM, though it appears safe, at least concerning grade 3 toxicity. The use of anticoagulants by the time of SRS significantly increased the risk of HA.

Current Treatment Approaches and Global Consensus Guidelines for Brain Metastases in Melanoma

Background

Up to 60% of melanoma patients develop melanoma brain metastases (MBM), which traditionally have a poor diagnosis. Current treatment strategies include immunotherapies (IO), targeted therapies (TT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but there is considerable heterogeneity across worldwide consensus guidelines.

Objective

To summarize current treatments and compare worldwide guidelines for the treatment of MBM.

Methods

Review of global consensus treatment guidelines for MBM patients.

Results

Substantial evidence supported that concurrent IO or TT plus SRS improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Guidelines are inconsistent with regards to recommendations for surgical resection of MBM, since surgical resection of symptomatic lesions alleviates neurological symptoms but does not improve OS. Whole-brain radiation therapy is not recommended by all guidelines due to negative effects on neurocognition but can be offered in rare palliative scenarios.

Conclusion

Worldwide consensus guidelines consistently recommend up-front combination IO or TT with or without SRS for the treatment of MBM.

Primary intracranial malignant melanomas in solitary type: a tertiary center experience

PURPOSE

Solitary type primary intracranial malignant melanoma (PIMM) is extremely rare but fatal. The optimal treatment algorithm according to clinical relevance of symptoms and outcomes is unclear. This series emphasized the prognostic factors of solitary PIMM and established the treatment algorithm for this rare disease.

METHODS

Patients with solitary PIMMs were pathologically verified and treated with neurosurgical tumor resection. All solitary PIMMs recruited at our institute received multidisciplinary team care. We analyzed the clinical findings and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 10 patients. PIMMs in solitary type impacted middle-aged populations with male predominance in Taiwan. Most patients (80%) presented a single tumor initially. Six patients had progressed to multiplicity after the initial treatment. Rates of tumor bleeding and leptomeningeal metastasis seeding (LS) are high in solitary PIMMs. Patients who had gross-total resection (GTR) had better survival than those who had incomplete resection, with median overall survival (OS) rates of 170.4 months vs. 5.23 months (p = 0.004). Multiplicity, eloquent area involvement, initial tumor bleeding, LS, hydrocephalus, and Karnofsky Performance Score < 80 at diagnosis were associated with negative outcomes in progression-free survival and OS. Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients who had LS and for those who cannot undergo grossly total tumor removal resulted in a good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

GTR demonstrated better outcomes for solitary PIMM. For recurrent tumors, aggressively repeated surgical resection remained beneficial for selected cases. Adjuvant radiotherapy was a treatment option for LS following operation. We proposed a possible treatment algorithm for solitary PIMM.

Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Targeted Therapy and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Simple Summary

Brain metastases are common in melanoma and are often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although many new treatments for melanoma have been approved in recent years, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, limited data are available for survival for patients with brain metastases treated with these novel therapies. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate current surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies over the past 10 years in melanoma patients with brain metastases. Our study noted increased overall survival in patients treated with craniotomy and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors, while whole brain radiation was associated with poorer overall survival.

Abstract

Brain metastases commonly develop in melanoma and are associated with poor overall survival of about five to nine months. Fortunately, new therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, have been developed. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma were identified at a single institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify baseline and treatment factors, which correlated with progression-free and overall survival. A total of 209 patients with melanoma brain metastases were identified. The median overall survival of the cohort was 5.3 months. On multivariable analysis, the presence of non-cranial metastatic disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2–4), whole-brain radiation therapy, and older age at diagnosis of brain metastasis were associated with poorer overall survival. Craniotomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.97) and treatment with a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.94) were the only interventions associated with improved overall survival. Further studies with novel agents are needed to extend lifespan in patients with brain metastases in melanoma.

Oligoprogression After Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Locoregional Therapy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have demonstrated a heterogenous spectrum of response and disease progression that may not be fully captured by conventional response criteria, such as a limited degree of progression, known as oligoprogression, which could benefit from local treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma, who received CPI between January 2006 and March 2018 at Royal Marsden. We enrolled 36 patients who experienced progression in a maximum of 3 metastatic sites, after achieving disease control from therapy with CPI, and were radically treated with the locoregional approach. We carried out Kaplan-Meier analysis to obtain progression free-survival post-first oligoprogression (PFS-PO1), overall survival (OS) post-first oligoprogression, and OS estimates. The median time to oligoprogression from the start of CPI was 12 months. At a median follow-up of 34 months, the median PFS-PO1 was 32 months, with 50% of patients not progressed at the time of the data cutoff. The median OS-post-first oligoprogression was not reached. At a median follow-up of 52 months (from the first cycle of CPI), the median OS was not reached, with 75% of patients alive at the time of analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that baseline American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV M1a or M1b is associated with a longer PFS-PO1 compared with stage M1c or M1d. We observed that local therapy for oligoprogression after CPI can result in durable disease control, suggesting that locoregional treatment should be considered in patients being treated with immunotherapy. However, prospective evaluation, perhaps in randomized trials, is needed.

Melanoma brain metastases - Interdisciplinary management recommendations 2020

Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common and associated with a particularly poor prognosis; they directly cause death in 60-70% of melanoma patients. In the past, systemic treatments have shown response rates around 5%, whole brain radiation as standard of care has achieved a median overall survival of approximately three months. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of MAP-kinase inhibitors both have shown very promising response rates of up to 55% and 58%, respectively, and improved survival. However, current clinical evidence is based on multi-cohort studies only, as prospectively randomized trials have been carried out rarely in MBM, independently whether investigating systemic therapy, radiotherapy or surgical techniques. Here, an interdisciplinary expert team reviewed the outcome of prospectively conducted clinical studies in MBM, identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, outcome evaluation and monitoring of MBM patients. The recommendations refer to four distinct scenarios: patients (i) with 'brain-only' disease, (ii) with oligometastatic asymptomatic intra- and extracranial disease, (iii) with multiple asymptomatic metastases, and (iv) with multiple symptomatic MBM or leptomeningeal disease. Changes in current management recommendations comprise the use of immunotherapy - preferably combined anti-CTLA-4/PD-1-immunotherapy - in asymptomatic MBM minus/plus stereotactic radiosurgery which remains the mainstay of local brain therapy being safe and effective. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit in oligometastatic MBM. Among the systemic therapies, combined MAPK-kinase inhibition provides, in BRAF^V600-mutated patients with rapidly progressing or/and symptomatic MBM, an alternative to combined immunotherapy.

A central nervous system metastasis of melanoma with stroke-like onset of left-lower quadrantanopsia

"Stroke mimics" mean diseases presenting with acute neurological impairments that are taken for stroke. Discriminating them is crucial to avoid improper treatment or delayed correct treatment. We describe a 48-year-old woman presenting with a sudden onset of scintillating scotoma and left-lower quadrantanopsia. Hyperacute cerebral infarction was suspected. However, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass at the cortico-medullary junction in the right occipital lobe. We diagnosed her as metastatic melanoma. We suspected that neurological deficits can be attributed to seizure, and therefore introduced levetiracetam. She showed neurological improvement immediately. Our case demonstrated the importance of considering brain tumor as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with acute-onset neurological deficits. In addition to appropriate treatment of tumor, the use of newer antiepileptic drugs resulted in good neurological prognosis in metastatic brain tumors.

A review of anticoagulation in patients with central nervous system malignancy: between a rock and a hard place

The incidence and prevalence of patients who develop primary and secondary metastatic central nervous system cancer (CNS) is increasing. This is a consequence of advancements in the sensitivity and availability of diagnostic imaging, and improved therapeutic options, leading to increased detection of CNS malignancies and improved survival. These patients are at very high risk of thrombosis as well as haemorrhage, and the optimum management of anticoagulation can be challenging for treating clinicians, particularly as robust prospective evidence is sparse. In this focused review, we discuss (1) risk factors for thrombosis and bleeding in these patients, (2) management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) including evidence for direct oral anticoagulants, and how to approach patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, (3) ambulatory VTE prophylaxis, (4) VTE prophylaxis in patients who have undergone craniotomy for cancer, and (5) management of anticoagulation-related intracranial haemorrhage. Based on review of the available literature and author opinion, we propose practical management algorithms to aid clinicians faced with treating CNS cancer patients with thrombosis or CNS haemorrhage.

Metastatic melanoma: Surgical treatment of brain metastases - Analysis of 110 patients

New Zealand has one of the highest rates of melanoma in the world. In up to 10% of cases, the disease is metastatic at diagnosis. Cerebral metastatic involvement carries a particularly poor prognosis. 110 patients were included in the analysis. A retrospective consecutive series of patients treated surgically at Auckland City Hospital were studied, with parameters of demographics, tumour characteristics, surgery, pathology, systemic therapy and survival analysed. Mean age was 59.9 years (range 22-81 years). Median survival from date of surgery was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.9-9.4 months). Of the 58 patients tested for BRAF mutation, 28 were positive, similar to previously published data. This conferred a better prognosis with median overall survival of 12.3 months (95% CI 7.2-17.3 months) compared to 7.8 months (95% CI 5.6-10 months) for those who were negative (p < 0.05). Survival correlated positively with extent of surgical resection. Both BRAF positive status and targeted and/or immunotherapy were significant predictors of improved survival. In this cohort, radiation therapy did not show a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. Survival from resection of cerebral metastases from melanoma is improving. Survival benefit is conferred by BRAF mutation, solitary metastasis and gross total resection of lesion.

Companion animal models of neurological disease

Clinical translation of novel therapeutics that improve the survival and quality of life of patients with neurological disease remains a challenge, with many investigational drug and device candidates failing in advanced stage clinical trials. Naturally occurring inherited and acquired neurological diseases, such as epilepsy, inborn errors of metabolism, brain tumors, spinal cord injury, and stroke occur frequently in companion animals, and many of these share epidemiologic, pathophysiologic and clinical features with their human counterparts. As companion animals have a relatively abbreviated lifespan and genetic background, are immunocompetent, share their environment with human caregivers, and can be clinically managed using techniques and tools similar to those used in humans, they have tremendous potential for increasing the predictive value of preclinical drug and device studies. Here, we review comparative features of spontaneous neurological diseases in companion animals with an emphasis on neuroimaging methods and features, illustrate their historical use in translational studies, and discuss inherent limitations associated with each disease model. Integration of companion animals with naturally occurring disease into preclinical studies can complement and expand the knowledge gained from studies in other animal models, accelerate or improve the manner in which research is translated to the human clinic, and ultimately generate discoveries that will benefit the health of humans and animals.

Survival Outcomes After Metastasectomy in Melanoma Patients Categorized by Response to Checkpoint Blockade

INTRODUCTION

Checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in metastatic melanoma, with 4-year overall survival (OS) of 46% for anti-PD-1 alone or 53% in combination with anti-CTLA-4. However, the median progression free survival is 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Many who progress have gone on to alternative treatments, including surgery, yet the outcome of patients selected for surgery after checkpoint blockade remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with checkpoint blockade from 2003 to 2017, followed by metastasectomy, were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional melanoma database. Response to immunotherapy was assessed at the time of surgery. Patients were categorized as having responding, isolated progressing, or multiple progressing lesions.

RESULTS

Of the 237 total patients identified, 208 (88%) had stage IV disease, and 29 (12%) had unresectable stage III disease at the start of immunotherapy. Median OS following first resection was 21 months. Median follow-up among survivors was 23 months. Complete resection at the first operation (n = 87, 37%) was associated with improved survival compared with patients with incomplete resection (n = 150, 63%) [median OS not reached (NR) vs. 10.8 months, respectively; 95% CI: 7.3, 14.8; p < 0.0001]. Patients resected for an isolated progressing or responding tumor had a longer median survival compared with those with multiple progressing lesions (NR vs. 7.8 months, 95% CI: 6.2, 11.2; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients selected for surgical resection following checkpoint blockade have a relatively favorable survival, especially if they had a response to immunotherapy and undergo complete resection of isolated progressing or responding disease.

Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Effective Treatment of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are the most prevalent of intracranial malignancies. They are associated with a very poor prognosis and near 100% mortality. This has been the case for decades, largely because we lack effective therapeutics to augment surgery and radiotherapy. Notwithstanding improvements in the precision and efficacy of these life-prolonging treatments, with no reliable options for adjunct systemic therapy, brain recurrences are virtually inevitable. The factors limiting intracranial efficacy of existing agents are both physiological and molecular in nature. For example, heterogeneous permeability, abnormal perfusion and high interstitial pressure oppose the conventional convective delivery of circulating drugs, thus new delivery strategies are needed to achieve uniform drug uptake at therapeutic concentrations. Brain metastases are also highly adapted to their microenvironment, with complex cross-talk between the tumor, the stroma and the neural compartments driving speciation and drug resistance. New strategies must account for resistance mechanisms that are frequently engaged in this milieu, such as HER3 and other receptor tyrosine kinases that become induced and activated in the brain microenvironment. Here, we discuss molecular and physiological factors that contribute to the recalcitrance of these tumors, and review emerging therapeutic strategies, including agents targeting the PI3K axis, immunotherapies, nanomedicines and MRI-guided focused ultrasound for externally controlling drug delivery.

Melanom

Das Melanom ist der gefährlichste Hautkrebs mit der höchsten Sterblichkeitsrate, der schon bei jungen Menschen auftreten kann und seit Jahrzehnten steigende Inzidenz verzeichnet (Jemal et al. 2007; Little et al. 2012). Jährlich erkranken weltweit etwa 137.000 Menschen am Melanom und 37.000 versterben an der Erkrankung (Boyle et al. 2004). Die Inzidenz liegt weltweit jährlich bei 2,3–2,6/100.000 Einwohner (Pisani et al. 2002). In Deutschland beträgt die Inzidenz 19,2/100.000 Einwohner und es verstarben 2711 Betroffene im Jahre 2010 (Statistisches Bundesamt).

Indications for the surgical resection of stage IV disease

Tumor biology and careful patient selection weigh heavily in determining the appropriate role of surgical resection in stage IV melanoma. Historically, surgical resection for highly selected patients with metastatic melanoma was the only treatment modality associated with improved long-term survival and the ability to provide palliation. With the new age of effective systemic therapies, the treatment of metastatic melanoma has become more intricate and future work is needed to better define the role for surgery within the current treatment paradigm.

Brain metastases: epidemiology

Brain metastases (BM) are the most commonly diagnosed type of central nervous system tumor in the United States. Estimates of the frequency of BM vary significantly, as there is no nationwide reporting system for metastases. BM may be the first sign of a previously undiagnosed cancer, or occur years or decades after the primary cancer was diagnosed. Incidence of BM varies significantly by primary cancer site. Lung, breast, and melanoma continue to be the leading cause of BM. These tumors are increasingly more common as new therapeutics, advanced imaging, and improved screening have led to lengthened survival after primary diagnosis for cancer patients. BM are difficult to treat, and for most individuals the diagnosis of BM generally portends a poor prognosis.

Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastasis in the era of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies

Background

Melanoma brain metastasis is associated with an extremely poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 4–5 months. Since 2011, the overall survival of patients with stage IV melanoma has been significantly improved with the advent of new targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors. We analyze the survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with brain metastasis after the introduction of these novel drugs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of our melanoma center database and identified 79 patients with brain metastasis between 2011 and 2015.

Results

The median time from primary melanoma diagnosis to brain metastasis was 3.2 years. The median overall survival duration from the time of initial brain metastasis was 12.8 months. Following a diagnosis of brain metastasis, 39 (49.4%), 28 (35.4%), and 24 (30.4%) patients were treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody, anti-PD-1 antibody, or BRAF inhibitors (with or without a MEK inhibitor), with a median overall survival of 19.2 months, 37.9 months and 12.7 months, respectively. Factors associated with significantly reduced overall survival included male sex, cerebellar metastasis, higher number of brain lesions, and treatment with whole-brain radiation therapy. Factors associated with significantly longer overall survival included treatment with craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, or with anti-PD-1 antibody after initial diagnosis of brain metastasis.

Conclusions

These results show a significant improvement in the overall survival of patients with melanoma brain metastasis in the era of novel therapies. In addition, they suggest the activity of anti-PD-1 therapy specifically in the setting of brain metastasis.

Surgical management of posterior fossa metastases

The diagnosis of brain metastases is associated with a poor prognosis reflecting uncontrolled primary disease that has spread to the relative sanctuary of the central nervous system. 20 % of brain metastases occur in the posterior fossa and are associated with significant morbidity. The risk of acute hydrocephalus and potential for sudden death means these metastases are often dealt with as emergency cases. This approach means a full pre-operative assessment and staging of underlying disease may be neglected and a proportion of patients undergo comparatively high risk surgery with little or no survival benefit. This study aimed to assess outcomes in patients to identify factors that may assist in case selection. We report a retrospective case series of 92 consecutive patients operated for posterior fossa metastases between 2007 and 2012. Routine demographic data was collected plus data on performance status, primary cancer site, details of surgery, adjuvant treatment and survival. The only independent positive prognostic factors identified on multivariate analysis were good performance status (if Karnofsky performance score >70, hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.36, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.69), adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.21–0.65) and adjuvant chemotherapy where there was extracranial disease and non-synchronous presentation (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.31–0.82). Patients presenting with posterior fossa metastases may not be investigated as thoroughly as those with supratentorial tumours. Staging and assessment is essential however, and in the meantime emergencies related to tumour mass effect should be managed with steroids and cerebrospinal fluid diversion as required.

Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Mechanisms, Models, and Medicine

The development of brain metastases in patients with advanced stage melanoma is common, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for their development are poorly understood. Melanoma brain metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality and confer a poor prognosis; traditional therapies including whole brain radiation, stereotactic radiotherapy, or chemotherapy yield only modest increases in overall survival (OS) for these patients. While recently approved therapies have significantly improved OS in melanoma patients, only a small number of studies have investigated their efficacy in patients with brain metastases. Preliminary data suggest that some responses have been observed in intracranial lesions, which has sparked new clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy in melanoma patients with brain metastases. Simultaneously, recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of melanoma cell dissemination to the brain have revealed novel and potentially therapeutic targets. In this review, we provide an overview of newly discovered mechanisms of melanoma spread to the brain, discuss preclinical models that are being used to further our understanding of this deadly disease and provide an update of the current clinical trials for melanoma patients with brain metastases.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors in cancer

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are widely known for their roles in synaptic signaling. However, accumulating evidence suggests roles of mGluRs in human malignancies in addition to synaptic transmission. Somatic cell homeostasis presents intriguing possibilities of mGluRs and glutamate signaling as novel targets for human cancers. More recently, aberrant glutamate signaling has been shown to participate in the transformation and maintenance of various cancer types, including glioma, melanoma skin cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, indicating that genes encoding mGluRs, GRMs, can function as oncogenes. Here, we provide a review on the interactions of mGluRs and their ligand, glutamate, in processes that promote the growth of tumors of neuronal and non-neuronal origins. Further, we discuss the evolution of riluzole, a glutamate release inhibitor approved for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but now fashioned as an mGluR1 inhibitor for melanoma therapy and as a radio-sensitizer for tumors that have metastasized to the brain. With the success of riluzole, it is not far-fetched to believe that other drugs that may act directly or indirectly on other mGluRs can be beneficial for multiple applications. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors, 5 years on'.

Intertumor heterogeneity in vascularity and invasiveness of artificial melanoma brain metastases

Background

Patients diagnosed with melanoma brain metastases have few treatment options and poor prognosis, and improved treatment strategies for these patients require detailed understanding of the underlying pathobiology. In this investigation we studied the vascularity and invasiveness of artificial brain metastases established from four human melanoma cell lines.

Methods

A-07, D-12, R-18, and U-25 cells transfected with GFP were injected intracerebrally and intra-arterially in nude mice. Moribund mice were killed and autopsied, and the brain was evaluated by fluorescence imaging or by histological examination. Expression and secretion of factors involved in angiogenesis and invasion were assessed by quantitative PCR, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry.

Results

The melanoma cells grew preferentially in the meninges and ventricles after intracerebral and intra-arterial injection. Intertumor heterogeneity in the aggressiveness of meningeal tumors reflected differences in angiogenic activity and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and interleukin 8 (IL-8). In contrast, growth and invasion of the brain parenchyma relied primarily on vascular co-option. The cell lines showed different patterns of invasion from meninges to the scull and from meninges to the brain parenchyma, and these differences were associated with differences in expression of the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9. Furthermore, the melanoma cells produced multiple brain lesions after intracerebral implantation by using the meningeal linings of the brain as transport routes.

Conclusions

The melanoma cell lines showed different growth patterns in the brain, and these differences were associated with differences in expression of the angiogenic factors VEGF-A and IL-8 and the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9.

The current management of brain metastasis in melanoma: a focus on riluzole

Brain metastasis is a common endpoint in human malignant melanoma, and the prognosis for patients remains poor despite advancements in therapy. Current treatment for melanoma metastatic to the brain is grouped into those providing symptomatic relief such as corticosteroids and antiepileptic agents, to those that are disease modifying. Related to the latter group, recent studies have demonstrated that aberrant glutamate signaling plays a role in the transformation and maintenance of various cancer types, including melanoma. Glutamate secretion from these and surrounding cells have been found to stimulate regulatory pathways that control tumor growth, proliferation and survival in vitro and in vivo. The antiglutamatergic actions of an inhibitor of glutamate release, riluzole, have been detected by its ability to clear glutamate from the synapse, and it has been shown to inhibit glutamate release rather than directly inhibiting glutamate receptors. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of riluzole to act as a radiosensitizing agent in melanoma. The effect of riluzole on downstream glutamatergic signaling has pointed to cross talk between the metabotropic G-protein-coupled glutamate receptors implicated in a subset of human melanomas with other signaling pathways, including apoptotic, angiogenic, ROS and cell invasion mechanisms, thus establishing its potential to be further explored in combination therapy regimens for both primary human melanoma and melanoma metastatic to the brain.

Metastasectomy for stage IV melanoma

Metastatic melanoma has an unpredictable natural history but a predictably high mortality. Despite recent advances in systemic therapy, many patients do not respond, or develop resistance to drug therapy. Surgery has consistently shown good outcomes in appropriately selected patients. It is likely to be even more successful in the era of more effective medical treatment. Surgery should remain a strongly considered option for metastatic melanoma.

Primary melanoma location on the scalp is an important risk factor for brain metastasis: a study of 1,687 patients with cutaneous head and neck melanomas

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous head and neck melanomas (HNM) are reported to be associated with a higher incidence of brain metastasis than trunk and limb melanomas (TLM). In this study, the incidence of brain metastases in patients with HNM and risk factors for the development of brain metastases were analyzed.

METHODS

From a large, prospectively-collected database, 1,687 HNM patients and 8,793 TLM patients who presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I and II disease were identified. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Independent risk factors were determined by binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of brain metastases 5 years after diagnosis of HNM was 6.7 % compared with 4.7 % for brain metastases from TLM (p = 0.003). Patients with scalp melanomas were most likely to develop brain metastases (12.7 %). Independent risk factors for brain metastasis in patients with HNM were Breslow thickness, ulceration, and scalp location.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary scalp melanomas had a much higher incidence of brain metastasis than patients with melanomas on other head and neck sites, who in turn had a higher incidence than patients with melanomas on sites elsewhere on the body. More intensive monitoring of patients with scalp melanomas, who are at particularly high risk of brain metastasis, might lead to earlier discovery of metastatic disease in the brain, offering the prospect of earlier intervention and better outcomes.

Are melanomas averse to cerebellum? Cerebellar metastases in a surgical series

OBJECTIVES

To study the propensity of different cancers to metastasize to the cerebrum and cerebellum, and to study overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for patients after surgical resection for cerebellar metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a prospectively collected tumor database, all patients that underwent a craniotomy for intracranial metastases between 2003 and 2011 at Oslo University Hospital were included.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty patients underwent resection for cerebellar metastases. Most common primary tumor sites were lung, colon/rectum, and breast in 45%, 19%, and 14%, respectively. None were prostate cancers. Melanoma metastases were significantly underrepresented, and colorectal cancer metastases significantly overrepresented in cerebellum, compared to the overall proportion of cerebellar/supratentorial metastases surgically resected (P < 0.05). Thirty-day post-operative mortality rate was 4.3%. Median OS was 7.7 months (95% CI 6.0-9.5 months) irrespective of post-operative adjuvant therapy. Median OS was 51.8, 8.4, and 3.4 months, respectively, for recursive partitioning analysis class 1(n = 11), 2 (n = 78) and 3 (n = 34). Significant negative prognostic factors were age ≥65 years, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <70, extracranial metastases and uncontrolled systemic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma metastases were significantly underrepresented in cerebellum, whereas colorectal cancer metastases were significantly overrepresented. Surgical mortality and OS after surgical treatment of cerebellar metastases were similar to the results of supratentorial metastases.

Predicting the development of brain metastases in patients with local/regional melanoma

BACKGROUND

The brain is a common site of recurrence in melanoma patients. Brain recurrence may present as a seizure, hemorrhage, or death. We sought to determine predictors of brain metastases in patients with primary and regional melanoma in order to facilitate targeted screening.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained databases were used to identify patients treated for local or regional melanoma who developed stage IV melanoma with and without brain metastasis at initial recurrence. One hundred twenty patients were identified with brain relapse and compared to 487 patients without brain recurrence.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, patients with brain metastases were younger (55 vs. 59yrs, P = 0.04) but did not differ in primary site (head and neck 23% vs. 21%, P = 0.20). Brain metastasis patients had thinner primaries (mean 3.4 vs. 4.5 mm, P = 0.01). There were no other pathologic differences including ulceration (55% vs. 53%, P = 0.75), mitoses (7 vs.7.5, P = 0.61) or histologic subtype. Younger age and decreased Breslow thickness were independently associated with brain metastases at stage IV recurrence (OR = 1.10 P = 0.01 and OR = 1.02 P = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis, the largest to date, demonstrates that thinner Breslow depth and younger age were associated with brain recurrence at first presentation with Stage IV disease.

The role of radiotherapy in the overall treatment of melanoma

Radiotherapy has become an effective treatment in the management of melanoma patients. It has its place beneath surgical treatment options in a tumor entity that has only limited response to systemic medical therapies. New therapies, such as ipilimumab and vemurafenib, may prolong survival for several months but will cure only a few patients. Radiotherapy will still be required in adjuvant settings to reduce the local recurrence rate and in palliative situations, particularly in brain and bone metastasis. We review several indications for radiotherapy in the management of malignant melanoma with an effect on the guidelines in our clinical practice.

Patients undergoing surgery of intracranial metastases have different outcomes based on their primary pathology

OBJECTIVES

Patients with a variety of different primary cancers can develop intracranial metastases. Patients who develop intracranial metastases are often grouped into the same study population, and therefore an understanding of outcomes for patients with different primary cancers remain unclear.

METHODS

Adults who underwent intracranial metastatic tumor surgery from 1997-2011 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Primary pathologies were compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

About 708 patients underwent surgery during the reviewed period, where 269 (38%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 106 (15%) breast cancer (BC), 72 (10%) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, 88 (12%) renal cell cancer (RCC), and 88 (12%) melanoma. The most notable differences were that NSCLC patients were older, BC younger, BC had more primary tumor control, and NSCLC less extracranial spread. BC had longer survival, RCC had longer local progression free survival (PFS), and NSCLC had longer distal PFS. The factors independently associated with survival for NSCLC (female, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, primary tumor control, solitary metastasis, tumor size, adenocarcinoma, radiation, discharge to home), BC (age, no skull base involvement, radiation), GI cancer (age, RPA class, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), lack of preoperative motor deficit, non-esophageal tumors, non-hemorrhagic tumors, avoidance of new deficits), melanoma (preoperative seizures, solitary metastasis, smaller tumor size, discharge to home, chemotherapy), and RCC (KPS, chemotherapy) were distinctly different.

DISCUSSION

These differences between patients with different primary cancers support the fact that patients with intracranial disease are not all the same and should be studied by their primary pathology.

Neuropathology of brain metastases

Metastatic tumors are the most common neoplasms encountered in the central nervous system (CNS), and continue to be major cause for mortality and morbidity. Macroscopic features and corresponding radiological findings can be diagnostic in majority of the cases, however, microscopic evaluation would be necessary when the differential diagnosis includes a primary CNS tumor, unknown primary tumor site, and when the resection of the tumor is either considered therapeutic or palliative. The first step in the diagnosis of a metastatic brain lesion is to exclude a primary CNS tumor, followed by verification or identification of the primary tumor and the site. Although general approach to a metastatic lesion from an unknown primary tumor is the same everywhere else, there are slight variations for the metastatic lesions in the CNS versus other regions. When morphological features are not enough to establish a definitive diagnosis, additional studies including immunohistochemical stains are applied. With the expending immunohistochemical armamentarium for pathologists, more accurate assessments are possible even in cases of unknown primary tumor. This review summarizes the diagnostic approach to CNS metastases, immunohistochemical assessment of neoplasm of unknown primary, and primary CNS lesions entering in the differential diagnosis of metastases.

Predictors and survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases

Brain metastases (BM) are one of the most frequent neurological complications of cancers. Melanoma is the third most common tumor to metastasize to the brain with a reported incidence of 10-40 %, and many patients have subclinical BM (>73 %). We computer-searched the clinical records of all our patients registered into a database to identify patients that presented or developed BM. A total of 49 patients with melanoma BM were included in our analysis. General time to brain metastases (TTBM) was 23 months. The nonparametric test between TTBM and the single variables showed an association between TTBM and Breslow thickness (p < 0.0076; Spearman's coefficient-0.411), ulceration (p = 0.0656; Spearman's coefficient-0.287) and positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.0015; Spearman's coefficient-0.475). Performing multiple regression, positive SLN remained the only, statistically significant, predictive variable (p < 0.01). Regarding the first melanoma site, the axial sites were more likely to develop BM than peripheral ones (p < 0.001). The analysis of brain metastasis survival (BMS) with Kaplan-Meier curves has resulted in a median survival rate of 6 months (range 1-134 months) and was strongly related to response to treatment, number of parenchymal lesions, presence or absence of symptoms. The results of the current analysis revealed clinical and primary tumor characteristics associated with the development of BM, TTBM, and BMS. The SNL was found to be the strongest predictor for BM development.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with anticoagulation therapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in melanoma patients with brain metastases (BM). The management of these patients is challenging because of the high risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and the limited data available on the safety of anticoagulation in this scenario. We reviewed the treatments and outcomes among melanoma patients with BM and VTE at our institution to determine the safety of anticoagulation in these patients. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify melanoma patients with BM who were diagnosed with VTE. The clinical characteristics of the BM and the VTE, the treatments given for VTE, subsequent ICH, and overall survival (OS) were determined. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who received systemic anticoagulation and those who did not. A total of 74 evaluable melanoma patients with BM and VTE were identified. Fifty-seven (77%) patients received systemic anticoagulation. There was no significant difference in the number (P=0.40) or the maximum diameter (P=0.55) of brain metastasis between the patients who received anticoagulation and those who did not. Two (4%) patients who received anticoagulation developed ICH, which was not statistically different from the patients who did not receive anticoagulation (0%, P=1.00). There was a trend toward longer OS from VTE among patients who received systemic anticoagulation (median OS: 4.2 vs. 1.2 months, P=0.06). Anticoagulation for VTE did not significantly increase the risk of ICH or decrease OS in patients with melanoma BM. These data support the safety of systemic anticoagulation for VTE in these patients.

Brain metastases research 1990-2010: pattern of citation and systematic review of highly cited articles

BACKGROUND

High and continuously increasing research activity related to different aspects of prevention, prediction, diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases has been performed between 1990 and 2010. One of the major databases contains 2695 scientific articles that were published during this time period. Different measures of impact, visibility, and quality of published research are available, each with its own pros and cons. For this overview, article citation rate was chosen.

RESULTS

Among the 10 most cited articles, 7 reported on randomized clinical trials. Nine covered surgical or radiosurgical approaches and the remaining one a widely adopted prognostic score. Overall, 30 randomized clinical trials were published between 1990 and 2010, including those with phase II design and excluding duplicate publications, for example, after longer followup or with focus on secondary endpoints. Twenty of these randomized clinical trials were published before 2008. Their median number of citations was 110, range 13-1013, compared to 5-6 citations for all types of publications. Annual citation rate appeared to gradually increase during the first 2-3 years after publication before reaching high levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A large variety of preclinical and clinical topics achieved high numbers of citations. However, areas such as quality of life, side effects, and end-of-life care were underrepresented. Efforts to increase their visibility might be warranted.

Epidemiology of brain metastases

Brain metastases are one of the most common neurologic complications of cancer. The incidence is 9%-17% based on various studies, although the exact incidence is thought to be higher. The incidence is increasing with the availability of improved imaging techniques which aid early diagnosis, and effective systemic treatment regimens which prolong life, thus allowing cancer to disseminate to the brain. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the most frequent to develop brain metastases, and account for 67%-80% of all cancers. Most patients with brain metastases have synchronous extracerebral metastases. Some patients present with no known primary cancer diagnosis. In children, brain metastases are rare; germ cell tumors, sarcomas, and neuroblastoma are the common offenders.

Radiographic response of brain metastasis after linear accelerator radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Radiographic response of brain metastasis to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over time has not been well characterized. Being able to predict SRS-induced changes in tumor size over time may allow improved counseling of patients and potentially earlier recognition of poor response to SRS.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the rate of change in size of metastatic brain tumors after treatment with a linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with LINAC SRS at the University of Florida between 1992 and 2009 who had at least one MRI after treatment. A total of 218 patients with 406 follow-up MRI scans were included in the study. Tumor area was calculated by measuring the largest tumor area on axial imaging and using the equation for area of an ellipse. Primary outcome was percent change in tumor size. The contribution of several factors including gender, primary tumor histology, synchronous or asynchronous presentation, prior treatment, primary tumor control, and SRS dose were examined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 58.3 years (range 4-86), and 48.6% of patients were female. Sixty-three percent of patients had primary tumor control and 70.6% had asynchronous presentation of their brain metastases. SRS peripheral dose range was 1,000-2,250 cGy with a median of 1,750 cGy. The mean percent size change was -22.6% with a mean rate of change of -7.0% per month. The median percent change was -49.7% with a median rate of change of -8.8% per month. The median follow-up was 4.8 months (range 0.3-52.5). Female gender and melanoma histology were found to be significant predictors of an increase in tumor size. Lack of previous surgical resection was a significant predictor of a decrease in tumor size after SRS. Other factors tested with multivariate analysis, including age, synchronicity of presentation, dose, dose volume, Karnofsky performance score, and primary tumor control, were not significant in predicting tumor size change after SRS.

CONCLUSION

In this study, brain metastases decreased in size by a median of 50% for a median follow-up of 4.8 months after SRS. The overall rate of decrease was 9% per month after treatment with SRS. Melanoma histology was a predictor of poor tumor control.

Single brain metastases from melanoma: remarks on a series of 84 patients

The authors report on 84 patients with single melanoma brain metastasis surgically treated from 1997 to 2007. There were 46 males and 38 females; mean age was 41 years (range 24-58 years). All patients were surgically treated, and 52 of them received postoperative adjuvant therapy consisting of whole-brain radiation therapy (36), radiosurgery (9), or a combination of these two techniques (7). Brain recurrences were observed in 44 cases, of which 9 were local. Of the latter, seven were re-operated while the remaining two were treated by radiosurgery. At 1-year follow-up, the survival rate was 52% (32 patients) whereas only 12 patients (14%) were still alive after 2 years. None of the patients in which removal was subtotal survived for more than 6 months after surgical treatment. Three years after the onset of the brain metastasis, five patients (6%) were still alive. Survival was significantly influenced by treatment with regard to overall survival reported in other series. A review of literature, together with our own series, suggests that radical surgical treatment of the lesion possibly employing the internal no-touch technique has significantly increased survival in our patients (p < 0.05) and that the association of postoperative radiotherapy and re-operation in the event of recurrent metastatic lesions is advisable even though statistical significance was not reached (p > 0.05).

Metastasectomy for stage IV melanoma: for whom and how much?

Although the conventional paradigm for treating metastatic melanoma relies on systemic therapies, a surgical approach should be strongly considered in selected patients. A surgical approach may not be appropriate for all patients, but it can offer a rapid clearance of disease without the toxicity of systemic therapy. Patient selection is of paramount importance for surgery to be effective. The rationale for surgical intervention in the management of metastatic melanoma, selection factors to be considered, published results, and future directions are discussed in this article.