Primary Failure to an Anti-TNF Agent in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Switch (to a Second Anti-TNF Agent) or Swap (for Another Mechanism of Action)?

Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Quantification of Infliximab: Analytical and Clinical Performance Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) can improve treatment outcomes; however, the temporal gap between drug concentration monitoring and subsequent availability restricts its practical application. To address this issue, an automated monitoring method, AFIAS IFX, was developed to rapidly and accurately analyze IFX concentration in blood. The analytical and clinical performances of this method were assessed to establish its clinical utility.

METHODS

The analytical performance of AFIAS IFX was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. For clinical validation, AFIAS IFX was compared with 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (LISA TRACKER, RIDASCREEN, and ImmunoGuide) using 100 consecutive samples from 28 patients treated with IFX. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the methods.

RESULTS

The detection and quantification limits of AFIAS IFX were 0.12 and 0.20 mcg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, AFIAS IFX analyzed samples within 10 minutes for concentrations up to 50 mcg/mL, exhibiting reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤7.8%) and accuracy (recovery 98%-101%) with serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. Clinically, it exhibited a good correlation with the 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. For patients treated with Remicade (IFX), the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.001-1.259, with a mean difference of -1.48 to 0.28 mcg/mL. For patients treated with CT-P13, the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 0.974-1.254, with a mean difference of -2.44 to 0.15 mcg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

AFIAS IFX, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow assay, exhibited excellent performance in analyzing IFX trough levels and is a potentially powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical settings, with opportunities for further development.

Risankizumab for Ulcerative Colitis: Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab.

Interventions

For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial.

Results

Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No adverse event signals were detected in the treatment groups.

Conclusion and Relevance

Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135.

Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of risankizumab as compared with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease are unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with blinded assessment of end points, patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy or unacceptable side effects with such therapy were randomly assigned to receive risankizumab or ustekinumab at standard doses for 48 weeks. The two primary end points, which were tested sequentially, were clinical remission at week 24 (defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]), which was analyzed in the first 50% of patients to complete the week 24 visit, with a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points; and endoscopic remission at week 48 (defined as a score of ≤4, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline, and no subscore >1 in any individual variable on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease]), which was analyzed for superiority in 100% of the patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of risankizumab or ustekinumab.

RESULTS

In the full intention-to-treat population for the efficacy analysis, 230 of 255 patients (90.2%) who received risankizumab and 193 of 265 patients (72.8%) who received ustekinumab completed all the assigned treatments. Both primary end points were met; risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 (58.6% vs. 39.5%; adjusted difference, 18.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6 to 30.3) and superior to ustekinumab with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48 (31.8% vs. 16.2%; adjusted difference, 15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.4 to 22.9; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this head-to-head clinical trial of risankizumab and ustekinumab involving patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had unacceptable side effects with anti-TNF therapy or an inadequate response to such therapy, risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 and superior with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04524611.).

Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consists of two primary types: Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) and Adalimumab (ADA) are frequently utilized in the management of moderate to severe cases of IBD.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe IBD.

METHOD

This study is a prospective open-labeled randomized parallel study that included moderate to severe IBD patients treated with either IFX or ADA. A total of 56 patients participated, with 34 patients received IFX and 22 patients received ADA. Various measures, including Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Mayo Score/ Disease Activity Index (DAI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were taken at baseline and week 14 to assess the efficacy of the treatments. In addition, the levels of drugs and sTREM-1 were measured at 14 weeks. Patient safety was monitored throughout the study period.

RESULTS

In the group received IFX, there was a notable decrease in CDAI (P = 0.045), DAI (P = 0.026), and CRP (P = 0.023 for CD, and P = 0.021 for UC) levels. In addition, the group received ADA experienced a significant reduction in CDAI (P = 0.001), DAI (P = 0.032), and CRP (P < 0.018 for CD and P = 0.003 for UC) levels. Responders had higher drug concentrations than non-responders, notably IFX concentration was higher in responders with CD (P = 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001). ADA concentration was higher in UC (P <= 0.001) and all CD patients responded to the treatment. The same trend was observed for sTREM-1 levels in CD and UC patients (P = 0.042, and P = 0.015, respectively) in the IFX group. In UC patients treated with ADA, the level of sTREM-1 was significantly low (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Both IFX and ADA have a good safety profile and deliver a beneficial clinical and laboratory response in moderate-severe IBD patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05291039. (You can access the study at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05291039 (First Posted: March 22, 2022).

Dupilumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (LIBERTY-CSU CUPID): Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent pruritic wheals (hives) and/or angioedema. Patients with CSU could remain symptomatic despite standard-of-care H1 antihistamines (H1-AH) or anti-IgE (omalizumab) treatment. Dupilumab blocks IL-4/IL-13 signaling and is approved for multiple type 2/atopic indications.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials comparing dupilumab with placebo in patients with symptomatic CSU despite H1-AH.

METHODS

In LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A, patients were omalizumab-naive (n = 138, aged ≥6 years). In Study B, patients were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders (n = 108, aged ≥12 years). The primary end point was either change from baseline over 7 days in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) or Itch Severity Score (ISS7) at week 24, with the other as a key secondary end point, depending on regional regulatory requirements. Studies were pooled for safety assessment.

RESULTS

In Study A, UAS7 and ISS7 improved with dupilumab versus placebo (difference -8.5 [95% CI, -13.2 to -3.9; P = .0003] and -4.2 [95% CI, -6.6 to -1.8; P = .0005]). In Study B, tested at α = 0.043 after interim analysis, UAS7 improved (difference -5.8 [95% CI, -11.4 to -0.3; P = .0390]), with a numerical trend in ISS7 (difference -2.9 [95% CI, -5.7 to -0.07; nominal P = .0449, not significant]). Pooled safety data were consistent between dupilumab and placebo and with the known dupilumab safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab reduced urticaria activity by reducing itch and hives severity in omalizumab-naive patients with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. Although the primary end point for Study B was not met, dupilumab effects were small in patients who were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders.

A practical guide to combination advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy.

SUMMARY

While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events.

Approach to loss of response to advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Remarkable progress over the last decade has equipped clinicians with many options in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinicians now have the unique opportunity to provide individualized treatment that can achieve and sustain remission in many patients. However, issues of primary non-response (PNR) and secondary loss of response (SLOR) to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies remains a common problem. Specific issues include the choice of optimization of therapy, identifying when dose optimization will recapture response, establishing optimal dose for escalation and when to switch therapy.

AIM

To explores the issues of PNR and SLOR to non-TNFi therapies.

METHODS

This review explores the current evidence and literature to elucidate management options in cases of PNR/SLOR. It will also explore potential predictors for response following SLOR/PNR to therapies including the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

RESULTS

In the setting of PNR and loss of response to alpha-beta7-integrin inhibitors and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibitors dose optimization is a reasonable option to capture response. For Janus kinase inhibitors dose optimization can be utilized to recapture response with loss of response.

CONCLUSION

The role of TDM in the setting of advanced non-TNFi therapies to identify patients who require dose optimization and as a predictor for clinical remission is not yet established and this remains an area that should be addressed in the future.

Trends in Targeted Therapy Usage in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: TRENDY Study of ENEIDA

Markers that allow for the selection of tailored treatments for individual patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are yet to be identified. Our aim was to describe trends in real-life treatment usage. For this purpose, patients from the ENEIDA registry who received their first targeted IBD treatment (biologics or tofacitinib) between 2015 and 2021 were included. A subsequent analysis with Machine Learning models was performed. The study included 10,009 patients [71% with Crohn's disease (CD) and 29% with ulcerative colitis (UC)]. In CD, anti-TNF (predominantly adalimumab) were the main agents in the 1st line of treatment (LoT), although their use declined over time. In UC, anti-TNF (mainly infliximab) use was predominant in 1st LoT, remaining stable over time. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were the most prescribed drugs in 2nd and 3rd LoT in CD and UC, respectively. Overall, the use of biosimilars increased over time. Machine Learning failed to identify a model capable of predicting treatment patterns. In conclusion, drug positioning is different in CD and UC. Anti-TNF were the most used drugs in IBD 1st LoT, being adalimumab predominant in CD and infliximab in UC. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab have gained importance in CD and UC, respectively. The approval of biosimilars had a significant impact on treatment.

An in vitro analysis of the interaction between infliximab and granulocyte-monocyte apheresis

OBJECTIVE

Primary non-response and secondary loss of response to anti-TNF agents are common in inflammatory bowel disease. Increasing drug concentrations are correlated to better clinical response and remission rates. Combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents could be an option in these patients. The objective of our study was to perform an in vitro assay to determine if the GMA device can lead to infliximab (IFX) adsorption.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A blood sample was obtained from a healthy control. It was incubated with three concentrations of IFX (3, 6, and 9μg/ml) at room temperature for 10min. At that time, 1ml was collected to determine the IFX concentration. Then, 10ml of each drug concentration was incubated with 5ml of cellulose acetate (CA) beads from the GMA device at 200rpm for 1h at 37°C to simulate physiological human conditions. A second sample of each concentration was collected and IFX levels were determined.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in the IFX levels in the blood samples before and after incubation with the CA beads (p=0.41) and after repeated measurements (p=0.31). Mean change was 3.8μg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro combination of GMA and IFX did not change the circulating levels of IFX at the three concentrations tested, suggesting that there is no interaction between the drug and the apheresis device in vitro and that they might be safely combined with each other.

Two-Year Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 104 Weeks of Continuous Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study

BACKGROUND

Mirikizumab, a p19-directed interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, is efficacious in inducing clinical remission at week 12 (W12) and maintaining clinical remission at W52 in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Results are presented from the open-label extension study through W104.

METHODS

Clinical, symptomatic, quality-of-life, and adverse event outcomes are reported for mirikizumab induction responders and extended induction responders, including biologic-failed patients, who entered LUCENT-3, with data shown for W52 maintenance responders or remitters. Discontinuations or missing data were handled by nonresponder imputation (NRI), modified NRI (mNRI), and observed case (OC).

RESULTS

Among W52 mirikizumab responders, clinical response at W104 was 74.5%, 87.2%, and 96.7% and clinical remission was 76.6%, 89.0%, and 98.3% for NRI, mNRI, and OC, respectively. Among W52 mirikizumab remitters, clinical response at W104 was 54.0%, 62.8%, and 70.1% and clinical remission was 65.6%, 76.1%, and 84.2%. Using mNRI, remission rates at W104 for W52 clinical remitters were 74.7% corticosteroid-free, 79.5% endoscopic, 63.9% histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission, 85.9% symptomatic, 59.8% bowel urgency, 80.5% Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (using NRI), 71.2% histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and 77.5% bowel urgency improvement. Previous biologic-failed vs not-biologic-failed patient data were generally similar. Extended induction mNRI clinical response was 81.9%. Serious adverse events were reported in 5.2% of patients; 2.8% discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic, histologic, symptomatic, and quality-of-life outcomes support the long-term benefit of mirikizumab treatment up to 104 weeks in patients with ulcerative colitis, including biologic-failed patients, with no new safety concerns.

Predicting Endoscopic Improvement in Ulcerative Colitis Using the Ulcerative Colitis Severity Index

INTRODUCTION

We developed and internally validated a prognostic scoring index for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients that includes baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs), biomarkers, endoscopy, and histology for achieving 1-year endoscopic improvement (EI).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included 644 patients treated with ustekinumab induction therapy. Data were randomly split to obtain a 70% training and 30% testing cohort. Multivariate analyses assessed baseline variables and those with P < .05 were assigned weights based on their relative prognostic value from logistic regression modeling for predicting 1-year EI (Mayo endoscopic score ≤1). A cutoff was obtained by calculating the maximum Youden index and validated in the testing cohort.

RESULTS

Prior biologic failure, albumin <40 g/L, C-reactive protein >5 mg/L, Mayo stool frequency subscore, endoscopic erosions/ulcerations, and chronic histologic structural/architectural changes demonstrated significant associations with 1-year EI and were included in the final model. The Ulcerative Colitis Severity Index (UCSI) had acceptable discriminative ability for 1-year EI in the training (area under the curve [AUC], 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.86) and testing cohort (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85). Compared with the UCSI, the Mayo Clinic score demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.58) for predicting 1-year EI (P = .0006). The UCSI predicted 1-year endoscopic healing (Mayo endoscopic score = 0), clinical remission (total Mayo Clinic score ≤2 and no subscore >1), partial Mayo score remission <2, and 2-item Patient-Reported Outcome score (Mayo stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscore = 0) with significantly greater accuracy compared with the Mayo Clinic score.

DISCUSSION

The UCSI is an internally validated prognostic scoring tool that accurately predicts 1-year EI at baseline among moderate-to-severe UC patients initiating therapy. Further validation with additional datasets is needed.

A Retrospective Observational Study of Patterns of Biologic Drug Change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction

Multiple therapies are currently available for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); it is therefore crucial to understand patterns of drug change. This study aimed to examine the patterns of biological drug change and identify predictors of change in patients with IBD.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with IBD who were initiated on treatment with biologics between June 2017 and October 2022. The study's primary objective was to describe biologic drug change patterns. Secondary outcomes included identifying predictors of drug change.

Results

910 patients were screened; 475 patients were eligible, 319 (67%) had Crohn's disease (CD), and 253 (53.3%) were males. The most selected first and second choices of biologic were adalimumab (58.2% and 39.1%, p < 0.001) and infliximab (37.6% and 48.9%, p = 0.004) for both CD and ulcerative colitis (UC), respectively. On multiple regression analysis, a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR = 3.60, p = 0.025) and smoking (OR = 0.34, p = 0.026) were associated with drug change for all patients. When stratified by disease subtype, drug change was associated with a diagnosis made between age 17 and 40 years (OR = 0.46, p = 0.024) and extra-intestinal manifestations (OR = 2.07, p = 0.015) in CD while selecting vedolizumab as the first biologic (OR = 0.30, p = 0.041), male gender (OR = 2.40, p = 0.043), and history of VTE (OR = 7.32, p = 0.031) were associated with drug change in UC.

Conclusions

Despite introducing several new biologics, anti-TNF therapies remain the preferred first and second choice of biologics for patients with IBD. Multiple predictors of drug change over time exist for both diseases. Selecting vedolizumab as the first biologic for UC is associated with a lower risk of drug change.

Use of Upadacitinib in 16 Tofacitinib-refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Single-center Case 2Series

We present a case series of 16 patients with ulcerative colitis who received upadacitinib after failing tofacitinib. Five patients (36%) achieved steroid-free clinical remission. Five (62%) demonstrated endoscopic response, while 2 patients (25%) achieved endoscopic remission. Adverse events were low.

Mitochondrial dysfunction-associated microbiota establishes a transmissible refractory response to anti-TNF therapy during ulcerative colitis

Anti-TNF therapy can induce and maintain a remission status during intestinal bowel disease. However, up to 30% of patients do not respond to this therapy by mechanisms that are unknown. Here, we show that the absence of MCJ, a natural inhibitor of the respiratory chain Complex I, induces gut microbiota changes that are critical determinants of the lack of response in a murine model of DSS-induced inflammation. First, we found that MCJ expression is restricted to macrophages in human colonic tissue. Therefore, we demonstrate by transcriptomic analysis of colon macrophages from DSS-induced mice that MCJ-deficiency is linked to the expression of genes belonging to the FcγR signaling pathway and contains an anti-TNF refractory gene signature identified in ulcerative colitis patients. The gut microbial composition changes observed upon DSS treatment in the MCJ-deficient mice revealed the increased presence of specific colitogenic members, including Ruminococcus gnavus and Oscillospira, which could be associated with the non-response to TNF inhibitors. Further, we show that the presence of a microbiota associated resistance to treatment is dominant and transmissible to responsive individuals. Collectively, our findings underscore the critical role played by macrophage mitochondrial function in the gut ecological niche that can substantially affect not only the severity of inflammation but also the ability to successfully respond to current therapies.

Identification of Targets for Subsequent Treatment of Crohn's Disease Patients After Failure of Anti-TNF Therapy

Background

Anti-TNF medications are the first-line treatment for Crohn's Disease (CD), despite the fact that a significant portion of the population continues to be ineffectively treated. This research aims to discover accurate intervention targets for the follow-up of anti-TNF non-responders using bioinformatics technology.

Methods

GSE16879, GSE111761, and GSE52746 retrieved from the GEO database. Unbiased differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were discovered utilizing the limma and RobustRankAggreg (RRA) tools. Then, we used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify the module most strongly associated with non responders and subjected this module to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis with overlapping genes of the DEGs. GSEA analysis applied to check the results of GO and KEGG. Using the Cytoscape program, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed. The software's MCODE addon and CytoHubba addon was used to find the most important modules and the hub genes. Subsequently, we employed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to confirm hub gene expression from mucosal biopsy specimens.

Results

There were a total of 142 genes co-upregulated and 65 genes co-downregulated. According to the WGCNA analysis, 42 genes were duplicated inside the light cyan module. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of overlapped genes in nonresponders demonstrated an increase in the expression of genes associated with inflammation and immune response, consistent with GSEA results. The PPI network was constructed using 41 protein nodes and 177 edges. After validation, 8 of the top 10 genes were verified to be differentially expressed.

Conclusion

Our investigation is the first to integrate three CD databases after the anti-TNF medication treatment. We identified IL1B, CCL4, CXCL1, CXCL10, CCL3, CSF3, TREM1, and IL1RN as potential therapeutic targets for patients whose anti-TNF treatment failed.

The current role of Tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis in adult patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite rescue therapy, acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is associated with a high risk of colectomy, while treatment options remain limited. Tofacitinib, a rapidly acting Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is gaining ground as an effective alternative treatment option for the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis, which may prevent emergency colectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase was undertaken for studies of adult patients with ASUC treated with tofacitinib.

RESULTS

In total, two observational studies, seven case series and five case reports incorporating 134 patients who received tofacitinib in ASUC were identified with a follow-up period ranging from 30 days to 14 months. Overall, the pooled colectomy rate was 23.9% (95% CI 16.6-31.2). The pooled 90-day and 6-month colectomy free rate were 79.9% (95% CI 73.1-86.7) and 71.6% (95% CI 64-79.2) respectively. The most frequent adverse event was C. Difficile infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib appears to be a promising option for the treatment of ASUC. Randomized clinical trials are required to further access the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of tofacitinib in cases of ASUC.

10 years of biologic use patterns in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: treatment persistence, switching and dose intensification - a nationwide population-based study

Background

Treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have evolved in the era of biologics. However, the real-world data on their usage patterns and sequencing are still limited.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate treatment persistence and dose intensification of first- and second-line biologics in patients with IBD.

Design

In this retrospective, cohort study using nationwide claims data, 13,087 patients with IBD initiating biologic therapy between 2010 and 2020 were identified.

Methods

Treatment persistence and dose intensification during the first 2 years and switching patterns of biologics were analysed while identifying predictors of non-persistence.

Results

As a first-line treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), ustekinumab had a lower risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.69, p = 0.048]. Second-line ustekinumab and vedolizumab showed the highest and lowest persistence (79.2% and 54.9%), respectively. As a first-line treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), golimumab had a higher risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab (aHR, 1.68, p < 0.001). Second-line golimumab also showed a significantly lower persistence rate than adalimumab and vedolizumab. The risk of non-persistence was higher in UC than in CD (first line: aHR, 1.97; second line: aHR, 1.39; p < 0.001), and in the second-line treatment than in the first-line treatment for CD (aHR, 1.55; p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of dose intensification was highest with ustekinumab for CD (first line, 43.3%, second line, 69.1%) and adalimumab for second-line UC (40.7%). It was significantly increased in second-line therapy in CD, but not in UC. Among switchers of first-line anti-tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy, after all biologics were approved, 69% of CD patients and 78.4% of UC patients switched to other classes of second-line treatment.

Conclusion

Ustekinumab had higher persistence in the first-line treatment of CD, while golimumab had lower persistence for first- and second-line treatments of UC. Dose intensification rates varied, with the highest cumulative rates observed for ustekinumab in CD and adalimumab in second-line UC.

Predictors and optimal management of tumor necrosis factor antagonist nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease: A literature review

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists, the first biologics approved for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are effective for the induction and maintenance of remission and significantly improving prognosis. However, up to one-third of treated patients show primary nonresponse (PNR) to anti-TNF-α therapies, and 23%-50% of IBD patients experience loss of response (LOR) to these biologics during subsequent treatment. There is still no recognized predictor for evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs. This review summarizes the existing predictors of PNR and LOR to anti-TNF in IBD patients. Most predictors remain controversial, and only previous surgical history, disease manifestations, drug concentrations, antidrug antibodies, serum albumin, some biologic markers, and some genetic markers may be potentially predictive. In addition, we also discuss the next steps of treatment for patients with PNR or LOR to TNF antagonists. Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in treatment selection. Dose escalation, combination therapy, switching to a different anti-TNF drug, or switching to a biologic with a different mechanism of action can be selected based on the concentration of the drug and/or antidrug antibodies.

Persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-experienced patients with Crohn's disease initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on persistence on ustekinumab and adalimumab among bio-experienced patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment persistence and describe switching, restart, and dose titration among bio-experienced patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: IBM MarketScan Commercial Database was used to identify bio-experienced adults with CD who were assigned to either the ustekinumab or adalimumab cohort based on the agent first initiated (index date) after September 23, 2016. Cohorts were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect on treated. Persistence on index agent (absence of exposure gap > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, and persistence while receiving monotherapy were assessed at 12 months after index date and compared between cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model analyses. RESULTS: Among 903 patients in the ustekinumab cohort and 525 patients in the adalimumab cohort, baseline characteristics were balanced after weighting. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab was associated with higher persistence (80.1% vs 64.6%; hazard ratio = 2.02 [95% CI = 1.60-2.56]; P < 0.001) and persistence while receiving monotherapy (51.6% vs 40.0%; 1.51 [1.28-1.78]; P < 0.001) vs adalimumab. Persistence while corticosteroid-free was similar in the ustekinumab vs adalimumab cohort (50.1% vs 48.2%; 1.19 [1.00-1.41]; P = 0.0516). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective real-world study demonstrated that among bio-experienced patients with CD, initiation of ustekinumab was associated with better persistence at 12 months of follow-up, including persistence while receiving monotherapy, compared with adalimumab. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Drs Zhao, Ding, and Kachroo are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Dr Manceur, Mr Lefebvre, Ms Zhdanava, and Mr Pilon are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting company that has provided paid consulting services to Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, which funded the development and conduct of this study and article. Mr Holiday was an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., at the time of study conduct.

Efficacy of biologic and small molecule agents as second-line therapy after exposure to TNF inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis: A propensity-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is limited real-world data on comparative effectiveness of different biologic or small molecule agents as second-line therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a TNFi. Failure of medical therapy was defined as a composite outcome of intravenous steroids or colectomy within 2 years. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, disease extent, mean haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin and calprotectin, prior IBD medications and steroid use between cohorts.

RESULTS

Among 2141 patients with UC and prior exposure to TNFi, 348 (16.2%), 716 (33.4%) and 1077 (50.3%) were switched to tofacitinib, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. After propensity-score matching, there was no difference in the composite outcome (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-0.1.07) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.31-5.50) in the tofacitinib cohort than the vedolizumab cohort. There was no difference in the risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.89-1.86) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.24-5.58) in the tofacitinib cohort than the ustekinumab cohort. The vedolizumab cohort had a higher risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.29-2.16) than the ustekinumab cohort.

CONCLUSION

Ustekinumab might be the preferred second-line therapy over tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with UC that were previously exposed to a TNFi.

Recent Advances and Potential Multi-Omics Approaches in the Early Phases of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease leads to debilitating gastrointestinal symptoms and reduced quality of life, resulting in a significant burden on healthcare utilization and costs. Despite substantial advancements in diagnosis and treatment, there may still be considerable delays in diagnosing some patients. To reduce disease progression before the full disease spectrum appears and improve prognostic outcomes, several strategies have concentrated on early intervention and prevention. Recent evidence shows that initial immune response changes and endoscopic lesions may exist for years before diagnosis, implying the existence of a preclinical phase of inflammatory bowel disease comparable to findings in other immune-mediated disorders. In this review, we highlight the most relevant findings regarding preclinical inflammatory bowel disease and the prospective role of novel omics techniques in this field.

Differences in Whole-Blood Transcriptional Profiles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Responding to Vedolizumab Compared with Non-Responders

Vedolizumab is efficacious in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, a significant proportion of patients present with a non-response. To investigate whether differences in the clinical response to vedolizumab is reflected in changes in gene expression levels in whole blood, samples were collected at baseline before treatment, and at follow-up after 10-12 weeks. Whole genome transcriptional profiles were established by RNA sequencing. Before treatment, no differentially expressed genes were noted between responders (n = 9, UC 4, CD 5) and non-responders (n = 11, UC 3, CD 8). At follow-up, compared with baseline, responders displayed 201 differentially expressed genes, and 51 upregulated (e.g., translation initiation, mitochondrial translation, and peroxisomal membrane protein import) and 221 downregulated (e.g., Toll-like receptor activating cascades, and phagocytosis related) pathways. Twenty-two of the upregulated pathways in responders were instead downregulated in non-responders. The results correspond with a dampening of inflammatory activity in responders. Although considered a gut-specific drug, our study shows a considerable gene regulation in the blood of patients responding to vedolizumab. It also suggests that whole blood is not optimal for identifying predictive pre-treatment biomarkers based on individual genes. However, treatment outcomes may depend on several interacting genes, and our results indicate a possible potential of pathway analysis in predicting response to treatment, which merits further investigation.

Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Innate Immune System

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a heterogeneous state of chronic intestinal inflammation with no exact known cause. Intestinal innate immunity is enacted by neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs), and innate lymphoid cells and NK cells, characterized by their capacity to produce a rapid and nonspecific reaction as a first-line response. Innate immune cells (IIC) defend against pathogens and excessive entry of intestinal microorganisms, while preserving immune tolerance to resident intestinal microbiota. Changes to this equilibrium are linked to intestinal inflammation in the gut and IBD. IICs mediate host defense responses, inflammation, and tissue healing by producing cytokines and chemokines, activating the complement cascade and phagocytosis, or presenting antigens to activate the adaptive immune response. IICs exert important functions that promote or ameliorate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie and sustain IBD. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying these clinical manifestations will be important for developing therapies targeting the innate immune system in IBD patients. This review examines the complex roles of and interactions among IICs, and their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells in homeostasis and pathological conditions.

Anti-TNF Therapies Suppress Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Crohn’s Disease

Anti-TNF biologics have been shown to markedly improve the quality of life for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), yet one-third of patients fail to benefit from this treatment. Patients with CD develop a characteristic wrapping of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in the inflamed intestinal area, termed creeping fat, and it is known that adipose tissue expansion influences the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs. We questioned whether anti-TNF therapies impact the creeping fat in CD, which might affect the outcome of the disease. Adipose tissue biopsies were obtained from a cohort of 14 patients with CD that received anti-TNF drugs and from 29 non-anti-TNF-treated patients (control group) matched by sex, age, and body mass index undergoing surgical interventions for symptomatic complications. We found that anti-TNF therapies restored adipose tissue morphology and suppressed immune cell infiltration in the creeping fat. Additionally, anti-TNF treatments appeared to markedly improve the pro-inflammatory phenotype of adipose-tissue macrophages and adipose-tissue-derived stem cells. Our study provides evidence that anti-TNF medications influence immune cells and progenitor cells in the creeping of patients with CD, suppressing inflammation. We propose that perilesional VAT should be considered when administering anti-TNF therapy in patients with CD.

Real-World Evidence of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

(1) Background: Evidence on the outcomes of ustekinumab treatment in real-world Crohn’s disease (CD) patients is needed. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in CD, reported by observational studies. (2) Methods: bibliographical searches were performed (PubMed, EMBASE). Selection: observational studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in CD. Exclusion criteria: studies using ustekinumab as a prophylaxis for postoperative recurrence or perianal disease. Data synthesis: effectiveness by intention-to-treat (random-effects model). Data were stratified by study design, population included, administered dose, and prior biologic exposure. (3) Results: A total of 63 studies (8529 patients) were included. Response was achieved in 60% (95% CI, 54–67%) in the short term (8–14 weeks); 64% (57–71%) in the medium term (16–24 weeks); and 64% (52–74%) in the long term (48–52 weeks). Remission was achieved in 37% (28–46%) in the short term; 42% (36–49%) in the medium term; and 45% (37–53%) in the long term. The endoscopic remission rate was 33% (25–40%) in the long term. Eighteen percent of patients lost response during follow-up. Nearly one-third of the patients needed dose optimisation, and in 59% of them it was effective. Twenty-five percent of patients developed adverse events, leading to treatment withdrawal in seven percent of the cases. (4) Conclusions: Ustekinumab is an effective and safe therapy in real-world refractory CD patients. Dose optimisation is frequently required, being effective in a high percentage of cases.

Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Modulation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Keeping Lymphocytes Out of the Intestine

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic and disabling conditions that, uncontrolled, lead to irreversible bowel damage and associated comorbidities. Despite the new era of biological therapies, IBDs remain not curative. The treatment purpose is to induce endoscopic remission, reduce the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life. Optimal and early treatment could enable the prevention of their complications. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the capacity of overcoming the limitations of biologic agents (i.e., parenteral administration, rapidity of action and primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Of special interest are results from the use of oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (ozanimod, etrasimod, fingolimod and laquinimod), based on S1P activities to target lymphocyte recirculation in the mucosa, acting as immunosuppressive agents. Most S1P modulators are reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of both UC and CD. High and satisfactory rates of clinical remission as well as endoscopic improvement and remission can be achieved with these molecules. Safety alarms remain rather low, although the S1P binding to two of its G protein-coupled receptors, 2 and 3 (S1PR2 and S1PR3), may be associated with cardiovascular risks. Cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define their place in therapy. This review summarizes these emerging data published by PubMed and EMBASE databases and from ongoing clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of selectivity of S1P modulators in the treatment of IBD.

The second decade of anti-TNF-a therapy in clinical practice: new lessons and future directions in the COVID-19 era

Since the late 1990s, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (anti-TNFs) have revolutionized the therapy of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) affecting the gut, joints, skin and eyes. Although the therapeutic armamentarium in IMIDs is being constantly expanded, anti-TNFs remain the cornerstone of their treatment. During the second decade of their application in clinical practice, a large body of additional knowledge has accumulated regarding various aspects of anti-TNF-α therapy, whereas new indications have been added. Recent experimental studies have shown that anti-TNFs exert their beneficial effects not only by restoring aberrant TNF-mediated immune mechanisms, but also by de-activating pathogenic fibroblast-like mesenchymal cells. Real-world data on millions of patients further confirmed the remarkable efficacy of anti-TNFs. It is now clear that anti-TNFs alter the physical course of inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, leading to inhibition of local and systemic bone loss and to a decline in the number of surgeries for disease-related complications, while anti-TNFs improve morbidity and mortality, acting beneficially also on cardiovascular comorbidities. On the other hand, no new safety signals emerged, whereas anti-TNF-α safety in pregnancy and amid the COVID-19 pandemic was confirmed. The use of biosimilars was associated with cost reductions making anti-TNFs more widely available. Moreover, the current implementation of the “treat-to-target” approach and treatment de-escalation strategies of IMIDs were based on anti-TNFs. An intensive search to discover biomarkers to optimize response to anti-TNF-α treatment is currently ongoing. Finally, selective targeting of TNF-α receptors, new forms of anti-TNFs and combinations with other agents, are being tested in clinical trials and will probably expand the spectrum of TNF-α inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for IMIDs.