Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society

Risk factors, prevention and screening of colorectal cancer: A rising problem

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The leading risk factors for CRC include male gender, age over 50, family history, obesity, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and unhealthy diet. CRC screening methods vary considerably between countries and depend on incidence, economic resources and healthcare structure. Important aspects of screening include adherence, which can vary significantly across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Basic concepts of CRC screening include pre-stratification of patients by identifying risk factors and then using fecal immunochemical test or guaiac-based fecal occult blood test and/or colonoscopy or radiologic imaging techniques. Technological capabilities for CRC screening are rapidly evolving and include stool DNA test, liquid biopsy, virtual colonography, and the use of artificial intelligence. A CRC prevention strategy should be comprehensive and include active patient education along with targeted implementation of screening.

Reducing information avoidance: The effectiveness of humour, cute animals and coping messages

OBJECTIVES

Guided by the hedonic surplus/mood-as-resource hypotheses, we sought to identify message components that prevent health information avoidance by inducing hedonic psychological states.

DESIGN

Two experimental studies.

METHODS

Participants, age 45-75, recruited from the online survey platform, Prolific (Study 1 N = 288, Study 2 N = 505), completed a survey of their colorectal cancer (CRC) information avoidance tendency and demographics. They were reinvited to participate in a study where they were randomized to view one of four types of images: humorous comics, cute animals, coping messages or streetscapes images (control condition). To assess CRC information avoidance behaviour after viewing the stimuli, participants choose whether to be directed to a website to complete a CRC risk calculator (Study 1), or whether to view a CRC information video or a video about foot care (Study 2). Using logistic regression, we regressed each outcome variable on interactions between self-reported CRC information avoidance tendency and experimental condition. We then used the PROCESS macro to test if mood mediated these interaction effects.

RESULTS

In Study 1, to the degree participants reported CRC information avoidance tendency, viewing humorous comics compared to control images increased their odds of choosing to view the risk calculator (OR = 5.26, p = .02). The same was true in Study 2 for choosing to watch the video about CRC vs. foot care (OR = 2.42, p = .04). Effects were not mediated through mood and there were no effects for the cute animals or coping messages.

CONCLUSIONS

Using humour at the outset of a health message may increase reach to people who otherwise avoid CRC or other health messaging.

Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management

OBJECTIVES

Adenomatous colorectal polyps require endoscopic resection, as opposed to non-adenomatous hyperplastic colorectal polyps. This study aims to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five board-certified radiologists evaluated CT colonography images with colorectal polyps of all sizes and morphologies retrospectively and decided whether the depicted polyps required endoscopic resection. After a primary unassisted reading based on current guidelines, a second reading with access to the classification of a radiomics-based random-forest AI-model labelling each polyp as "non-adenomatous" or "adenomatous" was performed. Performance was evaluated using polyp histopathology as the reference standard.

RESULTS

77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp image series (47% supine position, 53% prone position) were evaluated unassisted and AI-assisted by five independent board-certified radiologists, resulting in a total of 1180 readings (subsequent polypectomy: yes or no). AI-assisted readings had higher accuracy (76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%), sensitivity (78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%), and specificity (73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was improved in the AI-assisted readings (Fleiss' kappa 0.69 vs. 0.92).

CONCLUSION

AI-based characterisation of colorectal polyps at CT colonography as a second reader might enable a more precise selection of polyps eligible for subsequent endoscopic resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and histopathologic polyp evaluation is still mandatory.

KEY POINTS

Question This is the first study evaluating the impact of AI-based polyp classification in CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Findings Compared with unassisted reading, AI-assisted reading had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI tool for colorectal polyp classification in CT colonography could further improve radiologists' therapy recommendations.

Association between colorectal cancer and arthritis among Americans in 2005-2016

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the most prevalent cancers globally. Some studies have found that arthritis could reduce the risk of CRC through inflammatory immune mediation. However, there have been no reports on whether arthritis is related to CRC. Therefore, the correlation between arthritis and CRC was investigated to provide some theoretical support for understanding the prevention and diagnosis of CRC.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to investigate the relationship between arthritis and CRC among Americans. A total of 300,106 adults participated in the study, and through a questionnaire survey, they were categorized into the control group and the CRC group. In this study, arthritis was considered the exposure variable, and 17 covariates were included. The relationship between the variables and CRC was then revealed through baseline characteristic analysis, association analysis, and stratified analysis. The predictive efficiency of arthritis for the CRC was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Finally, nomogram was created to evaluate the predictive capacity.

RESULTS

A total of 297,681 control subjects and 2,425 CRC subjects within this survey. Significant disparities were observed between the two groups for all variables except for drink and poverty income ratio (PIR). Three models demonstrated a clear association between arthritis and CRC (model 1: odds ratio (OR) = 3.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.5-5.1, P = 0.00000000025; model 2: OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.15-2.53, P = 0.008; model 3: OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.03-2.38, P = 0.0369), indicating that the effect of arthritis on CRC was not significantly confounded by other covariates across the three models. Stratified analysis showed that arthritis was positively associated with CRC, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.818, indicating that arthritis was more effective in the prognosis of CRC. Finally, the decision curve and calibration curve indicated that the nomogram could effectively predict CRC.

CONCLUSION

This study found that arthritis had a strong association with the occurrence of CRC, providing ideas and strategies for its early detection.

Morphological and functional analysis of colorectal cancer cell lines in 2D and 3D culture models

The epithelial and mesenchymal features of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAC) cell lines were compared in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cultures. In 2D cultures, the three CRAC cell lines exhibited epithelial characteristics with high E-cadherin and low vimentin levels, whereas two exhibited mesenchymal traits with opposite expression patterns. In 3D cultures using low-attachment plates, mesenchymal cells from 2D cultures showed reduced vimentin mRNA levels. Morphologically, the five CRAC cell lines appeared similarly shaped in 2D culture but formed different structures in 3D culture. Epithelial DLD-1 and mesenchymal COLO-320 cells produced large granular spheres, whereas epithelial HCT-15 cells formed small solid spheres. Tubular structures were observed in epithelial CACO-2 and mesenchymal SW480 spheres. Desmosome-like structures developed in epithelial CRAC cells, whereas entosis was observed in CACO-2, HCT-15, and SW480 cells. The Ki-67-positive proliferating cell count varied in 2D and 3D cultures of epithelial cells but remained high and unchanged in mesenchymal cells. These findings suggest that while CRAC cells display distinct epithelial and mesenchymal properties in 2D cultures, they form diverse 3D structures, irrespective of these traits.

Global, regional, and national burden of early-onset colorectal cancer from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021

BACKGROUND

To provide estimates and trends for burdens of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) from 1990 to 2021 at the global, regional, and national levels, and to provide projections of EOCRC burden through 2030.

METHODS

A trend analysis based on the Global Burden of Diseases 2021. The joinpoint regression model was used to analyze the temporal trends on EOCRC burden by calculating the corresponding average annual percent changes (AAPCs). A decomposition analysis was used to understand the drivers of the changes in EOCRC burden. The relationship between socio-demographic index (SDI) and disease burden was assessed by the concentration index of inequality. In addition, we constructed a Bayesian age-period-cohort model to predict the burden of EOCRC worldwide from 2022 to 2030.

RESULTS

Globally, the burden of EOCRC increased significantly between 1990 and 2021, with the incidence rising from 5.43/100000 to 6.13/100000 (AAPC = 0.39), and the prevalence increasing from 29.65/100000 to 38.86/100000 (AAPC = 0.87). Over the same period, the death rate decreased from 2.98/100000 to 2.30/100000 (AAPC = - 0.84), whereas the disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) decreased from 148.46/100000 to 115.42/100000 (AAPC = - 0.82). In 2021, East Asia and China had the highest burden of EOCRC regionally and nationally. Decomposition analysis indicated the increase in EOCRC burden was mainly driven by population growth. The concentration index revealed that high-SDI countries had a greater burden of EOCRC than low-SDI countries. The global incidence and prevalence of EOCRC will rise continuously from 2022 to 2030.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1990 and 2021, the incidence and prevalence of EOCRC have escalated, whereas the death rate and DALY rate have declined. The burden varied with sex, SDI, and geographical locations. Given the rising trend of EOCRC burden, coordinated efforts are needed to reduce the burden posed by this malignancy.

Incidence and determinants of mortality among patients with colorectal cancer in oncology centers of Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2024: multicenter retrospective follow up study

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of mortality globally, with several factors impacting patient outcomes, including access to healthcare, early detection, and treatment. Despite this, the specific factors affecting incidence of death among colorectal cancer patients in the Amhara region have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, this study seeks to assess incidence and determinants of mortality among colorectal cancer patients in Amhara Region oncology centers.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 48.6 years (SD ± 15). Median survival time was 23.8 months. The overall incidence rate or incidence density of a colorectal cancer mortality rate was 2.9 per 100 person-months (95% CI: 2.5-3.4). Survival rates of colorectal cancer patients 1and 5 year was 69.78% and 16.1%, respectively. The result of the multivariable analysis showed that colorectal cancer patients who had presenting symptoms [AHR = 2.67 (95% CI: 1.95, 3.67)], Base line HGB level < 12.5 mg/dl [AHR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.12, 2.37)], WHO or ECOG poor performance status [AHR = 2.99 (95% CI: 2.17, 4.12), late stage of cancer [AHR = 2.32 (95% CI: 1.42, 3.79)] and location of tumor on colorectal [AHR = 1.76 (95% CI: 1.20, 2.55)] were significantly associated with mortality of colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The study highlights significant findings on the survival and mortality of colorectal cancer patients. The overall mortality rate was 2.9 per 100 person-months. Multivariable analysis identified presenting symptoms, low baseline hemoglobin levels, poor performance status, late-stage cancer, and tumor location as significant predictors of mortality. Highlighting the need for early detection and targeted care strategies.

Prognosis of early-onset versus late-onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the last years, a dramatic increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses in early-onset (EO) patients has been observed. The prognosis of EO-CRC compared to late-onset (LO) patients is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to clarify whether there is any difference in the prognosis between the two groups.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library in March 2024 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) risk outcomes between EO-CRC (<50 years old) and LO-CRC (>50 years old) with at least 50 patients per group and one year of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Data from stage prevalence and survival were extracted and meta-analysed. Meta-regression was used to identify impacting effect modifiers. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024573264.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified; 1,062,037 patients (13.4% EO-CRC and 86.6% LO-CRC) were included in the stage prevalence and 567,689 in the prognostic meta-analysis. Overall, 60% of the EO-CRC and 49% of the LO-CRC were diagnosed with an advanced stage (III-IV) of disease (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, I2=87%). EO-CRC had a better OS than LO-CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.99, I2=89%) but equal CSS (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.83-1.06, I2=82%), DFS (HR 1.05 95%CI 0.94-1.16, I2=76%), LR (HR 1.41, 95%CI 0.62-3.18, I2=49%) and DR (HR 1.51, 95%CI 0.79-2.89) risk. Meta-regression analysis identified a worse DFS in the EO-CRC rectal cancer subgroup (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30, I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high heterogeneity of existing studies, EO-CRC patients are diagnosed with significantly more advanced stages than LO-CRC, although this is not reflected in any difference in cancer-related survival. There is an urgent need for increased vigilance in the early detection of CRC in young patients.

Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden, and screening can greatly reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Previous studies investigated the economic effects of CRC screening. We performed a systematic review to provide the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies across countries with different income levels.

METHODS

We searched relevant scientific databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. We selected English-language studies related to model-based economic evaluations of CRC screening strategies. Information such as the characters of screening tests, model characteristics, and key cost-effectiveness findings were collected. The net monetary benefit approach was used to compare the outcomes of various strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies were identified, including 46 from high-income countries (HICs), 6 from upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and 4 from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Most annual fecal occult blood tests and fecal immunochemical tests were cost-saving, and colonoscopy every 10 years was cost-saving. Other strategies involving multitarget fecal FIT-DNA detection, computed tomography colonography, and flexible sigmoidoscopy were cost-effective compared with no screening. Newer strategies such as magnetic resonance colonography every 5 years, annual urine metabolomic tests, and fecal bacterial biomarkers were cost-effective compared with no screening.

CONCLUSION

In our updated review, we found that common CRC screening strategies and magnetic resonance colonography continued to be cost-effective compared with no screening. Areas for further development include accurately modeling the natural history of colorectal cancer and obtaining more evidence from UMICs and LMICs.

The HOX Gene Family's Role as Prognostic and Diagnostic Biomarkers in Hematological and Solid Tumors

The HOX gene family encodes for regulatory transcription factors that play a crucial role in embryogenesis and differentiation of adult cells. This highly conserved family of genes consists of thirty-nine genes in humans that are located in four clusters, A-D, on different chromosomes. While early studies on the HOX gene family have been focused on embryonic development and its related disorders, research has shifted to examine aberrant expression of HOX genes and the subsequent implication in cancer prediction and progression. Due to their role of encoding master regulatory transcription factors, the abnormal expression of HOX genes has been shown to affect all stages of tumorigenesis and metastasis. This review highlights the novel role of the HOX family's clinical relevance as both prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in hematological and solid tumors.

Diagnostic performance and clinical outcomes of computed tomography colonography in a sick inpatient population

PURPOSE

Though prior studies have proven CTC's efficacy in outpatients, its utility in the inpatient setting has not been studied. We evaluated the efficacy of a modified CTC protocol in the inpatient setting, primarily for patients awaiting organ transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared a group of inpatient CTCs from 2019 to 2021 and a randomly selected, age-matched 2:1 control group of outpatient CTCs. Both groups were assessed based on established criteria from literature.

RESULTS

10 % (63/652) of CTCs were performed in the inpatient setting, of which 29 were excluded, yielding 34 inpatient cases. 90 % (589/652) of CTCs were performed in the outpatient setting, from which 68 randomly selected, age-matched patients were selected as controls. Significantly more (24 %, 8/34) inpatients expired due to extracolonic causes (vs. 1 %, 1/68 outpatients, p < 0.05). 62 % (21/34) of inpatient CTCs were reported as diagnostic (vs. 74 %, 50/68 outpatient, p = 0.22). Significantly more inpatients (12 %, 4/34) than outpatients (1 %, 1/68) were unable to tolerate two imaging positions (p = 0.02). Subsequent colonoscopy was performed in 24 % (8/34) of inpatients, revealing pathologies including colonic polyps and non-bleeding ulcers. Inpatient CTCs had lower average quality scores, significant for one reviewer (p = 0.009-0.054). Inpatients had a larger number of segments with: >25 % residual fluid (1.22-1.28 inpatients vs. 0.60-0.73 outpatients, p = 0.003-0.026) and inadequate fluid tagging (1.10 inpatients vs. 0.49 outpatients, p = 0.046-0.0501). Distention was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.317-0.410).

CONCLUSION

Quality of inpatient CTC was inferior to outpatient CTCs across several metrics. 24 % undergoing inpatient CTC died of extracolonic causes within 22 months, and most did not have findings warranting intervention, questioning the value of this difficult exam in this patient population. Routine CT may be sufficient to exclude large or metastatic colonic lesions precluding transplant.

Mutational and co-mutational landscape of early onset colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality before 50 have been rising alarmingly in the recent decades.

METHODS

Using a cohort of 10,000 patients, this study investigates the clinical, mutational, and co-mutational features of CRC in early-onset (EOCRC, < 50 years) compared to late-onset (LOCRC, ≥ 50 years).

RESULTS

EOCRC was associated with a higher prevalence of Asian and Hispanic patients, rectal or left-sided tumors (72% vs. 59%), and advanced-stage disease. Molecular analyses revealed differences in mutation patterns, with EOCRC having higher frequencies of TP53 (74% vs. 68%, p < 0.01) and SMAD4 (17% vs. 14%, p = 0.015), while BRAF (5% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and NOTCH1 (2.7% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.01) mutations were more prevalent in LOCRC. Stratification by tumor site and MSI status highlighted significant location- and age-specific molecular differences, such as increased KRAS and CTNNB1 mutations in right-sided EOCRC and higher BRAF prevalence in MSI-H LOCRC (47% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001). Additionally, co-occurrence analysis revealed unique mutational networks in EOCRC MSS, including significant co-occurrences of FBXW7 with NOTCH3, RB1, and PIK3R1.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significance of age-specific molecular profiling, offering insights into the unique biology of EOCRC and potential clinical applications.

Potential for enhancing efficacy of screening colonoscopy by lowering starting ages and extending screening intervals: A modelling study for Germany

Studies aimed to evaluate the expected impact of alternative screening strategies are essential for optimizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening offers, but such studies are lacking in Germany, where two screening colonoscopies (CS) 10 years apart are offered for men from age 50 and women from age 55. Our aim was to explore whether and to what extent the efficacy of utilizing two CS could be enhanced by alternative starting ages and screening intervals. We modeled the expected numbers of CRC cases, CRC deaths, years of potential life lost (YPLL), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to CRC in hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 men and women aged 45-85 using COSIMO, a validated Markov-based multi-state simulation model. Modeled strategies included combinations of starting ages (45/50/55/60) and CS (10/15/20 years). For men, CRC deaths could be slightly reduced by extending the interval to 15 years, with a second CS at 65. YPLL and DALYs would be reduced by decreasing starting age to 45 when combined with a 15-year screening interval. For women, use of two CS at ages 50 and 65 would reduce all CRC burden parameters compared to the current earliest-use offer at 55 and 65 years. Our results suggest that lowering the starting age of screening colonoscopy to 45 for men and 50 for women, combined with extending the CS screening interval to 15 years would have the potential to enable significant reductions in years of potential life lost, and disability-adjusted life years compared to current screening offers in Germany.

Long‐term prognostic outcomes in high‐risk T1 colorectal cancer: A multicentre retrospective comparison of surgery versus observation postendoscopic treatment

Aim

The risk of lymph node metastasis after endoscopic resection of high‐risk T1 colorectal cancer prompts additional resection. However, age and comorbidities are considered in decision‐making and some surgeons opt for observation. We compared the long‐term outcomes of these approaches with the aim of clarifying the need for additional resection.

Method

This multicentre retrospective study included high‐risk T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between January 2013 and April 2021. Patients who met one or more of the following criteria were eligible for inclusion: submucosal invasion depth ≥1000 μm, vessel invasion, poor differentiation, budding grade 2/3 or a positive vertical margin. Patients were divided into resection (R) and observation (O) groups. Outcomes were evaluated based on overall survival (OS) and 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS), with an additional stratified analysis using the age‐adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI).

Results

The study included 178 patients (group R, n = 131; group O, n = 47). Patients in group O were significantly older and had more comorbidities. Group R showed better 5‐year OS and CSS (OS 87.0% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.001; CSS 98.8% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.002). Stratification by ACCI revealed that benefits of additional resection remained for patients with ACCI ≤ 6 (OS 91.2% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.013; CSS 98.4% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.001) but not for those with ACCI ≥7 (OS 75.9% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.289; CSS 100% vs. 100%, p = 0.617).

Conclusions

Significant survival benefits were demonstrated in group R patients with high‐risk T1 cancer. However, the survival benefit of additional surgical resection was unconfirmed in patients with ACCI ≥ 7.

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality indicator set at a minimum of 25% in unselected populations by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Nevertheless, a lack of pooled observational data resembling real-world practice limits support for this threshold. We aimed to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled rates for conventional adenoma detection, polyp detection (PDR), cecal intubation, bowel preparation, and complications in population-based studies.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until May 2023 for populational-based studies reporting overall ADR in unselected individuals. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

31 studies were included, comprising 3 644 561 subjects. A high quality of procedures was noticeable, with a high cecal intubation rate and low complication rate. The overall pooled ADR, PDR, and rate of cancer detection were 26.5% (95%CI 23.3% to 29.7%), 38.3% (95%CI 32.5% to 44.1%), and 2.7% (95%CI 1.5% to 3.9%), respectively. ADR varied according to indication: screening 33.3% (95%CI 24.5% to 42.2%), surveillance 42.9% (95%CI 36.9% to 49.0%), and diagnostic 24.7% (95%CI 19.5% to 29.9%), with subgroup analysis revealing rates of 34.4% (95%CI 22.0% to 40.5%) for post-fecal occult blood test and 26.6% (95%CI 22.6% to 30.5%) for primary colonoscopy screening. Diminutive conventional adenomas yielded a pooled rate of 59.9% (95%CI 43.4% to 76.3%). The pooled rate for overall serrated lesion detection was 12.4% (95%CI 8.8% to 16.0%). Male sex and higher age were significantly associated with an ADR above the benchmark.

CONCLUSION

This first meta-analysis relying on real-world observational studies supports the ESGE benchmark for ADR, while suggesting that different benchmarks might be used according to indication, sex, and age.

Beneficial microbiome and diet interplay in early-onset colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although the risk of developing CRC increases with age, approximately 10% of newly diagnosed cases occur in individuals under the age of 50. Significant changes in dietary habits in young adults since industrialization create a favorable microenvironment for colorectal carcinogenesis. We aim here to shed light on the complex interplay between diet and gut microbiome in the pathogenesis and prevention of early-onset CRC (EO-CRC). We provide an overview of dietary risk factors associated with EO-CRC and contrast them with the general trends for CRC. We delve into gut bacteria, fungi, and phages with potential benefits against CRC and discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, based on recent findings from human studies, we offer insights into how dietary modifications could potentially enhance gut microbiome composition to mitigate CRC risk. All together, we outline the current research landscape in this area and propose directions for future investigations that could pave the way for novel preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Serum biomarkers REG1A and REG3A combined with the traditional CEA represent a novel nomogram for the screening and risk stratification of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To develop and validate a serum protein nomogram for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

METHODS

The serum protein characteristics were extracted from an independent sample containing 30 colorectal cancer and 12 polyp tissues along with their paired samples, and different serum protein expression profiles were validated using RNA microarrays. The prediction model was developed in a training cohort that included 1345 patients clinicopathologically confirmed CRC and 518 normal participants, and data were gathered from November 2011 to January 2017. The lasso logistic regression model was employed for features selection and serum nomogram building. An internal validation cohort containing 576 CRC patients and 222 normal participants was assessed.

RESULTS

Serum signatures containing 27 secreted proteins were significantly differentially expressed in polyps and CRC compared to paired normal tissue, and REG family proteins were selected as potential predictors. The C-index of the nomogram1 (based on Lasso logistic regression model) which contains REG1A, REG3A, CEA and age was 0.913 (95% CI, 0.899 to 0.928) and was well calibrated. Addition of CA199 to the nomogram failed to show incremental prognostic value, as shown in nomogram2 (based on logistic regression model). Application of the nomogram1 in the independent validation cohort had similar discrimination (C-index, 0.912 [95% CI, 0.890 to 0.934]) and good calibration. The decision curve (DCA) and clinical impact curve (ICI) analysis demonstrated that nomogram1 was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a serum nomogram that included REG1A, REG3A, CEA and age, which can be convenient for screening of colorectal cancer.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer in two Indiana healthcare systems

Objective

To describe trends in the use of non-invasive tests (NIST) and the interval between a positive NIST and diagnostic colonoscopy.

Methods

Using a retrospective time-trend design, we examined medical records of patients within two large Indiana integrated healthcare systems who had a positive NIST between January 2019 and June 2021 and quantified the proportion of patients who had not completed colonoscopy within 60, 90, and 180 days to determine the interval between NIST result and diagnostic colonoscopy in days.

Results

Of 1379 patients with positive NISTs, 930 (68 %) underwent diagnostic colonoscopy during the 30-month study timeframe. Median time to colonoscopy completion was significantly longer in 2020 compared to 2019 (50 vs. 37 days, p < 0.01) and 2021 (46 days, p = 0.06). The proportion of patients completing colonoscopy within 90 days of a positive FIT in 2019, 2020, and 2021 were 79 %, 83 %, and 72 %, respectively (p = 0.63), and were 86 %, 78 %, and 84 %, respectively, after positive FIT/DNA (p = 0.07). Median time to diagnostic colonoscopy completion was significantly longer in 2020, likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions

Studies of outcomes in those who declined or delayed colonoscopy in 2020 are needed to estimate the potential subsequent colorectal cancer disease burden.

Cancer statistics, 2025

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries (through 2021) and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (through 2022). In 2025, 2,041,910 new cancer cases and 618,120 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. The cancer mortality rate continued to decline through 2022, averting nearly 4.5 million deaths since 1991 because of smoking reductions, earlier detection for some cancers, and improved treatment. Yet alarming disparities persist; Native American people bear the highest cancer mortality, including rates that are two to three times those in White people for kidney, liver, stomach, and cervical cancers. Similarly, Black people have two-fold higher mortality than White people for prostate, stomach, and uterine corpus cancers. Overall cancer incidence has generally declined in men but has risen in women, narrowing the male-to-female rate ratio (RR) from a peak of 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-1.61) in 1992 to 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.12) in 2021. However, rates in women aged 50-64 years have already surpassed those in men (832.5 vs. 830.6 per 100,000), and younger women (younger than 50 years) have an 82% higher incidence rate than their male counterparts (141.1 vs. 77.4 per 100,000), up from 51% in 2002. Notably, lung cancer incidence in women surpassed that in men among people younger than 65 years in 2021 (15.7 vs. 15.4 per 100,000; RR, 0.98, p = 0.03). In summary, cancer mortality continues to decline, but future gains are threatened by rampant racial inequalities and a growing burden of disease in middle-aged and young adults, especially women. Continued progress will require investment in cancer prevention and access to equitable treatment, especially for Native American and Black individuals.

Targeting Invasion: The Role of MMP-2 and MMP-9 Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide, prompting ongoing research into innovative therapeutic strategies. This review aims to systematically evaluate the role of gelatinases, specifically MMP-2 and MMP-9, as therapeutic targets in CRC, providing a critical analysis of their potential to improve patient outcomes. Gelatinases, specifically MMP-2 and MMP-9, play critical roles in the processes of tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Their expression and activity are significantly elevated in CRC, correlating with poor prognosis and lower survival rates. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological roles of gelatinases in CRC, highlighting their contribution to tumor microenvironment modulation, angiogenesis, and the metastatic cascade. We also critically evaluate recent advancements in the development of gelatinase inhibitors, including small molecule inhibitors, natural compounds, and novel therapeutic approaches like gene silencing techniques. Challenges such as nonspecificity, adverse side effects, and resistance mechanisms are discussed. We explore the potential of gelatinase inhibition in combination therapies, particularly with conventional chemotherapy and emerging targeted treatments, to enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance. The novelty of this review lies in its integration of recent findings on diverse inhibition strategies with insights into their clinical relevance, offering a roadmap for future research. By addressing the limitations of current approaches and proposing novel strategies, this review underscores the potential of gelatinase inhibitors in CRC prevention and therapy, inspiring further exploration in this promising area of oncological treatment.

Global, regional, and national burden of very early-onset colorectal cancer and its risk factors from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019

AIMS

Very early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) was defined as CRC diagnosed before the age of 35 proposed by the latest EOCRC management guideline. Until now, the disease burden of very EOCRC has never been reported. This study aimed to explore the burden of very EOCRC across the past three decades.

METHODS

We extracted the data from Global Burden of Disease Study to analyze the disease burden of very EOCRC. Risk factors for the burden of deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to very EOCRC were also explored in this study. Additionally, decomposition analysis and frontier analysis were also conducted.

RESULTS

Despite regional and gender variations, the global very EOCRC incidence cases increased from 21,874 (95 % UI: 20,386-23,470) to 41,545 (95 % UI: 37,978-45,523). Besides, the deaths cases also increased from 11,445 (95 % UI: 10,545-12,374) to 15,486 (95 % UI: 14,289-16,803), and the DALYs cases increased from 718,136 (95 % UI: 659,858-778,283) to 961,460 (95 % UI: 886,807-1,042,734). Decomposition analysis revealed the epidemiological change contributed most to the incidence burden of very EOCRC. Countries or regions with Sociodemographic Index (SDI) between 0.4 and 0.8 had greater disease burden improvement potential through frontier analysis. Diet low in milk, diet low in calcium, alcohol use, and high body-mass index were the main contributors to deaths and DALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in CRC burden among populations younger than 35 years globally requires vigilance from policy makers, physicians, and young individuals themselves, especially those regions experiencing faster growth burden of very EOCRC.

When Should Colon Cancer Screening Begin? The Impact of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and the Reality of an Unscreened Older Population

BACKGROUND

Recent increases in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality under age 50 have led the US to recommend starting screening at age 45 years instead of 50. Several other countries are now also reconsidering the age to start CRC screening.

AIMS

To aid decision makers in making an informed decision about lowering the starting age of CRC screening in their jurisdictions.

METHODS

In this article, we present the clinical and modeling evidence for the optimal age to start CRC screening and provide a checklist of considerations for decisions on age to start CRC screening.

RESULTS

Two observational studies showed that detection of advanced neoplasia in those aged 45-49 years undergoing colonoscopy was at least as high as in those aged 50-54 years. One Taiwanese study reported a 22% reduction in CRC incidence and a 39% reduction in CRC mortality from FIT screening in those 40-49 years compared to those 50 years and older. Nine modeling studies concluded that lowering the age to start screening to age 45 was cost-effective. However, lowering the start age can have negative spill-off effects, such as increased wait times for diagnostic colonoscopy for symptomatic individuals and decreased screening participation. In an effort to support decision making and prevent negative spill-off, the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Network in Canada proposed a Worksheet to determine the resource impact of earlier screening initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lowering the age to start CRC screening to 45 years likely leads to a reduction in CRC incidence and mortality but requires additional healthcare resources. Policy makers can use the worksheet to assess the expected increase and assess the feasibility within their jurisdictions.

Trends of early-onset colorectal cancer in Singapore: an epidemiological study of a multi-ethnic population

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in those aged 50 years and above have decreased over the last 2 decades. However, there is a rising incidence in CRC among individuals under 50 years of age, termed early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC). EOCRC patients are more advanced stage at diagnosis and may suffer more psychosocial, emotional and financial distress.

OBJECTIVE

Our study examines the epidemiological shifts of CRC in Singapore, a multiethnic country.

METHODS

CRCs diagnosed at age 20 and above from 1968 to 2019 were identified from the Singapore Cancer Registry. Patient characteristics included gender, ethnicity and age of diagnosis of CRC. Population information was obtained from the Department of Statistics Singapore. Age specific incidence rates (ASR) and age standardized incidence rates (ASIR) were calculated. The cohort was divided into 3 age groups: 20 - 49, 50 - 64 and ≥65 years. Temporal trends of incidence rates were modelled with Joinpoint Regression. Birth cohort models were fitted using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) age-period-cohort analysis tool. Cancer-specific survival analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

53044 CRCs were included, and 6183 (11.7%) adults aged 20 to 49 years were diagnosed with EOCRC. ASR of EOCRC rose from 5 in 1968 to 9 per 100,000 in 1996 at 2.1% annually and rose to 10 per 100,000 in 2019 at 0.64% annually. The ASR for CRC among adults 50 to 64 years rose at 3% annually from 1968 to 1987 and plateaued from 1987 while the ASR for adults aged 65 and above rose at 4.1% from 1968 to 1989 and 1.3% annually from 1989 to 2003 but decreased from 2003 onwards at 1% annually. There is a continued rise in the ASR of EOCRC among males (APC: 1.5%) compared to females (APC: 0.41%) and a significant increase in APC for early-onset rectal cancer at 1.5% yearly. Compared to the 1950 - 1954 birth reference cohort, the 1970 - 1984 birth cohort had a significantly higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.17 - 1.36 for rectal cancer while there was no significant change for colon cancer in later cohorts. There were differences in CRC trends across the 3 ethnic groups. Malays had a rapid and persistent rise in ASR of CRC across all age groups (APC: 2- 3%) while amongst young Chinese, only the ASR of rectal cancer is increasing (APC: 1.5%). EOCRC patients had better survival compared to patients diagnosed at 65 years and above (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 - 0.79, P <0.001) after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

The rise in incidence of rectal cancer among young adults especially among Chinese and Malays in Singapore highlights the need for further research to diagnose CRC earlier and reduce cancer-related morbidity and mortality.

CLINICALTRIAL

Empowering cancer prevention with AI: unlocking new frontiers in prediction, diagnosis, and intervention

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing our world at an exponential rate and its transformative power has extensively reached important sectors like healthcare. In the fight against cancer, AI proved to be a novel and powerful tool, offering new hope for prevention and early detection. In this review, we will comprehensively explore the medical applications of AI, including early cancer detection through pathological and imaging analysis, risk stratification, patient triage, and the development of personalized prevention approaches. However, despite the successful impact AI has contributed to, we will also discuss the myriad of challenges that we have faced so far toward optimal AI implementation. There are problems when it comes to the best way in which we can use AI systemically. Having the correct data that can be understood easily must remain one of the most significant concerns in all its uses including sharing information. Another challenge that exists is how to interpret AI models because they are too complicated for people to follow through examples used in their developments which may affect trust, especially among medical professionals. Other considerations like data privacy, algorithm bias, and equitable access to AI tools have also arisen. Finally, we will evaluate possible future directions for this promising field that highlight AI's capacity to transform preventative cancer care.

Is early-onset colorectal cancer an evolving pandemic? Real-world data from a tertiary cancer center

BACKGROUND

Early onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC), defined as those diagnosed under the age of 50, has been increasing rapidly since 1970. UK data on EOCRC are currently limited and better understanding of the condition is needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of patients with EOCRC treated over 9 years (2013-2021) at a large UK cancer center was performed. Clinicopathological features, risk factors, molecular drivers, treatment, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 203 patients were included. A significant increase in cases was reported from 2018-2019 (n = 33) to 2020-2021 (n = 118). Sporadic EOCRC accounted for 70% of cases and left-sided tumors represented 70.9% (n = 144). Median duration of symptoms was 3 months, while 52.7% of the patients had de-novo metastatic disease. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 4.85-7.15) and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 32.86-43.14). In the advanced setting, left-sided primary tumors were associated with a median OS benefit of 14 months over right-sided primaries (28 vs 14 months, P = .009). Finally, primary tumor resection was associated with median OS benefit of 21 months compared with in situ tumors (38 vs 17 months, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of EOCRC is increasing, and survival outcomes remain modest. Raising public awareness and lowering the age for colorectal cancer screening are directions that could improve EOCRC clinical outcomes. There is also a need for large prospective studies to improve the understanding of the nature of EOCRC and the best therapeutic approaches.

Comparative analysis of the clinical aspects of colorectal cancer in young adult and older adult patients in Saudi Arabia

Introduction

Recent studies have shown an increase in the prevalence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) in people aged 20-49 compared to those aged 50-74, with a more rapid increase in the younger age groups. Poorly differentiated, left-sided, and rectal tumors were more common in young adults than in older adult CRC patients. We aimed to improve the understanding of early-onset CRC and to guide primary care physicians on strategies to mitigate its impact.

Methods

Adult patients with CRC identified within 2015-2022 were recruited and divided into young adult-onset (CRC identified at age ≤49 years) and older adult-onset (CRC identified at age ≥50 years). Clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records, then analyzed. Multivariable analyses were performed to predict the CRC prognosis in both age groups.

Results

The study cohort had 530 patients categorized into young adult (n=98; 18.5%) and older adult (n=432; 81.5%). Higher proportions of family histories of CRC, other malignancies, and inflammatory bowel disease in the young adult group were observed (P<0.05). Gastrointestinal symptoms mainly abdominal pain and nausea were more often identified in the young adults. Mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet ring cells, and poorly differentiated tumors were higher in the young adults (P<0.05). Lymphovascular invasion was an independent predictor for advanced stage CRC (AOR 8.638, 95%CI 2.152-34.673, P=0.002 for young adults and AOR 21.757, 95%CI 10.025-47.219, P=0.001 for older adults). Further, the mucinous (AOR 3.727, 95%CI 1.937-7.173, P=0.001 for young adults and AOR 3.534, 95%CI 1.698-7.354, P=0.001 for older adults) and lymphovascular invasion (AOR 3.371, 95%CI 2.107-5.393, P=0.001 for young adults and AOR 3.246, 95%CI 1.910-5.517, P=0.001 for older adults) were independent predictors for recurrence/late metastasis in both age groups.

Conclusion

We recommended to raise awareness among healthcare providers of the importance of lowering the threshold of suspicion in young people presenting with worrisome gastrointestinal symptoms. Our findings suggested the importance of reconsidering the current CRC screening guidelines to lower the threshold of the recommended starting age.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SURGICAL VOLUME AND MORTALITY FROM COLON CANCER IN COLOMBIA: A NATIONAL COHORT

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is the third most common malignancy in Colombia, only exceeded by prostate and breast cancers. It is the second most common cancer among females and the third most common among males. The epidemiology of this disease has changed in Colombia, and its peak incidence has now surpassed that of gastric cancer.

AIMS

We aimed to determine the association between hospital surgical volume and mortality in patients with colon cancer undergoing surgical resection in Colombia.

METHODS

This was a national retrospective cohort study based on administrative data and included adult patients undergoing surgical resection for colon cancer who were enrolled in Colombia's contributory health system between 2012 and 2017. We defined exposure as the hospital's surgical volume where the colon cancer surgery was performed. We classified the patients as exposed to a high surgical volume (above the 90th percentile of the provider distribution) and a low surgical volume (under the 90th percentile). The main outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariate Poisson regressions were used to identify the association between exposure and mortality rates.

RESULTS

The study included 4,647 patients, of which 4,188 underwent surgery at hospitals with a colectomy volume lower than 33 per year and 459 underwent surgery at institutions with volumes equal to or higher than 33 per year. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for observable variables, a lower risk of 30-day mortality was found in patients who underwent surgery at high surgical volume institutions (relative risk - RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 0.033-0.97). No differences were found in the one-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

The high surgical volume of a hospital is associated with a 30-day mortality in colon cancer, as described in other studies, but the 1-year mortality did not show this association. Prospective studies are required to establish a causal relationship.

The association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening: 2018-2021 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

PURPOSE

To assess the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake in screening eligible participants in New York State.

METHODS

We analyzed 28,154 adults who participated in New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2018 to 2021, were age-eligible for colorectal cancer screening based on the USPSTF guidelines at the time of survey administration and answered a version of the administered survey that included the module on food insecurity. Participants were defined as food insecure if they self-reported being always, usually, or sometimes stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals in the past 12 months. We compared demographic, healthcare access, overall health status, food insecurity by colorectal cancer screening status. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association of food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening status after adjusting for relevant covariates. Weighted analyses were performed using survey procedures to obtain population estimates.

RESULTS

Food insecurity was statistically significantly associated a decreased likelihood of being up to date on colorectal cancer screening (ORadj 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.94]) and being ever screened for colorectal cancer (ORadj 0.74, 95% CI [0.64, 0.87]) after adjusting for overall health status, healthcare coverage, interview year, age, race/ethnicity, sex, educational attainment, and income. Health status, health coverage, age, and Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity showed positive, statistically significant association with ever being screened and with being up to date for colorectal cancer screening. Lower income, lower educational attainment, and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were statistically significant inverse predictors of ever being screened and being up to date on screening.

CONCLUSION

This project assessed the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake using the BRFSS survey. Food insecurity may be an important predictor for colorectal cancer screening uptake in eligible adults in the United States. The results from the study can inform future interventions and policies designed to improve participation in routine colorectal cancer screening.

Evaluating the Use of Environmental and Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Risk-Based Surveillance Intervals

INTRODUCTION

United States Multi-Society Task Force colonoscopy surveillance intervals are based solely on adenoma characteristics, without accounting for other risk factors. We investigated whether a risk model including demographic, environmental, and genetic risk factors could individualize surveillance intervals under an "equal management of equal risks" framework.

METHODS

Using 14,069 individuals from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial who had a diagnostic colonoscopy following an abnormal flexible sigmoidoscopy, we modeled the risk of colorectal cancer, considering the diagnostic colonoscopy finding, baseline risk factors (e.g., age and sex), 19 lifestyle and environmental risk factors, and a polygenic risk score for colorectal cancer. Ten-year absolute cancer risks for each diagnostic colonoscopy finding (advanced adenomas [N = 2,446], ≥3 non-advanced adenomas [N = 483], 1-2 non-advanced adenomas [N = 4,400], and no adenoma [N = 7,183]) were used as implicit risk thresholds for recommended surveillance intervals.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for the model including colonoscopy findings, baseline characteristics, and polygenic risk score was 0.658. Applying the equal management of equal risks framework, 28.2% of individuals with no adenoma and 42.7% of those with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas would be considered high risk and assigned a significantly shorter surveillance interval than currently recommended. Among individuals who developed cancer within 10 years, 52.4% with no adenoma and 48.3% with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas would have been considered high risk and assigned a shorter surveillance interval.

DISCUSSION

Using a personalized risk-based model has the potential to identify individuals with no adenoma or 1-2 non-advanced adenomas, who are higher risk and may benefit from shorter surveillance intervals.

Incidence, Clinicopathological Features, and Outcomes of Signet Ring Colorectal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Background Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer with significant variations in clinical characteristics and poor prognosis. However, there is limited data available in Pakistan. Therefore, we analyzed to examine the incidence, clinicopathological features, treatments, and outcomes of SRCC in colorectal cancer cases in Pakistan. Methods This study includes 214 primary signet ring cell carcinoma cases in the colon and rectum. All relevant clinical information extracts on demographic details, laboratory results, radiological findings, endoscopy, pathologic diagnoses, surgical interventions, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, and their corresponding outcomes were undertaken from the same online database of hospital and analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Chi-square test, and independent sample Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results The prevalence of SRCC was higher in younger patients (<50 years), 184 (86%). SRCC was more common in advanced stages T3 and T4, with 210 (98%) cases and 106 cases (49.5%) belonging to stage N2. In 27 cases (12.6%), there was already distant metastasis. The most common site of recurrent disease in SRCC patients was the peritoneum in about 50 (51.5%) patients, followed by multi-site metastases involving the lung, liver, bones, and lymph nodes. Conclusion Signet ring cell colorectal cancer (SRCC) manifests in Pakistan at a younger age and is diagnosed at a more advanced stage, often accompanied by peritoneal metastasis with elevated levels of recurrence due to relatively low rates of screening and the absence of national cancer data and guidelines. It is imperative that these issues should be addressed in order to alleviate the burden of this disease in our population.

Factors affect knowledge, attitudes, and practices in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on exploring various factors that affect knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

METHODS

A systematic search across five databases was performed to identify factors influencing KAP scores towards CRC screening. The PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct the literature search, and the time spanned is from March to June 2023. The search included observational studies published between January 2000 and June 2023 that met the predetermined review criteria. Data were extracted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal checklist to evaluate the quality of the articles.

RESULTS

Out of 16,904 records, 1174 articles were reviewed in full text, resulting in 43 high-quality studies included based on the JBI checklist. These studies assessed knowledge (42), attitudes (26), and practices (11) related to CRC screening. Key factors to improving KAP towards CRC screening in the general public were sociodemographic, social media influence, and physician recommendations. For healthcare professionals, factors promoting KAP included screening methods, guidelines, qualifications, and understanding of CRC screening. Educators lacked awareness of CRC symptoms and needed training to teach CRC screening and prevention. Pharmacists showed positive attitudes towards early CRC detection but had varying knowledge levels.

CONCLUSIONS

KAP towards CRC screening is suboptimal among the general public, healthcare professionals, students, educators, and pharmacists worldwide. Routine CRC screening counselling is paramount to improving screening rates. Continuous medical education and training programmes are essential for healthcare professionals to enhance their KAP towards CRC screening. Students and university teachers should be educated and trained about CRC screening to improve their knowledge and foster positive behavioural changes. These comprehensive measures are critical for establishing an effective screening programme.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Yield in Patients Aged 45 to 50 Years : An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines now recommend initiating colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at age 45 years rather than 50 years, but little is known about screening completion and yield among people aged 45 to 49 years.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion and yield in patients aged 45 to 49 versus 50 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Washington, and Colorado.

PATIENTS

Those distributed a FIT kit during January to September 2022.

MEASUREMENTS

FIT completion within 3 months, FIT positivity, receipt of colonoscopy within 3 months after a positive FIT result, and colonoscopy yield.

RESULTS

A total of 267 732 FIT kits were distributed: 213 928 (79.9%) to patients aged 45 to 49 years, and 53 804 (20.1%) to those aged 50 years. Overall, FIT completion was slightly higher in patients aged 45 to 49 years (38.9% vs. 37.5%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.06]), although at Colorado, those aged 45 to 49 years were substantially less likely to complete a FIT (30.7% vs. 40.2%; aRR, 0.77 [CI, 0.73 to 0.80]). Overall, FIT positivity was lower in patients aged 45 to 49 years (3.6% vs. 4.0%; aRR, 0.91 [CI, 0.84 to 0.98]), and receipt of colonoscopy after a positive FIT result was similar between groups (64.9% vs. 67.4%; aRR, 1.00 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). Adenoma detection was lower in the younger group (58.8% vs. 67.7%; aRR, 0.88 [CI, 0.83 to 0.95]). Yields were similar for adenoma with advanced histology (13.2% vs. 15.9%; aRR, 0.86 [CI, 0.69 to 1.07]), polyp with high-grade dysplasia (3.4% vs. 5.1%; aRR, 0.68 [CI, 0.44 to 1.04]), sessile serrated lesion (10.3% vs. 11.7%; aRR, 0.92 [CI, 0.71 to 1.21]), and CRC (2.8% vs. 2.7%; aRR, 1.10 [CI, 0.62 to 1.96]).

LIMITATION

The small number of neoplasia events contributed to wide CIs.

CONCLUSION

Similar FIT completion and yield rates in people aged 45 to 50 years support initiation of CRC screening at age 45 years.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Kaiser Permanente Sidney R. Garfield Memorial Fund.

Association of Chronic Hepatitis B With Colorectal Cancer and Its Dual Impact on Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Narrative Review

Viral hepatitis B is infamous for being contracted in young adulthood and adolescence, as high-risk behaviors like unprotected sexual intercourse and intravenous drug abuse are common. Most infections caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) are cleared without any long-term sequelae, but some may persist and cause chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This chronicity may produce a state of prolonged inflammation and significantly increase the risk of developing colorectal adenomas (CRA) and colorectal carcinomas (CRC). The aim of this review is to deep-dive into the mechanisms by which CHB may predispose a patient to develop CRA and, more grimly, CRC. It also focuses on studying the influence of CHB on colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We conducted a comprehensive literature search using databases like PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on studies that investigate the role of HBV in colorectal carcinogenesis and CRLM rates in patients suffering from CHB. Chronic inflammation, viral protein interactions with tumor suppressor genes, alteration of cellular pathways such as wingless-related integration site (Wnt) signaling, and extrahepatic accumulation of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were the key mechanisms identified. Quite peculiarly, CHB, which is thought to increase the risk for CRA, seemed to protect against CRLM probably due to its sclerosing effect on the liver parenchyma and due to certain immune-mediated mechanisms that suppress tumor growth. Nonetheless, high viral count or the presence of hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) was found to increase the risk for CRLM, potentially due to increased angiogenesis in the liver. These findings provide convincing evidence that enhanced colonoscopic screening and stronger management protocols for patients suffering from it have the potential to reduce the risk of developing CRC and CRLM.

Survival outcomes of poorly differentiated colorectal carcinoma variants: Insights from a single teaching institute

The morphologic diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is typically straight forward. However, there are certain subtypes of CRC that pose diagnostic challenges for daily practice due to sometimes overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical features. These subtypes include poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma NOS, in the absence of conventional morphology (PDA-NOS), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), medullary carcinoma (MC), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC). This study aims to see if there is a survival difference between poorly differentiated variants of CRC, as well as other clinicopathological features that may affect prognosis. Additionally, we analyzed interobserver agreement among gastrointestinal pathologists (GP) at our institution in subclassifying poorly differentiated CRC. All consecutive patients with the diagnoses of PDA-NOS, MC, LCNEC, UC and LELC between July 2018 and July 2023 were included. Cox proportional regression test was used for multivariate analysis, while log-rank and Kaplan-Meier tests were used for univariate and survival analyses. Out of the same cohort of patients, 58 samples identified and reviewed by 3 GI-subspecialty-trained pathologists who were asked to assign the cases as PDA-NOS, LCNEC, MC, UC and LELC. Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Fleiss Kappa. Of the total 77 patients, 63 were PDA-NOS, 3 were LCNEC, 6 were MC, 4 were UC and 1 was LELC patients. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional regression showed that tumor size (p = 0.001, HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.38), patient age (p = 0.001, HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.24-2.40), and M stage (p = 0.02, HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14-4.32) were significantly associated with worse OS. For the 58 cases analyzed, 3 GP agreed on 42 (72%) cases. The most common diagnosis was PDA-NOS and for 33 (57%) agreement was unanimous. There was moderate agreement (k 0.41-0.60) between all 3 GP. Our study evaluated the challenges associated with histological evaluation of colon cancers with poorly differentiated morphologies. Among the diagnoses considered in the study, MC and LCNEC had different prognostic implications compared to PDA-NOS and UC. Additionally, our GP showed moderate interobserver agreement, indicating that some level of variability in diagnosing poorly differentiated CRC subtypes may be inevitable.

Temporal Trends in Racial and Gender Disparities of Early Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States: An Analysis of the CDC WONDER Database

BACKGROUND

The mortality rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) have surged globally over the past two decades. While the underlying reasons remain largely unknown, understanding its epidemiology is crucial to address this escalating trend. This study aimed to identify disparities potentially influencing these rates, enhancing risk assessment tools, and highlighting areas necessitating further research.

METHODS

Using the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database, this study assessed EOCRC mortality data from 2012 to 2020. Individuals under 50 years who succumbed to EOCRC were identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Data interpretation and representation were performed using R 4.2.2 software.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2020, EOCRC mortality rates fluctuated marginally between 1.7 and 1.8 per 100,000. Male mortality rates increased from 1.9 to 2.0 per 100,000, while female rates varied between 1.5 and 1.6 per 100,000. Significant variations were observed across age groups, with the 40-49 years category experiencing an increase from 6.34 (2012) to 6.94 (2020) per 100,000. Racial category-based data revealed the highest mortality rates among African Americans. Geographically, Mississippi and Alabama exhibited elevated mortality rates. Age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) assessments indicated a marked decline for both genders from 2012 to 2020, with consistently higher rates for men.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the evolving landscape of EOCRC mortality, revealing significant gender, age, and racial disparities. These results underscore the urgent need for tailored health strategies and intensified research efforts targeting these disparities.

Early-onset Colorectal Cancer Patients Do Not Require Shorter Intervals for Post-surgical Surveillance Colonoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC), diagnosed before age 50, is rising in incidence worldwide. Although post-surgical colonoscopy surveillance strategies exist, appropriate intervals in EO-CRC remain elusive, as long-term surveillance outcomes remain scant. We sought to compare findings of surveillance colonoscopies of EO-CRC with patients with average onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC) to help define surveillance outcomes in these groups.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective chart review identified EO-CRC and AO-CRC patients with colonoscopy and no evidence of disease. Surveillance intervals and time to development of advanced neoplasia (CRC and advanced polyps [adenoma/sessile serrated]) were examined. For each group, 3 serial surveillance colonoscopies were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing log-ranked Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

A total of 1259 patients with CRC were identified, with 612 and 647 patients in the EO-CRC and AO-CRC groups, respectively. Compared with patients with AO-CRC, patients with EO-CRC had a 29% decreased risk of developing advanced neoplasia from time of initial surgery to first surveillance colonoscopy (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.0). Average follow-up time from surgical resection to first surveillance colonoscopy was 12.6 months for both cohorts. Overall surveillance findings differed between cohorts (P = .003), and patients with EO-CRC were found to have less advanced neoplasia compared with their counterparts with AO-CRC (12.4% vs 16.0%, respectively). Subsequent colonoscopies found that, while patients with EO-CRC returned for follow-up surveillance colonoscopy earlier than patients with AO-CRC, the EO-CRC cohort did not have more advanced neoplasia nor non-advanced adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EO-CRC do not have an increased risk of advanced neoplasia compared with patients with AO-CRC and therefore do not require more frequent colonoscopy surveillance than current guidelines recommend.

Patterns of Care Following a Positive Fecal Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Multilevel barriers to colonoscopy after a positive fecal blood test for colorectal cancer (CRC) are well-documented. A less-explored barrier to appropriate follow-up is repeat fecal testing after a positive test. We investigated this phenomenon using mixed methods.

DESIGN

This sequential mixed methods study included quantitative data from a large cohort of patients 50-89 years from four healthcare systems with a positive fecal test 2010-2018 and qualitative data from interviews with physicians and patients.

MAIN MEASURES

Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether repeat testing was associated with failure to complete subsequent colonoscopy and to identify factors associated with repeat testing. Interviews were coded and analyzed to explore reasons for repeat testing.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 316,443 patients had a positive fecal test. Within 1 year, 76.3% received a colonoscopy without repeat fecal testing, 3% repeated testing and then received a colonoscopy, 4.4% repeated testing without colonoscopy, and 16.3% did nothing. Among repeat testers (7.4% of total cohort, N = 23,312), 59% did not receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. In adjusted models, those with an initial positive test followed by a negative second test were significantly less likely to receive colonoscopy than those with two successive positive tests (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.35-0.40). Older age (65-75 vs. 50-64 years: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.41) and higher comorbidity score (≥ 4 vs. 0: OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.67-1.83) were significantly associated with repeat testing compared to those who received colonoscopy without repeat tests. Qualitative interview data revealed reasons underlying repeat testing, including colonoscopy avoidance, bargaining, and disbelief of positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients in this cohort, 7.4% repeated fecal testing after an initial positive test. Of those, over half did not go on to receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. Efforts to improve CRC screening must address repeat fecal testing after a positive test as a barrier to completing colonoscopy.

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of computer-aided detection (CADe) system-enhanced colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy suggest increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) and decreased adenoma miss rate (AMR), but the effect on detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to compare performance of CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched through February 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Published RCTs comparing CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy.

DATA EXTRACTION

Average adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) and ACN per colonoscopy were primary outcomes. Adenoma detection rate, AMR, and ACN detection rate (ACN DR) were secondary outcomes. Balancing outcomes included withdrawal time and resection of nonneoplastic polyps (NNPs). Subgroup analyses were done by neural network architecture.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Forty-four RCTs with 36 201 cases were included. Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have higher average APC (12 090 of 12 279 [0.98] vs. 9690 of 12 292 [0.78], incidence rate difference [IRD] = 0.22 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.28]) and higher ADR (7098 of 16 253 [44.7%] vs. 5825 of 15 855 [36.7%], rate ratio [RR] = 1.21 [CI, 1.15 to 1.28]). Average ACN per colonoscopy was similar (1512 of 9296 [0.16] vs. 1392 of 9121 [0.15], IRD = 0.01 [CI, -0.01 to 0.02]), but ACN DR was higher with CADe system use (1260 of 9899 [12.7%] vs. 1119 of 9746 [11.5%], RR = 1.16 [CI, 1.02 to 1.32]). Using CADe systems resulted in resection of almost 2 extra NNPs per 10 colonoscopies and longer total withdrawal time (0.53 minutes [CI, 0.30 to 0.77]).

LIMITATION

Statistically significant heterogeneity in quality and sample size and inability to blind endoscopists to the intervention in included studies may affect the performance estimates.

CONCLUSION

Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have increased APC and detection rate but no difference in ACN per colonoscopy and a small increase in ACN DR. There is minimal increase in procedure time and no difference in performance across neural network architectures.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None. (PROSPERO: CRD42023422835).

Colorectal cancer screening using a multi-locus blood-based assay targeting circulating tumor DNA methylation: a cross-sectional study in an average-risk population

BACKGROUND

Effective screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) enables earlier diagnosis and intervention to improve patient survival.

METHODS

In this study, we prospectively conducted a blood-based CRC screening program for community residents in Hanjiang District, Yangzhou City, and evaluated the screening efficacy of a blood-based multi-locus DNA methylation assay (ColonAiQ). The ColonAiQ-positive rate and colonoscopy participation rate of the population, detection rate of intestinal lesions, and positive predictive value (PPV) of CRC and advanced adenoma (AA) were calculated, and the associated factors were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 105,285 participants were enrolled from January 2021 to December 2022, all of whom completed the ColonAiQ assay, yielding a positive rate of 6.42% (6759/105,285). The colonoscopy compliance rate was 48.56% (3282/6759). Intestinal lesions were detected in 1773 individuals (54.02%), including 63 cases of CRCs (predominately early-stage), 1195 adenomas (441 cases of AAs), 327 polyps, and 188 other benign lesions. CRC patients exhibited higher ColonAiQ scores and more positive loci compared to healthy individuals. The PPVs were 1.92% for CRC and 13.44% for AA. Among participants, 66,121 (62.8%) completed questionnaires graded by the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score, with 12,139 (18.36%) classified in the high-risk tier. High-risk participants had a higher ColonAiQ-positive rate (11.07%) and PPVs for CRC (3.46%) and AA (22.18%). Factors associated with increased detection rates for CRC and AA included male gender, older age, a history of alcohol consumption, and prior polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that ColonAiQ assay effectively identifies high-risk population. These findings strongly suggest that the ColonAiQ assay represents a promising strategy for the early detection of CRC and AA in individuals at average risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05336539).

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.

Assessment of the frequency and risk factors for colorectal cancer in acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is associated with a possible increased risk of neoplasias, like colorectal cancer (CRC), although magnitude of this risk is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps and CRC in patients with acromegaly at first and subsequent colonoscopies; correlate risk factors of CRC and disease activity of acromegaly with colonoscopy findings and analyze relationship of acromegaly as a risk factor for CRC and the best period for screening this neoplasia.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years-old with acromegaly were included. A questionnaire involving characteristics of follow-up of acromegaly and risk factors of CRC was created. Biochemical and colonoscopic data were collected through medical records. Only full-length colonoscopies with satisfactory colonic preparation were included.

RESULTS

123 patients (77 women) were included (mean age at diagnosis of 43.1 years and mean follow-up of 13.7 years). In baseline colonoscopy, 80.5% had non-neoplastic findings, 14.6% non-advanced adenomas, 3.3% advanced adenomas and 1.6% CRC. At end of the study, 3 (2.4%) patients were diagnosed with CRC. No patient under 50 years had a neoplastic lesion on colonoscopy. We observed a positive statistically significant relationship between smoking (p = 0.026), age at diagnosis of acromegaly (p < 0.001), age at baseline colonoscopy (p = 0.002), and risk of adenomas and/or CRC at initial colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking and advanced age were positively related to a higher risk of developing premalignant/malignant colonic lesions. Age ( > 50 years) was the most robust variable. Our data suggest that screening age for CRC in acromegaly should be reviewed.

Colon cancer screening programs prevent cancer

In this article we comment on the article by Agatsuma et al. Our article focuses on the use of screening for colon cancer increases the likelihood of early diagnosis of colorectal cancer compared to those presenting after symptoms develop. Patients with symptoms were more likely to have left-sided lesions with resultant hematochezia and/or changes in bowel habits. In this study almost all patients in the screen group were first screened with immunochemical fecal occult blood testing. Colonoscopy was used either if it was thought to be the more appropriate initial screening modality or if the non-invasive test was positive. The exact timing when an initial screening colonoscopy should be performed is not totally clear from this study. However, early screening for colon cancer does reduce the risk of cancer diagnosis and more advanced cancer diagnoses.

A decade-long study on pathological distinctions of resectable early versus late onset colorectal cancer and optimal screening age determination

The incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC) is increasing. However, the prognosis of EOCRC compared to Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer (LOCRC), and the ideal age for initial colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are not clear. In this study, we identified the pathological differences between the groups and determined the optimal screening age for CRC patients. We included 10,172 patients diagnosed with CRC from January 2011 to December 2021 in this study. Survival differences were compared by plotting Kaplan-Meier survival curves and conducting landmark analysis. Additionally, the diagnostic age of CRC patients was analyzed using age cumulative curves. Compared to LOCRC patients, EOCRC patients had a higher proportion of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and more advanced TNM staging (P < 0.05). The five-year survival of EOCRC patients was significantly better than that of LOCRC patients (P < 0.05). Laparoscopic surgery improved the long-term survival of EOCRC patients. Proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) favored the long-term survival of EOCRC patients. The survival rate of EOCRC patients at TNM stages I and II was higher than that of LOCRC patients at the same stages (P < 0.05). The age cumulative curve showed a substantial increase in the number of CRC patients at 40 years. The long-term prognosis of EOCRC patients is better than that of LOCRC patients, especially among those with pMMR, stages I-II, and who undergo laparoscopic surgery. For people with a high risk of cancer, such as a family history of cancer and poor lifestyle habits, the starting age for CRC screening should be 40 years.

Prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer based on the SEER database: Integrating Cox regression and competing risk analysis

Locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) remains a significant global health challenge owing to its high recurrence rates and poor outcomes, despite current treatments. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive risk stratification model for LACC by integrating Cox regression and competing risk analyses. This was done to improve clinical decision making. We analyzed data from 3428 patients with LACC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and diagnosed them between 2010 and 2015. Cox regression and competing risk analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors. We constructed and validated nomograms for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Multivariate Cox regression identified key prognostic factors for OS, including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, age, marital status, ethnicity, and tumor size. Notably, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIA, IIIB, and IVA had hazard ratios of 2.227, 2.451, and 4.852, respectively, significantly increasing the mortality risk compared to stage IB2. Ethnic disparities were evident, with African Americans facing a 39.8% higher risk than Caucasians did. Competing risk analyses confirmed the significance of these factors in DSS, particularly tumor size. Our nomogram demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.706 to 0.784 for DSS and 0.717 to 0.781 for OS. Calibration plots and decision curve analyses further validated the clinical utility of this nomogram. We present effective nomograms for LACC risk stratification that incorporate multiple prognostic factors. These models provide a refined approach for individualized patient management and have the potential to significantly enhance therapeutic strategies for LACC.

Early onset colorectal cancer, not just the age: Data from a large health organization

Early onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) is increasing. We investigated the risk factors for ER-CRC compared to late onset colorectal cancer (LO-CRC). CRC patients between the years 1999 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, malignancies, and mortality were collected. Data were retrieved using the MdClone platform from a large Health Maintenance Organization. The cohort was subdivided into EO-CRC (age ≤ 50 years) and LO-CRC (age ≥ 51 years) groups. 61,679 patients diagnosed with CRC were included in our analysis, 30,456 (49.4%) males, and 4891 (7.9%) Arabs, with an average age at diagnosis of 70.1 ± 13.1 years. 5561 (9%) patients were included in the EO-CRC group. Over the last decades, higher rates of EO-CRC were diagnosed compared to the previous decade, 9.8% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001. A higher percentage of EO-CRC patients were females (52.8% vs 50.4%), had a family history of CRC (9.9% vs 5.5%), were Arabs (18.7% vs 6.9%), and were smokers (32.7% vs 30.2%) compared to LO-CRC patients. Significantly lower rates of comorbidities such as ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, and iron deficiency anemia were found among EO-CRC patients, with a lower all-cause mortality (27.7% vs 63.1%, p < 0.001). 348 (6.3%) of the EO-CRC patients had another Lynch-related cancer until age 50 years compared to 45 (0.1%) at the LO-CRC. Young individuals with increased risk for CRC need special consideration and should be referred early for screening and endoscopic investigation, particularly those with a family history of CRC, smokers, and those of Arab ethnicity.

Interaction of Insurance and Neighborhood Income on Operative Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Within a National Database

INTRODUCTION

Sociodemographic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients are known. Few studies, however, have examined the intersection of insurance type and median household income (MHI).

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2019, all CRC surgery patients between 50 and 64 y old were included. Patients were further stratified based on insurance type (commercial, Medicaid, and uninsured) as well as county-level MHI quartiles. Outcomes included nonelective surgery (primary outcome), inpatient mortality, complications, and blood transfusions. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic variables, medical comorbidities, and hospital-level factors.

RESULTS

Of 108,606 patients, 80.5% of patients had commercial insurance, while 5.8% were uninsured. On multivariate analysis, Medicaid or no insurance, especially when living in a lower-income community, were associated with significantly higher odds of nonelective surgery (ORs: 1.11-4.54). There was a stepwise effect on nonelective surgery by insurance type (uninsured with lower odds than insured) and MHI (each lower quartile had higher odds). There were similar trends for inpatient blood transfusions, but there were no significant differences in mortality or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially when considered together, noncommercial insurance and lower MHI were associated with worse outcomes in CRC patients. Insurance was more protective than MHI against worse outcomes. These findings among a screening-aged cohort have policy planning implications for insurance expansions and healthcare funding allocations. Further research is needed to understand the complex underlying mechanisms that create this interaction between insurance and MHI.

Assessing the Relationship Between Self-Rated General Health and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to be effective in reducing the burden of colorectal cancer. However, the screening rate has been suboptimal, and mortality due to colorectal cancer remains high. With the presence of proactive prevention strategies, low screening rates could still be due to individual factors. Following the health-belief model, this study examined the relationship between self-rated general health perception and colorectal cancer screening.

METHODS

The study utilized the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Annual Survey dataset. The sample size was 177,889 and included individuals aged 45-75 years. The outcome variable was a categorical variable with binary responses of screened or not screened. The main predictor variable was an ordinal variable with five responses of poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent in the assessment of self-rated general health. Other covariates were age, sex, marital status, race, insurance status, level of education, annual income, and poor physical and mental health durations. The weighting variable of the dataset was used to adjust the sample to a weighted sample size. After obtaining descriptive statistics, simple and multivariate logistic regressions were fitted to analyze the relationship between the main predictor and the outcome variables. Statistical significance was set at a 95% confidence level.

RESULT

The weighted sample size was 83,303,438. Of these, 70.09% were screened and 29.91% were not screened for colorectal cancer. Excellent general health was reported by 14.80%, 34.32% very good, 32.1% good, 13.91% fair, and 4.87% had poor general health. Individuals with excellent general health perception were 25% less likely (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=0.75; 95% CI=0.65, 0.88; p<0.0001) to be screened for colorectal cancer compared to those with poor general health perception.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the individual's excellent health perception as a possible contributing factor to the deficiency towards the realization of the goal in the rate of screening uptake and the need for revised and improved awareness programs.

Association of Endoscopist Colonoscopy Quality Measures With Follow-Up Colonoscopy Outcomes After Positive Stool Tests (Multitarget Stool DNA or Fecal Immunochemical Test): Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

INTRODUCTION

Negative colonoscopies following positive stool tests could result from stool test characteristics or from the quality of endoscopist performance. We used New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to examine the association between endoscopist detection rates and polyp yield in colonoscopies performed for positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test to evaluate the degree to which positive stool tests followed by negative colonoscopy ("false positives") vary with endoscopist quality. In addition, we investigated the frequency of significant polyps in the subgroup of highest quality colonoscopies following positive stool tests.

METHODS

We compared the frequencies of negative colonoscopies and of specific polyps following positive stool tests across quartiles of endoscopist adenoma detection rate (ADR) and clinically significant serrated polyp detection rate (CSSDR).

RESULTS

Our sample included 864 mt-sDNA+ and 497 FIT+ patients. We found a significantly lower frequency of negative colonoscopies following positive stool tests among endoscopists with higher ADR and CSSDR, particularly in the 2 highest quartiles. In addition, detection of any adenoma after a positive stool test for endoscopists in the fourth ADR quartile was 63.3% (FIT+) and 62.8% (mt-sDNA+). Among endoscopists in the fourth CSSDR quartile, sessile serrated lesions were found in 29.2% of examinations following a positive mt-sDNA and in 13.5% following FIT+ examinations.

DISCUSSION

The frequency of negative colonoscopies after positive stool tests was significantly higher in examinations performed by endoscopists with low ADR and CSSDR. Our results also suggest a benchmark target of at least 40% for ADR in patients with mt-sDNA+ or FIT+ tests and 20% for sessile serrated lesions in mt-sDNA+ patients.