Interventions on Adherence to Treatment in Children With Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review

School-supervised Asthma Therapy is Associated with Improved Long-Term Asthma Outcomes for Underrepresented Minority Children

Asthma morbidity disproportionately impacts children from low-income and racial/ethnic minority communities. School-supervised asthma therapy improves asthma outcomes for up to 15 months for underrepresented minority children, but little is known about whether these benefits are sustained over time. We examined the frequency of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions for 83 children enrolled in Asthma Link, a school nurse-supervised asthma therapy program serving predominantly underrepresented minority children. We compared outcomes between the year preceding enrollment and years one-four post-enrollment. Compared with the year prior to enrollment, asthma-related ED visits decreased by 67.9% at one year, 59.5% at two years, 70.2% at three years, and 50% at four years post-enrollment (all p-values< 0.005). There were also significant declines in mean numbers of total ED visits, asthma-related hospital admissions, and total hospital admissions. Our results indicate that school nurse-supervised asthma therapy could potentially mitigate racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequities in childhood asthma.

Telemonitoring of pediatric asthma in outpatient settings: A systematic review

Telemonitoring technologies are rapidly evolving, offering a promising solution for remote monitoring and timely management of asthma acute episodes. We aimed to describe current pediatric asthma telemonitoring technologies. A systematic review was conducted until September 2023 on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies of children (0-18 years) with asthma or recurrent wheezing whose respiratory condition was telemonitored outside the healthcare setting. A narrative synthesis was performed. We identified 40 telemonitoring technologies described in 40 studies. The more frequently used technologies for telemonitoring were mobile applications (n = 21) and web-based systems (n = 14). Telemonitoring duration varied between 2 weeks and 32 months. Data collection included asthma symptoms (n = 30), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (n = 11), spirometry/peak flow readings (n = 20), medication adherence (n = 17), inhaler technique (n = 3), air quality (n = 2), and respiratory sounds (n = 2). Both parents and children were the technology target users in most studies (n = 23). Technology training was reported in 23 studies of which 3 provided ongoing support. Automatic feedback was found in 30 studies, mostly related with asthma control. HCP were involved in data management in 27 studies. Technologies were tested in samples from 4 to 327 children, with most studies including school-aged children and/or adolescents (n = 38) and eight including preschool children. This review provides an overview of existing technologies for the outpatient telemonitoring of pediatric asthma. Specific technologies for preschool children represent a gap in the literature that needs to be specifically addressed in future research.

Effect of monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) alone or in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) using electronic methods on asthma outcomes: a narrative systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate through a systematic review the effectiveness of electronic methods in monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone or in combination with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and their effect on clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A narrative systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science were searched through up to 10 July 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included peer-reviewed studies of qualitative and quantitative outcomes that compared the effect of electronic methods to routine non-electronic monitoring intervention or placebo among children and adults with asthma on medication adherence rates to regular ICS alone or in combination with LABA, asthma control and asthma exacerbations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction was performed according to a predetermined sheet specific to the review objectives. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool for systematic reviews. Meta-analysis was not possible based on the findings of the scoping search; however, a narrative review was performed to allow for the grouping of results based on asthma inhaler adherence rates, asthma control and exacerbations.

RESULTS

Six articles comprising 98 studies published from 1998 to 2022 in the USA, Canada and the UK were included. Compared with the control, electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) showed a 23% adherence improvement, mean difference (MD) of 23%, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16, p=0.0002. Asthmatic children were 1.5 times more likely to be adherent using EMDs compared with non-EMD users (RR=1.5, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.9) (p<0.001). Mobile devices and text message reminders (MHealth) showed a 12% adherence improvement (MD 12%, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03) (p<0.0001), alongside a small to medium improvement in asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44), small improvement in asthma-related quality of life (SMD 0.26) (p=0.007) and variable risk reduction in asthma exacerbations for digital health (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91) (p=0.02) compared with EMDs, which showed insignificant differences (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.75) (p=0.72). Technologies combined yielded variable adherence effects, with an SMD for eHealth of 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.79, and MD for digital health was 14.66% higher than the control, 95% CI 7.74 to 21.57. Heterogeneity between studies was significant (eHealth I2=98%, digital I2=94%).

CONCLUSION

Electronic methods improved adherence to inhaled medications in asthma. EMDs appear to be the most effective technology, followed by mHealth. The adherence improvement was associated with a small clinical improvement. There was inconsistent overlapping of terminology describing electronic methods that require standardisation. Data on the cost-effectiveness of electronic devices and their utilisation in severe asthma are lacking and require further research.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022303069.

Clinical outcomes of children using a metered dose inhaler with a sleeve attachment device to improve ease of use

Background

Activating pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is often challenging for children. The Easy Squeezy (ES) is a novel sleeve attachment device that reduces activation force by 3 times. Although users have favored using the ES over using a pMDI alone, the clinical impact of the ES remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare lung function and quality of life between ES users and users of a pMDI alone.

Objectives

Our aim was to measure and compare lung function of asthmatic children after they used the ES and pMDI alone.

Methods

In this crossover study we recruited 65 asthmatic children between the ages of 5 and 12 years. The participants were randomized into 2 groups. One of the groups used the ES for 6 weeks whereas the other group used a pMDI. After 6 weeks the participants crossed over to the other group. Lung function test parameters were measured after randomization and after each 6 weeks of device use. Quality of life (measured by the Patient Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [PAQLQ]) and Childhood Asthma Control Test were measured after each period of device use.

Results

There was no significant difference in the baseline lung function between the groups. The ES group had a significantly lower percentage difference between prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV1 values. Although no significant differences were observed in PAQLQ scores between the groups, more patients in the ES group had improvement of their PAQLQ score than did patients in the group using a pMDI alone. Total Childhood Asthma Control Test scores were significantly higher for the ES group.

Conclusions

The ES device may allow users' asthma to be better controlled than by using a pMDI alone.

Study of Adherence to Medication in Pediatric Liver Diseases ("SAMPLD" Study) in Indian Children

Background/objectives

Adherence to medication(s) is an essential component of holistic management in any chronic disease including in post liver transplant (LT) patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess adherence to medications in Indian pediatric liver disease patients (including post LT recipients) and to identify variables affecting its occurrence.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among pediatric (<18 years of age) subjects with Wilson disease (WD) and autoimmune liver disease (AILD) along with post LT recipients from May 2021 to October 2021. Structured tools using prevalidated questionnaires (Medication adherence measure and the Child & Adolescent Adherence to Medication Questionnaire) were used to collect data related to nonadherence prevalence (based on missed and late doses) and factors influencing the adherence.

Results

A total of 152 children were included in the study (WD 39.5%, AILD 32.9%, and post LT 27.6%). Prevalence of missed and late dose nonadherence (at a cut-off of ≥20%) was 12.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Older age (odd's ratio/O.R 1.185), stay in a rural area (O.R 5.08), and barriers like bad taste of medication (O.R 4.728) and hard to remember the medication (O.R 7.180) were independently associated with nonadherence (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, nonadherence was seen in 12-16%, i.e., around one-sixth of the patients, with least nonadherence seen in post LT recipients (0-2.4%). Older age of the patient, rural place of stay and personal barriers like hard to remember/forgetfulness and bad medication taste were identified as factors independently leading to nonadherence.

Behavioral parenting skills as a novel target for improving medication adherence in young children: Feasibility and acceptability of the CareMeds intervention

In pediatric cancer care, medication non-adherence is a significant driver of avoidable suffering and death. There is a lack of interventions designed for families of young children, where patient medication refusal/avoidance is a common barrier to adherence. We developed the CareMeds intervention which focuses on caregiver skills training to help young children take medicine calmly and without use of restraint techniques. The goal of this preliminary study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the CareMeds intervention. Caregivers of pediatric cancer patients (ages 2-10) whose children were on a home-based oral medication regimen were recruited to participate. Feasibility was examined through study enrollment and retention rates as well as reasons for refusal and drop out. Acceptability was evaluated through usability of and engagement with intervention components and an acceptability questionnaire. Feasibility: We recruited N = 9 caregivers to participate in this intervention pilot study and had a 75% enrollment rate. Reasons for declining included scheduling concerns (n = 2) and lack of interest (n = 1). The participant retention rate was 100% with 100% adherence to intervention sessions. Acceptability: Parents rated the sessions and resource materials as acceptable and reported frequent use of skills taught in the intervention. The CareMeds intervention is an acceptable and feasible strategy for caregivers of pediatric cancer patients and warrants future research to examine the efficacy of behavioral parenting skills interventions to improve medication adherence in young children.

Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is the most common chronic lung condition worldwide, affecting 334 million adults and children globally. Despite the availability of effective treatment, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), adherence to maintenance medication remains suboptimal. Poor ICS adherence leads to increased asthma symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalisations, and healthcare utilisation. Importantly, suboptimal use of asthma medication is a key contributor to asthma deaths. The impact of digital interventions on adherence and asthma outcomes is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving adherence to maintenance treatments in asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted the most recent searches on 1 June 2020, with no restrictions on language of publication. A further search was run in October 2021, but studies were not fully incorporated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including cluster- and quasi-randomised trials of any duration in any setting, comparing a digital adherence intervention with a non-digital adherence intervention or usual care. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, receiving maintenance treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures for data collection. We used GRADE to assess quantitative outcomes where data were available.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and children with asthma (n = 15,207), of which eight are ongoing studies. Of the included studies, 30 contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The total number of participants ranged from 18 to 8517 (median 339). Intervention length ranged from two to 104 weeks. Most studies (n = 29) reported adherence to maintenance medication as their primary outcome; other outcomes such as asthma control and quality of life were also commonly reported. Studies had low or unclear risk of selection bias but high risk of performance and detection biases due to inability to blind the participants, personnel, or outcome assessors. A quarter of the studies had high risk of attrition bias and selective outcome reporting. We examined the effect of digital interventions using meta-analysis for the following outcomes: adherence (16 studies); asthma control (16 studies); asthma exacerbations (six studies); unscheduled healthcare utilisation (four studies); lung function (seven studies); and quality of life (10 studies). Pooled results showed that patients receiving digital interventions may have increased adherence (mean difference of 14.66 percentage points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.74 to 21.57; low-certainty evidence); this is likely to be clinically significant in those with poor baseline medication adherence. Subgroup analysis by type of intervention was significant (P = 0.001), with better adherence shown with electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) (23 percentage points over control, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16; seven studies), and with short message services (SMS) (12 percentage points over control, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03; four studies). No significant subgroup differences were seen for interventions having an in-person component versus fully digital interventions, adherence feedback, one or multiple digital components to the intervention, or participant age. Digital interventions were likely to improve asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31 higher, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44; moderate-certainty evidence) - a small but likely clinically significant effect. They may reduce asthma exacerbations (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91; low-certainty evidence). Digital interventions may result in a slight change in unscheduled healthcare utilisation, although some studies reported no or a worsened effect. School or work absence data could not be included for meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in reporting and the low number of studies. They may result in little or no difference in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁)): there was an improvement of 3.58% predicted FEV₁, 95% CI 1.00% to 6.17%; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is unlikely to be clinically significant as the FEV₁ change is below 12%. Digital interventions likely increase quality of life (SMD 0.26 higher, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is a small effect that may not be clinically significant. Acceptability data showed positive attitudes towards digital interventions. There were no data on cost-effectiveness or adverse events. Our confidence in the evidence was reduced by risk of bias and inconsistency.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, digital interventions may result in a large increase in adherence (low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence that digital adherence interventions likely improve asthma control to a degree that is clinically significant, and likely increase quality of life, but there is little or no improvement in lung function. The review found low-certainty evidence that digital interventions may reduce asthma exacerbations. Subgroup analyses show that EMDs may improve adherence by 23% and SMS interventions by 12%, and interventions with an in-person element and adherence feedback may have greater benefits for asthma control and adherence, respectively. Future studies should include percentage adherence as a routine outcome measure to enable comparison between studies and meta-analysis, and use validated questionnaires to assess adherence and outcomes.

Diagnosis and management of asthma in children

Asthma is the the most common chronic respiratory condition of childhood worldwide, with around 14% of children and young people affected. Despite the high prevalence, paediatric asthma outcomes are inadequate, and there are several avoidable deaths each year. Characteristic asthma features include wheeze, shortness of breath and cough, which are typically triggered by a number of possible stimuli. There are several diagnostic challenges, and as a result, both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of paediatric asthma remain problematic.Effective asthma management involves a holistic approach addressing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, as well as education and self-management aspects. Working in partnership with children and families is key in promoting good outcomes. Education on how to take treatment effectively, trigger avoidance, modifiable risk factors and actions to take during acute attacks via personalised asthma action plans is essential.This review aimed to provide an overview of good clinical practice in the diagnosis and management of paediatric asthma. We discuss the current diagnostic challenges and predictors of life-threatening attacks. Additionally, we outline the similarities and differences in global paediatric asthma guidelines and highlight potential future developments in care. It is hoped that this review will be useful for healthcare providers working in a range of child health settings.

The Impact of Adherence and Health Literacy on Difficult-to-Control Asthma

Medication nonadherence and health literacy are key factors that influence the management of difficult-to-control asthma. Adherence, or the extent to which a patient follows a treatment plan, extends beyond asthma medication use and includes an appropriate inhaler technique. Assessment of adherence is critical before making a diagnosis of severe asthma and stepping up asthma therapy but is challenging in the clinical context. Health literacy, or the degree to which individuals can obtain, process, and understand health information and services needed to make health care decisions, is additionally important for asthma management and has been shown to impact medication adherence. Initiatives aiming to improve difficult-to-control asthma should address medication adherence and health literacy. Universal health literacy precautions are recommended while communicating with patients, in addition to the creation of low health literacy asthma action plans. To improve adherence, a comprehensive assessment of adherence should be conducted. Additional evidence-based interventions aiming to improve adherence focus on appropriate inhaler use, improved access to medications, the use of digital platforms, school-based asthma interventions, and the implementation of culturally tailored interventions. Data are limited regarding the use of these initiatives in patients with severe or difficult-to-control asthma.

Packaging and Delivery of Asthma Therapeutics

Asthma is a life-altering, chronic disease of heterogenous origin that features a complex interplay of immune and environmental signaling. Although very little progress has been made in prevention, diverse types of medications and delivery systems, including nanoscale systems, have been or are currently being developed to control airway inflammation and prevent exacerbations and fibrosis. These medications are delivered through mechanical methods, with various inhalers (with benefits and drawbacks) existing, and new types offering some variety in delivery. Of particular interest is the progress being made in nanosized materials for efficient penetration into the epithelial mucus layer and delivery into the deepest parts of the lungs. Liposomes, nanoparticles, and extracellular vesicles, both natural and synthetic, have been explored in animal models of asthma and have produced promising results. This review will summarize and synthesize the latest developments in both macro-(inhaler) and micro-sized delivery systems for the purpose of treating asthma patients.

Meta-Analysis of Adherence Promotion Interventions in Pediatric Asthma

BACKGROUND

Youth with asthma commonly have suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is critical to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of ICS adherence promotion interventions and discern which techniques are most effective.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to (1) quantify the extent to which interventions improve ICS adherence in pediatric asthma, (2) explore differences in effect size estimates based on intervention and study characteristics, and (3) characterize the risk of bias across interventions.

METHODS

We conducted literature searches across five databases. Included studies quantitatively measured ICS adherence as an intervention outcome among youth (<18 years old) diagnosed with asthma and were published after 1997. We analyzed aggregate effect sizes and moderator variables using random-effects models and characterized risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-three unique studies met inclusion criteria. At post-intervention, the aggregate effect size for pediatric ICS adherence promotion interventions was small but significant (n = 33, g = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.54); however, the aggregate effect size at follow-up was not statistically significant (n = 6, g = 0.38, 95% CI = -0.08 to 0.83). Method of adherence measurement and intervention format were significant moderators. Most interventions had a high risk of performance bias and an unclear risk of bias in one or more domains.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS adherence promotion interventions are effective among youth with asthma. Additional longitudinal research is needed to quantify a more precise measure of intervention effectiveness over time, and moderators of intervention effectiveness should be reassessed as the literature base expands.

Pediatric problematic severe asthma: Recent advances in management

Problematic severe asthma remains a significant challenge to manage, accounting for the majority of healthcare utilization among children with asthma. The heterogeneity is recognized and the clinical phenotypes of "difficult-to-treat" asthma (DA) and "severe therapy-resistant asthma" (STRA) help to guide management. Recent evidence supports molecular distinctions between these phenotypes and shows poor correlations between peripheral and airway markers of inflammation, especially in STRA. Airway neutrophils in the context of childhood severe asthma have been explored, but their role in disease causation, protection, or as bystanders remain unknown, and thus, treatment implications are unclear. Several novel management strategies, including once-daily maintenance therapy, single-device maintenance and reliever therapy, and novel biological treatments are being increasingly used for DA and STRA. However, pediatric data for efficacy of novel treatments is scarce, and when available, is restricted to adolescents. The aim of this review is to highlight recent advances in objective biomarkers that aid stratification and management of childhood severe asthma and to highlight gaps in pediatric evidence. Specifically, the urgent need for efficacy studies to improve the management of problematic severe asthma in children younger than 12 years.

Pictorial versus written asthma action plans for youth: initial impact on regimen knowledge, medication adherence, symptom control, and family satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

Asthma action plans (AAP) are recommended to guide asthma management. Written AAPs (WAAPs) are under-utilized and can be difficult to understand. Our study designed and tested a simplified pictorial AAP (PAAP). We hypothesized that better outcomes would be obtained for youth with the PAAP.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-nine (169) youth (aged 8-17; AAP-naïve) were screened for this pilot, 2-arm randomized controlled trial. Feasibility, usability and preliminary efficacy of PAAP compared to a WAAP, for improving outcomes (inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence, symptom control, AAP knowledge, AAP satisfaction) were assessed quantitatively. Youth received an AAP from their physician after completing baseline measures and completed measures at three additional time points (1-, 3-, and 6-month).

RESULTS

Forty-five youth were recruited (PAAP = 22; WAAP = 23). Youth AAP knowledge was higher for the PAAP group compared to the WAAP group (p = .017). ICS adherence did not differ between groups, over time, or based on prescribed dosing; however, for WAAP participants, adherence was lower with a higher daily prescription (4 puffs) relative to a lower dose (p = .006). Symptom control improved with both AAPs, but the change was not statistically significant. Lung function did not change significantly by AAP type or time, and literacy variables were not related significantly to outcomes. Youth satisfaction with AAP improved significantly for the PAAP group compared to the WAAP group (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher AAP knowledge and satisfaction among youth in the PAAP group suggests that structured education from a physician using a PAAP is beneficial. Intervention and study design insights gained will guide future research.

A hospital-based multidimensional intervention for high risk pediatric patients with asthma

Objective: To determine the effects of a multi-dimensional intervention (consisting of education, recommendations for medical management, and short-term case management) provided by pulmonology nurse practitioners(NP) on inpatient and post-discharge outcomes for patients admitted with asthma exacerbations to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit(PICU).Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed on subjects with an asthma exacerbation admitted to the PICU from 01-01-2015 to 31-12-2018. Records were reviewed for 12-months post-discharge. We compared inpatient and post-discharge outcomes for those who did vs. did not receive NP consultation. The primary outcome evaluated was optimization of discharge medications. Rates of follow up, repeat ED visits and hospitalizations were also reviewed.Results: 222 subjects met inclusion and exclusion criteria; of those, 101(45.5%) patients received NP consultation and 121(54.5%) had PICU management only. Patients with NP consultation were more likely to have controllers initiated (34.6% vs. 15%) or adjusted (55.5% vs. 33.3%) per asthma guidelines (p < 0.001). The consult group were more likely to have an asthma follow-up appointment made prior to discharge (99% vs. 45%, p < 0.001), and were more likely to attend the appointment (51% vs. 21%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups for ED visits or readmission for asthma 12-months post-discharge.Conclusions: Patients with NP consultation were more likely to have controllers started or adjusted per guidelines and were more likely to attend specialty follow-up appointments post-discharge. No impact was seen on ED visits or readmissions. Implementation of such a program may aid in optimizing asthma management and continuity of care post hospitalization.

Disease burden and treatment adherence among children and adolescent patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To assess asthma burden and medication adherence in a US de-identified patient level claims database.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used the IQVIA PHARMETRICS PLUS database to identify patients aged 5-17 years, diagnosed with asthma between 01/01/2012-09/30/2017 (asthma cohort), and those initiating treatment with twice-daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or twice-daily ICS/long-acting beta₂ agonists (LABA) (treatment cohorts; index date = first dispensing). Patient characteristics, asthma medication, and healthcare resource utilization were assessed over a 12-month baseline period. Treatment cohort endpoints were assessed in a 12-month follow-up period, including: adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC); persistence (no gap >45 days between dispensings).

RESULTS

The asthma cohort included 186,868 patients (112,689 children, mean age 7.9 years; 74,179 adolescents, mean age 14.3 years). During baseline, 34.5% used ICS or ICS/LABA, 24% used oral corticosteroids, 11.1% had ≥1 asthma-related emergency department visit, 2.2% had ≥1 asthma-related hospitalization. Among treatment cohorts, 47,276 and 10,247 patients initiated twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA, respectively (mean ages: 9.9; 12.5 years). Mean PDC adherence to twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA was 30% and 34% at 6 months (PDC ≥0.8: 4.3%; 6.1%); 21% and 24% at 12 months (PDC ≥0.8: 1.8%; 2.8%). Persistence with twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA was 10.1% and 14.2% at 6 months; 5.6% and 8.0% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A large disease burden and unmet need exist among US children/adolescent asthma patients, evidenced by low use of, and poor adherence to, ICS-containing medication, the notable proportion of oral corticosteroid users, and higher-than-expected asthma-related emergency department and hospitalization rates.

Personalized Medication Adherence Management in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Review of Effective Interventions and Development of a Practical Adherence Toolkit

BACKGROUND

The management of medication nonadherence of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains challenging. Given the multitude of underlying causes, a personalized approach is required. The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) can identify reasons for nonadherence, but it does not provide guidance regarding how to act effectively after results.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a practical, evidence-based decision support toolkit for health care professionals managing adult patients with asthma and/or COPD, by matching TAI-identified adherence barriers to proven effective adherence-enhancing interventions.

METHODS

We performed a literature review in PubMed and Embase identifying interventions that enhanced medication adherence in adult patients with asthma and/or COPD. Randomized controlled trials published in English with full texts available were included. Effective interventions assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool were categorized, matched with specific TAI responses, and developed into a practical TAI Toolkit. The Toolkit was assessed for content and usability (System Usability Scale) by a multidisciplinary group of health care professionals.

RESULTS

In total, 40 randomized controlled trials were included in the review. Seven effective interventions categories were identified, informing the TAI Toolkit: reminders, educational interventions, motivational strategies, feedback on medication use, shared decision-making, simplifying the medication regimen, and multiple component interventions. Health care professionals rated the TAI Toolkit with a mean System Usability Scale score of 71.4 (range, 57.5-80.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence can be improved using the different interventions that the TAI Toolkit helps select. The TAI Toolkit was well-received by health care professionals. Further research is required to test its validity, practicality, and effectiveness in practice.

Differences between patients who achieved asthma control and those who remain uncontrolled after standardized severe asthma care strategy

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical, functional, and inflammatory patterns of children and adolescents with severe uncontrolled asthma, and investigate the differences between patients who achieved asthma control and those who remain uncontrolled after standardized asthma care strategy.

METHODS

Screening all children and adolescents with asthma from the Pediatric Pulmonology Outpatient Clinic of Unicamp, Brazil, and included those with severe uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines criteria. Patients were assessed at baseline and after by demographic and medication data, questionnaires (Asthma Control Test and Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), Six-Minute Walk Test, skin prick test, spirometry, induced sputum, and blood collection (total immunoglobulin E and eosinophil count). Cytokine dosage was analyzed in sputum supernatant and serum by Cytometric Bead Array.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with severe uncontrolled asthma were included (median age 10.9 [7.00-17.60] years). All patients presented satisfactory adherence to treatment and 50% of them achieved good asthma control after six-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients who achieved asthma control reported higher intervals since their last exacerbation episode (p = 0.008) and higher quality of life scores (p < 0.001) as compared to patients who remained uncontrolled. We found no changes in lung function markers, inflammatory biomarkers, or cytokine levels between patients with uncontrolled and controlled asthma.

CONCLUSION

Participation of six months in a structured outpatient clinic for children with severe asthma had a notable improvement in control and quality of life of patients. This demonstrates the importance of a global assessment, focused on peculiarities presented by patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Persistence and Adherence to ICS/LABA Drugs in UK Patients with Asthma: A Retrospective New-User Cohort Study

Introduction

Asthma is associated with significant economic burden. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta₂-agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapies are considered mainstays of treatment. We describe real-world use of ICS/LABAs by comparing treatment persistence and adherence among patients with asthma in the United Kingdom initiating fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) or beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/FM).

Methods

A retrospective new-user active comparator database study was conducted in the IQVIA Medical Research Database. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed for FF/VI versus BUD/FM, and FF/VI versus BDP/FM. The primary objective was to compare patient treatment persistence (time to discontinuation), while secondary objectives included assessing adherence (mean proportion of days covered [PDC] with medication in the study period) and the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% PDC.

Results

New users of FF/VI (N = 966), BUD/FM (N = 5931) and BDP/FM (N = 9607) were identified and PS-matched: FF/VI (n = 945) versus BUD/FM (n = 3272), and FF/VI (n = 902) versus BDP/FM (n = 3465). At 12 months, treatment persistence was 69% (FF/VI), 53% (BUD/FM) and 57% (BDP/FM). The likelihood of treatment discontinuation within 12 months after initiation with FF/VI was 35% lower than with BUD/FM and 31% lower than for BDP/FM (both p < 0.001). Mean PDC was higher for FF/VI compared with BUD/FM (77.7 vs 72.4; p < 0.0001) and BDP/FM (78.2 vs 71.0; p < 0.0001). The odds of achieving ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% PDC were greater for FF/VI than for BUD/FM and BDP/FM.

Conclusions

In this study, patients who initiated FF/VI were less likely to discontinue treatment and showed greater treatment adherence versus patients who initiated BUD/FM or BDP/FM.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01344-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Severe asthma in children: therapeutic considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Children with poor asthma control despite maximal maintenance therapy have problematic severe asthma (PSA). A step-wise approach including objective adherence monitoring and a detailed multidisciplinary team assessment to identify modifiable factors contributing to poor control is needed prior to considering therapy escalation. Pathophysiological phenotyping in those with true severe therapy-resistant asthma (STRA) and the current array of add-on therapies will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adherence monitoring using electronic devices has shown that only 20-30% of children with PSA have STRA and need additional therapies. Omalizumab and mepolizumab are licensed for children with STRA aged 6 years and older. Although robust safety and efficacy data, with reduced exacerbations, are available for omalizumab, biomarkers predicting response to treatment are lacking. Paediatric safety data are available for mepolizumab, but efficacy data are unknown for those aged 6-11 years and minimal for those 12 years and older. A sub-group of children with STRA have neutrophilia, but the clinical significance and contribution to disease severity remains uncertain.

SUMMARY

Most children with PSA have steroid sensitive disease which improves with adherence to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids. Add-on therapies are only needed for the minority with STRA. Paediatric efficacy data of novel biologics and biomarkers that identify the optimal add-on for each child are lacking. If we are to progress toward individualized therapy for STRA, pragmatic clinical trials of biologics in accurately phenotyped children are needed.

A Novel, Portable MESH Nebulizer-An Alternative to Metered Dose Inhaler: Efficacy and Usability in Preschool Wheezers

Introduction and Objectives: Wheezing episodes are the first causes of doctor's consultation in preschool age. Treatment is usually administered with a metered dose inhaler (MDI) spacer. At variance, many parents and doctors prefer to use a compressor nebulizer, which cannot be easily carried. The study is aimed at testing whether a pocket mesh nebulizer has similar efficacy and acceptability than a standard MDI device. Materials and Methods: The IPAC study was a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial (number: 1616/2018, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu'-IRCCS). The study had two arms: cases, using MicroAIR U100, and controls, using MDI+spacer device. Both devices were adopted for long-term treatment and for exacerbations. Follow-up was organized with clinical visits and a daily e-diary connected to an application for mobile phone. Results: One hundred patients were enrolled. The frequency of asthmatic symptoms showed a non-inferiority for MicroAIR U100 group vs. MDI. Accordingly, no significant difference was found in the average % of days with cough, wheezing, breathlessness after exercise, days lost at school, and not-programmed visits. Considering only patients with >1 day with symptoms, no significant sdifferences were found in the number of exacerbations nor in the cumulative days with symptoms. The acceptance and usability of both devices have been favorable. However, the MDI+AeroChamber® device showed better acceptability. Conclusions: Our study shows that MicroAIR U-100, a mesh nebulizer, has similar clinical efficacy but lower acceptance and usability than an MDI plus Aerochamber® in delivering therapy in preschool wheezers. Therefore, MicroAIR U-100 might be a valuable second choice, when the delivery of medication with an MDI plus Aerochamber® is not accepted, or wrongly used by the parents.

Medication adherence in patients with asthma using once-daily versus twice-daily ICS/LABAs

OBJECTIVE

This real-world observational study compared medication adherence and persistence among patients with asthma receiving the once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA) fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus the twice-daily ICS/LABAs budesonide/formoterol (B/F) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study conducted using IQVIA^TM Health Plan Claims Data included patients with asthma ≥18 years of age initiating ICS/LABA therapy with FF/VI, B/F, or FP/SAL between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 (index date). Patients had ≥12 months and ≥3 months of continuous eligibility pre- and post-index date, respectively. Patients receiving FF/VI were separately matched 1:1 with patients receiving B/F or FP/SAL using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression to balance baseline covariates between cohorts. The primary endpoint was medication adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving PDC ≥ 0.5 and PDC ≥ 0.8 and persistence with index medication, measured by time to discontinuation (>45-day gap in therapy).

RESULTS

After PSM, 3,764 and 3,339 patients receiving FF/VI were matched with patients receiving B/F or FP/SAL, respectively. Mean PDC was significantly higher for FF/VI versus B/F (0.453 vs 0.345; adjusted p < 0.001) and FP/SAL (0.446 vs 0.341; adjusted p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving PDC ≥ 0.5 or PDC ≥ 0.8, and treatment persistence were significantly higher for FF/VI versus B/F and FP/SAL (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, patients initiating FF/VI had better adherence and lower risk of discontinuing treatment versus B/F or FP/SAL, suggesting that once-daily ICS/LABA treatment might improve adherence and persistence compared with twice-daily alternatives.

What Is the Impact of Innovative Electronic Health Interventions in Improving Treatment Adherence in Asthma? The Pediatric Perspective

Suboptimal adherence to treatment is a significant issue in the management of pediatric asthma and is a major cause of uncontrolled disease, life-threatening attacks, and increased use of health care resources. Electronic health solutions have the potential to positively impact asthma self-management in children and adolescents and their families, thereby improving treatment adherence and asthma outcomes. However, there is a lack of sufficient data to support widespread adoption of electronic health tools in pediatric asthma practice. A critical evaluation of the impact of these new interventions on treatment adherence in childhood asthma must consider unmet needs, heterogeneity of trials, safety and data security issues, long-term effects, and cost-effectiveness. This article explores the most relevant issues facing the role of electronic health and its subcategory-mobile health-in promoting treatment adherence in childhood asthma, focusing on current evidence gaps and limitations, and future research perspectives.

Tailored medication adherence incentives for high-risk children with asthma: a pilot study

Objective: While reminder-based electronic monitoring systems have shown promise in enhancing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence in select populations, more engaging strategies may be needed in families of children with high-risk asthma. This study assesses the acceptability and feasibility of gain-framed ICS adherence incentives in families of urban, minority children with frequent asthma hospitalization.Methods: We enrolled children aged 5-11 years with multiple yearly asthma hospitalizations in a 2-month, mixed methods, ICS adherence incentive pilot study. All participants received inhaler sensors and a smartphone app to track ICS use. During month 1, families received daily adherence reminders and weekly feedback, and children earned up to $1/day for complete adherence. No reminders, feedback, or incentives were provided in month 2. We assessed feasibility and acceptability using caregiver surveys and semi-structured interviews and ICS adherence using electronic monitoring data.Results: Of the 29 families approached, 20 enrolled (69%). Participants were primarily Black (95%), publicly insured (75%), and averaged 2.9 asthma hospitalizations in the prior year. Fifteen of the 16 caregivers (94%) surveyed at month 2 liked the idea of receiving adherence incentives. Mean adherence was significantly higher in month 1 compared with month 2 (80% vs. 33%, mean difference = 47%; 95% CI [33, 61], p < 0.001). Caregivers reported that their competing priorities often limited adherence, while incentives helped motivate child adherence.Conclusions: ICS adherence incentives were acceptable and feasible in a high-risk cohort of children with asthma. Future studies should assess the efficacy of adherence incentives in enhancing ICS adherence in high-risk children.

Prevalence and predictors of adherence to controller therapy in adult patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Nonadherence to prescribed treatment is an important cause for poor asthma control. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence in adult patients with severe asthma.Data sources: Embase and Pubmed were searched for publications in English studying adult patients and containing the keywords "severe asthma", "adherence", and "compliance".Study selection: Only studies utilizing objective methods for monitoring adherence and clear definition of the level of asthma severity were included. Predominantly pediatric studies or studies of less severe asthma were excluded.Results: The search returned 488 reports, of which 14 reports (of 2297 patients) were included. The weighted mean age of patients was 44 years and 64% were females. In studies using a cutoff of acquiring 50% or less of the medication, an overall rate of nonadherence was 42.9%. For studies reporting nonadherence of a continuous scale, the weighted mean nonadherence was 42.9% (95% CI 28.2-49.5). Meta-analysis of adherence predictors showed that male sex was associated with adherence with an odds ratio of 2.25 and higher asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) scores with a mean difference 0.47 points in adherent patients. Other predictors were reported to have significant association with adherence (e.g. older age, more knowledge about asthma, simpler medication schedules) but these were from single studies.Conclusion: Nonadherence to therapy is a common problem in the management of patients with severe asthma. More robust and objective methods are needed to homogenize and improve the accuracy of assessment methods. More studies are needed from developing countries. Systematic review registration number: CRD42018114669.

Effectiveness of an educational program for children and their families on asthma control treatment adherence

Objective: Τo investigate the effect of an asthma care educational program for children and adolescents with asthma, on adherence to asthma control treatment and on clinical indices.Methods: Individuals newly diagnosed with asthma, aged 4-16 years, randomized to the intervention and control group. The participants were monitored for 6 weeks. At baseline, before the initiation of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta₂-agonist (ICS/LABA), the intervention group attended the educational program; the control group received the usual care. Both groups were equipped with electronic monitoring devices for measuring adherence. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), and asthma control test (ACT) score were measured in both groups in the pre and post-ICS/LABA initiation visit.Results: Seventy-eight participants were enrolled in this study (n = 39 to each group). Median percentage of adherence was 73% for the total sample, and 80% and 68% in intervention and control group, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the program was positively associated with improved adherence (p < 0.001). ICS/LABA had a positive effect on spirometric indices, FeNO, and ACT score, whilst the educational program did not improved significantly the above variables.Conclusions: Establishing and increasing adherence is challenging. An asthma care educational program is associated with greater short-term adherence during a period of active monitoring.